His Majesties Prerogative or the known Laws of the Land Ecclesiastical or Temporal or the politick Government either in Church or State or which may give just offence I do hereby absolutely retract it as no wayes by me intended or thought of wishing this small taste may stir up others more able to make a further and better progress in this kind Anno 13. CAROLI II. Regis An Act for explanation of a Clause contained in an Act of Parliament made in the seventeenth year of the late King Charles entituled An Act for repeal of a branch of a Statute primo Elizabethae concerning Commissioners for Causes Ecclesiastical WHereas in an Act of Parliantent made in the seventeenth year of the late King Charles entituled An Act for repeal of a branch of a Statute primo Elizabethae concerning Commissioners for Causes Ecclesiastical it is amongst other things enacted That no Archbishop Bishop nor Micar General nor any Chancellor nor Commissary of any Archbishop Bishop or Micar General nor any Droinary whatsoever nor any other Spiritual or Ecclessastical Judge Dificer or Minister of Justice nor any other person or persons whatsoever exercising Spiritual or Ecclessastical Power Authority or Jurisdiction by any Grant License or Commission of the Kings Majesty his Meirs or Successors or by any Power or Authority derived from the King his Deirs or Successors or otherwise shall from and after the first day of August which then shall be in the year of our Lord Bod One thousand six hundred forty one award impose or inflict any Pain Penalty Fine Amercement Imprisonment or other corporal punishment upon any of the Kings Subjects for any Contempt Misdemeanour Crime Offence matter or thing whatsoever belonging to Spiritual or Ecclestastical Cognilance or Jucisdiction whereupon some doubt hath been made that all ordinary Power of Coertion and Proceedings in Causes Ecclessastical were taken away whereby the ordinary course of Justice in Causes Ecclessastical hath been obstructed Be it therefore declared and Enacted by the King most excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority thereof That neither the said Act nor any thing therein contained both or shall take away and ordinary Power or Authority from any of the said Archbishops Bishops of any other person of persons named as aforesaid but that they and every of them evercisting Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction may proceed determine sentence erecute and erecise all manner of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and all Censures and Coertions appertaining and belonging to the same before the making of the Act before recited in all causes and matters belonging to Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction according to the Kings Magesties Ecclesiastical Laws used and practised in this Realm in as ample manner and form as they did and might lawfully have none before the making of the said Act. And be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid that the afore recited Act of decimo septimo Caroli and all the matters and clauses therein contained ercepting what concerns the High Commission Court or the new erection of some such like Court by Commission shall be and is hereby repealed to all intents and parposes whatsoever Any thing clause or sentence in the said Act contained to the contrary notwithstanding Provided alwayes and it is hereby enacted That neither this Act not any thing herein contained shall ertend or he construed to revive or give force to the said branch of the said Statute mave in the said first year of the Reign of the said late Queen Elizabeth mentioned in the said Act of Parliament made in the said seventeenth year of the Reign of the said King Charles but that the said branch of the said Statute made in the said first year of the Reign of the said Queen Elizabeth shall stand and be repealed in such sort as if this Act had never been made Provided also and it is hereby further enacted that it shall not be lawful for any Archbishop Bishop Hicar General Chancellor Commissary or any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Judge Officer or Minister or any other person having or erercising Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction to tenver or administer anto any person whatsoever the Oath usually called the Oath Ex officio or any other Oath whereby such person to whom the same is tenvered or administred may be charged or compelled to confesse or accuse or to purge him or her self of any criminal matter or thing whereby he or she may be lyable to any censure or punishment any thing in this Statute or any other Law Custom or Mage heretofore to the contrary hereof in any wise not withstanding Provided alwayes that this Act or any thing therein contained shall not extend or be construed to extend to give unto any Archbishop Bishop or any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Judge Officer or other person or persons aforesaid any power or authority to exercise execute inflict or determine any Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Censure or Coertion which they might not by Law have done before the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred thirty and nine nor to abridge or diminish the Kings Majesties Supremacy in Ecclesiastical matters and affairs nor to confirm the Canons made in the year One thousand six hundred and forty nor any of them nor any other Ecclesiastical Laws or Canons not formerly confirmed allowed or enarted by Parliament or by the established Laws of the Land as they stood in the year of the Lord One thousand six hundred thirty and nine The Contents of the Chapters Chap. I. THe endeavours of the Innovators to change the course of Ecclesiastical proceedings That stupendious Fanatick Hackett his fearful end Mr. Cambdens judgment touching the Innovators Their perseverance in their design of Innovation in King James his time and afterwards The pretended taking away the Coercive power from the Ecclesiastical Courts how gained what use was made of it by the Innovators and how they boasted of their benefit by it Two passages in the Long Parliament touching two Inconformists Page 1. Chap. II. The two Proviso's in the late Act that takes away the doubt touching Coercive power in Ecclesiastical Courts Dr. Cosens Apologie for sundry proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical That groundless Opinion That a several Royal assent to the executing of every particular Canon in required is confuted The validity of the Ecclesiastical Laws The clamours of Inconformists Innovators and Fanaticks against the putting of Ecclesiastical Laws in execution though the Ecclesiastical Officers and Ministers are by Act of Parliament severely commanded to do it p. 10. Chap. III. The Heads of the several Chapters in that Apologie of Doctor Cosens Part 1. p. 27. Chap. IV. By the late Act the manner of proceeding in Ecclesiastical Courts is not altered but left as it was A summary relation of what Dr. Cosens in his Apologie hath asserted and made good by Gods Word the practice of the Primitive Christians the opinion of the Father the
book has by variety of proof so sufficiently made it good already But yet it is worth the setting down what some of our own Countrey-men have in their writings acknowledg'd to the very same purpose and those especially amongst the rest whose interest and high valuation which they pass upon the Laws of their own Countrey will not permit them to ascribe more to the Civil Law then the just truth will bear And it is most observable what King James himself the learnedest of all modern Princes said here in a Speech made to no less solemn assembly then his Lords and Commons of Parliament u 21. Martii 1609. which we have extant amongst his printed works As a King saith he I have least cause of any man to dislike the Common-Law for no Law can be more favourable and advantagious for a King and extendeth further his Prerogative then it doth And for a King of England to despise the the Common-Law it is to neglect his own Crown Yet saith he I do greatly esteem the Civil Law the profession thereof serving more for general learning and being most necessary for matters of Treaty with all forreign Nations And I think that if it should be taken away it would make an entry to Barbarisme in this Kingdome and would blemish the honour of England for it is in a manner lex Gentium and maintaineth entercourse with all forreign Nations But I onely allow it to have course here according to those limits of jurisdiction which the Common-Law it self doth allow it And therefore though it be not fit for the general government of the people here it doth not follow it should be extinct no more then because the Latin tongue is not the mother or radicall Language of any Nation in the World at this time that therefore the English tongue should onely now be learned in this Kingdome which were to bring in barbarisme And in another speech in Star-chamber x 20 Iun. 1616. printed also God forbid saith he the Law of Nations intending thereby chiefly the Civil Law should be barred in this Kingdome and that for two