that of the pluralitie and non recidencie which the Archbishop of Canterbury limits by his approbation Eccl. Anglicanae Canon 41. And priviledges must necessarily bee where there are multitudes of statutes which be so strict in point of injunction as if the makers of them had not considered that politique lawes must be made with respect to morall possibilitie as what men may doe and yet the punishment of their transgression is not expressed but left to the pleasure or displeasure of the King But these are not the priviledges that the Kings royall prerogatiue doth grant as immunities and impunities for then the lawes should bee onely punitine if there were onely vse of protections and pardons but as lawes are also remuneratiue so Princes haue power to reward after a priviledging manner and chiefly in our Kingdome where it seemes to be on purpose omitted by the written lawes and left to the Kings pleasure and power especially concerning Ecclesiasticall persons who haue most neede of them and may now as freely enjoy them as any other persons For though heretofore it was prejudiciall to our Kings to grant priviledges to all Ecclesiasticall persons when they were so encreased in multitudes and overgrowne in magnitude for the whole Kingdome and the Popes would confirme them as irrevocable yet now they are but few in number and small in power and the King may call them in when hee pleases This want of these priviledges hath beene the cause of much evill in the Church and the more they are impeached by those that professe themselues the maintainers of the Kings peace lawes and royall prerogatiue the more will the state Ecclesiasticall runne to ruine And they are much infringed in our Vniversities which I am forced to complaine of with feare lest that fall out which happened to the Vniversitie of Prague which was vtterly ruined by Charles the fift taking the priviledges away at Don Leâ—is desire Whereas Francis the first of France fearing and favouring the Vniversitie of Paris restored all the priviledges which Lewis the eleventh had taken away vpon a just ground of sedition Dino hist 〈◊〉 which hath made it to reviue and flourish ever since But there are some politiques that hold it a needlesse thing to bee any way indulgent to silly Schollers Cujaâ— sent 1. tit as Cujacius saith out of Galen that they expressed weake men vnder the title of scholastici they make meere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Iohn a noakes of them but the fault is in themselues according to the French Proverbe Qui se fait brebis le lâ—up la mange For though the Clergie bee weake of it selfe and tempt the contemners of it to over-top and over-turne it Yet since we haue a pious prudent Prince that is royally ready vpon the first appeale to protect and relieue his poore Clergie we are not to be pittied if we neglect to implore his supreame assistance And thus it is something evident how the honour of the Clergie annexed to the power of order is granted and sustained by the Kings lawes and royall prerogatiue I must now in briefe shew the like of the honour annexed to the power of jurisdiction § 6 The power of jurisdiction which I doe here intend is not that deligated power which is in Bishops Vicars or Officialls nor that power Archdeacons and Deanes enjoy either by custome or priviledge but that ordinary power which is in Bishops To this power of jurisdiction there is honour annexed by the lawes of this land and the Kings royall prerogatiue which I divide as before into revenewes ordinary and priviledges the revenewes are their temporalls and part of the perquisits called the Census Cathedraticus the first of which are given and granted by the Kings royall bounty confirmed by the lawes the other are set downe and approved by the same lawes Bishops temporalls are annexed to their sees by the Kings gift Stanford praerogat cap. 1. and are as it were their Gleab but are indeed their Baronies which they hold of the King in capite and performe services for them and therefore they are as it were wards to the King during the vacancie quae ratione Baroniae as Linwood ad Episcopum spectare possunt Linwood de immunitatib Ecclesiae Duarenus de beneficijs l. 3. c. 11. Dominus Rex custodiam habet as Duarenus sayes of the Kings of France Princeps quà m diu vacat Episcopalis sedes feudorum lege praediorum omnium administrationem suscipit But these temporalls are not to be restored till consecration and so seeme to be annexed to the power of order in Bishops Augustinus de Ancona de potest P. P. quaest 22. Art 9. for their consecration according to the scholasticall Canonists is but perfectio characteris which they at first received when they tooke the order of Priesthood and so seeme not properly annexed to the power of jurisdiction for before consecration vpon election and confirmation they may exercise the power of jurisdiction though not of order Episcopus electus confirmatus potest exercere quae sunt jurisdictionis Panormitan in Decret Ver. Cons §. 