For the haue in al these their worslipful procedinge against her made suche a hotchepoche suche a minglemangle suche a confuse anâ— disordered Chaos against Iustice and Nature that they them selues were the Accusers they them selues the witnesses they them selues the Iudges and examiners of her cause Is there any honest meaning and gentle natured harte that can once patiently abide and suffer to heare these their taunting and intolerable outragious inueyings and accusations especially of the Earles Murray and MurtoÌ„ the Capiteines ringleaders and chief practitioners thereof against her to whome they are most depely bound aswel for high preferment vndeserued as for diuers pardons of death by manifolde treasons worthely deserued To whom the one of them is by nature and blood albe it base as a brother entierly conioyned And to whome they both ought to be with the rest as to their Irege Ladie most loially subiected Shal they now with the Lord Lindzay be admitted to staine and defile her honour to seeke her harts blood who long sithens had worthely lost ther ingrate chorlishe traiterouse blood if they had not ben preserued by her singuler and incredible clemencie Yet let vs coÌ„sider their precise and most holy forme of Iudgement The Queene was disorderly and rebelliously appreheÌ„ded she was cast in prison not once heard to answer for her selfe most instantly and pitifully crauing audience She was forced and constrained by most vehement and iust feare to geue ouer her Croune and dimisse the regiment to the Earle Murray One great argument of the said constraint and compulsion among other is that she neuer readde such writinges as were offered to her to be by her subscribed nor entred into any couenant or talke for the maintenance of her liuing or safegard of her life Which thing she would neuer by any indifferent mans iudgement haue done if she had freely and voluntarily yelded vp her Regal Dignity Neither can the pretensed ParlameÌ„t be preiudicial to her standing vpoÌ„ no better nor surer grouÌ„d then vpon such as we haue rehearsed and vpon such worshipful letters missiue as are by them I can not tel more falsly or more fondly counterfeited Surely such Traitours as durst laye violent handes vppon their Queene and intrude them selues into the Regal Gouernement will make but smal â–ª curtesie in the faining and forging a letter thereby to worke their purposed mischiefe I would then father demaund of them what authoritie they had to somon and assemble a Parlament And whether this fact of hers supposing she were therein guilty deserueth in her being a Prince and considering how heinously the Lorde Darley had offended her and the Croune of Scotland such extreme punishment to be leuied vpon her for one simple murther especially by them that committed that shameful murther vpon her Secretarie that haue committed so many treasons and daily do committe so many horrible murthers vpoÌ„ the Quenes true louing subiectes How many and how cruel and terrible deathes do such Traitours deserue We haue moreouer to demaund of them whereas they pretende a merueilous and a singuler zeale to religioÌ„ and holy Scripture and to measure al their doinges precisely by Scripture and order thereof what sufficient warrant they haue therein by their priuate authoritie to set violent handes vpon their annointed Prince I find ther that King Dauid was both an adultrer and also a murtherer I finde that God was highly displeased with him therfore Yet find I not that he was therefore by his subiectes deposed And here might I take occasion out of the sacred Scriptures to declaime and discours against your disordered doinges but that it is nedelesse and our matters otherwise growe long But yet consider ye with your selfe you the Earles Murray and Murton with your consociats that euen adiudging the Queene were culpable and in some fault as she is not in this matter whether it had not ben much better and more auaileable to your commoÌ„ wealth and to the state thereof prudently to haue dissembled the matter as your forefathers haue heretofore done in a greater cause then this namely in Duke Robert the Gouernour Kings Roberts brother then to haue permitted your coÌ„mon wealth to haue commen into so miserable and wretched a state as it is now falleÌ„ in and dayly like to be in worse case and worse I suppose it wil be found that it had ben a much better policie to haue reserued the punishment thereof to Gods owne rodde and iustice in this or in an other worlde then to haue taken from him that he hath reserued to his owne only iudgemeÌ„t and to haue geuen to the subiects of other Princes suche a wicked president that if these other subiectes treade fast vppon your steppes there wil shortly fewe Kinges and Princes haue any sure and fast holde of their Sceptre and Roâ—al Dignitie We conclude then against you speake and doe the worste by her that ye can inuent that your proceedinges be not agreable or correspondent to law order and Iustice and therfore to be reuoked and adnulled We say that the common rule of the lawe ought here to take place Spoliatus ante omnia restiâ—uendus est vnlesse where all lawes aswel Gods as mans lawe doe fauour and preferre Princes causes with singuler priuileges and prerogatiues ye haue now espied out a newe law whereby Princes shal haue and enioye lesse benefits and preeminences in their owne defence then other priuate persons We say that for these and many other good and necessary considerations all is voide that ye haue busied your selues about We say that al your dooinges ought to be remoued reuersed and clearly annulled and the Queene wrongfully by you displaced to be restored to her state and former dignitie and honour Then let the whole matter be if there be any iuste cause before competent and meete Iudges to sitte vppon a Prince iustly and orderly heard and determined For as for you especially the Earle Marray and Murton ye are to be charged and chalenged byside al other iust exceptions euen as the principal inuentours mainteiners and workers of this shamefull and cruel murther for the whiche ye haue made al this hurly burly and as I may say stirred heauen and earth against your owne very natural Prince Neither may the Lord Lindzay be heard or suffred to intermedle against her if lawe take place for diuers his demerites among which he standeth charged aswel for that that he was one of the chiefe instrumentes in the slaughter of the Queenes Secretarie Dauid as also in the apprehending and imprisoning of her Grace But I much muse and merueyle how the Bisshoppe of Orkney for shame coulde so presumptuously and heynously inueigh and declaime before the Commissioners of Englande against his Maistresse pretensed mariage with the Earle Bothwell seeinge that he him selfe did celebrate the solemnitie thereof Who also was your onely Bifshop that was present at the Coronation of your newe erected king A man moste apte and ready to serue
the Title whiche the Kinges of England haue claimed vnto the Realme of Scotland is not in the possession of the lande and Croune of Scotlande but onely vnto the seruice of homage and fealtie for the same And although the Kinges of Scotland sith the time of King Henry the eight haue intermitted to doe the said homage and fealtie vnto the Kinges of Englande yet for al that the Kinges of Scotland can not by any reason or lawe be called vsurpers And thus may ye see gentle Reader by the opinion of al indifferente men not lead by affection that the Realme of Scotlande hath bene and is yet within the allegeance and dominion of England And so is the Antecedent or first proposition false And yet that maketh no proufe that the Realme of France likewise should nowe be said to be within the allegeance of the Kings of England by reason of the manifest and apparent difference before shewed But what if your Antecedent were true and that we did agree both with the said Queene of Scotland and her subiectes and also with you that Scotland were out of the allegeance of England Yet it is very plaine that your consequent and conclusion can not by any meanes be true And that principally for three causes whereof one is for that neither the King not the Croune not being specially mētioned in the said rule or pretended Maxime can be intended to be within the meaning of the same Maxime as we haue before sufficiently proued by a great number of other suche like generall rules and Maximes of the lawes An other cause is for that the Croune can not be taken to be within the woordes of the said supposed Maxime and that for twoo respectes one is bycause the rule doth only dishable Aliens to demaunde any heritage within the allegeance of England Whiche rule can not be stretched to the demaunde of the Croune of Englād which is not with in the allegeance of England but is the very allegeance it selfe As for a like example it is true that al the landes within the Kinges dominion are holdē of the King either mediatly or immediately and yet it is not true that the Croune by whiche onely the King hath his Dominion can be said to be holdē of the King. For without the Croune there can be neither King nor allegeance And so long as the Croune resteth onely in demaund not being vested in any person ther is no allegeāce at al. So that the Croune can not be said by any meanes to be within the allegeance of England and therfore not within the wordes of the said rule or Maime The Title of the Croune is also out of the wordes and meaning of the same rule in an other respect and that is bycanse that rule doth only dishable an Alien to demaūd landes by descent as heire For it doth not extende vnto landes purchased by an Alien as we haue before sufficiently proued And then can not that rule extende vnto the Croune being a thing incorporate the right wherof doth not descend according to the common course of priuate inheritance but goeth by successiō as other corporatiōs do No man doubteth but that a Prior Alien being no denizon might alwaies in time of peace demaund land in the right of his corporatiō And so likewise a Deane or a Person being Aliens and no deniznos might demaund lande in respecte of their corporations not withstāding the said supposed rule or Maxime as may appeare by diuerse booke cases as also by the statute made in the time of King Richard the second And although the Croune hath alwaies gone according to the common course of a Descent yet doth it not properly descende but succede And that is the reason of the lawe that although the Kinge be more fauoured in all his doinges then any common person shal be yet can not the King by lawe auoide his grauntes and Letters Patentes by reason of his Nonage as other infantes may doe but shal alwaies be said to be of ful age in respect of his Croune euen as a Person Vicare or Deane or any other person incorporate shal be Whiche can not by any meanes be said in lawe to be within age in respect of their corporations although the corporation be but one yeare olde Bysides that the King can not by the law auoide the Letters Patentes made by any vsurper of the Croune vnlesse it be by act of Parlament no more then other persons incorporate shal auoide the grauntes made by one that was before wrongfully in their places and romes whereas in Descentes of inheritance the lawe is otherwise For there the heire may auoide al estates made by the disseafour or abatour or any other person whose estate is by lawe defeated Whereby it doth plainely appeare that the King is incorporate vnto the Croune and hath the same properly by succession and not by Descent onely And that is likewise an other reason to proue that the King and the Croune can neither be saide to be within the wordes nor yet with in the meaning of the said general rule or Maxime The third and most prncipall cause of all is for that in the said statute whervpon the said supposed rule or Maxime is gathered the children descendantes and descended of the blood royal by the wordes of Infantes de Roy are expresly excepted out of the said supposed rule or Maxime Whiche wordes the Aduersaries do much abuse in restrainīg and construing them to extende but to the first degree only whereas the same wordes may very wel beare a more large and ample interpretation And that for three causes and considerations First by the Ciuil lawe this word Liberi which the worde Infantes being the vsuall and original worde of the statute written in the Frenche tongue counteruaileth doth comprehende by proper and peculier signification not only the childrē of the first degree but other Descendants also in the law saying That he who is manumissed or made free shal not commence any Action against the children of the Patrone or manumissour without licence not onely the first degree but the other also is conteined The like is when the lawe of the twelue Tables saith The first place and roome of succession after the death of the parentes that die intestate is due to the children which successiō apperteineth as wel to degrees remoued as to the firste Yea in al causes fauourable as ours is this worde son Filius cōteineth the nephew though not by the propertie of the voice or speache yet by interpretation admittable in al such thinges as the law disposeth of As touching this worde Infantes in Frēch We say that it reacheth to other Descendāts as wel as the first degree Wherein I do referre me to suche as be expert in the said tongue We haue no one worde for the barenes of our English tōgue to coūterpaise the said French word Infantes or the Latin word
