or collegiate church is remayned on foote vvith the rents and dignities therunto apperteyning and vvhen our nobilytie shal remember how the nobilitie of Scotland is subiect at this day to a few ordinary and common ministers vvithout any head vvho in their synodes and assemblies haue authority to put to the horne and driue out of the realme any noble man vvhatsoeuer vvithout remedy or redresse except he vvil yeald and humble himselfe to them and that the king himselfe standeth in avve of this exorbitant and populer povver of his ministers and is content to yeld therunto it is to be thought say these men that few Inglish be they of vvhat religion or opinion so-euer vvil shevv themselues forvvard to receaue such a King in respect of his religion that hath no better order in his ovvne at home and thus much concerning the King of Scotland Now then it remayneth that we come to treat of the lady Arbella second branch of the house of Scotlād touching whose title though much of that vvhich hath bin said before for or against the king of Scotland may also be vnderstoode to apparteyne vnto her for that she is of the same house yet shal I in this place repeat in few wordes the principal points that are alleaged in her behalfe or preiudice First of al then is alleaged for her and by her fauourers that she is descended of the foresaid lady Margaret eldest daughter of king Henry the seuenth by her second marriage vvith Archibald Duglas earle of Anguys and that she is in the third degree only from her for that she is the daughter of Charles Steward vvho was sonne to Margaret Countesse of Lenox daughter to the said lady Margaret Queene of Scots so as this lady Arbella is but neece once remoued vnto the said Queene Margaret to vvit in equal degree of discent vvith the king of Scots vvhich king being excluded as the fauorers of this vvoman do affirme by the causes and arguments before alleaged against hym no reason say they but that this lady should enter in his place as next in blood vnto him Secondly is alleaged in her behalfe that she as an Inglish vvoman borne in Ingland and of parents vvho at the tyme of her birth vvere of Inglish alleageance vvherin she goeth before the king of Scots as hath bin seene as also in this other principal pointe that by her admission no such inconuenience can be feared of bringing in strangers or causing troobles sedition vvith-in the realme as in the pretence of the Scotish king hath bin considered and this in effect is al that I haue heard alleaged for her But against her by other competitors and their frendes I haue hard diuers arguments of no smale importance and consideration produced vvherof the first is that vvhich before hath bin alleaged against the king of Scotlād in like māner to wit that neither of them is properly of the house of Lancaster as in the genealogie set downe in the third chapter hath appeared And secondly that the title of Lācaster is before the pretence of Yorke as hath bin proued in the fourth chapter wherof is inferred that neythere the king of Scots nor Arbella are next in successiō and for that of these two propositiōs ther hath bin much treated before I remitte me therunto only promising that of the first of the tvvo vvhich is how king Henry the seuēth vvas of the house of Lancaster touching right of succession I shal handle more particulerly afterward vvhen I come to speake of the house of Portugal vvherby also shal appeare playnly vvhat pretence of succession to the crowne or duchy of Lancaster the discendentes of the said king Henry can iustely make The second impediment against the lady Arbella is the aforesaid testament of king Henry the eight and the two acts of parlaments for authorising of the same by al vvhich is pretended that the house of Suffolke is preferred before this other of Scotland A third argument is for that there is yet liuing one of the house of Suffolk that is neerer by a degree to the stemme to vvit to Hēry the seuenth to vvhom after the discease of her Maiesty that now is we must returne then is the lady Arbella or the king of Scots and this is the lady Margeret countesse of Darby mother to the present earle of Darby vvho was daughter to lady Elenor daughter of Queene Mary of France that vvas second daughter of king Henry the seuēth so as this lady Margaret coūtesse of Darby is but in the third degree from the said Henry wheras both the king of Scotland and Arbella are in the fourth and consequently she is next in propinquitie of blood how greatly this propinquity hath bin fauoured in such cases though they vvere of the yōger liine the examples before alleaged in the fourth chapter do make manifest Fourthlie and lastely and most strongly of al they do argue against the title of this lady Arbella affirming that her discent is not free from bastardly vvhich they proue first for that Queene Margaret soone after the death of her first husband king Iames the fourth marryed secretly one Steward lord of Annerdale which Steward vvas alyue longe after her marriage vvith Duglas and consequently this second marriage vvith Duglas Steward being aliue could not be lawful vvhich they do proue also by an other meane for that they saie it is most certaine and to be made euident that the said Archibald Duglas earle of Anguis had an other vvife also aliue vvhen he married the said Queene vvhich points they say vvere so publique as they came to king Henries eares vvhervppon he sent into Scotland the lord William Howard brother to the old duke of Norfolke and father to the present lord Admiral of Ingland to enquire of these pointes and the said lord Howard founde them to be true and so he reported not only to the king but also aftervvards many tymes to others and namely to Queene Mary to vvhom he vvas lord Chamberlayne and to diuers others of vvhom many be yet liuing which can and will testefy the same vppon the relation they heard from the-sayd lord Williams owne mouthe vvheruppon king Henry vvas greatly offended and would haue letted the marriage betweene his said sister and Duglas but that they were married in secret and had consummate their marriage before this was knowne or that the thing could be preuented vvhich is thought vvas one especial cause and motiue also to the said king afterward to put back the issue of his said sister of Scotland as by his fornamed testament is pretended and this touching Arbellas title by propinquitie of byrthe But besides this the same men do alleage dimers reasons also of inconucnience in respect of the common vvealthe for vvhich in their opinions it should be hurtful to the real me to admitt this lady Arbella for Queene as first of al for that she is a
vvith the king of Castiles daughter and had by her a sonne called Denyse vvho reigned after him and his successors vnto this day al which succession of kinge Denyse his posteritie the said Queene mother would haue improued and shevved that it apperteyned to her by the said Raphe for this cause sent she to Portugal one lord Vrban bishop of Comince in Gasgonie to plead her cause vvhich cause of hers vvas quicklie reiected and only the forsaide fiue princes discended of king Emanuels children were admitted to tryal for the same which vvere Don Antonio sonne of lord Lewis the king Cardinals elder brother and king Phillip of Spayne sonne of lady Elizabeth the eldest sisteof t he said Cardinal and Philibert duke of Sauoy sonne of the lady Beatrix the same Cardinals yonger sister and the two duchesses of Parma and Bragansa named Mary and Catherine daughters of lord Edward yonger brother of the said Cardinal and yongest child of king Emanuel And for that the lady Mary duchesse of Parma vvhich vvas the elder of the tvvo daughters vvas dead before this controuersie fel out her eldest sonne lord Ranutio now duke of Parma pretended by her right to the said crowne And for that this matter vvas of so great importance euery parte procured to lay downe their reasons and declared their rightes in the best manner they could and such as could not be present themselues in Portugal sent thither their agentes Embassadors and Atturneys to plead their causes for them Don Antonio and the duchesse of Bragansa as inhabitants of that kingdome were present and declared their pretences namely Don Antonio by himselfe and for himselfe and the lady Mary of Bragansa by her husband the duke and his learned councel The prince of Parma sent thither for his parte one Ferdinande Farnese bishop of Parma The duke of Sauoy sent Charles of Rouere aftervvard made Cardinal The king of Spaine as the greatest pretender sent the lord Peter Gyrō duke of Osuna afterward Viceroy of Naples Syr Christopher de Mora knight of his chamber at that tyme but since of his priuye councel and lately made earle of Castel Rodrigo in Portugal of vvhich country he is natiue and besides these two a great lawyer named Roderigo Vasques made since as I heare saye lord President of Castil vvhich is as much almost as lord Chancelor vvith vs. Al these did lay forth before the king Cardinall their seueral reasons and pretensions to the succession of the crowne of Portugal for the fiue persons before mentioned whereof two vvere quickly excluded to wit the duke of Sauoy for that his mother was yonger sister to king Phillips mother and himselfe also of lesse age then the said king And secondly Don Antonio was also excluded by publike and iudicial sentence of the king Cardinal his vncle as illegitimate and borne out of lawful wedloke and albeit Dō Antonio denyed the same and went about to proue hym selfe legitimat affirming that his father the lord Lewis before his death had married with his mother in secret and for this brought forth some witnesses as namely his mothers sister with her husband and two others yet the king Cardinal affirmed that vppon examinatiō he had found them to be suborned vvhich he said vvas euident to him partly for that they agreed not in their speeches and partly for that some of them had confessed the same to wit that they were suborned vvhom he cast into prison and caused them to be punished and so sitting in iudgement accompained with fower bishopes and fower lawyers vvhō he had called to assist him in this cause he pronounced the same Don Antonio to be a bastard for vvhich the Authors that I haue read about this matter which are principally two the first named Hierom Franke a gentleman of Genua who wrote ten bookes in Italian of the vnion of the crowne of Portugal to the crowne of Castilia and the second is named Ioanes Antonius Viperanus a Sicilian as I take him who wrote one booke only in latine de obtenta Portugallia à rege Catholico Phillippo of Portugal gotte by king Phillip the Catholike both these bookes I say out of vvhom principally I haue taken the pointes which heere I wil touch do seuerally set downe the causes following vvhy the king Cardinal did reiect the pretence of Don Antonio before al other pretenders and pronounced him a bastard First for that he had byn euer so taken al the tyme of his fathers life and no man euer dowted therof or called the matter in question vntil now that himselfe denyed the same Secondly for that in the tyme of Iulius Tertius the Pope when certayne decres came out from Rome against the promotion of bastardes the same Dō Antonio sued to the said Pope to be dispensed with al in that case vvhich argueth that then he knew himselfe not legitimate Thirdly that his father the lord Lewis had often tymes both by word and writing testified the same that this Antonye vvas his bastard and had signified also so much in his last vvil testament Fourthly the said Cardinal as of himselfe also affirmed that if his brother the lord Lewis had euer dōne any such thinge as to marry this Woman who was but base in birth and of the Iewish race as these stories do affirme that it is like that he would haue made some of his owne frendes kynred acquainted therwith as a matter so much important for them to know but he neuer did though the said Cardinal auowed that himselfe was present vvith him at his death Fiftly he said that if Don Antonio had bin legitimate how happened that he did not pretend the succession before the Cardinal himselfe next after the death of king Sebastian seing that he vvas to haue gone before the said Cardinal by as good right as his other nephew Sebastian did if he had bin legitimate for that he vvas sonne also to the Cardinales elder brother as hath bin saide Sixtly lastly the said king Cardinal auowched against Don Antonio partly the disagreeing and partly the open confessing of the vvitnesses that they were suborned by him vppon al vvhich causes and considerations he proceeded to the iudicial sentence before alleaged Thus passed the matter in the case of Don Antonio vvho if he had bin legitimate no doubt but by al right he should haue bin preferred before al the other pretenders to the crowne of Portugal and must be at this day towards the crowne of Ingland before al those that pretend of the house of Portugal if vve graunt him to be legitimate and much more clearly may he pretend to the dukedome of Lancaster as before hath bin declared for that it must discend to the lawful heyre of lady Phillip Queene of Portugall wherof enseweth also one consideration not impertinent to vs in Ingland that seing we hold him there for true king of Portugal I see not
how we can denye him his right to the said dukedome at least of Lancaster wherof if vve would giue him but the possession with al the appurtenances as they lye it were no euel interteynmēt for him in our country vntil he could gett the possession of the crowne in his owne After the exclusions of these two pretenders to vvit of the duke of Sauoy and of Don Antonio the whole controuersie for Portugal remayned betweene the other three vvhich were the king of Spayne sonne of lady Isabel eldest daughter of king Emanuel and the tvvo duchesses of Parma and Bragansa daughters of the yonger sonne of the said king Emanuel to vvit of the lord Edward infant of Portugal And first of al for that the eldest of these two Ladyes to vvit Mary duchesse of Parma vvas now dead her eldest sonne lord Ranutio now duke of Parma entred in her place and alleaged that he represented his mother and she her father lord Edward which Lord if he had bin aliue he should no doubt haue bin preferred before his elder sister lady Elizabeth mother of king Phillip and consequently that the said lord Edwards issue ought to be preferred before her issue and this he alleaged against king Phillip And against the duchesse of Bragansa he alleaged that his said mother vvas the elder sister and for that cause he vvhich now possessed her right and represented her person vvas to be preferred before the said lady Catherine duchesse of Bragansa so that the foundation of this pretence of the duke of Parma vvas that he vvas nephew to the lord Edward by his eldest daughter and that to king Emanuel he was nephew once remoued by his sonne vvheras king Phillip vvas nephew but by his daughter only and that the lady Catherine of he was of the right discendant lyne of K. Iohn and the Cardinal vvas but of the collateral or transuersal lyne and that al law alloweth that the right lyne shal first be serued and preferred before the collateral shal be admitted so that heerby representation is nothing furthered This exclusion of representation did greatly further and aduance the pretence of king Phillip for the excluding of both these ladyes and their issues for that supposing as this answere auoucheth that their is no representation of father or mother or predecessors to be admitted but that euery pretender is to be considered only in his owne person then it followeth said these men which plead for the king that king Phillip being in equal degree of propinquitie of blood with the two ladyes in respect as wel of K. Hēry yet liuing for that they were al three children of brother and sister it followeth that he was to be preferred before them both as well in respect that he was a man and they both Women as also for that he was elder in age and borne before them both And albeit the duke of Parma alleaged that he was also a man yet was it answered that he was one degree further of from the foresaid kings then was king Phillip so as not respecting representation of their parentes that is to say not considering at all that king Phillip discended of a Woman the two duchesses of a man but only respecting their owne persons as hath bin declared these men auouched that king Phillipps person was euidently to be preferred for that he was a degree neerer in blood then the duke of Parma and superior in sex age to the lady Catherine of Bragansa Moreouer the lawyers of king Phillipps side affirmed that he was neerer also in propinquitie of blood to king Sebastian the last king then vvas the very king Cardinal himselfe much more than any of the other two pretenders for that he was brother to the said king Sebastians mother and the Cardinal was but brother to his grādfather And besides this they alleaged that Portugal did belong to the crowne of Castil by diuers other meanes of old as for that it could not be giuen away by kings of Castil in marriage of their daughters as the principal partes therof had byn as also for that whēking Iohn the first that was a bastard was made king of Portugal by election of the people the inheritance therof did euidently apperteyne to king Iohn of Castil that had to wife the lady Beatrix daughter and heyre of Ferdinand king of Portugal from which inheritance of that crowne by open iniurye both she and her posteritie vvhose right is in king Phillip at this day vvere debarred by the intrusiō of the said Iohn master of Auis bastard brother of the foresaid king Ferdinand These reasons alleaged diuers lawyers in the behalfe of king Phillip and those not only Spaniards but also of diuers other countryes nations as my authors before named do anow and many bookes were written of this matter and when the contention vvas at the hotest then died the king Cardinal before he could decide the same controuersie vppon which occasion the king of Spaine being persuaded that his right vvas best that he being a Monarch and vnder no temporal iudge vvas not bound to expect any other iudgment in this affayre not to subiect himselfe to any other tribunal but that he might by force put himselfe in possession of that which he tooke to be his owne if otherwise he could not haue it deliuered vnto him for so write these authors by me named seing also don Antonio to pretend the said kingdome by only fauour of some populer partie that he had In Lisbone the said king Phillip entred vppon Portugal by force of armes as al the world knoweth and holdeth the same peaceably vnto the day And I haue byn the longer in setting downe this contention about the succession to the crowne of Portugal for that it includeth also the very same pretence and contention for the crowne of Inglād For that al these three princes before named may in like manner pretend the succession of that interest to the house of Lancaster and by that to the crowne of Ingland which doth discend from Queene Phillippe eldest daughter of Iohn of Gaunt duke of Lancaster and sister of king Henry the fourth as hath largely bin declared And albeit that some men Wil saye that this matter is now decided which of these princes of the house of Portugal hath the interest to Ingland for that king Phillip being now preferred in the succession of Portugal entreth also therby to the other right of succession of Ingland yet others vvill say no for that the lawes of succession in Portugal and Ingland be different For that in Ingland representation taketh place so as the children of the sonne though they be women shal euer be preferred before the children of the daughter though they be men vvherof these men do inferr that seing the lady Phillipps right before mentioned to the dukedome of Lancaster and therby also to the crowne of Ingland is to be preferred according to
immediatly ther followeth mentiō yet may it seeme also to be taken and verified of kingly authority in respect of al other gouerments seing that at this tyme when the Apostle wrote this epistle the chiefe gouernour of the world vvas not called king but emperour and therfore seing in such a tyme S. Peter affirmeth the state of kingly gouerment to be most excellent it may seme he meant it absolutly signifying therby that this is the best kind of gouerment among al others though to confesse the truth betwene the title of king and Emperor ther is litle or no difference in substance but only in name for that the authority is equal euery king is an Emperor in his owne kingdome And finally the excellency of this gouerment aboue al other is not only proued by the perfection therof in it selfe as for that it is most ancient simple and conforme vnto nature most resembling the gouerment of God himselfe as hath bin said but by the effects also and vtility that it bringeth vnto the subiects with farr lesse inconueniences then any other forme of gouerment what-soeuer if vve compare them together for in the monarchy of one king ther is more vnity agreement and conformity and therby also celerity commonly in dispaching of busines and in defending the cōmon vvealth then vvher many heades be lesse passions also in one man then in many as for example in Democratia vvher the common people do beare the cheife sway which is bellua multorum capitum as Cicero wisely said that is a beast of many heades ther is nothing but sedition trouble tumults outrages and iniustices committed vppon euery litle occasion especially vvher crafty and conning men may be admitted to incense or assuage them with sugred vvords such as were the Orators in Athens and other cyties of Greece that had this gouermēr and the Tribunes of the people of Rome and other such populer and plausible men vvho could moue the vvaues rayse vp the windes and inkindle the fier of the vulgar peoples affections passions or furies at their pleasure by which vve see that of al other common vvealthes these of populer gouerment haue soonest come to ruine vvhich might be shevved not only by old examples of Greec Asia and Africa but also of many cyties in Italy as Florence Bolonia Siena Pisa Arezzo Spoleto Perugia Padua and others vvhich vppon the fall or diminution of the Roman Empire vnder which they vvere before tooke vnto themselues populer gouerments vvherin they vvere so tossed vvith continual sedition mutines and bāding of factions as they could neuer haue ende therof vntil after infinite murthers massacres and inundatiō of blood they came in the ende to be vnder the monarchy of some one Prince or other as at this day they remayne so that of al other gouerments this is the vvorst The second forme which is called Oligarchia or Aristocratia for that a few and those presumed to be the best are ioyned together in authority as it doth participate some thinge of both the other gouermēts to wit of monarchia and Democratia or rather tempereth them both so hath it both good and euil in it but yet inclineth more to the euil for the disunion that commonly by mans infirmity malice is among thos heades for vvhich cause the states before named of Venice and Genua vvhich were wont to haue simply this gouerment of Aristocratia in that their regiment was by certaine chose senators were inforced in the end to chuse Dukes also as heades of their senates for auoyding of dissention and so they haue them at this day though their authority be but smale as hath bin said We see also by the examples of Carthage Rome wher gouerment of Aristocratia tooke place that the diuision and factions among the senators of Carthage was the cause why ayde and succor was not sent to Hanibal their Captaine in Italy after his so great and important victory at Cannas which was the very cause of the sauing of the Roman Empire and the losse of their owne As also afterwardes the emulations discord and disunion of the Roman senators among themselues in the affaires and contentions of Marius and Silla and of Pompey and Cesar was the occasion of al their destruction of their common vvealth with them Euident then it is that of al other gouerments the monarchy is the best least subiect to the inconueuiences that other gouerments haue and if the prince that gouerneth alone hath supreme authority to himselfe as he resembleth God in this poynte of sole gouermēt so could he resemble him also in wise discret and iust gouerment and in ruling without passion no doubt but that nothing more excellent in the world could be desired for the prefect filicity of his subiects but for that a king or Prince is a man as others be and therby not only subiect to errors in iudgment but also to passionat affections in his wil for this cause it was necessary that the common vvealth as it gaue him this great power ouer them so it should assigne him also the best helpes that might be for directing and rectifying both his wil and iudgment and make him therin as like in gouerment to God whom he representeth as mans fraylty can reach vnto For this consideration they assigned to him first ofal the assistance and direction of law wherby to gouerne which law Aristotle saith Est mens quaedam nullo perturbata affectu it is a certayne mynde disquieted with no disordinate affection as mens myndes commonly be for that when a law is made for the most part it is made vppon dew consideration and deliberation and without perturbation of euil affections as anger enuy hatred rashnes or the like passions and it is referred to some good end and commodity of the common vvealth which law being once made remayneth so stil without alteration or partial affectiō being indifferent to al and partial to none but telleth one tale to euery man in this it resembleth the perfection as it were of God himselfe for the which cause the said philosopher in the same place addeth a notable wise sayng to wit that he which ioyneth a law to gouerne with the Prince ioyneth God to the Prince but he that ioyneth to the Prince his affection to gouerne ioyneth a beast for that mens affections and concupiscenses are common also to beastes so that a Prince ruling by law is more then a man or a man deifyed and a Prince ruling by affections is lesse then a man or a man brutified In an other place also the same philpsopher sayeth that a Prince that leaueth law and ruleth himselfe others by his owne appetite and affections of al creatures is the worst and of al beasts is the most furious and dangerous for that nothing is so outragious as iniustice armed and no armor is so strong as witt and authority
