Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n king_n law_n see_v 2,769 5 3.8029 3 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A46362 The history of the Council of Trent is eight books : whereunto is prefixt a disourse containing historical reflexions on councils, and particularly on the conduct of the Council of Trent, proving that the Protestants are not oblig'd to submit thereto / written in French by Peter Jurieu ... ; and now done into English.; Abrégé de l'histoire du Concile de Trente. English Jurieu, Pierre, 1637-1713. 1684 (1684) Wing J1203; ESTC R12857 373,770 725

There are 14 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the People demanded but rather the Pope's Yoke upon the Clergy and the Clergy's upon the People was made heavier In the fifth Chapter of the General Reformation the Pope reserves to himself the Cognisance of all Criminal Causes of Bishops which are called the greater taking them from the Metropolitans and Provincial Synods The Decree ordains that when the Pope shall give any one a Commission in partibus that Commission shall onely extend to the taking of Informations In the twelfth Canon about Marriage the Council pronounces Anathema against those who shall deny that the Tryal of Matrimonial Causes belongs to the Church Some who pretend to a little skill in Antiquity could not but observe that from the beginning it was not so that all Laws concerning Marriage had been made by Emperours and that the Causes which did arise from those Laws were tryed by the secular Magistrates Nay more it s known that some Gothick Kings gave Dispensations for forbidden Degrees and in the Formularies of Cassiodorus the style of these Dispensations is still to be seen There were some who expected some good from the fourteenth Chapter of the General Reformation which revokes cancells and annuls and Constitutions or Customes of paying any thing for the purchase of Titles and the possession of Benefices they were in hopes that that Article if rightly interpreted would overthrow the Annats which are pay'd to the Pope for the taking possession of Benefices but experience hath evinced that that was the wrong way of interpreting the Decree The Eighth Chapter ordains that they who have sinned publickly should make publick repentance and it was hoped that that would be an advance towards the ancient Discipline But there is a Clause rarely well put in ni aliter Episcopo videatur for it hath not as yet seemed good to the Bishops to doe any thing in Execution of that Decree They who are jealous of the rights of Princes and secular Magistrates besides what we have already observed did not take it well that the Council in the sixth Chapter of the Reformation of Marriage should ordain that he who deflowers a Woman shall give her a Portion whether he Marry her or not for they looked upon that as a mere civil Constitution that cannot come under the Cognisance of an Ecclesiastick Judge Those who had no great kindness for the Council and sought to make themselves merry at its cost laughed a little at the Canon which prohibits Clandestine Marriages because it pronounceth an Anathema against those who deny that these Marriages are true Sacraments and yet subjoins that the Church hath always detested them This seemed to be an odd Clinch that the Church should declare she detested true Sacraments The one and twentieth Chapter about the Clause proponentibus legatis made sport also for a great many The Chapter declared that by that Clause there was no design of changing any thing in the manner that had been observed in ancient Councils nor of giving or taking from any one any right contrary to ancient Constitutions When all was done the Council at a conclusion and that the Legates had drawn all the advantage from this Clause that they could expect they come in at last with a Declaration that it was not their intention forsooth to doe prejudice to any body This could not pass without a remark that it looked very like the man's excuse who having given another a box on the Ear said that he had not done it with an intention to offend him It was observed that for the future the Pope had found out an excellent way to keep Councils in Bondage that there was no more to be done but in the beginning to make such a Clause as this let the Members quarrel about it during the whole sitting of the Council and then declare in the end when the business is done that it was not thereby designed to restrain any man's Liberty The Council precipitates to its end the Count de Luna and the Spaniards oppose it We are now at length come to the actions which immediately went before the last Session The countenance of affairs is now much to be altered no more of those long delays that held all Europe in suspence the Council joggs not on fair and soft to its end it runs post precipitates and all conspire to a conclusion The Pope stoops under the Burthen of the Council he intends upon any terms to shake it off the French who expect no more from that Assembly follow the Cardinal of Lorrain that hath struck in with the Pope The Germans abandon the Council as a Patient past hopes of recovery and none remain but the Spaniards who would march on gravely and step by step in the rest as they had done all along till then But they are not able of themselves alone not resist that torrent of impatience which hurried the Council to its end There remained still to be handled the matters of Indulgences Worship of Saints Purgatory Images and Fasts and that was enough to have employed the Council for several years after the rate that the former Points were managed The matter of Indulgences alone would have taken up the Council for several Months if it had been examined as the Point of Justification was but all was dispatched in a fortnights time That they might attain to this speedy Expedition the Legates and Cardinal of Lorrain agreed together that all which remained should be dispatched in one Session The Cardinal of Lorrain and Imperial Ambassadours undertook to prepare the Members for it by spreading of Reports that the Emperour desired that it might be concluded before Christmass and that the French were to depart in the Month of December that therefore matters ought to be so ordered that all things should be expeded before their departure They who were weary of their stay at Trent received the news with all imaginable Joy and on the fifteenth of November Cardinal Morone assembled at his house a Cabal of the Council and desired the Prelates to give their opinions as to the Conclusion of it that was so wished for All consented to it except the Count de Luna Ambassadour of Spain but the Legates were resolved to step over all difficulties The Decree which was minuted by the Clergy for the Reformation of Princes and against which the French Ambassadours had protested was one of the most ticklish Points The Legates therefore resolved to let that alone and yet to doe somewhat for the satisfaction of the Clergy which was that reviving the ancient Canons without specifying them they should put in an exhortation to Princes to preserve the Church in her privileges and even to make restitution of the rights which had been usurped upon the Clergy by secular Judges But no Anathema's nor threatnings were added they onely made use of terms full of respect to Sovereigns The Pope having well consulted the matter of Rome ordered it to pass so The Council held dayly two Congregations
THE COUNCIL of TRENT The Representation of the Fathers assembled in the Council of Trent begun about the end of the year 1545. Concluded towards the end of 1563. under the Pontisicate of Paul III. Tulius III. Marcel II. Paul IV. and Pius IV. There were XXV Sessions in which were present VII Cardinals V. whereof were the Popes Legates XVI Ambassadours from Kings Princes Republicks CCL Patriarchs Arch bishops Bishops Abbots and Generals of Orders All Divines and Doctours of the Civil and Canon Law THE HISTORY OF THE Council of TRENT In Eight Books Whereunto is prefixt A Discourse containing Historical Reflexions on Councils and particularly on the Conduct of the Council of Trent proving that the Protestants are not oblig'd to submit thereto Written in French by Peter Jurieu Doctour and Professour of Divinity And now done into English LONDON Printed by J. Heptinstall for Edward Evets at the Green Dragon and Henry Faithorne and John Kersey at the Rose in St. Paul's Church-Yard MDCLXXXIV Historical Reflections ON COUNCILS And particularly on the Council of TRENT PROVING That Protestants are not Obliged to submit thereto I Believe it will by all men readily be granted that since the first appearance of Christianity there hath not hapned an Affair of greater moment than was the separation of the Protestants from the Church of Rome which fell out in the beginning of the last Century It was a mighty rupture that took whole States and Kingdoms from the Roman See Schism is indeed one of the greatest mischiefs which can befall the Church it is an enemy to Charity nay ruinous to it and since Charity is no less necessary to Salvation than Faith Schism that destroys Charity is no less to be feared than Heresie that overthrows the Faith In our present subject we find both Heresie and Schism The mischief is great on either part Those of the separation are Schismaticks if they have not done it upon solid grounds But if the Church from which they separate hath given occasion for such separation and by her own errors made it absolutely necessary the guilt of the Schism falls then upon her From hence arises a great contest to know who it is that must one day answer before the Tribunal of God for this scandalous breach that puts a stop to the progress of Chtistianity sowing among Christians the seeds of variance and contention The Roman Church pretends it to be a Cause already adjudged and determined that famous Assembly the General Council of Trent who could not err having pronounced definitively upon it By this Judgment say they men ought to abide for there will else be no end of Controversie Disputes should not be everlasting but when the Judges have given their final Sentence there can be no further proceeding The Protestants are very far from thinking thus of the matter they pretend a right to review the Cause they cry out against the incompetence of the Judge they complain of undue and irregular proceedings and will admit no other Decision of the truth and antiquity of their Religion than the Holy Scripture as for Tradition Councils and Schools by which they are condemned they look upon them as things doubtful falsified false and apt to occasion illusion and error This Controversie is most certainly of the greatest importance no less than eternal Salvation depends upon it so that it is the interest of all men to examine it to the bottom It were a thing to be wished that we might plead our cause before a disinteressed Judge but it cannot be For all the sincere and worthy persons of Europe have already taken part on one side or the other and those that can still ballance between the two Religions are too ill Christians to have the honour of being Judges in a Cause which properly speaking is the Cause of God But we entreat the Reader that at least for a few hours he will lay aside all manner of prepossession that he may so make the better Judgment of the force of our Arguments My intention is not to enter into the depth of this vast matter for that were to descend to particulars and to examine the right and wrong of every dispute I will only shew that the Protestants are not to be blamed for refusing to submit to the Decisions of the Council of Trent and that from reasons taken from the Council it self I will prove that it is not from giddiness nor from perverseness but from a just and solid resolution that they refuse to submit For it seems reasonable that