Particulars of Royal Abatements Edicts or make new Laws or change any of the old standing Laws without the mutual Consent of the two Houses of Parliament He may not oppress the People or in any Arbitrary way take from them their Liberties or Estates under any pretence whatsoever without due course of Law Nor can he impose upon their (m) Stamford's Pleas of the Crown Persons what Charges or Burthens he pleaseth but according to and by the Laws of the Kingdom He cannot do any thing against the Law of the Nation or against common Right cannot change Ancient Customs for a Legal (n) Hâ—ghs 's Reports 254.263 Cousâ—uetudo lâ—galis plus habet quam concessio Regalis Custom is more available than a Royal Concession yet on the other side that Custom which advanceth against the Prerogative of the King is void He cannot impose Arbitrary (o) Petit. of Right 3 Car. 1.7 Car. 1. c. 17. payments erect new Offices of Charge to the Subject may not deny or delay Justice may not compel his People to make Gifts Loan Benevolence or Tax without consent of the two Houses The King (p) 2 Car. 1. c. 1. Coke 12.46.2 part Brown lib. 2. c. 2. Coke Instit 2 part 47 48. Petition of Right Dyer 176. may not imprison without just Cause nor keep any Mans Cause from Tryal may not send any man out of the Realm without his own Consent may not in time of Peace Billet or Quarter Soldiers or Mariners upon his People against their Wills may not grant Commission to try Men by Martial Law in time of Peace nor to determine any matters of difference betwixt Subjects other ways than by ordinary (q) 21 Jac. c. 31. Coke 11.87 Plowden 497. course of Law and ordinary Courts may not by Patent or Licence make a grant of a Monopoly or the benefit of a Penal Law or give a Power to dispense with Penal Laws in some Cases (r) Coke 11.87 He may not have or take that he hath right to which is in the Possession of another but by due course of Laws and may not make new or alter old Courts of Justice unless to be kept after the Course of the Law and not in Course of Equity Nor (s) Sheppard's Grand Abridgment part 3. fol. 49. alter the Courts of Westminster that have been time out of mind nor erect new Courts of Chancery Kings-Bench Common-pleas or Exchequer (t) Fleetwood lib. 1. c. 8. He may not by his last Will and Testament under the great Seal or otherwise dispose of the Government or of the Crown it self nor give and grant away the Crown-Lands or Jewels which he hath in his Politic Capacity nor give away any of the incommunicable Prerogatives By these Abatements of Power and gracious Condescentions of the Kings of England for the Benefit and Security of the Subject No Power co-ordinate with the King 's we are not to conclude that there either is or can be any Co-ordination or Coaequality of any State Order or Degree of the Subjects with the Sovereign nor any Competition of the Subjects Power in his Concurrence with the Vertual and Primary Influence of the Sovereign but a plain Subordination and subjected Ministration of the one under the Sovereignty of the other For although there is a Co-operation of the Members with the Head for the performing some Acts of State and they may seem Orders or States coaequally Authorized in the Power of Acting with the Sovereign in Petitioning for advising or consulting about or consenting upon the Kings Summons to Laws And although in judging and determining matters of Private Interest the King hath not an Arbitrary Judgment but is restrained to the Judgment to be administred by the proper sworn Judges in his Courts whom he appoints to judge according to his Laws and in the making of Laws his Power and Judgment is restrained to the Concurrence of the Nobles and Commons in Parliament yet in all other things wherein he is not expresly restricted by any Law of his own or Progenitors granting he retaineth the absolute Power as in the particulars before mentioned and in the Chapters of Parliaments I shall further discourse In the Rebellion under King Charles the First the (u) Observations on His Majesty's Messages c. The Rebels in 1641. would have lessened the King's Sovereignty and placed it in the People or their Representatives Pencombatants for the Party knowing they had the whole Current of the Laws against them made a great noise and bustle with Sophisms and plausible specious Pretences to captivate the Populace and nothing was more frequent than the Misapplication of that of the Philosopher That the King was Singulis major but Vniversis minor Inferring from thence That the Collective Body of the People and their Representatives were Greater in Authority than the King In answer to which it may be observed That the Aphorism how true soever in any other sense is most false in any sense of Sovereignty For if it be meant That the King is a better Man only than any of us single this doth not tell us he is better than Two and this is no more than possibly he might be before he was King For we must needs look upon Princes as Persons of Worth Honour and Eminency when taken from the People which the superaddition of Royalty did not destroy Besides any Lord of the Land may challenge such a Supremacy over all the Knights and any Knight over all the Esquires Furthermore if Princes be Sovereigns to single Persons of Subjects only and not to the universality of them then every single Subject by himself is a Body Politick whereof the King as King is Head and so the Publick Community is out of the King's Protection he being no King as to them in a complex Body Such impudent Falsities and many more destructive Consequences flow from such absurd Principles And if the Maxim were true the People have placed a King not over but under themselves But they enforce the Argument still further That the Fountain and efficient Cause of Power is the People and from hence they say the Inference is just That he is less than the Universe But the (w) Answer to Observations p. 10. Consequence is rather the contrary For suppose the People were the efficient Cause of Power it can be no otherwise than by translating or deriving their divided Power and uniting it in him Since then they cannot retain what they have parted with nor have what they gave away it follows That he who hath all their Power and his own particular besides must needs be greater and more powerful than they it being a very great Truth That he is the only Fountain of Power and Justice Another of their Maxims was That quicquid efficit tale illud est magis tale And they assume But the King was made by the People therefore less than the People In answer to which it is
Earls Barons Great Men and the whole body of the Tenents in Capite expressed by those words in the former Questions Clergy and People for by them these demands were made and no doubt they would first ask for themselves for the Vulgar or Rabble could not come near to make their Demands at such a Solemnity as this was so (y) Walsingham fol. 95. num 20. great and splendid there being at it Charles and Lewis Earls of Clermont two of the King of France's Brothers the D. of Brabant the Earl of Fens and the other great Men both of France and England with the Countess of Artois Whoever desires further satisfaction may consult the same learned (z) Elossary p. 24. Author who makes it clear That the word Plebs Vulgus Populus in the Writers of that Age was used for the Laity in way of contradistinction from the Clergy I shall at present leave this and note that for any thing appears to the contrary the same Interrogations Oath c. presented to Edward the Second and Third without the additions of King Richard's continued without any alteration to Henry the Eighth's (a) Book of Oaths fol. 1. time and in that we find the King promiseth he shall keep and maintain the Liberties of the Holy Church of old time granted by their Righteous Kings of England The Oath of King Henry the Eighth I find in the Heralds Office the words thus Do ye grant the rightful Laws and Cusioms to be holden and permit ye after your Strength and Power such Laws as to the Honour of God shall be chosen to the People by you to be strengthned and desensed Vid in Coll. Arm. p. 60. and that he shall keep all the Lands Honours and Dignities righteous and free of the Church of England in all manner Holy without any manner of minishments and the rights of the Crown hurt decay or loss to his Power shall call again into the ancient estate and that he shall keep the Peace of Holy Church and of the Clergy and of the People with good accord and that he shall do in his Judgment Equity and right Justice with Discretion and Mercy and that he shall grant to hold the Laws and Customs of the Realm and to his Power keep them and affirm them which the People and Flock have chosen and the evil Laws and Customs wholly to put out and stedfast and stable Peace to the People of this Realm keep and cause to be kept to his Power In this Oath King Henry the Eighth interlined for the right explication of it instead of People and Flock these Words which the Nobles and People have chosen with my Consent The Oath of King Edward the Sixth Oath of Edward the Sixth so far as relates to my purpose was this Do you grant to make no new Laws but such as shall be to the honour and glory of God and to the good of the Commonwealth and that the same shall be made by the consent of the People as hath been accustomed Oaths of Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth not seen by the Author The Oaths of King James the First and King Charles the First The Oath of King Charles the Second Hist Coronationis Caroli 2. in Colleg. Arm. I have not seen any Transcripts of the Oaths of Queen Mary or Queen Elizabeth those which King James and King Charles the First took run thus Will you grant to hold and keep the Laws and Rightful Customs which the Commonalty of this Kingdom have and will you defend and uphold them to the Honour of God so much as in you lyeth That Branch of the Oath which relates to my purpose taken by King Charles the Second runs thus Sir Will you grant to keep the rightful Customs which the Commonalty of your Kingdom have c. The Oath that our present King James the Second took at his Coronation The Oath of King James the Second was in the same Words as that of his Royal Brother wherein the Word Customs is to be taken in the largest extent to include Laws also Now upon the whole we must consider First Considerations upon this Discourse of the Coronation Oaths That in the Eye of the Law the King never dyes so that he is King before any Solemnity of Coronation Secondly The variety of Forms and Precedents seem to prove that one precise form is not simply necessary so the interlining of Henry the Eighth upon Record also shews And if it had been of consequence to have retained the old form we should have heard of it either then or in some succeeding Parliaments Lastly it cannot be denied that if the King be bound by a lawful Oath to pass all Bills it is not the form of denying it but the not doing of it which makes the Perjury And so when the King is tender of a flat denial and attributing so much to the judgment of his great Council that he only useth the words avisera it would be a strange Doctrine that all the Kings of England who have given this Answer have been forsworn and neither Parliament nor Convocation taken notice of it in so many Ages But when by dint of Argument the Parliament Champions were driven from these Holds they fled to their last Burrow So one of them confesses that in Acts of Grace the King is not bound to assent nor in Acts wherein he is to depart from the particular right and interest of his Crown and lastly that if he do not consent however bound by Oath yet they are not binding Laws to the Subject How the Long Parliament Writers would have the King part with his Prerogative in Cases of necessity only But then comes the handful of Gourds which spoils the Pottage Except in cases of necessity If the safety of the People be concerned If it may prove dangerous or inconvenient to them then an extraordinary course may be taken This was the plausible Plea of 1641. to get the Militia into their hands for they urged that in case of apparent and imminent danger the Peoples safety was not to be neglected They might not be exposed as a prey to their Enemies therefore must be put into a posture of defence This was grateful to the People out of that real love they bare to themselves they must favour that side which pretends to take care of their safety Give to any Person or Society a Legislative Power without the King in case of necessity (b) Answer to Observ b. 76. permit them withal to be sole Judges of necessity when it is and how long it lasts and then it is more than probable the necessity will not determine till they have their utmost desires which is the same in effect as if they had the Legislative Power Further it must be considered that necessity upon that supposition must be very evident there needs no such great stir who shall be Judge of it when it comes indeed it
Gentry be bred up in Learning Young Nobility and Gentry to be so educated as they may be fitted for Magistracy Military Discipline and all other ways that might accomplish them for the service of their Prince and Country for where a Prince can be served by the Nobility and ancient Gentry it much facilitates the execution of their trusts but in some cases it may be requisite to imploy those of great Wisdom Judgment and Diligence the Endowments of noble Minds though not of so noble Extract So (q) 6. Annal. Mecaenas advised Augustus that he should chuse the praefectus praetorio out of the Horsemen lest if he were one of the Nobility he might attempt something against the Prince and so it is noted in (r) Quod pâ—r negotiis â—eque â—upra erat Tacitus That the Province was given to Sabinus not for any excellency but that he was fit and not above the imployment But this caution is unnecessary where Kingdoms are hereditary and depend not upon the approbation of Soldiery or Senate Princes not to give too great Powers to any Above all things Princes should take care that they commit not any of their Royal Prerogatives to the Magistrates or their Curators 'T is not safe for a Prince to intrust any of these in a Subjects hands for it is by many Histories apparent that when by reason of a Prince's Captivity Minority his prosecuting some War out of his Country whereby a Kingdom cannot be governed without a Viceroy or Protector with the whole Authority of a Prince the sweetness of this Power hath tempted them to usurp or do ill Offices to their Prince or People (s) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Polit. lib. 5. c. 11. Hence the Philosopher adviseth not to make such great who in Wit and Manners are bold and daring Therefore it is not safe for Princes to keep Viceroys long in their imployments especially if there be any danger of their Ambitious aimes to get the Soveraignty into their own hands or that they will not be observant of the due Execution of the Laws or for private ends will suppress the Nobility Great Ministers not to be long continued in the same Station or oppress the People by their Interest pervert the course of Justice or introduce new Laws by surprizing the Soveraign in gaining his consent In all such cases the rule of the (t) Qui parvo tempore Magistratui praesunt non tam facile nocere possunt quam qui longo Philosopâ—er is most true They that for a short time obtain the Magistracy cannot so soon hurt as they which enjoy it long as he instanceth in Demagogues in Popular Government and the Dynastae in Oligarchies which by that means became Tyrants Julius Caesar (u) Clapmarius de Arcanis Imperil lib. 2. c. 18. and Augustus made all their Magistrates annually whereby they gratified all the eminent men of the Commonwealth by rotation but (w) Alii taedio novae curae semel placita pro aeternis servavisse quidam invidia ne plures fruerentur sunt qui existiment ut callidum ejus ingenium ita anxium judicium Tiberius did otherwise giving this reason for it That Horse-leeches having sucked much blood are at quiet and so the biting of fresh men are most sharp Some think saith Tacitus he did it only to seclude others from injoying of them and to prevent his yearly trouble in chusing which as it would oblige the Elected so would disoblige the Candidates but most ascribe it to the subtilty of his Nature quod nec (x) Tacitus 1. Annal. cap. ult eminentes virtutes sectabatur rursum vitia oderit ab optimis periculum sibi à pessimis dedecus publicum metuebat He did not make great search or take much care to find men of the most eminent Vertues and yet he hated the Vitious fearing from the best danger to himself and from the worst disgrace to the Commonweal In our constitution of Government The Sovereign's Power to change Magistrates a most excellent temper is observed where by the Princes Power is reserved to change the prime Ministers of State and Judicature at his pleasure which obligeth them to great care to act justly in their Places and prevents Sedition where any other had the Power of Electing for it is the Power of chusing in any other than the Soveraign that is the only cause of Faction not what the (y) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Polit. c. 5. Philosopher notes against Socrates That the same continually being Magistrates is the cause of Sedition by reason of the Envy of the rejected Candidates and also among Spirited and Martial People that expect those imployment The Kings of England have undoubtedly the sole Power of creating and appointing Magistrates See more of this in the next Chapter and Officers of greatest Authority So (z) Smith de Repub. Angliae lib. 2. the grave Author of the Commonwealth of England affirms That in the appointing all the great Officers and Ministers of the Realm whether Spiritual or Temporal the highest are immediately in the Kings Power to nominate and the inferiour by Authority derived from him So the Kings of England appoint the High Commissioner and all other the great Ministers and Officers in Scotland the Lord Lieutenant Lord Justices and other great Ministers and Officers in Ireland and by Letters Patents appoint a Prorex locum tenens or Guardian of the Realm in their absence before whom even Parliaments have been held but it were endless to descend to the particular imployments of Magistrates under the Soveraign Therefore I shall only note what the (a) MS. Speech 1 Eliz. penes Rad. Thoresly de Leedes Gen. Chancellor in the Queens name said to Sir Thomas Gargrave chosen Speaker of the Commons House That to the head of every body Politick bâ—â—ngeth immediately or mediately the assignment and admitting of every Member of the Body to his Ministry and Duty the contrary whereof were monstrous in Nature and Reason It is both a great glory and happiness to a Prince when he is served by Magistrates of great probity for the skill and watchfulness The necessary Care of a Prince in chusing Magistrates as well as indulgent care of a Prince is thereby discovered and revered in such a choice and the evil Complexion of the People is chargeable mostly on the Magistrates Therefore what the Chancellor (b) MS. Speech Trim. Term. 1557. in a Speech in the Star-Chamber by the Queens direction told the Justices is applicable to all sorts of Magistrates That the not or remiss doing of Justice must by the Prince be charged upon their shoulders as the immediate Executors of the Law The qualifications of Magistrates may be the Subject of a Common place I shall only hint some more necessary referring the rest to the succeeding Chapter First they ought to be Persons undisturbed with Passions for as they are appointed to
Xenoph. de Rep. Athenarum Thucyd. lib. 3. this is a Mart wherein voices are bought and sold poverty and ignorance driving the crowds to null that to day which they have eagerly pursued the day before scarce forbearing the same day to condemn and absolve nothing being done amongst them but in tumultuary ferments and an high boyling fret or a dead torpidness and irresolution the Ebbings and Flowings of the Ocean being more regular than theirs whereas all Government according to the (b) Polit. l. 4. c. 4. Philosopher subsists and is established in firmness and constancy by every mans knowing what is his right to enjoy and his duty to do or as (c) Coeius hominum Juris consensu utibitatis communione sociatus De Civitate Dei c. 23. St. Augustine calls it a society of Men incorporated for common benefits by the agreement of Laws It is a grave saying of (d) Populus negligit rempublicam magnitudine nimia communium curarum expers 1. Hist Privata cuique stimulatio vile decus publicum 2. Annal. Tacitus That the common People neglect the affairs of the Common-weal by their over-bulkiness void of publick spirit and care and in another place That the incentives to their private profit produce a disregarding neglect of the publick (e) Quod omnia aetatis membra familiasque singulas in unum corpus cogit De Rep. lib. 1. Bodinus compares a Common-wealth or Government to a Ship and well observes that without the Keel which unites the Stern and Fore-castle Ribs c. it would be but informe lignum So a Community without Government which unites the members of all Ages and all Families in one body can no ways deserve the name of society Such a People headless is not worthy to be called a Body Politick for Government no ways consists in the number of Persons or the heads of Citizens but in the combination of them under one Soveraign Power The unwieldy bulk of numerous Armies wanting Conduct and Discipline rarely effect any glorious enterprise In the Tumults of Naples the Rascality were forced to set up an Head though it were but the frothy boisterous Thomas Anello So were Cade Ket Tyler and others in our popular Rebellions set up as the Captains Leaders and Idols of the Clowns From whence we may learn that even such people as rose up as they pretended to suppress Magistrates Monarchy or Tyranny level Estates and set all at liberty yet once imbodied were forced to chuse Captains to lead them to whose Orders there was a necessity of submission If we thoughtfully consider How Superiority and Government founded in Nature we shall find that Government is founded in nature in which state there is no such thing as equality for the Parent by priority of natural cause must be superior to the Children Yea if we should believe People to be Juvenes ab Aquilone creati like Grashoppers or Locusts or like Cadmus his men sprung up at once out of the Earth underived from any pre-existent Parent all of them having equal Origin and Power yet a short converse one with another would have necessitated them to embody in Societies We Christians believe God made Man after his own Image Dominion given to Man and gave him dominion over all the Creatures of our sublunary world and it is not reasonable to think that he endowed him not with faculties necessary for the administration of that great Empire not only over the Brutes but over his own Species For the Philosopher (f) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1. Polit c. 5. notes that nature hath made some fit to command and others to obey or serve of which we have many and great Instances So Julius Caesar and others whose great actions are recorded in History manifested more sublime Spirits than any of those who were subdued by them Some born to Empire and when those great Heroes were dead though their Officers and Soldiers survived by whose prowess and valour they had effected those wonders yet we read of a suddain degeneracy as if the soul had expired and left the carcass only of an Army The Orator observes that no Nation was ever so Barbarous No Nation so Savage wherein some Government hath not been as to be wholly void of Religious Worshippers since every where some Deity or other hath been acknowledged Even so we may affirm that never any People were so rude wild and savage but they found a necessity of Government of which they had at least in their first embodying some unpollished Model and some sort of Institutes appointed by and coeval with their Governours by which their political interests and private concerns were regulated without the infinite disorder which would happen to all publick transactions which should be the product of tumultuous votes where every meeting would be a jumble of great and small The Mischiefs of tumultuous voting and want of Magistrates soft and hard sculls a pudling of business and putting all things to chance and blundering in a maze till at last some Mens wisdom formed them into order How then is that condition of a People to be wailed which Tacitus (g) Ea demum libertas Romae est non Senatus non Magistratus non Leges non Mores Majorum non Instituta Patrum 1 Annal. describes to be the Roman State of liberty wherein there was no Senate no Magistrates no Laws no Ancient Usage no Institutes of the Fathers From all which we may conclude that the same nature that ordered societies gives them prudence to know that to preserve the Society and the peace of it it was necessary that there should be one or some who laying aside private advantage and particular Interest should imploy their minds bend all their thoughts and direct their actions for the publick good and by the sinews of power hold all so fast united as they should guide them to the same end and we must determine that Government is absolutely necessary for the being and well-being of a People though there be servitude in it which made Seneca comparing Augustus's times with the preceding irregular ones say Salva esse Roma non potuit nisi benesicio servitutis The City could not have been safe without the benefit of servitude CHAP. III. That the People are not the Original of Authority and Government BEfore I proceed to treat of the several forms of Government I judge it requisite to examine some positions made use of by Republicans so long at least as they argue against Monarchical Government or till they obtain their ends in the subverting of it One of which is that supreme power is originally and fundamentally in the People for whose benefit all Government was established Secondly That there is a tacit reservation of power in them to vary the form of Government and change the Persons when the people finds it convenient for them The Law of Nature as they say justifying any attempt
Oyer and Terminer Gaol-Delivery and Justices of Peace are determined by the Death of the Predecessor that made them Therefore the Statute of 25 Ed. 3. declares it to be Treason if any man kill the Chancellor The Judges represent the King's Person Treasurer or the Kings Justices of the one Bench or the other Justices in Eyre or Assise or any other Justices assigned to hear and determine being in their places doing their Offices The (f) Id. 3. Instit p. 18 140. reason whereof is assigned because all these represent the King 's Royal Person in his own Courts by his own Commission under the Great Seal in the very Execution of the Kings Royal Office viz. Administration of publick Justice to his People As therefore the King at his Coronation (g) Facies fieri in omnibus Justiciis tuis aequam rectam Justitiam discretionem in misericordia veritate secundum vires tuas taketh an Oath to make to be done in all his Judgments equal and right Justice and Discretion in Mercy and Truth according to his Power So he lays the Burthen thereof upon the Judges according to that of E. 3. for the Pleasure of God and quietness of our Subjects as to save our Conscience and keep our Oath by the assent of our great Men and other of our Council we have commanded our Justices that they shall from henceforth do even Law and Execution of right to all our Subjects Rich and Poor without having regard to any Person c. Therefore before this in (h) Nulli vendemus nulli negabimus aut differemus Justitiam vel Rectum c. 29. Magna Charta we find that the King will sell deny or defer Justice to none Yet from hence it doth not follow that if in the opinion of some the King doth not do Justice that therefore any Subject should conclude as the Master of the Hospitallers of Jerusalem in England at Clerkenwell Anno 1252. 37 H. 3. did The Story is thus told by (i) Hist p. 826 827. Edit prioris Matthew Paris The Master waiting a time when he might discourse with the King he complained of some Injuries done him The King loseth not his Authority tho' he do not Justice and shewed the King some Charters of Protection of himself and his Ancestors The King answered with an Oath and in Wrath You Prelates and Religious especially Templars and Hospitallers have so many Liberties and Charters that they make you proud c. Therefore they ought prudently to be revoked which imprudently have been granted to you for even the Pope oftentimes revokes his Grants with a non obstante and the King told him so he would do To all which the (k) Cui Magister Hospitalis respondit alacâ—iter vultu elevato Quid est quod diciâ— Domine Rex Absit ut in ore tuo recitetur hoc verbum illepidum absurdum Quamdia Justitiam observas Rex esse poteris quam cito bane infregeris Rex esse desines Master saith Matt. Paris answered chearfully and with a lifted up Countenance What is this you say my Lord the King far be it from you to speak so absurd a thing As long as you observe Justice you may be a King and as soon as ever you break this you cease to be a King Thus he would make Dominion founded in Justice as others in Grace But I need not add many Authorities upon this Head for by the universal Suffrage of the profound Lawyers the Kings of England solely nominate create and (l) Dyer fol. 56. appoint all the Judges of the great Courts at Westminister and may remove them at their Pleasure and alone make (m) Davis 45. and appoint Justices of Oyer and Terminer of Gaol-delivery Justices of the Peace Sheriffs and the like Officers and (n) Coke 4. Inst n. 4. 14. 114. 117. remove them when they see Cause and the (o) Bulstrod 3. 296. 1 H. 7. c. 25. Prerogative of making Judges cannot be given or claimed by a Subject The King hath also Power to name create make (p) Sheppard's Grand Abridgment part 3. p. 53. and remove the great Officers Ecclesiastical and Civil by Sea and Land as Archbishops Bishops by way I suppose of Conge deslier The King 's placing and displacing all Great Officers and Translation Lord Chancellor or Keeper Lord Treasurer Lord President Lord Privy-Seal Lord High Steward Lord Admiral Lord High Constable Earl Marshal Lord Chamberlain Privy Counsellors the Marshal or Steward of the Kings House and the rest of the Officers of his Houshold Master of the Horse Officers of the Mint of the Castles Port-Towns and Shipping Lord Lieutenants and many more too tedious to be named So that either mediately or immediately all Officers are by the Kings appointment which is not only a manifest badge but a necessary appurtenance of the Soveraignty SECT 2 The Court of High-Steward THE Kings Courts have been various The Court of the High-Steward as that of the Privy-Council called the Council-Board of which I have spoke before The Court of the High-Steward of England intituled Placita Coronae coram Seneschallo Angliae disused since the Reign of Henry the Fourth and now a Lord High-Steward is only appointed pro hac vice with limitations for the Tryals of some Peers of the Kingdom upon Inditement His Power anciently was (q) Coke 4 Inst c. 4. Supervidere regulare sub Rege immediate post Regem totum Regnum Angliae omnes Ministros Legum infra idem Regnum temporibus Pacis Guerrarum The next Court which is now totally suppressed was the Honourable Court of Star-Chamber The Star-chamber Court of ancient time stiled Coram Rege Concilio suo coram Rege Concilio suo in Camera stellata of which I shall have occasion to write something in the Chapter below SECT 3 The Court of King's-Bench AS to the great and standing Courts The King's-Bench the first of them that is mentioned in Ancient Writers is that of the Kings Bench coram Rege This (r) Rex illarum Curiarum habet unam propriam sicut Aulam Regiam Justiciarios Capitales qui proprias Causas Regias terminant Bracton saith was the Kings proper Court called the Kings Hall and had for Judges in it Chief-Justices which determined the Kings proper Causes c. The same (s) Justiciariorum quidam sunt Capitales generales perpâ—tui majores a latere Regis residâ—ates qui emnium aliorum corrigere tenentur injurias errores Lib. 3. c. 7. fol. 108 b. Author speaking of the Justices of this Court saith That some of them were Capital General perpetual and the greater sitting by the Kings side which were to correct the injuries and errors of all others Fleta in describing this Court saith My Lord Coke gives this account That the King in this Court hath his Justiciaries as well Knights as Clergy-men as
