that Robinson and his Wife upon their Examinations before a Justice of the Peace said they did not know him Then the Statute of 27. Eliz. Cap. 2. was read and the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury brought him in Guilty Then VVilliam Atkins was set to the Bar having been Arraigned for being a Romish Priest and his Indictment read to the same Jury Then VVilliam Jackson being sworn said He could say nothing Francis VVilden deposed That he heard him say Prayers in an Unknown Tongue in a Surplice and had seen him give the Sacrament to seven or eight according to the manner of the Church of Rome in a Wafer at Mrs. Stamford's House in VVolverhampton Then John Jarvis being called refused to be sworn saying He was troubled with a Vision last Night But the Ld. Ch. Justice told him he mistook for Old Men dream Dreams 't was Young Men see Visions and that he was an old Man Bidding him speak the Truth and he 'd warrant him he should not be troubled with Visions any more this being a Trick of the Priests So he being sworn deposed That he had often been relieved by this Atkins and had heard him say somewhat in an Unknown Tongue and had Confess'd to him and often received the Sacrament from him he being in a Priests Habit. Henry Brown also deposed That he was almost turned from the Protestant Religion to that of the Church of Rome but never went further than Confession and that was to this Man and then he left them Then Thomas Dudley deposed That he likewise was given that way and had been at Confession with one Atkins whom he believed to be this Man and had seen him perform several Rites of the Church of Rome at VVell-Head at Ham. Then the Statute was read and the Prisoner saying He had neither any Witnesses to call nor any thing to say The Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury brought him also in Guilty And the Ld. Ch. Justice sentenced them both to be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd ON Monday Aug. 4. 1679. at Hereford Charles Kerne was brought to the Bar and being Arraigned he pleaded Not Guilty to the Indictment which was for being a Romish Priest Then the Jury being sworn whose Name 's are not inserted into this Trial only that one VVill. Barret was Foreman the Court proceeded to call the Evidence against him And first Edward Biddolph was sworn who deposed that he did not know the Prisoner that he had seen one of that name 6 Years agone at Mr. Somerset's at Bellingham but would not say this was he Then Margaret Edwards deposed That she had known Kerne five or six Years That the first time she ever saw him was at Mr. VVigmore's of Lucton who told her it was he That she hath seen him several times since twice or thrice at VVoebly and the last time was the 29th of May was Twelvemonth at Sarnsfield at Mrs. Monington's where she saw him deliver the Wafer and remembred the Words Corpus Christi to four persons that were there but she her self did not receive She gave also an account of the Reason of her then coming thither it being at the request of one Harris of Lempster whose Wife was sick to seek some Remedy from Mrs. Monington for her Telling how the Maid brought her up to the Mistress how she acquainted her with her Errand what advice was given her and how Mrs. Monington understanding she was a Papist took her into the Chappel whereof she gave a Description Then Mary Jones deposed That she knew Mr. Kerne about eight Years ago when she lived at Mr. Somersets and that Mr. Kerne lived in the House about half a Year That she hath seen several Persons come thither And that one Sunday Morning she saw several Persons go up with Mr. Kerne and listning she heard Mr. Kerne say something aloud which she did not understand there being but a Wall between them That also there was a Child Christned in the House and no one there but Mr. Somerset and his Wife Mr. Latchet and his Wife and Mr. Kerne to do it but she did not see him do it though she heard his Voice And that once she wash'd a Surplice but knew not whose it was Then the Prisoner in his own Defence called one Mr. Hyet who said That Margaret Edwards had denied to him that she knew Mr. Kerne but not being on her Oath when she said so it was not regarded Mr. Weston's maid affirmed That she saw Margaret Edwards and Mary Jones talking together and Marg. Edwards instructed the other what she should say but being called they both denyed it upon their Oaths Then Mrs. Monington appear'd who said She neither knew Marg. Edwards nor James Harris and Mrs. Monington's Maid denied that ever she saw her at her Mistresses House Then the Statute being read of 27 Eliz. the Prisoner urged that Persons that are not Priest's may say Mass except that of Bread and Wine and Christen too in extremis Then the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence concluding Margaret Edwards to be a Positive Evidence but leaving the other doubtful to the Consideration of the. Jury who brought the Prisoner in Not Guilty The Trial of Thomas Knox and John Lane at the King's-Bench Bar on Tuesday Novemb. 25. 1679. before the Lord Chief Justice Scroggs and the other Judges of that Court. THen and there the Prisoners were indicted for a Conspiracy to defame and scandalize Dr. Oates and Mr. Bedloe thereby to discredit their Evidence about the Horrid Popish Plot. To which having pleaded Not Guilty the Jury was sworn viz. Sir John Kirke Thomas Harriot Henry Johnson Simon Middleton Hugh Squire Francis Dorrington John Roberts Rainsford Waterhouse Thomas Earsby Joseph Radcliffe James Supple Richard Cooper To whom the Indictment being read Trenchard Esq of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the Indictment Serjeant Maynard pursued the Charge and Sir Creswel Levinz his Majesty's Attorney General opened the Evidence Then the Attainders of those Persons executed for the Plot and the Impeachments of the Lords in the Tower and of the Earl of Danby mentioned in the Indictment being allowed Robert Radford one of his Majesty's Yeomen of the Guard being call'd and sworn deposed That Richard Lane who was a Yeoman of the Guard extraordinary and Father of this John Lane told him about a Year ago that Doctor Oates did attempt many times to Bugger his Son but knowing him to be a lying Fellow he durst not speak of it again for fear he would have put it upon him Mr. Thomas Allen only deposed that in December last when Lane was out of Dr. Oates's Service he desired him to interceed for him which he did till he was admitted again Mr. Samuel Oates the Doctor 's Brother deposed That in April last about a Fortnight before Lane went from his Brother he heard him say having before wished for 1000 l. that he questioned not
Lady Tempest would have hang'd him for breaking a Trunk but now he would be even with her and that Sir Miles Stapleton kept Priests in his House but he would apprehend them presently for he might have 20 l. apiece for taking of them Richard Pears Sir Miles's Man testified that three or four days after his Master was taken into Custody Bolron asked him if they did not blame him for accusing his Master and he saying he did not hear him named said he it was not him but I must not tell who it is and said he would have gone to have seen Sir Miles but I think said he he does not know me Then one Stephen Tompson declared some threatning Words of Bolrons against Sir Thomas Gascoyne that he would do him some ill turn but it not concerning the Prisoner the Court would not admit it The Lady Vavasor said she believed her Husband was not at Barnborow in any part of the Year because he was infirm at York Bolron having sworn that Sir VValter Vavasor was one at that Consult but this was not judg'd a conclusive Evidence Then Mr. Leggat said that he had heard Bolron say he knew nothing against Sir Miles Stapleton And Mrs. Elizabeth Holmes said that Bolron meeting her in London said he heard she was to be a Witness against him at York but if she would be kind to him he would be so to her and speak as favourably as he could and he said if he had known he should have been no better rewarded he would never have been a Witness the Devil should have been a Witness as soon as he Then Edward Cooper told what he heard Mowbray say as before in Thwing's Trial but the Court observed that being before his Discovery and while he was a Papist and on the High-way it could not be material Then Madam Sherborn testified that Bolron and Mowbray came to her house under a pretence to search for Priests and Bolron took away several parcels of Silver with him But the Court would not suffer such Evidence besides that Mowbray deposed it was only Chalices and other Popish Trinkets After this the Counsel for the King called one Dixon who swore that he had 40 s. proffer'd him to be a Witness for Sir Tho. Gascoyne in Novemb. 1679. Then Mr. VVilson deposed that Mr. Babbington Sollicitor for Sir Miles would have given him 10 l. and Hickeringil proffer'd him 10 l. to have been a Witness for Sir Miles Then Christopher Langley deposed also that VVil. Batley and John Ross proffer'd him two Oxen and ten Sheep to witness for Sir Miles those things they should direct him Richard Corker deposed that he was by and heard that very proffer made to Langley Then Mr. Baines deposed that Mrs. Holmes proffer'd him 60 l. per annum and Mrs. Hewit said she would give him more if he would say nothing against Sir Miles After this Mr. Justice Dolben summ'd up the Evidence and Baron Gregory proceeded to do the same and then the Jury withdrew for half an hour and gave in their Verdict Not Guilty The Trial of George Busby Priest at the Assizes at Derby on Monday July 25 1681. HE then and there appeared and having been Arraigned he now refused to plead in stead thereof presenting a Petition to the Court shewing that he was committed to the Goal in March last for being a Popish Priest and that having obtained his Habeas Corpus to be removed to London the Under-Sheriff then dying the Habeas Corbus was not executed Praying therefore that he may be removed to the King's-Bench that he may have time to make his Defence he depending upon his Habeas Corpus his most material Evidence to clear him and to prove his being an Alien being then in London c. But the Grand Jury having found the Bill the Court told him they must proceed and he was then Indicted as a Romish Priest and Jesuit upon the Statute of 27 Eliz. cap. 2. To which Indictment he excepted because it was not said therein that he took Orders beyond Sea But he was inform'd that his taking Orders any where from the Authority of the Bishop of Rome was Sufficient He then pleaded not Guilty and challenged of the Jury near the Number allowed by the Law Those Sworn were Samuel Ward Gent. Thomas Wilson Gent. John Steer John Ratcliff Ed. Wolmesly Gent. William Horn Gent. George Tricket Gent. Jeremiah Ward John Roper John Creswel Gent. Edmund Woodhead and Anthony Bowne To whom the Indictment being read Mr. Bridges of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the same and Mr. Coombes another of the King's Counsel opened the Evidence And then Mr. Gilbert a Justice of Peace for the County of Derby was called and Sworn who deposed that he lived within 2 Miles of Mr. Powtrells house at West-Hallam where Busby was took and whose Wife was Busby's Neece and had heard for 6 or 7 Years that he was a Priest and when the Plot broke out that he was a Person concern'd as appeared by a Warrant from the Lords of the Council for his Apprehension which he received March 22 1678. which he producing was read in the Court and on the Monday following searched Mr. Powtrells House for him but could not find him tho afterwards he was informed that he was then in the House In 1679 Mr. Powtrel travelling it was reported Busby was gone with him beyond Sea tho he still remained in that House and last Christmas he was informed that he was seen in Corn-Harvest walking in the Garden with one Anne Smally a Widow which caus'd him to search again for him in March last when this Smally assured him he had been out of England two Years yet he then found in Busby's Chamber Popish Vestments a Surplice Wafers an Altar-stone c. but could not find him About a fortnight after he searched again for him surprizing them at one in the Night but could have no admittance till they broke open the door and going into Busby's Chamber he found the fire had been lately extinguished and the Bed-Clothes laid in confused heaps on the bed some part of them warm and some cold but the feather-bed quite cold till feeling underneath he found it warm and that it had been turned which assured him that the Priest was in the House but the Persons in the house denied it and only jeered them for searching for a Person that was beyond Sea and those that were without tho they heard a trampling and directed the Searchers within to the place yet they were from one till after 10 next Morning before they could find him Which at last they did in a little hole under the Tiling whence they carried him to Derby and Mr. Gilbert having took his Examination committed him to Goal on March 16th and sent Word to the King and Council of what he had done The Prisoner then pleaded his being an Alien born at Brussels his Father removing his Family thither during the Troubles
he should be call'd to an Account for all his Actions for all the World might see that he did resolve to bring in Arbitrary Power and Popery and that unless he would let the Parliament sit at Oxford since he had called them together and put the People to Charges in chusing them and them in coming down he should be seiz'd at Oxford and brought to the Block as was the Logger-head his Father That the Parliament should sit at Guild-hall and adjust the Grievances of the Subject and of the Nation and that no King of his Race should ever Reign in England after him And unless the King did expel from his Council the Earl of Clarendon cunning Lory Hide the Earl of Hallifax that great turn-coat Rogue that was before so much against the Papists a Rascal whom we should see hang'd and all the Tory Counsellors England should be too hot for him That for this End there was in the City 1500 Barrels of Powder and 100000 Men ready at an hour's warning and that every thing was ordered in a due Method against the sitting of the Parliament at Oxford And that he should see England the most glorious Nation in the World when they had cut off that beastly Fellow Rowley who came of the Race of Buggerers for his Grand-father King James buggered the old Duke of Buckingham Railing then at Judg Pemberton saying Let him try Fitz-Harris if he dare I shall see him go to Tyburn for it I hope a turn-coat Rogue That he was for the Plot whilst he was puisne Judg but now he was Chief Justice he was the greatest Rogue in the World even like one of the Pensioners in the Long Parliament That the Prisoner would moreover have put this Informant upon charging the King With the firing of London and the Murder of Sir Edmondbury Godfry telling him that such and suck Lords should live and die by him and that he needed not to fear but that England should espouse his Cause And discoursing then of the Libel of Fitz-Harris The Devil take me said Colledge every individual Word is as true as God is in Heaven and that if the Informant did not join with Fitz-Harris in his Evidence and charge the King home he was the basest Fellow in the World because he made them Slaves and Beggars and would make all the World so and that it was a kind of Charity to charge him home that we might be rid of such a Tyrant He depos'd further That he also receiv'd a blew Ribbond from Mr. Colledge whom meeting after he came from Oxford he asked Where now were all his Cracks and Braggs for that the King had fool'd them who answered That they had not done with the King yet though they could do nothing then for that no Servant no Man living did know whether he would dissolve the Parliament that Day That he was that very nick of Time at the Lobby of the Lords House and there was a Man came in with a Gown under his Arm and every one looked upon him to be a Tailor and no Body did suspect no not his own intimate Friends except it were Fitz-Gerald that he would Dissolve the Parliament that Day But presently he put on his Robes and sent away for the House of Commons and when he had dissolved them before ever the House could get down he took Coach and went away otherwise that the Parliament had been too hard for him for that there was never a Parliament-Man but had divers armed Men to wait on him and that he had his Blunderbuss and his Man to wait upon him The next Witness against Mr. Colledge was Mr. Turbervile who being sworn deposed That when the Parliament sat in Oxford about the middle of the Week he dined with Mr. Colledge Capt. Brown and Don Lewis Clerk of Derby-House at the Chequer-Inn in Oxford After Dinner Don Lewis went out about some Business and Capt. Brown went to sleep and Mr. Colledge and he fell a talking of the Times and he was observing he thought the Parliament was not a long-liv'd Parliament Whereupon Mr. Colledge answered That there was no Good to be expected from the King for he and all his Family were Papists and had ever been such Then said Turbervile the King will offer something or other by way of surprize to the Parliament Said Colledge I would he would begin but if he do not we will begin with him and seize him for there are several brave Fellows about this Town that will secure him till we have those Terms that we expect from him adding That he had got a Case of Pistols and a very good Sword and a Velvet Cap Giving Turbervile a piece of blew Ribbond to put in his Hat to be a distinction if there should be any disturbance Then Mr. Masters was sworn who deposed That he and Colledge had been long acquainted And that a little before the Parliament at Oxford about Christmass after the Parliament at Westminster at Mr. Charlton's Shop the Wollen-Draper in Paul's Church-Yard discoursing with him about the Government he was justifying of the late Long-Parliament's Actions in Forty He said That that Parliament was as good a Parliament as ever was chosen in the Nation and that they did nothing but what they had just cause for and that the Parliament that sat last at Westminster was of their Opinion and so he should have seen it And that another time he calling him in a jocose way Colonel Colledge bid him mock not for he might be one in a little time Then Sir William Jennings being sworn deposed That Colledge gave him one time a Picture and another time he saw him bring into a Coffee-House a parcel of blew Ribbond with No Popery No Slavery wrought in it and sold a Yard of it there to a Parliament-Man as he took him to be for 2 s. who tied it upon his Sword And that on that very Day the Parliament was Dissolved at Oxford he came to him standing in the School-House-yard telling him Mr. Fitz-Gerald had spit in his Face and that he spit in his Face again and that so they went to Logerheads together and that upon Sir William's telling him his Nose bled he said I have lost the first blood in the Cause but it will not be long before more be lost The Evidence for the King here ending Mr. Serj. Holloway briefly explained to the Jury that the seizing the Person of the King was in Law a compassing and intending his Death as it was worded in the Indictment which therefore they ought so to understand Then Mr. Colledge desired to be resolved these Questions upon the Evidence which he had heard 1. Whether any Conspiracy for which his Indictment was had been herein proved 2. Whether there ought not to be two Witnesses distinct to swear words at one and the same time And 3. Whether any Act of Treason done at London shall be given in Evidence to prove the Treason for which he was now
