where the originall was made and at last it was resolved by all the Court that the Record should be amended by the Cursitor and made according to the Note or Title delivered unto him by the Plaintiffes Attorney Cook 8. part fol. 15. b. It appeareth in our Book of Law that the highest and lowest Dignity are uniuersall For as if a King of a Forreign Nation come into England by leave of the King of this Realm as it ought to be in this case he shall â—â—e and be sued in the name of a King 11. Ed. 3. Test Breccon 473. So shall he sue or be sued by the Name of a Knight whersoever he received that degree of Dignity â—o Ed. 4.6 H. 6.14 but otherwise it is as â—f a Duke Marquesse Earl or other Title of Honour given by any Forreign King yea though the King by Letters Pattents of â—ife conduct do name him Duke or by any other his forâ—eign Title of Dignity For experience sheweth that Kings joyned in league together by a certain mutuall â—nd as it were a Naturall power of Monarchs according â—o the Law of Nations have denized one anothers subâ—ects and Ambassadors graced with this title of Honour Therefore though a Knight receive his Dignitie of Forraigne Prince he is so to be stiled in all Legall proceedings within England Vide Cooke 7. part fol. 16. b. And Kings were wont to send their sonnes to theâ—â— Neighbour Princes to receive Knighthood at theiâ— hands Vide Selden fol. 331. 308. thinking that iâ— was more honourable to take Armes of some other leâ—â— affection might seeme to prevent judgement when thâ— father gave them that honour Thus was our King H. 2. sent unto David King oâ— Scots and Malcombe also king there sent unto our H 2. and our king to the king of Castile to take of them Military or Civill Armes for the tearmes and phraseâ— they used in that age for the making of a knight Vidâ— Camden 174.8 vide Selden fol. 315. And knights in all forraigne Countries have eveâ— place and precedencie according as they are ancient knights which priviledge is deemed to Noblemen for be they never so ancient in forraigce Countries they shall goe before as Puesneys The degree of knighthood is not onely a Dignitie and honour to the party for so it is termed in Brooke title Additions fol. 44. but honourable for the kingdome and therefore it hath been an ancient Prerogative of the kings of this Realm at their pleasure to compell men of worth to take upon them this degree upon the payment of a Fine as appeareth in Ann. 7. H. 6.15 Pitzh Abridg. tit Im. 12. and by the Statute a. 1. Ed. 2. de militibus But we see by experience in these daies that none are compelled thereunto and that is the reason wherefore if the Plaintiffe be made knight hanging the Writ it shall abate because he hath changed his name and that by his owne act Vide Cooke 7. part f. 27. b. part 10. b. 1 Ed. 6. cap. 7. contrary And for that cause also by the common Law not only the king but every Lord of a Manor ought to have of every of his tenants a reasonable fine to make his eldest son knight Vide Bracton fol. 36. b. and all lands are subject to these aides except onely ancient Demeasnes and grand and petty serjeantly tenures as the Law hath been anciently delivered Vide Fiszh Nat. bre f. 83. a. and Selden f. 13. where it is also said one that wrote a little after the statute of West the first allowes as a good barre to the avowry for the tenant to plead that the father himself is no knight so that one not knighted cannot claime the aide of his own Tenants Briton de Prises de Avers And it was not at the liberty of the Lord to make more or lesse of his Tenants by the common Law in this case but by the statute at Westminster 1. cap. 35. it is put into certainty viz. forasmuch as before this time reasonable and to make one son knight or to marry his daughter was never put into certainty nor how much should be taken at that time whereby some levyed unreasonable aide and more often then seemed necessary whereby the people were sore grieved And it is therefore provided that from henceforth a whole knights see be taken but 20. s. and of more more and of lesse lesse after that rate and that none shall levie such aide to make his son knight untill the sonne be 15. yeares of age nor to marry his daughter untill she be of the age of 7. yeares and of that there shall be mention made in the kings Writs formed on the same if any one will demand it and if it happen that the Father after he had leavied any such aid of his Tenants did before he hath marryed his Daughter the Executors of thâ— Father shall be bound to the daughter for so much as thâ— Father received for the Aid And if the Fathers goods bâ— not sufficient his heir shall be charged therwith unto thâ— daughter and this Heir is so incident that although thâ— Lord do confirm unto the Tenant to hold by fealty anâ— certain Rent and release unto him all other services anâ— demands yet he shall have the aid to make his eldeâ—â— Son Knight Anno 40. E. 3. f. 22. Finches book 24. but the King was not bound by the statute beforementioned because the King was not named in that statute and therforâ— by the statute 25. E. 3. cap. 11. The Kings aids were brought to a like value Selden fol. 3.30 The intention of the Law is that an heir within the age of 21. years is not able to do Knight-service till his full age of 21. years Littleton lib. 2. cap 4. f. 22. But such a presumption of Law doth give place to 〈◊〉 judgment and proof to the contrary as Bracton saith Saâ—â—litur presumptioni donec probetur in contrarium And therfore the King who is the Sovereign and Supream Judge of Chivalty hath dubbed him Knight he by this hath judged him able to do him Knight-service and all men concluded not to say to the contrary therfore such an heir being made Knight either in the life of his Father or afterwards during his minority shall be out of ward and custody both for Lands and for his body or marriage by the ancient common Law by reason also that the Honour of Knight-hood is so great that it is not to be holden under by any yet if the King do create any such an Heir within Age a Duke or Marquesse Earl Count Viscount or Baron by this he shall be out of ward â—nd custody both for his Land and for his body vide â—ook 6 part 74 a. And therfore it is provided by the statute of Magâ—â—â—harta Cap. 3. Ita tamen quod si ipse dum infra aetatem fueâ—â—t fiat miles nihil ominus terra remaneat in custodia doâ—inorum suorum So that although
degree which they call creation Money this is so annexed unto the Dignity that by no grant assurance or any manner of Alienation it can be given from the same but is still incident and a support of the same Creation Dyer fol. 21. c. Jn all Cases wherein Suite of Law a Baron or Peere of the Realme is to be amerced other then a Duke his amercement is no lesse tâ—e 12 100. s 9 E. 4.9 21. E. 4.77 38. E. 3.31 9. H. 6.21 but the amercement of a Duke is 10. l. 19. E. 4.9 1 H. 6.7 although the Statute of Magna Charta Chap. 14. be in the negative viz. Comites at Barones non amerciantur nisi per pures suos et non nisi secundum modum delicti and yet the usage hath â—educed it into a certainty also by the same Statute it â—ppeareth that such amercements should be afferred per â—ures suos but for that it were troublesome to assemble â—arons for so small a matter such amercements in times â—ast hath beene afferred by the Barons of the Exchequer who sometimes were Barons of the Realme as is beâ—ore in this Treatise mentioned and hereof writeth Bracton Lib. 3. Tract 2. chap. Fol. 116. viz. Comites â—iero vel Barones non sunt amerciandi nisi per paces suos secundum modum delicti hoc per Barones de Scacario vel coram ipso Rege Vid. Cooke 8. part 39. sequentiae this Section is to be omitted because it is more fitly to be written hereafter If a Plaintiffe recover against a Peere of the Realme in an Action of debt or trespasse upon such a Plea pleaded by him or other default in him so that a Fine thereby doth grow to the King and thereupon on a Capias per Fine issueth out against him this shall not prejudice that Nobleman so as the Plaintiffe may thereby take advantage by prayer that he shall abide in Execution for the Plaintiffe neither without his prayer nor though he doe pray it by the opinion of Brian Justice 14. H. 7.21 VVhereas by a Statute made 32. H. 8. Cap. 16. Jt is enacted that the Subjects of the Realme shall not keepe in their Families or Houses above the number of Foure Strangers borne neverthelesse by a proviso in the said Act every Lord of the Parliament hath his priviledge allowed unto him to keepe in his Family the number of six Strangers borne any thing in that Act to the contrary notwithstanding By the Statute of 24. H. 8. Cap. 13. a. A Priviledge was granted to the Nobility according to their degrees concerning their Apparell but because by a Statute made in the first Yeare of the King that now is Chap. 25. all Lawes and Statutes made concerning Apparell are taken away I leave further to speake of that matter 1. Jac. cap. 25. By the Statute of 5. R. 2. cap. 12. The King our Soveraigne