giving the History of this Council we do also give an account why we conceive our selves not obliged to receive it reason 1 1. First reason of not owning the Council of Trent because it is a Party in the Controversie In the first place the Reformed decline the jurisdiction of this Council as a Judge incompetent because a Party I easily foresee I shall be stop'd short here and that it will be returned upon me that the Churches being a Party is the ordinary refuge of Hereticks Had not the Arians as much right to tell the Council of Nice you are a Party and therefore can be no Judge in the Cause What! is not the Church obliged to maintain the rights of truth against Hereticks and shall this shadow of a pretence be able to deprive her of the power to Judge It is fit however that we be heard in the matter to see if there be not a mighty difference between what we alledge for our selves and what they are pleased to make the Hereticks say The Church is certainly the prop and the pillar of truth as St. Paul speaks that is she is obliged to support it But yet Hereticks must not for that reason look upon the Church as a Party and reject her as unfit to judge of religious Controversies For Legislators and the Garrantees of Laws cannot justly be considered as Parties when they have no other interest in a matter in question but the conservation of the Laws Were it reasonable for a Murderer to harangue his Judges thus Gentlemen you cannot be my Judges you have an interest in the prosecution inasmuch as you have forbidden to commit murder It is an easie thing to foresee what Judgment you will give thus prejudiced as you are by your own Principles and Maximes I demand therefore a fair and equal trial by Judges wholly free from all prepossession There could be nothing so senseless as such kind of talk yet such would be that of Hereticks who should reject the judgment of the Church in Contests of this kind Had the Council of Trent been the Council of the Church and without other interest than to defend the truth we might have appealed from its Judgment had it determined of any thing contrary to truth but we could not have refused to own it as a Council But we affirm that the Council of Trent is not a Council of the Church but of the Pope and of
Convention by themselves in Thrace but others on the contrary do affirm that the whole Assembly was Orthodox However there was at least three hundred of them Orthodox that were met together from all Parts The holy Confessour Hosius Bishop of Cordoua did preside in it St. Athanasius was re-established in his See by it and the Nicene Creed was also by it explained according to truth Nevertheless this very Council has not been able to obtain to pass for legitimate St. Austin formally rejects it nor is it reckoned among the first six De. Conciliis l. 1. c 7. Bellarmine indeed so far favours it as to account it among those that are in part rejected and in part approved If the Ancients had believed that General Councils were infallible I cannot see why they should reject this it having all the marks of Universality Gratus Bishop of Carthage was present at it with five and thirty African Bishops more and yet the African Church never received it she took so little notice of it that sixty or eighty years after she had no manner of knowledge of its Canons which appears by the History of the great Contest between the Church of Africk and the Bishops of Rome in the Affair of Pelagius upon the right of Appealls Celestius a Pelagian who had been condemned by the Councils of Africk obtained of Pope Zosimus to be acquitted of all the Censures that had been given against him The Africans opposed it affirming that the Canons permitted not that one accused of Heresie should be tried out of his own Province or but by his own Synod and that the Bishop of Rome had no authority to receive the Appeals of such as stood condemned by the Bishops of Africk Zozimus produced a Canon as of the Council of Nice which permitted Appeals to Rome Tho it was not really a Canon of that Council but of the Council of Sardica The Africans were surprized at it and knew not on the sudden what to reply for in their Copies of the Canons of the Council of Nice there was no such Canon to be found so that not knowing from whence it might be taken because they knew nothing of the Council of Sardica or its Canons there was need of time to clear the mystery The fifth General Council upon the Cause of Arius was the Council of Milan held about the year 354. Ruffinus plainly says that many of the Orthodox fell into the snares of Heresie Hist l. 1. c. 20. And indeed the Bishops that held for Athanasius and the term Consubstantial were in fine banished by the Emperour Constantius Could there be a more famous Council than was that of Ariminum in Italy There were present and assisting in it no fewer than six hundred Bishops of which four hundred of the Eastern Church and two hundred of the West If we may believe Socrates Hist l. 2. c. 29. there was nothing done in this Council repugnant to the Faith of the Church But he is not in this to be credited He thought perhaps it would be a mighty service to the Church to prevaricate in her behalf and deny that this Great Council was of the number of those that favoured Arianism But it is undeniable that this Synod sunk under the violence of the Emperour Constantius and was over reached by the cunning and artifice of Vrsacius Bishop of Singidunum and of Valens Bishop of Mursa The testimony of Athanasius in the Book by him written concerning the Council of Ariminum puts the matter beyond all doubt especially when we consider the concurrent evidence of S. Austin in the fourteenth Chapter of his third Book against Maximin and of St. Hilary in his Book de Synodis adversus Arianos where we find the Letters of Liberius Bishop of Rome to the Eastern Bishops wherein he avers that the Fathers of the Council of Ariminum overcome by the Emperour and by the cheats of Valence and Vrsacius had pronounced contrary to the Faith of the Church but were again perfectly returned from their error and had each of them pronounced Anathema against the Confession of Faith made by the Council of Ariminuw We have thus already five General Councils that have erred about the same matter In the Cause of Eutiches who confounded the two Natures of Christ there were two General Councils assembled The first was at Ephesus in the year 449. convened by Theodosius the younger a Prince truly Catholick All the Patriarchs were present at it Juvenal Patriarch of Jerusalem Dioscorus of Alexandria Domnus of Antioch Flavian of Constantinople and by his Legats Leo Bishop of Rome Nothing was wanting to the Legality or Universality of this Council For to say that this Council was Illegal because not convened by the Pope and that the Patriarch of Alexandria and not the Popes Legates did preside therein is a very vain Allegation the weakness of which however in this place we are not concerned to shew For we oppose not such as make the Pope Superiour to Councils and all the Authority of Councils to depend upon the Popes Pleasure We oppose such as make the Council Superiour to the Pope and hold a Council to be nothing the less legal or less infallible for not being under the Popes direction such as look upon the Councils of Constance and of Basil as most holy Councils tho the Popes did not preside in them and such in fine as require us to submit to the Council of Trent upon its own Authority This General Council of Ephesus tho legally assembled and according to the Canons is notwithstanding a detestable Convention that justified the Heretick Eutiches confirmed his Doctrine and deposed Flavian Patriarch of Constantinople a most holy and Orthodox person About nineteen years before there had been held another General Council at the same City of Ephesus in the Cause of Nestorius who affirmed there was to Persons in Christ This Heresie was there condemned and Truth triumphed This certainly makes an essential difference between these two Councils tho otherwise there be none that I can see as to Form and Externals unless that Error was victorious in the second Council with less scandal than truth overcame in the first For it is true indeed that Dioscorus President of the second Council of Ephesus did with much facility cause the Heresie of Eutiches to prevail the Popes Legats and some few others having been only a little roughly treated whilst in the first Council of Ephesus which is the third received General Council there was a horrible Schism occasioned by Cyril of Alexandria and John of Antioch who made Parties and deposed each other Socrat. l. 7. c. 33. Evagrius l. 1. c. 4. The Emperour was forced to interpose in the matter and to make use of his Authority to appease so dreadful a Sedition It is apparent from all these Considerations that tho the Council of Trent could be considered as a General Council that would not bind us to believe it infallible nor
to submit blindly to its Decisions reason 3 3. Third reason of rejecting the Council of Trent That it is a Council of the Church of Rome not of the Universal Church But to leave these general Arguments and come up closer to the Council of Trent We say it is a Council of the Roman not of the Catholick or Universal Church and that we can look on it as no other So that were it true that Occumenical Councils were infallible yet the Council of Trent nor any of those held in the Church of Rome since the Schism of the Eastern and Western Churches would have no right to pretend to this priviledg of Infallibility The Schism of those two Churches fell out in the tenth Century beginning indeed toward the end of the ninth since that time the Greek Church hath had no Communion with the Latin It is true there have been several attempts to re-unite them but without success So that the Greeks have had no Voice in the Latin Councils nor the Latins in the Greek Councils for six or seven hundred years The Church of the Latins is not near half of the Christian Church yet she will needs have it that hers are General Councils whilest the Councils of the Southern and Eastern Churches must pass forsooth but for little Consults or a sort of Conventicles It is a prodigious temerity for a Church scarce more than a fourth of the Christian World to set up it self for the Universal Church and to count the rest for nothing All the Churches of the East North and South the Greek Church the Church of the Abyssins who possess all Ethiopia which is a large share of Africa and the Church of the Russians are say they Schismatical Assemblies they have broken the bands of Union with the Head which is the Pope and are no longer worthy of the name of Churches for there are no true Christians but those that are subject to the Holy See which is the band of Unity This indeed is an excellent Principle According to this Hypothesis all the Christians in the East in the South and in the North are condemned to everlasting Perdition What can be imagined so cruel as this Tenet I cannot for my part believe that there is any reasonable Man of the Romish Communion that dares seriously affirm that an innumerable multitude of Christians believing in Jesus Christ and receiving the Canons of the Ancient Councils are yet in a state of Reprobation only for not acknowledging the Papal Supremacy I know very well that this Doctrine is taught but I appeal to the Conscience of those that teach it and am fully perswaded that they cannot but inwardly grant that such Persons may be saved out of the Pope's Communion And were but that Point as openly confessed as it is secretly owned they must then be constrained to acknowledg that the Councils of the Church of Rome are no General Councils For if the Greeks may be saved it is because the Church of which they are Members is a true Church since all Men acknowledg that out of the