and that the Pardon doth not belong to the other Man for want of true Faith nay that because he hath not Faith he is subject to the threatnings denounced against Unbelievers God's present dealings with Souls according to his Gospel is a kind of virtual Sentence but at the great day he will solemnly judge according to the Gospel Rom. 2.16 Mat. 25. The Work of that day will be to Sentence Mens Faith true or false upon full evidence of its truth or falshood and to convince the World that God hath pardoned all Believers and none but Believers and to condemn publickly all Unbelievers and solemnize before all the happy State of those pardoned Believers The Case is the same as to every other Grace or Duty to which God hath promised any Benefit in the Gospel As far as God makes any Duty a necessary Condition of any Benefit by the Gospel he will Judge us according to that Duty and if we totally want it that Benefit will be with-held He that did not repent shall be denied the blotting out of Sins at that day Acts 3.19 13. Hence Men can be said to be Justified by Faith as a sort of Work no otherwise than thus That Christ adjudgeth a Man to be a Believer who is so and his Faith a true Faith and that he is to be dealt with as a true Believer according to the Gospel Promise Justification in this sense is quite another thing than Justification by Christ's Righteousness or by Faith as it connotes that Object This is not Pardoning Absolving and Accepting a guilty undone Sinner which must be upon a Righteousness adequate to the Law and satisfying to Justice no no It is but a determination of a particular Cause viz. He is a true Believer and not an unbelieving Hypocrite and yet it is of great importance to our main Cause being that God hath said Christ's Righteousness shall be imputed to none but the true Believer And if we must be judged whether we be Believers or no we must be sentenced to be Believers or Unbelievers and if we be sentenced to be Believers we are so far justified by Faith as a sort of Work and if our Faith be tried by our Words or other Works our Faith is justified by those Words and Works and we are Justified as to this Cause in trial by those Words and Works i. e. We are adjudged not to be Vnbelievers nor to be meerly such Believers whose Faith was not evidenced by such Words and Works Mat. 12.37 Iam. 2-17 21 25. The matter is the same as to any thing the Gospel indispensibly requireth and concerning which we must be judged 14. In the like manner Faith can be called our subordinate Righteousness no otherwise than as it is the performed Condition which the Gospel requireth in the person whom God promiseth to Impute the Righteousness of Christ to for Justification or actual Forgiveness and Absolution It is not the legal Righteousness the Law would Condemn any Man notwithstanding his Faith if he had not Christ's Righteousness Imputed to him It is not the Righteousness that is Imputed for Justification as that in the right whereof Pardon and Acceptance is promised or stands It is not the Merit that God regards either in making or applying the Promise It is not a Righteousness by Acceptilation which the Socinians call it that is it is not reckoned instead of a Legal or Perfect Righteousness which were to exclude Christ's Satisfaction and set it instead of his Righteousness It is not a Righteousness that makes up Christ's Righteousness or at all serves to the same End It 's not a Righteousness by or for which God justifies us i. e. God doth not Pardon or Accept us for this But Christ having a full Righteousness and promising to Impute it for Justification to all that will Believe sincerely and requiring and commanding Sinners to Believe in him with this Promise That if they will Believe they shall be justified by his Righteousness and if they Believe not they shall not be justified by his Righteousness but Die in their Sins notwithstanding the full Righteousness that is iâ— him and the Offers made to them I say a far as this Promise gives a Believer a right to the promised Benefit his Faith is that upon which he receives that right and so far the Gospel makes him Righteous by his Faith i. e. He is the Man whom the Gospel assures that Benefit to which it gives the Unbeliever no right to but directly excludes him So that this Faith is no Righteousness that is any part of Justification which is the Benefit promised and subsists entirely in its own Causes But what Righteousness it is depends wholly on the Authority Tenure and Truth of the Gospel as the instrument whereby God applies Christ's Righteousness to us for our Justification If the Gospel doth not promise