saith That Enrollments (l) Pur le Enrolments de Pardon de Roy in le Chancery en temps le Roy Alfred of Pardons of the King were in the Chancery in the time of King Alfred Altho' Mauricius Regis Cancellarius by that title subscribes as witness to the Charter of King William the Conquerer to the Abby of Westminster yet none of these prove that such a Court was in those Ages constituted as we now call the Chancery For Sir Henry Spelman (m) Gless p. 107 ◠proves the Chancery was no Court but only the Ship as he calls it of the Kings Writs and Charters in old time now consisting of three Parts sc è Collegio Scribarum Regiorum è Foro Juris communis è Praetorio boni aqui Mr. Lambard (n) Archaion p. 62 63. hath proved that till the Reign of King Edward the First we find nothing of the Chancellors hearing and determining of Civil causes for till then the Justiciarius Angliae had the great Power Sir William Dugdale 's Origines Jurid fol. 36. b. which being then restrained ad placita coram Rege tenenda the King together with the trust and charge of the Great Seals appointed him to represent his own Royal and extraordinary Preheminence of Jurisdiction in Civil Causes and he gives this particular reason for his opinion That Britton a Learned Lawyer in Edward the First 's time writing of all other Courts from the highest Tribunal to a Court Baron maketh no mention of this Chancery Yet towards (o) 28 E. 1. c. 5. the latter end of his Reign we find it enacted The Chancellor and Justices of the King's-Bench to follow the King That the Chancellor and Justices of the Bench should follow the King that is remove with the Kings Court so that he might have at all times near him some Sages of the Law which were able to order all such matters as should come unto the Court at all times when need should require Yet this Act did not give an absolute Power to the Chancellor alone of determining in such Civil Causes as may seem by that Law which was made 20 Ed. 3. (p) Cap. 6. where it appears the Treasurer was joyned with him to hear complaints against Sheriffs Escheators c. something like this about Purveyors and Escheators that they might not oppress was enacted (q) Cap. 3. 36 Ed. 3. Nevertheless Mr. Lambard observes When Causes in Equity determined in Chancery that it doth not appear in the Reports of the Common Law that there is any frequent mention of Causes usually drawn before the Chancellor for help in Equity till from the time of King Henry the fourth nor are there found any Bills and Decrees in Chancery before the 20 of H. 6. such Causes as since that time were heard in that Court having formerly been determined in the Lords House of Parliament So Sir Edward Coke saith In the Chancery are two Courts First the ordinary coram Domino Rege in Cancellaria where in the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper of the Great Seal proceeds according to the right line (r) Secundum Legen Consuetudinem Angliae of the Laws and Statutes of the Realm Secondly extraordinary according to the Rule of Equity Secundum aequum bonum But it is not my business to enter into particulars The curious may consult Sir Edward (s) 4. Instit c. 8. Coke Mr. Richard Cromptom cap. 3. Sir Henry Spelman 1. glossar 1. de Cancellario à pag. 105. ad pag 113. Ryley's Appendix Ash's Repertory tit Courts Sect. 2. Roll's Abridgment p. 374. to 587. Prynne's Animadversions p. 48. Anno 5 Eliz. (t) Cap. 18. it was Enacted that the Lord Keeper for the time being hath always had used and executed and so may for the future The Lord Keeper equal to Lord Chancellor the like place Authority Preheminence Jurisdiction Execution of Law c. as the Lord Chancellor of England for the time being lawfully used The Oath of the Chancellor or Lord Keeper is to be found (u) Rot. Parl. 10 R. 2. col 8. 10 R. 2. consisting of six Parts First That well and truly he shall serve our Soveraign Lord the King and his People in the Office of Chancellor The Oath of the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper Secondly That he shall do right to all manner of people Poor and Rich after the Laws and usages of the Realm Thirdly That he shall truly counsel the King and his Counsel he shall layen i. e. hide or keep secret Fourthly That he shall not know nor suffer the hurt or disheriting of the King or that the Rights of the Crown be decreased by any means as far as he may lett it Fifthly That if he may not lett it he shall make it clearly and expresly to be known to the King with his true Advice and Counsel Sixthly That he shall do and purchase the Kings profit in all that he reasonably may as God help him and by the Contents of this Book SECT 6. Of the Court of the Exchequer SIR Edward Coke saith the Authority of this Court is of original Jurisdiction without any Commission Bracton mentioneth nothing of this Court and Fleta giveth a very short account that the King hath his Court and his Justiciaries residing at his Exchequer but descends to no particulars of the Jurisdiction (w) Fol. 2 b. But x Britton who lived in Edward the First 's Reign and all along writes in the name of the King as if his whole work had been the Kings gives us an account of the Nature of this Court in several particulars To hear and determine all Causes which touch the Kings Debts his Fees and the incident Causes without which these cannot be tried So of Purprestures Rents Farms Customs and generally of whatever appertained to the Revenue of the Crown the Tenants and Receivers of it so that the Court is divided into two Parts viz. Judicial Accounts called Scaccarium Computorum and into the Receipt of the Exchequer The principal Officer is the Lord Treasurer of England who formerly had this great Office The Lord Treasurer principal Officer of the Exchequer by delivery of the Golden Keys of the Treasury and hath the Office this day by delivery of a white Staff at the Kings Will and Pleasure his Oath is much-what the same as the Chancellors differing principally in that clause That the Kings Treasure he shall truly keep and dispend The other great Officers are the Treasurer of the Exchequer the Chancellor and Chief Baron and other Barons of the Exchequer The rest of the Officers are particularly reckoned in Sir (x) 4. Instit fol. 106 107 108. Edward Coke The Oath of the Barons of the Exchequer is to be found in the Statutes (y) The Oath of 〈◊〉 Barons of the 〈◊〉 chequer 20 Ed. 3. cap. 2. whereof the principal parts are That he shall truly charge and discharge
the Commission of Sewers by Law (e) Discretio est discernere per Legem quid sit justum Coke Inst 4. fol. 41. 3 H. 8. allowing the Commissioners to make Orders c. according to their Judgments and Discretions the word Discretion is interpreted by Lawyers to discern by Law what is Just as appears when a Jury do doubt of the Law and desire to do what is Just they find the special matter and the entry is Et super tota materia petunt advisamentum discretionem Justiciariorum that is they desire that the Judges would discern by Law what is Just and give Judgment accordingly It was resolved in the Court of Common-Pleas when a new Court was (f) Whyte's Sacred Laws p. 33. erected 31 H. 8. to hear and determine according to Law and Custom or otherwise to their sound discretion That the last Clause was against Law For when Laws are writ and published Magistrates know what to command and the People to obey otherwise the Law must necessarily be errant wandring uncertain and unknown which is a (g) Miser servitus ubi jus vagum miserable yea the most miserable Slavery This was the ground of the taking away the most August and very Ancient Court of the Star-Chamber The Court of Star-chamber dissolved though appointed by Act of Parliament (h) 3 H. 7. c. 1. 21 H. 8. and consisting of very great Personages as the Lord Chancellor Lord President of the Council Lord Privy-Seal Bishops Lords and Justices For tho' there were other Reasons that moved the Houses to be so pressing to get that Act pass the grounds of its Repeal alledged in the (i) 17 Car. 1. c. 10. Preamble of the Act are That the Judges have not kept themselves to the points limited by the Statutes and have undertaken to punish where no Law doth warrant and to make Decrees for things having no such Authority and have inflicted heavier punishments than by Law warranted and that all matters Examinable and Determinable before them had their proper Remedy Redress and Punishment by Common Law and in the ordinary Courts of Justice elsewhere In the like manner and on the same reason were the Court of Request (k) Ibid. cap. 9. before the (l) Cap. 48. President of the Marches of Wales of the President and Council in (m) Cap. 49. the North and of the County-Palatine (o) Cap. 37. of Chester either totally abolished or much eclipsed Having thus far discoursed of the several standing Courts I think it necessary to give an account of the Oath the Judges of either Bench are enjoyned to take having before spoke of the Lord Chancellor Lord Treasurer and Barons of the Exchequers Oath SECT 10. Of the Judges Oath COncerning this Oath there is a Controversie betwixt Mr. (p) Animadv on Coke's 4. Inst fol. 38. Prynne and Sir Edward Coke the latter affirming it to be in our Printed Statutes but not upon Record which Mr. Prynne disproves thus That the Oath of the Judges Barons of the Exchequer and Justices Itinerant and the Ordinances annexed to the Oath were made by the King because of divers complaints to him by the assent of the great men and other wise men of his Council and commanded to be openly published by the Sheriffs of every County by (q) 7 May 20 E. 3. special Writs issued to them for the Reasons specified in the beginning and close of the Writs at least three Months before the Parliament was held that Year and they are all entred upon Record as they are Printed in the Statute Books at large (r) Cl. 20 E. 3. part 1. m. 12 13. 20 E. 3. in the Clause-Rolls but not in the Parliament or Statute-Rolls of that Year because not made in but before the Parliament From whence I note a good Argument of the Kings Prerogative in appointing Judges and Commissionating them himself without any Parliamentary concurrence since he appoints the very Oath which was to direct them in their Office out of Parliament We find the Commons so well pleased with this Oath that in the (s) Rot. Parl. 20 E. 3. num 25. Parliament 20 E. 3. they petitioned the King that the Justices of Assise and Enquiry might be sworn by the same Oath as the Justice of the Bench Abridgment of Records p. 48. and that the chief of them might have power to swear the rest which the King assented to with some Qualifications but when in the Twenty first of his Reign they petitioned that his other Ministers might take the Oath and might be sworn to take nothing from any other the King answered that he would advise what other Ministers shall be fit to take the Oath Mr. Prynne refers us to the Cl. 18 H. 3. m. 19. Cl. 35 E. 1. m. 7. Cl. 1 E. 2. m. 19. and Cl. 5 E. 3. m. 27. for some Clauses of the Oaths of Justices agreeing with those prescribed to the Kings Council But the Oath as it hath been after used is to this purpose That they shall swear well and lawfully to serve our Lord the King and his People in the Office of Justice and lawfully counsel the King in his Business not counsel or assent to any thing which may turn him in damage or disherison by any manner way or colour and shall not know of any such thing but cause the King to be warned thereof by themselves or others shall do equal Justice and Execution of Right to all the Subjects and take neither by themselves nor others privily or apertly Gift or Reward of Gold or Silver nor of any thing which may turn to their profit unless it be Meat or Drink and that of a small value of any man that shall have any Plea or Process hanging before them c. shall take no Fee as long as they are Justices nor Robes of any man great or small but of the King give no Advice to any man great or small where the King is Party If any of what condition soever come before them in their Sessions with force and Arms or otherwise against the Peace or against the Statute thereof made to disturb the execution of the Common Law or to menace the People that they may not pursue the Law That they cause their Bodies to be Arrested and put in Prison and if they cannot be Arrested that the King be certified That they themselves nor others maintain no Plea or Quarrel hanging in the Kings Court or elsewhere in the Country That they deny to no man Common Right by the Kings Letter nor none other mans nor for none other Cause and in case any other Letters come to them contrary to the Law they do nothing by such Letters but certifie the King thereof and proceed to execute the Law notwithstanding any such Letters That they shall procure the profit of the King and of his Crown and if in default shall be at the Kings Will of Body Lands and
Capitularia Caroli (e) See Fred. Lindebrogus Codex Legum Antiq. magnis the Burgundian Alman Bavarian Saxon Longobard Ripuarian and Frisons Laws mention such Officers for preserving the publick Peace and (f) See Prynne 's Irenarch Redivivus p. 1. ad 5. punishing all Malefactors and infringers of the publick Peace as we have At the Common-Law before Justices of Peace were made there were sundry Persons to whose Charge the maintenance of the Peace was recommended and who with their other (g) Dalton's Justice of Peace c. 1. Conservators of the Peace Offices had and yet still have the Conservation of the Peace annexed to their Charge as incident to and inseparable from their said Offices yet they were only stiled and so now are by their Offices the Conservation of the Peace being included therein First the King is the principal (h) Idem Conservator of the Peace within his Dominions The King the principal Conservator of Peace and is properly Capitalis Justiciarius Angliae in whose Hands at the beginning the Administration of all Justice and all Judicature in all Causes first was and afterwards by and from him only was the Authority derived and given to all yet the Power nevertheless remains still in himself insomuch that he may himself sit in Judgment as in ancient times the Kings here have done and may take Knowledg of all cases and causes Before I leave this Head I cannot pass by the Act of (i) 20 H. 7. c. 11. H. 7. wherein is so fully declared the King's Care to have due Administration of Justice as in the close of the last Chapter I have only hinted The Reasons why Justices of Peace made The King's Care for right and easie Administration of Justice The Preamble saith The King considereth that a great part of the Wealth and Prosperity of the Land standeth in that that his Subjects may live in Surety under his Peace in their Bodies and Goods and that the Husbandry of this Land may encrease and be upholden which must be had by due Execution of Laws and Ordinances and so commandeth the Justices to execute the tenor of their Commission as they will stand in Love and Favour of his Grace and in avoiding the pains that he ordained if they do the contrary If they be lett or hindred they must show it to the King which if they do not and it come to the Kings knowledg they shall be out of his Favour as Men out of Credence and put out of Commission for ever Moreover he chargeth and commandeth all manner of Men as well Poor as Rich which be to him all one in due Administration of Justice that is hurt or grieved in any thing that the said Justice of Peace may hear determine or execute in any wise that he so grieved make his complaint to the next Justice of Peace and if he afford no remedy then to the Justices of the Assise and if he find no remedy there then to the King or Chancellor c. and as a further security it is added And over that his Highness shall not lett for any favour affection costs charge nor none other cause but that he shall see his Laws to have plain and true execution and his Subjects to live in security of their Lands Bodies and Goods according to his said Laws Thus we see who is the Principal Other Conservator of the Peace and Royal Conservator of the Peace others are the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper Lord Treasurer Lord High Steward of England Earl Marshal Lord High Constable of England every Justice of the Kings Bench and Master of the Rolls who have the power included in their Office and over all the Realm when they are present may award Precepts take Recognisances for the Peace of which and others Lambard in his Eirenarche may be consulted and how far Justices of Assise Stewards of the Sheriffs Turn and Court of Pye-powders the Sheriffs Chief Constable Coroners and Petty Constables may commit to Ward breakers of the Peace in their view though they cannot take surety at the request of any man that being peculiar to the Justices of Peace's Office Sir Edward Coke (k) Term. Pasch fol. 176. 4. Inst Coram Rege prima fuit Institutio Justiciariorum pro Pace conservanda Ad Pacem nostram conservandam saith that the first institution of Justices for the preserving the Peace was 6 Ed. 1. but Mr. Prynne will have it of older date because he finds that King Henry the Third by several Patents or Writs from the 17th to the end of his Reign did constitute and appoint several persons in most Counties of the Realm to be Guardians and Preservers of the Peace of the Realm and in the Patent 51 H. 3. m. 10.13 dorso it is dilectis fidelibus suis custodibus pacis Com. Linc. North. Ebor. Vicecom eorundem Comitat. and the like 54 H. 3. m. 21. d. But the first regular settlement of them seems to be Anno 1327. 1 Ed. 3. c. 16. The Authorities afterwards were further explained 4 Ed. 3. c. 2. 18 Ed. 3. c. 2. 34 Ed. 3. c. 1. Sir Edward Coke (l) Ibid. 171. tells us that the Commission of Peace stood over-burthened and incumbered with divers Statutes some whereof were before and some since repealed and stuffed with many vain and unnecessary repetitions and many other corruptions crept into it by mistaking of Clerks c. for amendment and correction whereof (m) Mich. 32 33 Eliz. Sir Christopher Wray Chief Justice of England assembled all the Judges of England and upon perusal had of the former Commission of Peace and due consideration had thereupon and often conferences betwixt themselves they resolved upon a reformation of the form with divers additions and alterations both in matter and method as it stood in Sir Edward's time and he saith It needed another Reformation by reason of Statutes since repealed and others expired of which he gives several instances Therefore he saith It is a good rule for all Judges and Justices whatsoever that have Jurisdiction by any Statute which at the first was Temporary or for a time to consider well before they give Judgment Whether that Statute hath been continued or made perpetual and if at first it was made perpetual Whether it be not repealed or altered by any later Statute What Commissions Patents and Writs were issued out by King Edward the First for preserving the Peace of the Realm suppressing seising and punishing of those who disturbed it may be found Cl. 9 Ed. 1. m. 10. d. in Rylies (n) P. 443 451 to 457 433 480. Prynne's Animadv fol. 149. Appendix so there is a Patent 14 Ed. 1. m. 15. 15 Ed. 1. m. 13. de militibus constitutis ad Articulos in Statuto de conservatione pacis edito contentoâ— observandos constituting persons of note in every County to observe them named in the Record and so for other Kings Reigns
may be disguised it is upon the State it self It is this kind of Envy that principally forebodes Mischief and requires greater Skill and Dexterity in the Prince and his Ministers to avoid the Malignity of the Blast of these black Souls and the Sting of such Asps Vipers and Scorpions Therefore it is no small Skill to chuse out such for publick Negotiations as will be less subject to be envied which in Part may be understood by electing those that have Worth Ability and Vertue to commend them and not private Affection or Interest only Sixthly 6. The Discontented The discontented are File-leaders of Faction The best foresight and prevention of Mischief from them is that there be no fit Head that hath Reputation with the discontented Party upon whom they may turn their Eyes Such are either to be won off or affronted with some other of the same Party that may oppose them and so divide the Reputation and make distinct Interests among them for Factions generally subdivide as that of the Optimates and Lucullus did against Pompey and Caesar and when the Senates Authority was pulled down Caesar and Pompey after broke upon one another So Antonius and Lepidus against Brutus and Cassius and after they were overthrown Antonius and Augustus divided So in the late War the Presbyterians and Independents clashed till at last the Contest betwixt them two so weakned both that it much facilitated the Restauration of the King To give moderate Liberty for Grief and Discontent to evaporate so it be without too great Insolence saith a Wise Man (w) St. Albans tit Sedition is safe especially if a Prince noting the Causes of Discontent be removing of them insensibly during his Connivence so as he seem aliud agere to let them see it was not for want of Foresight or Good-will that he set not on the Work sooner but that he waited the critical time The neglect of this some think was one of the great misfortunes of King Charles the First 's Reign That his Ministers who could not but be sensible how universal the discontent of the People was from the beginning of his Reign yet suffered them fifteen years to be fermenting and the causes not to be insensibly removed till when it was done at last all at once Anno 1640 1641. the King got no thanks for it as seeming to be favours rather extorted than freely granted For by the long lodging of discontent in the bosom of the People the humour turned back made the wound bleed inwardly and ingendered dangerous Ulcers and malignant Imposthumes However it is too apparent though that was a great oversight yet the backwardness of the Parliaments to afford Supplies and the designers of the Civil Wars who had been at work all along were the true Cause of those Miseries together with the blessed Kings Clemency Carrying men from hopes to hopes of redress so as it be not too tiresome is one of the best Antidotes against the poyson of discontentment and when it ariseth not so much from malice as mistake (x) Da malorum poenitentiae honorum consensui spacium Tacit. 1. Histor a Prince may respite a while the Prosecution to give space to the evil to repent and to the good to consent or be convinced perhaps a little time will mellow and meliorate humours diem forsitan tempusque ipsum leniturum iras sanctitatemque animis allaturam as Livy judiciously observes Yet this is to be admitted with some restriction For as Tacitus notes (y) Ipse inutili contatione agendi tempus consultando consumpsit mox utrumque concilium aspernatus quod inter ancipitia deterrimum est dum media sequitur nec ausus est satis nec praevidit Id. 3. Hist in another case of Valens Lieutenant to Vitellius That using delay in prosecuting the Enemy to the great danger of his cause he spent the time of Action in Consultation and then rejecting the extreams of Counsel he took the middle course which saith he in cases of danger and doubt of all other is the worst So in punishing Authors of Faction it is better use severity at first for a terror than to suffer smaller Symptoms of discontent to pass so long unrectified that at last they sprout out with Hydra's heads and grow too numerous to suppress for in such cases all delays are dangerous and soft quiet dealing brings more evil than hazarding rashly as in another case about (a) Nec contatione opus ubi perniciosior fit quies quam temeritas Idem 1. Hist Otho's Conspiracy and the quickness of the execution of it he relates which might have been prevented if Galba or Piso had well observed Otho's popularity and his ingratiating himself with the Souldiery whom Galba had discontented about the Donative Seventhly 7. The Emulous The Emulous being such as think themselves equally capable of their Prince's Trust and Regard make great ruptures in a State Therefore Tacitus condemns the Politicks of Caius Caesar (b) Aequatus inter duos beneficiorum numerus mixtis utriusque mandatis discordia quaesita auctaque pravo certamine legatorum jus adolevit diuturnitate officii vel quia minoribus major mulandi cura 4. Hist that divided the Proconsulship of Africk betwixt the Proconsul and the Legate giving the latter the Legion for by parting the Office thus betwixt two without subordination their charge and points of Commission lying intermingled and running joyntly together bred and nourished discord and quarrel and through sinister emulation the Legat Valerius Festus who had command of the Legion murthered Piso the Proconsul of Africk So by the reason of that emulous hatred betwixt Vinius and Lucro c Galba knew not what Council to follow and was ruined Eighthly 8. Popularity Popular men are to be noted of what Principles they are and to which of the qualifications of the Factious Persons they are inclined or how many of Factious Ingredients are in their composition It is worth the Prince's care saith a great (d) Operae pretium est 〈◊〉 nere litium animos eâ—sque tanquam suspectos notare qui nimium populariter student â—i enim facile plebis animos quaquaversum torquent adrapiunt quodlib ertatis avidi praesentem Rempublicam contemnuaâ— Lipsius Polit. Praefat. Author to discover the inclinations of his Subjects especially those who over much affect popularity for their wheedles easily twine and hurry the common peoples minds whither they please despising the Government out of a greedy desire of liberty If these being covetous cannot be set upon some Collections of Taxes and Duties on the Subject which may be heavy upon them though laid on by Authority whereby they may be rendered ingrateful to the people who often bestow their ill will upon such or if they cannot be trapped in some escapes of their words or actions whereby fear of punishment may make them slacken their Sails lest they be over-set and cannot ride the storm Or if they
call Tyranny Aristocracy into Oligarchy Idem pag. 200. and Democracy into Bestial Chirocracy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when the Seditious of the people prevail more by Fisticuffs than reason When he enumerates the causes of the Envy and Hatred of the People against the King that is turned Tyrant he never mentions that the People challenged any Original Right or that they conferred any trust upon him or made any compact with him to govern so and so But that some young Princes degenerating from their Just Prudent Wise and Valorous Ancestors giving themselves up to Debauchery and because of their plenty following their Pleasures committed excess in ther Habits eat more deliciously and luxuriously indulged themselves in prohibited Lusts by some necessities or wantonness galling the Necks of their Subjects or committed some contumelious or outragious Act against some powerful Person or committing the managery of affairs to some unfit or envied Person lost the affections of some popular persons and by their immersing themselves in Pleasure neglecting the Inspection into their affairs or by their sloth and lasiness neglecting the timely redress of Evils or suppressing of some growing Faction gave opportunity to some of the most popular and daring of their Subjects to conspire together to put an end to their Lives and Governments But in all this he mentioneth nothing of those miserable devastations which are brought upon whole Countries that in popular Governments are torn in pieces by them as too often I shall have occasion to mention For certainly one days misrule by the Rable may do more mischief to a Country than the whole age of a vitious Prince and the pretences of making Government more easie for the People and that the end of it is the Peoples safety hath ushered in all Tragical Revolutions and Rebellions and however Philosophers and other Writers of Greece and Rome declaim against Tyranny and absolute Monarchy yet they conceal not the perpetual intestine as well as Foreign Wars betwixt one Commonweal and another or what Butcheries Countries have undergone whereever the People got a participation of the executive parts of the Soveraignty It is not unfit to be observed what the great (u) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arist de Repub. l. 5. c. 10. initio Philosopher notes that a Kingdom is the refuge and defence of the good against the injury of the People for saith he a King is constituted of the good and those that excel in vertue and vertuous actions but a Tyrant is taken out of the People and Multitude against the Noble and Illustrious as he instanceth in Phidon at Argos Phalaris in Ionia Panaetius among the Leontines Cypselus at Corinth Pisistratus at Athens and Dionysius at Syracuse by the cunning leading of the People So that according to his opinion and the experience of all ages the People may be truly said to be the Original of Tyrants and not of Kings For whereever an unlawful Government was introduced which properly might be called Tyranny it was brought upon the People by their own choice some ambitious cunning man having wound himself into their good opinion was by their strongth and assistance able to suppress the Nobility and establish himself their Executioner after he had long been their Creature Those who please themselves with the notion of Compact and Agreement mostly do it for some ill end to make a plausible Scheme to decoy the People into an opinion that Princes can claim no more Power as of right belonging to them than the People shall intrust them withal which they may from time to time as they shall see cause in order to the pretended publick weal and safety either enlarge or restrain at their pleasure These must suppose saith a most profound (w) Bishop of Lincoln Preface to the Power of Princes Scholar a multitude all free without any sort of dependences on Parents under no restraint but every one at full liberty to do what he listeth with an equality of Power in them none having authority over other which surely was never yet found in any People or Country since the Creation of the World if these men will own its Creation or the Scripture-History of it and if they could in Authentic History point out some Parallel story they would do well to produce it for though I have quoted Polybius his conjecture of a state nearest it yet he makes no such inference from it that I can find But the forementioned Reverend Bishop hath suggested so many quaeries to be answered before any thing can be yielded to in this way of contract that it will puzzle the ablest of the Patrons of this popular way of constituting Government to solve any of them whereby to satisfie any considerate man of the legality of such a way or the consentaneousness of it to Principles of nature and the state of Liberty these men are such pretenders to It would be resolved whether Women and Children Mad-men and Fools had the freedom of suffrage as well as Men of Age and Fortunes and understandings If any were excluded who did it and by what authority If all were admitted whether with equal right to every one or with some inequality Was the Wives interest towards making up the bargain equal with that of the Husband and the Child with that of the Parents and the Servant's if there were or could be any such thing as Master and Servant equal with that of his Master's If one had not an equal share and interest in the business whence did the inequality arise who made the difference among them and what right had any man and how came he to have that right to give more or less power to one than another If all were equal who could summon the rest to convene or appoint the day and place of meeting Or when met take upon him the Authority and Office of regulating their proceedings or presiding or moderating in their Assembly of determining such doubts and differences as might arise while matters were under debate of calculating the voices and drawing up the Articles of Agreement in case they should agree Supposing all these doubts were cleared and the Contract made as they would have it it may be demanded whether majority of Votes shall conclude all that are present Dissenters as well as others Whether by vertue of an Act of those upon the place an obligation shall lie upon such as are casually necessarily or willingly absent when it was free for them to do so no man having power to require their appearance And whether a contract made by such persons as were at liberty before can debar those that shall succeed them in the next Generation from the use of that liberty their Ancestors had and enjoyed If so by what Law and Right are the said respective persons so concluded and whence should the obligation spring None of these look like the Dictates of the Laws of Nature and other Laws besides that according to the