Church there is no Salvation If then the Greek Church be still a part of the true Church it must necessarily follow that those Councils wherein she has no part cannot be called General Councils nor can have the priviledges of them reason 4 4. Fourth Cause of Rejection The Council of Trent was but a part even of the Latin Church The nearer approaches we make to the Council of Trent the more plainly we discover the imperfections that ruine its Authority with the Protestants We have already seen that this Council is their adverse Party in the Cause that granting it a General Council it could not be infallible that yet it is not a General Council for that three parts of the Christian Church have no part in it it follows that it is then at most but a Council of the Roman Church But alas it is not so much as a General Council even of the Roman Church It is a Council of Italy and of the Italians it is a Council of some sixty odd Bishops whereof many were the Pope's Pensioners This Council was assembled three several times the first time under Paul III. the second time under Julius the 3d. the third time under Pius IV. In the two first there were not above sixty Bishops present almost all Spaniards or Italians Where then is the Universality of a Council consisting of so few Persons Yet have these few adventured to decide the most important Matters There were sixteen Sessions held during the two first Convocations wherein were decided the Controversies of the Scripture Tradition Original Sin Grace Justification Baptism the Eucharist Penance Extream Vnction Sixty Persons undertake to give Laws to all the Consciences of the Christian World and in things not understood by them They must needs be very blind whose Faith can truckle to the Decisions of so small a number of Men of so little Understanding Paul the 4th was very much in the right to say as he often did that it was great folly to send sixty trifling Bishops to the Mountains and imagine that they must presently have the advantage of discerning the Truth rather than the See of Rome where there is always so great a number of excellent Persons who make the Study of Divinity the sole business of their Life I must confess indeed that there were above two hundred Prelats present at the third Convocation of the Council But how There came some fifteen or twenty from France and not till about the end neither There was yet a few more Spaniards But no Germans no Polonians no Hungarians or if there were it was so very few as could never be thought to represent the Nations For it was one of the Policies of the Court of Rome not to permit to Vote by Nations nor that the absent Bishops might Vote by Proxy and that each Bishop spake only for himself There might be about fifty or sixty or some few more French Spanish and German Bishops the rest were Italians and that rest were three parts of four for there was more than one hundred and fifty Not the Lutherans only but all Europe agreed in it that the Council of Trent was purely an Italian a Papal Council reason 5 5. Fifth Reason to reject it The hatred of the Council of Trent to the Protestants If we regard the conduct of this Council we find from thence another reason to reject it Already we have taken notice with what heat and violence that Council acted against those over whom it pretended to be Judg. It hath frequently quitted the quality of Judge to assume that of being the adverse Party and such a Party as cared not to exceed all the bounds of honour and good Faith The Design of making odious the Doctrine of the Lutherans was apparently the reigning Passion of the Council For it countenanced the false extracts made of the Lutheran books and
and Tyranny could make use of What then had been done or rather what had not been done if as the Protestants desired the Pope's Authority had been directly struck at and the subversion of his Grandeur openly attempted If the Council of Trent had but only offered at what was actually done by the Council of Constance that is the declaring of the Pope to be subject to the Council the Court of Rome would rather have set all Christendom in confusion that have suffer'd it The Presidents had express Orders if that Point came at all into question immediately to break up the Council and return to Rome reason 7 7. Seventh cause of Rejection The Council of Trent hath erred even by the Confession o● those that would have us submit to it But I would very fain know why we should be obliged to receive the Decisions of the Council of Trent since the Roman Church her self does not receive them Why should it be expected from us that we should look upon this Council as Infallible when thousands of the Roman Communion do believe that the Council hath de facto erred and in consequence of that Belief do refuse to submit to it and daily reject its Canons This last reason for our rejecting that Council is indeed of high importance we shall therefore enlarge a little upon it and evidently make it appear that those that would exact of us a Submission to this Council have themselves no regard to its Authority and that upon the score of its having erred I shall not press upon the Council for having forbid Non-Residence under grievous Penalties which yet is now universally connived at for having forbidden Pluralities and yet there are now no Eminent Prelats but are guilty of it for having forbidden to give Dispensations but in Cases of great moment and yet now at Rome they are denied to none but to such as want Mony that matter of mighty moment for which only they are granted For I very well know that to these and to a hundred other particulars in which I could instance it will presently be replyed that they are Corruptions indeed but that those Corruptions indeed but that those Corruptions do not hinder the Decrees of the Council from being just and good And the Popes Flatterers will add that he is not bound by the Decrees of the Council but has Power to dispence with the Canons when he thinks fit But I speak of Decrees made by this Council and rejected by an infinite number of People Decrees that never were suffered to take place in France after all the endeavors of the Court of Rome The French Kings their Parliaments and Bishops dislike several things in the Decrees of this Council Reasons why the Council of Trent is not received in France 1. That the Council hath done and suffered many things that suppose and confirm a Superiority of the Pope over Councils 2. That it hath confirmed the Papal Encroachments upon Ordinaries Ses 2. Res. c. 8. by Exemption of Chapters and Privileges of Regulars who are both withdrawn from Episcopal Jurisdiction 3. That it hath not restored to the Bishops certain Functions appertaining to their Office and taken from them otherwise than to execute them as Delegates of the See of Rome 4. That it hath infringed the Privileges of Bishops of being judged by their Metropolitan and the Bishops of the Province by permitting a Removal of great Causes to Rome and giving Power to the Pope to name Commissioners to judg the Accused Bishop 5. That it hath declared that neither Princes Magistrates nor People are to be consulted in the placing and setling of Bishops 6. That it hath empowered Bishops to proceed in their Jurisdictions by Civil Pains by Imprisonment and by Seisure of Temporalties 7. That it hath made Bishops the Executors of all Donations for Pious Uses 8. That it hath given them a superintendency over Hospitals Colleges and Fraternities with Power of disposing their Goods and Revenues notwithstanding that those matters had been always managed by Lay-men 9. That it hath ordained that Bishops shall have the examining of all Notaries Royal and Imperial with Power to deprive or suspend notwithstanding any Opposition or Appeal 10. That it hath given Power to Bishops with consent of two Members of their Chapter and of two of their Clergy to take and retrench part of the Revenue of Hospitals nay to take away Feodal Tithes belonging to Lay-men 11. That it hath made Bishops the Masters of Foundations of Piety as Churches Chappels and Hospitals so as that those that have the care and Government of them are obliged to be accomptable to the Bishops 12. That in confirming Ecclesiastical Exemptions it hath wholly ascribed to the Pope and the Spiritual Judges all Power of judging the Causes of accused Bishops as if Sovereign Princes had lost the Right they have over their Subjects as soon as they became Ecclesiasticks 13. That it hath empowered the Ordinaries and Judges Ecclesiastical in quality of Delegates of the Holy See to enquire of the Right and Possession of Lay-Patronages and to quash and annul them if they were not of great necessity and well founded 14. That in prohibiting Duels it had declared that such Emperor King or Prince as should shew favour to Duelling should therefore be Excommunicated and deprived of the Seignory of the Place holding of the Church where the Duel was sought 15. That it hath permitted the Mendicant Fryars to possess Immoveables 16. That it hath ordained an Establishment of Judges it calls Apostolick in all Dioceses with Power to judg of Spiritual and Ecclesiastical matters in prejudice of the Ordinaries 17. That it hath declared that Matrimonial Causes are of the Churches Jurisdiction 18. That it hath enjoyned Kings and Princes to leave Ecclesiasticks the free and intire Possession of the Jurisdiction granted them by the Holy Canons and General Councils that is to say Usurped by the Clergy over the Civil Power These are the principal Points disputed in France Those that tend to the diminution of the Authority and Privileges of Bishops to enlarge the Roman Power are rejected by the Bishops and those that would extend the Power of Bishops to the prejudice of the Civil Authority are rejected by the Parliaments Between both this Council as enacting contrary to the Rights and Liberties of the Gallican Church was never at all received in France so as to obtain the force of a Law Why then should that Assembly give Law to us Protestants that is rejected by so great a part of the Church of Rome If it hath not erred why do Roman Catholicks as they will be termed refuse to receive it And if it hath erred what reason is there to press us to receive it I know what is answered to this that matters of Faith and of Discipline must be distinguished that the Council did not nor could not err in matters of Faith and Doctrine and that it was only mistaken in points