to Justifie one that hath true Faith though it be imperfect then indeed Faith is no Condition nor at all a Conformity to the Gospel as defining the Condition and if the Gospel doth not by its Pormise or Sanction give any Right to the Benefit promised upon performing the Condition then indeed Faith must not be called a subordinate Righteousness But if the Gospel assures to every true Believer Justification by Christ's Righteousness then true Faith is the performed Condition and thereupon the Gospel gives him an infallible Title yea this Gospel is his Title by God's gracious will to his partaking of Justification by Christ's Righteousness yea to the Imputation of Christ's Righteousness for Justification but still it 's Christ's Righteousness that justifies and only that though it be thus assuredly applied to him that believes 15. Faith it self much less any other Grace or Work is not the Righteousness or any Part of the Righteousness wherein a Believer is accepted pardoned or glorified or stands in before the Justice of God or is it pleadable against the Law of Works or Charge of Sin It 's Christ's Righteousness alone that pleads for Believers in all these respects this answers the Law and for this we are released from the Curse By this Righteousness our Pardon and Heaven were purchased and for it they are given That there is a Pardon that there is a Glory for fallen Man is owing to Christ and that Believers have those given to them is also in Christ's Right though his Gospel assures them to Believers Yea it 's for Christ's Righteousness that the Spirit works Faith in any Person Faith puts in no Claim of Merit nor can it stand before governing Iustice nor admit a Trial before God as Creator as what entitles any to his Rewards But to the Praise of divine Grace and Wisdom our blessed Redeemer will own true Faith as that which he hath ordained to be a Means of investing us in his blessed Righteousness and what renders a Sinner certain of the Fruits of his Merits The Believer hath a Right by the Gospel to plead all Christ's
of ours to any of these Purposes and this is all they pretend But if it prove that Christ never intended his Righteousness to be instead of true Faith and Repentance Sincere Love to God and Men and Perseverance in True Holiness and Fruitfulness And that Christ will judge us according to these as things he required to our actual enjoying of promised Benefits in his Righteousness They who pursue and by Grace have these will be safer than such as neglect them yea Mr. M. owneth P. 67. Such are thy bounden Duties and God will Damn thee for neglecting them It were easie to shew how these Men contradict each other as well as themselves but I forbear exposing them That the Faâ—her of Light and Love would guide all of us into the way of Truth and Peace is the unfeigned Prayer of Thy Servant in the Kingdom and Patience of Christ Daniel Williams THE Errata's are such as may easily be Corrected Any who consider what Men I have to deal with will excuse my frequent Repetitions and sometimes less accurate words as object for subject when I would most plainly distinguish between Justifying Righteousness with its Causes and the Person partaker of it SERMON I. Of Christ's Obedience Rom. 5. the last part of the 19th Verse So by the Obedience of One shall many be made Righteous THE Text represents to us First A saving Priviledge and Dignity Made Righteous It supposes us Unrighteous ere we are made Righteous and so subject to the Curse till we are Absolved as well as Disobedient to the Gospel while Unconverted The Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 oft though not always denotes an act of Authority as Mat. 25.21 Luk. 12.14 42. Act. 6.3 c. thus it s properly enough applicable to the Matter before us We are constituted Righteous Juridically and all other Benefits included here in the term Righteous are Authoritatively Conferred and this according to a Divine enacted Constitution of which hereafter Secondly The sole procuring Cause of our being made Righteous It s by the Obedience of One This One is the Lord Jesus He alone was capable to make fallen Men Righteous by his Obedience and it s by his Obedience that Sinners are constituted Righteous Mercy prompted the recovery of miserable Man Wisdom contrived this as a way sufficient effectual and congruous to that End God as our Judge and Ruler admitted and accepted this and in his adjusted way applies it for our Pardon and Adoption Faith is the Moral Instrument or Condition of that Application the Gospel Promise is the express Sign of the Divine Will or the Instrument whereby God doth apply it But the