July 13. 1683. THen and there the Prisoner appearing he was Arraigned upon an Indictment of High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government To which being required to plead he desired a Copy of his Indictment but being told nothing could be granted till he had pleaded he pleaded Not Guilty And then complain'd of his being arraign'd and tried at the same time desiring a Copy of his Panel having had only some Names of Persons usually upon Juries and that his Trial might be deferr'd till the Afternoon in regard he had a Witness that was not in Town But the Attorn Gen. urg'd the Jury might be called Then the Prisoner desired a Pen and Ink and some to write for him and to have the use of his Papers all which were granted And then John Martin being named the Lord Russel asked if he were a Free-holder of forty Shillings a Year saying that he thought none were allowed but such as were Free-holders To which the Court replied That no Pannel was made in London by Free-holders for that London Estates belonging either to the Nobility or Gentry that lived out of the City or to Corporations London was excepted To this his Lordship urged the Statute of 2 Hen. 5. wherein he said it was positive that in Cases of Life and Death no Man should be judged but by those that have forty Shillings a Year But the Attorn Gen. not allowing the Prisoners Exceptions his Counsel were called and again assigned him by the Court Mr. Pollexfen Mr. Holt and Mr. Ward who learnedly urged what they took to be Law in that Case and were answer'd by the Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. Sir George Jefferies and Mr. North the King's Counsel And then it was adjudged by eight of the Judges being present viz. the Ld. Ch. Justice the Ld. Ch. Baron Mr. Justice Wyndham Mr. Justice Jones Mr. Justice Charlton Mr. Justice Levins Mr. Baron Street and Mr. Justice Withens that in case of Treason Free-hold was no good cause of Challenge The Jury-men therefore were called and after the Lord Russel hah challenged 31 of them the following Persons were sworn viz. John Martin William Rouse Jervas Seaton William Fashion Thomas Short George Toriano VVilliam Butler James Pickering Thomas Jeve Hugh Noden Robert Brough Thomas Oneby To whom the Indictment being read the same was opened by Mr. North and the Attorny-General opened the Evidence And then Col. Rumsey being sworn deposed That about the latter end of October or beginning of November the Lord Shaftsbury sent him from his Lodging by VVapping to Mr. Shepherd's to the Duke of Monmouth the Lord Russel Lord Grey Sir Thomas Armstrong and Mr. Ferguson there met to know what Resolution they were come to about the rising of Taunton Their answer was That Mr. Trenchard had failed them that he had promised 1000 foot and 300 Horse but when he came to perform it he could not He thought the People would not meddle unless they had some time to make Provision for their Families That Mr. Ferguson made this Answer the Lord Russel and the Duke of Monmouth being present and the Lord Grey saying something to the same purpose And upon this it was the Lord Shaftsbury prepared to be gone That he was with them at Shepherd's about a quarter of an hour and that there was some discourse about seizing of the Guards at the Savoy and Mews in case the Insurrection had gone on which was to have been on Novemb. 19. and that the Duke of Monmouth the Lord. Grey and Sir Thomas Armstrong undertook to view the Guards and that the Lord Russel assented to all this and the Witness was to have gone to Bristol by the order of the Earl of Shaftsbury against that time Then Mr. Shepherd deposed that in October Mr. Ferguson came to him in the Duke of Monmouth's Name to request the conveniency of his House for him and some other Persons of Quality to meet That in the Evening came the Duke of Monmouth the Lord Grey the Lord Russel Sir Thomas Armstrong Col. Rumsey and Mr. Ferguson one after another That Sir Thomas Armstrong desired they might be private and therefore what they wanted he fetch'd up himself not suffering his Servants to come up That their Discourse was about seizing the Guards and the Duke of Monmouth Lord Grey and Sir Thomas Armstrong went one time to view them and the next time they met at his House he heard Sir Thomas say the Guards were very remiss in their Places and not like Soldiers and that the thing was feasible if they had strength to do it That they met twice at his House and the Prisoner was there both times That Mr. Ferguson read a Paper in the Nature of a Declaration setting forth the Grievances of the Nation in order to a Rising He could not say the Lord Russel was present at the reading of it but Col. Rumsey was who then deny'd it saying it was over before he came Then the Lord Howard being sworn began his long Evidence with a low Voice pretending the News he had just then receiv'd of the Earl of Essex's Fate had sunk his Voice and a long Story of the Designs of the Earl of Shaftsbury an Account of which he had from Capt. VValcot whom he brought acquainted with the Earl of Shaftsbury and by whom the Earl of Shaftsbury sent for him while he absconded at one VVatson's at the end of VVoodstreet and there discover'd to him his Design of the Rising and that he had 10000 brisk Boys ready to follow him whenever he held up his Finger who were to possess themselves of the Gates and would in an Hour's time be 5 times multiplied But that his Design was much retarded by the backwardness of the Duke of Monmouth and the Lord Russel who failed him in not being ready prepared to concur with him in the Country that he then endeavour'd to shew the Earl of Shaftsbury the necessity of having those Lords concurrence in so weighty an Undertaking and proffer'd his Service to bring them to a right Understanding among themselves to this end he spoke with the Duke of Monmouth who deny'd that either he or the Lord Russel had given the Earl of Shaftsbury any incouragement to be so forward because they knew the Country could not be ready to stir so soon That a Meeting was then propos'd but afterwards put off by reason of the Earl of Shaftsbury's fears of being discover'd That the Duke of Monmouth told him that the Lord Russel had been with the Earl of Shaftsbury and preswaded him to put off his Rendezvouz for only a Fortnight against which time they would try to be ready for him But the Country not being ready that Design was disappointed That in October Captain Walcot acquainted him with the Design upon the King with which he acquainted the Duke of Monmouth who said he would never suffer it and they did all they could to prevent it This failing the
no Advantage should be taken or use made of it Upon which the Kings Counsel again urged that the Paper might be now read but the Bishops Counsel still opposed it pleading that first it ought to be proved that this Libel as they call'd it was written and published in Middlesex for that all Matters of Crime were so local that if it be not proved to be done in the County where it is layed the Party accused is as innocent as if he never had done the thing But this the Ld. Ch. Justice over-ruled that it was not proper to urge this until the Paper had been read then Mr. Justice Powel at first opposed it The Bishops Petition then was read and shewn to the Jury The King's Counsel leaving it here till they had seen what should be said to it The Bishops Counsel therefore urged their former Objection that nothing had been proved to be done in Middlesex and that the Bishops owning the Paper in that County would not amount to a Publication of it there besides that the Information and Petition did not agree the Direction and Petitionary Part being left out To which the King's Counsel reply'd That the Fact being own'd in Middlesex it is to be supposed to be done there until they had proved it to be done elsewhere Which therefore the Bishops Counsel did by Mr. Francis Nichols who being sworn deposed that he had served the Arch-Bishop in his Bed-Chamber this seven Years and he was sure that he never stirred out of the Gate of Lambeth-house since Michaelmas last till the time he was summoned before the Council Yet Mr. Finch insisted on it that the King's Counsel ought to prove the place in which it was writ for that the Locality of it being part of the Crime as laid in the Information they had not proved the Charge unless they did that Which because the King's Counsel could not do they yielded in that Point and insisted upon the Publication of it in that County because there it was own'd instancing in several cases wherein the writing of a Libel was adjudged a Publication To which the Bishops Counsel reply'd that in those Cases it was proved that the Libel was sent by the Persons which here it is not and till that is proved it cannot be said to be published by them an owning of it to the King and Council not being criminal because then an Answer to a Question put by Authority would be a Crime and then it would be as if Authority were employed to do wrong The King's Counsel therefore insisted upon it that it was their parts to prove it did not come from them to the King for that the King had it and they own'd it and till they proved it otherwise they must presume it was deliver'd by them But Presumption being looked upon as no Evidence the Court would not accept of this And therefore the King's Counsel called Mr. Blathwayt again who deposed as before that he was present when this Paper was delivered by the King at the Council-Board and being asked by Mr. Sollicitor General if there was any mention of what it was done for upon the account of Religion or how he answered he did hot remember any thing of that At which there was a great Laughter But that he received it from the King's hands and he knew it was presented to him by the Bishops for that he had heard the King say so several times That to the best of his remembrance the Bishops were question'd whether this was the Paper presented by them to the King and that he did always think it a plain Case that it was so nor did they deny it but as to that Question he did not remember what the Words were At which there was a great Shout Then Mr. Bridgman was asked the same Question Whether there was any question at the Council-Board whether this was the Paper presented by the Bishops to the King To which he in answer deposed that there was something about it but he did not remember whether the question was directly asked or answered But he Believed there was no Body doubted that that was not the Paper And that he saw it soon after it was delivered and heard the King say it was the Petition the Bishops had delivered and on Sunday the King commanded him to copy it and there was no Copy made of it but that one notwithstanding that he saw a Copy within a day or two after it was presented about the Town Then Sir John Nicholas being asked to the same Question answered that though he was then present at the Council-Board he did not remember that Then there was a great Shout Then Mr. Pepy's being sworn was examin'd to the same and depos'd that he did not remember any thing was spoken about the delivering but he believed it was understood by every Body at the Table that that was the Paper the Bishops had delivered Then Mr. Musgrave being sworn and examin'd to the same deposed that he did not remember that ever any such direct Question was asked Upon this Evidence then the King's Counsel when they had opened it submitted to the Jury And the Ld. Ch. Justice began to direct the Jury but was interrupted by Mr. Finch who questioned whether it were Evidence or no because if it were they had other matter to offer in Answer to this Evidence and in their own Defence Whereupon the Ld. Ch. Justice resolved to hear them though the rest of the Bishops Counsel pray'd him to go on with his Lordships Direction But just as he was beginning to go on the King's Counsel then pray'd his Patience Mr. Solicitor General saying There was a Fatality in some Causes and so there was in this for that they had notice that a Person of very great Quality was coming that would make it appear that the Bishops made their Addresses to him that they might deliver this Paper to the King Then there was 3 or 4 long Pauses for above half an Hour And no one coming the Criar made Oath that Mr. Grabam coming into the Hall when his Lordship was directing the Jury said my Lord Sunderland was a coming but he would go and prevent him And afterwards returning and finding his Lordship did not go on he said he would go again for the Lord Sunderland whom he had sent away and he was now gone for him and said he would bring him with him presently At length the Lord President came and being sworn deposed That the Bishops of Saint Asaph and Chichester came to his Office and told him that they came in the Name of the Archbishop and 4 other of their Brethren viz. the Bishops of Ely Bath and Wells Bristol and Peterborough to let him know that they had a Petition to deliver to the King if he would give them leaver and desired to know of him which was the best way to do it That he told them he would know the King's Pleasure and bring them
Sir John Gage of Sussex which the Witness saw to be an Officer in the Army That in August there was a Consult whereat Fenwick was wherein there was a Design laid for killing the Duke of Ormond and raising a Rebellion in Ireland to which VVhitebread also consented when he came over as appears by their Entry-Books That in September VVhitebread having had Intimation from one Beddingfield of the Plots being discover'd and of the suspicion they had of the Witness being waited upon at his Lodgings upon his coming over by the Witness he beat affronted and reviled the said Witness commanding him to go beyond Sea again assaulting him in his Lodging afterwards to have murthered him being jealous that he had betrayed them He deposed also that Grove did go about with one Smith to gather Peter-Pence and that he saw the Book wherein it was entred And confessed to him that he with three Irish Men did fire Southwark for which Grove had 400 l. and the other three 200 l. a piece Then Mr. Bedloe deposed That he had been five Years almost employed by the Jesuits and the English Monks in Paris to carry and bring Letters between them from and to England for the promoting of this Plot Relating how Harcourt began to employ him and naming the particular places whither he had been sent to shew the Reasons of his knowledg in this matter saying that in all their Consults wherein he was it was always concluded on That they would not leave any Member of any Heretick in England that should survive to tell in the Kingdom hereafter that there ever was any such Religion in England as the Protestant Religion Then he proceeded to depose that in August last there was a Consult at Harcourt's Chamber about killing the King as Pritchard inform'd him and of sending the four Ruffians to Windsor who failing it was afterwards concluded Pickering and Grove should go on and Conyers be joyned with them to assassinate the King in his Morning-Walks at New-Market this he heard in Harcourt's Chamber in August also Grove and Pickering and Pritchard and Fogarthy and Harcourt and the Witness being present And Grove being more forward than the rest said Since it could not be done clandestinely it should be attempted openly That those that fell had the Glory to die in a good Cause But if it were discovered the Discovery could never come to the heighth but their Party would be strong enough to bring it to pass That Grove was to have 1500 l. and Pickering a considerable number of Masses That there was a Discourse at the same time of a design to kill several Noble Persons Knight was to kill the Earl of Shaftsbury Pritchard the Duke of Buckingham Oneile the Earl of Ossory and Obrian the Duke of Ormond Then a Letter was produced and read in Court sworn by Sir Thomas Doleman to have been found among Harcourt's Papers four or five days after Dr. Oates had given in his Informations from one Edward Petre giving account when the Consult was to be as ordered by their Provincial Whitebread mightily confirming Dr. Oates's Evidence as to that particular Then the Seals also were shewn in Court that were made use of to sign Commissions taken out of VVhitebread's Chamber Then the King's Counsel here ending their Evidence the Lord Chief Justice took notice to the Jury that there had only one Witness sworn against Whitebread and Fenwick Bedloe charging them with nothing of his own knowledg and that therefore he would discharge them of them and accordingly he sent them back to the Goal And the other three were called upon to make their Defence which was only a bare denial of the Matter of Fact Only Ireland being charged in August laboured very much to prove that he was out of Town all that Month by the Testimony of his Mother and Sister and one Harrison Sir John Southcott's Coachman and one Gifford His Mother and Sister saying expresly that he went out of Town August 3d and Harrison that he saw him at St. Albans August 5th and continued in his Company to the 16th and Gifford that he saw him at the latter end of August and beginning of September at Wolverhampton tho it was reproved by very good Circumstances and upon Oath for the King by Sarah Pain Servant to Grove that she saw him at his own door in London about the 12th or 13th of the same Month. His next Defence was a weak Reflections upon Dr. Oates's Credit to which purpose an Indictment for Perjury never prosecuted was urged against him but the Attourny-General made slight of it as of a thing that had nothing in it Neither was that which Sir Dennis Ashbournham said of greater force concerning the Irregularities of his Childhood which he said would have staggered his Belief of what the Doctor had deposed if the matter had depended solely upon his Testimony but being so corroborated with other Circumstances he was convinced of the Truth of what he had discovered nor did he think any thing could be said against Dr. Oates to take off his Credibility The Lord Chief Justice then summ'd up the Evidence smartly inveighing against the Principles and Doctrines of Popery After which the Jury retired for a very little while and then brought those three Prisoners in Guilty And then the Court Adjourn'd till the Afternoon when being met about five a Clock Mr. Recorder the Judges being gone home made an excellent Speech against Popery to the Prisoners sentencing them to be drawn hang'd and quartered which accordingly was executed upon them at Tyburn on Friday Jan. 24th following The Trials of Robert Green Henry Berry and Laurence Hill at the King's-Bench-Bar at Westminster on Monday Feb. 10th 1678. THE Prisoners there appearing were indicted for the Murder of Sir Edmondbury Godfrey Kt. one of his Majesty's Justices of the Peace for the County of Middlesex to which they pleaded Not Guilty on Wednesday Feb. 5. and were ordered to be brought the next day to their Trials But Mr. Attourny-General the next day moved the Court that it might be deferred till Monday Feb. 10. that the King's Evidence might be the more ready which was granted On Monday therefore they were brought to their Trials and the Jury impanell'd were Sir Will. Roberts Bar. Sir Rich. Fisher Bar. Sir Mich. Heneage Kt. Sir Tho. Bridges Kt. William Avery Esq Char. Vmphrevile Esq John Bathurst Esq Richard Gowre Esq Thomas Henslowe Esq John Sharpe Esq John Haynes Esq Walter Moyle Esq To whom the Indictment being read Sir Thomas Stringer Serjeant at Law and of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the Charge and Sir William Jones Attorney-General opened the Evidence Then Dr. Oates being sworn deposed That in September Sir Edmondbury Godfrey in Discourse did tell him what Affronts he had received from some great Persons for being so zealous to take Examinations concerning the Plot And that others who were well inclin'd to have the Discovery made did think that