all the Factions in Commonwealths were to write a voluminous History I shall touch upon some and show that the causes either given or taken will always be the same in these kinds of Government the very Constitution of them by the purity and equality of Dignity and Power naturally producing Jealousies Animosities and Aemulations whereas the (d) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Polit. l. 3. c. 15. Philosopher well notes that many may disagree among themselves but one cannot The difference of Judgment as to Conduct and Managery among multitudes of Equals embarrassing Debates the Result must be according to the prevailing of some Faction Every one Judging most advantageously of his own council and advice and those whose Councils are rejected will look upon it as a Diminution of that esteem for Wisdom and Policy which they think they deserve and these Discontents will occasion making of Parties entring into Confederacies and Combinations of Faction and frequently end in popular Insurrections Tumults and Disorders to which Republics by their make are thus propense Since therefore they are the seminaries of Faction we can expect no wholesome Fruit from such corrupt Seed for all factions endeavour to suppress their Opposites and those heats underminings and jarrs are not confined to their Senate-house but are dispersed according to the places of their Residence Estates Marriages or Alliances through the whole Dominions every one strengthening his Interest what he can and the nature of Mankind being to side with one or other if the Parties be Proud Ambitious Covetous or Imperious they will be most absolute and arbitrary in such places where they can prevail and if Persons admitted to Copartnership of Rule be not of their own Nature guilty of such Vices the desires of every one to be reputed the wisest and to gain the leading of a Party or obtain the supream Authority are apt to taint such who being exalted not born to Greatness would have all to judg that such Promotions are the pure-pute effects of their Merits and whoever sets that high value upon himself cannot escape the danger of unsupportable Pride as well as Vanity which will hurry them on to over-bear all Opposition I shall now proceed to some few Instances of the Ruins brought upon many by Faction The Athenian Changes and Factions At Athens after the death of Codrus the race of their Hereditary Kings ceased and there succeeded Kings for term of Life like as the Elective Kings of Poland After twelve such Kings ending in Alcmenon they constituted Decennial Kings or Archontes whereof Erixias was the last and then they passed to annual Magistrates like Lord Mayors or Burgo-Masters and all these changes were by the prevalence of one Faction after another Solon was one of these yearly Magistrates and he compiled their Laws such as the Romans in after-times sent to peruse and reduced into twelve Tables These were framed unto the Practice and maintenance of popular Government which in Solon's own Life-time were violated and almost extinguished for Pisistratus the Son of Hippocrates finding the Citizens distracted betwixt two Factions whereof Megacles and Lycurgus two Citizens of noble Families were become the heads took occasion by their contention and Insolence to raise a third Faction more powerfull because more plausible for that he seemed a Protector of the Citizens in general and having once got love and credit he wounded himself and feigned that by Malice of his Enemies he had like to have been slain for his love to the good Citizens and so procured a Guard and made himself Lord but he was soon driven out by Megacles and Lycurgus and then the Aemulation began afresh betwixt the former Factions and Megacles finding himself too weak called in Pisistratus but he was once more expelled and was restored a third time and governed Athens seventeen Years and his Son Hippias succeeded him who was at last forced to fly to Darius I shall under this Head only touch upon one example more in Athens Concerning the 30 Tyrants of Athens After the Lacedaemonians had subverted the Walls of Athens thirty Men were appointed by the People to compile a Body of their Laws and these had supream Authority and were made Judges and in cases wherein the Laws were defective had power to give Sentence according to their own pleasures At first they exercised their Authority upon lewd and wicked Persons such as were odious to the People But afterwards all sorts of People under the notion of Perturbers of the Peace were Fined Imprisoned or put to Death according as they among themselves judged fit To strengthen their own Tyranny they associated three Thousand Citizens to them the rest they disarmed exercising the greatest Tyranny imaginable upon them and agreed amongst themselves that every one should name one whose Goods should be seized on and the owner put to Death upon which Theramenes one of the Thirty discovering his detestation at those proceedings though there had been a Law that none of the three Thousand should suffer Death at the appointment of the Thirty but have a legal Tryal yet Critias one of these thirty Tyrants ordered Theramenes's name to be blotted out of the Number Theramenes urged the ill consequence to the rest of the Thirty if without any just reason the names of any might be expunged by the overruling of one or more of the number but every one thought fit rather to preserve his own Life by Silence than presently to draw upon himself the danger which as yet he thought concerned him little and perhaps would never come near him so the Tyrants interpreting Silence Consent he was forthwith condemned and compelled to drink Poyson These Proceedings caused many Citizens to fly who under the conduct of Thrasybulus made head against them and at last the Lacedemonians removed the thirty Tyrants to Sparta and the Citizens rose against the Captains of the tyrannical Faction and slew them as they were coming to a Parley and so put an end to that worst of Miseries they had undergone since those thirty were constituted In which sad History we may observe that these Tyrants were elected by the People and at last after their outragious cruelties were by the People destroyed and no doubt they at first appeared such to the People as they might confide in for Administration of Impartial Justice into which belief they had cunningly bewitched them and they were by the same Hands that raised them demolished For as Sir (e) History p. 278. W. Raleigh well observes in popular States when any mischief happens the People take revenge on the Commanders and where any Judgment is left to them as in popular States they will be always pushing on for a Share there will be very dismal and indirect Proceedings and when their Judgment proves sound it is by chance rather than otherwise In Carthage Of Factions in Carthage Factious and disorderly popular Government was as fatal as in any other place Hanno and Bomilcar
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and according to the Use of the Country for that the Barbarous Nations were more prone to Servitude than the Grecians and the Asiaticks endured with less trouble than the Europeans that Command which he calls Absolute as of Masters over Servants This he calls in reality 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tyrannical Government but Kingly also in that it is firm legitimate and according to the Use of the Country For that he (s) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Polit. lib. 3. cap. 10. Hâ—insii saith Citizens or Subjects defend Kings but Guards of Strangers are employed by Tyrants Kings commanding lawfully over the willing and Tyrants over the unwilling and without Rules of Law The third kind he calls that which among the Grecians was styled the Aesmynetian And this he (t) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Optiva tyrannis i. suffragio 〈◊〉 saith was an Elective Tyranny either perpetual for Life or for a time And this because it was a Command over the Willing such Persons being elected he styles a Kingly Government and instanceth in the Mitylenians who chose Pittacus to be their King against Alcaeus and Antimenides who were banished Such (u) Halicarnassâ—us lib. 5. Dionysius makes the Roman Dictators Such the Cumaeni by an honester Name styled their Tyrants and such were the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Athens Such a Kingdom Timolio held at Syracuse which he as well as Pittacus spontaneously resigned and did not convert into a Tyranny as Dionysius did or as Sylla and Julius Caesar did at Rome and Aratus at Sicyon according to the (w) Lib. 3. de Officiis Orator The last kind he calls (x) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lib. 3. Polit. c. 10. Heinsii Heroic because it was used in the Heroick Ages and had three Characteristicks of true Kingly Government That it was a Power exercised over the Willing Fatherly and Legitimate For he saith the first Kings either for the Benefits they conferred on the Multitude by Invention of Arts Conduct in War or leading them out in Colonies or supplying them with Lands governing those who lonies or supplying them with Lands governing those who freely yielded to obey were in that esteem and had that Power and Authority which was requisite These had command in War and in things sacred where there were no Priests and did determine Causes and all these things some Kings administred without Oath others were sworn to the observation of them by the lifting up the Scepter and (y) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid. concludes that in ancient times Kings had Rule and were Lords over all affairs of the City and those at home and abroad From whence and from what the Philosopher delivered in the beginning of this work and elsewhere (z) Commâ—nt in lib. 1. Polit. initic Giphanius with Thucydides concludes That these Hereditary Kings had such a Power as was restrained by certain Laws and they did not Reign as they listed and at their Pleasure but by certain Prescripts of Laws such we may presume as they ordained This was that Monarchy which was known in the first Ages of the World All People in all Ages and all places having by constant Experience found it most conducive to their Happiness and well-being For had there been any other form under which Mankind could have rationally promised themselves more or more certain Happiness than under this all humane care would long e're this have hit on it and there would have been an universal Regifugium But supposing we should quit these Topicks of Monarchy Other commendable Qualifications of Monarchy being according to the Law of Nature and that it is venerably for its Antiquity there are other Commodities wherein it excells other Forms As first that it is freest from the Canker of Faction which corrodes and consumes all other Governments Hence the most judicious (a) Tacitus 1. Annal. Historian tells us what Asinius Gallus replied to Tiberius That the Body of the Empire is one and so is to be governed by one Soul and in (b) Arduum sape eodem loci potentiam concordiam esse Idem another place tells us how difficult it is to find Concord among Equals in Power especially where not only as at Sparta there were two races of Kings governing at once but as many of them as there were Senators or Magistrates which by Bands and Confederacies are restlessly making Parties against each other whereby the Administration rowls from one Faction to another whereas Kingly Government is uniform and equal in it self and when by Factions Commonweals have been brought almost to utter ruin a (c) Omnem potestatem ad unum conferri pacis interfuit Tacitus 1. Histor single Persons Conduct hath restored all As (d) Perculsum undique ordinavit Imperii corpus quod ita haud dubie nunquam coire consentire potuisset nisi unius Praesidis nutu quasi anima mente regeretur Lib. 4. c. 3. Florus writes of Augustus Caesar that he ordered the shaken and distracted Body of the Empire which without doubt could never have been united in one Form again unless by the Direction of one President as a Soul and Spirit Even so we experienced in his late Majestie 's admirable yea miraculous Retauration which effected as great Blessings to these Islands as that of Augustus to the Roman Empire Besides it is a strong Argument for the Preference of Monarchical Government to all sorts of Republics that in all popular States we find all great affairs managed by some one leading Man who by the dexterity of his Address Power of his Eloquence or the Strength of his Arguments induceth so many as are necessary to join with him to effect them unless when by contrary renitency they are dissolved into Faction So when the Senate of Rome was in a most critical Debate An delenda esset Carthago Cato shewing them the Grapes which a few Years before grew there illustrated from thence the dangerous vicinity of so potent and opulent a State as had contended with them for the universal Empire and wanted only the skill of an uti Victoria to have effected it By which he cooled the warm Debates of the Senate and brought them to an affirmative Determination So Cicero often prevailed so Demosthenes and so the Daemagogues in popular States who are (e) Nalson's Common Interest pro tempore Monarchs the very head of every Faction in a Republic being a King in Disguise or a Tyrant in the dress of a Private Man The single Government being freed from the prime Cause of all intestine decay viz. Faction It necessarily follows that it must be of longer Duration Monarchy more durable as being built upon stronger and firmer Foundations than any other Model Ambitions Aemulations Hostile Parities popular Insolencies Senatorian Tyranny tumultuous Elections and infinite causes of Discords are the inseparable Associates and close Conomitants of all other Forms But in Monarchy hereditary
Religion (s) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Polit. lib. 5. c. 11. saith It is not foolishly and impertinently to be pretended whereby we may infer it is to be sincere and Cordial So Pomponius (t) In Philipp◠Laetus tells us That Philippus Arabs covered his Wickedness and Cruelties by feigning himself a Christian and relaxing their Persecutions and he reigned but five Years and He and his Sons were massacred by his Soldiers at Verona Indeed it cannot be expected otherwise but that the Judgment of God and the Indignation of Men should fall upon such Dissimulation and Hypocrisie For however Princes or private Persons may lacker over their specious Religiousness yet in some times or places it will appear so thin that it will be discovered and at best it will bear no resemblance with pure Gold Foyl It must not be denied That Princes have a larger Latitude than others to conceal their Sentiments of Religion or to set the fairest Gloss upon it as being to guide their Actions in this matter as well as in secular Affairs suitable to the Interests of State But every one will likewise acknowledge that a Prince The Credit a Prince gains that is truly Religious who useth in this as well as other matters a generous plain dealing is valued more by this Standard Coin without Alloy than those are who make as the States of Holland do their Third in Silver mixed with four parts of adulterate Metal pass for currant Sterling Coyn. Among just Men such a Prince that deals candidly with God and the World will find infinite more credit than any Tinsel heart will do But I must pass to another of the Florentine's Paradoxes (u) Discourse lib. 1. cap. 12. 〈◊〉 's Opinion of the Bencht of the Heathen Religion he saith The Pagan World was kept principally in Obedience by the belief they had in the Responses of Oracles as that of Jupiter Ammon at Delos or Apollo's at Delphos c. or by the Prognosticks of the Augurs and that when once Men began to sleight these they neither believed God nor the Devil but became as ungovernable as unchained Slaves and in another (w) Id. lib. 2. c. 5. place adds That the cause why the Force and Power of Christians is less than that of the Grecians and Romans was in the difference of their Religion For that the Christian Religion makes the Honour of the World contemptible and of little Estimation whereas the Gentiles esteemed Honour to be the Soveraign good which to obtain they had an exceeding great Fierceness and Hardiness in all their Deeds and Enterprizes and that the Heathen Religion promiseth no Happiness but to such as having fought for their Prince Country and Commonweal were loaded with Glory and worldly Honour whereas the Christian Religion promiseth blessings to such as are humble and contemplative and to those which despise most the Goods and Honours of this World and further adds That the Christian Religion hath conducted and brought the World into that Weakness and Feebleness we see it in delivering it as a Prey to the wicked and barbarous People because all Christians to take the way to Paradise dispose and arm themselves rather to receive Blows than to give or take Vengeance So that to him it seems That the thing which makes Christians so effeminate and cowardly proceeds only from this That they esteem more of an Idle and Contemplative than an Active Life In answer to all which I do own The Answer That the Oracles and Augurs had some Influence upon the People but we must likewise yield That they were often Instruments and Tools fitted by Princes to carry on some designs to give Courage to their Soldiers and disheartning to their Enemies and that God in the Machine was oftentimes a Prince's Spring that lay there As to the Rites and Ceremonies whatever Power they had to influence Mens Minds to Obedience and Duty to Governours and to stimulate and excite them to great and glorious Actions the same Motives and Inducements we may find in the Christian Religion and better bottomed That there is something else besides bare Forms Modes and Schemes of Religion that ought to be countenanced and cherished by Princes and which is very conducive not to make any Comparisons to the support of Government I will now endeavour to prove First therefore let us consider what is related of Numa Concerning Numa Pompilius It is said he appointed divers Ordinances concerning Priests and several Ceremonies whereof several Rolls were found in his (x) Livius lib. 40. Decad. 4. Sepulcher Anno V. C. 574. in the Consulship of Lucius Manilius in a Stone Coffin one part Latin and the other Greek These Books being seven in all by order from the Consuls and Senate were perused by Quintus Petilius who made such a Report of them that according to Livy they were decreed to be burnt as of no great account and besides judged pernicious and damageable to the Commonwealth by bringing that Religion into Use which was like to bring great (y) Cum animadvertisset pleraque dissolvendam Religionem esse Ibid. alterations in the present Rites Valerius Maximus gives something a different account for he saith the Greek Books only (z) De disciplina sapientiae quia aliqua ex parte ad solvendam Religionem pertinere existimabantur noluerunt enim prisei viri quicquam in hac asservari civitate quo animi hominum a deorum cultu avocarentur Lib. 5. de Religione num 12. of the Discipline of Wisdom were burnt for that they were judged in some respects to dissolve Religion For saith my Author the Ancients would preserve nothing in this City by which the Minds of Men might be withdrawn or led aside from the Worship of the Gods From this Story I shall first mark obiter that it seems for want of the engraving these Institutions of Numa concerning Religion in Brass as the Roman Laws were though the successive Priests had the ordering them ever since yet there was that alteration made in that long interval of time in the Rites and Ceremonies from what he had instituted that to have reduced them to their practice was like to un-hinge all their present Ecclesiastical Polity and so the Senate Consuls and Priests thought it more adviseable to burn and annihilate them than to disorder the present Establishment Secondly We may note that the Senate and Consuls took care that nothing should be exposed to the People how sacred a Relique soever that might enervate or debilitate Religion Now we may further note out of a judicious (a) Dionys Halicarnassaeus lib. 11. Historian That Numa built a Temple to Faith where he established many Ceremonies to induce People to reverence Faith The good things Numa established in order to Government and to fear Perjury and ordained likewise upon Controversies happening among Parties they should be bound to go to the same Temple and there with certain
used to bodily Labour he ordered him a Chariot and by other ways letting him understand that the weight of Government was not to be sustained by such Shoulders as his so wearied and discouraged him that he desired to be freed from the toylsomeness of it and when he understood the Emperors drift and expected his severity he only recommended him to those Soldiers that were forward to elect him and sent him to his Village If therefore such little Tryals discouraged Camillus what must we think it will do any Prince that hath untractable Subjects who force him to make Essays of various Methods to reclaim them and of a constant standing upon his Guard to secure himself and the Government Such are they who make many Princes Reigns Calamitous that might have been calm and peaceable Kingdoms saith my Lord St. Albans represent our Bodies Many Particulars wherein the Burthen of Government is discovered have their times of Health and Sickness Seasons of Prosperity and Adversity flourish with Wealth and languish in Poverty and Want suffer Distempers Alterations and Changes If therefore the Care and Concern of the Physician be great that hath the Health of many Patients under his Cure How much more must this great Aesculapius's be who hath the superintending of infinite Numbers of Subjects of all Degrees to preserve them in their perfect State of Felicity and Happiness to watch over the growth of depraved Humors and hinder their Ferments from boyling into the Fevers and Calentures of Rebellion to remove all the Obstructions that may hinder the equal distribution of Nourishment in Trade Commerce and the free Energy and Force of the Laws so to order the infinite Varieties of Tempers and Dispositions that the very lucta and jarring of them may produce an Harmony in the whole Besides these there is a Necessity to cherish the Vertuous and the Brave to discountenance the Vitious and Debauched and keep them from infecting others and finally so to manage all things as not only the present Age but remote Posterity may find the happy Effects of his Reign This is to undergo the nobilem Servitutem as Antigonus told his Son Kingship was Governours to be endowed with various Qualifications Therefore Philo observes That as the Pilot must change his Sails and Rudder and as the Physician useth not one kind of Remedy for all Diseases but observing the Encrease or Remisness of Symptoms the plenty or want of Humors and according to the changes of Causes tries various Experiments So a Supreme Governour ought to be multiform or endowed with variety of Qualifications to act one way in times of Peace and another in War being opposed by few to act resolutely and couragiously if by many to add to these Authoritative Suasives in publick Dangers to act himself and to commit those Ministeries to others which require Labour more than Conduct In his Councils to be a Judge in his Exchequer an Accountant in his Armies a General in his Navies Admiral in his whole Dominions the prime Gentleman Patriot and Peer in Vertue as well as Place Besides all these foregoing Considerations though a Prince by his own Justice Prudence and other Regal Vertues and the well disposedness of his People may keep his own Domimions in Peace and though there were no Whirlwinds Earthquakes or Trepidations of Faction and Sedition in his own Kingdom yet a King's Care is no less in making diligent Observations upon the Designs and Actions of all his Neighbour-Princes and States to shelter his own Subjects from Tempests and Hurricanes from abroad to divert Storms A Prince's Care in preserving his People at home and abroad to mingle Interests or divide as shall be most for the advantage of his Subjects to assist his Allies to countermine the Clandestine Designs of his Enemies abroad These require an Atlas to support this immense Structure of Government The Imployment of many under a Prince These require many Hands of the roughest delicatest and strongest many Feet of the swiftest and steadiest many strong Shoulders and brawny Arms many severe commanding or charming Eyes many wise subtle and toyling Brains infinite Varieties of Tempers and Dispositions which must be directed ordered and imployed by that presiding Soul that every where in every part and in all seasons must give Life and Energy to all its Members Faculties and Imployments Furthermore A Prince much concerned foâ— his Fame the Actions of Princes after their deaths will be judged (i) Suum cuique decus posâ—â—â— it is rependit Tacit. 4. Annal. without Flattery and Varnish As after Death and Corruption of parts the Vertues of Kings perfume their Graves ennoble and by Examples refine Posterity and leave a taste of immortality behind out-living their Marble So if they rule ill they cannot think by their (k) Praesenti potentia extingui posse sequertis avi mâ—moriam Id. present Power to extinguish the memory of the next Age saith the judicious Historian Therefore Lipsius saith ‖ Post fata nullus est locus nullum tempus quo funestorum Principum manes a posteris exeâ—rationibus conquiescent After their Deaths there is no place then or time wherein the Ghosts of detested Princes will be free from Execration Since therefore Kings are like heavenly bodies cause good or evil times have much Veneration but no rest since their Examples are constantly imitated so that as * Aâ— virtutem ille praeit sequimur aâ— vitia inclinamus bene beateque agit sloremâ—s improspere labimur aut ruimus cum illo Epist ad Polit. Flexibiles in quamcunque partem duâ—imur a Principe sequaces Panegyr Lipsius saith If a Prince lead to Vertue we follow if to Vice we easily bend to it if he live happily we flourish if unfortunately we fall into the praecipice with him Or that of Pliny be true That Subjects are mostly plyant and easily handed into whatsoever way the Prince leads it necessarily follows That this Consideration must bring a great Addition to their Cares For such elevated Souls must needs undergo great Anxiety how to comport themselves so as being conspicuous in Vertue and Conduct they may be secure of good Report For as (l) Omnia facta dictaque Principis rumor excipit nec magis ei quam Soli latere contigit 1. de Clem. Seneca saith Fame wafts abroad all the Deeds and Works of Princes that they cannot more lay hid than the Sun Hence Possibly we may conclude the Reason of that Inscription on Constantine's and others Coyn Soli invicto Comiti For as the Sun not only by his Light and enlivening Heat brings that unspeakable benefit to the whole Earth and living Creatures as a King is to do to his Subjects so by its Diurnal Motion we discover it never to be at rest Therefore it must be a great Care in a Prince that is placed in his Kingdom as the Sun in our Vortex whereby his Actions can never be long hid
great Council was adjourned to meet at Northampton where the King of Scots made his demands of the Counties of Northumberland Cumberland Westmorland and Lancashire Id. Hoved. and my Author saith That the King having taken advice with the Bishops Earls and Barons no orders of Men more are mentioned he gave answer to the King of Scots but it seems he had no mind to part with those Frontier Counties but by Charter in the presence of his Mother Alienor the Archbishop and other Bishops and many others as well Clerks as Laics of either Kingdom he granted the King and his Heirs certain Allowances Safe-Conduct c. when he should come to the King's Court upon Summons The most remarkable things in these Councils to be considered Remarks upon these Great Councils are the quick dispatch of Business in them the small Numbers they consisted of and that there appears no Footstep of any Commoners by Representation and by the Words Rex praecepit constituit c. it shows that the King had solely the Authoritative Power of passing the Consultations into binding Laws even where Mony was to be levied of the Subject and disseisure was to be made which was then practised but by an happy ease to the Subject is since by King Edward the First abrogated for which as we ought all to be thankful so to make use of this great Liberty that we may not abuse it to the damage of the Crown that bestowed the Largess and not so much boast our selves that we are freemen as to remember gratefully whence our Freedom came Of the Great Councils in King John's time THE first great Council that I have met with in King John's time is that held at Oxford (a) Matt. Paris fol. 176. num 30. ult edit Anno Dom. 1204. 6 Regni the Morrow after the Circumcision where as Matthew Paris saith convenerunt ad colloquium Rex Magnates and there were granted to the King two Marks and an half out of every Knights Fee Yet though all the Members are included under the name of Magnates yet my Author (b) Nec etiam Episcopi et Abbates sive Ecclesiasticae personae sine promissione recesserunt Idem saith that neither the Bishops Abbats or Ecclesiastic Persons passed away without a promise of supply I suppose So that I conceive the Clergy undertook for their Order to contribute something apart as it hath been since in use for the Convocation to give a distinct Tax imposed by themselves on the Clergy some evident Footsteps of which usage we find in that Council of (c) Hoveden fol. 282. b. num 10. Praecepit Rex Archiepiscopis Episcopis ut Siâ—illa sua apponeâ—enâ— cum cateri proni essent ad id saeciendum Archiepise Cant. juravit quod nunquam scripto illi apponeret nec leges consirmaret Clarendon wherein Thomas Becket Archbishop of Canterbury was required by the King that he and the Bishops should set to their Seals in Confirmation of the antient Laws the King enjoined to be observed which when the Bishops were willing to do the Archbishop swore he would never do The Members of the Great Council and the absoluteness of King John in imposing Taxes is fully discovered in what Matthew (d) Fol. 180. num 30. Paris writes that Anno 1207. 9 Regni the King kept his Christmass at Winchester the Magnates Regni being present and on the Purification of the Virgin Mary he took through England the Thirteenth of Moveables The King imposeth Taxes and other things both of the Laics and Ecclesiastics all murmuring (e) Cunctis murmurantibus sed contradicere non audentibus A Great Council held in the King's absence but none daring to contradict him Anno 1213. 15 Joh. the King intending an expedition into Normandy left Geofrey Fitz-Peter and the Bishop of Winchester Commissioners in his absence who at St. Albans held a Council with the Archbishop the Bishops and the Magnates Regni where on the part of the King it was firmly (f) Mat. Paris fol. 201. num 30. Ex parte Regis firmiter est praeceptum sicut vitam membra sua diligunt ne a quoquam aliquid violenter extorqueant vel aliâ—ui injuriam irrogare praesumant enjoyned that the Laws of King Henry his Grandfather should be kept by all in his Kingdom and all evil Laws should be totally disannulled and all Sheriffs Foresters and other Ministers of the King under the severest Penalties of Life and Limb should not violently extort any thing from any Person or presume to offer Injury to any In which we may observe the Conventions of great Councils in the Kings absence and that the Laws have force only by the King's Authority as appears by the expressions ex parte Regis firmiter est praeceptum In the same Year the Eighth of the Calends of September Stephen A Convention or Conspiracy against the King Archbishop of Canterbury with the Bishops Abbats Priors Deans and Barons of the Kingdom met at London at St. Pauls in a Conspiracy against King John and as (g) Fol. 201. num 50 60. Matthew Paris saith the Fame was that the Archbishop calling to himself a Club of the Nobles told them secretly that they had heard how he had absolved the King and compelled him to swear that he should destroy evil Laws and should recal the good Laws viz those of King Edward and make them to be observed in his Kingdom and that now there was found a Charter of King Henry the First by which if they would they might recal to the Pristine State their long-lost Liberties which Charter he produced and it was that made to Hugh de Bocland his Justiciary and so they made a Confederacy among themselves and broke up their Assembly We may note Observations on the foregoing Councils that this Convention at London was a Conspiracy yet it had the Face of a great Council as to the constituent Parts of it and no Representatives of the People and they grounded their Confederacy upon the regaining their lost Liberties and had recourse to King Edward's Laws and their Confirmation by King Henry the First So that even such Rebels owned Kings the Fountains Authors and Establishers of their Liberties as well knowing they were born Subjects and whatever was remitted of the absolute Power of Princes was by their own Grants though they might be induced to those Concessions from several causes but whenever threats force or other necessities for supplies or such like extorted these they were very ill kept Anno 1215. 17 Joh. the Barons pressing the King to confirm the Charter of Priviledges the Archbishop with his Associates read over each Chapter But the King understanding the Tenor of them with indignation and scorn said (h) Quare cum istis iniquis exactionibus Barones non postulant Regnum Nunquam tales illis concederet libertates unde ipse efficeretur servus Matt. Paris fol. 213. num