and remaining beyond the sea in the custody of the said Constance yet of this fact being against al Iustice aswel the said Archbishop as also many of th' other did after most earnestly repent considering the cruel and the vniust putting to death of the said Arthur procured and after some Authours committed by the said Iohn himself Which most foul aÌ„d shamful act the said Iohn neded not to haue committed if by foraine birth the said Arthur had beÌ„ barred to inherit the Croune of England And much lesse to haue imprisoned that most innocent Ladie Elenor sister to the said Arthur in Bristow Castle wher she miserably ended her life if that gay Maxime would haue serued to haue excluded these two childreÌ„ bicause thei wer straÌ„gers borne in the partes beyond the seas Yea it appeareth in other doings also of the said time and by the storie of the said Iohn that the birth out of the legeaÌ„ce of England by father aÌ„d mother foram was not takeÌ„ for a sufficieÌ„t repulse and reiectioÌ„ to the right and title of the Croune For the BaroÌ„s of EnglaÌ„d being then at dissension with the said King Iohn and renouÌ„cing their allegeance to him receaued Lewis the eldest sonne of Philip the FreÌ„ch king to be their King in the right of Blanch his wife whiche was a stranger borne albe it the lawful Neece of the said Richard and daughter to Alphonse king of Caâ—til begotten on the bodie of Elenour his wife one of the daughters of king Henrie the second and sister to the said king Richard and king Iohn Which storie I alleage only to this purpose thereby to gather the opinion of the time that foraine birth was then thought no barre in the Title of the Croune For otherwise how could Lewis of FraÌ„ce preteÌ„d title to the Croune in the right of the said Bblach his wife borne in Spaine These examples are sufficient I suppose to satisfie and content any man that is not obstinatly wedded to his own fond fantasies and froward friuolous imaginatioÌ„s or otherwise worse depraued for a good sure and substantial interpretation of the coÌ„mon law And it were not altogether from the purpose here to consider and weigh with what and how greuous plagues this Realme hath bene oft afflicted and scourged by reason of wrongful and vsurped titles I wil not reuiue by odious rehearsal the greatenes and number of the same plagues as wel otherwise as especially by the contention of the noble houses and families of York and Lancaster seeing it is so fortunately and almost within mans remeÌ„brance extinct and buried I wil now put the gentle Reader in remembrance of those only with whose vsurping Titles we are nowe presently in hand And to begyn with the most auncieÌ„t what became I pray you of Harold that by briberie and helpe of his kinred vsurped the Croune against the foresaid yong Eadgar who as I haue said and as the old monumeÌ„ts of our Historiographers do plainly testifie was the true and lawful Heire Could he thinke you enioy his ambitious and naughty vsurping one whole entier yere No surely ere the first yeare of his vsurped reigne turned about he was spoiled and turned out both of Croune and his life withal Yea his vsurpation occasioned the conquest of the whole realme by WilliaÌ„ Duke of NormaÌ„die bastard sonne to Robert the sixt Duke of the same And may we thinke al safe and sound now from like danger if we should tread the said wrong steppes with Harolde forsaking the right and high way of law and iustice What shal I now speake of the cruel ciuil warres betwene King Stephen and King Henry the second whiche warres rose by reason of the said Henry was vniustly kept froÌ„ the Croune dew to his mother Maude and to him afterwardes The pitiful reigne of the said Iohn who doth not lament with the lamentable losse of Normandie Aquitaine and the possibilitie of the Dukedome of Britanie and with the losse of our other goodly possessions in France whereof the Croune of England was robbed and spoiled by the vnlawful vsurping of him against his nephew Arthur Wel let vs leaue these greuouse and lothsome remembrances and let vs yet seeke if we may finde any later interpretation either of the said statute or rather of the coÌ„mon law for our purpose And lo the great goodnes and prouidence of God who hath if the foresaid exaÌ„ples would not serue prouided a later but so good so sure so apt and mete interpretatioÌ„ for our cause as any reasonable hart may desire The interpretatioÌ„ directly toucheth our case which I meane by the mariage of the Lady Margaret eldest daughter to King HeÌ„ry the vij vnto Iames the fourth KiÌ„g of ScotlaÌ„d and by the opinioÌ„ of the said most prudeÌ„t Prince in bestowing his said daughter into ScotlaÌ„d a ma ter sufficient inough to ouerthrow al those cauilling inueÌ„tioÌ„s of the aduersarie For what time King Iames the fourth sent his ambassadour to king HeÌ„ry the seueÌ„th to obteine his good wil to espouse the said Lady Margaret there were of his Counsaile not ignorant of the lawes and Customes of the Realme that did not wel like vpon the said Mariage saying it might so fal out that the right and Title of the Croune might be deuolued to the Lady Margaret and her childreÌ„ and the Realm therby might be subiect to ScotlaÌ„d To the whiche the prudent and wise King answered that in case any such deuolution should happen it would be nothing preiudicial to England For England as the chief and principal and worthiest part of the I le should drawe Scotland to it as it did Normandie from the time of the Conqueste Which answere was wonderfully wel liked of al the Counsaile And so consequâ—tly the mariage toke effect as appereth by Polydor the Historiographer of this Realm and such a one as wrote the Actes of the time by the instruction of the King him selfe I say then the worthy wise Salomon foreseeing that such deuolution might happen was an interpretour with his prudente and sage Counsaile for our cause For els they neaded not to reason of any such subiection to Scotlande if the children of the Ladie Margaret might not lawfully inherite the Croune of England For as to her husband we could not be subiect hauing him selfe no right by this mariage to the Title of the Croune of this Realme Wherevpon I may wel inferre that the said newe Maxime of these men whereby they would rule and ouer rule the succession of Princes was not knowen to the said wise King neither to any of his Counsaile Or if it were yet was it taken not to reache to his blood royall borne in Scotlande And so on euery side the Title of Quene Marie is assured So that now by this that we haue said it may easely be seen by what light and slender consideration the Aduersarie hath gone about to strayne the wordes Infantes or children to the first degree
likewise the statute made in Anno 32. H. 8. geueth auctoritie to dispose landes and Testamentes by last Wil and Testament in writing If a man do demise his lande by his last Wil and Testament nuncupatiue without writing this demise is insufcient in law and not warranted by the said statute We leaue of a number of like cases that we might multiplie in the prouffe of this matter wherein we haue taried the longer by cause th' Aduersaries make so great a coūtenance therevpon and bycause al vnder one it may serue for the answere also touching the Kinges royal assente to be geuen to Parlamentes by his Letters Patentes signed with his hande which is nothing else but a declaration and affirmāce of the common lawe and no newe authoritie geuen to him to do that he could not doo before or any forme prescribed to bind him vnto Bysides that in this case there is no feare in the worlde of forging and counterfeyting the Kinges hande whereas in the Testamentarie cause it is farre otherwise as the worlde knoweth and dayly experience teacheth And so withal do we conclude that by reason this surmised Wil was not signed with the Kinges hand it can not any way hurt or hinder the iuste right and claime of the Quene of Scotland to the succession of the Croune of England Now supposing that neither the L. Paget nor Sir Edward Montague and Williā Clarke had testified or published any thing to the infringing annd ouerthrowing of the Aduersaries assertiō touching the signing of the said Wil yet is not therby the Queene of Scotlandes title altogether hindred For she yet hath her iust and lawfull defence for the oppugning of the said assertion as well against the persons and saying of the witnesses if any shal come foorth as otherwise shee may iustly require the said Wil to be brought forth to light and especially the signing of the same with the Kings hand to be duely and consideratly pondered we yed and conferred She hath her iust defence and exceptions and must haue And it were against al lawes and the lawe of nature it selfe to spoile her of the same And all good reason geueth that the said original Wil standing vppon the triall of the Kinges hande be exhibited that it may be compared with his other certaine and wel knowen hand writing And that other things may be done requisite in this behalfe But yet all this notwithstanding let vs nowe imagine and suppose that the King him selfe whose harte and hande were doubtelesse farre from any suche doinges lette vs yet I say admitte that he had signed the said Will with his owne hande Yet for al that the Aduersaries perchance shal not finde no not in this case that the Queenes iuste Title right and interest doth any thing fayle or quayle Or rather lette vs without any perchance say the iustice and equitie of her cause and the inuincible force of trueth to be such that neither the Stampe nor the Kinges owne hande can beare and beate it downe Which thing we we speake not without good probable and weightie reasons Neither do we at this time minde to debate and discourse what power and autoritie and how farre the Parlament hath it in this and like cases Which perchance some other would here do We wil only intermedle with other thinges that reache not so farre nor so high and seeme in this our present question worthy and necessarie to be considered And first before we enter into other matters we aske this reasonable and necessarie questiō whether these general words wherby this large and ample autoritie is cōueied to king Henry must be as generally and as amply taken or be restrained by some māner of limitation and restrictiō agreable to such mind and purpose of the Parlament as must of very necessitie or great likelihod be construed to be the very mind and purpose of the said Parlamēt Ye wil say perchance that the power and autoritie of assignatiō must be taken generally and absolutely without exception sauing for the outward signing of the Will. Trueth it is there is nothing els expressed but yet was there some thing els principally intended and yet for al that needed not to be specified The outward maner was so specially and precisely appointed and specified to auoyde suspitious dealing to auoide corruption and forgery And yet was the Wil good and effectual without the Kinges hande Yea and the assignatiō to had ben good had not that restrainte of the Kinges hande bene added by the Parlament But for the qualification of the person to be limited and assigned and so for the necessarie restriction and limitation of the wordes were they neuer so large and ample there is though nothing were spoken thereof an ordinary helpe and remedie Otherwise if the Realme had ben set ouer to a furious or a madde man or to an idiote or to some foraine and Mahometical Prince and to such a one our stories testifie that King Iohn would haue submitted him selfe and his Realme or to any other notorious incapable or vnhable person the generalitie of the wordes seeme to beare it but the good minde and purpose of the Parlament and mans reason doe in no wise beare it If ye graunt that these wordes must nedes haue some good and honest constructiō and interpretation as reason doth force you to graunt it yet wil I aske farther whether as the King cutte of in this pretensed Wil the whole noble race of the eldest sister and the first issue of the yongest sister so if he had cutte of also al the ofspringes as wel of the said yongest sister as of the remnante of the royal blood and placed some being not of the said blood and perchance otherwise vnable this assignatiō had bene good and vailable in law as conformable to reason and to the mind and purpose of the Parlament It were surely to great an absurdity to graūt it There must be therefore in this matter some reasonable moderation and interpretatiō as wel touching the persons cōprehēded within this assignation and their qualities and for the persons also hauing right and yet excluded as for the manner of the doing of the Acte and signing the Wil. For the king as King could not dispose the Croune by his Wil and was in this behalfe but an Arbiter and Commissioner Wherefore his doinges must be directed and ruled by the lawe and according to the good minde and meaning of those that gaue the authoritie And what their minde was it wil appeare well inough euen in the statute it selfe It was for the auoiding of all ambiguities doubtes and diuisions touching the Succession They putte theyr whole truste vppon the King as one whom they thought most earnestly to minde the wealth of the Realme as one that woulde and could best and most prudently consider and weigh the matter of the Succession and prouide for the same accordingly If the doinges of the King do not plainely and
euidently tende to this ende and scope if a zealous minde to the common Wealth if prudence and wisdome did not rule and measure al these doinges but contrariewise partial affection and displeasure if this arbitrement putteth not away al contentions and striffes if the mind and purpose of the honorable Parlament be not satisfied if there be dishonorable deuises and assignmentes of the Croune in this Wil and Testament if there be a new Succession vnnaturally deuised finally if this be not a Testament and last Wil such as Modestinus defineth Testamentum est tusta voluntatus nostra sententia de eo quod quis post mortem suam fieti velit then though the Kinges hand were put to it the matter goeth not altogether so wel and so smothe But that there is good and great cause farther to consider and debate vpon it whether it be so or no let the indifferent when they haue wel thought vpon it iudge accordingly The Aduersaries them selues can not altogether denie but that this Testament is not correspondent to such expectation as men worthely should haue of it Whiche thing they do plainly confesse For in vrging their presumptions whereof we haue spokē and minding to proue that this wil whiche they say is commonly called King Henries Wil was no new Wil deuised in his sicknes but euen the very same wherof as they say were diuers olde copies they inferre these wordes saying thus For if it be a newe Wil then deuised who could thinke that either him selfe would or any man durst haue moued him to put therin so many thinges contrary to his honour Much lesse durst they themselues deuise any new successiō or moue him to alter it otherwise then they foūd it when they saw that naturally it could not be otherwise disposed Wherein they say very truely For it is certaine that not only the common lawe of this Realme but nature it selfe telleth vs that the Queene of Scotlād after the said Kinges children is the next and rightful Heire of the Croune Wherefore the King if he had excluded her he had done an vnnatural acte Ye wil say he had some cause to doo this by reason she was a forainer and borne out of the Realm Yet this notwithstanding he did very vnnaturally yea vnaduisedly inconsideratly and wrongfully and to the great preiudice and danger of his owne Title to the Croune of France as we haue already declared And moreouer it is wel to be weighed that reason and equitie and Ius Gentium doth require and craue that as the Kings of this Realme would thinke them selues to be iniuriously handled and openly wronged if they mariyng with the heires of Spaine Scotland or any other Countrey where the succession of the Croune deuolueth to the woman were shutte out and barred from theyr said right dewe to them by the wiues as we haue said so likewise they ought to thinke of women of their royal blood that marie in Scotland that they may wel iudge and take them selues much iniured vnnaturally and wrongfully dealt withall to be thruste from the succession of this Croune being thereto called by the nexte proximitie of the royal blood And such deuolutiōs of other Kingdoms to the Croune of England by foraine mariage might by possibilitie often times haue chaunced and was euen nowe in this our time very like to haue chanced for Scotland if the intended mariage with the Queene of Scotland that now is and the late King Edward the sixt with his longer life and some issue had takē place But now that she is no suche forainer as is not capable of the Croune we haue at large already discussed Yea I wil now say farther that supposing the Parlament minded to exclude her and might rightfully so doe and that the King by vertue of this statute did exclude her in his supposed Wil yet is she not a plaine forainer and incapable of the Croune For if the lawfull heires of the said Ladie Francis and of the Ladie Elenour should happē to faile which seeme now to faile at the least in the Ladie Katherin and her issue for whose title great sturre hath lately ben made by reason of a late sentence definitiue geuen against her pretensed mariage with the Earle of Herford then is there no stay or stoppe either by the Parlament or by the supposed Will but that she the said Queene of Scotlande and her Heires may haue and obteine their iust Title and claime For by the said pretensed Wil it is limited that for default of the lawfull Heyres of the said Ladre Francis and Elenour the Croune shall remaine and come to the next rightful Heires But if she shal be said to be a forainer for the time for the induction of farther argument then what saye the Aduersaries to my Ladie Leneux borne at Herbottel in England and from thirtene yeares of age brought vppe also in England and commonly taken and reputed as well of the King and Nobilitie as of other the lawefully Neece of the said King Yea to turne nowe to the other Sister of the King maried to Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolke and her children the Ladie Francis and the Ladie Elenour why are they also disherited Surely if there be no iust cause neither in the Lady Leneux nor in the other it seemeth the King hath made a plaine Donatiue of the Croune Whiche thinge whether he could doe or whether it be conformable to the expectation of the Parlament or for the Kinges honour or for the honour for the Realme I leaue it to the farther consideration of other Nowe what causes should moue the Kinge to shutte them out by his pretensed Will from the Title of the Croune I minde not nor neede not especially seeing I take no notice of any such Wil touching the limitation of the said Croune here to to prosecute or examine Yet am I not ignorant what impedimentes many doo talke of and some as well by printed as vnprinted Bookes doe write of Wherein I will not take vppon me any asseueration any resolution or iudgement Thus only will I propound as it were by the way of consideration duely and depely to be wayed and thought vpon that is for as muche as the benefitte of this surmised Wil tendeth to the extrusion of the Queene of Scotland and others altogether to the issue of the French Queene whether in case the King had no cause to be offended with his sisters the Frenche Queenes children as the Aduersaries them selues confesse he had not and that there was no lawful impediment in them to take the succession of the Croune it were any thing reasonable or euer was once meant of the Parlament that the King without cause should disherite and exclude them from the Title of the Croune On th' other side if ther were any such impediment whereof this surmised Wil geueth out a great suspicion it is to be considered whether it standeth with reason and iustice with the honour of the King and the