different Interest of each of these prevents not the appropriation of all the Causal Merit to this Obedience God justifies regenerates and saves but it s with an Eye to this as the only procuring Cause Thirdly The Subject actually partaker of this Blessing Many they are Men and not Devils Fallen Men and not Innocent Many and not simply few nor yet all though it s for final Impenitency and Unbelief that any of the Sons of Men remain Condemned These many are equal to the number of Godly Believers in all Ages Fourthly The futurity and certainty of many being made Righteous both which the Future Tense imports Shall be made Righteous it notes Futurity With respect to the effect of Adam's Sin it 's said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they were made Sinners That Guilt is entailed on all his Seed and Filth derived to them as soon as they subsist yea its true they were all Offenders and Corrupted in Adam as being Seminally in him But by Christs Obedience it s affirmed many shall be made Righteous i. e. when it is applied and not before The Elect since Christs time remain Unrighteous whilst Unbelievers notwithstanding that Christs Obedience is long since finished as well as all Believers before Christs coming were made Righteous by this Obedience tho' it was not then actually performed Heb. 11.14 15. The Reason of both is the same viz. That we are made Righteous not immediately in the moment of Christs Obeying nor meerly on the Acts done but upon Gods applying this to us by the Word of his Gospel and Work of his Spirit Therefore believing Abraham was made Righteous many Ages before Christ Obeyed Rom. 4.22 And the Elect Corinthians were unjustified all the time of their Infidelity though Christ had finished his Work before 1 Cor. 6.11 The Gospel Promise confers Righteousness for Justification on all Believers and none but Believers tho' Christs Obedience be that for which alone when they believe any are justified This Righteousness is offered to all Hearers on the terms of the Gospel Its designed Infallibly for all the Elect but neither offer nor design constitutes any Man Righteous There must be another act even imputation and that terminates on no other object but the Believer 2. The Words denote certainty q. d. many shall eventually be made Righteous by it A may be made Righteous if they will believe is a Mercy to Mankind above Devils But a meer may be is too low a reward for Christ and incongruous to an Obedience so Astonishing Strange were it that the Lord of Life should Die for Sinners and it remain contingent whether any of them should Eternally speak his Praises or be happy by his Merits But my Text is an unerring Prediction which will be still accomplishing till Christs shall Judge the World His Seed he shall see whom by his knowledge he will justifie Is. 53.11 He will not violate the Gospel Constitution by justifying the Unbelievers because he is Elected but the Elect shall believe that they may be justified by his Obedience The Eternal Counsel shall be executed in the way enacted by Governing Grace 5. The Redditive Note which refers to the first clause in the Text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So The Apostle had said As by the Disobedience of one many were made Vnrighteous So c. He principally intends hereby to affirm That by Christs Obedience all his Regenerate Seed shall as certainly be made Righteous as Adam's Natural Seed were made Sinners by his Disobedience Christs Obedience is as effectual to the one as Adam's Disobedience was to the other Adam is said to be the Figure of Christ v. 14. They were two publick Persons in this respect All Men were made Sinners by Adams fall all Men that ever are made Righteous are made so by Christ's Obedience This is the main scope of the Apostles reasoning in the Parellel between the First and Second Adam but he intends not to infer a Similitude in all things between Christ and Adam who in so many things differ Nay in this Chapter you have sundry instances of that difference given Doct. By the Obedience of Iesus Christ GodMan our Redeemer many shall be made Righteous Good News to a lost World that thô we are undone as Adam's Posterity yet help is laid on Christ who is mighty to save Psa.
