appeareth 11 H. 7.9 34 H. 6.14 c. And in Bunting and Leppingwells Case in the part of my Reports And this is the usual form of all the Sentences in their Ecclesiastical Courts And this very Point Tr. 23 Reginae Eliz. in this Court between Cheyney and Frankwell all the matter being found as this Case is by speciall verdict was adjudged As to the fourth Objection videlicet That the said Queen had onely power by force of the said Act to nominate Commissioners for Ecclesiasticall causes and therefore the foresaid Nomination not pursuing the authority given unto her by that Act should be void Hereunto a threefold Answer was given and resolved by the whole Court 1. That they which were Commissioners and had places of Judicature over the King's subjects should be intended to be Subjects born and not Aliens But if in veritie they were Aliens yet in respect of the general intendment to the contrary it ought to be alledged and proved by the other party For Stabilitur praesumptum donec probetur in contrarium 2. The Jurors have found that the Queen by her said Letters Patents did authorize them secundum formam Statuti praedicti and therefore it doth by necessary consequence amount to as much as if they had found they had been Subjects born For if they were not Subjects born they could not be authorized secundum formam Statuti praedicti Vide 11 H. 4.4 13 Eliz. Dyer fol. And the rather for that this is found by special verdict 3. It was resolved That the said Act of the first year of the said Queen concerning Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction was not a Statute introductory of a new Law but declaratory of the old which appeareth as well by the Title of the said Act videlicet An Act restoring to the Crown the ancient Jurisdiction over the State Ecclesiastical and Spiritual c. as also by the body of the Act in divers parts thereof For that Act doth not annex any Jurisdiction to the Crown but that which in truth was or of right ought to be by the ancient Laws of the Realm parcell of the King's Jurisdiction and united to his Imperial Crown and which lawfully had been or might be exercised within the Realm The end of which Jurisdiction and of all the proceeding thereupon was that all things might be done in causes Ecclesiasticall to the pleasure of almighty God the increase of vertue and the conservation of the peace and unity of this Realm as by divers parts of the said Act appeareth And therefore as by that Act no pretended Jurisdiction exercised within this Realm being either ungodly or repugnant to the Prerogative or the ancient Law of the Crown of this Realm was or could be restored to the same Crown according to the ancient right and Law of the same So if that Act of the first year of the said Queen had never been made it was resolved by all the Judges that the King or Queen of England for the time being may make such an Ecclesiasticall Commission as is before mentioned by the ancient Prerogative and Law of England And therefore by the ancient Laws of this Realm this Kingdome of England is an absolute Empire and Monarchy consisting of one Head which is the King and of a Body politick compact and compounded of many and almost infinite severall and yet well-agreeing members All which the Law divideth into two several parts that is to say the Clergie and the Laietie both of them next and immediately under God subject and obedient to the Head Also the Kingly Head of this politick Body is instituted and furnished with plenary and entire power Prerogative and Jurisdiction to render Justice and right to every part and member of this Body of what estate degree or calling soever in all Causes Ecclesiasticall or Temporal otherwise he should not be a Head of the whole Body And as in Temporal causes the King by the mouth of the Judges in his Courts of Justice doth judge and determine the same by the temporal Laws of England so in causes Ecclesiasticall and Spiritual as namely Blasphemy Apostasie from Christianity Heresies Schisms Ordering Admissions Institutions of Clerks Celebration of Divine service Rights of Matrimony Divorces general Bastardy subtraction and right of Tithes Oblations Obventions Dilapidations Reparation of Churches Probate of Testaments Administrations and accounts upon the same Simony Incests Fornications Adulteries Solicitation of Chastity Pentions Procurations Appeals in Ecclesiasticall causes Commutation of penance and others the conusance whereof belong not to the Common Laws of England the same are to be determined and decided by Ecclesiasticall Judges according to the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm For as the Romans fetching divers Laws from Athens yet being approved and allowed by the State there called them notwithstanding Jus Civile Romanorum and as the Normans borrowing all or most of their Laws from England yet baptized them by the name of the Laws or Customes of Normandy So albeit the Kings of England derived their Ecclesiasticall Laws from others yet so many as were proved approved and allowed here by and with a general consent are aptly and rightly called The King 's Ecclesiasticall Laws of England which whosoever shall deny he denieth that the King hath full and plenary power to deliver Justice in all causes to all his subjects or to punish all crimes and offences within his Kingdome for that as before it appeareth the deciding of matters so many and of so great importance are not within the conusance of the Common Laws and consequently that the King is no compleat Monarch nor Head of the whole and entire Body of the Realm But to confirm those that hold the truth to satisfy such as being not instructed know not the ancient and modern Laws and Customes of England every man being perswaded as he is taught these few demonstrative proofs out of the Laws of England in stead of many in order serie temporum are here added KEnulphus Rex c. per Literas suas patentes consilio consensu Episcoporum Senatorum gentis suae largitus fuit Monasterio de Abnidon in Comitatu Bark ac cuidam Ruchnio tune Abbati Monasterii c. quandam ruris sui portionem id est quindecim Mansias in loco qui à Ruricelis tunc nuncupabatur Culnam cum omnibus utilitatibus ad eandem pertinentibus tam in magnis quam in modicis rebus in aeternam haereditatem Et quod praedictus Ruchnius c. ab omni Episcopali Jure in sempiternum esse quietus ut inhabitatores ejus nullius Episcopi aut suorum officialium jugo inde deprimantur sed in cunctis rerum eventibus discussionibus causarum Abbatis Monasterii praedicti decreto subjiciantur Ità quòd c. As by the said Charter pleaded in 1 Henr. 7. and vouched by Stamford at large appeareth which Charter granted above 850 years fithence was after confirmed per Edwinum
the Proclamation was published whereby all Jesuites and Priests ordained by forrein authority were commanded to depart out of this kingdome by a certain time prefixed After which time he began to lurk and to change his name howbeit at last he was apprehended in Dublin and committed to prison in the Castle there Upon his first Examination taken by the Lord Deputie himself he acknowledged that he was a Priest and ordained by a Popish Titulary Bishop that he had accepted the title and Office of the Pope's Vicar-generall in the three Dioceses before named and had exercised spirituall jurisdiction in foro conscientiae and in sundry other points he maintained and justified the Pope's authority onely he said he was of opinion that the Pope had no power to excommunicate or depose his Majestie because the King is not of the Pope's Religion The next Term after he was indicted upon the Statute of 2 Eliz. enacted in this Realm against such as should wilfully and advisedly maintain and uphold the jurisdiction of any forrein Prince or Prelate in any causes Ecclesiasticall or Civil within this Realm By which Statute the first offence of that kind is punished with losse of goods and one year's imprisonment the second offence incurreth the penaltie of the Praemunire and the third offence is made high Treason Upon this Indictment he was arraigned convicted and condemned and so rested in prison during the next two Terms without any farther question He then made petition unto the Lord Deputie to be set at liberty whereupon his Lordship caused him to be examined by Sir Oliver Saint John Sir James Fullerton Sir Jefferie Fenton the Atturney and Solicitor generall At first he made some evasive and indirect answers but at last voluntarily and freely he made this ensuing acknowledgement or confession which being set down in writing word for word as he made it was advisedly read by him and subscribed with his own hand and with the hands of those who took his examination and afterwards he confirmed it by his oath before the Lord Deputie and Counsell The Confession or Acknowledgement of Robert Lalor Priest made the 22. of December 1606. FIrst he doth acknowledge that he is not a lawfull Vicar-generall in the Dioceses of Dublin Kildare and Fernes and thinketh in his conscience that he cannot lawfully take upon him the said Office Item he doth acknowledge our Sovereign Lord King James that now is to be his lawfull chief and Supreme Governour in all causes as well Ecclesiasticall as Civil and that he is bound in conscience to obey him in all the said causes and that neither the Pope nor any other forrein Prelate Prince or Potentate hath any power to controll the King in any cause Ecclesiasticall or Civil within this Kingdome or any of his Majestie 's Dominions Item he doth in his conscience believe that all Bishops ordained and made by the King's authority within any of his Dominions are lawfull Bishops and that no Bishop made by the Pope or by any authority derived from the Pope within the King's Dominions hath any power or authoritie to impugn disannull or controll any Act done by any Bishop made by his Majestie 's authoritie as aforesaid Item he professeth himself willing and ready to obey the King as a good and obedient Subject ought to doe in all his lawfull commandments either concerning his function of Priesthood or any other dutie belonging to a good Subject After this Confession made the State here had no purpose to proceed against him severely either for his contempt of the Proclamation or offence against the Law So as he had more liberty then before and many of his friends had access unto him who telling him what they heard of his Confession he protested unto them that he had only acknowledged the King's Civill and Temporall power without any confession or admittance of his authoritie in Spirituall causes This being reported unto the Lord Deputie by sundry Gentlemen who gave faith unto what he said his Lordship thought sit that since he had incurred the pain of Praemunire by exercising Episcopall jurisdiction as Vicar-generall to the Pope that he should be attainted of that offence as well to make him an example to others of his profession for almost in every Diocese of this Kingdome there is a Titulary Bishop ordained by the Pope as also that at the time of his Trial a just occasion might be taken to publish the Confession and acknowledgement which he had voluntarily made signed and confirmed by oath before the Lord Deputie and Councell who have likewise subscribed their names as witnesses thereof Hereupon in Hillarie Term 4 Jacobi an Inditement was framed against him in the King's Bench upon the Statute of 16 Rich. 2. cap. 5. containing these severall points 1. That he had received a Bull or Brief purchased or procured in the Court of Rome which Bull or Brief did touch or concern the King's Crown and dignity Royall containing a Commission of Authoritie from the Pope of Rome unto Richard Brady and David Magragh to constitute a Vicar-generall for the See of Rome by the name of the See Apostolick in the severall Dioceses of Dublin Kildare and Fernes within this Kingdome of Ireland 2. That by pretext or colour of that Bull or Brief he was constituted Vicar-generall of the See of Rome and took upon him the style and title of Vicar-generall in the said severall Dioceses 3. That he did exercise Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction as Vicar-generall of the See of Rome by instituting divers persons to Benefices with cure of souls by granting dispensations in causes Matrimonial by pronouncing sentences of divorce between divers married persons and by doing all other acts and things pertaining to Episcopal Jurisdiction within the said several Dioceses against our Sovereign Lord the King his Crown and dignity Royal and in contempt of his Majesty and disherison of his Crown and contrary to the form and effect of the Statute c. To this Inditement Lalor pleaded Not guilty and when the issue was to be tried the name and reputation of the man and the nature of the cause drew all the principal Gentlemen both of the Pale and Provinces that were in town to the hearing of the matter At what time a substantial Jury of the City of Dublin being sworn for the trial and the points of the Inditement being opened and set forth by the King's Serjeant the Attorney general thought it not impertinent but very necessary before he descended to the particular evidence against the prisoner to inform and satisfie the hearers in two Points 1. What reason moved us to ground this Inditement upon the old Statute of 16 Rich. 2. rather then upon some other later Law made since the time of King Henr. 8. 2. What were the true causes of the making of this Law of 16 Rich. and other former Laws against Provisors and such as did appeal to the Court of Rome in those
