and no Certificate of Bishops hath power to take that right from them 7. Here the wantonness of Widows is forbidden who are for new Husbands as soon as the old is put in his Grave whereby who are Fathers of their Children is made uncertain 8. Here is no false Fathering of Children on those who are within four Seas 9. Here is no punishing Men twice for one offence once by the Temporal Court and then by the Spiritual Court or contrary punishments by contrary Courts one by the Contentious Court and another by the Penitential Court 10. Here is no Auricular Confession of their Wives or Daughters by Priests in Temples or Chambers and defiling thereby of their Families 11. Here is no punishing of Women for bringing forth Children nor the Murders of so many Infants caused thereby as by the Papist Laws is continually done Yet I conclude though the Law of the Turk is far better than that of the Pope and shall rise in Judgment against such as plant his Canons in their Courts in defiance of the Law of God and Nature I think neither a fit Rule to judge Marriage Legitimation or Succession by CHAP. V. Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession not to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws THE Question is Whether Marriage Legitimation and Succession ought to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws No English Lawyer can mention my Lord Coke without great honour but how he came so biass'd as to endeavour to set up Papal and Episcopal Laws under the name of Regal appears not Object 1 It is objected by Coke lib. 5.1 part 40. in Cawdryes Case That the Kingdom of England is an absolute Monarchy and if the King cannot Authorize by his Commission or Writ Ecclesiastical Judges to determin and judg those great and important Causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy by Certificate of the Bishop who is the Ecclesiastical Witness and Judg both of Fact and Law and by the Canon Laws which by use and custom are now our Ecclesiastical Laws Then he is disabled to be supreme Governour of this Realm in all Spiritual things or Causes as well as Temporal according to the Oath of Supremacy due to him And that he could not then cause Justice to be administred to his Subjects in these so great and important causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy on which depends the strength of mens Descents and Inheritances This I conceive though not in the same words yet in sence and substance to be the weight of my Lord Coke's Argument whereby he would make use of Marriage as one means amongst his many other to set up an Ecclesiastical Law and Judg over the Temporal Freeholds and Inheritances and other Birth-rights of the Subjects To which is answer'd First As to the words Absolute and Supream I suppose he intended no such absolute Monarchy or Supremacy as is not under the Law of God though it be not so express'd in the form of the Oath of Supremacy For though Regum timendorum in proprios greges Ecclesiastical Laws not needful to the King's Supremacy but hurtful Reges in ipsos imperium est Jovis then I think he doth not intend it to be above the Law of the Land seeing the King himself by his Oath is pleased to oblige himself to his People to govern according to that Law where it is not contrary to the Law of God Then as to the pretended want of Power of doing Justice concerning causes of Free-hold and Inheritance depending on marriage except by Ecclesiastical Laws and Judges that is very strange for how was Justice done in the times of Primitive Christianity for many Hundred Years after Christ when neither Bishops or any other Ecclesiastical Judges ever pretended Jurisdiction todetermin Temporal Right or Propriety but left the same to be judged by the Imperial Laws How was Justice done in the time of Henry the Second when the Jurisdiction of all Matrimonial causes remained in the Temporal Courts Richard the First his Son being the first as Matthew Paris writes whom the Clergy got by his publick Edict to give the Jurisdiction of Power and Gifts by reason of Marriage and of all Matrimonial causes to the Bishops Courts and the same Richard likewise gave them Jurisdiction of all breach of Faith Promises and Oaths whereby if much of the Power so rashly granted had not been by him so speedily resumed they had hookt to themselves the whole Jurisdiction from the King's Courts of all Contracts and Conveyances Bonds and Obligations as well as Marriages concerning Temporal Goods and Inheritances And why cannot general as well as special Bastardy be tryed at Common Law And how likewise are all Rights depending on all Marriages made during the late Civil Wars by pretence of any Ordinance of Parliament made by 12. Car. 2. cap. 33. to be tryed by a Jury and the Common Law and not by Certificate of the Bishop or any Ecclesiastical Judg to the advancement and not prejudice of Justice and a far greater expedition and advantage to the same would it be if by the like Act the Jurisdiction of all Marriages and Legitimations as it was in the time of Henry the Second were again restored to the Common-Law-Courts So likewise anciently Bastardy alledged in an Action of Trespass was triable by Jury but now usurped by Bishops as well in personal as real Actions 4. Edw. 4.35 Object 2 Coke lib. 5.1 part in the same case of Cawdry it is further alledged Circumspectè agatis gives no Jurisdiction of Marriage to Bishops That the Statutes of Circumspectè agatis made 13. Eliz. 1. of Articuli Cleri made 9. E. 2. Anno Domini 1315. of 15. E. 3. Cap. 6. of 31. E. 3. Cap. 11. give Jurisdiction of marriage to Bishops To which is answer'd That in the Statute of Circumspectè agatis there is not a word mention'd of marriage but only by it Jurisdiction is given to the Bishops of Fornication and Adultery which is not Marriage but rather Anti-marriage for Marriage is an Ordinance of God Fornication and Adultery are Ordinances of the Devil and whereas before the Jurisdiction of Fornication and Adultery as acknowledged by Coke lib. 5.1 part 488. was in Leets under the name of Letherwit or more properly Lecherwit yet had Leets never Jurisdiction of Marriage or Divorce neither consequently could Bishops have it from them As for Articuli Cleri and the other Statutes there is not a word in them concerning Marriage nor so much as of Fornication and Adultery the Jurisdiction therefore pretended was never given by any Statute Linwood likewise expounds the words of the Statute of Circumspectè agatis which gives Bishops Jurisdiction of all deadly Sins as Fornication and Adultery and the like Non intelligas de omni peccato mortali sed de tali cujus punitio spectat merè ad forum Ecclesiasticum nam si de ratione cujuslibet peccati mortalis cognosceret Ecclesia sic periret temporalis gladii Jurisdictio
Children the same ought to be wholly and intirely performed to such Sons and Daughters in all Successions whether to a Testament or an Intestate And in short that they ought not to be made unlike other Children in Successions whom Nature hath made like Hence it appears that the Civil Law wills the Succession of Children shall be according to the Law of Nature and not according to any Canon Law or Law made by the Priest Natura duce errare nullo modo potest Tul. 1. de leg Cum vero parentibus rediti deinde Magistris traditi sumus tum ita variis imbuimur erroribus ut vanitati veritas opinioni confirmatae natura ipsa cedit 3. Tusc Where nature is our Guide it is impossible to err but when we fall into the hands of Parents and are delivered to Shool-Masters we are then infected with so many Errors that all truth gives place to vanity and Nature it self yields to opinion accustomed To fight against Nature is like Giants to fight against God Cato major Of the Final Causes of Marriage by the Law of God and Nature The Final causes of Marriage which is the Ordinance of God and not of Man are not to fill Priests pockets with money or to satisfie their insatiable Covetousness and Ambition to set their Foot on the Necks of Emperours and Kings in their Legitimations and Successions and thereby to dispose of the Kingdoms of Princes and the Liberty Propriety and Goods of the Subjects at their Arbitrary will and pleasure But the Final causes of Marriage by the Law of God and Nature are three 1. Procreation of Children 2. That Man might have an Help-meet for him there being many necessities especially in time of sickness wherein Man cannot be without the help of a Woman 3. To make his life more pleasant and delightful Tristis sine conjuge lectus As for the first part which is the greatest and chiefest end of Marriage namely procreation of Children without which the World cannot be continued To be the shorter I shall only mention one Poet as follows Providei ille maximus mundi-Parens Cùm tam rapaces cerneret fati minas Vt damna semper sobole repararet nova Excedat agedum rebus humanis Venus Quae supplet ac restituit exhaustum genus Orbis jacebit squalido turpis situ Vacuum sine ullis classibus stabit mare Alesque Coelo deerit silvis fera Solis Aer pervius ventis erit Sen. in Hippol. Fates cruel Threats when the great Parent saw Against his Creatures by as great a Law He then Inacted all those whom it slew Sould by new Births perpetually renew Should Venus lease and should not still restore With fresh Supplies Natures exhausted store On squalid Earth no Beauty would remain No gallant Fleets would dance upon the Main No Deer in Woods no Birds would be in Skie Winds only through sad Air would sighing flie There could be neither King nor Parliament nor People nor Governours nor Governed neither could the Protestant Religion defend it self against Pope or Turk without Marriage for though it be Apocrypha it is truly said Esdras 4.15 Women have born the King and all the People that bear rule by Sea or Land The End of the First Book THE CONTENTS Of the Second Book BY what Judg Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession ought not and ought to be Judged Of the Five Competitors to be Judges of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession 1. The Bishop 2 The Magistrate 3. The Souldier 4 The Parents 5. The King and Parliament 137 Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Legislative ib. Except 1. They assume to be Judges Jure Divino without a Sign of Mission from God which overthrows the Legislative Power of the King and Parliament ib. Of the Sign of Mission required by the Grand Seignior from Sabatai Sevi a counterfeit Jewish Messiah 139 2. They have falsely translated the Scripture in all words relating to Marriage 142 They have falsely translated Ish Isha Zona Kadesh Philiegesh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Husband Wife Harlot Concubine c. 142 No such as word as Concubine in the whole Original Scripture ib. They have falsely translated the Seventh Commandment Lo Tinaph to be Adultery 145 They have falsely translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be Fornication ib. They have falsely translated the Tenth Commandment in the words Wife Man-Servant Maid-Servant 146 They have falsely translated Mamzer in the Old and Nothus in the New Testament Bastard Wherein are noted the Errors of Coke Skene and Grotius in following Episcopal and other Popish translations ib. Of the absurdity of Common and Ecclesiastical Lawyers who make the Child born without the Ceremonies of a Priest and Temple no Sib Kin or of Blood to the Father who begot or the Mother who bare him 154 155 Further Reasons shewn that they have falsely translated Mamzer in the Old and Nothus in the New Testament Bastard 156 No such word or thing as Bastard in the whole Original Scripture or amongst the Hebrews Greeks or Romans 3. They have corrupted the Press both as to Scripture and Acts of Parliament and interdict Protestants to Print against or answer Papists 162 A Counterfeit Act of Parliament Printed by Bishops against Protestants and the true supprest 163 Mischiefs which follow the Interdiction of the Press to Protestants 164 165 4. By pretence of giving the King the name of Supremacy they have taken the thing to themselves 167 5. By pretence of giving the King Supremacy by the Ceremonies of the Coronation they take it from him to themselves 169 David Anointed and Crowned by his Parliament and not by the Priest 173 6. They assume in all matters concerning Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession to be above Appeal to the Kings Courts 175 Of the abominable Judgement pass'd by the Common Law Judges in Kennes Case Coke lib. 7.42 whereby they gave away the Supremacy of the King's Courts to Bishops and made them in all causes Matrimonial subject to no Appeal ib. Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Judicial Power 180 1. They are prohibited by the example of Christ to Judg Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession ib. 2. They are totally ignorant of the Fact and were never Educated in the Laws by which they pretend to Judg Marriage 181 3. They Judg by a Chancellour and not in Person 4. They have Plurality of Offices and more than they are able to serve yet will be Judges of Marriage besides ib. 5. They are ambidextrous and amphibious Judges 182 6. They Judg Marriage by pretended Canons and Laws made by Bishops without assent of Parliament ib. 183 7. They take to themselves Fines and Penalties of their own Judgments 184 8. They Licence Dispence and Pardon all Crimes within their pretended Jurisdiction for Money 9. They cannot be known whether Protestants or Papists if Bishops 185 10. They Judg by Fictions and not by Truth 11. They Judg
whole People is to be intended only where the Case is reduced to that necessity that either one or other must be but in this there is no necessity Trial should be by Certificate of a Bishop at all and though uno absurdo dato mille sequuntur were there a Thousand inconveniences followed if the Certificate of a Bishop should be question'd for falsity it being first granted it belongs to him to make Certificates yet there is no necessity that absurdity should be first granted that it should belong to him to make Certificates for there are ways enough wherein no Inconveniences follow of Trial of Truth without Certificates of Bishops 2. The supposition is repugnant and impossible that any Case should happen or be shewn in the World wherein Fiction or Falsity ought to be suffer'd in Judicial proceeding or where Probation ought not by the Law of God to be admitted against such Fiction and Falsity notwithstanding the corrupt practice of Courts to the contrary and such suffering of a private mischief of that kind to a private Person is so far from preventing a publick Inconvenience that it will bring both a private and publick mischief and destroy both for it is as impossible to separate Truth from Justice as the Light from the Sun 3. That which is alledged for an inconvenience to the publick That one Bishop would make a Certificate contrary to another this is no more publick inconvenience than if Thieves should fall out and true men come by their Goods 4. As to what is said That the Certificate of the Bishop is in this Case the highest Trial in the Law we must distinguish the Law for it was then the Law of Popery was Predominant which gave Supremacy in Causes of Marriage Filiation and Succession to the Bishops above Kings and to the Sentences in Bishops Courts and made them above Appeal to the Kings Courts and the Foundation of that their Supremacy was That then by that Law Marriage was a Sacrament and Penance was a Sacrament but the Law being now changed from Popish to Protestant and the Supremacy being now given by the Protestant Law to the King above the Bishop as well in Causes Matrimonial as in all other Ecclesiastical Causes and the Protestant Religion taking away the two Popish Sacraments of Marriage and Penance which were the only Roots whence the Episcopal Jurisdiction of Marriage and the incidents to the same pretended to sprout Cessante Causa ratione legis cessat Lex the pretended Causes of the Jurisdiction ceasing the Jurisdiction it self ceases whereby now the Certificate of the Bishop is so far from being the highest Trial that it ought to be no Trial at all for the Sacraments ceasing the Jurisdiction ceaseth and the Jurisdiction ceasing the Power of Trial ought likewise to cease 5. For Councel to advise his Client to maintain a false Certificate of the Bishops knowing it to be false is as wicked as for the Bishop to make a false Certificate knowing it to be false or which is impossible for him to know to be true as all relating to Filiation are it being their own Rule Filiatio non potest probari except by the Parents wherefore ex Ore Suo they condemn themselves of false Judgment and are not therefore fit to be Judges 11. They Judg by Ceremonies and not by Circumstances As to the word Ceremonia some will have it derived à Cerere because they used divers Formalities in the Worship of the Goddess Ceres But this is not proper seeing all the Heathen Gods and Goddesses had as many Formalities in their Worship as she others derive it from Cerete a Latine Town whither as saith Valerius Maximus the Flamen Quirinalis and the Vestal Virgins fled with their Trinkets while the Gauls besieged Rome others derive it à Cereis from Torches and Tapers lighted made of Wax which amongst the old Pagans was a great Ceremony used in the Temples of their Gods and at their Marriages but this is likewise improper and only figurative to take species famosior pro toto genere and not natural so it appears the Etymology of it is either unknown or it is it self an Original not derived from any Rites which is a word usually joined with Ceremonies and much of the same Signification some will have derived à Ritualibus now the Rituales were old Magical and Superstitious Books of the Hetruscan Priests by help of which they either conjur'd their Gods or made the People believe so and they had all the Formalities written in them which were to be used at making Marriages at laying the Foundations of a City and how Altars Temples and Houses were to be Consecrated and how their Courts of Justice and Counties and Hundreds were to be divided for in all these the old Pagans used to Consult their Augurs Aruspices Bishops and Priests and were like our Books of Ecclesiastical Canons But it seems rather these ritual Books had their names derived from the Rites whereof they were made a written Collection and not the Rites from the Rituals and so Rites as well as Ceremonies may be words which none knows whence they came or whether they will But to come from the Etymology of the word Ceremony to the thing usually signified by it and the difference between a Ceremony and a Circumstance it seems A Ceremony is an Act accessary joined to a Principal not affecting the Principal Act with Good or Evil by the Law of God A Circumstance is an Act accessary joined with a Principal affecting the same Principal Act with Good or Evil by the Law of God Ceremonies are infinite but Circumstances are usually drawn to Seven Heads 1. The Cause of doing the Act which is divided into four kinds The Efficient Final Material Formal and these again subdivided into others 2. The Person by or with whom the Act was done 3. The Place where it was done 4. The Time when it was done 5. The Quantity continued or discrete 6. The Quality which is manifold 7. The Seventh and last Circumstance is the Event of the Act the Civilians expound very improperly and instance whether the Act is done by Fear Force Error Deceit Fault Chance or the like for how can these which are precedent Causes of the Act and therefore ought to be refer'd to the Cirstumstance of the Causes be said to be the Event of an Act which is always subsequent and not precedent to the Principal Act and in that sense is always used by the best Latinists as Cicero in Rhetor. Things are often judged from the Event than which there is nothing more unjust and the Poets agree in the same Careat Successibus opto Quisquis ab Eventu facta notanda putat Eventus Belli incertus wherein it is used for the Fortune and Success following the Battel and not the Fortune or Chance which began or occasion'd it So the Common Law in punishing the Event as the death of any Man within a Day or
