maruailously wounded grieued and molested and that the soules of the people are therby not gouerned at all but left at randon to their owne direction hauing no guyde to conduct them euery one may euydently discerne dispensations in that behalfe to be altogeather intollerable hauing no ground nor foundation of reason equity or lawe but onely graunted for the priuate gayne and lucre of some couetous vaine glorious persons Wheras it may be answered that the statutes of the Realme licensing diuers Ecclesiasticall persons qualified either by degree of schoole or by seruice vnto nobilitie ought more to be respected in this behalfe then the reasons of the Canon law Herevnto I answere that for my part I heartely desire and pray vnto God that these lawes might be respected and that the law of Englande might rule an English man in this case But alas our lawes are bels without clappers they are founded but they sound not they are bandes but they binde not For thogh by the statutes of the realm certain noble mens chappleines and others graduated in the Vniuersities be qualified made capable of dispensatiōs yet I deny the laws of this realm to approue any maner of dispēsations tollerable at al for any kind of these qualified men vnles the same be Frst in cases of necessity for the peace of the cōmon weal Secondly in cases of conueniency for the honor of hir highnesse person and lastly warranted by the holy scriptures lawes of god For though the statute make some men fit men for the Archb. to work vpon and as it were anuiles for him to strike vpon yet the same statute imposeth no necessity for the B. to work without the word But if it be lawful by the word then by the law he may if he wil. But if it be vnlawful by the word thē he may not thogh he would The law followeth Be it enacted that neither the king his heires and successors kinges of this realme nor any of their subiectes of this realm nor of the kinges dominions shall from thence foorth sue to the sea of Rome or vnto any person or persons hauing or pretending any authoritie by the same for licences dispensations impositions faculties grauntes rescriptes delegacies instruments or other writings of what kind name c. for the which any licence dispensation composition faculty graunt rescript delegacie instrument or other wryting heretofore hath ben vsed and accustomed to be had and obtayned at the sea of Rome or by authority therof or of any prelate of this realm nor of any maner of other licenses dispensatiōs compositions faculties grauntes rescriptes delegacies or any other instruments or writinges that in cases of necessity may lawfully be graunted without offending holy scriptures lawes of God but that from henceforth euery such licence c. aforenamed mentioned necessary for your highnes your heires or successors your their people and subiects vpon the due examination of the causes qualities of the persons procuring such dispensations licenses c. shal be granted had obtained frō time to time within this your realm other your dominions not els where in maner and form following no otherwise that is to say the Arch. of canterbury for the time being his successors shall haue power authority frō time to time by their discretions to giue grant dispose by an instrument vnder the seal of the said Archb. vnto your Maiesty and to your heires successors kings of this realm as well all maner such licenses dispensations faculties grants rescripts delegacies instruments all other writings for cases not being cōtrary or repugnant to the holy scriptures lawes of God as heretofore hath ben accustomed to be had obtained by your Highn or any your most noble progenitors or any of yours or their subiectes at the sea of Rome or any person or persons by authority of the same al other licences dispensatiōs faculties c. in for vpon al such causes matters as shal be conuenient and necessary to be had for the honor surety of your highnes your heires successors and the wealth profit of this your realm so that the said Archb. or any his successors in no maner wise shall graunt any dispensation licence rescript or any other writing afore rehearsed for any cause or matter repugnant to the law ofalmighty god This act is renued 1. Elizab. Prouided alwaies that this act nor any thing or things therin cōtained shal be hereafter interpreted or expounded that your grace your nobles subiects intend by the same to decline or vary frō the congregation of christ his church in any thing concerning the verye articles of the catholique faith of Christendome or in any other thinges declared by holy scripture and the word of God necessary for your and their saluations but onely to make an ordinance by policie necessarye and conuenient to represse vice and for good conseruation of this Realme in peace vnitie and tranquilitie from rauyne and spoyle In which Act is set foorth vnto vs what great care and circumspection our auncestors in the twilight of the Gospel had for the abolishing of corruptions the establishing of a sincere gouernment both in the Church and common weale and how diligently and faithfully they prouided that no maner of dispensatiōs licenses or immunities shold be had or obtayned but in cases of necessitie in cases not contrary or repugnant to the lawes of God in cases wherin the wealth profit peace and conseruation of the realm requireth in cases conuenient for the honor safety of the kings person with a due confideration alwaies of the causes qualities for the which of the persons to whom any licence or immunity shold be granted And therfore out of this statute first I conclude thus against plurified men 1 Whatsoeuer cause or matter is repugnant to the law of God the Archb. may not dispence with the same 2 But the matter of hauing many benefices or being Non residents is repugnant to the laws of God 3 Therfore the Archbish may not dispence with the same Againe 1 Whatsoeuer is not necessary for the wealth peace profite and conseruation of the realm the same by this statute is forbidden 2 But that one man should enioy by way of dispensation from the Archbish liuings appointed for many men is not necessary for the wealth peace profite and conseruation of the realme 3 Therefore the same is forbidden by this statute Lastly 1 Whatsoeuer is not conuenient for the honour and safety of hir highnes person the same by this statute is forbidden 2 But it is not conuenient for the honor and safety of hir highnes person to haue the Archbish disspence for many benefices 3 Therefore by this statute the Archbish is forbidden to dispence c. THe Minor proposition of the first syllogisme hath beene already sufficiently prooued by manye in fallible conclusions of Lawe and vndoubted truethes
of the worde of God and therefore it is needelesse to make any repetition thereof Onely I would haue the reader diligently to marke the wordes of the Statute forbidding all manner of Dispensations in any matter or cause repugnant to the worde of God For though the aduersary cauill that we finde not in the scriptures these Termes Viz. Licenses Tollerations Dispensations c. precisely specified in any commaundement prohibitory in the Scriptures Yet in as much as the matter or cause of Dispensations for many benefices is there generally forbidden as ambition pride couetousnes perill of soules c. It is against the peace profit of the common weale that the Archb. should dispence Therefore it followeth that by this statute Dispensations in this case are absolutely inhibited The minor proposition of the second Syllogism may be confirmed by three euident reasons First from the euent which by our owne common and daily experience we too too well knowe to be true For by the same we see a fewe wealthy and ritch Prelates in pride iolity to be maintained and a great number of needy Stipendary Curates and poore Ministers to be vtterly destitute of meete and conuenient allowaunces so that sometimes after theire dissease their distressed wiues and Children are forced eyther to bee releeued by the seuerall Parishes of their aboades to the impouerishing of the same parishes or else constrained to beg from place to place so be chastised as rogues or pilfer steal and so be punished as fellons Secondly by a comparison drawn from other Statutes of the realme prouiding that one rich and mighty man shoulde not exercise many seueral misteries trades and faculties and so rob the poorer sort from the ordinary meanes wherby they might liue well and honestly in the common wealth The third reason is taken from an adiunct or common accident to euery common weal rightly gouerned that is that the last Willes and Testamentes of all and singular testators be duely execued especiallye such as whereby the honour of God is promoted the Church and common weale manifestly regarded but vnto the performaunce of the the last Willes and Testaments of many patrons endowing many churches with large and ample possessions to the intent conuenient liuinge might be alwayes prouided for