6. non quae sunt ordinis Episcopalis ante consecrationem as Othobone vpon Linwood suspendere potest à beneficio non ab officio Linwooâ— de constiâ— Glanvil cap. 10. quia ab officio suspendere est à potestate ordinis ordinaria But Iustice Glanvil seemes to intimate that they were restored when they were but Lords elect because electi ante consecrationem homagia sua facere solent but whether it were de jure or de gratia as the learned in the Common law distinguish I leaue to them to determine and thinke it great happinesse for the Bishops and the great honour of our moderne Kings that they are so fully restored at all since they haue as much power and may pretend as much reason to seise the temporalls into their hands as well as others But our Royall Soveraignes pious Father 1. Iacob set a good example to his Majestie to follow for in the first yeare of his raigne hee enacted a statute to prevent all diminution of Episcopall revenewes though it were to alienate them to the vse of his Crowne yea though it were but in exchange for impropriations a course which was too common in Queene Elizabeths dayes insteed whereof our Kings haue out of royall indulgence given some licences for Mortmaines If this redresse had come before they had beene too much impaired Bishops would not haue desired so many Commendams nor Rectors of Parishes made vse of the statute of pluralitie To their revenewes in these temporalls there are many honourable priviledges annexed as they are Barones So that Bishops haue the priviledges of Barons in the Parliament and that vpon good ground since they hold of the King and performe the services belonging to them Mathew Hen. 2. as Mathew Paris Episcopi de rege tenent in capite Baronias faciunt
capacities of government in him the one spirituall the other temporall by both these hee hath supremacie and this supremacie is chiefly exercised in the calling presedencie and dissolving of the great assembly of the three States which high Court is not competently correspondent to both those powers in the King vnlesse the Parliament consist collectiue of spirituall and temporall persons which it hath anciently if the Booke De modo tenendi Parliamenti be authenticall for hee makes the vpper House consist of three States the Kings Majestie the Lords spirituall and temporall and lower of the Knights Ridleys view of Ecclesiasticall Lawes Procurators for the Clergie and the Burgesses which both answer the Kings mixt supremacie So that as he is supremus Iustitiarius totius Angliae in relation to the temporalitie so he is supremus or as Constantine truely entitled himselfe in the Councell of Nice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Eusebius in vita lib. 3. in respect of the spiritualty But to returne to my present promise and purpose which was to shew how the actes of supremacie haue their effects in the Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction derived to the Clergie And I am now to shew what effect the power of promulgation of lawes hath which is in consenting confirming and publishing the Ecclesiasticall Lawes which are agreed vpon in Convocation not excluding the advice of the Parliament because the State Ecclesiasticall is not an independant societie but a member of the whole hence it is that they are called the Kings Ecclesiasticall Lawes by which the Clergie is ruled in spirituall causes according to which they exercise their jurisdiction in foro exteriori contentioso hence it is that for this last age the Ecclesiasticall Lawes of this Realme haue so well agreed with the Civill because they passe not without the assent of the supreame governour And it were much to be desired that Christian Princes would not onely permit lawes to be made and giue force to them by their authority but also that they would vouchsafe their personall presence to be Presidents in all assemblies for that end for then they would proceed and conclude to better purpose As Isidorus Pelusiota writes to the Emperour Theodosius the younger to be resident and president in the Councell of Ephesus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is that if hee would be pleased to take so much time as to be present there he did not feare that any thing that should passe could be faultie but if he leaue it all to be done by turbulent suffrages 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Isiodoru◠lus lib. 311. Who can free that Synod from scornfull scoffings his counsell was safe and seasonable because the cause of feare was very probable and eminent For in a Councell where there is a Monarchicall authority a supreame power in one there will be more dispatch in deliberations more expedition in executions than where multitudes of equals sit alone