Lord of his Royall Majesty defendeth the passe utterly of all manner of people aswell Clarkes as others in every Port and other Towne and place upon the Coasts of the Sea upon the paine of forfeiture of all their goods except onely the Lords and other great men of the Realme and true and Noble Merchants and the Kings Souldiers and every person then is before excepted which after publication of this Ordinance made shall passe out of the said Realme without the Kings speciall Lycence which Lycence the King willeth and commandeth that it be not from henceforth made but in one of the Ports vnder written that is to say London Sandwich Dover Southampton Plimouth Dartmouth Bristoll Yarmouth St. Buttolphe Kingstone upon Hull Newcastle upon Tine and the other parts and passages towards Ireland and the Iles pertaining to England shall forfeit towards the King as much as he hath in goods as afore is said but because this Statute is also taken away by a â—â—te Act of Parliament made in the fourth yeare of King James cap. 1. J doe not set downe this for â—ne of the Priviledges appertaining to the Nobility 〈◊〉 this day But Phillip Earle of Arundel Sonne of Thomas Duke of Norffolke was taken upon the Sea passing inâ—o France about the 30. yeare of the late Queene â—nd was fined in the Star-chamber to a great summe because he did not take Shipping at one of the Ports mentioned Cromptons Courts 31. Whereas by the Statute of 2. H. 2. Parl. 2. cap. 1. Jt is ordained that the Justices of Peace in every County named of the Cuorum should be resident in the Shieres wherein they are Justices there is a Proviso whereby the Lord and Peeres of the Realme named in such Commission are excepted By the Statute of 1. E. 6. cap. 12. amongst other things it is enacted that in all and every case and Cases where any of the Kings Subjects shall and may upon his Prayer have the Priviledge of his Clergie as a Clarke Convict that may make purgation in all those Cases and every of them and also in every Case and Cases of Fellony wherein the priviledge and benefit of Clergie is taken away by this Statute wilfull malice and poysoning of malice prepensed onely excepted the Lord and Lords of the Parliament and Peere and Peeres of the Realme having place and voyce in Parliament shall by vertue of this Act of Common grace upon his and their Requests and Prayer alleadging that he is a Lord or Peere of the Realme claiming the benefit of this Act though hee cannot reade without burning of the Hand losse of Inheritance or corruption of his blood bee adjudged deemed taken and used for the first time onely to all Jnstructions intents and purposes as a Clarke Convict which may make purgation without any further or other benefit of the Clergy to any such Lord or Peere from thenceforth at any time after for any cause to bee allowed adjudged or admitted any Law Custome Statute or any thing to the contrary notwithstanding By this Statute a Lord of the Parliament shall have the priviledge of his Clergy where a common person shall not viz. for the breaking of a house by day or night for robbing of any in the high way and in all other cases excepted in the Statute of 1. E. 6.12 saving in wilfull murder and poysoning But in all other cases wherein Clergy is taken away by any Statute made since the said Statute of 1. E. 6. he is in the same Degree that a common and inferior person is but the Court will not give him the benefit of this Statute if he doe not require it Jf the Lord of the Parliament doth confesse his offence upon his Arraignment or doth abjure or is outlawed for Fellony it seemes that in those cases he may have the benefit of this Statute viz. his Clergy for that by the Statute of 18. Eliz. cap. 18. he nor any other need to make his purgation but shall be forthwith delivered out of prison by the Justices sed quaere Poulton 202. b. By the Jmperiall Constitutions
of the Kings eldest Sonne and Heir is crimen lasoe Majestatis high treason or if a man do violate the Wife of the Kings eldest Sonne and Heir it is high treason and see the Statute 20. Hen. 8. cap. 13. And so was the ancient common Law of England and not a new Law made by this Statute Cooks 8. Part. 28.6 But this Statute is a manifestation and declaration or publication of the ancient common Law in this Case By a Statute made in the said 25. yeer of King Ed. 3. It is declared because the people be in ambiguity and doubt of the children born in the parts beyond the Sea out of the Kings Legiance of England should be able to demand any inheritance within the same Legiance or not Whereof a Petition was put into the Parliament late holden at Westminster the 17. yeer of the raign of our Soveraign Lord the King assembled in this Parliament and was not at the same time wholly assented Our Soveraign Lord the King willing that all doubts and ambiguities should be put away and the Law in this case declared and put in a certainty hath charged the said Prelates Earls Barons and other wise men of his Councell assembled in this Parliament to deliberate upon this point who with one assent hath said That the Law of the Crown of England is and alwayes hath been such that Les Enfants du Roy the children of the King of England in whatsoever part they be born in England or elsewhere be able and ought to bear the inheritance after the death of their Ancestors which Law our Soveraign Lord the King the said Prelates Earls Barons and other great men and all the Commons assembled in this Parliament do approve and affirm for ever Note These words in the Statute Les Infants du Roy have briefly set down and in a vulgar manner for loquendum ut vulgus and not in form of exquisite pleading for sentiendum ut docti and therefore ought to be understood largely Cooks 7. part 11.6 and as the Latine word liberi is with the Civilians Bract. lib. 2. cap. 29. hath these words Item descendit jus vero heredi ubicunque nat in fuerit vel in utero matris intra mare vel ultra Nec potest sibi aliquis facere beredem quia solus Deus heredem facit The right doth deseend unto the true Heir wheresoever he shall be born in the Womb of his Mother on this side the Sea or beyond no man can make an Heir unto himself because God only doth make the Heir read the Statute and Cook 7. part 18. a. Where you shall see that though generally the birth-place is observable yet many times Legiance and obedience without any place within the Kings Dominions may make a Subject born for though we see by experience almost in every Parliament Ambassadors Merchants and the Kings souldiers doth shew there in such causes to have their children naturalized or made denixens yet that doth proceed onely of doubt and needlesse scupulosity and ignorance of the Law even as we see men that are doubtfull desire to be resolved as may appear by sundry covenants in bargaining more then necessary And by renuing of Chartes though there be no forfeitures and by suing forth particular pardons when a generall is granted by Parliament Priests and Ministers see to the Parliament for legitimation of their children And in the Articles confirmed by Parliament touching the marriage between Philip Prince of Spain and Queen Mary a speciall proviso was to barre him from being Tenant by the courtesie of the Crown in case he should have issâ—e by her and survive which was superfluous because the Common-Law would have denyed this last point See the Lord Cromwels Speech in the case of the Postnati fol. 36. But note that if an Alien Enemy come into this Realm and his Wife English or stranger be delivered of a childe within England this childe notwithstanding his birth-place is an Alien born for want of allegeance in the Parents Ibidem King Henry did create Edward his eldest Sonne the first Prince of Wales and did give unto him the dignity and Dominion of it to be holden of him and his Heirs Kings of England and after that time the eldest sonne of the King of England hath been Prince of Wales and as incident to the State and dignity of a Prince and might make Laws and Statutes and use jurisdiction and authority as amply as any King of that Nation could do Cooks 7. part 21.6 Vide Mills fol. 312. Plowden 126. For Wales was a Kingdom in ancient time But in a Statute made in the 12. Ed. 1. Wales was united and incorporated into England and made parcell of England in possession And note in Tho. Mylls 112. the devise of the said King was to draw the Welchmen to acknowledge the Kings eldest Son Edward of Carnarvan to be their Prince Also by another Statute made 27. Hen. 8. cap. 24. a generall resumption of many liberties and franchises heretofore taken or granted from the Crown as the authority to pardon Treason murther man-slaughter and fellony power to make Justices in Oyre Justices of assize Justices of peace Goal delivery and such like so that from thenceforth the Kings eldest Sonne hath only the name and stile of Prince of Wales but no other Jurisdiction then at the Kings pleasure is permitted him and granted by his Letters Patents as by the tenour thereof following made by