Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n king_n law_n prerogative_n 1,605 5 10.3114 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A80048 Judges judged out of their own mouthes or the question resolved by Magna charta, &c. Who have been Englands enemies, kings seducers, and peoples destroyers, from Hen. 3. to Hen. 8. and before and since. Stated by Sr. Edvvard Coke, Knt. late L. Chief Justice of England. Expostulated, and put to the vote of the people, by J. Jones, Gent. Whereunto is added eight observable points of law, executable by justices of peace. Jones, J., Gent.; Coke, Edward, Sir, 1552-1634.; England. Magna Charta. 1650 (1650) Wing C4938; Thomason E1414_1; ESTC R13507 46,191 120

There are 8 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

chief Court could command Bishops to give their clergy to such as ought to have it another cause was That the life of a man ought to be tryed before Judges of learning and experience of the Laws of the Realm for Ignorantia Judicis est saepenumerò calamitas innocentis These are the reasons that the Lord Coke alledgeth why some Pleas of the Crown were taken from Sheriffs Castellans Escheators Coronors and Bailiffs under which names saith he are comprehended all inferiour Judges Justices and Courts of Justice albeit saith he it be provided by the 9th chap. of Mag. Charta That the Barons of the five Ports should have all their Liberties and Customs These general words saith he again must be understood of such Liberti●s and Customs as are not afterwards in the same Charter by express words taken away and assumed to the Crown Might not the Kings inferior Courts command ordinary Ministers to give men their Clergie Expost and Quer. And might not that serve before Magna Charta as it is usual since For seldom or never in our memories did Bishops themselves attend any court for that service and now should they be necessary onely for that imployment So the Kings Court would be onely to command them but if Bishops may be spared why may not that Court for that cause And if by this Charter the King resumed some Pleas of the crown from those that formerly had them dor●● et follow that he resumed all Ple●● from those that formerly had them And if under the name of Bailiffs be comprehended all Judges and Justices are not the Judges of the Common-Pleas and Barons of the Exchecquer so comprehended And are none of them of such learning and experience in the Laws of the Realm to try the life of a man as Judges of the Kings-Bench Or else why are they sent for Goal-deliveries aswel as Judges of the Kings-Bench are Was it not provided by the 9. chapter of Mag. Charta That London and other Cities Burroughs and Towns as well as the Barons of the five Ports and other Ports should have their Liberties and Free-Customs Are all these now resumed by this 17. chap Who can understand so Or what meaneth the L. C. by his riddles Shall Magna Charta contradict it self though the Lord C. would and doth here and elsewhere Are not Commissions of Oyer and Terminer usual for Tryal of mens lives where Judges of the Kings-Bench cannot reach or dare not go Doth not London and other Corporations execute their Charters by their Recorders when the Kings-Bench gives them leave and then do not the Judges of the Kings-Bench grant that such Judges may be as learned and experienced in the Laws as themselves for the Trying of mens lives Are not mens lives Tryable for matter of Fact and not of Law except Treasons that reach to thoughts Are not Jurors the Judges of matters of Fact What great learning or experience in Law is requisite for a Judge to pronounce the sentence of death where the verdict hath determined the life But how many true men have been hanged and thieves saved by Judges interposing and obtruding their pestifferous pretended learning and experience in the Laws between the weak consciences of ignorant Jurors and the truth which kind of Jurors they make Sheriffs return for such purposes when they may have such returned as know the Facts and have sounder learning and experience in express Law than themselves All Wears from henceforth be utterly put down by Thames C. 23. Wear● c. and Medway and throughout all England but onely by the Sea-coasts It was specially given in charge by the Justices in Eyre saith the Lord C. that all Juries should inquire of all such as Fished with wears and Dams L. C. upon M. C. fol. 38. and it appeareth saith he by Glandvil lib. 9. c. 11. That when any thing is unjustly occupied within the Kings demesne or obstructed in publick waies or Rivers turned off their right channels or Citie-streets built upon and in general as often as any nusance to the Kings holding or his High-way or to any Citie is committed That is a purpresture viz. an Inclosure whereby one in chroacheth or maketh that several to himself which ought to be common to all or many and every publick River or stream the Kings High way If Wears be nusances as I am sure they are throughout England Expost and Quer. and Wales and if Commissioners for Sewers and Justices of Peace for want of them be sufficiently authorized to reform such wrongs and do not because chief doers thereof or sharers in the unlawful gain made thereof themselves why not Justices in Eyer imployed to execute their charge for the general amendment thereof for the publick good One Measure of Wine shall be throughout our Realm C. 29. Measures c. and one measure of Corn viz. according to the Quarter of London and Haberjects that is to say two yards within the list and as it is of Weights so shall it be of Measures This Act concerning Measures L. Cok● upon M. C. fol. 49. and Weights that there should be one Measure and one Weight through England is grounded upon the Law of God Deut. 25. v. 13 14. And this by Authority of Parliaments hath been often enacted but never effected If Weights and Measures throughout England ought to be one Expost and Quer. and that not onely by the Law of God as the Lord C. instanceth but also by this Charter of Agreement between the King and the People Why did not the Lord C. being chief Justice of England sworn to do Law and Justice too and between King and People as partly before did and hereafter further shall appear he was or ought to have been see this point of Justice so highly required by the Law of God and so mutually agreed upon by the Kings of this Land and their Subjects duly executed Nothing shall henceforth be given for a Writ of Inquisition Ca. 16. Inquisition nor taken of him that prayeth the Inquisition of Life or Member but it shall be granted freely A Writ of Inquisition L. C. upon M. C. fol. 42. viz. De odio atia anciently called De bono malo c. which the Common-Law gave a man that was imprisoned though it were for the most odious cause for the death of a man for which without the Kings Writ he could not be bailed Yet the Law favouring the Libertie and Freedom of a man from Imprisonment c. until the Justices in Eyre should come at what time he was to be tryed he might sue out this VVrit directed to the Sheriff c. If a Writ De odio atia was given by the common-Common-Law Expost and Quer. to a man Imprisoned for the most odious cause even for the death of a man and if the common-Common-Law favoured the Liberty of a man Imprisoned so that he should be Bailed for such a Fact until