in these Articles Bishops presumed to be Legislators Judges and Executioners in their own Case for the Bishops make the Article 36. whereby they Constitute themselves Arch-Bishops and Bishops and Article 32. They Declare it lawful for all men to Marry Article 34. They Ridiculously make Traditions of the Church to be Changeable according to Diversity of Countries Times and mens Manners so before they come to their Ceremonial Law they set up their Legend-Law and the Ceremonies must be Founded on what Legends they please and no man must oppose either Tradition or Legend or Ceremonies set up by Common Authority that is by Authority of the Bishops for the House of Commons never Authorized them Rog. Art 34. Prop. 2. p. 196. Then Article 33. they Order Excommunication Delivery to Satan Penance and Absolution Then to compell the Observation of these Articles Anno 1603. They assume the Legislative Power to make Canons and Constitutions Ecclesiastical without the assent of the House of Commons they Order Saying or Singing of Common-Prayer and the Letany with all the Ceremonies prescribed by the Can. 14 15. Copes Surplices and Hoods to be wom in Cathedrals by Can. 17 27. Marriage not to be without Banns or License Can. 62. None to deliver from Satan without the Bishops License Can. 72. And no Minister to Preach Read Lecture or Catechize without Subscription to the 39. Articles Can. 36 37. And then to make clear work they Order That if any affirm any of the Nine and Thirty Articles made by the Arch-Bishops and Bishops to be in any part Erroneous or such as he may not with a good Conscience Subscribe to let him be Excommunicate Ipso facto which is without Summons or Hearing Can. 5. Can. 9. So unless the Protestant-Minister will Popishly acknowledg the Bishop to be Infallible and without Error and that all his Traditions and Ceremonies of Worship of Marriage and the like Ordained by Episcopal Authority are of Divine Right to oblige the Conscience and that he neither can Teach nor Fast nor Pray though to deliver from the Devil without his License Here is a Test wherein the Bishop assumes to be Legislator Judg an Ipso facto Executioner in his own Cause against a Protestant-Minister and not only prohibited to speak Book of 39. Articles and of Canons oblige not the Subjects to Clergy or Lay. but his Conscience to think against it in his own Defence 3. This Subscription to the 39. Articles ought not to be Imposed as a Test because neither the said Book of Articles nor Book of Canons had the Assent of the House of Commons at the time of their Making without whose Actual and Express Assent no Law or Canon or Article can be made to oblige the Subject which is more fully proved before Whether the Positive part of the Oath of Supremacy is a true Test The Form of the Oath 1. Eliz. 1. is as followeth I A. B. do utterly Testifie and Declare in my Conscience That the Kings Highness is the only Supreme Governor of this Realm and of all other his Highness's Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes as Temporal and that no Foreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preheminence or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm and therefore I do utterly Renounce and Forsake all Foreign Jurisdictions Powers Superiorities and Authorities and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear Faith and true Allegiance to the Kings Highness his Heirs and lawful Successors or Vnited and Annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm So help me God and by the Contents of this Book It being granted that no true Test can be which the Conscience of a Protestant weak or strong ignorant or knowing refuseth or is doubtful to take it is manifest that the positive part is refused by a very considerable part of the People and a greater part are doubtful and take it with Reluctancy yet are they such as cannot be doubted to be sincere Protestants in Religion and most Faithful and Loyal Subjects to the King and their Objections seem to be these 1. The words only Supreme Governor are of so infinite and unlimited an Extent in the Letter that there is necessity of limiting them in the intention which intention being Implicit only and not Express may be made so various by Expositors that the same likewise is infinitely ambiguous and unintelligible and that Pious Queen Elizabeth being at her first Entry to the Kingdom as good as under the Wardships of Bishops could not avoid the Forming of this Oath of Supremacy by them on the first Act and Year of her Reign and to impose the same on the Subjects not for her Benefit but their own though after finding the same so general obscure and wrested by false Interpretations she endeavour'd by a subsequent Declaration published to have explained and limited the same according to her true intention and meaning but the same being not done by Act of Parliament proved not sufficient to relieve many doubtful and wounded Consciences amongst the People of which vide more at large before p. 167 168. 2. The words Supreme Governor include both the Legislative Judicial and Executive Power The words only Supreme exclude Parliaments and the word only excludes literally the Parliament from having any Vote in either whereas the known Law of the Land is That no Law can be Enacted to bind the People without the mutual Assent of the King and their lawful Representative in Parliament and that no Contract of Supreme Government can be made without the Assent of two Parties at least and not one only 3. The words only Supreme Governor in all Spiritual things according to the Letter include the Papal Power of Dispensation with the Law of God of Receiving Confessions of Sins Imposing Penance Excommunication Absolution and Pardon of Sins which are Powers only belonging to God in Person and ought not to be Assumed or Exercised by Angels Saints Daemons or Men. 4. The same words include Supreme Power over the Souls and Consciences of men which is a Power belonging only to God in Person and ought not to be Assumed by Angels Saints Daemons or Men. 5. When all this Supremacy in Spiritual things is congested into an Oath and the Flowers inseparable from the Celestial Crown presumptuously attempted to be torn thence and annexed to a Temporal what is the Design and Effect of it but that the Bishop Robs both God and the King of the Supremacy pretended to both but intended to neither for where will the Bishop permit the Temporal Prince to dispense with the Law of God to Receive Confession of Sins to Impose Penance to Excommunicate to give Absolution and Pardon of Sins but he will command him to desist or what is worse with his Temporal Sword to beat the Bush that the Bishop may catch the Bird or with his
Excommunicato Capiendo and Heretico Comburendo to catch and roast the Bird himself for the Bishop to eat it and of the subtlety of the Bishop as to this matter see more before p. 167 168 169. How little incouragement there is therefore for Protestants to take this Oath of Supremacy wherein the Kings name is only abused and made a Stale to draw a Supreme and Arbitrary Power to Bishops both over the King and them and to drein the Royal Treasury into their own Pockets and how untrue a Test such an Oath must be is humbly submitted to Supreme Authority Supremacy granted by Act of Parliament of Marriage and Legitimation to Canterbury yet Sworn to be in the King 6. By the Statute 25. H. 8.21 Power is granted to the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and his Successors by their Discretions to Grant unto the King his Heirs and Successors all such Licenses Dispensations Compositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies for Causes not contrary to the holy Scriptures and Laws of God as heretofore had been used and accustomed to be held and obtained by his Highness or by any his most Noble Progenitors at the See of Rome and all Children procreated after Marriage by virtue of any such License or Dispensations shall be admitted and reputed Legitimate in all Courts Spiritual and Temporal So this Act of Parliament made in time of Popery translates the Pope from Rome to Canterbury and the Supremacy before used or accustomed by him over the King and his Subjects concerning all the matters mention'd in the Act is placed in the Person of the Arch-Bishop and the Bishops call this a Supremacy in them according to Scripture and the Law of God which is worse and more Papal than to claim it only by Act of Parliament for what more Papal Supremacy can there be than Power to Grant Licenses Dispensations Faculties Compositions Grants Rescripts Delegacies of Marriage Legitimation and all other matters which Popes have formerly granted from Rome to Kings and their Subjects at discretion and this Exceptio is contraria facto for the granting of Licenses by Popes to Kings is contrary to the Law of the Land and is a Power Supreme to the Legislative and Law of the Land so the Grant in the Act is Repugnant to the Exception for 〈◊〉 Licenses or Dispensations are necessary but where there is a standing Law of God or Man to the Licensed or Dispensed with no Composition or Pardon necessary but where there is a standing Law violated or broken no Faculty necessary but where is a standing Law disabling the Party to do what he desires to have a Faâ—ulty for that he may be enabled to do No Rescript is but from a Supreme Prince no Delegacy but from a Superior to an Inferior for the Pope is Superior to his Legate though he be Legatus à Latere and the highest preferment this Popish Act of Parliament allows the King is to be the Arch-Bishop's Legate then the Act having made him Supreme to the Legislative Law and King gives him as high Supremacy over the Judicial Power in all Courts as well Spiritual as Temporal which is Supremacy over the Parliament which is a Court-Temporal This Act therefore doth set up more than Prelacy or Arch-Prelacy at Canterbury for that was there before and the Gyants had piled up Pelion on Ossa already and now they steeple it with Olympus and if they set not on the Gyants head the Triple Crown 't is sure they have the Triple Miter three stories high of Prelacy Arch-Prelacy and Supremacy When the Arch-Bishop got therefore of the Parliament this Act he was something like the Carpenter who begg'd of the Wood only one Helve long enough to turn his Hatchet into an Ax and when he had got that he cut down the whole Wood for he having now got so long a Helve to his Spiritual Hatchet as Supremacy over the Marriage not only of the old Palm Trees and Legitimations of the young at his Discretion that is to say if they give him whatsoever Money he asks for Dispensation and Legitimation this gives him likewise Power to strike both at Root and Branch of all the Royal Protestant-Cedars themselves in the Popish Points of Ceremonial Marriage and Legitimation endeavour'd now to be brought to the true Test of a more Supreme Law and Judg than his the Moral Law of God himself How therefore the Protestant can safely Swear in Conscience the Supremacy to be only in the King when so great a share of it is granted to the Arch-Bishop by the King and Parliament until the same Act of Parliament of 25. H. 8.21 by which 't is done is Repealed I confess my Ignorance and if it be without cause crave Pardon 7. The Party who is to Swear who is the only Supreme Governour must be intended to Swear either who is Supreme De Facto or De Jure if De Facto who hath the Actual Power of the Sword it may happen to be in a time of War when two Armies are in the Field and Inter utrumque Volat Dubiis Victoria pennis It is necessary at such a time that the Swearer unless he will Forswear himself be a Prophet of whom there are not many in this Age amongst such as take the Oath of Supremacy if it be said the Swearer ought to Swear De Jure who hath Right to be only Supreme Governor to this is Answer'd 1. Unless he can Swear to the matter in Fact he cannot Swear to the matter of Law or Right for Ex facio jus Oritur all matter of Law must arise from the matter of Fact therefore the Fact must be first known before the Right can be known which is to be deduced from it 2. The Right when the Oath is required may be as to Succession of the Crown wherein the matter of Fact depending only on Genealogies the Heralds themselves especially after Wars may not be able to make any clear probation of the Descents as Ezra 2.62 and Nehem. 7.64 it is said These sought their Register among those that were reckoned by Genealogie but it was not found therefore were they as Polluted put from the Priest-hood If therefore the Genealogies of Priests who wore themselves the Registers and kept their own Descents as curiously as was possible may be lost much easier may those of the Lay and the Law and Divinity may likewise be so doubtful that it is justly acknowledged by the King and Parliament themselves 25. H. 8.22 That Ambiguities and Doubts touching the Successions of the Crown have been Causes of much Trouble and no perfect and substantial Law hath been made for Remedy of the same and accordingly at the Death of Queen Elizabeth there were no less than Sixteen titles endeavour'd to have been set on foot to the Succession partly by Papists to overthrow the Protestant-Religion partly by others to overthrow the Union between the two Kingdoms in the Person of King James in which the Protestants of
of Wine and prayes over it and offers it to the married Couple to tast but the Bridegroom dashes it against the Wall in memory of the destruction of Jerusalem so the Bridegroom in sign of sorrow puts on a black Cloak and the Bride a black Hood Mr. Addison tells of the Barbary Jews That they are married at the Bride's Chamber only by putting a Ring on the Woman's finger and pronunciation of these words by the Rabbi Thou art Married or Sanctified unto this Man with this Ring according to the Law And when married they use a foolish Ceremony if the Bride is a Virgin they give her Wine in a narrow-mouth'd Cup if a Widow in a broad mouth'd Cup and after the Bridegroom casts a raw Egg at the Bride c. And how the fopperies of such Ceremonies come by God's Law to make a marriage or no marriage or legitimate or illegitimate the Child no rational Man ever understood Plurality of Wives As to the determination of number of Wives by Nature it seems to be according to the number she her self gives As in the East and Southern climes the Feminine number naturall exceeding the Males many fold And in times of great destructions by Wars such as are foretold Isa 3.25 Thy men shall fall by the sword and thy mighty in War and her Gates shall lament and mourn and being desolate shall sit upon the ground And in that day seven Women shall take hold on one Man In the Kingdom of Benym amongst the Negro's the King hath five or six hundred Wives and his Subjects keep 20 30 40 50. 60. according to their ability and the poorest sort five or six and some a Dozen Hierotinus an Arabian King had six hundred Children by Concubines so it seems excessive multiplication may be one reason against Plurality It was a Law amongst the Garamants That when any Woman married had three Children she should be separated from her Husband because a multitude of Children cause Men to have covetous hearts and if any Woman bring forth more Children they shall be slain before their Eyes Aristotle in his Politiques thinks it profitable That Plebeians should not have too many Children and therefore allows Divorce lest the Wives should bear too many Connubia mille non illis generis nexus non pignora curae sed numero languet pietas Claud. de Bell. Gild. Amongst the Medes antiently Polygamy was so far from being esteemed a fault that it was a punishment for a common Person not to have seven Wives and for Noble Women to have less then five Husbands Heylin 814. Of the custom of the Jews to keep one barren Wife and another to breed One Barren and another Breeding Wife Selden de Jur. natur lib. 5. pag. 586. translates out of a Jewish Rabbi these words Sub diluvium hominum mos erat ut pro libitu binas sibi duceret quisque uxores alteram prolis gratia alteram in Concubitum ea autem quae prolis gratia haberetur velut vidua quamdiu superstes esset degebat sed ea quae in Concubitum adhiberetur sterilitatis exhaurire solebat Poculum ut sterilis redderetur atque juxta virum accumbere solita velut meretricio ornabatur habitu And in another place ornata etiam velut nova nupta lautiores comedebat dapes acerbius autem durius tractabatur socia lugebat vidua To which alludes Job 24.2 as 't is in the Hebrew he fed the Barren which brings not forth but did no good to the Widow Moses saith Cursed be he that lieth with his Sister Incest the Daughter of his Father or the Daughter of his Mother Deut. 27.22 Yet Abraham allowed it in his time and married Sarah And Amram took him Jochebed his Father's Sister to Wife and she bare him Aaron and Moses and the years of the life of Amram were an hundred and thirty and seven years Exod. 6.20 Aretas King of Arabia Petraea and Herod fell at strife the one with the other for this cause which ensueth Herod the Tetrarch had married Aretas his Daughter with whom he lived married a long time afterwards taking his Journey towards Rome he lodged with Herod his half Brother by the Father's side for Herod was the Son of Simon 's Daughter which Simon was the High Priest and there being surprized with the love of Herodias his Brother's Wife who was Daughter to Aristobulus their Brother and Sister to the great Agrippa he was so bold as to offer her some speech of marriage which when she had accepted Accords were made between them That he should banish his Wife Aretas far from him who complaining to her Father the Arabian King of the injury done her by her Husband Herod the same raised War between him and Herod Josep lib. 18. cap. 7. de Antiq. And Aretas overt rowing Herod's Army divers Jews were of opinion That this Judgment fell upon him because he had cut off John's head by the instigation of Herodias ibid. But as for this opinion divers believe that it hath been foisted into Josephus vid. Blâ—ndell Hist Sybill But as to the Point in question of Incest 't is very clear That John justly reproved Herod for marrying his Brother's Wife whether there was a Judgment followed on it or not But it cannot be infer'd that the cause why he reproved it or why the War followed on him was Incest but the cause thereof is more likely to be because he so wrongfully Divorced his first lawful Wife and likewise caused his Brother's Wife to be Divorced from him while his Brother was alive and Tetrarch of Galilee that he might have her from him So here was a double Divorce matter enough to reprove without minding any Incest which agreed likewise with the Doctrine of Christ and 't is manifest that was the only cause of the War and not any pretence of Incest for Aretas would have raised the War alike if the wrong had been done his Daughter by a strange Woman as if it had been by a Kinswoman Therefore no Argument can be brought that St. John's opinion was this was Incest nor that any Judgment happen'd for Incest but rather for unlawful Divorces so the marrying the Brother's Wife to raise up Seed to the Brother seems a custom tolerated for hardness of their hearts and not to be imitated by Christians Tryal of Virginity more wicked then the Bill of Divorce for this was after the Husband had lain with her Tryal of Virginity and perhaps likewise he might have got her with child Deut. 22.13 It is said If any man take a Wife and go in unto her and hate her and give occasion of speech against her and say I took this Woman and when I came to her I found her not a Maid Then shall the Father of the Damsel and her Mother take and bring forth the Tokens of the Damsel's Virginity unto the Elders of the City in the Gate and the Damsel's Father shall say
