Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	king_n	lord_n	say_a	4,832	5	7.2464	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A43547	Parliaments power in lawes for religion, or, An ansvvere to that old and groundles [sic] calumny of the papists, nick-naming the religion of the Church of England, by the name of a parliamentary-religion sent to a friend who was troubled at it, and earnestly desired satisfaction in it.	Heylyn, Peter, 1600-1662.	1645 (1645)	Wing H1730; ESTC R200234	30,417	44

with the curiositie of the Ministers and mistakes of the People rather then for any other weighty cause As the Statute 5. 6. Ed. 6. cap. 1. it was thought expedient by the King with the Assent of the Lords and Commons in Parliament assembled that the said Order of Common-Service should be faithfully and godly perused explained and made fully perfect Perused and Explained by whom Why questionlesse by those who made it or else by those if they were not the same men who were appointed by the King to draw up and compose a Form of Ordination for the use of the Church And this Assent of theirs for it was no more was the only part that was ever acted by the Parliament in matter of this present nature save that a Statute passed in the former Parliament 3. 4. Ed. 6. c. 12. unto this effect that such Form and manner of making and consecrating Archbishops Bishops Priests Deacons and other Ministers of the Church which before I spake of as by six Prelates and six other men of this Realm learned in Gods Lawes by the King to be appointed and assigned shall be devised for that purpose and set forth under the Great Seale shall be lawfully used and exercised and none other Where note that the King only was to nominate and appoint the men the Bishops and other learned men were to make the book that the Parliament in a blinde obedience or at the least upon a charitable confidence in the integrity of the men so nominated did confirm that book before any of their Members had ever seene it though afterwards indeed in the following Parliament this book together with the book of Common-prayer so printed and explained retained a more formall confirmation as to the use thereof throughout the kingdome but in no other respect for which see the Statute 5. 6. Ed. 6. c. 1. As for the time of Q. Elizabeth when the Common prayer book now in use being the same almost with the last of King Edward was to be brought again into the Church from whence it was cast out in Q. Maries Reigne it was committed to the care of some learned men that is to say to Master Whitehead once Chaplain to Q. Anne Bullen Doctor Parker after Archbishop of Canterbury D. Grindall after Bishop of London D. Coxe after Bishop of Ely D. Pilkinton after Bishop of Durham D. May Deane of S. Paules D. Bill Provost of Eaton after Deane of Westminster and Sr. Tho. Smith By whom being alter'd in some few passages which the Statute points to 1 Eliz. cap. 21. It was presented to the Parliament and by the Parliament received and established without more adoe or troubling any Committee of both or either Houses to consider of it for ought appeares in their Records All that the Parliament did in it being to put it into the condition in which it stood before in King Ed. Reigne partly by repealing the Repeale of King Ed. Statutes made in the 1 of Q. Mary cap. 2. and partly by the adding of some farther penalties on such as did deprave the book or neglect to use it or wilfully did absent themselves from their parish-Churches And for the Alterations made therein in King Iames his time being small and in the Rubrick only and for the additions of the Thanksgivings at the end of the Letany the Prayer for the Queen and the royall Issue and the doctrine of the Sacraments at the end of the Catechisme which were not in the book before they were never referred unto the Parliament but were done only by authority of the Kings Commission and stand in force by virtue only of his Proclamation which you may find before the book the charge of buying the said book so explained and altered being layd upon the severall and respective parishes by no other authority than that of of the eightieth Canon made in Convocation An. 1603. The like may also be affirmed of the Formes of Prayer for the Inauguration day of our Kings and Queenes the Prayer-books for the fifth of November and the fifth of August and those which have beene used in all publique Fasts All which without the help of Parliaments have been composed by the Bishops and imposed by the King Now unto this discourse of the Formes of Worship I shall subjoyn a word or two of the times of Worship that is to say the holy daies observed in the Church of England and so observed that they doe owe that observation cheifely to the Churches power For whereas it was found in the former times that the number of the holy daies was grown so great that they became a burden to the common people and a great hindrance to the thrift and manufactures of the kingdome there was a Canon made in the Convocation An. 1536 for cutting off of many superstitious and superfluous holy daies and the reducing them unto the number in which now they stand save that