the Lord Christ hath ordained no Power nor Order in his Church no Office or Duty that should stand in need of the Civil Authority Sanction or force to preserve it or make it effectual unto its proper ends It is sufficient to discharge any thing of a pretence to be an appointment of Christ in his Church if it be not sufficient unto its own proper End without the help of the Civil Magistrate That Church-state which is either constituted by humane Authority or cannot consist without it is not from him That Ordinance which is in its own Nature divine or is pretended so to be so far as it is not effectual unto its end without the aid of Humane Authority is not of him he needs it not he will not borrow the assistance of Civil Authority to rule in and over the Consciences of men with respect unto their living to God and coming unto the enjoyment of himself The way of requiring the Sanction of Civil Authority unto Ecclesiastical Orders and Determinations began with the use of General Councils in the days of Constantine And when once it was engaged in and approved so far as that what was determined in the Synods either as to Doctrine or as unto the Rule of the Church should be confirmed by the Imperial Authority with penalties on all that should gainsay such Determinations It is deplorable to consider what mutual havock was made among Christians upon the various Sentiments of Synods and Emperours Yet this way pleased the Rulers of the Church so well and as they thought eased them of so much trouble that it was so far improved amongst them that at last they left no Power in or about Religion or Religious Persons unto the Civil Magistrate but what was to be exercised in the execution of the Decrees and Determinations of the Church It is necessary from this Institution of particular Churches that they have their Subsistence Continuation Order and the efficacy of all that they act and do as Churches from Christ himself For whereas all that they are and do is Heavenly Spiritual and not of this world that it reacheth nothing of all those things which are under the Power of the Magistrate that is the Lives and Bodies of Men and all Civil Interests appertaining to them and affect nothing but what no Power of all the Magistrates under Heaven can reach unto that is the Souls and Consciences of men no trouble can hence arise unto any Rulers of the world no Contests about what they ought and what they ought not to confirm which have caused great Disorders among many 3. In particular also There neither is nor can be in this Church-state the least pretence of Power or Authority to be acted towards or over the Persons of Kings or Rulers which should either impeach their Right or impede the exercise of their just Authority For as Christ hath granted no such Power unto the Church so it is impossible that any pretence of it should be seated in a particular Congregation especially being gathered on this Principle that there is no Church Power properly so called but what is so seated and that no Concurrence Agreement or Association of many Churches can adde a new greater or other Power or Authority unto them than what they had singly before And what Power can such Churches act towards Kings Potentates or Rulers of Nations Have they not the highest Security that it is uttterly impossible that ever their Authority or their persons in the exercise of it should be impeached hindered or receive any detriment from any thing that belongs to this Church-state These Principles I say are sufficient to secure Christian Religion and the State Order and Power of Churches instituted therein from all reflections of Inconsistency with Civil Government or of influencing men into Attempts of its Change or Ruine The summe is Let the outward frame and order of righteous Government be of what sort it will nothing inconsistent with it nothing entrenching on it nothing making opposition unto it is appointed by Jesus Christ or doth belong unto that Church-state which he hath ordained and established Two things only must be added unto these Principles that we may not seem so to distinguish the Civil State and the Church as to make them unconcerned in each other For 1. It is the unquestionable Duty of the Rulers and Governours of the World upon the Preaching of the Gospel to receive its Truth and so yield Obedience unto its Commands And whereas all Power and Offices are to be discharged for God whose Ministers all Rulers be they are bound in the discharge of their Office to countenance supply and protect the Profession and Professours of the Truth that is the Church according unto the degrees and measures which they shall judge necessary 2. It is the Duty of the Church materially considered that is of all those who are Members of it in any Kingdom or Commonwealth to be usefully subservient even as Christians unto that Rule which is over them as Men in all those ways and by all those means which the Laws Usages and Customs of the Countries whereof they are do direct and prescribe But these things are frequently spoken unto There are sundry other Considerations whereby it may be evinced not only that this Order and State of Gospel-Churches is not only consistent with every righteous Government in the world I mean that is so in its Constitution though as all other Forms it be capable of Male-Administration but the most useful and subservient unto its righteous Administrations being utterly uncapable of immixing itself as such in any of those occasions of the world or State-Affairs as may create the least difficulty or trouble unto Rulers With others it is not so It is known that the very Constitution of the Papal Church as it is stated in the Canons of it is inconsistent with the just Rights of Kings and Rulers and oft-times in the exercise of its Power destructive unto their Persons and Dominions And herein concurred the Prelatical Church-state of England whilst it continued in their Communion and held its dependance on the Roman Church For although they had all their Power originally from the Kings of this Realm as the Records and Laws of it do expressly affirm That the Church of England was founded in Episcopacy by the King and his Nobles yet they claimed such an addition of Power and Authority by vertue of their Office from the Papal Omnipotency as that they were Ringleaders in perplexing the Government of this Nation under the pretence of maintaining of what they called the Rights of the Church And hereunto they were inabled by the very Constitution of their Church-Order which gave them that Power Grandeur with Political Interest that were needful to effectuate their Designe And since they have been taken off from this foundation of contesting Kings and Princes on their own Ecclesiastical Authority and deprived of their dependance on the Power
and Interest of the Papal See having no bottom for or supportment of their Church state and Order but Regal Favour and mutable Laws there have on such Causes and Reasons which I shall not mention ensued such Emulations of the Nobility and Gentry and such contempts of the Commonâ—People as leave it questionable Whether their Adherence unto the Government be not more burdensome and dangerous unto it than were their antient Contests and Oppositions CHAP. VII No other Church-state of Divine Institution IT may be it will be generally granted I am sure it cannot be modestly denied that particular Churches or Congregations are of a Divine original Institution as also that the Primitive Churches continued long in that Form or Order But it will be farther pleaded that granting or supposing this Divine Institution of particular Churches yet there may be Churches of another Form and Order also as Diocesan or National that we are obliged to submit unto For although the Apostles appointed that there should be Bishops or Elders ordained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in every City and Town where Christian Religion was received and Clemens affirmeth that they did themselves constitute Bishops and Deacons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Regions or Villages and Cities yet there was another Form afterwards introduced Theodoret Bishop of Cyprus affirms that there were eight hundred Churches committed to his care Epist. 