suae â—re proprio specialiter sibi Regno suo salvavit excepit That the King in the Declaration of the said Sentence did by his own Mouth specially save and except to himself and his Kingdom all the Liberties ancient Customs of his Kingdom and Usages Dignities and Rights of his Crown By which it is apparent how cautious the King was in these liberal Concessions not to prejudice his Prerogative They are neither few in Number nor of mean repute for judgment and learning in our Laws who assert Such like Protestation King Richard the Second made 10 Reg. Rot. Parl. 10 R. 2. num 32. See in King Stephen that as Acts of Parliament made contrary to Magna Charta are void so likewise are all such as diminish the Prerogative in any part of it which is necessary for the support of the Government So upon the passing the Petition (q) His Majesty's Speeches fol. 368. of the Basilica of Right King Charles the First the King said The King willeth that Right be done according to the Laws and Customs of the Land and that the Statutes be put in due Execution that the Subjects may have no cause to complain of any Wrong or Oppression contrary to their Just Rights and Liberties to the Preservation whereof he holdeth himself obliged as well as of his Prerogative But this would not please and so he pronounced Le droit soit fait comme il est desire and adds that he is sure is full but no more than he granted in his first Answer his meaning in that being to confirm all their Liberties knowing according to their Protestations they neither meant nor can hurt his Prerogative The Peoples Liberty strengthens the Kings Prerogative and the Kings Prerogative is to defend the Peoples Liberties The rest of the Parliaments of this Kings Reign are said to be called (r) Id. 435. num 10.21 H. 3. Id. 693. num 20.26 H. 3. Id. fol. 579. num 40. Id. fol. 696. num 30. Id. fol. 698. num 40. Vide Brady's Appendix fol. 59 60. per scripta Regalia submonitione Regia or that scripsit Rex praecipiens or missis literis convocavit Anno 1246. 30 H. 3. or Edicto Regio convocat c. which denotes the Authority convening them and for the Members they are either stiled Magnates omnis Regni Nobilitas or Clerus Populus cum Magnatibus Magnates tam Laici quam Praelati Episcopi alii Ecclesiarum Praelati cum Proceribus Regni or else they are particularly numbred to be Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors for the Clergy and the Comites Barones for the Laity In one I find Archiepiscopus cum Suffraganeis suis for the rest of the Bishops and (s) M. Paris fol. 397. num 10.10 H. 3. another runs thus Anno 1247. 31 H. 3. fecit Dominus Rex Magnates suos nec-non Angliae Archidiaconos per scripta sua Regia Londinum convocari Yet though Matt. Paris only mention the Magnates Archidiaconi yet he saith when the prefixed day was come the Bishops all willingly absented themselves and he gives the Reason ne viderentur propâ—iis factis eminus adversari sciebant enim corda omnium usque ad animae amaritudinem non immerito sauciari Then when he (u) Id. 629. Edit ult num 10. Archdeacons summoned to Parliament gives an Account of the business of this great Council he saith that the Archdeacons of England as also not the least part of the whole Clergy of the Kingdom with the Magnates complained of the Popes exaction and so Letters were writ to the Pope and Cardinals It may be noted also That in those Days the Kings summoned other dignified Clergy besides Bishops Abbats and Priors I shall insist no longer upon these Matters The new Constitution of Parliament by Representatives but pass to the great Mutation which was made in the Constitution of our English Parliaments It seems to be clear that before King John's time the Members of the Great Councils were summoned by special Writ and they were only the Archbishops Bishops Abbats and Priors for the Clergy and the Earls and Barons and such of the Tenents in Capite as were of greatest quality as the King pleased But in King John's Charter all the Tenents in Capite were convened by a General Summons which did much encrease the number of the Members of these great Councils and by so much as they were more numerous it is likely the Popular Barons hoped to make their Party the stronger against the King for we find it introduced when the Barons were propense to rebel So the Second great Alteration on the Constitution of Parliament was introduced Montfort's Rebellion when Simon Montfort Earl of Leicester and the Rebellious Barons had the King and the Prince Prisoners Simon Montford to strengthen his Interest first in the Kings Name summons the Earls and Barons which were in Arms against the King also at other times summoned more Abbats and Priors than had been used for that the Clergy at that time had a great Opinion of him and he was their Minion as is apparent in Matthew Paris and fully in the judicious (w) Answer to Petyt fol. 137 138 139. Doctor Brady to whom I must specially refer the curious Reader in this particular The 14th The Form of the Writ of Summons of Dec. 48 H. 3. the first Writ issued out thus Item mandatum est singulis Vicecomitibus per Angliam quod venire faciant duos Milites de legalioribus discretioribus Militibus singulorum Comitatuum It is commanded to all the Sheriffs of England that they make or cause to come two Knights of the more Legal and Discreet Knights of every County to be at London on the Octaves of St. Hilary next So in the like manner (x) Cl. 49 H. 3. m. 11. dorso schedulae Writs were directed to Cities and Burroughs to send two of the more Discreet Legal and Honest Citizens and Burgesses This is without Date that to the Barons of the Cinque Ports is Jan. 20. It doth not appear by the Writ to the Sheriffs whether they or the Counties were to elect and send those Knights or who were Electors It is the Opinion of most learned (y) Brady against Petyt fol. 143. Dugdale's Baronage fol. 759. col 3. Men that Simon Montfort apprehended from the Concourse of the Nobility and their great Retinues and the Example of his and the Barons Practices at Oxford some danger to himself and his Affairs and so altered the ancient Usage Upon the 5th of August 49 H. 3. Simon Montfort was slain at Evesham and all his Party routed and the 8th of September following the King convened his Parliament at Winchester which according to the old form The old Form again used consisted only of the Bishops Abbats Priors Earls Barons and Great Men nor did he continue Montfort's Method after as appears by that Parliament he
Barons Justices and others which are of the King's Council who may not depart without special leave of the King I shall not here enter into the enquiry how far the extent of the Power of the King's Council was in those days but it is very apparent that the King with advice of his Council proposed Laws and that others proposed by the Houses were considered by the King and Council as no doubt they are now considered before the King gives his Assent to Bills So in the Statute of the Definition of (x) Pulton An. 1304. fol. 72. Conspirators in the three and Thirtieth Year of King Edward the First it is said This Ordinance was accorded by the King and his Council in his Parliament Also in the Ordinance of (y) Idem Anno 1305. Enquests the Eighteenth of Sept. in the thirty third Year of Ed. the First It is said it is agreed and ordained by the King and all his Council that is his Parliament As to the special Prerogative of the King in giving the ultimate Character and fiat to the Laws every Act expresseth it so the Statute of (z) 18 Sept. 33 E. 1. Champerty the Statutes are called by the King Our Statutes and Our Lord the King hath commanded and in the Statute de Conjunctim feoffat it is said It is no new thing that among divers Establishments of Laws which we have ordained in our time so in the Ordinatio Forestae 34 Ed. 1. The King Ordains (a) Id. Anno 1306. fol. 73. We have ordained for our selves and our Heirs So in the Statute De asportatu Religiosorum 35 Ed. 1. it is said by the Council of his Earls Barons great Men and other Nobles of his Kingdom at his Parliament Our Lord the King hath Ordained and Enacted I shall only note first That in the Twenty eighth of this King those the (b) Cl. 28 E. 1. m. 3. dorso King had appointed being ready to give an account of the Perambulation of the Forests the King put a present stop to their report and his determination because the Prelates Earls Barons The Reason the King will determine nothing without advice in Parliament and the rest of the Magnates of the Kingdom in whose Presence his own and others Reasons should be propounded and heard and by whose Councils he intended to work especially seeing they were bound by Oath as well as himself to observe and maintain the Rights of the Kingdom and Crown were not then present and those were not summoned who should propound their Reasons so far as the matters concerned them and the King was not willing without their advice to put an end to the matters therefore he orders the Sheriffs to cause the two Knights that came to the last Parliament by his Precept now to come and the like for the Cities and Burroughs and if any were dead or infirm so that he could not come then to cause another to be chosen By which it appears that it was only from the King's Indulgence and that he might more deliberately resolve for the best advantage of his Subjects and for their satisfaction that he would have the advice of a fuller Assembly We may also further note from hence that it was in the King's Power to summon the same Knights Citizens and Burgesses without a new Choice except the Persons were dead or infirm Of the Parliaments in King Edward the Second's time IN this King's Reign these following Particulars are most observable In the Statute for (a) Pulton An. 1307. fol. 79. Knights 1 Regni it is said Our Lord the King hath granted In the Summons 5 Ed. 2. the Precept to the Sheriff The same Knights c. to come that were before is to cause to come to the Parliament to be held at Westminster those Knights Citizens and Burgesses in his Bailiwick which he caused to come lately to the present Parliament at London and which for certain causes went from the said Parliament (b) Cl. 5 E. 2. m. 26. dorso Vel alios ad hâ—â— idoneos loco ipsorum si ad hoc vacare non possunt or others fit for the Imployment if they cannot be at leisure Dated Octob. 11. In the sixth of Ed. 2. we have an example of the King 's (c) Cl. 6 E. 2. m. 27. dorso A Form of Prorogation proroguing the House of Commons in these Words Dominus Rex praecepit quod Milites Cives Burgenses qui ad Parliamentum Regis ibidem summonitum convenerunt pro Comitatibus Civitatibus Burgis Angliae ad propria remearent ita quod reverterentur ibidem in crastino S. Mich. prox futuro sub poena qua decet So that as they were commanded to return home so they were appointed a time to return under the Intimation of a Punishment The Preamble to the (d) Pulton An. 1315. fol. 80. The King with his Council revise Articles after the Parliament ended Articuli Cleri runs thus That by the Kings Progrenitors and himself at the Instance of the Prelates certain Articles were made and in the Parliament at Lincoln 9 Regni he caused them to be rehearsed before his Council and made certain answers to be corrected and to the residue of the Articles answers were made by him and his Council and so by way of Charter they are published at York 24 Nov. 10 Regni The Statute of (e) Id. 1316. fol. 83. Gavelet at London saith It is provided by our Lord the King and his Justices In the Statute de Terris (f) Id. Anno 1323. 17 E. 2. fol. 91. Templariorum it is said Great conference was had before the King himself in the presence of the Prelates Earls Barons Nobles and great Men of the Realm and others present whereupon the Greater part of the King's Council The King's Council and Justices affirm as well the Justices as other Lay-men being assembled the Justices affirmed precisely c. After the recital of Particulars the words are It is ordained and agreed in the same Parliament Anno 1326. the last of Ed. 2. There is a Prorogation of the (g) Claus 20 E. 2. m. 4. dorso A Prorogation before Meeting Parliament before meeting which runs thus That though the King had intended Colloquium Tractatum Conference and Treaty in the Quindene of St. Andrew by Isabel the Queen and Edward his eldest Son Custos of the Kingdom the King then being beyond Sea and the Prelats Proceres Magnates Regni and so had commanded two Knights of the Community of the County two Burgesses of every Burrough (h) Quia tamen quibusdam de causis necessariis utilibus praedict Parliamentum Tractatum usque in crast inum Epiphaniae prox jam futur c. duximus prorogandum yet for certain causes necessary and profitable he hath prorogued the said Parliament and Treaty unto the day after Epiphany c. Of the Parliaments in King Edward the Third's
Preamble to the Writ of Summons 4 E. 3. is very (r) Cl. 4 E. 3. m. 13. dorso General Causes of Summons remarkable Rex c. Qualiter negotia nos statum Regni nostri contingentia postquam suscepimus gubernacula Regni nostri hucusque in nostri dampnum dedecus ac depauperationem populi nostri deducta erant vestram credimus prudentiam non latere propter quod non volentes hoc urgente conscientia ulterius sustinere ac desiderantes toto corde statum Regimen Regni nostri secundum juris ac rationis exigentiam ad honorem Dei tranquillitatem pacem Sanctae Ecclesiae ac totius populi ejusdem Regni reformari Ordinavimus c. Parliamentum c. The 22 of E. 3. hath a peculiar (s) Cl. 22 E. 3. part 2. m. 9. dorso Clause Quod dictum Parliamentum non ad Auxilia seu Tallagia a populo dicti Regni nostri petenda vel alia onera eidem populo imponenda sed duntaxat pro justitia ipsi populo nostro super dampnis gravaminibus sibi illatis facienda Another considerable (t) Cl. 31 E. 3. m. 21. dorso Clause is to be found 31 E. 3. Et quum praedicta negotia perquam ardua sine maxima deliberatione tam Praelatorum Cleri quam Magnatum Communitatis ejusdem Regni nullo modo expediri poterunt ad quorum expeditionem Auxilium Consilium tam a vobis c. habere necessario oportet The (u) Cl. 3 H. 6. m. 9. dorso Preamble 3 H. 6. is to enquire how Justice hath been done c. Quia nos jam dum in Annis degimus teneris an pax justitia ubilibet inter Ligeos nostros Regni nostri Angliae sine quarum observatione Regnum aliquod prospicere non potest debite conserventur exhibeantur necne c. Therefore he summons a Parliament The cause (w) Cl. 22 23 E. 4. m. 11. dorso of the Summons 22 E. 4. is thus expressed Quibusdam arduis urgentibus negotiis nos securitatem defensâ—onem Ecclesiae Anglicanae ac pacem tranquillitatem bonum publicum defensionem Regni nostri Subditorum nostrorum ejusdem concernentibus Therefore he summons them The special causes are mostwhat to have supply against the Kings Enemies Special Causes of Summons the French or Scotch Kings and it is to be noted that in the Summons of King E. 2. mostly the (x) Sâ—otis Inimiâ—is Rebellibus nosâ—ris Claus 2. E. 2. m. 20. dorso Scots are not only called the Kings Enemies but his Rebels which implies them Subjects by vertue of the Homage done to his Father and so 8 E. 2. M. 24. dorso it is called Terra nostra Scotiae though he was the most unfortunate of all our Kings in his Expeditions against that Kingdom The first (y) Cl. 14 E. 3. part 2. m. 28. dorso With the Advice of the King's Council Writ I have found wherein it is said the King called his Parliament with the Advice of his Council was 14 E. 3. quia de avisamento Concilii nostri ordinavimus and so in 46 E. 3. and afterwards sometimes used and often omitted but in later times generally used The last considerable thing in their Writs is what the Prelates c. summoned were to do at these Parliaments which most-what is comprehended in these Words That it is (z) Vestrum expedit habere consilium Cl. 6 Jo. m. 3. dorso What the Summoned were to do expedient to have their Counsel or nobiscum super dictis negotiis tractaturi vestrumque consilium impensuri 23 E. 1. m. 9. dorso or ad tractandum ordinandum faciendum nobiscum Cl. 24 E. 1. m. 4. dorso Ad ordinandum de quantitate modo subsidii Ibid. m. 7. dorso habere colloquium tractatum Claus 2 E. 2. m. 20. dorso ad tractandum consentiendum Cl. 6 E. 2. m. 2. dorso So in (a) Cl. 14 E. 3 par 1. m. 33. dorso another Ordinabimus quod juxta consilium vestrum aliorum Praelatorum Magnatum caeterorumque ibidem convocatorum viderimus opportunum In the (b) Cl. 20 E. 3. par 2. m. 22. dorso 20 of E. 3. it is thus expressed Ad consentiendum hiis quae tunc praedictos Praelatos Comites alios Proceres ordinari contigerit super negotiis antedictis and the like 46 E. 3. m. 11. dorso In the Writ 38 H. 6. m. 29. dorso it is Ad tractandum consentiendum praecludendum super praemissis aliis and 23 E. 4. Et concludendum and so in the 15th of K. Ch. the First Ad tractandum consentiendum concludendum SECT 3. Of the Summons of the Temporal Lords I Have been the longer upon these Writs of Summons to the Clergy Summons to the Lords Temporal like those to the Prelates excepting in some few Particulars because those to the Nobles differ'd not much and the material differences will be all I need note in their Writs and in these we may find the gradual alteration from giving Counsel and Advice only it came to Treaty Ordaining Consenting Doing and Concluding I shall refer the curious Reader for the remarks that may be made from all these Writs to Mr. Prynn's (c) Part 1. Briâ—f Register p. 1â—2 c. Collection of them and only note some few most to my purpose of the Earls Barons and the greater Tenents in Capite's Writs and then proceed to the Writs of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses The first Writ of Summons to a Parliament now left upon Record as (d) Ibid. p. 160. Mr. Prynn notes is that of 49. H. 3. those of the (e) Cl. 45 H. 3. m. 3. dorso 45th being only Summons to assist the King cum Equis Armis cum Posse vestro as that to W. de Bello Campo de Aumel and others shew being only to afford him aid against his Enemies and Rebels In most of the Writs to the Princes Dukes Earls Barons and Peers In Fide Homagio vel Ligeanâ—ia proper to Temporal Lords we find the Mandamus is Vobis in fide homagio quibus nobis tenemini But sometimes as to Edmund Earl of (f) Cl. 25 E. 1. m. 25. dorso Cornwal it is Mandamus in homagio fide dilectione and that to Thomas de (g) Cl. 36 E. 3. m. 42. dorso Furnival 36 E. 3. is fide ligeancia quibus nobis tenemini That to Edward Prince of Wales 49 E. 3. 6 m. dorso is directed Carissimo primogenito suo Ed. Principi Walliae and the Mandamus neither hath adjoined to it fide homagio or any other Word See Prynne's Brief Register part 1. p. 207. but only commands him to be present in propria persona though others have fide homagio or ligeancea It is to be noted that the clause in
together with Judges and King's Council Citizens Burgesses of Parliament and Barons of the Cinque-Ports being usually summoned to the one but to the other some few Spiritual and Temporal Lords only without (x) Brief Register part 1. pag. 187. to 192. any Judges Assistants Knights Citizens Burgesses or Barons of the Cinque-Ports or some few of them only and divers who were no usual Lords or Barons of Parliament as Mr. Prynn hath made evident and the Rolls themselves in the Margin notes them by de Concilio summonito or deveniendo ad Concilium which some Antiquaries having not noted have confounded them SECT 4. Of the Judicature of the House of Lords IT is evident that the Lords in Parliament have ever been the usual Judges not only in all criminal and civil causes 6. The Lords Judicature proper for Parliaments to judg or punish and Writs of Errors but likewise in all cases of Precedencies and Controversies concerning Peers and Peerage which Power was in them as the King 's Supreme Court before there were any Knights Citizens or Burgesses summoned to our Parliaments So Hoveden (y) Annal. pars poster p. 561. ad 566. is express in the case of Sanctius King of Navar and Alphonsus King of Castile Comites Barones Regalis Curiae Angliae adjudicaverunt Anno 1177. 23 H. 2. So Fleta in Ed. the First 's time writes (z) Habet enim Rex Curiam suam in Concilio suo in Parliamentis suis praesentibus Pralatis Comitibus Baronibus Proceribus aliis viris peritis ubi terminatae sunt dubitationes judiciorum Lib. 2. c. 2. p. 66. thus The King hath his Court in his Council in his Parliaments there being present the Prelates Earls Barons Nobles and other skillful Men viz. the Judges Assistants where are ended the doubts of Judgments This Particular of the Jurisdiction of the House of Lords is so fully in every Branch of it proved by Mr. Prynn in his Plea for the Lords House that it were an Injury to the inquisitive Reader not to referr him to that Treatise for full Satisfaction therefore I shall only pick out a very few out of a Manuscript I have of the Priviledges belonging to the Baronage of England and Mr. Prynn In the fourth of King (a) Roâ— Parl. 4 E. 3. m. 7. num 3. Judgment of Lords on John Mautravers Edward the Third the Peers Earls and Barons assembled at Westminster saith the Record have strictly examined and thereupon assented and agreed that John Mautravers is guilty of the death of Esmon Earl of Kent Uncle of our Lord the King that now is wherefore the said Peers of the Land and Judges of Parliament judged and awarded that he the said John should be drawn hanged and beheaded In the first of R. 2. John Lord of (b) Rot. Par. 1 R. 2. m. 6. num 38 39. Gomenys and William de Weston were brought before the Lords sitting in the white Chamber On John Lord of Gâ—menys and William Weston for delivering up Forts to the Enemy and were severally charged at the Commandment of the Lords by Sir Richard Scroop Knight Steward of the Kings House William Weston being accused for rendring the Castle of Outhrewike and John Lord of Gomenys for rendring the Castle of Ards. They both made plausible defences and Sir Rich. Scroop Steward tells William that the Lords sitting in full Parliament do adjudge him to death But because our Lord the King is not yet informed of the manner of this Judgment the execution thereof shall be respited till the King be informed thereof and the like Sentence he passed upon John Lord of Gomenies only adding that he being a Gentleman and Banneret should be beheaded There are many more Examples of Judgments given in Capital matters upon Bergo de Bayons 4 E. 3. m. 7. num 4. Thomas de Gurny eadem membrana num 5. and others and for Offences not Capital of Richard Lions 59 E. 3. m. 7. William le Latymer 42 E. 3. m. 2. William Ellis ibid num 31 John Chichester and Botesha 1 R. 2. num 32. Alice Piers Ibid. num 41. Mr. Antiquity of Judgment by Peeâ—s Prynn (c) Plea for Lords p. 203. Hist lib. 4. shews this Jurisdiction out of Historians even from Cassibellan out of Geoffrey of Monmouth Also Anno 924. of Elfred a Nobleman who opposed King Aethelstan's Title and had his Lands adjudged by the Peers forfeit to him the Words of the King are Et eas accepi (d) Malmsb. de Gest is Reg. lib. 2. c. 6. p. 62. Spelman Conc. Tom. 1. p. 407 408. Anno 1043. quemadmodum judicaverunt omnes â—ptimates Regni Anglorum So Earl Godwin having murdred Prince Alfred Brother to King Edward the Confessor being fled into Denmark and hearing of King Edward's Piety and Mercy returned and came to London to the King who then held a Great Council and denied the Fact and put himself upon the (e) vnde super hoc pono me in consideratione Curiae vestrae Chron. Brompton col 937 938. consideration of the Kings Court and the King speaks to the Earls and Barons thus Volo quod inter nos in illa appellatione rectum judicium decernatis debitam justiciam faciatis and after it is said Quicquid judicaverint per omnia ratificavit So in the Constitutions of (f) An. 1164. M. Paris 94. Sicut Barones caeteri debent interesse judiciis Curiae Regis cum Baronibus quousque perveniatur in judicio ad diminutionem membrorum vel ad mortem The House of Lords the King's Court of Barons Clarendon it is appointed That the Archbishop Bishops and those Clergy that held in Capite as by Barony should be Parties in the Judgments of the Kings Court as other Barons ought with the other Barons till it come in Judgment to the loss of Member or to Death So in the Case of Tho. Becket Archbishop of Canterbury Anno 1165. 11 H. 2. we find in Hoveden parte post p. 494 495. that Barones Curiae Regis judicaverunt eum esse in misericordia Regis and afterwards when he would not yield to the Kings Will he (g) Dixit Baronibus suâ—s Cito facite mihi judicium de illo qui homo meus Ligeus est stare Juri in Curia mea recusat saith to his Barons Quickly make to me Judgment of him who is my Liege Man and refuseth to stand to the Law in my Court The Barons going out judg'd him fit to be seiz'd on and sent to Prison and the Historian saith tunc misit Rex Reginaldum Comitem Cornubiae Robertum Comitem Leicestriae ad indicandum ei judicium de illo factum Anno 1208. King (h) Anno 10 Johan Mat. Paris p. 218. John exacted Pledges of his Subjects and amongst others of William de Breause who said If he had offended the King he would be ready to answer his Lord and that without Hostages secundum judicium
Curiae suae Baronum Parium suorum So Anno 1240. 24 H. 3. (i) Graviter accusatus coram Rege Curia tota Lond. Mat. Westm 153. Matthew Paris saith That Hubert de Burgo Earl of Kent was grievously accused before the King and his whole Court and it was adjudged he should resign to the King four of his Castles I cannot omit one memorable passage that (k) Mat. Westm Anno 1260. p. 295 296. Anno 1260. 44 H. 3. there falling out a difference betwixt King Hen. 3. Prince Edward his Son Simon Montfort and other Nobles the King called his Baronage to St. Pauls and there it being urged that Prince Edward had done some injuries to the King he offered to prove himself innocent before the King and his Uncle who was King of the Romans saying Who are Peers of Prince Edward That none of (l) Omnes alios Barones Comites sibi de â—ure non esse Pares nec sâ—â—s in eum excercerâ— disâ—ussiones the rest of the Barons and Earls were by right his Peers nor ought to exercise upon him their Discussions of the matter By which it appears that he judged himself to be something more than a Peer of the Realm being the Heir apparent of the Crown I might fill a large Volum with the Histories and Records to prove this but since Levellers and the House of Commons that voted the House of Lords dangerous and useless have received such deadly wounds by Mr. Prynne in his Plea for the Lords who was once one of their own Champions I think it needless to whet those Weapons again since they always will be in readiness for any one to make use of if need require and shall only obviate one objection that may be urged That whatever the usage was before the Representatives of the Commons An Objection That after the House of Commons were admitted the Jurisdiction of the Lords House was lessened Answered yet the Commons after were often admitted to a share of Judicature in some cases But I shall give a few Instances how after this change of the Constitution of Parliament still this power of Judicature remained in the King and House of Lords Roger de (m) 4 E. 3. num 11.28 E. 3. num 9 10. Mortimer being accused of High Treason 4 E. 3. for the Murther of King Edward 2. after his resignation and unlawful deposition Knighton (n) De Event Angliae lib. 3. c. 16. col 1556 1557. giving an account of the proceedings agreeable to the Parliament Roll saith Rex praecepit Comitibus Baronibus caeteris Magnatibus Regni justum judicium ferre super praedicto Rogero de Mortimer So at the Parliament held at Salisbury 7 R. 2. W. de Zouch is said to be called to the Parliament to stand to the Judgment (o) Ad standum judicio Regis Domincrum Walâ—ingham p. 334. Hist Ang. Hypodig Neust p. 141. of the King and the Lords So Michael de la Pole Earl of Suffolk and Chancellor of England 10 R. 2. (p) Rot. Parl. 10 R. 2. num 6. ad 18. was accused by the Commons in full Parliament before the King Bishops and Lords and at last it is said The Lords in full Parliament gave judgment against him In the Parliament 11 R. 2. Thomas Duke of Gloucester offered to put himself upon his Tryal as the Lords of the Parliament would award c. After which the Lords as well Spiritual as Temporal claimed their Liberties and Franchises namely That all weighty matters in the same Parliament which should be after moved touching the Peers of the Land should be judged and determined by them by the course of Parliament and not by the Civil Law nor yet by the Common Law of the Land used in other Courts of the Realm Yet this seems a very high Demand for they have not Juris dandi but dati Jurisdictionem as they are a Court of Ministerial Jurisdiction being the Court of the King's Barons in Parliament And though when upon Writ of Error (q) Egerton sect 4.22 23. any Judgment in the King's Bench is examined in the House of Lords and there affirmed or reversed the Judgment is said to be affirmed or reversed in Parliament yet we cannot conclude they have the Power of the High Court of Parliament that their Decrees if against the Law should be as binding as Acts of Parliament How the Lords judge ministerially And though the same House in the same Session may not have Power to review again their own Judgment nor to restore again any Judgment they have reversed because they judge ministerially and not sovereignly and so bind their own Hands as well as their Inferiors whereas an Absolute Supreme Court is never at the last Period of Jurisdiction yet we see Attainders in one Parliament reversed in another and so may their Judgments be But this obiter I shall but add one proof more being full and express to the purpose to prove the House of Lords sole Jurisdiction with the King who must always be understood to give Judgment by them The Record is 1 H. 4. (r) Rot. Par. 1 H. 4. num 79. Exact Abridgment p. 392. where it is said That 3 Nov. the Commons in this Parliament shewed to the King Come les joggements du Parlement apperteignent soulement au Roy Seignieurs nient aus Communes c. That the Judgments of Parliament appertained only to the King and to the Lords and not unto the Commons Thereupon they prayed the King out of his special Grace to shew unto them the said Judgments and the cause of them that so no Record might be made in Parliament against the said Commons which are or shall be parties to any Judgment given or hereafter to be given in Parliament without their Privity Whereunto the Archbishop of Canterbury gave them this Answer by the Kings Commandment That the Commons themselves are Petitioners and Demanders and that the King (s) Et que le Roy les Seigniours de tout temps ont eues averont de droit les Juggement in Parliament en manere come mesmes les Communes soâ—t monstres and Lords from all times have had and shall have of right the Judgments in Parliaments in manner as the Commons have shewed How far the King and House of Lords have been Judges of the Priviledges of the House of Commons I shall declare in that part of this Chapter wherein I treat of that House SECT 5. Of the Assistants to the House of Lords HAving thus far treated of the Constituent Parts of the House of Lords I come now to the Assistants to this most Honourable House which were mostly the (t) Prynne's Brief Register part 1. sect 3. p. 240. The Judges and other Assistants of the House of Lords King 's Great Officers as well Clergy-men as Secular Persons who were no Lords or Barons of the Realm as namely his Treasurer
in the Record Item mandatum est singâ—lis Vicecomitibus per Angliam quod venire faciant duos Milites delegalioribus probioribus discretioribus Militibus singulorum Comitatuum ad Regem London in forma praedicta Item in forma praedicta scribitur Civibus Ebor. Lincoln caeteris Burgis Angliae quod mittant in forma praedicta duos de discretioribus legalioribus probioribus tam Civibus quam Burgensibus suis and so to the Barons of the Cinque-Ports which runs thus Rex Baronibus Ballivis Portus sui de Sandwico Cum Praelati Nobiles Regni nostri tam pro negotio Liberationis Edwardi Primogeniti nostri quam pro aliis Communitatem Regni nostri tangentibus ad instans Parliamentum c. Vobis mandamus in fide dilectione quibus nobis tenemini firmiter injungentes omnibus aliis praetermissis mittatis ad nos ibidem 4 de legalioribus discertioribus Portus vestri c. Nobiscum cum praefatis Magnatibus Regni nostri tractatum super praemissis consilium impensuri From all which it is observable first Observations on the first Writ to the Barons of the Cinque-Ports that in all probability the Writs then issued to the Knights Citizens and Burgesses were the same in form and substance with those to the Spiritual and Temporal Lords and in those to the Sheriffs c. Secondly the Qualifications of those to be elected are limited Thirdly It doth not appear whether the Counties themselves or the Sheriffs alone were to elect Fourthly The Writs for electing Citizens and Burgesses were directed immediately to the Citizens and Burgesses themselves not to the Sheriffs of the Counties Lastly that no Writ issued to the Citizens of London their Liberties then being seized into the King's Hand and that York and Lincoln are the only Cities mentioned particularly in the Roll. The first Writs entred at large in the Rolls are those (e) Cl. 22 E. 1. m. 6. dorso 22 E. 1. wherein is expressed that the King intending a Colloquium Tractatum with his Barons and great Men he commands that the Sheriffs cause to be elected two Knights De diâ—â—retioribus ad laborandum potentioribus cum plena potestate pro se tota communitate Com. praedicti ad consulendum consâ—ntiendum pro se communitate illa Hiis quae Comites Barones Proceres praeâ—icti concorditer ordinaverint in praemissis c. of the more discreet and more able to take Pains c. to come to Westminster c. with full Power for themselves and the whole Community of the said County to consult and consent each for himself and the said Community to those things which the Earls Barons and Nobles aforesaid unanimously ordain in the Premisses so that for want of such like Power the Business remain not undone I shall now insert what Variations I find in the Writs of Summons promiscuosly whether to Knights Citizens or Burgesses unless there be some remarkable difference to be observed First The Qualifications in the Writs As to their Qualifications generally both Knights Citizens and Burgesses are to be de legalioribus discretioribus ad laborandum potentioribus In the Writ 25 E. 1. (f) Cl. 25 E. 1. m. 6. dorso it is probioribus legalioribus and some two or all of these Epithetes are generally used till (g) Cl. 22 E. 3. m. 7. dorso 22 E. 3. m. 7. dorso where it is expressed that the Knights be gladio cinctos ordinem militarem habentes non alios de qualibet Civitate de quolibet Burgo duos Burgos de aptioribus discretioribus probioribus fide dignis Militibus Civibus Burgensibus Cl. 24 E. 3. par 2. m. 3. dorso and in the Twenty fourth of E. 3. there is an addition and limitation No Maintainers of Sâ—its c. to be choâ—â—n Qui non sunt Placitorum aut querelarum manutentores aut ex hujusmodi quaestu viventes sed homines valentes bonae fidei publicum commodum diligentes eligi and the self-same Limitations are in the 25 28 and 29 E. 3. So that it was used so long as the King thought fit In (h) Cl. 26 E. 3. m. 14. dorso 26 Ed. 3. it is unum Militem de provectioribus discretioribus magis expertis Militibus and so for Citizens and Burgesses by which it appears the King desired not any under Age as now is allowed to be chosen In 31 Ed. 3. besides (i) Cl. 31 E. 3. m. 2. dorso the usual words de discretioribus probioribus there is added de elegantioribus personis eligi Which in no Writ else before or after is to be found In the 36 E. 3. (k) Cl. 36 E. 3. m. 16. dorso it is de melioribus validioribus Militibus c. That of the Forty fourth of (l) Cl. 44 E. 3. m. 12. dorso E. 3. runs Duos Milites gladiis cinctos in Armis Actibus Armorum magis probatos circumspectos discretos It appears by the Parliament Roll 46 (m) Nul home de Ley pursuont busoignes en la Courte de Roy ne Viscount pur le Temps que il est Viscount soient retournez ne acceptez Chevalers des Countees neque ves qui sont Gentz de Ley Visâ—ounts ore retournez au Parlement eient Gages Rot. Parl. 46 E. 3. cum 13. E. 3. That it was accorded and assented to in that Parliament and an Ordinance made That no Lawyer pursuing Business in the Court of the King nor any Sheriff while he was Sheriff should be returned or accepted Knights of the Counties and if any were so returned they should have no wages Therefore in the fourteenth Number of the said Roll it is thus expressed Mes voyet le Roy que Chevalers Serjaunts i. e. Esquires not Serjeants at Law des meulieur valeurs du paiis soiz retornez desore Chevalers en Parlement quils sount esluz en plein Counts That Knights and Esquires of greatest value in their Country should be chosen in the full County The very next Writ 47 E. 3. (n) Cl. 47 E. 3 m. 13 dorso To be Knights giâ—t with Swords and skilful in Arms. runs thus Duos Milites gladiis cinctos seâ— Armigeros which explains the word Serjaunts before as in that Age being reputed Servants to Knights as holding Lands in such a Tenure of them de dicto Com. digniores probiores in Actibus Armorum magis expertos discretos non alterius conditionis duos Cives Burgenses qui in navigo exercitio mercandisarum notitiam habeant meliorem eligi and then in the Close follows Nolumus autem quod tu seu aliquis alius Vicecomes Regni praedicti aut aliquis alteriâ—s conditionis quam superius specificatur aliqualiter sit electus and the last Clause