Pastors to be resiaunt and to feede their posterity with the foode of life the worde of God there can be nothing more preiudiciall or more derogatory then that these seuerall patrimonies and inheritaunces appointed by seuerall patrons for seuerall Pastors to such seuerall and good vses shoulde by the dispensation of one man be transformed and giuen to another vse contrary to the testator his intent and purpose And therefore I confirme my Minor Proposition by these three conclusions 1 Whatsoeuer is an occasion that poore and needy Ministers their wiues and children do want a competent conuenient maintainance the same is not necessary for the profite peace wealth and conseruation of the common weale 2 But that one man shoulde by dispensation enioy many benefices is an occasion that pore and needy Ministers their wiues and Children doe want a competent and conuenient maintainance 3 Therfore that one man should by dispensation enioy many benefices is not necessary for the profit peace wealth and conseruation of the common weale 1 Whatsoeuer is an occasion that one man shoulde enioy the offices liuings of many men the same is not necessary for the peace profite wealth and conseruation of the common weale 2 But that one man should by dispensation enioy many benefices is an occasion that one man should enioy the offices and liuings of many men 3 Therefore that one man should enioy by dispensation many benefices is not necessarye for the peace profite wealth and conseruation of the common wealth 1 Whatsoeuer is preiudiciall and derogatory to the last willes and testaments of Testators disposing their patrimony to lawfull holy vses the same is not necessary for the peace profite wealth and conseruation of the Realme 2 But that one man by dispensation shoulde enioy many benefices is preiudiciall and derogatory to such last Willes and Testaments 3 Therefore that one man by dispensation shoulde enioy many benefices is not necessarye for the peace profite wealth and conseruation of the Realme It is inconuenient for the honor safety of her highnesse person for the Archb. to dispence COncerning the validitye of the Minor proposition of my third syllogisme drawne from the conueniencie of her highnesse honor namely that it is not conuenient for the honour and suerty of her Highnes person to leaue any manner of authority for the Archb. to dispence none may wel doubt therof but only such as respect more the pomp and glory of an Archb. then the dignity preeminence of a Christian King For in good soth this statute made principally to abolish al vsurped power challēged by a forrē Romish pope ouer the king his subiects yet to authorise a domestical English Archb. in his roome containeth in it such a contrariety such an absurdity as it is wonder how either any Archb. durst challenge the executiō thereof or else how hir highnesse most noble Father brother her highnes own person could endure the same so long vncanselled vnrepealed especiallye the same being most preiudiciall to their regall crownes and dignities For first by the vertue of this Statute it is enioyned the Archb. and his successours in no manner wise to graunt any dispensation licence rescript or any other writing for anye cause or matter repugnaunt to the lawe of Almighty God Secondly it is permitted vnto the sayde Archbysh and his successours by their discretions to graunt vnto the K. Maiestie and to his heires and successours Kings of this Realme all manner such licenses c. as heretofore haue beene accustomed to bee had and obtayned by his Highnesse or any his Noble Progenitors or any his subiectes at the sea of Rome Which two clauses without dishonour to the Maiesty of God or preiudice to her highnesse prerogatiue cannot possible establish a sound and perfect Lawe For first in as much as the popes person was neuer duly qualified to be a Lawfull dispensor or any lawfull Magistrate in the Church of God it is manifest that euery dispensation granted at that time at the sea of Rome was directly against the Lawe of God as graunted by one that was no member of the Church of God Again In as much as the trueth of the Gospell warranteth vs that symony Vsury Periury Adultery Incest Nonresidency many benefices Marriages against the Leuiticall Law obseruations of superstitious dayes and times not eating of flesh in Lent and such like are against the Lawe of God it is euident that dispensations graunted at that time for these and such like things at the Sea of Rome were granted in causes and matters repugnant to the law of God and so by the former braunch of this statute being
precisely dissalowed cannot by the secōd branch of the same be generally approoued For how can one the self same law forbid and comand things so contrary and repugnant in themselues Or how can the Archbishop safely ground his iurisdiction vppon a lawe so contrary and repugnaunt vnto it selfe If the Archbyshop shall think that these two braunches may be reconciled that the meaning of the former maye and ought simply to be vnderstood as the words them selues import and that the second braunch may and ought to be vnderstoode to bound and limite such an authoritie to him selfe as whereby he might graunt such licenses as were had and obtayned at that time at the sea of Rome for matters not contrary or repugnant to the law of God yet neither by this interpretation is the Archbishop truely intituled vnto any authoritie therby to dispence for symony nonresidence many benefices marriages in Lent c. in as much as such maner of licenses obtayned at that time at the sea of Rome were obtayned for matters repugnaunt vnto the law of God and contrary to the truth of the doctrine of the Gospell and so by this statute flatly forbidden Which thinges our auncestors not thoroughly foreseeing neither duely examining for what maner of causes or matters licenses were at that time obtayned at the sea of Rome but onely in a generallitie inhibiting thinges repugnaunt vnto the law of God and neuer particularly describing what those things were but leauing the same wholy to the iudgement and discretion of one man the Archbishop alone haue fallen into two palpable absurdities the one that one man alone hath from time to time authoritie by his discretion to determine what causes are repugnaunt to the holy scriptures and lawes of God what causes matters are conuenient for the honour and safety of the King of England and what are necessary to be had for the wealth and profite of the realme three thinges of such waight and importaunce as the whole body of the realme at that time was scarceable to conceiue much lesse shall euer any one Archbish be able to practize The other absurditie is this viz. that by this statute soueraignity is giuen to the Archbishop and his successors to dispence with the king and his successors kinges and Queenes of Englande The wordes of the statute are plaine and euident But what reason is there for kinges and queenes of England to become wardes and pupils vnto an Archbishop of England Or howe agreeth it with the worde of God that a Christian king should in any sort be in subiection vnto his owne vassall Or what christian subiect dareth attempt to offer vnto his Christian soueraigne a tolleration For in case the matter of the sayde tolleration be pretended to concerne the conscience then if the matter be free and lawfull by the law of God a Christian king may as well and as freely vse the liberty of his conscience with out licence from his subiect as his subiect maye vse his freedome without dispensation from the king If it be contrary to the lawe of God then may neither a christian king neither a Christian subiecte be dispenced with For what man can dispence with the Lawe of God And in case the matter of dispensation concerne any thing appertayning vnto this life how then should the king receiue a dispensation from the Archbishop without impeaching his kingly dignitie and prerogatiue For either he must bee dispenced with for breach of the positiue Lawe of this lande and haue the payne of Lawe remitted him by the Archbishop which were to set the Archbishops keyes aboue the Kinges armes Or els he muste purchase a dispensation that he may breake his Lawe which were against his honour and safety For saith the Emperour Digna vox est maiestate regnantis legibus alligatum se principem profiteri C. De le cōstit princ l. digna It is a worde worthy the maiestie of a ruler to acknowledge himselfe as chiefe tyed vnto the lawes Moreouer this case between the king and the Archbishop is farre different from the case betweene the king and his Iustices at lawe determining matters according to the common lawes and customes of the Realme betweene the king and his subiectes For they remayne still the kinges vnderlinges and in deed giue but the kinges iudgements they iudge not the kinges person neither commeth any thing touching his person before them But dispensations from the Archbishop to the king concerne the kinges owne person The king