causes one because it is a Law to satisfie strangers which will not hold themselves so well satisfied with other municipal Laws another to satisfie our own subjects in matters of Piracy Marriage Wills and things of like nature And again when he was so mightily pressing to have had an union of England and Scotland under the same policy of Laws as they had but one and the same King in a speech made upon that subject y Ult. Mart. 1607. extant in his printed works he told his two Houses of Parliament that in point of conjunction of Nations the Civil Law ought to bear a great sway it being the Law of Nations These are the expressions of a King the interest of whose Crown and Scepter and the prerogatives thereunto belonging did depend upon the favour of another Law and yet he positively and in down-right termes in the face of all his people avows the Civil Law to be the Law of Nations and that all transactions of Treaty and of Trade with forreign Nations were dispatched by the rule and reason thereof and that the authority thereof was so great in the esteem of strangers that they would rest satisfied therewith when no municipal Law could satisfie them But in that he avers also that when the people of England shall exterminate that Law which must needs be when the practice thereof is quite taken away or thrust into a poor narrow compass their honour will be obscured and they will be in danger to be over-run with barbarisme it was never so well worth the observing as at this present time And it clearly shews that wise and learned King did perfectly understand the true use of the Civil Law for as the language thereof must needs be a means to maintain learning which does civilize soften the minds of men so there is no sort of learning with the which the matter of it does not correspond and participate but above all it does afford more and better rules for civil living and orderly conversation amongst men and for righteous dealing each with other then any other study or learning whatsoever But this practise and usage of the Civil Law in forreign parts is yet better confirmed by the authority of those who studying and professing the Law of England have been alwayes jealous of the rising and growth of the Civil Law in this Nation For though they have desired to keep it low here for what reason I need not mention yet some of them have freely enough owned how much it is in use and practise in other Countreys Sir Francis Bacon in his Epistle Dedicatory to the Queen set before his Maximes of Law after he had told the Queen that Justinian the Emperour did gloriously and yet aptly call the Body of the Roman Laws proprium sanctissimum templum justitiae consecratum a true and a most sacred temple consecrated unto justice he sayes that it is a work of great excellency indeed as may well appear in that France Italy and Spain who have long since shaken off the yoke of the Roman Empire do yet nevertheless continue to use the policy of that Law My Lord Ellesmere Chancellour of England as Sir Francis Bacon was in his speech of the Postnati does expresly deliver that the Civil Law is taken to be the most universal and general Law in the World Sir John Fortescue himselfe Lord chief Justice of England and afterwards Lord Chancellour in King Henry the sixth's dayes in his book wherein he does so highly magnifie and commend the Laws England above the Civil Law yet he could say z De Laud. legum Angliae ca. 9. That Civiles supra humanas cunctas leges alias fama per orbem extollit gloriosa The Civil Laws throughout the whole World are advanced in glory and renown above all other mans Laws Fulbeck also another of the same profession and of great learning does agree with the former in these words a In his parallel part 1. Epistle to the Reader The Roman Laws saith he in the times of Arcadius Theodosius and Justinian recovered their strength and shining to all the Common-wealths of Europe as the Sun to all the climates of the Earth have for their worthiness and necessary use and employment received entertainment countenance and great reward of Emperours Kings and Princes Likewise Mr Sâ—lden a Graduate in the Common-Law but a great Student in all learning and one that seems to have searched narrowly into the state of the Civil Law as it has stood in use and request in other Countreys as well as in England in all times in his additional discourse upon Fleta wholly spent upon that subject owns the entertainment and use of the Civil Law in the Western Countreys of Europe that had left to acknowledge the Roman Empire long before For in that discourse b Ca.
not be good just and lawful and after the same Matrimony solemnized and consummate by carnal knowledge and also sometime fruit of children ensued of the same Marriage upon pretence of a former contract made and not consummate by carnal copulation for proof whereof two witnesses by that Law were onely required been divorced and separate contrary to Gods Law and so the true Matrimony both solemnized â—n the face of the Church and consummate with bodily knowledge and confirmed also with the fruit of children had between them clearly frustrate and dissolved Farther also by reason of other prohibitions then Gods Law admitteth for their lucre by that Court invented the dispensations whereof they alwayes reserved to themselves as in kindred or affinity between Cousin-germans and so to the fourth and fourth degree carnal knowledge of any of the same kin or affinity before in such outward degrées which else were lawful and be not prohibited by Gods Law and all because they would get money by it and kéep a reputation of their usurped jurisdiction whereby not onely much discord betwéen lawful married persons hath contrary to Gods Ordinance arisen much debate and suit at the Law with wrongful veration and great damage of the innocent party hath béen procured and many just marriages brought in doubt and danger of undoing and also many times undone and lawful heirs disherited whereof there had never else but for his vain-glorious usurpation béen moved any such question since fréedom in them was given by Gods Law which ought to be most sure and certain But that notwithstanding Marriages have been brought into such an uncertainty thereby that no Marriage could be surely knit and bounden but it should lye in either of the parties power and arbiter casting away the fear of God by means and compasses to prove a precontract a kindred and aliance or a carnal knowledge to defeat the same and so under the pretence of these allegations afore rehearsed to live all the dayes of their life in detestable Adultery to the utter destruction of their own souls and the provocation of the terrible wrath of God upon the places where such abominations were used and suffered Be it therefore enacted by the King our Soveraign Lord the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same That from the first day of the Moneth of July next coming in the year of our Lord God 1540. all and every such Marriages as within this Church of England shall be contracted betwéen lawful persons as by this Act we declare all persons to be lawful that be not prohibited by Gods Law to marry such being Marriages contracted and solemnized in the face of the Church and consummate with bodily knowledge or fruit of children or child being had therein betwéen the parties so married shall be by authority of this present Parliament aforesaid déemed judged and taken to be lawful good just and indissoluble notwithstanding any Precontract or Precontracts or Matrimony not consummate with bodily knowledge which either of the parties so married or both shall have made with any other person or persons before the time of contracting that marriage which is solemnized and consummate or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as afore and notwithstanding any Dispensation Prescription Law or other thing granted or confirmed by Act or otherwise And that no reservation or prohibition Gods Law except shall trouble or impeach any marriage without the Levitical degrées And that no person of which estate degrée or condition he or she be shall after the said first day of the Moneth of July aforesaid be admitted to any of the Spiritual Courts within this the Kings Realm or any his Graces other Lands and Dominions to any processe plea or allegation contrary to this foresaid Act. Rep. 1 2 P. M. 8. Rep. 1. El. 1. This Act was not many years after repealed as followeth 2 3 Ed. 6. cap. 23. Part of the Statute of Precontracts repealed WHereas in the two and thirtieth year of the reign of the late King of famous memory King Henry the eighth because that many inconveniences had chanced in this Realm by breaking and dissolving good and lawful marriages yea whereupon also sometime issue and children had followed under the colour and pretence of a former contract made with another the which contract divers times was but very slenderly proved and often but surmised by the malice of the party who desired to be dissolved from the marriage which they liked not and to be coupled with another there was an Act made that all and every such marriages