wherof the first he hath in that he is a man and the other in that he is a Prince For this cause then al common wealthes haue prescribed lawes vnto their Princes to gouerne therby as by a most excellent certayne immutable rule to which sense Cicero said leges sunt inuentae vt omnibus semper vna 〈◊〉 voce loquerentur lawes were inuented to the ende they should speake in one and the 〈◊〉 same sense to al men For which very reason in lyke maner thes lawes haue bin called by Philosophers a rule or square inflexible and by Aristotle in particular a mynde without passion as hath bin said but the Prophet Dauid who was also a Prince king semeth to cal it by the name of Discipline for that as discipline doth keepe al the partes of a man or of a particuler house in order so law vvel ministred keepeth al the partes of a common vvealth in good order and to sheow how seuerely God exacteth this at al Princes handes he sayth these wordes And now learne ye kinges and be instructed you that iudge the world serue God in feare and reioyse in him with trembling embrace ye discipline least he enter into wrath and so ye perish from the way of righteousnes Which wordes being vttered by a prophet and king do conteyne diuers poynts of much cōsideration for this purpose as first that kings and Prince are bound to learne law and discipline and secondly to obserue the same vvith great humility and feare of Gods wrath and thirdly that if they do not they shal perish frō the way of righteousnes as though the greatest plage of al to a Prince weare to lose the way of righteousnes law and reason in his gouerment and to giue himselfe ouer to passion and his owne vvil whereby they are suer to come to shipwrack and thus much of the first helpe The second help that common wealthes haue giuen to their kings and Princes especially in later ages hath bin cerrayne councelles and councellors with whom to consult in matters of most importance as we see the parlaments of Ingland and France the courtes in Spayne and diets in Germany vvithout which no matter of great moment can be concluded and besides this commonly euery king hath his priuy councel whom he is bound to heare and this vvas done to temper somwhat the absolute for me of a Monarchy whose danger is by reason of his sole authority to fal into tiranny as Aristotle vvisely noteth in his fourth booke of politiques shewing the incōuenience or dangers of this gouerment vvhich is the cause that vve haue few or no simple monarchies now in the world especially among Christians but al are mixt lightely with diuers pointes of the other two formes of gouerment also and namely in Ingland al three do enter more or lesse for in that ther is one king or Queene it is a monarchy in that it hath certayne councelles which must be hard it participateth of Aristocratia and in that the commonalty haue their voices and burgesses in parlament it taketh part also of Democratia or populer gouerment al which limitations of the Princes absolute authority as you see do come for the common wealth as hauing authority aboue their Princes for their restraint to the good of the realme as more at large shal be proued hereafter From like authority and for like considerations haue come the limitations of other kings and kingly povver in al tymes and countries from the beginning both touching themselues and their posterity and successors as breefly in this place I shal declare And first of al if we vvil consider the tvvo most renoumed and allowed states of al the world I meane of the Romans and Grecians vve shal finde that both of them began vvith kings but yet vvith far different lawes and restraints about their authorityes for in Rome the kings that succeded Romulus their first founder had as great and absolute authority as ours haue now a dayes but yet their children or next in blood succeded them not of necessity but new kings were chosen partly by the senate and partly by the people as Titus Liuius testifieth so as of three most excellent kings that ensewed immediatly after Romulus to wit Numa Pompilius Tullius Hostilsus Tarqninus Priscus none of them were of the blood royal nor of kyn the one to the other no nor yet Romans borne but chosen rather from among straingers for their vertue and valor and that by election of the senate and consent of the people In Greece and namely among the lacedemonians which vvas the most emynent kingdom among others at that tyme the succession of children after their fathers was more certayne but yet as Aristotle noteth ther authority power was so restrayned by certayne officers of the people named Ephori which commonly vvere fiue in number as they were not only checked and chastined by them if occasion serued but also depriued and some tymes put to death for which cause the said philosopher did iustly mislike this emynent iurisdiction of the Ephori ouer their kings but yet hereby we see vvhat authority the common wealth had in this case and what their meaning vvas in making lawes and restrayning their kings power to wit therby the more to binde them to do iustice which Cicero in his offices vttereth in tbes vvordes Iustitiae fruendae causae apud maiores 〈◊〉 I se Asia in Europe bene morati regesolint sunt constituti c. at cum ius aequabile ab vno viro 〈◊〉 non consequerentur inuentae sunt leges Good kings vvere appoynted in old tyme among our ancestors in Asia and Europe to the end therby to obteyne iustice but when men could not ob teyne equal iustice at one mans handes they inuented lawes The same reason yealdeth the same philosopher in another place not only of the first institution of kingdomes but also of the chainge therof agayne into other gouerments when thes vvere abused Omnes antiquae gentes regibus 〈◊〉 paruerunt c. That is al old nations did liue vnder kingdomes at the beginning which king of gouerment first they gaue vnto the most iust and wisest men which they could finde and also after for loue of them they gaue the same to their posterity ot next in kynne as now also it remayneth vvher kingly gouerment is in vse but other countries which liked not that forme of gouerment and haue shaken of haue done it not that they wil not be vnder any but for that they wil not be euer vnder one only Thus far Cicero and he speaketh this principally in deferice of his-owne cornmō wealth I meane the Roman which had cast of that kinde of gouerment as before hath bin said for the offence they had taken agaynst cessayne kings of thers and first of al agaynst 〈◊〉 himselfe their first founder for 〈◊〉
as Alexander the great conquered the most parte of Asia in the space of 9. or 10. yeares so did this Henry conquere France in lesse then the like tyme. I might recon also in this number of Princes deposed for defect in gouermēt though otherwise he vvere no euel man in lyfe this king Henry the fourths nephew I meane king Henry the sixt vvho after almost forty yeares reigne vvas deposed and imprisoned and put to death also together vvith his sonne the Prince of wales by Edward the fourth of the howse of yorke the same was confirmed by the commons and especially by the people of London and afterwards also by publique act of parliament in respect not only of the title which king Edward pretended but also and especially for that king Henry did suffer himselfe to be ouerruled by the Queene his wife and had broken the articles of agrement made by the parlament betwene him and the Duke of Yorke and solemnly sworē on both sides the 8. of Octob. in the yeare 1459. In punishment vvherof and of his other negligent and euel gouermēt though for his owne particuler life he vvas a good man as hath bin said sentence was giuen agaynst him partly by force and partly by law and king Edward the fourth vvas put in his place who was no euel king as al Inglish men vvel know but one of the renoumedst for martial actes and iustice that hath worne the Inglish crowne But after this man agayne ther fel an other accident much more notorious vvhich was that Richard Duke of Glocester this king Edwards yonger brother did put to death his two nephewes this mans children to vvit king Edward the fifth and his litle brother made him selfe king and albeit he synned greuously by taking vppon him the crowne in this wicked manner yet when his nephewes were once dead he might in reason seeme to be lawful king both in respect that he was the next male in blood after his said brother as also for that by diuers acts of parlament both before and after the death of thos infantes his title vvas authorized and made good and yet no man vvil say I thinke but that he vvas lawfully also deposed agayne afterward by the cōmō wealth which called out of France Henry Earle of Richmond to chastise him and to put him downe and fo he did and tooke from him both life and kingdome in the fielde and vvas king himselfe after him by the name of king Henry the seuenth and no man I suppose vvil say but that he vvas lawfully king also vvhich yet cannot be except the other might lawfully be deposed moreouer as I sayd at the beginning I vvould haue you consider in al thes mutations what men commonly haue succeded in the places of such as haue bin deposed as namely in Ingland in the place of thos fiue kings before named that vvere depriued to vvit Iohn Edward the second Richard the second Henry the sixt and Richard the third ther haue succeded the three Henryes to wit the third fourth and seuenth two Edwards the third and fourth al most rare valiant Princes who haue donne infinit importanr acts in their cōmon vvealthes and among other haue raysed many houses to nobility put downe others changed states both abroad and at home distributed ecclesiastical dignityes altred the course of discent in the blood royal and the like al which was iniust and is voyd at this day if the chainges and depriuations of the former Princes could not be made and consequently none of thes that do pretende the crowne of Ingland at this day can haue any title at al for that from thos men they discende vvho were put vp in place of the depriued And this may be sufficient for proofe of the two principal poynts which you required to be discussed in the beginning of this spech to wit that lawful Princes haue oftentymes by their common wealthes bin lawfully deposed for misgouerment and that God hath allowed and assisted the same with good successe vnto the weal publique and if this be so or might be so in kings lawfully set in possession then much more hath the said common wealth power authority to alter the succession of such as do but yet pretend to that dignity if ther be dew reason and causes for the same which is the head poynt that first we began to treate of saide the Ciuilian and with this ended his speech vvithout saying any more VVHER IN CONSISTETH PRINCIPALLY THE LAVFVLNES OF PROCEEDING AGAYNST Princes which in the former chapter is mētioned what interest Princes haue in their subiect 's goods or liues how othes doth binde or may be broken by subiects towards Princes and finally the difference betwene a good king and a Tirant CHAP. IIII. VVHEN the Ciuilian had ended his speech the temporal lawyer looked vppon the stāders by to see whether any would reply or no and perceauing al to hold ther peace he began to say in this māner Truly Syr I cannot deny but the examples are many that you haue alleaged and they seme to proue sufficiently that which you affirmed at the beginning to wit that the Princes by you named were depriued and put downe by their common vvealthes for ther euel gouerment And good successors commonly raysed vp in their places and that the common wealth had authority also to do it I do not greatly doubt at least wise they did it de facto and now to cal thes factes in question were to embroyle and turne vp-side-downe al the states of Christen dom as you haue wel signified but yet for that you haue added this vvord lawfully so many tymes in the course of your narration I vvould you tooke the payne to tel vs also by vvhat law they did the same seing that Belloy whom you haue named before and some other of his opinion do affirme that albeit by nature the common vvealth haue authority ouer the Prince to chuse and appoynt him at the beginning as you haue vvel proued out of Aristotle and other vvayes yet hauing once made him and giuen vp al their authority vnto him he is now no more subiect to ther cortection or restraynt but remayneth absolute of himselfe without respect to any but only to god alone vvhich they proue by the example of euery particuler man that hath authority to make his Master or Prince of his inferior but not afterwards to put him downe agayne or to depriue him of the authority vvhich he gaue him though he should not beare himselfe vvel and gratefully but discourtious rather iniuriously towards him that gaue him first this authority To which also they do alleage the speech of the prophet Samuel in the first booke of the kings vvher the people of Israel demaunded to haue a king to gouerne ouer them as other nations round about them had and to leaue the gouerment of the high Prieste vnder
our lord 1170. but his deuise had no good successe for that king Henry the yonger made war soore after vppō king Henry the elder had both the kings of France and Scotland many nobles of ingland and Normandie to take his part for which cause it is thought that this thing hath neuer bin put in practise againe since that tyme in Ingland but yet heerby it is euident what the opinion of the world vvas in those dayes of the force of coronation and admission of the common vvealth how litle propinquitie of blood preuaileth vvithout that And for more ample profe heerof and fuller cōclusion of al the whole matter I had thought to haue laid downe also in this place some number of the most nororious examples that I haue read for I haue read many vvherin the commō vvealth vppon iust occasions hath extended her authority to alter the natural course of succession by birth but for that the thing requireth some litle study and loking ouer some notes that I haue taken out of stories for helpe of memorie I shal deferr it vntil our next meeting at vvhat tyme I shall by Gods grace make this pointe very cleere and so ende my vvhole discourse for I see that I haue bin much longer then at the beginning I purposed and now I desire much to giue place vnto our temporal lawyer heere present vvho I doubt not hath matter to say of more delectation pleasure then this though you of your curtesies haue done me so much sauour as to heare me hitherto vvith patience and attention Whervnto the vvhole company answered that not vvith patience but vvith great pleasure delight and contentation they had hard him and so they vvould do the temporal lawer also in his turne but yet they desired him that nothing of this discourse might be omitted but vvholy finished for that it gaue very great satisfaction to al and opened many important pointes vnto them vvhich they had neuer thought of before and vvith this they parted for that night euery man vnto his loging habitation HOVV THE NEXT IN SVCCESSION BY PROPINQVITY OF BLOOD HATH OFTEN tymes bin put back by the commonwealth others further of admitted in their places euen in those kingdomes where succession preuaileth with many examples of the kingdomes of Israel and Spayne CAP. VII AT the next meeting the Ciuilian camein very pensiue as though his head had bin ful of study vvherof being asked the reason he answered that he had reuolued many stories since his departure about the pointe vvhich he promised to treat of that he had found such store and great variety of matter as he knew not vvel vvher to begin and much lesse where to end for quoth he if I should begin with the 〈◊〉 kinges before mentioned it vvere infinite that might be alleaged and perhaps some man vvould say they vvere ouer old and far fetched examples and cannot be presidents to vs in these ages if I lay before you the examples of Romane kings and emperors put in and out against the law and right of succession the same men perhapps vvil answer that it vvas by force and iniury of mutinous souldiars whervnto that common wealth was greatly subiect And if I should bring forth any presidents and examples of holy scriptures some other might chance to reply that this was by particuler priuilege vvherin God almightie would deale and dispose of things against the ordinary course of mans law as best liked himselfe whose wil is more then law and whose actions are right it selfe for that he is lord of al and to be limited by no rule or law of man but yet that this is not properly the acte of a common wealth as our question demanndeth Thus I say it may be that some man would reply and therfore hauing store inough of plaine and euident matter vvhich hath no exception for that it hath happened in setled commō vvealthes those 〈◊〉 home where the law of succession is receaued and established to vvit in Spayne France and Ingland I shal retyre my selfe to them aloue but yet putting you in mynd before I passe any further that it is a matter much to be marked how god delt in this poynt vvith the people of Israel at the beginning after he had graunted to them that they should hauve the same gouerment of kings that other nations round about the had vvhos kings did ordinarily reigne by succession as ours do at this day and as al the kings of the Iewes did afterwards and yet this not-vvith standing God at the beginning to vvit at the very entrance of their first kings vvould shew playnely that this law of succeding of the one the other by birth and propinquity of blood though for the most part it should preuaile yet that it was not so precisely necessary but that vppon iust causes it might be altered For proofe wherof we are to consider that albeit he made Saule a trew and lawful king ouer the lewes consequently also gaue him al kingly priuileges benefites and prerogatiues belonging to that degree and state wherof one principal as you know is to haue his children succede after him in the crowne yet after his death God suffred not any one of his generatiō to succed him though he left behinde him many children and among others Is boseth a prince of 40. yeares of age vvhom Abner the general captayne of that nation with eleuē tribes followed for a tyme as their lawful lord and master by succession vntil God checked them for it and induced them to reiect him though heyre apparent by discent and to cleaue to Dauid newly elected king vvho vvas a stranget by birthe no kynee at al to the king deceased And if you say heere that this vvas for the sinne of Saule vvhom God had reiected I do confesse it but yet this is nothing against our purpose for that vve pretend not that a prince that is next in blood can iustly be put back except it be for his owne defects or those of his ancestors And moreouer I vvould haue you consider that by this it is euident that the fault of the father may preiudicate the sonnes right to the crowne albeit the sonne haue no parte in the fault as vve may se in this example not only of Isboseth that vvas punished and depriued for the offence of Saul his father not with standing he had bin proclay med king as hath bin said but also of Ionathas Saules other sonne vvho vvas so good a man and so much praysed in holy seripture yet he being slayne in warr and leauing a sonne named Miphiboseth he vvas put back also though by nearnes of blood he had great interest in the succession as you see and much before Dauid But Dauid being placed in the crowne by election free consent admission of the people of Israel as the scripture playnly testifieth
Polydor that wrote in king Henry the 8. his tyme and others that haue followed him since do take al right from the house of Lancaster and giue the same to the house of Yorke wherfore the best waye I suppose wil be not so much to consider vvhat historiographers do say according to their affections or interests as vvhat reasons and profes be alleged of euery side for that by this we shal more easely come to iudge where the right or wrong doth lye First therfore the defendors of the house of Yorke do alleage that their title is playne and euident for that as in the former chapter hath bin declared Richard duke of Yorke first pretender of this house vvhose father vvas sonne to Edmond Langley duke of Yorke fourth sonne of king Edward the third and his mother Anne Mortimer that vvas neece once remoued and sole heyre to Leonel duke of Clarence second sonne of the said king Edward this Richard I say duke of York pretended that for so much as he had tvvo titles ioyned together in himselfe and vvas lawful heyre as vvel to duke Leonel the second brother as to duke Edmond the fourth that he vvas to be preferred in succession of the crowne after the death of king Richard the second heyre of the first sonne of king Edward before the issue of Iohn of Gaunt that vvas but third sonne to the said king Edward and consequently that Hēry Bolenbrook Iohn of Gaunts sonne duke of Lancaster called afterward king Henry the fourth entred the crowne by tyrāny violēce first for deposing the true and lawful king Richard and secondly for taking the kingdome vppon himselfe vvhich kingdome after the death of the foresaid king Richard which happened in the yeare 1399 belonged to Edmond mortimer Earle of march then liuing and after his death to Anne Mortimer his sister marryed to Richard earle of Cābridge father to this Richard pretendent duke of Yorke as hath bin said for that this Edmond and Anne Mortimer were children to Roger Mortimer sonne of Phillip that vvas daughter to duke Leonel vvhich Leonel vvas elder vncle to king Richard and before Iohn of Gaunt the yonger brother vvhose sonne tooke the crovvne vppon him For the better vnderstanding of which pretence and allegation of the house of Yorke against Lancaster we must note the story following to wit that king Edward the third seing in his old age that prince Edward his eldest sonne whom of al his children he loued most dearly was deade though their vvanted not much doubt in some mēs heads as after shal be shewed vvho ought to succede yet the old man for the exceeding affection he bare to the dead prince vvould heare nothing in that behalfe but appointed Richard the said prince Edwards only sonne and heyre to succed him in the kingdome and made the same to be confirmed by act of parlament and inforced al his children then a liue to svveare to the same which were Iohn of Gaunt duke of Lancaster his third and eldest sonne that then liued for Leonel his second sonne duke of Clarence vvas dead before and Edmond Langley and Thomas Woodstock earles at that tyme but after dukes of Yorke Glocester so king Richard reigned with good obedience of his vncles and their children for 20. yeares together but in the end when he grew insolent had put to death his vncle the duke of Glocester together vvith the earle of Arundel and banished many others of the nobility and among them the Archbishop of Canterbury as also his owne cosin germaine Henry duke of Hereford after of Lancaster sonne and heyre of Iohn of Gaunt and had made many wicked statutes aswel against the church and state Ecclesiastical as also to intangle the realme and nobility with fayned crymes of treason against his regaltie as then he termed them the principal men of the realme seing a fit occasion offred by the kings absence in Ireland called home out of France the foresaid Henry duke of Lancaster vvith the Archbishop of Canterbury earles of Arundel and Warwick and others which vvere in banishment and by common consent gathered vppon the suddaine such an army to assist them in Ingland as they took the king brought him to London and there in a parlament laying together the intollerable faults of his gouerment they depriued him of al regal dignity as before they had done to his great grandfather king Edward the second then by vniuersal consent of the parlament and people their present they chose admitted the said Henry duke of Lancaster to be their king vvho continewed so al the daies of his life and left the crowne vnto his sonne and sonnes sonne after him by the space of threescore yeares vntill this Richard before named duke of Yorke made chalenge of the same in manner and forme as before hath bin shewed Now then the storie being this the question is first whether Richard the second were iustly deposed or no and secondly whether after his deposition the house of Yorke or house of Lācaster should haue entred and thirdly if the house of Lancaster did commit any wronge or iniustice at their first entrance to the crowne yet whether the continuance of so many yeares in possession vvith so many approbations and confirmations therof by the common vvealth vvere not sufficient to legitimate their right Concerning vvhich points many things are alleaged by the fauourers of both families and in the first pointe touching the lawfulnes or vnlawfulnes of king Richards deposition three articles especially do seeme most considerable to wit about the thing in it selfe whether a lawful king may be deposed vppon iust causes secōdly about these causes in king Richards deposition to vvit vvhether they vvere iust or sufficient for deposition of the said king and lastly about the manner of doing it vvhether the same were good and orderly or not And touching the first of these three pointes vvhich is that a king vppon iust causes may be deposed I thinke both parties though neuer so contrary betweene themselues vvil easely agree and the Ciuil lawyer seemeth to me to haue proued it so euidently before throughout his vvhole discourse as I thinke very litle may be said against the same For he hath declared if you remember both by reason authority examples of al nations Christian that this may and hath and ought to be done vvhen vrgent occasions are offred And first by reason he sheweth it for that al kingly authority is giuen them only by the common wealth that with this expresse condition that they shal gouerne according to law and equity that this is the cause of their exaltation aboue other men that this is the end of their gouerment the butt of their authority the starr and pole by vvhich they ought to direct their sterne to witt the good of the people by the vveale of their subiects by the benefite of the realme