in his royall person or by his proctor muste appeare in the Archbishops consistory he must alleage before the Archbishop sufficient matter whervpon the Archbishop but a subiect may be mooued to dispence with the King his soueraigne and finally the Kinges wisedome muste be subiected to the Archbishops discretion And therefore to confirme the Minor proposition of my third syllogisme I conclude 1 Whatsoeuer is dishonourable and dangerous for hir highnesse person the same can not be conuenient for hir honour and safetie 2 But it is dishonourable and daungerous to haue the Archbishop to dispence with hir highnesse 3 Therefore the same is not conuenient c. WHich reason also maye as well be applied to disprooue the vnlawfulnes of the Archbishops dispensations granted vnto any of hir highnes subiectes as vnto hir highnesse owne person in as much as hir kingly prerogatiue and supreame gouernment in matters lawful by the holy scriptures is therby impeached The Arch. iurisdictiō only aduanced the surety of hir royal person peace of the cōmō weal il prouided for Againe sithence euery one of sound iudgement vnderstandeth the honour and safety of hir highnesse person onely and wholly to consist in the protection and safegarde of our most mighty and most gratious God and that nothing can bee so honourable and safe for hir highnesse as humbly and reuerently to attend and to submit hir selfe to the scepter of his word the execution of this statute by the Archbishop can not be but most inconuenient and perillous for hir highnes person in as much as partly through a corrupt construction partly by a synister iudgement not rightly discerning what thinges are repugnant to the word of God the sayde Archbishop dispenseth in causes and matters contrary and repugnaunt to the holy scriptures which causeth the name of God to be euill spoken of and is a dishonour vnto God and therefore no honour nor safety vnto hir highnes person And therfore hir highnes is humbly to be intreated to take the entier dominion and whole soueraignty due vnto hir by the word of God into hir owne handes and not anye longer to suffer such a blemishe to remayne in hir gouenement Had hir highnesse moste noble Father vnderstoode his kingly person to haue vndergone the Censorship of his subiect no doubt he wold as couragiously haue fought against an Archb. as he did against an Abbot Pouerty of the person no cause for a dispensatiō As
graunted For in truth either the defect of the qualitie of the person or the want of a iust cause in lawe doth frustrate and make voyde euery dispensation For neither can a man qualified and in all respectes capable of a dispensation enioye the benefite thereof vnlesse he maye also enioye the same vpon a good ground and iust cause warranted by lawe Neither can a iuste cause and good ground approoued by Lawe bee sufficient matter to induce a Iudge to graunt a dispensation to him that is vnable and vnapt to receiue the same A man well Lettered singularly qualified and endued with vertue and godlinesse or of some noble house and parentage is by Lawe a fit and meete man to enioye moe benefices by dispensation then one Neither is it a sufficient qualification for one destitute of learning to become a Chappleine onelye to some Noble man For the statute prouiding that some Noble mens Chappleines shoulde be made capable by dispensation to retayne moe benefices doth not thereby take away the qualities requyred to be in such persons by common right but addeth a new qualitie requisite to be had of euery one and so maketh the law stronger and of more efficacie against pluralities Panor in c. ex parte l. 3. de verb signi fi fol. 189. nu 3. Statuta debent intelligi quod aliquid addant iuri communi Statutes ought so to be vnderstoode that they may adde somewhat to common right Extr de prebend c. ff de multa Circa sublimes literatas personas quae maioribus beneficiis sunt honorandae cum ratio postulauerit per sedem apostolicam poterit dispensari Concerning men of Nobilitie and learning who with greater benefices are to be honoured the Apostolike sea if reason shall requyre may dispence with such And in an other Chapiter the same is confirmed Extr. de elec c inâ—…otuit MVLTA ENIM in hoe casu dispensationem inducere videbantur literarum scientia morum honest as vitae virtus fama personae multipliciter a quibusdam etiam ex fratribus nostris qui eum in scholis cognouerant approbatae Manie thinges in this case seemed to leade to the graunting of a dispensation his learning his honest conuersation his vpright life and the good report of the person diuersly commended euen by some of our brethren which knew him at schoole These giftes and graces these qualities and these conditions are incident and appertayne by common right to these men that by way of dispensation maye possesse manie benefices Whosoeuer then is not commendable for his learning for his honesty for his sincere life or not of some auncient and noble familie the same man by lawe is vtterly barred and secluded from this benefite The second qualitie requyred to the validitie of euery dispensation is the waightinesse of some speciall cause as appeareth in the Chapiter before recited in these wordes Cum ratio postulauerit When reason requyreth Extra de voto c. 1. And againe we aunswere sayth Alexander the thirde in a decretall Epistle written to the Bishop of Exceter that it belongeth to the iudgement of him that is President that he consider diligentlye the cause of commutation and so accordingly to dispence And by the Chapiter Magnae Extra de voto It is playne and euident that there must be some speciall cause knowen for the which euery dispensation is to be graunted For as I sayde before to the ende that euery dispensation be good and auaylable by Lawe there is requyred necessarilie both the abilitie of the person to whome and the iustice of the cause for which the same ought to be gyuen For neither maye an able man without a iust cause neither a iust cause without an able man mooue the Iudge in anywise to dispence And to tell you what these speciall causes are in few wordes they are these vrgent necessitie and euident vtilitie of the Church Extra de ele c cum nobis Propter vrgentem necessitatem euidentem vtilitatem ecclesiae Capuanae quam in hac parte potius approbamus volumus ipsum firmiter perdurare Necessitie vtilitie of the church only iust causes of a dispensatioÌ„ For the vrgent necessitie and euident vtilitie of the Church of Capua which on this behalfe we rather haue respect vnto our pleasure and will is that he continue It is vnlawfull by common right for a Monke or Layeman to be admitted to the gouernment of any church with cure of soule yet notwithstanding if by reason of warre famine persecution or other extraordinary cause the office of pastorall teaching did cease so that the people had none to instruct them in the way of saluation 1. q. 7. requiritis §. nisi now in this case it is lawfull for him that hath authoritie to dispence with a Monke or Layeman endued with learning to the ende he might by instruction bring the people to knowledge It is vnlawfull that children borne of a Nun violently taken away and marryed should be admitted to any Ecclesiastical orders NotwithstaÌ„ding if the great profit or necessitie of the church require they may by dispensation be admitted Suppose there were a custome of long coÌ„tinuaunce and time out of minde in the Church of Paules contrary to the first foundation of the Church that not onely the Prebendaries daylye present at diuine seruice but also others absenting them selues should receiue euery one a like some dayly pention either in money or some kinde of victuall this custome by law is voyd because it is vnreasonable And yet notwithstanding anye iust and necessary infirmitie of the body of any prebendary or euident vtilitie of the same Church may be a lawfull and sufficient inducement for the Ordinary to dispence with the not restoring of that which was vnlawfully taken vnder pretence of the former custom If by the first foundation of the church of Paules twelue prebendaries were appointed to be maintayned by the reuenues of the Church and the sayd reuenues were not sufficient for the maintenance of these twelue the Bishop then in this case if the necessitie and vtilitie of the Church so requyre maye annect certayne other Chappels for the maintenaunce of the sayde prebendaries These examples do sufficiently prooue that euery dispensation priuiledge or immunitie ought to be graunted vpon some iust and reasonable cause and that the sayde iuste and reasonable cause ought euermore to be the vrgent necessitie and euident profit and commoditie of the Church And that the sayd vrgent necessitie and euident commoditie of the Church ought euermore to be vnderstoode the well gouerning of the soules of the people If therfore neither vrgent necessitie or euident vtilitie of the Church requyre that any one should haue many benefices yea rather if it be most profitable and necessarie for the Church that one man should haue but a liuing appoynted for one man and that by ioyning benefice to benefice and Church to Church the Church indeed is
