Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	king_n	law_n	prerogative_n	1,605	5	10.3114	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A38938	An exact narrative of the tryal and condemnation of John Twyn for printing and dispersing of a treasonable book with the tryals of Thomas Brewster, bookseller, Simon Dover, printer, Nathan Brooks, bookbinder, for printing, publishing, and uttering of seditious, scandalous, and malitious pamphlets : at Justice-Hall in the Old-Bayly, London, the 20th, and 22th of February, 1663/4.	Twyn, John, d. 1664.; Brewster, Thomas.; Dover, Simon.; Brooks, Nathan.	1664 (1664)	Wing E3668; ESTC R15143	52,156	88

trying your Neighbours may come Brewster My Lord I shall desist for the present Serj. Morton May it please your Lordship and you Gentlemen of the Jury I am of Council for the King against Tho Brewster Bookseller that stands here Indicted for that he contrary to the duty of his Allegiance which he owes to our Soveraign Lord the King he did cause maliciously a seditious and scandalous Book to be printed wherein there are divers scandalous clauses contained that are in disparagement of the Kings Royal Prerogative and against his Government Crown and Dignitie and likewise that he has sold and uttered the same Books in contempt of his Majesties Laws This is the effect of the Indictment it has been proved to you by four Witnesses that for which he stands Indicted First that he did cause part of the Book to be Printed that 's clearly proved by Creek likewise that he has sold and uttered those Books in his Shop nay he confesses that he did and saies they were sold openly as a Diurnal and therefore he thinks it was lawful for him to do it he has gone about to make a defence of this his seditious behaviour he tells you he did not print all the Book it is not said that he printed such and such a Letter of the Book but that he caused such a Book to be printed and it is to be presumed if he caused one part he would cause the other or otherwise it would be a Book of maimed sence and imperfect Gentlemen for the uttering and selling of them that himself confesses you have heard the excuses he hath made whether you will not find him Guilty of this crime that I must leave to you and to the direction of the Court. L. Hide You of the Jury you see the Indictment is for causing a libellous and seditious Book to be printed under such a Title that is The Speeches and Prayers c. It is for causing this seditiously factiously and wickedly to be printed and for selling and publishing it abroad to the Kings people For the matter of Evidence you have heard it I will not repeat the particulars to you only something to what he has said that you may not be misled First He saies it does not appear that he did it maliciously or knowingly there are some things that you that are of the Jury are not to expect Evidence for which it is impossible to know but by the Act it self malice is conceived in the heart no man knows it unless he declares it As in Murder I have malice to a man no man knows it I meet this man and kill him the Law calls this malice If a man speak scandalous words against a man in his calling or trade he laies his action Malice though he cannot prove it but by the words themselves If I say a Printer or Stationer is an ignorant person has no skill in his Trade I would not have any man to deal with him he understands not how to Set Letters or the like here is nothing of malice at all appears yet if you bring your Action you must lay it Maliciously it is the destroying your Trade and you will have damages I instance in this particular that you may see there is malice supposed to a particular private person in that slander much more to the King and the State The thing it self in causing a Book to be printed that is so full of scandals and lies to inveigle misguide and deceive the people this is in construction of the Law Malice though no malice appear further The next is this factiously seditiously knowingly This carries sedition as well as malice Such a barbarous transcendent wretch that murdered his Prince without the least colour of Justice to declare that he rejoyced in his bonds and that the Martyrs would willingly come from Heaven to suffer for it horrid blasphemy all the Saints that ingaged in it to wish that they had sealed it with their blood what can you have more to incourage and incite the people to the killing of Kings and murdering their lawful Prince This they publish and say it was spoken publickly let it be upon his own soul that did it for in case he did it no man knew it but those that heard it But to publish it all over England 3000 of the first Impression and a second This is to fill all the Kings Subjects with the justification of that horrid murther I will be bold to say Not so horrid a villany has been done upon the face of the earth since the crucifying of our Saviour To Print and publish this is Sedition The next thing is your Trade I have a Calling to use and I may justifie the using of it so long as I use it lawfully but that must not justifie me in all manner of wickedness against the King and State As if a Lawyer I will put it in my own Coat pleads a mans Cause and against the King this is justifiable he ought to plead for his Client but he must plead as becomes him if a Lawyer in defence of his Client will speak Sedition do you think he is free from being punished so of a Printer if a Printer prints seditious and factious Books he must look to himself that 's no part of his Calling to poison the Kings people so though printing of a Book be lawful he must use it as the Law appoints him and not to incite the people to faction Writing of Letters you know it is common and lawful but if I write Treasonable Letters give notice to Rise do such and such unlawful acts I am to be punished for these Letters A Printer he is a publick Agent he is to do what he is able to answer or else he must take what follows He saies there was no Act against bim It is true you see he is not Indicted upon the Statute but at the Common Law for an offence in the nature of a Libel If I were a Printer and would compile a Pamphlet against a man though not in Authority and disparage him this is the publishing of a Libel and an offence for which he ought to be Indicted and punished by the Common Law and he that prints that Libel against me as a publick person or against me as Sir Robert Hide That Printer and he that sets him at work must answer it much more when against the King and the State Another thing is this he talks to you of dying mens words if men will be so vile to be as wicked at their deaths as they had been in their lives put the Case of that man on Saturday convicted for printing a horrible villainous thing if he will be so unchristian to himself as to justifie this at his death or to speak as bad as he had caused to be printed is that a Justification to publish them because they are the words of a dying man God forbid a Robber declares at the Gallows it is for a