ordained in the Premisses by the Common Council and so the Returns are ad faciendum quod tunc ibidem ordinabitur In 17 E. 2. (h) Cl. 17 E. 2. m. 27. dorso it is enjoyned that the Knights c. be there ad faciendum consentiendum hiis quae in dicto Parliamento ordinari contigerit super negotiis antedictis Anno 21 E. 3. (i) Cl. 21 E. 3. m. 12. dorso there is some more Power granted to the Knights c. ad tractandum consulendum consentiendum hiis quae tunc favente divina Clementia contigerit ordinari Whereas before it was only to hear and do what was ordained by the King the Prince or the great Council here it is to treat consult and consent to what then should be ordained But the Writ Anno 36. (k) Cl. 36 E. 3. m. 16. dorso explains who had the ordaining Power for it runs ad consentiendum hiis quae per nos ac dictos Praelatos Magnates Proceres ordinari contigerit So here the King the Bishops and the Nobles ordain and the House of Commons are to assent Anno 47 E. 3. (l) Cl. 47 E. 3. m. 13. dorso the words are ad faciendum consentiendum eis quae tunc de Communi Concilio Regni nostri favente Domino contingant ordinari which Form is continued to this day so that according to the import of the Writ the Commons are to do and assent to what shall be ordained in Parliament by which two words I suppose they have the full Power to frame Bills and to assent which also implies a Power of Dissent to the Bills sent to them by the House of Lords Having thus drawn into one Scheme the most material Alterations and variety of Expressions from all the Writs of Summons of Mr. Prynne and others that fill so great Volumes and truly as I hope quoted all the Records which illustrate these Particulars and in a very clear Landscape represented the most material Parts of the two so noble and wisely constituted Houses from whose great Wisdom with the Sovereigns Authority and Fiat all those wholesome and necessary Laws are derived that establish this great Monarchy I shall now pass to some general Remarques and from thence to the ancient and modern Priviledges of the House of Commons First it is very obvious Kings not confined to two Knights c. that the Kings of England formerly were not confined to summon only two Knights Citizens and Burgesses as now for Anno 22 (m) Cl. 22 E. 1. m. 6. dorso E. 1. the King issued out his Writs of Summons for two Knights of every County after which follows a second Writ entred immediately after in the same Dorse for other two Knights in these words Praeter illos duos Milites eligi facias alios duos Milites legales c. So 28 E. 1. three Knights or other three de probioribus legalioribus discretioribus Liberis Hominibus c. eligi These probi legales homines were such as held in Capite So in the (n) Cl. 26 E. 3. m 14. dorso Vâ— hâ—mines ab ista occupaâ—â—one autumpâ—alibus quo minus possumus retrahamus 26 of E. 3. the King considering that it was Harvest time that he might not withdraw Men from that Employment unum tantum Militem de quolibet Comitatu ad dictum Concilium mittendum habere volumus ista vice So (o) Cl. 45 E. 3. m. 21. dorso Ordinavimus ut laboribus parâ—atur expensis 45 E. 3. the King in his Writ saith That he might spare the Labours and Expences he will have treaty with some only of the Magnates by which the Knights of Shires here are to be understood Citizens and Burgesses One Citizen and one Burgess therefore appoints one Knight for the County of Kent one Citizen for Canterbury and one for Rochester whom he names if they be alive otherwise the Companion of him that was before In 18 E. 3. the Writs issued only for two (p) Brevia Parl. rediviva p. 144. ad 147. Knights in every County and no Writ for Electing Citizens or Burgesses and 26 E. 3. the Writs are for one Knight in every County and no Citizens or Burgesses yet in (q) These things are now reduced to a certainty by the Statutes 5 R. 2. c. 4. and others Prynne's Brief Regisâ— par 2 p. 32. this the King issued out particular Writs to Mayors and Bailiffs oâ— Cities and Burroughs to elect and return one Citizen for every City and one Burgess for every Burrough Secondly That the Kings of England had a Power to supersede particular Persons being chosen to resummon those that returned without leave or appoint others in their places and omit sending Writs to some Cities and Burroughs that had formerly sent and to create new Burroughs So the Lord Camoys (r) See Brief Regist p. 118. ad 123. as I have instanced before being elected by the King 's first Writ the King by new Writ declared it null and ordered to proceed to a new Election and the King appears in that Age to be the sole Judge of void and double Elections So in the (s) Cl. 28 E. 1. m. 7. dorso 28 Ed. 1. Phillip de Geyton being chosen one of the Knights for the County of Northampton and could not attend the King orders another to be chosen So 5 (t) Cl. 5 E. 2. m. 26. dorso E. 2. because the Knights Citizens and Burgesses of Yorkshire went away for certain causes not there expressed it is probable without the Kings Leave therefore he sends his Precept to the Sheriff to cause them to return vel alios ad hoc idoneos loco eorum si ad hoc vacare non possint But this more especially is to be taken notice of when I come to discouse of Priviledges of Parliament As to the last particular of the King 's appointing new Burroughs The King makes new Burroughs impowering them by special Charters to send Citizens and Burgesses to all Parliaments to be afterwards held by the King his Heirs and Successors Judge (u) Reports p. 14 15. Hobarts hath cleared it and (w) Brief Register par 2. p. 170. Mr. Prynne hath reduce them all into Chronological Tables and he makes it a certain Note that where the Sheriff makes his Return nulli sunt Cives nec Burgenses in Com. praedict or non est alia Civitas vel Burgus or non sunt alii Burgi we may certainly conclude that every City or Burrough omitted then out of those ancient Returns and since returned for Cities or Burroughs were made Cities and Burroughs since that time as the curious may see at large in his (x) P. 223. ad 297. Brevia Parliamenta Rediviva But on the other side Old Burroughs discontinued for what reason we find many Burroughs who elected Burgesses in 26 E. 1. as particularly Pontefract and
de Sabaudia J. Filius Galfridi Jacobus de Audel Petrus de Monteforti vice totius Communitatis praesentibus Literis sigilla nostra apposuimus in Testimonium praedictorum So that it is plain it was not Peter de Montefort that signed vice Communitatis but they all did it and he was a great Baron himself the Head of whose Barony was Beldesent Castle in Warwickshire I think it not amiss here to offer my Opinion concerning this Question and the great Controversie betwixt Dr. Concerning the Commons first summoning to Parliament Brady and Mr. Petyt and those that are so earnest to find the Commons summoned to Parliament before the 49 H. 3. before King John granted his Charter wherein he grants that he will cause to be summoned the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Earls and greater Barons of his Kingdom singly by his Letters and besides (i) Et Praeterea faciemus submoneri in generali per Viâ—ecomites Ballivos nostros omnes alios qui in Capite tenent de nobis Matt. Paris fol. 216. Edit ult num 20. will cause to be summoned in general by his Sheriffs The Tenents in Capite in stead of the Representative Commons as now and Bayliffs all others which hold of him in Capite at a certain day there is no doubt but the Tenents in Capite such of them at least as were eminent for Parts or as the King pleased were summoned to the great Councils and it being in that Charter said that the cause of the Meeting should be expressed in the Summons and that Forty days warning should be given and in the same Charter that the City of London should have all its ancient Liberties and free Customs and that all other Cities Burghs and Villa's which was of the same import as a Free Burrough as we find in Pontefract which is always stiled Villa Some summoned from Cities and Burroughs before King John's time but not as our Citizens and Burgesses now by Representation and the Inhabitants Burgenses who held a certain Land called Burgage Land and the Barons of the Cinque Ports and all the Ports should have all their Liberties and their Free Customs ad habendum commune concilium Regni de Auxiliis c. that is as I suppose to have some of their Members at the great Councils where Aids were to be granted to the King other ways than in three cases before excepted that is to redeem the Kings body to make his Eldest Son a Knight and to marry once his Eldest Daughter excepting which three Particulars reserved before in his Charter he had granted that no Scutage nor Aid should be laid on his Kingdom unless by the Common Council of his Kingdom From whence I think may be inferred that such Cities Burroughs and Villa's which held in Capite or the Lord that was principal owner of them by his Praepositus Ballivus or some that held immediately under him and so some for the Dominicae Civitates Burgi Regis might be summoned with the lesser Barons or the other Tenents inc Capite But this doth not prove them to come by way of Representatives nor that they had any more Power than the Knights Citizens and Burgesses had in after-times which as I have made it apparent by the several expressions in the Summons was only to hear and assent to what the King and Magnates ordained Since there are now extant no Summons in King John's time or before the 49 H. 3. except some few that are about the Tenents in Capite aiding the King in his Wars the subsequent Practices are the best Expounders of ancient Usages Upon the whole I do judge that before King John's Charter there were many of the Tenents in Capite summoned to the great Councils but so as the King had his liberty to summon whom he pleased and that some from Cities Burghs Villa's and other Ports did come to the great Council but still at the Kings pleasure and that in King John's time the body of the Kingdom siding with the Lords that so often rebelled against him the Lords thinking to make their Party stronger got the Clause for other Tenents in Capite to be summoned by general Summons After King John's Charter the Tenents in Capite so numerous as might be reputed an House of Commons Now whatever number were convened before King John's Charter this general Summons must greatly encrease the House of Commons as I may call it and there needs no such strife about the want of Freemen in these Councils for after this Charter all who were properly Freemen were capable the other were generally Tenents to them and Homagers which was a Tenure that though it might free their Persons yet their Lands were obnoxious to forfeiture upon every breach of Homage and their Lords had the power of taxing them so that in some sense they were their Tenents Representatives and as long as they were Freeholders themselves and were a more numerous body if they all appeared as for any thing I see they might do if not hindred by Impotence Nonage or the Kings service they far exceeded the number of Representatives in the Reigns of King H. 3. E. 1. and E. 2. So that it amounts to the same thing as to the general Freedom of the Nation when all these were Members of the Great Councils Who properly Freeholders in Kâ— John's time whether the common Freeholder were represented or not as now which Dr. Brady hath so nervously confuted every where in his Introduction that they were not that I think the Freedom Mr. Petyt Mr. Pen and others make so great a coyl about no ways impaired by Dr. Brady who like a judicious Person would have us use propriety of Speech and rather be thankful for the Freedom we now enjoy and our Ancestors have from time to time obtained by the grant of Kings than to make such Claims to native Freedoms and Liberties as Mr. Pen would have it that our Ancestors contended for as if their Ancestors had enjoyed them before we had any Kings and stipulated with their Kings for them before they admitted them to Soveraignty which no considering person that will impartially read ancient History either of our Country or others can find any certain footsteps of To return now to the business which the foregoing observation gives some light to I conceive as the Thegns the Kings Prepositi and Reeves As the Thegns in the Saxon-times so the Praepositi Reeves c. of Burroughs after by reason of their Imployments about the Kings Demesn Lands governing of Burroughs Stewards of Hundreds Wapentakes and men employed in other civil Affairs of the Kingdom did meet in the Saxon Councils so from Cities and Burroughs where great Lords had Fees as most if not all of them may be easily proved to have been held immediately of the King or of some of the very great Barons there might come before King John's time some Members to the great
Statutes of this Kingdom do give assign and appoint the correction and punishment of all Offenders against the Regality and Dignity of the Crown and the Laws of this Realm unto the King which manifests P. 23 that all such things are to be tried in his Courts So that surely the Commons Privileges must be included for to trouble any saith the Author of The Lawyer outlawed that doth not offend against the Crown or Laws of the Land is very Illegal and Arbitrary Id. p. 16. and an high breach of the Liberty of the Subject It would therefore be considered how improbable it is that after our Ancestors have struggled for many Ages Infoeliciter aegrotat cui plus mali venit a Medico quam a Morbo to preserve themselves and posterity from the unbounded Rule of Arbitrary Pleasure and having obtained that from their Soveraigns in so much that they can neither be fined or imprisoned by their Soveraign unless for transgressing some known Penal Law of the Land should leave any Arbitrariness in the House of Commons who are but the Peoples honourable Deputies Trustees and Atturneys Thirdly The Law hath provided where the Breach of the greatest Privileges are to be tried It is to be considered that the Law hath expresly provided where and how Breaches of Privilege ought to be punished 5 H. 4. c. 6. and 11 H. 6. c. 11. about any Assault upon a Parliament man or his menial Servant to be in the Kings Bench. Since therefore such Assaults are far more Criminal than Arrests of them or words spoken against them or inferiour misdemeanours to argue a majori ad minus it should seem rational that in the Courts of Justice being open to redress all sorts of Illegalities matters should be rather tryed than that persons should be punished by Imprisonments of the House of Commons alone For if this Arbitrariness were allowed it would argue a great defect in our Laws that they are not the entire Rule of the Subjects Civil Obedience and if the ordinary Courts of Justice can try the greater they may certainly try the lesser Crime as they have done in the Case of Done against Welsh River against Cosyn Shewish against Trewynnard Mich. 12. E. 4. Rot. 20. Excheq Hil. 14. E. 4. Rot. 7. Dyer fol. 59. But I have sufficiently shewed before that in old time the determination and knowledge of the Privileges did belong to the Lords How agreeable these ways of Proceedings were to the Usage of the House of Commons in 1640. and 1680. The Proceeding of the Houses in Anno 1640. and 1680. are fresh in every ones memory when not only they ejected and imprisoned their own Members but by Messengers sent for several Gentlemen and others no Members for acting according to the known Laws and King's Proclamations and often for Persons having spoke angrily or slightingly of some Member as in the Case of Abhorrers It is to be hoped those very Gentlemen now wish it might be forgot as I hope it will never be put in practice again when after a chargeable sending for up by the terrible Messengers after being detained in Custody during the Pleasure of the House and brought to receive their Sentence on their Knees at the House of Commons Bar they were dismissed So that I knew one who principally to avoid the Charge his Crime being for speaking Words against a Member in his Cups was forced upon notice of the Messenger 's coming for him to fly into Ireland Fourthly That the Law and Custom of Parliament may be declared It is worthy great Consideration by all the Members of the Honourable House of Commons that it is an undoubted Maxim both in Law and Reason and is necessary to the Obligation of all positive Constitutions That they should be published in express Words The immediate Laws even of God Almighty in the Opinion of Learned Men being not obligatory where they were never promulged Now since it hath not been hitherto published to the People what this Lex Consuetudo Parliamenti is 4. Inst it p. 15. Illa lex ab omnibus quarenda a multis ignorata a paucis cognita Fleta l. 2. c. 2. which Sir Edward Coke saith out of Fleta is to be enquired into of all is understood by many and known to few it would not only be obliging but most necessary that the Honourable House would give a true and full Description of this Law and Custom of Parliament and an exact Account of their Privileges that People might in some measure for the future shun those dangerous Rocks and not be surprized or shipwrack'd on such hidden Shelfs I shall close this long Chapter wherein according to my Talent I have endeavoured to comprise what hath been voluminously treated of by all the Authors I am furnished withal and digested things into an easie Method with some Assertions of Mr. Prynne whose Writings in this Particular are better esteemed than many others He saith Brief Register part 4. p. 685. Mr. Prynne's Opinion concerning the great Privilege the Commons The Parliament being the Supremest Court of Law and Justice ought to proceed legally according to the Course of Law and not to enlarge or extend the Privileges of Parliament beyond their Ancient Just and Legal Bounds nor alter the Law therein by their absolute Power Much more ought the House of Commons themselves to follow their Precedent and not to extend their old or vote up new Privilege to the delay Ibid. p. 1210. retarding or deluding of Common Right and Justice Therefore he condemns the writing of Letters by the Speaker 18 Jacobi 1. 14 Feb. 18 Jac. fol. 24. b. to stay a Tryal betwixt Sir William Coxe and Mr. Humphrey Aylworth as likewise in other Cases the same Year Ibid. fol. 51. b. fol. 137. 3 March and 20 April which he saith is diametrically opposite to the Judges Oath and against the Great Charter which saith See Stat. 2 E. 3. c. 6. 14 E. 3. c. 14.20 E. 3. c. 1 2. Nulli negabimus nulli differemus Justitiam Rectum To which I may add the Hardship used to Mr. Sherridon Lawyer outlawed p. 28. who being in the Custody of the Serjeant at Arms the Warrant of Commitment being during the Pleasure of the House of Commons Mr. Sherridon's Case who was denied the Benefit of the Habeas Corpus Act. without any Cause shown now the Habeas Corpus Act is express That all Persons are Bailable by what Person soever committed not excepting the King and Council much less the House of Commons unless for Treason or Felony One of the Judges made application to the House of Commons to know whether he might grant the Writ of Habeas Corpus to him The Debate lasted three days by reason of the Difficulty of the Cause For if they openly declared against the Habeas Corpus the Nation would be much alarm'd and suspect these Gentlemen instead of securing
the personal Will and Power of the Sovereign himself standing in his highest Estate Royal. Therefore whoever reads the Authors that writ in defence of the Parliament must consider this Fallacy they frequently used that he do not apply the Authoritative Act of the King with the Consent of the two Houses to the Houses without the King From the Co-operation of the two Houses in preparing Laws (b) Freeholder's Grand Inquest p. 34. the late 〈◊〉 since King Charles the First 's time of the words The King is not one of the Three Estates Be it endâ—ed by the King the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons as if they were all Fellow-Commissioners and the unwariness of some of the Penners of the King's Answers to some of the Papers of the two Houses wherein they stiled the King the third Estate the Commonwealths-Men have taken the advantage to reckon the King but as a third Legislator Therefore I think it necessary to remove this Rub e're I proceed further Although the Author of the Imposture The Modus makes the Parliament to consist of six Parts called the modus tenendi Parliamentum makes six degrees of constituent Members of the Parliament viz. The King first then Secondly the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors and other Clerks who held Baronies Thirdly the Proctors of the Clergy Fourthly the Earls Barons and other great Men who held to the value of a County or Barony Fifthly the Knights of Shires Sixthly the Citizens and Burgesses to which he might have added the Barons of the Cinque-Ports yet he saith the King is the Head Beginning and End of the Parliament and so hath no (c) Ita non habet Parem in suo gradu Peer in his degree Yet it plainly appears that these we now call the two Houses were by reason of their distinct Orders most frequently divided into three For in (d) As queux Prelats ou la Clargie par eux mesmes les Countes Barons par eux mesmes Chevalers Gentz de Countez Gentz de la Commune par eux mesmes entreteront Prynne Animadv p. 10. 6 E. 3. at his Parliament at York the Record saith That on the Friday before the Feast of St. Michael the Prelates or the Clergy by themselves the Earls and Barons by themselves the Knights of the Counties and the Commons by themselves treated c. Othertimes we find the Prelates Earls Barons and great Men and the Knights Citizens and Burgesses to have separate Consultations by themselves and to give their several answers to Articles and business propounded to them in Parliament as Mr. Prynne out of the Abridgment of the Records of the Tower hath given us above twenty instances At the making of the Statute of Praemunire 16 R. 2. the Commons pray The Lords Spiritual Lords Temporal and Commons make the Three Estates That the Lords as well Spiritual as Temporal severally and all the Estates of Parliament might be examined how they thought of that matter and the Lords Spiritual answered by themselves and the Lords Temporal by themselves and the King was Petitioned to make this Examination So in 40 E. 3. the King asking the Houses Whether King John could have subjected the Realm as he did the Prelates by themselves and the Dukes Earls and Barons by themselves gave their Answer Besides we find as at large I have before instanced in the last Chapter the Writs of Summons of the Bishops and Clergy were only in side dilectione and the Barons generally (e) Stat. 18. â— 6. c. 1. in fide homagio or Ligeancia and the Clergy granted their Subsidies apart and distinct from the Nobles Besides that the Bishops are to be esteemed the Third Estate is clear by Act of Parliament for it being questioned (f) 8 Eliz. c. 1. whether the making Bishops had been duly and orderly done according to Law the Statute saith That the questioning of it is much tending to the slander of all the Clergy being 〈◊〉 of the greatest States of the Realm So Sir (g) P. 36. Thomas Smith as in the last Chapter I have noted distinguisheth the two Houses into three Estates and Sir Edward (h) 4. Instr p. 1. Coke saith expresly That the High Court of Parliament consisteth of the Kings Majesty sitting in his Royal Politick Capacity and the three States of the Realm viz. the Lords Spiritual Lords Temporal and Commons the like the learned (i) Interpreter tit Parliament Cowel affirms Sir Henry Spelman (k) Solenne collequium omnium Ordinum Regni Authoritate solius Regis ad consulendum statuendumque de negotiis Regni indictum Gloss p. 449. calls it a Colloquy of all the Orders of the Kingdom convened by the sole Authority of the King to consult and appoint in the Affairs of the Kingdom This was also known to Foreigners uninteressed Persons for the Lord Argenton speaking how Subsidies were granted in England saith * Lib. 5. p. 253. Convocatis primis Ordinibus Clericis Laicis assentiente Populo And Bodin ‖ De Repul lib. 6. whenever he speaks of the Constitution of our Parliament calls it the King and the three Estates of the Realm But to put all out of doubt in King Charles the Second's Reign it is determined in the Act for the Form of Prayers for the Fifth of November For the Preservation of the King and the Three Estates Now the reason why in King Charles the First 's answer Why in some of King Charles the First 's Writings the King was called the Third Estate we meet with the expressions of making the King the third Estate was because at that time the Bishops being voted out of the House of Lords and the two Houses setting themselves in all the points of Controversie in opposition to the King the notion of a Triumvirate was more intelligible as it may be thought to the People and those who were so bitter Enemies to the King and had such a Rebellious force would have still increased the Peoples aversion if the King had asserted his Royal Prerogative otherwise Whether this were the true reason or the oversight of the Penners of his Majesties Answers I will not undertake to determine but I am induced to believe the first because I find the King and those that writ in defence of his Cause using frequently this way of Argument In every State there are three Parts saith (l) Review of Observations one the King ordered to write for him capable of just or unjust Soveraignty viz. the Prince Nobles and People Now through the Piety of our Lawgiving Princes a just and regular course of Government being obtained the stability of which being found to be more concerned in the Power of making Laws than in any other Power belonging to the Soveraign for preventing of Innovations that might subvert that setled regularity the frame and state of Government was in such a sort established as that the
the King who by the same Laws hath the Power of putting in execution and suspending the execution of the Laws in many Cases or that Aristocracy or Democracy have any such mixture with the Monarchy as they can impose their Laws upon him For to suppose a mixed Monarchy consisting of Three Estates independent for their Authority upon one another and to have several shares in the Rights of Sovereignty and to say The Government of three Estates is the Government of one Monarch is perfect nonsence for when (q) Besold Synopsis Polit. Doct. l. 1. c. 6. Monarchy Aristocracy and Democracy are melted and allayed together that which resulteth can take its name from none of the simple species or kinds of Government but must have some other Appellation Whoever will consider aright of the concurrence of the two Houses in preparing Bills will find How the two Houses concur in making Laws That though the Houses be as the Causa sine qua non yet the efficient procatarctick Cause and the Authoritative Power in passing these into Laws is the King only and what the two Houses do without his Assent is but as the Counsellor at Law 's framing a Deed and the Clerks Ingrossing the Indenture of Conveyance but till the Seal be set to it and delivery made as the Act and Deed of Donor or Conveyor it is of no force and virtue neither do we call it the Act and Deed of the Counsellor or Clerk but of the Person that seals it Another Objection those Champions for the two Houses made great noise with was (r) King's Supremacy p. 84. Objection That the Mixture is in the Supremacy of Power That the Power where the Legislative is in all Three is in the very Root and Essence of it compounded and mixed of those three so that where this height of Power resideth in a mixed Subject that is in three concurrent Estates the consent and concursus of all being most free and none depending on the Will of the other that Monarchy is in the most proper sence and in the very model of it a mixed Constitution And that such is the State of the Monarchy of England the Objector thinks clear because the House of Peers are an Aristocracy and the Commons a Democracy and this mixture of Interests and Powers being in the very Legislative Power he concludes the mixture is in the Root and Supremacy of Power and not in the exercise alone In answer to which it must be considered Answer That is only in the Exercise of the Power That though the concurrence of both the Estates with the Monarch in the making and promulgation of Laws be such as our Laws describe yet it is no otherwise than in the precedent Chapters by undeniable proofs I have made it out That what participation soever the two Houses have with the King in the Legislature it is only derivative from the Crown by the King's Summons and the restriction of those Summons to do and consent It is known to be the common Assertion of (s) Panorm cap. Gravem de Sent. Excom Canonists (t) Bertol. in Lomnes Populi sect de Justitia Jure q. 2. Civilians and (u) Suarez lib. 1. de Leg. c. 8. n. 9. Schoolmen That the Legislative Power is communicable by the Princes allowance and that such a concurrence as our Kings have allowed is no Argument of Supremacy such a mixture of the three Estates hath been in other Monarchies * Besold de Juribus Magist c. 2. which every where are owned to be absolute in respect of Power For as they are summoned by the Princes single Authority and dissolved at his own pleasure they can claim no sort of Right during their Session further than to consult about and prepare Bills for the Royal Assent Therefore (w) De Imperio Summarum Potestatum circa sacra c. 8. num 11. Grotius saith Istam Legislationem quae aliis quam Summae Potestati competit nihil imminuere de jure Summae Potestatis quod in Scholis dicunt cumulative datum censeri non privative So in our Kingdom every Corporation hath Authority to make Ordinances and Constitutions within their own Liberties for the good Order and Government of the Body and the Inhabitants (x) Coke 5. part tit Cases de By-Laws Ordinances of every Parish to make By-Laws and Ordinances among themselves for their own profit where they have Custom for it and for the Publick Good where they have no Custom Surely this is a sort of Legislative Power yet thereby it cannot be inferred that they have any Co-ordinate Power with the King in the Rights of Soveraignty So that allowing the Power of the two Houses as large as can be proved by the Laws for the stretch that the Parliamentarians would make is by the Tenters they only have set up the whole latitude of the Nomothetical Power is not jointly in the two Houses for none but Strangers to our Laws can deny That the King hath sole Power to dispense with the Statutes and abate their Rigour where a mischief would otherwise insue he alone hath Power by Edicts and Proclamations to order all Affairs for which there is no order taken by certain and perpetual Laws The Legislative Power is either (y) King's Supremacy p. 88. Of Architectonical and Preceptive Power Architectonical or Preceptive The Architectonical is that which layeth Materials of Law and consisteth in two things First in determining what is just convenient or necessary Secondly in declaring and promulgating that to be actually made a Law and Enacted which upon consultation is thought to be just convenient or necessary The first shews no Jurisdiction in the Persons who have it but only an Office and Imployment to deliberate and consult But whoever hath the Second Power hath a Jurisdiction to define Authoritatively what shall be Law and this Preceptive Power is that which makes the Law sacred and inviolable and which giveth it force to oblige the Conscience Now it is evident by undeniable Testimony and Authority that the exercise of the Architectonical Power is only committed to the two Houses who have votum consultivum decisivum but it is derived from the King who hath only the Preceptive Power So that the Writers for the two Houses generally did use a Sophistical way of arguing not discovering what they could not but know the difference betwixt the King's and the two Houses Powers in the making of Laws For subordinate Agents that are but Instruments of another and work by a derived Power when they concur with the Principal and supream Agent have their causality in producing the Effect yet this doth not prove the Authority to be radically in them As in an Estate of Lands saith (z) Idem p. 91. Mr. Sherringham wherein a Man hath a perpetual Right in Fee his Right is distinguished from the King 's Right of whom he holds the King having the demean of the