as within the Church of England should be contracted and solemnized in the face of the Church and consummate with bodily knowledge or fruit of children or child being had between the parties so married should be by authority of the said Parliament deemed judged and taken to be lawful good just and indissoluble notwithstanding any precontract or precontracts of Matrimony not consummate with bodily knowledge which either of the persons so married or both had made with any other person or persons before the time of contracting that marriage which is solemnized or consummated or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as by the same Act more plainly appear Sithence the time of the which Act although the same was godly meant the unrulinesse of men hath ungodly abused the same and divers inconveniences intolerable in manner to Christian ears and eyes followed thereupon women and men breaking their own promises and faiths made by the one unto the other so set upon sensuality and pleasure that if after the contract of Matrimony they might have whom they more favoured and desired they could be contented by lightnesse of their nature to overturn all that they had done afore and not afraid in manner even from the very Church door and Marriage feast the man to take another spouse and the espouse to take another husband more for bodily lust and carnal knowledge then for surety of faith and truth or having God in their good remembrance contemning many times also the commandment of the Ecclesiastical Iudge forbidding the parties having made the contract to attempt or do any thing in prejudice of the same Be it therefore enacted by the Kings Highnesse the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled that as concerning Precontracts the said former Statute shall from the first day of Day next comming cease be repealed and of no force or effect and be reduced to the estate and order of the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm which immediately before the making of the said Estatute in this case were used in this Realm so that from the said first day of Day when any cause or contract of marriage is pretended to have been made it shall be lawful to the Kings Ecclesiastical Iudge of that place to hear and examine the said cause and
Ministers are by Act of Parliament severely commanded to do it BY the late Act before mentioned where the Doubt so it is called there about the Coercive power in Ecclesiastical Courts is clear'd and taken away One Proviso is That that Act nor any thing therein conteined shall extend or be construed to extend to give unto any Archbishop or Bishop or any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Judge c. any power or authority to exercise c. If any be peccant that way it ought to be amended Another Proviso forbids any Archbishop Bishop c. to tender or administer unto any person the Oath usually called the Oath Ex officio or any other Oath whereby such person to whom the same is tendred or administred may be charged or compelled to confess or accuse or to purge him or her self of any criminal matter or thing whereby he or she may be lyable to any censure or punishment This being now forbidden by Act of Parliament every Subject ought to give obedience therein But some now insulting and upbraiding the Ecclesiastical Courts that all this while they have oppressed the Subject with that proceeding which the Parliament hath taken away renewing the old cry in Queen Elizabeths time and ever since against such proceedings which never till now I alwayes except what was done in the late times of usurped government were legally prohibited Though I am far from questioning the reasons whereupon that Act passed but do humbly submit to it both in word and practice yet I hope it will be allowed to make some defence against such persons as so tax such proceedings before the passing of this Act. And herein I shall follow that most able Civilian Richard Cosin Doctor of the Laws and Dean of the Arches in that his Apology for sundry proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical c. Mr. Cambden as before mentions him with honour as surely he well deserv'd and that work of his if nothing else evinces it Mr. Swinburn in that Work of his of Last Wills and Testaments printed at London for the Company of Stationers 1611. in the first part sect 6. numb 8. fol. 17. writes thus of him and of that Work of his that Apology I find saith he written by that learned and no less religious man Doctor Cosins at I take it in that worthy Work entituled An Apology for sundry proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical c. and so he goes on Upon this subject he hath written so fully that I believe little can be added to it and if any should go about it excepting such additions as well may be added by reason of some emergencies since the time he wrote and some other additions and explications not derogatory from him they would be forced very much to plough with his Heyfer which would but look too much like a Plagiary I could wish the book were reprinted and haply it will be so which may serve for Topicks to this subject For as all the Poets after Homer are said to drink of his Fountain according to that picture or statue of his that denotes as much with that Inscription Ridet anhelantem post se vestigia turbam Even so must I conceive all do from Doctor Cosin that shall write upon this subject I was upon Epitomizing that Apology of his and had made some progress therein but upon second thoughts desisted thinking it better to refer the Reader to him rather then to adventure to abbreviate him and thereby perhaps wrong him an offence that too many Epitomizers are guilty of therefore I say I shall onely make use of some Notes as confessed arrows out of his quiver and sippe of some others elsewhere and point the Reader to his full stream where any that list may drink their fill Upon these words in the late Act Provided that this Act. nor anything therein contained shall extend or be construed to extend or give unto any Archbishop Bishop c. any power or authority to exercise or execute c. any jurisdiction which they might not have done before the year of our Lord 1639. or to abridge or diminish the Kings Majesties Supremacy in Ecclesiastical matters or affairs nor to confirm the Canons made in the year 1640. I say upon these words some are ready mistaking questionless the words and meaning of that Act to renew that old exploded Opinion or rather groundless Fancy That a several Royal assent to the executing of every particular Canon is required Hereto Doctor Cosin answers That admitting This were true then all the other opinions of those that oppugn the ordinary Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical stand in no stead and might be spared because this would cut off all at once For none that exercise ordinary Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical have it in particularity which by the oppugners seems to be meant otherwise then by permission of Law to every of their proceedings and impossible were it by reason of the infinity of it and troublesomness to procure such particular assent to the execution of every Canon His Majesties Delegates when Appeals are made to His Majesty in Chancery would signifie nothing could not exercise the power to them delegated by reason of the want of such particular assent and it is a gross absurdity to grant as even the Oppugners and Innovators do That Testamentary and Matrimonial causes are of Ecclesiastical cognizance to say nothing of the rest of Ecclesiastical causes and yet cannot by reason of this want be dispatched nor can be dealt in by any other authority according to any Law in force This would speak a defect in the publick Government that the Subject should have a right but no likely or ready mean to come by it and great offences by Law punishable and yet no man sufficiently authorized to execute these Laws Since the abrogation of Papal pretended Supremacy when the ancient rights of the Kings of England of being Supreme Governors over all persons within their Dominions as well in all spiritual or Ecclesiastical things or causes as Temporal and that no forreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction power superiority preeminence or authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm and so forth as in the Act and the Oath Since these rights were as it were ex postliminio restored and declared to have been as they ever ought to have been in the Kings of England many Laws have been made in several Parliaments for the strengthning of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and the more effectual execution thereof and some of the Ecclesiastical Laws were enlarged altered and explained * 25 H. 8.19 The Statutes for Delegates upon Appeals †27 H 8 130. 32 H 8.7 Not long after two Statues for assistance of ordinary Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and for the speedier recovery of Tithes in Courts Ecclesiastical * 34 35 H. 8 19. The like for the recovery of Pensions Procurations c. †1 Ed. 6. c. 2. In the time of Edw. 6.