not to be objected against us because we are not subject to Foraign Laws Again that custom or use of Civil or Canon-Laws or Precedents doth not make Civil or Canon-Law the Law of England appears by the use of Sentences of Philosophers and Poets and Precedents of Historians all as much used in Courts of Records of Courts of Judicature as the Civil or Canon-Law yet doth not this use or custom make these Sentences of Philosophy and Poets and the like to be the Law of England or obligatory to the People of England unless such Sentences of Philosophers and Poets are selected from the rest and inacted or confirmed by Act of Parliament to be hereafter the Laws of England And they are so far otherwise from being Laws of England that Cardinal Woolsey Mich. 21. H. 8. Coram Rege was Indicted That he intended Antiquissimas Angliae Leges penitus subvertere enervare universumque hoc Regnum Angliae ejusdem Regni populum Legibus imperialibus vulgo dictis Legibus Civilibus earundem Legum Canonibus in perpetuum subjugare subducere c Let any shew a sensible reason why the Bishops and Ecclesiastical Judges who actually bring in the whole heap of Civil and Canon Laws to judge of the Marriages Filiation and Succession of the Subjects and amongst them the new coin'd Law at the Council of Trent made when Forein Jurisdiction was abolish'd and thereby actually deprive him of that invaluable liberty to which every Native Subject is born and is confirmed to him by so many Acts of Parliament And those great Fundamental Acts Magna Charta and the Petition of Right to have his Birth-right tried per legale judicium parium deserve not as high a censure by Parliament as Cardinal Woolsey had who only intended to do the same And if any hath any mind to consult besides the Laws and Precedents against Forein Laws and Precedents Bod. lib. 1. of a Common-wealth fo 107 108. will give him some satisfaction Forein Laws become not the Laws of this Land by being used by Lawyers where he saith It was in most strong Terms judged by a Decree in the Court of Paris in the Case of Philip the Second the French King That be was not bound unto the customs of the Civil Law at such time as they who were next kindred would have redeemed of him the Countrey of Guyens howbeit that many both think and write the Prince to be bound to that Law for that they think that Law to be Common to all Nations and not Common to any City And yet than the which Law the Romans themselves in some Cases thought nothing more unreasonable But our Ancestors would not have even our Subjects bound to the Roman Laws as we see in the Ancient Records that Philip the Fair erecting the Parliament of Paris and Mompelier declared That they should not be bound unto the Roman Laws And in the erection of Universities the Kings have always declared That their purpose was to have the Civil and Canon Laws in them publickly professed and taught to make use thereof at their discretion but not that the Subjects should be any way bound thereto lest they should seem to derogate from the Laws of their own Countrey by advancing the Laws of strangers And for the same cause Alaricus King of the Goths forbad upon pain of death any Man to alledge the Roman Laws contrary to his Decrees and Ordinances which M. Charles du Moulin my Companion and Ornament of all Lawyers mistaking is therefore with him very angry and in reproach calleth him therefore barbarous howbeit that nothing was therein by Alaricus decreed or done but that which every wise Prince would of good right have decreed and done For Subjects will so long both remember and hope for the Government of Strangers as they are Govern'd by their Laws The like Edict there is of King Charles the Fair and an old Decree of the Court of Paris whereby we are expresly forbidden to alledge the Laws of the Romans against the Laws and Customs of our Ancestors Yea the King of Spain also hath upon Capital pain forbidden any Man to alledge the Roman Laws in confirmation of their own Laws as Oldrad writeth And albeit there was nothing in the Laws and Customs of their Country which differ'd from the Roman Laws yet such is the force of that Edict that all men may understand that the Judges in deciding of the Subjects Causes were not bound unto the Roman Laws And therefore much less the Prince himself who thought it a thing dangerous to have his Subjects bound unto strange Laws And worthy he is to be accounted a Traitor that dares to oppose strange Laws and strange Decrees against the Laws of his own Prince In which doings when the Spaniards did too much offend Stephen King of Spain forbad the Roman Laws to be at all taught in Spain as Polycrates writeth Which was more straightly provided for by King Alphonsus the Tenth who commanded the Magistrates and Judges to come unto the Prince himself and as often as there was nothing written in the Laws of their Country concerning the matter in Question Wherein Baldus is mistaken when he writeth the Italians to be bound to the Roman Laws but the French no otherwise than so far as they should seem unto them to agree with Equity and Reason For the one is as little bound as the other howbeit that Italy Spain the Countries of Province Savoy Languedoc and Lyonnois use the Roman Laws more then other People And that Frederick Barbarossa the Emperour caused the Books of the Roman Laws to be published and taught the greatest part whereof have yet no place in Italy and much less in Germany But there is much difference betwixt a Right and a Law for a Right still without command respecteth nothing but that which is good and upright but a Law importeth a Commandment for the Law is nothing else but the Commandment of a Soveraign using of his Soveraign Power Wherefore then as a Soveraign is not bound unto the Laws of the Greeks nor of any other stranger whatsoever he be no more is he bound unto the Roman Laws more then that they are conformable unto the Law of Nature which is the Law whereunto saith Pindarus all Kings and Princes are subject From which we are not to except either the Pope or the Emperour as some pernicious Flaterers do saying That those two viz. the Pope and the Emperour may of Right without cause take unto themselves the Goods of their Subjects Object 5 Forein Laws cannot be baptized with the name of the King's Laws without act of Parliament As to what is mention'd of baptizing Forein Ecclesiastical Laws by the name of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of England he seems still to mistake and puts baptizing by the name where it should have been confirmation by the name and that confirmation too to be given not by the Bishops but the
and Earth and all the good Angels his faithful Ministers to assist me in the defence of the faithful obedience to the Law of the Gospel and of his Church Assist me O Christ assist me O Jesu assist me O Holy Spirit Ed. Kelly It appeareth written on a White Crucifix My Grace is greater then the Commandment for my Grace is such that Mad-men shall attain Blessedness Verily I say unto you If I command a man to kill his Brother and he doth it not he is the Child of Sin and Death c. Dr. d ee Hereupon we were in great amazement and greif of mind that so impure a Doctrine should proceed from such as I from the beginning and hitherto had judged and undoubtedly esteemed good Angels and had unto Edward Kelly offer'd my Soul as a pawn to indemnifie Edward Kellys crediting of them as the good and faithful Ministers of Almighty God But now my heart was sore afflicted on many causes and Mr. Edward Kelly had as he now thought he had a just cause of leaving dealing with them any more and his Prayer to God had been as he said of a long time that he might have power to do it Afterward I made some Declaration to our Wives of this our great greif by reason of the Command laid upon us to use Matrimonial Acts between us four in common which thing was strange to the Women and they hoped of some more comfortable issue of the matter and so for that time I left off After Edward Kelly had been four hours in seeing new Apparitions giving him admonition to receive the same Doctrine with threatning of Judgment upon us if we should not and many other things told me We departed each to Bed where I found my Wife awake attending to hear some new matter of me And we being alone I then told her and said Jane I see there is no other remedy but as hath been said of our cross Matching so it must needs be done Thereupon she fell a weeping and trembling for a quarter of an hour and I pacified her as well as I could and so in the fear of God and beleiving of his Admonishments did persuade her that she shewed her self prettily resolved to be content for God's sake and his secret purposes to obey the Heavenly admonishment But Edward Kelly who had divers other Apparitions made to him in his own Chamber remained notwithstanding in his purpose of forsaking and utterly discrediting these Creatures A Spirit calling himself Raphael the Arch-Angel there speaketh to them who were not satisfied with the Testimony of Madimi Raphael Dear is thy Wife more dear is Wisdom and most dear ought I to be unto thee Thou being Elected tremblest and by doubting sinnest all these things are lawful unto you I admonish you as the Children of God to consider your Vocation and the love of God towards you and not to prefer your Wisdom before the Wisdom of the Highest whose Mercy is so great towards you Consider that if he find you obstinate the Plâ—gues of hainous Sinners and the contemners of the gifts of God shall fall upon you Therefore shew your selves lovers of him that hath led you and cover'd you with a mighty Sheild or shortly look for the reward of those who contemn the Wisdom and Majesty of the Highest I Raphael counsel you to make a Covenant with the Highest and to esteem his Wing more then your lives After some little discouse and conference there they went to Bed April 20th 1587. April 21th 1587. John Dee Edward Kelly Jane d ee and Jane Kelly promise to God though above their Carnal reason in Abraham-like faith and obedience to subscribe a Covenant to him to have one another in common April 22th 1587. Edward Kelly having on further consideration a new reluctancy concerning this promiscuous Matrimony makes a Declaration in writing that he would from that forward no farther meddle therein April 24th There are further Prayers made to God desiring a further manifestation of his pleasure concerning this new Doctrine so contrary to the Laws formerly promulgated by him A great flame of Fire appeareth in the principal stone standing on the Table before Edward Kelly and behold one suddenly seemeth to come into the South Window of the Chappel right against Edward Kelly but before that the stone was heaved up an handful high and set down again well which thing Edward Kelly did think signified some strange matter toward Then after the man who came in at the Window seem'd to have his nether parts in a Cloud and with spread abroad Arms to come towards Edward Kelly at which sight he shrunk back somewhat and then that Creature took up between both his hands the principal stone and frame of Gold and mounted up away as he came Edward Kelly catch'd at it but could not touch it at which thing so taken and carried away and at the sight thereof Edward Kelly was in great fear and trembling but Dr. Dee was glad and well pleased A Fire next appears in the lesser stone left behind on the Table and a man in the fire with flaxen hair hanging down on him being naked to the Paps with spots of blood upon him and in the shape of Christ Christ If I had intended to have overthrown you or brought you to confusion or suffered you to be led into temptation beyond your strength and power then had the Seas long since swallowed you yea there had not a Soul lived amongst you But the Law and tidings of Gladness in Mankind are both grounded in me I am the beginning and the end behold I was even my self the figure of Misery and Death for your Sins why therefore disdain you to be figured after me And as I have made you the figure of two People to come so have I likewise sanctified you in an holy Ordinance giving you the first-fruits of the time to come contrary to my self I teach you nothing for this Commandment is not to be given to Mortal men but is given to you to manifest your Faith I I am the first and the last and I will be Shepherd overall that the Kingdom of my Father may come and that my Spirit may be on all flesh where there shall be no Law nor need of light for I my self will be their light for ever I am Holy and Holiness it self and out of me cometh no unclean thing and if there be any of you that seeketh a Miracle at my hands and beleiveth in my words let him or her present themselves here next Monday and he shall perceive that I was the Judg of Abiram and the God of Abraham May 3d. being Sunday 1587. Stylo Novo A Covenant with God is drawn into form that according to his new Commandment they will by Abraham-like-faith and obedience use Matrimonial Acts with one another in common and was subscribed by John Dee Edward Kelly Jane Dee and Joan Kelly at Trebon-Castle The Covenant being thus formed written
the colour and pretence of a former Contract made with another the which Contract divers times was but very slenderly proved and often but surmised by the malice of the party who desired to be dissolved from the Marriage which they liked not and to be coupled with another There was an Act made That all and every such Marriages as within the Church of England should be Contracted and Solemnized in the face of the Church and Consummate with Bodily knowledge or fruit of Children or Child being had between the parties so married should be by Authority of the said Parliament Deémed Iudged and taken to be Lawful Good Iust and Indissolvable notwithstanding any pre-contract or pre-contracts of Matrimony not Consummate with Bodily knowledge which either of the Persons so married or both had made with any other Person or Persons before the time of Contracting of that Marriage which is Solemnized or Consummated or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as by the same Act more plainly may appear Since the time of which Act. although the same was Godly meant the unruliness of Men hath ungodlily abused the same and divers inconveniences intolerable in manner to Christian Ears and Eyes followed thereupon Women and Men breaking their own promises and faiths made by the one unto the other so set upon sensuality and pleasure that if after the Contract of Matrimony they might have whom they more favoured and desired they could be contented by lightness of their nature to over-turn all that they had done afore and not afraid in manner even from the very Church-door and Marriage Feast the Man to take another Spouse and the Spouse to take another Husband more for Bodily lust and carnal knowledge then for surety of faith truth or having God in their good remembrance contemning many times also the Commandment of the Ecclesiastical Iudge forbidding the parties having made the Contract to attempt or do any thing in prejudice of the same Be it therefore Enacted by the King's Highness The Lords Spiritual Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled That as concerning pre-contracts the said former Statute shall from the first day of May next coming cease be repealed and of no force or effect and be reduced to the estate and order of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm which immediately before the making of the said Statute in this case were used in this Realm So that from the said first day of May when any cause or contract of Marriage is pretended to have beén made it shall be lawful to the King 's Ecclesiastical Iudge of that place to hear and examine the said Cause And having the said Contract sufficiently and lawfully proved before him to give sentence for Matrimony commanding Solemnization Co-habitation Consummation and Tractation as it becometh Man and Wife to have with inflicting all such pains upon the disobedients and disturbers thereof as in times past before the said Statute the King 's Ecclesiastical Iudges by the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws ought and might have done if the said Statute had never been made Any Clause Article or Sentence in the said Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Of the Law making private Marriage or carnal knowledge between persons not prohibited by the Law of God to marry Fornication Private Marriage or carnal knowledge is of two sorts the one without publick Witness the other without any Witness at all and both by the Popish Laws because if permitted they would spoil their gains are prohibited and called clandestine Marriages The publick Witnesses are the Priest or Magistrate private Witnesses are any other Marriage without Witness nor clandestine not appointed by Law The Law of England makes all private Marriage and carnal knowledge without publick Witness Fornication The Law of Scotland in some cases relieves though there be a defect and no publick Witness of the Marriage by the Priest as appears in the before cited Author Craig Feud 269. If there appear private Witnesses of Men or Instruments but in all cases likewise where there are neither publick or private Witnesses they leave it to be Fornication That which I here affirm against both is Marriage without Witness not Fornication 1. That carnal knowledge between parties not prohibited by the Law of God to marry is not Fornication nor any other Crime though in the highest secrecy and without any Testimony of Men or Instruments whatsoever 2. That privacy of Marriage being not prohibited nor publication commanded by God all parties ought to have liberty of Conscience to use the one or the other according as suits best with their occasions As to the first there are these reasons That private Marriage without Witness is not Fornication nor any other Crime 1. There is no Law of God prohibiting private Marriage without Witness Where there is therefore no Law there is no transgression Rom. 4.15 2. It is before shewen That for any human Law to prohibit Marriage or Meat where not prohibited by the Law of God the same came from the Devil 1 Tim. cap. 4. v. 1 2 3. And that therefore the Law of the Pope and Council of Trent which nulls all Marriages except made before a Priest in a Temple and two Witnesses came from the Devil and the Priests of Priapus and Venus for filthy lucre to the Priests 3. Isa 45.7 It is said I create evil And Isa 5.20 It is said Wo unto them that call good evil and evil good That put darkness for light and light for darkness Here is therefore a curse pronounced against those who if God created not marriage without Witnesses evil of their own heads call it evil and where God created it to be in darkness and natural modesty of their own heads will have it by Torch-light and the whole Parish of Witnesses 4. All Fornication is Polyandry and Confusio seminum whereby the Child cannot know the Father nor the Father the Child but here is no such thing it is impossible therefore to be Fornication Liberty Conscience to marry with or without Witnesses As to the second Point which I am to maintain That privacy of Marriage without Witnesses being not prohibited by the Law of God nor publication commanded by the same no human power ought to presume to prohibit what Marriage God hath not prohibited but all persons ought to be left liberty of Conscience to marry publickly or privately with or without Witnesses as it suits best with their conveniences and occasions as is the use and practice in all other civil Contracts which men do with or without Witnesses as they think best and were never accused of sin if they had no Witnesses whereon to bring their Action only that Party is justly charged with sin who wilfully breaks his Contracts because there are no Witnesses but God to prove it against him Against these Positions I shall first answer the Objections and then shew further Reasons to confirm the same