times when both the Prince and people of England did for the most part acknowledge the Pope to be the thirteenth Apostle and onely oracle in matters of Religion and did follow his doctrine in most of those points wherein we now dissent from him 1. For the first Point we did purposely forbear to proceed against him upon any later Law to the end that such as were ignorant might be informed that long before King Henr. 8. was born divers Laws were made against the Usurpation of the Bishop of Rome upon the rights of the Crown of England well-nigh as sharp and as severe as any Statutes which have been made in later times and that therefore we made choice to proceed upon a Law made more then 200 years past when the King the Lords and Commons which made the Laws and the Judges which did interpret the Laws did for the most part follow the same opinions in Religion which were taught and held in the Court of Rome 2. For the second Point the causes that moved and almost enforced the English Nation to make this and other Statutes of the same nature were of the greatest importance that could possibly arise in any State For these Laws were made to uphold and maintain the Sovereignty of the King the Liberty of the people the Common Law and the Commonweal which otherwise had been undermined and utterly ruined by the Usurpation of the Bishop of Rome For albeit the Kings of England were absolute Emperours within their Dominions and had under them as learned a Prelacy and Clergy as valiant and prudent a Nobility as free and wealthy a Commonalty as any was then in Christendom yet if we look into the stories and records of these two Imperial Kingdoms we shall find that if these Laws of Provision and Praemunire had not been made they had lost the name of Imperial and of Kingdoms too and had been long since made Tributary Provinces to the Bishop of Rome or rather part of S. Peter's Patrimony in demesne Our Kings had had their Scepters wrested out of their hands their Crowns spurned off from their heads their necks trod upon they had been made Lacquays or Footmen to the Bishop of Rome as some of the Emperours and French Kings were our Prelates had been made his Chaplains and Clerks our Nobility his Vassals and Servants our Commons his Slaves and Villains if these Acts of manumission had not freed them In a word before the making of these Laws the flourishing Crown and Commonwealth of England was in extream danger to have been brought into most miserable servitude and slavery under colour of Religion and devotion to the See of Rome And this was not onely seen and felt by the King and much repined at and protested against by the Nobility but the Commons the general multitude of the Subjects did exclaim and cry out upon it For the Commons of England mâ—y be an example unto all other Subjects in the world in this that they have ever been tender and sensible of the wrongs and dishonours offered unto their Kings and have ever contended to uphold and maintain their honour and Sovereignty And their faith and loyaltie hath been generally such though every Age hath brought forth some particular monsters of disloyaltie as no pretence of zeal or religion could ever withdraw the greater part of the Subjects to submit themselves to a forrein yoke no not when Popery was in her height and exaltation whereof this Act and divers others of the same kind are clear and manifest testimonies For this Act of 16 Rich. 2. was made at the prayer of the Commons which prayer they make not for themselves neither shew they their own self love therein as in other Bills which contain their Grievances but their love and zeal to the King and his Crown When after the Norman Conquest they importuned their Kings for the Great Charter they sought their own Liberties and in other Bills preferred commonly by the Commons against Shriefs Escheators Purveyors or the like they seek their own profit and ease but here their Petition is to the King to make a Law for the defence and maintenance of his own honour They complain That by Bulls and Processes from Rome the King is deprived of that Jurisdiction which belongs of right to his Imperial Crown That the King doth lose the service and counsel of his Prelates and learned men by translations made by the Bishop of Rome That the King's Laws are defeated at his will the Treasure of the Realm is exhausted and exported to enrich his Court And that by those means the Crown of England which hath ever been free and subject unto none but immediately unto God should be submitted unto the Bishop of Rome to the utter destruction of the King and the whole Realm which God defend say they and thereupon out of their exceeding zeal and fervency they offer to live and die with the King in defence of the liberties of the Crown And lastly they pray and require the King by way of justice to examine all the Lords in Parliament what they thought of these manifest wrongs and usurpations and whether they would stand with the King in defence of his Royall liberties or no. Which the King did according to their Petition and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal did all answer that these Usurpations of the Bishop of Rome were against the liberties of the Crown and that they were all bound by their allegeance to stand with the King and to maintain his honour and Prerogative And thereupon it was enacted with a full consent of the three Estates That such as should purchase in the Court of Rome or elsewhere any Bulls or Processes or other things which might touch the King in his Crown and dignitie Royall and such as should bring them into the Realm and such as should receive them publish them or execute them they their Notaries Proctors Maintainors and Counsellors should be all out of the King's protection their lands and goods forfeited to the King their bodies attached if they might be found or else processe of Pramunire facias to be awarded against them Upon these motives and with this affection and zeal of the people was the Statute of 16 Rich. 2. made whereupon we have framed our Inditement Now let us look higher and see whether the former Laws made by King Edw. 1. and King Edw. 3. against the Usurpation of the Bishop of Rome were not grounded upon the like cause and reason The Statute of 38 Edw. 3. cap. 1. expressing the mischiefs that did arise by Breves of Citation which drew the bodies of the people and by Bulls of Provision and Reservation of Ecclesiasticall Benefices which drew the wealth of the Realm to the Court of Rome doth declare that by these means the ancient Laws Customes and Franchises of the Realm were confounded the Crown of our Sovereign Lord the King diminished and his person falsely defamed
waters Yet during this King's reign they wone that point of jurisdiction which they attempted to get but failed thereof in the time of King William Rufus namely That Appeals might be made to the Court of Rome For in a Synod at London summoned by Henr. Bishop of Winchester the Pope's Legate it was decreed That Appeals should be made from Provinciall Councils to the Pope Before that time Appellationes in usu non erant saith a Monk of that time donec Henricus Winton Episcopus malo suo dum Legatus esset crudeliter intrusit Thus did the Pope usurp three main points of Jurisdiction upon three severall Kings after the Conquest for of William Rufus he could win nothing namely upon the Conquerour the sending of Legates or Commissioners to hear and determine Ecclesiasticall causes upon Hen. 1. the Donation and Investiture of Bishopricks and other Benefices upon King Stephen the Appeals to the Court of Rome Now are we come to King Hen. 2. in whose time they made a farther encroachment upon the Crown whereby they endeavoured to make him but half a King and to take away half his Subjects by exempting all Clerks from Secular power Hereupon rose that long and great contention between King Hen. 2. and Thomas Becket which on Becket's behalf may be rightly termed rebellion and treason the just cause and ground whereof was the same that made the late difference between the Pope and the Venetians For a Priest had committed a foul murther and being thereof indicted and convicted prayed the benefit of his Clergie which being allowed unto him he was delivered to the Bishop of Salisbury being his Ordinary to make his purgation which the murtherer failing to doe should by the Law have been degraded and delivered back to the Secular power But the Bishop contemning the Law of the land to enlarge the liberties of the Church sent his prisoner to Thomas Becket then Archbishop of Canterbury who shifted him into an Abbey and so rescued him from the capital punishment he had justly deserved This gap of impunitie being once opened the Clergie grew so outrageous as the King was informed of a hundred murthers committed by Clerks and yet not one of them executed for the same for that the Archbishop had protected them all after the same manner For this the King was justly incensed against the Archbishop who justified his doing herein Whereupon a common Council as well of the Bishops as of the Nobility was called wherein they did revive and re-establish the ancient laws and customes of the Kingdome for the government of the Clergie and ordering of causes Ecclesiasticall whereof these were the principal Heads or Articles 1. That no Bishop nor Clerk should depart the Realm without the King's licence and that such as obtained licence should give sureties that they should procure no hurt or damage to the King or Realm during their absence in forrein parts 2. That all Bishopricks and Abbeys being void should remain in the King's hands as his own demesnes untill he had chosen and appointed a Prelate thereunto and that every such Prelate should doe his homage to the King before he were admitted unto the place 3. That Appeals should be made in causes Ecclesiasticall in this manner from the Archdeacon to the Ordinary from the Ordinary to the Metropolitan from the Metropolitan to the King and no farther 4. That Peter-pence should be paid no more to the Pope but to the King 5. That if any Clerk should commit Felony he should be hanged if Treason he should be drawn and quartered 6. That it should be adjudged high Treason to bring in Bulls of Excommunication whereby the Realm should be cursed 7. That no Decree should be brought from the Pope to be executed in England upon pain of imprisonment and confiscation of goods To these and other Constitutions of the like nature made at Claringdon all the rest of the Bishops and great men did subscribe and bound themselves by oath to observe the same absolutely onely the Archbishop would not subscribe and swear but with a Saving salvo suo ordine honore sanctae Ecclesiae yet at last he was content to make the like absolute Subscription and Oath as the rest had done but presently he repented and to shew his repentance suspended himself from celebrating Masse till he had received absolution from the Pope Then he began to maintain and justifie the exemption of Clerks again whereat the King's displeasure was kindled anew and then the Archbishop once again promised absolute obedience to the King's Laws See the fickleness and mutability of your constant Martyr The King to bind fast this slippery Proteus called a Parliament of the Bishops and Barons and sending for the Roll of those Laws required all the Bishops to set their Seals thereunto They all assented but the Archbishop who protested he would not set his Seal nor give allowance to those Laws The King being highly offended with his rebellious demeanour required the Barons in Parliament to give Judgement of him who being his Subject would not be ruled by his Laws Citò facite mihi justitiam de illo qui homo meus ligeus est stare Juri in Curia mea recusat Whereupon the Barons proceeding against him and being ready to condemn him I prohibit you quoth the Archbishop in the name of Almighty God to proceed against me for I have appealed to the Pope and so departed in contempt of that high Court Omnibus clamantibus saith Hoveden Quò progrederis proditor exspecta audi judicium tuum After this he lurked secretly near the Sea-shore and changing his apparell and name like a Jesuit of these times he took shipping with a purpose to fly to Rome but his passage being hindered by contrary winds he was summoned to a Parliament at Northampton where he made default wilfully for which contempt his Temporalties were seized and his body being attach'd he was charged with so great an account to the King as that he was found in arrear thirty thousand marks and committed to prison whence he found means to escape shortly after and to passe out of the Realm to Rome He was no sooner gone but the King sends Writs to all the Sherifs in England to attach the bodies of all such as made any Appeals to the Court of Rome Hereupon many messages and letters passing to and fro all the Suffragans of Canterbury joyn in a letter to the Pope wherein they condemn the fugitive Archbishop and justifie the King's proceedings Upon this the Pope sends two Legates to the King being then in Normandy to mediate for the Archbishop They with the mediation of the French King prevailed so far with King Henry as that he was pleased to accept his submission once again and promised the King of France that if he would be obedient to his Laws he should enjoy as ample liberties as any Archbishop of Canterbury ever had and so sent him into England with