King Henry the eight to Edward his sonne and heir apparent may appear Henry Ireland was before 33. Hen. 8. a Lordship and now is a Kingdom and the King of England was as absolute a Prince and Soveraign when he was Lord of Ireland as now when he is stiled King of the same Cooks 7. part By the grace of God King of England and of France Lord of Ireland c. To all Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors Dukes Earls Barons Justices Viscounts Governours Ministers and to all our Bailiffs and faithfull Subjects greeting out of the excellency of Royall preheminence like as the beams from the Sunne so doth inferiour honour proceed neither doth the integrity of Royall lustre and brightnesse by the naturall disposition of the light-affording light feel any losse or detriment by such borrowed lights yea the Royall Scepter is also much the more extolled and the Royall Throne exalted by how much more noblenesse preeminences and honours are under the power and command thereof And this worthy consideration allureth and induceth us with desire to the increase of the name and honour of our first begotten and best beloved Sonne Edward in whom we behold and see our selves to be honoured and our Royall House also and our people subject to us hoping by the grace of God by conjecture taken of his gratious future proceedings to be the more honourably strengthned that we may with honour prevent and with aboundant grace prosecute him who in reputation of us is deemed the same
others the most materiall and of moment used in this behalf it shall be convenient for the more easie unfolding the state of this question to exhibite certain necessary and requisite propositions and upon them to draw true and infallible conclusions and then to prove them by authority of Law consent and time and manifold presidents which done the answere will be easily made as I conceive to every of the foresaid objections First therefore if a Baron by tenure which holdeth any Castle Honour or Mannour per Baroniam do alien or give the same either he doth it without any licence obtained from his Majesty so to do or else by some certain licence in that behalf obtained If he doe it without licence then the conclusion is certain by the lawes of this Realme the Barony Castle Honour and Mannour so aliened without licence or consent is forfeited and the same Honour Castle or Mannour so holden by Barony and so aliened is to be seised into the Kings hands for the said forfeiture and such dignity and estate no longer to be borne and continue but to be resumed and extinguished in the Crowne from whence it was derived Read hereof in Stamfords Prerogative cap. 7. But nota in Cook 2. part 80. b. The reason thereof is notable if we call to remembrance that which was formerly alledged out of Bracton That Baronies are the strength of the Realme and suffer no division they suffer also no alienation without the consent or licence of the soveraign Monarch for so should the Realme be enfeebled and base persons enabled without desert of vertue or prowesse For where the thing so aliened is an Honour or head of the Barony it differs much from the ordinary tenure in capite whereof if the Tenaut make alienation without licence hee is onely to pay fine by the statute 1. E. 3. cap. 12. whereof also before the making of the statute there was diversity of opinion at the Common Law after the statute of Magna Charta But let me cite some authorities for the proofe of these allegations Glanvile the most ancient Writer of the Lawes of this Realme now extant hath these words Notandum autem quòd nec Episcopus nec Abbas quia corum Baroniae sunt de eleemosyna Rege Antecessoris ejus non possunt de Dominicis suis aliquan partem dare ad remanentiam sine assensu confirmatione Domini Regis lib. 7. cap. 1. in fine statut Westm cap. 42. In Edward the thirds time certaine land being parcell oâ— the Barony of Brember was aliened by William de Bruse the Baron thereof without licence of the King and in the argument of a cause concerning the same Greene one of the Judges delivereth this for law That parcell of a Barony or Earldome held of the King in chiefe cannot be aliened or dismembred without his licence and if it be it shall bee seised into the Kings hands as forfeit and the King shall be seised thereof in his own right again In 46. E. 3. it was found by office that William Bishop of Chester had leased unto one John Peston for his life a Mannour which was parcell of the Mannour of the said Bishopricke without licence and it was resolved by the Judges and other of the Kings Councell that the same was forfeit but by mediation of the said Councell the Bishop submitted himselfe to the King and made a fine and severall Scire facias issued out against them that had received the maine profits to answer unto the King thereof And thus much concerning alienation of Baronies without licence But on the other part if a Baron by tenure which holdeth any Honour Castle or Mannour by Barony do grant or alien the same by licence I must again distinguish For either such alienation is made for the continuance of his Barony Honours Lands and Tenements in his owne name blood issue male Or else the same alienation is made for mony or other recompence or otherwise to a meere stranger and hereof ensueth this second conclusion or assertion That if such alienation be made for the continuance of the Barony in his name and blood or issue male as many have made the like then have the issue male together with the Barony be it Castle Honour or Mannour so holden held also and lawfully enjoyed the name stile title and dignity of a Baron and thereof have the heires generall or next heires female been excluded and debarred And for the proof of this assertion there may manifold presidents be produced wherof certain have happened almost in every age for 300. yeers space namely so long in effect as there have bin observations thereof of which some certain doe ensue William de Ferrariis Comes Derby obiit Anno 30. H. 3. Robertus de Ferrariis Comes Derby Johannes de Ferariis Dom. De Charley Margaretae Comitissa Derby Domina de Grooby Will. de Perrar Dom. de Grooby ex dono Matris William de Ferrariis Dominus de Grooby It appeareth by an office found after the death of William de Ferrariis Lord of Grooby 23. H. 6. that Margaret Lady of Grooby gave to William Ferrars her second sonne and to the heires of his body the Mannour of Grooby c. By vertue of which gift the said William Ferrars and his heires were ever after Barons of Grooby Robert Walleron Baron of Kilpeck died in 1. Ed. 1. without heires of his body and Robert Walleron sonne of William brother of the said Robert was his next heire yet notwithstanding the said Robert dying gave to Allen Plagenet sonne of â—â—â—lice his sister the Castle Mannour and Lordship of Kilpeck with the appurtenances To have unto the said Allen and to the heires of his body comming as appeareth by his office c. By vertue of which gift the said Allen was Baron of Kilpeck and summoned among other Barons to the Parliament and he died 27. E. 1. Walleron Baron of Kilpecke Robert Walleron Baron of Kilpee obiit sine exitu 5. E. 1. William Walleron Robert Walleron the next heir William Deyncourt BaroÌ„ of Blaxronry by reason of the entaile obiit 38. E. 3. William Deyncourt ante patrem William Deyncourt Baron of Blackney John Deincourt John Deincourt Alice married to Plagenet Allen Plagenet Baron of Kilpecke coron dono Edmond Deynecourt Baron of Blasteny obiit An. 20. E. 2. Edmond Deyncourt Isabel his next heire The King to all Christian people sendeth greeting c Know ye that whereas lately for that our well-beloved and faithfull subject Edmond Deyncourt pondered and considered that both his Sirname and also his Armes after his death in the person of Isabell daughter of Edmond Deyncourt his heire apparent should be blotted out of memory most earnestly he desired that his Sirname and Armes after his death for ever might be had in remembrance To whose request for the worthy service as well to our father Edward late King of England as also to our selfe by our Letters