then shal we with our children after vs reape the pleasant fruites of this noble coÌ„iunctioÌ„ wrought thus to our haÌ„des by Gods good and gratious prouidence without expense force or slaughter which hitherto a numbre of our courageous wise and mightie Princes haue this thousand yeares and vpward sought for but in vaine as yet with so excessiue charges with so great paines and with so many and maine Armies and with the blood of so many of their subiectes Then shal we most fortunately see and most gloriously inioye a perfect and entier Monarchy of this I le of Britanie or Albion vnited and incorporated after a most merueilous sort and in the worthie and excelleÌ„t person of a Prince mete and capable of such a monarchie As in whose person by side her worthy noble and princely qualities not only the roial and vnspotted blood of the auncient and noble Kings of ScotlaÌ„d but of the Normans and of th' English Kings withal as wel long before as sitheÌ„ce the CoÌ„quest yea and of the Britaine 's also the most auncient inhabitants and Lords of this Iland do woÌ„derfully and as it were euen for such a notable purpose by the great prouidence of God most happily concurre The euident trueth whereof the said Queenes petigrue doth most plainly and openly set foorth to euery mans sight and eye Then I say may this noble Realme and Iland be called not Albion only but rather Olbion that is fortunate happy and blessed Which happy and blessed coniunction when it chauÌ„ceth if we vnthankfully refuse we refuse our health and welfare and Gods good blessing vpon vs we refuse our dewty to God who sendeth our dewty to the partie whom he sendeth and our dewty to our natiue CouÌ„trey to whom he sendeth such a person to be our Maistresse And such commodities and honour withal comming therby as I haue said to whole AlbioÌ„ as a greater we cannot wishe And finally we shal procure and purchase as much as in vs lieth such disturbance of the common-wealth such vexatioÌ„s troubles and warres as may tende to the vtter subuersion of this Realme from which dangers God of his great and vnspeakable mercie defend and pre serue vs. FINIS Hos tres libros à viris Catholicis ijsque eruditissimis lectos examinatos intellecto ab ijsdem librorum argumento vnà cum editionis necessarijs causis iudicaui meritò edendos esse Actum Louanij 6. Martij 1571. Thomas Gozaeus à Bellomonte sacrae Theologiae Professor authoritate Pontificis librorum approbator Errata Libri secundi Fol. Pa. Lin. Errata Correction 4 2 16 Ad And 10 1 18 vvorlde vvorde 11 2 14 good goodes 28 2 17 Bblach Blanch. 32 1 3 in Chauncerie In the Chauncerie 53 2 16 landes and testamentes laÌ„des and tenemeÌ„tes 58 2 24 laufully neece laufull neece 64 2 5 unto heires unto the heires 66 2 27 be produced be procured 67 1 17 put out vvrongfully Errata Libri tertij 9 1 2 Salomon Salmon 9 1 5 fasly safely 15 2 22 father Constantinus father Constantius MeÌ„ should be rather prone to absolue then to coÌ„demne It is nothing like that the Queene vvould haue sought the destruction of the Lord Darley by these meanes vvhen she might haue opeÌ„ly put him to death by Iustice The Q. contrary to minde of her Nobles came into England The Q. enemies lay to her discord vvith the Lorde Darley vvhereof they vvere the authours The Q. vvas fully reconciled to the L. Darley before his death The adueriaties charge the Q vvith their ovvne vvicked deuises The Q. moued by them to make a diuorse vvith the L. Darley The accusation touching letters lent by her to the Earle Bothevvel The vnlikely tale of the Earle Both vvelles letters surmised to be sent to Master Balfoure In case the suâ—mised letters vvere sent by the Q they can make no good prouf against her L. sin e dâ— Probat What exquisite proufes be re quired in criminal causes The surmi sed letters neither haue superscriptioÌ„ of the vvriter nor subscription neitherany date neither signed nor sealed and the beater neuer knovveÌ„ He that vvas the surmised bearer at his death denied the same An easy thing to couÌ„terfeit a mans hande These letters vvere fained and contriued by the Queenes Aduersaries An ansvver to the Aduersaries obiectioÌ„s that the Queene did not mourne the death of the L. Darley L. Liberor ff de his qui notantur inf The consideration mouing â–ª or rather forcing the Quene to this pretensed mâ— riage The Aduersaries declaratioÌ„ before the Commissioners of England The causes that the Rebelles pretended at the beginning Ansvvere to the first The Lord Grange promised vpoÌ„ his knees obedience in al the Rebelles names The Q. imprisoned at LochleueÌ„ The Q. thretned to be â—id avvay if she vvould not renouÌ„ce her Croune The ansvvere to the secoÌ„d The Quenes ene mies dimissed the Earle Both vvel vvheÌ„ thei might haue takeÌ„ him The Quenes enemies bouÌ„d by their haud vvriting to obey the Eâ—le Bothvvel if he matied the Q. An ansvvere to the third The PriÌ„ce if he vvere at age vvold not like the enâ—mies doinges against his mother He vvas vnlavvfully crouned Why the confirmation of the Rebelles doinges made by an acte of Parlament is nothing vvorth The incoÌ„stancy of the Queenes enemies first preteÌ„ding before the Counsaile of EnglaÌ„d her voluntary dimission of the Croune and after vvard that she vvas deposed A strange doctrine of Maister knoxe against vvo mans Gouernment The Quenes enemies fondly triumph of their victory against her true subiectes In case the Queene vvere culpable yet are her enemies procedigs vnlavvful It is not inough to do a good thing vnlesse it be vvel done The lavv geueth exceptions to the Defendant against the Iudges the Accusers and vvitnesses C. Qui accusat non po L. Iniquum l. fin L. qui accusat ff de accusa A good argument that the Queene by coÌ„pulsion dimissed the Croune The Duke Robert of Scotland ExceptioÌ„s most iust against the Queenes accusers 〈…〉 ly against the Earle of Murray The great benefits emploied by the Q. vpon the said Earle He vvent about to entaile the Croune of the Realm to him self and the Stevvardes His tebellâ—â— against the Qâ—ene His coÌ„spiracy vvith them that slevve the Secretatie Dauid A charged pistilet set to the Queenes belly The Q. by her industrie coÌ„ueied her selfe avvay vvith the L. Darley The cause vvhy the Earle Murray hated the Lorde Darley The cause vvhy the Enemies did impute the slaughter to the Q. The vvorking of Murray in the time of his absence Murray and MortoÌ„ the heades of the coÌ„spiracy against the L. Darley 2. Machab. 3. 4. Hect Boet. Lib. 11. The Earle of Murray resembled to Dunvvaldus that procured the slaughter of King Duffus in Scotland Idem li. 16. The like paâ—te plaid by Duke Robert in Scotland The Earle Murray aÌ„d his felovves being driuen froÌ„ al other shiftes at leÌ„gth laied to their Quene
CONCERNING THE DEFENCE OF THE HONOVR OF THE RIGHT HIGH MIGHTIE AND NOBLE PRINcesse Marie Queene of Scotland and Douager of France with a Declaration as wel of her Right Title and Interest to the Succession of the Croune of England as that the Regiment of women is conformable to the lawe of God and Nature Made by Morgan Philippes Bachelar of Diuinitie An. 1570. LEODII Apud Gualterum Morberium 1571. A DEFENCE OF THE HONOVR OF THE RIGHT HIGH RIGHT MIGHTIE and Noble Princesse Marie Queene of Scotlande and Douager of France The First Booke IT were to be wished that as God and nature haue most decently ordinately and prouidentely furnished and adorned manne with two eies two eares and but with one mouth and one tongue wonderfully bridled and kept in with the lippes and the teeth so men would consider the cause of it and the great prouidence of God therein and after due coÌ„sideration vse them selues accordingly Then should we sone learne and practise a good lesson to heare and see many thinges and yet not to runne headlong nor rudely and rashly to talke of al we heare and see but to talke within a compasse and to referre al our talke to a temperance and sobrietie and to a knowen tried trueth especially where the said talke may sound to the blemishing and disgracing of any mans good name and estimation But now a daies the more pitie there is nothing almost but that as sone as it is perceaued by the eye or the eare must furthwith be lasshed out againe by the mouth suche a superfluous and curious itching we haue dissolutely and vnaduisely to talke of al matters though they tende to the great hinderance and infamie of many of our bretherne and though we be nothing assured of the certaine trewth of the matter yea without respecte to priuate or publique persons Of such vnbrideled talke no man or woman in our daies hath as I suppose more iuste cause to complaine then the right Excellent Princesse Ladie Marie Queene of Scotland whose honour many haue gone about to blotte and deface in charging her moste falsly and vniustly with the death of her late husbande the Lorde Darley For the defence and mainteining of whose innocencie in this behalfe we intend to lay forth before the gentle Reader the most chief and principal reasons grouÌ„ds and arguments whervpon the Patrones the Inuentors and workers of al these mischieuouse and diuelish driftes grounded themselues and all their outragious doomges And then consequently to infringe and repulse the same For to rehearse answere to and repell all their assertions and obiections it would require a very long tediouse and a superfluouse Discourse in as muche as these iolie gaie oratours measuring their dooinges more by number of false obiections then by true substantial and pitthy matter to make a goodly florish and a trim shewe to face out and countenance their craftie Iuglinges and to couer their disordered dealings therewithal haue raked vp and heaped together one vpon another against their good Maistres and Souereigne Queene no smal number of slanderous Articles But in al this rablement in al this raking and racking what thing els do they but vtter and disclose their owne spiteful malice and malicious spite to the discrediting of their cause and them selues also Euen as the accusers of Aristophanes among the Athenienses did by whome he being ninetie and fiue times greeuously accused was yet euery time by the Iudges cleared and found guiltlesse as I do no whit doubt but that this good innoceÌ„t Ladie wil be by the verdit and sentence of al indifferent men ridde and vnburdened in like maner of al maner of suspicion that these reprocheful men woulde by their malice and ambition bring her into by thier willes with al the worlde For as goodly and as greate a muster as they make two partes of their slaunderous accusation are manifest false and opeÌ„ vntruethes and foule forged lies The residue thereof though in some part they beare trueth and be nothing preiudicial to the Queene in this matter yet they are ful calumniously and meruelous maliciously depraued drawen and wrested to the worst The effect and drifte of the whole tendeth to this that first they would we should beleeue that after her mariage her minde was as it were alienated from her husband Secondly they pretende certaine letters that they surmise and would haue to haue bene written by her Grace wherby they seeke to inferre against her many a presumption as their wily braines imagine But the moste weighty of them al seemeth to them to be her pretensed Mariage whereof we wil lastly entreate And yet though they haue done their worste though they haue cast out al their spite and malice against her they neuer haue bene able by any direct and lawful meanes to prooue any thing at al wherby they may staine her Graces honour in any one of the foresaid points Had they brought forth any such necessarily concluding illation we had not atteÌ„pted this Defence in her behalfe but would haue yelded and geuen place to an open knowen trewth But seeing that the best matter they haue to supporte their doings withal is nothing else but presumptions and surmises which yet are not of the surest and moste probable forte neither suche as are presumptions Iuris de Iureâ— contra quas non admittitur probatio seeing also that we ought alwaies in criminal causes chiefly when a Prince is touched who is Gods annointed to be more procliue and prone to fauour then to hatred to be readier to absolue and release then to deteine and condemne and that it is farre better and a more sure and more indifferent and vpright way to saue the guilties life then to condeÌ„ne and cast away the innoceÌ„t I trust and am in an assured hope that al the indifferent Readers hereof this being the cause and woful aduersity of a PriÌ„ce wheras the like estate of Princes ought and is wont to moue and sturre al honest harted men to commiseration and pitie and to do their indeuour to the redresse and reformation of suche wrong and oppression done wil with indifferencie and without all partialitie weigh and coÌ„sider the allegatioÌ„s of the one and the other side and iudge of the matter as it falleth out accordingly Which is the very thing we most desire And seeing the Aduersaries throughout al their cause wander by ghesses and vncertaine presumptions let vs also as I may say abuse a litle parte of our Defence What â—y I abuse perchance truely if we had no better or they any good matter at al nay rather vse them accordingly for the more ample and better trial and iustification of our cause We as ke theÌ„ then why the better and the stronger presumptions should not frustrate auoide and set backe the weaker and the worse This sexe naturally abhorreth such butcherly practises Surely rare it is to heare such foule practises in women And may we find in our harts