at Common Law Proceedings in Chancery with the several species and kinds of cases wherein such Oaths at Common Law are tendered being very numerous and are by him cap. 6. in the third part of his Apology and other parts thereof reckoned up and fully set forth And if this may be done in civil causes ought it not much rather be allowed the Church in criminal which works onely medicinaliter to reformation the Common-wealth works ad poenam the Church not so this to the amendment of the party to bring him to a voluntary submission and to take away the offence and scandal which he hath justly given to his Neighbour and to lead a new life that perhaps to the loss of liberty corporal punishment or livelyhood at least besides the infamy of being convicted of doing dishonestly and unworthily CHAP. V. That it is consonant to Gods Word to give such an Oath Ex Officio or otherwise EVery soul is to be subject to the Higher Powers Rom. 13. This is to be understood in all commands not contrary to Gods Word Acts 5.29 in such comes in the Apostles rule It is better to obey God then man That the giving such an oath is not contrary to Gods word An oath duly imposed by the Magistrate necessitates the Subject to take it as appears by the commandment of God himself Thou shalt the Lord thy God and serve him and shalt swear by his name The like is given by the Lord in the Prophet Jeremy O Israel thou shalt swear The Lord liveth in truth in judgment and righteousness Joshua gave charge to all the Magistrates of Israel Jer. 4.25 that They shall not make mention of the gods of other Nations nor shall cause to swear by them Saul did not onely charge the people with an oath Josh 23.2 7. but made them vow with a curse not to eat any food that day till night therefore one of them reported to Jonathan Sauls son 1 Sam. 14. That his father had made the people to swear Some would cavil at this as but an Adjuration and would without reason difference that from an Oath but in that Chapter 1 Sam. 14. it is four several times called an Oath The wise King Salomon imposed an oath upon Shimei in a cause capital to him Did not I make thee saith he swear by the Lord c. 2 Kings 42. So King Saul urged David to swear unto him 1 Sam. 24. for a private offence only between Neighbours King Salomon testifieth that a necessary oath of Purgation may be required by the Complainant 3 Kings 8. When a man shall trespass against his neighbour and he lay upon him an Oath to cause him to swear c. 2 Chron. 34. King Josias made a covenant and vow and caused all that were found in Jerusalem and Benjamin to stand to it Neh. 5.12 Nehemiah caused the Priests to swear c. It is assigned for a special mark of a Godly man To swear to his neighbour and not to disappoint him though it be to his own hinderance Num. 30.3 Psal 15.4 Abraham said thus to his servant I will make thee swear by the Lord God of the Heavens c. this in a private cause Gen. 24.3 much more a Magistrate in a cause wherein the Commonwealth or Church of God hath Interest to have it sincerely dealt in Jacob moved Esau to the sale of his birthright Gen. 25.33 and took an Oath for confirmation of it A man supposed to have born false witness against another is thereof brought in question Deut. 19.17 and re-examined if it be objected it was not upon oath by consequence of reason it must be upon oath when what he has said before upon oath is re-examined and this in a case very penal to him The oath of Adjuration is very frequent in Scripture Prov. 29.14 about not declaring cursing which he heard By the History * Jud. 17.1 2. of Micah as we are †1 Cor. 10.3 bound to do all to the glory of God so it belongeth to the glory of God for a man by due presumptions burdned with a crime and charged by the Magistrate to confess of himself as appeareth by the history of Achan The lot fell upon him but this was but an inducement to ground a special Inquisition against him if hereupon he might have been executed Joshua needed not to have required any further confession of him but he goes further with a most solemn Adjuration Lev. 5.1 in those dayes used for an oath the Hebrew word signifying both and being translated sometimes juramentum and sometimes adjuratio Son give glory to the Lord God of Israel c. Josh 7.9 albeit the punishment was capital Ezra adjured the Chief Priests c. Calvin in his Institutions gathereth Ezra 10.5 that Achan took an oath When a man is found secretly murdered in the field and the murder is not known nor suspected yet all the Elders of the next City thereunto should use certain Ceremonies and then swear That their hands have not shed this bloud nor their eyes have seen him that shed it Deut. 21. In Leviticus a certain Sacrifice is to be made for certain sins amongst which this is one as Arias Montanus translates it out of the Hebrew If a soul or a man shall have sinned and have heard the voice of an Adjuration or Oath c. That which is here said Lev. â—5 â— if he have heard the voice of an Oath the Geneva Translation offereth it thus in the Margin as if it were nearer to the Hebrew then the other in that Text viz. If the judge hath taken an oath of any other Exod. â—â— When a man delivers money of stuff on trust to be kept by his neighbour if it happen to be imbezelled away and the thief be not certainly known or found by the Low of God be must take a necessary oath of purgation and enquiry The same also is a little after established by God touching any quick goods happening to be left in deposito Ibid. v. 10. A sacrifice of Atonement for such a sin of Perjury is prescribed If any do sin saith the Lord any deny unto his neighbour c. If a man be moved with a jealous mind against his wife Num. 5.14 she is not onely to be charged with an oath but to have further tryal to drink the bitter waters Jer. 38.14 When the Prophet Jeremy was charged by the King in a generality to answer that which he would aske him the Prophet promiseth so it should not be capital to him he would answer it Whether upon oath or not oath for before God 't is the same no doubt he answered the truth (a) Jer. 37.13 The same Prophet when he was charged with a particular high crime refused not to answer or bid them prove it but roundly answers it (b) 2 Kings 5. So Elisha
off his posterity 2 Sam. 21.2 Therefore this is not lawful for a King a Commonwealth nor a private man to do Now I conclude So be it there be not danger of loss of life in it in matters and causes which are punished either by pecuniary Mulcts or by imprisonment it is lawful for the Subject to undergo that oath and for the Magistrate to require it But in this point is much doubting this Oath how far it is lawful and in what manner an case Which whilest I treat of all my action is as they call it the pursuing of the Judicial proceedings by which it may be known at length in which way we may go where we may go no further and hereof I see three parts as for as concerns our purpose which are thus designed in holy Writ 1. The admission of the suit or complaint as the Hebrews call it that is the entrance of the cause into judgment out of Isaiah 1.23 St. Paul calls it receiving an accusation 1 Tim. 5.19 The second is the state and position of the cause that is the foundation of the suit or complaint as the Hebrews give it the name out of Deut. 19.13 The Greeks call it the matter to be judged and determined St. Paul if I be not deceived sayes it is an end of strife Heb. 6.16 The third is Inquisition upon the proofs that is as the Jews call it a Pervestigation or sifting of the suit or complaint out of Iob 29.16 the Greeks call it a Structure of the cause St. Paul calls it a confirmation Heb. 6.16 for with the fourth which all men call the Sentence I have nothing to do Therefore these three things are to be in all Judiciary proceedings That the party ought to be lawfully questioned after that the state of the cause then the proofs are to be looked