justified by his blood It 's by this Blood as the procuring Cause this was the Propitiation Hence his Blood is said to cleanse us 1 Iohn 1.7 I hope you will not doubt that that of Christ for which we are justified is at least a part of Christ's Righteousness 4. If Christ's Poverty merited Riches for us then his Sufferings merited for us but Christ's Poverty merited Riches for us 2 Cor. 8.9 For ye know the grace of our Lord Iesus Christ that thô he was rich yet for your sakes he became poor that ye through his poverty might be rich He was Owner of all Things but for a time he quitted as it were his Claim to acquire Treasures for us who has forfeited all He had not a Cottage of his own to lay his Head in that he might purchase Mansions for us 5. That in the Virtue whereof Christ intercedes for and gives out the saving Blessings we receive did merit for us but it 's in the Virtue of his Death and Sufferings that Christ intercedes for and gives out the saving Blessings we receive He is entred into the holy place Heb. 9.12 Into heaven it self v. 24. There he presents the Offering he had finished on Earth that is in the Virtue thereof he claims and expects the Blessings promised thereto and merited thereby The dispensing thereof is committed to him and each of them is given to us and received by us in the express Virtue of that Offering I shall enumerate some and shew that each is assigned to Christ's Death and Sufferings Col. 1.14 In whom we have redemption through his blood even the forgiveness of sins Which Blood was shed for the remission of sins Matth. 26.28 Eph. 1.7 We have redemption through his blood Heb. 13. 12. Wherefore Iesus that he might sanctifie the people with his own blood suffered without the gate Reconciliation is owing to the same cause Col. 1.21 22. Now hath he reconciled in the body of his flesh through death to present you holy c. Yea eternal Life the sum of all promised good is granted on the same account Heb. 9.15 That by means of death for the redemption of their transgressions that were under the first Testament they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance Can you suppose that we have Remission Sanctification Peace and an eternal Inheritance for Christ's Death and Sufferings and that his Intercession for these and other Blessings is in the Virtue of his Blood and yet his Death merited not these 6. I might add Heb. 10.14 He hath by one offering perfected for ever them that are sanctified Which must not only prove that Christ's Death and Sufferings merited for us but that all saving Blessings are under their Influence as the meritorious Cause thereof Object Christ's Death and Sufferings were but the paying of a Debt and therefore merited nothing 1. A. Was not our Obedience a Debt Yea it was so more properly than our Sins or Punishment Sins are metaphorically called Debts but they are not Things we owe to God but are the neglect of that Obedience which we do owe to God and so oblige us to Punishment Punishments are called a Debt not as what God owes to us as a Debt or we to him but as what we are obnoxious to â—or Disobâ—dience if God is pleased to inflict them But yet he is not so obliged to Punish us as to exempt him from a Pardoning Right in the way his infinite Perfections will adjust If the Objection then will prove that Christ's Death merited nothing because it was the payment of a Debt theâ— it will more follow that Christ's Active Obedience merited nothing for that 's as much at least the paying of a Debt yea more properly The Confusion which this word Debt hath induced weak Men into especially as a Pecuniary Debt in the Doctrine oâ— Satisfaction I shall afterwards be necessitated to speak to 2. A. Christ's Death and Sufferings were Acts of Obedience in Christ and so they merited Our undergoing of Punishment would have been no Act of Obedience in us but an involuntary enduring of Vengeance It was not by a Divine Precept made our Duty but by the Sanction rendred due to us There was a Threatning whence it must be endured but no Commandment that made our being Punished an Obediential Act in us Is it an Act of our Obedience to die a Spiritual Death or to be hated and abhorred by the Lord Yea Is being eternally Damned a Duty performed to God by the Tormented But whatever our Lord Jesus suffered was obedientially and voluntarily endured It was God's Commandment to him and in him an Act of the highest Obedience to God he pleased God therein Ioh. 10.17 Therefore doth the father love me because I lay down my life He was obedient unto death Phil. 2.8 His willing subjection to God's Authority and Design herein was that which gave Life and Enâ—rgy to his Sufferings Truly Christ's Dying was the highest Act of Obedience and what we call his Active Obedience yields no Instance that equalleth this It followeth then that if Christ's Obedience could merâ—â— then his Death and Sufferings merited because they were strictly Acts of Obedience His very ensuring them was Obediential 3. A. Thô Death was due to us as Sinners