1684. was brought from thence by Habeas-Corpus to the Bar at the King's-Bench at Westminster where being Arraign'd he was told of his being Indicted and Outlaw'd and thereby Attainted for High-Treason and ask'd what he had to say why Execution should not be awarded against him upon that Attainder To which be reply'd that since he had made an Ingenuous Confession to his Majesty of all that he knew of any manner of Conspiracy against him he hoped That would render him Capable of Mercy and Pardon Upon which the Attorny-General offer'd him a Trial that if he had any thing to say he Defend himself from the Indictment but he Confessing himself Guilty of many things therein declin'd it and threw himself wholly upon the King's Mercy But the Court telling him that the King was the Dispenser of his own Mercy and that they were only to Execute his Justice gave a Rule for his Execution upon Wednesday Sevennight after there being no other Judgment to be pronounced in such Cases as the Court told the Attorny-General when he moved for it the Outlawry it self being the Judgment Which accordingly was Executed upon him on Wednesday the 30th of April 1684. at Tyburn Proceedings in the Court of King's-Bench against Sir Thomas Armstrong June 14. 1684. Sir George Jefferies being Lord Chief Justice SIR Thomas Armstrong Kt. was upon the 14th of June 1684. brought by a Writ of Habeas-Corpus from Newgate to the Bar of the Court of King's-Bench at Westminster and there Arraign'd upon an Outlawry of High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King c. And being ask'd what he had to say for himself why Sentence should not be awarded against him upon that Attainder pleaded his being beyond-Sea at the time of the Outlawry and desired to be tried upon the Indictment Which the Court refusing to grant him he pleaded the Statute of the 6th of Edw. the 6th which gives the Person Outlaw'd a Year's time to reverse the Outlawry and desired it might be read which accordingly was done But it appearing by the Statute That the Person Outlaw'd ought to render himself to the Chief Justice of England within a Year's time Sir Thomas was told this did not concern him for he had not rendred himself but was taken and brought thither against his Will To which he answered That the Year was not then expir'd fie was there and did now render himself and pray'd Counsel might be assign'd him to argue it in Point of Law but the Court over-rul'd him in it telling him There was no such Doubt or Difficulty in the Matter as to need any such thing Upon which insisting much upon his Innocency and offering to make proof of it if he might be admitted to a Trial he produc'd Holloway's Case as a Precedent for it who had but a little before been offer'd it at the same Place but the Court told him that what had been done therein was meerly from the King's Grace and Mercy and that the King might extend the same Mercy to him also if he so pleas'd but since he had not done so and it not being their Business they must proceed to award Execution upon the Outlawry Upon which Mrs. Matthews Daughter to the Prisoner call'd out to the Court not to Murder her Father For which the Chief Justice caus'd her to be committed to the Marshal and accordingly she wishing that God Almighty's Judgments might light upon them was carried away the Chief Justice saying That he thanked God he was Clamour-proof After which the Attorn Gen. offered to shew the Reasons why the King extended that Grace to Holloway but ought not to extend it to Sir T.A. as not at all deserving any sort of Indulgence or Mercy but that having relation to the Evidence and not to the Outlawry the Court refus'd to hear any thing of it and so proceeded to give a Rule for his Execution the Friday following telling him upon his earnest pressing to have the Benefit of the Statute he had cited the he should have the Full Benefit of the Law And accordingly on Friday the 20th of June he was Executed at Tyburn Mrs. Matthews upon a Petition being before releas'd out of Custody without Fees The Trial between Sir William Pritchard Kt. and Alderman of the City of London Plaintiff and Thomas Papillon Esq Defendant in an Action upon the Case at the Sessions of Nisi Prius holden for the Court of Kings-Bench at the Guild-hall in the City of London on Thursday the 6th of November in Michaelmas Term in the 36th Year of the Reign of King Charles the Second 1684. Before Sir George Jefferies Kt. and Baronet then Lord Chief Justice of the said Court of Kings-Bench SIR William Pritchard late Lord Mayor of the City of London having in Easter Term last brought an Action upon the Case for falsly maliciously and without probable cause procured him to be arrested and imprisoned in his Mayoralty against Thomas Papillon Esq The Defendant pleaded Not Guilty and thereupon issue being joined it came this day to be tried before the Lord Chief Justice Jefferys and the Jury sworn to try this Cause were these Bartholomew Ferryman Thomas Blackmore Thomas Symonds William Whatton John Green Thomas Amy Joseph Baggs Daniel Chandler John Reynalds John Allen Joseph Caine William Withers jun. Then Mr. Munday being of Counsel for the Plaintiff opened the Case to which Mr. Attorney General added something And then Mr. Solicitor General called Mr. Keeling who being sworn deposed That on April the 24th he being sent for by a Letter from Mr. Goodenough came to Mr. Russel's a Cooks-shop in Iron-monger-lane to meet him where were 30 or 40 Persons together By whom while he was gone for a little while his Name was put into a Warrant to be a special Bailiff to arrest the Lord Mayor which he seeming unwilling to do was urged thereto for fear of displeasing the Discontented Party which he said were such as he and the Goodenoughs were of even such as would have killed the King and the Duke that being prevailed upon he went along with the Coroner Mr. Burton and Mr. Francis Goodenough to Grocers-hall where Sir William Pritchard kept his Mayoralty to whom the Coroner came up and said he had a Warrant against him and therefore pray'd him to give an Appearance at the Suit of Mr. Thomas Papillon and another at the Suit of Mr. John Dubois whereupon some Words passed between them and the Lord Mayor refusing to give any Appearance the Coroner bid us execute our Warrants upon which he came up to the Lord Mayor and touched him upon the Shoulder telling him that he did arrest him at the Suit of Thomas Papillon Esq and one Ferdinando Burley arrested him then again at the Suit of Mr. John Dubois and then the Coroner dismissing them and taking the Lord Mayor into his own Custody he went thence to Sir Henry Tulse's and arrested him also Then Sir Henry Tulse being called and sworn deposed that about
four a Clock in the Asternoon Mr. Keeling came with two more to his house and arrested him at the Suit of Mr Papillon and another of them did the same at the Suit of Mr. Dubois telling him if he would not give Appearance he must go to the Lord Mayor who was at Skinners-hall but that they would take his word till the Morrow Morning However he immediately went to the Lord Mayor's-house and not finding him at home he went to Skinners-hall where he found him all alone and no Alderman only the Officers with him where he had been but a little while but was detained and he with him till about eleven a Clock abundance of People being gather'd together about the Door but a Company of the trained Band-Souldiers coming keptall quiet Then Mr. Wells the common Cryer was called and sworn who deposed That he being in the next room to the Hall wherein the Lord Mayor was arrested was presently sent for to my Lord who bid him send out the Officers to summon a Lieutenancy which he did and the Sword-Bearer being not just then at hand the Lord-Mayor bid him take the Sword and go along with him and so they were carry'd by the Coroner to his own house and the Lord-Mayor put up into a little Room by himself and he commanded by him to go and see for Sir James Edwards and Sir Henry Tulse and the Ld. Mayor that now is whom he found to be all arrested before he came Then Sir John Peake was sworn who deposed that upon the News of the Lord Mayor's being arrested he had order from the Lieutenancy to raise his Regiment which he did in a very little time and came with his Soldier to Skinners-Hall where he heard the Lord Mayor was and prevented any stir as it was feared there would have been Here the King's Counsel rested their Evidence till they had heard what the other said to it Whereupon Serjeant Maynard being of Counsel for the Defendant Mr. Papillon told the Jury in a very learned and excellent Speech that the Lord Mayor was as much subject to the Process of Law and Actions as any private Person in the City if he did injury or that which was not right in his Office That the Defendant did then suppose himself to have wrong done him and had therefore probable cause to bring his Action which he had done in a legal Manner against the Lord Mayor Then Mr. VVilliams insisted upon the probability of the cause of Action it being a controverted Question Whether Mr. Papillon and Mr. Dubois or Sir Dudley North and Mr. Box were chosen Sheriffs of London And some were so much dissatisfied with swearing Sir Dudley North and Mr. Rich Sheriffs as thinking them not duly Elected that they would have the Court of Kings-Bench moved for the Writ of Mandamus to swear Mr. Papillon and Mr. Dubois which Mandamus was granted to which the Mayor and Aldermen to whom it was directed made a Return that they were not Elected Sheriffs of London which Return was apprehended to be false and really to try the truth of this Return was the Action brought against the Plantiff which was the only way they had to right themselves and therefore they proceeded regularly and orderly in a decent Manner applying themselves to get an Appearance to their Action For that first they took out a Latitat against my Lord Mayor and by the Attorny gave him notice of it and desired an Appearance so that the Question in dispute might come to some determination But he was not pleased to give an Appearance to that Writ so they took out a Capias gave him notice of it and desired an Appearance but could have none whereupon they took out an alias Capias and the Coroner then told that he should be called upon to make some Return to the Writ which he acquainted the Lord Mayor with and desired again an Appearance which he refusing the Officer was constrained to arrest him and an Appearance at last was given Upon which they declared in the beginning of Hilary or Easter-Term 83. But it falling out that in Easter-Term 83 that that there was an Information for a Riot upon Midsummer-day before about this contested Election which being tried May the 10th was found to be so and the Sheriffs sworn to be duly elected thereupon being satisfied that they were mistaken they immediately discontinued their Action Then Mr. VVard of Counsel also for the Defendant spoke vindicating the Defendant from some unjust Reflections which the King's Counsel had made as if he had caused the Lord Mayor to be Arrested for the furtherance of some designed Insurrection against the King and Government and shewing the probability of the Cause then at that time though it be quite otherwise since the Question of the Right and Election being determined on the other side in the Trial about the Riot at the Election But the Ld. Ch. Justice here interrupting him would by no means allow that to be the Question then determined which raised some Words between them whereat there was a little Hiss begun which made the Ld. Ch. Justice in a great Fury ask who that Fellow was that durst hum or hiss while he sat there threatning to lay him by the heels and make an Example of him saying That indeed he knew the time when Causes were to be carried according as the Mobile hiss'd or humm'd and that he did not question but they had as good a will to it now Then he suffered the Defendants Counsel to call their Witnesses And therefore Mr Brome being call'd and swore deposed That aster he had the Writs he waited upon my Ld. Mayor praying his Appearance and gave him 9 or 10 days to consider and that the Defendants Attorny Mr. Goodenough did threaten to complain of him to the Court if he did not make a Return of the Writ And that when at last he could get no Appearance the Officers named in the Warrant by his Command did arrest him and carry him to Skinners-Hall and that soon aster he himself was taken into Custody and committed to the Compter Then after the Ld. Ch. Justice had cross'd Questions with him to have forc'd him a fall Mr. Cornish was swore who depos'd That Mr. Papillon and Mr. Dubois being at his house in came Mr. Goodenough the Attorny to receive their Orders what he should do telling them the time was almost spent and he had addressed himself from time to time to the Lord Mayor and some of the Aldermen to get them to appear but they would not They told him they had already given him Orders and desired that the matter might be brought to some Trial or issue and that he should desire an Appearance to the Action and if he would give it take it and remember my Lord Mayor is the Chief Magistrate of the City and pray'd him to carry it with all respect and regard imaginable to him The Ld. Ch. Justice then fell violently
wherein he says The Design prospered so well that he doubted not but in a little time the Business would be managed to the utter Ruin of the Protestant Party And by other Letters he writes to the French King's Confessor that the Assistance of his most Christian Majesty is necessary and desires Mony from him to carry on the Design But there was one Letter without Date more bloody than all the rest which was written to Le Chese in some short time after the long Letter of Sept. 29 1675. wherein among many other things Mr. Coleman expresses himself thus We have a mighty Work upon our hands no less than the Conversion of three Kingdoms and the utter subduing of a Pestilent Heresy which hath for some time domineer'd over this Northern Part of the World and there never were such hopes of success since the Death of our Queen Mary as now in our days And in the Conclusion of this Letter he implores Le Chese to get all the Aid and Assistance he can from France and that next to God Almighty he did rely upon the mighty Mind of his Most Christian Majesty and therefore did hope Le Chese would procure Mony and Assistance from him Then Dr. Oates at the desire of the Prisoner was call'd again concerning the time of the Consult Coleman offering to prove that he was the most part of that Month in Warwickshire offering something to excuse himself from the Guilt of Treason but being clearly convic'd in both Points Sir Francis Winnington his Majesty's Solitcior General sum'd up the Evidence to which Serjeant Pemberton added something and then the Lord Chief Justice Scroggs spoke to the Jury who presently brought the Prisoner in Guilty who on the Morrow Morning being brought to the Bar offered again something as to his being out of Town and pleaded the King's Act of Grace the insufficiency of which as to him being shewn the Ld. Ch. Justice directed a very excellent and Christian Speech to him pronouncing Sentence upon him to be hang'd drawn and quartered And on Tuesday Decemb. 3. following he was accordingly drawn on a Sledg from Newgate to Tyburn where he declared that he had been a Roman Catholick for many Years and that he thanked God he died in that Religion and he said he did not think that Religion at all prejudicial to the King and Government The Sheriff told him if he had any thing to say by way of Confession or Contrition he might proceed otherwise it was not seasonable for him to go on with such like Expressions And being asked if he knew any thing of the Murther of Sir Edmondbury Godfrey he declared upon the words of a dying Man he knew not any thing of it for that he was a Prisoner at that time Then after some private Prayers and Ejaculations to himself the Sentence was executed upon him The Trials of William Ireland Thomas Pickering and John Grove at the Sessions-house in the Old-Baily on Tuesday December 17 1678. THen and there were Arraigned Thomas White alias Whitebread William Ireland John Fenwick Thomas Pickering and John Grove upon an Indictment of High-Treason for conspiring to murder the King To which they pleaded Not Guilty Their Jury were Sir Will. Roberts Bar. Sir Phil. Matthews Bar. Sir Charles Lee Kt. Edward Wilford Esq John Foster Esq Joshua Galliard Esq John Byfield Esq Thomas Eaglesfield Esq Thomas Johnson Esq John Pulford Esq Thomas Earnesby Esq Rich. Wheeler Gent. To whom the Indictment was read and Sir Creswel Levinz opened it Sir Samuel Baldwyn opened the Charge and Mr. Finch all of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the Evidence And Dr. Oates being sworn deposed That in December last VVhitebread receiv'd a Patent from the General of the Jesuits at Rome to be Provincial of that Order That after that he ordered Conyers to preach against the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy at St. Omers upon St. Thomas of Canterbury's day That he sent several Letters thither to Ashby about Assassinating the King and in February a Summons to the Consult held April 24 upon which nine did appear at London and the Consult was begun at the White-Horse Tavern in the Strand and afterwards adjourn'd into several little Meetings wherein a Resolve was drawn up by Secretary Mico for Pickering and Grove to go on in their Attempt to kill the King for which Grove was to have 15000 l. and Pickering 30000 Masses and this Resolve was signed by Whitebread Fenwick Ireland and others whom he saw sign it That in June the Witness was sent over to murder Dr. Tongue for translating the Jesuits Morals out of French that he met with Fenwick at Dover whose Box being seiz'd by the Searchers then said that if they had search'd his Pockets they would have found Letters as might have cost him his Life That soon after Ashby who had been sometime Rector of St. Omers brought Instructions from VVhitebred who was then looking after his Charge as Provincial beyond Sea that Care should be taken for the Murder of the Bishop of Hereford and Dr. Stillingfleet and that 10000 l. should be proposed to Sir Geo. VVakeman for poysoning the King and that nevertheless Pickering and Grove should go on still in their Attempts That the 10000 l. was proposed to but refused as too little by Sir George whereupon VVhitebread writ from St. Omers that 15000 l. should be proposed which was both proposed and accepted whereof 5000 l. was paid by Coleman or his Order That in August at a Consult of the Jesuits with the Benedictines the four Ruffians were recommended by Dr. Fogarthy to which Fenwick being present consented and they were sent away to VVindsor and the next day 80 l. was sent after them That in this Month other Letters came from VVhitebread ordering Harcourt to send one Moor and Sanders alias Browne into Scotland to carry on the Design which Fenwick and Ireland had plotted of a Rebellion there That Pickering and Grove did accept the Terms and Grove took the Sacrament and Oaths of Secrecy upon it after the Consult was over in VVhitebread's Chamber That he saw Pickering and Grove several time walking in the Park together with their Screw'd Pistols that they had Silver Bullets to shoot with which he had seen and Grove would have had the Bullets to be champt for fear the Would to be given by them might be curable That in March last these Persons having followed the King several Years Pickering had a fair opportunity but that the Flint of his Pistol being loose he durst not venture to give Fire for which Negligence he underwent Penance and had twenty or thirty strokes of Discipline and Grove was chidden for his Carelesness That Fenwick was by when the 80 l. was sent by Harcourt to VVindsor for the four Ruffians That he received the Oath of Secrecy which VVhitebread administred upon a Mass-Book Mico holding the Candle That VVhitebread issued out several Commissions and particularly one for