that were before Magna Charta chosen by the peole as they were Ministers of Justice wherein the people were concerned And were they by this Act but restored to their ancient jurisdiction as the Lord Coke saith Sheriffs were Was not that alteration which was made by divers Acts of Parliament made by such Acts as were contrary to Magna Charta And are not or ought not all such Acts to be void as the L. Coke hath elsewhere said Doth not these contradictions declare the Lord Coke to have been distracted with spight and envy against ●ustices in Eyer And where in this leaf he would perswade the people to suspect Justices in Eyer of corruption and Monopolizing justice to wrong the people that chuse them can the people believe that these Justices who are to be chosen by them and to be displaced by them when and as often as they see cause will or can wrong them more than those chosen by the King and his Servants without their consents unless they can believe that they may be perswaded to give their consents to wrong themselves Is it not a Bull of less formality than ever any Popish Bull was keeping a man off with his Horns That he shall have no hold of his tail when he saith That the clause where no remedy was before c. ought to be expounded where no Action was given by the Kings Writs to be pursued at Common Law Since by the Statute of Marlebridge Justices in Eyer were to inquire by the Kings Writs and now are by express words of this chapter not onely to inquire but also to determine by virtue of their Commissions without the Kings Writs And what cause could they or can any other Court determine by virtue of their Commission without the Kings Writs but is Actionable by the Kings Writs What doth this Statute give by virtue of this Commission if all things Actionable by Writs be not determinable by these Commissions without Writs And what doth this Statute avail if not constructable as others so that there should be no failer of justice Where was the failer of justice but in the Kings Courts and Iudges in not executing justice upon the Offendors of Magna Charta Doth it not therefore appear that the said clause Where no Remedy was before ought to be expounded where no remedy was given before by Iustices in Westminster against the Kings Servants and themselves that were the greatest contractors in the breaches of Magna Charta Were not the Iustices in Eyer therefore inabled with a power to supply their defaults faults and to do right to the People against the King himself and all his Servants at Westminster that wilfully failed in their justice and power And where he saith The Justices called Trail Baston had like authoritie as Justices in eyer and committed Errors upon pretence thereof had all their proceedings transported to the Kings-Bench doth it not appear by the Statute called Ragman that those Iustices were made by the King without the consent of the people and sent abroad perhaps of purpose to err and abuse the people to give colour to the Kings-Bench to send their Writs of Error for the proceedings of the Iustices in Eyer upon pretence of like Errors so to suppress all Iustice against themselves and their Creatures Doth not the Lord Coke here withal prefer the chargeable delaies of causes spun out by Termes and Years before speedy justice done day by day at mens own doors which he calleth Piecipitat Doth he not ground this course for suppressing speedy justice by Writs of Errors upon the resolution of the Iudges at Westminster which he al leadgeth as sufficient to maister Authority given by Act of Parliament And is it not the resolution of all Lawyers that no power but Parliament is equal to Parliament and no Parliament to be so impowred as to cross Magna Charta and its Confirmations Doth he not further sol 559. alleadge the resolution of all the Iudges of England against the King and his Councel for an Erroneous Act when they had chosen a Sheriff for Lincoln in a case of necessity without the consent of the People But to hasten this Treatise to an end I shall end this Statute for this time with few chapters following viz. The King hath granted unto his people Cap. 8. Elect. of Sherifts that they shall have Election of their Sheriff in every Shire where the Sheriffalty is not of the Fee if they list I shall say no more to this than hath been said before In summons and Attachements in Plea of land C. 25. Summons A. ●ach the Whits from henceforth shall contain 15. days full at the least after the Common Law if it be not in Attachement of Assizes taken in the Kings presence or of Pleas before Iustices in Eyer during the Eyer Upon this I must ask Expost and Quer. Is not a Writ of Debt Summons Should not that be given to the party which ought to be summoned Should not an Attachement follow by distinction of 15. days as this Statute prescribeth Shall the repealed Statute of the 25th of Ed. the 3d serve Lawyers turns to make a distinction between a Plea real and Personal And shall that Writ of Summons be counterfeited either in it self or in its return as aforesaid Such Executions shall be done of them that make false Returns of Writs Ca. 16. False Retur of Wr. whereby right is deferred as it is ordained in the 2. Statute of Westminster with like pain at the Kings commandment This is an Act of Confirmation L. C. upon Ca. 16 f. 568. whereby the Statute of Westminster the 2d. cap. 39th touching false returns is confirmed Doth not the 2d Statute of Westminster cap. 39. say Expost Q. That the King hath commanded that Sheriffs shall be punished by the Justices once or twice if need be for such false Returns and if they offend a third time none shall have to do therewith but the King c Doth not the Court of Kings-Bench assume the King to be always there in Person And what they speak to be his own speech Is it not they therefore that should punish Sheriffs for their false Returns the third time of their offence But is it not indeed they and their Creatures as well as those of the Common-Pleas do make false Returns in the names of the Sheriffs of L●ndon and Middlesex and do consequently make those Sheriffs liable to Actions as aforesaid How can they punish those Sheriffs for those false Returns which they themselves suffer their Clerks to make unknown to the Sheriffs as aforesaid And who but they cause or suffer all Sheriffs falsly to Return Exigents with the words Per judicium Coronatorum and the Coroners names who know no such thing And if any man be Out-lawed without the judgement of the Coroners of his County or any mention made thereof in the Sheriffs Return is not that Outlawry as injurious