Part. Fol. 584. saith And here is to be observed how the Statute of 35. E. 1. hath been dealt with since the 17th of E. 3. for in an Act that Year a branch of the Statute of 35. E. 1. was recited That forbad any thing should be attempted or brought into the Realm which should tend to blemish the King's Prerogative or in prejudice of his Lords and Commons which is now wholy omitted and Fol. 585. he saith Note in the Roll of Parliament of the Statute of 38. E. 3. Cap. 1. of Provisors there are more sharp and biting words against the Pope then in Print a Mystery often in use but not to be known of all men from which examples it is manifest that this came by the Fraud of the Bishops who before Printing were Masters of the Authentick Copies of the Laws appointed for promulgation and since Printing are Masters of the Press to interdict and publish what they will Accipe nunc horum insidias Crimine ab uno Disce omnes These few Frauds are discover'd in Print against the Interdictors of Printers which discovery they would likewise have interdicted if they had been able for these latter Books of my Lord Coke were prohibited to be Printed and got out in the late time of Troubles but by these it is clear which were only spoken obiter and without any inquisition after them that all they are guilty of are not discover'd and that to give either Spiritual or Temporal Judges Power to interdict the Press is to give them Power to have what Law what Gospel what Text what Translation what Canonical what Apocryphal what Scripture what Act of Parliament what Common Law what Statute what Religion what Justice what Liberty and what Slavery they please Besides which Power of Fraud and Forgery destructive to all Truth these further mischeifs follow all interdictions of the Press but I shall first answer such Objections as are made against the Liberty of it Object 1 First If Liberty of the Press should be permitted Enemies would have it equal with Friends Papists with Protestants Hereticks with Orthodox Secondly They would Print Blasphemy Idolatry Treason Rebellion Vncleanness Calumny Reviling Derision and all manner of Heresie Answ 1 To the First is answer'd 1. That it is impossible to exclude Enemies and Papists from Printing they being possess'd of so many Transmarine Presses whence they can with far greater advantage vent their matters then from any Presses in England 2. Admit they could be excluded yet in prudence they ought not but are more necessary to be admitted then Friends for those whom we use to call Friends are pessimum inimicorum genus Adulantes the worst kind of Enemies Flatterers who flatter and sooth us up in our Vices and destroy us but any truth of our Faults we shall never hear but from Enemies Plutarch therefore calls an Enemy a School-Master which costs us nothing 2. As to the matters of Blasphemy Idolatry or Uncleanness neither Enemy or Friend will so far dishonour themselves or their Cause as to Print them openly for it is against their interest As to Treason or Rebellion who that hath an Enemy doth not desire to know before-hand wherein the strength of his Cause as well as of his Forces lies and to have the War Proclaimed in Print before it begin that he may the better provide against Besides if there were but a Law made that nothing shall be printed without the names of the Author and Printer with their Additions and Designations And that all Crimes against the publick committed by Printing should be punished by Indictment according to Law and all injuries to private persons should be reparable by the parties injured on their Actions according to Damage Who would dare make himself guilty of a publick Crime or private Injury in Print to which he had set his name 3. As to matters of Heresie such as by accident become dangerous to public safety the prudence of the Legislators may where they find cause prohibit them both Press and Pulpit but not in the Thoughts and Consciences of Men As in the end of the Wars of Germany between the Lutherans and Catholicks it was Enacted mutually on both sides on pain of death That no Catholick should Preach against the Lutheran Doctrine or Lutheran against the Catholick but both should enjoy the liberty of their own Consciences to themselves This agreement was here made otherwise those bloody Wars would never have ended without a total destruction of one of the Parties And likewise such a Law were here much more necessary between dissentient Protestants who were Brethren then it was between the Lutherans and Catholicks who were mortal Enemies That no dissentient Protestant should Print or Preach publickly on any point of Ceremonial dissentiency or other matter not necessary to Salvation except in such matters as are particularly allowed by Supream Authority to exclude Popery there being Field-room enough in the Moral Law of God to exercise gifts in Preaching and matters which have the promise of this life and of that to come and no cause for any to complain who have liberty likewise of Conscience to use what Protestant Ceremonies and Form of Worship they will to themselves though they have not power to compel the Consciences of others who are dissentients But if Protestants are tolerated to Print or Preach against one another this is the thing the Papist would have and knows will in the end make them both a prey to himself But though Protestants ought not to preach one against another yet the juncture of Affairs being not at present in great Britain as before mention'd in Germany and an appearance of War Plotted by the Papist rather to begin than end with the Protestant the Bishops ought not to be suffer'd to interdict either Press or Pulpit to the Protestants against them To come at length to the further mischiefs insuing the Interdiction of the Press any Interdiction of the Press except in Cases before mention'd either to Friend or Enemy is a dishonour to the Protestant Religion as if it dared not suffer it self to be disputed or to meet an Enemy in the open field whereas in truth it is not Protestancy but Episcopacy 'T is not the Moral Law which is the Protestant Law but the Ceremonial which is the Popish Law which dares not encounter the shock of an Enemy And 't is Fiction and not Truth Vice and not Vertue which fears either Press or Pasquil 2. The Foreign Presses being impossible to be interdicted to the Papist if the English are interdicted to the Protestant he is thereby silenced and prohibited to answer the Papist let him preach what he pleaseth 3. By Interdiction the profit of the English Protestant Print-houses will be transported to Foreign Papists which will be a great discouragement to so necessary a Trade in England and prejudice to the Protestant Religion and Policy 4. The Interdiction of the Press will multiply the greater evil
there is no such Miracle ensues from Episcopal Unction or Consecration neither do they shew any sign of Mission to Anoint as Samuel did but every man that is born hath a sign of Mission from God to Contract with that Prince under the protection of whose Sword he happens to be born to yield him Subjection for Protection and to concur with the whole Body of the other Subjects to present him with a Symbol or sign of the same with a Crown or Oil as here the men of Israel and Judah do to David 2. David anointed by his Parliament That the Anointing which gave David the Investiture of the Kingdoms was made by the Representative of the People in Parliament and not by the Priest for it is said That all the Tribes and all Israel and all the Elders which were a Senate or Parliament to treat for the People and make a League and Covenant with the King for it was impossible for him otherwise to treat with so great a multitude as all Israel had they not agreed to Elect a fit Representative for them therefore it is said The Elders anointed David and no mention made of the Priest neither had the Priest any Law of Moses to anoint Kings 3. That as there was no Crown sent David from Heaven for his Coronation whereby Pontifical men might pretend to have the disposing so there was no Oil sent thence for â—is Anointing but he received both from the People And surely the Mission of the Oil of Rhemes thence is as great a Fable as of the Crown of Nimrod or of the Image which fell from Jupiter neither did there need any Consecration of either for by the Customs of most Nations Crowns and Unctions were but civil Ceremonies of Honour given to the Parties which received them not only in Elections of Kings but almost in all other Solemnities as Military Triumphs Olympick and other Games yea even in their ordinary Feasts both of Aegyptians Greeks and Romans Habent Vnctae mollia serta Comae Ovid. Which shews both Crowning and Anointing of their Guests with Garlands or Crowns of Flowers and Unction with Oil of the Olive both which materials though more properly made by God than Crowns of Gold and Oils confected and Consecrated yet were esteemed but as civil Ceremonies and were a ministred by Lay-hands without a Priest And of this civil Festival Honour of Anointing used amongst the Jews as well as other Nations Christ is pleased to take notice Luke 7.36 My Head with Oil thou didst not anoint but this Woman hath anointed my Feet with Ointment And though both Coronation and Unction were but civil Ceremonies and of humane Institution where no Miracle testified a Divine yet is David called God's Anointed more truly than if he had been anointed by the Priest seeing God gave the Priest no Mission but yet himself turned the Hearts of the People by the civil signs of Coronation and Unction to acknowledg David for their Sovereign for which he himself giveth thanks and saith Psal 18.47 God subdueth the People under me 4. That David doth not make a League and Covenant with the High Priest but with his Parliament who were the Convention of Elders who anointed him 5. That though there had been long Civil Wars between Judah who followed David and Israel who followed Isbosheth the Son of Saul and Abner his General was dead and Isbosheth was dead and there remained with him Victorious and Veteran Armies yet neither Judah nor Israel anointed him till he had first made with them a League and Covenant 6. From hence may be discover'd the great Mystery of Iniquity whereby Popes have terrified Emperors and Kings as their Vassals to receive Crowns and Unctions from them which hath been only by persuading That none but Bishops could Crown or Anoint them the manifold mischiefs of which to Princes and People are too long here to be recited only whosoever will consider them will find it clear That Bishops who have pretended or may pretend to so dangerous a Tâ—nent as That none but they have Right to make Coronations and Unctions are no fit Judges of Successions to Crowns They assume in the Judgment of all matters concerning Marririage Filiation Aliment and Succession to be above Appeal to the Kings Courts It hath been already shewn that Bishops by assuming a Power Jure Divino without shewing a sign of Mission and by false translating Scripture and by corrupting and interdicting the Press exercise a Power superior or equal to the Legislative from which doth follow That such as are Legislators or assume or exercise such Power ought not to be Judges Delegate 1. Because Legislation Supream and Judgment Delegate are two distinct Offices and ought not to be confounded 2. Because it is Repugnant that a Legislator should be a Delegate to himself for in Presentia Majoris cessat potestas Minoris the lesser Power is lost in the greater 3. If wrong Judgment happen to be given there can be no appeal but to those who did the Wrong whereby they become Judges and Parties and Judg in their own Case 4 A Power Delegate to Judg without Appeal ceases to be a Delegate Power and is greater than the Legislative which Power that it is assumed by the Bishops in all Matrimonial Causes is the thing next to be shewn Of the abominable Judgment passed by the Common Law Judges in Kennes Case Coke lib. 7.42 whereby they gave away the Supremacy of the King's Courts to the Bishop and made them in all Causes Matrimonial subject to no Appeal Mich. 4. Jac. In the Court of Wards between Thomas Robertson and Elizabeth his Wife Plaintiff and Florence Lady Stallenge Defendant The Case was This Christopher Kenne Esq was seized of the Mannor of Kenne in the County of Sommerset holden by Knights Service in Capite and 37. H. 8. de facto married Elizabeth Stowell and had Issue Martha the Mother of Elizabeth one of the now Plaintiffs and after 1. 2. Ph. Mar. in the Court of Audience between the said Christopher Kenne Plaintiff and Elizabeth Stewell Defendant the Judg there gave a Sentence in these words Pretens ' tractat ' contract ' sponsalia Matrimonium quin verius Effigiem matrimonij inter Christopherum Kenne Elizabeth Stowell in Minore sua impubertatis aetate eorundem aut eorum alterius de fact ' habit ' contract ' celebrat ' fuisse esse eosdemque Christopherum Eliz. tam tempore contractus Solemnizationis dict' pretens ' matrimonij quam etiam continuo postea idem matrimonio pretens ' Solemnizationi ejusdem dissensisse contravenisse Reclamasse Reluctasse ac eo praetextu hujusmodi Pretens ' tractat ' sponsalia matrimonium de jure nullum nulla irritum irrita cassum cassa invalidum invalida minus efficax inefficacia fuisse esse viribusque juris caruisse carere carere debere Nec non Antedictos Christopherum Kenne
Eliz Stowell quatenus de factor fuerunt ad invicem matrimonio ut predicitur copulat ' ab invicem Separand ' divorciand ' fore debere pronunciamus decernimus declaramus Eosque Separamus Divorciamus eisdemque Christopher ' Eliz. licentiam Libertatem ad alia vota convolanda concedimus tribuimus impertimur per hanc Sententiam nostram definitivam sive hoc finale nostrum decretum quam sive quod ferimus promulgamus in hiis Scriptis c. And after the Divorce the said Christopher Kenne Espous'd and took to Wife Elizabeth Beckwith And after Anno 5th Eliz. before certain Commissioners Ecclesiastical the said Elizabeth Beckwith Libelled against the said Christopher Kenne That before the Marriage between them contracted he had Married with Elizabeth Stowell on which process was awarded against Elizabeth Stowell pro interesse And upon due examination of the Cause it was Sentenced That the Marriage between the said Christopher Kenne and Elizabeth Beckwith was lawful and Sentenced them ad Exequenda Conjugalta obsequia c. And that the said Christopher Kenne was never lawfully Espoused unto the said Elizabeth Stowell and after the said Elizabeth Beckwith died after whose death the said Christopher took to Wife the said Florence by whom he had Issue one Daughter and called Elizabeth and died And Anno 36th Eliz. it was found by Office in the County of Sommerset by Force of a Mandamus after the death of the said Christopher Kenne that the said Elizabeth Kenne was his Daughter and Heir who was within Age Viz. of the Age of Ten Months The Queen granted her Wardship to Sir Nicholas Stallenge and the said Florence then his Wife on which the said Martha alledged her self to be Daughter and Heir to the said Christopher Kenne and with her Husband Silvester Williams Exhibited their Bill in the Court of Wards against the said Sir Nicholas and Florence alledging That the said Martha was Daughter and Heir of the Body of the said Elizabeth Stowell his lawful Wife and that they the said Christopher and Elizabeth Stowell at the time of their Marriage in Anno 37. H. 8. were both of them above the Age of Consent and that they Cohabited together Nine or Ten Years before the said supposed Divorce during which Cohabitation the said Martha was procreate between them and therefore pray they may have License to Traverse the said Office To which Bill the said Nicholas and Florence put in their answer and the Plaintiff examined divers Witnesses and before Publication Sir Nicholas dies and thereupon the said Silvester and Martha exhibited a Bill of Reviver against the said Florence and after Martha having Issue Elizabeth the Wife of the now Pl. died after whose death the said Thomas Robertson and Elizabeth his Wife bring a new Bill of Reviver to revive the first Sute in which the Witnesses were examined and this Case was refer'd to Fleming and Coke Chief Justices and Tanfeild Chief Baron and Selverton and Williams Justices and Sing and Altham Barons of the Exchequer If it be asked for what reason was such a Sentence given my Lord Coke nor the rest will neither tie the Bishop nor themselves to shew any for he saith The lawfulness of Marriage belonging originally to be tried in the Ecclesiastical Court if the Ecclesiastical Judg that is the Bishop Sentence a Marriage Null We that is the Judges