113. whereof many were in Towns and Cities having no Bishop of their own The whole Country of Scythia though there were in it many Cities Villages and Fortresses yet had but one Bishop whose Residence was at Tomis all other Churches being under him as Zozomen declares lib. 6. cap. 20. So it is at this day in divers Provinces belonging of old unto the Greek-Church as in Moldavia and Walachia where they have one whom they call the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Leader or Ruler that presides over all the Churches in the Nation And this Oâ—der of things that there should not be a Bishop in smaller Churches was first confirmed in the sixth Canon of the Council of Sardis in the Year 347. In Answer hereunto I shall do these two things First I shall shew that there is no Church Order State or Church-Form of Divine Institution that doth any way impede take away or overthrow the Liberty Power and Order of particular Congregations such as we have described Secondly I shall enquire into the causes of Churches of another State or Order as the Power of Magistrates and Rulers or their own choice and consent 1. There is no Form Order or Church state Divinely Instituted that should annul the Institution of particular Congregations or abridge them of their Liberties or deprive them of the Power committed unto them It is such a Church-state alone that we are now concerned to enquire after Whatever of that kinde either is or may be imagined that entrenches not on the State Liberty and Power of particular Congregations is not of our present Consideration Men may frame and order what they please and what advantage they make thereby shall not be envied unto them whilst they injure not any of the Institutions of Christ. But 1. These Churches as they are Churches are meet and able to attain the Ends of Churches To say they are Churches and yet have not in themselves Power to attain the ends of Churches is to speak contradictions or to grant and deny the same thing in the same breath For a Church is nothing but such a Society as hath Power Ability and Fitness to attain those ends for which Christ hath ordained Churches That which hath so is a Church and that which hath not so is none Men may if they please deny them to be Churches but then I know not where they will finde any that are so For instance suppose men should deny all the Parochial Churches in England to be such Churches as are intrusted with Church-Power and Administrations what Church in the first Instance could they require our Communion withal Will they say it is with the National or Diocesan Churches neither of these do or can as such administer Sacred Ordinances A man cannot Preach nor hear the Word but in a particular Assembly The Lord's Supper cannot be Administred but in a particular Congregation nor any presential local Communion of Believers among themselves like that described by the Apostle 1 Cor. chap. 12. and chap. 14. be otherwise attained No Communion is firstly and immediately required or can be required with Diocesan Churches as such Wherefore it is Parochial particular Churches that we are required to hold Communion with We say therefore these Parochial Churches are either really and truely so endued with Church-Power and Liberty or they are not If they are or are acknowledged so to be we have herein obtained what we plead for if they are not then are we required to joyn in Church Communion with those Societies that are not Churches and if we refrain so doing we are charged with Schism which is to turn Religion into Ridicule For 2. It is utterly forreign to the Scripture and a Monster unto Antiquity I mean that which is pure and regardable in this Cause that there should be Churches with a part half more or less of Church-Power and not the whole neither in Right nor Exercise or that there should be Church-Officers Elders Presbyters or Bishops that should have a partiary Power half or a third part or less of that which entirely belongeth unto the Office they hold Let one Testimony be given out of the Scripture or that Antiquity which we appeal unto unto this purpose and we shall cease our Plea But this is that which our Understandings are set on rack withal every day There is a National Church that is entrusted with Supreme Church-Power in the Nation whereof it is Here at the entrance we fall into a double disquietment For 1. we know not as yet what this National Church is here or in France nor of what Persons it doth consist 2. We know not whether this National Church have all the Power that Christ hath given unto the Church or that there is a Reserve for some Addition from beyond Sea if things were well accommodated Then that there are Diocesan Churches whose Original with the Causes and Occasions of their Bounds Limits Power and manner of Administrations I think God alone knows perfectly we do but guess for there is not one word mentioned of any of their concernments in the Scripture And we know that these Churches cannot be said to have all the Power that Christ hath entrusted his Church withal because there is another Church unto which they are in subjection and on which they do depend but it seems they have the next degree of Power unto that which is uppermost But whatever their Power be it is so administred by Chancellors Commissaries Officials in such ways and for such ends that I shall believe a dissent from them and it
lies therein To assert this expresly would be to exalt him above Jesus Christ at least to give him power equal unto his though really unto the Institution of the Gospel Church state and the Communication of Graces Offices and Gifts to make it useful unto its end no less than all power in Heaven and Earth be required Some plead that there is no certain Form of Church-Government appointed in the Scripture that there was none ordained by Christ nor exemplifyed by the Apostles and therefore it is in the power of the Magistrate to appoint any such form thereof as is suited unto the publick Interest It would seem to follow more evidently that no Form at all should by any be appointed for what shall he do that cometh after the King what shall any one ordain in the Church which the Lord Christ thought not meet to ordain And this is the proper inference from this consideration Such a Church-Government as men imagine Christ hath not appointed therefore neither may men do so But suppose that the Lord Christ hath appointed a Church-state or that there should be Churches of his Disciples on the Earth let them therein but yeild Obedience unto all that he hath commanded and in their so doing make use of the light of nature and rules of common prudence so as to do it unto their own edification which to deny to be their duty is to destroy their nature as created of God trusting in all things unto the conduct of the promised Divine Assistance of the Holy Spirit if any instance can be given of what is wanting unto the compleat state and Rule of the Church we shall willingly allow that it be added by the Civil Magistrate or whosoever men can agree upon as was before declared If it be said there is yet something wanting to accommodate these Churches and their Rule unto the state of the Publick Interest and Political Government under which they are placed whereon they may be framed into Churches Diocesan and Metropolitical with such a Rule as they are capable of I say 1. That in their Original Constitution they are more accommodated unto the Interest of all righteous Secular Government than any Arbitrary moulding them unto a pretended meetness to comply therewithal can attain unto This we have proved before and shall farther enlarge upon it if it be required And we find it by experience that those Additions Changes and Alterations in the State Order and Rule of the Churches pretended for the end mentioned have proved the cause of endless Contentions which have no good aspect on the publick peace and will assuredly continue for ever so to be 2. It is granted that the Magistrate may dispose of many outward concerns of these Churches may impart of his favour to them or any of them as he sees cause may take care that nothing falls out among them that may occasion any publick disturbance in and by itself may prohibit the publick exercise of Worship Idolatrous or Superstitious may remove and take away all Instruments and Monuments of Idolatry may coerce restrain and punish as there is occasion persons who under pretence of Religion do advance Principles of Sedition or promote any Forreign Interest opposite and destructive to his Government the welfare of the Nation and the Truth of Religion with sundry things of the like nature And