same Pedegree of the said Lord Dacres it is expressed that Thomas sometimes Lord Dacres had issue Thomas his eldest son Ralph his second sonne and Humphrey his third sonne Thomas the eldest dyed in the life time of his Father having Issue Ioan his daughter and heire who was marryed unto Sir Richard Fines Knight And after Thomas Lord Dacres her Grandfather and Father unto the said Sir Ralph and Humphrey dyed After whose death Henry 6. by his Letters Parents bearing date at Westminster 7. Novem. Anno 7. regni reciting the said Pedegree and Marriage doth by his Letter a Pattents accept declare and repute the said Richard Fines to be Lord Dacres and one of the Barons of his Realme But afterward in the time of Edw 4. the said Humphrey Dacres after the attaindor of the said Ralph and himselfe by an Act of Parliament which was in 1. Ed. 4. and after the death of the said Ralph and after the reversall of the same Act by another Act 12. Edw. 4. the said Humphrey made challenge unto the said Barony and to divers Lands of the said Thomas his Father whereupon both parties after their title had been considered in Parliament submitted themselves unto the Arbitrement of King Edw. 4. and entred into Bond each to other for the performance thereof Wherupon the said King in his award under his Privie seale bearing date at Westminster 8. April Anno regni 13. did award that the said Rich Fines in the right of Ioan his wife and the Heires of his body lawfully begotten should be reputed had named and called Lord Dacres and that the said Richard Fines and the Heires of his body by the said Ioane begotten should keepe have and use the same state and place in every Parliament as the said Thomas Dacres Knight late Lord Dacres had used kept c. that the heires of the body of the said Thomas Dacres Knight late Lord Dacres lawfully begotten should have and hold to them their Heires the Mannor of Holbech And furthermore the said King did award on the other part that the said Humphrey Dacres Knight and the Heires males of the said Thomas late Lord Dacres should be reputed had named and called the L. Dacres of Gillesland And that he and the heires males of the said Thomas then late Lord Dacres should have use and keepe the place in Parliament next adjoyning beneath the said place which the said Rich Fines Knight Lord Dacres then had and occupied and that the heires of the body of the said Ioan his wife should have and occupie And that the Heires males of the said Thomas Dacres late L. Dacres should have to them to the heires males of their bodies begotten the Mannor of Jothington c. And so note that the name of the ancient Barony namely Gilestand remained unto the Heire male unto whom the land was entailed Moreover this is specially observed if any Baron by writ doe dy having none other issue then Female and that by some speciall entail or other assurance there be an heire male which doth enioy all or a great part of the lands possessions and inheritances of such Barons deceased the Kings of this Realme have used to call to the Parliament by writ as Baron such heire male omitting the Husband or issue male of such heire female and this also appeareth by a notable controversie in the time of Henry 7. betweene Sir Robert Willoughby Lord Brooke and Richard Lord Latimer for the Barony of Latimer which in effect was The said Lord Brooke did challenge the Barony of Latimer as cosen and Heire to Elizabeth his great grandmother who was sister and heire to Iohn Nevill Lord Latimer who died without issue and hereupon exhibited a Petition to Henry 7. in Parliament whereto Richard then Lord Latimer was called to answer because he then enioyed the said title and dignity The said Richard Lord Latimer by his answer did shew that it was true that after the death of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Latimer dying without issue the said Elizabeth was the sister and next heire and married unto Sir Thomas Willlonghby Knight second son of the Lord VVilloughby but Henry 6. for that the said Iohn Nevill was dead without issue and that the next heire was female did therefore call to the Parliament George Nevill Knight second son of Ralph Earle of Westmerland to be Lord Latimer as Cozen and next heire male of the said Iohn Nevil Lord Latimer which George was grandfather of the said Richard Lord Latimer namely Father of Henry Lord Latimer Father of the said Richard In debate of which cause the question now in hand whether a Barony by writ may discend unto the heirea semales was advisedly considered of by the said King and his Nobility in Parliament and in the end adjudged with the said Richard Lord Latimer which President doth afford us two Iudgements in this point one in the time of Hen. 6. when the writ was directed to the said Sir George Nevill whereby he was summoned as Lord Latimer to the Parliament and as heire Male and not the said Sir Thomas Willoughby Knight husband of the said Eliza. heire male And the second judgement was given in the time of Henry 7. whereby the Barony was adiudged vnto the said Richard Lord Latimer comming of the speciall heire male against the said Lord Brooke descended of the generall heire male But here the President before remembred of the Barony of Dacres may be objected to incounter this confusion For there was an heire female martied unto Sir Richard Fines who by the declaration of Hen. 6. was Baron of Dacres in the right of his wife and there was also Ralph and Humfrey the heires males before whom the heire female was preferred by the censure of Henry 6. and Edward 4. This objection is easily answered For although Hen. 6. through the Princely favour which hee bare unto Sir Richard Fines had declared him to bee Lord Dacres in the right of his wife yet notwithstanding did Ralph Dacres being heire male unto the then Lord Dacres deceased beare also the name of 〈◊〉 Dacres and by that name was attainted in Parliament Wherefore the reason why the heire male could not bee regarded was the said attainder of the said Ralph and Humfrey his brother and therefore when Humphrey 12. Edw. 4. laboured to have the said attainder reversed he submitted himselfe vnto the Arbitrament of the King who to satisfie both Competitors because both had well deserved of him after he had admitted them to his favour he allowed the one to be Lord Dacres the other to be Lord Dacres of Gillesland thus much concerning the second point whether a Barony by writ may discend unto the heire female or not As concerning the third point admitting such discent to bee to the heire female when there is no heire male at all that may claime the same for then doth this question take place whether the husband of such heire
Ancestor had estate in fee simple There is a maxime in the Law Possessio fratris de feodo simplici facit ' sororem esse heredem the possession of the brother in see simple doth make his sister to bee his heire But if a man by any of the three names before mentioned be created into a title of dignity to him and to his heires for ever and he hath issue a sonne and a daughter by one Venter and hath also a sonne by a second wife afterwards the Father dyeth and his eldest sonne entreth into all his Fathers inheritance and also enioyeth the title and name of dignity which his Father had but dyeth without issue In this case the dignity shal goe and deseend unto the younger sonne though he be but of the halfe blood unto him that last enioyed that name and title by discent and shall not descend unto his sister of the whole blood and yet in this case shee should only bee her brothers heire of all his fee simple Lands and the reason and cause hereof is because Possessio fratris because the possession of the brother is the maine and sole cause which may give title to her his sister which faileth in this cause of dignity For it cannot be said that her eldest brother was in possession of his title of honour no more then of his blood For the dignity was inherent to his blood so that neither by his owne Act neither by any act to be done by another did hee gaine any more actuall possession if so it may be termed then by the law did descend unto him and therfore the younger brother may well by the Law make himselfe heire unto his Father of the honour though he cannot bee heire unto his brother so that this word Possessio which is none other then pedis positio a fixing of the foot extendeth only unto such things of which a man may by his entry or other 〈◊〉 and doth require actuall possession Cooks 3. part â—â— Ratcliffs case And having thus much dilated concerning the creaâ—â—s and other things incident to the degrees of Noâ—â—ty I cannot with silence pretermit something to â—â—lare concerning that sufficiency and ability of estate â—hich the Law doth require to be in every of them â—â—rding to their severall dignities The Common Law that alwayes will that decorum â—â—ed conveniency be observed considering the charges â—â—d expences appertaining to these degrees and digâ—â—ies being offices of principall service to the King â—â—d the Realme both in time of warre and peace as â—â—th beene said hath ordered that each of them have 〈◊〉 convenient portion and value of lands of inheriâ—â—oâ— for the support of their honours which supâ—â—yes are as sinewer conjoyned unto the same For in â—ertue and in riches as Aristotle counselleth all the â—ld Nobllity consisted and which two as Ecclesiastes â—â—athethâ— maketh a good accomplement for saith he Vâ—ilior est sapientia cum divitiis conjuncta Lamberts Perambulation of Kent 368. Therefore a Knight ought to have 20. l. land by the yeare a Baron 13. Knights fees and a quarter an Earle to knights fees and this doth appeare by the Statute of Magna Charta cap. 2. For alwâ—ies the fourth part of such Revenues which is by the Law requisite to the dignity shall be paid to the King for reliefe as for example The reliefe of a Knight is five pound which is the fourth part of 20. l. which is the revenue of a Knight see the Statute hereof 1 E. 2. and the reliefe of a Baron is a 100. markes which is the fourth part of his revenues that is to say 400. markeâ— yeare which doth include 13. Knights fees anâ— quarter and the reliefe of an Earle is a 100. l. whâ—â—â— is the fourth part of 400. l. which is the revenue of Earle and it appeares by the Records of the Excheqâ—â—â— that the reliefe of a Duke amounteth unto 200. l. 