into And in the first part there is no use of an oath that I know or have read of yet that I should enquire hereof some mens error makes me do it which error I shall lessen this day if it may be done who think themselves not sufficiently accused nay they think they shall accuse themselves except an accuser step forth and shew himself and who falsly and rashly suppose and yet they suppose it that that oath which is required of them for the stating of the cause that is the second part that is to be required to the first part this is the admission of the suit or complaint So I propose it thus In every suit or complaint the matter either is so apparent as that it is manifest as well concerning the fact as the person whether the person be deprehended in the deed doing that is as they say taken in the manner as she was Iohn 8.4 Or so with an high hand or as we use to say with a notorious boldness as attempted before the Magistrate and all the Congreation as was Zimri's wickedness Numb 25.8 In which cases so openly acted there was no need of accuser or witness or if it be so that the fact is manifest but the person is unknown as in the deed body found but the murtherer is not known Deut. 21.1 or the person is known but the fact unknown as in Achans case Josh 7.18 In which matter so controverted a man may by the judgment of the Divine Law be called into question four manner of wayes For either one may be brought forth upon some signs or presumptions as in that first piece of Gods justice which all humane justice imitates it was done against Adam without an accuser onely upon signs and presumptions that is that he fled and hid himself amongst the Trees a sign of a guilty mind Gen. 3.8 In the second piece of justice against Cain that likewise was upon signs and presumptions that is Abel appearing no where effusion of bloud being found Cains anger or envy towards Abel foregoing it Gen. 4.6.10 This is the first manner The second is Or one may be brought forth upon the impeachment of another as in that very first piece of justice Adam onely was cited but he being questioned as usually it happens impeaches Eve she likewise the Serpent Gen. 3.12 and so they two hereby were made parties guilty or defendant The third is by Fame or rather Infamy as for the most part suspicion follows in the neck of the facts of wicked men talk or fame follows the suspicion and insinuation or complaint follows the talk or fame And thus was the course against the Sodomites Gen. 18.20 The cry of the sodomites is great I will go down now and see c. saith the Lord. And after the same manner were Inquisitions made both in the Law If it be told thee and thou hast heard it Deut. 17.4 and in the Gospel against the incestuous person 1 Cor 5.1 It is reported The fourth is by Suggestion or Complaint as in Iobs case cap. 1.11 where the Accuser of our brethren as St. Iohn calls him would have made that holy man guilty of Hypocrisie a false crime yet a crime and that partly juridically under which name amongst the Hebrews they were called Masters of the suit or controversie Isaiah 50.8 we translate it Adversary And here the punishment of the offending party was sought after that he might give satisfaction to the person wronged partly as it is called Evangelically wherein one is denounced or reported to the Church where onely the medicine or remedy is sought after that the Church may have satisfaction in cause of scandal In the first the thing it self as we use to say speaks and impeaches the party guilty in the second one guilty person impeaches another in the third the speech of the people is the Accuser in the fourth any one under the proper and true name of an Accuser To this I adde a Fifth but not as these as an ordinary remedy to determine the controversie but plainly an extraordinary one not to be put in practice but in the Valley of Achor that is against the troublers of Israel for so the word Achor sounds that is in some heinous wickedness or the state of the Church and Kingdom being in danger in such cases we run to extraordinary remedies that is to Lots as Ioshua did which in certain causes is not granted Iosh 7.16 In this Ioseph made use onely of his own suspicion Are not you Spies saith he to see the nakedness of the Land ye are come Gen 42 9. and when they denyed yet without sign or token fame or any Accuser he questioned them thrust Simeon into prison and forced the rest to take an oath Nor did they appeal to the Law of Nations or complain that they were used contrary to Law and right For where the peace of the Commonwealth is concerned that is of such moment that I doubt not that God suffers his spirit of jealousie to come upon the Magistrate touching the safety of his Israel no less then he suffers the Husband to have
his touching the chastity of his Wife Num. 5 14. For the matter in question it is in a main degree dangerous that it ought not to be dissembled and the persons with whom 't is acted use not to bring in any witnesses but such as are guilty themselves by whom hey may be convinced And as to the crime we speak of it is of that kind of wickednesse that leaves no prints footsteps or marks behind it by which they may be taken hold of Wherefore in those cases it is no lesse lawful to question or accuse upon suspicion onely then it is by the Pillory Stocks or * A punishment amongst the Heathens where the party was put into a Boat and another Boat whelm'd over him Boat for such purpose these things were in Gods †Jer. 29.26 Commonwealth Either of which in other either controversies or crimes no man allowes Well does Seneca if I remember well render the reason hereof Where Villanies run riot beyond measure 't is unjust that justice should be tyed to degrees to which that plainly extraordinary question of him who about that wicked extraordinary act of Achan betook himself to lots is not very unlike The God of Israel would have them to be troubled that go about to trouble the Israel of God and hereof the Valley of Achor is a perpetual monument Now whomsoever the Magistrate calls in question by any one of these four or if it concern the peace of the Commonwealth or of the Church the fifth way either foregoing the partie is lawfully called Nor is there any reason he should fear that he should accuse or bewray himself he is now lawfully accused and bewrayed He is now that he is accused and bewrayed to take care how he shall lawfully defend himself And hitherto of the right of Accusation Now I assume the second The matter being thus before the Judge brought into doubt the party guilty or defendant either confesses the crime committed as Achan did and then the Judge hath no more to do but to pronounce sentence or which is most commonly done denies it which Solomon most elegantly expresses Prov. 18.17 He that is first in his own cause seemeth just but his neighbour cometh and searcheth him Now the party guilty or defendant denying by repelling the objection and the Agent or Plaintiff affirming his intention thereon arises that contradiction St. Paul speaks of Heb. 6.16 the bounder or end of which contradiction is that which is every Judicature is sought for as there the Apostle observes but no bounder will be found till the matter be put in an equal ballance except the one party have a better confirmation then the other 't is the Apostles word in the same place therefore 't is the Judges part to enquire on which part that lyes 'T is but a light labour and little praise to end such contentions as are easie and plain but that 's the worth of a Judge to sift out such causes where the right is obscure and perplexed The cause which I knew not I searched out saith Iob of himself Iob 29.16 And to do that dexterously and fitly is the honour of a Magistrate saith Solomon Prov. 25.1 to whom himself that sentence he pronounced in that most difficult cause 'twixt the two Harlots touching the uncertain mother of the surviving