noble houses before mētioned in our country of the dela Pooles Staffords Plantagenets and others destroyed by king Henry the eight vvhat auayled them that the said king was not only their country man but also their neare kinsman vvhat profit or commodity vvas it vnto Thomas of woodstock duke of Glocester that he liued vnder a king that was his nephew to wit king Richard the second or to George duke of Clarence in king Edward the fourthes tyme that the said king vvas his owne brother when both of them vvere pursued disgraced and put to death by them and lost their liues landes dignities goodly possessions stately manners gorgeous houses vvith their wiues children al other felicities of this world vvhich perhaps vnder a strainge prince they might haue enioyed many a fayre day and yeare This is that then vvhich these men do first require to vvitt that al fansie and fonde opiniō of the vulgar people be aparted in this matter from truth and substance as also say they vve ought to desire and determine vvho are properly straingers or forrainers seing that some do take for straingers and forayners al those that are not of the same dominion and gouermente though otherwise they be of the same nation and language according as those other men that are enimyes to straingers saide a litle before if you remember that the princes of the house of Guyse and their kynred are taken for straingers in france by them that by that meanes would make them odious to the people for that their ancestors in tymes past came out of Lorayne vvhich is a prouince ioyning hard vppon france of the same nation lāguage and manners but only vnder an other prince And so I my selfe noted in my traueling throughe Italie that the Florātines are hated called straingers in Siena vvhere they gouerne albeit the one state be not 30. myles from the other and both of one nation language manners and education And on the contrary side vve shal se that some of different language nation do hold themselues for country men as for example the Biscayns in Spaine do not hold the Castilians for straingers but are contented to be ruled by them as by their owne countreymen albeit they be a different nation and haue different language aud manners and the same I do note in the Britaynes and Normans towards the French in the welsh also towards the Inglish vvho are a different people and of different language and yet are they gouerned peaceably by the Inglish the Inglish againe do accompt them for their country mē as may appeare by that vvhen king Henry the seuenth came to be king of Ingland I do not finde any resistance made against him by the Inglish for that respecte that he vvas of that nation as euidently he vvas by his fathers side that vvas of the Tidders of vvales so as this pointe also vvho be straingers and vvho be not seemeth to be a thing that dependeth much of the opinion and affection of each people nation the one towards the other And this being so these men come to treate more particulerly of the purpose in hand and do saye that in two or three manners a nation may come to be vnder the gouerment of straingers or forrayners first as a prouince that is to saye as a peece or member of an other dominion as Ingland vvas in tymes past vnder the Romans and as Ireland is vnder Ingland at this day and as the Brittons are vnder France and as many states of Italie be vnder the crownes of Aragon and Castile And this may come to passe either by Conquest and force of armes as the Welsh came to be vnder the Inglish and the Inglish to be vnder the Normans and Danes and as Sicilia and Naples came to be vnder the Spaniards and as Normandye and Aquitaine came to be vnder the French as almost al the world in old tyme was brought to be vnder the Romans or otherwise the same may come to passe by inheritance as Aquitaine and Normandie in tymes past came to Ingland as Flanders vvith the states therof came to the house of Austria and as Britany to the crowne of France or els thirdly it may happen by mixt meanes that is to say partly by force and partly by other meanes of composition as Millā came to Spayne and Ireland to Ingland according as the Irish do hold and so Portugal hath in out dayes come to the king of Spaine for that besides his pretence and right of inheritance he vsed also force of armes for getting the same Of al these three vvayes then euident it is that Conquest is the hardest and most preiudicial to the subiects for that theare al standeth at the wil and clemency of the Conqueror vvhom either anger or feare or ielosie of his assurance may often driue to hold a hard hand ouer the conquered at least vvise for a tyme vntil his estate be better setled so that I maruaile not though no people or country commonly would willingly be conquered but yet pollicye also teacheth such a Cōqueror vvhatsoeuer he be that as on the one side it behoueth him to be watchful so to fortyfie himselfe as the vnquiet can do him no hurt so on the other side is it necessarie by the same rule of pollicie to vse al fauour and sweete meanes to content gayne those that be or may be made quiet for better establishing of his state euē as a Phisition after a vehement purgation doth minister lenitiues and sofre medicines to calme and appease the good humors left and to strenghten the vvhole body againe that it may hold out This we see to be true not only by reason of state and pollicy as hath bin said but also by experience of al countries that haue bin conquered in Europ or other where if the continual resisting and reuolting of those that are conquered do not cause a contrary course in the Conqueror as it did in the conquest of the Danes and Normands vppon the Inglish and in the conquest of the Inglish vppon the British or Welsh vvhere the often rysing of them that were ouercome enforced the vanquishers to be much more cruel and rigorouse thē other vvise they would haue bin for al our stories do testifie that king Sweno the Dane and much more his sonne king Canutus as also William conqueror had a great desire after their victories to haue appeased and made much of the Inglish nation but that they vvere neuer quiet vnder them and so in like manner the Inglish kings oftentymes gaue their daughters in marriage to the princes of Wales and many priuileges to that people therby to gayne them but that their continual reuolting caused much seuerity and bloodshed to be vsed and the like seuerity did it cause oftentimes in the very Romans towards the said Britaynes conquered But vvhere the people vanquished vvere content to be quiet
wealth others further of admitted in their places euen in those kingdomes where succession preuaileth with many examples of the kingdomes of Israel and Spayne Cap. 7. fol. 140. Of diuers other examples out of the states of France Ingland for proofe that the next in blood are sometymes put back from succession and how god hath approued the same with good successe Cap. 8. fol. 164. VVhat are the principall points which à cōmō wealth ought to respect in admitting or excluding any Prince wherin is handled largly also of the diuersitie of religions and other such Causes Cap. 9. fol. 197. THE CONTENTS OF THE SECOND BOOKE THe preface with the intention protestation of the Lawyer to treat this matter without the hurt or preiudice of any Of diuers bookes treatises that haue bin written heretofore about the titles of such as pretende the crowne of Ingland and what they do conteyne in fauour or disfauour of diuers pretendors Cap. 1. fol. 1. Of the succession of the crowne of Ingland from the conquest vnto the tyme of king Edward the third with the beginning of three principal linages of the Inglish blood royal dispersed into the houses of Britanie Lancaster and Yorke Cap. 2. fol. 12. Of the successiō of Inglish kings frō king Edward the third vnto our dayes with the particuler causes of dissention betweene the families of Yorke and Lancaster more largly declared Cap. 3. fol. 37. Of the great and general controuersie and contention betweene the said two houses royal of Lancaster and Yorke and which of them may seeme to haue had the beteer right to the crowne by way of succession Cap. 4. fol. 56. Of fiue principal and particuler houses or linages that do or may pretend the crowne of Ingland at this day which are the houses of Scotland of Suffolck of Clarence of Britanie and of Portugal and first of al the house of Scorland which conteyneth the pretentions of the king of Scotts of the Lady Arbella Cap. 5. fol. 107. Of the house of Suffolke conteyning the clayme 's aswel of the countesse of Darby and of her children as also of the children of the earle of Hartfort Cap. 6. fol. 130. Of the houses of Clarence and Britany which conteyneth the claymes of the carle of Huntington and of the Lady Infanta of Spayne and others of these two families Cap. 7. fol. 141. Of the house of Portugall which conteyneth the clayme 's as well of the king and Prince of Spayne to the succession of Ingland as also of the dukes of Parma and Bragansa by the house of Lancaster Cap. 8. fol. 160. VVhether it be better to be vnder a forraine or hom-borne Prince and whether vnder a great and mightic monarch or vnder a little Prince or king Cap. 9. fol. 193. Of certayne other secondary or collateral lines and how extreme doubtfull at the pretences be and which of all thease pretenders are most like by probability to preuaile in the end to get the crowne of Ingland Cap. 10. fol. 233. THE PREFACE CONTEYNING THE OCCASION OF THIS TREATIS with the subiect purpose and partes therof THER chaunced not long ago I meane in the monethes of Aprill and May of this last yeare 93. to mete in Amsterdam in Holland certayne Gentlemen of diuers nations qualities and affections as wel in religion as otherwise yet the most part Inglish and Irish and they had bine in diuers countries studied different artes and followed vnlike professions some of souldiars some of lawyers both temporal ciuil others of meere trauelors to learne experience and pollicy And for that the aduises which dayly came from Ingland at that tyme the parlament being then in hand gaue occasion to discourse of Inglish affaires they fell into diuers poyntes concerning the same but yet none was treated so largly or so seriously as was the matter of succession and competitors to the crowne for that it was presumed a great while that some thing would be determined thereof in that parlament though one or two of the wisest of that company held euer the contrary opinion But when at lenght newes was brought that nothing at al had bin done therin but rather that one or two as was reported had bin checked or committed for speaking in the same then came it in question among thes Gentlemen what should be the causes of such proceding in a matter so waighty and so necessary for al Inglish men to know But two Gentlemen Lawyers of the company one of the common law and the other a Ciuilian alleaged so many reasons for iustifying the Queenes Maiesties doings in this behalfe as al did seeme satisfied for that it was made playne that it could not stande with the safety eyther of her Maiesty or of the realme or of the party himselfe who should be preferred that any declaration of heyre apparent should be made during the life of her Maiesty that now is how dangerons soeuer the delay therof may be estemed for the tyme to come And so the end of this speach brought in presently the begining of an other to wit what weare like to be thes dangers and who might be likest of the pretendors to preuaile after her Maiestie about which matter ther was much discoursed by diuers parties but the conclusion of al was that both thes poyntes remayned very doubtful but much more the second who should preuaile of the competitors which they said did make the former poynt lesse doubtful of the multitude of dangers that therby did hang ouer the common wealth of Ingland though it wanted not doubt also in particuler what and where they should fal for said they whersoeuer many pretenders of the blood royall are knowne to be competitors to a crowne ther cannot chuse but many perilles also must be imminent to the realme To this one of the company said that he did not see how ther could be eyther so many pretenders to the crowne as the day before had bin spoken of in that place for the commō lawyer before named newly come out of Ingland had tould them that he had hard of some 9. or 10. or more plotts that were debated within the realme for so many pretenders or yf ther were any such great number descended of the blood royall yet their titles could not be so doubtfull seing it was an easy matter to discerne who was next in discent of blood and who not Not so easy quoth this Gentleman lawyer for that although it cannot be denyed but that ther is among al such as may pretend at this day a certayne knowne order and degree of neernes in blood to some king or Queene that hath possessed the crowne before them and in this discent it is knowne also commonly who descendeth of the elder house and who of the yonger and other such like vulgar circumstances yet notwithstanding for that ther be many other poyntes considerable in this affaire as the right of the first
in Magistrats and for that the former is of nature the other also is of nature Al which is confitmed also by the consent vse of al nations through-out the world which general consent Cicero calleth ipsius vocem naturae the voice of nature herselfe for ther was neuer yet nation found ether of ancient tyme or now in our dayes by the discouery of the Indies or els where among vvhom men liuing together had not some kind of Magestrate or superior to gouerne them which euidently declareth that this poynt of Magestrates is also of nature and from god that created nature which poynt our ciuil law doth proue in like manner in the very begining of our digestes vvher the secōd title of the first booke is de origineiuris ciuilis omnium magestratuum of the begining of the ciuil law and of al magestrates which begining is referred to this first principle of natural instinct and Gods institution And last of al that God did concurr also expresly vvith this instinct of nature our diuines do proue by cleare testimony of holy scripture as vvhen God saith to Salomon by me kings do raigne and S. Paule to the Romans auoucheth that autbority is not but of God and therfore he which resisteth authority resisteth God Which is to be vnderstood of authority power or iutisdiction in it selfe according to the first institution as also vvhen it is lawfully laid vppō any person for otherwise when it is ether vvrongfully taken or vniustly vsed it may be resisted in diuers cases as afterwards more in particuler shal be declared for then it is not law ful authority Thes two poynts then are of nature to wit the common wealth and gouerment of the same by magistrates but vvhat kind of gouermēt ech common vvealth vvil haue whether Democratia vvhich is popular gouerment by the people it selfe as Athens Thebes and many other cyties of Greece had in old tyme as the Cantons of Swizers at this day haue or els Aristocratia vvhich is the gouerment of some certayne chosen number of the best as the Romans many yeares vvere gouerned by Consuls and senators and at this day the states of this countrey of Holland do imitate the same or els Monarchia vvhich is the regiment of one and this agayne eyther of an Emperor King Duke Earle or the like thes particuler formes of gouerment I say are not determyned by God or nature as the other two poyntes before for thē they should be al one in al nations as the other are seing God and nature are one to al as often hath bin said but thes particuler formes are left vnto euery nation and countrey to chuse that forme of gouerment which they shal like best and think most fit for the natures and conditions of their people vvhich Aristotle proueth through out al the second and fourth bookes of his politiques very largly laying dovvne diuers kinds of gouerments in his dayes as namely in Greece that of the Milesians Lacedemonians Candians and others and shevving the causes of their differences which he attributeth to the diuersity of mens natures customes educations and other such causes that made them make choise of such or such forme of gouerment And this might be proued also by infinit other examples both of tymes past and present and in al nations and countryes both christian and otherwise which haue not had only differēt fassions of gouermēts the one frō the other but euen among themselues at one tyme one forme of gouerment and an other at other tymes for the Romans first had Kings and after reiecting them for their euil gouerment they chose 〈◊〉 vvhich vvere two gouernours for euervycare vvhose authority yet they limited by a multitude of senators which vvere of their counsel and thes mens power vvas restrayned also by adding tribunes of the people and some tyme dictators and finally they came to be gouerned last of al by Emperors The like might be said of Carthage in Africa and many cityes and common wealthes of Greece which in diuers seasons and vppon diuers causes haue taken different formes of gouerment to themselues The like vve see in Europe at this day for in only Italye what different formes of gouerment haue you Naples hath a kinge for their soueraine Rome the pope and vnder him one senator in place of so many as vvere wont to be in that common vvealth Venice and Genua haue senators Dukes but litle authority haue ther Dukes Florence Farara Mantua Parma Vrbin and Sauoy haue their Dukes only without senators and there power is absolut Milan vvas once a kingdom but now a Dukedom the like is of Burgundy Lorayne Bauire Gascony and Britayne the lesser al which once had their distinct kings and now haue Dukes for their supreme gouernours The like may be said of al Germany that many yeares together had one king ouer al which now is deuided into so many Dukedomes Earldomes other like titles of supreme Princes But the contrary is of Castile Aragon Portugal Barcelona and orher kingdomes this day in Spayne which vvere first earldomes only and after Dukedomes and then kingdomes and now a gayne are al vnder one Monarchy The like is of Boeme and Polonia which vvere but Dukedomes in old tyme and now are kingdomes The like may be said of France also after the expulsion of the Romans vvhich was first a monarchy vnder Pharamond their first king and so continued for many yeares vnder Clodion Merouys Childrik and Clodouaeus ther first christened kings but after they deuided it into fower kingdomes to vvit one of Paris an other of Suessons the third of Orleans and the fourth of Metts and so it continued for diuers yeares but yet aftervvards they made it one monarchy agayne England also vvas first a monarchy vnder the Britaynes and then a prouince vnder the Romans and after that deuided into seauen kingdomes at once vnder the Saxons and novv a monarchy agayne vnder the Inglish and al this by Gods permission and approbation vvho in token therof suffred his owne peculier people also of Israel to be vnder diuers manners of gouerments in diuers tymes as first vnder Patriarques Abraham Isaac and Iacob then vnder Captaynes as Moses Iosua and the like then vnder iudges as Othoniel Aiod and Gedion then vnder high Priestes as Hely and Samuel then vnder kings as Saul Dauid and the rest then vnder captaines highe priests agayne as Zorobabelludas Machabeus his brethren vntil the gouerment vvas lastely taken from them and they brought vnder the povver of the Romans and forraine kinges appoynted by them So as of al this ther can be no doubt but that the common vvealth hath power to chuse their owne fassion of gouerment as also to change the same vppon resonable causes as we see they haue done in al tymes and countryes and God no
at his pleasure without law as Titus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for which cause the senators at length 〈◊〉 him and cut him in smal peces And aftervards they were greatly greeued at the entring of Seruius Tullius their sixt king for that he gaue the crowne by fraude and not by election of the senate and special approbation of the people as he should haue done but most of al they were exasperated by the proceeding of their seuenth kinge named Lucius Tarquinas surnamed the proud who for that as Liuius faith he neglected the lawes of gouerment prescribed no him by the common wealth as namely in that he consulted not with the senate in matters of great importance for that he made war peace of his owne head for that he appoynted to himselfe a gard as though he had mistrusted the people and for that he did vse ininstice to diuers particuler men and suffred his children to be insolent he was expelled with al his posterity and the gouerment of Rome changed from a kingdome vnto the regiment of consuls after two hundreth yeares that the other had endured And thus much for those kingdomes of Italy and Greece And if likewise we wil looke vppon other kingdomes of Europe we shal see the very same to wit that euery kingdome countrey hath his particuler lawes prescribed to their kings by the common vvealth both for their gouerment authority and succession in the same for if we behold the Romā Empire it selfe as it is at this day annexed to the Germaine electors though it be the first in dignity among christian Princes yet shal we see it so restrayned by particuler lawes as the Emperor can do much lesse in his state then other kings in theirs for he can nether make vvarr nor exact any contribution of men or money therunto but by the free leaue and consent of al the states of the Germayne diet or parlament and for his children or next in kynn they haue no action interest or pretence at al to succed in their fathers dignity but only by free electiō if they shal be thought vvorthy Nay one of the chiefest poynts that the Emperor must sweare at his entrance as Sleydan writeth is this that he shal neuer go about to make the dignity of the Emperor peculiar or hereditary to his family but leaue it vnto the seuen electors free in their power to chuse his successor according to the law made by the pope Gregory the fyfth and the Emperor Charles the fourth in this behalfe The kingdomes of Polonia Boemia do go much after the same fashion both for there restrainte of power and succession to their kings For first touching their authority they haue great limitation nether can they do any thing of great moment without the consent of certayne principal men called Palatines or Castellans nether may their children or next of blood succede except they be chosen as in the Empire In Spayne France and Ingland the priuileges of kings are far more eminent in both thes points for that both their authority is much more absolute and their next in blood do ordinarily succede but yet in different manner for as touching authority it semeth that the kings of Spayne and France haue greater then the king of England for that euery ordination of thes two kings is law in it selfe without further approbatiō of the common wealth which holdeth not in England where no general law can be made without consent of parlament but in the other pointe of succession it appeareth that the restraint is far greater in thos other two countries then in Ingland for that in Spayne the next in blood cannot succede be he neuer so lawfully descended but by a new approbation of the nobility and bishops and states of the Realme as it is expresly set downe in the two ancient councelles of Tolledo the fourth and fifth In confirmation wherof we see at this day that the king of Spaynes owne sonne cannot succede not be called Prince except he be first sworne by the said nobility and states in token of their new consent and so we haue seene it practized in our dayes towards three or fower of King Philips children which haue succeded the one after the other in the title of Princes of Spaine and at euery chainge a new oth required at the subiects handes for their admission to the said dignity which is not vsed in the kings children of France or Ingland In France the world knoweth how women are not admitted to succed in the crowne be they neuer so neare in blood nether any of their issue though it be male For which cause I doubt not but you remēber how king Edward the third of Ingland though he were sonne heyre vnto a daughter of France whose three brethren were kings and left hir sole heyre to hir father king Phillip the fourth surnamed the fayre yet vvas he put by the crowne as also was the king of Nauar at the same tyme who was sonne and heyre vnto this womans eldest brothers daughter named Lewis Huttin king of Ftance which king of Nauar therby seemed also to be before king Edward of Ingland but yet were they both put by it and Philip de Vallois a brothers sonne of Phillip the faire was preferred to it by general decree of the states of France and by vardit of the whole parlament of Paris gathered about the same affayre Nether did it auayle that the two kings a fore said alleaged that it was agaynst reason conscience and custome of al nations to exclud vvomen from the succession of the crowne which appartayned vnto them by propinquity of blood seing both nature God hath made them capable of such succession euery where as it appereth by example of al other nations and in the old testament among the people of god it selfe wher we see women haue bin admitted vnto kingdomes by succession but al this I say preuayled not vvith the French as it doth not also at this day for the admission of Dona Isabella Eugenia Clara infanta of Spayne vnto the said crowne of France though by dissent of blood ther be no question of her next propinquity for that she is the eldest child of the last kings eldest sister The like exclusion is made agaynst the Prince of Lorayne that now liueth though he be a man and nephew to the last king for that his title is by a woman to wit his mother that vvas yonger sister vnto the last king Henry of France And albeit the law called Salica by the Frenchmen by vertue vvherof they pretend to exclude the succession of vvomen be no very ancient law as the French themselues do confesse and much lesse made by Pharamond ther first king or in thos ancient tymes as others without ground do affirme yet do vve se that it is sufficient to bynd al Princes and subiects of
by al the states of that counttey but also a broad as namely of Maximilian the Emperor and approued also by the king of Denmarke and by al the Princes of Germany neere about that realme who saw the resonable causes which that common wealth had to proceed as it did And a litle before that the like was practised also in Denmarke agaynst Cisternus ther lawful king if we respect his discent in blood for he vvas sonne to king Iohn that reigned a fore him and crowned in his fathers life but yet afterwards for his intolerable cruelty he vvas depriued and driuen into banishment together with his vvife and three children al vvhich were disinherited his vncle Frederik Prince of Holsatia vvas chosen king whose progeni yet remayneth in the crowne the other though he were marryed to the sister of Charles the fifth last Emperor of that name and vvere of kyn also to king Henry the eight of Ingland yet could he neuer get to be restored but passed his tyme miserably partly in banishment and partly in prison vntil he dyed But it shal be best perhapps to ende this narration with an example or two out of Ingland it selfe for that no where els haue I read more markable accidents touching this poynt then in Ingland and for breuity sake I shal touch only two or three happened since the cōquest for that I wil go no higher though I might as appeareth by the exāple of K. Edwin others nether vvil I beginne to stand much vppon the example of king Iohn though wel also I might for that by his euel gouerment he made himselfe both so odious at home contemptible abroade hauing lost Normandy Gascony Guyenne and al the rest in effect which the crowne of Ingland had in France as first of al he vvas both excommunicated and deposed by sentence of the pope at the sute of his owne people and vvas inforced to make his peace by resigning his crowne into the handes of Pandulfe the popes legate as Polidor recounteth and afterwards faling back agayne to his old defects and naughtie gouerment albeit by his promise to the pope to go and make warr against the Turkes if he might be quiet at home and that his kyngdome should be perpetually tributary to the sea of Rome he procured him to be of his side for a tyme and against the Barōs yet that stayed not them to proceed to his depriuation which they did effectuate first at Canterbury and after at London in the eighteenth last yeare of king Iohns reigne and meant also to haue disinherited his sonne Henry which vvas afterward named king Henry the third and at that tyme a childe of eight yeares old only and al this in punishement of the father yf he had liued and for that cause they called into Ingland Lodouick the Prince of France sonne to king Philip the second and father to Saynt Lewis the nynth and chose him for their king and did sweare him fealtye with general consent in London the yeare of our Lord 1216. And but that the death of king Iohn that presently ensued altered the vvhole course of that designment and moued them to turne their purposes and accept of his sonne Henry before matters were fully established for king Lodowick it vvas most likely that France and Ingland would haue bin ioyned by thes meanes vnder one crowne But in the end as I haue said king Henry the third vvas admitted and he proued a very wor thi king after so euel as had gon before him and had bin deposed which is a circumstance that you must alwayes note in this narration and he reigned more yeares then euer king in Ingland did before or after him for he reigned ful 53. yeares left his sonne heyre Edward the first not inferior to himselfe in manhode vertue vvho reigned 34. yeares and left a sonne named Edward the second vvho falling into the same defects of gouerment or vvorse then king Iohn his great grandfather had donne was after 19. yeares reigne deposed also by act of parlament holden at London the yeare 1326. his body adiudged to perpetual prison in which he was at that present in the castle of vvallingford vvherher diuers both bishops Lordes knights of the Parlament vvere sent vnto him to denounce the sentence of the realme agaynst him to wit how they had deptiued him and chosen Edward his sonne in his place for vvhich act of choosing his sonne he thanked them hartely and vvith many teares acknowledged his owne vnwoorthines wheruppon he was digraded his name of king first taken from him and he appoynted to be called Edward of Carnaruan from that howre forward and then his crowne and ring were taken away and the steward of his house brake the stafe of his office in his presence and discharged his seruants of their seruice and al other people of ther obedience or allegeance toward him and towardes his mayntenance he had only a hundreth markes a yeare allowed for his expences and then was he delyuered also into the hands of certayne particuler keepers vvho led him prisoner from thence by diuers other places vsing him with extreme indignity in the way vntil at last they tooke his life from him in the castle of Barkley and his sonne Edward the third reigned in his place who if we respect eyther valor provvesse length of reigne acts of cheualry or the multitude of famous Princes his children left behinde him vvas one of the noblest kinges that euer Inglād had though he were chosen in the place of a very euel one as you haue séen But vvhat shal we say is this worthines vvhich God giueth commōly to the successors at thes changes perpetual or certayne by discēt no truly nor the example of one Princes punishment maketh an other to beware for the next successor after this noble Edward vvhich vvas king Richard the second though he were not his sonne but his sonnes sonne to wit sonne and heyre to the excellent and renounced black Prince of vvales this Richard I say forgetting the miserable end of his great grand father for euel gouerment as also the felicity and vertue of his father and grand father for the contrary suffered himselfe to be abused and misled by euel councellors to the great hurte disquietnes of the realme For vvhich cause after he had raigned 22. yeares he was also deposed by act of parlamāt holden in London the yeare of our Lord 1399. and condemned to perpetual prison in the castel of Pomfret vvher he was soone after put to death also and vsed as the other before had bin and in this mānes place by free electiō was chosen for king the noble knight Henry Duke of Lācaster who proued afterwards so notable a king as the world knoweth and vvas father to king Henry the fifth surnamed commonly the Alexander of Ingland for that