wherof you may by the laws recited perceiue the same to haue beene as lawfull by priuiledge as by custome Institu de iure natu gent. ciui §. sine scripto The reasons of which custome are these viz. Diuturni mores consensu vtentium comprobati legem imitantur Dayly or continuall manners approoued by consent of such as practize them do imitate a law ff de leg l. de quibus § CVM IPSAE LEGES c. In as much as the lawes themselues by no other meanes do binde vs then for that they be receaued by the iudgement of the people euen as rightly shall those thinges also binde all which the people without any writing hath allowed For what difference is there whether the people declare their will by voyces or by deedes and the thinges them selues Wherefore this thing also hath beene very rightly receaued that the lawes should not onely â—e abrogated by the voyce of a law maker but also thorow the secreat consent of all by growing out of vse Instit de iure nat gent. ci § sine The Lacedemonians whatsoeuer they by experience found behoueful for their gouernment put the same to memory and kept the same as a law ff in c. quanto c. nouit extra de hiis quae fi sin consensu ca. c. 1. de consuetud lib. 6. Panor in c. fi extr de consuet QVAMVIS saith PANORMITAN ius induxit c. Though the lawe haue ordayned that a Bishop should determine matters with the Chapter because the Bishop and the Canons make one body and therefore that iudgement is to be reckoned more strong that is ratified by the consent of many Yet notwithstanding a contrary custome may be established namely that by meanes thereof busines might be speedely dispatched Vpon which reason this law following touching this controuersie was made Extra de hiis quae fin si c. consen cap. c. ca. noscitur NISI EX ANTIQVA c. Vnlesse by some auncient and approoued custome or liberty graunted some of them prooue that the consent of the Colledge committed to their gouernment ought not to be requyred in conferring Churches or benefices And againe Lib 6. de consuet c. non est Dum talis sit prescripta Canonice consuetudo c. So that such a custome be canonically prescribed which the Bishop doth alleadge that in the inquisition and correction of his subiectes excesses he is not bound to require the councell of his Chapter These reasons and these lawes being the reasons and the lawes alleadged for custome in this case to gouerne and rule are particularly to be examined and applied to this action No cause for this custome to be continued Touching the reason of the Canon law namely that by meanes of this custome the affaires of the church shold easilier be dispatched If we in these dayes had the like multitude of Church matters to be dispatched as the papistes had that the Cleargy now were loden with the like burthens as at the time of these ordinaunces they were there might be then some shew of reason that the same custome for the same cause should still remaine Many Monasteries Priores Frieries Nunneries and other irreligious houses vnder the iurisdiction of popish bishops had many businesses many blind matters to be decided It was combersome for euery baudy matter of a frier and a Nun to call a Chapter it was troublesome for placing or displacing euery Abbot frier Nun Dean prebend parson vicar or any other of the Cleargie to call a Chapter In our churches God be praised we haue no such tumultuous Cleargy continually to trouble the chapter we haue no such number of bad matters as they had And therefore the cause in this respect ceassing the effect also might right well cease Moreouer the common and vsuall dissention amongest them were speciall meanes that elections institutions confirmations collations and such like were hindered Many frustratory appeales and other delaies made and long suites commensed But our Cleargie are better instructed in the wayes of the Lord they teach the people peace and exhort them to brotherly amity and loue and therfore it is to be coniectured that causes amoÌ„gst peaceable men wold speedely and peaceably be ended and therefore in this respect also the cause ceasing the effect shoulde cease Lastly the case standeth not now with vs at this time as it did then betweene the bishop and the Chapter The law written then was that the bishop and Chapter shoulde excommunicate c. Quia firmius est iudicium quòd plurimorum sententia confirmat Because a iudgement confirmed with the opinioÌ„ of many is more strong The reason of the custome for the Bi. without the Chapter was this Vt facilius expediantur negotia That businesse might more easely be finished In which cases you se the matter to stande whollye betweene the bishop and the Chapter As whether the bishop with the Chapter or without the Chapter for the foresayde seuerall reasons might haue the rule and gouernement in Church matters To the which demand I answere thus If the controuersie were betweene the Bishop of London and the Deane and Chapter of Paules whether a sentence of excommunication denounced by the bishop alone against any persons contumacie within the Diocesse of London without the aduise of the Dean and Chapter were good forcible in law and that the bishop were able by proof in law to confirme that time out of mind and memorie of man he and his predecessors bishops of London without contradiction of the Dean and Chapter vsed whensoeuer oportunity serued to excoÌ„municate alone without the presence of the Dean and Chapter I saye that in this case by Canon law a sentence giuen by the bishop alone were good and not reuersible by meanes of the Dean Chapters absence For that herein now they haue willingly lost their owne right and depriued themselues of their interest For the bishop alwayes giuing sentence in the Chapter house where the Dean Chapter might continually be present and haue their aduise they voluntarily absenting theÌ„selues hath gotten vnto himselfe this iurisdiction whervnto they haue also yeelded by giuing their secret consent that the B. alone should execute those things wherin they had an interest and which otherwise he might not haue don In like maner if the Archdeacon should make the lyke assertion against the Bish to prooue and insynuate wils and Testaments and were able to prooue the same his assertion I would consult that he likewise by the Canon law had right herein against the B. For in these cases the Bishop and the Archdeacon are in place of priuate men the Dean and Chapter hath the roome of a priuat man because were the matter in controuersie to bee decyded betweene them they were to commence their Actions before superiour Magistrates But the matter of Excommunication mentioned by the Lawe written and of right Excommunication indeede is not
otherwise then that there hath but little good growen to the Common weale hitherto by the bishops and Cleargie men in the Administration of Ciuill iustice And that therefore such as haue written or spoken or preached againste Ciuill iurisdiction in the Eclesiasticall state haue done it for two vrgent and waightie considerations Friendes of reformation friendes of the queenes maiesties prerogatiue First not to encounter hir maiesties prerogatiue as it is falsely supposed but to teach their Lorde and maisters truth They haue not doone it in disobedience to hir crowne but in obedience to their God They know it is better to obey God then men and therefore they haue laboured faythfully by the worde of God to perswade hir maiestie and the estates of the Realme that these offices ought not by the Lawe of God to be resiaunt in one person and therefore hath exhorted hir maiestie and them in the name and feare of God to vse hir prerogatiue and theire authorities to the seuering of them Secondly they haue preferred the generall welfare and commoditie of the common weale before the vnlawfull honours and promotions of priuate men They know by learning and haue prooued by experience what detriment maye insue to the Common weale when offices are committed to men ignoraunt of such duties as belong vnto their charge A man that hath spent all the dayes of his lyfe in the studie of Grammar or Oratorie and hath alwayes taught the same were a very vnfit man at the age of threeschore yeares to be made a publique Keader in Phisicke or Law and yet notwithstanding to remayne a Schoolemaister still Expedit reipublicae vt quisque officio suo fungatur It is expedient for the Common weale that euery one execute his owne office And I am of opinion that the friendes of reformation are greater friendes and mayntainers to and of hir highnesse prerogatiue then the others be For they ascribe vnto hir maiestie indeede truth and veritie that which the others do but in worde shew and semblaunce onely They earnestly desire and craue that as hir highnesse hath beene annoynted and Crowned by the Lord him selfe Queene and