of the King's Courts ought to give Faith that is implicit Faith to their Sentence as they do to our Judgment whether true or false right or wrong reason or no reason and so he saith Where the original cause of Sute concerning Marriage belongs to the Common Law Courts the Ecclesiastical Judg is to give like Faith to them as 22. E. 4. in Corbets Case which was this Sir Robert Corbet had by Elizabeth his Wife two Sons Robert the Elder and Roger the Younger and dies Robert the Elder being under the Age of Fourteen takes to Wife one Matilda and they dwell together tâ—ll full Age Et habuerunt carnalem copulam cogniti reputati pro viro uxore palam And after the said Robert put off the said Matilda having no Issue by her and Married one Lettice in the life of the said Matilda and hath Issue by her Robert and dies Lettice Preached openly that she was the lawful Wife of Robert and her Son a mulier Roger the Son of Sir Robert Corbet sues in the Spiritual Court to Reverse these Espousals between Robert his Brother and Lettice for which Lettice sues a Prohibition In which Case it was Resolved 1. That if Robert and Matilda had had Issue and had been unjustly Divorced and after Robert had Married Lettice and had Issue and died that as long as the unjust Divorce had continued the Issue of Matilda could have had no remedy at Common Law the same gives so great Faith to the Sentence of the Bishop 2. That here Roger might sue at Common Law notwithstanding the second Marriage in regard the same was void being made while the first Wife lived On which may be noted the injustice of the Bishops being above Appeal in Judgment in these particulars 1. Here is a lawful Matirmony Consummate by the Birth of a Child and two Persons thereby indissolubly joined together by the Act and Law of God put asunder by the Bishop and his Papal Law Here is a Dispute from Generation to Generation concerning the Validity of a Marriage and Succession to an Inheritance Against the Marriage is alledged That the same was declared void by a Sentence of Divorce or rather of Nullity given by the Bishop Against it is answered by Elizabeth a Descendent of the said Marriage and the right Heir to the Inheritance that the cause of the said Sentence was false And she offer'd to prove that the said Christopher Kenne and Elizabeth Stowell were both above the Age of Consent to Marriage in Anno 37. H. 8. and were then lawfully Married and Cohabited together Nine or Ten Years and the said Martha was lawfully Procreate between them before the pretended Divorce was made Was there ever Probation more Relevant tender'd was there ever better Reason alledged by a poor Lady to defend her Inheritance On this Hoskins Bacon Dodridge and other Council Argued so long from Term to Term as was enough to spend a good Portion before it was got But alas to no purpose for had this Elizabeth been Queen Elizabeth her self these Judges will give no Relief or Hearing against a Bishops Sentence unless his Lordship will please to Revoke it himself And notwithstanding all Arguments to the contrary it was accordingly resolved by all the Justices and Barons That she must go without her Inheritance and her Mother Martha remain a Bastard till the Bishop who made her so should again unmake her which was in plain English to adjudg there should be no Appeal in any case of Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession from the Bishops to
the Kings Courts 2. He rests not there but says Iisdem licentiam ad alia vota convolanda concedimus So that here not only Licence may be had for Money to Marry but for the same to leave the old and make a new choice as often as they please And my Lord Coke will have the Common Law to give such Faith that they ought not to question these doings true or false right or wrong which sets all Women and Men to Sale for Money and gave the occasion to Cornelius Agrippa to call all Ecclesiasticks Panders General for their Profit 3. The Common Law Judges give the Bishop the same Supremacy of Power in Matrimonial Causes since the Protestant Religion hath made Marriage no Sacrament as they had in the time of highest Popery and made it a Sacrament though Sublata causa tollitur effectus The same ceasing to be a Sacrament and becoming a mear Temporal Contract the old superstitious Faith of a Sacrament ought not to be given those who are no Judges of Temporal matters 4. It is worth a smile in this Case were it not so wicked to see how hot the Common Lawyers were a while in the scuffle for Supremacy of Marriage But no sooner had the Bishops turn'd the muzzles of the Romish Canons against them and discharged their piece of Conjuring in a strange Language instead of a Sentence but our Worthies of the Law fell flat on their faces and yielded the Royal Fort of the Prerogative and all the Protestant Subjects Laws and Liberties eya Magna Charta it self to the Mercy of the Enemy by so abominable a Judgment that no Appeal lay to the Kings Courts against the Sentence of a Bishop touching Marriage Filiation or Succession true or false right or wrong with cause or without cause a Resolve deserving to be mark'd with a Note of perpetual Infamy and Razed out of all Records On which and other Reasons though in most parts of Christendom the Clergy generally composed one Estate of the Country yet since the Reformation they were excluded from being any part of the Estates and of Holland neither were they allowed any Vote in their Assembly and far less Reason have they in England seeing they have equal Privilege here with the Gentry and all other Lay-free-holders in Election of Knights of the Shire to assume any other Power in the Legislative Temporal or Spiritual either in Person or by any other Representative The like Practice is likewise in Venice though they are Catholicks where before the Council sits the Cryer with a loud Voice commands all Priests out of Doors lest they should discover the State secrets to the Pope and likewise assume the Supremacy of Judgment from the Temporalty to the Spiritualty to produce which effects they are a dangerous ingredient to be mixt in how small a quantity soever in any Supream Council and a little Leven of so active a Fermentation Leveneth the whole Lump A Reason is given by Aeneas Silvius why it was held by more That the Pope was above a Council than a Council above a Pope because Popes gave Bishopricks and Arch-Bishopricks but Councils gave none Which doth not only hold in meer Spiritual Councils but in such Spiritual Councils as are mixt with the Temporalty in which the Spiritualty are always Bribed and Pension'd by the gift of their Offices And this is apparent and needs no further proof And if any of the Temporalty receive the like Bribes and Pensions upon lawful proof thereof made it cannot be denied that neither of them are equal or fit Legislators and much less Judges of the Holy Laws of God of Marriage Filiation and Succession of Subjects and least of all of Kings Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Judicial Power 1. They are prohibited by the example of Christ to Judg Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession We Read Christ was at a Marriage-Feast but it was so poor a one they wanted Wine and 't is likely he would have helped them to none had the man been rich for he might have bought enough for his Money without Miracle But Christ shewed his Bounty to the Poor and the Rich he sent empty away We read likewise he taught the Doctrine of Marriage but it was according to the Moral Law of God and all Ceremonial Laws he Established neither did he or his Apostles ever join any hands by the Ceremonies of a Priest or Temple nor ever spake of any other joining Man and Woman together but by God only as it was from the beginning And as to the point of being a Judg of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession he utterly refused it though he knew the Fact and the Right far above any Bishop as appears Luke 12.14 And one of the company said unto him Master Speak to my Brother that he divide the Inheritance with me And he said unto him Man Who made me a Judg or a Divider over you To give Judgment in this Case according to Episcopal Doctrine Christ must first have enquired with what Ceremonies the Father and Mother were Married whereby the Marriage must have been first Judged Then Whether these two Brothers were begot before the Ceremonies or after and whether there were Witnesses at the begetting which concerns Filiation Then Whether the Inheritance which according to the Romish Law then Imperial in Judaea included both Lands and moveable Goods were left by a Testate or an Intestate which would have concerned the Aliment and Succession but Christ in a word refused to Judg any of these And those who alledg themselves his Successors ought to follow his Example who if he sent them sent them to teach and not to Judg. For he saith Go teach all Nations but there is not a word of Judging any Nation 2. They are totally ignorant in the Fact and were never Educated in the Laws by which they pretend to Judg Marriage That 't is impossible for them to know the Facts of Marriage or Filiation or to receive any Testimony of the same is already shewn and proved P. 104 105. and indeed the Cook with his white Sleeves who dress'd the Wedding-Dinner and the Tailor who made the Wedding-Cloaths and the Midwife and Gossips who eat the Pie and drunk the Bowl if any Certificate or Judgment were at all necessary as to the Fact of Marriage and Filiation besides that of the Parents were far more credible and fit than the Bishop's who was an Hundred Miles off at the time of getting the Child and of all these doings besides And as to the Law 't is known they were never Educated either in the Civil Canon Common or Statute Laws the knowledg of all which they themselves cannot but acknowledg are necessary to make up an Ecclesiastical Lawyer by which is manifest they are as ignorant of the Law of Marriage and Filiation as they are before proved to be of the Fact With what Face or Conscience can they undertake to be Judges of what they
are totally Ignorant except only to take account of the Money and Gaines 3. They Judg by a Chancellour and Commissaries and not in Person The Causes are First Ignorance whereof they are before proved Guilty The Second Pride that they may be equal to Kings who pream Judg or Legislative Power can delegate Judgment A Bishop must therefore be a Judg Supream or Delegate if he Arrogate to be Supream he ought not to be suffer'd if a Delegate Delegatus non potest Delegare The Third is Sloth to take the Gains and not the Pains of doing Justice The Fourth is Covetousnes that they may have Plurality of Offices and let them to Farm to Deputies all which are most sad Ingredients to compound a Judg of Marriage Filiation and Succession and it is clean contrary to the known Laws for any Judg Delegate to Act by Deputy and not in Person for the Office of a Judg is an Office of Trust and cannot be granted over and neither ought nor can be executed by any Assign Deputy Commissaries or Chancellour but ought to be served in Person besides they Excommunicate by Lay-deputies contrary to their own Pretences that the Power of the Keys belongs only to Persons in pretended Holy Orders 4. They have Pluralities of Offices and more than they are able to serve yet will be Judges besides One good thing is remembred of Becket Arch-Bishop of Canterbury who though he was a Traitor to King Henry the Second yet being first by him made Chancellor of England and after made Arch-Bishop of Canterbury before he would take upon him the Office of Arch-Bishop he of his own accord first surrendred his Office of Chancellor not thinking it fit for one man to have two such great Offices at once but they now make St. Peters Net of so small a Mash that great or small all is Fish that comes to it And first they begin with the Coronation Office already mention'd then the Offices of Legislation in Parliaments of Legislation in Assemblies of Legislation in Synods of Chancellors of State of Negotiators of Intelligencers of Soldiers of Treasurers of Almoners of Temporal Barons of Masters of the Ceremonies of Worship of Visitors of Inquisitors of Confessors of Penancers of Excommunicators of Pardoners of Absolvers of Dispencers of Faculties of Interdictors of Marriages of Liâ—ncers of Marriage of Interdictors of the Press of Licencers of the Press of makers of Ministers of Licencers of Preachers Curates Lecturers Schoolmasters Physicians of Consecrators of Churches of Consecrators of Church-yards of Interdictors of Burial of Interdictors to cast out the Devil by Fasting and Prayers of Licencers to cast out the Devil and many others out of each of which they reap gains yet are not able to serve the least part of them but let them to Farm to their Spunges whom they squeeze into their own See whereas they cannot so much as pretend any Mission from Christ for more than One Office which is of Teaching in Season and out of Season and would they follow that as they ought the same would be sufficient to take up the whole man and leave them little leisure of being Judges of Marriage Filiation and Succession or to execute any other Temporal Office 5. They are Ambidexter and Amphibious Judges in Spirituals and Temporals They cannot deny that Marriage since it was purified by the Protestant Religion from the defilement of being a Romish Sacrament and Filiation Aliment and Succession incident to the same became meer Temporal matters and nothing can be more Temporal in it self or wherein the higest Temporal Rights of Princes and People of Liberty of Person and Propriety of Goods Freehold and Inheritance are more concerned than in them and it being likewise confess'd both by Common and Ecclesiastical Lawyers That the meer Spiritual Judge ought not to judg of Temporal matters neither was there any such Jurisdiction ever pretended to Marriage by the Pope himself but as to a Spiritual Sacrament and in Ordine ad Spiritualia he by it deposed Kings and disposed of the Succession of Kingdoms at his Will and Pleasure Unless therefore a Bishop will affirm That Marriage continues still a Romish Sacrament or that he may like the Pope judg of any Temporal matters in Ordine ad Spiritualia he hath no pretence or colour of Right to be a Judg of Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession but let the Right be what it will de Facto he hath got a Spiritual Lord and a Temporal Baron into one Doublet and produced from thence a monstrous Ambidextrous Jurisdiction with the Spiritual Sword in one hand and the Temporal in the other neither Divine nor Humane nor Fish nor Flesh but like the Amphibious Crocodile partly with Tears partly with Terror Raving both by Land and Water and Destroying in both the Elements of Spirituals and Temporals 6. They Judg Marriage by pretended Canons and Laws made by Bishops and Synods which are no Laws but are utterly void they not having had in their making the Assent of the Parliament No English-man can deny That to make a Law are required the joint Assent both of King and Parliament and if either is wanting there can be no Law decreed and enacted by any other Convention Ecclesiastical or Lay whether Council or Synod And this is so great a Birth-right of the People That if any House of Commons who are Elected by the People and intrusted by them to be their Delegates to treat with his Majesty or his Successors to enact Laws of Marriage and other Laws concerning the same should consent and agree That an Act of Parliament should be made that the Bishops and a Synod should instead of the House of Commons have full Power and Authority on their Convention by the Kings Writ to treat with the King and by his Royal Assent to make and enact Canons and Laws concerning Marriage Filiation Succession Religion Liberty and Propriety of the People and such Canons and Laws so made should have the force of Acts of Parliaments and the Commons should declare That to ease themselves of the trouble of so often being summon'd from their remote Habitations in the Country and so long Journies to the City and their not being verst in the difficulties of Legislation or any other probable matter of Excuse that they desired to refer the whole care of the Publick Affairs to Bishops and Synods who are Learned men and they should from time to time as often as they saw necessary on Summons make wholesom Canons and Laws for the People and that the House of Commons desired to be excused from the burden of sitting any more and accordingly such an Act should be passed and thereon a Synod be Summon'd and they should make a Book of Canons concerning Marriage Filiation and Succession by the Royal Consent and these should be proclaimed to be Laws and to have the force of Acts of Parliament yet would such Book of Canons be utterly void and of none effect