vvith litle intention of performance But in al good and vvel ordered common vveathes wher matters passe by reason conscience vvisdom and consultation and espetially since christian religion hath preuailed giuen perfection to that natural light vvhich morall good men had before in matters of gouerment since that tyme I say this point of mutual and reciprocal othes betvveene Princes and subiects at the day of ther coronation or admission for al are not crowned haue bin much more established made cleare and put in vre And this forme of agreement and conuention betwene the common vvealth and their christian head or king hath bin reduced to a more sacred and religious kinde of vnion and concord then before for that the vvhole actiō hath bin donn by Bishopes and ecclesiastical Prelats and the astipulation and promises made on both sides haue passed and bin giuen receaued and regestred vvith great reuerence in sacred places and with great solemnity of religious ceremonies vvhich before vvere not so much vsed though alvvayes ther weare some And therfore our examples at this tyme shal be only of christian common vvealthes for that they are more peculiarly to our purpose as you wil confesse First then to begin vvith the East or Greeke Emperors of Constantinople as the most anicient among other for that after the Empire once translated from Rome to Constantinople by our Constantine the great and the first Christian Emperor that euer did publiquely shew himselfe for such thes Greeke Emperors were the most eminent Princes of al christianity among vvhom I do finde that albeit ther comming to the crowne were nothing so orderly for the most part as at this day it is vsed but many tymes the meanes therof vvere turbulēt and seditious yet find I as I saye that aboue a thousand yeares gone they vvere wont to haue an oth exacted at their handes by the patriarck of Constantinople vvho was their chiefe Prelate for thus writeth Zonaras of the coronation of Anastatius the first that succeded Zeno about the yeare of Christ 524. Antequam coronaretur fidei confessionem scriptam qua polliceretur se in dogmatibus Ecclesiasticis nihil esse nouaturum ab eo exegit patriarcha Euphemius vir sanctus orthodoxus The Patriarch Euphemius being a holy and catholique man required of Anastatius elected Emperor before he was crowned a confession in writing wherin he should promisse to change or innouate nothing in matters perteyning to the doctrine of the church thus much Zonaras the same haue Nicephorus Euagrius others And not only this but diuers other conditions also doth the same author insinuate that this Anastatius promised at his corouation before he could be crowned as among other things the taking away of certaine tributs and impositions the giuing of offices without money and other like points appertayning to reformation and good gouerment vvhich he performed for a tyme in the beginning of his gouerment but after fel into the heresies of the Eutichians banished this same good Patriach Euphemius that had crowned him he thriued therafter for that he vvas slayne by a thunder bolt from heauē after he had reigned 7. yeares and vvas accompted for a very wicked man by al vvriters for that he had broken as they said the conditions quas graui iuramento scriptis relato confirmasset That is to say the conditions which he had confirmed auowed with a graue oth as sayeth Euagrius The like I read about 300. yeares after recorded by the same author of the Emperor Michael the first in thes wordes Michael vbi diluxit magnam ecclesiam ingressus à Patriarcha Nicephoro imperatorio diademate est ornatus postulaio prius scripto quo promitteret se nulla ecclesiae instituta violaturum neque christianorum sanguine manus contaminaturum Which is Michel new chosen Emperor came early in the morning into the great church of Constantinople and vvas crowned ther with the Emperial crowne by the handes of Nicephorus the Patriach but yet so as hs was first required to swear and promise by writing that he would not violate the ordināces of the church nor contaminat his hands with christian blood which in effect is as much to say as that he should reigne godly iustly and many other such examples might be alleaged but by this it is easy to see what vvas the fassion of admitting and crowning thos gretian Emperors by their Patriarkes in the name of al the common wealth which common wealth was not satisfied with an oth except also it were set downe in vvriting And if we passe to the latine west empyre which about this very tyme was restored by Zacharie the pope and by the whole common wealth of Rome as before hath bin shewed and was giuen to Charles the great and his posterity vve shal fynd that this point is more setled and more in-violably kept yet in this empyre thē in the other for albeit that this empire of the west vvent by succession for the most part at the begining vntil afterwards it vvas appointed by Pope Gregory the fifth to passe by the election of certaine Princes in Germanie that now enioy that priueledge to be electors yet shal vve see alwaies that they euen before this cōstitution when this dignity went by succession were neuer admitted to the same vvithout this circumstance of swearing to conditions of righteous gouerment the forme and manner of which admission for that I find it set downe more perfectly and particulerly in the coronation of Otho the first then of any other Emperor and that by many authors and that this Otho was sonne and heyre vnto the famous Emperor Henry the first of that name Duke of Saxonie surnamed the faulkner for the great delight he had in the flght of faucons for thes causes I meane to begin with the coronation of this man before any other This Otho then sonne as I haue said to Henry the first though being his eldest sonne he vvere also his heyre and so named by Henry him self to the inheritance of the said crowne of Germany yet was he not admitted thervnto vntil he had made his oth and receaued his new approbation by the people for so the story saith that the Archbishop of Moguntia who is the chief primate of al Germany bringing him to the aulter wher he must swear said thes vvords vnto the people Behold I bring you heare Otho chosen by God appointed out by his father Henry our Lord and now made king by al the Princes of this empire if this election please you do you signifie the same by boulding vp your handes to heauen Thus far are the vvordes of the historiographer and then he addeth that al held vp their handes and that theruppon the said archbishop turned ahout to the aulter vvher lay al the oruaments and ensignes of the empyre as the sword vvith the girdle the cloke vvith
admonish yon in a few wordes what the charge importeth which you are to take vppon you c. Thus he beginneth and after this he declareth vnto him for what end he is made king vvhat the obligation of that place and dignity byndeth him vnto and vnto vvhat points he must sweare what do signifie the sword the ring the sceptor and the crowne that he is to receaue and at the deliuery of each of thes things he maketh both a short exhortation vnto him and prayer vnto God for him And the kings oth is in thes words Promitto coram Deo angelis eius I do promise and sweare before God and his angels that I will do law and iustice to al and kepe the peace of christ hisChurche and the vniō of his catholique fayth and wil do and cause to be done dew and canonical honor vnto the bishops of this land and to the rest of the cleargie and if which God for bid I should break my oth I am content that the inhabitants of this kingdome shal owe no duty or obedience vnto me as God shal help me and Gods holy ghospelles After this oth made by the king and receaued by the subiects the Lord Martial general of the whole kingdome doth aske vvith a loud voice of al the councellors nobility people ther present whether they be content to submit themselues vnto this king or no Who answering yea the archbishop doth ende the residue of the ceremonies doth place him in the royal throne wher al his subiects do homage vnto him and this for Polonia In Spayne I do find that the manner of admitting ther kings was different and not the same before and after the distruction therof by the Moores but yet that in both tymes ther kings did sweare in effect the selfe same points vvhich before haue bin mentioned in other kingdomes For first before the entring of the Moores when spayne remayned yet one general monatchie vnder the Gothes it is recorded in the fourth national coūcel of Toledo which vvas holden the yeare of our Lord 633. according to Ambrosio Morales the most learned diligēt historiographer of Spayne though other do appoint it some few yeares after in this councel I say it is said that their new king Sissinandus who had expelled Suintila ther fotmer king for his euel gouerment This king Sissinandus I saye comming into the said councel in the third yeare of his reigne accompained with a most magnificent number of nobles that waighted on him did fal downe prostrate vppon the ground before the Archbishops and bishops ther gathered together which vvere 70. in number and desired them vvith teares to pray for him and to determine in that councel that which should be needful and most conuenient both for mainteyning of Gods religion and also for vpholding and prospering the whole common wealth wheruppō thos fathers after matters of religion and reformation of manners vvhich they handled in 73. chapters In the end and last chapter they come to handle matters of estate also And first of al they do confirme the deposition of king Suintila together with his wife brother and children and al for his great wickednes which in the councel is recounted and they do depriue them not only of al title to the crowne but also of al other goods and possessions mouables immouables sauing only that vvhich the new kings mercy should bestow vppon them and in this councel was present and subscribed first of al other S. Isidorus Archbishop of Siuil who writing his history of spayne dedicated the same vnto this king Sissinandus and speaketh infinite good in the same of the vertues of king Suintila that was now deposed and condemned in this said councel wherby it is to presumed that he had changed much his life afterward and became so wicked a man as here is reported After this the councel confirmeth the title of Sissinandus and maketh decrees for the defence therof but yet insinuateth vvhat points he was bound vnto and wherunto he had sworne when they said vnto him Te quoque praesentem regem ac futuros aetatum sequentium principes c. We do require you that are our present king and al other our Princes that shal follow here after vvith the humility which is conuenient that you be meeke moderate towards your subiects and that you gouerne your people in iustice and piety and that none of you do giue sentence alone against any mā in cause of life and death but with the consent of your publique councel and with thos that be gouernours in matters of iudgment And against al kings that are to come we do promulgate this sentence that if any of them shal against the reuerence of our lawes excercise cruel authority with proud domination and kingly pompe only following ther owne concupiscence in wickednes that they are condemned by Christ with the sentence of excommunication and haue theyr separation both from him and vs to euerlasting iudgment and this much of that councel But in the next two yeares after the ende of this councel king Sissinandus being now dead and one Chintilla made king in his place ther were other two councels gathered in Toledo the first vvherof was but prouincial and the second national and they are named by the names of the fift and sixt councels of Toledo In the vvhich councels according to the manner of the Gothes who being once conuerted from the Arrian haeresie were very catholique and deuout euer after and gouerned themselues most by their cleargie and not only matters of religion were handled but also of state and of the common wealth especially aboute the successiō to the crowne safty of the Prince prouision for his children frendes officers and fauorites after his death and against such as without election or approbation of the commō wealth did aspire to the same al thes points I say vvere determined in thes councels and among other points a very seuere decree vvas made in the sixt councel concerning the kings oth at his admission in thes vvords Consonam vno corde ore promulgamus Deo placituram sententiam We do promulgate vvith one hart and mouth this sentence agreable pleasing vnto God and do decree the same vvith the consent and deliberation of the nobles and peeres of this realme that vvhosoeuer in tyme to come shal be aduanced to the honor and preferment of this kingdome he shal not be placed in the royal seat vntil among other conditions he haue promised by the Sacrament of an oth that he vvil suffer no man to break the Catholique faith c. Thus far that synod or councel By which wordes especially thos among other conditions is made euident that thos Princes sweare not only to kepe the faith but also such other conditions of good gouerment as were touched before in the fourth councel and thes things were determyned while
France I do not see His other proposition is That albeit the heyre apparent which is next by birth to any crowne should be neuer so impotent or vnfit to gouerne as if for examples sake he should be depriued of his senses madd furious lunatique a foole or the like or that he should be knowne ō the other side to be most malicious wicked vitious or abhominable or should degenerat into a very beast yea if it were knowne that he should go about to destroy the common wealth and drowne the shipp which he had to guide yet saith this man he must be sacred and holy vnto vs and admitted whithout condradiction to his inheritance which God nature hath laid vppon him his direction restaint or punishment must only be remitted to God alone for that no mā or cōmun wealth may reforme or restraine him Thus saith Belloy which I doubt not vvil feme vnto you rather belly and base doctrine then to come from the head of any learned or discreet man that regardeth the end why common vvealthes and kingdomes and al gouerments vvere ordeyned by God and nature and not the flattering or adoring of any one miserable man that shal stand ouer them to distroy the vvhole But novv to the particuler matter that vve are to treat vvhich is vvhat is to be attributed to this succession or propinquity of birth alone I am of opinion as before I signified that albeit ther vvant not reasons on both sides among learned men vvhat kinde of prouiding gouernors to common vvealthes is best either by simple and free election only or by succession of birth my opinion I say is that succession is much to be preferred not for that it vvanteth al difficulties and inconueniences vvhich al temporal things vppon earth haue but lyke as before I haue shewed of the particular gouerment of a monarchie in respect of other formes of regimēt to wit that it wanted not al but had fevver inconueniences then other formes of regiment haue so say I also of this that albeit some inconueniences want not in succession yet are they commonly far lesse and fewer then would follow by mere electiō vvhich is subiect to great and continual dangers of ambition emulation diuision sedition and contention which do bring vvith them euident peril of vniuersal destruction desoiation of the vvhole body this at euery change of the Prince vvhich change on the other side is much assured by succession for that great occasions of strife and contention are ther by cut of And besides this the Prince vvho is in present possession knowing that his sonne or next of kynn is to be his heyre hath more care to leaue the realme in good order as vve see that the husband man hath to til and manure that ground vvhich is his owne and to remayne to his posterity A third commodity also ther is for that lesse mutations and alterations are seene in the common vvealth wher succession preuayleth for that the sonne following his father doth commonly retayne the same frends councellers officiers and seruants vvhich his father had before him pursueth the same actions and intentions vvith the same māner of proceding for the most part vvher as he that entereth by election being an allien to him that vvent before him neuer lightly his frend doth change alter and turne vpsidowne al things Further more which may be also a fourth reason he that entereth by succession for that he is either borne a Prince or hath bin much respected stil for his title to the crowne bringeth vvith him lesse passions of hatred emulation anger enuy or reuenge agaynst particuler men for that no man durst offend him then doth he vvhich entreth by only election for that he hauing bin a subiect and equal to others before his aduancement and therby holden contention with many especially at this election must needs haue matter of quarrel with many vvhich he vvil seeke easily to reuenge whē he is in authority as on the other side also such as were his equales before wil beare him lesse respect more vnwillingly be vnder him then if by birth he had bin ther soueraine Thes and diuets other are the commodities of succession whervnto vve may also ad the preheminence and priuilegde of primogenitura and auncetrie of birth so much respected commended by holy writ not only in men but in al other creatures also whos first borne were dedicated to God himselfe and one notable example among other occurreth to my mynde of the two sonnes of Isaac of the which two albeit God had ordeyned to chuse the yonger before he was borne at S. Paul testifieth and to reiect the elder that is to say that Iacob should inherite the benediction and not Esau Yet would God haue this yonger to procure the said priuilege of elder ship frō Esau by diuers meanes as first by bargaine and after by guile according to the storie we read in Genes Out of which story two points may be ponde red much to our purpose first that primogenitura or elder ship of birth as I haue said was greatly respected by God and according to that al the discents and successions of kinges were commonly among that people for that ordinarily the eldest sonne euer succeded his father in the crowne of Iury. And the second pointe is that God would shew euen in this begining that yet this priuilege was not so inuiolable but that vppon iust causes it might be broken as it was by this his choyse of Iacob the yōger and reiecting Esau the Elder and many times after in matter of gouerment the same was practised by God him self as vvhen Iuda the fourth tribe and not Ruben the first eldest was appointed by God to enioy the scepter and crowne of the Iewes as also when king Dauid dyed not his first second or third sonne but his tenth in order to wit Salomon who was also the fourth that he had by Bersabee vvas appointed for his successor So that in very deede we haue here both out two cases that were propounded in the begining ouerruled and determined by authority and example of holy writ it selfe namely and first of al that priority and propinquity of blood in succession is greatly to be honored regarded and preferred in al affaires of dignity and principallity and yet which is the second pointe are we not so absolutly peremptorily bound thervnto alwayes but that vppon iust and vrgent occasions that course may be altered and broken Which licence or liberty is indeed the only or at least wise the most principal remedy for such inconueniences as do or may ensew of the course of succession vvhich inconueniences as before I shewed to be far lesse and fewer then are wont to follow of bare election alone yet did I confesse also that some did or might fal out as namely that the
brothers sonne to Don Alonso the catholique vvas preferred and reigned peacably six yeares and then dying without issue for that the hatred of the spaniards was not yet ended against the memory of king Fruela they would not yet admit any of his generation but rather excluded them agayne the second tyme and admitted a brother in law of his named Don Silo that was married to his sister Dona Adosinda daughter to the fore said noble king catholique Alonso So that here we see twise the right heyres of king Don Fruela for his euel gouerment were put back But Don Silo being dead without issue as also Don Aurelio was before him and the Spaniards anger against king Fruela being now vvel assuaged they admitted to the kingdone his fore said sonne Don Alonso the yonger surnamed afterward the chast whom now twise before they had put back as you haue seene but now they admitted him though hisreigne at the first endured very litle for that a certayne bastard vncle of his named Don Mauregato by help of the moores put him out and reigned by force 6. yeares and in the end dying with out issue the matter came in deliberation againe whether the king Don Alonso the chaste that yet liued and had bin hidden in a monastary of Galitia during the tyme of the tyrāt should returne agayne to gouerne or rather that his cosen german Don vermudo sonne to his vncle the Prince Vimerano whom vve shewed before to haue byn slayne by this mans father king Fruela should be elected in his place And the realme of Spayne determined the second to vvit that Don Vermudo though he vvere much further of by propiuquity of blood and vvith in ecclesiastical order also for that he had bin made deacon should be admitted partly for that he vvas iudged for the more valiant and able Prince then the other vvho seemed to be made more acquainted now vvith the life of monkes and religious men then of a king hauing first bin brought vp among them for 10. or 12. yeares space vvhiles Don Aurelio and Don Silo reigned after the death of his father kinge Fruela and secondly agayne other six yeares during the reigne of the tyrant Mauregato for which cause they estemed the other to be fitter as also for the differēt memories of there tvvo fathers king Fruela and prince Vimerano wherof the first vvas hateful the other most deare as before hath bin declared nether do any of the foure ancient Bishops historiographers of Spayne to wit that of Toledo Besa Salamanca or Ture that liued al about those dayes wrote the storie reprehend this fact of the realme of spaine or put any doubt whether it were lawful or no for the causes before recited Trew it is that after three yeares reigne this king Vermudo being weary of kingly life and feeling some scruple of conscience that being deacon he had forsaken the life ecclesiastical and maryed though by dispensation of the pope as Morales sayeth and entangled himselfe vvith the affaires of a kingdome he resigned vvillingly the gouerment vnto his said Cosen Don Alonso the chast and himselfe liued after a priuate life for diuers yeares but this Don Alonso vvho now the fourth tyme had bin depriued of his succession as you haue seene deceaued the expectation of the spaniards that accoūpted him a monke for he proued the most valiāt and excellent king that euer that nation had both for his vertue valor victories against the moores buylding of townes castells churches Monasteries and other such workes of Christianity as Morales recounteth and be reigned after this his last admission one and fyftie yeares had great frendship vvith king Charles the great of France who liued in the same tyme with hym And this man among other most noble exploites so tamed the Moores of his country as during his dayes he neuer paid that cruel and horrible tribute which before after was paide by the christians to the Moores which was a hundred yong maidens and fiftie sonnes of Gētlemen euery yeare to be brought vp in the religiō of Mahomet amōg those infidel tyrants And finally this man after so much afflictiō came to be one of the most renoumed Princes of the world After this Don Alonso vvho left no children for that he would neuer marry but liued al his life in chastitye ther succeded to him by electiō his nephew named Don Ramiro sonne to the former said king Don Vermudo the deacon that gaue this man the crowne as you haue hard of whose electiō morales writeth these woords Muerto el Rey Don Alonso el casto fue eligido por los 〈◊〉 y grandes del reyno el Rey Don Ramiro primero deste nombre hyio del Rey Don vermudo el diaeono That is the king Don Alōso the chast being dead ther vvas chosen king by the Prelates nobility of the realme Don Ramiro the first of this name sonne of king Vermudo the deacon who resigned his crowne to Don Alonso and it is to be noted that albeit this Don Ramiro vvas next in blood to the succession after the death of his vncle Don Alonso without children yet vvas he chosen by the states as here it is said in expresse vvordes Moreouer it is to be noted that albeit this author Ambrosio Morales and other spanish writers do say that in the tyme of this king Ramiro the law of succession by propinquity in blood vvas so reuiued and strongly confirmed that as the kingdome of Spayne was made as Maiorasgo as he termeth it which is an inheritance so intayled and tyed only to the next in blood as ther is no possibility to alter the same and that frō this tyme forward the king alwayes caused his eldest sonne to be named king or Prince so euer to be sworne by the realme nobilitie yet shal vve find this ordinance and succession oftentymes to haue byn broken vppon seueral considerations as this author himselfe in that very chapter confesseth As for example after foure discents from this man vvhich were Don Ordonio the first this mans sonne and Don Alonso the third Don Garzia and Don Ordonio the second al fower kings by orderly succession it happened that in the yeare of christ 924. Don Ordonio the second dying left foure sonnes and one daughter lawfully begotten and yet the state of spayne displaced them al and gaue the kingdome to ther vncle Don Fruela second brother to there father Don Ordonio and morales sayeth that ther appeareth no other reason heerof but only for that these sonnes of the king disceased vvere yong and not so apt to gouerne vvel the realme as ther vncle was But after a yeares reigne this king Fruelae dyed also left diuers children at mans estate and then did the spaniards as much agaynst them as they had done for him before against the children of his elder brother