JUDGES JUDGED out of their own mouthes OR The QUESTION Resolved by MAGNA CHARTA c. Who have been Englands Enemies Kings Seducers and Peoples Destroyers from Hen. 3. to Hen. 8. and before and since Stated by Sr. EDVVARD COKE Kn ● late L. Chief Justice of England Expostulated and put to the Vote of the People by J. JONES Gent. Whereunto is added Eight Observable Points of Law Executable by Justices of Peace Abusum ego non usum forensem damne Ex legibus illis quae non in tempus aliquod sea perpetuâ utilitatis causâ in aeternum latae sunt null abrogari debet nisi quam aut u sus ceärguit aut status aliquis Reipublica inutilem fecit Tit. Liv. lib. 4. dec 4. LONDON Printed by W. Bently and are to be sold by E. Dod and N. Ekins at the Gun in Ivy-Lane MDCL To the Right HONOURABLE HONOURABLE Right WORSHIPFULL And Well-beloved the COMMONS and PEOPLE of England Universally BEcause Magna Char. Printed in English An. 1564. and bound up with other Statutes at large too Voluminous and costly for the generality to read or buy doth yield less profit than hath been long necessary I have presumed at the instance of some to Dedicate this Treatise to you all as it concerneth the good of all that be or would be good the hurt of none that have left any unhurt wherein you shall find so many Chap. of Mag. Char. Confir Char. Art super Char. and other Statutes at large corroborating the same and the L. C. Exposition thereupon with some Expostulations and Queres of mine own as I thought requisite or convenient for these times The rest of the Charter concerning the Church yet unsetled or the Kings Tenures otherways disposed of I have omitted as useless desiring that thus much may prove useful to all undertakers of Reformation as well Martial as Civil Whose Servant to my power I shall ever be and continue with due faithfulness and humility Jo. Jones The Great CHARTER of the LIBERTIES of ENGLAND Granted to the People of the same By King HENRY the third And accorded between him and them in diverse full Parliaments as followeth viz. HENRY by the Grace of God King of England Lord of Ireland Duke of Normandie and Guyen and Earl of Angeow To all Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons Sheriffs Provosts Officers And to all Bailiffs and our faithfull Subjects which shall see this present Charter greeting Know ye that We to the honour of Almightie God and for the salvation of the souls of our Progenitours and Successours Kings of England to the advancement of holy church and amendment of our Realm of England of Our meer free will have given and granted to all Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons and to all Free-men of this Realm of England for evermore First We have granted to God and by this present Charter have confirmed for Vs Cap. 1. Liberties and our Heirs for evermore That the church of England shall be free and shall have all her whole rights and liberties inviolable We have granted also and given to all Free-men of our Realm for Vs and Our Heirs for evermore these Liberties under-written to have and to hold to them and to their heirs of Vs and Our heirs for evermore Here be four rehearsals saith the Lord Coke of four notable causes of the making this Law Lord Coke upon Mag. Chart. Fol. 1. First for the honour of God Secondly for the health of the Kings soul Thirdly For the exaltation of the church Fourthly for the amendment of the Kingdom And all granted to all subjects and their heirs from the King and his heirs for evermore That the great Charter might live and take effect in all successions of ages for ever Expost and Quer. The last of these causes which the L. C. in his Preamble calleth the ends for which this Charter was made being for the amendment of the Realm was saith the L. C. upon the first chapter of confirmatio Chart. fol. 529. to amend great mischiefs and inconveniences which oppressed the whole Realm before the making of both Charters viz. This and the Charter of the Forrest which saith the L. C. in his Preface were declarative Acts of the old Common-Law of the Land and no introductives of any new Law If the mischiefs and inconveniencies of the Realm were great before the said Acts were made to declare the Laws of the land which formerly the lawyers reserved to themselves till then undeclared Were there not greater since those Acts were made and the Lawes thereby declared and since the accord of King and People to keep the same inviolable when and as often as they were violated by Kings and their Counsel learned in the Laws As hereafter shall appear We Cap. 8. Debt Debtors Suerties nor Our Bailiffs shall not seise any lands or rent for any debt as long as the present goods and chattels of the debtors do suffice to pay the debt and the debtor himself be ready to satisfie Therefore shall neither the pledges of the debtor be distrained as long as the principle debtor is sufficient for payment of the debt and if the principal debtor fail in paiment of the debt haveing nought wherewith to pay or will not where he is able enough Then the pledges shall answer for the debt and if they will they shall have the lands and rents of the debtor until they be satisfied of that which they before paid for him except that the debtor can shew himself to be acquitted against the suerties We saith the Lord Coke spoken in the politique capacitie of a King L. Coke upon M. C. fol. 19. extendeth to his Successours And by Bailiffs are meant Sheriffs who write Baliva mea c. And by the words shall not seiz is expressed the Kings Grace who by the Common-Law had Execution against his Debtors bodies lands and goods And by the Statute of 33. Hen. 8. cap. 9. The Sheriff is to inquire c. and to extend all Lands Goods Chattels c. and 〈◊〉 take and imprison the Bodies as by that Stat. appeareth and as the daily practice sheweth Expost and Quer. If We extend to Successors even to King Hen. 8. Why not longer If Magna Charta was to live for ever Why not hitherto If the King of his Grace remitted by this Act the execution which the Common Law gave him before against his Debtors Bodies Lands and Goods in case of having nought wherewith to pay through decay of their estates by unavoidable necessities then the Kings Debtors obtained of the Kings Grace as much Liberty for their bodies as this King gave to all his free subjects by the 29th of this Act viz. No Free man c. And for his Estate as much as the proverb saith Where nothing is to be bad the King looseth his due If the King did not remit so much by this Act then did he gain thereby more