herein lies an ample field wherein the Magistrate may exercise his power and discharge his duty It cannot well be denyed but that the present pretences and pleas of some to reduce all things in the practice of Religion into the power and disposal of the Civil Magistrate are full of offence and scandal It seems to be only a design and contrivance to secure Mens secular Interests under every way of the profession of Christian Religion true or false which may have the advantage of the Magistrates Approbation By this device Conscience is set at liberty from concerning itself in an humble diligent enquiry into the mind of God as unto what is its duty in his Worship And when it is so with the Conscience of any it will not be much concerned in what it doth attend unto or observe What is in Divine things done or practised solely on the Authority of the Magistrate is immediately and directly Obedience unto him and not unto God Whatever therefore the Supreme Power in any place may do or will be pleased to do for the accommodation of the outward state of the Church and the exercise of its Rule unto the Political Government of a People or Nation yet these two things are certain 1. That he can form erect or institute no new Church-state which is not ordained and appointed by Christ and his Apostles by vertue of his Authority and what he doth of that nature appoint is called a Church only equivocally or by reason of some resemblance unto that which is properly so called 2. To dissent from what is so appointed by the Supreme Power in and about the State Form Rule and Worship of Churches whatever other evil it may be charged with or supposed liable unto can have nothing in it of that which the Scripture condemns under the name of Schism which hath respect only unto what is stated by Christ himself That which in this place we should next enquire into is what these particular Churches themselves may do by their own voluntary consent and act in a way of Association or otherwise for the accumulation and exercise of a power not formally inherent in them as particular Churches but I shall refer it unto the Head of the Communion of Churches which must be afterwards spoken unto CHAP. VIII The Duty of Believers to joyn themselves in Church-Order UNto some one or other of those particular Congregations which we have described continuing to be the ground and pillar of Truth it is the duty of every Believer of every Disciple of Christ to joyn himself for the due and orderly observation and performance of the commands of Christ unto the glory of God and their own edification Matth. 28.18 19 20. This in general is granted by all sorts and Parties of men the grant of it is the ground whereon they stand in the management of their mutual fewds in Religion pleading that men ought to be of or joyn themselves unto this or that Church still supposing that it is their Duty to be of one or another Yea it is granted also that Persons ought to chuse what Churches they will joyn themselves unto wherein they may have the best advantage unto their Edification and Salvation They are to chuse to joyn themselves unto that Church which is in all things most according to the mind of God This it is supposed is the Liberty and Duty of every Man for if it be not so it is the foolishest thing in the world for any to attempt to get others from one Church unto another which is almost the whole business of Religion that some think
Life it self An Opinion Ignominious unto Christian Religion however vapoured withal by young Men whose Wit flies above all serious Consideration of things and their Circumstances and countenanced by others from an influence of Interest who otherwise would not be imposed on by such an Anti-Evangelical Presumption I shall therefore at the utmost distance from Interest or Passion briefly consider the Case proposed and give an account of my Thoughts concerning it 1. One or two things are usually premised unto the consideration of this case as namely 1. That those who refrain from that Communion with the Church of England which we insist upon do yet agree therewith in all important Doctrines of Faith which is the Foundation the Life and Soul of Church Union and Communion This I freely grant but with this Limitation that this Agreement respects the Doctrine as declared at the first Reformation and explained in the Age next ensuing thereon If there be a change made in or of these Doctrines or any of them by any in or of the Church of England we profess our Disagreement from them and do declare that thereby the Foundation of our Communion with them is weakened and the principal bond of it loosened 2. That not only as Christians but as Reformed Protestants we do agree in the Renunciation of the Doctrines and Worship of the Church of Rome which are opposed by the common consent of all those who are usually so called Yet this must be added thereunto that if any in or of the Church of England should make an Accession unto any Parts of the Doctrine and Worship of the Roman Church not avowed or warranted by the consent of the Church in its first Reformation we are not we cannot be obliged unto Communion with them therein and by their so doing the Original Bond of our Communion is weakened if not dissolved 2. These things being premised we shall enquire in the first place what is the Rule of that Communion with the Church of England in its Parochial Assemblies which is required of us If this be pleaded to be a Rule of divine Prescription we acknowledge that great diligence and humility are required unto the consideration of it that we be not mistaken And if it prove to be according to the Mind of Christ that is of his Institution if we fail of a compliance with it we are guilty of Schisme But if the Rule prescribing limiting and exacting this Communion be not so much as pleaded to be of divine Institution whatever fault there may be in our dissent from it Schisme it is not For Ecclesiastical Schisme neither hath nor can have respect unto any thing but divine Institutions For if it hath it is in the Power of any sort of men to make Schismaticks of whom they please as practically and in pretence it is come to pass at this day in the World Now the Rule of the Communion required is the Law of the Land the Book of Canons with the Rubrick of the Common Prayer If according to the Prescriptions Directions and Commands given in them we do joyn our selves in Communion with Parochial Assemblies then are we judged conformable to the Church of England and not else By and according unto these are all enquiries made concerning Communion with the Church and if they are observed the return is Omnia bene Now this Rule hath no divine Warrant for its Institution no Example in the Primitive Churches especially considering what are the things which it obliges us unto nor can be made consistent with the Liberty wherewith Christ hath made his Disciples free A Dissent from this Rule is as far from Schisme as any man need desire it For nothing is so but what respects some Command or Institution of Christ which immediately affects the Conscience It is true the Lord Christ hath Commanded that Love Union Peace and Order whereof Schisme is a disturbance and whereunto it is opposite But they are that Love Union and Order which he hath appointed To suppose that he hath left it unto Men to invent and appoint a new kind of Union and Order which is done in the Rule we treat of which he never required and then to oblige his Disciples unto the Observation of it be it what it will so as that their dissent from it should be Criminal and that for this Reason that it is so appointed of men is no small mistake And if all that Love Union Peace and Order which the Lord Jesus hath enjoyned his Disciples may be punctually observed without any respect unto this Rule as a Rule of Church Communion to dissent from it whatever fault of another kind it may be is no more Schisme than it is Adultery And if on some mens Arbitrary Constitution of this Rule and the Dissent of others from it such Differences and Divisions ensue as seem to have the general Nature of Schisme the Evil of them belongs unto those alone by whom the Rule is framed If indeed some should frame such a Rule of Church Communion because they suppose they see Cause for it and would then leave it unto others to observe as they see Cause if it be not of Use it would not be liable unto much abuse But whereas our Lord Jesus Christ hath given one and the