apparent of Spayne and they put back in ther grand fathers tyme and by his and the realmes consent ther father as I haue said being dead and this was done in a general parlament holden at Segouia in the yeare 1276. and after this Don Sancho was made king in the yeare 1284. and the two Princes put into prisō but afterward at the sure of there vncle king Phillip the third of France they were let out agayne and endued with certayne landes and so they remaine vnto this day and of thes do come the Dukes of Medina Celi and al the rest of the house of Cerda which are of much nobility in Spayne at this tyme and king Phillip that reyneth cometh of Don Sancho the yonger brother Not long after this agayne when Don Pedro surnamed the cruel king of Castile was driuen out and his bastard brother Henry the second set vp in his place as before hath bin mētioned the Duke of Lancaster Iohn of Gant hauing maried Dona Constantia the said king peters daughter heyre pretended by succession the said crowne of Castile as in deed it appertayned vnto him but yet the state of spaine denied it flatly and defended it by atmes and they preuailed against Iohn of Gant as dyd also the race of Henry the bastard against his lawful brother the race of Don Sancho the vncle against his lawful nephewes as hath byn shewed and that of Dona Berenguela against her elder sister al which races do reigne vnto this day thes three changes of the trew lyue happened with in two ages and in the third and principal discent of the Spanish kings when this matter of succession was most assuredly and perfectly established and yet who wil deny but that the kings of Spayne who hold by the later titles at this day be true and lawful kings Well one example wil I giue you more out of the kyngdom of Portugal and so wil I make an ende with thes countreyes This kinge Henry the bastard last named king of Spayne had a sonne that succeded him in the crowne of Spayne named Iohn the first who married the daughter and heyre named Dona Beatrix of king Fernando the first of Portugal but yet after the death of the said King Fernando the states of Portugal would neuer agree to admit him for ther king for not subiecting themselues by that meanes to the Castilians and for that cause they rather tooke for ther king a bastard brother of the said late king Don Fernando whos name was Don Iuan a youth of 20. yeares old who had bin master of a militare order in Portugal named de Auis and so they excluded Dona Beatrix Queene of Castile that was their lawful heyre aud chose this yong man and maried him afterwards to the lady Phillippe daughter of Iohn of Gant Duke of Lancaster by his first wife blanch Duchesse and heyre of Lācaster in whose right the kings of Portugal and ther discendents do pretend vnto this day a cerrayne interest to the house of Lancaster which I leaue to our tēporal lawyer to discusse but heereby we see what an ordinary matter it hath bin in Spayne and Portugal to alter the lyne of next succession vppon any reasonable consideration which they imagined to be for ther weal publique and the like we shal finde in France Ingland which euen now I wil begin to treat of DIVERS OTHER EXAM'PLES OVT OF THE STATES OF FRANCE AND INGLAND FOR proofe that the next in blood are some tymes put backe from succession and how God had approued the same with good successe CAP. VIII AS concerning the state of France I haue noted before that albeit since the entrāce of ther first king Pharamond with his Frankes out of Germanie which vvas about the yeare of Christ 419. they haue neuer had any strāger come to were there crowne which they attribute to the benefit of there law Salike that for biddeth women to reigne yet among themselues haue they changed twyse there whole race and linage of kings once in the entrance of king Pepin that put out the lyne of Pharamond about the yeare 751. and agayne in the promotion of kinge Hugo Capetus that put out the lyne of Pepin in the yeare 988 so as they haue had three discents and races of kings as wel as the spaniards the first of Pharamond the 2. of Pepin and the 3. of Capetus which indureth vnto this present if it be not altered now by the exclusion that diuers pretend to make of the king of Nauarr and other Princes of the blood royal of the howse of Burbon Wherfore as I did before in the spaniards so I wil heere let passe the first ranke of al of the french kings for that some men may say perhaps that the common wealth and law of succession was not so wel setled in those dayes as it hath bin afterward in tyme of kinge Pepin Charles the great and ther discendantes as also for that it were in very deede ouer tedious to examine and pervse al three rankes of kings in France as you wil say when you shal see what store I haue to alleage out of the second ranck only which began vvith the exclusion and deposition of their lawful King Childerike the third and election of king Pepin as before you haue heard at large declared in the third chapter of this discourse it shal not be need ful to repeate the same agayne in this place Pepin then surnamed le brefe or the litle for his smale stature though he vvere a gyant in deeds being made king of France by mere election in the yeare of Christ 751. after 22. kings that had reigned of the first lyne of Pharamond for the space of more then three hundreth yeares and being so famous and worthy a king as al the world knoweth reigned 18. yeares then left his states and kingdomes by succession vnto his eldest sonne Charles surnamed afterward the great for his famous and heroical acts And albeit the vvhole kingdome of France appertayned vnto him alone by the law of succession as hath bin said his father being king and he his eldest sonne yet would the realme of France shew ther authority in his admission which Girard setteth downe in thes vvords Estant Pepin decedé les Francois esleurent Rois Charles Carlomon ses fils ala charge qu'ils partageroient entre eux egalement le royaume Which is king Pipin being deade the french men chose for ther kings his two sonnes Charles and Carlomon with condition that they should part equally betwene them the realme Wherin is to be noted not only the election of the common wealth besides succession but also the heauie condition laid vppon the heyre to part halfe of his kingdome vvith his yonger brother and the very same woords hath Eginard an ancient French writer in the life of this Charles the great
of the vvhole matter in manner following VVHAT ARE THE PRINCIPAL POINTS WHICH A COMMON-VVEALTH OVGHT to respect in admitting or excluding of any prince that pretendeth to succeede wherin is handlid largely also of the diuersitie of religions and other such causes CAP. IX AFTER the Ciuilian had alleaged al thes examples of succession altered or reiected by publique authoritie of common wealthes and of the allowance and approbation good successe vvhich for the most part god semeth to haue giuen vnto the same one of the company brake forth and said that this poynt appeared so euident vnto him as no doubt in the vvorld could be made therof I meane whether this thing in it selfe be lawful or no to alter sometymes the course of succession seing that al cōmon vvealthes of Christendome had donne it so often Only he said that it remayned somewhat doubful vnto him whether the causes alleaged in thes mutations and chainges before mentioned were alwayes sufficient or no for that sometymes they semed to him but weake and slender as when for example the vncle was preferred before the nephewes for that he vvas a man and the other children which cause and reason hath oftentymes byn alleaged in the former exāples both of Spaine Fraunce and Ingland as also vvhen the yonger or bastard brother is admitted the elder and legitimate excluded for that the one is a warrier the other not and other such like causes are yealded said he in the exclusions before rehearsed vvhich yet seme not some-tymes vvaighty enough for so great an affaire To this answered the Ciuilian that according to their law both ciuil and canon vvhich thing also he affirmed to be founded in great reason it is a matter most certayne that he vvho is iudge and hath to giue the sentence in the thing it selfe is also to iudge of the cause for therof is he called iudge and if he haue authority in the one good reason he should also haue power to discerne the other so as if vve graunte according to the forme proofes that the realme or common vvealth hath povver to admitt or put back the prince or pretender to the crowne then must vve also confesse that the same common vvealth hath authority to iudge of the lawfulnes of the causes and considering further that it is in ther owne affaire in a matter that hath his whole beginning continuance and substance from them alone I meane from the common wealth for that no man is king or prince by institution of nature as before hath bin declared but euery king and kings sonne hath his dignity and preheminēce aboue other men by authority only of the cōmon vvealth who can affirme the contrary said the Ciuilian but that god doth allow for a iust and sufficient cause in this behalfe the only vvil and iudgment of the weal publique it selfe supposing alwayes as in reason we may that a whole realme wil neuer agree by orderly vvay of iudgment for of this only I meane and not of any particuler faction of priuate men agaynst ther heyre appatēt to exclude or put back the next heyre in blood and succession without a reasonable cause in their sight and censure And seing that they only are to be iudges of this case as now I haue said vve are to presume that vvhat they determyne is iust and lawful for the tyme and if at one tyme they should determine one thing the contrary at an other as they did often in Ingland during the contention betwene York Lancaster and in other like occasions vvhat can a priuate man iudge otherwise but that they had different reasons and motions to leade them at different tymes and they being properly lords and owners of the vvhole busines committed vnto them it is enough for euery particuler man to subiect himselfe to that vvhich his common vvealth doth in this behalfe and to obey simply without any further inquisition except he should see that open iniustice vvere donne therin or God manifestly offended and the fealme indangered Open iniustice I cal said he when not the true common wealth but some faction of wicked mē should offer to determine this matter vvithout lawful authority of the realme committed to them and I cal manifest offence of God and danger of the realme when such a man is preferred to the crowne as is euident that he wil do vvhat lyeth in him to the preiudice of them both I meane bothe of Gods glory and the publique wealth as for example if a Turke or Moore as before I haue said or some other notorious wicked man or tyrant should be offered by succession or otherwise to gouerne among Christians in which cases euery man no doubt is bound to resist vvhat he can for that the very end and intent for which al gouermēt vvas first ordeyned is herein manifestly impugned Thus the Ciuilian discoursed and the whole company seemed to like very vvel therof for that they said his opinion appeared both prudent and pious and by this occasiō it came also presently in question vvhat vvere the true causes and principal points which ought to be chiefly regarded as wel by the commō wealth as by euery particuler man in this great action of furthering or hindering any Prince towards a crowne And they said vnto the Ciuilian that if he vvould discusse in like manner this pointe vnto them it would be a very apt and good cōclusion to al his former speach and discourses vvhich hauing bin of the authority that weale publiques haue ouer princes titles this other of the causes and considerations that ought to lead them for vse and excercise of the same authority would fal very fit and necessary for the vp short of al. Heerunto the Ciuilian answered that he wel saw the fitnes and importance of the matter and therefore that he was content to speak a word or two more therof notwithstāding that much had bin said alredy therin to witt in al those pointès which had bin disputed about the end of gouerment and why it vvas appoynted which ende said he seing it is as largely hath bin proued before to defend preserue and benifite the common wealth heer hence that is from this consideration of the weal publique are to be deduced al other considerations of most importance for discerning a good or enel prince For that whosoeuer is most likely to defend preserue and benifite most his realme and subiects he is most to be allowed and desyred as most conforme to the end for vvhich gouerment was ordeyned And on the contrary side he that is least like to do this deserueth least to be preferred and heer quoth he you see doth enter also that consideration mentioned by you before which diuers common vvealthes had in putting back oftentymes children impotēt people though otherwise next in blood from succession and pteferring more able men though further of by discent for that they were more like
ancient lyne of Lancaster ther vvant not noble houses vvith in the realme at this day issued thence before the cōttouersie fell out betweene yorke this family of vvhich controuersie how it rose and how it vvas continued I shall now begyn to make more particuler declaration taking my begining from the children of king Edward the third who vvere the causers of this fatal dissention OE THE SVCCESSION OF INGLISH KINGES FROM KING EDVARD THE THIRD VNTO OVR dayes with the particuler causes of dissention betweene the families of yorke and Lancaster more largly declared CAP. III. KING Edward the third surnamed by the English the victorious though he had many children wherof some dyed vvithout issue vvhich appertaine not to vs to treat of yet had he fiue sonnes that lest issue behinde them to wit Edward the eldest that was prince of Wales surnamed the black Prince Leonel duke of Clarence vvhich vvas the 2. sonne Iohn of Gant so called for that he vvas borne in that citye that vvas the third sonne and by his wife was duke of Lancaster and fourthly Edmond surnamed of Langley for that he was also borne ther and vvas duke of Yorke last of al Thomas the fift sonne surnamed of Woodstocke for the same reason of his birth and vvas duke of Glocester Al these fiue dukes being great princes and sonnes of one king left issue behinde them as shal be declared and for that the discendents of the third and fourth of these sonnes to wit of the dukes of Lancaster and Yorke came afterward to striue who had best title to reigne therof it came that the controuersie had his name of these two familes vvhich for more distinctiō sake the better to be knowne tooke vppon them for their ensignes a rose of two different colures to wit the white rose and the redd as al the vvorld knoweth wherof the vvhite serued for Yorke and the redd for Lancaster To begyn then to shew the issue of al these fiue princes it is to be noted that the two elder of them to wit prince Edward and his second brother Leonel Duke of Clarence dyed both of them before king Edward their father and left each of them an heyre for that Prince Edward left a sonne named Richard vvho succeded in the crowne immediatly after his grādfather by the name of king Richard the secōd but aftervvard for his euel gouerment vvas deposed and dyed in prison vvithout issue and so vvas ended in him the succession of the first sonne of king Edward The second sonne Leonel dying also before his father left behind him one only daughter and heyre named Phillip who was marryed to one Edmond mortimer Earle of march and he had by her a sonne and heyre named Roger mortimer vvhich Roger had issue two sonnes named Edmond and Roger which dyed both without children and one daughter named Ann mortimer vvhich was marryed vnto Richard Plantaginet earle of Cambrige second sonne vnto Edmond Langly duke of Yorke vvhich duke Edmond vvas fourth sonne as hath bin said vnto king Edward the third and for that this Richard Plantaginet marryed the said Anne as hath bin saide hereby it came to passe that the house of Yorke ioyned two titles in one to wit that of Leonel duke of Clarence vvhich was the secōd sonne of K. Edward the third that of Edmond langly duke of yorke which vvas the fourth sonne and albeit this Richard Plantaginet him selfe neuer came to be duke of Yorke for that he was put to death whiles his elder brother lyued by king Henry the fift for a conspiracy discouered in South hampton against the said king vvhen he vvas going ouer into france vvith his army yet he left a sonne behind him named also Richard vvho afterward came to be duke of Yorke by the death of his vncle vvhich vncle vvas 〈◊〉 soone after in the battel of Egēcourt in France this Richard began first of al to prosecute openly his quarrel for the title of the crowne against the house of Lancaster as a litle afterward more in particuler shal be declared as also shal be shewed how that this 2. Richard duke of Yorke being slame also in the same quariel left a sonne named Edward earle of march who after much trooble gat to be king by the name of king Edward the 4. by the oppression and putting downe of king Henry the 6. of the house of Lancaster and was the first king of the house of Yorke vvhose geuealogie vve shal lay downe more largly aftervvards in place conuenient And nowe it followeth in order that vve should speak of Iohn of Gaūt the third sonne but for that his discent is great I shal first shew the discent of the fifth and last sonne of king Edward who vvas Thomas of Woodstock duke of Glocester and earle of Buckingham that vvas put to death afterward or rather murthered wrongfully by order of his nephew king Richard the second and he left only one daughter and heyre named Anna vvho vvas marryed to the L. Stafford vvhose familie aftervvard in regard of this marriage came to be dukes of Bucking ha vvere put downe by king Richard the third and king Henry the eight albeit some of the blood and name do remayne yet stil in Ingland And thus hauing brought to an end the issue of three sonnes of king Edward to wit of the first second fift touched also some what of the fourth ther resteth to prosecute more fully the issues discēts of the third fourth sonnes to vvit of Iohn of Gaunt duke of Lācaster and of Edmond Langly duke of Yorke which are the heades of these two noble families which thing I shal do in this place vvith al breuity and perspecuity possible begining first vvith the house of Lancaster Iohn of Gaunt third sonne of king Edward being duke of Lancaster by his wife as hath bin said had three wiues in al and by euery one of them had issue though the bishop of Rosse in his great Latin arbor of the genealogies of the kings of Ingland printed in Parris in the yeare 1580. assigneth but one wife only to this Iohn of Gaunt and consequently that al his childen were borne of her which is a great and manifest error and causeth great confusion in al the rest which in his booke of the Queene of Scots title he buyldeth hereon for that it being euident that only the first wife vvas daughter and heyre of the house of Lancaster and Iohn of Gant duke therof by her it followeth that the children only that vvere borne of her can pretend properly to the inheritance of that house and not others borne of Iohn of Gaunt by other wiues as al the vvorld vvil confesse First then as I haue said this Iohn of Gaunt marryed Blanch daughter and heyre of Henry duke of Lancaster and had by her one sonne only and two daughters The sonne was called Henry earle first of Darby
vvhich end being taken away or peruerted the king becommeth a tyrant a Tigar a fearse Lion a rauening wolfe a publique enimy and a bloody murtherer vvhich vvere against al reason both natural and moral that a common wealth could not deliuer it selfe from so eminent a distruction By authority also you haue heard it proued of al law-makers Philosophers Lawyers Diuines and Gouernours of common vvealthes vvho haue set downe in their statutes and ordonances that kings shal sweare and protest at their entrance to gouerment that they vvil obserue and performe the conditions their promised otherwise to haue no interest in that dignity soueraintie By examples in like manner of al realmes christian he declared how that often-tymes they haue deposed their princes for iust causes and that God hath concurred and assisted wonderfully the-same sending them commonly very good kings after those that vvere depriued and in no country more then in Ingland it selfe yea in the very lyne and familye of this king Richard vvhose noble grand-father king Edward the third vvas exalted to the crowne by a most solemne deposition of his predecessor king Edvvard the second vvherfore in this point their can be litle controuersie and therfore vve shal passe vnto the second vvhich is vvhether the causes vvere good and iust for which this king Richard vvas esteemed vvorthy to be deposed And in this second pointe much more difference their is betwixt Yorke and Lancaster and betwene the vvhite rose and the redd for that the house of Yorke seeking to make the other odious as though they had entred by tyrannie cruelty doth not stick to auouch that king Richard vvas vniustly deposed but against this the house of Lancaster alleageth first that the howse of Yorke cā not iustly saye this for that the chiefe prince assistant to the deposing of king Richard vvas lorde Edmond hymselfe duke of Yorke and head of that familie together with Edward earle of Rutland duke of Aumarle his eldest sonne and heyre yea and his yonger sonne also Richard earle of Cambrige father to this Richard that now pretēdeth for so do write both Stow Hollingshead and other chroniclers of Ingland that those princes of the howse of Yorke did principally assist Hēry duke of Lancaster in getting the crowne and deposing king Richard Polidor speaking of the wicked gouerment of king Richard and of the first cogitation about deposing him vvhen king Henry of Lancaster vvas yet in France banished and seemed not to thinke of any such matter he hath these words Sed Edmundo Eboracensium duei eares cum primis bilem commouit quod rex omnia iam iura peruerteret quòd antea parricidio postea rapinis se obstrinxisset c. That is this matter of the wicked gouerment of king Richard did principally offend his vncle Edmond duke of Yorke for that he saw the king novv to peruert al law and equity and that as before he had defiled himselfe vvith parricide that is with the murther of his owne Vncle the duke of Glocester brother to this Edmond so now he intangled himselfe also vvith rapine in that he tooke by violence the goods and inheritance of Iohn ofGaunt late deceased vvhich did belong to Henry duke of Lancaster his cosen germaine by which wordes of Polidor as also for that the duke of Lancaster cōming out of Britayne accompaned only with three score persons as some stories say chose first to goe into Yorke-shire and to enter at Rauenspurr at the mouthe of Humber as al the vvorld knoweth which he would neuer haue done if the princes of Yorke had not principally fauoured him in that action al this I say is an euident argumēt that these princes of the house of Yorke were then the chiefe doers in this deposition and consequently cannot alleage now with reason that the said Richard was deposed vniustly Secondly the house of Lancaster alleageth for the iustifying of this deposition the opinions of al historiographers that euer haue written of this matter vvhether they be Inglish French Duch Latine or of any other nation or language vvho al with one accord do affirme that king Richards gouerment vvas intolerable he worthy of deposition wherof he that wil se more let him reade Thomas of Walsingham and Iohn Frosard in the life of king Richard Thirdly they of Lancaster do alleage the particuler outrages and insolences of king Richards gouerment and first the suffring himselfe to be carryed away with euil counsel of his fauorites and thē the peruerting of al lawes generally vnder his gouerment as before you haue hard out of Polidor the ioyning vvith his my niōs for opressing the nobility of which Stow hath these vvordes The king being at Bristow with Robert de Vere duke of Ireland Michael de la Pole Earle of Suffolke deuised how to take away the duke of Glocester the earles of Arundel VVarwick Darby and Notingham and others whose deathes they conspired thus sayeth Stow. And soone after they executed the most par of their deuises for that Thomas of Woodstock duke of Glocester vvas made away vvithout law or processe the earle of Arundel also vvas put to death and VVarwick vvas banished and so was also Thomas Arundel Archbishop of Canterbury by like injustice and the like was done to Henry duke of Hereford and after of Lancaster and among other insolences he suffred Robert Vere to dishonour and put from him his vvife a noble and goodly yong Lady as Stow sayeth and borne of Lady Isabel king Richards aunt that vvas daughter to king Edward the third and suffred Vere to marry an other openly to her disgrace and dishonour of her kynred And finaly in the last parlament that euer he held which vvas in the 21. yeare of his reigne commonly called the euel parlament he would needs haue al authority absolute graunted to certaine fauourits of his which Thomas Walsingham saith were not aboue 6. or 7. to determine of all matters vvith al ful authority as if they only had bin the vvhole realme vvhich vvas nothing in deede but to take al authority to him selfe only and Stow in his chronicle hath these wordes following This parlameut began about the 15. of September in the yeare 1397. at the beginning wherof Edward Stafford Bishop of Exceter Lord Chancellor of Ingland made a proposition or sermon in which he affirmed that the power of the king was alone and perfit of it selfe and those that do impeatch it were worthy to suffer paine of the law c. thus saith Stow by al vvhich is euident how exorbitant and contrary to al law and equity this kinges gouerment vvas Fourthly and lastly those of Lancaster do alleage for iustifying of this depriuation that duke Henry vvas called home by expresse lettres of the more and better part of al the realme and that he came vvholy in a manner vn-armed considering his person for that