when such persons have been attainted for Felons have prayed for to have them delivered as Clerks which were made Bigamy before the same Constitution It is agreed and declared before the King and his Council that the same Constitution shall be understood in this wise That whether they were Bigamy before the same Constitution or after they shall not from henceforth be delivered to the Prelates but Justice shall be executed upon them as upon other Lay people In an Act made at a Parliament holden at Carlile in the 25. year of the said King Ed. the First it is declared That the Holy Church of England was founded in the state of Prelacy within this Realm of England by the King and his Progenitors c. for them to inform the people in the Law of God and to keep Hospitality give Alms and doe other works of Charity c. And the said Kings in times past were wont to have the Advice and Counsel for the safeguard of the Realm when they had need of such Prelates The and Clerks so advanced The Bishop of Rome usurping the Seigniories of such Benefices did give and grant the same Benefices to Aliens which did never dwell in England and to Cardinals which might not dwell here c. in adnullation of the state of the Holy Church of England disherison of the King Earls Barons and other Nobles of the Realm and in offence and destruction of the Laws and Rites of this Realm and against the good disposition and will of the first Founders It was enacted by the King by assent of all the Lords and Comminalty in full Parliament That the said Oppressions Grievances and Dammages in this Realm from thenceforth should not be suffered as more at large appeareth by that Act. In the Reign of King Edward the Second ALbeit by the Ordinance of Circumspectè agatis made in the 13. year of Edw. 1. and by general allowance and usage the Ecclesiasticall Court held plea of Tithes Obventions Oblations Mortuaries Redemptions of penance Laying of violent hands upon a Clerk Defamations c. yet did not the Clergy think themselves assured nor quiet from Prohibitions purchased by Subjects untill that King Edw. the 2. by his Letters Patents under the great Seal in and by consent of Parliament upon the Petitions of the Clergy had granted unto them to have Jurisdiction in those cases The King in a Parliament holden in the 9. year of his Reign after particular Answers made to their Petitions concerning the matters abovesaid doth grant and give his Royall Assent in these words We desiring as much as of right we may to provide for the state of the Church of England and the tranquillity and quiet of the Prelates of the said Clergy to the honour of God and the amendment of the state of the said Church and of the Prelates and Clergy ratifying and approving all and singular the said Answers which appear in the said Act and all and singular things in the said Answers contained We do for us and our Heirs grant and command that the same be inviolably kept for ever Willing and granting for us and our Heirs That the said Prelates and Clergy and their Successors for ever do exercise Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction in the premisses according to the tenour of the said Answer In the Reign of King Edward the Third AN Excommunication by the Archbishop albeit it be disannulled by the Pope or his Legates is to be allowed neither ought the Judges to give any allowance of any such Sentence of the Pope or his Legate It is often resolved that all the Bishopricks within England were founded by the King's Progenitors and therefore the Advowsons of them all belong to the King and at the first they were donative And that if an Incumbent of any Church with Cure die if the Patron present not within 6 months the Bishop of that Diocese ought to collate to the end the Cure may not be destitute of a Pastor If he be negligent by the space of 6 months the Metropolitan of that Diocese shall confer one to that Church And if he also leave the Church destitute by the space of 6 months then the Common Law giveth to the King as to the Supreme within his own Kingdome and not to the Bishop of Rome power to provide a competent Pastor for that Church The King may not onely exempt any Ecclesiasticall person from the Jurisdiction of the Ordinary but may grant unto him Episcopal Jurisdiction As thus it appeareth there the King had done of ancient time to the Archdeacon of Richmond All Religious or Ecclesiasticall Houses whereof the King was Founder are by the King exempt from ordinary Jurisdiction and onely visitable and corrigible by the King 's Ecclesiasticall Commission The Abbot of Bury in Suffolk was exempted fron Episcopall Jurisdiction by the King's Charter The King presented to a Benefice and his Presentee was disturbed by one that had obtained Bulls from Rome for which offence he was condemned to perpetuall imprisonment c. Tithes arising in places out of any Parish the King shall have for that he having the Supreme Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction is bound to provide a sufficient Pastor that shall have the Cure of souls of that place which is not within any Parish And by the Common Laws of England it is evident that no man unlesse he be Ecclesiasticall or have Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction can have inheritance of Tithes The King shall present to his free Chappels in default of the Dean by Lapse in respect of his Supreme Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction And Fitzherbert saith that the King in that case doth present by Lapse as Ordinarie An Excommunication under the Pope's Bull is of no force to disable any man within England And the Judges said that he that pleadeth such Bulls though they concern the Excommunication of a Subject were in a hard case if the King would extend his justice against him If Excommunication being the extreme and final end of any Suit in the Court at Rome be not to be allowed within England it consequently followeth that by the ancient Common Laws of England no Suit for any Cause though it be spiritual rising within this Realm ought to be determined in the Court of Rome Quia frustrà expectatur eventus cujus effectus nullus sequitur And that the Bishops of England are the immediate Officers and Ministers to the King's Courts In an Attachment upon a Prohibition the Defendant pleaded the Pope's Bull of Excommunication of the Plaintif The Judges demanded of the Defendant if he had not the Certificate of some Bishop within the Realm testifying this Excommunication To whom the Counsell of the Defendant answered that he had not neither was it as they supposed necessarie for that the Bulls of the Pope under Lead were notorious enough But it was adjudged that they were not sufficiet for that the Court ought not to ave regard to
that is to say the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates being in the Parliament severally examined making protestations that it was not their mind to deny or affirm that the Bishop of Rome might not excommunicate Bishops nor that he might make Translation of Prelates after the Law of Holy Church answered and said That if any Executions or Processes in the King's Court as before were made by any and censures of Excommunications be made against any Bishop of England or any other of the King's liege people for that they had made execution of such commandments and that if any executions of such Translations be made of any Prelats of the same Realm which Prelats were very profitable and necessary to the King and to his said Realm or that his sage men of his Council without his assent and against his will be withdrawn and eloigned out of the Realm so that the substance and Treasury of the Realm might be destroyed that the same was against the King and his Crown as it was contained in the Petition before named And likewise the same Procurators every one by himself examined upon the said matters did answer and say in the name and for their Lords as the said Bishops had said and answered And that the said Lords Spiritual would and ought to stand with the King in these cases lawfully in maintaining of his Crown and in all other cases touching his Crown and his Regalty as they were bound by their Allegeance Whereupon the King by the assent aforesaid and at the prayer of his said Commons did ordain and establish That if any purchase or pursue or cause to be purchased or pursued in the Court of Rome or elsewhere any such Translations Processes and Sentences of Excommunication Bulls Instruments or any other things which touched the King their Lord against him his Crown and his Regalty or his Realm as is aforesaid and they which bring them within the Realm or them receive or make thereof notification or any other execution within the same Realm or without that they their notorious procurators maintainers fautors and counsellors should be put out of the King's protection and their lands and tenements goods and chattels forfeit to the King and they be attached by their bodies if they may be found and brought before the King and his Council there to answer to the cases aforesaid or that processe be made against them by Premunire facias as it is ordained in other Statutes of Provisors and others which do sue in any other Court in derogation of the Regalty of the King as by the said Act also appeareth In the Reign of King Henry the Fourth IT is resolved that the Pope's Collector though he have the Pope's Bulls for that purpose hath no Jurisdiction within this Realm and there the Archbishops and Bishops c. of this Realm are called the King's Spirituall Judges By the ancient Laws Ecclesiasticall of this Realm no man could be convicted of Heresie being high Treason against the Almighty but by the Archbishop and all the Clergy of that Province and after abjured thereupon and after that newly convicted and condemned by the Clergy of that Province in their general Council of Convocation But the Statute 2 H. 4. cap. 15. doth give the Bishop in his Diocese power to condemn an Heretick And before that Statute he could not be committed to the Secular power to be burnt untill he had once abjured and was again relapsed to that or some other Heresie Whereby it appeareth that the King by consent of Parliament directed the proceedings in the Ecclesiasticall Court in case of Heresie and other matters more spirituall The Pope cannot alter the Laws of England The Judges say that the Statutes which restrain the Pope's Provisions to the Benefices of the advowsons of Spiritual men were made for that the Spiritualty durst not in their just cause say against the Pope's Provisions So as those Statutes were made but in affirmance of the Common Laws Excommunication made by the Pope is of no fore in England and the same being certified by the Pope into any Court in England ought not to be allowed neither is any Certificate of any Excommunication available in law but what is made by some Bishop of England for the Bishops are by the Common Laws the immediate Officers and Ministers of justice to the King's Courts in Causes Ecclesiasticall If any Bishop do excommunicate any person for a Cause that belongeth not unto him the King may write unto the Bishop and command him to assoil and absolve the party If any person of Religion obtain of the Bishop of Rome to be exempt from obedience Regular or ordinary he is in case of Premunire which is an offence as hath been said contra Regem Coronam Dignitatem suas The Commons did grievously complain to the King at the Parliament holden in the 6. year of H. 4. of the horrible mischiefs and damnable customes which then were introduct of new in the Court of Rome that no person Abbot or other should have provision of any Archbishoprick or Bishoprick which should be void till he had compounded with the Pope's Chamber to pay great and excessive sums of money as well for the First-fruits of the same Archbishoprick or Bishoprick as for the other lesse Services in the same Court and that the same sums or the greater part thereof be paid before hand which sums passed the treble or the double at the least of that that was accustomed of old time to be paid in the said Chamber and otherwise by the occasions of such Provisions whereby a great part of the Treasury of this Realm had been brought and carried to the said Court and also should be in time to come to the great impoverishing of the Archbishops and Bishops within the same Realm and elsewhere within the King's dominions if convenient remedy were not for the same provided The King to the honour of God as well to eschew the dammage of this Realm as the perils of their souls which owen to be advanced to any Archbishopricks and Bishopricks within the Realm of England and elsewhere within the King's dominions out of the same Realm by the advice and assent of the Great men of his Realm in the Parliament did ordain and establish That they and every of them that should pay to the said Chamber or otherwise for such Fruits and Services greater sums of mony then had been accustomed to be paid in old time past they and every of them should incur the forfeiture of as much as they may forfeit towards the King as by the said Act appeareth No person Religious or Secular of what estate or condition that he were by colour of any Bulls containing priviledges to be discharged of Tithes pertaining to Parish-churches Prebends Hospitals Vicarages purchased before the first year of King Richard the 2. or after and not executed should put in execution any