St. Georges day and Mary Magdalens day and all the Festivals of the blessed Virgin had their place amongst them according to which Canon there went out a Monitory from the Archibishop of Canterbury to all the Suffragans of his Province respectively to see the same observed in their severall Diocesses which is still extant on Record But being the authority of the Church was then in the wane it was thought necessary to confirm their Acts and see execution done upon it by the Kings Injunction which did accordingly come forth with this Form or preamble That the abolishing of the said holy daies was Decreed ordained and established by the kings Highnesse Authority as supreme Head in Earth of the Church of England with the common consent and assent of the Prelates and Clergy of this his Realm in Convocation lawfully assembled and Congregate Of which see Fox his Acts and Monuments fol. 1246.1247 Afterwards in the yeare 1541. The King perceiving with what difficulty the People were induced to leave off those holy daies to which they had been so long accustomed published his Proclamation of the twenty third of Iuly for the abolishing of such holy daies amongst other things as were prohibited before by his Injunctions both built upon the same foundation namely the resolution of the Clergy in their Convocation And so it stood untill the Reigne of King E. 6. at what time the Reformation of the publique Liturgy drew after it by consequence an alteration in the present businesse no daies being to be kept or accounted holy but those for which the Church had set apart a peculiar office and not all those neither For whereas there are severall and peculiar offices for the day of the Conversion of Saint Paul and the day of St. Barnabas the Apostles neither of these are kept as holy daies nor reckoned or esteemed as such in the Act of Parliament wherein the names and number of the holy daies is precisely specified which makes some think the Act of Parliament to have had an over-ruling

Domine instead of Ora pro nobis and the like to these And of this sort were the Injunctions which came out in some yeares succeeding for the taking away of Images and Reliques with all the Ornaments of the same and all the Monuments and writings of fained Miracles and for restraint of offering or setting up lights in any Church but only to the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar in which he was directed chiefly by Archbishop Cranmer as also those for eating of white-meates in the time of Lent the abolishing the fast on St. Marks day and the ridiculous but superstitious sports accustomably used on the dayes of Saint Clement St. Catherine and St. Nicholas All which and more was done in the said Kings Reigne without help of Parliament For which I shall refer you to the Acts Mon. fol. 1385. 1425. 1441. The like may also be affirmed of the Injunctions published in the name of K. Ed. 6. An. 1547. and printed also then for the use of the Subjects and of the severall Letters missive which went forth in his name prohibiting the bearing of Candles on Candlemas day of Ashes in Lent and of Palmes on Palm-Sunday for the taking down of all the Images throughout the kingdom for administring the Communion in both kinds dated March 13. 1548. for abrogating of private Masses Iun. 24. 1549. for bringing in all Missals Graduals Processionals Legends and Ordinals about the latter end of December of the same yeare for taking down of Altars and setting up Tables instead thereof An. 1550. and the like to these All which particulars you have in Foxes book of Acts Mon. in King Edwards life which whether they were done of the Kings meer motion or by advice of his Counsell or by consultation with his Bishops for there is little left upon Record of the Convocations of that time more than the Articles of the yeare 1552 certain I am that there was nothing done nor yet pretended to be done in all these particulars by the authority of Parliament Thus also in Q. Elizabeths time before the new Bishops were well setled and the Queen assured of the affections of her Clergy she went that way to work in the Reformation which not only her two Predecessors but all the godly Kings and Princes in the Iewish State and many of the Christian Emperours in the Primitive times had done before her in the well ordering of the Church and People committed to their care and government by Almighty God And to that end she published her Injunctions An. 1559. A book of Orders An. 1561. Another of Advertisements An. 1562. all tending unto Reformation unto the building up of the new Ierusalem with the advise no doubt of some godly Prelates as were then about her But past all doubt without the least concurrence of her Court of Parliament But when the times were better setled and the first difficulties of her Reigne passed over she left Church-work to the disposing of Church-men who by their place and calling were most proper for it And they being met in Convocation and thereto authorized as the Lawe required did make and publish severall books of Canons as viz. 1571. An. 1584. An. 1597. Which being confirmed by the Queene under the broad Seale of England were in force