frosard sayeth he had but three shippes only out of Britanie and Walsingham saith he had but 15. Lances and 400. footmen and the additions to Polychronicon as before I noted do auouch that when he landed at Rauenspurt in the county of Yorke he had but threescore men in al to begin the reformation of his realme against so potent a tyrant as King Richard was then accompted and yet vvas the concourse of al people so great and general vnto him that within few dayes he achiued the matter and that without any battaile or bloodshed at al thus much for the iustnes of the cause But now if we vvil consider the manner and forme of this act they of Lancaster do affirme also that it could not be executed in better nor more conuenient order First for that it vvas done by the choise and inuitation of al the realme or greater and better parte therof as hath bin said Secondly for that is vvas done vvithout slaughter and thirdly for that the king vvas deposed by act of parlament and himselfe conuinced of his vnworthy gouerment and brought to confesse that he vvas vvorthely depriued and that he vvillingly and freely resigned the same nether can their be any more circumstances required saye these men for any lavvful deposition of a Prince And if any man wil yet obiect and saye that notwithstanding al this their vvas violence for that duke Henry was armed and by force of armes brought this to passe they of Lancaster do answere that this is true that he brought the matter to an Roboam for the sinnes of Salomon his father and yet spare him also in parte for the sake of his grand father Dauid he caused a rebellion to be raysed against him by Ieroboam his seruant and more then three partes of foure of his people to rebell against him and this by Gods owne instinct and motion and by his expresse allowance therof after it vvas done as the scripture auoucheth and if Roboam had fought against them for this fault as once he had thought to do and vvas prepared vvith a mayne army no doubt but they might haue lawfully stayne him for that now these tenn tribes that for-sooke him had iust authority to depose him for his euel gouerment and for not yealding to their iust request made vnto him for easing them of those greuous tributes laid vppon them as the scripture reporteth For albeit God had a meaning to punish him for the sinnes of his father Salomon yet suffred he that Roboam also should giue iust occasion him selfe for the people to leaue him as appereth by the story and this is Gods highe vvisdome iustice prouidence and swete disposition in humane affaires An other example of punishing and deposing euel Princes by force they do alleage out of the first booke of kings wher God appointed Elizens the Prophet to send the sonne of an other Prophet to annoynt Iehu Captaine of Ioram king of Israel vvhich Ioram was sonne to the Queene Iezabel and to persuade Iehu to take armes against his said king and against his mother the Queene and to depriue them both not only of their kingdomes but also of their liues and so he did for the scripture saith Coniurauit ergo Iehu contra Ioram Iehu did coniure and conspite at the persuasion of this Prophet vvith the rest of his fellow Captaines against his king Ioram and Queene Iezabel the kinges mother to put them downe and to put them to death with al the ignomy he could deuise and God allowed therof and perswaded the same by so holy a Prophet as Elizeus vvas wherby we maye assure our selues that the fact was not only lawfull but also most godly albeit in it selfe it might seeme abhominable And in the same booke of kings within two chapters after there is an other example how God moued loiada high priest of Ierusalem to persuade the Captaines and Coronels of that cittye to conspire against Athalia the Queene that had reigned 6. yeares and to arme them selues with the armor of the temple for that purpose and to beseige the pallace wher she lay and to kill al them that should offer or goe about to defend her so they did and hauing taken her aliue she vvas put to death also by sentence of the said high priest and the fact vvas allowed by God and highly commended in the scripture and Ioas yong king of the blood royal was crowned in her place al this might haue bin done as you see without such trouble of armes bloodshed if God vvould but he appointed this seueral meanes for working of his wil and for releeuing of common wealthes oppressed by euel princes And this seemeth sufficient proofe to these men that king Richard of Ingland might be remoued by force of armes his life and gouerment being so euel and pernitious as before hath bin shewed It remayneth then that vve passe to the second principal pointe proposed in the begining vvhich was that supposing this depriuation of king Richard vvas iust and lawful vvhat house by right should haue succeded him ether that of lācaster as it did or the other of Yorke And first of al it is to be vnderstood that at that very tyme vvhen king Richard vvas deposed the house of Yorke had no pretence or little at al to the crowne for that Edmond Mortimer earle of march nephew to the lady Phillip vvas then aliue with his sister Anne Mortymer marryed to Richard earle of Cambrige by vvhich Anne the howse of Yorke did after make their clayme but could not do so yet for that the said Edmond her brother was liuing and so continued many yeares after as appeareth for that wee reade that he vvas aliue 16. yeares after this to witt in the third yeare of the raigne of king Henry the fift vvhen his said brother in law Richard earle of Cambrigs vvas put to death in South-hampton vvhom this Edmond appeached as after shal be shewed and that this Edmond vvas now earle of March when king Richard vvas deposed and not his father Roger as Polidot mistaketh is euident by that that the said Roger vvas slayne in Ireland a litle before the depositiō of King Richard to witt in the yeare 1398. and not many monethes after he had bin declared heyre apparent by king Richard and Rogers father named Edmond also husband of the lady Phillip dyed some three yeares before him that is before Roger as after wil be seene so as seing that at the deposition of king Richard this Edmond Mortimer elder brother to Anne was yet liuing the question cannot be whether the house of Yorke should haue entred to the crowne presently after the depriuation of kinge Richard for they had vet no pretence as hath bin shewed but whether this Edmond Mortimer as heyre of Leonel duke of Clarence or els Henry the duke of Lancaster heyre of Iohn of Gaunt should haue entred For as for
the house of Yorke their was yet no question as appereth also by Stow in his chronicle vvho setteth downe how that after the said deposition of Richard the Archbishop of Canterbuty asked the people three tymes whom they would haue to be their king vvhether the duke of Yorke their standing present or not and they answered no and then he asked the seronde tyme if they vvould haue his eldest sonne the duke of Aumaile and they said no he asked the third tyme yf they would haue his yongest-sonne Richard earle of cambridge and they said no. Thus writeth Stow vvher-by it is euident that albeit this earle of Cabridge had married now the sister of Edmōd Mortimer by whom his posterity claymed afterward yet could he not pretend at this tyme her brother being yet aliue who after dying vvithout issue left al his right to her by her to the house of Yorke for albeit this earle Richard neuer came to be duke of Yorke for that he vvas beheaded bv king Henry the fift at Southampton as before hath 〈◊〉 said vvhile his elder brother vvas a lyue yet left he a sonne named Richard that after hym came to be duke of Yorke by the death of his vncle Edmund duke of Yorke that dyed vvithout issue as on the other side also by his mother Anne Mortimer he vvas earle of March and was the first of the house of Yorke that made title to the crowne So that the question now is whether after the deposition of king Richard Edmond Mortimer nephew remoued of Leonel which Leonel vvas the second sonne to king Edward or els Henry duke of Lancaster sonne to Iohn of Gaunt which Iohn vvas third sonne to king Edward should by right haue succeded to king Richard and for Edmond is alleaged that he was heyre of the elder brother and for Hēry is said that he vvas neerer by two degrees to the stemme or last king that is to say to king Richard deposed then Edmond was for that Henry vvas sonne to king Richards vncle of Lancaster and Edmond was but nephew remoued that is to say daughters sonnes sonne to the said king Richards other vncle of Yorke And that in such a case the next in degree of consanguinitie to the last king is to be preferred though he be not of the elder lyne the fauourers of Lancaster alleage many proofes wher of some shal be touched a litle after we haue seene the same practized in our dayes in France where the Cardinal of Burbone by the iudgement of the most part of that realme was preferred to the crowne for his propinquity in blood to the dead king before the king of Nauarre though he were of the elder lyne Moreouer it is alleaged for Henry that his title came by a man and the others by a vvoman vvhich is not so much fauoured either by nature law or reason and so they saye that the pretenders of this title of lady Phillippe that vvas daughter of duke Leonel neuer opened their mouthes in those dayes to clayme vntil some 50. yeares after the deposition death of king Richard Nay more ouer they of Lancaster say that sixteene yeares after the deposition of king Richard vvhen king Henry the fift vvas now in possession of the crowne cerrayne noble mē especially Richard earle of Cambridge that had marryed this Edmond Mortimers sister offred to haue slayne king Henry and to haue made the said Edmōd Mortymer kinge for that he was discended of duke Leonel but he refused the matter thinking it not to be according to equitie and so vvent and discouered the whole treason to the king wheruppō they vvere al put to death in Southampton within fowre or fiue dayes after as before hath bin noted and this hapened in the yeare 1415. and from hence foreward vntil the yeare 1451. and thirreth of the reigne of king Henry the sixt vvhich vvas 36 yeares after the execution done vppon these conspirators no more mention or pretēce was made of this matter at vvhat tyme Richard duke of Yorke began to moue troobles about it againe Thus say those of the house of Lancaster but now these of Yorke haue a great argument for themselues as to them it seemeth vvhich is that in the yeare of Christ 1385. and 9 yeare of the reigne of king Richard the second it vvas declared by act of parlament as Polidor writeth that Edmond Mortimer vvho had marryed Phillip daughter heyre of Leonel duke of Clarence and was grandfather to the last Edmond by me named should be heyre apparent to the crowne if the king should chance to dye without issue To which obiection those of Lancaster do answere first that Polidor doth err in the person when he sayeth that Edmond husband of lady Philippe was declared for heyre apparent for that his Edmond Mortimer that married lady Philippe dyed peacably in Ireland three yeares before this parlament vvas holden to witt in the yeare of Christ 1382. as both Hollings head Stow and other chroniclets do testifie and therfore Polidor doth erre not only in this place about this man but also in that in an other place he sayeth that this Edmond so declared heyre apparent by king Richard vvas slayne by the Irish in Ireland 12. yeares after this declaration made of the succession to vvit in the yeare 1394. vvhich vvas in deede not this man but his sonne Roger Mortimer heyre to him and to the Lady Phillip his wife vvho vvas declared heyre apparent in the parlament afore said at the instance of king Richard and that for especial hatred malice as these men say vhich he did beate against his said vncle the duke of Lancaster and his sonne Henry vvhom he desired to exclude from the succession The cause of this hatred is said to be for that presently vppon the death of prince Edvvard father to this Richard which prince dyed in the yeare of Christ 1376. and but 10. monethes before his father king Edward the third their vvanted not diuers learned and vvise men in Ingland that were of opinion that Iohn of Gaunt duke of Lancaster eldest sonne then liuing of the said king Edward should haue succeded his father iure propinquitatis before Richard that vvas but nephew and one degree further of then he but the old king vvas so extremly affectionate vnto his eldest sonne the blacke prince Edward newly dead that he vvould not heare of any to succede him as Frosard saith but only Richard the said princes sonne Wherfore he called presently a parlament vvhich vvas the last that euer he hold and therin caused his said nephew Richard to be declared heyre apparent and made his three sonnes then liuing that were vncles to the youth to vvitt Iohn of Gaunt duke of Lancaster and Edmond Langhly duke afterward of Yorke and Thomas woodstock duke of Glocester to sweare fealtie vnto Richard as they did And albeit Iohn of Gaunt al his life
after for keping of his oth that he had made vnto his father neuer pretended any right to the crowne yet king Richard knowing vvel the pretence that he and his might haue vvas stil afraid of him and sought infinite meanes to be rydd of him first by perswading him to goe and make vvarr in Spaine vvher he thought he might miscarry in so dangerous an attempt and then offering to giue him al Aquitaine if he vvould leaue Ingland to goe liue there as he did for three yeares vvith extreme peril for that the people of Aquitaine would not receaue him but rose against him and refused his gouerment and vvould not admitt him for their Lord but appealed to the king vvho also allowed therof and so vvhen Iohn of Gaunt came home into Ingland againe kinge Richard thought no better way to vveaken him then to banish his sonne Henry duke of Herford and so he did And besides this the said king Richard practised also by diuers secret drifts the death of his said vncle the duke of Lancaster as Walsingham witnesseth and vvhen the said duke came at lenghte to dye which vvas in the 22. yeare of king Richards raigne he vvrote such ioyous letters therof as frossard saith to his father in law the sixt Charles king of France as though he had bin deliuered of his chiefest enemy not immagining that his owne distructioÌ„ was so neere at hand and much accelerated by the death of the said duke as it was And these vvere the causes say the fauorers of the house of Lancaster why king Richard caused this acte of parlament to passe in fauour of Roger Mortimer in preiudice of the house of Lancaster and not for that the right of earle Mortimer vvas better then that of the duke of Lancaster And this they say is no new thing for princes often tymes to procure partial lawes to passe in parlament for matter of succession according to their owne affections for the like say they did Edward the third procure in the fauour of this Richard as before I haue shevved in the last parlament before his death and afterward againe king Richard the third vvith much more open 〈◊〉 caused an act of parlament to passe in his dayes vvherby his nephew Iohn de la pole earle of Lincolne sonne to his sister Elizabeth duchesse of Suffolke vvas declared heyre apparent to the crowne excluding therby the children of his two elder brothers to vvit the daughters of king Edward the fourth and the sonne and daughter of Georg duke of Clarence vvhich yet by al order should haue gone before their sisters children And like facilitie founde king Henry the 8. to get the consent of two parlaments to giue him authority to appointe what successor he would of his owne kynred by which authority afterward he apointed by his testament as in an other place shal be shewed that the issue of his yonger sister mary should be preferred before the issue of his eldest sister Margaret of Scotland A like declaration was that also of king Edward the sixt of late memory vvho appointed the lady Iane Gray his cosen germane remoued to be his heyre and successor in the crowne of Ingland and excluded his owne tvvo sisters the lady Mary and the lady Elizabeth from the same but these declaratioÌ„s make litle to the purpose vvhen right and equity do repugne as these men say that it did in the fore said declaratioÌ„ of Roger Mortimer to be heyre apparent for that they hold and auow the house of Lancaster to haue had the true right to enter not only after the death of king Richard the second as it did but also before him that is to say immediatly vppon the death of king Edward the third for that Iohn of Gaunt vvas then the eldest sonne which king Edward had lyuing and neerer to his father by a degree then vvas Richard the nephew About vvhich pointe to wit vvhether the vncle or the nephew should be preferred in succession of kingdomes it seemeth that in this age of K. Edward the third there vvas great trouble and controuersy in the world abroad for so testifieth Girard du Haillan Counceler and secretary of France in his story of the yeare of Christ 1346. vvhich vvas about the middest of king Edwards reigne and therfore no maruaile though king Edward tooke such care of the sure establishing of his nephew Richard in succession as is before related And much lesse maruail is it if king Richard had stil great ielosy of his vncle the duke of Lancaster and of his ofspring considering how doubtful the question vvas among the wise and learned of those dayes For more declaration vvher-of I thinke it not amisse to alleage the very vvordes of the foresaid chronicler with the examples by him recited thus then he vvriteth About this tyme sayeth he their did arise a great and doubtful question in the world whether vncles or nephewes that is to say the yonger brother or els the children of the elder should succed vnto realmes and kingdomes vvhich coÌ„trouersy put al christianity into great broyles and troobles For first Charles the secoÌ„d king of Naples begar of Mary his wife Queene and heyre of Hungary diuers children but namely three sonnes Marrel Robert and Phillip 〈◊〉 dying before his father left a sonne named Charles vvhich in his grandmothers right vvas king also of Hungary but about the kingdome of Naples the question vvas vvhen king Charles was dead who should succeed him either Charles his nephew king of Hungary or Robert his second sonne but Robert vvas preferred and reygned in Naples and enioyed the earldome of Prouince in France also for the space of 33. yeares vvith great renowne of valor wisdome And this is one example that 〈◊〉 recounteth vvhich example is reported by the famoê° lawyer 〈◊〉 in his commentaries touching the succession of the kingdome of Sicilia and he saith that this succession of the vncle before the nephew vvas auerred also for rightful by the learend of that tyme and confirmed for inst by the iudicial 〈◊〉 of Pope Boniface and that for the reasons which afterward shal be shewed vvhen vve shal treat of this question more in particuler An other example also reporteth Girard vvhich 〈◊〉 immediatly after in the same place for that the forsaid king Robert hauing a sonne named Charles which dyed before 〈◊〉 he left a daughter and heyre named Ioan neece vnto king Robert which Ioan was married to Andrew the yonger sonne of the foresaid Charles king of Hungary but king Robert being dead ther stept vp one Lewis prince of Tarranto a place of the same kingdome of Naples who vvas sonne to Phillip before mentioned vonger brother to king Robert vvhich Lewis pretending his right to be better then that of Ioan for that he vvas a man and one degree neerer to king Charles his grand father then Ioan was for that he was nephew
of three bretheren the elder dye without issue and the second leaue a sonne yet in the inheritance and succession of the crowne it goeth otherwise as by al the former eight examples haue bin shewed and this is the first they saye about the common law The second pointe which they affirme is that the ground of our common lawes consisteth principally and almost only about this pointe of the crowne in custome for so say they we see by experience that nothing in effect is written therof in the common law and al old lawyers do affirme this pointe as vvere Ranulfus de Granuilla in his booke of the lawes and customes of Ingland vvhich he vvrote in the tyme of king Henry the second and Iudge Fortescue in his booke of the prayse of Inglish lawes vvhich he compiled in the tyme of king Henry the sixt and others Wherof these men do inferr that seing there are so many presidēts and examples alleaged before of the vncles case preferred before the nephew not only in forayne countryes but also in Ingland for this cause I saye they do affirme that our cōmon lawes cannot but fauour also this title and cōsequently must needs like vvel of the interest of Lancaster as they auouch that al the best old lawyers did in those tymes for example they do record two by name of the most famous learned men vvhich those ages had who not only defended the said title of Lancaster in those dayes but also suffred much for the same The one vvas the forenamed iudge Fortescue Chancelor of Ingland and named father of the common lawes in that age vvho fled out os Ingland vvhith the Queene vvife of king Henry the sixt vvith the prince her sonne and liued in banishment in france vvhere it seemeth also that he vvrote his learned booke intituled de laudibus legum Angliae And the other vvas Sir Thomas Thorope chiefe Baron of the excheker in the same reigne of the same king Henry the sixt vvho being aftervvard put into the tower by the Princes of the house of Yorke for his eger defence of the title of Lancaster remayned ther a long tyme and after being deliuered was beheaded at hygate in a tumulte in the dayes of king Edward the fourth These then are the allegations which the fauourers of the house of Lācaster do lay downe for the iustyfying of that title affirming first that Iohn of Gaunt duke of Lancaster ought to haue succeded his father K. Edward the third immediately before king Richard and that iniury vvas done vnto him in that king Richard vvas preferred And secondly that king Richard vvere his right neuer so good vvas iustly orderly deposed for his euil gouerment by lawful authority of the common wealth And thirdly that after his deposition Henry duke of Lancaster sonne heyre of Iohn of Gaunt vvas next in succession euery vvay both in respect of the right of his father as also for that he vvas two degrees neerer to the king deposed then vvas Edmond Mortimer descended of Leonel duke of Clarence and these are the principal and substancial proofes of their right and title But yet besides these they do add also these other arguments and cōsiderations following first that vvhat soeuer right or pretence the house of Yorke had the princes therof did forfeit and leese the same many tymes by their cōspiraces rehellions attainders as namely Richard earle of Cambrige that married the lady Anne Mortimer and by her tooke his pretence to the crowne vvas conuicted of a conspiracy against king Henry the fift in Southampton as before I haue said and there vvas put to death for the same by iudgment of the king and of al his peeres in the yeare 1415. the duke of Yorke his elder brother being one of the iury that condēned him This earle Richards sonne also named Richard comming afterward by the death of his vncle to be duke of York first of al made open clay me to the crowne by the title of Yorke But yet after many othes sworne and broken to king Henry the sixt he was attaynted of treason I meane bothe he and Edward his sonne then earle of march which aftervvard vvas king vvith the rest of his ofspringe euen to the nynth degree as Stow affirmeth in a parlament holden at Couentry in the yeare 1459. and in the 38. yeare of the reigne of the said king Henry and the very next yeare after the said Richard was slayne in the same quarrel but the honse of Lācaster say these mē was neuer attainted of any such crime Secondly they saye that the house of Yorke did enter only by violence by infinite blood-shedd and by wilful murthering not only of diuers of the nobilitie both spiritual and temporal but also of both king Hēry the sixt hym self and of prince Edward his sonne and by a certaine populer and mutinous election of a certaine few souldiers in Smithfield of Lōdon and this vvas the entrance of the howse of Yorke to the crowne vvheras king Henry the fourth first king of the house of Lancaster entred vvithout bloodshedd as hath bin shewed beinge called home by the requestes and letters of the people and nobility and his election admission to the crowne vvas orderly and authorized by general consent of parlament in the doing therof Thirdly they alleage that king Hēry the sixt put downe by the house of Yorke was a good and holy king and had reigned peaceably 40 yeares and neuer committed any act vvorthy deposition vvheras king Richard the second had many waies deserued the same as him selfe came to acknowledge and ther vppon made a personal solemne and publique resignation of the said crowne vnto his cosen Henry of Lancaster the which iustified much the said Henries entrance Fourthly they alleage that the housa of Lancaster had bin in possession of the crowne vppon the pointe of 60. yeares before the house of Yorke did raise trouble vnto them for the same in vvhich tyme their title was confirmed by many parlaments othes approbations and publique acts of the common vvealth and by the nobles peeres and people therof and by the states both spiritual and temporal and vvith the cōsent of al foraine nations so that if there had bin any fault in their first entrance yet vvas this sufficient to authorize the same as we see it vvas in the title of king William the Conqueror and of his two sonnes king William Rufus and king Henry the first that entred before their elder brother and of king Iohn that entred before his nephew of his sonne king Henry the third that entred after his fathers depriuation and after the election of prince Lewis of france as also of Edward the third that entred by deposition of his owne father of al which titles yet might there haue bin doubt made at the begining but by tyme and durance of possession and