than he gave contrary to the opinion of all Lawyers that say All Acts of Parliament are to be expounded for the benefit of the Subject And what and how did he gain but contrary to his Honour much more to his Grace when two more of his subjects were hedged in by this Act as Pledges to pay for his undone Debtor and to undoe themselves and their families by the bargain And their estates being too little to pay their own debts their Creditours must see the King first served our of the same to their no small prejudice if not undoing whereby many are injured through one mans occasion If therefore this Act ought to be construed for the honour of the King and benefit of the subject as I believe it ought and the L. C. saith others have thought so it followeth That the Statute of the 33. Hen. 8.9 was made as many more were before and since against Mag. Chart. and not onely against Kings honour and grace but also their Oathes to the undoing of multitudes of their subjects which was ungracious for their Counsel learned in the Laws to give advice or assent to the making such Laws or when made to allow them much more to maintain them being that all Judges are to receive Mag. Chart. for a Plea against all Statutes made against it And all Judgements given against Mag. Chart. are and ought to be void as appeareth in the L. C. preamble And all such Statutes as were made before the 42. of Ed. 3. against Mag. Chart. were then replealed and as I conceive all made so since are repealed by the Petition of Right 3. Car. that restored Mag. Char. to its primitive vigor and consequently enervated all its opponents The City of London shall have the old Liberties Cap. 9. London c. and customs which it hath been used to have Moreover We will and grant that all other Cities Burroughs Towns and the Barr ons of the five Ports and all other Ports shall have their Liberties and Free-customs This Chapter saith the Lord Coke is excellently interpreted by an ancient Author quoting the Mirrour in the Margent who saith L. C. upon M. C. fol. 20. that by this Chapter the Citizens of London ought to have their Franchizes whereof they are inheritable by loyal Title of the gift and confirmation of the Kings which they have not forfetted by any abuse and that they shall have their Franchizes and Customes which are sufferable by right and not repugnant to law And the same interpretation serveth for the Cinque-ports and other places Expost and Quer. Doth not this Charter and chapter sufficiently declare and Lawyers though unwillingly yet plainly confess that London and the rest had old Liberties and customes and that they are inheritable thereof and ought still to have the same so long and so far as not repugnant to Law which I conceive to be this Law and not any that have been made since against it And do not the several Charters of London and other Cities and Towns obtained since this Law declare further what those Liberties and Customs were And if the Kings learned Councel have consented that he should grant or Professors of the Law advised Londoners or any other Citizens to ask things repugnant to this Law and prevailed with both parties Have they not misled both parties And though they have so done often yet in this case doth not the Statute of the 19th of Henry 7. chap. 7. help the offendors with less danger than the forfeiture of their Customs and Liberties if they offend especially but in those points which their lawyers so much misadvised them to ask and the Kings him to grant Common-Pleas shall not follow Our Court Ca. 11. Common Pleas. but shall be holden in some place certain Before this Statute saith the Lord Coke Common-Pleas might have been holden in the Kings-Bench L. C. upon M.C. fol. 22 23. and all Writs returnable unto the same Bench And because the Court was holden coram Rege and followed the Kings Court and removable at the Kings will the Returns were Ubicumque suerimus in Angliâ whereupon many discontinuances ensued and great trouble of Jurors charges of Parties and delay of Justice for this cause this Statute was made c. And Pleas of the Crown were divided into high Treason Misprision of Treason Petty Treason Fellony c. and limited to this Court because contrà coronam dignitatem c. So that of these the Lord Coke saith the Common-Pleas cannot hold Plea But to shew that Common-Pleas may be holden in the Kings-Bench he saith That the King is out of this Statute and may sue in that Court Secondly if a man be in Custodia any other may lay upon him any Action of debt covenant or the like personal Action because that he that is in Custodia ought to have the priviledge of that Court And this Act taketh not away the Priviledge of any Court. Thirdly any Action that is Quare vi Armis where the King is to have a Fine may be sued in this Court Fourthly Replevins may be removed thither Fifthly saith the Lord Coke Albeit originally the Kings-Bench be restrained by this Act to hold Plea of any Real action yet by a mean they may as when removed by writ of Error from Common-Pleas thither for necessitie lest any party that hath right should be without remedie or that there should be a failer of Justice and therefore Statutes are alwaies to be expounded so that there should be no failer of Justice Expost and Quer. Do not the L. C. words viz. Before this Statute c. imply that after the Statute Common-Pleas ought not to be holden in the Kins-Bench nor all Writs be returnable into the same Beach Doth the Register or Natura brevium therefore shew any Writ for debt returnable to the Kings-Bench Doth not Fitz. H. natura brevium fol. 119. h. k. declare that there is no Writ in Law for debt but a Justicies which is a judicial Commission to the Sheriff to determine the matter Nè amplius indè clamorem audiamuus So that the Kings-Bench ought not to be troubled with the matter at all or if an Original returnable to the Common-Pleas Doth not that Original declare it self to be a Summons And doth not Mr Kitchen in his Ret. brev fol. 4. Tit. com bank declare that Summons Atachment and Distringas succestively distant fifteen days one after another is the onely Proces at Common Law The Kings-Beach and Common-Pleas ought to practise by the Common Law declared by Mag. Chart. and accord of the King and People declared and injoyned to be observed inviolable and immutable for ever Did ever any Judge of the Kings-Bench or Common-Pleas advise or consent to the making any Statute or Law to the contrarie being sworn to execute and maintain Mag. Chart. as anon shall appear all were or ought to be and was not perjured Did or doth any