and seke as many fine fetches as ye list ye neuer shall shift it of with honestie nor wel ridde your handes thereof Whereof I for my part do take my selfe ful assured and therefore do thinke it a nedelesse discourse for me to make any further descant vpon suche an vnpleasant iarring and vntuneable plaine song of your owne setting and making and am right wel contented that ye do make as gaye glosing comments and interpretations as ye list and as your cunning and skil wil serue you to these your owne shameful vntrue textes But now weigh and consider with your selues I hartily pray you and see whether that al your legerdemaine and close conueiances in your false play aswel touching and concerning your fit iugling boxe as al your other like trickes and cunning illusions be not fully espied and plainely and openly inough laied out to eche mans eye to behold and vew And as touching your said iugling boxe you haue ben very fouly and merueâ—lously ouersene in the close and cleane conueiaÌ„ce of your fingers for that a man more then halfe blinde may perfectly see and perceaue your foule play foras much as the very selfe said Doughleish whom amoÌ„g other ye executed and ridde out of the way hath said and sufficieÌ„tly declared for the Quenes innocencie Nay nay perhaps you wil say although our letters although our dead witnesses and although our other matters faile vs yet we hope that the litle faint mourning she made for his death the acquital of the Earle and her preteÌ„ded mariage with him wil help your cause and geue testimony against her And why so I pray you Was not his body enbalmed inseared and interred bysides the Queenes father the late King Iames accoÌ„panied with Iustice Clerke the Lorde of Traquarre and with diuers other GentlemeÌ„ The ceremonies in deede were the fewer bycause that the greatest parte of the Counsaile were Protestantes and had before enterred their owne parentes without accustomed solennities of ceremonies Neither is there any suche order or custome as ye pretende and make your reckning of for the reseruation of the corps forty dayes nor any such obseruation was kept and vsed about the corps of the very father of the Prince neither yet was there any such order taken or appointed by the Counsaile for the enterring of the said Lord Darleyes bodie in such sorte as ye notifie but euen directly to the coÌ„trary Yea ye are as litle able to proue that there hath ben any such customarie solemnitie obserued of so straight and strange a mourning as ye most seuerely would restraine and bind the Queene vnto as ye be able to proue the residue of the premisses But in case ye could wel iustifie some such vsual order yet shal ye neuer be able to shew that it doth extend and apperteine to suche kinde of Queenes as she is For they mourne their husbands who were Kings her Grace mourneth after an other sort she a Prince her husbande a priuate man and a subiect They as women most coÌ„monly do take their honour and chief dignitie of their husbandes Her husbandes encrease of aduancement came by his matching with her â–ª And further women by the Ciuil law are in diuers cases discharged and excused for their omitting thereof and forbearing their so doing And yet did this good gentle Lady bemone euen suche a one a notable time enioying and vsing none other then candle light as was knowen to al the Nobilitie of Scotland and also to one M. Henrie Killigraie who was sent thither from Englande to her comfort according to the vse and maâ—er of Princes Who had a longer time in this lameÌ„ting wise coÌ„tinued had she not ben moste earnestly dehorted by the vehement exhortatioÌ„s and persuasioÌ„s of her CouÌ„saile who were moued therto by her Physitians informatioÌ„s declaring to them the great and immineÌ„t daÌ„gers of her health and life if she did not in al spede breake vp and leaue that kind of close and solitarie life and repaire to some good opeÌ„ and holsome aire which she did being this aduised and earnestly thereto solicited by her said CouÌ„saile Al which yet not withstanding this her fact is with these most seuere and graue Censors takeÌ„ for and reputed as the very next sin of al to the most greuous sinne against the holy Ghoste But ô good pitiful men who for the very tender loue and singuler affection which you did euer beare to the L. Darley the which truly was so vehemeÌ„t that for your exceding hot and ferueÌ„t loue towards him ye euer sought his harts blood do now so pitifully bewaile him But if she had by reason of the closenes of the aire and somewhat loÌ„ger coÌ„tinuaÌ„ce in her mourning place and in her desolate and doleful estate accelerated her owne death withal then had she by the Earle Murrareâ— and his adherents gostly iudgements mourned like a good honest wife and to their best coÌ„tentation it being the right way and readiest meanes to haue conueied and brought the said Earle to that place where vnto he so long and so greedily aspired and the which now at the length he hath atchie ued and atteined As for the residue of their saynges 〈◊〉 there be any fault in the Queene it surely falleth dubble and treble vpon these A chitophelles And the good innoceÌ„t Lady whâ— hath bene so wretchedly and so vnworthely by them abused and circumuented is moâ— to be pitied then to be blamed The Earl Bothwel was acquited by his Peeres according to the common and ordinarie tradâ— and maner in suche cases vsually obserued These vnnatural and disloyal subiects thesâ— most shameful craftie colluders her Aduer saries and accusers I meane the Earle MortoÌ„ the Lord Simple the Lord Lindzay with their adherents and affinitie especially procured and with al diligence laboured hiâ— purgation and acquital which was afterward confirmed by the three Estates by Acte of Parlament These these I say whereof some are now the vehement and hotte fault finders and most earnest reprouers and blamers of the said preteÌ„ded Mariage were then the principal inuenters practisers persuaders and compassers of the same They procured a great part of the Nobilitie to solicite the Queene to couple her selfe in mariage with the said Earle as with a man most fitte apt and mete for her present estate and case First alleaging the dangerous worlde and oft inculcating into her minde and remembrance the present perilous time and dealinges of menne whiche the better to preuent and more surely to withstande by their counsel and persuadings induced her and by other their crafty doinges as it were enforced and constrained her to take a husband to be her comforter her assister her buckler and her shilde to defend her against al her whatsoeuer Aduersaries If she would be contented so to doe they promised him seruice and to the Queene loyal obedience Yea many of them bound them selues to the said Earle by their owne hande writing to assist mainteine
and intent of the said law Now in case these two causes and cōsiderations wil not satisfie th Aduersarie we wil adioine therevnto a third which he shal neuer by any good and honest shift auoid And that is the vse and practise of the Realme as wel in the time foregoing the said statute as afterward We stand vpon the interpretation of the cōmon law recited and declared by the said statute And how shal we better vnderstand what the law is therein then by the vse and practise of the said lawe For the best interpretation of the lawe is custome But the Realme before the statute admitted to the Croune not only kings children and others of the first degre but also of a farther degre and such as were plainely borne out of the Kings allegeance The soresaid vse and practise appeareth as wel before as sithens the time of the Conquest Among other King Edward the Confessour being destitute of a lawful Heire within the Realme sent into Hūgary for Edward his Nephew surnamed Outlaw son to King Edmūd called Irōside after many yeres of his exile to returne into Englād to th' intent the said Outlaw should inherite this Realme whiche neuerthelesse came not to effect by reason the said outlaw died before the said king Edward his Vncle. After whose death the said king apointed Eadgar Etheling sonne of the said Outlaw being his next cosen and heire as he was of right to the Croune of Englād And for that the said Eadgar was but of yong and tender yeares and not able to take vpō him so great a gouernement the said king cōmitted the protection as wel of the yong Prince as also of the Realm to Harold Earle of Kent vntil suche time as the said Eadgar had obteined perfit age to be hable to weld the state of a King Which Harold neuerthelesse cōtrary to the trust supplanted the said yong Prince of the Kingdome and put the Croune vpon his own head By this it is apparent that foraine birth was not accōpted of before the time of the Cōquest a iust cause to repel and reiect any man being of the next proximitie in blood frō the Title of the Croune And though the said king Edward the Cōfessors wil and purpose toke no such force and effect as he desired and the law craued yet the like succession toke place effectuously in king Stephen and king Hēry the secōd as we haue already declared Neither wil th' Aduersaries shift of foramers borne of father and mother which be not of the kings alegeāce help him forasmuch as this clause of the said statut is not to be applied to the kings childrē but to others as appeareth in the same statute And these two kings Stephē and Henrie the 2. as they were borne in a forain place so their fathers and mothers wer not of the kings allegeāce but mere Aliens and strāgers And how notorious a vaine thing is it that th' Aduersarie would perswade vs that the said K. Henrie the secōd rather came in by force of a cōposition then by the proximitie and nearenes of blood I leaue it to euery man to cōsider that hath any maner of feling in the discours of the stories of this realm The cōpositiō did procure him quietnes and rest for the time with a good and sure hope of quiet and peaceable entrance also after the death of King Stephen and so it followed in deede but ther grew to him nomore right therby then was due to him before For he was the true heir to the Croune as appeareth by Stephen his Aduersaries owne confession Henry the firste maried his daughter Mathildis to Henry the Emperour by whome he had no childrē And no dout in case she had had any children by th'Emperour they should haue ben heires by succession to the Croune of England After whose death she retourned to her father yet did King Henry cause all the Nobilitie by an expresse othe to embrace her after his death as Queene and after her her children Not long after she was maried to Ieffrey Plantagenet a Frenchman borne Earle of Aniowe who begat of her this Henry the second being in France Whervpon the said King did reuiue and renue the like othe of allegeāce aswel to her as to her sonne after her With the like false persuasiō the Adueruersarie abuseth him selfe and his Reader touching Arthur Duke of Britanie Nephew to King Richard the first As though forsooth he were iustly excluded by Kinge Iohn his vncle by cause he was a forainer borne If he had said that he was excluded by reason the vncle ought to be preferred before the Nephewe though it should haue ben a false allegation and plaine against the rules of the lawes of this Realme as may wel appeare among other thinges by King Richard the second who succeded his grādfather king Edward the third which Richard had diuerse worthie and noble vncles who neither for lacke of knowledge coulde be ignorant of the right neither for lacke of frendes courage and power be enforced to forbeare to chalenge their title and interest yet should he haue had some countenance of reason and probabilitie bicause many arguments and the authoritie of many learned and notable Ciuilians doo concurre for the vncles right before the Nephewe But to make the place of the natiuitie of an inheritour to a kingdom a sufficiēt barre against the right of his blood it seemeth to haue but a weake and slender holde and grounde And in our case it is a most vnsure and false ground seeing it is moste true that King Richard the first as we haue said declared the said Arthur borne in Britanie and not son of a King but his brother Geffreys sonne Duke of Britanie heire apparent his vncle Iohn yet liuing And for such a one is he taken in al our stories And for such a one did all the worlde take him after the said King Richard his death neither was King Iohn taken for other then for an vsurper by excluding him and afterward for a murtherer for imprisoning him and priuily making him away For the which facte the French King seased vpon al the goodly Coūtries in France belonging to the King of England as forfeited to him being the chiefe Lorde By this outragious deede of King Iohn we lost Normandie withall and our possibilitie to the inheritance of all Britanie the right and Title to the said Britanie being dewe to the said Arthur and his heires by the right of his mother Constance And though the said king Iohn by the practise and ambition of Quene Elenour his mother and by the special procurement of Huberte then Archebishop of Caunterburie and of some other factious persons in Englād preuēted the said Arthur his nephew as it was easy for him to do hauing gotten into his handes al his brother Richardes treasure by sides many other rentes then in England and the said Arthur being an infante
only Of the like weight is his other coÌ„sideration imaginiÌ„g and surmising this statute to be made bicause the King had so many occasioÌ„s to be so oft ouer the sea with his spouse the Queene As though diuers Kings before him vsed not often to passe ouer the seas As though this were a personal statute made of special purpose and not to be takeÌ„ as a declaratioÌ„ of the coÌ„mon law Which to say is most directly repugnant and contrary to the letter of the said statute Or as though his children also did not very often repaire to outward Countries as Iohn of Gaunt Duke of Lancaster that maried Peters the King of Castiles eldest daughter by whose right he claimed the Croune of Castile as his brother EdmuÌ„d Erle of Cambridge that maried the yongest daughter as Lionell Duke of Claraunce that maried at Milaine ViolaÌ„t daughter and heir to Galeatius Duke of Milan But especially Prince Edwarde whiche moste victoriously toke in battaile Iohn the French King and brought him into England his prisoner to the great triumphe and reioysing of the Realme whose eldest sonne Edward that died in short time after was borne beyond the seas in Gascome and his other sonne Richard that succeded his grandfather was borne at Burdeaux as these noble King Edwardes sonnes maried with forainers so did they geue out their daughters in mariage to foraine Princes as the Duke of Lancaster his daughter Philippe to the king of Portingale and his daughter Catherin to the King of Spaine and his Neece Iohan daughter to his sonne Earle of Somerset was ioyned in mariage to the King of Scottes Iohan daughter to his brother Thomas of Wodstocke Duke of Gloucester was Queene of Spaine and his other daughter Marie Duchesse of Britannie Now by this mans interpretation none of the issue of al these noble Women could haue enioyed the Croune of England when it had fallen to them though they had bene of the neerest roial blood after the death of their Auncestours Which surely had bene against the auncient presidentes and examples that we haue declared and against the common Lawe the whiche muste not be thought by this Statute any thing taken away but only declared and against al good reason also For as we would haue thought this Realme greatly iniured if it had ben defrauded of Spaine or any of the foresaid couÌ„treies being deuolued to the same by the foresaid Mariages as we thincke our self at this day iniured for the withholding of France so the issue of the foresaide noble womeÌ„ might and would haue thought them hardly and iniuriously handled yf any such case had happened Neither suche friuolous interpretation and gloses as