same Rule equally unto all his Disciples in these things namely that they should observe and do all that he hath commanded them for some of them on any pretence or Plea whatever as of their being the Church or the like arbitrarily to frame a Rule of their own as an Addition unto his obliging all others unto a strict Observance of it because they have so framed it is that which neither the Scripture nor Primitive Antiquity know any thing of I will not enquire what is that Power and Authority whereby this Rule is constituted and confirmed nor in whom it doth reside The Name of the Church is usually pretended and pleaded But before any can be concerned herein all that hath been pleaded for the true state and nature of Evangelical Churches must be overthrown which will not be done speedily Railings Revilings and Reproaches will not do it But until this is done it will be believed that every particular Congregation is indispensibly obliged in itself to observe and do all the Commands of Christ and is left at Liberty so to regulate the outward circumstances of its Worship and Order as is best for its own Edification whereof it self is the most competent Judge But as for a Church of another sort invested with Authority to make a Rule not only as unto the outward Circumstances of those Actions wherein Church Order and Worship do consist but as unto sundry Religious Rites and Observances which thereby are added unto it and impose the Observance of it on a great Multitude of other Congregations without their consent whether they judge the things enjoyned to be for their Edification or otherwise it is apparently not from
World according as they had oppâ—â—tunity of Converse with them And when on any occasion any Division or Schisme fell out among any of their Members in this Church state it was severely rebuked by the Apostles All these Churches and all the Members of them were obliged by vertue of Divine Institution to obey their Guides to Honour and Reverence them and by their voluntary Contribution to provide for their Honourable Subsistence and maintenance according to their Ability Other Church state neither the Scripture nor Antiquity unto the End of the second Century do know any thing of which I shall hereafter more fully manifest Neither was there any thing known then to be Schisme or so esteemed but a Division falling out in some one of these Churches which hapned for the most part if not onely by some of their Teachers falling into heresie and drawing away Disciples after them Acts 20.30 or by various opinions about their Guides 1 Cor. 1.12 or the Ambition of some in seeking the Power and Authority of office among them To seek for any thing among those Churches wherein our present Contest about Schisme is concerned is altogether in vain There was then no such subordination of Churches of many unto one as is now pleaded No such distinction of Officers into those who have a plenary and those who have a partiary power onely in the Rule of the Church No Church with a single Officer over it Comprehending in a Subjection unto its Jurisdiction a multitude of other Churches No Invention no Imposition of any Orders Formâ— of Prayer or Ceremonies of Worship not of Divine Institution were once thought of and when any thing of that Nature was first attempted it caused great troubles amongst them In a Word the things on the account of a Non-compliance wherewithal we are vehemently charged with Schisme were then neither laid nor hatch'd neither thought of nor invented To Erect new kinds of Churches to introduce into them new Orders new Rules Rites and Ceremonies to impose their Observation on all Churches and all Members of them and to charge their dissent with the guilt of Schisme that Schisme which is prohibited and condemned in the Scripture hath much of an assumed Authority and Severity in it nothing of Countenance from the Scripture or Primitive Antiquity But after that Churches began to depart from this original Constitution by the wayes and means before declared every alteration produced a new supposition of Church Unity and peace whereto every Church of a new Constitution layed claim New sorts of Schisme were also coyned and framed For there was a certain way found out and carried on in a Mistery of Iniquity whereby those Meek Holy Humble Churches or Societies of Christs Institution who as such had nothing to do with the things of the World in Power Authority Dignity Jurisdiction or Wealth in some Instances wherein they got the Advantage one of another became in all these things to equal Kingdomes and Principalities yea one of them to Claim a Monarchy over the whole World During the Progression of this Apostacy Church Unity and Schisme declined from their Centre and varied their state according unto the present Interest of them that prevailed Whoever had got Possession of the name of the Church in a prevailing Reputation though the state of it was never so Corrupt made it bite and devour all that disliked it and would swear that submission unto them in all things was Church-Unity and to dissent from them was Schisme Unto that state all the World know that things were come in the Church of Rome Howbeit what hath been disputed about or contended for of Power Priviledges Authority Preheminence Jurisdiction Catholicisme wayes of Worship Rule and Discipline which the World is filled with such a noise about and in the dispute whereof so many various Hypotheses are advanced that cannot be accommodated unto such Christian Congregations as we have described are but the Effects of the Prudence or Imprudence of men and what it will prove the Event will shew Things of this Nature being once well understood will deliver the World from innumerable fruitless endless Contests Sovereign Princes from all disturbance on the account of Religion and private Persons from the fatal Mistake of entrusting the eternal Concernments of their Souls unto their Relation unto one Church and not unto another I am not so vain as at this time to expect the Reduction of Christian Religion unto its primitive Power Purity and Simplicity nor do I reflect blame on them who walk Conscientiously in such a Church state and Order as they approve of or suppose it the best they can attain unto onely I think it Lawful for all Christs Disciples at all times to yield Obedience unto all his Commands and to abstain from being Servants of Men in what he hath not enjoyned An Answer to Dr. Stillingfleets Book of the Unreasonableness of Separation in Defence of the Vindication of Non-Conformists from the Guilt of Schisme THE Preceding Discourse was written for the most part before the publishing of the Treatise of the Reverend Dr. Stillingfleet Entituled the Vnreasonableness of Separation Yet was it not so without a Prospect at least a probable Conjecture that something of the same kind and tendency with the Doctors Book would be published in Defence of the Cause which he had undertaken And I was not without hopes that the whole of it might have been both finished and communicated unto publick view before any thing farther were attempted against our Cause whereby many Mistakes might have been prevented For as I was willing yea very desirous if it were the Will of God that I might see before my departure out of this World the Cause of Conformity as things are now stated between us and the Church of England pleaded with Judgment Moderation and Learning with the best of those Arguments whereby our Principles or Practises are opposed so considering on what hand that work was now like to fall I thought si pergania dextra c. and am of the same Mind still But my expectation being frustrate of representing our whole Cause truly stated for the Prevention of Mistakes by the coming out of this Book against all sorts of Nonconformists I thought it convenient to publish this first Part of what I had designed and to annex unto it the ensuing Defence of the Vindication of Non-conformists from the charge of Schisme For although I do know that there is nothing material in the whole Book of the Vnreasonableness of Sepaeration but what is obviated or answered before hand in the preceeding Discourse so as that the Principles and Demonstrations of them contained therein may easily be applyed unto all the Reasonings Exceptions and Pleas in and of that Book to render them useless unto the End designed which is to reinforce a charge of Schisme against us Yet I think it necessary to shew how unsuccessful from the disadvantage of his Cause the Doctor hath been