the foresaid Iustices as far forth as appertaineth unto their Offices And besides these things granted upon the Articles of the Charters aforesaid The King of his special Grace for redress of the grievances that the people hath sustained by reason of his Wars and for the amendment of their Estate to the intern that they may be the more ready to do him service and the more willing to assist and aid him in time of need hath granted certain Articles the which he supposeth shall not onely be observed of his leige people but also shall be as much profitable or more than of the Articles heretofore granted One of the causes for the making this Act L. Coke f. 537 538 539. was saith the Lord Coke as in the Preamble is suggested that there was no certain punishment in many points established by the said Charters against the violators of the same which also by this Act saith he is remedied And the word People here saith he doth include all the Kings Subjects c. And again the word Pain ne fuit estable some read saith he Pain ne fuit execute and that is true in effect but the Original is Pain ne fuit estable that is no pain was set down certain And saith he fol. 539. This Act had but the force of a Charter until confirmed by this Parliament the 34th Ed. 1. And that these Charters should be read four times in the year in full County here is an order taken for the publishing And Ou remedie ne fuit avant c. is to be construed saith he where no Action was given by the Kings Writ to be pursued at Common Law c. Again here saith he for the better Execution of those glorious two Lights Magna Charta and Charta Forestae a new Court and new Justices were appointed c. Again saith he these clauses against the Kings Servants out of their places as well as others And to hear the Plaints without delay day by day and to determine them without admitting such delaies as be at Common Law was the first ground of the raising of the Justices called Trail Baston and their Courts so called in respect of their precipitate proceedings from day to day without such convenient leisure and time as Common Law allowed c. they in the end had such Authoritie as Justices in Eyer but albeit they had their Authoritie by Act of Parliament yet if they erred in judgement a Writ of Error did lie by the general Rule of the Common Law to reverse the Judgement in the Kings-Bench which being once resolved and known and their Jurisdiction fettered with so many limitations their Authoritie by little and little vanish●d Expost and Quer. Was there any certain Pain established by this Statute against the violators of Magna Charta other than by Commission in Eyer that the Justices might determine and punish the Offendors by Imprisonments Fines or Amerciaments according to the Trespass Ought not the Justices of the Kings-Bench to have so punished all such as were Indicted before Sheriffs or Justices in Eyer who had power to inquire and certifie them of all such Offendors and Offences against Magna Charta by the Statute of Marlebridge 51. Hen. 3d Doth not the Lord Coke say elsewhere That all Statutes ought to be construed so as that there should be no failer of Justice should not the Justices of the Kings-Bench have construed Magna Charta so Doth not the 14th chap. of Mag. Charta expresly direct That all offendors ought to be Amercied by their equals according to the quantitie of the Trespass Doth the Lord Coke speak truth when he saith this Statute gave any man Remedie for the certaintie of the punishment other than Magna Charta did before Was it not made more uncertain by referring it to the Justices in Eyers discretion whether Amerciaments Fyne or Imprisonment Doth he not confess plainly when he saith It is true in effect that the Pain was not Executed as some read instead of the Pain was not Established That it was the fault of the Justices of the Kings-Bench in not Executing the Pain of Amercying c. as they might and ought to have done was the cause of Impowering the Justices in Eyer who were but Enquirers before now to determine and punish such Offendors and Offences as they did forbear viz. The Kings Servants with whom by this time they of the Kings-Bench tampered for their Offices And was it not for the same cause the people were Declared to be choosers of Justices in Eyer And doth not the Lord Coke shew a great spight between himself and his brethren whom he would have to be ancient and the Justices in Eyer whom he calleth a new Court and new Justices And shew his Memory to be weak as his Envy was strong when he is forced to give himself the Lye either here or in his Exposition of the Stat. of Marlebridge where he saith They were then Justices and a court though but for Inquirie And upon the 23th Chap. of Magna Charta he saith they used before that time to give charge to all Juries concerning Wears c. Doth not the Lord Coke say fol. 235. That Bracton wrote before the making West 1. which was 3. Ed. 1 And doth not Bracton lib. 3. cap. 11 12 and 13. say Justices in Eyer were before his time Doth not Camden in his Britannia pag. 104. say They were Instituted by King Hen. 2 Doth not Hoveden in his Annais part poster fol. 113. b. confirm the same And add that K. Hen. 2. divided the Realm in six parts setled thre● Justices in Eyer to every part whose names he relateth And doth not the Mirror of Justice lib. 3o. Tit. 1o. Justice in Eyer declare their power at large And as for their Election by the people doth he not say fol. 538. That Magna charta c. containeth the substance of all that is contained in these Articles And doth he not say in his Preamble That Magna Charta is an Act declarative of the ancient Laws and Customs of England before it and no introductive of any new And fol. 558. That of ancient time before the making of this Act all such Officers or Ministers as were instituted either for Preservation of the Peace of the County or for execution of Justice because it concerned all the Subjects of that County and they had a great interest in the due and just exercise of their places were by force of the Kings Writs in every several County chosen in full and open County by the Free-holders of the same County Again saith he So it was then and yet is of Coroners and so it was then and yet is of Knights of the Shire for Parliaments and of the Verdors of a Forest and likewise it was of ancient time of the Sheriff of the County and restored by this Act but this is altered by divers Acts of Parliament Now were not Justices in Eyer therefore