Reading should direct as also for giving the said Mr. Bedloe 50 Guinies in Hand and promising him greater Rewards for the Ends and Purposes aforesaid To which he pleaded Not Guilty in Thought Word or Deed. Then the Jurors sworn were Sir John Cutler Joshua Galliard Esq Edward Wilford Esq Thomas Henslow Esq Thomas Earsby Esq John Serle Esq Thomas Casse Esq Rainsf Waterhouse Esq Matthew Bateman Esq VValter Moyle Esq Richard Pagett Esq John Haynes Esq Mr. Reading at first challeng'd Sir John Cutler as being in Commission of Peace and labour'd very much to have made his Challenge good But the Court over-rul'd it in regard Sir John was not in the particular Commission then sitting and for that he could not challenge him peremptorily the Indictment not endangering his Life as it might have been laid but only for a Misdemeanour Thereupon the Court proceeded and the Indictment being read to the Jury Edward VVard Esq of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened it and Sir Creswel Levinz opened the Charge After which Mr. Reading to save time admitting those Publick Passages laid in the Preamble of his Indictment as that Coleman Ireland c. were Executed for Treason and that the Lords in the Tower were accused and impeached in Parliament for this Plot Mr. Bedloe was sworn and deposed That Sir Trevor VVilliams brought him first acquainted with the Prisoner who began with him as a friendly Adviser in publick always pressing him to discover what he knew of the Plot but in private advising him to be cautions and not to run at the whole Herd of Men intimating as if the Ld. Ch. Justice also seemed displeased at his forwardness saying that he would make the Parliament his Friends by proving the Plot the King his Friend in not charging all the Lords and the Lords his Friends by being kind to them That the Persons Mr. Reading most sollicited for were the Lords Petre Powis and Stafford and Sir Henry Tichborn Mr. Roper Mr. Caryl and Corker That he should have Mony and an Estate by the negotiation of the Prisoner at the Bar to shorten the Evidence and bring them off from the Charge of High-Treason That he and Mr. Reading had several Consultations about this matter none of which he did conceal but revealed them presently to the Prince the Earl of Essex Counsellor Smith Mr. Kirby and several others And that he did not give in his full Evidence against VVhitebread and Fenwick a Ireland's Tryal because he was then treating with Mr. Reading who had made him easie That the Prisoner in assurance of his Reward told him he had order to draw blank Deeds to be sign'd in ten days after the discharge of those for whom the Sollication was made That he and the Prisoner had a private Consultation in his Bed-chamber March 29. last when Mr. Speke and his own Man Henry VViggens were hid privately in the Room and over-heard the main of the Consultation and Overture of Mr. Reading At what time Mr. Bedloe was to pen his Testimony as the Prisoner should direct him for the mitigation of the Evidence That when that Paper was finished the Prisoner carried it to the Lords to consider of it And that after they had consider'd of it and mended it as they pleas'd Reading return'd with the Emendations written with his own hand and deliver'd them to Mr. Bedloe in the Painted-Chamber who held them so behind him that Mr. Speke as it was agreed took them unobserved out of his hand Which Paper being then Produced was read in open Court Then Mr. Speke was sworn who deposed That on Saturday morning March the 29th last he was hid behind the Hangings between the Bed's-head and the Wall in Mr. Bedloe's Chamber as was agreed on before and there he heard Mr. Reading's and Mr. Bedloes Negotiation together That Mr. Bedloe asked the Prisoner what the Lords said to the Business and what the Lord Stafford said to the Estate in Glocestershire To which the Prisoner answered That the Lord Stafford had faithfully promised him to settle that Estate upon Mr. Bedloe and that he had Orders from that Lord to draw up a blank Deed in order to the Settlement which the said Lord had engag'd to Sign and Seal within 10 days after he should be discharg'd by Mr. Bedloe's contracting of his Evidence And that the Lords Powis and Petre and Sir Henry Tichbourn had faithfully engag'd and promis'd to give Mr. Bedloe a very fair and noble Reward which should be suitable to the Service he should do them in bringing them off from the charge of High-Treason To which when Mr. Bedloe answer'd that he would not rely upon their Promises only but expected to have something under their Hands Mr. Reading reply'd That they did not think it convenient so to do as yet but that Mr. Bedloe might take his Word as he had done theirs and that he would engage his Life for the performance With much other Discourse all tending to the same effect That on the Monday morning he saw Mr. Reading deliver the Paper to Mr. Bedloe from whom he received it and he and Mr. Wharton read it immediately in the Lord Privy Seal's Room After him Henry Wiggen's Mr. Bedloe's Man deposed That he was concealed under the Rugg upon his Master's Bed at the same time and to the same intent as Mr. Speke was giving the same Evidence as to what had been discours'd of between the Prisoner and his Master in the Chamber which afterwards he and Mr. Speke writ down And that he saw Mr. Reading deliver the Paper to his Master in the Painted-Chamber and saw Mr. Speke take it who went with another Gentleman into the Lord Privy Seal's Room with it After this Mr. Reading began his Defence Protesting his own Innocency producing Mr. Bulstrode only to testify that the occasion of his going to the Lord Stafford was his sending for him which yet he did not without leave from the Committee of Secrets That then he was employ'd by the Lords only to get them their Habeas Corpus's And Sir Trevor Williams being called by him declared how he only recommended Mr. Bedloe to him for his Advise about having his Pardon as perfect as could be The Prisoner owning his being in Mr. Bedloe's Chamber at that time and taking his Evidence and carrying it afterwards to the Lords but that it was purely out of Conscience and to prevent Perjury and the Shedding of Innocent Blood and the Deed discoursed of was only for 200 l. to be paid him by the Lord Stafford within 10 days after he should be discharged pro Consilio impenso impendendo to be secured upon an Estate in Glocestershire the which Mony the Lord Stafford indeed told him when he had received he might dispose of it as he thought fit which Confession the Court declared amounted to the Confession of the whole Charge Then he endeavour'd the bespattering the Witnesses Relating how Mr. Bedloe had vilify'd Dr. Stilling-fleet
Dr. Tillotson and Dr. Lloyd and that he heard him say he had by him several Witnesses that would swear whatever he bid them and that he laid in Provisions of Fire Coals and Billets behind the Palsegrave-Head Tavern and hard by Charing-Cross to burn the City of VVestminster which he produced one Mr. Palmer to swear and that he lent him Mony as also he had Mr. Speke which was yet unpaid which proved to be 6 s. 8 d. for an Order which was for Mr. Speke's Brother aspersing them with being Eves-droppers multiplying words to little purpose His Defence therefore being Artificial as the Lord Chief Justice told him because nothing to the purpose Nay Mr. Justice VVild told him he disgrac'd his Profession by making so weak a Defence And Bedloe own'd some of the Crimes he bespattered him with as part of the Guilt for which the King had given him his Pardon and farther Depos'd That Mr. Reading was to have 100 l. a Year out of every 1000 l. a Year of Bedloe's Reward The Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence to which the Ld. Ch. Baron added some little and then the Jury after a short recess brought the Prisoner in Guilty And then the Court Adjourn'd for half an hour when being met again and the Prisoner at the Bar The Ld. Ch. Justice Sentenc'd him to be Fined 1000 l. to be imprisoned for the space of a whole Year and to be set in the Pillory for the space of one hour in the Palace-Yard in VVestminster On the Monday following he was Pillored accordingly the Sheriff having a particular Charge of his Person that nothing but Shame and Infamy might befal him to which he had been condemned and did deserve as well as any Man that ever was convicted The Trials of Thomas White alias Whitebread Provincial of the Jesuits in England William Harcourt pretended Rector of London John Fenwick Procurator for the Jesuits in England John Gavan alias Gawen and Anthony Turner all Jesuits and Priests At the Sessions-house in the Old-Baily on Friday June 13 1679. THen and there the Court being met and all the Judges of England present Proclamation was made of Silence and Attention whilst the King's Commission of Oyer and Terminer and of Goal-Delivery were openly read then the Prisoners being set to the Bar James Corker a Priest and Jesuit brought thither to be tried with them presented to the Court a Petition setting forth that he was absolutely surprized and unprepared for his Trial and therefore besought the Court that he might not be tried till the next Sessions To which the Court seemed inclinable enough nor did the Attorney General gain-say it upon condition that he could really make it out that he wanted Witnesses without which he could not make his Defence However it was thought fitting that he should hear the Charge that was against him read to the end he might be able to give the Court an account what Witnesses he had that might avail him in reference to his Defence against it which being done the Indictment being in general for High-Treason in conspiring the Death of the King the Subversion of the Government and Protestant Religion the former Question was put to him again and then he named one Alice Gatton now at Tunbridg as a Witness to prove that he was not in Town upon the 24th of April so that being respited till the next day the Court said nothing farther to him that Sitting Immediately after the Indictment was read VVhitebread represented to the Court that in regard he had been tried upon the 17th of December before upon the same Indictment at what time the Jury being impanell'd and the Evidence found insufficient which came in against him the Jury was discharged without a Verdict he was informed that no Man could be tried and consequently put in Jeopardy of his Life twice for the same Cause For which reason he pray'd for Counsel to direct him upon that Point in matter of Law He urged that his Life was in danger as being deliver'd over in Charge to the Jury and to make it out he alledg'd the Case of Sayer in the 31 Eliz. who having pleaded to a former Indictment for a Burglary was indicted a second time upon which it was the Opinion of the Judges that he could not be indicted twice for the same Fact He likewise desir'd a sight of the Record and that he might be informed whether or no when a Person comes upon his Trial he ought not either to be condemned or acquitted Upon the whole matter and his Motion together the Court declar'd to him that the Jury being discharg'd of him his Life was in no danger For that the Jury being sworn to make a true deliverance or the Prisoners in their Charge their Charge could not be full till the last Charge of the Court after Evidence Moreover he was told that such a Plea as he produc'd could not be supported without a Record and it was certain there was none here because there was no Verdict and besides this was not the same Indictment in regard it contain'd new matter Then Fenwick offered the same Plea his Case being the same appearing before with Whitebread upon his Trial but the Court returning the same Answer to him as to the former they both submitted and so all of them pleaded severally Not Guilty to the Indictment Then the Jury being to be impanell'd they unanimously excepted without naming them aganist all those Persons that had serv'd before as Jury-Men in the same Cause which the Court allowed them as but reason And the Jury therefore that were sworn were these twelve Thomas Harriott William Gulston Allen Garraway Richard Cheney John Roberts Thomas Cash Rainsford Waterhouse Matthew Bateman John Kain Richard White Richard Bull Thomas Cox To whom the Indictment being read Mr. Belwood of Counsel for the King in this Cause open'd the Indictment and Sir Creswel Levinz proved the Charge and then Dr. Oates was first called and being sworn he deposed That Whitebread was made Provincial the last December was twelve Month and by virtue of his Authority order'd one Conyers to preach in the English Seminary upon St. Thomas of Becket's-day that the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy were Heretical Antichristian and Devilish which accordingly was done That in January or February he wrote Letters to St. Omers concerning the State of Ireland of which he had an account from Arch-bishop Talbot who wrote him word that there were several thousands of Irish ready to rise when the Blow by which was meant the King's Murther should be given in England and he hoped it would not be long ere it was given That he sent over two Jesuits into Ireland in January to see how Affairs stood there of whose return he writ an account to St. Omers in April and of the Consult to be that Month at which he was and signed a Resolve at Wild-house that Pickering and Grove should go on in their design to dispatch
Secresy as to time and place it appearing of its own Nature necessary The other was a Letter from one Christopher Anderton dated from Hilton by which was meant Rome Feb. the 5th 1677 8. wherein mention was made of the Patents being sent thence both which Letters the Prisoners strugled much to vindicate by such forced Constructions of the matters they contained as all the Court rejected Against Gavan Dr. Oates deposed That he saw his Name to the Resolve though he could not swear he was at the Consult of the 24th of April That he gave an account from time to time of the Affairs of Staffordshire and Shropshire relating to the Plot and that coming to London he gave the same account to Ireland his own Chamber and talk'd of two or 3000 l. that would be ready for the Design Mr. Prance then deposed that Harcourt had told him above a Year before as he was paying him for an Image of the Virgin Mary that there was a Plot upon the Life of the King Mr. Dugdale deposed against him that it was he who had engaged him in the Plot upon the Life of the King and often perswaded and encouraged him to it That at Ewer's and his Chambers at Boscobel and other places several Consultations had been had about the Death of the King and bringing in of Popery wherein Mr. Gaven was always a great Man being a good Orator to perswade People in the Design That at the same Consultations he had heard the Massacre often discours'd of And that Gaven should say That tho they were but in a low condition themselves yet they would have Men and Mony enough to spare for such a Design That the said Gaven had many times endeavoured to convince him of the Lawfulness if not the Merit of killing any person whatsoever for the Advancement of their Religion As to Turner it was sworn by Dr. Oates that he was at the Consult of Fenwick's Chamber and sign'd the Resolve Mr. Dugdale also deposed that Ewers had told him that Turner was to carry on the Design in VVorcestershire That the said Turner had met with Ewers Leveson and others in several places and had in every one of them given his consent to and assisted with his Counsel in the carrying on of the grand Design of killing the King and introducing of Popery This was the main of the Evidence for the King The Prisoner's defence lay chiefly in seeking to invalidate the Testimony given against them and to prove Oates perjured they produced these St Omers Witnesses who testify'd that he was not in England in April viz. Mr. Hilsley William Parry Doddington Gifford Palmer Cox who differed in his Testimony from all the rest and caused two great Laughters in the Court Thomas Billing Townley Fall John Hall Butler Cooke a Taylor some of which were so positive that they affirmed that Dr. Oates never lay but two Nights out of the Colledg from December till the middle of June And to prove further that he did not come over with Sir John VVarner and Sir Thomas Preston as he had deposed elsewhere one Bartlet a Dutchman Carlier Verron Baillee who spoke by an Interpreter John Joseph and Peter Carpenter appear'd Then Gaven produced two Witnesses to prove him to be at VVolverhampton in Staffordshire at the time of the Consult viz. one Mrs. Kath. VVinford at whose House he there lodged and Mary Poole a Servant in the House the latter of whom was so lame in her Testimony as caused both Laughter and Shouts He produced four more that affirm'd him to be in VVolverhampton the last week in July but none that could speak to the other three weeks in that Month. However he protested his Innocency and desired to put himself upon the Trial of Ordeal Then VVhitebread in his defence offered to prove D. Oates mistaken in his Evidence at Mr. Ireland's Trial which the Court would not allow Harcourt endeavoured to prove Dr. Oates mistaken as to Ireland's being with him in his Chamber in August One Gifford the Lady Southcott Sir John Southcott Mr. Edward Southcott his Son Mrs. Harewel her Daughter Eliz. Keeling Pendrel and his Wife two Mrs. Giffords and one Mr. Bedloe affirming him to have been most of that Month in Saffordshire Fenwick offer'd to invalidate Mr. Bedloe's Evidence from his having been an ill Man c. Then Sir Creswel Levinz of Counsel for the King summ'd up the Prisoners Defence and to clear Dr. Oates's Evidence about Ireland he called Sarah Pain who swore that she saw Ireland in London about the middle of August And for the Proof of Dr. Oates's being in England at the time he said he was Mr. VValker a Minister Mrs. Ives Mrs. Mayo Sir Richard Barker Philip Page Butler his Servants Mr. Smith Schoolmaster of Islington and Mr. Clay a Popish Priest all deposed as to his being seen in April and May 78 to which the Prisoners only opposed the Number and Innocency of their Evidence being most young Boys After which the Ld. Ch. Justice directed the Jury and in summing up the Evidence insisted particularly on Dugdal's Evidence concerning Sir Edmondbury Godfrey's Death as a mighty Confirmation of the Plot. Then an Officer was sworn to keep the Jury who withdrew and the Judges also went off from the Bench leaving Mr. Recorder and a competent number of Commissioners there to take the Verdict and about a quarter of an Hour after the Jury brought them all in Guilty Then the Prisoners were carried back to Newgate and the Court adjourned till eight next Morning And then Mr. Langhorn was tried and found guilty After which they were all six brought to the Bar together and received Judgment to be Drawn Hang'd and Quartered which accordingly was done upon these 5 Jesuits and Priests on Friday June the 20th at Tyburn The Trial of Richard Langhorn Esq Counsellour at Law at the Old-Baily on Saturday June the 14th 1679. HIS Indictment was for conspiring the Death of the King Subversion of the Government and Protestant Religion whereto he pleading Not guilty the Jury were impannelled for his Trial who were Arthur Yong Edward Beeker Robert Twyford VVilliam Yapp John Kirkham Peter Pickering Thomas Barnes Francis Neeve John Hall George Sitwel James VVood Richard Cawthorne To whom the Indictment being read Roger Belwood Esq of Counsel for the King in this cause opened the Indictment and Sir Creswel Levins proved the Charge And Then Mr. Dugdale was first called to give Evidence of the general Design from which afterwards it would be brought down particularly to Mr. Langhorn who therefore deposed that he had been in several Consultations for alteration of this present Government and for the introducing of Popery and Murther of the King that he was to have a Sum of Money to be one of them that should kill the King being put upon it by Mr. Ewers Mr Gavan Mr. Luson and Mr. Vavasor all Jesuits that there was then to have been a Massacre of the Protestants and