for they will be many of them over-wise and most over-wilfull to agree in one poynt when as every singular person will broach his particular project and propose it as a publick law with resolution to be a recusant to all their lawes if they will not be Protestants to his and so it comes to passe too often that they are forced to yeeld to one another or else no law should passe Hence is that multiplicitie vncertainty confusion contrariety of lawes in some diseased States than which nothing discovers a State to be more desperately declining though they are good in their particulars for they shew the multiplication of ill manners which per accidens begot them and they are likely to make them worse because they being appointed to amend them are disappointed and disabled by their owne crosse contrarieties As in a naturall body over-growne and over-flowne with ill humours If a Philosopher that considers onely a body neither sick nor well giues that which is good 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Hippocrates calls it and when he hath done an Emperick come that considers it as sick but he knowes not of what nor the temper of the constitution but boldly and blindly giues one medicine to all for all diseases and at last the judicious Physitian come and consider it as it is and know what to doe hee must first vndoe all the other haue done before hee dare administer that which should first haue beene taken and by this time the body is either past cure or desperate conclusions must be tried to recover it Therefore happy is our State Ecclesiasticall in whose Convocation our supream Soveraign is President so that the Lawes passing with his royall consent are certaine and easie to be obeyed by reason of their rarenesse and paucitie which makes them pertinent distinct and free from confusion And therefore I doe not a little marveile at learned Baronius Baronius Annal Anno. 528. that since hee doth not deny Iustinianus the Emperour the power of making Ecclesiasticall Lawes he should so scrupulously and busily inquire what should moue him to meddle with the making of them when as I doe not doubt but the Clergie then might request him to it This last act of supremacie is to receiue appeales and giue determinate decisions and this hath its effect and is exercised in the Ecclesiasticall Courts And they doe not exercise any power that is not derived from this supremacie either immediately or mediately So that as the lawes they execute are the Kings Ecclesiasticall Lawes so these Courts are the Kings and all the processes and courses approved by his Majesties Lawes Therefore now there is no ground for a praemunire in them though the words of the Statute runne to Rome or else-where for by else-where seemes to be meant the Romish power Babylonem◠Gallicam vt Petrarch epist 123. or Court which was not then at Rome because the Popes seat was then at Avignion in France and not our Bishops consistorie For I beleeue that Statute was made to free them as well from the forraine vsurpation as any other of the King Courts as the pragmaticall sanction of France doth which was of the nature and in imitation of it about the same time by Charles the seventh brother-in-brother-in-law to Edward the third But however it was then meant I am sure it cannot extend to them now vnlesse wee will deny the Kings supremacie over all causes and persons Ecclesiasticall and then they are not the Kings Courts but if we grant the Kings supremacie wee must deny that any of his Courts can incurre a praemunire A prohibition I grant may lawfully lye there because it is safe for the whole State that every jurisdiction should haue its bounds and keep or be kept in them But yet I will not say so in generall but we must admit them with distinction of prohibitions one of Law another of Fact Now that prohibition which is of Law according to the expresse words of the Statute which are commonly large enough
is the prohibition that is lawfull as for a prohibition of fact which is by a sophisticall suggestion sucked and squeezed out of the copie of the libell without judgment of the Kings Courts vpon it in my opinion is not right and is many times the cause of wrong either in vnjustice or delayes yea and in abusing of the Statute with the Kings Courts For the prohibition of law the most I conceiue it inferres is to make all the proceedings voide Coram non Iudice But if I might know what degree and quality of offence it is for a Court temporall to hold plea of a meere Ecclesiasticall cause I should more easily apprehend the scandalous nature of the ground of a prohibition which it may be is the same with a writ of errour in the temporall Court since that a consultation doth not ensue vpon that but after a prohibition grounded vpon a suggestion So then all the proceedings of these Courts haue their power from this last act of supremacie as well in primatiue processes of inquisition as in punitiue processes of execution As this authentick authoritie is most seene in the proceedings ex officio which are not onely nor alwayes by oath as many are mistaken These are by immediate commission where an Ecclesiasticall cause is criminall and prosecuted as criminall And so also the vtmost punitiue processe Ecclesiasticall which is a writ de Excommunicato capiendo is evidently derived from the Kings power and issueth immediately from his favour to the Church that it may be more easily obeyed Iohan. de Paris de Potestate Reg. Concl. 