to the Party Perjurious in the Judges who admit such a Return and proceed upon it and as Illegal in the Sheriff that makes such a Return and as different from due Proces of Law as the other And do not those false Returns filed upon their Records make all their proceedings thereupon false and faint Actions as aforesaid And if all before written be not sufficient to make it appear to the world that they are not onely Forgers Perjurers and Anathema's themselves but also the onely causers of all others to be or be accompted the like And that their Lives Lands and Goods are in the immediate dispose of the present State by the judgements and confessions of their own mouths Behold their Oath which they voluntarily take when they assume their places whereby they binde themselves further before God and man as followeth viz. Ye shall Swear The Oath of the Kings Judges that well and lawfully ye shall serve our Sovereign Lord the King and his people in the office of Iustice and that lawfully ye shall Counsel the King in his business and that ye shall not councel nor assent to any thing which may turn him to dammage or disherison by any manner way or colour And that Ye shall not know the dammage or disherison of him whereof Ye shall not do him to be warned by Your self or by other And that Ye shall do even Law and Execution of right to all his Subjects rich and poor without having regard to any person And that You take not by Your self or by other privily nor apertly gift nor reward of gold not silver nor of any other thing which may turn to Your profit unless it be meat or drink and of small valure of any man that shall have any Plea or Proces hanging before You as long as the Proces shall be so hanging nor after the same cause And that Ye take no Fee as long as Ye shall be Iustice nor Robes of any may great or small but of the King himself And that Ye give none advise nor Counsel to no man great nor small in no case where the King is party And in case that any of what Estatt or Condition they be come before You in Your Sessions with Force and Arms or other ways against the Peace or against the form of the Statute thereof made to disturb Execution of the Common Law or to manace the people that they may not pursue the Law that Ye do their Bodies to be Arrested and put in prison and in case they be such that Ye may not Arrest them that Ye certifie the King of their names and of their Misprision hastily so that he may thereof ordain a covenable remedie And that You by Your selfe nor by other privily nor apertly maintain any Plea or quarrel hanging in the Kings Court or else where in the Countrie And that Ye denie to no man common right by the Kings Letters nor none other mans nor for none other cause and in case any Letters come to You contrarie to the Law that You do nothing by such lett but certifie the King thereof and go forth to do the Law notwithstanding the same Letters And that Ye shall do and procure the profit of the King and of his Crown with all things where Ye may reasonably do the same And in case Ye be from henceforth found in default in any of the points aforesaid Ye shall be at the Kings Will of Body Lands Goods thereof to be done as shall please him As God You help and all Saints Anno 18. Edward 3. Stat. 3. Expost and Quer. If Atheists can perswade Christians that this Oath was no binding for them that had taken it even the Wise Learned Reverend Judges Sages Scientissimous Interpreters of the Laws of England sufficient to keep them within the compass of their Oath Law and Knowledges Shall not Christians perswade themselves that it is a sufficient Confession Declaration and judgement of their own mouths that made it that their forfeitures viz. their Lives Lands and Goods in case of their breach of any point of this Oath are now immediately in the power of the State to dispose of to the publique use at their pleasures without any further Proces or proceedings in Law but onely to give Order and Warrant to Arrest the persons of such Offendors to stand to their censures and to Sequester their Estates and to divide them to the said use accordingly Did Lords ever use any more Law than their own Wills when they Sequestred and punished their villains Had Lords any more Law Right or Reason to Sequester and punish their villains at their own Wills but for that their villains did take their Lands upon conditions to do those services which they and their Lords agreed upon and gave their Lords their Oaths as their greatest bonds to perform those conditions or in case of breach to suffer their Lords to repossess their Lands with the forfeitures of their Goods which they gained and their Lives which they sustained upon the same Was the Oath of a Villain though made by Parliament to the end that Lords should be well served by their Slaves in their private and meanest Offices of as considerable consequence to be observed or in default thereof their forfeitures to be executed as the Oath of Judges made and Confirmed by several Parliaments to the end that the common-wealth should be well served by their Justices in their publike and most honourable if rightly served Offices of Judicature and administration of Justice Are not such Villains as dare incroach not onely upon their Lords Lands and Estates but also upon their Lives and Liberties dangerous transcendent Hyper-Prelatical Usurpers Are not such Usurpers intollerable mischiefs in a Common-wealth Who being sworn servants to the Common-wealth as by this Oath it appeareth the Kings Justices were make all the Common-wealth their servants to attend their Trains at Westminster at their pleasures And all Prisoners for Debt not onely their own Villains but also Villains to their Villainous Goalors and Slaves to their Slaves Are not the meanest of the Free-People of England interessed in the due execution of Justice to which these Judges were sworn as well to them as to Kings and consequently ought they not to be such Lords as dare and will take the forfeitures of such Villains as do them daily Injustice Is not this Oath a sufficient Evidence in it self that the takers of it have do dayly break it cause all others that have or do break it to do so likewise Since Kings and People have wholly referred themselves and their Estates not onely to the Justice of their Judges but also to their fatherly advertisements and admonitions whereby they ought not to suffer any that depend upon them to err through ignorance and they contrariwise admonish none not to offend but suffer and cause more to offend than willingly and wittingly would and so do for want of such admonitions much