Authority and not elsewhere in such Courts Spiritual and Temporal of the same as the natures conditions and qualities of the Cases and matters aforesaid in contention or thereafter happening in contention should require without having any respect to any custome use or sufferance in hinderance lett or prejudice of the same or to any other thing used or suffered to the contrary thereof by any other manner person or persons in any manner of wise any forrein Inhibitions Appeals Sentences Summons Citations Suspensions Interdictions Excommunications Restraints Judgements or any other Process or Impediment of what natures names qualities or conditions soever they be from the See of Rome or any other forrein Courts or Potentates of the world or from and out of this Realm or any other the King's dominions or Marches of the same to the See of Rome or to any other forrein Courts or Potentates to the let tor impediment thereof in any wise notwithstanding as by the said Act appeareth By an Act of Parliament in 25 H. 8. it is declared by the King the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled That neither the King his Heirs nor Successors Kings of this Realm nor any his subjects of this Realm nor of any other his dominions should from thenceforth sue to the said Bishop of Rome called the Pope or to the See of Rome or to any person or persons having or pretending any Authority by the same for Licences Dispensations Impositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies or any other Instruments or Writings of what kind name nature or quality soever they be for any cause or matter for the which any Licence Dispensation Composition Faculty Grant Rescript Delegacy Instrument or other Writing theretofore had been used and accustomed to be had and obtained at the See of Rome or by authority thereof or of any Prelat of this Realm nor for any manner of other Licences Dispensations Compositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies or any other Instruments or Writings that in cases of necessity might lawfully be granted without offending of the Holy Scriptures and Laws of God But that from thenceforth every such Licence Dispensation Composition Faculty Grant Rescript Delegacy Instrument and other Writing afore named and mentioned necessary for the King his Heirs and Successors and his and their people and subjects upon the due examination of the causes and qualities of the persons procuring such Dispensations Licences Compositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies Instruments or other Writings should be granted had and obtained from time to time within this his Realm and other his dominions and not elsewhere in manner and form following and not otherwise That is to say The Archbishop of Canterbury for the time being and his Successors should have power and authority from time to time by their discretions to give grant and dispose by an Instrument under the Seal of the said Archbishop unto the King and unto his Heirs and Successors Kings of this Realm as well all manner of such Licences Dispensations Compositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies Instruments and all other Writings for causes not being contrary or repugnant to the Holy Scriptures and Laws of God as theretofore had been used and accustomed to be had and obtained by the King or any his most noble Progenitors or any of his or their subjects from the See of Rome or any person or persons by authority of the same and all other Licences Dispensations Faculties Compositions Grants Rescripts Delegacies Instruments and other Writings in for and upon all such causes and matters as should be convenient and necessary to be had for the honour and surety of the King his Heirs and Successors and the wealth and profit of this his Realm so that the said Archbishop or any his Successors in no manner wise should grant any Dispensation Licence Rescript or any other Writing before rehearsed for any cause or matter repugnant to the Law of Almightie God as by the said Act also appeareth If it be demanded what Canons Constitutions Ordinances and Synodals provincial are still in force within this Realm I answer that it is resolved and enacted by Authority of Parliament That such as have been allowed by general consent and custome within the Realm and are not contrariant or repugnant to the Laws Statutes and Customes of this Realm nor are to the dammage or hurt of the King's Prerogative royal are still in force within this Realm as the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of the same Now as consent and custome hath allowed those Canons so no doubt by general consent of the whole Realm any of the same may be corrected inlarged explained or abrogated For example There is a Decree that all Clerks that have received any manner of Orders greater or smaller should be exempt pro causis criminalibus before the Temporal Judges This Decree had never any force within England First for that it was never approved and allowed of by general consent within the Realm Secondly it was against the Laws of the Realm as it doth appear by infinite precedents Thirdly it was against the Prerogative and Sovereignty of the King that any subject within this Realm should not be subject to the Laws of this Realm In the Reign of Queen Elizabeth BY the said Act of Parliament whereupon the principal case then in question partly dependeth made in the first year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth it is declared That where in the time of the Reign of King Henry the 8. divers good Laws and Statutes were made and established as well for the utter extinguishment and putting away of all usurped and forrein powers and authorities out of this Realm and other her dominions and countries as also for the restoring and uniting to the Imperial Crown of this Realm the ancient Jurisdiction Authorities Superiorities and Preheminences to the same of right belonging and appertaining by reason whereof her most humble subjects from the 25. year of the said King Henry the 8. were continually kept in good order and were disburthened of divers great and intolerable charges and vexations before that time unlawfully taken and exacted by such forrein power and authority as before that was usurped And to the intent that all usurped and forrein power and authority Spirituall and Temporal might for ever be clearly extinguished and never be used or obeyed within this Realm or any other her dominions or countries It was by the Authority of that Parliament enacted That no forrein Prince person Prelate State or Potentate Spiritual or Temporal should at any time after the last day of that Session of Parliament use enjoy or exercise any manner of Power Jurisdiction Superiority Authority Preheminence or Priviledge Spiritual or Ecclesiastical within this Realm or within any other the Queen's dominions or countries that then were or hereafter should be but from thenceforth the same should be clearly abolished out of this Realm and all other her dominions for ever any Statute
reconciled to the said usurped Authority of the See of Rome and to take Absolution at the hands of the said naughty and subtil practisers whereby did grow great disobedience and boldness in many not onely to withdraw and absent themselves from all Divine Service then most godly set forth and used within this Realm but also to think themselves discharged of and from all Obedience Duty and Allegeance to her Majesty whereby most wicked and unnatural Rebellion did ensue and to the farther danger of this Realm was thereafter very like to be renewed if the ungodly and wicked attempts in that behalf were not by severity of Laws in time restrained and bridled For remedy and redress whereof and to prevent the great mischiefs and inconveniences that thereby might ensue it was enacted by the Queen with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That if any person or persons after the first day of July then next coming should use or put in ure in any place within this Realm or in any the Queen's dominions any such Bull Writing or Instrument written or printed of Absolution or Reconciliation at any time theretofore obtained and gotten or at any time thereafter to be obtained or gotten from the said Bishop of Rome or any his Successors or from any other person or persons authorized or claiming authority by or from the said Bishop of Rome his Predecessors or Successors or the See of Rome Or if any person or persons after the said first day of July should take upon him or them by colour of any such Bull Writing Instrument or Authority to absolve or reconcile any person or persons or to grant or promise to any person or persons within this Realm or any other the Queen's dominions any such Absolution or Reconciliation by any speech preaching teaching writing or any other open deed Or if any other person or persons within this Realm or any the Queen's dominions after the said first day of July should willingly receive and take any such Absolution or Reconciliation Or else if any person or persons had obtained or gotten sithence the last day of the Parliament holden in the first year of her Reign or after the said first day of July should obtain or get from the said Bishop of Rome or any his Successors or the See of Rome any manner of Bull Writing or Instrument written or printed containing any thing matter or cause whatsoever Or should publish or by any waies or means put in ure any such Bull Writing or Instrument That then all and every such act or acts offence and offences should be deemed and adjudged by the Authority of the said Act to be high Treason and the Offendor and Offendors therein their Procurors Abettors and Counsellours to the fact and committing of the said offence or offences should be deemed and adjudged high Traitours to the Queen and the Realm and being thereof lawfully indicted and attainted according to the course of the Laws of this Realm should suffer pains of death also lose and forfeit all their Lands Tenements Hereditaments Goods and Chattels as in cases of high Treason by the Laws of this Realm ought to be lost and forfeited as by the said Act appeareth And albeit many of her subjects after the said Bull of Pius Quintus adhering to the Pope did renounce their former Obedience to the Queen in respect of that Bull yet all this time no Law was either made or attempted against them for their Recusancy though it were grounded upon so disloyal a Cause Now that these speechless Bulls were declared by Act of Parliament to be so dangerous then in place of them Jesuites and Romish Priests were sent over who in secret corners whispered and infused into the hearts of many of the unlearned subjects of this Realm that the Pope had power to excommunicate and depose Kings and Princes that he had excommunicated the Queen deprived her of her Kingdome and discharged all her subjects of their Oath Duties and Allegeance to her and therefore they ought not to obey her or any of her Commandments or Laws under pain of the Pope's Curse This was high Treason by the ancient Laws of England And thereupon Campion Sherwin and many other Romish Priests being apprehended and confessing that they came into England to make a party for the Catholick cause when need should require were in the 21. year of the said Queen's Reign by the ancient Common Laws of England indicted arraigned tried adjudged and executed for high Treason against their natural Allegeance which they ought their liege Sovereign But all this time there was no Act of Parliament made either against Recusants or Jesuites or Priests her Majesty still desiring and expecting their conversion and that by clemency and mildness they might be reclaimed to their former obedience and conformity before the said Bull. After Priests and Jesuites were punished by sentence of Law according to their demerits then great numbers of slanderous and seditious Books libri falsidici against her Majesty and the State were dispersed and scattered within this Realm tending to the inciting and stirring of the Subjects to Insurrection and Rebellion Her Majestie in open Parliament having with the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons mature consideration of so weighty and important causes in the 23. year of her Reign made two several Laws One against the makers and publishers of Seditious Books ordaining that offence to be Felony another against Recusants inflicting the penalty of twenty pounds the month for their Recusancie and yet upon their submission according to the Act to be thereof freely and absolutely discharged a milde and merciful Law considering their former Conformity and the cause of their Revolt But after these Jesuites and Romish Priests coming daily into and swarming within the Realm instilling still this poison into the Subjects hearts that by reason of the said Bull of Pius Quintus her Majesty was excommunicated deprived of her Kingdome that her Subjects were discharged of all Obedience to her and by all means endeavouring to withdraw them from their Duty and Allegeance to her Majesty and to reconcile them to the Church of Rome in the 27. year of her Reign by Authority of Parliament her Majesty made it Treason for any Jesuite or Romish Priest being her natural-born Subject and made a Romish Priest or Jesuite sithence the beginning of her Reign to come into any of her dominions intending thereby to keep them out of the same to the end that they should not infect any other Subjects with such treasonable and damnable perswasions and practices as are aforesaid which without controversie were high Treason by the ancient Common Laws of England Neither would ever magnanimous King of England fithence the first establishment of this Monarchy have suffered any especially being his own natural-born