gouernesse ouer them and as she is their naturall and onely lawfull Ladie and Mistresse and as she hath the name title and stile of supreame and chiefe ruler ouer all persons in all causes So likewise the causes now accōpted Ecclesiasticall beeing meere Ciuill shee might in deed truth and veritie haue all and all maner of iurisdiction executed in hir maiesties owne name as well in Courts and iudgements nowe reputed Ecclesiasticall as in other hir maiesties Courtes temporall whereby hir Ciuill gouernement might be more enlarged Which thing the abettours of reformation perceiue now to be otherwyse Forall summons actes proceedinges sentences decrees and iudgementes in all causes and controuersies determinable before Archbishops Bishops and Archdeacons are begunne continued and ended in the Archbishops bishops Archdeacons their Commissaries or Officials names stiles and dignities without any relation or mention of authoritie gyuen unto them as proceeding from hir maiestie then the which there can not seeme anye thing more preiudiciall to hir state Crowne and dignitie For be it that they be created Archbishops and Bishops by hir highnesse and inuested into their seas at hir Graces commaundement yet this argueth no greater prerogatiue belonging vnto hir maiesty ouer them then such as she hath ouer hir other subiectes whom she createth Barons or dubbeth knights But as concerning common and ordinarie iurisdiction in causes reputed Ecclesiasticall they haue no letters patentes from hir maiestie conuaying vnto themas from hir royall person any power ouer hir subiects to heare and determine their causes in hir highnesse name and vnder hir gouernement Onely they execute such iurisdiction as by popishe constitutions or popish customes hath beene heretofore annexed to their Archbishopprickes bishopprickes and Archdeaconries and that by an vtter enemy to hir royall person state and gouernment B. L. to his colleague Comissioners In so much that some of them by Letters hath signified vnto their Colleague Commissioners that common and ordinarie authoritie in causes ecclesiasticall chiefly and almost onely belong to them selues and their officers And that commissions from hir maiestie for reformation in matters ecclesiasticall graunt onely an extraordinarie authoritie And that therefore the sayde Commissioners haue not to heare matters of instance and such as requyre iudgement of lawe for that such causes belong onely to them selues and their officers whereby they haue insinuated hir maiestie to haue no common or ordinarie authoritie in causes ecclesiasticall as they them selues haue Whereas all other courts within hir highnesse Empyre as leetes courtes Baron courtes of regarde courtes of Forrestes I leaue to speake of hir highnesse owne Courtes at Westminster all liberties and franchises all parkes and free warrens belonging to any of the Nobilitie Gentrie or any Citie or borow of this Realme haue euer had their beginninges and establishmentes by the gratious fauour of the Kinges of this Realme as from whose prerogatiue such dignities and immunities ought franckly to proceed and by whom onely they haue beene graunted Onely oure Church gouernours challenge not their authoritie as from hir sacred seate of iustice and princely throone but they challenge their authoritie as a power belonging to their owne seats deriued from an vsurped and forren power 17. pag. ◠28. Henry c. 16. The statute made that euery Archbishop and bishop of this realme and of other the kings dominions may minister vse and exercise all and euery thing and thinges pertayning to the office or order of an Archbishop and bishop with all tokens ensignes and ceremonyes therevnto belonging and that all Archdeacons and Deanes and other hauing offices cures and dignities spiritual may by authoritie of this act and not by vertue of any forren power or authoritie administer vse and exercise all things appertaining to their dignities offices orders cures religions felowships and may lawfully hereafter vse all tokens ensignes and ceremonyes which they haue beene accustomed to vse in times past so it be not expresly against the lawes of God and this Realme This statute I say hauing beene the rule of our Archbishops and bishops consciences for their gracinges there Lordinges there vsheringes their kneelinges there tastinges their cupbearinges and such like improoueth no whit any part of the force of the former assertions but rather confirmeth and fortifieth the same First the statute hauing relation onely to tokens ensignes and ceremonies accustomably administred vsed and exercised before the making of the statute all which beeing Antichristian and therefore expreslye against the lawes of God are plainely by this statute abrogated and therfore ought no more to bee administred vsed or exercised For though the Kinge the peeres and commons at that time not instructed in the vnlawfulnesse of them did not holde and repute them to be againste the lawes of God and therefore did not specially abridge any particuler
of lay men as in trueth it is already executed by lay men yet the Courtes of Arches and Audience and the Court of Delegates might remayne and continue still and as they ought indeede so they might in worde as well and better to bee called the Queenes Courtes of Arches and Audience as the Archbysh of Canterburies Courtes of Arches and Audience As conuenient for the Doctors to attend vpon the Queene as vpon the Archbysh And as good a sight it were as dutiful a part for my masters Doctoures of the Ciuill Lawe in their Scarlet robes to attend vppon her Maiestyes roiall person in case she passed thorough Paules as to attend vppon their Lordes grace his person And as touching euery other Consistory nowe called the Bpshoppes or Archdeacons Consistory for auoyding of confusion and many iudgement seates if they were vnited and reduced in euery Shiere or euery Diocesse to one consistorye it mighte lykewise haue the name of the Queenes Consistorye and the Courtes bee called the Queenes ciuill Courtes as wherein according to the natures and qualities of the causes before specified Ciuill Iustice might bee ministred and the Popish ecclesiasticall Lawe abandoned and as a froth or filth bee spewed oute of the Common Weale Her hignesse can not more gratify the Pope then by executing his lawe For assuredlye by no meanes can her Maiestye so much gratifye her capitall enemye as by authorising and practising his Lawes nor by no meanes can shee more honour the Lord then vtterlye to abandon all semblaunce of any gouernment proceeding from an enemye and Traytour to his Maiestye Neyther were it a Dodkin matter so little is his Lawe worth in her state and gouernment to haue all Bookes of her enemyes Lawes layde on a heape in Smithfielde and sacrificed in Fire vnto the Lorde her owne common and statute Lawes the Ciuill Lawe for the exellencye thereof receyued among all Nations and certayne prouinciall Constitutions made heretofore at her Auncestours commaundement haue for the moste part alreadye and where neede is speedilye maye haue sufficient matter in them for the gonernment of the Church and Common weale without any helpe from the Laws of the enemy of the church and Common weale Instit de iur natu genti ciui § sed quod The Lawe of a King is as it were the mouth of a King for that he alwayes speaketh by his Lawe And if wee suffer the Pope to speake amongest vs as a King doe wee not honour him as a King If wee imbrace his power doe wee banish his personne If you say that they bee not executed as his Lawes but as ours I aske you agayne why shoulde they at all be executed as oures For in trueth they doe lesse good vnto vs then an Herb-Iohn doth as is sayde in the Potage for that Herbe doth neyther good nor harme But these Lawes doe annoye vs vvonderfullye and they doe vs no manner of good at all They are altogether needelesse they are altogether Bootelesse I woulde to GOD they were altogether footelesse too For touching the gouernment of the Church wee haue first the perfect and altogether righteous Lavve of God to rule the same by Secondlye wee haue her Maiesties Iniunctions the common and Statute Laws of the Realme and the prouinciall constitutions conteyning in effect whatsoeuer ought in anye case by any subiect to bee practised within this Realme Touching the administration of Iustice in anye ciuill cause before mentioned and wherof practise is made in the ecclesiasticall Court there is nothing good in the whole body of the Canon Lawe concerning the same but the same hath beene culled out of the Ciuill Lawe it is but an Epitomy of the Ciuill Law The rules of the Cannon Lawe are for the most part rules taken out of the Ciuill Lawe onely there is this difference that by the Cannon Lawe a man in some case shall not in his whole life time get an end of his suyte as these parties that had a cause depending in the Popes Court twentye foure yeeres and yet in all that space Lis non erat contestata an issue