then an Army to have appear'd to have cut off those that might escape the Massacre that these Consultations were in Staffordshire one at Tixal another at Boscobel at my Lord Aston's and Mr. Gerrard's Also that Mr. Ewers received a Letter on Munday dated on Saturday from Mr. Harcourt which did express and begin thus This very night Sir Edmondbury Godfrey is dispatched with some other words of like Import Then Mr. Prance deposed that he was told by the Lord Butler that one Mr. Messenger a Gentleman of the Horse to the Lord Arundel of VVarder was by him imployed and the Lord Powis to kill the King for a good Reward That Mr. Harcourt in his hearing said that the King was to be killed by several And that Fenwick said Mr. Langhorn was to have a great hand in it That then an Army of 50000 Men was to be raised and governed by the Lords Arundel and Powis to rain the Protestants and settle the Catholick Religion whereof he hath heard Fenwick Ireland and Grove speak at the same time together Then for the Proof of the particular matters of the Indictment Dr. Oates was sworn who deposed That in April 1677 he went into Spain and in September following Mr. Langhorn's Sons came thither the one a Scholar of the English Colledg at Madrid the other of the English Colledg at Valladolid to study Philosophy in order to their receiving of the Priesthood That in November following he returned into England and brought Mr. Langhorn Letters from his Sons which he delivered soon after his Arrival to him telling him at the same time that he believ'd his Sons would both enter into the Society whereat Mr. Langhorn seem'd mightily pleased saying that by so doing they might quickly come to Preferment in England for that things would not last long in the posture they were in That in the latter end of November he returning to St. Omers Mr. Langhorn deliver'd to him a Pacquet to carry thither wherein when it was opened he saw a Letter from him to the Fathers giving them thanks for their care and kindness towards his Sons promising them to repay them their charges of his Son's Journey into Spain which was 20 l. telling them that he had writ to Father Le Chese in order to their Concerns saying that Mr. Coleman had been very large with him and therefore it would not be necessary for him to trouble his Reverence with any large Epistles at that time which Letter he saw not only this account of it That there was in March or April after another Letter from Mr. Langhorn to the Fathers at St. Omers about an extravagant Son of his wherein he also express'd his great care for the carrying on of the Design of the Catholicks and that the Parliament began now to flag in promoting the Protestant Religion and that now they had a fair Opportunity to begin and give the Blow That in April or May when the Consult was to which several of them came over from St. Omers and at which tho Mr. Langhorn was not present yet that he had Orders from the Provincial to give him an account of what Resolutions and Passages and Minutes pass'd and this he did as well as he could telling him who went Procurator to Rome which was one Father Cary that several of the Fathers were to be admonished for their irregular living as they termed it and that it was resolv'd that the King should be kill'd that Pickering and Grove should go on to do it for which Grove was to have 1500 l. and Pickering 30000 Masses upon the hearing of which Mr. Langhorn lift up his Hands and Eyes and prayed God that it might have good Success That then he saw in Mr. Langhorn's Chamber seven or eight Commissions whereof there were about fifty by Virtue of a Breve from the Pope directed to the General of the Society and signed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Johannes Paulus de Oliva those he saw were for the Lord Arundel to be Lord Chancellor of England the Lord Powis to be Lord High Treasurer the Lord Bellasis to be General the Lord Peter to be Lieutenant General the Lord Stafford to be Pay-Master or some such office in the Army Mr. Coleman to be Secretary of State and Mr. Langhorn to be Advocate of the Army That he saw the Answers of Le Cheese and Anderton who was Rector of the Colledg at Rome to Mr. Langhorn's Letters to them and carried the Originals of them to the Fathers who requested them from Mr. Langhorn wherein Le Chese did assure him of his Stedfastness and Constancy to assist the English Society for the carrying on the Cause And that they should not need doubt but the French King would stand by them That Mr. Langhorn was employed as Solicitor for the Jesuits and went with Harcourt Fenwick Keines and Langworth and communicated the Secret to the Benedictine Monks desiring them to stand by them with a Sum of Money for the carrying on the Design upon which as he heard that 6000 l. was promised and that Mr. Langhorn was to receive it which though he could not prove that he had yet that he was sure he was much disgusted that Sir George Wakeman was not contented with 10000 l. to poison the King saying he was a covetous Man that it was in a Publick Concern and that being it was to carry on the Cause it was no matter if he did it for nothing but he was a narrow-spirited and a narrow-soul'd Physician That Mr. Langhorn also did know of 800000 Crowns come to France for England from the Congregation at Rome Then Mr. Bedloe being sworn there was as a Confirmation of what Dr. Oates had deposed concerning the Commissions an Instrument produced found by Mr. Bedloe in searching Mr. Arthur's Study a Papist a good while after Dr. Oates had given his Testimony publickly signed and seal'd just as the Commissions were He then deposed that about three Years since he was sent by Mr. Harcourt and Mr. Coleman with Letters to Le Chese that the Letters were writ at Coleman's House and brought open by Mr. Coleman to Mr. Langhorn's Chamber in the Temple where the Prisoner read and registred them and then Coleman sealing them up gave them to him to carry away The effect of which was to let Le Chese know that they waited only now for his Answer how far he had proceeded with the French King for sending of Mony for they only wanted Mony all other things were in readiness That the Catholicks of England were in safety had made all Places and all Offices to be disposed of to Catholicks or such as they thought would be so that all Garisons were either in their own Hands or ready to be put into them that they had so fair an Opportunity having a King so easy to believe what was dictated to him by their Party that if they slipp'd this Opportunity they must despair of ever introducing Popery into England for having a
King of England so easy and the French King so powerful they must not miss such an Opportunity That about a Year and an half since Mr. Harcourt sent him with another Pacquet of Letters to Mr. Langhorn to Register wherein were two Letters that he before had brought from Spain the one from Sir William Godolphin to the Lord Bellasis the other from the Irish Colledg of Jesuits in Salamanca That the Letter from the Rector did specify That they would have the Lord Bellasis and the rest of the Lords that were concerned and the rest of the Party in England to be in readiness and to have this communicated with all expedition for that now they had provided in Spain under the Notion of Pilgrims for St. Jago some Irish cashier'd Souldiers and a great many of Lay-Brothers to be ready to take Shipping at the Groin to land at Milford-Haven there to meet the Lord Powis and an Army that he was to raise in Wales to further this Design That also he met with Father Keins he brought a Letter from Mr. Langhorn in his Hand which he said was a chiding Letter from the Secretary de propaganda Fide Cardinal Barbarino to Mr. Langhorn and the rest of the Conspirators for going on no faster when they had so fair an Opportunity Then Thomas Buss the Duke of Monmouth's Cook was sworn who being out of the way before now deposed to the Plot in general That he in September last being at VVindsor heard one Handkinson bid one Anthony a Portuguese and the Queen's Confessor's Man who was then drinking in their Company that he should have a special care of the four Irish Gentlemen he brought over with him for that they would do their Business whom since he had seen Coleman's Trial he supposed to be the four Irish-Men that were to kill the King Then this Anthony was sent for by the Court to be took up but Handkinson was return'd beyond Sea Then the Prisoner in his own defence offer'd to the Court that the two Witnesses against him Oates and Bedloe were Parties to the Crime which was laid to his Charge and therefore he desired to know whether they had their Pardon or no Which tho it were sufficiently made out yet the Court for his further satisfaction declared That whether they had or had not yet they were good Witnesses or else they should not have been admitted Whereupon the Prisoner started another Question Whether having had their Pardons they might not fall under the same prospect in Law with an Approver not as being Approvers but as under some equivalence of reason for them From whence he would have inferr'd That if the Approver be pardoned the Appellee ought to be discharg'd To which the Court replied That an Approver was ever allow'd Maintenance and that there ought to be a proof of corrupt Contract or Subornation to invalidate a Testimony Then the Prisoner desired to know whether they had ever received or did not expect Gratifications and Rewards for their Discoveries To which Dr. Oates declared That he was 6 or 700 l. out of Pocket and knew not when he should see it again The Prisoner urged That Mr. Reading had told him that Mr. Bedloe had received 500 l. But the Court inform'd him that was for the discovery of the Murderers of Sir Edmondbury Godfrey Then these little Passes being all put by and he having nothing to answer to the Fact to invalidate the Witnesses he called in the St. Omers Gang which had all been heard and baffled but the day before to prove that Dr. Oates did not come over with those Persons he deposed he did nor at that Time but was at St. Omers in April and May which was the only Months they could answer any Questions about because as one of those Witnesses very honestly confess'd the Question that he came for did not fall upon any other Time Others of them contradicted themselves as to what they had spoke the day before one calling it the 24th of April New-Stile who yesterday call'd it Old-Stile another June who yesterday said July And the Woman of the VVhite-Horse Tavern affirming her House to be little and that there was never a Room therein that could contain near so many as Dr. Oates had deposed had met there at the Consult several in the Court presently contradicted her affirming that Fifty might dine at once in some of her Rooms Then Mr. Langhorne would have urged something against the Witnesses which they had said at other Trials the unreasonableness whereof the Court shew'd him Then several substantial Witnesses being sworn whereof one was a Papist deposed That they saw Dr. Oates in London in April and May 1678. which quite contradicted the St. Omer's Evidence Then Mr. Langhorn urg'd the St. Omer's Testimony notwithstanding against Dr. Oates's Evidence and affirm'd that he had never seen Mr. Bedloe before that day and that it was improbable that one that was in his way of Practice should become a Clerk to register Letters and that there was no proving a Negative disclaiming all Principles of Disloyalty leaving the rest to the Jury Therefore the Ld. Ch. Justice then summ'd up the Evidence and directed the Jury And then a Letter found among Harcourt's Papers five or six days after Dr. Oates had given in his Information to the King and Council was produc'd and read in Court to confirm Dr. Oates's Testimony about the Consult Then an Officer was sworn to keep the Jury who withdrew to consider of their Verdict and the Judges also went off from the Bench. After a short space the Jury returned and brought the Prisoner in Guilty upon which there was a very great Shout Then the five Prisoners cast the day before were all brought to the Bar and received Sentence together To be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd Mr. Recorder applying himself first to them in a very handsom Speech Which Sentence after a Month's Reprieve was executed upon him at Tyburn The Trials of Sir George Wakeman Bar. William Marshall Benedictine Monks William Rumley Benedictine Monks James Corker Benedictine Monks At the Sessions-House in the Old-Baily on Friday July 18. 1679. THen and there these Prisoners were Indicted for High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King subversion of the Government and Protestant Religion whereto they all pleaded Not Guilty Their Jury were Ralph Hawtrey Esq Henry Hawley Esq Henry Hodges Esq Richard Downton Esq John Bathurst Esq Robert Hampton Esq William Heydon Esq John Baldwyn Esq Richard Dobbins Esq William Avery Esq Richard White Gent. William VVayte Gent. To whom the Indictment being read Edward VVard Esq of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the Indictment and Sir Robert Sawyer opened the Charge And then Mr. Dugdale was first called to give a general Account only of the Plot. Who therefore being sworn deposed That for these seven Years he had known of the Plot and for two Years particularly and that in order thereto the best way was
end of February last and desired him to get him a Copy of his Master's Papers and take a Journal of his Actions and the Names of the Persons that came to him and that the Lord Treasurer would incourage him for his pains saying That Oates and Bedloe were two great Rogues and that the King knew them to be so and believed not a VVord they said and as soon as he had heard all they could say they should be hang'd Then Mrs. VViggens deposed the same as being present all the time that Knox was with her Son who refused that her Son should consent or go then with him as Knox motion'd to the Lady Danby for assurance of Encouragement and any Place in her Lord's disposal Then Mr. Palmer a Yeoman o th' Guard and one that attended Mr. Bedloe and got VViggens into his Service deposed That Mr. Wiggens made a discovery to him of what Knox had said to him for to acquaint his Master with which he did Then Mr. Thomas Dangerfield deposed That he in June was imployed by the Lady Powis to look after the Prisoners Lane and Knox in the Gate-House and did furnish Lane with Mony and got him bail'd out after which he was entertain'd at Powis-House and then removed and had 10 s. a week allowed him and was clothed That Knox afterward got his Liberty by the means of one Mr. Nevil who was furnished with Mony from the Lords in the Tower for that end From this Knox he received several Papers which were Informations against Oates which he sent to the Tower and thence they were sent to Mr. Nevil to enlarge upon and after to the Ld. Castlemain and then to him again by Mrs. Celier with an Order to draw up an Affidavit according to those Directions and get Lane sworn to the same which he did before Sir James Butler it being about Buggery and then he deliver'd the Papers so enlarged to Knox again Who some time after inform'd the Witness that he had got Osborne sworn also to the same Informations and shew'd him the Affidavit whereof he gave an Account to the Lady Powis who understanding his Poverty order'd him Encouragement and accordingly he has 40 s. from the Witness which he believed came from the Tower as also that 10 s. a Week allowed for Lane An Indictment was hereupon to have been drawn up against Oates by the Advice of Mr. Nevil and this Witness against this Term. Then the King's Counsel moved for the reading of these Information The Justices swore them and then the Information of Knox was read which was a relation how Osborne and Lane brought him the Information against Oates desiring him to assist them in getting them sworn to them A Second Paper was offered to be read but there appearing Scandalous Matter to be in it reflecting on the King the Court thought not fit to suffer any more to be read And so the Counsel for the Defendants were called upon to speak Accordingly Mr. VVithens Mr. Saunders and Mr. Scroggs endeavoured to defend their Client Knox by throwing the Guilt upon Lane and Osborne as if they had induced him in and he only acted for them out of Simplicity and great Innocency And to this end they produced Lane's Mother and Sister to shew that Lane and Osborne applied themselves to Knox first Mr. Holt. and Mr. VVilliams were of Counsel for the Defendant Lane who endeavour'd in requital to throw the Guilt upon Knox as being tâ—â— Inducer making it a Battel Royal where every one has two Enemies to oppose But the Case being clear the Court thought it needless to sum up the Evidences or the Jury to go away from the Bar so laying their Heads together they presently declared them Guilty At which the People gave a great Shout and the Prisoners were taken into the Marshal's Custody The Trials of Lionel Anderson alias Munson William Russel alias Napper Charles Parris alias Parry Henry Starkey James Corker William Marshal and Alexander Lumsden a Scotchman at the Sessions-house in the Old-Baily on Saturday Jan. 17 1679. THese Prisoners then and there appearing their Indictment was for High-treason as Romish Priests upon the Statute of 27 Eliz. cap. 2. David Joseph Kemish who was arraigned with them for the same Offence after he had pleaded was set aside by reason of Sickness Corker and Marshal both pleaded that they had been already tried and acquitted for this Offence but the Court convinc'd them to the contrary it being another Fact The Jury then sworn were John Bradshaw Lawrence VVood Matthew Bateman John Vyner Francis Mayo Martin James Anthony Hall Samuel Jewel Richard Bealing Thomas Hall Richard Bromfield Samuel Lynne To whom the Clerk of the Crown read the Charge against Lionel Anderson all the rest being set away and Roger Belwood Esq opened the Indictment Sir John Keiling pursued the Charge and Serjeant Strode all of Counsel for the King in this Cause managed the Evidence And then Mr. Dangerfield swore against him That when he was a Prisoner in the King's-Bench for Debt this Anderson shew'd him a Letter from the Lady Powis which was to desire the Witness to scour his Kettle which was to confess and receive the Sacrament to be true to the Cause The next day accordingly he went into Anderson's Chamber to Confession and received Absolution and the Sacrament from another to whom Anderson sent him that was saying Mass at that time After which returning to Anderson again he told him that he as a Priest did give him free Toleration to go and be drunk with one Stroude being for the good of the Cause he being to bring over this Stroude to be a Witness for the Lords in the Tower to invalidate Mr. Bedloe's Testimony Dr. Oates deposed that he was a Priest a Dominican Friar that he had heard him say Mass seen him consecrate the Sacrament been at Confession with him and seen his Letters of Orders as a Priest which he confess'd to him he had from Rome and that he was an English-Man and the Son of an English Gentleman Mr. Bedloe deposed That he was a Priest and an Englishman and Mr. Anderson's Son of Oxfordshire and he was told that he had heard him say Mass and seen him administer the Sacrament at some the Embassadors House Mr. Prance deposed That he had heard him say Mass several times at VVild-house and had seen him there take Confessions and give the Sacrament having known him seven Years To this Prisoner pleaded that it had not been proved that he was an English-man tho his Speech betrayed him and confess'd his Father was a Lincolnshire-Man and that he had been countenanc'd by the King and his Council and known to most of the dignify'd Clergy-men and if the Parliament had not been dissolved he had been protected by them for his writing against the Temporal Power of Rome and that he was therefore excommunicated by the Church of Rome and had not said Mass in any Parish Church this ten Years