1. and is divers and variable in sundry governments and executed by temporall power being nothing of the nature of the spirituall excommunication but an accession concessâ permissione ex devotione Principum as Iohannes de Parisiis saith against Boniface the eight As for the judgements of Bishops consistories as they are derived from the power and law of Christ the great Bishop so they are like the judges of them who are rather arbiters amicabiles compositores as Panormitane then Iudges ruling by the austerity of authority so that poore defendants may flie to them as to their altars who are Ministers of the altar and in this sense that which Architas speakes is most true Arist Rhet. lib. 3. c. 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Idem esse arbitrum Aram. And though they haue no forcing power but from the King and no power of any force against the King yet the greatest and best Kings haue yeelded to them in their advice not as Prelates but as they are Fathers in God as Alexander the great said to his father King Philip 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dion Chrysost 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 farre vnlike the Bishops of Rome who will rule the highest Princes and yet professe themselues servants of servants which makes mee call to minde the observation of the wisest King Salomon Proverb 30. that one of the chiefest instruments whereby the earth is shaken is a servant that rules over Princes And as they vsurpe rule so they vsurpe the sword of temporall Princes and carry it in the spirituall scabbard and drawing it doe more hurt in their passion then they can help by their priviledge when as they found it soberly and orderly put up by St Peter when Christ was at his elbow to heale the greatest wound that hee could make Thus is it somewhat plaine how Ecclesiasticall power is derived from the King as hee is supreame head in lawfull and full authority over all causes and persons which double power in my conceit the custome of the ancient Persians at the death of their Monarch doth fully and fitly expresse for the lawes are silent Brisso◠Regn◠lib. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yea and their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their holy eternall fire which every one worshiped in his private house as his houshold god was put out when the Emperour died § 4 The next thing which I promised to declare was how the honour of the state Ecclesiasticall is annexed to the power by the Kings lawes and royall prorogatiue The honour of the Clergy is contained in revenewes and priviledges 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A◠lib. 1. which are vnited to their powers of order and jurisdiction which powers although we should grant that simply considered in themselues they are not distinguished jure divino yet I am sure none will deny that they are distinct quoad extensionem permissione approbatione divinâ as Iohannes de Parisiis doth distinguish the power given the Apostles into six parts in respect of so many severall acts of execution the fift of which is potestas dispositionis ministrorum secundum quosdam quoad determinationem jurisdictionis Ecclesiasticae ut vitetur confusio Ioh. de cap. 1 And as they are thus distinct according to the execution and stand so confirmed by the positiue lawes of the land so they haue distinct portions and priviledges according to the same lawes yet after a different manner especially in respect of the portion For the power of order which hath maintenance of diverse kindes as tithes oblations Gleabland and mortuaries holds them all according to the lawes of this land as due to the Clergie for executing the power of order but by different acts of these lawes as Mortuaries are permitted and Gleablands granted Tithes and Oblations confirmed and all constrained to be paid Now tithes that are onely confirmed by the Kings positiue lawes are supposed to bee due by some other law of higher nature then the Kings which is not any forraine law Bellar. de Cler. lib. 1. cap. 10. as Ius Ecclesiasticum as Bellarmine calls the Cannon law it must bee then by law divine or immediately arising from supernaturall and morall considerations which law we grant to be positiue yet not meerely humaine Hooker Eccles Polit. l. 1. §. 