and after by himself and his mock-Representatives by Councils of State and Safety and such new Names and Powers as our Laws never heard of and all this under pretence that they Acted by the Peoples Authority and suffrage and all the sad Devastations of that Age resulted from the confiding so much in the pretended Representatives of the People Which (a) England's Universal Distraction p. 4. one some Years before the sad Catastrophe plainly foretold tho' like belief was given to him as of old to Cassandra His Words are That the so much exalting the Power of the Representatives was first to destroy the King by the Parliament and next the Parliament and Kingdom by the People Thus ignorant Politicians that build upon such Quick-sands soon live to see their Insanae Structurae ruinously fall about their Ears Thirdly Whereas the Advocates for the Representatives would gladly have possessed the People that they could rely upon none so securely and safely as upon those they had themselves chosen they being less subject to private ends and affections than any particular man such a Body being not likely to counsel or consent to any thing but what is publickly advantageous It is to be considered that it is a false Postulatum Such a Body being but an Aggregate of particulars may have as many private ends as any other number of Subjects it being well known that Communities themselves are subject to dangerous Inclinations from private Incitements and I the Representatives subject to misleading Factions and Ambitions of private Men and by coalition of Parties when they fall into designs they are most dangerous and fatally violent and tho' it may at first View seem to be repugnant that an Universality should have private ends yet seeing it is not the number of Agents but the capacity in which they act and the quality of the Actors and the coherence or incoherence of what they pursue with the publick end and weal which makes the Actions of men public or private It must needs follow That if without Authority or out of the way of Public Ordinances men pursue any thing though the whole Community concur in the pursuit yet it is all of the nature of a private Action and done to a corrupt and private end Because the Author of some Observations upon some of K. Charles the 1st Messages was reputed the great Champion of the two Houses I shall content my self with culling out some of the daringest assertions Why Reason and Law were not hearkned to by the Advocates of the Long Parliament he and some other of their Triarii used and apply such of those Answers and Reasonings as the Learned and Loyal offered then against them though they could not be heard while the Torrent bore all down the stream The hideous noise of Tumults and after of Drums Trumpets Cannons and Fire-Arms hushed and silenced all the still voice of Law and Reason But now it is to be hoped when Mens Eyes are unsealed the Mask and Vizard dropped or pulled off the fatal Consequences of such pernicious Principles throughly manifested and the loud Thunder of the Two Houses Ordinance allayed mens Spirits will be better fitted to hear them refuted Besides what I have endeavoured to answer before concerning the Authority of the Representative which they would make an Assembly in which the People in underived Majesty are by these Proxies convened to affirm an Imaginary Power supposed to be theirs originally and in such a convention to be put in execution I say besides this which in several places I have refuted That filled all their Declarations Messages and Treatises when they were contriving the setting up the Commons House Topmost to prove That they were a Body that was not easily corrupted byassed tempted or prevailed upon to Act any thing but what was the best for the Peoples advantage Therefore I think fit in many particulars to shew how such Bodies may be warped to sinister ends and especially how that House not only deceived but tyrannized over the whole Nation Private (b) Answer to Observer p. 130 131. How Passions Affections Interests and Factions may sway Representatives Quarrels and the memory of former Sufferings may work upon some discontent and envy at other mens preferment may transport others the fear of the lash and desire to secure themselves have forced some to personate a part great Offices and Honours have been a Pearl in some Mens Eyes to hinder their Fight others have been like Organ Pipes to whom the wind of popular Applause hath only given a sound others who have premeditated their Parts before their design was discovered have upon some pretences or other suppose of an unlawful Election being Monopolists Abhorrers or such like got those excluded by Vote whom they conceived to be likely to oppose their designs The bewitching Power of Oratory prevails upon many In others there is a Speechless Humour of following the Drove The Ambition and Covetousness of Representatives Can we not easily conceive several of this Body may be ambitious which would prompt them to alter the old way of bestowing Offices and collating of Honours so by disservice as well as service in Parliaments some Men have obtained Honours Offices and Estates finding it a good way to get preferment by putting the King upon necessity of granting Good Woodmen say That some have used Deer-stealing as an Introduction to a Keepers place So we have seen a Non-conformist's mouth stopped I might instance in other Professions with a good Benefice whereas before he was satisfied he could gape as wide as his Neighbours Others by more only ways slip into Preferment for Covetousness and Ambition will sail with any Wind. The Covetousness of the Members of the long Parliament by woful experience was found insatiable witness their Voting for one anothers Offices Governments satisfaction for their losses out of Delinquents Estates sharing the Kings Lands and Revenue the Bishops Deans and Chapters Lands and the Estates of the Royal Party hence together with the itch of Arbitrary rule they drew the determination of Causes out of the ordinary Courts of Justice before their Houses and Committees of them and in every County had their Sub-committees to Tyrannize over the People and fleece them Their cruelty appeared in their erecting High Courts of Justice Major Generals and other Arbitrary Courts The Cruelty of the Long Parliament where many a Loyal and brave man for serving his King against such Rebels either lost his Life or his Liberty and Estate and when they were the gentlest yet they could show hatred enough by Imprisoning upon I know not what suspicion and at leasure prosecuting such as they had a pique against The partiality of Members in such Conventions are very frequent The Partiality in shielding their friends from being questioned though their Corruptions were notorious to all the World So in the fatal Parliament of 1641. A Monopolist if a Loyal man was sure to be
in such cases it is not to be wondred at that a majority of Votes might be opposite to more judicious and foreseeing Members judgments neither is the Maxim universally true for it must be caeteris paribus if all things be alike For it is not sufficient for an Adviser to see unless he can let another see by the light of Reason A man ought not implicitely to ground his Actions upon the Authority of other mens Eyes whether many or few but of his own One Physician may see more into the state of a mans body than many Empiricks One experienced Commander may know more in Military Affairs than ten fresh-water Souldiers One old States-man in his own Element is worth many new Practitioners One man upon a Hill may see more than an Hundred in a Valley And who will deny but among an Hundred one of them may have a stronger Eye and see clearer and further than all the Ninety Nine So one Paphnutius in the Council of Nice saw more than many greater Clerks And it is no new thing to find one or two men in the Parliament change the Votes of the House Therefore nothing is got by this way of arguing though it be one of the plausiblest and most improveable of any of the Topicks they choose And if we could be sure that all the Members of such Assemblies were free from all the imperfections such are liable to much might be yielded to it All these Arguments were used for that sole end that they might possess their Party with the reasonableness of their desires to the King that he would implicitly yield up his reason to the guidance of their Councils They were not so frontless at first Concerning the Negative Voice as positively to deny the Kings negative Vote in Parliament that had never been doubted and there is good reason it should be a most sure Fundamental of the Government since nothing can be Statute-law but that to which the King assents Le Roy le veult For who can be said to will that hath not the Power to deny Si vult is scire an velim efficite us possim nolle Seneca But they affirmed that in Cases extraordinary when the Kingdom was to be saved from ruine the King seduced and preferring dangerous men it was necessary for them to take care of the Publick And then the Kings denying to pass their Bills was a deserting of them Objection That in Cases of Extraordinary necessity the Houses to have Power to secure the People from Tyranny Otherwise they alledged Parliaments had not sufficient Power to restrain Tyranny and so they boldly affirmed they had an absolute indisputable Power in declaring Law and as their Observer words it they are not bound to Precedents since Statutes cannot bind them there being no obligation stronger than the Justice and Honour of Parliaments And to summ up all he tells us if the Parliament meaning the two Houses be not vertually the whole Kingdom it self if it be not the supreme Judicature as well in matters of State as matters of Law if it be not the great Council of the Kingdom as well as of the King to whom it belongeth by the consent of all Nations to provide in all extraordinary cases ne quid detrimenti capiat Respublica let the brand of Treason saith he stick upon it Indeed because by all these most false and impious assertions and those horrid Acts built upon them they brought so great a ruine to the Kingdom they are and ever will be uâ—less a Platonick year return again branded with Rebellion in the highest degree To answer this Accumulation of Treasonable Positions for such I hope I may call in some sence Answer what is against the Kings Crown and Dignity is no ways difficult from the discourse of right constituted Parliaments For those of them that carry any shew of Reason are such only as may be understood of Acts of Parliament compleated by the Royal Assent but being spoken of either or both Houses in opposition to the King they are most false as I shall shew in particular For First If the two Houses are not bound to keep any Law no man can accuse them of breach of any What obligation can Justice lay on them who by a strange vertue of Representation are not capable of doing wrong But it is well known that Statutes stand in full force to the two Houses as being not void till repealed by a joynt consent of the King and the two Houses It would be much for the credit of the Observers desperate Cause if he were able to shew one such Precedent of an Ordinance made by Parliament without the Kings assent that was binding to the Kingdom in nature of a Law Our Kings can repeal no Laws by their own Prerogative though they may suspend the Execution It seems the Houses would have Power to do both and our Author in another place thinks it strange that the King should assume or challenge such a share in the Legislative Power to himself as without his concurrence the Lords and Commons should have no right to make Temporary Orders for putting the Kingdom into a Posture of Defence These were strange Phrases never heard before by English Ears Our Laws give this Honour to the King That he can joyn or be sharer with no man The King like Solomon's true Mother challengeth the whole Child not a divisible share but the very life of the Legislative Power The Commons present and pray the Lords advise and consent the King Enacts Secondly The Houses have no Power to declare Law As to their claiming an absolute Power in declaring Law it is as bold and false an Assertion as the other when spoken of the two Houses They may vote in order to a new Bill the explaining or repeal of any Law formerly made or prepare a Bill for any New Law and that is all they can do but authoritatively to declare any Law is most contrary to the Constitution of the Houses and never was adjudged one of their Privileges Thirdly As to the Justice and Honour of a Parliament when the State is in quiet and the Conventions only for making wholsome Laws for the Publick weal there are no Factions in Court or Country no private Intriegues to be managed the People neither uneasie nor discontented then it is to be expected That none but the wisest and wealthiest of the Gentry will be chosen Members of that August Assembly and their Justice and Honour will be conspicuous in all their Actions But have we not known Houses of Commons composed of other kinds of Persons who have voted their own Justice and Honour to be to imprison their fellow Members and fellow Subjects in an Arbitrary way How (d) Address part 3. p. 121. could a generous Soul conscious to himself he had transgressed no Law kneel at the Bar of such a House with the same submission as if he believed the Speaker
Second as they found it in the Latin (o) Cl. 1. R. 2. m. 44. Records therefore before I apply those it is needful to note the Latin which as we find it 1 R. 2. was this Capto per Archiepiscopum Cantuar. Sacramento Dom. Regis Corporali de concedendo servando cum sucra confirmatione Leges consuetudines ab antiquis justis Deo devotis Regibus Angliae Progenitoribus Plebi Regni Angliae concessas praesortim leges consuetudines libertates a gloriosissimo sanctissimo Rege Edwardo Clero Populoque Regni praedicti concessas servando Deo Ecclesiae Sanctae Domini Cleroque Populo pacem concordiam integre in Deo juxta vires suas de faciendo fieri in omnibus judiciis suis aequam rectam Justitiam discretionem in misericordia veritate otiam de tenendo custodiendo justas Leges Consuetudines Ecclesiae de faciendo per ipsum Dom. Regem eas esse protegendas ad honorem Dei corroborandas quas vulgus juste rationabiliter elegerit juxta vires ejusdem Dom. Regis This is an additional Clause This is verbatim the Latin for the preceding French except in the additional Clause and the Conclusion which makes the just Laws and Customs both to relate to those of the Church and those that the Vulgar shall have justly and reasonably chosen The like we find (q) Rot. Parl. 1 H. 4. num 16 17. 1 H. 4. and in the Pontificale of the Archbishops and Bishops and it is added after the King hath King Henry the Fourth's Oath as before expressed answered to the Proposals Pronunciatis omnibus confirmat Rex se omnia servaturum Sacramento super Attari praestito coram cunctis i. e. that the King by his Oath taken upon the Altar before all present to observe these confirms them The Solemnities and Ceremonies used at the Coronation of King Richard the Second may be perused at large in Tho. (r) Hist Aug. fol. 194 195. Juravit coraem Archiepiscopo Proceribus qui ibi aderant quoniam ipsi solum ejus Juramentum audire potuerunt Walsingham and he saith he swore before the Bishops and Nobles there present for they only could hear his Oath that he would permit the Church to enjoy its Liberties and would honour it and its Ministers that he would hold right Faith and would forbid Rapines and all Iniquities in all their Degrees 2ly That he would make to be kept every where the good Laws of the Land and especially the Laws of St. Edward King and Confessor who was buried in that Church and would make all evil Laws to be abrogated 3ly That he would not be an accepter of Persons but would make right Judgment betwixt man and man that especially he (s) Praecipue misericordiam observaret sicut sibi suam indulgeat misericordiam clemens misericors Deus would observe Mercy as the Clement and Merciful God might grant Mercy to him Having thus given an account of these Coronation Oaths I come to the Objections First They (t) Prynne's Treachery and Disloyalty Answer to the Objections about the Words Quas vulgus elegerit say that the word Vulgus doth signifie the two Houses and the word elegerit is to be taken in the Future Tense so that the King is obliged to consent to such Laws as the two Houses especially the Commons do chuse It is a wonder to me how men that pretended to any reading or learning in Antiquities or in the Constitution of the Government could defend their Cause with such pitiful Reasonings especially against King Charles the First who neither had taken such an Oath nor many of his Predecessors before him The Latin Translation of two French words gave all the occasion of dispute for that which is called Communate is rendered Plebs and Vulgus and aura eslu is translated elegerit whereas were it to have been understood in the Future Tense it should have been eslira and agreeable to that in all the Authentick Records of the Exchequer the word elegerit is Englished in the Preterperfect Tense Thus much may suffice as to the word elegerit Dr. Brady's Glossary will satisfie the Curious about the import of the word it self Concerning the word Vulgus one solid (u) Freeholders Grand Inquest b. 46. What meant by Vulgus according to the Opinion of some Author saith That we may be confident that neither the Bishops Privy Council Parliament or any other whosoever they were that framed or penned this Oath ever intended in this word the Commons in Parliament much less the Lords they would never so much disparage the Members of Parliament as to disgrace them with a Title both base and false It had been enough if not too much to have called them Populus the People but Vulgus the Vulgar the rude multitude which hath the Epithete of ignobile vulgus is a word as dishonourable to the Composers of the Oath to give or for the King to use as for the Members of the Parliament to receive therefore he judgeth that by Vulgus must be meant the Common People not the Lords and Commons But then saith the same Author the doubt will be what the Common People or Vulgus out of Parliament have to do to chuse Laws In answer to which the preceding word is to be considered Consuetudines quas Vulgus elegerit the Customs which the Common People have chosen If we observe the nature of Custom Customs chosen by the Vulgar or Common People it is the Vulgus or Common People only who chuse Customs Common usage time out of mind creates a Custom and the commoner the usage is the stronger and the better is the Custom No where can so common an usage be found as among the Vulgar who are still the far greatest part of every multitude If a Custom be common through the whole Kingdom with us it is all one with the Common Law of England which is often called Common Custom so that to protect the Customs which the Vulgar chuse is to swear to protect the Common Laws of England Agreeable to this is what the learned Dr. Brady (w) Glossary p. 36. notes That upon the whole it signifies no more than that the Community had chosen that is owned submitted to and desired still to use their Old Customs which by use time out of mind they had enjoyed for the better management of Affairs and Conveniency betwixt Man and Man all the Nation over or in any particular County Hundred Town City or Burrough such long practices being the foundation of all Customs but these are to be just which intrench not upon the Government or Laws and by permission and sufferance only become Laws But the same (x) Id. p. 35. Author judiciously affirms That the Community here intended was the Community of the Bishops What meant by the Community Abbats Priors
and his People as they loved to phrase it they answer by their Prolocutor that those who contract to their own ruin or esteem such Contracts before their own preservation are felonious to themselves and rebellious to Nature Inferring from thence That if the legal Constitution of Government The Writers for the Parliament affirm That where the Houses think the Constitution of the Government is not agreeable to the Liberty of the People they may alter it be not agreeable to the Liberties the House conceives needful for them they are obliged to contend to alter them which is no more nor less than if a Criminal being condemned to be hanged should be guilty of another Felony and Treason against Nature to yield to the Sentence but that he ought in his own defence to kill as many as he could that he might thereby save his life by escape Thus I hope I have made apparent the falshood of the Positions ranged in defence of that dismal Parliament How the Long Parliament voted all the Power into their own Hands who made use of them as Platforms upon which to plant the Artillery of their Acts and Ordinances For under the pretext of their obligation to preserve the Kingdom they voted to put it in a posture of defence and they voted from the King his Navies Officers Privy Counsellors and Revenues pretending the Navies were still reserved for the King in better hands than he would put them and for the other they would furnish him with better principled Ministers Whereas by the same Precedent the Subjects were bound to give up their Estates to their ordering as often as they pretended they could dispose of them more wisely For they might alledge the State which they reputed themselves had an interest paramount in them in case of publick extremity so that as they pretended the Head without the Body was the State before so now it was fit the Body should be without the Head whereas the Law hath provided against either exorbitances and if there was necessity we must fall into one we ought in reason to chuse the former because being better acquainted with that we could better digest it and it would be less burthensom to our Estates to satisfie one than five hundred nay ten thousand as it appeared when the greedy Commonwealths men with their Committees Armies c. was that flat Vermine in the Bowels which how true soever it is of the lumbricus latus was certainly true of this Monster That it was every where Head and Mouth It is to be well weighed When Parliaments beneficial when not that as Parliaments are in the highest degree beneficial when they keep within the bounds of duty and sobriety so when they will have their Ordinances to have the force of Laws and not govern themselves by known Laws they are the cause of many Distempers in a Kingdom and the Subjects condition is most unhappy in the Multitude of Physicians for extraordinary Remedies such as they always pretend to use are saith Sir Henry Wotton like hot Waters which may help at a pang but being too often used spoil the Stomach A Compleat Parliament is that (f) Answer to Observ p. 150. Panchreston or Soveraign Salve for all Sores but some would make the name of Parliament a Medusa's Head to transform reasonable men into Stones and subordinate Monarchy to the two Houses who must be denied nothing but with their good will would claim for them a paramount interest with the Soveraign whom they would advance only to the height and mighty Dignity of a Doge of Venice or a Roman Consul whilest they must be the Tribunes of the People their Supervisors So that we cannot be content to gather the blessed fruits right constituted Parliaments would afford us but we must rend away the top Branch yea stub up the Tree that we may scramble for the Fruit. Tacitus (g) 10 Annal. gives a Caution how a Prince may support his Authority that he do not vim Principatus resolvere cuncta ad Senatum revocando Kings not to grant away their Prerogatives at the Importunity of Parliaments It is fit a Prince should have the Glory of performing those things himself which are his Prerogatives and not to refer such things to Conventions of Parliament which properly belong not to their Cognizance Since therefore by the condescensions of our Wise and Gracious Princes there are several things in England the King cannot by Law do alone it is a most requisite Wisdom in Princes that as they observe the Laws in securing the Peoples Liberties and Privileges so by no Arbitrary Assumption of either or both Houses to let their Prerogatives be invaded for those are now no more than are rationally and politically necessary for orderly and established Government The Encroachments of the never to be forgotten long Parliament several of which I have in this and the foregoing Chapter hinted may be sufficient documents to Princes not to yield such a body too much Power for if the ballance once decline a little weight will sink it Therefore though Princes are not to enlarge their Prerogatives nova siti ad alia aliaque properare yet they ought to preserve those that remain For any Raveling once yielded will make the Royal Cittadel defenceless Testudo ubi collecta est in suum tegmen tuta est ad omnes ictus ubi exerit partes aliquas quodcunque nudavit obnoxium infirmum est The Tortoise as long as it keeps within its shell and coverture is safe but if it unbare any part it is obnoxious to danger Above all things a Prince should he careful never to part with the Prerogative of Summoning and Dissolving Parliaments For we cannot forget that the Houses of 1641. not content with a Bill for Triennial Parliaments got an Act for perpetuating themselves and that would not satisfie but they prepared a Bill for the certainty of future Parliaments whether the King had occasion for them or not so that if the King omitted the sending out of Writs and Summons the Chancellor might and for failure the Sheriff and I know not what inferiour Officers of which the Blessed King complains I cannot dismiss this Subject without taking notice of the Fundamental cause of Factious Members of Parliament The fundamental Cause of Factious Members in Parliament In England there is no such powerful Engine to make Faction and Sedition formidable and dangerous to Government as when the Majority of the Freeholders are wrought upon by the Arts I have in some measure hinted before and shall more largely in the Chapter of Faction to chuse Members of the House of Commons of their own Temper for such a Number being imbodied in that House give and receive mutual strength from one another For when such are met they do not take care to unite the minds of the Subjects to their Prince or one to another or imploy their time upon the great concerns of
correct the Vitious so they should begin the Reformation at home Chilon's (c) Laertius in vita Chilonis Brother desiring to know why he was not chosen at Sparta as well as Chilon he answered that he knew how to bear an Injury which his Brother did not for in Publick imployments those who are the Censores morum and chastise the Infringers of the Laws must expect Calumnies and evil Entreaties from the incorrigible and debauched and such must be resolved to perform their duty without any other by-end of Revenge Tyranny and Imperiousness on the one hand or hasty rast Cholerickness Partiality or Corruptness on the other Plato (d) Lib. 4. de LL. adviseth that the wealthiest be chosen for the better support of the Dignity but withall that they be such as are exemplary in obeying the Laws For none are more fit to serve their Prince and profit the Subjects than such as are obedient to the Laws which when they make a rule of their own Actions they will be sure to exact it of others It is great disparagement to a Prince to chuse men of vitious or uncommendable lives or such as have not worth and honour to commend them So the Princes of Europe think the Grand Seignior not so well served by Slaves nor was it so commendable in the Roman Emperors to make their Freemen of greater Power with them in the managery of greater affairs than Consuls or Senators which made (e) Praecipuum indicium non magni Principis magni Liberti Panaegyr Pliny say It was the principal sign of a Prince not great where the Freemen were great The Prince cannot be presumed to chuse his Magistrates by his own knowledge of their abilities and fitness for their several Imployments but must trust such as are about him therefore it becomes them well to know the qualifications of such as are to bear Office for the Rule of Tacitus (f) Melius officiis administrationibus non peccaturos praeficere quam damnare cum peâ—â—arint Vita Agricolae is to be observed That it is better not to prefer to Offices and Administrations such as will transgress than to condemn them who have transgressed CHAP. XXXIII Of the Soveraigns appointing Judges Courts of Justice and other Officers HAving treated in the last Chapters of such as have a general inspection into and by the Soveraigns Election and placing them a power of advising at least how the whole frame of Government is to be disposed as both Prince and People may be happy I come now more particularly to the Ministerial Officers of Justice such as are the Lord Chancellor or Keeper Lord Treasurer the two Lord Chief Justices and the rest of the Judges whether they be the Judges at Westminster or those of Assises Oyer and Terminer to try Causes in their respective Circuits I undertake this Task Lugduni tanquam Rhetor dicturns ad Aram The Author's Apology or one that procul profanus adorat The Subject being only fit to be handled by such as have read and digested the whole Body of the Laws and are eminent in the Profession of them whereas I must own my self to have tasted only so much of that Ornamental and most useful Study as may quicken a dull and languid Appetite to praise or rather admire it than that I can hope to benefit the judicious Reader by an imperfect Description of their Calling and Office who by the Sovereign are appointed to be the Oracles of the Law and the Ministers of his Justice whose great Wisdom and Knowledge all ought to reverence But as they make so great a Figure in the Government I could not omit them though it be but to salute the Skirts and hold up the Train of their Scarlet Robes SECT 1. IN Edward the Elders Days those that gave Judgment under the King King Edward the Elder 's Law about Judges Gerefa had the name Gerefa under which name Aldermen Earls Presidents Prefects Governours c. were comprehended From whence with the Germans the word Grave is used for an Earl President Judge c. and our Sheriff is from Scyre gerev Raeve or Graeve of the Shire The Charge in that Kings Laws runs thus (a) Eadweard Cyning vyt thaem Gerefum eallum that gede man swa ribte domas swa gerihtoste cunnon hit on thaere dombec stande ne wandigeth for nanum thingum folcrihte to gerecanne c. Eadward the King wills that all his Graeves give so right Judgment as they can most Righteously as it stands in their Judgment Book that is as we may suppose in the written Laws fearing for no thing or cause to declare or pronounce Right or Justice to the People The which publishing of Justice they shall appoint at certain times or Terms when they will perform it and declare the same So that in this seems to be comprehended what is more at large in the Oath of a Judge in After-Ages We must principally consider that the King is the Fountain and original of all Justice in his Kingdom The King is the Fountain of Justice therefore Bracton (b) Lib. 3. cap. 9 10. Rex non alius debet judicare si solas ad id sufficere possit cum ad hoc per veritatem Sacramenti teneatur astrictus sicut Dei Vicartus Minister in terra saith That the King and not another ought to judge if he alone were sufficient to do it being bound by his Oath to it therefore the King ought to exercise the Power of the Law as Gods Vicar But if our Lord the King be not sufficient to determine all Causes that the Burthen may be lighter divided among several Persons he ought to chuse Men wise and fearing God See Britton fol. 1. Coke 4. Inst c. 7. and appoint them Justiciaries Yet this surrogating of Judges in the Kings respective Courts doth not divest the King of his Power for as the same (c) Rex habet ordinariam Jurisdictionem omnia Jura manu sua quae nec ita delegari possunt quin ordinaria remaneant cum ipso Rege Bracton saith The King hath ordinary Jurisdiction and all Laws are in his Hands which cannot be so delegated but that they remain with the King From which and other Authorities Mr. Lambard saith (d) Archaion That the Courts derive their Powers from the Crown their original and drawing by one and one as it were so many Roses from the Garland of the Prince leave nevertheless the Garland it self undespoiled of the Sovereigns Vertue in the Administration of Justice Therefore saith Sir Edward (e) Tit. Discontinue de Proces part 7. 30. Coke By the Common Law all Pleas were discontinued by the Death of the King and Process awarded and not returned before his Death was lost For by the Death of the King not only the Justices of both the Benches and the Barons of the Exchequer but Sheriffs also and Escheators and all Commissions of