child was an high honour 1 Kings 3.27 But before these confirmations that is the foundations of the cause ought to be or can be set forth it is necessary some state of the cause must be settled or as it were a hinge must be on which the cause may be turned and that first of all to be made manifest what and how far he affirms and the other denies wherein each of the Litigants may rightly call the other to set foot to foot and hand to hand Sayes the Iew and prudently does he say it First of all place me the controversie upon his foundation which except you do as very aptly some speak out of Prov. 21. the whole Action is but meer vanity tossed on this side and that side this way and that way 'twixt the Agent and Defendant which as we cannot endure here in the Schools much lesse ought it to be suffered in Judicature whose proceeding thoroughout ought to be solemn and sacred and the very Justice of Justice as it is Deut. 16.20 This subject matter to be judged or state of the cause or if any would rather call it so the bounder of the controversie is to be sought out either in the behalf of the guilty or defendant party or of the Agent Not of the Agent oftentimes he cannot because oftentimes there is none such when one is called into question upon presumption or else upon fame and when there is he is almost rapt and transposed or is driven on either out of hatred or some other oblique desire that he himself is unstated so that from him in vain is the state of the cause required Wherefore to the party guilty or defendant is this favour granted or rather this honor is given who is alwayes a person certain and whom the Law accounts not convicted for guiltlesse that he should either by affirming or denying fix to himself the state of the cause yea that by his answer onely the state of the whole controversie may be setled and not onely the state of the controversie but except he be convinced of falshood by the testimony of two witnesses beyond all exception an end too of the controversie But that he may not if he be loose and free depart from that state so by him sixed and afterwards not stand to that state but shall recoil and go back from his purpose a bond a bond of the soul as God gave it the name he is to enter into that is a religious affirmation by which his soul is as it were bound up with a chain to speak out the truth holily and sincerely that is the truth not that absolutely but as he knows it or believes it nor must go contrary to his conscience which we call lying but even as he were acting with God himself so must he act with the Magistrate that is Gods Lieutenant that represents him and requires right That Israel and the people of God proceeded thus that is swore to make true answer that practice of Michaeas of which I made mention above and that which is much apter that other in that questioning of Elias 1 Kings 18.10 evince it where when they had expresly answered He is not with as the King not herewith contented forced them to an oath that they had not found him as if no Law could compell a man to rest on the answer of a man unsworn Wherefore as it is altogether fit that the party guilty or defendant should be bound up lest he might evade or change the state of the cause and thereupon one state and then another follows and indeed so there will be no place of consistency or settling the cause
having the said contract sufficiently and lawfully proved before him to give sentence for Matrimony commanding solemnization cohabitation consummation and fractation as it becometh man and wife to have with inflicting all such pains upon the disobedients and disturbers thereof as in times past before the said Statute the Kings Ecclesiastical Iudge by the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws ought and might have done if the said Statute had never been made any clause article or sentence in the said Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Provided alwayes and be it enacted that this Act do not extend to disannul dissolve or break any marriage that hath or shall be solemnizated and consummated before the said first day of Day next ensuing by title or colour of any Precontract but that they be and be deemed of like force and effect to all intents constructions and purposes as if this Act had never been had ne made any thing in this present Act notwithstanding Provided also that this Act do not extend to make good any of the other causes to the dissolntion or disannulling of Matrimony which be in the said Act spoken of and disannulled But that in all other causes and other things there mentioned the said former Act of the two and thirtieth year of the late King of famous memory do stand and remain in his full strength and power any thing in this Act notwithstanding Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. By these the inconveniency appeareth of taking away or altering an ancient long-settled Law practised long in all Christian Countries as this way which had it not been good probably the inconveniency and hurt of it had appeared in so long a time and the Law for the Oath Ex officio and Purgation is of like antiquity and practice in all Christian Countries without inconvenience or hurt thereby arising as yet that I ever could hear of therefore such Laws ought to be deeply weighed and considered of before they be repealed or altered And now that I am speaking of repealing and altering old Laws and making new I thought fit to close this Tract with some Notes of mine drawn up almost all of them in the time of the usurped Government and some after His Majesties restauration and communicated to the sight of some of Quality touching the repealing or altering of some old Laws and making new Some are already past and effected as that for the Lords the Bishops sitting again in the Lords House in Parliament and other things These I offer with all humility to be considered of if it shall by those in Authority be thought fit otherwise to be as unsaid Protesting that I retract as before any thing which is here mentioned that shall appear contrary to Gods Word His Majesties Prerogative or the Laws of the Land or the Just policy and government of any of His Majesties Dominions Touching Parliaments AS a Parliament well constituted and acting regularly Parliament proceedings conduces much to the happinesse of King and Subject so any exorbitancy or deviation therein of which surely all unbiassed men cannot but confesse we have had too much sad experience in the Long Parliament works the contrary corruptio optimi pessima In the time of the Long Parliament some as it were idoliz'd it even almost to an opinion even of Infallibility of which they have made too much advantage to the misery of King and People Some advised then that that great Wheel that great Court should have had its sphere of activity it s known certain bounds publickly declared and not have been like a great River prodigiously overflowing all its banks and bounds Such a Parliament acting regularly is' t not probable the Members thereof would not so much have thirsted to lengthen much lesse to perpetuate it They were called up to consult may not he that calls his Counsellor forbear consulting him when he pleases and dismisse him The extent of an Ordinance of Parliament Ordinance of Parliament having by some been tentor'd then even almost to Infinity might it not have been precisely circumscribed and the exact definition of an Ordinance given As also the just privileges of Parliament explicitely have been made known Privileges of Parliament that the Subject might not then have sworn or promised or protested to have maintained and observed them and yet could not possibly know what they were That due care should have been taken that they might have been observed and kept inviolable on all sides neither diminished nor scrued too high and both the Members of the Houses and the People to have had