Subjects to live that perswaded his Subjects that he was no lawfull King and practised with them within the heart of this Realm to withdraw them from their Allegeance and Loyalty to their Sovereign the same being crimen laesae Majestatis by the ancient Laws of this Realm BY this and by all the Records of the Indictments it appeareth that these Jesuites and Priests are not condemned and executed for their Priesthood and Profession but for their treasonable and damnable Perswasions and Practices against the Crowns and Dignities of Monarchs and absolute Princes who hold their Kingdoms and Dominions by lawful Succession and by inherent Birth-right and descent of inheritance according to the fundamental Laws of this Realm immediately of Almighty God and are not Tenants of their Kingdomes as they would have it at the will and pleasure of any forrein Potentate whatsoever Now albeit the proceedings and process in the Ecclesiastical Courts be in the name of the Bishops c. it followeth not therefore that either the Court is not the King 's or the Law whereby they proceed is not the King's Law For taking one example for many every Leet or View of Frank-pledge holden by a Subject is kept in the Lord's name and yet it is the King's Court and all the proceedings therein are directed by the King's Laws and many subjects in England have and hold Courts of Record and other Courts and yet all their proceedings be according to the King's Laws and the Customes of the Realm Observe good Reader seeing that the determination of Heresies Schisms and Errours in Religion Ordering Examination Admission Institution and Deprivation of men of the Church which do concern God's true Religion and Service of right of Matrimony Divorces and general Bastardy whereupon depend the strength of mens Discents and Inheritances of probate of Testaments and letters of Administration without which no debt or dutie due to any dead man can be recovered by the Common Law Mortuaries Pensions Procurations Reparations of Churches Simony Incest Adultery Fornication and Incontinency and some others doth not belong to the Common Law how necessary it was for administration of Justice that his Majestie 's Progenitors Kings of this Realm did by publick authority authorize Ecclesiasticall Courts under them to determine those great and important Causes Ecclesiastical exempted from the Jurisdiction of the Common Law by the King's Laws Ecclesiastical Which was done originally for two causes 1. That Justice should be administred under the Kings of this Realm within their own Kingdome to all their Subjects and in all Causes 2. That the Kings of England should be furnished upon all occasions either forrein or domestical with learned Professors as well of the Ecclesiasticall as Temporall Laws THus hath it appeared as well by the ancient Common Laws of this Realm by the Resolutions and Judgements of the Judges and Sages of the Laws of England in all succession of ages as by Authority of many Acts of Parliament ancient and of latter times That the Kingdome of England is an absolute Monarchy and that the King is the onely Supreme Governour as well over Ecclesiasticall persons and in Ecclesiastical causes as Temporal within this Realm to the due observation of which Laws both the King and the Subject are sworn I have herein cited the very words and texts of the Laws Resolutions Judgements and Acts of Parliament all publick and in print without any inference argument or amplification and have particularly quoted the books years leaves chapters and such like certain references as every man may at his pleasure see and reade the Authorities herein cited This Case is reported in the English and Latine tongues as some other Writers of the Law have done to the end that my dear Countrymen may be acquainted with the Laws of this Realm their own Birth-right and inheritance and with such evidences as of right belong to the same assuring my self that no wise or true-hearted English-man that hath been perswaded before he was instructed will refuse to be instructed in the truth which he may see with his own eyes lest he should be disswaded from errour wherewith blindfold he hath been deceived For miserable is his case and worthy of pity that hath been perswaded before he was instructed and now will refuse to be instructed because he will not be perswaded FINIS Of what quality and credit Robert Lalor was His apprehension and first examination His first inditement and conviction His second examination His confession or acknowledgement The Inditement of Lalor upon the stat of 16 Ric. 2. The true cause of making the Statute of 16 R. 2. and other Statutes against Provisors The Statute of Praemunire made at the prayer of the Commons The effect of the Statute of 16 R. 2. c. 5. The effect of the Statute of 38 Edw. 3. cap. 1. The Statute of 27 Ed. 3. cap. 1. The Statute of 25 Edw. 3. reciting the Statute of 25 Ed. 1. These Laws made by such as did professe the Romish Religion Laws against Provisors made in Ireland When the Pope began first to usurp upon the liberties of the Crâ—wn of England A comparison of the spiritual Monarchy of the Church with the temporal Monarchies of the world The Pope had no jurisdiction in England in the time of the Britans The first usurpation of the Pope upon the Crown began in the time of King William the Conquerour By sending Legates into England In the time of William Rufus the Pope attempted to draw Appeals to Rome but prevailed not In the time of K. Henry the first the Pope usurpeth the donation of Bishoprikks c. Histor Jornalensis M S. in Archiv Rob. Cotton Eq. Aur. In the time of King Stephen the Pope gained Appeals to the Court of Rome In the time of K. Henry 2. the Pope claimed exemption of Clerks from the Secular power A brief of Th. Becket's troubles or rather treasons The Constitutions of Claringdon Four points of jurisdiction usurped upon the crown of England by the Pope before the reign of K. John The cause of the quarrell between K. John and the Pope When Canonical election began first in England King John's round and Kingly Letter to the Pope The Pope curseth the King and interdicteth the Realm King Edw. 1. oppâ—seth the Pope's Vsurpation E. 2. suffereth the Pope to usurp again E. 3. resisteth the Vsurpation of the Pope King Rich. 2. The Evidence against Lalor Lalor's Confession publickly read When the distinction of Ecclesiasticall Spirituall causes from Civil and Temporal causes began in the world Caudrey's Case The objections of the Counsell of the Plaintif 1. 2. 3. 4. The resolutions of the Court to the 1. and 2. To the 3. To the 4. What causes belong to the Ecclesiasticall Court. see Circumspectè agatis 13 E. 1. W. 2. 13 E. 1. cap. 5. versus finem Artic. cleri 9 E. 2. 15 E. 3. c. 6.31 E. 3. cap. 11.2 H. 5. c. 7.1 H. 7. cap. 4.23 H. 8. cap.
recommendation unto the young King his Son then lately crowned who hearing of his coming commanded him to forbear to come to his presence untill he had absolved the Archbishop of York and others whom he had excommunicated for performing their duties at his Coronation The Archbishop returned answer that they had done him wrong in usurping his office yet if they would take a solemn oath to become obedient to the Pope's commandment in all things concerning the Church he would absolve them The Bishops understanding this protested they would never take that oath unless the King willed them so to doe King Henry the Father being hereof advertised into France did rise into great passion and choler and in the hearing of some of his servants uttered words to this effect Will no man revenge me of mine enemies Whereupon the 4 Gentlemen named in the Stories of that time passed into England and first moving the Archbishop to absolve the Bishops whom he had excommunicated for performing their Duties at the young King's Coronation and receiving a peremptory answer of deniall from the Archbishop they laid violent hands upon him and slew him for which the King was fain not onely to suffer corporal penance but in token of his humiliation to kisse the knee of the Pope's Legate And this is the abridgement of Becket's Troubles or rather Treasons for which he was celebrated for so famous a Martyr And thus you see by what degrees the Court of Rome did within the space of one hundred and odde years usurp upon the Crown of England four points of Jurisdiction Viz. First sending out of Legates into England Secondly drawing of Appeals to the Court of Rome Thirdly donation of Bishopricks and other Ecclesiasticall Benefices And fourthly exemption of Clerks from the Secular power And you see withall how our Kings and Parliaments have from time to time opposed and withstood this unjust Usurpation Now then the Bishop of Rome having claimed and welnigh recovered full and sole jurisdiction in all causes Ecclesiasticall and over all persons Ecclesiasticall with power to dispose of all Ecclesiasticall Benefices in England whereby he had upon the matter made an absolute conquest of more then half the Kingdome for every one that could read the Psalm of Miserere was a Clerk and the Clergie possessed the moietie of all temporall possessions there remained now nothing to make him owner and proprietor of all but to get a surrender of the Crown and to make the King his Farmer and the people his Villains which he fully accomplished and brought to passe in the times of King John and of Hen. 3. The quarrell between the Pope and King John which wrested the Scepter out of his hand and in the end brake his heart began about the Election of the Archbishop of Canterbury I call it Election and not Donation or Investiture for the manner of investing of Bishops by the Staffe and Ring after the time of King Hen. 1. was not any more used but by the King's licence they were Canonically elected and being elected the King gave his Royall assent to their election and by restitution of their Temporalties did fully invest them And though this course of election began to be in use in the time of Rich. 1. and Hen. 2. yet I find it not confirmed by any Constitution or Charter before the time of King John who by his Charter dated the fifteenth of January in the sixteenth year of his Reign granted this privilege to the Church of England in these words viz. Quod qualiscunque consuetudo temporibus praedecessorum nostrorum hactenus in Ecclesia Anglicana fuerit observata quidquid juris nobis hactenus vindicaverimus de caetero in universis singulis Ecclesiis Mâ—nasteriis Cathedralibus Conventualibus totius regni Angliae liberae sint in perpetuum electiones quorumcumque Praelatorum majorum minorum Salvâ nobis haeredibus nostris custodiâ Ecclesiarum Monasteriorum vacantium quae ad nos pertinent Promittimus etiam quod nec impediemus nec impediri permittemus per ministros nostros nec procurabimus quin in universis singulis Monasteriis Ecclesiis postquam vacuerint praelaturae quemcunque voluerint libere sibi praeficiant electores Pastorum petitâ tamen à nobis priùs haeredibus nostris licentiâ eligendis quam non denegabimus nec differemus Et similiter post celebratam electionem noster requiratur assensus quem non denegabimus nisi adversus eandem rationale proposuerimus legitimè probaverimus propter quod non debemus consentire c. But to return to the cause of his great quarrell with the Pope The See of Canterbury being void the Monks of Canterbury suddenly and secretly without the King's licence elected one Reignold their Subprior to be Archbishop who immediately posted away to be confirmed by the Pope But when he came there the Pope rejected him because he came not recommended from the King Hereupon the Monks made suit to the King to nominate some fit person to whose election they might proceed The King commends John Gray Bishop of Norwich his principall Counsellour who was afterward Lord Justice of this Kingdome who with a full consent was elected by them and afterwards admitted and fully invested by the King These two elections bred such a controversie as none might determine but the Pope who gave a short rule in the case for he pronounced both elections void and caused some of the Monks of Canterbury who were then present in the Court of Rome to proceed to the election of Stephen Langton lately made Cardinal at the motion and suit of the French King who being so elected was forthwith confirmed and consecrated by the Pope and recommended to the King of England with a flattering Letter and a present of four Rings set with precious stones which were of great value and estimation in those days Howbeit the King more esteeming this Jewell of the Crown namely the Patronage of Bishopricks returned a round and Kingly answer to the Pope That inconsiderately and rashly he had cassed and made void the election of the Bishop of Norwich and had caused one Langton a man to him unknown and bred up and nourished amongst his mortal enemies to be consecrated Archbishop without any due form of election and without his Royal assent which was most of all requisite by the ancient laws and customes of his Realm That he marvelled much that the Pope himself and the whole Court of Rome did not consider what a precious account they ought to make of the King of England's friendship in regard that his one Kingdome did yield them more profit and revenue then all the other countries on this side the Alpes To conclude he would maintain the liberties of his Crown to the death he would restrain all his subjects from going to Rome And since the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates within his dominions were as learned and religious