Church A motion was made of Marrying the Queen who was already forty years old and three Matches were proposed Cardinal Pool who was of the Bloud Royal the Lord Courtenay Cozin to Henry VIII and Philip Prince of Spain Mary chose Philip and the Emperour fearing lest Cardinal Pool who had been his Son's Competitor might by his presence cross his Marriage with Mary did all he could not make him delay his Journey and not being able to perswade him sent Don Diego de Mendoza to stop him in the Palatinate by Force and Authority The Cardinal complained of this as of an action that did violate the Majesty of the holy See and an affront done to the Pope and his Legates So that Charles having detained him sometime was forced to give him his liberty and sent him to Brussels But he found a means to amuse him in Brabant under colour of engaging him in a negotiation of Peace betwixt the King of France and himself untill the Marriage was accomplished In the beginning of the year 1554. The Emperour sent four Ambassadours into England for concluding the Treaty betwixt the Queen of England his Son and himself Mary in the mean while who with much prudence went gradually on in the re-establishment of Religion made new Proclamations restored the use of the Latin Tongue in Divine Service renounced the Supremacy in the Church gave it back to the Pope and so annulled the Acts of her Father The matter was brought before the Parliament where it met with opposition amongst the Lords because of the Church Lands possessed by the Nobles which they must be obliged to give back again So that the Pope's Supremacy past not at that time Prince Philip that he might not seem inferiour to Mary in Dignity took the Title of King of Naples and consummated his Marriage at London the twenty fifth of July being St. James his day the Patron of Spain The Parliament met again in the month of November following and Cardinal Pool was therein restored to all his rights and honours Two Members of Parliament were sent to bring him over into England and he arrived at London the twenty third of November with the Silver Cross carried before him Being brought into the House of Lords where the King and Queen were present he made a Speech to that Illustrious Assembly thanking them for the favour they had done him in restoring him to his Honours and Countrey He earnestly exhorted them to return again to the obedience of the holy See wherein he prevailed and the Ceremony of Reconciliation was performed the last day of November for the Authority of the King and Queen had obliged all the dissatisfied Members to silence which silence was taken as a consent The Queen caused a Petition to be framed wherein the Parliament begg'd Pardon of the Pope for having withdrawn themselves from under his obedience This Petition was presented to the King and Queen who rising immediately from their Chairs of State went to the Legate and besought him to grant the Parliament the Pardon which they begg'd The Legate standing up and all the Members of Parliament kneeling before him made a Speech concerning the Joy that the repentance of sinners causes in Heaven and then having prayed over them he gave them absolution The Members rose up and the whole Parliament went in body to the Church where Te Deum was Sung Next day three Ambassadours were named to goe render homage to the Pope in name of the whole Nation and this success caused so great Joy at Rome that the Pope proclaimed a Jubile the twenty fourth of December to render thanks to God for so great a blessing The Parliament of England sitting till the middle of the next year Philip and Mary got all the Ancient Laws against Here-ticks to be revived All Acts to the contrary year 1554 made in the time of Henry and his Son Edward were Repealed and afterward the rigour of the Laws that were now again in force was put in execution against the Protestants One hundred threescore and sixteen persons of Quality besides inferiour people were by Mary's Order that year put to death amongst whom Cranmer Archbishop of Canterbury and the rest of the Bishops who had been the Authors of the Reformation were burnt It was put to their choice either to dye or to recant but none of them would save their Lives by a Recantation This persecution extended to the very Graves and the ashes of the dead the bodies of Bucer and Paulus Fagius who had been dead some four years were taken up and burnt So that the Protestants went to pot in all places for at the same time Henry the II. caused a great many of the reformed Religion to be burnt in France not so much out of Zeal as to satisfie the insatiable avarice of Diana of Poictiers Dutchess of Valentinois his Mistress to whom he had given the forfeitures of all that should be condemned for Heresie On the other hand Ferdinand King of the Romans published an Edict whereby he strictly charged all his Subjects not to make any innovation in matters of Religion and banished above two hundred Ministers out of Bohemia Several of his most considerable Nobility prayed him that he would at least permit the use of the Cup but he refused it and caused a Catechism to be made according to which all School masters should instruct their Scholars But this Edict did not altogether please the Pope who complained that a Prince should have undertaken to make a Formulary of Faith year 1555 The same year being 1555. a Diet was called at Ausbourg for composing the troubles of Religion Ferdinand made a long Speech in it 1555. A Diet at Ausbourg during which the Pope dies wherein he reckoned up the mischiefs that had been occasioned in Germany by those controversies in Religion and the horrid corruption of manners that these debates had drawn after them Divers means were proposed for taking up these differences and amongst others a conference of the learned of both sides but the Pope who had an aversion to any thing that bore the name of conference approved not that expedient he caused Cardinal Morone his Legate in Germany to represent to the Diet that all conferences ought to be avoided and that the onely way to put an end to controversies was that which was taken in England to wit to return again to the obedience of the holy See But Cardinal Morone was not long at Ausbourg before he heard of the death of Julius which happened in February 1555. He therefore returned to Rome to assist at the Election of a new Pope and found the business done before he came MARCEL II. Marcello Cervino Cardinal of Santa Croce was created Pope on the eighth of April 1555. It is observed as a thing singular in him that he would not change his name as others do This custome of changing of names upon promotion to the Papacy came from the Germans whose names
Duke knowing that they had not been prompted to that by a Spirit of Rebellion resolved to try fair means with them But at Rome the proposal was rejected with indignation they counsel'd him to use force which he followed and for eighteen Months waged War against these Wretches In the beginning of the same year a great Conspiracy was hatcht in France The Conspiracy of Amboise they who were engaged in the Plot were put upon it as much through interest of State as of Religion The House of Guise were absolute Masters both of the King's person and mind and this being a grievance to many they formed a Party and entered into a Confederacy for putting a stop to the fury of the Persecution and at the same time for rescuing the person of Francis the Second out of the hands of the Princes of Guise But the Plot was discovered the Court went from Blois to Amboise where there is a Citadel part of the Conspirators were taken and put to Death and so that Conspiracy of which one Renaudé was the chief was quickly dispersed and brought to naught The Protestants in the mean while encreased amidst all these Persecutions and that made the King's Council look out for other means of composing the troubles than what had been employed hitherto it was concluded that a Council of the whole Nation must be called but Cardinal d' Armagnac who was wholly for the interest of the Court of Rome and was as good as any Inquisitor against the Protestants withstood that resolution Monluc Bishop of Valence was of opinion for calling a national Synod and that prevailed This resolution was signified to the Pope but he approved not of it On the contrary he complained publickly at Rome against the King's proceedings who by a Declaration of the eighteenth of March had pardoned all who upon account of Religion had taken up Arms against him The Pope said it was the cause of God and that no Prince has power to pardon such Crimes that besides national Councils were good for nothing but to breed Schisms that there was need of a General Council and that he intended to convene it without delay The Pope solicites the King of France to take Geneva He sent into France the Bishop of Viterbo to represent the same things and that he might employ the King and take him off from thinking of that national Synod he essayed to perswade him to bend his forces against the City of Geneva He also solicited the Duke of Savoy and the King of Spain to the same Enterprise the King of Spain being a Neighbour to Geneva by the Franche Comte The Savoyard would have been very willing provided he could have kept Geneva for himself nor perhaps would the King of Spain have been against that but he knew very well that the King of France would never allow it to be in any other Prince's Possession and therefore he chose rather to suffer the new Religion to reign there than to see it in the hands of the French who were already too near Neighbours to the County of Burgundy which then belonged to the King of Spain so that that matter went no farther The King of Spain who thought it not proper to unite with the King of France for the Ruine of Geneva as he had been solicited by the Pope thought himself obliged at least to comply with the Pope's inclinations in disswading the French from holding a national Council For that effect he sent into France Antiono de Toledo Prior of Leon with instructions to offer France forces and assistance for the destruction of the Hereticks and it is certain that he could not doe more than what he did to satisfie the Pope by the Ruine of the Protestants The Court of France did not much listen to these Proposals they would indeed have been willing to have had Geneva but they feared the Switsers and the stirs that the Huguenots might raise in France during that War As to the matter of the Council they were stedfast in their design of calling a national one in France giving the Pope in the mean time assurance that nothing should be attempted in it contrary to his Authority But he could not trust too much to that he was very apprehensive of the French Prelates who were accused to be infected with Heresie and were at least prepossest with some Tenets which they call the Privileges of the Gallican Church and with Maximes that sute not with that Supremacy which is challenged by the Court of Rome The apprehension of this made the Pope absolutely resolve to call the General Council The Pope resolves to call a General Council But he was at a stand as to the place he would have been very willing to have held it at Bologna but he did not expect that the Prelates would come thither Milan was offered him but he would not accept of it unless the Citadel were put into his hands during the sitting of the Council The King of Spain for all he was so good a Catholick could not be brought to condescend to that for as to the point of worldly affairs and interests the Pope and other Princes are trusted much alike At length he concluded upon the City of Trent where it had been already assembled There happened two considerable matters which confirmed him in his resolution of hastening the Convocation of the Council the one was the Revolt of Scotland which banished Mary the Queen regent and fell off from the Church of Rome the other was the Jealousie that they had of Maximilian King of Bohemia Son to the Emperour Ferdinand Maximilian King of Bohemia and the Romans is suspected of Lutheranism who was always thought too favourable to the Protestants Paul IV. had accused him as an Abbetter of Heresie and one day he made an answer to the Pope's Ambassadours that much encreased the suspicion that they had of him The Pope's Nephew Maroo Altemps exhorting Maximilian in behalf of Pius IV. to continue a good Catholick promising him on the one hand that if he did the Pope would corroborate the pretentions he had to the Empire and on the other hand threatning that if he persisted to give Causes of Suspicion he would never confirm him King of the Romans but would deprive him of all his Territories Maximilian made answer to the promises that were made him of favour and assistance that he was very much obliged to his Holiness but that the Salvation of his Soul was much dearer to him than all worldly Enjoyments Now at Rome this kind of style was lookt upon as an infallible sign of Lutheranism and as the badge of those who were Enemies to the holy See All these reasons made the Pope on the third of June call together the Ambassadours of Princes and told them more plainly than hitherto he had done his design of re-establishing the Council at Trent ordering them to acquaint their Masters with the same He himself wrote to