the Kings Lieutenants in England as the Lords Justices were sometimes I suppose in Ireland before (t) Coram quibus non alibi nisi coram semetipso Concilio suo vel Aâ—ditoribus specialibus falsa Judicia Errores Justiciariorum reâ—ertuntur corriguntur whom and no where else unless before the King himself and his Council or special Commissioners false Judgments and Errors of Justices are reversed and corrected and there are determined Breeves of Appeals and other Breeves upon Criminal Actions and Injuries against the Peace of the King And Bracton saith That in Criminal Matters if they touched the King's Person as Treason they were tried coram Rege if concerning private matters then before the Justices only By many Records it appears The Kings of England used to fit in this Court that the King sometimes sate in this Court and that sometimes the King ordered it to follow his Court as particularly in 28 E. 1. (u) Cap. 5. it was established in the Statute of Articuli super Chartas Robert de Bruis was the first Capitalis Justiciarius ad placita coram Rege 8 March (w) Pat. 52. H. 3. m. 24. 52 H. 3. the Title of Justiciarius Angliae of whose great Power the learned (x) Glossary Spelman and (y) Sacred Laws Sir Henry Spelman about the Office of the Chief-Justice of England Mr. White have given an account having an end in Phillip Basset who was advanced to that place 45 H. 3. Who desires further satisfaction may consult Mr. Crompton's Jurisdiction des Courts c. 4. Sir Ed. Coke Sir William Dugdale Mr. Prynne and the Authors they cite who are many and learned and do at large treat of its Jurisdiction and the Practice in it which are foreign to my Design SECT 4. The Court of Common-Pleas The Common-Pleas THis Court of Common-Pleas appears to be as antient as Henry the First 's time for in his Charter to the (z) Coke's Reports part 8. Abbat of B. he grants Connusance of all Pleas so that neither the Justices of the one Bench or of the other or Justices of Assize should meddle Bracton (a) Cognoscunt de omnibus Placitis de quibus Authoritatem habent cognoscendi sine Warranto Jurisdictionem non habent nec Coercionem Lib. 3. c. 10. fol. 105 b. saith This Court had Cognizance of all Pleas of which Authority is given them without warrant they neither having Jurisdiction or Coercion Therefore Sir Edward Coke saith That regularly this Court cannot hold any Common-Plea in any Action real personal or mixt but by Writ out of Chancery returnable in this Court This Court proper for Pleas betwixt Party and Party Those that treat of this Court agree That it was for hearing and determining all Controversies in matters Civil betwixt Party and Party called the Common-Pleas as contradistinct from Pleas of the Crown and was anciently kept in the Kings own Palace Not to follow the King 's Court. In Magna Charta it is granted That the Common-Pleas shall not follow the Kings Court but shall be held in a certain place The Exchequer having been the place where these Causes were heard till (b) Articuli super Chartas cap. 4. 28 E. 1. that by Statute it was provided that no Common-Plea shall from henceforth be held in the Exchequer contrary to the form of the Great Charter The first who had the Appellation of Capitalis Justiciarius in this Court according to Sir William Dugdale was Gilbert de Preston who by that Title had his Livery of Robes (c) Liberat. 1 E. 1. m. 4. 1 E. 1. The number of the Justices (d) See Sir William Dugdale's Origines Juridiciales p. 39 b. The number of the Justices varied 3 E. 2. were Six 14 E. 3. they were Nine the latter end of Henry the Fourth and all the Reign of Henry the Seventh they were but Four Those that would be satisfied about the Jurisdiction of this Court may have recourse to Mr. Richard Crompton's Jurisdiction of Courts c. 7. fol. 91. the Year-Book quoted in Ash his Promptuary Sir Henry Spelman's Glossary tit Bancus Capitalis Justiciar de Banco Communi p. 417. Sir W. Dugdale's Origines Juridiciales Prynne's Animadversion p. 52. and many other good Authors cited by them SECT 5. Court of Chancery THE Court of Chancery in some Writers is placed the first Coâ—rt of Chancery in others as I have placed it Although it is true what Sir Edward (e) Sir Edw. Coke's Arguments for the Antiquity of the Chancery Coke saith That Kings had their Chancellors in the Saxon times indeed he adds the Brittish also of which little can be known yet I dare not avouch with him that the Court of Chancery was then as now the only Court out of which Original Writs do issue it is true that to the Charter of King (f) Spehran Tom. 1. Concil p. 631. Edward the Confessor maâ—e to the Abbat of Westminster amongst the Witnesses it is said Ego Swardus (g) Swyerg trius in Spelman Notarius ad vicem Reynbaldi Regiae dignitatis Cancellarii hanc cartam scripsi subscripsi So (h) Glossary fol. 106. Adulph is accounted Chancellor to King Edgar and Tâ—rketil to King Edred and King Edmund and Wolsine to King Athelstan and that the Chancellor had a Court may be presumed from what is found in the Book of Ely writ as it is supposed about King Stephen's time that King Aethelred who Reigned about Anno 978. appointed and granted Answer Canceliarius qui vel Regum praecepta aut Acta Judicum scribit Spelm. Gloss fol. 104. that the Ch. of Ely then and ever after in the Kings Court should have the dignity of the Chancery which albeit as Sir Edward Coke saith it was void in Law to grant the Chancellourship of England in Succession yet it proveth that then there was a Court of Chancery As to the first it is apparent that the Chancellor then had the power of composing the Charters and before Seals were in use might also subscribe with the Sign of the Cross as other of the Kings Officers did but this doth not prove what kind of Court he was made Judge of for there the Notary in the Chancellors room signs last and in the (i) Tom. 1. p. 486. Councils of Sir Henry Spelman's Edition I find Adulph stiled Herefordensis (k) Id. p. 489. Ecclesiae Catascapus signing last of the Abbats See Spelman Glossar p. 106. As to the Book of Ely I know not how to understand that the Church should have any dignity of Chancellorship in the Kings Court and if it be meant of the Bishop of that See only it might possibly be meant to be the principal Chirographer or drawer of the Kings Charters As to what is found in the Mirror it is of no great validity being writ according to the then custom of the Age wherein the Author
mixt and they rode from seven Years to seven Years These Justices in Eyre continued no longer than till Edward the Third's time for then as Mr. (m) Notes on Hengham p. 143. Justices of Assize Selden notes Justices of Assizes came in their Places though it is manifest that Justices of Assize were sooner begun For (n) Lib. 3. c. 10. Bracton mentions these Justices of Assizes in his time in these words Sunt etiam Justitiarii constituti ad quasdam Assisas duo vel tres vel plures qui quidem perpetui non sunt quia expleto negotio Jurisdictionem amittunt The form of the Writ in (o) Cl. 9 H. 3. m. 11. dorso 9 H. 3. is set down by Sir William Dugdale in which the King constitutes his Justitiarii to take the Assizes of new disseising and Delivery of the Gaol and the Command to the Sheriff is to cause (p) De qualibet Villa quatuor legales homines Praepositum de quolibet Burgo vel Villa mercanda duodecim legâ—les homines omnes Milites libere Tenentes c. four legal Men and the Provost out of every Village and twelve lawful Men out of every Market-Town and Borough and all the Knights and Free-Tenents that is all that held in Capite to do what the Justices should on the King's part appoint In 21 E. 1. (q) Placit Parliam 21 E. 1. num 12. another settlement was made that either discreet Justices should be assigned to take Assizes Jurats and Certificates throughout the whole Realm viz. for the Counties of York Northumberland Westmoreland Cumberland Lancaster Nottingham and Derby two In the Counties of Lincoln Leicester Warwick Stafford Salop Northampton Rutland Gloucester Hereford and Worcester other two In the Counties of Cornwall Devon Somerset Dorset Wiltshire Southamptom Oxford Berks Sussex and Surrey two For the Counties of Kent Essex Hertford Norfolk Suffolk Cambridge Huntingdon Bedford and Bucks two and that the Assizes c. of Middlesex should be taken before the Justices of the Bench. (r) Mâ—ltis vigiliis excegitata inventa fuit recuperandâ—e possessionis gratia ut per summariam cognitionem absque magna Juris solennitate quasi per compendium negotium terminetur Lib. 4. sol 164 b. Bracton speaking of the Writ called Assiza novae disseisinae saith it was found out and contrived by much Vigilance for the recovering of Possessions by a summary or speedy Conusance without great Solemnity of the Law that the business might be compendiously determined For before at Common-Law Assizes were not taken but either in the Bank or before Justices in Eyre which was a great delay to the Plaintiff and a great molestation and vexation of the Recognitors of the Assize therefore in Magna Charta the Assizes are appointed to be taken in the respective Counties and the Patents to Justices of Assize run thus (s) See the Patent Clause and Fine-Rolls from King John to Edw. 4. Sciatis quod constituimus vos Justiciarios nostros una cum hiis quos vobis associaverimus ad omnes Assisas c. in Com. c. arainandas capiendas c. facturi inde quod ad Justitiam pertinet secundum legem Consuetudinem Regni vostri Angliae Salvis nobis amerciamentis inde provenientibus The Justices of Nisi Prius (t) Ad exonerationem Juratorum ad ceâ— lerem justitiam in ea parte exhibendum Stat. de Finibus 27 E. 1. c. 4. were first instituted by the Statute of Westm Justices of Nisi Prius 2. and their Authority is annexed to the Justices of Assize These Justices were instituted for two principal Causes for the ease of Jurors and for the speedy exhibiting of Justice SECT 8. Justices of Oyer and Terminer AS to the Justices of Oyer and Terminer they are appointed either by (u) Coke 4. Inst fol. 162. general or special Commission By general Commission they are to enquire of Treasons Misprisions of Treason Insurrections Rebellions Murders Felonies Manslaughter (w) Interfectionibus Killing Burglaries Rapes of Women unlawful Assemblies Conventicles (x) Verborum prolationibus false News Combinations Misprision Confederacies false Allegations Riots Routs Retainings Escapes Contempts Falsities Negligences Concealments Maintenances Oppressions Combinations (y) Cambipartiis of Parties Deceits and other ill Deeds Offences and Injuries whatever and to do thereupon what appertains to Justice according to the Law and Custom of the Kingdom Special Commissions were not granted unless for enormous (z) Nisi pro â—nermi transgressione ubi necesse apponere festinum remedium Cl. 14 E. 3. part 1. m. 41. dorso Hil. 2 H. 4. Rot. 4. Mich. 1 H. 8. Transgressions where there was a necessity of speedy Remedy In some cases we find the Justices of Oyer and Terminer have upon an Indictment found proceeded the same day against the Party indicted So Thomas Marks Bishop of Carlisle before Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer was Indicted tryed and adjudged all in one day for High-Treason Likewise Sir Richard Empson was indicted of High-Treason and tried all in one day So Robert Bell 10 Dec. 3 E. 6. and 10 Eliz. 4 Aug. John Felton was before Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer in London indicted of High-Treason and tried the same day by the advice of all the Judges of England SECT 9. Of the Kings Erection of Courts IN some Cases the King may erect new Courts of Justice What new Courts the King may erect and grant Conusance of Pleas to a Corporation to be kept after the Rules of the Law not in a way of a Court of Equity but may not alter the great Courts at Westminster that have been time out of mind nor erect a new Court of Chancery Kings-Bench Common Pleas Exchequer c. Although in a proper Court such as our Chancery a Judge of Equity be allowed yet if it were permitted in all other Courts to expound the Law against the letter and perhaps the meaning of the Makers according to Conscience as we speak there would soon be introduced absoluteness and Arbitrary Power Therefore great Care is taken by those that understand the Law that matters be not left to the discretion of any Persons Commissionated by the King to adjudge of any Causes So the plausible Statute (b) 11 H. 7. c. 3. of H. 7. to put in Execution the Penal Laws impowering Justices of Assize and of Peace upon Information for the King by their Discretion to hear and determine all Offences and Contempts against any Statute unrepealed was found to have Authorised Empson and Dudly to commit upon the Subject unsufferable pressures and oppressions So that (c) 1 H. 8. c. 6. soon after that Kings death it was repealed and those two brought to Tryal and executed for their oppressions So the Statute (d) C. 2. 8 E. 4. of Liveries c. by the discretion of the Judges to stand as an Original is deservedly repealed In
(p) 14 E. 3. c. 5. Stat. 1. Rot. Parl. 2 â— 2. num 63. confirmed by Parliament a Court for redress of Delays of Judgment in the Kings Great Courts raised by Statute 14 E. 3. whereby one Prelate two Earls and two Barons the Chancellor Lord Treasurer the Justices of both the Benches and other of the Kings Council have Power to call before them the Tenor of Records and Processes of such Judgments so delayed and to proceed to take a good accord and Judgment and so remand all to the Justices before whom the Plea did depend He likewise (q) 4. Instit c. 6. fol. 67. tells us That by the Common-Law it is required that both plena celeris Justitia fiat and all Writs of Praecipe quod reddat are quod juste sine dilatione reddat c and that there did and yet doth lye a Writ de pracedendo ad Judicium when the Justices or Judges of any Court of Record or not of Record delayed the Party Plaintiff or Defendant Justice and in Case the Prelate the two Earls two Barons the Chancellor Treasurer c. may not for the Difficulty determine it then to bring it to the next Parliament there to have a final accord From this whole Discourse I hope it is apparent that as our Kings authorize the Justices to do right to every one according to the Laws and Customs of England so the Judges cannot well fail of performing it Before I end this Chapter I cannot omit the inserting of some of the Expressions that I find in the Saxon Laws whereby the desire those Kings had that equal Justice should be administred is very manifest The eighth Law of King Ina inflicts a mulct of thirty Shillings upon every (r) Hwilcum scirmen oththe othrum dâ—man Shireman or other Judge that grants not Justice to him that requires it and besides that within a Week he afford him right in Saxon thus binnan seoffon nihte gedo hine rihtes wrythe The first of the secular Laws of King Edgar runs thus That every one enjoy the Benefit of right Judgment whether he be Poor or Rich but in exacting of Punishments let there be that Moderation that they may be attempered to Divine Clemency and may be tolerable to Men. The Saxon runs thus That ole mà n sy folc rihtes wyrth ge earm geeadig and him mon righte Domas deme sy on thaerebote swylec forgyffenysse swylec hit fore God ge beorglice sy and for weoruld aberendlic The third Law of the same King is that the Judg who shall pass false Judgment on any shall pay the King a Hundred and twenty Shillings unless he confirm it by Oath that he did it by Error and Ignorance not for Malice However he shall be removed (s) Et tholige a his Thegnscipes butan he aeft al thaem Cyng gebiege swa he hin gethasian wills out of his place unless he obtain the same again of the King By which it further appears that in those days the King removed and placed Judges at his Pleasure The first of the secular Laws of King Canutus runs thus First I will that Man (t) That man ribte laga upp araere aegh wylec unlaga georne assylle set up right Laws and unjust Laws be suppressed and that every one according to his Power pluck up utterly by the Roots all unrighteousness and set up Gods Right i. e. Divine Justice and for the time to come the Poor as well as the Rich enjoy right Judgment and to both of (u) Fole rihtes wyrthe him man ribte domes deme them right Dooms be deemed Then the next Law is for exhibiting Mercy in judgment that even in Capital Matters such moderation be used in imposing the mulct that it be (w) Swa it for Gode sy gebeolice for woruld aberendlice As in the Law of King Edgar attempered to divine Clemency and be to be born by Men and that he that judgeth think in his Mind what he asks when he saith in the Lords Prayer and forgive us our Debts or Trespasses as we forgive them that trespass against us and he forbids that any Christian be put to Death for any small or contemptible cause that for a (x) Et ne forspille man for litlum Godes handgeweorce his agenne ceap the he deorgevobt small matter they suffer not to perish the work of Gods Hands which he hath redeemed with a great price In the Eleventh Law we find that the King saith That by all help and work it is to be endeavoured by what reason principally he may gain Counsel that may (y) His man fyrmest mâ—g raed aredian Theode to Thearfe ribâ—ne Cristendom swy thort araeran agh wilec unlaga georne assyllan confirm such things as are for the profit of the Republick and may confirm Christian Piety and may totally overthrow Injustice from hence that Profit at last coming to the Kingdom that Iniquity may be suppressed and Justice may be set up in the Presence of God and Men. I could add more but I shall have occasion in the next Chapter to mention something of this Subject and shall only close with that Admonition of King James (z) Dalton's Justice of Peace c. 2. the First to the Judges in the Star-Chamber 1616. wherein he gave them in Charge to do Justice uprightly and indifferently without delay without Partiality Fear or Bribes with stout and upright Hearts with clean and uncorrupt Hands and not to utter theirown Conceits but the true meaning of the Law not making Laws but interpreting the Law and that according to the true Sence thereof and after deliberate Consultation remembring their Office is Jus dicere not Jus dare CHAP. XXXIV Of Justices of Peace and their Sessions SIR Edward Coke (a) 4. Instit c. 31. fol. 170. observes that the Constitution of Justices of Peace is such a form of subordinate Government for the Tranquillity and quiet of the Realm as no part of the Christian World hath the like which may be true in the particular Limitation of the Power Officers like our Justices of Peace anciently in other Countries But that in other Countries such like Officers have been appointed particularly for the preservation of Peace is evident in the ancient Laws of the Wisigothes (b) Lib. 2. c. 16. compiled by Theodoricus their King about the Year of our Lord 437. which constituted Pacis Assertores and appointed them Judges to hear and determine those causes quas illis Regia deputaverit ordinandi Potestas So in the Sicilian (c) Anno 1221. Ibid. p. 704. to 722. lob 1. tit 8. Laws compiled by the Emperor Frederick the Second we find one Title de cultu pacis generali pace in Regno servanda and another de (d) Ibid. tit 41. officio Justiciaratus where the Title Office and Commission of the Justiciarii Regionum is at large recited almost in Parallel terms with ours at this Day The
in the Authors in the (o) Sir Edw. Coke 4 Inst Ryley's Appendix p. 521 c. 537 563. Margent the exact Abridgment of the Record of the Tower Tit. Justices of Peace and Prynne's Irenarchus Redivivus The constituting and making of Justices of Peace is inherent in and inseparable from the Crown as appears by the Statute 27 H. 8. c. 24. (p) Dalton c. 3. Some are Justices by Act of Parliament as the Archbishop of York Bishop of Duresm and Ely and their Successors others by the Kings Charters as Mayors and other Officers of Corportion Towns Others are by Commission which are properly Justices of Peace to take care not so much of the publick Discipline and correction of manners as for the Peace and security of the High-ways they being at their Quarter-Sessions to hear and determine of Felons Breakers of the Peace Contempts and Trespasses to suppress Routs and Tumults restore possessions forceably entred c. They (q) Sir Tho. Smith's Commonwealth part 2. c. 22. Who are chosen to be Justices of Peace are elected out of the Nobility Knights Esquires and Gentlemen and such as be learned in the Laws such and such number as the Prince shall think meet and in whom for wisdom and discretion he putteth his trust being mostly Inhabitants within the County saving that some of the High Nobility At the King's Pleasure and chief Magistrates for honour sake are put in all or most of the Commissions Those have no time limited but by Commission from his Majesty alterable at pleasure Much increased in number At first they were but four after eight and now thirty or forty in a Shire either by increase of riches learning or activity in Policy and Government more being found than anciently who have either will or power or both to do their King and Country service and they are not too many to handle affairs of the Commonwealth especially for the benefit of the Subject For the better distributing of Justice that they may have in all parts of the County one or more not very remote to apply themselves to The Faults they may punish Each of them hath Authority upon complaint to him made of any Theft Robbery Manslaughter Murther Violence Complots Routs Riots unlawful Games forceable Entries Excess in Apparel Conventicles evil order in Ale-houses and Taverns of Idle and Vagabond Persons Masters and Servants not observing the Laws Rapes false Moneys Extortions or any such Disturbances of the Peace quiet and good order of the Shire to commit the Persons supposed to be Offenders to the Prison and to charge the Constable or sheriff to bring them thither and the Jaylor to neceive them till the next Quarter-Sessions when the Sheriff or his Under-Sheriff with his Bailiffs be to attend him at their Sections where Informations are given in to them by Bill which is shown to the Juries and if they find just cause for the complaint they find the Bill and the Party is Indicted and Tryed by a Jury of twelve men at the Kings Suit for the King is reckoned the one Party and the Prisoner the other They are also to order the repair of Bridges High-ways the Poor the lame Souldiers pensions and do many things besides according to the Power given in their Commissions which particularizeth all things they are to take Cognizance of sometimes upon suspicion of War to take care for the order of the Shire and sometimes to take Muster of Harness and able men Once in a year or two the Prince with his Council Instructions given to Justices of the Peace saith a Manuscript I have seen chuseth out certain Articles out of Penal Laws made to repress the pride and evil rule of the People and sends them down to the Justices willing them to meet together and consult among themselves how to order the matter most wisely and circumspectly whereby the People might be kept in good order and obedience according to Law and they after a certain space meet and certify the Prince or his Privy-Council how they do find the Shire in rule and order touching those points and all other disorders There was never saith Sir Thomas Smith (r) Part 2. tit Juslices of Pearce in any Commonwealth devised a more wise a more dulce and gentle How beneficial the Institution of Justices of Peace or more certain way to rule the People whereby they are kept always as it were in a Bridle of good order and sooner looked to that they do not offend than punished when they have offended for seeing the chief Persons of Quality and Interest among them have such charge and Authority given them by the King and if occasion be do commit cause to be Indicted and punished or sent to Prison for disobedience Offenders against the Laws It curbeth and terrifieth Offenders so that it is a new Furbishing of the good Laws of the Realm and a continual repressing of Disorders which the Common sort of People are too prone to if it were not for this impending lash which every where is held over Criminals The Law it self as registred and printed is but a dumb and dead thing the Ministers of the Law are those that give life to it and for that end were Justices of the Peace Constituted who being Gentlemen of Interest and parts are the fittest Instruments to see the Laws duly Executed They are principally concerned in seeing to the Execution of several Laws which are Committed to their Charge and it is greatly advantagious to the Country that at every Quarter-Sessions in the face of the Country one of the Justices of the Peace gives a charge to the Jurys wherein with learning and Judgment he acquaints them with the Excellency Antiquity and Utility of Monarchical Government the usefulness of those Laws Wise and Gracious Princes have granted to their Subjects the excellent Composure Contexture and Harmony in the Government and many other particulars fit for them to know as good Subjects and good Neighbours Having met with some Speeches made in Queen Elizabeth's time which relate either to Justices of the Peace or the Execution of Laws in general I think it may not be unacceptable to the Reader to understand in what manner that Queen caused her Chancellor to quicken the execution of the Laws Some touches of which follow (s) MS. Speech to the Justices Itinerant Anno 1559. The Conservation of Peace their principal Charge By the Conservation of Peace and Concord every Commonweal hath a perfect Foundation to begin marvelous good course to increase a strong Pillar to sustain it and a strong Buckler to defend it The plain and good order of each County consisteth in the well or evil Executing of Justice for thereby either every man enjoyeth his own and the whole Commonweal is in a calm and even Temper or by remisness in Execution the Free-Booters and Beasts of Prey are let loose to rob and despoil some and affright
and Laity met it seemed most profitable that love and mutual benevolence through his whole Dominion should be cherished for it was (q) Et us eallum tha unribtlican menigfealdan gefrohâ—e the betwux us svlsum syndon irksom to them all that there should be unjust fighting among Christians and begins the Seventh Law thus It is the part (r) Witan seylon faeb the settan of the prudent to extinguish Capital Enmities For the better preservation of Peace King Aethelred appointed that every (s) That aele sreoman getreowne borb bebbe Freeman have sureties that if he be called in question for any Crime these Sureties may do justice to each one that is satisfie for the offender the Title of which is Be Borgum In the Law the duty of these Sureties is described at large and it appears by other Laws in after times that Nine Men were bound for every Tenth Man Whoever desires further satisfaction in this particular may consult the 19th Law of Canutus wherein he appoints (t) Et we willath that aele freoman beo on hundrede on Teothung gebrobt viz. the Tything security that every Free-man enter himself into an Hundred or into the Collegueship of the Ten. In other matters of preserving Peace they may consult the Second the Eighth and Twelfth Laws of the same Canutus the which Eighth Law is thus expressed Peace is so to be considered as that nothing can be more desirable that it to the Inhabitants and nothing more contrarily is offensive as Thieves which in the Saxon is thus Swa ymbe frythesbote Swathan bundan si selost tham Theoffon sy lathost swa ymb Heosbote Having met with a passage in the Laws of King (u) LL. Aethelstani fol. 53. Ethelstan which both illustrates the Care of the King to have the Peace preserved and likewise shews the readiness according to their duty of the Subjects to assist the King with their Persons and Estates I thought it not amiss to insert it as a Close to this Chapter and an Introduction to the next The words as to be rendred from the Saxon and the Latin Version of Mr. Lambard run thus I Aethelstan King do to all clearly signifie Cyth that I have diligently enquired the Cause wherefore our (w) Vre sryth is wyrs gehealden thonâ—e we lyst Peace was not kept as I desired and at Grantelee it was appointed and I received this Answer from (a) Et mine witan seigâ—h my Wise Men that it happened by my (b) That le hit to long forboren baebbe forbearance i.e. too much lenity in not punishing now of late when I staid at Exceter in the (c) Middum wintre Feast of the Nativity of our Lord attended by my Wise Men I found (d) â—t tha ealle syn 〈◊〉 mid bire sylfum midyfre which I signifying Heritage and though mis-placed in Lambard is by him translated Children mid wife mideallum thingum by Lâ—mbard translated properly all their Fortunes to faerenne thider thider le thonne will them â— most ready themselves with their Heirs with their Wives and all their Estates to go thither whither I will and will purge out or expel those Outlaws i. e. breakers of the Peace that are against this in such order or with such wisdom and consideration that they never after come on the Earth again i.e. that they be banished The Saxon of the latter part is thus Bretan hi offer this geswican willan on tha gerade the heo naefre aest on sorda ne cumen which Mr. Lambard translates thus Vt isti tandem pacis violatores Regno hand unquam redituri pellerentur Then it further is added And if these Men (e) And gif hi mon afre afâ— on thaem eorda gemit that hi syn swa seildig swa se the at hebbendra banda gefougen syn hereafter in these Lands be met with or found that they shall be so guilty as they are that are found hand having that is Stealing which Mr. Lambard renders Ac si eorum aliquis postea in Regno deprehenderetur pariter ac qui est in furto manifeste deprehensus plecteretur From all which we may observe That the Counsel of the Witan Nobles and Wise Men was at one of the times the King kept them in course viz. at Christmas called here Mid-winter Secondly That the King asks the Members of the Council their advice Thirdly They tell him that it happened that his Peace was not kept because of his forbearance in not putting the Laws in Execution that were established at Grantelee From whence we may observe that the King was to put these in Execution and that his Remisness Clemency or Indulgence increased the numbers of the breakers of the Peace Fourthly That for the suppressing of these breakers of the Peace the Nobles who met in Council at Exceter promiâ—e they will be in readiness provided themselves and their whoâ—e Families and all things they have to faerenne that is from faer to go forth in Expedition Armed as the King will appoint the signification of which word I have found in several Letters about the Wars betwixt England and Scotland in Henry the Eighth's and Edward the Sixth's time where when any considerable party of the Scots made an inrode into England to seize upon Men burn Towns or Houses or carry away Cattel it was called running a Forray Fifthly We may note that this shews that the Militia of the Subjects was at the Kings disposal to go whither then the King will which saves me a labour in the following Chapter to deduce the Kings Power over the Militia higher though I doubt not but a little looking into the Saxon Laws would afford me more Precedents as the Fifty ninth Law of William the (f) Statuimus etiam sirmiter praecipimus ut omnes liberi homines totius Regni noslri praedicli sint fratres conjurati ad Monarchiam nostram ad Regnum nostrum pro viribus suis facultatibus contra inimicos pro posse suo defendendum viriliter servandum Facem Dignitatem Coronae noslrae integram observandam ad Judicium rectum Justiciam constanter omnibus modis pro posse suo sine dolo sine dilatiene faciendam LL. Gul. 1. 59. fol. 171. Edit Wheeloch Conqueror doth expresly as before I have touched on another occasion but here think fit to recite it at length viz. The King appoints and firmly commands all the Free-men of his Kingdom that they be sworn Brothers to their Power to defend and manfully to keep his Monarchy and his Kingdom according to their might and Estates against Enemies and to observe or maintain the Peace and Dignity of his Crown entire and without delay without deceit to do right Judgment and Justice constantly all manner of ways according to their Power So that here we find these liberi Homines Conservators of the Peace also which I suppose was incumbent on them as well as