for all England divided into six See and compare Rast abridg fol. 65. and Rog. Hoveden parte poster Annal. fol. 548. The not reading and publishing of Mag. Char. is the default partly of Sheriffs not requiring it partly of the Clerk of the Crown c. not sending it to them under Seal All defaults of Sheriffs c. are inquirable and punishable by Justices of Peace as Lamb. Fitz. H. Cromp. Dali c. affirm at large 5. Observe the peoples choice resumed by this Statute when the King presumed to make Justices of P. and under that specious Title to impower them first to affront and by degrees to suppress and at last to extinguish the larger power of Conservatours A Prerogative imposture devised by Lawyers for their own advantage when they got the King to confer this creation of Justices of Peace upon his Chancellours and Keepers to whom their creatures became obliged to subject all England to Westminster contrary to Mag. Char. 5. Justices in Eyre are discontinued long since and not onely for that they were interrupted and wearied out by the Prerogative Judges and Courts at Westminster by their Certioraries Corpus cum causa Errours and other Writs as the Lord Coke confesseth in his Exposition of the Stat. called A●t super Chart. fol. 540. but also for that Justices of Assize Justices of Peace and all Oyers and Terminers by their Commissions and Magistrates of Corporations by their Charters were enabled sworn to hear and determine all Trespasses Contempts Oppressions and Misdemeanours according to the Laws and customs of England as appeareth in and by all Commissions of the Peace Oyers Terminers and Charters that have Oyer and Terminer and by the Stat. made for the first institution of Justices of Peace in the 18th year of Ed. 3d. in which year was also ordained the Oath of all Judges and Justices of Oyer and Terminer for the due execution of justice without sale delay or denial which the thrice reverend Judge Anthony Fitz Herb. admonisheth them that consider it and their duty to God and their Countrey not to break upon any conditions Nat. brevium fol. 240. d. but now the common practice is otherwise 6. Justices of Peace ought not to be seduced to transgress M. C. and the Petition of Right by any Stat. that contradicts them nor to lose the publike interest for any Prerogative usurpation but to re-assume their authority fro People to act as conservatours of the ancient peace and profit of the Common-wealth as in cases of Remitter men stand to their best Title 6. Any that Will ought to have Commissions of Oyer and Terminer for all Extortions Oppressions and Misdemeanours of Sheriffs Under sheriffs Escheatours Bayliffs Clerks and all other Officers See Cromp. Just Peace fol. 51.8 Fitz H. Nat. br fol. 112. d. And Justices of Peace and all other Commissioners that ought by their Commissions and Oaths to punish all such offences do not are no less than porjurers and the greatest malefactours of all other themselves Nor can any Writs of Certiorari Corpus cum causa Errour Supersedeas or putting out of Commission excuse or supercede them to finish their Judgements and Executions in all such causes brought in question before them See and compare the Stat. of 2. Ed. 3. and 14. Ed. 3.14 and the 20. Ed. 3.1 and the Procedendo thereupon in Fitz. H. Na. Bre. fol. 240. where it is said They shall proceed to justice according to law notwithstanding any Letter Commandment Prohibition Writ Privy-Seal or Great Seal to the contrary And if any such things be granted by the King or any of his Judges or Coutrs such a Procedendo ought to be granted by the Keeper of the Broad Seal to countermand them and to command justice judgement and execution to be done even against the King much rather against Judges who under colour of Authority and justice delude and wrong Kings and People For saith the L. Coke upon the Stat. of Marlebridge cap. 5. there is no greater injustice than when under colour of Justice men are injured but Writs of Certiorari Corpus cum causa and Errour ought to be had and granted upon proof of malice partiality injustice or errour in matter committed by any inferiour Court but not upon suggestions or bare suppositions as is used See and compare therefore all the said Statutes in this case together with M. Dearhams Manuel p. 25. Nor by any Superiour Judges or Courts that are parties or concerned in the cause See the L. Coke upon Art super Chart. 7. These oppressions are daily committed by mercinary lawyers by colour of Statutes of their own devices against Mag. C. which Stat. ought to be repealed the longer execution thereof resisted by all or any necessary means 7. The granting of Writs or Commissions to do injustice by or to stay or delay justice where it is done or doing or to deny Writs or Commissions to cause or further justice to be done which always was and yet is the practice of the Prerogative Judges at Westminster not onely to cross interrupt Commissioners legally chosen in and by their Counties as Justices in Eyre were and such and all Justices of Peace and Officers of Trust and concernement in and to the Common-wealth still ought to be is the worst of all Oppressions and a general destruction of Law and People committed by colour of an usurped Authority as saith the L. Coke upon the Statute of Marlebr cap. 5. To prevent which his Lordship further saith It is lawful for the People to take up Arms or for Inferiour Judges to commit their Superiors and that before any Verdict or Judgement because they worthily loose the benefit of Law who intend to subvert it and Subordinate authority is more to be obeyed and assisted in the execution of Justice than the Supreamest to be indured to obstruct it All this and more is to be read in effect in the L. Cokes Exposition upon Art super Char. and the Stat. of Marl●br which if executed by Justices of Peace in their Counties and Magistrates in their Corporations would soon regulate abuses settle Peace and much inable the State and Common-wealth to pay publike debts and relieve distressed Souldiers For it is Law it self as virtue it selfe invirtuateth dignifieth and authorizeth her true servants to execute her precepts and confoundeth expulseth and turneth out of her service all her unjust Stewards and underminers As Jacob and David were preferred before their elder brethren and Saul Jeroboam c. were confounded by and for their own Apostacies As in all these cases c. all Justices of Peace should be carefull to observe their Oaths and perform their duties to the Common-wealth whereof they are eminent members So no doubt the Freemen of England would be ready to assist them in the regaining and preservation of their ancient Birth-rights Laws and Liberties Deus Faxit 8. Under the Titles of Trespases Contempts Oppressions