this man nowe frameth and maketh vppon the statute woulde then haue serued nor nowe wil serue But of all other his friuolous and folish ghessing vpon the clause of the statute for Infantes de Roy there is one most fond of al. For he would make vs beleue such is the mans skil that this statute touching Infantes de Roy was made for the great doubte more in them then in other personnes touching their inheritance to their Auncestours For being then a Maxime saieth he in the lawe that none could inherite to his Auncestours being not of father and mother vnder the obedience of the King seing the King him selfe could not be vnder obedience it plainely seemed that the Kinges children were of farre worse condition then others and quite excluded And therefore he saith that this statute was not to geue them any other priuilege but to make them equall with other And that therefore this statute touching the Kinges children is rather in the superficial parte of the worde then in effecte Nowe among other thinges he saieth as we haue shewed before that this word Infantes de Roy in this statute mentioned must be taken for the children of the first degree whiche he seemeth to proue by a note taken out of M. Rastal But to this we answer that this maÌ„ swetely dreamed when he imagined this fonde and fantasticall exposition And that he shewed him selfe a very infante in law and reason For this was no Maxime or at lest not so certaine before the making of this statute whiche geueth no new right to the Kinges children nor answereth any doubt touching them and their inheritance but saith that the law of the Croune of England is and alwaies hath bene which lawe saith the King say the Lordes say the Commons we allowe and affirme for euer that the Kinges children shal be hable to inherite the Landes of their Auncesters whereâ—oeuer they be borne Al the doubt was for other persons as appeareth euideÌ„tly by the tenour of the statute whether by the coÌ„mon law they being borne out of the allegeance were heritable to their Auncestours And it appeareth that th' Aduersary is driueÌ„ to the hard wal when he is faine to catch hold vpon a selie poore marginal note of M. Rastal of the Kinges childreÌ„ and not of the Kings childrens children Which yet nothing at al serueth his purpose touching this statute But he or the Printer or who so euer he be as he draweth out of the text many other notes of the matter therin coÌ„prised so vpoÌ„ these FreÌ„ch wordes Les enfants de Roy he noteth in the MargeÌ„t The Kings childreÌ„ but how far that word reacheth he saieth neither more nor lesse Neither it is any thing preiudicial to the said Queenes right or Title whether the said wordes Infants ought to be takeÌ„ strictly for the first degree or farther enlarged For if this statute toucheth only the succession of the Kings children to their Auncestours for other inheritaÌ„ce and not for the Cround as most men take it and as it may be as we haue said very wel takeÌ„ and allowed then doth this supposed Maxime of forain borne that seemeth to be gathered out of this statute nothing anoy or hinder the Queene of Scotlandes Title to the Croune as not therto apperteining On the other side if by the inheritance of the kings childreÌ„ the Croune also is meant yet neither may we enforce the rule of foraine borne vpoÌ„ the kings children which are by theâ—presse wordes of the statute excepted neither enforce the word Inâ—â—â—s to the first degree only for such reasons presidents and examples and other prouffes largely by vs before set forth to the coÌ„trarie seing that the right of the Croune falling vpoÌ„ them they may wel be called the kings ChildreÌ„ or at the lest the childreÌ„ of the Croune Ther is also one other cause why though this statute reach to the Croune and may and ought to be expouÌ„ded of the same the said Queene is out of the reach and coÌ„passe of the said statute For the said statute can not be vnderstanded of any persons borne in Scotlande or Wales but onely of persons borne beyond the sea out of the allegeance of the King of England that is to wrtte France Flandres and such like For England
the said Wil and others for the execution and performance of the same Finally the said Testament was recorded in the Chancerie Wherfore they affirme thaâ— there ought no manner of doubt moue any man to the coÌ„trarie and that either we must graunt this Wil to be signed with his hand or that he made no Wil at al both must be graunted or both denied If any wil deny it in case he be one of the witnesses he shal impugne his owne testimonie if he be one of the executours he shal ouerthrow the foundatioÌ„ of al his doinges in procuring the said Wil to be inrolled and set forth vnder the great Seale And so by their dubblenes they shal make them selues no mete witnesses Nowe a man can not lightly imagine how any other bysides these two kind of witnesses for some of them and of the executors were such as were coÌ„tinually wayting vpon the Kinges person may impugne this Wil and proue that the king did not signe the same But if any such impugne the Wil it would be coÌ„sidered how many they are and what they are and it wil be very harde to proue negatiuam facti But it is euidente say they that there was neuer any such lawful proufe against the said Wil producted For if it had ben it would haue ben published in the Starrechamber preached at Poules Crosse declared by Acte of Parlament proclaimed in euery quarter of the Realme Yea admitting say they that it were proued that the said pretensed Wil lacked the Kinges hande yet neuerthelesse say they the very copies we haue spoken of being written and signed or at least interlined with his owne hande may be saide a sufficient signing with his owne hande For seing the scope and final purpose of the statute was to haue the succession prouided for and ascerteined whiche is sufficiently done in the said Wil and seing his owne hande was required but onely for eschewing euil and sinister dealing whereof there is no suspicion in this Will to be gathered what matter in the worlde or what difference is there when the King fulfilled and accomplisihed this gratiouse Acte that was loked for at his handes whether he signed the Will with his owne hande or no If it be obiected that the King was obliged and bound to a certaine precise order and forme which he could in no wise shift but that the Acte without it muste perish and be of no valewe then say they wee vndoe whole Parlamentes aswel in Queene Maries time as in King Henry the eightes time In Queene Maries time bycause she omitted the Style appointed by Parlamente Anno 〈◊〉 octauiâ—rice simo quinto In King Henries tyme by reason there was a statute that the Kinges royal assent may be geuen to an Acte of Parlamente by his Letters Patentes signed with his hande though he be not there personally And yet did the saied King supplie full ofte his confente by the stampe only This yet notwithstanding the said Parlamentes for the omission of these formes so exactely and precisely appointed are not destroyed and disannulled After this sorte in effecte haue the Aduersaries replied for the defence of the said pretensed Will. To this we wil make our reioynder and saye Firste that our principall matter is not to ioyne an islewe whether the saide Kinge made and ordeyned any sufficient Will or no. We leaue that to an other time But whether he made any Testament in suche order and forme as the statute requireth Wherefore if it be defectiue in the said forme as we affirme it to be were it otherwise neuer so good and perfect though it were exemplified by the great Seale and recorded in Chancerie and taken commonly for his Wâ—ll and so accomplished it is nothing to the principal question It resteth then for vs to consider the weight of the Aduersaries presumptions whereby they would inforce a probabilitie that the Testament had the foresaide requisite forme Yet first it is to be coÌ„sidered what presumptions and of what force and number do occurre to auoide and frustrate the Aduersaries presumptions and all other like We say then there occurre many likelyhoddes many presumptions many great and weightie reasons to make vs to thinke that as the king neuer had good and iuste cause to minde and enterprise suche an Acte as is pretended so likewise he did enterprise no such Acte in deede I deny not but that theâ— was such authoritie geuen him neither I deâ—y but that he might also in some honorable sort haue practised the same to the honour and wealth of the Realme and to the good coÌ„tentation of the same Realm But that he had either cause or did exercise the said authoritie in suche strange and dishonorable sort as is pretended I plainely denie For being at the time of this pretensed Wil furnished and adorned with issue the late king Edward and the Ladies Marie and Elizabeth their state and succession being also lately by Acte of Parlament established what neede or likelyhod was there for the king then to practise such newe deuises as neuer did I suppose any king in this Realme before and fewe in any other byside And where they were practised commonly had infortunate and lamentable successe What likelyhode was there for him to practise such deuises especially in his later daies when wisdome the loue of God and his Realme should haue bene moste ripe in him that were likely to sturre vppe a greater fier of greeuouse contention and woful destruction in England then euer did the deadly factioÌ„ of the red Rose and the white lately by the incorporation and vnion of the house of Yorke and Lancaster in the person of his father through the mariage of Ladie Elizabeth eldest daughter of king Edwarde the fourth most happily extinguished and buried And though it might be thought or said that there would be no such eause of feare by reason the matter passed by Parlament yet could not he be ignorant that neither Parlamentes made for Henry the fourth or continuance of twoo Descentes whiche toke no place in geuing any Title touching the Croune in King Henry the sixt nor Parlamentes made for King Râ—chard the third nor Parlaments of attainder made against his father could either preiudice his fathers right or releaue other against such as pretended iust right and title And as he could not be ignoraÌ„t therof so it is not to be thought that he would abuse the great confidence put vppon him by the Parlament and disherite without any apparent cause the next royal blood and thinke all thinges sure by the colour of Parlament The litle force whereof against the right inheritour he had to his fathers and his owne so ample benefit so lately and so largely sene and felt And yet if he minded at any time to preiudice the said Lady Marie Queend of Scotland of al times he would not haue done it then when al his care was by al possible meanes to contriue and compasse a mariage
betwene his sonne Edward and the said Lady and Quene Surely he was to wise of him selfe and was furnished with to wise CouÌ„sailours to take such an homely way to procure and purchase the said mariage by And least of all can we say he attempted that dishonorable disherision for any special inclination or fauour he bare to the French Queene his sisters children For there haue bene of his neere and priuie Counfaile that haue reported that the King neuer had any great liking of the mariage of his sister with the Duke of Suffolke who maried her first priuily in France and afterward openly in England And as it is said had his pardon for the said priuy mariage in writing Howe so euer this matter goeth certeine it is that if this pretensed Wil be true he transferreed and traÌ„sposed the reuersion of the Croune not only from the Queene of ScotlaÌ„d from my Ladie Leneux and their issue but euen from my Ladie Francis and my Ladie Elenour also daughters to the Frenche Queene whiche is a ching in a manner incredible and therefore nothing likely I must now gentle Reader put thee in remeÌ„brance of two other most pregnaÌ„t and notable coniectures and presumptions For among al other incoÌ„ueniences and absurdities that do and may accoÌ„panie this rash and vnaduised acte by this preteÌ„sed Wil inconsiderately mainteined it is principally to be noted that this Acte geueth appareÌ„t and iust occasion of perpetual disherison of the Style and Title of FraÌ„ce incorporated and vnited to the Croune of this Realme For whereby do or haue the Frenchmen hitherto excluded the Kings of this Realme claiming the Croune of France by the Title of Edward the third falling vpon him by the right of his mother other then by a politike and ciuil law of their owne that barreth the female from the right of the Croune And what doth this preteÌ„sed Act of king Henrie but iustifie and strengthen their quarel and ouerthoweth the foundatioÌ„ and bulworke wherby we mainteme our foresaid Title and claime If we may by our municipal law exclude the said Queene of Scotland being called to the Croune by the Title of general heritage then is their municipal law likewise good and effectual and coÌ„sequently we 〈◊〉 and haue made al this while an vniust and wrongful claime to the Croune of France But now to go somewhat farther in the matter or rather to come neerer home and to the quicke of the matter we say as there was some apparent and good cause why the king should the twentie and eight yeare of his reigne thinke vpon some limitation and appointement of the Croune king Edward as yet vnborne so after he was borne and that the Title and interest of the reuersion of the Croune after him was the thirtie and fifte yeare by Parlament confirmed to the late Queene Marie and her sister Elizabeth it is not to be thought that he would afterward ieoparde so great a matter by a Testament and Wil which may easely be altered and counterfeyted And least of al make such assignation of the Croune as is nowe pretended For being a Prince of such wisdome and experience he could not be ignorant that this was the next and rediest way to put the state at least of both his daughters to great peril and vtter disherison For the Kinges exaÌ„ple and boldnes in interrupting and cutting away so many branches of the neerest side and line might sone breede in aspiring and ambitious hartes a bolde and wicked attempte the way being so farre brought in and prepared to their handes by the King him selfe and their natures so readie and prone to follow euil presidents and to clime high by some colourable meanes or other to spoile and depriue the said daughters of their right of the Croune that should descend and fal vpon them and to conuey the same to the heires of the said Ladie Francis. And did not I pray you this drift and deuise fal out euen so tending to the vtter exclusioÌ„ of the late Queene Marie and her Sister Elizabeth if God had not of his mercy most gratiously and wonderfully repressed and ouerthroweÌ„ the same These reasons then and presumptions may seme wel able and sufficient to beare doune to breake doune and ouerthrow the weake and slender presumptions of th' Aduersaries grounded vpon vncertaine and mere surmises ghesses and coniectures as among other that the King was offended with the Quene of Scotland and with the Ladie Leneux Which is not true And as for the Ladie Leneux it hath no manner of probabilitie as it hath not in dede in the said Queene And if it had yet it is as probable and much more probable that the King would haue especially at that time for such cause as we haue declared suppressed the same displeasure Graunting now that there were some such displeasure was it honorable either for the King or the Realm or was it thinke ye euer thought by the Parlament that the King should disherite them for euery light displeasure And if as the Aduersaries confesse the king had no cause to be offended with the FreÌ„ch Quenes childreÌ„ why did he disherite the Ladie FraÌ„cis and the Ladie Elenor also Their other presumption whiche they ground vpoÌ„ the auoyding of the vncertenty of the succession by reason of his Wil is of smal force and rather turneth against them For it is so farre of that by this meanes the succession is made more certaine and sure that contrarywise it is subiecte to more vncerteintie and to lesse suertie then before For whereas before the right and claime to the Croune hong vppon an ordinarie and certaine course of the common lawe vpon the certaine and assured right of the royall and vnspotted blood yea vppon the very lawe of nature whereby many inconueniences manie troubles daungers and seditions are in al Countries politikely auoided so now depending vpon the statute onely it is as easie by an other statute to be intringed and ouerthrowen And depending vppon a Testament is subiect to many corruptions sinister dealinges cauillations yea and iust ouerthrowes by the dishabilitie of the Testatours witnesses or the Legatorie himselfe or for lacke of dewe order to be obserued or by the death of the Witnesses vnexamined and for many other like considerations The Monumentes of al antiquitie the memorie of al ages and of our owne age and dayly experience can tel and shewe vs many lamentable examples of many a good and lawful Testament by vndue and craftie meanes by false and suborned witnesses by the couetous bearing and main tenance of such as be in authoritie quite vndone and ouerthrowne Wherefore Valerius Maxtmus crieth out against M. Crassus and Q. Hortensiu Lumina â—uriae ornamenta Fori quod scelus vindicare debebant inhonesti lucri captura inuitati authoritatibus suis texerunt This presumption then of the Aduersaries rather maketh for vs and ministreth to vs good occasion to thinke that the King would not hasard