〈◊〉 by consequence his revennue ought to be 800. l. per 〈◊〉 num and this is the reason in every of our bookes thâ— every of the Nobility is presumed in our law 〈◊〉 have sufficient free-hold Ad sustinendum nomen onus and to what value these ancient Rents in tiâ—â— of H. 3. Edw. 1. at this day doe amount unto everâ— man knoweth not Cooke 7. part 33. And in cases of decay of Nobility and meane◠〈◊〉 Senatores Romani rere amotisenata as senators of Roâ— were removed from the Senate so sometimes thâ—â— are not admitted to the upper house in the Parliameâ—â— though they keope the name and title of dignity stiâ—â—â— Sir Thomas Smith de reipub Angl. 221. And by a Sâ—â—tute made 31. H. 8 ca. 10. The Lords have their pâ—â—â—ces prescribed after this manner following viz. theâ—â— foure the Lord Chancellour the Lord Treasurer tâ—â— Lord President of the Councell and the Lord Priâ—â— Seale being persons of the degree of a Baron or 〈◊〉 bove and in the same act appointed to sit in the Pâ—â—liaments and all assemblies or Councell above all doties not being of the blood royall viz. the Kings brother Vnkle Nephew and these sixe the Lord Hiâ—â— Chamberlaine of England the Lord Marshall and the Lord Admirall of England the Lord Steward of the Kings House and the Lord Chamberlaine of the Houshold by that act to bee placed in all assemblies of â—â—â—ncell after the Lord Privy Seale according to 〈◊〉 degrees and estates so that if hee bee a Baron 〈◊〉 he is to sit above all Barons or an Earle aboue 〈◊〉 Earles and so likewise the Kings Secretary beâ—â—â— a Baron of the Parliament hath a place above all â—â—â—ons and if hee bee a man of higher degree hee â—ll sit and be placed according thereunto Priviledges incident to the Nobility according to the Lawes of England VVHen a Peere of the Realme and Lord of the Parliament is to be arraigned upon any treaâ—â—â— or fellony whereof he is indicted and whereupon â—â—e hath pleaded not guilty the King by his Letters â—â—â—tents shall assigne some great and sage Lord of 〈◊〉 Parliament to bee High Steward of England for 〈◊〉 day of his arraignment who before the same day â—â—all make precept to his Sergeant at armes that is â—â—pointed to serve him during the time of his Comâ—â—ssion to warne to appeare before him 18. or 20. Lords of the Parliament or 12. at the least upon the â—â—me day and then at the day appointed when the â—â—igh Steward shall bee set under the Clothe of State â—pon the arraignement of the Prisoner and hath caused the Commission to bee read the same Sergeant shall returne his Precepts and thereupon the Lords shall bee called and when they have appeared and set in their places the Constable of the Tower shall bee called to bring his Prisoner into the Court who then shall bring his Prisoner to the Barre and the Hâ—â— Steward shall declare unto the people the cause 〈◊〉 the King hath assembled thither those Lords and 〈◊〉 and perswade him
to answere without feare 〈◊〉 then hee shall cause the Clarke of the Crowne to reâ—â— his endictment unto him and aske him if hee 〈◊〉 guilty or not whereunto when hee hath answerâ— not guilty the Clarke of the Crowne shall aske hâ—â— how he will be tryed and then hee will say by Gâ—â— and his Peeres and then the Kings Sergeants 〈◊〉 Atturney will give evidence against him whereunto when the Prisoner hath made answere thâ— Constable shall bee commanded to retire the Prisonâ— from the Barre to some other place while the Lorâ— doe secretly conferre in the Court together and theâ— the Lords shall rise out of their places and consuâ—â— amongst themselves and what they affirme shall bee done upon their Honour without any oath to be ministred unto them and when they all or the greatest part of them bee agreed they shall returne to their places and sit downe and then the High Steward shall aske of the youngest Lord by himselfe if he that is arraigned bee guilty or not of the offence whereof hee is arraigned and then of the youngeâ—â— next him and so of the residue one by one untill hee have asked them all and every Lord shall answer by himselfe and then the High Steward shall send for the Prisoner againe who shall bee led to the Barre to whom the High Steward shall reherse the verdict of the Peeres and give iudgement accordingly 〈◊〉 Stamford Pleas dol Corona lib. 3. cap. 1. Poulton 188. The antiquity of this kind of triall by the opinion of the last recited Authours is grounded from the Statute of Magna charta so called not in regard of the quantity but in regard of the weight thereof Cooke Epistle to the 8. part fol. 2. c. 29. beginning thus Nullus liber homo c. nec super eum ibimus neâ— super eum mittimus nisi per legale judicium parvu ' â—â—orum But I take it to be more ancient then the â—â—me of Hen. 3. as brought into the Realme with the Conquerour being answerable to the Norman and French Lawes and agreeable with the Customes Fewdall where almost all the controversies arising betweene the Soveraigne and his vassall are tried per judicium Parvu ' suorum And if a Peere of the Realme upon his arraignement of treason doe stand mute or will not answer directly iudgement shall bee given against him as a Traytour convicted and he shall not bee pressed to death and thereby save the forfeiture of his lands for treason is out of the Statute of Westminster the first c. 12 15. E. 4.33 Dyer 205 and 300. But if hee bee arraigned upon an indictement of fellony he may bee mute It appeareth by this Statute of Magna charta that a Peere of the Realme shall be tried by his Peeres onely in case where he is indicted at the Kings suite of treason or fellony for the words of the Statute be We will not passe or sit in judgement upon him but by his Peeres But if an appeale of murder or other fellony be sued by any Common person against a Peere of the Realme hee shall bee tried by Common persons and not by his Peeres Stam. Pleas del Coron lib. 3. cap. 1. Brooke triall 14â— Poulton 188 6. This priviledge hath some restrainâ— as well in regard of the person as in the manner of proceedings As touching the person First the Archbishops and Bishops of this Realme though they bee Lords of the Parliament if they bee impeached of such an offence they shall not be tryed by the Peeres of the Realme but by a jury of Knights and other substantialâ— persons upon their oaths the reasons thereof alleadged is for as much as Archbishops and Bishops cannot passe in like cases upon the triall of any other of the Peeres for that they are prohibited by the Common and Ecclesiasticall Lawes to bee Iudges of life and death and reason would that the other Peeres should not trie them for this triall should bee mutuall for as much as is performed upon their Honours without any oath taken And so by the way you may see the great regard the Law hath to the word of a Peere of the Realme when he speaketh upon his Honour even in a case concerning the life of a man and that of a Peere and therefore ought they much more to keepe their words and promises in smaller matters when they engage their Honours for any fast cause or consideration Crompton Courts 13. Secondly as touching the Persons no temporall Lords but they that are Lords of the Parliament shall have this kind of triall and therefore hereout are excluded the eldest Sonne and Heire apparant of 〈◊〉 Duke in the life of his Father though he be called an Earle and it was the case of Henry Howard Earle of Surrey Sonne and Heir apparant of Thomas Duke of Suffolke in 38. H. 8. which is in Brooks abridgement treason likewise the Son and Heir apparant of an Earl though he be called Lord or Baron And all the younger Sonnes of the Kings are Earles by birth though they have no other creation but shall not be partakers of this or other priviledges incident to the Lords of the Parliament Thirdly those that are Barons of the Nobility of Ireland or of Scotland if upon the like offence committed in England they be apprehended in England they shall not have their triall by Peeres no though they were borne within England for they received their dignity from a King of their Nations But if the King of England at this day do create one of his subjects of Scotland to be Viscount Rochester within England or by ordinary summons under his great Seale doe call him to his upper House of Parliament do assign him a place and to have a voice there in his great Councell amongst the Lords and Peeres of the Realme he shall thereby also be a Peere of the Realme and be partaker with them in all priviledges and thus much concerning the restraint of the said priviledges in respect of the person as touching the manner of proceeding it appeareth by the said statute of Magna charta c. 29. that a Peere of the Realme shall be tried by his Peeres only in case where he is indicted at the Kings suite of treason or fellony for the words of the statute be Nec super cum ibimus But if an appeale of murder or other fellony be sued by any Common person by a Peere of the Realme he shall be tried by Common persons and not by his Peeres Stam. Pleas del Corone lib. 3. cap. 1. Poulton 118. and so was Fines Lord Dacres tried in appeale of murder 33. H. 8. Brooke Abridgement trials 142. The Nobility of this Realme enjoy that priviledge that they are not to be impanelled in any Iury or Inquests to make tryall or Enquiry upon their corporall oathes betweene party and party for they may have their writ for their discharge to the Sheriffe Rex Vic ' Com c. quia barones regni