let him rot in Goal this being the Complaint of Harris and the Disparagement of all these Hummers and brave Fellows that seem to espouse the Cause and affront the Government And that hereby they had now ruin'd and undone Care if so be he were found Guilty whom otherwise he should have thought a more favourable Sentence might have serv'd The Jury then withdrawing for about an hour brought the Defendant in Guilty and the Ld. Ch. Justice and Mr. Recorder told them They had done like honest Men. The Trial of Elizabeth Cellier at the King's-Bench Bar on Friday June the 11th 1680. THen and there the Prisoner appearing and the usual Formalities being passed and the Jury sworn but their Names not inserted in the printed Trial the Indictment was read which was for High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government and Protestant Religion And to this end expending divers Sums of Mony to several Persons to procure them to kill the King and to impose the said Treasons upon the Presbyterians c. For the Proof whereof Mr. John Gadbury deposed That he knew nothing of this Plot nor of any Contrivance of Mrs. Cellier's to kill the King but rather the contrary she being concern'd to bring Sir Robert Peyton over to the King's Interest and told him that one Smith and Phillips were willing to tell some Stories of Mr. Oates and Mr. Bedloe and that he had heard Mr. Dangerfield talk of a Nonconformist's Plot that would take off the Popish Plot. That upon the going over of one Clay she said she heard there were several Priests and Jesuits coming over That she fear'd the Nation would be destroy'd before the Popish Plotters were because abundance of the best of the Nation went into other Nations and spent their Mony abroad which weakened the Nation That meeting him in Westminster-Abbey she in discourse said that place had been filled with Benedictine Monks as the Temple had with Fryers and said she what if it should be so again That he had been acquainted with her 10 or 12 Years and when the King was ill at Windsor she did move some Questions to him about the Life of the King but he refused to tell her any thing and then she said she would consult some other Astrologer at the same time discoursing him about Dangerfield how to get him out of Prison Then Mr. Dangerfield came forth as a Witness against her whom she excepted against for that he had been Whipp'd Transported Pilloried and Perjured and by a Witness proved his Conviction of Felony c. To which he pleading the King's Pardon was sent away to fetch it and in the mean time Thomas Williamson deposed That Mrs. Gellien employed him to get Dangerfield out of Prison whosoever staid behind Margaret Jenkins swore She never saw Mrs. Cellier and Dangerfield together but twice and it was a Year ago at the Lady Powis's House and she never heard any Discourse about the Plot. Susan Edwards swore That she had oft seen them together and had heard her say That the Popish Plot would turn to a Presbyterian Plot. Bennet Dowdal swore That he had oft seen them together but never heard them talk of the Plot. Then the Court expected Mr. Dangerfield's return and in the mean time a Copy of a Record from Salisbury was read of his standing in the Pillory for uttering false Guinies as also a Copy of a Record of an Outlawry for Felony After about half an hours stay Mr. Dangerfield returned and brought his Pardon which was read and the word Felony omitted and his Pardon being thereby judged defective his Evidence was laid aside And so there being but one Witness the Jury return'd her Not Guilty so she was acquitted and Dangerfield for want of present Bail was committed The Trial of Roger Earl of Castlemain before the Ld. Ch. Justice Scroggs at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster on Wednesday June 23. 1680. ROger Palmer Esq Earl of Castlemain in the Kingdom of Ireland having been Arraigned at the King's Bench Bar June 16. 1680. for High-Treason in conspiring the Death of the King the subversion of the Government and introducing of Popery and Arbitrary Power c. To which he pleaded Not Guilty He was now brought again by the Lieutenant of the Tower to the Bar to receive his Trial. And his Jury were Sir John Cutler Kt. Bar. Sir Reginald Foster Bar. Henry Herriott Esq Richard Cheney Esq Thomas Johnson Esq John Roberts Esq Francis Dorrington Esq Hugh Squire Esq Charles Good Esq John Pulford Esq Edward Claxton Esq Francis Mayhew Gent. To whom the Indictment being read Mr. Bonithon of Counsel for the King in this Cause and Mr. Attorney General opened the same Then Dr. Oates was sworn who deposed That when he returned out of Spain in Novemb. 1677. he brought a Letter thence from the Fathers to the Prisoner wherein was expressed That the Fathers in Spain were very zealous to concur with the Fathers here in England in the Design the Letter being shewn him before it was sealed Which Letter he delivered to Strange the then Provincial to give to the Prisoner And that in December following the saw a Letter at St. Omers from the Prisoner to the Fathers wherein he gave them an account of his Letter from Spain and was glad the Fathers there had so good an Opinion of his Integrity in the Cause That in March he saw another Letter of the Prisoners to the Fathers at St. Omers importing his dislike that the Secular Clergy should be trusted with the Design That in April he came over into England to the Consult soon after which he saw the Prisoner come and enquire about the Copies of some Letters to be sent up into Germany and did desire that an Agreement between them the Jesuits and the Monks might be made up that so they might have the Assistance of that Order to carry on the Design That afterwards he heard the Prisoner and Mr. Langworth and Mr. Fenwick talking in Fenwick's Chamber about the Transactions of the Consult and how unanimous the Fathers were in signing of it and the Prisoner then said That now he should be reveng'd for the Injuries done to him That he saw in Strange's Hand an Account of a Divorce that was between the Prisoner and Barbara Dutchess of Cleveland And that he heard the Prisoner say he had been at great Expence about a Divorce and a Priest's Chamber being searched there was a Paper found wherein the whole Case was stated Then the Prisoner and the Ld. Ch. Justice cross-examin'd Dr. Oates a long time to have catch'd him but were not able Then Mr. Dangerfield was called but the Prisoner opposed his being sworn because he had been Out-lawed for Felony and burnt in the Hand for Felony and the Records were produced But Mr. Attorney General shewed his Pardon by which he was restored But this the Prisoner desired his Counsel might speak to Whether a Man branded and
the third at Charing-cross and in every place some Parcels of her Books to be burnt by the Common Hangman before her Face and a Paper of the cause to be upon the Pillory and she to find Sureties for her good Behaviour during Life The Trials of Thomas Thwing and Mary Pressicks at the Assizes at York on Thursday July the 29th 1680. THen and there the Prisoners appeared having been arraigned and pleaded Not Guilty to an Indictment of High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and Subversion of the Government The Jury after 25 challenged by Thwing sworn were Sir George Cook Bar. Thomas Worsley Esq William Caley Esq Roger Lee Gent. John Dixon Gent. George Wray Gent. Henry Pinckney Gent. John Blackston Gent. William Hardcastle Gent. Nicholas Stone Gent. George VVesterby Gent. Charles Tucker Gent. To these the Indictment was read and afterwards opened and the Treasons therein aggravated by the King's Counsel Then Mr. Robert Bolron being sworn deposed that in 1674. he came to live with Sir Thomas Gascoyne and was Steward of his Colepits and in 1675. he turned Papist and about January 1676. Mr. Thwing Father Rushton and several others came to his House at Shippon and did there examine him how he stood affected to the Roman Catholick Religion and whether he was resolved to venture his Life and Estate in it if there were any occasion to which he agreed and resoved to obey his Ghostly Father in all things and Father Rushton his Confessor gave him the Oath of Secresy That in 1677. there was a Consult at Barnborow-Hall Sir Thomas Gascoyne's House in the old Dining-Room Sir Miles Stapleton Sir Thomas Gascoyne the Lady Tempest Thwing Rushton and others being present wherein it was agreed that the King should be killed and Thwing said that if they mist this opportunity of doing it they should never have the like again and the effecting of it would be very beneficial to the Church of Rome And in hopes this would succeed they agreed they would erect a Nunnery at Dolebank but their real Intention was to have it at Heworth within a Mile of York after the King was killed and to avoid Suspicion the Lady Tempest promised them Broughton for the present and Thwing was to be Confessor of the Nunnery for the present That he paid 10 l. to Rushton in Thwing's presence towards killing the King and saw a List in Rushton and Thwing's Hands of Money raised for that purpose He paid 5 l. also to have his Soul prayed for And Thwing told him afterwards that in Yorkshire Lancashire and Derbyshire 30000 l. was raised for the killing of the King and that the List was sent beyond Sea Against Mrs. Pressicks he deposed That in 1678. she told him that she being in London did hear a Woman cry after her Stop the Papist stop the Plotter but she got away and afterwards durst not appear publickly That discoursing with her about the Plot she said Father Harcourt was her Confessor and first engaged her in it and that Pickering told her he was to have killed the King saying she was sorry he did not and that Oates and Bedloe were two Rogues had it not been for them the Plot had not been discovered Telling him the Gun which was to have shot the King was found with Pickering which she believed was the cause of his Death And that she said the King was an Asse and not fit to govern that what Mony the Parliament gave him he spent on Whores and Concubines Then Mr. Lawrence Mowbray deposed That about Michaelmas 1676. there was an Assembly of divers Priests in Rushton's Chamber at Barnborow-hall whereat he was admitted he being one that waited upon Rushton at the Altar and having took the Oath of Secrecy from him and Thwing was there he and Rushton manag'd the Conference wherein they declared the King was an Heretick and excommunicated by the Pope and that he should be killed because he had broke his Promise made to the Jesuits when he was beyond Sea and that it was not only lawful but meritorious to kill him That there was a List of those engaged in the design That he did not accuse Mr. Thwing till his 2d Examination before Justice VVarcup and that he knew nothing against Mrs. Pressicks Then Mrs. Bolron deposed the same against Mrs. Pressicks of what she had said at Mr. Bolron's House as before adding that she said there would never be quiet in England till the Papists had got the upper hand and not left a Protestant and she hoped an Army of Catholicks would be raised to set up Popery Mrs. Bolron jun. deposed the same being then also present One John Hutchinson was present too and deposed the same adding that she said likewise that we should never be quiet till the D. of York was made King Then Thwing urged in his defence that all this was only out of Malice to Sir Thomas Gascoyne's Family to which he was related and called Witnesses Nathaniel VVilson said that about last Michaelmas Mr. Bolron asked him if he could tell any thing of Father Rushton and he told him no then he bid him keep his Secrets and he would give him more than he could earn in seven Years but that unless he could shed the Blood of some of them he should get nothing Then Mr. Lowther the Justice who took Mr. Bolron's Examination the 24th or 25th of June 1679. testified that he did not then mention Thwing Obediah Moor said that about last Candlemas was 12 Months Mr. Bolron told him that Sir Tho. Gascoyne nor none of his Family were concerned in the Plot and that he believed there was no Plot. But in August after he told him he had but equivocated with him in what he said before and that there was a real Plot and if he had sworn a thousand Lies he could have been forgiven them Stephen Tompson testified that Bolron was arrested by Sir Tho. Gascoyne for Debt to whom he was bound with him When the Plot came out he asked Bolron if Sir Thomas was concerned he said no he was as innocent as the Child unborn but afterwards he said if Sir Thomas did sue him he would do him a greater Mischief and that while he intreated Sir Thomas's Forbearance for three Weeks Bolron came up to London and swore Treason against him and as to Mrs. Pressicks Bolron's Grandmother told him she could say nothing against her but Bolron said she must say so and so Then Zachary Thorpe testified that he meeting Bolron in Long-Acre before the last Assizes he told him Sir Tho. Gascoyne was cleared but swore the Jury were Rogues And that he was now going down to the Assizes at York against the Lady Tempest and swore he would ruin them if one thing would not do another should do it And that Bolron would have had him been evidence against Shipton last Assizes But Mr. Justice Dolben knowing this Witness thought his Testimony very improbable William Hardwick
endeavours to have over-ruled without so much as hearing the Prisoners Counsel for the maintaining it for that they said it was nought because it produced no Record of his Impeachment and did not specify what the High-Treason was for which he was Impeached and that the King had Power to proceed on an Impeachment or Indictment for the same thing at his Election Nevertheless the Attorny General demurred and the Prisoner joined in the Demurrer And then after much arguing a Day was given to argue the Plea till Saturday May. 7. At which time the Attorny General added to the Exceptions he took to the Plea Whether a Suit in a Superior Court can take away the Jurisdiction of the Cause of the Person and of the Fact at the time of the Fact committed To maintain the Plea Mr. VVilliams of Counsel for the Prisoner in a very long and learned Discourse first spoke stating the Prisoner's Case upon the Indictment the Plea to the Indictment and the Demurrer to the Plea Alledging the Difference of an Impeachment from an Indictment and offering some Reasons why this Court ought not to proceed upon this Indictment Then answering distinctly Mr. Attorney's Exceptions to the Plea producing some Presidents of this Courts Prosecution being stop'd by Pleas to the Jurisdiction shewing what had been done upon those Pleas What Doom they had Laying before the Court the Right of the Commons to Impeach in Parliament the Judicature of the Lords to determine that Impeachment and the Method and Proceedings of Parliament submitting it to them how far they would lay their Hands on this Case thus circumstantiated Here the Ld. Ch. Justice declared That all these Things were quite foreign to the Case and the Matter in Hand only was Whether this Plea as thus pleaded was sufficient to protect the Prisoner from being questioned in this Court for the Treasonable Matter in the Indictment before them To which Mr. VVilliams reply'd That 't was an hard matter for the Bar to answer the Bench. After which Sir Francis Winnington pleaded That he conceived that it was confessed by the Demurrer that there is an Impeachment by the Commons of England of High-Treason against Fitz-Harris lodged in the House of Lords Secundum Legem consuetudinem Parliamenti And that the Treason for which he was impeached is the same Treason contained in the Indictment So that now the general Question was Whether an Impeachment for Treason by the House of Commons and still depending were a sufficient Matter to oust the Court from proceeding upon an Indictment for the same Offence Which he learnedly endeavoured to make good by several Reasons as well as Presidents Mr. Wallop pleaded next on the same side whose Province was to prove That the Treason in the Impeachment and in the Indictment was the same and that this was well averred in the Plea Mr. Pollexfen pleaded That a general Impeachment in Parliament was a good Impeachment and the Judges had declared so to the King and Council concerning the five Popish Lords who could not therefore be tried upon Indictments so long as general Impeachments were depending for the same Treason and that therefore this Plea was good both as to Matter and Form c. In reply to vitiate the Plea it was insisted on by Mr. Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. Serj. Jefferies and Sir Francis VVithens of Counsel for the King that the Plea concluded not in the usual Form That perhaps this Matter if the Prisoner had been acquitted upon the Impeachment might have been pleaded in Bar to the Indictment but it was not pleadable to the Jurisdiction of the Court That in the Case of the five Lords the Indictments were removed into the House of Lords and that the Judges Opinion given at the Council-Board was not a Judicial Opinion nor did any way affect this Cause After which the Ld. Ch. Justice thought fit not to give present Judgment but to take time for Deliberation Whereupon the Prisoner was carried back to the Tower And on Tuesday May 10. Mr. Attorney moved the Court to appoint a Day for their Judgment on the Plea and for Fitz-Harris to be brought up which they appointed to be the next Morning Accordingly on Wednesday Morning May 11. the Prisoner being brought to the Bar the Ld. Ch. Justice deliver'd the Opinion of the Court upon Conference had with other Judges That his Brother Jones his Brother Raymond and himself were of Opinion that the Plea was insufficient his Brother Dolben not being resolved but doubting concerning it and therefore awarded the Prisoner should plead to the Indictment which he did Not Guilty and his Trial ordered to be the next Term. The Trial of Edward Fitz-Harris at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster before the Lord Chief Justice Pemberton on Thursday June 9. 1681. THE Prisoner then and there appearing after several Challenges made for the King the Jury sworn were Thomas Johnson Lucy Knightly Edward Wilford Alexander Hosey Martin James John Viner William Withers William Cleave Thomas Goffe Ralph Farr Samuel Freebody John Lockier To whom the Indictment was read which was for High-Treason in conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government the which Mr. Heath Serj. Maynard and Mr. Attorn Gen. opened And then Mr. Everard deposed How the Prisoner was with him on Monday Feb. 21. 1681. having a little before been with him to renew the Acquaintance which had been between them while they were both in the French King's Service and to perswade him to re-ingratiate himself into the French and Popish Interest and gave him by word of Mouth Heads to write a Pamphlet to scandalize the King raise Rebellion alienate the Hearts of the People and set them together by the Ears Whereupon he acquainted one Mr. Savile of Lincolns-Inn Mr. Crown Mr. Smith and Sir William Waller with it And the next day Mr. Fitz-Harris coming again to his Chamber in Grays-Inn he convey'd Mr. Smith into a Closet Sir William Waller failing to come where he both saw and heard the Prisoner ask him What he had done as to the Libel and give him further Instructions about what to write viz. That the King was Popishly Affected and Arbitrarily Inclined That King Charles the First had an Hand in the Irish Rebellion and King Charles the Second did countenance the same c. That the People should therefore be stirred up to rebel especially the City c. That the Day after he coming again he had convey'd Sir William Waller into the next Room where he also might both hear and see shewing him to Copies of what he had drawn up which he marked that he might know them again and see what alteration would be made That Fitz-Harris did them read one of the Copies and amended it adding some things and striking out other things saying The Libel was to be presented to the French Ambassador's Confessor and he was to present it to the French Ambassador and that it was to beget a