his Nuncio's in all places that they should exhort the Princes to have their Arms in readiness to constrain the Rebels to return into the bosome of the Church for it was not so much his thought to hold a Council for deciding of Controversies as to take from Princes all pretext of dealing with Protestants in the way of Lenity and Mildness The opinions of the Princes were extremely divided as to that particular The King of Spain approved both the Council and the choice of the place but the French refused the City of Trent and proposed Treves Constance Wormes or Haguenau The Emperour was of the same mind affirming that the Lutherans did abominate the Council which was begun that it would be impossible ever to induce them to come or to submit to the Council if a new one were not called He added that he could not undertake for the Empire before he had assembled a General Diet and that for his hereditary Dominions it would be hard for him to make them come to the Council if the Cup and Marriage of Priests were not again allowed them These proposals did not please the Pope he declared that he would never suffer the matters which had been already decided at Trent to be examined over again if it should cost him his life that as to the Restitution of the Chalice and the Marriage of Priests which were onely of positive right he should refer himself to the Council but that he would act nothing of himself alone though he had Authority to doe so The Assembly at Fontainebleau where it is resolved that a National Council shall be called in France and Severities in the mean time cease The Protestants multiplied in France and the dissentions encreased also The King was therefore obliged to call a numerous Assembly of the chief of the Kingdom to meet at Fontainebleau the twentieth of August in the same year 1560. Jean de Mouluc Bishop of Valence who was no Enemy to the Protestants and who wished for some Reformation in the Church gave his Judgment there for a national Council and for the forbearance of Persecution affirming that People were amazed at the Constancy of those that suffered which made them inform themselves about their Religion he was seconded by a great many more and Admiral Coligny himself presented to the King Petitions that had been delivered to him in Normandy which begg'd that a stop might be put to all Severities untill the Cause should be tried He added that having enquired whence these Petitions came they had made him answer that fifty thousand were ready to set their hands to them The Duke and Cardinal of Guise opposed these opinions and rejecting a national Council voted for the continuance of Severities The conclusion of the Assembly was an Edict ordaining the States to meet at Meaux the tenth of December ensuing and that if a General Council were not called the Bishops of France should assemble the thirteenth of January following that they might take their measures for holding of a national Council and that in the mean time Severities should cease That Assembly of Fontainebleau gave the Pope fresh Jealousies and he was the more afraid of the National Council because he found that the Protestants likewise demanded it He sent therefore orders to the Cardinal of Tournon his Legate in France to endeavour what lay in his power to prevent the Assembly of the Bishops and pressed the affair of calling the General Council He proposed it once again to the Ambassadours and represented to them the disorders that would be occasioned by a National Synod but he could not forbear discovering the true reason of the hatred which he bore to these National Synods in which he had not the absolute power They pretend said he to subject the Pope and Court of Rome to a Council but I am ready to lay down my life rather than to suffer it Pro fide religione volumus mori He would have the Ministers of Princes to give their opinions concerning that affair The Emperour's Ambassadour according to his Master's intention was of the mind that the matter should not be hastened too much that a Diet might be assembled to consult about it but the other Ambassadours consented to a speedy Convocation of the Council according to the intentions of the Pope In the mean time the Politicians looked upon all this eagerness of the Pope to be a kind of Comedy For they thought it a clear case that if he could not avoid a Council he would at least endeavour to put it off untill he had enriched his Family and his Nephews and that afterwards he would be willing to give others good Examples of frugality and moderation and bear more easily with the Reformations that might be made in the Council About the beginning of November Letters came to Rome from the Emperour's Court still pressing that the Council might not be called at Trent and that that Convocation might not pass for a Continuation of the former Council because the Place and that Continuation would be stumbling blocks to the Lutherans and would raise difficulties never to be surmounted France continued likewise in the same mind and the Union of those two great Powers in the same Sentiments put the Pope into a great deal of perplexity and made him thereupon hold several Congregations At length he resolved to pass over all these difficulties he minuted the Bull of Convocation The Pope formes the Bull of Convocation of the Council and still chuses the City of Trent and devised a form that might give content to all as well those who were onely for removing the Suspension of the Council as the rest who desired a Council to be called anew He gave this title to his Bull The Indiction of the Council of Trent which seemed to insinuate that it was to be a new Council but in the body of the Bull he said that he removed the Suspension and made use of the word Continue This middle way contented no body and displeased both parties However the Pope did all he could to perswade Princes to be satisfied and sent orders to his Ministers in France to endeavour to remove all Scruples about the word Continue because that should not hinder but that the affairs which had been decided under Paul and Julius III. might be reviewed if the Council thought it expedient year 1561 The opening of that Assembly was appointed to be on Easterday in the year 1561. And the Pope dispatcht the Bull into all places with Nuncio's to invite not onely Catholick Princes to the Council but all Protestant Princes also He sent the Abbot Martinengo to the Queen of England but she forbid him to enter her Dominions though the Kings that were in alliance with her had used all their interests to perswade her to receive him He had likewise designed to have sent a Nuncio into Muscovy to invite the Czar who is of the Greek Church to come to
raised and so they interrupted the Congregations But this Remedy augmented the Disease and occasioned complainings against the Legates and many private Assemblies where new measures were dayly taken against the interests of the Court of Rome After seven days had been spent without any Congregation the Spaniards lost all Patience they went to the Legates who were met at Council and demanded Audience for making new Instances that Episcopacy might be declared to be of Divine Right This they did in a stately grave manner according to the humour of that Nation protesting if that were refused them they would appear no more in any Congregation or Session To Counterpoise this Party the Legates solicited eighteen or twenty Prelates to demand with the same earnestness that no Decision might pass upon that matter They looked upon this as an excellent Sally-port to get out at For said they some would have it others oppose it what course can be taken to please both Parties But this fetch of the Legates did not take for that made the contrary Party fortifie themselves and to keep private Assemblies in greater number to find out means for supporting the Interest of their Cause The Pope's Party did the like so that the Council was broken and divided into a great many little Conventicles which made so great Tumult that at length the Legates feared some disorder The Cardinal Simoneta was most concerned in the allarm because he saw himself alone exposed to the shock of so many contradictions He complained that he was not seconded by the Cardinals of Mantua and Seripando and that they had still some secret inclination for the Party that opposed the Interests of the Court of Rome The Presidents had likewise procured Letters from the Marquess of Pescara wherein he pressed the Spaniards to condescend and not to offer at any thing that might be opposite to the Interests of the Holy See But they had no regard to the Instances of the Marquess they made Protestations indeed that they had no intentions of proposing any thing contrary to the Interest of his Holiness nevertheless they declared that they could not abandon the truth which they had espoused and that they doubted not to find easie means to Justifie their Conduct to the King that they were sent to act according to their Consciences and that they could doe nothing to the contrary And in effect they sent one of their number to Spain to Justifie all their Proceedings to the King At length the Congregations began again the third of November and the Legates proposed afresh the Articles of Doctrine concerning the Sacrament of Orders The matter of Residence is again proposed afresh This was handled three days that is the same things that had been said before were said over again In fine the Legates after so long delay being overcome by the instances that were made to them to keep their promise they had made of bringing the Point of Residence again under Deliberation resolved now to propose it They laboured to make a Decision that might give content to all but found it a difficult task to cast it in such a mould as might satisfie both the Pope and the different Parties that were in the Council For the Council was divided into three almost equal parts the first were for referring the matter to the Pope the second would have it decided in the Council and the third that it should be handled in the Council but with the consent of his Holiness There were four different opinions concerning the manner of framing the Decree about Residence Some were for having the Necessity of Residence onely decreed under such Penalties and Rewards as might keep Bishops from violating that Law Others were of opinion that the Decree should be a bare Decree of Reference to the Pope But some desired that that Reference might be demanded by the Prelates and others that it should be demanded by the Presidents so that this second Party branched out into two The third and last were of the Judgment that the Pope without consulting the Council should anticipate its Decisions and emit a Bull commanding Residence and then the Council would press the matter no more it beng already done to their hands But the Legates found Difficulties in all these opinions It is true that the Bishop of Mazara a Town in Sicily had by canvassing and caballing brought over seven Bishops from the Spanish Faction and perhaps that was the thing that brought them to a determination For at length they resolved to strike in with the first opinion and to frame the Decree without deciding whether Residence were of Divine Right or not but onely enjoyning it as necessary under Penalties and Rewards The Cardinal of Mantua proposed it to the Congregation in that form and did it with all the Address he could He gave them to understand that all that could be required was onely a punctual performance of that which every one judged necessary and that it was not convenient to deviate from that by needless Questions that the matter was not great of what Right Residence were provided it were duely observed and added that it was the opinion of M. de Lansac the French Ambassadour In the Decree which was read among other things it was enacted that Resident Bishops should not be obliged to pay Tenths to their Princes And this Clause was very gratefull to the Bishops but it startled all the Ambassadours and engaged them to oppose the Decree Lansac the French Ambassadour took notice of two particular wrongs in the Conduct of the Cardinal of Mantua the one was that in the Decree the Catholick King was named before the most Christian King and the other that the Cardinal had abused his Confidence For though he had in Discourse let slip a word and said that it signified not much whether Residence were of Divine Right provided it were observed what he spoke as a private Person in a familiar Conversation ought not in his opinion to have been mentioned in Council as the opinion and advice of an Ambassadour The satisfaction which the Prelates received in that the Council had exempted them from Tenths lasted not long their eyes were immediately opened and were let see that it was a snare laid for them and a plausible wheadle to make them the better digest the refusal of declaring the Divine Right of Residence which was obstinately made them And indeed they well perceived that the Council intended to grant them a Privilege which they could not put them in possession of because Princes would never give way to it nay the Italians themselves were made sensible that even in the Ecclesiastick State matters would goe as they had gone before and that they would be still made to pay by virtue of a fair non obstantibus c. They come again to the question whether Episcopacy be of Divine Right In the Congregation the day after they came to speak again of the Sacrament of Orders