proved fully all the parts of the Indictment First it was proved by Lalor's own Confession upon severall Examinations taken before the Lord Deputie and Lord Chancellor and others that he had accepted the Office and title of Vicar-general in the Dioceses of Dublin Kildare and Fernes by virtue of the Pope's Bull. Secondly it appeared by the copies of sundry Letters found among his papers at his apprehension that he styled himself the Pope's Vicar in this form Robertus Dublinien Kildaren Fernen Dioeces Vicarius Apostolicus Thirdly there were produced the copies of divers Acts and Instruments written for the most part with Lalor's own hand some of Institutions of Popish Priests to Benefices others of Dispensations with Marriage within the degrees others of Divorces others of Dispensations for non-payment of Tithes Whereby it was manifestly proved that he did execute the Pope's Bull in usurping and exercising Episcopall jurisdiction as Vicar-generall of the See Apostolick within the Dioceses before named To this evidence he made a threefold answer First That he was no suiter for the office of Vicar-generall but it was imposed on him and he accepted virtute obedientiae onely to obey his Superiours Next That he did exercise the office of Vicar-generall in foro conscientiae tantum and not in foro judicii And lastly that those copies of Institutions Dispensations and Divorces were many of them written with his man's hand as precedents of such Acts and Instruments without his privity or direction Hereupon Sir James Ley Chief Justice told him that he could not well say that he accepted that unlawfull office virtute obedientiae for there was no vertue in that obedience That he ow'd an obedience to the Law and to the King who is the true Superiour and Sovereign over all his subjects and hath no Peer within his dominions and that the Superiours whom he meant and intended were but Usurpers upon the King's Jurisdiction and therefore this excuse did aggravate his contempt in that it appeared he had vowed obedience to those who were apparent enemies to the King and his Crown And though it were manifest that he exercised jurisdiction in foro judicii for every Institution is a Judgement and so is every Sentence of divorce yet were his offence nothing diminished if he had executed his office of Vicar-generall in foro conscientiae tantum for the court of man's conscience is the highest tribunall and wherein the power of the Keys is exercised in the highest degree Hereunto the Atturney generall took occasion to adde thus much That Lalor had committed these high offences not onely against the Law but against his own Conscience and that he was already condemned in foro conscientiae For that he upon his second Examination had voluntarily acknowledged himself not to be a lawfull Vicar-generall and that he thought in his conscience he could not lawfully take upon him the said office He hath also acknowledged our Sovereign Lord K. James to be his lawfull Chief and Supreme Governour in all causes as well Ecclesiasticall as Civile and that he is in conscience bound to obey him in all the said causes c. as it is contained in his Acknowledgement or Confession before set down Which being shewed forth by the Atturney generall the Court caused it to be publickly read and thereupon demanded of Lalor if that were not his free and voluntary confession signed with his own hand and confirmed by his oath before the Lord Deputie and Councill He was not a little abashed at the publishing of this Acknowledgement and Confession in the hearing of so many principal Gentlemen to whom he had preached a contrary doctrine therefore said he the shewing forth of this Confession is altogether impertinent and besides the matter Howsoever he could not deny but that he made it and signed it and swore it as it was testified by the Lord Deputie and the rest Then was it demanded of him whether since the making of this Confession he had not protestâ—â—o divers of his friends that he had not acknowledged the King's Supremacie in Ecclesiasticall causes His answer was That indeed he had said to some of his friends who visited him in the Castle of Dublin that he had not confessed or acknowledged that the King was his Supreme Governour in Spirituall causes for that the truth is in the Confession there is no mention made of Spirituall causes but of Ecclesiasticall This is a subtile evasion indeed said the Atturney generall I pray you what difference do you make between Ecclesiasticall causes and Spirituall causes This question said Lalor is sudden and unexpected at this time and therefore you shall doe well to take another day to dispute this point Nay said the Atturney generall we can never speak of it in a better time or fitter place and therefore though you that bear so reverend a title and hold the reputation of so great a Clerk require a farther time yet shall you hear that we Lay-men that serve his Majestie and by the dutie of our places are to maintain the Jurisdiction of the Crown are never so unprovided but that we can say somewhat touching the nature and difference of these Causes First then let us see when this distinction of Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall causes from Civile and Temporall causes did first begin in point of jurisdiction Assuredly for the space of three hundred years after Christ this distinction was not known or heard of in the Christian world For the causes of Testaments of Matrimony of Bastardy and Adultery and the rest which are called Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall câ—uses were meerly Civil and determined by the rules of the Civil Law and subject onely to the jurisdiction of the Civil Magistrate as all Civilians will testifie with me But after that the Emperours had received the Christian Faith out of a zeal and desire they had to grace and honour the learned and godly Bishops of that time they were pleased to single out certain speciall Causes wherein they granted jurisdiction unto the Bishops namely in causes of Tithes because they were paid to men of the Church in causes of Matrimony because Marriages were for the most part solemnized in the Church in causes Testamentary because Testaments were many times made in extremis when Church-men were present giving spiritual comfort to the Testator and therefore they were thought the fittest persons to take the probates of such Testaments Howbeit these Bishops did not proceed in these causes according to the Canons and Decrees of the Church for the Canon Law was not then hatched or dream'd of but according to the rules of the Imperiall Law as the Civil Magistrate did proceed in other causes neither did the Emperours in giving this Jurisdiction unto them give away their own Supreme and absolute power to correct and punish these Judges as well as others if they performed not their severall duties This then is most certain that the primitive Jurisdiction in all these causes was
in the Civil Magistrate and so in right it remaineth at this day and though it be derived from him it remaineth in him as in the fountain For every Christian Monarch as well as the godly Kings of Juda is custos utriusque Tabulae and consequently hath power to punish not onely Treason Murther Theft and all manner of Force and Fraud but Incest Adultery Usury Perjury Simony Sorcery Idolatry Blasphemy Neither are these Causes in respect of their own quality and nature to be distinguished one from another by the names of Spirituall or Temporall For why is Adultery a Spirituall cause rather then Murther when they are both offences alike against the Second Table or Idolatry rather then Perjury being both offences likewise against the First Table And indeed if we consider the natures of these Causes it will seem somewhat absurd that they are distinguished by the name of Spirituall and Temporall for to speak properly that which is opposed to Spirituall should be termed Carnall and that which is opposed to Temporall should be called Eternall And therefore if things were called by their proper names Adultery should not be called a spirituall offence but a carnall But shall I expresse plainly and briefly why these Causes were first denominated some Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall and others Temporall and Civil Truly they were so called not from the nature of the Causes as I said before but from the quality of the persons whom the Prince had made Judges in those Causes The Clergie did study spirituall things and did professe to live secundum spiritum and were called spirituall men and therefore they called the Causes wherein Princes had given them jurisdiction spirituall causes after their own name and quality But because the Lay-magistrates were said to intend the things of this world which are temporall and transitory the Clergie called them secular or temporall men and the Causes wherein they were Judges temporall causes This distinction began first in the Court of Rome where the Clergie having by this Jurisdiction gotten great wealth their wealth begot pride their pride begot ingratitude towards Princes who first gave them their Jurisdiction and then according to the nature of all ungratefull persons they went about to extinguish the memory of the benefit for whereas their Jurisdiction was first derived from Caesar in the execution whereof they were Caesar's Judges so as both their Courts and Causes ought still to have born Caesar's image and superscription as belonging unto Caesar they blotted Caesar's name out of the style of their Courts and called them Courts Christian as if the Courts holden by other Magistrates had been in comparison but Courts of Ethnicks and the Causes which in their nature were meerly Civil they called Spirituall and Ecclesiasticall So as if the Emperour should challenge his Courts and Causes again and say Reddite Caesariquae sunt Caesaris they would all cry out on the contrary part and say Date Deo quae sunt Dei our Courts bear the name and title of Christ the superscription of Caesar is quite worn out and not to be found upon them And this point of their policy is worth the observing that when they found their jurisdiction in Matrimoniall causes to be the most sweet and gainfull of all other for of Matrimony they made matter of money indeed to the end that Caesar might never resume so rich a perquisite of their Spirituall jurisdiction they reduced Matrimony into the number of the 7 Sacraments after which time it had been Sacriledge if the Civil Magistrate had intermeddled with the least matter that had relation to Matrimonie or any dependencie thereupon So then it appeareth that all Causes whereof Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall persons have cognisance or jurisdiction by the grants or permission of Princes are called Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall causes And as all their Courts are called Spirituall Courts so all Causes determinable in those Courts are called Spirituall Causes And therefore where Mr. Lalor hath acknowledged the King's Majestie to be Supreme Governour in all Ecclesiasticall causes he hath therein acknowledged the King's Supremacie in all Spirituall causes wherein he hath but rendered to Caesar that which is Caesar's and hath given unto his Majestie no more then all the Bishops of England have yielded to his Predecessours not onely in this latter Age but also in former times both before and since the Conquest as hath been before at large expressed Here the day being far spent the Court demanded of the prisoner if he had any more to say for himself His answer was That he did willingly renounce his office of Vicar-generall and did humbly crave his Majestie 's grace and pardon And to that end he desired the Court to move the L. Deputy to be favourable unto him Then the Jury departed from the Bar and returning within half an hour found the prisoner guiltie of the Contempts whereof he was indicted Whereupon the Solicitor generall moved the Court to proceed to Judgement And Sir Dominick Sarsfield Knight one of the Justices of his Majestie 's chief place gave Judgement according to the form of the Statute whereupon the Indictment was framed OF THE KING' 's Ecclesiasticall Law IN the Term of S. Hillary in the 33. year of the Reign of Q. Elizabeth Rotulo 340. Robert Caudrey Clerk brought an action of Trespasse against George Atton for breaking of his Close at North-Luffenham in the County of Rutland the 7. day of August in the 31. year of the Reign of the said Queen The Defendant pleaded not guilty and the Jury returned and sworn for triall of this issue gave a speciall Verdict that is they found the truth of the Case at large referring the same for the Law to the judgment of the Court to this effect They found that the Plaintif before the Trespasse supposed to be done was Parson of the Rectory of South-Luffenham in the County aforesaid whereof the place wherein the Trespass is alledged was parcell and found the Statute made in the first year of the said Queen's Reign by which in effect it is enacted That such Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall as by any Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall power hath heretofore been or may lawfully be exercised for the Visitation of the Ecclesiasticall estate and persons and for reformation order and correction of the same and of all manner of Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities within this Realm should for ever be united and annexed to the Imperiall Crown of this Realm And that her Highnesse her Heirs and Successors should have full power and authority by virtue of that Act by Letters Patents under the great Seal of England to assign nominate and authorize such persons being natural-born Subjects as her Highness her Heirs or Successors should think meet to exercise and execute under her Highnesse her Heirs and Successors all and all manner of Jurisdiction Priviledges and Preheminences in any wise touching or concerning any Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction within this