nostri iâ— Assizis Iuratis seurecognitionibus aliquibus poni non consueverint ut dicunt nisi corum sacramentumadeo sit necessarium quod sine illis veritas inquire non potest Tibi precipimus quod dilectum fidelem nostram A.B. in Assizis Iuratis seu recognitionibus aliquibus non ponas seu poni faciatis contra voluntatem suam sine mandato nostro speciali nisi suam presentia ob aliquam causam specialiter exigatur teste c. But it is a rule in Law vigilantibus non dormientibus subveniuns Iura For if the Sheriffe have not received any such writ and the Sheriffe have returned any Lords in Iuries or in Assizes c. and they thereupon doe appeare they shall be sworne and if they doe not appeare they shall loose their issues 35. H. 6.46 and in such case they must purchase a writ out of the Chancery reciting their priviledge directed to the Iustices before whom such noble persons are so impannelled commanding them to dismisse him or them that were so impannelled out of the said pannell Fitz na br 165. This priviledge hath restraint in two cases first if the Enquiry concerne the King and Common-wealth in any necessary or important degree or busines of the Realme then this priviledge is not allowed nor taketh place and therefore divers Barons of the marches of Wales were impannelled before the Bishop of Ely and after Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer to enquire of a notable out-rage committed by Gilbert de Clare Earle of Gloucester against Humphery de Bohuâ— Earle of Hereford and Essex and his Tennant in Wales the 12th yeare of Ed. 1. where John de Hastings Edmond de Mortimer Theonald de Bordmor and others Barons of the Marches challenged their Priviledges aforesaid and much insisted upon the same but it was afterwards answered by the Courts as by the words in the Recordâ— appeareth Domino quod res ista Dom. Regem Coronam dignitatem suam tangit dictum fuit Dominum Regis Johan de Hastings omnibus aliis magnatibus supra nominatis quod per statu Iure Regni per conservatione dignitatis Coronae pacis suae apponunt manum ad librum ad faciendum id quod eis ex perte Dom. Regis in jungeretur The Barons aforesaid did neverthelesse persist in the Challenge and in the end both the said Earles between whom the said outrage had been perpetrated submitted themselves to the Kings grace and made their Fines Secondly this Priviledge hath no place in case of necessity where the truth of the case cannot otherwise come to light for the words of the Writ in the Register before mentioned are Nifi sua presentiae ob aliquamâ— causam specialiter exigatur c. Register 179. If a Nobleman doe bring an Action of debt upon an Accompt in case where the Party is to be examined which is alwayes intended to be upon Oath upon the truth of his cause by vertue of the Statute of 2. H. 4. cap. 8. Jt shall suffice to examine his Attorney and not himselfe upon Oath 3. H. 6.48 Cooke 6. part 53. And this Priviledge the Law doth give to the Nobility that they are not to be arrested by any Warrant of any Justice of the Peace for the peace or for the good behaviour nor by a supplicavit out of the Chancery so called because it issueth out at the supplication of the partie or from the Kings Bench for such an opinion hath the Law conceived of the peaceable disposition of Noblemen that it hath beene thought enough to take their promise upon Honour in that behalfe Lamb. Instice of Peace lib. 2. cap. 2. Fol. 17. E. 44.24 E. 3.33 subpenae Fitz 20. And as in civill causes the like rule doth the Court of Equity observe in causes of conscience for if the desendant be a Peere of the Realm in the Star-Chamber or Court of Chancery a Subpena shall not be awarded but a Letter from the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper in liew thereof and if he doe not appeare no attachment shall go forth against him For in the 14. Yeare of the late Queene Eliz. the Order and rule was declared in the Parliament Chamber and so to be inrolled in the Parliament that attachment is not to be awarded by Common Law custome or president against any Lord of the Parliament Dyer 315. a. and if he doe appeare he may make his Answer to the Bill of complaint upon his Honour onely and is not compelable to be sworne By the Statute 5. Eliz. chap. 1. Jt is enacted that all Knights and Burgesses of the Parliament shall take their Oath for the Supremacy and so shall Citizens and Barons of the Cinque-ports being returned of the Parliament before they enter into the Parliament House which Oath shall be according to the tenour effect and forme of the same Oath verbatim which is and as it is already set forth to be taken in the Statute 1. Eliz. provided alwayes that for so much as the Queenes Majestie is otherwise sufficiently assured of the faith and loyalty of the temporall Lords of her â—igh Court of Parliament Therefore this Act nor any thing therein contayned shall not extend to comâ—ell any temporall person of or above the degree of a â—aron of this Realme to take or Pronounce the Oath â—bovesaid nor to incurre any Penalty limited by this Act for not taking or refusing the same If any Peere of the Realme be sued in the Common Pleas in an Action of debt or trespasse and Processe are awarded against him by Capias or by Exigent then he may sue a Certiorare in the Chancery directed to the Justices of the Common Pleas testifying that he is a Peere of the Realme and the Writ is thus Rex c. Iusticiarijs suis de banco salutem mandamus vobis quasi G. F. miles corum nobis ad sectam alicujus per Actionem personalem in placitatus existat talem processum non alium versus ipsum in actionem predicta scire saciat qualem versus Dominos magnates Comites seu Barones Regni nostri Anglium qui ad Parl. nostra de suminicionem nostra venire debent aut eorum aliquem secundum legem consuetudinem regnum nostri Angl. feri faciendum quia pred G T. vnius Baronum Regnum in pred ad Parliamentum nostri de suminitionem regia venient record hoc vobis mandanus alijs quorum interest innatescimus teste est lan H. N B. fol. 247. For unlesse the Court be judicially certified by the Kings Writ out of the Chancery that the defendant is a Lord of the Parliament Jf a Capias or Exigent issue forth against him no errour neither is it punishable in the Sheriffes his Bayliffes or Officers if they execute the said processe and Arrest the body of the said Noble person for it appertaineth not to them to argue or dispute the Authority of the Court but if the Court be thereof certified in
Nobiles non torquentur in quibus plebeij torquerentur nobiles non suspenlantur sed decapitantur and so it is almost growne into a Custome in England by the favour of the Prince for rare is it to have a Nobleman executed in other forme yet Thomas Fines Lord Dacres of the South in 33. H. 8. and Lord Sturton 4. Mar. were hanged Brooke Iury 48. Jn the first yeare of the late Queene Eliz cap. 1. in the Acts of Parliament for the uniformity of Common Prayer c. there is contained this proviso and be it enacted and ordained that all the Lords of Parliament for the third offence above mentioned shall bee tryed by their Peeres and not by any Ecclesiasticall Courts reade the Statute at large At the Common Law it was lawfull for any Nobleman or ignoble to retaine as many Chaplaines as hee would for their Instruction in Religion but by a Statute made 21. Hen. 8. cap. 13. A restraint was made and a certaine number onely allowed to the Nobility and such Chaplaines for their attendance have Immunities as by the Statute at large may appeare viz Every Archbishop and Duke may have sixe Chaplaines whereof every one shall or may purchase Lycence or dispensation and take receive and keepe two Personages or Benefices with cure of Soules and that every Marquesse or Earle may have five Chaplaines whereof every one may purchase Lycence or Dispensation and take receive and keepe two Parsonages or Benefices with cure of Soules and that every Viscount and other Bishop may have foure Chaplaines whereof every one may purchase Lycence and receive have and keepe two Parsonages or Benefices with cure of Soules as aforesaid And that the Chancellour of England for the time being and every Baron and Knight of the Garter may have three Chaplaines whereof every one