Act for that purpose yet that prevented not the Inundation of blood and we found those men that moved Heaven and Earth with their clamours against the King as governing arbitrarily when they got the Power made it their dayly practice to lay what unprecedented illegal Taxes they pleased on their fellow Subjects to the value as some compute of Forty Eight Millions Therefore all Judicious persons lovers of their King The Advantages to Prince and People when the Crown is liberally provided for Country and Posterity finding the sad effects those disputes brought to the Blessed King and the whole Kingdom will think it a necessary prudence in a Prince to have always such a provision of Money ready as will enable him in all difficulties that may occur in the Administration of the Government without being obliged to part with any of his Royal Prerogatives when any discontented or designing Factious Members shall be able to take advantage of his Wants whereby to drive their barter with the Crown for thereby he shall defeat their ends On the other side it will be the most prudent and dutiful course both for their own security and the Princes honour for Parliaments upon all just and honourable Wars or occasions of assisting Allies preparing Fleets in readiness upon necessary defence to assist the Prince liberally and repay out of the Publick what for publick Service he hath expended out of his own Revenue rather than he should be in disesteem with his Neighbours and Allies whereby the honour of the Prince and consequently of his Subjects should be Eclipsed or he be necessitated to take any unusual course for raising Money or be compelled to make any inglorious Peace for we can never forget how the want of supplies to King Charles the First brought not only Ship-money and Knight-hoodmony Monopolies and the long disuse of Parliaments but at last that most calamitous War upon the whole Nation We cannot forget how zealous an House of Commons was of late to prevent any Arbitrariness as it was insinuated Decemb. 17.1680 The Care of some Parliaments to keep the King poor in the late King so that they voted a Bill to be brought in against illegal Exaction of Money upon the People under the Penalty of Treason not foreseeing that the Charters of the City of London and many other Corporations were forfeitable upon that account which if it had been made Treason the King had got a good Revenue against the intentions of those who in all appearance voted for a contrary end which further appeared in their Vote Jan. the 7th following (h) Address part 3. That whosoever should lend or cause to be lent by way of advance any Money upon the branches of the Kings Revenue arising by Customs Excise or Hearth-money the three principal branches should be judged to hinder the sitting of Parliament and be responsible for the same in Parliament So that they would give nothing themselves but as much as in them lay terrified others from lending or advancing any Money to him which was not according to their Writ to advise but by duress and force to compel the King to submit to their Judgments and instead of giving him Assistance to support his Allies and enable him to preserve Tangier they tended to the disenabling him from contributing to either by his own Revenue and Credit not only exposing him to the dangers that might happen either at home or abroad but endeavouring to deprive him of the Possibility of supporting the Government it self and reduce him to a more helpless Condition than the meanest of his Subjects as the King sadly and justly complained and in that Vote the Subjects Liberty and Property was invaded in that he could not dispose of his Money to his own Profit and the Benefit of the Government if either Insurrection or Rebellion happened in the interval of Parliament or a foreign Force on a sudden should attacque us yet these Gentlemen would be counted Loyal and Dutiful Subjects It is not to be denyed but that if a Prince's standing Revenue were so great that by it he might not only support the ordinary expences of the Government but lay by a summ sufficient to defray all extraordinary incident Charges either occasioned by intestine Rebellions or foreign Invasions that a King should not have occasion to have so often recourse to Parliaments for Aids Yet when we confider that there would be many other occasions of frequent convening that great Council for making wholesom Laws which is one great Portion of their Business and that the Subjects never can be happy under a poor Prince who thereby should be brought into contempt and how much greater mischiefs accrue to the Subjects by rendring their Prince impotent and unable to preserve them from factious disturbers of their Peace and Repose and the preserving their Properties as well as the defending them from the designs of foreign Princes who would injure our Merchants lock us in our Island and force us to sell our own native Commodities and receive theirs at what Rates they pleased if our Soveraign were not able to keep a sufficient Fleet and infinite other Mischiefs which would accompany a starved Exchequer we should too late find that the Expence of many Millions would not again restore us to that condition of Prosperity and Renown that one timely bestowed on our Prince would preserve us in It is much less Charge to keep in good Repair a well-built Fort Castle or Man of War than to build a new one especially if upon the demolishing of the old we were to fight for the Ground and Materials whereupon and wherewith we should build the new It is a singular Security to the English Subject that no Money can be levied upon him but by Act of Parliament to which in his Representatives he gives his Consent and the House of Commons is generally careful that they understand a great necessity ere they pass any Money-bill yet we have known in our Age some that have stood upon such terms with their Sovereign that either he hath chosen rather to want Supplies than have them upon such hard Terms or their Principals have suffered a thousand times more by such denials than they had done if they had been granted So was Constantinople lost to the Turks for want of furnishing the Emperor with the hundredth part of that which the victorious Enemy plundered the Citizens of and so the Count Palatine elected King of Bohemia lost that Kingdom and all his Hereditary Seigniories by unfurnishing his Soldiers with present Pay when he had it by him And how many suffer by the want of a liberal and proportionable Supply to pay off the Debts of the Exchequer is too sadly felt by many and if the Parliament of 1639. had furnished King Charles the First with twelve Subsidies as it appears by the sequel the Expence of four times as many Millions besides the infinite quantity of Christian Blood shed in the
Parliament of England knew they had no Power to make such an Act and we may conclude That such Politick and Temporary provisions find no approbation either by the Laws or succeeding ages who in all such cases judge more impartially therefore it is much more honourable for the Legislative Power to found their Laws upon Justice and Right rather than upon the humours and Interests of those who desire but the shadow of a Law to countenance their designs It must be owned that King Edward the Second was deposed The Injustice in deposing Kings for making use of Gaveston and the Spencers But how illegally all succeeding ages have acknowledged and it rather shews how extravagant the People and their Representatives are in their humors than how just their Powers are For by the same parity of Reason the horrid Murther of the blessed Martyr or the Murther of Edward the Second may be justified as his deposing may be and the like may be said of King Richard the Second against whom the Fourteenth Article was that he refused to allow the Laws made in Parliament which had been in effect to consent that the two Houses should have been the Soveraign and that he had transferred the Royal Power on them Whoever desires further satisfaction may consult Arnisaeus in that Treatise Quod nulla ex causa subditis fas sit contra legitimum Principem arma sumere Whereas Richard Duke of York in Henry the Sixth's time after he had been declared Heir Apparent was by another Act of Parliament declared uncapable of Succession all that can be inferred from it is When Acts of Parliament to be less esteemed That Acts of Parliament when they are bottomed upon private affections to Parties in times of Faction and civil War are not to be looked upon with that veneration as when they regularly pass in times that are calm when no potent Persons oppress Justice or usurping Powers hinder faithful Judges from expounding the Laws soundly Therefore we find in the claim of the said Duke of York that it is more consentaneously to Law expressed That no Act taketh place or is of force against him that is right inheritor of the Crown as accordeth saith the Record with Gods Laws and all natural Laws and we may observe that though there was a Succession of three Kings of the House of Lancaster who had usurped the Crown for Sixty Years yet all our Historians and the Laws call those Kings de facto and not de jure Such a true sence of just and right the uninterested Ages have had of that Usurpation ever since although there were Acts of Parliament carefully penned to corroborate â—he Title of the house of Lancaster during that time and all ways and means used to have established that Line yet by vertue of the Right of Lineal Succession Edward the Fourth Son to the said Duke of York came to be owned lawful King of England though the Right of his Family had been interrupted ever since Henry the Fourth usurped the Crown which might have been a sufficient document to all Ages not to have attempted any sort of praeterition of the Right Heir Yet we find that unsuccessful attempts were made by H. 8. contrary to the fundamentals of Succession which when rightly considered I hope will convince all of how little validity even such Acts are to be reputed Therefore because these have been made use of for Precedents I shall speak a little more fully to them In the 25 of H. 8. (f) Cap. 22. the Marriage with Queen Katherine is made void Concerning the several Entailings of the Crown by King Henry the Eighth and that with Queen Anne's declared good and an Entail made on the Issue Male or Female and the Penalty for hurting the Kings Person disturbing his Title to the Crown or slandering the present Marriage is judged High Treason and Anno 26. (g) Cap. 2. a strict Oath is injoyned to observe the Succession there appointed But 28 H. 8. (h) Cap. 7. it is declared that the former Act was made upon a pure perfect and clear foundation thinking the Marriage then had between his Majesty and the Lady Anne they are the words of the Act in their Consciences to have been pure sincere and perfect and good c. till now of late that it appeareth that the said Marriage was never good or consonant to the Laws but utterly void and of none effect and so both the Marriage with the Princess Katherine and the Lady Anne are declared void and their Issue made illegitimate and the perils are enumerated that might ensue to the Realm for want of a declared lawful Successor to the Crown and the Act impowers the King if he dye without Issue of his body that he may limit the Crown to any by his Letters Patents or his last Will in Writing and it is declared Treason to declare either of the Marriages to be good or to call the Lady Mary or Lady Elizabeth Legitimate and the former Oath is made void and this may be judged to be procured when he resolved to settle the Crown on Henry Fitz Roy Duke of Richmond his natural Son But after the Birth of Prince Edward 38 H. 8. (i) Cap. 1. another alteration is made whereby the Crown is entailed on Prince Edward and for want of his Issue on the Lady Mary and for want of her Issue on the Lady Elizabeth and for want of Issue of the King or them then the King is impowered by his Letters Patents or last Will to dispose of the Crown at his free will It is therefore to be considered that in such a juncture of affairs when the legality of the Kings Marriages were so disputable by reason that two of the legal Successors upon niceties not of nature but of the Popes 〈◊〉 for Divorcing were declared Bastards there was some â—eason (k) 25 H. 8. c. 22. that the Act should express that the Ambiguity of several Titles pretended to the Crown then not perfectly declared but that men might expound them to every ones sinister affection and sence contrary to the right legality of Succession and Posterity of the lawful Kings and Emperours of the Realm hath been the cause of that great effusion and destruction of mens blood and the like cause will produce the like effect as the words are Upon such grounds it was very plausible to declare by Act of Parliament the Succession But this does not prove that where the Right of nature is clear that the Parliament may invert the same and they teach us how dangerous it is to leave Parliaments to the Impression of Kings when it is too obvious the first of these Laws was made to gratifie the Kings affection to Queen Anne in the case of naming a Successor as it is also to expose Kings to the Arbitrariness of Parliaments And we may well infer H. 8. taking such care by his Parliaments to legitimate and illegitimate his
intended to invade the Subjects Liberties but if they allowed the Writ the delicious Power of Imprisoning such as they had a Pique to was utterly lost and all Persons referred to the ordinary Courts of Justice or upon their failure to the House of Lords Sir William Jones against any ones Release by Habeas Corpus if they were imprisoned by the House of Commons the Supreme Tribunal of England Sir William Jones insisted much upon the Power of the House and that they did not intend by that Act to bind themselves which yet must bind the King though it might as well be alledged That he did not intend to bind himself by it However Sir William persisted urging See Debates of the House p. 217. That whatever Reasons may be given for discharging such as are not committed for Breach of Privilege if grounded on the Act for the Habeas Corpus will hold as strong for discharging of Persons for Breach of Privilege and so consequently deprive the House of all its Power and Dignity and so make it insignificant and said That was so plain and obvious that all the Judges ought to take notice of it and so judged it below the House to make any Resolution therein but rather to leave the Judges to do otherwise at their peril and let the Debate fall without any Question But Baron Weston had the Courage to grant the Habeas Corpus Baron Weston grants the Habeas Corpus as rather willing to expose himself to the Displeasure of the House than deny or delay Justice contrary to his Oath I could not omit this remarkable Passage as a Specimen of the Arbitrariness of the Leading Party in that House Brief Register part 4. p. 846. and now shall proceed to Mr. Prynne's Remarks upon the Proceedings of the long House of Commons He observes Privilegia omnino amittere meretur qui sibi abutitur concessa penestate Ejus est interpretari cujus concedere Summa Rosella Privilegium 3. That Privileges may be lost by the abuse of the Power and that whatever Privilege the House hath is from the King's Grant or Toleration Therefore according to the Canonists Rule If the Privilege granted be expressed in general dubious or obscure Words then it is in the power of him to interpret who hath the power to grant Now the Petition of the Speaker is That the Commons in this Parliament may and shall have all their Ancient and Just Privileges allowed them Therefore the King Nemini liceat Chartas Regias nisi ipsis Regibus judicare Placita Parl. 18 E. 1. num 19. p. 20. being the sole Granter of these Privileges must be the only proper Interpreter and Judge of them as he is of all his other Charters of Privileges Liberties Franchises and Acts of Parliament themselves after his Regal Assent thereto not the Commons or Persons to whom they are granted and that both in and out of Parliament by Advice of his Nobles or Judges of the Common-Law Therefore he saith first How the Breach of Privilege to be punished according to Mr. Prynne See the Authority Brief Regist part 2. p. 847. That if the Commons by Petition to the King and Lords in Parliament complain of the Breach of their ancient Privileges and Liberties as they ever did in the Cases of Lark Thorp Hyde Clerk Atwyll and others the King by Advice of his Lords in Parliament assisted with his Judges hath been and as he humbly conceives is the sole proper Judge of them and their violations not the Commons who being Parties Prosecutors and Complainants are no legal indifferent Judges in their own or Menial Servants cases if they will avoid partiality which is the reason the Law allows Challenges to Jurors in Civil and Criminal causes Therefore he observes Ibid. p. 1206. that the House of Commons taking Informations without Oath may be easilier abused by misinformation and sometimes thereby are put upon over hasty Votes which upon finding out evil Combinations they are forced to retract Secondly The Chancellor or Lord Keeper to grant the Writ If the complaint of the breach of Privilege be made in the Commons House and thereupon an Habeas Corpus Writ of Privilege or Supersedeas prayed under the great Seal for the Members or menial Servants release whose Privilege is infringed the Lord Chancellor or Keeper of the great Seal representing the Kings person in Chancery the Court for relief in cases of Privilege is the properest Judge and Examiner of the claimed Privilege and its violations upon Oath and other sufficient Evidence assisted by all the Kings Judges in cases of difficulty who thereupon will grant or deny the Writs Thirdly The Judges of the Courts to which the Writ is directed to judge of the validity of the Privilege When these Writs of Privilege Supersedeas or Habeas Corpus are granted to any Member or menial Servants and directed to any of the Kings Courts to enlarge their restrained Persons or stay any Arrests Process or Judgments against them the Kings own Judges in his respective Courts to which they are directed are then the proper Judges of the Privileges of Parliament and of their breaches suggested in these Writs who may examine not only all matters of Law or Fact comprised in them which are Traversable but likewise adjudge allow or disallow the very Privilege it self if no real ancient Parliamentary Privilege allowed by the Laws and Customs of the Realm How far he is in the right I will not undertake to judge but I remember somewhere he wisheth an Act of Parliament to pass to adjust these matters which possibly would prevent many of those chargeable attendances about false Returns and save much expence of time in the discussing of them and enable the Subjects to pay a right and due obedience to them SECT 12. Concerning the Royal Assent to Bills I Have treated so much of this elsewhere as to the sole Power in the King the ancient Custom of Sealing the Acts with the Kings Seal and of some of the Prelates and Nobles as Witnesses of their Assents that I shall only now speak as to the usual formality of passing the Bills into Acts by the Kings last Act. See also his Memorials For Mr. Hackwell hath given a full account of the manner how Statutes are enacted in Parliament by passing of Bills to which Book I refer the curious Reader that would understand the order that is used in the debating and passing of them When Bills are passed by both Houses upon three several Readings in either House Hackwell of Passing of Bills p. 179. ad 182. they ought for their last approbation to have the Royal Assent whereby every Statute is as Mr. Hackwell observes like Silver seven times tryed The Royal Assent is usually deferred to the last day of the Session and because some have been of opinion that the passing of Bills The Royal Assent determines not the Session
his Uncles Death was declared Tutor and Governour without any remission or being restored and if his Cousin King James had died without Issue he had been declared the true Successour of the Crown We have a memorable Instance of this in H. 7. who when he came to the Crown called his Parliament and the Judges having determined that those Members of the House that had been outlawed by the Parliament in Richard the Third's time and been declared Rebels should absent themselves till a Bill were brought in for their restoring It was moved among the Judges what should be done about the King who had been condemned and declared Traytor c. and it was by the unanimous consent of all the Judges saith the learned (q) St. Alban's Hist H. 7. p. 29. Chancellor declared That the Crown removed all the obstructions in the Blood which might in any manner impede its descent and from that time the King took the Crown Coronam ipsam omnes sanguinis oppilationes quae descensum Coronae ullatenus impediunt deobstruere Vt Regi opera Parliamentaria non fuisset opus the fountain of his Blood was purged and all the Corruptions and Impurities taken away so that he had no need of any Parliamentary help to supply him Thirdly The Consideration of the Oaths which the Subjects are bound to take and observe gives some further Proof of the Obligation of all the Subjects to maintain this lineal Succession The Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy bind the Subjects to bear Faith and true Allegiance to the King's Highness The Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy against altering Succession his Heirs and lawful Successors and that to their Power they shall assist and defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preheminences and Authorities granted to the King's Highness his Heirs and lawful Successors or united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm and of those Priviledges c. I think none will deny but that Hereditary Succession is one of the principal Prerogatives intended by those Oaths We are not in these only sworn to His Majesty but his Lawful Successors which word Lawful is inserted to cut off the Pretences of such as should not succeed by Law and the insolent Arbitrariness of such as being but Subjects themselves think they may chuse their King These being promissory Oaths as well to the Successors when their Right shall fall as to the present King they have every of them in their respective degrees and orders and indispensible Right confirmed to them by this Oath So that the Predecessor hath no legal right to deprive his Successor as hereafter I shall clear nor to remit the Peoples Obligation to him as lawful Heir and Successor (r) Address part 3. p. 64. much less can the two Houses do it for they are all within the Obligation of this Oath and it is unreasonable that Men should dispence with their own promissory Oaths to others for this would destroy all Faith and Confidence amongst Men and pull up the very roots of Society and Government Whereas some object out of my Lord (s) Coke on Littleton p. 8. Coke Objection That none is Heir before the death of his Ancestor but Heir apparent It is to be considered Answered that it must be the Heir presumptive or apparent that is here understood otherwise the inserting the word Heir were superfluous if by the Oaths were not intended he that is next Heir upon the Death of the King and if any Person think to evade it by affirming that if the Parliament declare any Person to be no next Heir he ceaseth to be so as also not to be lawful Successor because by such an Act he is outlawed Let such Persons consider that this is neither better nor worse than palpable Aequivocation For we swear in the common Sence of the words and so by Heir we understand such as by proximity of Blood have greatest right to succeed in the Inheritance It may be farther considered that the Lord Chancellor Treasurer and Judges (t) See 18 E. 3. all the great Officers of State the Privy-Council c. are all sworn to defend the Rights of the Crown and that they shall not concurr or assent to any thing which may turn to the King in Damage or Dis-herison How then can any of these much less the Judges who are to expound and interpret the Law consent without palpable violation of their Oaths to the changing of the Essence of the Monarchy I shall now endeavour to prove Acts of Parliament cannot alter Lineal Succession that no Parliament by a compleat Act can legally alter the Succession in an Hereditary Monarchy For first all (u) Jus Reg. p. 153. Kings and Parliaments are subordinate to the Laws of God the Laws of Nature and Nations So that unless we give the Inferior Power and Jurisdiction over the Superior no Act of Parliament can be binding to overturn what those three Laws have have established and I hope I have proved under all these Heads in the preceding part of this discourse that the right of Succession is founded on them As to the Law of God it is clear not only from the general dictates of Religion but 28 H. 8. c. 7. the Parliament uses these words For no Man can dispence with God's Laws which we also affirm and think As to the Laws of Nature they are acknowledged to be immutable from the Principles of Reason So the (w) Sect. sed naturale Institut de Jure naturali Law it self confesseth Naturalia quaedam Jura quae apud omnes gentes observantur divina quadam providentia constituta semper firma atque immutabilia permanent Certain natural Laws which are observed by all Nations and such is that of Primogeniture by Divine Providence being constituted remain always firm and immutable So when the Law declares that a supreme Prince is free from the obligation of Laws solutus Legibus yet Lawyers (x) Voet. de Statutis sect 5. c. 1 Accursius in L. Princeps F. de Leg. Clementina pasturalis de re Judicata still acknowledge that this does not exclude these Supream Powers from being liable to the Laws of God Nature and Nations as is evident by all that treat of that Point Nor can the Law of Nations be overturned by private municipal Laws so all Statutes to the prejudice of Ambassadors who are secured by the Law of Nations are confessed by all to be null and the highest Power whatsoever cannot take off the denouncing of a War before a War can be lawful Besides secondly a Parliament cannot do more than (y) Jus Reg. p. 154. any absolute Monarch in his own Kingdom for they when joyned are but in place of the supreme Power sitting in Judgment We must not think our Parliaments have an unlimited Power de jure so as they may make a forfeiture or take away Life without a cause or pass Sentence against the Subjects
without citing or hearing them For if they had such Power we should be the greatest Slaves and live under the most arbitrary Government imaginable Therefore an absolute Prince cannot in an Hereditary Kingdom where the Successor is to succeed Jure Regni (z) Nulla clausula Successori Jus auferri potest modo succedat ille Jure Regni Aristaeus c. 7. num 5. prejudge the Successors right of Succession for the same right the present King hath to the Possession the next of Blood hath to the Succession Therefore Hottoman Lib. 2. de Regno Galliae affirms That ea quae Jure Regni primogenito competunt ne Testamento quidem Patris adimi possunt That in the absolute Monarchy of France The Father cannot by his last Will deprive the First-born of those things which belong to him by Royal right So when the King of France designed to break the Salique Law of Succession as in the Reign of Charles the Fifth it was found impracticable by the three States So when Pyrrhus would have preferred his younger Son to the Crown (a) Pausanias lib. 1. the Epirots following the Law of Nations and then own refused him So Anno 1649. when Amurat the Grand Signior left the Empire to Han the Tartarian passing his Brother Ibrahim the whole Officers of State did unanimously cancel the Testament and restored Ibrahim the true Heir though no other than a Fool. So if Kings could have inverted their Succession Saint Lewis had preferred his own Third Son to Lewis his Eldest and Alphonsus King of Leon in Spain had preferred his Daughter to Ferdinand his Eldest Son and Edward the Sixth of England had preferred and did actually prefer the Lady Jane Grey to his Sisters Mary and Elizabeth Thirdly It is undeniable in the opinion of all Lawyers That a King cannot in Law alienate his Crown but that the Deed is void nor can he in Law consent to an Act of Parliament declaring that he should be the last King For if such consents and Acts (b) Jus Regium p. 163. had been sufficient to bind Successors then weak Kings by their own simplicity and gentle Kings by the Rebellion of their Subjects or being wrought upon by the importunity of their Wives or Concubines or the mis-representation of Favourites might do great mischiefs to their People in raising up continual Factions of the miseries of which I shall speak hereafter This is owned in Subjects That the Honour and Nobility that is bestowed upon a man and his Heirs doth so necessarily descend upon those Heirs that the Father or Predecessor cannot exclude the Successor or derogate from his Right by renouncing resigning following base or mean Trades or such like For Fab. Cod. 9. tiâ— 28. say the Lawyers since he derives his Right from his old Progenitors and owes it not to his Father his Fathers Deed should not prejudge him so much more in Kings the ill consequences of such violations of Justice and Right being infinitely more destructive the Predecessor should not do any Act to prejudice his Successor For that right of blood which makes the Eldest First makes the other Second and all the Statutes that acknowledge the present Kings Prerogative acknowledge that they belong to him and his Heirs For as a Prince cannot even ex plenitudine potestatis legitimate a Bastard in prejudice of former Children though they have only but an hope of Succession much less can he bastardize or disinherit the Right Heir who is so made by God and honoured from him with the Character If therefore Kings how absolute soever cannot de jure invert the natural order of Succession there is no reason that the States of Parliament should have such a Power For by the known Laws they have no Legislative Power otherwise than by assenting to what the King does and all that their assent could do would be no more than that they and their Successors should not oppose his nomination because of their consent but that can never amount to a Power of transferring For if the States of Parliament had this Power originally in themselves to bestow why might they not reserve it for themselves and so perpetuate the Government in their own hands So Judge Jenkin asserts according to Law That no King can be named or in any time made in this Kingdom (d) Liberty of Subject p. 25. by the People Kings being before there were Parliaments and there is good reason for then the Monarchy should not be Hereditary but Elective the very Essence of Hereditary Monarchy consisting in the Right of Succession whereas if the Parliament can prefer the next save one they may prefer the last of all the Line and the same reason by which they can chuse a Successor which can only be that they have Power above him should likewise in the opinion of a very (e) Jus Regium p. 167. learned Person justify their deposing of Kings as we saw in the last Age that such reasons as of late have been urged to incapacitate the Children of King Charles the First from the hope of Succession viz. Popery and Arbitrary Government did embolden men to dethrone and murther the Father who was actual King For if it were once yielded that the Houses had a Right in themselves to take care for the Salus populi that none but such Princes should succeed who were approved of by the prevailing Faction in their body nothing but confusion would follow one Party having their Votes seconded by force one time and a quite contrary another yet all pretending the Publick Weal and so a large breach should be made by pretending to stop one dangerous Successor to the inflowing of successive Usurpers and thereby the Crown should not only by ambulatory but unstable upon every head that wore it and alwaies in danger of a bloody surprise till at last the Regalia being secured from the expectant Heir the Factious would find a way to pillage them from the present Soveraign and convert them into a Mace for an House of Commons I writ this Part with greater Enlargements in answer to the plausiblest Arguments for the Bill of Seclusion while that matter was in the hottest agitation But since there will be no need of dilating upon that Subject now that God Almighty hath so signally determined the Controversie by the peaceable settlement of his Majesty upon his Throne I shall close this Chapter with some few remarks of the miseries have been brought upon Kingdoms and especially upon this by the disjoynting the Succession So we read what dreadful (f) Jus Regium p. 166. mischiefs arose from Pelops preferring his younger Son to the Kingdom of Mycene The Miseries which Kingdoms have sustained where the Succession hath been interrupted from Oedipus commanding that Polynices his Youngest Son should reign interchangeably with the Eldest From Parisatis the Queen of Persia's preferring her Youngest Son Cyrus to her Eldest Artaxerxes From Aristodomus admitting