could not bee ioyned wheras by Ciuill Law a cause in the first instaunce ought to bee finished within three yeeres at the vtmoste or else the Agent becommeth non suite And if vppon cause the matter bee appealed after definitiue sencence the same cause of appeale ought ordinarily to bee ended within one yeare or vppon some iust cause extraordinarilye happening vvithin two years Otherwise the appeale is frustrate so that in both instaunces fiue yeares onely must bee spent in suit of law And nowe what reason is there that the Canon Lawe shold be still canonized amongst vs when it was ordeined that none should proceed in any vniuersity doctor of the Canon lawe I thinke the meaning of the ordinance cheefly was that leauing no hope of preferment to the professours thereof the thing being of it selfe so vile they shoulde loose no labour in the study thereof But I will conclude that in as much as by the Canons Constitutions ordinaunces and synodalles prouinciall made before the 25. yeare of Henrye the eyght Byshpos and all other Cleargy men are forbidden to be Vicountes Presydentes Iustices Stewardes Bayliefes gouernoures of Villadges Iudges Aduocates Assessors Tutors Gardians Ouerseers runnagates to seculer Courts farmers of temporall possessions receyuers of reuenewes present in anye place where mencion of anye processe or iudgement is to bee awarded agaynste anye man to the sheading of bloude And in asmuch as they are commaunded to apply themselues wholly to Prayer and supplication and not to neglect their office and to intangle them selues with worldlye businesse And for as much also as the Emperour hath vppon substantiall reasons and principles inhibited the Cleargy vnder his Dominions the like offices to the end there mighte bee no confusion of gouernment nor mingling of offices nor Iustice vnministred nor one to defraude another and for as much also that such Canons Constitutions ordinaunces and synodalles prouinciall before specified bee not contrariant nor repugnaunt to the Lawes Statutes and Customes of this Realme nor to the domage or hurt of the Queenes Prerogatiue royall but rather for the establishment of the same the same Canons beeing both founded vppon the Lawe of God whereby her prerogatiue standeth and is vpholden and confirmed by the Lawes of reason and nature and also ratified by the consent of Emperoures and nations that therefore these Canons constitutions ordinaunces and synodals prouinciall ought to be vsed and executed as they were before the making of the Act 25. Henry the eight and that therefore it is vnlawfull for Archbishops bishoppes or anie Cleargie men to beare any ciuill office in the common wealth If any except that before 25. of Henry the 8. bishops and Cleargie men did vse and execute those offices and that therefore these Canons were not then in vse and executed and therefore not in vse now or to
Lyndw. ne clerici vel monac c. vlt. PRESENTI DECRETO c. Wee ordeyne by this present decree that Clearkes beneficed or placed in holy orders bee neyther admitted gouerners of Villadges as to be Stewards or Bayliffes of such administrations by occasion whereof they might be lyable to make accounts vnto laye men neyther yet that they exercise anye secular iurisdiction speciallye those whereunto iudgement of bloode is annexed And from these decrees I conclude thus 1 Whosoeuer ought to attend vppon the alter and to giue him selfe to prayer and making of supplication ought not by anye testament to bee made a Tutor or Gardian 2 But euery one honored with the holy priesthood and placed in the ministery of Clearkes ought to attend vppon the Alter and apply him selfe to prayer making of supplication 3 Therefore none honoured c. and placed c. ought by any testament to bee made a Tutor or Gardian 1 Whosoeuer is gouernour of any Village Steward or Bayliffe of anye liberty or bayliwicke is by vertue of his office accountable to the laytie 2 But no Clearke beneficed or otherwise placed in holy orders by occasion of temporall officers ought to bee accountable to lay men 3 Therefore noe Clearke beneficed or anye other placed in holye orders ought to bee anye Gouernour Steward or Bayliffe THE lyke constitution was made by Octobone sometimes Legate from the Popes side here in Englande and speciallye publyshed againste the excesse of our Englishe Cleargy in this behalfe Constitu Octob. ne clerici iuris secular exerceant CVM HONESTATIS c. Insomuch as it is reputed a speciall decency of ecclesiastical honesty to be farre estranged from carnall actions we deeme it a very heynous and filthy thing that handes deputed vnto heauenly ministeries shoulde be intangled with secular affayres Or that certaine Clearkes seeking after earthly gaines and temporall iurisdiction thorowe a foule and greedy rauine doe receiue from lay men seculer iurisdiction and be called Iusticers and minister iustice which they cannot minister without a dissipation and iniury of ecclesiasticall order Therefore we desirous to extirpate this horrible vice straightly forbid all persons of churches and Vicars with perpetuities yea also all other manner of persons whatsoeuer placed in the ministery that they presume not to take any secular iurisdiction of any secular person or to exercise the same according to the precepts of holy Canons by this present Constitution we straightly inhibite that none placed in spirituall warfare presume to exercise in the secular court the office of an aduocate eyther in the cause of bloud or in any cause whatsouer saue onely in such causes as are permitted vnto him by Law And we likewise forbid that any cleargy man shoulde presume to bee eyther a iudge or an assessor Which constitutiō of Octobone as it seemeth in some sence and in some respect to exempt cleargy men altogether from the power and soueraignty of Kings and princes denying them indeed power ouer the Cleargy and so in this sense be contrary and repugnant to her highnesse Crowne and prerogatiue royall and therefore not authorised by act of Parliament though in the end the same Legate seeme to allowe the Kings priuiledges adding these words Saluis domini Regis priuilegiis Sauing the priuiledge of my Lorde the King So in another respect and in another sence if regard be had to the generall equitye of the inhibition we shall finde the same to agree altogether with the reasons of the former prouisions For in this constitution the Legate allegeth other reasons then before were alleaged and forbiddeth other offices then by the former were forbidden The reasons may be gathered thus 1 Whatsoeuer is iniurious vnto the ministerye or breedeth a dissipation of the ministerye the same may not be lawfully layde vppon the ministery 2 But to be deputed a minister of iustice to be made an aduocate a Iudge or an assessor is iniurious to the ministerye and breedeth a dissipation thereof 3 Therefore these offices may not be deputed vnto them 1 Whatsoeuer may be cause that the cleargy by any foule fault should swarue from the workes of fayth the same may not lawfully be layde vpon the cleargy 2 But to be made a Iustice an aduocate a iudge an assessor in seculer Courts may be cause that the Cleargye shoulde swarue from the workes of faith 3 Therefore Cleargye men lawfully maye not bee made Iustices aduocates Iudges or assessors in seculer courtes WHich two reasons of this prouinciall decree may probablie seeme to haue beene collected out of some more auncient Canons long before that time established wherby the like offices were forbidden and principally for these causes following 21. q 3. peruenit Gloss non exerceant Extra de vit honest cler c. clerici consecratio distinc 5. c. First that for filthy lucres sake they meddle not with taking to hire possessions seculer causes Secondly that thorough slouth idlenesse they separate not themselues from the holy ministeries Thirdly that they runne not a gadding to the Courtes of seculer princes And lastly because the Psalter should neuer be out of their handes And not onely vpon these groundes haue these Lawes at the first had their essence and establishment but sundry other considerations as forceable as these are apparantly known to the learned in the laws for the ouerthrow of ciuill Iurisdiction in ecclesiastical men In the administration of ciuil Iustice euery one in commission of peace without respect eyther of the person or of the cause oughte indifferenly and vnpartially to execute his office For bee a man once sworn in commission of peace he may not afterwards deale with hearing of what causes he list hee may not take notice of halfepeny matters and post ouer matters of bloud to his fellow iustice hee may not onely set an ende betweene neighbour and neighbour for shrewde wordes passed but he must prosecute the murtherer to death he must take his examination and he must send him with a Mittimus to the Iaile He must at the generall Sessions of gayle deliuery certifie the murtherers confession Now because it is a matter very haynous by the ecclesiasticall lawe in force that any ecclesiasticall person shoulde bee present in any place where any sentence is giuen for the sheading of bloud much lesse to bee a minister of Iustice in a cause of bloud Therefore ciuill iurisdiction for this cause also is forbidden ecclesiastical men And among many constitutions I haue thought good to recite onely these that follow Extra ne cleric vel mon. c. clericis CLERICIS IN SACRIS ORDINIBVS c. It is not lawfull by the Councell of Toletane for Clearkes placed in holy orders to handle iudgement of bloude Wherfore we prohibit that they by them selues neyther chop of any members or cause any to be chepped off For if any shall doe such a thing let him be depriued of his honour and of his place And agayne