any Excommunication out of he Realm And therefore by the rule of the Court the Plaintif was not thereby disabled Reges sacro oleo uncti sunt Spiritualis Jurisdictionis capaces Where a Prior is the King's debtor and ought to have Tithes of another Spiritual person he may chuse either to sue for subtraction of his Tithes in the Ecclesiastical Court or in the Exchequer and yet the persons and matter also were Ecclesiastical For seeing the matter by a mean concerneth the King he may sue for them in the Exchequer as well as in the Ecclesiastical Court and there shall the right of Tithes be determined And Fitzherbert in his Nabre fol. 30. holdeth that before the Statute of 18 E. 3. cap. 7. right of Tithes were determinable at the Temporal Courts at the election of the party and by that Statute assigned to be determined in the Ecclesiastical Court and the Temporal Court excluded thereof And the Courts of divers Mannors of the King 's and of other Lords in ancient times had the Probates of last Wills and Testaments And it appeareth by 11 H. 7. fol. 12. that Probate of Testaments did not appertain to the Ecclesiasticall Court but that of late time they were determinable there So as of such Causes and in such manner as the Kings of the Realm by general consent and allowance have assigned to their Ecclesiasticall Courts they have Jurisdiction by force of such allowance The King did by his Charter translate Canons Secular into Regular and Religious persons which he did by his Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction and could not doe it unlesse he had Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall The Abbot of Waltham died in the 45. year of E. 3. and one Nicholas Morris was elected Abbot who for that the Abbey was exempt from ordinary Jurisdiction sent to Rome to be confirmed by the Pope And because the Pope by his Constitutions had reserved all such Collations to himself he did recite by his Bull that he having no regard to the Election of the said Nicholas gave to him the said Abbey and the Spiritualties and Temporalties belonging to the same of his spirituall grace and at the request as he feigned of the King of England This Bull was read and considered of in Councill that is before all the Judges of England and it was resolved by them all that this Bull was against the Laws of England and that the Abbot for obtaining the same was fallen into the King's mercy whereupon all his possessions were seised into the King's hands as more at large by the said Case appeareth Where the Abbot of Westminster had a Prior and Convent who were Regular and mort in law yet the King by his Charter did divide that Corporation and made the Prior and Convent a distinct and capable Body to sue and be sued by themselves At a Parliament holden in the 25. year of King Edward the Third it was enacted by consent of the whole Parliament That as well they that obtained Provisions from Rome as they that put them in execution should be out of the King's protection and that a man might doe with them as with the enemies of the King And he that offendeth against such Provisors in body goods or other possessions should be excused against all people and should never be impeached or grieved for the same By which Law every man might lawfully kill such an Offendor as a common enemy against the King and his Countrey so hainous were such offences then holden Afterwards in the same 25. year of King Edward the Third it was in open Parliament by the grievous complaints of all the Commons of this Realm shewed that the Grievances and Mischiefs aforesaid did daily abound to the great dammage and destruction of all this Realm more then ever before viz. That of late the Bishop of Rome by procurement of Clerks and otherwise had reserved and did daily reserve to his Collation generally and specially as well Archbishopricks Abbies and Priories as all other Dignities and other Benefices of England which were of the Advowrie of people of Holy Church and gave the same as well to Aliens as to Natives and did take of all such Benefices the First-fruits and many other Profits and a great part of the Treasure of the Realm was carried away and dispended out of the Realm by the purchasors of such graces and also by such privy Reservations many Clerks advanced in the Realm by their true Patrons which peaceably had holden their Advancements by long time were suddenly put out Whereupon the said Commons did pray their said Sovereign Lord the King that fithence the right of the Crown of England and the Law of the said Realm was such that upon the mischiefs and dammages which happened to his Realm he ought and was bound of the accord of his said people thereof to provide remedie and law for the avoiding the mischiefs and dammage which thereof came That it might please him thereupon to ordain remedy The said King Ed. the 3. seeing the mischiefs and dammage before named and having regard to the Statute made in the time of his Grandfather King Ed. 1. and to the causes contained in the same which Statute holdeth always his force and was never defeated nor adnulled in any point and forasmuch as he was bound by his Oath to see the same to be kept as a Law of this Realm though that by sufferance and negligence it had been fithence attempted to the contrary also having regard to the grievous complaints made to him by his people in divers his Parliaments holden heretofore willing to ordain remedy for the great dammage and mischiefs which had happened and daily did happen to the Church of England by the said cause by the assent of all the Great men and the Commonalty of the said Realm to the honour of God and profit of the said Church of England and of all his Realm did order and establish That the free Election of Archbishops Bishops and all other Dignities and Benefices electory in England should hold from thenceforth in the manner as they were granted by the King's Progenitors and founded by the Ancestors of other Lords And that all Prelates and other people of Holy Church which had Advowsons of any Benefices of the King's gift or of any of his Progenitors or of other Lords and Donors to doe Divine Service and other charges thereto pertaining should have their Collations and Presentments freely in the manner as they were infeoffed by their Donors And in case that Reservation Collation or Provision be made by the Court of Rome of any Archbishoprick Bishoprick Dignity or other Benefice in disturbance of the Elections Collations or Presentations afore named That at the time of the Avoidance that such Reservations Collations and Provisions ought to take effect the said King Edward the Third and his Heirs should have and enjoy the same Collations to the Archbishopricks and other Dignities
elective which be of his Avowry as his Progenitors did before that free Election was granted fithence that the Elections were first granted by the King's Progenitors upon a certain form and condition as to demand licence of the King to chuse and after the Election to have his Royall Assent and not in other manner which conditions not kept the King ought by reason to resort to the first nature as by the said Act more at large appeareth In the 27. year of the Reign of the same King it was grievously complained to the King in a Parliament then holden by the Great men and Commons of the Realm how that divers of the people were and had been drawn out of the Realm to answer to things whereof the conusance pertained to the King's Court and also that the Judgments given in the same Court were impeached in other Courts in prejudice and disherison of the King and of his Crown and of all the people of his said Realm and to the undoing and destruction of the Common Law of the same Realm at all times used Whereupon good deliberation being had with the Great men and others of his said Council it was assented and accorded by the King and the Great men and Commons aforesaid That all the people of the King's allegeance of what condition that they be which should draw any out of the Realm for plea whereof the conusance pertained to the King's Court or for things whereof Judgments were given in the King's Court or which did sue in any other Court to defeat or impeach the Judgments given in the King's Courts should incur the danger of Premunire as by the said Act appeareth To nourish love peace and concord between Holy Church and the Realm and to appease and cease the great hurt and perils and importable losses and grievances that had been done and happened in times past and that should happen hereafter if the thing from thenceforth be suffered to pass because of personal Citations and other that be passed before this time and commonly did passe from day to day out of the Court of Rome by feigned and false Suggestions and Propositions against all manner of persons of the Realm upon Causes whose cognisance and final discussing pertained unto the King and his Royal Court and also of Impetrations and Provisions of Benefices and Offices of Holy Church pertaining to the gift presentation donation and disposition of the King and other Lay Patrons of this Realm as of Churches Chappels and other Benefices appropriated to Cathedrall Churches Abbies Priories Chauntries Hospitalls and other poor Houses and of other Dignities Offices and Benefices occupied in times past and presented by divers and notable persons of the said Realm for which causes and dispensing whereof the good ancient Lâ—ws Usages Customes and Franchises of the said Realm had been and were greatly appaired blemished and confounded the Crown of their Sovereign Lord the King minished and his Person falsely defamed his Treasury and Riches of the Realm carried away the inhabitants and subjects of the Realm impoverished and troubled the Benefices of Holy Church wasted and destroyed Divine Service Hospitalities Alms-deeds and works of charity withdrawn and set apart the Commons and Subjects of the Realm in body and goods consumed The King at his Parliament holden at Westminster in the Vtas of S. Hillary the 38. year of his Reign having regard to the quietness of his people which he chiefly desired to sustain in tranquillity and peace to govern according to the Laws Usages and Franchises of his Land as he was bound by his Oath made at his Coronation following the ways of his Progenitors which for their time made certain good Ordinances and Provisions against the said Grievances and Perils which Ordinances and Provisions and all the other made in his time and especially in the 25. and 27. years of his Reign the King by the assent and expresse will and concord of the Dukes Earls Barons and the Commons of this Realm and of all other whom these things touched by good and meet deliberation and advisement did approve accept and confirm as by the said Act appeareth But those which should execute the said good Laws against such capitall Offendors were cursed reproved and defamed by such as maintained the usurped Jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome Against which an especial Act of Parliament was made by the King and his whole Realm prohibiting thereby such Defamations and Reproofs In the Reign of King Richard the Second AGainst an Incumbent of a Church in England another sueth a Provision in the Court of Rome and there pursueth untill he recovereth the Church against the Incumbent and after brought an Action of Account against him as receiver of divers sums of money which in troth were the Oblations and Offerings which the Incumbent had received And the whole Court was of opinion against the Plaintif and thereupon he became non-suit It is declared by that Parliament that the Crown of England hath been so free at all times that it hath been in subjection to no Realm but immediately subject to God and none other and that the same ought not in any thing touching the Regalty of the same Crown be submitted to the Bishop of Rome nor the Laws and Statutes of this Realm by him frustrated or defeated at his will to the perpetuall destruction of the King his Sovereignty Crown and Regalty and of all his Realm And the Commons in that Parliament affirmed that the things attempted by the Bishop of Rome be clearly against the King's Crown and his Regalty used and approved in the time of all his Progenitors Wherefore they and all the liege Commons of the same Realm would stand with the King and his said Crown and his Regalty in the cases aforesaid and in all other cases attempted against him his Crown and his Regalty in all points to live and to die And moreover they did pray the King and him required by way of justice that he would examine all the Lords in the Parliament as well Spiritual as Temporal severally and all the States of the Parliament how they thought of the cases aforesaid which were so openly against the King's Crown and in derogation of his Regalty and how they would stand in the same cases with the King in upholding the Rights of the said Crown and Regalty Whereupon the Lords Temporal so demanded did answer every one by himself That the cases aforesaid were clearly in derogation of the King's Crown and of his Regalty as it was well known and had been of long time known and that they would stand with the same Crown and Regalty in those cases especially and in all other cases which should be attempted against the said Crown and Regalty in all points with all their power And moreover then was demanded of the Lords Spiritual there being and the Procurators of others being absent their advice and will in all those cases which Lords