Ten Wives of a Turk which kind of Luxury first corrupts the mind Nil non permittit mulier sibi turpe putat nil Cum virides gemmas collo circumdedit cum Auribus extensis magnos suspendit elenchos and corrupts and effeminates the State by exhausting the Treasury in Faeminine which is necessary to be bestowed in Military Ornaments and maintenance Seneca saith That Women would wear too rich Inheritances at their Ears And it is related of the Daughter of a Proconsul That she wore at one time in Apparel and Jewels the value of Three Millions of Crowns This Vanity is by many attributed to be one of the chief causes of the decay and ruin of the Roman Empire I should but trespass on the Readers patience to recite the excessive Costs particularly and the profuseness of Princes and great Persons in Masking Tilting Tuneaments at publick Weddings in one whereof a French King Tilting in Person was kill'd by the casual running of a Splinter of the staff of the Lance into his Eye as likewise to describe the Gluttony Riot and Drunkenness accompanying Marriage-Feasts they being all notorious 6. It undoeth the Poor in their Marriages The chief times of the Year seasonable for Marriage of Advent Septuagesima and Rogation it deprives the Poor of the use of Gods Ordinance for they are neither able to lose their days labour to travel to the Court nor to expend the Money necessary to pay for a License to Marry and when Married publickly by a Priest in a Temple the expense of new Cloths for Man and Woman the Wedding Dinner the Barrel of Beer the Bridale-Night the Baptizing of the Child the God-Fathers and God-Mothers the Gossips and Churching the Woman Falling all within the compass of the Year most commonly bring the Poor man so far in Debt that he never recovers out of it as long as he lives I was informed of a certain Poor Man who intending to be Married agreed the day with the Minister and Clerk and accordingly on a Prayer day he and the Woman came to the Church intending to be Married and came up to the appointed place in the Body of the Church where the Minister reading first the Form prescribed of the Institution and Ends of Marriage before he joined their hands to Contract them the man to be Married laid his Money on the Ministers Book that he might proceed to Marry him which the Minister refused to do unless he would give him more Money than there was the man answer'd There was all he had and prayed him to accept thereof the Minister peremptorily refused unless he made up the Price to Marry him the Poor man seeing no remedy took up his Money again and he and his Woman returned to his House without any joining or Benediction of the Priest and whether he had a Malediction I cannot tell but at Night the Couple that were thus Churched and not Married the Ceremonial way went to Bed and Married themselves the Real way which though contrary to Episcopâ—l Canons yet no Bishops can shew to be contrary to the Moral Law of God but every one can shew that Laws of compulsion of a Poor man to marry by the Ceremony of a Priest and giving liberty to the Priest to refuse to Marry him unless he pay him more than he hath are contrary to the Moral Law of God for this is prohibiting to Marry and a depriving of the Poor of the Use of Gods Ordinance which is already proved to be the Doctrine of Devils 7. It causeth immadesty in Brides wanton Songs and Ceremonies premiscuary Dancing and corruption of Youth How modest Nature is in the State of Innocence appears well in the expression of a Vertuous young Lady a Virgin who said She wondred how any Woman could have the face to go openly to Church with a Man and the Custom of most Nations not to suffer any Woman to appear in Publick without a Veil manifesteth the same Yea Mahomet himself forbids Women to expose themselves to publick view for thus Alch. Cap. 33. P. 262. he represents God speaking to him Oh Prophet speak to thy Wives and thy Daughters and the Wives of True Believers that they cover themselves with Veils And Cap. 24. Speak unto the true believing Women that they retain their Sight and that they be Chast that they suffer nothing of their Beauâ—y to be seen but what ought to be seen and that they cover their Bosome and their Visage that they permit them not to be seen but by their Husbands their Children the Children of their Husbands their Brothers their Nephews their Sisters their Women their Daughters Maid-Servants and Slaves their Domesticks that are not capable of Marriage and Children that regard not the Beauty of Women And this publick exposing of Virgins in their Marriages to be the Gazing-stocks of the multitude in a Congregation seems likewise against the precept in Scripture 1 Cor. 11.10 For this cause ought a Woman to have Power on her Head because of the Angels which is interpreted covering on her head and is likewise prohibited by Christ Matth. 5.28 Whosoever looketh on a Woman to lust after her hath committed Adultery with her already in his Heart If it be therefore Adultery to look on a Woman to lust after her then is it a Temptation to Adultery to expose her who is to be another mans Wife to the publick view of the whole Congregation in all the dress of Temptation whereof Beauty can be capable Qui videt is peccat qui non te viderit ergo Non cupiet Facti crimina lumen habet Propert. lib. 3. Eleg. Who sees thee Sins who not doth neither hate Nor love thee Light hath all the Crimes of Fate Why it is not more modest therefore for Virgins to Marry in Thalamo than in Templo appears not I shall recite not here the particular wanton Songs and Ceremonies which are used with us and in other Nations by reason of this pompous Ceremony of leading the Bride to the Priest and Temple amongst a Rout of Boys for whom between her Banning and her Churching it is asufficient sport a Week after lest the same should cause what I endeavour to avoid the Corruption of Youth and shall only here mention the grave Admonition of a Poet concerning the same Nil dictu foedum visuque haec limina tangat Intra quae Puer est procul hine procul inde Puellae Lenonum Cantus pernoctantis Parasiti Maxima debetur puero reverentia siquid Turpe paras nec tu pueri contempseris Annos Juvenal 8. It exposeth to publick view what God hath commanded to be secret and ridiculously appointeth ocular Witnesses of what is invisible and neither lawful nor pussible to be seen Of this Vid. P. 101 104. before 9. It causeth Community of Women Community of Children Fornication Adultery Stews Brothels and the dissemination of most contagious and deadly Diseases amongst the People As to Community of Women it
them durst adventure seeing Bajezet was of a furious Nature and in his Anger dangerous to be spoken with to mediate in their behalf no not Alis Bassa Charadin Bassa's Son whom of all men he favour'd most There was at that time in the Court an Aethiopian Jester who under some Covert pleasant Jest would often times bolt out to the King in his greatest heat what his gravest Councellors durst not speak to him in secret This Jester Alis Bassa requested to devise some means to entreat the angry King in behalf of these Judges promising to give him what he would desire if he could appease the Kings displeasure The Aethiopian without fear undertook the matter and presently put on his Head a rich Hat all wrought over with Gold and accoutred in all other his Cloths suitably presented himself before the King with a great counterfeit Gravity whereat Bajazet marveling asked him the cause why he was so Gay I have a Request unto your Majesty said he and wish to find favour in your sight Bajazet more desirous than before to know the matter asked what his Request was If it stand with your pleasure said the Aethiopian I would fain go as your Ambassador to the Empeperor of Constantinople in hope whereof I have put my self in this readiness To what purpose wouldst thou go said Bajazet To crave of the Emperor some Forty or Fifty of his old grave Monks and Friers to bring with me hither to the Court. And what should they do here said Bajazet I would have them placed said the Jester in the rooms of the old doteing Judges whom you intend as I hear to put to death Why said Bajazet I can place others of my own People who are better in their rooms True said the Aethiopian for Gravity of Look and Countenance and so would the old Monks and Friers serve as well but not so learned in the Laws and Customs of your Kingdom as are those in your displeasure If they are Learned why do they then contrary to their Learning pervert Justice and take Bribes There is a good reason for that too said the Jester What reason said the King That can he that there standeth by tell better than I said the Jester pointing to Alis Bassa who forthwith commanded by Bajazet to give the reason with great Reverence first done shewed that those Judges so in displeasure were not conveniently provided for and were therefore enforced many times for their necessary maintenance to take Rewards where they could get them to the staying of the due course of Justice which Bajazet understanding to be true commanded Alis Bassa to appoint them convenient stipends for their maintenance and forthwith granted their Pardon Whereupon the Bassa set down Order That of every matter in Suit exceeding One Thousand Aspers the Judges should have Twenty Aspers which Fees they yet take to this day Whence may be Observed 1. That to place Judges in Courts to undergo the incessant labours of hearing multitudes of Causes and not to allow them honourable maintenance is the ready way to make men of ordinary Principles Freebooters and to take the Prey for themselves So the meanness of the Salary in Russia being but an Hundred Marks per Annum makes the Judges extream Extortious on the People 2. That those who buy either Judicial or Ministerial places in Judicatories must sell again and the sale of either is contrary to the Law of God and of infinite Damage to the Publick turning the weights of Justice to the false weights of Merchandize as says the Poet Ergo Judicium nihil est nisi publica Merces Quid faciunt leges ubi sola Pecunia Regnat 3. That the Basha when he was appointed to provide the Judges maintenance by stipend providing the same by Fees made them worse then before and gave them a pretence to take Bribes of the People under the name of Fees and there are none more corrupt Judges for Bribery than the Turks to this day and well they may if they take Fees Neither Judg nor Minister to take Fees but Salary It was the Ancient Law of England that none having any Office concerning the Administration of Justice should take any Fee or Reward of any Subject for the doing of his Office Coke 2. part 176. and by the Statute Westm 1. cap. 25. neither Judicial nor Ministerial Officer as Sheriff Escheator Coroner Bailiff Gaoler Clerk of the Market Aulnager nor other inferior Minister or Officer of the King whose Offices do any way concern the Administration or Execution of Justice or the common good of the Subject or the Kings Service but shall be paid of what they receive from the King on pain the Offender against this Act shall pay double Damages of the Plaintiff and shall be otherwise punish'd at the Will of the King Marrying for Fees contrary to the Laws of God and of the Land By which appears that the Episcopal Judging of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession for Fees and the granting of Licenses of Marriage by Bishops and taking of Fees by a Priest for Banns or Marriage of any Persons in a Temple or elsewhere is wicked abominable and contrary to the Laws of God and Fundamental Laws of the Land and they ought to be punish'd for doing the same and had not Bishops corrupted the true Doctrine of Gods Ordinance of Marriage to obtain Fees and other covetous and ambitious Ends Men had at this day Married according to the Moral Law of God and not the Ceremonial Laws of Priapus and Venus The Inconveniences which ensue Judges and Ministers taking Fees are 1. As Coke saith 2 part 210. When neither Judges or Ministers had any Fees then had they no colour to exact any thing of the Subject who knew they ought to take nothing at all of them they being maintained by Salary from the King but when some Acts of Parliament changing the Rules of the Common Law gave to the Ministers of the King Fees in some particular Cases to be taken of the Subject whereas before all their Office was done without taking now no Office at all is done without taking and a gap being once open'd there was after no bounds to the breach so it causeth Oppression 2. It causeth corruption of Justice for if a Judg take Fees it is from the Plaintiff and Defendant and he will sell Justice to him who gives him the greatest but if he take a Salary he takes it from the Publick and will be for the Publick good and not partial to the Parties 3. The Publick by giving the Salary and receiving the Fees increases the Publick Treasury for the vast Income of Fees far exceeding the Merits of the Judges and Officers it is just the overplus should be applied to discharge Publick Burdens and not to fill private Pockets and what was unequally shared amongst Officers ignorant and idle by way of Fees The English in Scotland turn'd all the Fees of Courts into
Pernitiosa not to preserve Children but to destroy them and not only those of Subjects but of their Prince though not captived in War yet exiled by War No Digression to father on Bishops the Fictions and Preposterations of Common Law as well as Spiritual Judges by which it was impossible to use the Episcopal Ceremonies of Common Prayer-Books in Marriage or without danger of his Life to Marry otherwise than by the Moral Law of God And let it not seem here a Digression that I am enforced to Father on Romish Bishops not only all the pernitious Fictions and Preposterations in Judicial Proceedings of Spiritual but likewise of Temporal Courts and to make it part of the Exception against them That they are not fit Judges of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession 1. Because Romish Bishops as is already shewn were the Formers of all the Common Law Writs in the Register and Forms of Judicial Proceedings in the Book of Entries and the Compile of the Common Laws was trusted to Britton a Bishop as well as the Forms of the Citations Libells Litiscontestations Compurgations Excommunications and Provincial Laws and Canons were to other Bishops and the Bishops have been the chief Judges in the Common Law Courts of Westminster and Chancellors in the Chancery and have rid the Circuit with the Earls in the Countries and after them with the Sheriffs which Earls and other Lay-Judges in time of Popery were only Assessors or Executioners of the Sentence of the Bishop and he only the pretended infallible Oracle both of Law and Gospel to Judg how he pleased 2. Because what is a good exception against a Common Law Judg is a good exception against a Spiritual Judg and what Fiction is a good exception against Succession by the Verdict of the Jury is a good exception against Succession by the Certificate of a Bishop 3. Because by a kind of Conspiracy between the Spiritual and Common Law Courts in time of Popery their Preposterations Fictions and Formalities are so complex'd and intangled one with another that 't is impossible to divide them or carry on a perfect Discourse of one without the other or of Preposteration without Fiction and Formality the one being commonly cause of the other 4. It is necessary to prevent any Excuse the Spiritual Judg may pretend if he should say The Common Law Judg is suffer'd to Summon and Arrest before Copy to Copy before Oath of Calumny and to use Hundreds of Fictions and Falsities in his Judicial Proceedings and why should not the Spiritual Judg be allowed as well as he but where they are both censured they can neither recriminate And how guilty they both are of nursing that viperous brood of the old Serpent who have eaten through the Bowels of Justice may appear by the particulars following The Subpoena in Chancery is a Writ or Summons formed by the Bishops themselves when Chancellors wherein notwithstanding the Holy Catholick Fathers formed as many Lies as Lines 1. It begins as West hath it Proceeding in Chancery p. 183. Jacobus Dei gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex Fidei Defensor Fictions and Falsities fomented in all Forms of Judicial Proceedings Subpana's full of Fictions c. A. C. salutem Quibusdam certis de causis coram nobis in Cancel ' nostra propositis This is not true for though here and in other Nations anciently Princes sat in their Courts of Judicature in Person 't is not so now neither are any Causes proposed coram nobis before the King in Person unless as some presume they will attribute the incomprehensible Attribute of Omnipresence to Humanity neither is it sufficient to reply that he is present there by his Delegate for a Delegate is only where the Prince is absent or will not himself receive the Complaint which is signified by the words of Absalom 2 Sam. 15.3 See thy matters are good and right for there is no man deputed of the King to hear thee Intimating if there had been a Judg Deputed he needed not fear the Kings presence to have his matters so severely weighed as if he had Judged in Person And we see to avoid the Fiction of Human Omnipresence in an Action of Debt returnable in the Common Pleas where the King sat not in Person but Judged by Delegates the Sheriff is commanded Sum ' per bonos Sum ' praedictum A quod sit coram Justitiariis nostris apud Westmonasterium and if it had been Coram Nobis it would have been a Fiction but that which makes the Certis de Causis coram nobis in Cancel ' nostra propositis not only a Fiction but a gross Falsity is that the Complainant hath taken out his Subpoena before he hath any Bill presented either to the King in Person or the Chancellor or the meanest Clerk in the Court It goes on and say Tibi praecipimus firmiter injungentes quod omnibus aliis praetermissis excusatione quacunque cessante Yet ought the Defendant to be admitted to offer a lawful cause of Excuse or Essoin Next it says In propria persona tua yet may the Defendant be admitted to appear by Attorney Next Sis coram nobis in dicta Canc ' nostra à die Paschae proxim ' futu◠' in unum Mensem Yet to appear Quarto die post the Return-day is sufficient then ubicunque tunc fuerit ad respond ' super his quae objicientur an Objection cannot be unless there is some allegation first put in by the Defendant any more than an Answer can before some Bill put in by the Plaintiff here is therefore a double Falsity and the Poor Countrey man is fool'd to ride up an Hundred Miles when he never put in a Bill himself to be objected against nor when he with much labour is got to Town weary quarto die post is there any Bill put in against him by the Complainant for him to Answer Then it is further said Et ad faciend ' ulterius recipiend ' quod Curia nostra consideraverit in hac parte yet had neither Party Plaintiff or Defendant a Bill or Answer in Court how can it then be said In hac parte where there is no Party Et hoc Sub poena Centum librarum nullatenus omittatis This is likewise a Menacing Fiction the Chancellor having no Power to impose any Fine or Forfeiture on any Subject of a Farthing Et habeas ibi hoc breve Teste meipso apud Westmonasterium when the King is a Hundred Miles off Westminster 12 die Febr. Anno Regui Domini c. George c. But if the Defendant is a Noble-man then no Subpoena is awarded but a Letter by the Lord Chancellor or Lord-Keeper thus A Note of the Fictions of the Episcopal Form of the Letter in Chancery usually sent to a Noble-man instead of a Subpoena to Answer The Superscription is which first comes to be read and is directed thus To my very good Lord I. L. D. These This