that number comes far short of most part of the Ancient Councils None of the French spoke neither in this nor in the following Congregation because they waited for the Cardinal of Lorrain The Party of the Court of Rome looked upon these new-comers as a powerfull reinforcement come to the assistance of their Enemies and therefore they doubled their vigilance and thought it best to fortifie themselves by new Councils The Archbishop of Otranto was one of the leading men of that Party and one of the most zealous sticklers for the Grandure of the Pope He had a mind to assemble all those who were linked with him in the same Interests but so as it might not appear to be done with intention to treat of business and for that purpose on the nineteenth of November he made a great Entertainment for the Prelates who were called the well affected He that invited them told them that for the sake and service of the Holy See they should not fail to come It was not doubted but that design was laid for making a League against the French and they had certain notice given them that there had been long Conferences about the Subject in that Assembly An action that M. de l'Isle the French Ambassadour had done at Rome encreased these Umbrages against the French for during an indisposition which by some accident had happened to the Pope that had almost cost him his life he began to tamper and carry on a kind of Negotiation that if the Pope should chance to die the next Pope might be chosen at Trent by Nations and that the See might remain Vacant untill the Reformation should be completed that so the Council might be free and that the Pope Elect might accept of that Reformation according as he should find it setled This vexed the Pope to purpose for besides that these designs did not at all please him men do not like that way of counting before the Host and framing of Designs in prospect of their death All these things together allarmed him mightily so that he held several Congregations of Cardinals wherein he desired them to find out some sure means to secure him from the Enterprises of the Council which as he said he considered as his greatest Enemy He was certainly very faithfully served by his Pensioners and yet it was not altogether to his mind for he complained that all the Bishops whom he entertained were against him and that he sed an Army of Enemies at Trent Notwithstanding he continued still to multiply these Enemies for he sent away all the Italian Bishops that were at Rome even to the Bishop of Aosta Ambassadour there from the Duke of Savoy But he discharged the Archbishop of Torre from going thither because in the time of Paul III. he had maintained the Divine Right of Residence with some Zeal and Fervour He made the same prohibition to the Bishop of Cesana because he was the intimate friend of the Cardinal of Naples whose two Uncles the Carraffa's the Pope had put to death by the hand of the common Executioner besides the Persecutions wherewith he had afflicted himself and so had reason to consider him as an Enemy About the same time he dispatched into France Sebastiano Gualtero Bishop of Viterbo a thorough pac'd Zealot for the Interests of the Court of Rome The pretext of this Embassie was the carrying of forty thousand Crowns to the King being part of an hundred thousand which the Pope had promised him for the War against the Huguenots but the true reason was that he might be a Spie over the Actions of the Council of France The Cardinal of Lorrain is received in Congregation he speaks and after him du Ferrier who offends the Council At length the Cardinal of Lorrain resolved to appear in Congregation the twenty third of November The French and he had agreed that he should first make a Speech and then the Ambassadour Du Ferrier At first the Legates opposed this Resolution saying that in this Council neither under Paul nor Julius it had been allowed that Ambassadours should speak publickly in Congregation but onely on the day of their Reception But at length they suffered themselves to be over perswaded by the Cardinal of Lorrain and permitted Du Ferrier to speak The King's Letters to the Council were then read which contained onely Prayers and general Exhortations to set about a Reformation of the Church The Letters being read the Cardinal spoke and began with a long and pathetick description of the miseries which the Wars about Religion caused in France and prayed the Council to remedy them He insisted upon what he had already said to the Legates that they should avoid all unnecessary questions and then demanded two things in the name of the King of France first that they might have some respect to those who were separated from the Church in granting them all that might be allowed without doing prejudice to the Faith and that they would consider them as Brethren as far as might be Next he demanded in name of the King a Reformation in the Church whereof he laid open the extraordinary Corruptions and there took an occasion to make an ingenious Application to the Clergy of the History of Jonas We we are the cause of the Storm said he throw us into the Sea and the Tempest will cease The Cardinal of Mantua made a civil answer to that Harangue protesting that the Council had always been extremely concerned for the miseries of France and would doe all that was possible to clear the truth confirm the true Service of God and rectifie the manners and the disorders in Discipline The Ambassadour Du Ferrier had leave to speak next and spoke very smartly He told them that his Master demanded that the Church might be restored to its Ancient Lustre and that the good and holy Laws which the Devil had stole away and hid might be brought back from Bondage into the City of God He made use of an Allusion that prickt to the quick the Adorers of the Court of Rome If you ask me said he why France is not in peace and whence proceed those horrible divisions that rend it in pieces I shall answer as Jehu did to Joram when he asked is it peace Jehu What peace so long as c. answered he here he stopt saying ye know the rest And indeed they all supplied what was wanting in the Citation by the rest of the Text What peace so long as the Whoredoms of thy Mother Jezebel and her Witchcrafts are so many He concluded that if they endeavoured not that Reformation all the Bloud that should be spilt would be demanded at their hands This Liberty did exceedingly displease the Pope's Party but they Legates dissembled their discontent because they were afraid of the French The Cardinal of Lorrain holds private Congregations in his house which allarms the Legates and Court of Rome It was the Cardinal of Lorrain's custom afterwards to
be assigned an Assistant for collecting the Acts because they questioned his fidelity they gave him for a Substitute another Italian the Bishop of Campagna in the Kingdom of Naples The first business that he did as Clark was to read the answer which was to be given to Birague of which the Legates had presented a Draught to the Council It was long and perplex'd and it did not therein appear whether the Fathers commended or blamed the action of the King of France in making Peace with the Huguenots The Prelates gave their Votes and the dark and ambiguous strain that it was framed in was cause of diversity of opinions The Cardinal of Lorrain approved it not which was a surprising matter because Cardinal Morone having shew'd it him he seemed to have been satisfied therewith In sine the matter was referred to the Legates and the two Cardinals Madruccio and Lorrain with power to frame that answer as they should judge most convenient A Clashing betwixt the Cardinal of Lorrain and the Archbishop of Otranto June the eleventh the Legates had a solemn consultation for finding out Expedients to settle the differences about the question of the Divine Right of the Institution of Bishops This gave the Cardinal of Lorrain who was present at the Consultation occasion to speak of the Authority of the Pope a question that depends naturally on that of the Institution of Bishops He touched by the bye the opinion of the French that the Pope is Inferiour to a Council declaring that it was not his desire that the Council should Pronounce in favour of that opinion but withall he wished that they would not decide any thing to the contrary The Archbishop of Otranto took him up sharply and spoke bitterly not onely against that opinion but against the Cardinal himself even so far as to accuse him of being the cause of all the troubles which had arisen about that Subject by proposing a project of decision that had given occasion to the debates The matter went so far that the Count de Luna told the Archbishop who was a Subject of the King of Spain that if his Catholick Majesty knew that he had fallen into that ill-timed passion he would not take it well A French Prelate hereupon gave the Legates advice not to call the Archbishop of Otranto any more to Consultations with the Cardinal of Lorrain because the Cardinal was informed that the Archbishop spoke ill of him on all occasions and spared not to call him a man full of Venome Cardinal Morone gave no heed to that advice but answered that he had orders from the Pope to doe nothing without the Archbishop that he had the disposal of forty Votes and that therefore he must not be disobliged The Cardinal of Lorrain was sufficiently vexed both with Cardinal Morone and the Archbishop of Otranto but the design he had of getting into the Pope's favour obliged him to dissemble President Birague having stayed for the Councils Answer as long as became his character went to wait on the Emperour at Inspruck according as he was enjoined by his Commission And his chief business was to confer with the Emperour about the means of transferring the Council unto a place where it might enjoy full liberty The Queen of France had written of that to the King of Spain who disliked the proposition but he wrote to the Count de Luna his Ambassadour that according to the Instructions which he had given him he should press the revocation of the Clause proponentibus legatis for setting the Council at liberty