and to take awaye all occasion from others to seeke preferment in that house at hir maiesties hands they of late haue inuented a new deuice and practized a new tricke where they were by the order and foundation of the house bound yearely to make elections of such schollers as might presently at the time of the election be placed in the vacant roomes they now either at one time choose a greater number of schollers for them selues then are places vacant and so make but one election in two yeares or else so soone as any place by the departure of any schooler is voyd they foorthwith in the name of the Deane or some Prebendarie chop an other in his roome by meanes whereof either hir maiesties letters are delayed vnto the ende of two yeares or else remayne altogeather frustrated so kinde hearted these no Precisians and these no Puritanes haue beene and so thankfull they haue shewed them selues for their maisterships Deanries and Prebendaries receiued at hir maiesties hands by hir gratious bountie and liberallitie And therefore since they striue so egerly for such tryfles and vse such foule shiftes to shut hir out of doores and make hir schollers packehorses and set them at the Cartes tayle in hir owne Colledges I thinke a man may gesse twice and yet not gesse so nigh as to gesse that Cleargie men enemies to reformation rather then they woulde loose their dignities woulde if it laye in their power gyue hir Highnesse prerogatiue the Canuysadoe They allow hir maiestie a royall power to shred greene Olyue braunches but to roote vp olde rotten dotterelles they deny hir anye such authoritie they can bee contented hir maiestie shoulde strippe poore men cloathed with sackecloath but mighty men decked in scarelet shee may not touch or once looke awrye vppon No cause of the name of ecclesiastical court Concerning the Courtes and iudgement seates of Archbishops bishops and Archdeacons hitherto reputed and called Ecclesiasticall Courtes I can see no reason in the worlde why they shoulde be any more so esteemed taken or reputed or why anye matter or cause or suite or controuersie commenced in those places shoulde or ought to be called or counted Ecclesiasticall For though in times past I meane in time of popery they might probably and coullorably be so called either for that Cleargy men alone were Iudges and exercised iudgement in them either for that such parties as betweene whom suites did depend were for the most part meere church men either for that all peticions and actions made and begunne in those Courtes were for such matters and causes as whereof church men onely by vsurpation challenged vnto them selues the decision and determination yet now so it is that all these reasons fayle and are of no force For with vs at this day though Archbishops bishops and Archdeacons be Cleargie men and chiefe amongest the ecclesiasticall seat yet notwithstanding Doctors of the Ciuill lawe meere laye men as they call them and no whit beneficed by priuiledge of Cleargie exercise all iurisdiction reputed Ecclesiasticall in their consistories and by the ordinaunces of the Realme are made competent and lawfull Iudges in these Courtes 25 Henrici octui Where one suite now dependeth or these manye yeares hath depended in the same Courtes betweene Cleargie men alone one hundreth almost are and hath beene depending betweene laye men alone the causes them selues are all for the moste part mere Ciuill and belong onely to the Ciuill court Approbations and insinuations of Willes and Testamentes by expresse wordes as you haue hearde out of the Ciuill lawe are absolutely prohibited vnto Bishops and all other Cleargie men And so consequently for that Appendices sequuntur principalis subiecti naturam Accessories follow the nature of the principall subiect All causes of Legacies Bequestes Accountes Inuentaries Commissions of Orphanes gooddes and whatsoeuer else may be incident to anye of those causes are vtterly forbydden Causes of wrongfull and iniurious slaunders infamous Libels and contumelious crymes causes of contractes and marriages causes of dowrie and diuorce causes of filiation and legitimation of children matters of Vsurie and whatsoeuer appertayneth to the decision of these causes are causes meere ciuill and pertaine to the ciuill magistrate and therefore sithence Archbish Bish and Archdea to disburthen them selues may lawfullye commit the hearing of these causes from them selues yea and very seldome or not at all execute their iurisdictions by them selues but continually and effectually do surrogate and depute Doctors or Bachelors of the Ciuill lawe What iniurie to their persons or alteration of the state and gouernment can it be in case hir maiestie by hir prerotiue did commit the same causes vnto the same men and make the bishops men hir men and their commissaries hir presidentes Touching matters of tith it is lawfull for the chiefe Iustice of the kings bench where any vsage or custome by any partie is pretended to paye lesse then the whole tith as suppose the twenteth or forteth part of his tithes Yea in some cases where no tith at all is payde as vpon the statute of tith wood beeing timber trees aboue twentie yeares groweth to prohibite in hir maiesties name euery iudge ecclesiasticall that hee proceed not to the determination of any such cause and so to take vnto him selfe the hearing and determination of the same according to the common lawes of hir highnesse realme There is small diuersitie of reason why the same or some other Ciuill magistrate may not as well heare and determyne all and singular causes of tithes after what maner or forme soeuer they be payde as whereby long continuaunce of tyme they haue beene customablye payde after such and such sort or where no payement at all hath beene made In the seconde or thirde instaunce when appeale is made from an Archbishop Bishop or Archdeacon into hir highnesse high Court of Chauncerie or Delegates in any case whatsoeuer hir maiestie by the prerogatiue of hir Crowne and dignitie hath absolute power to appoynt such men to set a finall ende and ordinate direction therein as by their wisedomes shall be thought consonant to equitie right and good conscience There is no disparity of reason why in the first instaunce shee maye not as well haue like authority or why like authority from her or by her Maiesty may not lawfullye bee committed to any of her subiectes though no ecclesiasticall persons but onely seculer and laye men Neyther by this meanes shoulde the course of Lawe touching appeales be taken away but the same might be still practised as now it is In the prouinces belonging to the Romaine Empire though presidents and Proconsulles had their Commissions from the Emperour yet appeales were notwithstanding made from those Gouernours vnto the Consistories and tribunall Seates of the Emperoures imperiall City of resyaunce and cheefe aboade And therefore though the Gouernmentes nowe reputed Ecclesiasticall but in trueth Ciuil were absolutely translated from Ecclesiasticall men and put into the hands