shall now purchase Lycence and Dispensation and receive have and keepe two Benefices with cure of Soules read the Statute at large And forasmuch as retaining of Chaplaines by Lords of great estates is ordinary and neverthelesse some questions in Law have beene concerning the true understanding of the said Statute J thinke it not impertinent to set downe some subsequent resolutions of the Judges touching such matters If a Bishop be translated to an Archbishop or a Baron to be created to an Earle c. yet within this Act they can have but onely so many Chaplaines as an Archbishop or Earle might have for although he have divers dignities yet he is still but one selfe-same person to whom the Attendance and service â—ould be done so if a Baron be made a Knight of the â—arter or Lord Warden of the Cinque-Ports hee â—all have but three Chaplaines in all sic de simiâ—â—us Also if such an Officer allowed by the Statute to â—â—ve one two or more Chaplaines doe retaine accorâ—ingly and after he is removed from his Office in this â—â—se he cannot be now non-resident or accept of a seâ—ond Benefice if his Compliment were not full â—efore his remaining and yet in that case it behoveth â—â—e Chaplaine to procure a non obstante otherwise â—e may be punished for his non-residency So if an Earle or Baron doe retaine a Chaplaine â—nd before his advancement his Lord is attainted of Treason as it was in the Case of the Earle of â—estmerland after the said Attainder such a Chapâ—aine cannot accept a second Benefice for though his Lord be still living according to nature yet after the Attainder he is a dead Person in the Law and therefore out of the case to have Priviledge for himselfe or for his Chaplaines If a Baron have three Chaplaines and every one of them have two Benifices and after the Baron dyeth yet they shall enjoy those benefices with cure which were lawfully setled in them before but in this case though the said Chaplaine be resident upon one of his Benifices yet now he is become unpunishable for being non-resident upon the other for cessante causa cesâ— effectus the same Law is if a Baron be attainted of treâ—son or Fellony or if any Officer be removed from 〈◊〉 Office Et sic de similibus vide Actons Case Cooke 〈◊〉 part Fol. 117. for all those matters A Baron or others of degree of Honour doe retainâ— such number of Chaplains as are allowed by the Statute and after upon suite and request the said noble persoâ— doth retaine more Chaplaines In this Case they that are first retayned shall onely have priviledge nam qui prior est tempore potior est Iureâ— so if a Lord doe at any time retayne more Chaplaiâ—â— then are allowed by the Common Law the lawfull number onely shall have priviledge and in this case which of them first promoted shall have priviledge and the rest are excluded for in equali Iure inelior est condiâ—â—â— possidentes Jf a Nobleman doe retayne Chaplaines above the number at severall times if any of his first Chaplaiâ—â— die the next that was then retayned shall not succeed for his first retayner was void and therefore in thiâ— Case it doth behove him to have a new retayning after the death of the predecessour and before his advancement nam quod initio non valet in tractu temporis non coâ—valescit If a noble person retaine such a number of Chaplains as is by the Law allowed him but afterward upon some dislike or other cause doe discharge some of them from their attendance or service the Lord in this case cannot retaine others thereby to give them priviledge during the life of them so retained and discharged and the reason thereof is because the first Chaplaines were lawfully retained and by virtue thereof during their lives might purchase dispensations to have advantage according to the statute and therefore if the discharge of their service and attendance might give a liberty to the Lord to retaine others by such meanes the Lords might advance Chaplains without number by which the statute should be defrauded and the said statute must be construed strictly against non-Residents and Pluralities as a thing prejudiciall to the service of God and the ordinary instruction of the people of God These premises are to be read in Cooks 4 part fol. 90. Druries case By the statute of 3. H. 7. cap. 14. it is enacted as followeth viz. Forasmuch as by quarrels made to such as have been in great authority office and of counsell with the King of this Realme hath ensued the destruction of the King and thereby the undoing of this Realme so that it hath appeared evidently when the compassing of the death of such as were the Kings true subjects was laid the destruction of the Prince was imagined thereby and for the most part it hath growne and been occasioned by envie and malice of the Kings owne houshold servants and for that by the lawes of this land if actuall deeds were not there was no remedy for such false compassing imaginations and confederacies had against any Lord or any of the Kings
for the saving of his tenancy being minded to pay all the arrerages before judgment given against him as by the Law hee ought to doe in this case hee must come in proper person and not by Atturney 15. H. 7.9 b. If a noble man in contempt of any processe which hath beene awarded from out of any the Kings Courts doth make rescous and wilfully doth refuse to obey the said writ and the same his offence doth appeare of record to the Court by the Sheriffs returne there may be and shall be awarded against him a Capias 1 H. 5. Case ult 27 H. 8.22 Cooks 6. part 54. If any Lord doe depart this Realm as Ambassadour or otherwise by the Kings lincence or without licence and doe not returne at the Kings Commandement or upon the Kings writ under his privy Signet the King may seize his lands goods and chattells Dyer 108. b. 17. the Dutchesse of Suffolks case If a Lord arrested upon a Supplicavit for the peace doe wilfully refuse to obey the arrest and make rescous upon his returne shall issue an attachment against the said Lord for his contempt to take his body and this is the way to obtaine peace against any Lord of the Parliament whereas the party could not have an attachment against him if the Subpoena had beene duly served and peaceably accepted although the said Lord had not appeared thereunto Cromptons Justice of Peace 134. If a Lord of the Parliament doth with force and arms detaine a man in prison in his House or elsewhere the remedy is in such cases by himselfe or his friends abroad at liberty to have a writ called de homine replegiando to deliver him but if the Lord to prevent the execution thereof and of malice doe keep or convey away this man so wrongfully imprisoned so privily as that the Sheriffe cannot execute his said writ then will the Court award a Witheram whereby the Sheriffe shall attach and arrest the body of the said Lord and imprison him untill he doe deliver his said prisoner 11 H. 4.15 All Lords are compellable to take the Oath mentioned in the Statute of 3 Jac. 4. vide the Statute 7 Jac. cap. 6. who have authority to minister the said Oath to them Bracton lib. 5. fol. 337.6 H. 3. 351. writing of essoines delivereth this learning that if a Baron that holdeth by Baron tenure have his absence excused by essoine he which casteth such essoine or excuse ought to finde surety that the said essoine is true but in case of common persons it shall rest upon the credit and integrity of the Essoince and so is the use at this day The Statute of magna charta cap. 1 a. is quod liber homo non amercietur pro parvo delicto nisi secundum modum illius delicti pro magno delicto secundum magnitudinem delicti nulla praedictarum miscricordiarum ponatur nisi per Sacramentum proborum legalium hominum de vicinate and accordingly is the Law thereunto at this day But the subsequent words in the said Statute viz. Comites Barones non amercientur nisi per pares suos non nisi secundum modum delicti are not in use for whether the offence be great or small for which they are to be amerced their amercement must be certaine viz. of a Duke ten pound and of any other of the Nobility Also whereas the amercement should be offered per pares the use is to offer them by the Barons of the Exchequer Cooks 8. Rep. 40. Bracton lib. 3. Tractat. 