their just rights entire and for this purpose that that Protestation then put in by the Lords Spiritual the Bishops The Bishops Protestation with their Petition to have the force removed that kept them from the Lords House should have been well consider'd on and the right of Protestation in Parliament declared and maintained being a great privilege And whether after a just Protestation unjustly rejected and the Members kept out of the House by force that so protested and petitioned whether the other Members could then have proceeded further in the House In the late Kings time in the beginning of his Reign when the Earl of Arundel was imprisoned in the Tower about his sons marriage of the Duke of Lenox's daughter being of the Bloud Royal without the Kings consent the Lords would do nothing in their House till he was restored in regard he was committed onely for a misdemeanour and neither for Treason Felony nor breach of peace in which cases they then confessed a Member of Parliament in Parliament time might be kept prisoner The King none of the three Estates And the Lords Spiritual being one of the three Estates as 1 Eliz. 3. and elsewhere and the King being none of the three Estates the contrary whereof hath been falsly held but the Head and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons being but Members and further the Lords Spiritual being one of the greatest Estates of the Realm as 8 Eliz. 1. Some doubted whether one of the Estates can destroy another and whether that come not near the contradicting that Axiom that the Parliament cannot be Felo de se whether that concerns not the Lords Temporal and Commons as well as the Lords Spiritual As for His late Majesties assent 't is known how far the prevalent power in both Houses then carried that and other things too to the misery of the Kingdom Who knows not in what condition the King then was forced to flye by reason of the tumults from Westminster to remoter places And as touching that Act of Parliament for their expulsion out of the Lords House it is not to be forgotten that when it was first brought into the Lords House it was rejected and ought not to have been brought in again that Session yet afterwards it was contrary to the order and course of Parliament brought in again when a great part of the Lords were absent if
Lords House at first Could the Houses especially the Commons House then have been brought into such due order as not to act extra spheram activitatis suae 't is well to be hoped they would not as above have been desirous to lengthen or perpetuate that Parliament when they can as by right repeal no old nor make no new Law nor tax the Subjects estate nor make Ordinances to have the force of Laws without His Majesties assent King Henry the Eighth suffered the Houses of Parliament in Ireland for a matter of two years or thereabouts to continue petitioning him to dissolve them and dismiss them home which he would not do till he saw cause Though this is not in his commendation yet hereby the just power of the King appeared and the right of his Prerogative which hath been too long and too much trampled upon And surely the Law in this point is the same in England as in Ireland that the just bounds and limits on all sides might be preserved inviolate Touching the Age of Parliament-men In the Lords House none sit there under 21. Age of Parliament-men years of age and some wish none might under 30. though there they are singly for themselves and represent not others as in the House of Commons But in the House of Commons there hath been sometimes as was in the Long Parliament Members about 16. or 17. years of age if not some of them under and their Suffrages and Votes were of as much force as the eldest most experienced in the House And it hath been the observation of some experienced and wise Parliament-men that oftentimes in that House those that had the shortest wings were the highest flyers and such as these could adde number and so consequently weight to a side The inconvenience and hurt that arose from hence is easily demonstrable and hath too much appeared by frequent experience Some have wished that there should have been no Member of the Commons House under the age of 30. years there being so large a field whereout to choose Parliament-men for every place and it being even as it were ex diametro contrary to the nature and denomination of a Parliament which is but a great Senate so called à Senioribus the constituting Members thereof Touching the Election of Parliament-men Some have advised that it should be clearly free Election of Parliament-men without such ambient means as were used in the Long Parliament by some Factions and whereas every man may give his suffrage for Counties that hath 40 s. per annum and in Cities and Corporations without such a value that being the old custom And that which was 40 s. per annum in former Ages is worth now ten times as much well nigh if not more So consequently the Electors should be of better estate There being such a vast disproportion betwixt the Cities The great number of Burroughs Corporations alwayes excepting London and Corporations Burroughs especially and the Counties wherein that Burrough and Corporation is scituate for number of Inhabitants which heightens the concernment In some Counties there being so many Corporations that the County having but two Parliament-men to represent them be the County never so great yet every petty Corporation whereof in many Counties especially in the West there are very many such hath as many to represent it of equal power in the Commons House with any other Member of County or City So that the Parliament-men serving for Cities and Burroughs are in number by many degrees far much more then for Counties which hath been conceived to have been no small cause of our late troubles Some advised for that reason and for other reasons too well known notorious and obvious to every indifferent eye that the number of these Burroughs should be much lessened or at leastwise that power of Electing Parliament-Members Especially so many of these Corporations Cities and Burroughs having in these late troubles so clearly forfeited their Charters Touching the manner of proceeding in Parliament in the Commons House in the Long-Parliament It hath been ordinarily observed as is touched above that in Committees in that Long-Parliament some have given their Suffrage or Vote Negatively or Affirmatively upon the cause when it was to be reported though they have not heard the whole cause and sometimes but a small part of it Great numerous bodies being sometimes too ready to divide into parties and factions as hath been seen too often in that Long-Parliament and so consequently endeavouring to heighten their own side have taken hold of and created all occasions and advantages that might further it Oftentimes the Younger tyring and wearying out the Elder or more incurious Members by long Speeches and continuing the sitting of the House long and late in the night till it was grown thin and by the departure out of it of so many of the more Aged and less sedulous Members that the remaining party according to the destined and strongly preoperated design grew prevalent To instance no more and happy had it been for these miserable Kingdoms that it never could have been instanced that fatal great Declaration or as the late blessed King and Martyr called it the Appeal to the People hammer'd out that way by wearying out so many of the Members by sitting so long even all or the greatest part of the night may witnesse this to all posterity Which gave occasion to some to call it a Nocturnal parliament but very appositely did Sir Benjamin Rudyard one of those ancient Members that was so wearied out when one asked him what he thought of that Vote so carried for that Declaration so late in the night or rather in the next morning answered that it looked like the