the weight and importaÌ„ce of such a matter to reste vpon the validitie or mualiditie of a bare Testament only By this that we haue said we may probably gather that the King had no cause to aduenture so great an interprise by a bare Wil and seâ—tament Ye shal now heare also why we think he did neuer attempt or enterprise any such thing It is wel knowen the King was not wonte lightly to ouerslippe the occasion of any great commoditie presently offered And yet this notwithstanding hauing geuen to him by Acte of Parlament the ordering and disposition of al Chantries and Colleges he did neuer or very litle practise and execute this authoritie And shall we thinke vnlesse ful and sufficient prouse necessarily enforce creditte that the King to his no present coÌ„moditie and aduantage but yet to his great dishonour and to the great obloquie of his subiectes and other Countries to the notable disherison of so many the next royal blood did vse any such authoritie as is surmised Againe if he had made any such assignation who doubteth but that as he conditioned in the said pretensed Wil with his noble daughters to marie with his CouÌ„sels aduise either els not to enioy the benefitte of the succession he would haue tyed the said Ladie Francis and Ladie Elenours heirs to the same condition Farthermore I am driuen to thinke that ther passed no such limitatioÌ„ by the said king Henries wil by reason there is not nor was these many yeares any original copy therof nor any autheÌ„tical Record in the ChaÌ„cerie or els wher to be shewed in al EnglaÌ„d as the Aduersaries theÌ„selues confesse and in the copies that be spread abrode the witnesses preteÌ„ded to be present at the signing of the said Wil be such for the meanesse of their state on the one side and for the greatnesse and weight of the cause on th' other side as seme not the most sufficient for suche a case The importance of the cause being no lesse then the disherision of so many heires of the Croune as wel from the one sister as froÌ„ the other required and craued some one or other of the priuie CouÌ„saile or some one honorable and notable person to haue ben present at the said signing or that some notificatioÌ„ should haue ben made afterward to such persons by the King him selfe or at least before some Notarie and autheÌ„tical person for the better strengthening of the said Wil. Here is now farther to be coÌ„sidered that seing the interest to the Croune is become a plaine testamentarie matter and claime and dependeth vpon a last Wil when and before what Ordinarie this Wil was exhibited al lowed and prooued Where and of whome toke the Executours their othe for the true performaÌ„ce of the Wil Who coÌ„mitted to theÌ„ th'administratioÌ„ of the Kings goods and chattles When and to whome haue they brought in the InueÌ„tory of the same Who examined the witnesses vpon their othe for the tenour and trueth of the said TestameÌ„t Namely vpon the signement of the Kinges hand wherein only consisteth the weight of no lesse then of the Croune it self where or in what spiritual or temporal Courte may one find their depositions But it were a very hard thing to finde that that as farre as men can learne neuer was And yet if the matter were so plaine so good and so sound as these men beare vs in hand if the original TestameÌ„t had ben such as might haue biddeÌ„ the touchstone the trial the light and the sight of the worlde why did not they that enioyed most commoditie therby and for the sway and authorite they bare might and ought best to haue done it take coÌ„uenient and sure order that th' original might hane ben duely and safely preserued or at the least the ordinarie Probate which is in euery poore mans Testament diligeÌ„tly obserued might haue ben procured or sene one or other auteÌ„tical InstrumeÌ„t therof reserued The Aduersaries theÌ„selues see wel inough yea and are faine to coÌ„fesse these defectes But to helpe this mischief they wold fame haue the EnrolmeÌ„t in the Chancerie to be taken for a sufficient Probate by cause as they say both the spiritual and temporal authoritie did concurre in the Kings person Yet do they know wel inough that this plaister wil not cure the sore and that this is but a poore helpe and a shift For neither the Letters Patents nor th'EnrolmeÌ„t may in any wise be counted a sufficient Probate The ChaÌ„cerie is not the Court or ordinarie place for the probate of Willes nor the Rolles for recording the same Both must be done in the Spiritual Courts where th'Executours also must be impleaded and geue their accompt where the weakenes or strength of the Wil must be tried the witnesses examined finally the probate and al other thinges thereto requisite dispatched Or if it may be done by any other person yet must his authoritie be shewed The probate and al thinges must be done accordingly And among other things the vsual clause of Saluo iure cuiuscunque must not be omitted Which things I am assured the recording in the ChaÌ„cerie caÌ„not import But this caution and prouiso of Saluo iure cuiuscunque which is most coÌ„formable to al law and reason did litle serue some mens turne And therefore there was one other caution and prouiso that though the poorest mans TestameÌ„t in al England hath this prouiso at the probate of the same yet for this Testament the weightiest I trow that euer was made in England no suche probate or clause can be found either in the one or the other court Yet we nedes must al this notwithstanding be borne in hande and borne doune that there was a TestameÌ„t and Wil formably framed according to the purpose and effect of the statute yet must the right of th' imperial Croune of EnglaÌ„d be coÌ„ueied and caried away with the color and shadow only of a Wil. I say the shadow only by reason of another coniecture and presumptioÌ„ whiche I shal tel you of Whiche is so liuely and effectual that I verily suppose it wil be very harde for any man by any good and probable reason to answere and auoide the same And is so important and vehemeÌ„t that this only might seeme vtterly to destroie al the Aduersaries coniectural prouffes coÌ„cerning the maintenance of this supposed Wil. We say therfore and affirme that in case there had ben any good and sure helpe and handfast to take and hold the Croune for the heirs of Lady Francis by the said Wil that the faction that vniustly intruded the Lady Iane eldest daughter to the said Lady FraÌ„cis to the possession of the Croune would neuer haue omitted to take receaue and imbrace the occasioÌ„ and benefit therof to them presently offered They neither would nor could haue ben driuen to so harde and bare a shifte as to colour their vsurpation against the Late Queene Marie only and her Sister Elizabeth with the
oportet sed ad sinceram testimoniorum fidem testimonia quibus potius lux veritatis assistit It hath not lightly bene heard or sene that men of suche state and vocation in so great and weightie a cause would incurre first the displeasure of God then of their Prince and of some other of the best sorte if their depositions were vntrue and would purchase them selues dishonour slaunder and infamie yea disclose their owne shame to their owne no manner of way hoped cōmoditie nor to the commoditie of other their frendes or discommoditie and hurte of their enemies This sufficiently doth purge them I wil not say of their fact and fault from al sinister suspicion for this their deposition and testimonie their deposition proceding as it plainly seemeth from no affection corruption or partialitie but from a zeale to the trueth and to the honour of the Realme And though perchance if they had bene thereof iudicially conuicted and condemned and had not by dew penance themselues reformed some exceptiōs might haue bene layed against them by any partie iudicially cōuented for his better aduantage yet as the case standeth nowe there is no cause in the worlde to discredit their testimonie yea and by the way of accusation also such persons as be otherwise dishabled are in treason and other publike matters touching the state enhabled both to accuse and testifie As for the eleuen witnesses the beste of of them Sir Iohn Gates we know by what meanes he is departed out of this life One other the said William Clarke is so gone from them that he geueth good cause to misdeeme and mistrust the whole matter Howe many of the residue liue I know not To whom perchaunce some thing might be said if we once knowe what them selues say Which seeing it doth not by authentical recorde appeare bare names of dumme witnesses can in no wise hinder and deface so solemne a testimonie of the foresaid L. Paget and Sir Edwarde Mountague Neither is the difficultie so great as the Aduersaries pretend in prouing Negatiuam facti Which as we graunt it to be true when it standeth within the limites of a mere negatiue so being restrained and referred to time and place may be as wel proued as the affirmatiue It appeareth now then by the premisses that the Aduersaries argumentes whereby they would weaken and discredit the testimonie either of the witnesses or of the executours that haue or may come in against the said pretensed Wil are but of smal force and strength And especially their slender exaggeration by a superficial Rhetorike enforced Whereby they would abvse the ignorance of the people and make them beleue that there was no good and substantial prouffe brought foorth against the forgerie of this supposed Wil by cause the vntrueth of the same was not preached at Poules Crosse and declared in al open places and assembles through the Realme when they knowe wel inough that there was no necessitie so to doe And that it was notoriously knowen by reason it was disclosed by the saide Lorde Paget as wel to the Counsaile as to the higher and lower house of the Parlament And the foresaid forged Recorde in the Chancerie therevpon worthely defaced and abolished The disclosing whereof seing it came foorth by such and in such sort and order as we haue specified as it doth nothing deface or blemish the testimonie geuen against the said supposed Wil whether it were of any of the witnesses or executours so is ther no nede at al why any other witnesses bysides those that haue already impugned the same should be now farther producted I denie not but that if any such witnesse or Exeoutour had vpon his othe before a lawful Iudge deposed of his owne certaine notice and knoweledge that the said Wil was signed with the Kinges owne hande in case he should afterward contrarie and reuoke this his solemne deposition it ought not lightly to be discredited for any suche contradiction afterward happening But as I haue said suche authentical and ordinarie examinations and depositions we find not nor yet heare of any such so passed Now contrariwise if any of the said witnesses or executours haue or shal before a competēt Iudge especially not producted of any partie or against any partie for any priuate suite commenced but as I haue said moued of conscience only and of a zeale to truth and to the honour of God and the Realme freely and voluntarie discouer and detecte such forgerie although perchance it toucheth them selues for some thing done or said of them to the contrary or being called by the said cōpetent Iudge haue or shal declare and testifie any thing against the same this later testimonie may be wel credited by good reason and law Whereas they would nowe inferre that either this pretenfed Will was King Henries Wil or that he made none at al I doo not as I haue said entende nor neede not curiously to examine and discusse this thing as a mater not apperteining to our principal purpose And wel it may be that he made a Wil conteining the whole tenour of this pretensed Wil sauing for the limitation of the Croune and that these supposed witnesses were present either when he subscribed the same with his owne hand or when by his cōmaundment the Stampe of which and of his owne hand the common sort of men make no difference as in dede in diuers other cases there is no difference whiche these witnesses might take to be as it were his owne hand was set to the Wil. This I say might after some sort so be And yet this notwithstāding there might be as there was in deede an other Wil touching the pretēsed limitation of the Croune by the Kinges owne hande counterfeyted and suborned after his death falsly and coulorably bearing the coūtenance of his owne hand and of the pretensed witnesses names How so euer it be it is but to smal purpose to goe about any full and exquisite answere touching this point seeing that neither the original surmised Wil whereof these witnesses are supposed to be priuy is extant nor their depositions any where appeare nor yet that it appeareth that euer they were as we haue said iudicially examined Seeing nowe then that if it so falleth out that the principal Wil and that that was by the great Seale exemplified and in the Chācery recorded had not at least touching the clause of limitation and assignment of the Croune the Kings hand to it we neede not nor wil not tarie about certain scrolles and copies of the said Wil that the Aduersaries pretend to haue ben either writte or signed with his hand A kingdom is to heauy to be so easely caried away by suche scrolles and copies When al this faileth the Aduersaries haue yet one shift left for the last cast They vrge the equitie of the matter and the mind of the Parlament Which is they say accomplished and satisfied by making this assignation for