15. nor changeable in respect to us and they must necessarily runne into many grosse errours that take onely such lawes for positiue as are invented by men and thence conclude them mutable And therefore I presume that the learned Selden doth so vnderstand the positiue law by which hee holds tithes to be due not in opposition to divine and morall but as specially diverse from it as it partly appeares in the whole drift of his history where I doe not beleeue that any can finde that hee ever delivers his judgement denying them to bee jure divino so that in my apprehension and I hope not against his intention he may doe the Church much good in his relating what wrongs the Clergy in all ages haue sustained For his history is onely de facto what hath beene done hee giues not his judgement de iure what ought to haue beene done which if he had he would assuredly haue pronounced for them and this I am forced to beleeue when I consider his exact generall knowledge and the reverent respect he beares to
Bishop the Arch-deacon is his Vicar iure as Zerola vicarius natus Zerola Episc Archiâ— as Hostiensis which they vnderstand in respect of jurisdiction in spiritualibus for not they but the Archipresbyter is Vicar in divinis which is in spiritualibus in relation to the power of order So that you see they take not any such ordinary power vpon them but leaue it to the Bishops and their most naturall and lawfull Vicars in that power Formâ— tattorâ—â—ensis and yet they may be their Vicars in Pontificalibus as the Canonists expresse it which is in those causes that belong to their Sees as they haue peculiar and prerogatiue Courts and such may be Lay-men according to the most moderate moderne Decretists Syndicos saith Duarenus siue defensores Duarâ— officijs l. 1. c. apocrisiarios siue responsales laicos posse esse though by the old Canon Law Vicarius Episcopi debet esse Clericus And it is counted one of the insolent rare actions of the Popes causas Ecclesiasticas Laicis delegare This jurisdiction they may haue without any trenching vpon the office of a Bishop in his personall jurisdiction which I conceiue â—â—nnot be delegated to a lay person Durand de orig Iuris Eccl. Con. 2. being that jurisdiction whereby he doth exercise and execute his correctiue coercitiue coactiue power which is the instrument of his pastorall paternall care over his Clergie and proceeds from the power of consecrated order and is inseparably vnited to it which power I finde fully yet briefly expressed by St Cyprian speaking of a contumacious Deacon to his Bishop Cypr. Epist. Rogat Episc he adviseth the Bishop vigore Episcopalis cathedrae aut deponas eum aut abstineas either to degrade or suspend him neither of these will a Lay delegate doe yet I grant he may suspend if not ab officio yet à beneficio And for their visitations which are an act of ordinary jurisdiction they performe them not ex officio but by a speciall commission And for the forme and force of their inquisition in them it is not generall concerning the doctrine and manners of the Clergie but directed and restrained according to the Bishops Articles Formula visit Dioecesis Coloniensis and without requiring an oath of the party presented visitatores interrogabunt absque exactione iuramenti yet I doe not disaproue that an oath should be required vpon a fame because it respects as much the purgation as the conviction of the jurant And for the sentence of excommunication which some make the processe of spirituall Courts in point of contumacy I am not able I confesse fully to satisfie in that point but I dare subscribe to what iudicious Bishop Bilson saith of it to cleare it who I am sure could and would say as much in the behalfe of Ecclesiasticall officers as any Bishop of his time who speaking of the power of Excommunication De perpetua guber Eccl. cap. 14. saith Nequaquam sibi clavium potestatem assumunt sed poenam ob contumaciam infligunt quâ omnes illae animadversiones continentur quae legibus in eos sancitae sunt qui claves Ecclesiae temerè contemnunt quocunque nomine appelletur sive suspensio sive condemnatio aut excommunicatio nil refert dummodo ne potestatem hanc divino sed humano iure sibi vendicent nil causae tunc est quin Iudices civiles delinquentem in poenam Canonis incidisse declarent But the maine ground of these and such like exceptions is because Civilians are not in orders with vs as most Canonists be beyond the Seas though they haue no title and are but Presbyteri Vtopiani as Duarenus cals such if then our Ecclesiasticall officers were all in orders as some of them are then they could not with any reason except against them for Lay-men no more then they can against the Pontificiall Canonists who haue farre more Ecclesiasticall power especially the moderne Legists and are as able to judge of heresie as the Duke of Bavaria