this constant total Communion doth not only include a conscientious Observance of all things appointed to be done by the Rules or Canons in those Assemblies but a Renunciation also of all other ways and means of Edification by joint Communion as unlawful and Evil. And it will be hard to prove that on a Concession of the Lawfulness of Communion in some Acts of Divine Worship it Will be necessary for men to oblige themselves unto total constant Communion with a Renunciation and Condemnation of all other ways and means of joint Edification It may also be lawful to do a thing with some respects and Limitations at some times which it may not be lawful to do absolutely and alwayes It may be necessary from outward circumstances to do that Sometimes which is lawful in itself though not necessary from itself it can never be necessary to do that which is unlawful Of the first sort they esteem occasional Communion and the other of the latter Some time is spent in taking off an Exception unto this Inference from the Practise of our Saviour who had occasional Communion with the Jews in the Temple and Synagogues which he proves to have been constant and perpetual and not occasional only and that he prescribed the same Practise unto his Disciples But I think this labour might have been spared For there is nothing more clear and certain then that our Lord Jesus Christ did joyn with the Jews in the Observance of Gods Institutions among them on the one hand and on the other that he never joyned with them in the observance of their own Traditions and Pharasaical Impositions but warned all his Disciples to avoid them and refuse them whose Example we desire to follow for concerning all such Observances in the Church he pronounced that sentence Every plant that my Heavenly Father hath not planted shall be rooted up But the Doctor proceeds unto a second Argument pag. 163 to the same Purpose from as he calls it the particular force of that Text Phil. 3.16 As far as we have already attained let us walk by the same Rule mind the same things This is the Text which gave the first occasion unto this whole Dispute The Doctors Intention is so indefensible from this place that I thought however he might persist in the Defence of the Cause he had undertaken he would have forborn from seeking Comtenance unto it from these Words of the Apostle But it is fallen out otherwise and I am here in the first place called unto an Account for the Exceptions I put in unto his Application of these Words of the Apostle in my Vindication of the Non-conformists I will spare the Reader as much as is possible in the Repetition of things formerly spoken and the Transcription of his Words or my own without prejudice unto the Cause itself After a Reflection of some Obscurity and Intricacy on my Discourse he repeates my sense of the Words according unto his Apprehension under four Heads about which I shall not contend seeing whether he hath apprehended my Mind aright or no or expressed the whole of what I declared belongs not unto the Merit of the Cause in hand Nor indeed do I yet know directly what he judgeth this Text doth prove or what it is that he inferrs from it though I know well enough what it is designed to give countenance unto and what is the Application that is made of it And therefore he issues his whole Dispute about it in this Enquiry how far the Apostles Rule hath an influence on this case But whosoever shall come unto a sedate Consideration of this Text and Context without Prejudice without preconceived Opinions without Interest in Parties or Causes will judge it to be a Matter of Art to apply them unto the present Controversie as unto the Imposition of an Arbitrary Rule of walking in Churches on all that are presumed to belong unto them But to clear these things the Doctor proposeth three things to be debated 1. Whether the Apostle speaks of different Opinions or different Practices 2. Whether the Rule he gives be mutual Forbearance 3. How far the Apostle's Rule hath an influence into this case The two first of these belong not at all unto the present Argument and the last is but faintly proposed and pursued though it be the Foundation of his whole Fabrick The Reader if he will put himself to so much trouble as to compare my former Discourse with what is here offered in Answer or Opposition unto it he will easily see that nothing is pleaded that may abate the force of what was insisted on For indeed the Discourse on these things consists for the most part in Diversions from the Argument in hand whereby an Appearance is made of various Arguings and the Proof of sundry things which belong not unto the Case in hand Without any long Deductions artificial Insinuations or diverting Reasonings without wresting the Text or Context these things are plain and evident in them 1. A Supposition of Differences among Believers in and about Opinions and Practises relating unto Religion and the Worship of God So is at present between us and those of the Church of England by whom we are opposed 2. In this state whilst these Differences do continue there is one common Rule according unto which those who so dissent among themselves are to walk in the things wherein they are agreed Such is the Rule of Faith and Love which we all assent unto and are agreed in 3. This Rule cannot consist in a precise Determination of the things in Difference with an Authoritative Prescription of Vniformity in Opinions and Practise because it is directed unto upon a supposition of the continuation of those Differences between Believers 4. That during the continuation of these Differences or different Apprehensions and Practices whilst on all hands they use the means of coming unto the Knowledge of the Truth in all things that they should walk in Love mutually forbearing one another in those things wherein they differed Untill it be manifested that these things are not the Design of the Context and to contain the sense of the Words they are not only useless unto the Doctors Design but opposite unto it and destructive of it But nothing is here attempted unto that Purpose To draw any Argument from these Words applicable unto his Design it must be proved 1. That besides the Rule of Faith Love and Worship given by Divine Institution and Obligatory unto all the Disciples of Christ or all Churches in all times and Ages that the Apostles gave a Rule concerning outward Rites Ceremonies Modes of Worship Feasts and Fastings Ecclesiastical Government Liturgies and the like unto which all Believers ought to conform on the Penalty of being esteemed Schismaticks and dealt withal accordingly For this only is that wherein we are concerned 2. That because the Apostles made such a Rule which we know not what it is or what is become of it that
part of the Churches Unity doth or ever did consist in them In his Procedure hereon our Author seemes to embrace occasions of contending seeking for Advantages therein in things not belonging unto the Merit of the Cause which I thought was beneath him From my Concession that some at least of our Parochial Churches are true Churches he asks in what sense Are they Churches rightly constituted with whom they may joyn in Communion as Members I think it is somewhat too late now after all this dispute about the Reasons of refraining from their Communion and his severe Charges of Schisme upon us for our so doing to make this Enquiry Wherefore he Answers himself No but his Meaning is saith he that they are not guilty of any such heynous Errors in Doctrine or Idolatrous Practise in Worship as should utterly deprive them of the Being and nature of Churches which I suppose are my Words But then comes in the Advantage doth saith he this Kindness belong only unto some of our Parochial Churches I had thought that every Parochial Church was true or false according unto its frame and constitution which among us supposeth the owning the Doctrine and Worship established in the Church of England I answer briefly it is true every Church is true or false according unto its Original frame and Constitution This frame and Constitution of Churches if it proceed from and depend upon the Institution of Christ it is true and approveable If it depend only on a National Establishment of Doctrine and Worship I know not well what to say unto it But let any of these Parochial Churches be so constituted as to answer the legal establishment in the