he maketh as it it were a plaine demurre with vs in law that we haue pleaded our matters al this while in a wrong Court. For lo this matter by this sobre mans iudgement seemeth not triable either in the Arches or Consistorie of Poules by the Ciuil or CannoÌ„law or in Westminster Hal by any law or Acte of ParlameÌ„t This plee must be only mainteined with the recordes of holy Scripture but of his owne sobre braines interpretatioÌ„ only and holdeÌ„ before himself and his new erected tribunal furnished and adorned with such quiet and sobre spirits as hiself is Th'infallible verity the high M ie of the sacred scriptures I do most hartly coÌ„fesse and most humbly reuerence But yet if ye wil intrude your selfe and others with the promulging from your new Tribunal seate such and so strange paradoxes and sentences to the vtter ouerthrowing of al humaine policies and lawes yea to the present and and iÌ„minent danger not only of this of Scotland but also of al other whatsoeuer Queenes we must be bold to see what warrant and commission you haue and to examine and well to vew the same we must buckle with you and trie whether the autoritie of holy Scripture whiche is your only refuge wil vpholde and beare out your strange and stout conclusion The place then wherevpon he grouÌ„deth him selfe is this Thow shalt make him King ouer thee whome thy Lorde thy God shal choose from amongst thy brethern him shalt thou make a King amongst them From this authoritie he fetcheth out al his high mystical and supernatural conclusions And first he excludeth the Queene of Scotland bycause she is an alien and not ex fratribus and therefore not chosen of god Wherevnto he addeth that the King must be suche as the people may say to him as the Israelites said to King Dauid Ecce â—s tuum caro tua nos sumus We are of one nation and blood Therevnto he adioyneth that it is assigned as one iuste cause why Athalia was turned out of her kingdome bycause she was alienigena an alien maternum genus ducens à Tyriis Sidoniâ—â— These now are all the proufes deducted by this man out of holy Scripture For other hath he none why the Queene of Scotland being a stranger ought to be disherited and reiected from al such claime as she pretendeth to the Croune of England Now for answere and first to the 17. of Deuteronomie wherein as I wil not quarel with you for the shrewde meaning that perchaunce some man may probablie gather out of this Treatise and smal liking that ye haue to the Gouernment proceeding from succession onely so I plainly affirme first that we are not bound to the Ceremoniall or Iudicial or other preceptes of the Iewish law except the Decaloge farther then the Churche or Ciuil policie haue renued againe I say then farther that this authoritie of Deutronomie can not fitly serue your purpose for that it taketh place when the people chooseth a King and not when there is a lawful and ordinary Succession as was euen amongest the Iewes from King Dauides time Albe it he and King Saul before him came in by Gods and the peoples special election Wherefore I doe admit your Principle to be wel grouÌ„ded vpon Scripture That the choise and election of Princes must be directed and measured by Gods Holy Worde wil and pleasure What then I would fame know by what Logike by what reason a maÌ„ may thus conclude we ought to choose no straunger to our Prince ergo a straunger though he be the iust and next inheritour to the Croune must be displaced The one dâ—pendeth of our owne free wil and election which we may measure and rule as we see good cause the other hangeth only vpoÌ„ the disposition and prouidence of God. There we may pick out choice here we must take such as God sendeth There consent beareth the stroke here proximitie of blood beareth the sway There we offre no iniurie to any partie in accepting the one and leauing th' other here do we iniurie to god that doth send and to the partie that is by him sent And to say the trueth it is but a malaperte controlment of Gods owne direction and prouidence For in the former parte we be the choosers and must direct and gouerne our choise by reason and discretion by the merit and worthines of the person here al the choice al the voices are in Gods haÌ„d only As good right hath the infant in the swadling clothes as hath any man called at his perfect age and wisdom It is a true saying Christiani fimus we are made ChristiaÌ„ menâ— we are not borne ChristiaÌ„ men noÌ„ nascimur But in this case of successioÌ„ Reges nascuÌ„tur noÌ„ fium men are borne and not made kings Let this fellow therfore coÌ„clude as stroÌ„gly as he caÌ„ or wil against the chosing of strauÌ„gers yet if he bring forth no place out of Scripture against the SuccessioÌ„ of a stranger claiming by proximitie of the blood Roial as farre as the man shoteth he shoteth to short to hit the marke But Lord what an â—lfauored short shote wil it be accoÌ„pted if she be found no strauÌ„ger at al It is very probable that in this place the scripture meaneth of a mere foreiner and straunger such as were neither borne in Iewrie nor of the Iewishe blood For with suche Aliens they were forbidden also to couple in mariage by reason they were Idolatours and might thereby them selues be occasioned as they were oftentimes in deede to abandone and forsake their true and sincere Religion Such a stranger I am wel assured this Ladie is not to vs if she be any straunger at al. The Scottesmen and we be al Christians and of one Iland of one tonge and almost of one fashion and manners customes and lawes So that we can not in any wise accompt them amongest such kinde of straungers that this place of Moyses mentioneth namely the Ladie Marie the Quene of Scotland being not only in hart wel affectioned and minded to al Englishmen as hath by many experiments ben wel knoweÌ„ but also by descent and Roial blood all English whiche she taketh from the noble Kinges longe before the Conquest and after the Conquest from the worthie Princes Henry the first and Edward the third and of late daies from the excellent Prince King Henry the seuenth and his daughter Ladie Margaret her grandmother Al which causes with some other in such number concurrant ought rather to inforce vs to thinke and to take her as no straunger to vs rather then to estraunge her from vs by the only place of her Natiuitie which is yet neuerthelesse within the fower seas and very nigh to England by Osbred bounding at Starling bridge Last of al touching the forsaid Chapter of Deuteronomie we affirme that it is vntrue that ye say aswel that this lawe of Gouernment bindeth our Kinges to the
hauing and following of this law as we haue said vnlesse to omitte other thinges ye would bind our Kinges also to receaue the Deuteronomie at the haÌ„ds of the Leuitical Tribe as that ye say that God gaue here a lawe to the Iewes to make or choose a King and so consequently al your illations out of this place seeme to be of smal force For to say the trueth as God neither gaue them this or any other lawe for choosing of a King nor did bid or will them to choose a King so did the people most greeuously offend God in demanding a King. For though by the iudgement of Aristotle and other Philosophers Monarchie wel and orderly vsed is the best kinde of al other Regiments which God doth also wel like yet would he haue no such magistrate among the Iewes But as he chose them for his propre peculier and selecte people and ruled them as wel in the Desert as in Iudea by a seueral peculier and distinct order and Gouernement from other Nations and after suche wonderful and miraculous sort as the like was neuer harde of in any Regiment by sides so would he also reserue to him selfe only the said Supremacie and Monarchie Neither was he a litle angrie with the Iewes nor they committed any smal fault but as it were renounced and reiected Gods owne Monarchie in crauing a King as holy Scripture plainely and openly testifiet Nonâ—ie inquit reiecerunt sed me ne regnem super eos And the people afterwardes acknowledged their fault Addidimus vniuersis peccatis nostris malum vt peteremus nobu Regem God therefore did not bidde them or wil them to choose a King but forknowing long before by his eternall forsight what they would do though contrarie to his blessed wil and pleasure did in this as in other matters beare with their weakenes and condescended vnto the same and fortold them in the said 17. Chapter that in case they would needes haue a King of what kind and sort he should be And therefore immediatly before the wordes that ye recite thou shalt make him a King ouer them is this texte Cum ingressus fuer is terram quam Dominus Deus dabit tibi possederis illam habâ—â—auerisque in illa dixeris constituam super me Regem sicut habent omnes per circuitum Nationes â—um constitues c. And when thou shalt come into the laÌ„d which the Lord thy God geueth thee and shalt possesse yea and dwel therein if thou say I wil set a King ouer me like as all the Nations that are about me then thou shalt make him King ouer thee whome c. Whiche wordes making for the illustratioÌ„ of this place ye haue omitted Wherfore as this place serueth nothing for any absolute election of a King the second which you seeme especially to regard and ground your selfe vpon so doth it as we haue shewed as litle relieue you to prooue therby your conclusions especially against the ordinarie successioÌ„ either of a strauÌ„ger or of a woman that ye would gather and conclude out of the same Thus haue we sufficiently answered the place of Deuteronomie for this one purpose Th' other two autorities may be much more easely answered The people meant nothing els by their said wordes spoken to Dauid but that they were the seede of Abraham Isaac and Iacob as wel as he and intended with true and sincere hartes vnfainedly to agnise him as their chiefe Lord and Soueraigne For at that time the Tribe of Iuda only whereof King Dauid came by lineal descent did acknowledge him as king Now the residue which before helde with Saules sonne did also incorporate and vnite themselues to the said kingdome If this man looke wel vpon the matter he shal find I trowe that the Queene of Scotland may as wel cal her selfe the bones and fleshe of the Noble Princes of England as this people cal them selues the bones and sheshe of King Dauid But yet the great terrible battering Cannon Athalia is behind She being in possessession of the kingdome seuen yeares was iustly thrust out by cause she was an Alien We may then saith this man iustly denie the Queene of Scotland the right of that which if she had in possession she should not iustly enioy Yet Sir if the Queene of Scotland be no Alien as we haue said then is your Cannon shot more feareful then dangerous We deny not but that Athalia was lawfully deposed but we beseche you to tell vs your Authours name that doth assigne the cause to be suche as you alleage Surely for my part after diligent searche I finde no such Authour Trueth is it that Iosephus writeth as ye doe that she descended by the mothers side of the Tyrians and Sidonians yet neuerthelesse he assigneth no such cause as ye doe And as ye are in this your preatie poisoned pamflet the first I trow of al Christian men I wil not except either Latin or Greke vnlesse it be some fantastical fonde and new vpstart Doctour as M. Knoxe or some the like neither Iew Chaldee nor Arabian that hath thus straungely glosed and deformed this place of holie Scripture against the ordinarie succession of women Princes so are you the first also of all other Diuines or Lawiers throughout the world that hath set forth this new fonde foolishe lawe that the Kings childe must be counted an Alien whose father and mother are not of the same and one CouÌ„trie If the French or Spanish King chaunce to marâ—e an English woman or the King of England to marie a French a Spanish or any other Country woman their Children by this new Lycurgus are Aliens and so consequently in al other Nations al such are haue ben and shal be AlieÌ„s by this your new oracle For what other cause shew you that this Athalia was an Alien but by cause her mother was an Alien genus duceÌ„s say you à Tyrijs Sydoâ—iis coming by lineal descent by the mothers side from the Tyrians and Sydonians King Achas maried her mother doughter to Ithobal King of the said Tyrians and Sydonians This Athalia whom Iosephus cal leth Gotholio Achas daughter maried IoraÌ„ King of uda her brother called also Ioram being king of Israel after the decease of his father Achas So then ye see that this Athalia was nomore an Alien among the Iewes then â—â—ing Edbalde Baldus was the sonne of Bertha a FreÌ„ch womaÌ„ and of King Ethelbertus the first Christian King of th' English nation no more then was the noble King Edward the third borne of a French woma â—more then Queene Marie was no more â—en should haue bene the issue of the said Q. Marie in case she had had any by the king â—f Spaine I perceaue that your felowes that â—ould faine make King Stephen King HeÌ„â—e the second and Arthur Neuew to King â—ichard the first Aliens had but rude dul â—nd grosse heades in comparison of
your â—â—e subtile and high fetches If I should now desire your patience notwithstanding the allegations of al your Diâ—initie to be content a while and touching this matter to harken to the most excellent Ciuilian VlpiaÌ„ though he were an Ethnike ye would perchance make litle accompt of him and be angrie with me for producing a profane Witnesse against you And yet truely in this I offre neither to you nor yet to Gods holy Worde any iniurie in the world For Christes high and Diuine Doctrine doth not subuert and impugne humaine and Ciuil policie being not repugnaÌ„t to his expresse Worde and wil. Let vs then heare whome the saied Vlpian maketh an Alien He is a Campane saith this Vlpian that is borne of father and mother being Campaines panes yea if his father be a Campane and his mother be a Puteolane yet is the childe a Citizen or Burgesse of Campanie And then he sheweth farther that in some CouÌ„tries as among the Ilians and Delphians and them of Pontus the Childe shal be counted to be originally of the mothers and not of the Fathers Countrie His wordes in Latin as he wrote them are these Qui ex duobus Campanis parentibus natus est Campanus est Sed si ex patre Campano matre Puteolana aeque municeps Campanus est nisi fortè priuilegio aliquo materna origo censeatur Tunc enim maternae originis erit municeps Vipotè I lien sibus concessum est vt qui matre Iliensi est sit éorúm municeps Etiam Delphis hoc idem tributum conseruatum est Celsus etiam refert Ponticis ex beneficio Pompeij Magni competere vt qui Pontica matre natus esset Ponticus esset Which his saying is direct against you for this your strange declaration of Alienigena an Alien Wel if neither the declaration of Vlpian nor yet the practise of the world most conformable also to reason nor any thing els wil satisfie you vnlesse it be deriued and taken out of the Holy Scripture we are content to ioyne issue with you and 〈◊〉 be tried by the same only Christe came Lineally of Booz whome Salomon begat of Raab as the most common opinion of Writers is that betraied Hiericho to Iosue and may we now falsly think that this Booz was a straÌ„ger an AlieÌ„ and no Iew and so withal infringe breake and peruert the Genealogie of Christ and the continual SuccessioÌ„ of the Iewes Christes progenitors Ye know that as Athalias mother was a TyriaÌ„ or a Sydonian so was Ruth a Moabite This Ruth maried the foresaid Booz I aske you now again whether Obed the son of the said Booz and Ruth were AlieÌ„s amoÌ„g the lewes If ye say he was not then must you nedes coÌ„fesse the same of Athalia If you say he was then the holy Scripture maketh euideÌ„tly against you For of this Obed Christ came lineally And if you step forward as you lustily begin a foot or two more ye wil or as wel you may make king Dauid also to whom Obed was graÌ„dfather yea and Christ himselfe not much better then AlieÌ„s And so hath Athalia at leÌ„gth spon a faire thred for you We deny then that this Athalia was an AlieÌ„ amoÌ„g the Israelits and therfore she could not be bard froÌ„ any inheritance due vnto the daughter among the Children of Israel Neither was she remoued from the kingdom as this sobre man being best awaked dreameth bycause she was a