he that ineucteth him after this sort shall haue of him that is inducted necessary expences and such as are agreeable to his estate and calling vnder the moderation limited vnto the Archdeacon him selfe or his officiall if either of them had personally made any such induction Prouin lind de censib c. item licet ILLVM ARCHIDIACONORVM c. We detesting that abuse of the Archdeacons and their Officials and other Ordinaries whereby they exact of the Priestes appointed to celebrate in their iurisdictions before they doe celebrate a certayne and excessiue sume of money vnlawfully conuerting the liberalitie wherewith such Priestes were wont to content them selues receauing but one peny of Clearkes registring their names in their recordes vnto a confiscal exaction of sixe pence or there aboutes We ordayne that from hencefoorth of the sayde Archdeacons and other Ordinaries or any of their ministers vnder payne of suspencion from the celebration of diuine things by any meanes presume not to receiue of the sayde Priestes aboue one peny For the which there names must be registred in their first admissions Lind. de censib c. saeua A cruell and miserable greedinesse hath inuented that vnmeasurable exactions for letters of institutions of Clearkes admtited vnto ecclesiasticall benefices for letters of orders for labour of writinges and for seales are oftentimes made the Canon disalowing the same saying as it becommeth not a bishop to sell the imposition of handes so it is not decent for his minister to sell his quill Moreouer the Clearkes of Archdeacons and their Officials and other ordinances refuse to deliuer the certificates of inquisitions made vppon vacant benefices vnlesse they first haue an excessiue some of money for writing We therefore willing to abolish this abase haue determined by the aduise of this present counsel to ordayne that for the writing of the letters of inquisitions institutions or collations and commissions to induct or for the certificates of the same into their benefices the sayd Clearkes receiue not either by them selues or by others aboue 12. pence And for the letters of euery holy order the sayde Clearkes neither by them selues nor by any other shall receiue aboue sixe pence In other things let the Ordinaries themselues be bound to allot stipendes for their ministers and officers wherby they may iustly be satisfied But for sealing of such letters or to the Marshals for entring into the house or to the Portors or doore keepers or Barbers we will that nothing at all be exacted or payde by any coulorable intent least the payment for seales os letters or enteraunces aforesayd be turned vnto a damnable gaine Bishops and bishops men not a few are suspended by this Canon And this we ordayne vpon paine of double to be restored within one moueth Otherwise the Clearkes that refuse to restore double let them know them selues to stande suspended from their office and from their benefice And now generally to conclude It were not amisse in my simple vnderstanding that the whole Church made humble supplication vnto her excellent Maiesty and her honourable Counsaylers that the Iudges of the Land might bee consulted vppon the validity of the former act of Parliament and that it might bee knowne whether the foresayde Cannons established thereby or any of them be in force and if so that then her Maiesty woulde vouchsafe gratiously to take the Church affayres into hir owne handes and by hir commisson Ecclesiasticall appoynt such honourable and faythfull men as are not in the ministerie to examine the bishops proceedinges Viz. Whether they haue made any criminous and vnlearned ministers Whether they haue suffred any such men to remaine in the ministery all the tyme of her maiesties raigne Whether the Archbish haue dispenced in any matter or cause contrary to the word of God Whether the pastor of euery congregation be suffered to execute the discipline of Christ authorized by Act of Parliament Whether the Archbish bish haue sat in matters of blood Whether they haue made a minister without a title allowing him whereon he might liue Whether he haue made anye in his owne Diocesse without licence from his felow bishops Whether he haue receiued any money for letters of orders institutions or suffered his Archdeacons to do the like for inductions Whether he haue receiued money for excommunication and absolution Whether he haue set out his bishopprick or any part of his iurisdiction for an annuall rent Whether he haue not suffered his chiefe houses of resiaunce to fall into dilapidations Whether he haue not admitted vnto anye benefice the sonne of him whose father was placed in the same benefice before Whether hee suffer none to bee non resident but where the euident necessitie and vtilitie of the Church requyreth Whether he haue promulged and executed any Canon or iniunction without hir maiesties writ and royall assent Whether he haue personally visited the Churches of his Diocesse onely vpon iust cause and not for gaine whether a minister haue not by commoÌ„ right Act of Parliament a lawfull calling in the ministery and such a calling as from the which the bishop maye not remooue him without some speciall cause Whether an Archbishop or bishop by vertue of his Archiepiscopall or Episcopall authoritie may promulge or execute any Canon or Iniunction vnlesse it be made in conuocation summoned by hir maiesties wryt and authorized by hir royall assent Whether a murtherer or theife be vsually compellable vpon his oth to detect his murther or fellony Whether an Archbishop or bish may lawfully bring vppon hir highnesse leage people an inquisition sifting them with othes what fayth deuotion or maners they professe Especially the sayde people liuing in outward obedience of hir highnesse positiue lawes And if not then whether an Archbishop or bishop may lawfully vrge the like touching matters onely of discipline and ceremonies and commaunde hir sayde people by vertue of their othes to declare what when where or how they haue spoken or preached out of the word of God the truth of God touching the same Whether a preacher onely vpon occasion of his text teaching the people that weomen by the lawe of God may not baptize or that by the same lawe a Deacons office is not to preach may bee iustly condemned to haue preached maliciously against the booke of common prayer the sayd preacher not once mencioning in all his sermon one word of the sayd booke Whether a preacher of the Gospell borne within hir maiesties Dominions haue not freedome of an English Citizen to challenge the benefit of hir highnesse lawes for the defence of his person fame goodes landes and liuinges Whether a preacher of the Gospel fearing some vniust vexation of his Diocesan may not complaine into hir highnes court of Chauncery and haue hir maiesties writ Quia timet against the sayde Diocesan Whether a preacher of the Gospell may not lawfully haue his bill of complaint admitted by the honorable Counsellours Peares and Lordes of the Starre chamber against his Diocesans iniurious intreaties and contemptes of hir highnesse lawes Whether some kinde of writ out of hir highnesse other temporall Courtes may not lye as well against a Diocesan for proceeding against a preacher of the gospell contrary to common or statute lawe or contrary to hir highnesse prerogatiue royall as some kinde of writ doth lye against an Archbishop for proceeding against some other of hir highnesse liege people contrary to the intent of the statutes prouided against vsury periurie payment of tithes and such like Whether an Archbishop may sing a note aboue Aela and lawfully exercise an absolute power within hir maiesties Dominions Whether a minister admitted by the order of the booke of king Edwarde the sixth be not presently a lawfull minister and may preach in his owne cure with out any licence in writing from the Bishop Whether licences graunted by hir maiestie or hir maiesties ecclesiasticall Commissioners or any of the Vniuersities be at any time reuocable by an Archbishop alone Whether any licence for mariage without banes asking be lawfull or no and whether banes asking be of necessitie required by the booke of Common prayer Whether any commutation of penance be lawfull Whether a meere lay man no doctor of the ciuil law may be a chauncelor and so excommunicate Whether a meere laye man no Doctor of the Ciuill law may be a bishops register contrary to an Act of Parliament Whether it be lawfull for a symoniacall excommunâ—…cat and irreguler person to bee a ludge or no And 〈◊〉 an Archbishoppe be such a person whether he may resort to the Pope to be absolued or no or where or how he may be absolued Faultes escaped PAg. 12. li 29. for leaue these read leaue the seate pag. 12. li. 33. for he shall be in read be in pag 13. l. 24. for by the popes act of parliament read made by the pope coâ—…med by act of parliament pag. 14. l. 12. for he is deposed read he deposeth pag. 14 l 35. put a before certain pag. 14. l 13 for functions read fâ—…ns pag 18 l. 28. for correcteth or improoueth rea to correct and improoue pag 20. l. 35. read and that it did not concern the honor of the Sonne of the most pag. 22 l. 7 for 4 read 1â— articles pag 23. for corruptions read occupations pag. 33. l. 3 for the minister chargeth read the minister at the Bâ— instance chargeth pa. 56 l. 11. for that they read that the â—… pa 75 for collation read collusion pa. 71. l. 35. for curall rea â—urall p 79 l 15 for dicit rea dicere p. 79. l. 27. for oâ— yet a consent rea nor yet consent pa 82 l. 18. for partâ— rea pacta pa. 161. l. 9 for reputari idoneas rea reputare idoneâ—… pa 101. l 27. for this plurality man rea a plurality man pag. 103. l. 8. for harly rea Carlile pag. 103. l. 35. for canon rea common pag 151. for petion rea petition p 157. l. 5. for passion rea possession pag. 173. l. 27. for runneth thee rea runneth against thee pag 175. l. 25. for of sufficient rea of no sufficient pa 222. for seruants rea tenaunts pag. 141. l 25. for Abbot rea Abbiâ— pa. 169. for of excommunication rea of sole excommunication p. 122. l. 10. for Moses rea Ioâ—hua and pag. 122. l. 12. for Ioshua read Ioshuas 〈◊〉