by confirmation of the commō wealth they were made lawful vvithout controuersie Fiftly they say that if we consider the fowre king Heuryes that haue bin of the house of Lancaster to vvit the 4. 5. 6. and 7. and do compare thē vvith the other fower that haue bin of the house of York to wit Edward the fourth Richard the third Henry the eight Edward the sixt al their acts both at home abroade vvhat quietnes or troobles haue passed what the common wealth of Ingland hath gotten or lost vnder each of them vve shal finde that God hath seemed to prosper and allow much more of those of Lancaster then of those of Yorke for that vnder those of Lancaster the realme hath enioyed much more peace and gayned far greater honor and enlarged more the dominions of the crowne then vnder those of Yorke and that it had done also much more if the seditions rebellions and troobles raysed and brought in by the princes of the house of Yorke had not hindered the same as saye these men it vvas euidently seene in the tyme of king Henry the sixt when their contention against the princes of the house of Lancaster vvas the principal cause vvhy al the English states in France vvere lost and what garboiles and troubles at home haue ensued afterwards and how infinite murthers and man slaughters vvith chainge of nobility haue bin caused hereby and increased aftervvard vnder the gouerment and rule of the princes of Yorke neadeth not say these men to be declared One thing only they note in particuler vvhich I vvil not omit and let it be the sixt note and that is that the princes of Yorke haue not only bin rigorous and very bloody vnto their aduersaires but also among themselues and to their owne kynred vvhich these men take to be a iust punishment of God vppon them And for proofe heerof they alleage first the testimonie of Polydor vvho albeit he vvere a great aduocat of the house of Yorke as before hath bin noted for that he liued and vvrote his story vnder king Henry the eight yet in one place he breaketh foorth into these wordes of the princes of this house Cum non haberent iam inimicos in quos soeuitiam explerent saturarent in semetipsos crudelitatem exercuerunt proprioque sanguine suas pollure manus When these princes now had brought to destruction al those of the house of Lancaster so as they had no more enimyes vppon vvhom to fill and satiat their crueltie then began they to exercise their fiersnes vppon themselues and to embrevv their handes with their owne blood thus far Polidor Secondly they do shew the same by the deedes of both sides for that the loue vnion trust confidence fayth fulnes kyndnes and loyaltie of the princes of Lancaster the one tovvardes the other is singuler and notorious as may appeare by the acts and studious endeuours of the lord Henry bishop of Winchester and Cardinal and of the lord Thomas duke of Excester and marques of Dorset brothers of king Henry the fourth to vvhom and to his children they were most faythfull frendly and loyal as also by the noble proceedings of the lordes Thomas duke of Clarence Iohn duke of Bedford and Humfrey duke of Glocester sonnes of the foresaid Henry the fourth and brothers of king Henry the fist the first of vvhich three gaue his blood in his seruice the other two spent their whole liues in defence of the dignity of the Inglish crowne the one as regent of France the other as protector of Ingland by the worthy acts also and renomed fayth fulnes of the dukes of Somerset cosen germans to the said king Henry the fourth and to his children and the proper ancestors of king Henry the seuenth al vvhich dukes of Somerset of the house of Lancaster being fiue or six in number did not only as Polydor sayeth assist and helpe their soueraine and the vvhole realme Vigilijs curis pcriculis that is to saye with watchfulnes cares and offering themselues to dangers but also fower of them one after an other to with Edmond with his three sonnes Henry Edmond and Iohn wherof two successiuely after him vvere dukes of Somerset and the other marques dorset were al fower I say as so many Machabyes slayne in the defence of their country and family by the other factiō of the house of Yorke which thing say these men shewed euidently both a maruelous confidence that these men had in their quarrel as also a great blessing of God towards that familie that they had such loue and vnion among them selues But now in the house of Yorke these men endeuour to shew al the contrary to witt that there vvas nothing els but suspition hatred emulations among themselues and extreme crueltie of one against the other and so vve see that as soone almost as Edward duke of Yorke came to be king George duke of Clarence his yonger brother conspired against him did help to driue him out againe both from the realme and crowne In recompence vvherof his said elder brother afterward notwithstanding al the reconciliation and many othes that passed betweene them of new loue and vnion caused him vppon new grudges to be taken murthered priuily at Calis as al the world knoweth And after both their deathes Richard their third brother murthered the two sonnes of his said elder brother and kept in prison vvhiles he liued the sonne and heyre of his second brother I meane the yong earle of Warwick though he were but a very child vvhom king Henry the seuenth aftervvard put to death But king Henry the eight that succeded them passed al the rest in crueltie toward his owne kynred for he weeded out almost al that euer he could finde of the blood royal of York and this either for emulation or causes of meere suspicion only For first of al he behedded Edmond de la Pole duke of Suffolk sonne of his owne aunt lady Elizabeth that was sister to king Edward the fourth vvhich Edward vvas grand father to king Henry as is euident The like distruction king Henry vvent about to bring to Richard de la Pole brother to the said Edmond if he had not escaped his handes by flying the realme whom yet he neuer ceased to pursue vntil he vvas slayne in the battel of Pauia in seruice of the king of Frāce by whose death vvas extinguished the noble house of the de la Poles Agayne the said king Henry put to death Edward duke of Buckingham high constable of Ingland the sonne of his great Aunt sister to the Queene Elizabeth his grādmother and therby ouerthew also that vvorthy house of Buckingham after againe he put to death his cosen germaine Henry Courtney marques of Excester sonne of the lady Catherin his Aūt that vvas daughter of king Edward the fourth and attainted iointly vvith him his
which is a token that they esteemed his title of Lancaster sufficient of it selfe to beare away the crowne albeit for better ending of strife he tooke to vvife also the lady Elizabeth heyre of the howse of Yorke as hath bin said and this may be sufficient for the present in this controuersie OF FIVE PRINCIPAL HOVSES OR LINAGES THAT DOOR MAY PRETEND TO THE CROWNE of Ingland which are the houses of Scotland Suffolke Clarence Britanie and Portugal and first of al of the house of Scotland which conteyneth the pretentions of the king of Scottes and the Lady Arbella CAP. V. HAVING declared in the former chapter so much as apparteyneth vnto the general controuersie betweene the two principal houses and royal families of Lancaster and Yorke it remayneth now that I lay before you the particuler chalenges claymes and pretentions which diuers houses and families descended for the most part of those two haue among themselues for their titles to the same Al which families may be reduccd to three or fower general heades For that some do pretende by the house of Lancaster alone as those families principally that do descend of the line royal of Portngal some other do pretende by the howse of Yorke only as those that are descended of George duke of Clarence second brother to K. Edward the fourth Some agayne wil seeme to pretend from both howses ioyned together as al those that descende from king Henry the seuenth vvhich are the houses of Scotland and Suffolke albeit as before hath appeared others do deny that these families haue any true part in the house of Lancaster which pointe shal afterward be discussed more at large And fourthly others do pretend before the two houses of Yorke and Lancaster were deuided as the Infanta of Spayne duchesse of Sauoy the prince of Lorayne such others as haue descended of the house of Britanny and France of al vvhich pretences pretendors vve shal speake in order and consider vvith indifferencie vvhat is said or alleaged of euery side to and fro begining first with the house of Scotland as with that which in common opinion of vulgar men is taken to be first and neerest though others denye it for that they are descēded of the first and eldest daughter of king Henry the seuenth as before in the third chapter hath bin declared First then two persons are knowne to be of this house at this daye that may haue action clayme to the crowne of Ingland the first is Lord Iames the sixt of that name presently king of Scotland who descendeth of Margaret eldest daughter of king Henry the seuēth that vvas married by her first marriage to Iames the fourth king of Scots by him had issue Iames the fift and he agayne the lady Mary mother to this king now pretendant The second person that may pretend in this house is the lady Arbella descended of the selfe same Queene Margaret by her secōd marriage vnto Archibald Douglas earle of Anguis by vvhom she had Margaret that vvas married to Mathew Steward earle of Lenox and by him had Charles her second sonne earle of Lenox vvho by Elizabeth daughter of Syr William Candish knight in Ingland had issue this Arbella now aliue First then for the king of Scots those that do fauour his cause wherof I confesse that I haue not founde very many in Ingland do alleage that he is the first and cheefest pretendor of al others and next in succession for that he is the first person that is descended as you see of the eldest daughter of king Henry the seuenth and that in this discent ther cā no bastardy or other lawful impediment be auowed vvhy he should not succeede according to the priority of his pretention and birth And moreouer secondly they do alleage that it would be greatly for the honor and profit of Ingland for that hereby the two Realmes of Ingland and Scotland should come to be ioyned a pointe lōge sought for and much to be wished and finally such as are affected to his religion do adde that hereby true religion wil come to be more setled also and established in Ingland which they take to be a matter of no smale consequence and consideration and this in effect is that vvhich the fauourers of this prince do alleage in his behalfe But on the other side there want not many that do accompt this pretence of the king of Scots neither good nor iust nor any waye expedient for the state of Ingland and they do answere largely to al the allegations before mentioned in his behalfe And first of al as cōcerning his title by neernes of succession they make litle accompt therof both for that in it selfe they saye it may easily be ouerthrowne and proued to be of no validitie as also for that if it were neuer so good yet might it for other considerations be reiected and made frustrate as our frend the Giuil lawyer hath largely learnedly proued these dayes in our hearing To begin then to speake first of the king of Scots title by 〈◊〉 of blood these men do affirme that albeit there be not alleaged any ba stardy in his discent from K. Henry the seuēth his daughter as there is in her second marriage against the lady 〈◊〉 yet are there other reasons enough to 〈◊〉 and ouerthrow this clay me and pretention and first of al for that he is not say these men of the house of Lancaster by the lady Blanch the only true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as before hath in 〈◊〉 bin shewed and shal be aftervvard more largely but only by Catherin Swinford whose children being vn lawfully begotten and but of the halfe blood whether they may by that legitimation of parlament that vvas giuen them be made inheritable vnto the crowne before the lawful daughter of the whole blood shal be discussed afterward in place conuenient when we shal talke of the house of Portugal but in the meane space these men do presume that the king of Scots is but only of the house of Yorke and then affirming further that the title of the house of Lancaster is better then that of Yorke as by many argumētes the fauorers of Lācaster haue indeuored to shew in the former chapter they do inferr that this is sufficient to make voide al clayme of the king of Scots that he maye pretende by neernes of blood especially seing there wāt not at this day pretēders enough of the other house of Lācaster to clayme their right so as the howse of Yorke shal not neede to enter for fault of true heyres and this is the first argumēt which is made against the Scotish king al the rest of his linage by the fauourers and followers of the said house of Lancaster A second Argument is made against the said kings succession not by them of Lancaster but rather by those of his owne house of Yorke vvhich is founded vppon his forraine birth by
the auersion and natural alienatiōn of that people from the Inglish and their ancient inclination to ioyne with the Frēch Irish against vs maketh it yery probable that that subiection of theirs to the crowne of Ingland vvould not loug indure as by expetience we haue feene since the tyme of king Edward the first vvhen after the death of their king Alexander the third without issue they chose king Edward to be their king deliuered their townes and fortresses into his hands did sweare him fealty receaued his deputy or viceroy as Polidor at large declareth And yet al this serued afterward to no other effect but only slaughter bloodshed and infinyt losses and charges of Ingland Thirdly they saye that if the king of Scots should come to possesse the crowne of Inglād he cannot choose at least for many yeares but to stand in great ielousy of so many other competitors of the Inglish blood royal as he shal finde in Ingland against whom he must needes fortifie him selfe by those other forayne natiōs that may be presumed to be most sure vnto him though most contrary by natural inclination least tollerable in gouermēt to Inglish men as are the Scots of whom he is borne and danes vvith vvhom he is allyed and French of vvhom he is descended and of the vnciuil part ofIreland vvith vvhom one great piece of his realme hath most coniunction the authority sway of which fower nations in Ingland and ouer Inglish-men vvhat trouble it may worke euery vvise man may easely coniecture Besides that the Scots-men themselues specially those of the nobility do openly professe that they desire not this coniunction and subordination vnto Ingland which in no wise they can beare both for the auersion they haue to al Inglish gouerment ouer them as also for that their liberties are far greater as now they liue then in that case it would be suffred their king coming heerby to be of greater power to force them to the forme of Inglish subiection as no doubt but in tyme he would And seing the greatest vtility that in this case by reason and probability can be hoped for by this vnion is that the Scotish nation should come to be aduanced in Inglād and to be made of the nobility both temporal and spiritual of the priuy councel and of other lyke dignities of credit and confidence for otherwise no vnion or amitie durable can be hoped for and considering that the king both for his owne safetie as before hath bin said as also for gratitude and loue to his owne nation and allied frends must needs plant them about him in chiefe place of credit vvhich are most opposite to Inglish natures and by litle litle through occasion of emulations and of controuersies that vvil fal out daylie betwixt such diuersity of nations he must needes secretlie begin to fauour and fortifie his owne as we reade that William Conqueror did his Normannes and Canutus before him his Danes to the incredible calamity of the Inglish nation though otherwise neither of them vvas of themselues either an euil king or enimye to the Inglish blood but driuē hereunto for their owne saftie and for that it vvas impossible to stand neutral in such national contentions if al this I say fel out so then as vve know it did and our ancestors felt it to their extreme ruine what other effect can be hoped for now by this violent vnion of nations that are by nature so disunited and opposite as are the Inglish Scotish Irishe Danishe Frenche other on them depending vvhich by this meanes must needs be planted together in Ingland And if vve reade that the vvhole realme of Spayne did refuse to admitt S. Lewis king of France to be their king in Spayne to vvhom yet by law of succession it vvas euident confessed by the spaniards themselues as their chronicler Garibay writeth that the right most clearly dyd appertayne by his mother lady Blanch eldest daughter and heyre of K. Alonso the nynth and that they dyd this only for that he vvas a Frenchman and might therby bring the french to haue chiefe authority in Spayne and if for this cause they did agree together to giue the kingdome rather to Ferdinando the third that was sonne of Lady Berenguela yonger sister to the said lady Blanch and if this determination vvas thought at that tyme to be vvife and prouident though against al right of lineal succession and if vve see that it had good successe for that it indureth vnto this day what shal vve say in this case say these men vvhere the king in question is not yet a S. Lewis nor his title to Ingland so cleere as that other vvas to spayne and the auersion betwixt his nation and ours much greater then vvas that betwixt the french and Spanish thus they do reason Agayne we heard out of the discourse made by the Ciuilian before how the states of Portugal after the death of their king Don Ferdinando the first of that name vvho left one only daughter and heyre named lady Beatrix married vnto Iohn the first king of Castile to whō the succession of Portugal vvithout al controuersie did apertaine they rather determyned to chose for their king a bastard brother of the sayd Don Fernando named Iohn then to admitt the true inheretor Beatrix vvith the gouerment of the Castilians by vvhom yet they being much the richer people the Portugals might hope to reape far greater vtility then Inglish men can do by Scotland considering it is the poorer country and nation And this is that in effect which these men do answere in this behalfe noting also by the way that the Romās themselues vvith al their power could neuer bring vnion or peace betweene thease two nations of Ingland Scotlande nor hold the Scots and North-Irish in obedience of any authority residing in Ingland and so in the end they vvere enforced to cut them of to make that famous walle begun by Adrian and pursued by other Emperours to diuide them from Inglād and barre them from ioyning as al the vvorld knoweth and much lesse shal any one king liuing in Ingland now hold them al in obedience let him be of vvhat nation he vvil and this for the vtility that may be hoped by this vnion But now for the other pointe alleaged by the fauourers of Scotland about establishmēt of true religion in Ingland by entrance of this king of Scots these other mē do hold that this is the vvoorst and most dangerous pointe of al other considering vvhat the state of religion is in Scotland at this day and how different or rather opposite to that forme which in Ingland is mainteyned and vvhen the Archbishopes bishopes deanes archdeacons and other such of ecclesiastical and honorable dignities of Ingland shal consider that no such dignity or promotion is left now standing in Scotland no nor any cathedral
also of the houses of Scotland Suffolke that hold likewise of the house of Yorke and that for the reasons and argumēts vvhich in the former two chapters I haue set downe in particuler against euery one of them and shal here-after also againe those that remaine vvhich arguments and obiections or any of them if they should not be founde sufficient to exclude the said other houses then is the clayme of this house of Huntington therby made voide for that it is as vve see by the yonger childe of the house of Yorke that is to saye by the second brother so as if either the pretence of Lancaster in general be better thē that of Yorke or if in the house of Yorke it selfe any of the fornamed pretenders descended frō K. Edward the fourth as of the elder brother may hold or take place then holdeth not this title of Clarence for that as I haue said it cōming from the yonger brother must needes be grounded only or principally vppō the barring and excluding of the rest that ioyntly do pretēd of which barres and exclusions laid by this house of Clarence against the rest for that I haue spoken sufficiētly in the last two chapters going tefore for so much as toucheth the two houses of Scotland and Suffolk and shal do afterwards about the other two of Britanie and Portugal I meane in this place to omit to say any more therin only to consider vvhat the other competitors do alleage against this house of Clarence and especially agaynst the pretence of the earle of Huntington as chiefe titler therof for to the excluding of him do concurr not only those other of opposite houses but also the Pooles of his owne house as now vve shall see First then the contrary houses do alleage generally against al this house of Clarence that seing their clayme is founded only vppon the right of the daughter of George duke of Clarence second brother to K. Edward the fourth euident it is that so long as any lawful issue remayneth of any elder daughter of the said king Edward the elder brother as they say much doth and cannot be denyed no clayme or pretence of the yonger brothers daughter can be admitted and so by standing vppon this and answering to the obiections alleaged before against the elder houses they hold this matter for very cleere and al pretence of this house of Clarence vtterly excluded Secondly the same opposite houses do alleage diuers attainders against the principal heades of the house of Clarence vvherby their vvhole interests vvere cut of as namely it is to be shewed in three discents the one after the other to vvit in duke George himselfe the first head beginner of this house that was attainted and executed and then in the lady Margaret his daughter and heyre countesse of Salisbury and in like manner attaynted and executed thirdly in her sonne and heyre Henry Poole lord Monrague put also to death from vvhose daughters both the earle of Huntington his brethren vvith the children of Syr Thomas Barrington do descende and albeit some may say that the said house of Clarence hath bin since those attainders restored in blood yet reply these men that except it can be shewed that particuler mention was made of reabiliting the same to this pretence of succession to the crowne it vvil not be sufficient as in like manner they affirme that the same restoring in blood if any such were hath not bin sufficiēt to recouer the ancient landes and titles of honor which this house of Clarence had before these attainders for that they were forfeited therby to the crowne and so say these men was their forfeited therby in like manner vnto the next in blood not attainted this prerogatiue of succeeding to the crowne and cannot be restored againe by any general restauration in blood except special mention be made therof euen as vve see that many houses attainted are restored daylie in blood without restoremēt of their titles and dignities and a present example we haue in the earle of Arundel restored in blood but not to the title of duke of Norfolke and this saye the opposite houses against this house of Clarence But now thirdly entreth in also against the earle of Huntington the opposition of some of his owne house vvhich is of the issue of Syr Geffrey Poole brother to his grād father vvho say that vvhen the lord Henry Montague vvas put to death vvith his mother the countesse of Salisbury and therby both their pretences and titles cut of in them then fel al such right as they had or might haue vppō the said Sir Geffry Poole and not vppon his neece the lady Catherin daughter of the lord Henry his elder brother and mother of the earle of Huntingtō and this for three causes First for that he was not attainted and so vvhether we respect his grand-father duke George of Clarence or his great grand father duke Richard of York the saide right in this respect discended to him and secondly for that he vvas a degree neerer to the said dukes his ancestors then vvas at that tyme his neece Catherine vvhich right of neerest propinquitie say these men is made good lawful by al the reasons examples presidēts and authorities alleaged before in the fourth chapter of this conference in fauour of vncles before their nephewes and it shal not neede that vve speake any thing more of that matter in this place but only to remit your remembrance to that vvhich herein hath bin said before Fourthly they proue the same in fauour of Syr Geffrey for that the lady Catherin vvas a vvoman and Syr Geffrey a man vvhose priuilege is so great in a matter of succession as also hath bin touched before that albeit they had bin in equal degree and that Syr Greffrey were not a degree before her as he vvas yet seing neither of thē nor their fathers vvere euer in possessiō of the thing pretended Sir Geffrey should be preferred as hath bin shewed before by some presidents and shal be seene afterward in the case of Portugal wherin the king of Spaine that now is vvas preferred to the crowne for that respect only that his competitors vvere vvomen and in equal degree of discent vvith him and he a man And the very like allegation of propinquitie I haue hard produced for the lady Wenefred vvife of Syr Thomas Barrington if she be yet a-liue to wit that she is before the earle of Huntington and his brethrē by this reason of propinquitie in bloode for that she is one degree neerer to the stock then they Fiftly and lastely both these and other cōpetitors do alleage against the earle of Hūntington as an important and sufficient barr against his pretence the qualitie of his religion vvhich is as they say that he hath bin euer knowne to fauour those which commonly in Ingland are called Puritanes and not fauoured by the state but yet this
in his description of those countryes the whole wealth and riches of the world seemed to slow thither and I my selfe can remember to haue seene such exceding abundance in very ordinairy men of this country both for their dyet apparrel furniture of house and the like as was wonder ful besides that for their nobilitie they were al great Princes for that euery one had his prouince or great towne in gouerment which they ruled whith that pompe and honor as if they had bin absolute lordes themselues by reason of the farr distance of their supreme Prince and so they were receaued whith publique honor of al citties and townes their charges borne wheresoeuer they passed as such high estates are wont to be And albeit they had euer commonly a strainger for supreme gouernor among them vnder their kinge which bare the name to be aboue them yet did he in deed nothing but as they would haue him and this partly for that his time of gouerment being but short he alwaies attended principally to gett the good willes of the people and to hold them contented and therby to be grat-ful to his king at his returne home and partly also for that if he should attempt to do any thing against their myndes and liking they made reply by their president and Chancelor and other of their owne Councelers residing for the Flemish nation in the court of Spayne for this nation hath alwaies a particuler councel ther about the king as al other forayne nations also haue that are vnder him and by this meanes they obteyned lightly what they would and brought the gouernor to what they pleased so as in effect they were absolute kings in themselues wrought their willes in euery thing this in that tyme while the country was quiet But now since their reuolt which hath indured almose these foure or fiue and twenty yeares what hath succeded surely their hath not a quarter so many bin punished or put to death in al these yeares by order of Iustice of their king absent as before I haue shewed that there were in one day by their owne earles and dukes when they were present that vppon far lesse occasion and cause giuen then are these for if we take away the two noble men Egmond and Horne put to death at the beginning of these Flemish troobles by the duke of Alua for which some men say also that he had no thanke afterward by the king no man of importance hath bin since executed and the cheefest townes that haue bin and are agaynst the king in Holland and Zeland are suffred vntil this day to traffique freely into Spayne and yet we know that for a little beginning of a certayne tumult this last yeare past in Spayne it selfe to wit in the kingdome of Aragon many heades haue bin stroken of and much iustice done where of then riseth this differēce no doubt for that the Flemmings are straingers far of and the other neere at home natural borne so as this circumstance of being a stranger and dwelling far of doth them great pleasure and giueth them priuilege aboue the homborne subiects The like I might shew for this matter of punishment in the fore said states of Italie where if a mā do compare the number of them that were put to death pulled downe or afflicted by order of Iustice and other wise at the commandement of the Prince in tyme of their owne home-borne kings with that which hath bin since especially of the nobility you shal not finde one for twenty and the reason of this is for that their owne kings were absolute and had to giue accompt to no man of their doings and for that they were men and had their passions and emulations with the nobilitie and might put the same in execution without accompt or controlment they pulled downe set vp at their pleasure and made oftentymes but a iest of noblemens liues and deathes but now these that are gouernours viceroyes for a forraine prince first they haue not so great authority or comission as to touch any such principal persons liues whithout giuing relation therof first vnto their king councel and receaue againe particuler order for the same and then they knowing that after their three yeares gouermēt is ended they must be priuate men againe and stay their 40. dayes as subiects vnder the next new gouernour to giue a reconning of their doings against al that shal accuse them which in these countryes they call to make their residence they take heede what they doe and whom they offend so as the condition of nobility is far different vnder such a strainge gouerment as this is termed then vnder a natural Prince of their owne country which oppresseth them at his pleasure But now to draw neer homward if we wil examine and considerer what hath passed in Ingland in this point of massacring our nobility by our domestical Princes it is a matter lamentable for it may seeme that they haue serued oftentymes for our Princes to make disport to play whith their heades And to let passe al those which in tyme of warres rebellions comotions haue bin cut of which occasions may seeme more iustifiable I do read also in our chronicles that 2 Sangue freddo as the Italian sayth that is to say in tyme of peace and by execution of iustice at the Princes appoyntment these noblemen following and knyghts by name were put to death with in the space of one fiue yeares in king Henry the fourth his dayes The duke of Excester the duke of Surrey the Archbis hop of Yorke the earles of Salisbury of Glocester of Worcester and of Huntington The earle mowbray earle marshal The Baron of Kinderton S. Roger Clarington bastard sonne of Edward the black Prince S. Thomas Blunr S. Barnard Rocas S. Richard Vernon And agayne soone aftervnder king Edward the fourth in almost whith in as litle space The dukes of Somerset and of Excester The earles of Deuonshire of Oxford and of Keyns The Lord Rosse the Lord Molyns S. Thomas Tudingham S. Phillip Wentworth S. Thomas fyndam and many others afterward for this was but at the beginning of his reigne which number of nobility if a man should haue seene them aliue together with their traynes before they had bin put downe he would haue said they had bin a very goodly company pitiful that so many of our owne nobilitie should be brought by our own Princes to such confusion But yet this matter may seeme perhapps the lesse maruelous and more excusable vnder those two kings for that troobles and contentions had passed a little before in the realme about the succession and heervppon so many of the nobility might be cut of but let vs see then what ensued afterwards when thinges were established and al doubt of contention about the succession taken away as in king Henry the eight his dayes it was and yet do