of Lawes to all intents and purposes which they were first made but being confirmed without those formall words Her Heires and Successors are not binding now but expired together with the Queene No Act of Parliament required to confirm them then nor never required ever since on the like occasion A fuller evidence whereof we cannot have then in the Canons of the yeare 1603. being the first yeare of King Iames made by the Clergy only in the Convocation and confirmed only by the King For though the old Canons were in force which had been made before the Submission of the Clergy as before I shewed you which served in all these wavering and unsetled times for the perpetuall standing rule of the Churches Government yet many new emergent Cases did require new Rules and whilest there is a possibility of mali mores there will be a necessity of bonae Leges Now in the Confirmation of these Canons we shall find it thus That the Clergy being met in their Convocation according to the Tenour and effect of his Majesties Writ his Majesty was pleased by virtue of his Prerogative Royall and Supreme authority in Causes Ecclesiasticall to give and grant unto them by his Letters Patents dated Apr. 12. Iun. 25. full free and lawfull liberty licence power and authority to confer treate debate consider consult and agree upon such Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions as they should think necessary fit and convenient for the honour and service of Almighty God the good and quiet of the Church and the better Government thereof from time to time c. to be kept by all persons within this Realm as far as lawfully being members of the Church it may concern them which being agreed on by the Clergy and by them presented to the King humbly requiring him to give his Royall assent unto them according to the Statute made in the 25. of K. H. 8. and by his Majesties Prerogative and Supreme authority in Ecclesiasticall Causes to ratifie and confirm the same his Majesty was graciously pleased to confirm and ratifie them by his Letters Patents for Himselfe his Heires and lawfull Successours straitly commanding and requiring all his loving Subjects diligently to observe execute and keep the same in all points wherein they doe or may concern all or any of them No running to the Parliament to confirm these Canons nor any question made till this present by temperate and knowing men that there wanted any Act for their confirmation which the Lawe could give them But against this and all which hath been said before it will be objected That being the Bishops of the Church are fully and wholly Parliamentarian and have no more authority and jurisdiction nisi a Parliamentis derivatam but that which is conferred upon them by the power of Parliaments as both Sanders and Schultingius doe expresly say whatsoever they shall doe or conclude upon either in Convocation or in private Conferences may be called Parliamentarian also And this last calumny they build on the severall Statutes 24. H. 8. c. 12. touching the manner of electing and Consecrating Archbishops and Bishops that of the 1. Ed. 6. c. 2. appointing how they shall be chosen and what Seales they shall use those of the 3 4 Ed. 6. c. 12. and 5 6 Ed. 6. for authorising of the book of Ordination But chiefly that of the 8 Eliz. c. 1. for making good all Acts since 1 Eliz. in consecrating any Archbishop or Bishop within this Realm To give a generall answer to each severall cavill you may please to know that the Bishops as they now stand in the Church of England derive their Calling together with their Authority and

Power in Spirituall matters from no other hands than those of Christ and his Apostles their Temporall honors and possessions from the bounty and affection only of our Kings and Princes their Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction in Causes Matrimoniall Testamentary and the like for which no Action lieth at the Common-Lawe from continuall usage and prescription and owe no more unto the Parliament than all sort of Subjects doe besides whose fortunes and Estates have been occasionally and collaterally confirmed in Parliament And as for the particular Statutes which are touched upon that of the 24 H. 8. doth only constitute and ordain a way by which they might be chose and consecrated without recourse to Rome for a confirmation which formerly had put the Prelates to great charge and trouble but for the Form and manner of their Consecration the Statute leaves it to those Rites and Ceremonies wherewith before it was performed And therefore Sanders doth not stick to affirm that all the Bishops which were made in King Henries dayes were Lawfully and Canonically ordained and Consecrated the Bishops of that time not only being taken and acknowledged in Queen Maries dayes for lawfull and Canonicall Bishops but called on to assist at the Consecration of such other Bishops Cardinall Poole himselfe for one as were promoted in her Reigne whereof see Mason's book de Minist. Ang. l. 3. c.. Next for the Statute 1 Ed. 6. cap. 2. besides that it is satisfied in part by the former Answer as it relates to their Canonicall Consecrations it was repealed in Terminis