2. cap. 1. fol. 116. b. When a Peere of the Realme is arraigned in Appeale of Fellony he shall not have that priviledge to bee tried by his Peere as he should in case of Inditement but must undergoe the ordinary triall of twelve men Stamford Pleas of the Crowne lib. 3. cap. 1. Brook triall 142. Ferdinando Poulton 188. b. Read the book of Entries title appeale Sect. 7. also in Case of an Inditement the Defendant though a Peere of the Realme may not challenge any of his Triers either peremptorily or upon causes which in like cases permitted to all other common persons The Judgement to be given against any Lord of the Parliament in case of Felony or Treason shall be no other than according to the usuall judgement given against common persons and although the execution be not pursuant but with the losse only of their heads yet that is by the speciall grace of the King and not ex debito as by the examples of Thomas Lord Dacre 33. H. 8. and of the Lord Sturton 2 Mariae may appeare Brook tit Jury 48. By attainder of Treason or Fellony is corruption of blood so that their Children may not be heires unto them nor unto any of their Ancestors And if hee were a noble man before he is by the attainder made ignoble and not only himselfe but also his Children having no regard unto the Nobility which they had by their birth and this corruption is so strong and high that it cannot be saved by the Kings pardon or otherwise than by authority of Parliament Stamford Pleas del Coronae lib. 3. cap. 34. But here it is to bee observed that Nobility is not a thing substantiall but meere accidentall for that may be present or absent without corruption of the Subject whereof it dependeth for experience sheweth that the passage of honourable titles are restrained by exorbitant crimes when as nature in the meane while cannot bee thrust away with a fork Wherefore although the Lawyers doe terme and call that extinguishment of Nobility which hapneth by such hainous offences committed as corruption of blood neverthelesse they use not this manner of phrase and speech as though Nobility were naturally and essentially in the humour of blood more than any other hereditary faculty but because the right of inheritance which is by degree of communication of blood directed is by that meanes determined and ended and also in regard of the hatred and detestation of the crime it is called corruption of blood note in Dyer 16. Eliz. 332. the Lord Charles Howards case If one be made a Knight in a forraigne Kingdome by a forraigne Knight yet he is to be so stiled in this Realme in all legall proceedings but if a man be created by the Emperour an Earle of the Empire or into any other title of dignity he shall not beare this title here in England Cooks 7. part 16.20 E. 46. If there be a Father and Sonne and the Father is seised of lands holden in Capite or otherwise by knightly service the King doth create the same Duke and Earle or of any other degree of Nobility and afterwards the Father dieth his Sonne being within the age of one and twenty yeares he shall be in ward but if the King had made him Knight in the life of his Father he should not have beene in ward after the death of his Father neither for the lands descended
Lawyers tearme matter in fact and not by any record Cookes 6. part 53. a. But a noble Woman by Marriage though she take to her a second Husband a man of meane degree yet shee may keepe two Chaplaines according to the Proviso in the Statute of 21. H. 8. c. 13. for and in respect of the honour which once she had viz. at the time of the retayner and every such Chaplaine may purchase ly cense and dispensation Cookes 4. part 117. Cowels Instutions lib. tit 10.15 but her Chaplaines may not be nonresident afterwards And forasmuch as the retayning of Chaplaines by Ladies of great estates is ordinary and neverthelesse some questions in law have beene concerning the true understanding of the said Statute law I thinke it not impertinent to set downe some subsequent resolutions of the Judges touching such matters Anne Baronesse of Mount Eagle in her Widdowhood did retaine two Chaplaines according to the Statute and one of them had but one Benefice and therefore did obtaine a dispensation with a confirmation from the Queene according to the tenour of the said Statute but before he was presented to his second Benefice the Lady did take to Husband Henry Lord Compton whereby she did forsake her former dignity of Baronesse of Mount-Eagle and afterward the said Chaplain did accept a second Benefice and was therunto admitted and inducted and the Judges have resolved that the Chaplain hath done nothing herein but according to the meaning of the Statute and that the Ladies marriage between his Retainer and acceptance of his second benefice was no Countermand Revocation or determination of that Retainer which the Lady lawfully then did make but that she living he might proceed to the filling up of the qualification Causa origio est materia negoti for though the wife of a Noble-man during the covecture cannot by Law rerain a Chaplain to be quallified according to the statute because by Intendment her Husbands Chaplains are sufficient for that Office yet forasmuch as the Retainer was lawfull then she was widdow that being the principall matter shall enable him to take use and benefice after her marriage for though the husband and wife are but one person in Law yet as the Text is sunt animo duo in carne uno Bracton lib. 5. fol. 363 a. And in this case by the death of the Lord Compton her first Retainer was not determined for without any neer Retainer her said Chaplain may take his second benefice and also for that cause so long as the said Chaplains do attend upon their said Lady in her House they shall not be endammaged for Non-residency Cooks 4. part 117. fol. 90. 76. That which remains concerning the further exposition of this statute you may read before in the title of priviledge of Lords So long that the wise of a Duke be called Dutchesse or of an Earl be a Countesse and have the fruition of all the Honours appertaining to that estate with kneeling tasting serving and the rest and so long shall a Barons widow be saluted Lady and a Knights wise also by the courteous Speech of England quandiu Maj. aut viduitâ— vic durant except she happen to relaps with an Adulterer for as the Laws of this Kingdome do adjudge that 〈◊〉 woman shall lose her dower in that case viz. west cap. B. F.N.B. fol. 150. H. Perk. fel. 70. Kitchin 162. b. as Ruâ—oâ— Lands and Tenents so justly so doth the Laws of Gentry and Noblenesse give sentence against such a womaâ— advanced to Titles of Dignity by the husband to be unworthy to enjoy the same when she putting her husband out of mind hath subjected her self to another If a Lady which is married come through the Forrests he shall not take any thing but a Dutchesse or 〈◊〉 Countesse shall have advantage of the statute de Charâ—â— Porest 11. Art during the time that she is unmarried Cromptons Court fol. 167 b. Wheras it is contained in the great Charter amongâ—â— other things in the Form which followeth no Freemaâ— shall be taken or imprisoned or deseised of his Free-hoâ—â— or his Liberties or Free-customs or shall be outlawed oâ— banished or in any wise destroyed nor go upon him bâ—â— by the lawfull judgment of his Peers or by the Law oâ— the Land In which statute is no mention made how women Ladies of great estate because of their Husbands Peers of the Land married or sole that is to say Duchesse Countesse or Barronesse shall be put to answer oâ— before what Iudges they shall be judged upon an Inditement of Treason or Fellonyes by them committed oâ— done because wherof it is an Ambiguity in the Law oâ— England before whom and by whom such Ladies so endicted shall be put to answer and be judged by our said Soveraign Lord the King willing to put out such Ambiguities and Doubts hath declared by Authority aforesaid that such Ladies so endicted or hereafter to be endicted whether they be married or sole therof shall bee brought in answer and put to answer and judged before such Iudges and Peers of the Realm as Peers of the Realm should be if they were endicted of any Treasons or Fellonyes done or hereafter to be done and in like manner and Form and in none otherwise Anno 2. H. 6. Cap. 9. Which statute was but a Confirmation or Declaration of the common Law vide Cooks 6 part 52. b. This is a Rule in the civill law si filia R. nubat alicui dom vel Comiti dicetur semp Regalis As amongst Noble women there is a difference of degrees so according to their distinct excellentnesse the law doth give speciall Priviledges as followeth By the statute of 25. E. 3. cap. 2. It is High Treason to compose or imagine the death of the Queen or to violate the Kings Companion The Kings Espouse is a sole person exempted by the common law and she may purchase by Fee-simple or Make leases or Grants without the King she may plead and be impleaded which no other married woman can do without her husband Cook 4 part 23. B. Theol. lib. 1 a. cap. 4.24 E. 3.63 vide Bracton 363. a. All Acts of Parliaments for any cause which any way may concern the Queen and her Capacity are such statutes wherof the Judges ought to take recognisance as of generall statutes for though the matter do only concern the Capacity of the Queen yet it doth also concern all the subjects of the Realm for every subject hath interest in the King and none of his Subjects who are within hiâ— Lawes is divided from the King being his head and Soveraigne so that his businesse and things do touch all the Realme and as all the Realme hath interest in the King so and for the same Reason in the Queene being his wife Plouden 23.1 a. Cookes 8. Repl. 28. A man seised of divers Lands in Fee holden by Knights service some by Prioritie that is by ancient Feofment holden of others and some