the Servandes of the House or other famous Witnesse and sall execute their Offices and Charge and thereafter sall offer the Copie of the saidis Letters or Precept to ony of the Servands quhilk gif they refuse to do that they affix the samin upon the Èœett or Dure of the Persones Summoun'd and siklike gif they get na entress they first knockand at the Dure Sex Knockes they sall execute their Office before famous Witnesse at the said House and dwelling place and affix the Copie upon the Èœett or Dure thereof as said is quhilk sall be leiful and sufficient Summounding and delivering of the Copie and the Party and Officiar sall not be halden to give ony usher Copie bot at their awin pleasure And every Officiar in his Indorsation sall make mention of his awin Execution in manner fore said and the Partie at quhais instance the Letter or Precept is direct sall pay to the Officiar Executour the Expenses of the Copie affixed as said is and sall be taxed and given again to him the giving of the Decreet or Sentence gif he happenis to obteine And gif the Officiar heis foundin culpable in the Execution of his Office he sall be put in our Soveraine Lordis Prison and punished in his Person and Gudes at the Kingis Grace Will. Coke 4. part 99. saith The Common Pleas may in many cases proceed against their own Officers by Bill without Writ and why may not all the Subjects have the same Right as well as the Officers of the Common Pleas In London before the Mayor and Aldermen Debt and Personal Actions are determined by Bill without Writ City-Law 3. And so are Assises of Nusance ib. 4. and why may they not by Copy of the Bill be commenced better than by Writ over all the Kingdom The mischiefs of Original Writs from the Chancery Besides the Delays of Original Writs and Process by remoteness of Courts whither they are to be sent for and by the multiplications of Aliases and Pluries and the manifold dangers when gotten and executed to be again overthrown and nullified by Abatements for a multitude of frivolous Causes and Formalities and likewise for so many sorts of Variances as before mention'd of all which the Declaration might have been free if no Writ had preceded 1. It is excepted against Writs that Declarations are not amendable and it costs many times so much in amending the Misprision of Clerks in their Writs that the Plaintiff if he is not so poor as not to be able were better abate his own Writs and Declaration himself and pay Costs and buy Twenty new Writs than get one of the old amended 2. Writs Original are altogether useless except to get Money for nothing 3. They are saleable contrary to Magna Charta Nulli vendemus Justitiam and the Civil Law for Lege Julia tenetur repetundarum qui accepit aliquid ob Judicem delegatum dandum mutandum vel ob non dandum c. And what doth a Writ of Right a Justicies or any Original do besides but assign a Delegat Judg to hear the Cause in the Kings-Bench or Common-Pleas or Lords-Court or County-Court Then 't is contrary to Equity the Plaintiff should be compell'd to buy a Writ which is not only useless but pernicious to his Declaration and puts it in ten times more danger to be overthrown than if he might as he ought be permitted to use it without a Writ and the Plaintiff being to deliver a Copy of his Declaration Expensis Actoris to the Defendant 't is no reason he should be at any expence to pay Clerks for Writs impertinent 4. As to the Writ in Chancery of Subpaena Mischiefs of the Chancery Writ of Subpaena which is to be distinguished from the Writs to the Common Law Courts it is contrary to Magna Charta Nulli negabimus Justitiam for if a Poor man Sue a Noble-man there a Chancellour will deny a Poor man his terrible Writ which he uses to grant under a Hundred Pound Penalty in Terrorem Pauperum and he shall get no more of him if he do that at a greater price than the Writ would have cost but a poor begging Letter to the Noble-man to send his Answer to the Complaint against his Oppression which is no other than to bring into England the old Slavery of Rome whereby no Slaves were permitted to Sue their Lords before the Pretor or any other Judg were their Tyranny over them never so great and unjust What a wretched dishonour is it to Publick Justice which heretofore was blind to the Person that she turns now blind to the Cause and who heretofore carried the Sword in her hand Parcere Subjectis debellare superbus to have now lost her Sword and got a Crutch to become only a blind Beggar when she is to approach the Gates of Nobles neither is there any Law of God or man in England to justifie a Chancellour that he shall presume to use a different process of Concumacy against the Commons Chancellour hath no Power to Imprison Commons any more than Lords which he dares not use against the Lords for if it be not lawful for him to Issue Attachments or Commissions of Rebellion against the Lords or to imprison them then is it not lawful for him to Issue Attachments or Commissions of Rebellion against the Commons for both are equally Interested in Magna Charta and the Petition of Right not to be imprison'd without the lawful Judgment of their Peers and they being both Allies and Confederates by the said Acts to maintain the Commons Liberty The Liberty of the Commons is the Out-work which preserves the Liberty of the Lords if the Commons be Invaded though for the present such Invasion touch not the Lords yet when it hath destroyed the Liberty of the Commons the Lords will not be able to defend theirs when their Allies are lost The Liberty of the Commons is the Outwork which preserves the Liberty of the Lords the Liberty of the People is the Outwork which preserves the Liberty of the Parliament the Liberty of the Subjects is the Outwork which preserves the Safety of the King and as Solomon saith Prov. 20.28 Mercy and Truth preserve the King and if contrariorum contraria est ratio Cruelty and Fictions of Writs of Subpoena's in Chancery Latitats in Kings-Bench and Capiases without Summons in Common-Pleas wherewith they abuse the Kings name in false imprisonments of his Subjects without Crime or Cause destroys the prisonments of his Subjects without Crime or Cause destroys the Safety of the King himself and in a Case between the Duke of Lenox and the Lord Clifton M. 10. Jac. Though a Lord was not to be Committed for Contempt in a Poor mans Case yet in this Case between two Lords Chancellour Egerton said If Noble-men will commit Contempts they are to be Committed Now that the Imperial Power which hath been usurped by Chancellors to imprison the
in the said Chancery-Orders Printed 1669. presumes to do in the Court of Conscience what was never heard of to be done in the Courts of Turks Infidels or the most Barbarous Judicatories in the World for he is not ashamed publickly to give License to Cursitors and their Clerks to commit Crimen Falsi which we call Forgery by Antedating Writs taking them out of Returns past or of a former Term by reason of which Forgery of Writs and Forgery of Returns Antedated Capiases Proclamations Exigends and Outlawries Antedated have been likewise Forged and Thousands of Poor men unjustly cast in Goals and miserably undone without any Summons or Hearing and these are likewise the damnable effects of the Chancellours Writs by which as by others the Plaintiffs so here the Defendants are destroyed without Hearing and certainly these Crimes of Antedating and Forgery of Judicial Acts though here Licensed by Orders of Chancellors and Protected by Courts by not Licensing Averments against them are by the Civil Law and Laws of Scotland and of many other Nations both of these and Instruments Death and even by our own the imbeselling of a Record by a Clerk and Counterfeiting of Fines is Felony and if the second time so is the Forgery of Deeds Writings and Court-Rolls and deservedly the Offender better deserving death than a Robber on a High-way and why any Crimes of this Nature should be publickly Licensed to the Ruin of all Truth and Justice by any Chancellour in his Chancery Orders is very strange the mischievous effects of which said Attachments on Affidavit and Antedating Writs and Forgery of Outlawries are notoriously known and not complained of here without good Cause and Testimony and some particular experience of my own to my loss who have as well as others suffer'd in an high degree by the false Affidavit of a Fellow who Subscribed and Swore it by a false name and not his own and likewise procured a Forged Outlawry antedated against me It belongs not to a Chancellour to be a Judg of Equity in England 5. It belongs not to the Chancellours Office to be a Judg of Equity or to make Orders Edicts Laws or Writs and thereby to Imprison the Persons and dispose of the Lands and Goods of the Subjects Arbitrarily and at his Pleasure Coke 4. part 82. saith That all Statutes which give Authority to the Chancellour to determin Offences in Chancery are to be intended only in the Ordinary Court there which proceeds in Latine and is Secundum Legem c. and not in any Extraordinary Court which proceeds in English Secundum Aequum bonum and 37. H. 6.14 27. H. 8.18 it is Resolved That the Court of Chancery Proceeding by English Bill is no Court of Record and therefore it cannot bind either the State of the Subjects Lands or the Property of his Goods or Chattels and therefore they there admit he may Imprison the Person Chancellour cannot bind the Subject's Goods not Persons which is not only a Non sequitur but a contrary conclusion follows on it for if he cannot bind the Subjects Goods à Fortiori he cannot bind his Person For the Life is more than Meat and the Body is more than Raiment Luke 12.23 And though those Common Law Judge of H. 6. and H. 8. so sordidly deliver'd the Subject Prisoner to the Chancellour so as they might keep his Lands and Goods to themselves yet had they no more Law or Right to do it than they had to deliver him Prisoner to the Turks or to send him to the Barbado's for the Subject is no Slave neither ought he to be given or sold for one without his own Assent by his Representative in Parliament and having so good a Protection against the Chancellours and Common Law Judges and the Orders and Writs of both as Magna Charta and the Petition of Right both for his Lands Goods and Person they ought to shew some greater Laws than their Writs and Orders of Courts or Forgeries of Clerks before they presume to invade either 6. There being no Law in England which ever Ordained a Chancellour to be a Judg of Equity or to make Edicts or Orders concerning the same he can pretend no Title thereto unless from the Laws of France and to that effect Polydor Virgil saith The Chancery came in with the Conquest to which though my Lord Coke saith Perperam Erravit because the Mirror saith The Constitutions of the ancient Kings were that every one should have out of the Chancery of the King a Writ Remedial for his Flaint without difficulty yet he himself seems to be in the Error and not Polydore for though the name of Chancellour and Chancery was before the Conquest and divers other Countries use the name of Chancellour as well as England yet the greatest part of the Writs came from Normandy and are mention'd in their Customary as who will peruse it shall find but as to the Writ of Subpoena Centum librarum and Arbitrary Power of the Chancellour and to be a Judg of Equity came first from the Conquest and was never used before nor did it belong to the Chancellour's Office either of England or Scotland that having other employment and more than a Chancellour could do though he never troubled himself with Judgment but left the same to the Judges to whom the King Delegated the cause by Writ and this the very name of Chancellour testifieth who was Originally no other than a Master of Requests to the Prince whom he served and on Petitions deliver'd to him by the Subjects if unfit to be Granted he strook cross lines over them like Cancelli or Lettices by which he Cancell'd them and thence had his name of the Canceller or Chancellour as Turn lib. 11. advers c. 25. and not according to that Fictitious Verse of his Power Hic est qui Leges Regni Cancellat iniquas For when was ever any Chancellour in England allowed to Cancel any Roll or Act of Parliament And when these Petitions for Justice were deliver'd by the People to this Master of Requests call'd the Canceller of such of them as were Evil such as were Just he Cancelld not but on behalf of the Petitioner Granted the Princes Rescript or Warrant to the Praeses Provinciae where the cause of Action arose or the Defendant lived for Actor Sequitur Forum Rei which Rescript or Warrant we now call a Writ containing in it self 1. A Questus est nobis a short recital of the Complaint 2. Si A. fecerit te securum a taking Security or Pledges of the Plaintiff de Prosequendo 3. A Summoneas or Summons of the Defendant to appear before the Prince himself or such Judges as he Delegated though out of the Province or County where he lived which was the Reason of taking Pledges of the Plaintiff because he made the Defendant appear many times Hundreds of Miles from his Home when he might in those days implead him before the President
nane against quhome the Process beis led be received in the Kings Castle or Place or in his Presence nor admitted to Councel or Parliament heard nor answer'd in the Law of Judgment of Fee and Heritage or uther Causes bot ever Eschewed as Cursed unto the time the said Persons cum to amendis and assyith the Party and obteine Absolution in Form of Law And Jac. 6. p. 3. cap. 53. in the Kings Minority an Act was got by the Kirk ' That all Excommunicate Persons not Conforming ' in Forty Days should be denounced Rebels and put to the Horn. The English Commissioners in the said late time of the Troubles had Instructions to take from the then Kirk such Letters of Horning and not to assist any Excommunication with the Temporal Sword which we performed accordingly The King of Spain joined with Tyrone and the Rebels in Ireland against Queen Elizabeth And Don John de Aquila Landing in Ireland with 4000 Spaniards intitled himself Master-General and Captain of the Catholick King in the Wars of God for holding and keeping the Faith in Ireland only on pretence of Excommunication Sextus Quintus the Pope of Rome on the Invasion prepared by Spain against England Anno 1588. sent out his Crusado as if against the Turks and having pass'd Sentence of Excommunication and Deprivation by his Bulls against Queen Elizabeth promising Pardon of Sins Heaven and Eternal Life to all who di'd in the Invasion 1. To grant a Pope or a Bishop Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Subjects is to grant him Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Kings 2. To grant him Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Kings is to grant him Power to Levy Money Raise Soldiers Denounce War and Depose them 3. Of the Dilemma of Danger threatning Princes who seek Security of Goverement from the Excommunication of Popes or Bishops either over a People Religious or Superstitious 4. Of the Impossibility of Security for Princes unless their Subjects are Educated or Instructed to be free from the Superstition of Excommunication and to contemn it 5. Of the Impossibility of obliging Popes or Bishops either by Benefits or Oaths Excommunication is as Proscription made a pretetence of Confiscation without shewing cause The Romans saith Aman. Marcellus proscribed Ptolomy the then King of Cyprus being their Confederate for no fault only they wanted Money in the Treasury who therefore poison'd himself and the Isle became Tributary to the Romans In the like manner do Popes and Bishop fall on the Richest with their Excommunication to fill their empty Purses Pope Gregory the Tenth Commanded Percham Arch-Bishop of Canterbury to pay him Four Thousand Marks within Four Months on pain of Excommunication So Excommunication is a ready way to Levy Money for War Anno 1230. The Pope having Excommunicated the Emperor the Emperor was fain to pay for his Absolution an Hundred and Twenty Thousand Ounces of Gold Plat. Nam Anno 1231. The Emperor for memory of this hard Penny-worth for his Absolution put into a Pool at Helbrand divers Pikes and other Fishes with Brass Rings having Inscriptions of his name and the Year of the Lord one of the Fishes was taken up 267. Years after Ann. Suev Calv. Henry the Second after that Traitor Beckett the then Arch-Bishop of Canterbury had been Slain though not by the Kings Command was enjoined amongst other things this Slavish Penance He walked Three Miles bare-foot on the sharp Stones that he at length had so cut his Feet they marked the ground with Blood every step he went And after this which was worse than Running the Gantilope he Received of the Priests Monks Bishops and Abbots on his naked Flesh so many Jerks with Rods Oh brave Pedants and Pontifical Government for Princes as according to Baronius amounted to at least Fourscore Lashes which doubtless was the Number the Jew administred to the vilest Rogues lest their Brothers should be despised in their Eyes and not heard to have been Exercised in their Eyes and not heard to have been Exercised on the Priests Bishops and Abbots themselves though they kill'd and murder'd many Lay-men without Law or Justice they incur'd only a deprivation and instead of Hanging which they deserved sometimes no more than a suspension Temporary ab Officio In the time of King John Anno 1211. The Pope Excommunicated him and gave the Kingdom of England to the King of France Paris Wend. The Pope Excommunicated Henry the Eighth and gave the Kingdom Primo Occupanti Queen Elizabeth was Excommunicated by Three Popes Pius Quintus Gregory the Thirteenth and Sextus Quintus Anno 1308. The Pope Excommunicateth Andronicus Emperor of the East and setteth up the King of Russia against him Bzou So he dealt alike with the East and Western Emperors Excommunications have brought the Venetians to extreme Straights formerly therefore they are yet no Friends of it Dandalus Duke of Venice was compell'd by Pope Clement the Fifth to Crouch under the Table Chain'd like a Dog before he could obtain Peace for the Venetians The Pope Excommunicated John King of Navar and Granted his Kingdom to the Spaniards Nicephorus Phocas Emperor of the East was Excommunicated by Polyeuchus then Patriarch of Constantinople because he had been God-father to a Child of Theophania Wife to his Predecessor and after his Predecessor's Death Married her Pope Zachary deposed Chilperick the French King and gave the Crown of France to Pepin The two French Kings H. 3. and H. 4. who were Assassinated had great Guards whereby it appears though Princes may secure themselves in Vaults and Caves from Thunderbolts yet can they not against the Bishops of Romes Ignis Fatuus of Excommunication but that to Assault them Per medios ire Satellites Et perrumpere amat saxa potentius Ictu fulmineo Eight Emperors were Excommunicated by Popes who were these Frederick the First Frederick the Second Philip Conrad Otho the Fourth Lewes of Bavaria Henry the Fourth and Henry the Fifth The Emperor Henry the Fourth Fought in Threescore and Two several Battles and had for the most part Victory he was Excommunicated by the Pope and to obtain his Absolution came Three Days together bare-foot to the Gates of the City Canusium where the Pope then was and with much difficulty obtain'd it The Catholick Majesties of Spain cannot secure themselves from Excommunication without Money nor their great Vice-Roys in America for a Rebellion was Raised in Mexico by the Arch-Bishop there Excommunicating the Governors the People by Superstitious Episcopal Education made more afraid of the Counterfeit Power of the Keys than of the true Power of the Sword and will side in Rebellion with the Bishop against the Secular Governor men may talk therefore and believe what they please that the Supremacy of the Temporal Sword is Consistent with the Spiritual of Excommunication but when it comes to Trial amongst a Superstitious People they will be very much deceived and perhaps Ruin'd Bzovius de Pont. Roman 611 612. to maintain the Power That the Popes may depose Kings