Land yet if the Generality of their Members are openly wicked in their Lives and they have no lawful or sufficient Ministry we cannot acknowledge them for true Churches Some other things of the like nature do ensue but I shall not insist on them He gathers up in the next place the Titles of the Causes alledged for our refraining Communion with those Parochial Assemblies which he calls our Separation from them And hereon he enquires whether these Reasons be a ground for a Separation from a Church wherein it is confessed there are no Heynous Errors in Doctrine or Idolatrous Practise in Worship that is as he before cited my words as should utterly deprive them of the Being and Nature of Churches And it they be not then saith he such a Separation may be a formal Schisme because they set up other Churches of their own The Rule before laid down that all things lawful are to be done for the Churches Peace taking in the supposition on which it proceeds is as sufficient to establish Church Tyranny as any Principle made use of by the Church of Rome notwithstanding its plausible Appearance And that here insinuated of the Vnlawfulness of Separation from any Church in the World for that which hath pernicious Errors in Doctrine and Idolatry in Worship destroying its Being is no Church at all is as good Security unto Churches in an Obstinate Refusal of Reformation when the Souls of the People are ruined amongst them for the want of it as they need desire And I confess I suspect such Principles as are evidently suited unto the security of the Corrupt Interests of any sort of Men. I say therefore 1. That though a Church or that which pretends itself on any Grounds so to be do not profess any heynous Errour in Doctrine nor be guilty of Idolatrous Practise in Worship destroying its Nature and Being yet there may be sufficient Reasons to refrain from its Communion in Church Order and Worship and to joyn in or with other Churches for Edification That is that where such a Church is not capable of Reformation or is obstinate in a Resolution not to reform itself under the utmost Necessity thereof it is lawful for all or any of its Members to reform themselves according to the Mind of Christ and commands of the Gospel 2. That where Men are no otherwise Members of any Church but by an inevitable Necessity and outward Penal Laws preventing their own choice and any act of Obedience unto Christ in their joyning with such Churches the Case is different from theirs whose Relation unto any Church is founded in their own voluntary choice as submitting themselves unto the Laws Institution and Rule of Christ in that Church which we shall make use of afterwards 3. The Doctor might have done well to have stated the true nature of Schisme and the formal Reason of it before he had charged a formal Schisme on a Supposition of some outward Acts only 4. What is our Judgment concerning Parochial Assemblies how far we separate from them or refrain Communion with them what are the Reasons whereon we do so hath been now fully declared and thereunto we must appeal on all occasions for we cannot acquiesce in what is unduely imposed on us either as unto Principles or Practise To shew as he saith the Insufficiency of our Cause of Separation he will take this way namely to shew the great absurdities that follow on the allowance of them and addes These five especially I shall insist upon 1. That it weakens the Cause of Reformation 2. That it hinders all Vnion between the Protestant Churches 3. That it justifies the antient Schismes which have been always condemned by the Christian Church 4. That it makes Separation Endless 5. That it is contrary to the Obligation that lies on all Christians to preserve the Peace and Vnity of the Church Now as I shall consider what He offers on these several Heads and his Application of it unto the case in hand so I shall confirm the Reasons already given of our Separation if it must be so called from Parochial Assemblies with these five Considerations 1. That they strengthen the Cause of Reformation 2. That they open a way to Vnion between all Protestant Churches 3. That they give the just Grounds of condemning the antient Schismes that ever any Christian Church did justly condemn 4. That they give due bounds unto Sâ—paration 5. That they absolutely comply with all the Commands of the Scripture for the Preservation of the Peace and Vnity of the Church I shall begin with the consideration of the Absurdities charged by Him on our Principles and Practise The first of them is That it weakens the Cause of the Reformation This he proves by long Quotations out of some French Divines We are not to expect that they should speak unto our Cause or make any Determination in it seeing to the principal of them it was unknown But they say that which is contrary unto our Principles so they may do and yet this not weaken the Cause of the Reformation For it is known that they say somewhat also that is contrary to the Principles of our Episcopal Brethren for which one of them is sufficiently reviled but yet the Cause of Reformation is not weakened thereby The first
Testimony produced is that of Calvin A large Discourse he hath Institut lib. 4. cap. 1. against Causeless Separations from a true Church and by whom are they not condemned No determination of the Case in hand can be thence derived nor are the Grounds of our refraining Communion with Parochial Assemblies the same with those which he condemns as insufficient for a total Separation nor is the Separation he opposed in those days which was absolute and total with a condemnation of the Churches from which it was made of the same nature with that wherewith we are charged at least not with what we own and allow He gives the Notes of a true Church to be the pure Preaching of the Word and the Administration of the Sacraments according unto Christs Institution Where these are he allows a true Church to be not only without Diocesan Episcopacy but in a form and under a Rule opposite unto it and inconsistent with it And if he did at all speak to our Case as he doth not nor unto any of the Grounds of it why should we be pressed with his Authority on the one hand more then others from whom he differed also on the other Besides there is a great deal more belongs unto the pure preaching of the Word and the Administration of the Sacraments according unto Christs Institution then some seem to apprehend They may they ought to be so explained as that from the consideration of them we may justifie our whole Cause Both these may be wanting in a Church which is not guilty of such heynous Errors in Doctrine or Idolatry in Worship as should overthrow its Being And their want may be a just Cause of refraining Communion from a Church which yet we are not obliged to condemn as none at all Calvin expresseth his Judgment N. 12. I would not give Countenance unto Errors no not to the least so as to cherish them by flattery or Connivance But though I say that the Church is not to be forsaken for tristing Differences wherein the Doctrine of the Gospel is retained safe and sound wherein the Integrity of Godliness doth abide and the use of the Sacraments appointed of the Lord is preserved and we say the same And this very Calvin who doth so severely condemn Separation from a true Church as by him stated did himself quietly and peaceably withdraw and depart from the Church of Geneva when they refused to admit that Discipline which he esteemed to be according to the Mind of Christ. It is certain therefore that by the Separation which he condemns he doth not intend the peaceable Relinquishment of the Communion of any Church as unto a constant participation of all Ordinances in it for want of due means of Edification much less that which hath so many other Causes concurring therewith For the other Learned Men whom he quotes unto the same purpose I see not any thing that gives the least countenance unto his Assertion that our Principles weaken the Cause of the Reformation It is true they plead other Causes of Separation from the Church of Rome than those insisted on by us with respect unto the Church of England and indeed they had been otherwise much to blame having so many things as they had to plead of greater importance Did we say that the Reasons which we plead are all that can be pleaded to justifie the Separation of the Reformed Churches from the Church of Rome it would weaken the Cause of Reformation For we should then deny that