such Bulls so purchased or any such Balls to be purchased in time to come upon the pain of a Premunire as by the said Act appeareth In the Reign of King Henry the Fifth IN an Act of Parliament made in the third year of King H. 5. it is declared That whereas in the time of King H. 4. Father to the said King in the 7. year of his Reign to eschew many discords and debates and divers other mischiefs which were likely to arise and happen because of many Provisions then made or to be made by the Pope and also of Licence thereupon granted by the said late King amongst other things it was ordained and established That no such Licence or Pardon so granted before the same Ordinance or afterwards to be granted should be available to any Benefice full of any Incumbent at the day of the date of such Licence or Pardon granted Nevertheless divers persons having Provisions of the Pope of divers Benefices in England and elsewhere and Licences Royall to execute the same Provisions have by colour of the same Provisions Licences and Acceptations of the said Benefices subtilly excluded divers persons of their Benefices in which they had been Incumbents by a long season of the collation of the very Patrons Spiritual to them duely made to their intent to the final destruction and enervation of the states of the same Incumbents The King willing to void such mischiefs hath ordained and established That all the Incumbents of every Benefice of Holy Church of the Patronage Collation or Presentation of Spirituall Patrons might quietly and peaceably enjoy their said Benefices without being inquieted molested or any ways grieved by any colour of such Provisions Licences abd Acceptations And that all the Licences and Pardons upon and by such Provisions made in any manner should be void and of no value And if any feel himself grieved molested or inquieted in any wise from thenceforth by any by colour of such Provisions Licences Pardons or Acceptations that the same molestors grievors or inquietors and every of them have and incurre the pains and punishments contained in the Statutes of Provisors before that time made as by the said Act appeareth A Statute was made for extirpation of Heresie and Lollardry whereby full power and authority was given to the Justices of Peace and Justices of Assise to inquire of those that hold Errours Heresies or Lollardry and of their maintainers c. And that the Sheriffe or other Officer c. may arrest and apprehend them The King by consent of Parliament giveth power to Ordinaries to enquire of the foundation erection and governance of Hospitals other then such as be of the King's foundation and thereupon to make correction and reformation according to the Ecclesiasticall Law In the Reign of King Henry the Sixth EXcommunication made and certified by the Pope is of no force to disable any man within England And this is by the ancient Common Laws before any Statute was made concerning forrein Jurisdiction The King onely may grant or licence to found a Spiritual Incorporation In the Reign of King Henry the 6. the Pope writ Letters in derogation of the King and his Regalty and the Church-men durst not speak against them But Humfrey Duke of Gloucester for their safe keeping put them into the fire In the Reign of King Edward the Fourth IN the Reign of King Edward the Fourth the Pope granted to the Prior of Saint Johns to have Sanctuary within his Priory and this was pleaded and claimed by the Prior But it was resolved by the Judges that the Pope had no power to grant any Sanctuary within this Realm and therefore by judgement of the Law the same was disallowed There it appeareth that the opinion of the King's Bench had been oftentimes that if one Spiritual person sue another Spiritual man in the Court of Rome for a matter spiritual where he might have remedy before his Ordinary that is the Bishop of that Diocese within the Realm quia trahit ipsum in placitum extra regnum incurreth the danger of a Premunire a hainous offence it being contra legiantiae suae debitum in contemptum Domini Regis contra Coronam dignitatem suas By which it appeareth how grievous an offence it was against the King his Crown and Dignity if any subject although both the persons and cause were Spirituall did seek for justice out of the Realm as though either there wanted Jurisdiction or Justice was not executed in the Ecclesiastical Courts within the same which as it hath been said was an high offence contra Regem Coronam dignitatem suas In the King's Courts of Record where Felonies are determined the Bishop or his Deputy ought to give his attendance to the end that if any that is indicted and arraigned for Felony do demand the benefit of his Clergy that the Ordinary may inform the Court of his sufficiency or insufficiency that is whether he can reade as a Clerk or not whereof notwithstanding the Ordinary is not to judge but is a minister to the King's Court and the Judges of that Court are to judge of the sufficiency or insufficiency of the party whatsoever the Ordinary doth inform them and upon due examination of the party may give judgement against the Ordinarie's information for the King's Judges are Judges of the cause The Pope's Excommunication is of no force within the Realm of England In the Reign of King Edward the Fourth a Legate from the Pope came to Calice to have come into England but the King and his Council would not suffer him to come within England until he had taken an oath that he should attempt nothing against the King or his Crown and so the like was done in his Reign to another of the Pope's Legates And this is so reported in 1 Henrici 7. fol. 10. In the Reign of King Richard the Third IT is resolved by the Judges That a Judgement or Excommunication in the Court of Rome should not bind or prejudice any man within England at the Common Law In the Reign of King Henry the Seventh IN the Reign of King Henry the 7. the Pope had excommunicated all such persons whatsoever as had bought Allum of the Florentines And it was resolved by all the Judges of England that the Pope's Excommunication ought not to be obeyed or to be put in execution within the Realm of England In a Parliament holden in the first year of King Henry the Seventh for the more sure and likely reformation of Priests Clerks and Religious men culpable or by their demerits openly noised of incontinent living in their bodies contrary to their Order it was enacted ordained and established by the advice and assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in the said Parliament assembled and by authority of the same That it be lawful to all Archbishops and Bishops
and other Ordinaries having Episcopal Jurisdiction to punish and chastise Priests Clerks and Religious men being within the bounds of their Jurisdiction as shall be convicted afore them by examination and lawfull proof requisite by the law of the Church of Advoutrie Fornication Incest or any other fleshly Incontinency by committing them to ward and prison there to abide for such time as shall be thought to their discretions convenient for the quality and quantity of their trespass And that none of the said Archbishops Bishops or Ordinaries aforesaid be thereof chargeable of to or upon any action of false or wrongfull imprisonment but that they be utterly thereof discharged in any of the cases aforesaid by virtue of this Act. Rex est persona mixta because he hath both Ecclesiastical and Temporal Jurisdiction By the Ecclesiastical Laws allowed within this Realm a Priest cannot have two Benefices nor can a Bastard be a Priest but the King may by his Ecclesiasticall power and Jurisdiction dispense with both of these because they be mala prohibita and not mala per se In the Reign of King Henry the Eighth BY an Act of Parliament made in the 24. year of King Henry the 8. that is to say by the King 24 Bishops 29 Abbots and Priors for so many were then Lords of Parliament by all the Lords Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled it is declared That where by divers sundry old authentick Histories and Chronicles it was manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal estate of the Imperial Crown of the same unto whom a Body politick compact of all sorts and degrees of people divided in terms and by names of Spiritualty and Temporalty been bound and ought to bear next to God a natural and humble obedience he being also institute and furnished by the goodness and furtherance of Almighty God with plenary whole and entire Power Preheminence Authority Prerogative and Jurisdiction to render and yield Justice and final determination to all manner of folk resiants or subjects within this his Realm in all causes matters debates and contentions happening to occur insurge or begin within the limits thereof without restraint or provocation to any forrein Princes or Potentates of the world The Body Spiritual whereof having power when any cause of the Law Divine happened to come in question or of Spiritual learning that it was declared interpreted and shewed by that part of the said Body politick called the Spiritualty then being usually called the English Church which alwaies had been reputed and also found of that sort that both for knowledge integrity and sufficiency of number it had been always thought and was also at that hour sufficient and meet of it self without the intermeddling of any exteriour person or persons to declare and determine all such doubts and to administer all such offices and duties as to the rank spiritual did appertain For the due administration whereof and to keep them from corruption and sinister affection the King 's most noble Progenitors and the antecessors of the Nobles of this Realm did sufficiently indow the said Church both with honour and possessions And the Laws Temporal for trial of property of lands and goods and for the conservation of the people of this Realm in unity and peace without ravine or spoil was administred adjudged and executed by sundry Judges and Ministers of the other part of the said Body politick called the Temporaltie And both their Authorities and Jurisdictions did conjoyn together in the due administration of Justice the one to help the other And whereas the King his most noble Progenitors and the Nobility and Commons of the said Realm at divers and sundry Parliaments as well in the time King Edward the 1. Edward the 3. Richard the 2. Henry the 4. and other noble Kings of this Realm made sundry Ordinances Laws Statutes and Provisions for the entire and sure conservation of the Prerogatives Liberties and Preheminences of the said Imperial Crown of this Realm and of the Jurisdiction Spiritual and Temporal of the same to keep it from the annoiance as well of the See of Rome as from the authority of other forrein Potentates attempting the diminution or violation thereof as often and from time to time as any such annoiance or attempt might be known or espied And notwithstanding the said good Statutes and Ordinances made in the time of the King 's most noble Progenitors in preservation of the Authority and Prerogative of the said Imperiall Crown as is aforesaid yet nevertheless fithence the making of the said good Statutes and Ordinances divers and sundry inconveniences and dangers not provided for plainly by the said former Acts Statutes and Ordinances have risen and sprung by reason of Appeals sued out of this Realm to the See of Rome in causes Testamentary causes of Matrimony and Divorces right of Tithes Oblations and Obventions not onely to the great inquietation vexation trouble costs and charges of the King's Highness and many of his subjects and resiants in this his Realm but also to the great delay and lett to the true and speedy determination of the said causes forasmuch as the parties appealing to the said Court of Rome most commonly did the same for delay of Justice and forasmuch as the great distance of way was so far out of this Realm that neither the necessary proofs nor the true knowledge of the cause could be so well known or the witnesses there so well examined as within this Realm so that the parties grieved by means of the said Appeals were most times without remedy In consideration thereof the King his Nobles and Commons considering the great enormities dammages long delaies and hurts that as well to his Highness as to his said Noble subjects Commons and resiants of this his Realm in the said causes Testamentary causes of Matrimony and Divorces Tithes Oblations and Obventions did daily ensue did therefore by his Royall assent and by the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled and by Authority of the same enact establish and ordain That all causes Testamentary causes of Matrimony and Divorces rights of Tithes Oblations and Obventions the knowledge whereof by the goodness of Princes of this Realm and by the Laws and Customes of the same appertained to the Spiritual Jurisdiction of this Realm then already commenced moved depending being happening or hereafter coming in contention debate or question within this Realm or within any of the King's dominions or Marches of the same or elsewhere whether they concern the King his Heirs or Successors or any other subjects or resiants within this Realm of what degree soever they be should be from thenceforth heard examined discussed clearly finally and definitively adjudged and determined within the King's Jurisdiction and