The Count de Luna having declared his Commission to the Legates they answered that the Clause had past with consent of the Council and that it could not be revoked At the same time the Pope was earnestly solicited at Rome to dispense with that Clause and at length to case himself of the trouble that was given him upon that account he wrote to Cardinal Morone that they should Supersede the execution of it but Morone without consulting his Collegues answered plainly that he could not and that he had rather his Holiness would recall them In the Congregation of the fifteenth of June the Prelates pitcht upon the fifteenth of July for the day of the next Session and in the Congregation next day after Another Discourse of General Lainez in favour of the Court of Rome Lainez the General of the Jesuits speaking in his turn undertook to censure and refute all that had been said by others against the Court of Rome And he did it so vehemently and with so much zeal as if he had been treating of matters whereupon the Salvation of mankind depended He made an Apology for Dispensations Annats the Wealth of the Court of Rome and for every thing that others called Abuses He proved the Pope's Superiority over a Council and advanced his Authority not onely over Bishops but the whole Church as far as could be imagined in the same manner as he had done in his former Harangue The French were disgusted at this discourse nor were the Spaniards better satisfied they were perswaded that the Legates had chosen him as their mouth to speak their thoughts for it was observed that they affected to show a particular respect for him When he spoke they made him come out of his place and sit in the middle of the Assembly whereas the other Generals spoke standing and kept themselves in their own places Lainez was never tedious though he had taken up the whole time of Congregations but the others were never short enough This Jesuit sent his excuses to the Cardinal of Lorrain and the French Prelates pretending that he had not the least design of offending them but that he onely aimed at the Sorbonne Doctors whose opinions were not agreeable to the sentiment of the Church This excuse gave a new offence to the French and particularly to the Divines John de Verdun a Benedictine Monk desired leave from the Cardinal to refute Lainez nay even the Cordelier Hugonis though bought by the Pope's Pension offered himself to prove that the proposition which Lainez had asserted that the Tribunal of the Pope is the same as that of Jesus Christ is an Impious and Scandalous Proposition But the Cardinal of Lorrain who had his private views and interests qualified the heat of their Zeal All these Difficulties and Janglings arose upon the Points of Residence and the Institution of Bishops being of Divine Right and therefore the Legates to stop up the Spring of the Divisions laboured incessantly to form a Decree concerning these matters which by its Ambiguity and by clearing nothing at all might give all content They did the Jobb and the Cardinal of Lorrain was satisfied with it but the Pope's Divines and Pensionary Prelates who outdid the Legates in the matter of Zeal for the interests of the Court of Rome found a thousand difficulties in it The draught of it was sent to Rome where they Judged as the
he would never suffer neither as Emperour nor Archduke that the Council should offer to make such a Reformation to the prejudice of the Jurisdiction of Princes But the Conduct of the French upon that occasion was much more vigorous In the Congregation of the two and twentieth of November they had the patience to hear a long Harangue wherein one of the Prelates strove to prove that the disorders of the Church proceeded from Princes and that Care must be taken to reform them Du Ferrier protests against that Decree and makes a Speech that cuts the Prelates to the quick that since the Acts concerning that were ready there was no more to be done but to produce them The President Du Ferrier started up and made his Protestation by word of mouth in a long and witty discourse delivered briskly in words that cut to the heart He laughed at all the petty Reformations which the Council had made for the Clergy made a Comparison betwixt the Canons of the Council and the Ancient Canons of the Discipline of the Primitive Church wherein it was not permitted to Bishops to be absent from their Flocks three months of the year as the present Council allowed wherein Beneficiaries had not the liberty which the Council granted to dispose of the Revenues of their Benefices to the prejudice of the Poor to whom properly they belong And so went over all the Abuses authorised by the Council of Trent comparing them with the Severity of the Ancient Discipline He alledged that the Reformation of Princes which was proposed tended directly to the Ruine of the Liberties of the Gallican Church but that the King knew very well how to maintain them that he would make use of his Right in laying hold on the goods of the Church when his occasions did require it that it was an intolerable Attempt to excommunicate Kings even without a hearing as that Decree ordained that they should concern themselves with spiritual matters and not with the Affairs of Princes with which they had nothing to doe that the Kings of France had made Ordinances in Ecclesiastick matters and that the Church of France had been governed according to its Laws above four hundred years before the Compilation of the Decretals that Kings held their Power onely of God and that it belongs not to Churchmen to reform them that if they had a mind to reform Princes they should first think of reforming themselves and become like St. Ambrose St. Austin and St. Chrysostome and that that would be the way to make Princes imitate the Examples of the Theodosius's of Honorius Arcadius and the Valentinians This Harangue put the Council out of all patience and even the French Prelates themselves there arose a murmuring and confused Noise amongst them which was like to have broken out into some scandalous Transport had not the Legates to prevent it dismissed the Assembly The Bishops spoke all the Evil they could devise against his Speech to make it pass for Heretical and Nicolas Pelue Archbishop of Sens and Jerome de la Souchieres Abbot of Clervaux had big words with Du Ferrier about it They reported every where that that Protestation was made without Orders from the King that Du Ferrier was a Creature of the King of Navarre that he was suspected of Heresie and that he ought to be put into the Inquisition Others had scraped together some Notes of that Harangue but because Du Ferrier found them false he published it himself and sent a copy of it to the Cardinal of Lorrain with a Letter wherein he told him that he could not abandon the Royal Authority which for the space of four hundred years had been attempted upon by the Court of Rome that as a Frenchman and a Member of Parliament he was obliged to assert the Rights of his King and the opinions of his Faculty And that it was not just that the Council made up of the slaves of the Court of Rome should be Judge in its own Cause So soon as Du Ferrier's Speech appeared in publick the Council caused it to be refuted by a nameless Authour Du Ferrier made his defence and instead of recanting he confirmed all that he had said or written These Writings encreased the Provocation and the Bishops revenged themselves by reviling not so much the Ambassadours as the Court of France They accused the Queen Mother of openly favouring the Hereticks They affirmed that she was governed by the Chatillons who were declared Hereticks by the Chancellour de l'Hopital and the Bishop of Valence who were suspected of Heresie After that Protestation the Ambassadours of France The French Ambassadours goe to Venice having staid a Fourtnight longer at Trent retired to Venice according to the Orders they had from Court. Before they went away they declared to the few French Prelates that remained that it was the King's Intention they should oppose the fifth and sixth Articles of Reformation which were proposed because these Articles drew the Causes and Persons of Bishops out of the Kingdom whereas according to the Liberties of the Gallican Church the Members of the Clergy ought to be judged primâ instantiâ upon the place and by their immediate Superiours When the news of the French Ambassadour's Protestation came to Rome it caused great heart-burnings in the Pope's Court. No man was so much afflicted as the Cardinal of Lorrain because it was an unlucky accident that brought great Prejudice to the Negotiation that he was a managing with the Pope for the Grandeur of himself and Family He pacified the Pope the best he could blaming the Ambassadours and promising to write to the King that he might procure reparation of that Scandal He did indeed write and in such terms as well discovered that he had sacrificed the Interests of his King and the opinions of his Countrey to the design of pleasing the Pope whom he would engage in his private concerns The Pope wrote also to Trent that they should still goe on and that if the French Ambassadours had a mind to be gone they should not hinder them but withall give them no occasion of withdrawing that after all they should prepare to hold the Session immediately upon the return of the Cardinal of Lorrain and put an end to the Council that now he had got the better of the Germans and French and that none but the Spaniards remained to be overcome The truth is the Count de Luna not onely crossed the Pope's design of shortning the Council but also made it his business to obtain an Alteration of the Clause proponentibus legatis He continually charged a fresh and never left off soliciting Cardinal Morone even amidst the troubles that were occasioned by the Protestation of the French till at length the Cardinal was fain to promise that they should endeavour to give him satisfaction in the ensuing Session what this satisfaction was we shall see hereafter The Legates being pressed by the Bishops who were not baulked
good Laws and Ordinances which were made in it After the Ceremonies were over they read the Decrees concerning Purgatory the Intercession and Invocation of Saints Images and their Worship They also read the Decree for Reformation of Monks containing twenty Chapters to which they added an one and twentieth for a shield to the Pope's Authority lest by inadvertency it might be wounded in some of the Canons of Reformation and to leave him in full liberty to dispense with all the Canons The Council therefore declares in it that all the Decrees have been made with intention that the Authority of the Holy See should remain safe and inviolate without the least encroachment upon it When this was done because it was very late the rest was deferred till next day In this second day they read the Decrees concerning Indulgences the Choice of Meats Fasts and Holy days They made and Act of Reference to the Pope about the Index Expurgatorius Missals Breviaries Ceremonials and the Care of making a Catechism At length the Council caused and Act to be read which declared that the Places that had been assigned to Ambassadours ought not to be any ways prejudicial to the Rights and Privileges of Kings Princes and States whom the Council pretended to leave in the same condition as they were before The Assembly was concluded with Volleys of Acclamations to the Praise of the Pope Emperour Kings Legates and the Fathers Heretofore in Ancient Councils these Acclamations or Benedictions were made in a humming confused manner with a low Voice But at Trent they would have the matter performed in its Formalities It was written down read and sung after the manner of Antiphones The Cardinal of Lorrain pronounced the Acclamations and the Prelates answered This action of the Cardinal was extremely played