herein till he had been in France in 1677 and there seeing the slavery of the French People he thought it were better the Devil should reign over them than the French-Man Edmond Murfey hesitated much in giving his Evidence tho he had given it in the fullest of any to the Grand Jury but afterwards he ran away and was found at the Spanish Ambassadors though he owned that the Prisoner was to get 60 or 70000 l. for the establishing Popery But because he fenced in his Evidence the King's Counsel desired he might be committed which was done accordingly John Mac-Legh a Parish Priest in the County of Monagham in Ireland deposed That the Prisoner had received several Sums of Mony there and he had raised and paid him some for Arms and Ammunition for the Papists That he was at Vicar Bradey's House when Bishop Tyrrill came thither And that in France he had seen the Conditions upon which the Prisoner was made Primate which was to raise Men to join with the French to destroy the Protestant Religion John Moyer a Regular Priest and Begging Frier deposed That in 1672 he met with a Letter of the Prisoners in Caprennica directed to the Secretary of the Colledg De Propaganda Fide which he opened and copied producing the Copy wherein was said That 't was more proper for the Catholick Princes to agree together to extirpate Heresy than to vary among themselves that now was the time for there were 60000 Men ready to rise upon such an Invasion That in 1674 when he came into Ireland he told the Prisoner of this Letter and that he had seen it who thereupon pray'd him to be secret for what he did was not for his own Good but for the publick Good of the Catholicks who proffered him high Promotions if he would further the Design That he was at a Consult afterwards where the Primate Bishop Tyrrel and others were where they concluded to send Capt. Con O-Neale to France and Barcellona with certain Instruments wherewith the Captain shortly went and the two Bishops undertook to view Munster and Vlster and that this was in 1676. To all this the Prisoner only protested his Innocency complaining that his Witnesses and some Records he had not had time to procure and that the Jury were Strangers to him and the Witnesses and that by being brought out of his Country his Life was in danger where these Witnesses would not have been believed against him Then Mr. Sollicitor General and Serj. Jefferies having summ'd up the Evidence and the Lord Chief Justice giving the Charge the Jury withdrew for a quarter of an Hour and then brought the Prisoner in Guilty And on Wednesday June 15. after the Prisoner had pleaded the same things over again and informed the Court that now his Witnesses were come as far as Coventry being shew'd the insufficiency of such a Plea after so long time the Court had given him before his Trial the Lord Chief Justice sentenc'd him to be Drawn Hang'd and Quartered Which accordingly was execcuted upon him together with Fitz-Harris at Tyburn on Friday July 1. following The Trial of Sir Miles Stapleton at the Assizes at York on Monday July the 18th 1681. THen and there the Prisoner appearing having been arraigned and pleaded Not Guilty to Indictment of High Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and Subversion of the Government and Protestant Religion after several challenged on both sides the Jury sworn were Sir Barrington Boucher Kt. Sir John Jennings Kt. Richard Hutton Esq VVelbrough Norton Esq Tobias Hodgson Esq John Beverly Esq Anth. Frankland Esq John Adams Esq Francis Battery Esq Francis Fuldgam Esq Humphry Brooke Esq Thomas Lee Esq To whom the Indictment being read and then opened by Sir Thomas Stringer of Counsel for the King in this Cause the King's Witnesses were Mr. John Smith who being sworn told what he knew of the Plot in general much like what he related at the Trial of my Ld. Stafford to which the Reader is referred As to what he knew of the Plot in Yorkshire was that while he lived with Mr. Jennison Mr. Thwing the Priest who had suffered as a Conspirator much perswaded him to intreat Mr. Jennison to send his Daughters to Dolebank where a Nunnery was to be erected and he knew several that were there That he told him Sir Miles Stapleton was very zealous for promoting Popery and had contributed largely to it and was engaged with several others for making a Founder for Dolebank Then Mr. Robert Bolron deposed his Knowledg of the Plot just as he had done before at Thwing's Trial charging the Prisoner to have been at that Consult at Barnborow-hall in 1677 and thereat promised to give 200 l. towards the killing of the King It being then resolved to be done and Pickering mentioned to do it and it was said that if the D. of York did not please they would serve him as they would serve his Brother That one Sherborn told him that Sir Miles was to be a Privy-Councellour and that they would procure the Dukes consent to it That he was also at a Consult at Barnborow June the 13th 1678. and there it was agreed upon taking of Hull the letting in of the French there discoursing that the Ld. Bellasis had caused the Block-Houses to be almost ruin'd that the French might more easily come in and they had all Pardons for their Sins and that he had seen a collusive Conveyance of the Prisoner's Estate Then Mr. Lawrence Mowbray deposed that Sir Miles was at the Consult in 1676 at Rushton's Chamber where Rushton gave him the Oath of Secrecy and he promised to be true to the Design and would venture his Life and Estate for the promoting of so good a Cause Then Mr. Bayns was sworn who only depos'd that he had seen Sir Miles at several meetings at Barnborough-hall but knew nothing of what was discoursed thereat Then Sir Miles Stapleton began his Defence protesting his Innocency and having cross examin'd only Bolron he called Mr. Lowther to prove he did not accuse him when he was examin'd by him Yea Mr. Lowther said he told him that he knew nothing against Sir Miles but believed he was clear But afterwards he told him that Mowbray could accuse him and of what which Bolron denied both Then Sir Thomas Yarbrough testified that Bolron told him also Aug. 10 1679. that he knew nothing of Sir Miles's being concern'd in the Plot but believed him to be a very honest Gentleman only he knew he had made a collusive Conveyance of his Estate as most Papists he believed had done for Security Bolron denied this and deposed that he accused Sir Miles to the Council not in his first but second Information which was after the 10th of August The Lady Yarbrough then gave in the same Testimony with her Husband Mr. Normanton testified that in June 1679. Bolron told him that Sir Tho. Gascoyne would give 1000 l. for killing the King and the
drinking with Haynes who fell very foul against the Grand Jury because they had not found that Bill and he said my Lord Shaftsbury was a little Toad but that he would do his Business very suddenly Then he railed upon the Parliament and said they were a Company of Rogues they would give the King no Mony but that he would help him to Mony enough out of the Phanaticks Estates And said that they would damn their Souls to the Devil before the Catholick Cause should sink And that on Munday last meeting with Haynes again at Vxbridge at the Crown in discourse he heard him say that Sheriff Bethel's Estate should be the King 's e're long To invalidate this Testimony Haynes deny'd that ever he saw Lun before he saw him at Vxbridge which was sworn also by Mr. White the King's Messenger who was by and whose Prisoner Mr. Lun had been two Years affirming that Lun ask'd him who Haynes was and that he heard no such words spoken after which Serj. Jefferies bespatter'd him with some of his Reflections Next Mr. Jeremiah Broadgate was call'd who said That drinking with Mr. Turbervile he told him how the King's Evidence were villified and looked upon as poor inconsiderable Fellows and that he had had very great Offers from the Court if he would disown the Popish Plot and go upon the contrary Side Which Evidence also was rejected as nothing to the purpose Then Mr. John Zeal was called who because he could say nothing but what he had heard Mr. Ivy tell him was set aside And Mr. Ivy was called who confessing that he had given Evidence against the Prisoner the Prisoner concluded he could be no good one for him Therefore Mr. William Lewes was called who declared he knew nothing of any of the Evidence as to the Prisoner that he could only say something of Mr. Ivy as to a Presbyterian Plot and my Lord Shaftsbury And therefore Dr. Oates was next called who produced a Petition to the Common-Council subscribed by Edward Turbervile John Macnamarra c. wherein they set out how they had been tempted to unsay what they had said against the Papists And declared he charging Turbervile as if he was to be a Witness at the Old Baily against Colledge Mr. Turbervile said He would break any ones head that should say so against him for he neither was a Witness nor could give any Evidence against him Of which telling him after he had been at Oxford he confessed he had been sworn against Colledge before the Grand Jury For said he the Protestant-Citizens have deserted us and God damn him he would not starve This Turbervile then flatly denied upon his Oath and the Doctor affirmed upon the Word of a Priest As for Mr. Smith the Doctor affirmed That upon some provoking words between him and Mr. Colledge at Richard's Coffee-House he heard him swear God Damn him he would have Colledge 's Blood For which Dr. Oates reproving him as unbecoming words for a Minister of the Gospel his reply was God damn the Gospel This Smith also denied As for Mr. Dugdale the Doctor said that he had declared to him upon the report of his being an Evidence against my Lord Shaftsbury and several Protestants that he knew nothing against any Protestant in England Afterwards the Doctor telling him he fear'd he had gone against his Conscience he was sure against what he had declared to him Said he It was all long of Col. Warcup for I could get no Mony else and said that the Colonel did promise he should have a place at the Custom-house This Dugdale deny'd So the Court took notice to the Jury of these three Mens Oaths against the Doctor 's bare Word Which Mr. Colledge complain'd of as not fair dealing And that if he could witness for himself he could discover more than this that Dugdale had said to him alone how that he was forced to keep Company with Warcup or he must starve and to stay for his Mony from the Attorney General because there was new Work to be done such as his Conscience would not serve him to do that there was more Roguery that they would never have done plotting and counter-plotting but that they would make a thousand Plots if they could to destroy the real One But this he could not prove because it was to him alone he said it The Prisoner call'd then Mr. Alexander Blake who said that Mr. Smith told him one Morning That one Haynes was under Examination and had discovered very material things against some great Persons which some time after he told was a Sham-Plot a Meal-tub Plot. Then Mr. Samuel Smith was call'd who own'd his acquaintance with Smith and that he had heard him say he believed a Popish Plot but not any Protestant Plot and that though he denied not but that he had sworn against Mr. Colledge he did not believe what Colledge had said for he did not believe it himself Then Mr. Thomas Gardner being call'd testified the same Smith repeating it in his Company with Mr. Samuel Smith at the Rummer in Queen's-street And withal that two or three of the Jury-men that acquitted Mr. Colledge were Rascals and Villains And says he they talk as if I intended to sham the Popish Plot and make a Protestant Plot which said he I vow to God and I will justify it before God and all the World that I know of no Protestant Plot nor is there any Protestant concerned in a Plot to my knowledg but this Colledge and upon his Trial I believe he will be made appear to be more a Papist than a Protestant Then the Prisoner call'd for Dr. Oates again to give an Account to the Court what treasonable Words he heard spoke at Alderman Wilcox's Treat at the Crown-Tavern without Temple-Bar Who appearing again did affirm That the Discourse between the Coffee-House and the Tavern was between Mr. Colledge and him and not at all with Smith who either went before or followed them and that when he heard Smith swear at the Old-Baily that it was with him he did really in his Conscience look upon him as forsworn in that Particular That at the Tavern the Discourse was between him and one Mr. Savage who had been formerly a Romish Priest concerning the Existence of God and Immortality of the Soul That Colledge and Smith had no Discourse at all together in his hearing and that immediatly after Dinner Smith went his way Then Mr. Thomas Smith a Lawyer was call'd who said That he was at Dinner but heard no treasonable Words spoke most of the Discourse being between Dr. Oates and Mr. Savage and that if there had been any such words spoke he must needs have heard them the Room being small and for that Reason that they could not divide themselves into Cabals as Smith had deposed but that Colledge was asleep most of the time And as to Arms he knew that Mr. Colledge used to ride with Pistols having borrowed his Horse and had
and Riot The Trial of Capt. Thomas Walcot at the Old-Baily London on a Commission of Oyer and Terminer held there for the City of London and County of Middlesex on Thursday July the 12th 1683. THen and there the Prisoner was Arraign'd together with William Hone John Rouse and Capt. William Blague upon an Indictment for High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and raising a Rebellion in this Kingdom To which he pleaded Not Guilty with the other three And after some Exceptions the following Jury was Sworn Nicholas Charlton Christopher Pitts Robert Beddingfield John Pelling William Winbury Thomas Seaton William Rutland Thomas Short Theophilus Man John Genew John Short and Thomas Nicholas To whom the Indictment being read Mr. North of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the same and Mr. Attorney-General Mr. Serjeant Jefferies and Mr. Sollicitor-General opened the Evidence And then Col. Rumsey deposed That about the latter end of October or beginning of November he was sent by the Lord Shaftsbury to Mr. Shepherd's House near Lombard-street to the D. of Monmouth Lord Russel Lord Grey and Sir Thomas Armstrong to know of them what was done about raising Arms at Taunton who told him that Mr. Trenchard had failed them about the Men and they could proceed no further at that time Whereupon the Lord Shaftsbury said there was no dependance upon those Gentlemen and so prepared to be gone for Holland That about a fortnight or three Weeks afterwards there was a meeting at Mr. West's Chamber where was Mr. West Mr. Goodenough Mr. Wade and another where the taking off the King and the Duke was proposed as the surest way and for that end Mr. Ferguson was writ for out of Holland who came over upon that Letter and Capt. Walcot with him upon Ash-Wednesday And they had several meetings about getting a sufficient number of Men and Mr. Goodenough and Mr. Rumbold brought Notes of many Names and Capt. Walcot was then present and undertook to be one of the Men that should help to kill the King at Rumbold's House near Hodsden in Hertfordshire as he should come from New-Market the Saturday before Easter but Capt. Walcot refused to have an hand in attacking the Coach only he would command a Party that should charge the Guards For there was to be several Parties one small Party was to have killed the Postillion another to kill the Horses and Mr. Rumbold with a certain number to seize the Coach and Captain Walcot the Guards but the Fire at New-Market causing the King to return on the Tuesday before Easter they could not have their Men in a readiness and so were disappointed Immediately upon this it was resolved on in another meeting whereat the Prisoner was that Money and Arms should be provided and Mr. Ferguson undertook the raising of Money and Mr. West the buying of Arms therewith and Mr. Goodenough and Mr. Rumbold the providing of Men to be in a readiness against the first opportunity that happened further designing to kill the King as he came from Windsor to London or from Windsor to Hampton-Court or the Play-House and that Mr. West did tell him he did buy Arms and received 100 l. of Mr. Ferguson for them That the Thursday before the Discovery they met at the Salutation in Lombard-street where was Captain Walcot Mr. West Mr. Wade the two Goodenough's Mr. Nelthrop and himself discoursing about the Division of the City into 20 parts 7 of which Mr. Goodenough gave an account of That on the Saturday following they appointed another meeting at the George on Ludgate-hill but the Discovery coming out there met only four of them And the Monday after the Discovery they met again at Capt. Tracy's there being the Prisoner Mr. West Mr. Wade Mr. Nelthrop the two Goodenough's and Mr. Ferguson who exclaimed against Keeling and resolved to be gone Then Mr. Keeling being Sworn related how before the King went to New-Market he was drawn in by Goodenough and provided Burton Thompson and Barber to join in killing the King whom Rumbold encouraged thereto by telling them the conveniences of his House for that purpose being a lone House and having a Court-Wall using this as an Argument That to kill the King and the D. of York would be a keeping one of the Commandments because unless that were done there would be a great deal of Blood-shed committed telling them the way how they designed to effect it as before and if this way failed then there should be Men in the Habit of Countrey-men with a Cart in the Lane who should run the Cart a-thwart the Lane and so stop the Coach That at the Dolphin-Tavern in Bartholomew-Lane where were Rumbold West Goodenough and Hone the Joyner he heard West talking to Rumbold about the King 's returning from New-Market asking him how many Swan-Quills Goose-Quills and Crow-Quills with Sand and Ink he must have To which was answered 6 Swan-Quills 20 Goose-Quills and 20 or 30 Crows-Quills saying that by Swan-Quills was meant Blunderbusses by Goose-Quills Muskets and by Crows-Quills Pistols and by Sand and Ink Powder and Bullets That he was at the Salutation-Tavern in Lombard-street with the Prisoner and others the Thursday before the Discovery where some of them call'd him Gulick there being then a Report of one Gulick that headed a Rising at Cologn Mr. West telling him that Gulick in Dutch was Keeling in English and that he hoped to see him at the Head of as good an Army in Wapping as Gulick was at Cologn which was all he could say as to the Prisoner He gave them a further account how Goodenough gave him 3 Papers of 3 Divisions of the City one for himself and the other 2 for whom he could trust advising him to take 9 or 10 Men to his Assistance who were to ask several Persons Supposing that the Papists should rise or be a French Invasion Are you in a Posture of Defence Which was all they were to communicate and by this means feel them and see how many Men could be raised telling him moreover of a Design to kill the King and the Duke at the Bull-Feast and lay it upon the Papists as a Branch of the Popish Plot and that one was drawing a Declaration to take away the Chimney-Money that so the common People might fall in with them more readily Saying that it was trouble of Mind caused him to make this Discovery which he did to one Mr. Peckham who brought him to the Lord Dartmouth and thence to Mr. Secretary Jenkins Acknowledging himself to be the Person who arrested the Lord-Mayor and that Goodenough did tell him that the Design was to secure the Lord-Mayor and the Sheriffs and the Tower Then Mr. Zachary Bourne depos'd That he came acquainted with the Prisoner by means of Mr. Ferguson who lodg'd at his House That he was at their Meeting at the Dragon upon Snow-hill where the Prisoner was and their Discourse was about a Design of raising and dividing the