Idolatry and fundamental Errors in Faith were any Cause or Ground of that Separation However we know that the Imposition of them on the Faith and Practise of all Christians is more pleaded in Justification of a Separation from them then the things themselves But allowing those greater Reasons to be pleaded against the Roman Communion as we do it doth not in the least follow that our Reasons for refraining Communion with Parochial Assemblies doth weaken the Cause of the Reformation However let me not be misinterpreted as unto that expression of destroying our Faith which the Communion required with the Church of England as unto all the important Articles of it doth not do and I can subscribe unto the Words of Daille as quoted by our Author out of his Apology If saith he the Church of Rome hath not required any thing of us which destroys our Faith offends our Consciences and overthrows the Service which we believe due to God if the Differences have been small and such as we might safely have yeilded unto then he will grant their Separation was rash and unjust and they guilty of the Schisme He closeth his Transcription of the Words of sundry Learned Men who have justifyed the Separation of the reformed Churches from the Church of Rome wherein we are not in the least concerned with an Enquiry What Triumph would the Church of Rome make over us had we no other reasons to justifie our Separation from them but only those which as is pretended we plead in our Cause I say whereas we do plead confirm and justifie all the Reasons and Causes pleaded for the Separation of the Reformed Churches from them not opposing not weakning any of them by any Principle or Practise of ours but farther press the force of the same reasonings and causes in all Instances whereunto they will extend I see neither what cause the Papists have of Triumph noâ— any thing that weakens the Cause of the Reformation He adds further how should we be hissed aâ—d laughed at all over the Christian World if we had nothing to alledge for our Separation from the Roman Church but such things as these I answer that as the Case stands if we did alledge no other Reasons but those which we insist on for our refraining Communion with our own Parochial Assemblies we should deserve to be derided for relinquishing the Plea of those other important Reasons which the Heresies and Idolatries and Tyranny of that Church do render just and equal But if we had no other Causes of Separation from the Church of Rome but what we have for our Separation from our Parochial Assemblies at home as weak as our Allegations are pretended to be we should not be afraid to defend them against all the Papists in the World and let the World act like itself in hissing Whereas therefore the Cause of Reformation is not in any thing weakened by our Principles No Argument no Reason solidly pleaded to justifie the Separation from the Church of Rome being deserted by us neither Testimony Proof nor Evidence being produced to evince that it is weakned by us I shall in the Second place as was before proposed prove that the whole Cause of the Protestants Separation from the Church of Rome is strengthened and confirmed by us There were some general Principles on which the Protestants proceeded in their Separation from the Church of Rome and which they constantly pleaded in Justification thereof The first
Orthodox themselves but only as they were carried on unto a total Renunciation of all Communion whatever but only that which was enclosed unto their own Party 2. To Evidence that we give the least countenance unto the antient Schismes or do contract the Guilt with the Authors of them the thing aimed at there are three things incumbent on him to prove 1. That our Parochial Churches from whom we do refrain actual presential Communion in all Ordinances where it is required by Law which cannot be many and but one at one time do succeed into the room of that Church in a Separation from which those Schismes did consist For we pass no Judgement on any other Church but what concerns our selves as unto present Duty though that in a Nation may be extended unto many or all of the same sort But these Schismes consisted in a professed Separation from the whole Catholick Church that is all Christians in the World who joyned not with them in their Opinions and Practises and from the whole Church state then passant and allowed But our Author knows full well that there are others who long before our Parochial Churches do lay claim unto the absolute enclosure of this Church state unto themselves and thereon condemn both him and us and all the Protestants in the World of the same Schisme that those of old were guilty of especially they make a continual Clamour about the Novatians and Donatists I know that he is able to dispossess the Church of Rome from that Usurpation of the State and Rights of the antient Catholick Church from whence those Separations were made and it hath been sufficiently done by others But so soon as we have cast that out of Possession to bring in our Parochial Assemblies into the room of it and to press the Guilt of Separation from them with the same Reasons and Arguments as we were all of us but newly pressed withal by the Romanists namely that hereby we give countenance unto them yea do the same things with them who made Schismes in Separating from the Catholick Church of old is somewhat severe and unequal Wherefore unless the Church from which they separated which was the whole Catholick Church in the World not agreeing and acting with them and those Parochial Assemblies from whose Communion we refrain are the same and of the same consideration nothing can be argued from those ancient Schismes against us nor is any countenance given by us unto them For if it be asked of us whether it be free or lawful for Believers to joyn in Society and full Communion with other Churches besides those that are of our way and especial Communion we freely answer that we no way doubt of it nor do judge them for their so doing 2. It must be proved unto the End proposed that the Occasions and Reasons of their Separation of old were the same or of the same nature only with those which we plead for our refraining Communion from Parochial Assemblies Now though the Dr. here makes a flourish with some Expressions about Zeal Discipline Purity of the Church Edification which he will not find in any of their Pretences yet in truth there is not one thing alledged wherein there is a Coincidence between the Occasions and Reasons pleaded by them and ours It is known that the principal thing in general which we insist upon is the unwarrantable Imposition of unscriptural Termes and Conditions of Communion upon us was there any such thing pleaded by them that made the Schismes of Old indeed they were all of them imposers and separated from the Church because they would not submit unto their Impositions Some Bishops or some that would have been Bishops but could not entertaining some new Conceit of their own which they would have imposed on all others being not submitted unto therein were the Causes of all those Schismes which were justly esteemed Criminal So was it with the Novatians and Donatists in an especial manner Even the great Tertullian though no Bishop left the Communion of the Church on this Ground For because they would not admit of the strict Observance of some Austere Severities in Fasting Abstinence from sundry Meates and Watching with the like which he esteemed necessary though no way warranted by Scripture Rule or Example he utterly renounced their Communion and countenanced himself by adhering unto the Dotages of Montanus It is true some of them contended for a Severity of Discipline in the Church but they did it not upon any pretence of the Neglect of it in them unto whom the Administration of it was committed but for the want of establishing a false Principle Rule or Erronious Doctrine which they advanced namely that the most sincere penitents were never more to be admitted into Ecclesiastical Communion whereby they did not establish but overthrow one of the Principal ends of Church Discipline They did not therefore press for the Power or the Vse of the Keys as is pretended but advanced a false Doctrine in prejudice both unto the Power and Use of them They pretended indeed unto the Purity of the Church not that there were none impure wicked and hypocritical among them but that none might be admitted who had once fallen