upon It could not be imagined that he with all his Dignities A mean Action of the Cardinal of Lorrain and large Characters would have condescended to discharge the Office of a Deacon or Chanter It was lookt upon as a low and mean Carriage but the French had a worse opinion of it for besides the baseness of the action they lookt upon it as a Crime of State because in the Acclamations there was no express mention made of the King of France for which the Cardinal was severely checkt upon his return At length all was summ'd up with an Anathema pronounced against Hereticks in General The Council consulted whether they should not expresly Anathematise Luther Zuinglius and the other Heads of Parties as had heretofore been practised in the Case of Nestorius and other Hereticks But the Spanish and Imperial Ambassadours opposed that representing that the Princes were rather the Heads of the Parties in that affair than the Teachers that it would offend them and oblige them to make Leagues together against the Catholick Religion The Council acquiesced to that reason and rested satisfied with a General Anathema All the Prelates were commanded under pain of Excommunication to sign the Decrees before they went away which was done on Sunday They were signed by two hundred fifty and five Hands four Legates two Cardinals three Patriarchs five and twenty Archbishops an hundred fifty and eight Bishops seven Abbots thirty nine Proxies for Absents and seven Generals of Orders The Ambassadours had been enjoined to sign also but because those of France were not there and their Hands not being amongst the rest it would have been a Declaration that they refused to acknowledge the Council all the rest were therefore dispensed with no to sign upon Pretext that it had not been the Custome of Ancient Councils This last Session of the Council gave as little satisfaction as the rest hand done for after all the fair promises of setting about a Reformation there was nothing found that could answer the Expectations of People The nineteenth Chapter of General Reformation contained a very Christian Decree against Duels which were prohibited under very severe Penalties Nevertheless it was observed that the Council herein encroached upon the Right of Kings for it declared the Emperour all Kings Princes and Lords who should countenance Duels to be excommunicated and deprived of the Dominion of the Place holding of the Church wherein Duels should be fought It was not thought in the Power of a mere Ecclesiastick Judicature to deprive Sovereign Princes of their Territories and Temporal Possessions nor to lay Commands upon them under pain of Excommunication The Permission which the Council granted to Mendicants to enjoy Lands and Real Estates was so far from passing for an Article of Reformation that it was lookt upon as a great Corruption and as a fair means put into the hands of Monks to hook in the remainder of the Estates of Christendom whereof they already enjoyed the largest share In general few were satisfied with the Acts of the Council The Spaniards were displeased at the precipitant manner and hurry of concluding it without acquainting their King and expecting his answer But France more than all others because they found therein many things which overthrew the Liberties of the Gallican Church President Du Ferrier during his stay at Venice made it his business to make a Collection of them and upon the return of the Cardinal of Lorrain into France the Cardinal was severely censured for having suffered so many things to pass contrary to the Sentiments and Customs of the Church of France It was objected to him that after he had vigorously asserted the Superiority of a Council over the Pope yet at length he had basely betrayed the Cause seeing he had subscribed to the first Chapter of the General Reformation which grants the Pope Administrationem Ecclesiae the Administration of the Church Universal It was also thought that the opinion of the Pope's Superiority over a Council was sufficiently established by the last Chapter which declares that all things have been decreed without prejudice to the Authority of the Pope which is an evident raising of the Authority of the Holy See above that of the Decrees And above all it was thought that by demanding from the Pope the Confirmation of the Council they had placed his Holiness above a Council It was likewise objected as a fault to the Cardinal of Lorrain that in the one and twentieth Chapter of the General Reformation he had suffered the present Council to be declared the same with that which was held under Julius and Paul III. after that France had taken so much pains to have that Assembly called a new Council But the Parliament of Paris in a particular manner complained that he had suffered the Authority of the King's Judges to be trampled under foot seeing the Council had so far enlarged the Power of Churchmen as made a considerable breach in the Civil Jurisdiction As for instance it allows Bishops to proceed against Laicks by Pecuniary Fines and Imprisonments These oppositions that the Council met with in France were every delightfull to those who were separated
England writes against Luther p. 9. Shakes off the Pope's Authority without any innovation in Religion p. 39 Is excommunicated by Pope Paul III. p. 47 Henry II. King of France succeeds to Francis I. p. 167 He clashes with the Pope and sends not his Prelates to the Council p. 193 Causes Amiot his Ambassadour to protest against the Council p. 198 Then publishes a Manifesto against the Pope p. 200 Does all that lies in his Power to ruine the Protestants in his Kingdom p. 278 His death p. 279 Herman Archbishop of Cologne is excommunicated by the Pope and obliged to resign his Archbishoprick p. 90 Of the Hierarchy of the Church p. 405 I. IAmes Lainez General of the Jesuits creates no small trouble to the Council about Precedence p. 377 His Speech against the Divine Right of Episcopacy and what it produced p. 426 Another Discourse of his in favour of the Court of Rome p. 529 The Imperialists leave the City of Rome p. 28 Indices Expurgatorii and their Original p. 313 The Inquisition setled at Naples and causes a great Sedition p. 170 The Intention of the Priest in administring the Sacraments according to the Judgment of Ambrosio Cararino p. 151 The Interim made by the Emperour at the Diet of Ausburg p. 176 Much opposition made to the Establishment of it p. 179 Interviews betwixt the Emperour and the Pope the first the second 37. the third p. 44 An Interview of the Pope Emperour and King of France p. 47 A fourth Interview betwixt the Pope and the Emperour p. 52 A fifth p. 53 Julius II. Excommunicated Lewis XII King of France p. 2 He dies ibid. Julius III. formerly named John Maria di Monte succeeds to Paul III. p. 182 He clashes with the King of France p. 193 Sends into France Ascamo della Corna his Nephew to hinder the King from protecting the Duke of Parma and from calling a national Council p. 195 At one dash creates fourteen Italian Cardinals p. 232 His Death and Successour p. 257 The Jurisdiction of Bishops is the matter as to Reformation for the thirteenth Session p. 201 The Jurisdiction of the Tribunals of the Church their Original and Progress p. 206 Gropper votes for its abolition p. 210 Divers Regulations concerning Episcopal Jurisdiction p. 225 Justification and Imputed Righteousness p. 121 K. KAtherine of Medicis Queen Regent of France assembles the States at Orleans p. 291 Her designs for Reformation p. 299 and 312 L. LAinez v. James Lainez The Landgrave of Hesse attempts an Agreement betwixt Luther and Zuinglius but without Success p. 30 Is made Prisoner by the Emperour p. 169 The Legates complain that there appeared Division in the very Session and pretend to enter upon business p. 76 Oppose the beginning with Reformation p. 78 Make a Translation of the Council upon Pretext of bad Air. p. 164 Propose the Decree of the Reformation of Princes and the Ambassadours oppose it p. 546 The more they press the mater the greater noise it makes p. 553 The Protestation of the French Ambassadours against that Decree p. 556 The Legates press the Conclusion of the Council p. 572 Leo. X. created Pope and his Character p. 2 Causes Indulgences to be published in Germany by the advice of Cardinal Santiquatro and gives a great part of the profit of them to his Sister p. 3 Publishes a Bull for the Indulgences p. 6 Thunders a Bull against Luther and his Doctrine p. 7 Lewis XII King of France excommunicated by Pope Julius II. p. 2 Forms a Party against Julius II. and gets the Cardinals to assemble at Pisa for Election of another Pope ibid. Lewis d'Avila sent by the Emperour to Rome to solicite the Re-establishment of the Council p. 183 Luigi di Catanea and Dominico à Soto differ about the Point of Grace p. 128 Luther publishes Theses against the Doctrine of Indulgences which are answered by other Theses set out by John setzel a Jacobin who caused the Theses of Luther to he burnt p. 5 He is cited to appear at Ausburg before Cardinal Cajetan p. 6 Has two Conferences with the Cardinal without success and appeals to a Council ibid. He burns the Pope's Bull and Book of Decretals p. 8 Is cited to Wormes before the Emperour Charles V. ibid. But would neither recant nor condemn his Doctrine p. 9 An Edict past against him at Wormes ibid. Confirmed by a Decree at Ratisbonne p. 18 Abstracts are made of Lutheran Writings p. 145 M. THE Malecontents pass a severe censure vpon the Decrees of the Council p. 141 Mantua chosen by Paul III. for the place of holding the Council p. 44 The Cardinal of Mantua Legate dies at Trent p. 486 Marcello II. created Pope will not change his Name according to the Custom of other Popes and whence what Custom hath arisen p. 257 His Character and death that happened by an Apoplexy two and twenty days after his Exaltation p. 258 Marriage is reduced to eight Articles p. 473 Decrees and Canons are formed concerning that matter p. 544 Clandestine Marriages occasion fresh Debates p. 548 Mary succeeds her Brother Edward to the Crown of England and restores the Catholick Religion p. 252 She is rigorous against the Protestants p. 256 Her death p. 274 Marinier a Carmelite is not of opinion that Traditions should be made a Point of Faith p. 83 Will have the Name of Justifying Faith onely giv'n to that which works by Charity p. 117 Defends with Ambrosio Catarino the opinion that one may be certain of being in the State of Grace p. 123 Mass v. Sacrifice Maurice invested by the Emperour in the Electorate of Saxony whereof his Cousin Frederick had been dispossessed p. 171 Takes up Arms for the Liberty of Germany and of Religion p. 243 Maximilian King of Bohemia and of the Romans suspected of Lutheranism p. 286 Melancthon named with Bucer and Pistorius to speak for the Protestants p. 50 Is one of twelve who were opposed to a like number of Catholick Doctours in the Conference of Wormes p. 273 Mendicant Friars raise a great Debate upon occasion of Preaching and the Pulpits which they had seized p. 91 Misunderstanding betwixt the Pope and the Council and amongst the Fathers of the Council themselves p. 337 Morone Cardinal Legate in Spain under Julius III. p. 257 Is appointed first President of the Council by Pius IV. p. 489 Comes to Trent and went to the Emperour at Inspruck p. 448 Returns to the Council p. 506 N. NAvagiero Cardinal named Legate for presiding in the Council arrives at Trent with orders to endeavour a strict Reformation p. 502 Naumburg a Town of upper Saxony where the Protestant Princes held an Assembly p. 293 Nuncio's ill received by the Protestants in Germany p. 244 Nuremberg the Place of the Diet where the Hundred Grievances were presented p. 17 O. OCtavio Farnese Duke of Parma General of the Pope's Forces p. 111 Offerings and Oblations in what manner they may be permitted p. 154 Opinions about