verdict of a starved Jury Many other indirect wayes to call them no worse were used by interessed parties in that Long Parliament to compass their ends much by surprises when too many Members either wearied out as before or else gone out ither upon their pleasure or private concernments or thereupon absenting themselves from the House then the House being thin'd according to their desires they easily gained the major part of the suffrages or else clap'd in early into the House whilest the negligent party were in bed or absent upon their private business neglecting the publick to which they were called and so carried it and by such like wayes contrived and effected their laboured ends perhaps by their engines so laid to draw away many whose company they would gladly have been rid of out of the House and to keep them out when so absent or to hinder them from coming in at all Such may not improperly be called Parliament Decoyes or rather as in that Long Parliament when some of the Members impeached eleven of their number upon one of them in the charge against him they fixed the stigma of the Parliament-driver and when it made for them imputed it to him for a crime It would be
on that subject entituled Tenenda non tollenda or the necessity of preserving Tenures in capite c. and if it should be thought fit still to continue the abolition of Wardships c. whether the Tenures notwithstanding should be continued and whether a fitter retribution to His Majesty should be made then by Excise of Ale c. I need say no more of this but let Mr. Philipps book plead for it And also if it shall be thought fitting Rates to be set upon some Commodities for the sale of them that upon many more commodities then are yet the known rate and value of what they should be sold for should by indifferent and knowing men be set down considering the great hurt done by selling many commodities at unreasonable rates upon some accidental straits in regard of some accidents of time place or persons and many imposing upon the unskilful and unwary buyer very often as is notorious demanding more the double the price they will take In forreign parts both upon books and other commodities fitting rates are by Authority set down whereby the seller may have a just gain and the buyer not be over-reached Certum quid is the great satisfaction to the Subjects as in Fees certain in all Courts so at least in many commodities Also if it be thought fit that in point of dignity and precedency About dignity and precedency a fixt certain plain rule might be set down which probably would take away much emulation and grudging and quarrels oftentimes amongst many if it were clearly once determined And amongst others if it were so determined who should have precedency the eldest son of him whose father was a Knight and the first Knight of the Family or the eldest son of him whose father was but an Esquire but the eldest son of a Knight Senior to the Knight father of the former or whose Grandfather or direct Ancestor from whom he is lineally descended and is eldest son and heir was a Knight the second conceiving it is his right in regard he is the direct descendant and heir to the Senior Knight And that if it shall be thought fitting no person that bore Arms against the late King or His Majesty that now is or had any pretended Commission or authority so to do shall own the Title of General Lieutenant General Major General Commissary General Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Major Captain Lieutenant Cornet Ensign or any other Title by reason of any such pretended Commission or Authority nor any person shall so call them by any such Title under pain of a great Mulct toties quoties to be inflicted both upon the person that owns such Title and on the person that gives it or so calls them Nemo ex delicto consequitur beneficium and so bad a cause ought not in any implicite manner to be approved and rightly considered 't is an infamy to the parties to be called so And also Against the Act of limitation of actions in some cases if it be thought fitting that in regard that many who took the Kings part in the late wars could not have their right of suing for their own just due debts owing them and contracted either before the wars or in the time of the wars in the Courts of Justice then in being so that six years were elapsed according to that Act of 21 Jacobi 16. touching limitation of Actions and so they are thereby excluded to their great impoverishment There should be an abrogation or suspension of that Act so as to give remedy in this case that the spoiled may have reparation or retribution of justice if not reward for his Loyalty And also Against multiplicity of Statutes upon one and the same subject if it be thought fit that where Laws are doubtfully penned they may be explained and where there are multiplicity of several Statutes touching the same subject some repealing part of a statute some enlarging and altering so that the true meaning of the Statute becomes difficult and perplexed that in such cases all the said Statutes several so concerning the same subject may be repealed and one plain and clear Statute thereof to be made as namely these several Statutes in the Reigns of King Edward 6. Queen Mary Queen Elizabeth King James and King Charles 1. touching the prohibition of eating Flesh in Lent and other Fish-dayes and concerning Fasting-dayes may be so repealed and made void and one Statute made clearly and plainly to comprehend all that is necessary upon that subject Touching Ecclesiastical Persons Courts and Causes SOme have wished if it were thought fit The Clergies Proctors in the House of Commons that now the Lords Spiritual the Bishops being restored to their right in the Lords House that the Clergy should have their Proctors to sit in the House of Commons if they desired it representing the body of the Clergy as they used to do till about Henry the sixths time or not long before as it was then used since which time it hath been disused Some have affirmed that a Clergy-man of competent temporal estate having in King James's time been chosen Burgesse for a Corporation was not suffered to sit there nor a Clergy-man to say Prayers there Nor will some yield they can vote to chuse a Parliament-man either in County or borough so little of representation have they and yet when in Convocation they give the King Subsidies their grant must be confirmed by Act of Parliament Anciently such care was taken that Bishops should be present in Parliament that in their absence their Chancellors were summoned to sit there Also if it be thought fit About augmentation of Vicaridges that whereas before the dissolution of Monasteries the Bishops had power to augment poor Vicaridges out of the Tithes of Impropriations so they are now commonly called though the true name is Appropriations the Tithes having been appropriated to some Monastery or Religious house or other before the dissolution and after that falling into Lay-mens hands who held them improperly living by the Altar and doing nothing there got the Nick-name of Impropriators and Impropriations which now holds good such is the tyranny of Custom in this and many other cases Or if there were no Vicaridge endowed the Bishops might endow one nay and go so far as to leave to the Appropriator which then was that Religious house to which it was appropriated who then thought themselves as worthy to be kindly used as a man would think our Lay-Impropriators can do now not much more then a 50. part of the Tithes or thereabout It seems hard that the Lay-Impropriator should have a matter of 200. or 300 l. per annum Against Mensals or more and the poor Vicar a matter of 20. marks or 20. Pounds or thereabout and hardest in Mensals that is as it was usual when a Religious house could procure from the Patron the right of Presentation to some Living near their Monastery whither one of their