now it standeth and for the publique good not only of the common subiects but also of the nobility and especially and aboue others of the Inglish competitors and pretendors that cannot al speede no vvay vvere so commodious as this to avoid bloodshed to wit that some external Prince of this tyme should be admitted vppon such compositions and agreements as both the realme should remayne whith her ancient liberties and perhapps much more then now it enioyeth for such Princes commonly vppon such occasions of preferment vvould yeeld to much more in those cases then a homborne Prince vvould and the other pretenders at home also should remayne vvhith more security then they can wel hope to do vnder any Inglish competitor if he come to the crowne who shal be continually egged on by his owne kynred and by the auerhon emulation and hatred that he hath taken alredy by contention against the other opposite houses to pul them downe and to make them away and so we haue seene it by continual examples for many yeares though no occasion say these men hath euer bin offied to suspect the same so much as now if any one of the home Inglish blood be preferred before the rest and this is so much as they say to this second kinde of being vnder forrayne Princes To the third they confesse that it standeth subiect to much danger and inconuenience to admit a forayne Prince to liue among vs with forces either present or so neere as that without resistance he may call them when he listeth and of this their needeth no more proofe say these men then the examples before alleaged of the Danes and Normans and the misery and calamity which for many yearee the Inglish passed vnder them and further more the reason heerof is euident say these men for first in this third kinde of admitting a strainger king we are depriued by his dwelling amongest vs of those vtilities before mentioned which Ireland Flanders Britanie Naples and other states enioy by liuing far of from their Princes which commodities are much more libertie and freedome lesse payments lesse punishments more imployments of the nobility and others in gouerment and the like And secondly by his comming armed vnto vs we cannot expect those commodities vvhich before I touched in the second kynd of forraine gouerment but rather al the incommodities and inconueniences that are to be found either in domestical or foraine gouerments al I saye do fall vppon this third manner of admitting a stranger as easily shal be seene For first of al the greatest incommodities that can be feared of a domestical Prince are pride crueltie partiality pursuing of factions and particuler hatred extraordinary aduansing of his own kynred pressing pynching and ouer rigorous punishing of his people without feare for that he is euer sure of his partie to stand whith him within the realme and so hath he the lesse respect to others and for that al these inconueniences and other such like do grow for the most part by the Princes continual presence among his subiects they are incident also to this other though he be a strainger for that he is also to be present and to liue among vs and so much the more easely he may fall into them then a domestical Prince for that he shal haue both external coūcel of a people that hateth vs to prick him forward in it as also their external power to assist him in the same which two motiues euery domestical Prince hath not Agayne they say that the woorst greatest incommodities of a forraine gouerment that may be feared are tyranny and bringing into seruitude the people ouer whō they gouerne and filling of the realme with straingers and deuiding to them the dignities riches and preferments of the same al which they say are incident also by al probability to this third kinde of forraine gouermēt where the Prince strainger lyueth present and hath forces at hand to woorke his vvil and this is the case say they of the king of Scotts who only of any forraine pretender semeth may iustly be feared for these and other reasons alleaged before when we talked of his pretence to the crowne To conclude then these men are of opinion that of al these three manners of being vnder straingers or admitting forraine gouerments this third kynde 〈◊〉 as it vvere to the kinge of Scottes case is to be only feared and none els for as for the second they say that it is not only not to be feared or abhorred but rather much to be desyred for that of al other sortes it hath the least inconueniences and most commodities for which causes we read and see that wher kings goe by election commonly they take straingers as the Romans and Lacedemonians did often at the beginning and after the beginning of the Roman Monarchie their forraine borne Emperors were the best and most famous of al the rest as Traian and Adrian that were Spaniards Septimius Seuerus borne in Africa Constantine the great natural of Ingland and the like and the very woorst that euer they had as Caligula Nero Heliogabolus Commodus and such other like plagues of the weale publique were Romans and in our dayes and within a few yeares we haue seene that the Polonians haue chosen three kings straingers one after an other the first Stephen Battorius Prince of Transiluania the second Henry of France and last of al the Prince of Swecia that vet liueth and the state of Venetians by way of good polliei haue made it for a perpetuall Law that when they haue warr to make and must needs choose a general Captayne and commit their forces into his handes he must be a stranger to wit some Prince of Italie that is out of their owne states heerby to auoyde partiality and to haue him the more indifferent and equal to them al which yet so many prudent men vvould neuer agree vppon if there vvere not great reason of commodities therin so as this point is concluded that such as speake against this second kinde of hauing a forrayne Prince speake of passion or inconsideration or lacke of experience in matters of state and common vvealthes As for the first manner of being vnder foraine gouerment as a member or prouince of an other bigger kingdome and to be gouerned by a deputie viceroy or strange gouernour as Ireland Flanders Naples and other states before mentioned be vvith certayne and stable conditions of liberties and immunities and by a forme of gouerment agreed vppon on both sides these men do confesse also that their may be arguments reasons and probabilities alleaged on both sides and for both parties but yet that al things considered and the inconueniences hurtes and dangers before rehearsed that subiects do suffer also oftentymes at the handes of their owne natural Princes these men are of opinion for the causes alredy declared that the profittes are more and far greater then the damages or
with the course of that Lord hitherto and do thinke that they should do much better with his brother if so be he shal be thought more fitt yet are thease things vncertaine as we see but not withstanding such is the nature and fashon of man to hope euer great matters of youthes especially Princes God send al iust desires to take place and with this I wil ende and passe no further hoping that I haue performed the effect of my promisse made vnto you at the beginninge FINIS A â—â—rfect and exact Arbor and geneaâ—â—gie of al the Kynges Queenes and Prinâ—â—â— of the blood royal of EnglaÌ„d from the tâ—me of William the conqueror vnto our tâ—â—e wherby are to be seene the groundes oâ—â— the pretenders to the same crowne at thiâ—â—aye accordinge to the booke of M. R. Dâ—â—man set foorthe of the sayde pretenders and their seueral claymes this present yeare 1594. The ancient howses of the blood royal of England are the howse of Lancaster that beareth the redd rose and the howse of Yorke that beareth the vvhyte and then the howse of Britanie and France ioyned in one And out of these are made fiue particular howses which are the howse of ScotlaÌ„d of Suffolke of Clarence of Britanie of Portugal and in these are twelue different persons that by waye of succission do pretende eche one of theÌ„ to be next after her Maiestie that now is as by the booke appeareth Polyd in vita H. s. OccasioÌ„s of meeting The matter of succession discussed M. Bromely M. V VeÌ„rvvorth Tvvo lavvers Many pre tendors to the crovvne of InglaÌ„d SuccessioÌ„ doubtful vvhy Three or fovver principal heades of praetendors 1. Lancaster 2. Yorke 3. The tvvo houses ioyned Circumstances of the tyme present The Roman conclaue SuccessioÌ„ includeth also some kinde of election Of this more aftervvards Cap 4. 5. Neernes only in blood not sufficient More to be considered besides succession in the pretendors Tvvo principal pointes handled in this booke Tvvo partes of this conference Bellay apollog pro reg cap. 20. Not only successioÌ„ sufficient That no perticuler forme of gouermeÌ„t is of natu re To liue in company is natural to man the grouÌ„d of al com moÌ„ vvealthes Plato de repub Cicero de repub Aristotle polit Diuers praefes 1. InclinatioÌ„ vniuersal Pompon Mesa lib. 3. cap. 3. 4 Tacit. l. 8. 2. Aristot. l. 1. pol. c. 1. 2. 3. 4. Imbecilility of man Theoph. lib. de Plaut Plu tarch coÌ„de fortuna lib. de pietatem in parent Note this saying of Aristotle 4. The vse of iustice and FreÌ„ship Cicero lib. de amicitia The vse of charity helping one an other August lib. de amicitia Gen. 2. v. 18. That gouermeÌ„t iurisdiction of Magestrats is also of nature Necessity Iob 10. v. 12. 2. Consent of natioÌ„s Cicero li. 1. de natu ra DeoruÌ„ 3. The ciuil lavv Lib. 1. digest tit 2. 1. Scripture Prou. 2. Rom. 13. Particuler forme of gouermeÌ„t is free Arist. li. 2. polit Diuersitie of gouerment in diuers coÌ„tryes and tymes Rome Africa Greece Italie Dukes for kings and kings for dukes Spayne Boeme Polonia England The Ievves lib. Genes Lib. Exo. Lib. Iob. Lib. Iud. Lib. 1. Reg. Lib. Machab The realme chuseth her forme of gouermeÌ„t The common vvealth limiteth the gouernors authority A Natural Prince A monarchy the best gouerment A rist li. 4. pol. a. c. 9. Seneca Plutarch The antiquity of Monarchy 1 Reg. 8. Dionys. Haly l. 5. Cornel. Tacit. l. 3. Cicero l. 1. Offic. Hierom. l. 2. epist. 12 Chrisost. ho. 23. 1. Pet. 2. Tvvo poyntes to be noted Hovv S. Peter calleth a king most excellent Vtilites of a kingdome and in conueniences of other gouermentes Cicerol x offic Democratia Miseries of populer gouerment in Italy Aristocratia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 30. Eutrop. l. 3. Oros. l. 5. 6. The cause vvhy lavves be added to Kings Arist. l. 3. pol. c. vlt. A notable saying Arist. l. 3. Pol. c. 12. Arist. l. 1. Pol. c. 2. Diuers names propeties of lavves Cie lib. 2. offic Lavv is the discipline of a vveale pu blique Psal. 2. The CouÌ„cels of Princes a great healp Arist. l. 4. Pol. c. 10. The monarchie of Inglad reÌ„pered The restraints of kingly po vver in al estates Roman Kings Liu. lib. 1. dec 1. Grecian kings Arist. li. 2. c. 8. polit Plutarch in Lycurg Cic. lib. 2. 〈◊〉 Ciclib 3. de 〈◊〉 Restraints of kingdomes in Europe Sleydan lib. 8. An. 1532. Blond Di cad 2. li. 3 Crant li. cap. 25. Kingdomes of polonia and Boemia Herbert li. 9. hist. Polon Cromerus lib. 3. Hist. Polon Kinges of Spayne Fraunce and Ingland Concil blet 4. c. 74. coÌ„cil s. c. 3. Peculiar manner of succession An. 1340. Paul Anil hist. Franc. l. 2. Gerard. du Hayllan lib. 14 hist. FraÌ„c Fran. Belfor llb. 5. cap. 1. An. 1327. Reasons for succession of vvomen The infanta of Spayne Prince of Lorayne Gerard du Haillan Lib. 13. Hist. FraÌ„c Anno 1317. lib. 14. An. 1328. lib. 3. de l'Estat defrunaee Kings lavvfully possessed may be depriued A markable circuÌ„stance Agaynst rebellious people and contemnors of Princes 〈◊〉 flateries 〈◊〉 by Bellay others Belloy in apolog cath apolog pro rege The purpose of the next Chapter Tvvo pointes to be proued Nothing hear spokeÌ„ against devv respect to Princes Depriuations of kings recounted in scriptu re 1. Reg. 31. 4. Reg. 21. 44. King Iosias 2. Paralip 34. 〈◊〉 2. Paralip 35. King Dauid XenophoÌ„ in Cyropaed Nich. Machal l. 2. c. 2. in Tit. Liuius August l. de Gran. The vvisdome and piety of King Dauid 1. Paralip 15. 1. Psal. 24. 25. Thearmes of King Dauid His valor in chiualry King Dauides victoires 2. Reg. 8. Paral. 18 〈◊〉 2. Reg. 23 Ioseph l. 7 antiq c. 10 2. Reg. 7. His humi lity charity and dc uotion Kings pur doune among the romaÌ„s vvhat successors they had Halicar l. 1. Tertul. li. de praescrip contta haeres Iustin. martyr apolog Tit. liu li. 1. dec 〈◊〉 Eutrop. l. 1. Caesar Au gustus Dion in Caesa. Sueton in Caesa. Nero Vespatian Cornel. Tacit. lib. 20. 21. Egesip l. 5 Eutrop. in vita Caesa. Heliogabolus An. DnÌ„i 124. Alius laÌ„p in vita Heliog AlexaÌ„der Seuerus Herod in vit seuen MaxeÌ„tiua Constantin The chan ge of the east empy re Charles the greate An. 800. Tvvo changs in France Belfor l. 1 Girard l. 3 AEmil l. 2 Clem. Baudin en la chro mique des Roys de France Reasons of depriuation Hugo 〈◊〉 anno 988. Examples of Spayne Concil Tolet. 4. cap. 4. Ambros moral 1. II cap. 17. Isidor in 〈◊〉 hispan Esteuan de Garibay 1. 13 de la hist. de Espa. c. 15. Tabulae Astron. Alfonsinae King Don Alonso deposed Don Pedro cruel deposed Garibay l. 14. c. 40. 41. In Portugal King DoÌ„ Sancho 2. deposed Garibay lib. 4 de hist. Portug c. 19. Lib
primogenitura Genes 15 49 Deut. 21. 15. 2. Patalip 21. 3. Exod. 3. 2. Rom. 9. 13. Genes 28 27. Tvvo points to be noted Genes 29 49. Exod. 1. 2. Reg. 5. 1. Paral. 3. Tvvo cases resolued The remede of inconueniences by succession Election succession do helpe the 〈◊〉 thothen Ansvver to the 〈◊〉 principal questions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be 〈◊〉 VVhat an heyre apparent is before 〈◊〉 coronatiō Examples of tnatiage VVhat respect is devv to an heyre apparent VVhy Princes do cōpt ther yeares from the death of ther predecessors Girard de Haillan l. 3. de l'estate pag. 241. No heyre apparent K. before his coronation An euident Argument A rare example of King Henry V. Polydor. virg lib. 22. hittor Angliae in vita Henrici V. Stovv in the beginning of the life of king Henry V. Notes of this act 2. 3. 4. Admissiō of more importan ce then successiō See ther lastvvords to ther frendes in Sir Tho Moore Stovv VVhy diuer kings caused ther sonnes to be crovvned in ther ovvne dayes Hirrd du Haillan lib. 6. hist. an 1001. An. 1032. An. 1061. An. 1131. An. 1180. 3. Reg. 1. Polyd. Stovv in vita Henrici 11. The occasion of the next chapter The Ciuilian cloyed vvith copy Obiectiēs The example of the Ievves 3. Reg. 8. King Saule 2. Reg. 2. 21. An obiection ansevered 2. Reg. 9. King Dauid made by electiō 2. Reg. 2. 5. Psal. 131. 2. Paral. 6. Adonias the elder sonne relected 3. Reg. 1. The motiues of Adonias 〈◊〉 to King Dauid to make Salomō his successor 3. Reg. 1. The coronation of Salomon 〈◊〉 Reg. 1. A poynt to be noted The manner of admission of the prince Roboam 3. Reg. 12. 3. Reg. 11. 5. Reg. 12. 21. Foure races of Spanish Kings Ambros. moral Lib. 11. 〈◊〉 c. 12. 2. Race Ambros. moral lib. 13. c. 3 Moral lib. 37. e. 42. 43. 44. 3. Race Garibay lib 20. c. 〈◊〉 4. 〈◊〉 Examples of the first race Concil Tol. 3. c. 3. Conc. tol 4. cap. 74. Examples of the 2. race Episcop Tuyens l. 1. histoin Ludou de Molin li. de hared King Don Pelayo Ambros Mor 1. 13. cap. 6. 9. 10. Sebast. Epise Salam in hift Hisp. K. Don Alonso y Dö fruela Moral li 13. cap. 17 An. 768. Many breaches of succession Moral e. 21. King Don Aurelio King Don Sile. King Don Alonso the chast Mor I 15. cap. 25. A strange deliberation Great authoritie of comon vvealth K. Alonso the chast reyneth the secōd tyme. Moral e. 28. 29. An. 791. Moral li. 13. cap. 45 46. Anno 842. A horible tribute King Dō Ramiro 1 by election Moral e. 51. The kingdom of Spayne a Maiorasgo K. Don Ordonio An. 924. Moral 1. 16. cap. 1. An. 924. Don Alonso 4. Don Ramiro Moral lib. 19 cap. 20. An. 930. Don Ordonio 3. An. 950. Don Sancho 1. Moral l. 16. cap. 29 An. 950. Mor. l. 17. c. 1. 2. 3. 4. The end of the race of Don Pelayo Of the disceues follovving Spanish examples in the second discent 〈◊〉 1201 Carib li. 11. cap. 12 37. Lady Elenor an Inglish vvoman Q. of Spayne Garib l. 13. cap. 10 An 1207. An Inglish Qgrād mother to tvvo king saints at once An other brech of successiō The Cerdas put bark from the crovvne 1276. Garabay l. 15. c. 1. an 1363. Many alterations of lineal discent Dō Iohn the first a bastard made king of Portugal Garib l. 15 cap 22. li. 34. c. 39. Of the state of france An. 419. An. 751. An. 988. Examples of the 2. rancke of French Kings King Pepin by election An. 751. K. Charles by election Girard du Haillan l. 3. an 768. Eginard Belfor li 2. cap. 5. The vncle preferred before the nephevv Paul mili hist. Franc. King Luys de bonnaire An. 814. Girard l. 5 An. 834. An. 840 An. 878. Baudin en la Chroni que pag. 119. Girard l. 1 An. 879. Tvvo bastards pre ferred An. 881. Luys faineant K. of France An. 886. Charles 4 le Gros. King of France Girard li. 5. An. 888 Odo a king and after Duke of vvhom came Hugo Capetus Rafe 1. King of France An. 927. An. 929 Luys 4. d'Outremer The true geyre of France excluded Hugh Capet othervvise Snatch cappe 988 Belfor li. 3. cap 1. An. 988. Defence of Hugh Capetus title The embassage of the states of France vnto Char les of Loraine Girard 1. 6 an 988. Note this comparison Examples out of the third tyme of France Girard li. 6. an 1032 K. Henry 〈◊〉 preferred before his elder brother VVilliam conqueror hovv he came to be duke of Normandie Girard 1. 6. Anno 1032. 1037. Sonnes excluded for the fathers offences Girard lib. 7. An. 1110. Belfor l. 4 c. 1. l. 5 Cōmzus in comen tar l. 1. in vita Ludouic 11. Examples of the realme of Ingland Diuers races of Inglish Kinges Thename of Ingland and Inglish King Egbert the first monarch of Inglād Polidor hist. aug li. 4. in fine An. soz King Pepin of France king Adel vvolfe An. 829. King Alfred 872. King Edvvard elder An. 900. King Aleston the Bastard 〈◊〉 An. 924. Polid. 1. 5. hist. Angl. Stovv pag. 130. An. 924. King Edmond r. An. 940. The vncle preferred before the nephevvs 946. Polid. 1. 6. Stovv in his chronicles Edgar a famous king King Edvvard Martirized K. Etheldred 978. Polid. 1. 7. hist. Ang. K. Edmēd 〈◊〉 Quere Emma mother to King Edward the 〈◊〉 Many breches of lineal succestiō Sonnes of King Edmond Ironside King Canutus the first 〈◊〉 King Edvvard the confessor made K. against right of successiō Prince Edvvard the out lavv and his children put back Polyd l 8. Harald second K. by election 1066. Polid. vbi sup VVilliam Duke of Normādy King of Ingland An. 1066. by election Girard li. 6. an 1065 Chron. Cassin l. 3. cap. 34. Antoninus part z. chron tit 16. cap. 5. 9. 1. Examples after the conquest Polyd. in vita Gul. Conq. VVilliam Rufus King An. 1087. Henry 1. An. 1100 Mathild the empresse King Stephen entred against successiē 1135. An act of parlamēt about successiē 1153. King Richard and king Iohn 1190. Prince Ar tur put back Tvvo sisters of prince Artur Duke of Britaine K. Iohn and his sonne reiected 1216. The titles of york Lācaster The con clusion of this-chapter Causes of excluding Princes VVhe must iudge of the lavvful causes of exclusiōs Open iniustice to be resisted VVhat are the cheete pointes to be regarded in a princes ad mission VVhence the reasons of admitting or re iecting a prince are to be taken Girard li. 3. de l'Estar pag. 242. Three principal points to be considered VVhy he resolueth to treat of religion principally The cheef end of a common vvealth supernatural Philosophers and lavv makers vvhat end they had of ther doings The com mon vvealth of beastes The natu ral end of mans cōmon vvealth Sacrifices and oblations by
nature Gen 8. Iob. 1. The chife end of a common vvealth magestrates is religion Genebrard l 1. Chronolde 1 aetate Genes 25. 20. Deut. 21. 2. Paral. 〈◊〉 Regard of religion among gentiles Cicero li. 1. quest tusc. de natura deorum lib. 1. Plutarch aduersus Colotem Aristo l 7 politi c. 8. The absurd Athisemo of our tyme in politiques See before the othes made by princes at their coronations in the 4. chapter The oth to gouernors for defence of religion Collat 2. Nouella constit Iuflin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Note the forme of this othe vvryten An Dn̄i 560. Hovv great a defect is vvant of religion in a Magestrate Lack of religion the chefest cause to exclud a pretendor Vide Digest li. 23. fit 1 leg 8 10. Math. 14. Marc. 10. 1. Cor. 7. Lib. 4. decret Greg. tit 19. c. 7. VVhether 〈◊〉 in religiō be infidelity Act 23. 1. Cor. 8. 2. Cor. 5. 3. Pet. 3. Math. 18. Hovv he that doth agaynst his ovvne consciēce sinneth Rom. 14. 1. Cor. 8. 10. See vppō this place of S. Paul S. Chrisost hom 36. in 〈◊〉 epistolā Orig. l. to Theodor. in hune locum Hovv dāgrous to fauour a pretender of a contrary religion Against vvisdom and policy to preferre 〈◊〉 prince of a contrary religiē The conclusion of the vvhole speech A protestation of the lavvyer VVhy the vvil not determyne of any one title The book of Hales and Sir Nicholas Bacon The but of Hales book First reason 2. Reasun The booke of M. Morgan and iudge Browne Ansvver to the 1. reason To the 2. reason Heghingtons booke George Lilly in fine Epitchronic Anglic. Sundry importag pointes Diuers other notes and pampletes Sir Richard Shelly Franc. Peto A treatise in the behalfe of the Infāta of spaine Discent of V Villiam the Conqueror The children of the conqueror Polid. 1. 2. in fine Stovv in vita Guliel The miseries of Duke Robert and his sonne Stovv in vit Gul. Cōquest VVilliam soune of Duke Robett Belfor 1. 3. cap. 42. An. 1128. King VVilliam Rufus 〈◊〉 l. 2 del hist. del mondo K. Henry Polydor. in vita Henrici 1. The house of Britany by the elder daughter of the Conqueror Belfor l. 3 Pag. 423. Conan Duke of Britanie poysened by VVilliam Con queror Belfor l. 3 cap. 12. An. 1065. ex chronic dionis The daughters of spaine are of the blood royal of Ingland The houses of Aloys VVhy Stephen vvas admitted king of Girard l. 6 Belfor l. 3 The issue of king Stephen K. Henry the 2. Belfor l. 3 cap. 50. An. 1151. Gerard. l. 8. pag. 549 K. Henry the 2. his issue Stovv in vita Henci King RIchard Duke Geffrey Paradyn apud Belforest Belfor l. 3 cap. 71. An. 1203. Belfor l. 4 cap. 4. K. Iohn and his issue Miseries that fell vppō king Iohn Polid. Hol lings Stovv in vitae Iohannis The issue of king Henry the 2. hys daughters Belfor l. 3 cap. 49. An. 1152. The issue of Lady Eleanor Queene of spaine Polidor l. 15. in vit Iohan Stephen Garib li. 22. cap. 31 Queene Berenguela Garibay li. 12. c. 52 Pretences of the Infanta of spayne to Inglish French states K. Henry the 3 and his issue The meeting of three houses Prince Edvvard Duke Edmond Lad. Beatrix daughter of king Henry 3. The pede gree of the dukes of Britanie The great contention betvveene the houses of Mō ford and Bloys in Britanie Burgundy and Orleance The controuersie betvveene the house of monford and Bloys A Questiō about successiō betven the vncle and the neece The house of Blois ouer come The suecession of the Monfords in Britanie Francis last Duke of Britany Hovv the dukdome of Britanie vvas vnited to france 3. The issue male of king Hēry the 〈◊〉 The Bishop of Rosle in his booke of the Q. of Scotts title George Lilly in fine epitomes chron Anglic. That Edvvard vvas the elder Matheus vvest in vit Henrici 3. bollings Ibidem pag. 654. 2. 3. Holling head in vit Henrici 3. pag. 740. 777. 4. Edmonds line neuer pretended to the crovvne 5. Note this consequent 6. The elder ship of Edmond a fiction Polyd in fine vitae Hent 3. The issue of king Edvvard the first The issue of Edmond Crock-back Collateral lynes of Lācastez Fyue sonnes of K. Edvvard 3. The redd rose and the vvhite issue of the black prince The issue of leonel the 2. sonne The issue of Edmond the 4 sonne The issue of Thomas the 5. sonne The issue of the 3. sonne duke of Lancan The issue by Lady Blanch. L. Phillip marryed into Portugāl and her issue Lady Elizabeth second daughter The issue of King Henry the 4. The issue of Iohn of Gant by his 2. vvife The controuersie in Spaine betvveene King Peter the cruel and his bastard brother Garibay l. 15 c. 26. Of Lady Catherin Svvinford hollings head in vita Richardi 2. pag. 1088. The duke of Lancasters ba stards made legitimate Hollingh in vita Rich. 2. pag. 1090. The issue of Catherin Svvinfords chil dren K. Hēry 7. The dukes of Somerset Polidor hist. Ang. lib. 23. Hollings in vita Edvvadi 4. pa. 1314 1340. VVhat heyres of Lancaster novv romaine in The issue of the house of York Richard Earle of Cambrige executed Richard duke of York slayne Edvvard duke of York and King his issue The lyne of the Pooles The lyne of the hastings The Baringtons King Richard 3. Issue of king Henry the 7. Issue of the lady Mary of Scotland Issue of mary 2. sister to K. Henry Lady Francis Stovv An. 7. Edvvard 6. Of Lady Elen or of Suffolk Varietie of authores opinions about this controuersie Polydor in fine vit Henr. 3. initio vit Henr. 4. in vit Rich. An. 1386. The allegations of the house of yorke The storie of the controuersie betvveene Lancaster York Polydor. in vita Richard 2. lib. 20. King Richards de position Cheefe points of the controuersie betvveene Lancaster and York Three pointes about king Richards depositiō That a trevv K. maye be deposed 〈◊〉 Reason 2. Authority 3. Examples VVhether the causes vvere sufficient of King Rich. deposition The house of York chiefe doer in deposing King Richard Polyd. lib. 20. histor Angl. Addit ad Polycromicon Testimony of stories The euil gouermēt of king Richard Stovv in vit Rich. 2. pag. 502 regni 11. Agreat insolēcy The euel parlamēt Stovv an 21. regni Richard The duke of Laneaster called by common request Frosard VValsingham VVhether the manner of deposing King Richard vvere good 1. Roboam deposed by his subiects of ten tribes 2. Reg. 11 12. 2. Paralip cap. 10. Ioram his mother Iesabel deposed by force 4. Reg. 9. 5. Athalia depriued by force 4. Reg. 11. VVhether Lancaster or Yorke should haue entred after king Richard Polidor L. 20. in vit Richard Stovv 〈◊〉 vita Richard 2. VVhether the earle of march or duke of Lancaster should haue luc ceded