straunger But for that she moste cruelly and vnnaturally sleaing and murdering her Nevewes the sonnes of her sonne King Othozias lately killed by Iehu by shameful meanes vsurped her self the croune apperteining to her Nephew Ioas who by the prouidence of God was she being vsurper of it preserued from her boutcherie And after seuen yeares by the help of Ioada the High Priest was anointed King and she deposed and worthely put to death And this cause doth appeare euen in the very Chapter and place that this brauling braine doth alleage As for the cause he him selfe proponeth we wil not sticke with him to geue him a longer date to fetche out and shew vs his recordes and his authours at his good leasure Wel this string wil not serue his bowe we wil therefore listen againe to him and consider how wel he harpeth vpon the next string whiche surely doth geue as il fauored a iarring and as vntunable a noice as the first or rather more vntunable Wherein our good quiet brother doth so straine and wrest the worde ex fratribus among the bretherne that he wresteth away not only the right and interest that the Queene of Scotland pretendeth to the Succession of the Croune but doth wrest withal the Croune from al Princes neckes that haue ben are or shal be women And of al such as haue do or shal claime their inheritance by th' interest and title of their mothers whiche haue no better Title then their progenitours from whom they claime For amongest his new notable notes that he noteth out of this seuententh Chapter of Deuteronomie for the choosing of a King we may note saith he the sexe by the masculine gendre vsed in this worde ex fratribus for vnder the other sexe Ataxia most commonly creepeth into the stocke and Countrie He saith also afterward this politique law that God did geue the Iewes is grounded vpon the law of Nature and is also as euerlasting as Nature it selfe is and is of all natural men to be obserued It is saith he of Nature that the prescribed sexe should gouerne the other he meaneth women should be gouerned Then he knitteth vp the Conclusio of his new pestiferous policie which I coÌ„clude that Gods law Nature and good reason do reiecte the Queene of Scotland and denie her that kingdom which she wold faine possesse Who wold euer haue thought that such a quiet sobre braine out of this one word fratribus could haue found in his hart so vnbrotherly and so vnchristianly and so fondly withal to extort such an interpretatioÌ„ as is able if it were receaued to disturbe infriÌ„ge and breake the quiet and lauful possessioÌ„ and inheritance of a great part of the Princes of the world Yea and as fondly and vnnaturally to frame of hiÌ„self a new law of Nature also and so most wretchedly to corrupt depraue and maim both the law of God and Nature Yet bicause this maÌ„ geueth out his matters as it were coÌ„peÌ„dious oracles and least some might think that such a sobre maÌ„ hath some good and substaÌ„tial grouÌ„d in this his saying seing he is so bold with his owne gloses vpon the holy Scriptures I wil be as bold vpoÌ„ him alitle to sift and examine the weight and veritie of theÌ„ And first touchiÌ„g the law of nature which he maketh as a pikaxe to vndermine the state of so many Princes we might here inlarge many thiÌ„gs how and in what sort the law of Nature may be takeÌ„ But we wil
The possions of the Croune of Englad that vvere beyondthe seas sealed into the Frenche kings haÌ„ds for the murther of Arthur Polid. 15. flor histor An. 120â— Levvis the French Kings son claimed the Croune of this Realme in the Title of his vvise Pro hereditate uxoris meae scilicet neptis Regis loaÌ„ usque ad mortem â—â— necessitas exigeret decertabo Flor histo Anno 1216. Haroldus muneribuâ— genere fretê° regni diadema innasit H. Hunte hist Angli lib. 5 Cut regnuÌ„ iure hereditario debebatur Palredus Rhie ual in histo R. Angliae ad H. 2. Cui de iure debebatur regnum An glorum Io. Lond. in Chron. Angliae Eadem uerba sunt in Math West mon. in flor hist a. 1066 What calamities sell to this Realm by the vsurping of King Harolde King Stephen and Iohn Rex Eduar dus misit c. ut uel ipse Eduar uel filius e ius sibi succederent c. Rich. Cicest uid Wil. Malmest de reg Angl. E. 2. c. 45. lib. 3. c. 5. Polid. 26. king H. 7 vvith his Counsaile is a good interpretor of our present cause The mariages of King E. 3. sonnes A fond imagination of the Aduersarie of the statute of 25. E. 3. There vvas no doubt made of the Kinges children borne beyonde the seas This statute toucheth not the Q. of ScotlaÌ„d as one not borne beyond the seas Vide statuta Walliae in magna Charta Walesvvas vnder the allegeance of EnglaÌ„d before it vvas vnited to the Croune The statutes of King H. 8. touching the succession of the Croune An ansvves to the fore said statute The effect of the Aduersaries arguments for the exclusion of the Quene of Scotland by a pretensed vvil of King H. 8 An. H. 8.35 An. H. 8.33 21. An ansvvet by the vvay of reioindeâ— to the same Diuers presumptions and reasons agaiÌ„st this supposed vvil The supposed vvil is preiudicial to the Croune of Englande for the claime of the croune of France This supposed vvil geueth occasion of ambitious aspiring Succession to the Croune more vncerteÌ„ bi the supposed vvil then before Much forgene and counterfeyting of Testamets Valerius Maximus dict et fact lib. 9. c. 4. In this supposed vvil is no condition for the mariage of the heires of the L. Francis as is for the Kinges ovvne daughters No order taken for the probate of the supposed vvil The enrollement in the chance rie is not a probate A great presumption against the supposed vvil for that the late pretensed Q. Iane did not vse the benefit of the same against the Q. of Scotland and others See the proclamation made the x. of Iulie the first yeare of her pretensed reigne Polid. lib. 8. The forgetie of this 〈…〉 〈◊〉 discloseâ— before the Parlament by the L. Paget A vvorthy deede for à Prince to cancell false Recordes Cicero 3. offic Sueton. de uiris illustrib Bed. lib. 3. histor Ecclesiast c. 1. L. tefliuÌ„ ff de testibus L. Ob carnem ibid. No iust â—aâ—se to repel â—he testimonie of the L. Paget and others L. Famâ—â— ff ad 〈…〉 maies l. muliere ff de accusat Hovv a negatiue may be proued Gloss Doct. c. bo na de elect Hovv and vvhen the later testimonie is to be accepted before the former Why the stampe caÌ„not counteruaile the Kings hand in this case Ioan Andr. in adit spe cul tit de requisit consul ad finem L. Sifundus ff de rebus corumâ—c de rebus Ecelesiae in 6. An ansvvere to the aduersaries touchinge Actes of Parlament alleaged to proue that the Kinges ovvne haÌ„d vvas not necessarie to the supposed vvil 18. E. 3. fol. 30. 3. H. 4. fol. 3. 11. 11. H. 4. fol. 67.9 H. 6. fo 6. 19. H. 6. fo 7. et 10 35. H. 6. fol. 12. 10. H. 6. fol. 26. 3. H. 6. fol. 8. 33. E. 3. fo 13. Vide Prisot 33. H. 6. fol. 39. 9. H. 6. fol. 35.35 H. 6. fol. 34.40 E. 3. fol. 2. 40. E. 3. fol. 35.21 E. 4. fol. 97.7 H. 7. fol. 15. 9. E. 4. fo 2. 22. E. 4. fo 47. 29. H. 6. fol. 6.29 lib. Assis P. 64. 27. H. 8. c. 10. 32. H. 3. c. 1. The supposed vvil caÌ„ not preiudice the Q of Scot laÌ„d though it had ben signed vvith the Kinges ovvne haÌ„d Ther must needes be some qualification and restrait of the general vvordes of the statute Matthae us Paristensis in Iohan. L. 1. ff quâ— Testamenta facere The definition of a TestameÌ„t L. fl pater ff Quae in frau credit L. fill famil ff de Donat. L. 1. c quae res pign l. obligatione ff de pigno c in genera de Regum iuris in 6. L. quidaÌ„ ff de uerb sâ—g L. ut grada §. 1. de numer honor L. permitteÌ„do cuÌ„ notatis ff de iure dotiuÌ„ In geuing general au thoritie that seemeth not to be comprised that the partie vvould not haue graunted being specially demaunded General voordes must be referred to hable persons L. 2. c. de Nopal L. fin § in computatione De iure deliber ibi notat Alciat in l. 1. de uerb significat 11. H. 4. fol. 72. 9. H. 6. fol. 24.11 H. 6. fol. 15. Non est par ratiâ— lucra non capere damna sentire L. sin C. de co dicil L. Proculus ff de damno infect Insti de legat Si res L. qui â—eeâ— sare C. dâ— edendo §. commodum lust de indict L. st quiâ— iâ— aliquo documento C. de edendâ— An infamous libel made lately against the Queene of Scot. The Authour of the same seemeth litle to regarde touching the succession of the Croune any lavve but holy Scripture only He groundeh him self chefly vpon the 17. of Deuteron â— Samuel â— 2. Reg. 11. An ansvvere tou chinge the 17. of Deuteron Great difference be tvvixt successioÌ„ and clection August de merit remis pecc cont Pela li 3. c 8. 9. to 7 in quaest ex nouo Test ca. 8. to 4. Queene of Scotland no straunger 3. Politico 1. Reg. 8. 2. Reg. 12. An ansvvere to the 2. Samuel 5. Ioseph Iudaic An tiq lib. 9. cap. 6. A nevve fond and madde in terpretation vvho is an AlieÌ„ made by the Aduer sarie Ioseph ibi cap. 6. Athalia vvas no AheamoÌ„g the levves Who is an Alien by Vlpian Who is an Alien by Vlpian L. 1. ff ad municip Matth. 12 Iosue 6. Dauid and Christ descend of Obed Ruthes sonne 4. Reg. 11. An ansvvere to the Aduer farre touching the lavve of Nature vvhich he vvresteth against vvomens gouernement L. 1. ff de iust iure l. ueluti l. ex hoc l. omnes cod Est enim noÌ„ scripta sed nata lex c. Cicero pro Milone The practise of Womens Regiment in Asia Aphrica and Europa Straebo geâ— graph lib. 14. First in Asia Queene Artemesia Queene Ada. Solinus in collect lib. 67. Plinius lib. 6. cap. 20.
the death of the Lorde Darley before the Counsaile of EnglaÌ„d The causes vvhy the Earle Murray vvent about asvvel to make avvay the L. Darley as to depose the Queene The Earle Murray de clared the day before that the L Darley should be slaine Diuers assembles of the Earle Murray aÌ„d his adherents to consult vpon the slaughter of the L. Darley Indentures made and subscribed for the execution of the said purpose Diuers excuted in Scotland for the said murther vvhereof none could charge the Queene The Q. in a maÌ„ner miraculously deliuered out of Lochleuen prison The Commissioners appointed in EnglaÌ„d to heare the Quene of ScotlaÌ„d her maters vvel liked of her faid innocency and of her title to the succession of the Cioune An exhortation to the Earles Murray aÌ„d Murton aÌ„d others to reconcile theÌ„selues to the Q. The Q. of ScotlaÌ„d ful of mercy The ende of Rebels euer vnhappy Other Princes vvil not suffer the Quene of Scotland to be iniuried by her subiectes Man only hath the pierogatiue of vvit and reason among al earthlye creatures Men are most bouÌ„d to the preseruation of their CouÌ„trey A great coÌ„moditie to the coÌ„moÌ„ vvealth to knovv the heire appa rente Why all the vvorld almost doth enbrace succession of Princes rather then election Flores histor anno 1057. Richardus Canonicus sanctae Trinit Lond. Flor. histo anno 1190. Polid li. 14 Polid li. 20 The Quene of Scottes is right heire apparent to the Croune of Englande Inst de iust iure §. fin The common lavve of this Realme is rather grounded vpon a general custom then any lavve vvritten In Prologo suo eiusdem li. fo 1. et 2. De dict Ra nulpho GlaÌ„uilla uide Giraldum Cambren in topogra de Wallia Fortescue de lau Leg. Angl. c. 17. â— E. 4.19.33 H. 6.51 Pinsons printe Inst de iure natura geÌ„t ciuil §. ex non script 25. E. 3. The adueâ— sacies case pettineth to subiects only No Maxime of the lavve bindeth the Croune vnles the Croune specially be named Of the Tenante by the curtesy Nor that the landes shal be diuided among the daughters Not the vvife shall haue the third part 5. E. 3. Tit. praerog 21. E. 3.9 28. H. 6. Nor the rule oâ— Possessio fratris c. Nor that the executour shall haue the goods and Chattles of the resâ—atour 7. H. 4. sol 42. Nor that a traitour i vnable to take landes by discente and vvithout pardoÌ„ An ansvvere to the Aduersary making a difference be tvvene Attainder aÌ„d the birth out of the allegeaÌ„ce 22. H. 6. fol. 43. The suppo sed Maxime of the Aduersaries touching not Kinges borne beyond the sea as appeareth by King Stephen and King H. 2. The Aduersaries obiection touching King H. 2. auoided As touching Arthur King Richardes nephevve Vt autem pax ista summa dilectio taÌ„ multiplici quaÌ„ arctiori uin culo connectatur praedictis curiae uestrae Magnatibus id ex parte uâ— stra tractaÌ„tibus Domino disponente coÌ„diximus inter Arthurum egregiuÌ„ Dâ— cem BritaÌ„niae nepoteÌ„ nostrum haeredem si forte sine prole obirâ— nos contigâ— rit filiaÌ„ uestraÌ„ matrimonium contrahendum c. In tractatu paciâ— inter Richa 1. TancreduÌ„ Regem Si ciliae Vide Reg. Houeden RicharduÌ„ Canonicum S. Trinitatis Londin A false Maxime set forth by the Aduersarie 7. E. 4. fo 28.9 E. 4. fo 5.11 H. 4 fo 25.14 H. 4. fo 10. the statute of Edvv. 3. An. 25. to â— cheth inâ—e ritaÌ„ce not purchase â— H. 4. fo 25. Scotland is vvithin the allegeance of EnglaÌ„d The Lorde loseth not his seignorie though the tenaÌ„te doth not his seruice The causes vvhy the Croune caÌ„ not be coÌ„prised vvithin the pretended Maxime Without the croune there can neither be King nor allegeance 40. E. 3. fol. 10. 13. E. 3. Tit. Bref 264.16 E. 3. iurans desait 166.17 E. 3. tit scire fac 7. A Deane a Person a Priour being an Alien may demande lande in the right of his corporation An 3. R. 2.6 C. 3. fo 21. tit droit 26. lib. Ass p. 54.12 li. Ass tit enfant 13. H â— fol. 14.7 E. 4. fol. 10.16 E. 3. iurans defait 9. H. 6. fol. 33.35 H. 6. so 35.5 E. 4 fol. 70.49 li. Ass A. 8â— 22. H. 6. fo 31.13 H. â— so 14. The King is alvvaies at ful age in respecte of his Croune The Kings children are expresly excepted from the surmised Maxime â— LiberoruÌ„ ff de uerbo ruÌ„ signific L. Sed si de in ius uo caÌ„do instit de haere ab intest L. Lucius ff de baered instit L. Iusta L. Nâ—toruÌ„ L. Liberorum de uerb signif L. 2. § sâ— mater ad S. C. Tertul L. Filius de S. C. Maced L. Senatus de ritu nugâ— L quod sâ— nepotes ff test cuÌ„ notatis ibid. Infantes in Frenche couÌ„teruaileth this vvorde liberi in lat The grand fathers cal their nephues sonnes L. Gallâ—◠§ InstitueÌ„s ff de liber Eâ— post l. ff C. de impub. Alâ—is substan c 1. q. 4 Father and son coÌ„pted in person aÌ„d flesh in maner one Great absurditie in excluding the true aÌ„d right successour for the place of his birth only An euasion auoided preteÌ„ding the priuilege of the KiÌ„gs children not to be in respect of the Croune but of other laÌ„des The royall blood beareth his honour vvith it vvhereso euer it be Vide Anto. Corsetum de potest et excell regi q. 106. CoÌ„querors glad to ioinevvith the ioyall blood Henry the first L. â— ff de legious Commonvse and pâ—â—ctise the best interpretation of the lavv Eodâ— anno Rex cuÌ„ in diebus suis processisset AeldredaÌ„ Vigornen sem Episco pum ad Regem Hunga riae trans mittens reuocauit inde filium fratris sui Edmundi Eduardum cuÌ„ tota fa milia sua ut uel ipse uel filij eius sibi succedereÌ„t in regnum Flor. histor 1057. Flor histo â—066 Aelredus Regioual lens de reg Anglorum ad Regem Henr. 2. King Stephen and King H. â— The aduer saries fond imagination that King H. 2. should come to the croune by composition not by proximitie of blood Rex Stepha nus omni haerede ui duatus prae ter solummo do Ducem Henricum recognouit in conuentu EpiscoporuÌ„ aliorum de regno Optimatum quod Dux HeÌ„r ius hae reditariuÌ„ in regnuÌ„ Angliae habebat Et Dux benigne concessit ut Rex Stepha nus tota uita sua suuÌ„ regnuÌ„ pacifice possideret Ita tamen confirmatum est pactuÌ„ quod ipse Rex ipsttuÌ„e praesentes cum caeteris regni optimatibus iurareÌ„t quod Dux Henr. post morteÌ„ Regu si illum superuiueret regnum sine aliqua contradictione obtincret Flor. histo An 1153. The like fond imagination touching King Richardes nephevv Diuersitie of opinioÌ„s touching the vncle aÌ„d nephue vvhether of them ought to be preferred in the royall gouernement