Capel told him that it was a thing too great for him c. All which Mr. Braddon that you are to call Johnson whilest he is with you at your House will give you a true Relation of Mr. Braddon hath been at a great trouble and charge already about it I know few that would have ventured to have undertaken this Affair besides himself as Times go I received yours this Day with the great pains you took and the Letter to the Lady Russel which finding unsealed I sealed without looking into it and carried it my self she returns you ten thousand Thanks and says she knows not what return to make you for your most extraordinary kindness I have not time to write any more at present by reason that Mr. Braddon alias Johnson stays only for this my Letter I am Sir Your most obliged Friend and most humble Servant Hugh Speke I am writing a Letter to send to you by the Carrier Upon the reading of this a Gentleman appear'd from Sir Robert Atkins to assure the Court that he never had the Letter nor knew any thing of it and to desire therefore there might be no Reflections cast upon him The Attorny General repli'd 't was an unhappy thing to be thought well of by such sort of People Then the Information of Mrs Edwards of what her Son had said And the Boy 's Information As also another of Jane Lodeman concerning the same Matter and of one Mr. William Glasbrooke to attest it and Mr. Burgis's Letter to Cumpen were read all which Papers were found on Mr. Braddon when he was took And here the Evidence for the King ceas'd for the present Then Mr. Wallop and Mr. Williams of Counsel for the Defendants opened their Evidence and called one Lewes of Marleborough who refused to be sworn until Mr. Braddon had paid him his Charges and then he deposed That between the Hours of 3 and 5 riding up Husband within three or four miles of Andover on Friday the day before the News came to Marleborough and on that very day the Murder was said to be done a Man told him that he had heard that the Earl of Essex had cut his throat Then Mr. Fielder a Shop-keeper in Andover deposed That it was the common discourse among Women that came in and out of his Shop and up and down the Town on Wednesday and Thursday preceding the Saturday whereon the certain News came which was before the thing was done that the Earl of Essex had cut his Throat in the Tower But because the Witness could not fix the Report upon any particular Person the Ld. Ch. Justice cried out It was a Contrivance to deceive the King's Subjects and shew'd a Design to pick up Evidence to amuse the Unwary and fill their Heads with Fears and Jealousies of he knew not what Then Mr. Braddon desired to make his own Defence and called Mr. Edwards again who deposed That the first time his Son denied the Report was July 17. after Mr. Braddon came to examine him Then Mrs. Edwards deposed what the Boy had told her of the Razor and that he wept when he told it her but after Mr. Braddon had been at their House his Sister telling him when he came from School that a Gentleman had been to inquire about what he had said and intimating to him some danger bidding him to say the Truth and not tell a Lie to save his Breech he then denied it and this was before he signed Mr. Braddon's Paper and he knew of his denial Then Sarah Edwards her Daughter deposed likewise what her Brother had said but said she knowing him apt to tell Lies did not believe him That on Tuesday following after Mr. Braddon had been there and she had told her Brother of it he apprehending some danger did deny it and in the Afternoon Mr. Braddon coming again knew that he had denied it upon which he talk'd to the Boy and told him the danger of Lying and bid him speak the Truth c. And on Wednesday Mr. Braddon coming again the Boy then owned it again and he writ down what he owned and said he would be carried to Sir Henry Capel and the Lady Essex The Next day Mr. Braddon came again with another Paper written to which the Boy something unwillingly set his Hand But Mr. Braddon asking her what her Brother's Answer was to him when he asked him why he had denied it she said she could not recollect that though she confess'd the Boy ran to his Mother and cried out he should be Hang'd and that he was told that his Father would be in danger of losing his Place and the Family ruin'd But Mr. Wallop then asking her if she did not tell him the King would hang his Father if he did not deny it The Ld. Ch. Justice instead of suffering her to Answer not only upbraided that ancient learned and worthy Gentleman as if he intended to charge the King with a Design of hanging Men if they denied not the Truth but having huffed and hector'd him did threaten him with the Animadversion and Correction of the Court for reflecting upon and aspersing the Government telling him he was impetuous in the worst of Causes And there was such a heat in this Cause he wondred whence it should come he was sure Not from the Honesty of it But old Mr. Edwards being asked that the Boy own'd that it was Fear and Discouragement through his Sister's Threats was the Cause of his denying it Then Mrs. Ann Burt deposed That she was present and Mr. Edwards when Mr. Braddon took the Examination of the Boy and that she heard the Boy own what he had said and that his Mother told her that the reason of his denying it before was because his Sister had been talking to him But the Ld. Ch. Justice would not permit her to go on with such Hear-says and so broke off her Evidence Then Jane Lodeman a Girl of 13 Years old was sworn and deposed That she being in the Tower July 13 last between 9 and 10 a clock did see a Hand throw a bloody Razor out of a Window which she was told belonged to the E. of Essex's Lodgings and she heard either two Shrieks or two Groans presently after That the Razor fell within the Pales and she saw a Woman in a White Hood come out but did not see her take it up Then the Girles Information which Mr. Braddon had took from her was shewed wherein was that she heard a Soldier call for some Body to come out and take up a Razor but she say'd she does not know the Soldier was there and she heard no Body speak to the Maid And that she had no knowledge of Young Edwards Then Margaret Smith was sworn who was very shy of speaking any more than that she being the Girles Aunt the Girl told her what she had seen and that Mr. Braddon came afterwards and took her Information Then one William Glasbrooke living in the
Then Mr. Spekes Servant was sworn who related the surprize of his sudden Journey but that Mr. Braddon having got another to go with him he came back to his Master again Then the Ld. Ch. Justice asked the Defandants what they had more to say Mr. Braddon refused to say any thing Mr. Speke urged his Innocency of conspiring with Mr. Braddon that his being concerned was but accidental and a surprize to him and that what he did was neither designedly nor with any ill Design Then Mr. Braddon desired the Jury to take notice that there had been nothing proved of evil Practices used by him to perswade these Witnesses to testify a Falshood and desired them to take no ether notice of any thing that had been or should be spoken but what had been proved Then the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence representing the Crime very odiously as carrying all the Venom and Baseness the greatest Inveteracy against the Government that ever any Case did that he ever met with Insinuating That because the King and the Duke were walking in the Tower that day and near that time when this unfortunate thing happened now it must be whispered as tho the King and the Duke had designed this Murder And that there was Digitus Dei in this Accident and it was enough to satisfy all the World of the Conspiracy c. After he had finish'd his long Speech full of such-like Expressions the Court arose and the Jury afterwards gave in a private Verdict which the next Morning was repeated in Court and recorded And by that Verdict they found Mr. Braddon Guilty of the whole Matter charged upon him in the Information and Mr. Speke Guilty of all but the Conspiracy to procure false Witnesses and of that they found him Not Guilty And on Monday April 21. 1684. the Defendants being brought to the Bar their Counsel moved in Arrest of Judgment but Judgment being recorded it was too late and not admitted though it was before by consent agreed for the Defendants this day to move Then after Mr. Justice Withens and the Ld. Ch. Justice had severely upbraided Mr. Braddon's Impudence because he shewed no sorrow but still protested his Innocency and having consulted about the Sentence Mr. Justice Withens pronounced it first aggravating Mr. Braddon's Crime as if he had endeavoured to make the King concern'd in the Murder and would insinuate a Sham-Plot to take away Innocent Protestant Lives telling the Court for this Offence set upon Mr. Braddon the Fine of 2000 l. and order that he find Sureties for his good Behaviour during Life and that he be committed till this be performed And for Mr. Speke whom they had considered not so Guilty they thought fit to set upon him the Fine of 1000 l. and that he find Sureties for his good Behaviour during his Life and be committed till he perform it After which they were carried away to the King's-Bench The Trial of Sir Samuel Bernardiston Bar. before the Lord Chief Justice Jefferies at Guild-Hall London on Thursday Feb. 14. 1683. THen and there the Defendant appeared for his Trial upon an Information preferred against him in Hillary Term last for a High Misdemeanour in Scandalizing and Vilifying the Evidence in the late Plot in several Letters c. To which he had pleaded Not Guilty And the Jury now sworn were Thomas Vernon Percival Gilburn Edward Bovery William Withers James Wood. Robert Masters Samuel Newton George Torriano Kenelm Smith Thomas Goddard Thomas Amy. Richard Blackburn To whom the Information being read Mr. Poultney Mr. Recorder and Mr. Herbert being of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the same And then to prove him the Author Mr. Blathwayt was sworn who deposed That Sir Samuel Bernardiston upon Decemb. 10. last did before the King and Council own three of the Letters there in Court to be of his own hand-writing Nor did he deny but that he had publish'd and sent them Mr. Atterbury deposed That he also heard him then own three of the Letters to be written by him and that they were superscribed by one of his Servants and so ordered to be sent to the Post-house And that while he was in his house he heard him say he wondered how they were taken since they were sent to Sir Philip Skippon Then Nehemiah Osland deposed that he superscibed two of them Letters by Sir Samuel's Order as his Servant and that he wrote one of the four out of a Copy given him by his Master and writ by him to go into the Countrey and then as was usual left them in a Window to be carried to the Post-house Then the four Letters were read the first was that transcribed by Osland directed to Sir Philip Skippon Kt. at Ipswich and dated Novemb. the 29 1683. Sir The Return of the D. of Monmouth to White-hall and his being received into extraordinary favour of his Majesty hath made a strange Alteration of Affairs at Court For those that before spake of him very indecently now court cringe and creep to him His Grace complained to the King of the scandalous Misrepresentation that was made of him in the Monday's Gazet upon which the Gazetteer was called to account for it who alledged for himself that a Person of great Quality sent him in Writing the Words therein recited commanding him to put them in the Gazet. Yesterday being the last day of the Term all the Prisoners that were in the Tower upon the late Sham-Protestant-Plot were discharged upon Bail Mr. Braddon who prosecuted the Murder of the E. of Essex the Information put in against him in the Kings-Bench By Mr. Attorney for a pretended Subornation c. was not prosecuted and his Bail was discharged And the passing Sentence upon the Author of Julian the Apostate and the Printer of the late Ld. Russel's Speech was passed over with Silence Great Applications are made to his Majesty for the pardoning Mr. Sidney in the Tower which is believed will be attained and that he will be banished The Ld. Howard appears despicable in the Eyes of all Men he is under a Guard at VVhite-hall and believed he will be sent to the Tower for that the D. of M. will accuse him concerning the Testimony he thath given c. The Papists and high Tories are quite down in the Mouth their Pride is abated themselves and their Plot confounded but their Malice is not asswaged 'T is generally said the E. of Essex was murdered the brave Ld. Russel is afresh lamented The Plot is lost here except you in the Country can find it out amongst the Addressors and Abhorrers This sudden turn is an Amazement to all Men and must produce some strange Events which a little time will shew The second Letter was then read directed as the other and dated Decemb. the 1st 1683. Dear Sir I am to answer yours of the 27th and 29th past and truly I cannot but with great-Sorrow lament the loss of our good Friend honest
Majesty's gracious Government So shall your Petitioner ever pray c. This being read the Bishop return'd and the Chancellor told him they were not concerned in it and asked him If he desired his Answer should be read The Bishop said Yes saying that what he did therein was by Advice of Counsel and therefore hoped would not be interpreted to be done maliciously or obstinately And that in effect he did what the King commanded to be done having advised Doctor Sharp to forbear Preaching till his Majesty had received Satisfaction concerning him and accordingly that he had forborn in his Diocess Then the Bishop's Paper was read which contain'd the King's Letter and Bishop's Answer thereto The King's Letter Dated Monday July 14. 1686. Delivered at Fulham on Thursday June 17. in the Afternoon by Mr. Atterbury the Messenger JAMES R. RIght Reverend Father in God We greet you well Whereas We have been informed and are fully satisfied that Dr. John Sharp Rector of the Parish Church of St. Giles in the Fields in the County of Middlesex and in your Diocess notwithstanding Our late Letter to the most Reverend Fathers in God the Arch-Bishops of Canterbury and York and Our Directions concerning Preachers given at Our Court at White-hall March 15. 1685. in the Second Year of Our Reign yet he the said Dr. John Sharp in contempt of the said Orders hath in some of the Sermons he hath since preached presumed to make unbecoming Reflections and to utter such Expressions as were not fit or proper for him endeavouring thereby to beget k the Minds of his Hearers an evil Opinion of Us and Our Government by insinuating Fears and Jealousies to dispose them to Discontent and to lead them into Disobedience and Rebellion These are therefore to require and command you immediately upon receit hereof forthwith to suspend him from further Preaching in any Parish Church or Chappel in your Diocess until he has given Us Satisfaction and Our further Pleasure be known herein And for so doing this shall be your Warrant And so We bid you heartily farewel Given at our Court at Windsor June 14. 1686. in the Second Year of Our Reign By His Majesty's Command SVNDERLAND The Bishop of London's Answer sent by Dr. Sharp to the Earl of Sunderland then at Hampton-Court on Friday June 18. Who could have no Answer To the Right Honour able the Earl of Sunderland Lord President c. My Lord I Always have and shall count it my Duty to obey the King in what-ever Commands he lays upon me that I can perform with a safe Conscience But in this I humbly conceive I am obliged to proceed according to Law and therefore it is impossible for me to comply because though his Majesty commands me only to execute his Pleasure yet in the Capacity I am to do it I must act as a Judg and your Lordship knows no Judg condemns any Man before he has knowledg of the Cause and has cited the Party However I sent to Mr. Dean and acquainted him with his Majesty's Displeasure whom I find so ready to give all reasonable Satisfaction that I have thought fit to make him the Bearer of this Answer From him that will never be unfaithfull to the King nor otherwise than My Lord Your Lordships most humble Servant H. LONDON After this the Chancellor ask'd the Bishop if he had any more to say Who then desired his Counsel might be heard by whom they would have more clear and full Satisfaction concerning what he had said Whereupon the Bishop was desired to withdraw and after half an hour he and his Counsel were called in who were Dr. Oldish Hodges Prince and Newton Dr. Oldish pleaded That the King's Letter did not take cognizance of the Cause so that it could not be an absolute Suspension because that supposeth a Proof of the Crime charged upon him That there was no such word in their Laws as suspend from Preaching which therefore must be meant silencing and this the Bishop did and in such a Method as is observed in their Courts Dr. Hodges then pleaded That the Bishop had done what the King commanded and that he could not Suspend which is a Judicial Act without first a Citation and Hearing which is the Method of proving before all Courts and appeared to be so in this otherwise the Bishop needed not to have been cited before them And that in returning the King an Answer why he did not do what he commanded him he did but what was his Duty and what was Law Dr. Price pleaded that a Citation was Jure Gentium and could never be taken away by any Positive Command or Law whatsoever that therefore the Bishop had obeyed the King so far as he could in that he had silenced the Doctor the Advice of a Bishop being in some sense an Admonition which is a Judicial Act and was given by the Bishop and obeyed by the Doctor Dr. Newton pleaded that the Bishop had obeyed the King for as in Nature no Man can be desired to do what is impossible so no man can be obliged to do an unlawful Act which Suspension without Citation and Hearing is That the Bishops are Custodes Canonum and therefore must not break them themselves That he had done what was in his Power to do and it was in effect what the King commanded to be done For where he did Rescribere and heard not the further Pleasure of the King returned he ought to conclude the King was satisfied with what he had written according to his Duty and the King had altered his Commands Then the Bishop of London said If he had erred in any Circumstance he was very ready to beg his Majesties Pardon and would be ready to make any reparation he was capable After which the Bishop withdrew for half an Hour and then being called in was desired to attend the Court again on Sept. 6. So the Bishop desiring that care might be took concerning the Minutes taken by the Clerks of what passed that he might not be misrepresented to the King by the Mistake of the Pen-man he went away While the Counsellors were pleading Dr. Pinfold the King's Advocate stood at the Chancellor's Elbow and took Notes by which it was expected that he should make a Reply but he said nothing and 't is supposed that he staid with the Council when the Bishop withdrew and gave them Reasons for his silence On Monday Sept. 6. 1686. There being present in Council the same as before and the Bishop appearing he was desired to sit down and hear his Sentence which to prevent Mistake they had ordered to be put in Writing The Bishop then would have spoke but was not suffered And then Mr. Bridgman their Register read the Instrument whereby the Bishop of London was suspended from the Execution of his Episcopal Office upon pain of Deprivation during his Majesties Pleasure sealed with their Seal but signed by no Body at all And some day after one of the