in the first of Q. Maries Reigne and never stood in force nor practice to this day That of the authorizing of the book of Ordination in two severall Parliaments of that King the one a parte antè and the other a parte pòst as before I told you might indeed seem somewhat to the purpose if any thing were wanting in it which had been used in the formula's of the Primitive times or if the book had been composed in Parliament or by Parliament men or otherwise received more Authority from them then that it might be lawfully used and exercised throughout the Kingdom But it is plain that none of these things were objected in Queen Maries dayes when the Papists stood most upon their points the Ordinall not being called in because it had too much of the Parliament but because it had too little of the Pope and relished too strongly of the Primitive Piety And for the Statute of the 8 of Q. Elizabeth which is cheifly stood on all that was done therein was no more than this and on this occasion A question had been made by captious and unquiet men and amongst the rest by Dr. Bonner sometimes Bishop of London whether the Bishops of those times were lawfully ordained or not the reason of the doubt being this which I mervaile Mason did not see because the Book of Ordination which was annulled and abrogated in the first of Q. Mary had not been yet restored and revived by any legall Act of Q. Elizabeths time which Cause being brought before the Parliament in the 8. yeare of her Reigne the Parliament took notice first that their not restoring of that book to the former Power in Termes significant and expresse was but Casus omissus and then declare that by the Statute 5 6 Ed. 6. It had been added to the Book of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments as a member of it at least as an Appendant to it and therefore by the Statute 1 Eliz. c. 2. was restored againe together with the said book of Common Prayer intentionally at the least if not in Terminis But being the words in the said Statute were not cleare enough to remove all doubts they therefore did revive it now and did accordingly enact that whatsoever had been done by virtue of that Ordination should be good in Lawe This is the Totall of the Statute and this shewes rather in my judgement that the Bishops of the Queenes first times had too little of the Parliament in them then that they were conceived to have had too much And so I come to your last objection which concernes the Parliament whose entertayning all occasions to manifest their power in Ecclesiasticall matters doth seem to you to make that groundles slander of the Papists the more faire and plausible 'T is true indeed that many Members of both Houses in these latter times have been very ready to imbrace all businesses which are offered to them cut of a probable hope of drawing the managery of all Affaires as well Ecclesiasticall as Civill into their own hands and some there are who being they cannot hope to have their fancies authorised in a Regular way doe put them upon such designes as neither can consist with the nature of Parliaments nor the esteem and reputation of the Church of Christ And this hath been a practice even as old as Wicklef who in the time of K. Rich. 2. addressed his Petition to the Parliament as we reade in Walsingham for the Reformation of the Clergy the rooting out of many false and erroneous Tenents and for establishing of his own Doctrines who though he had some Wheat had more Tares by ods in the Church of England lest he might be thought to have gone a way as dangerous and unjustifiable as it was strange and new he laid it down for a Position that the Parliament or Temporall Lords where by the way this ascribes no authority or power at all to the House of Commons might lawfully examine and Reform the Disorders and Corruptions of the Church and on discovery of the errors and corruptions of it devest her of all Titles and Temporall endowments till she were reformed But for all this and more than this for all he was so strongly backed by the Duke of Lancaster neither his Petition nor his Position found any welcome in the Parliament further than that it made them cast many a longing eye on the Churches Patrimony or produced any other effect towards the worke of Reformation which he chiefly aymed at then that it hath since served for a Precedent to Penry Pryn and such like turbulent Innovators to disturbe the Church and set on foot those dreames and dotages which otherwise they durst not publish And to say truth as long as the Clergy were in power and had authority in Convocation to doe what they would in matters which concern'd Religion those of the Parliament conceived it neither safe nor fitting to intermeddle in such businesse as concern'd the Clergy for feare of being questioned for it at the Churches barre But when that power was lessen'd if it were not lost by the Submission of the Clergy to K. H. 8. and the Act of the Supremacy which ensued upon it then did the Parliaments begin to intrench upon the Church's Rights to offer at and enterteine such businesses as formerly were held peculiar to the Clergy only next to dispute their Charters and reverse