vnder Zachary who condemned Virgilius Bishop of Saltzburge of heresie because he affirmed Aventiâ— nal lib. that there were Antipodes when as Isidorus Hispalensis was not condemned for holding hell to be at the Antipodes Tho. Aq suppl qu Art 9. neere three hundred yeares before Yet these are the only men that are now judges of heresie which makes modest Melchior Canus complaine Melchioâ— lib. 8. câ— Non video quonam consilio in cognitione haereseos partes postremae ne dicam nullae theologis permittantur jurisconsultis verò vel primae vel etiam omnes When as with vs 1. Eliz. not our Chancellours nor Commissaries nor our Bishops alone may determine of heresie and yet I beleeue any of them haue as infallible assurance of truth as immediate vocation commission assistance by inspiration as all they but onely they are in orders ours are not as the twelue auditors of the over-ruling Court of the Rota are the Popes Chaplaines by their office as Lelius Zecchius de auditoribus Rotae and so are those irrefragable referendaries and the Popes finde great good in having them in orders for you shall not find but the Canonists haue alwayes stood for the Popes prerogatiue but onely in Concilio Pisano Guicciardine saith they that were for the Councell which was called against Iulius secundus by some of Lewis the twelfthes faction Guicc hist l. 9. Che de canonisti autoritata del convocare i Concilii nelle risedere solamente persona del Pontifice But it was not so much the Canonists as one principall one which was Philippus Decius of Millaine where the Councell began Car. Mol. annot in Decij Consil 37. who defended the cause as appeares out of Carolus Molinaeus his Annotations vpon Decius counsels so that the Popes knew what they did when they shewed and granted so many favours and priviledges to the Vniversitie of Bononia as Gregory the ninth dedicates his Decretals to Bononia so Boniface the eight his Sext and Iohn the two and twentieth his Clementines and Extravagants thus they are formally qualified by orders and because our Ecclesiasticall officers are not so some take and make these exceptions so that I will conclude this briefe Digression with this wish not altogether voyd of hope I would more of our learned Civilians were Divines Abbas Panorm Lect. in Decr. 120. or more of our judicious Divines Civilians Cum Theologia Ius Canonicum fraternizent THE SECOND CONCLVSION That vnder the dominion and protection of this Civill State this State Ecclesiasticall is most likely to enjoy all those rights that can any way belong vnto it THough they that sit at the tops and stearnes of States amongst all their great and graue cares doe little regard the opinion or censure of private men since they are no bound to giue a reason of their lawes noâ— an account of their actions their administration being absolute Yet if by these lawes
depend vpon the power of supremacie For though these powers of order and jurisdiction be immediately derived from Christ the misticall head of the Church in respect of their institution commission internall qualification and deputation to persons to performe them yet they are mediately derived from our Prince the ministeriall head of our particular Church in relation to their execution For the power of order cannot bee lawfully exercised in these dominions without the licence and permission from the power of jurisdiction which power is originally derived from the Kings dominion 1. Eliz. cap. 1. over Ecclesiasticall causes and persons So that it is plaine in generall that they are dependant on his Crowne and supremacie To omit the jurisdiction in foro conscientiae that depends vpon the power of order I will for a more particular view of this dependent derivation consider the severall proper acts and workes of this Ecclesiasticall supremacie which as I conceiue may be reduced to these foure The first worke is reformation of the Church in Doctrine manners and ceremonies The second is convocations of Councels and Synods for the reformation The third is promulgation of the lawes and edicts proceeding either from his Highnes pleasure in publick declarations or the Canons constitutions decreed or confirmed in his Councels The 4th is in receiving of appeales giving definite determinate decisions restitutions and deprivations belonging to causes persons Ecclesiasticall Now all these acts haue their effects in the power of jurisdiction for the reforming power of it is ordinarily perpetually derived to Archbishops B. de iure to Arch-deacons and Deanes de consuetudine to be executed by them in their Provinciall Trienniall and Annuall visitations but it is principally restrained to the correction of manners This power is extraordinarily ad tempus granted to the Church representatiue in Convocation It is not turned into a running regencie rolling round to every particular Presbyter though it be