Patriarchs and Bishops they dare not Excommunicate an Emperor of such a People who Contemn their Excommunication and would Revenge it on themselves if they should presume to make a vain noise with it Christ commands Wisdom to be learnt of the Serpent and the experience of all Ages witnesseth to whosoever will but consult Histories That there was never any Prince Gentile or Jew Mahumetan or Christian who admitted near his Throne Episcopal or Pontifical Consecration Ordination or Excommunication could that remain He or his Posterity secure or not Ruin'd or Plagued by those Devils Transformed which he Superstitiously or Impudently had Raised against himself or them as may sufficiently appoar by the Examples before Recited Presbyters independent Lastly 9. If Parochial Bishops and Presbyters were Elected by the Congregations or several Parishes these were Independents in the Primitive Christians time and no Prelacy was amongst them for though the Cities or Parishes in greatness might exceed one another in greatness and in Precedence yet the Presbyters Elected were as Independent one of another as Members of Parliament Elected from great and small Shires As to the Impossibility of obliging Bishops by Oath Bishops not to be obliged by Oath It is impossible to oblige those by Oaths who claim to be Judges of Oaths and Perjury as all Bishops do and their Spiritual Courts for how many and easie pretences will they find to Evade and Nullifie them sometimes a Parte Ante Force or Circumvention sometimes matter Ex post Facto that though at first Law yet by new matters since arising the same is became unlawful to be kept So grant a Bishop the Jurisdiction of Perjury he will never Judg himself guilty of it nor any Subject who breaks his Oath of Allegiance to the King in obedience to the Bishop and the rather because he is not bound to shew any Cause or Reason of his Judgment neither as Coke will have it to be question'd in the Kings Courts of what he hath the Jurisdiction 25. H. 8. Cap. 19. The Clergy Promise the King in verho sacerdotii that they will never her ceforth Praesume to attempt alledge claime or put in ure enact promulge or execute any Canons Constitutions Ordinance Provinciall or other or by whatsoever other name they shall be called in the Convocation unless the Kings most Royal assent may be to them had and that his Majesty do give his most Royal assent so it appeares they used to make them before presuming on their Power of Excommunication yet when Queen Mary came in they were as high again as ever notwithstanding their Promises Holy water to wash off Oaths There was a water which Ran in the way Appia dedicated to Mercury wherein the old Pagan Romans did believe if they dipped a Laurell Branch therewith calling on Mercury That they were discharged thereby from any breach of Oath and Perjury they had Committed Alex ab Alexandr Genial Dier The Popes have store of this Holy Water and no doubt can spare some to the Bishops as well as Holy Oyle Guiccuardin Com. de Pol. Relates a then in use Proverb Proprium esse Ecclesiae odisse et timere Caesares Ecclesiastical Lawes and Excommunications therefore made by such Enemies are not likely to be friends to Kings or subjects Bishops are Ecclesiastical Persons Aiming at a supremacy in Judgement of Heresy in Judgement of Oaths in Excommunication all inconsistent with Temporal Supremacy as is their Interest which hath alwayes made them perfidious to Temporal Powers Popes perjured The French King besieged Pope Alexander the Sixth in his Castle of St Angelo from whence after a time he came out swearing to such capitulations as he could obtain and the French King kissing his foot Amongst other Articles he agreed the French King should have his Son Caesar Hostage for the Performance but not long after Caesar making an Escape his Father the Pope contrary to his Oath contracted a League Contrary to the French to their great Prejudice and it was the Custom of that Pope to use most Oaths when he intended most to deceive Pope Julius the second had obliged himself by Oath to have a General Council within two years after his Election to the Popedome but this being not performed Maximillian the Emperour and Lewes the French King Conven'd a Synod at Pisa whither some Cardinals under protection of the French King caused the Pope to be summon'd to make his appearance but the Pope instead thereof Excommunicated them and the French King and call'd an Anti-Synod at Rome to whom he Excuses his Oath and Dies but how he Excused it after he was Dead the Historian doth not mention Anno. 1414. In the Council of Constance convened by Sigismond the Emperour and Pope John the Third Consisting of about a Thousand Bishops and Doctors and Continued four years yet amongst so many Bishops Vix una Fides Bishops perjured for though these declared that the Council was above the Pope yet they Resolved to be as perfidious to Protestants as he and accordingly there ordained That faith ought not to be kept with Hereticks Here they order'd the bones of John Wickliff that famous Primitive Protestant of England to be digged out of his Sepulchre and burnt at this Council likewise was John Hus and Jerome of Prague contrary to the safe conduct and faith given them by the Emperour and Bishops Perfidiously and Cruelly made Martyrs and burnt for the Protestant Religion Here you see were a thousand Bishops yet none kept the Promise of safe conduct Burchard Arch-Bishop of Magdeburg taking some offence at his Citizens besieged them with Armed Power but they Redemed their liberty with a summe of money he thereupon Swearing he would molest them no more yet shortly after he besieged them again but this Perjury was justly met with for in a Sally they took him Prisoner at which time by his humble Demeanor and counterfeit Oaths never to molest them more They Released him but when he was at Liberty getting a Despensation for his Oath from Pope John the 23d he began to molest them again Murthering them whom he had sworn to Maintain But it was Gods will he should be once again caught and cast into Prison and Punished for his wickedness Magdeb. Cent. And did not the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Becket as well as Burchard Arch-Bishop of Magdeburg as is before mention'd commit as great a Perjury against his native King Henry the second after all the Labour and pains taken with him both by fair and foul meanes to bring him to Agreement assoon as he Recovered home to his House by Retracting his Oath and getting an absolution from the Pope for the same Bishops compell H. 2. to accept the Kingdom on their Terms or not to have it By the Pretended Power of Consecration Ordination and Excommunication Popes and Bishops Pretend a Divine Mission to Anoint and Crown Kings and then again to Excommunicate and Depose them all to
will to thee for to get off my Fleet Which stuck upon the Sands I thought it meet Their safe return to speed through the rough Seas The angry gods with blood thus to appease R. 'T was with thine own blood Mad man A. true 't was so But that I was not Mad this lets thee know R. Whose thoughts Tumultuous made by Wickedness Takes False for True is mad and he no less Who doth by Folly err as who by Rage Was Ajax Mad who did in Fight ingage To kill Poor Lambs and thou Godly and Wise Who Iphigenia kill'st in Sacrifice And those Fair Titles from a Crime so black As thy Poor Daughter 't was to kill dost take Should one in Coach a Lamb have with him ride And for it Cloaths Money and Maids provide And think 't his Daughter Miss and Madam too Call it and Husband stout bring it to woe Would not the Praetor grant him for a Fool And what if one his Daughters at the Schole Should think a Lamb in Fold by like mistake And her Devoutly to the Altars take And think by Faith he that mute Creatures note Hears when he cuts his Shrieking Daughters throat Is he in his right mind the other is A Petty Folly wicked Madness this Who think their God a Lamb or that His Will Was they himself should on his Altar kill And offer to Himself how Mad are they Let sâ—me New Poet in a Satyr say Godw. Jew Ant. 141. Conceiveth Moloch to whom Children were Sacrificed to be the same Iâ—ol with Baal then P. 152. He Conceiveth Baal Peor so called from Peor the Hill on which his Temple stood to be the same Idol with Priapus so doth Cornelius Agrippa call Priapus Baal Phegor It is before shewn That Priapus was the first who got Women and Men to be joined together by a Priest in his Temple if Priapus therefore was Baal and Baal Moloch to whom Children were Sacrificed then 't is more than probable the same Idol who Married in Temples as he by this got the Jurisdiction of Marriage so by the Jurisdiction of Marriage he got into his Fiery hands the Jurisdiction of the Fruits of Marriage young Children and like a true unclean Devil Defiled his Temple and Altar not only with Lust but with Blood and so this Custom of Marrying by Priests in Temples in as many Nations which were the greatest part of the World which it past through carryed likewise the Barbarous Cruelty of Sacrificing such Children of such Marriages as the Priest requiâ—â—d what Children he pleased to be Sacrificed and as the Scripture Expresseth to Devils I shall for brevity only Cite one Poet concerning this wicked Custome Mos fuit in Populis quos condidit advena Dido Poscere caede Deos veniam ac flagrantibus aris Infandum dictu parvos imponere natos Silius The People who by Dido founded were Did Pray to Gods with Blood without a Tear And horribly on Flaming Altars burn Their little Babes yet for them never mourn Ille suis Divis mos Sacrificare puellos Ennius The Cruel Custome of the Indian Wives burning themselves with their Husbands grew from the Jurisdiction the Priest gained over them by such Priabeian Maraiage by a Priest in a Temple and by the profit he made by the same Burning or wicked Sacrifice of themselves Which Custome Propertius thus Describes Jamque ubi mortifero Jacta est fax ultima Lecto Vxorum fusis stat pia turba comis Et certamen habent Lethi quae prima sequatur Conjugium Pudor est non licuisse mori Ardent victrices flamae pectora praebent Imponuntque suis orâ— perusta viris Proper l. 3. Eleg. 12. When the last Brand doth light Deaths bed of Flames With Hair dissheveld stand the Pious Dames And strive who first shall with her Husband lye Oh shame they think if hinder'd then to dye Victorious they with Breasts and Mouths on fire Kiss their old Loves burning with new Desire The Indian Priests from whom this Fiery zeal Superstition and Mischief came usually attend the Woman at this Fatal Solemnity of her new marriage to her Husband in another World with which he Deludes her assuredly to believe follows of course if she burns her self and goes with him But first she must go to the River and be Baptized with Water for the washing away of her Sins and then be Baptized in this last fire where he promiseth her their Holy Spirit and god Ram will appear to her in a Vision in the midst of the Flames and be her Comforter you cannot think a Priest will take all this pain to Murder his whole Parish of Women if he can without a Fee though without a Tear for besides his Ordinary fees who should the Poor Deluded Martyress or Martyresses for many times the Indians their Laws allowing Plurality of Wives have Ten or a Dozen or if a Prince they may amount to a hundred the Husband being dead make Executor and Overseer of all their Goods they leave behind to bestow them according to his direction pur le Aline de defunct for the Benefit of the Souls of them he Murder'd But the Priest who so kindly helpt to dispatch them Besides he hath for a further small gratuity for his Pains all the Bracelets Pendants Rings and Jewels of Gold or Silver which the Women ware who came thus to Sacrifice themselves for they are Adorned most Richly as they were on their Wedding Day And besides other good Women throw into their Laps some Letters some Presents some Money and Desire her to Deliver them to their Mother or Brother or other Kinsman or Friend gone before them into the other World all which are burnt with her and when that is done the Priest Rakes the Ashes where what a Batch hath he of all that is Incombustible of Rings Bracelets Gold Silver Jewels Copper Brass Especially where there are many Wives who burn together and belonging to great Persons these so Sacred Reliques of these Saints belong only to the Priest to his great gain Taverenr 2. Part. 170. Lynschotten 16. It layes Punishment on Lawful Childbirths and destroys Millions of Infants The Punishment of which is Imposed on the Childbirths of every Woman who hath not first been before a Priest in a Temple and told all the Boys in the Parish That she hath a mind to lye with a Man is to be Exposed to Poblick shame in a White Sheet in the same Temple and the Boys aforesaid The cause of Penance in a White Sheet is only for the gains of the Bishop to make Mops and Mowes at her though they might better be Imployed in saying their Prayers after the Priest the Persons on whom this shame is to be Imposed is Principally the Mother of the Child but reflected by pâ—rticipation on her Parents Family Kindred and her Innocent Child it self The Fiâ—al Cause why this Shame is Imposed is that the Bishop may inforce her to give him what
Commutation Money he pleaseth to Demand for his Remission of this Penance and Pardon of her Sins and that he may have Power to set what Taxes he pleaseth on Gods Ordinance of Marriage and all Acts incident to the same which ought to be free and thereby set to Hire and Sale all Women Lawful and Unlawful and the Successions not only to all private Patrimonies but Kingdoms and thereby fill his Chests with Gold and Silver The Sin or Offence for which the Punishment is Imposed is Child-bearing and nothing else whatever is pretended which is proved by these Reasons 1. If he say That he punisheth the Mother for disobedience to his Ecclesiastical Laws and Canons in not Publishing her Intention to Marry to the Priest in the Temple and the Boys in the Parish and what is the bottom of the Business not paying him his Fees for Publication according to the Canons This is easily Answered by asking who made him a Legislator and Canon-Maker over a Free People and their Children This already is before proved That neither Ecclesiastical nor Temporal Law can be made nor Tax imposed on Marriage or any thing else without the Assent of the House of Commons and that was never given to any Papal or Episcopal Laws or Canons as hath been already proved And as hath likewise been proved All Ecclesiastical Laws and Canons made by any Popes or Bishops Councils or Synods from the beginning of the World to these presents in regard they never had the Assent of the House of Commons in Parliament are utterly Void and Null to bind the People or their Posterity No Law in England for standing in a White Sheet So there being not so much as a Law of Man in England Prohibiting Marriage without a Priest and Temple under the Penalty of standing in a White Sheet and there being no Law there can be no Offence Besides if there were such a Law it is already before shewn that all Laws Prohibiting Marriage Except by a Priest in a Temple are the Doctrine of Daemons and came Originally from Daemons and the Priests of Priapus and Venus and Contrary to the Moral Law of God and Nature the Bishop hath therefore no pretence to Punish the Woman for that 2. There are no other Offences in Bearing a Child which a Woman can commit but breach of Contract Incest Fornication or Adultery As to breach of Contract and Incest the Bishop punisheth Persons Free and not Prohibited by any Law of God to Marry As to Fornication and Adultery the first Offence cannot as hath already been shewn be Committed without Polyandry in the Woman and the second without Polygynecy in the Man But the Bishop punisheth her who bears a Child though the Father and Mother were no way Prohibited to Marry by any Law of God or Man and they were at the time of Begetting the Child both Virgins and neither Guilty of Polyandry or Polygynecy and so still continue Chast and Constant one to another The Bishop therefore punishing such a Woman doth punish her for Child-Bearing or for nothing 3. There is no Probation by two or more Witnesses of any Offence but Child bearing and Probation by Compulsion of the Woman to self-Accusation or by Compulsion of Canonical Purgation are unlawful The Bishop therefore punishing such a Woman if he punish her not for Child-bearing only he punisheth her for Facts whereof he hath no Lawful Probation It being therefore proved That the Bishop punisheth Lawful Child-bearing It appears further That he punisheth the Lawful more than the Unlawful for such Women as are common in Stews or Brothels seldom bear a Child as hath been shewen before and such Women as are Married to Husbands and therefore can only be Guilty of Adultery if the Husband be within the Four Seas of the time of Begeting the Children on their Wives by Adulterers it hath been shewen already That Littleton and Coke will by Fiction have it be believed that these Adulterous Children were got by the absent Husband And that Probatio non admittitur in Contrarium whereby Marriage by a Priest in a Temple is made a Sanctuary for Adulteresses and for Adulterous Child-bearing they are Exempt from punishment but the Poor Lawful Child-bearing Woman against whom there is neither Fact nor Probation of any Crime to be shewen is the Chief Subject of the Bishops punishment a Fact so Barbarous as not to be parallel'd in the Example of Turks Tartars Americans or any Ethniek Nation Except Gaeramantes who have a wicked Custom that if any Married Woman Procreate more than three Children she shall be Divorced from her Husband because a Multitude of Children caused Men to have Covetous hearts and besides the Divorce of the Mother such Supernumerary Children were to be slain before the Parents eyes But Bishops are worse than the Garamantes for they punish though but one Child-bearing whereas the other punish'd not till after Three and exercise those Inhumanities for their Gain against Child-Bearing Women which the Scripture Prohibits to be Exercised to the very Brutes Deuter. 22.6 If a Birds nest chance to be before thee in the way in any Tree or on the Ground whether they be young ones or Eggs and the Dam sitting upon the Young or upon the Eggs thou shalt not take the Dam with the Young But thou shalt in any wise let the Dam go and take the Young to thee that it may be well with thee and that thou mayest prolong thy days The Bird is not any wise to be punished for this Natural Piety to her Young but to be set at Liberty and let go and that they may Defile their Marriages by the Example of the Garamantes with Blood as they do by Example of Priapus and Venus with uncleanness they most Cruelly to that Misery Nature hath Imposed on the Mother in Sorrow to bring forth though of it self of pains Equal with Death and oft tiâ—â—es brings Death add their Punishment of Exposing the Mother to Publick Reproach and Shame which to the Modest is worse than Death And by how much the more Modest the Mother is by so much the more easily is she tempted by the Devil with a Praestat Emori quà m per dedecus vivere to destroy her Infant to cover her own shame and his Pope Gregory intending to Fish in a Deep Pond in Rome near a Nunnery the Water being let out found therein above Six Thousand Sculls of Infants 6000 Infants Skuls found in a Fish-pond so the punishing of Child-bearing Women and Prohibiting Marriage Except by a Priest in a Temple under this Infamous Punishment contrary to the Law of God and according to the Law of Devil who was a Murderer from the beginning caused the Destroying of these Six Thousand Infants and were all the like Instances recited which for Brevity are here to be omitted it would appear That this punishing of Child-births because the Mother went not first to a Priest in a Temple hath Murderd Millions