though really made pure by sincere Repentance This was their Zeal for Purity If a Man were overtaken if they could catch him in such a fault as by the Rules of the passaint Discipline he was to be cast out of the Church there they had him safe for ever No Evidence of the most sincere Repentance could prevail for a Readmission into the Church And because other Churches would admit them they renounced all Communion with them as no Churches of Christ. Are these our Principles are these our Practices do we give any countenance unto them by any thing we say or do I somewhat wonder that the Dr. from some general Expressions and casting their Pretences under new Appearances should seem to think that there is the least Coincidence between what they insisted on and what we plead in our own Defence He may see now more fully what are the Reasons of our Practise and I hope thereon will be of another Mind not as unto our Cause in general which I am far enough from the expectation of but as unto this invidious Charge of giving Countenance unto the Schismes condemned of old in the Church And we shall see immediately what were the Occasions of those Schismes which we are as remote from giving countenance unto as unto the Principles and Reasons which they pleaded in their own Justification 3. It ought also to be proved that the Separation which is charged on us is of the same nature with that charged on them of old for otherwise we cannot be said to give any Countenance unto what they did For it is known they so separated from all other Churches in the World as to confine the Church of Christ unto their own Party to condemn all others and to
is the matter of Fact that the Apostles appointed onely particular Congregations and that therefore they did not oblige the Christians about in a Province or Diocess to be of that Church which was first erected in any Town or City but they founded new Churches with new Officers of their own in all places where there were a sufficient number of Believers to make up such a Church And this I prove from the instance of the Church of Hierusalem which was first planted but quickly after there were Churches gathered and settled in Judea Gallilee and Samaria They planted Churches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Cities and Villages as Clemens speaks But what saith he is this to the proof of the Congregational way this it is namely That the Churches instituted by the Apostles were all of them Congregational not Diocesan Provincial or National but saith he the thing I desired was that when the Christians in one City multiplyed into more Congregations they would prove that they did make new and distinct Churches He may desire it of them who grant that the Christians did multiply in one City into more Congregations then one which I deny untill the end of the second Century although they might and did occasionally meet especially in times of Persecution in distinct Assemblies Neither will their multiplication into more Congregations without distinct Officers at all help the cause he pleadeth for for his Diocesan Church consisteth of many distinct Churches with their distinct Officers Order and Power as he afterwards describes our Parishes to do under one Bishop Yet such is his apprehension of the Justice of his cause that what hath been pleaded twenty times against it namely That speaking of one City the Scripture still calls it the Church of that place but speaking of a Province as Judea Galilee Samaria Galatia Macedonia it speaks of the Churches of them which evidently proves that it knows nothing of a Diocesan Provincial or National Church he produceth in the justification of it because he saith that it is evident theâ—ne that there was but one Church in one City which was never denyed There were indeed then many Bishops in one Church Phil. 1.1 Acts 20.28 And afterwards when one Church had one Bishop only yet there were two Bishops in one City which requires two Churches as Epiphanus affirms 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Haeres 68. S. 6. For Alexandria never had two Bishops as other Cities had Whether he intend two Bishops in one Church or two Churches in one City all is one to our purpose But the Dr. I presume makes this observation rather artificially to prevent an Objection against his main Hypothesis then with any design to strengthen it thereby For he cannot but know how frequently it is pleaded in opposition unto any National Church State as unto its mention in the Scripture For he that shall speak of the Churches in Essex Suffolk Hartfordshire and so of other Counties without the least intimation of any general Church unto which they should belong would be judged to speak rather the Independent then the Episcopal Dialect But saith he p. 236. I cannot but wonder what Dr. O. means when after he hath produced the Evidence of distinct Churches in the same Province he calls this plain Scripture Evidence and practise for the erecting particular distinct Congregations who denies that I say then it is incumbent on him to prove if he do any thing in this cause that they erected Churches of another sort kind and order also But saith he I see nothing like a proof of distinct Churches in the same City which was the thing to be proved but because it could not be proved was prudently let alone But this was not the thing to be proved nor did I propose it to confirmation nor assert it but have proved the contrary unto the end of the second Century This only I assert that every Church in one City was only one Church and nothing is offered by the Doctor to the contrary yea he affirms the same But saith he sect 6. p. 237. Dr. O. saith That the Christians of one City might not exceed the bounds of a particular Church or Congregation no although they had a multiplication of Bishops or Elders in them and occasional distinct Assemblies for some Acts of Divine Worship But then saith he The notion of a Church is not limited in the Scripture to a single Congregation Why so for saith he if occasional Assemblies be allowed for some Acts of Worship why not for others I say because they belong unto the whole Church or are Acts of Communion in the whole Church Assembled and so cannot be observed in occasional meetings do this saith the Apostle when you come together in one place And if saith he the number of Elders be unlimited then every of those may attend the occasional distinct Assemblies for Worship and yet altogether make up the Body of one Church and so say I they may and yet be one Church still joyning together in all Acts of Communion that are proper and peculiar unto the Church For as the meetings intended were occasional so also was the attendance of the Elders unto them as they found occasion for the Edification of the whole Church It may be the Dr. is not so well acquainted with the Principles and Practise of the Congregational way and therefore thinks that these things are contrary unto them But those of that way do maintain that there ought to be in every particular Congregation unto the compleatness of it many Elders or Overseers that the number of them ought to be encreased as the encrease of the Church makes it necessary for their Edification that the members of such a Church may and ought to meet occasionally in distinct Assemblies especially in the time of Persecution for Prayer Preaching of the Word and mutual Exhortation so when Peter was in Prison after the Death of James many met together in the House of Mary to Pray Acts 12.12 Which was not a meeting of the whole Church And that there were such private meetings of the Members of the same Church in times of Persecution among the Primitive Churches may be proved by a Multiplication of instances but still they continued one Church and joyned together in all Acts of Church Communion properly so called especially if it were possible every Lords-day as Justin Martyr declares that the Church did in his time For all the Christians saith he then in the City and Villages about gathered together in one place for the Ends mentioned But still these distinct occasional Assemblies did not constitute any distinct Societies or Corporations as the distinct Companies do in a City But saith he grant one single Bishop over all these Elders and they make up that representation of a Church which we have from the best and purest Antiquity I say we would quickly grant it could we see any warrant for it or if he could prove that so it was