not an ordinarie standing court the calling of which is the second worke of supremacie To this Convocation thus called there is given power and licence to deliberate of to order and doe all such things as shall concerne the setled continuance of the doctrine and discipline of the Church of England obtaining his Majesties royall consent in the proceeding and determinations as it is plaine in his Highnesse declaration And the lawes they make take their first force from the worke of his promulgation But before I proceed any farther I must of necessity take a little time though to some it may seeme an impertinent parenthesis rejoycingly to consider the gratious countenance our pious Prince so freely shewes to this discountenanced disabled house of Convocation Little did any thinke no not that able absolute States-man the last Lord-Chancellour though wished it that his Majestie could haue beene so fully and faithfully informed of the ancient power and priviledges of it as to thinke of restoring them seeing not onely in the opinion of the people but also in the practice of the lower house of Parliament it hath beene long dismembred from that high Court and lost all the power and priviledges as escheated to the same insomuch that it is questioned by some whether ever it was a member of the Parliament or no. But it seemes his Majestie did soone apprehend it to be an essentiall part of it and vpon a short search discovered that though heretofore it was a member whose nerues were wrested distorted distracted and racked from its naturall head by extention to a forraine yet there was no dissolutio continui as the Physitians speake from the head and therefore not from the collaterall members and seeing it was but a discontented discontinuance that did cause it to be suspected and suspended it being now againe contracted and knit most firmely to the head is vnited as closely to the members may safely exercise and enjoy all the power and priviledges that did of right belong vnto it with the Parliament for though it was no reason that it should haue the priviledges of the Parliament when it was distracted from it and assembled without it by vertue of the Popes Legates writ and so the power and purpose of it was forraine and justly came within the compasse of a Praemunire for the Clergie then was no true member of the common-wealth and so the Convocation cut off from the Parliament yet when as it is now assembled with it by the same writ of the King and the Parliament is not compleate without it being one of the three Orders and that State which makes it haue competent power in matters Ecclesiasticall that it is not a meere temporall Court and that in the judgement of those that had least reason so to esteeme it for wee finde 1. Philip. Mariae c. 8. 1 Phil. Mar. c. 8. That the Legate of Iulius the third tooke great care to haue Statutes repealed made against the Popes supremacie wherein hee granted them to be authentically made and consequently that they had Ecclesiasticall power to enact them otherwise by reason of nullitie they had been cancelled and abrogated in themselues And Antonius de Florebellis an Italian Prelate in his Panegyrick de restituta religione in Anglia saith it is done honorifico vniversi Anglorum consilii decreto in which speech Florebeâ— rat ad Marian he supposed their power to decree it which he would not haue done if hee had held it to be a meere temporall Court and he must necessarily haue so accounted it if hee did not reckon the vpper and lower Convocation Houses as members of it exercising equall power with equivalent priviledges As it was plaine in a particular example in that Parliament Fox Act pag. 16 for when Arch-deacon Philpot was questioned for some words that passed from him in the Convocation House hee pleaded that hee was priviledged to speake them since the Convocation was a member of the Parliament and this plea was not refused but neglected For they were not ignorant what was enacted by Henry the sixth to wit that all the Clergie 8 Hen. which be called to the Convocation by the Kings writ shall fully vse and enjoy all such liberties as the great men and Commons of the Realme haue that are called to the Parliament And as they had some priviledge so it is plaine by a Statute vicesimo quarto of Henry the eight 24. Heâ— though now abrogated that they had once as much power in their receiving appeales from inferiour Courts Ecclesiasticall when it was a Praemunire to appeale to Rome or else-where The words of the Statute printed in the yeare 1550 are The partie grieved may appeale to the spirituall Prelates Abbots Priors and Proctors convocate by the Kings writ in Convocation So that the restitution of the Convocation was a worthy consideration in his Majestie seeing it is as neerly and deerely annexed to his supremacie as the Parliament is for his Majestie having two