should others that are not such indeed be sheltered to defend or countenanced to offend under that pretence And as for Members of any Court why ought not they to sue and be sued by their Atturneys in other Courts than their own since it is unnatural for any bodie to suffer any of its Members though never so corrupt to be put to any smart which it may avoid And may not nay ought not every just Court avoid such suits and the suspition of their injustice by entertaining them and proceeding therein by leaving them to the justice of other Courts of competent judicature as all other Courts do leave their Members to the mercy of the Courts at Westminster or may not nay ought not all Courts of judicature within their jurisdictions determine the causes of all such Members of the Courts at Westminster as shall be found and arrested within their jurisdictions notwithstanding any Writs of priviledge or other Writs to remove them before they be determined rather than the Courts at Westminster may send for the Members of every Court to be justified by them For who can say he hath ever found any justice there against any priviledged man And how many that be no Members of any Court there indeed are so countenanced as subordinate to some ill Member or other there and have their Law for nothing to bring Fees and gain to one or other of those courts out of honestmens purses and Estates against whom they can shew no colour of right any where but where they know they shall be favored and their Adversaries oppressed And how many men of good Estates have been and daily are not onely oppressed but undone by that means Thirdly for Trespass vi Armis Is it but a common-Plea and consequently proper to all courts of Record and rather to be tryed within that jurisdiction where the offence is committed than elsewhere And hath not the King his Fines imposed and levyed by the authority of all such courts as wel as by the Kings-Bench Fourthly for Replevins may they not as well be removed to and determined by the Common-Pleas as in the Kings-Bench Fifthly what meaneth the Lord by his words viz. Originally restrained but that the Kings-Bench is restrained from having any original Writs Returnable thither in Real Pleas And is it not as much restrained from originals in Personal Pleas that are as Common-Pleas as Real by this Statute Or by what other Statute Law or President is it inabled to have any originals returnable to it for debt when the Register and Ret. brevium have no such Presidents as aforesaid Is not therefore all the practice of the Kings-Bench for debt unjust and perjurious as aforesaid and moreover a faint Action c. as the prisoners for debt in that Court have lately set forth by their Petition to the Lord General and his Officers concerning this matter A Free-man shall not be ameirced for a small fault Caput 14. Ameirciaments but after the quantitie of the fault and for a greater fault after the manner thereof saving to him his contenement or Freehold And a Merchant shall be likewise ameirced saving to him his Merchandize And any other Villain than Durs shall be likewise ameirced saving his Wainage if he fall into Our mercy And none of the said Ameirciaments shall be assessed but by the caths of honest men of the Visionage Carls and Barons shall not be ameirced but by their Peers and after the quantitie of their trespass No man of the Church shall be ameirced after the rate of his spiritual benefice but after the rate of his lay teuement and the quantitie of his trespass A Free-man here Lord Cook upon Magna Charta fol. 27. hath a special understanding saith the L. C. and is taken for a Free-holder and this appeareth by this clause Salvo contenemento suo viz. Saving his Free-hold c. This Act extendeth to Ameirciaments not to Fines imposed by any Court of Justice c. Free-men are not intended to officers or ministers or officers of justice c. The Writ of Moderata misericordia giveth remedie to the Partie that is excessively ameirced c. Albeit the Law of England is a Law of mercy yet it is now turned to a shadow for where by the wisdom of the Law these Ameirciaments were instituted to deter both Domandants from unjust suits and Defendants from unjust defences which was the cause in former times of fewer suits c. If amerciaments were instituted to deter Plantiffs from unjust suits Expost and Quer. and Defendants from unjust defences and were the causes of fewer suits in former times how comes the Law turned to a shaddow in the Lord Cokes time when in the Kings-Bench and Cmmon-Pleas am erciaments were as frequent and greivous as in any other time and suits no fewer nay more numerous than before as Records of both Courts declare unless he means that all the Writs in the Register and Natura brevium both original and judicial whereby suits were determined amongst neighbours friendly at home became useless since Habeas corpus c. carried all to Westminster And that there injustice shaddowed under the name and habit of justice remunerated the litigious supporters of her being with such shares of her spoils that though she trebled their amerciaments she made them alwaies gainers unless when to satisfie their revenge rather than their purses they commuted their monies for counsels and countenances to undo the opposers of their malice whereby both parties became loosers and often ruined and injustice onely remained the gainer and increased her kingdom as the Divel doth his by such suitors and made more suits for Westminster than all the Courts of Errors and their Judges Lawyers and Attorneys there shall wear out while they live without extraordinary helps of their servants No town or Free-man shall be distrained to make Bridges or banks C. 15. Bridg. Banks but such as of old time and of right have been accustomed to make them in the time of King Henry our Grandfather No Banks shall be defended henceforth C. 16. Banks but such as were in defence in the time of King Henry our Grandfather by the same places and the same hounds as were wont to be in his time Both the next precedent chapters sufficiently expound themselves so that the Lord Coke speaketh no more to this matter but that the Mirrour saith That diver Rivers and their Banks were in his time appropriated and blocked up by divers persons to debar common-fishings which were wont to be used there in the time of King H. 2. And I believe there are many more so done more lately which Commissioners for Sewers shall do well to look to No Sheriff C. 17. Pleas Crown Constable Escheator Coroner or any other our Bailiffs shall hold Pleas of the Crown One mischief before this Statute L. Coke upon M. C. 30. was saith the Lord Coke That no Court but the Kings