yet Death was not due to Christ but as it was to be Satisfactory and Meritorious It was thus proposed to him by the Father and thus consented to by Himself He was to bear it as a Punishment for the satisfaction of Governing Justice and to merit the Pardon of Sinners his Sufferings were a Pardoning Price He had committed no Crime and therefore deserved no Punishment nor needed any Pardon But he was willing to bear the Punishment of our Crimes that thereby he might merit our Forgiveness in a way consistent with the Perfections of God and conducive to the Glory of Divine Government Hence Is. 53.5 The chastisement of our peace was upon him It on him was a Chastisement for our Peace as it s designed End True it was for Sin or it had not been necessary nor yet a Punishment but yet it was to purchase our Salvation or he had not submitted to it 4. A. The immediate Efficacy and Operation of Christ's Sufferings upon us are as they be Meritorious Christ's Death must be satisfactory to God or he would not have accounted it Meritorious of Peace to us nor granted us Benefits on the account thereof Provoked Justice and the Injury to Divine Government by Sin stood in the Sinner's way yea stood in the way of all Merit for good to us There must be a Propitiation for Sin to God and this being made to God it 's accepted as a Ransom and Price by him and so it operates on the Sinner in a way of Merit consequential of that satisfaction we are redeemed by Christ's Blood as a Redeeming Price we are saved by it as Meritorious of Salvation Thô it was also offered as an
certain Rule of Judgment and doth infallibly direct Mens Hopes Fears and Expectations Also it governs Mens Endeavours after Graces and Duties as the certain Means on our part of coming at the respective Benefits graciously promised in and by Christ to or upon those Graces or Duties But these things I have before largely insisted on This Damning Error comes to no more at last than this The Gospel-Covenant is Conditional not as to the first Grace but as to the subsequent Benefits and so that God requires us to believe and repent that we may escape the Wrath of God and that there are Promises made to Graces All which the Assembly of Divines in plain words assert therefore how many are undâ—â— Mr. M's Condemnation Nay it 's well if 〈◊〉 was Innocent when he Prefaced Mr. 〈◊〉 Book called The Blow at the Root for there all that I assert in this Point is affirmed 2 Charge He is the Man that makes the State of Believers to be undecided and in Suspence during this Life This is my Second Damning Error Reply He is very unfair in wording this who would not infer either 1. That I affirm that all true Believers are not in a State of Salvation Or 2. That an Elect Person that is brought to believe Savingly will Apostarize and Eternally Perish 3. Or that a Believer during this Life may not be assured of his Eternal Happiness But he knows in his Conscience that I do often in the plainest words assert the contrary to each of these Take a few Instances out of my Book I affirm that we are Justified the same Moment as we truly believe in Christ and the Blessing is not Suspended for any time longer And an Elect Person once Justified shall by Christ's Care be kept in a Iustified Stated Gospel-Truth stated p. 104 105. Again I affirm That Assurance is attainable in this Life as the Effect of Faith Page 74. I affirm that a Penitent Believer shall be Saved if he die before he hath time for further Obedience Again The Essential Blessings of the Gospel become the Inheritance of a Believer as soon as he is united to Christ Page 125 126. Do not say the Elect Believer will not fall away I think the same yet is it the less true that even he should Perish if he fall away Nay Doth not God by these Threats contribute to keep hi◠〈◊〉 Apostasie P. 138. See Defence P. 9. 2. I 'll give thee the Ground upon which he wordeth this Charge P. 55. I said the Reason why I use the word Condition is because it best Suits with Man's Relation to God in his present Dealings with us as Subjects in trial for Eternity And P. 136. How unsuitable is it to the present State of Mankind that Christ should govern us without Promises and Threatnings He is a King and we are his Subjects and we are 1. his Subjects in a State of trial for another World 2. We have great Remains of Sin within us and Temptations without us These are the places that give him the greatest Umbrage Now where is here that a Believer's Case is undecided 3. Let us briefly examine where the very true Difference between him and me consists for certainly therâ— is one though he thinks it the best Defence of his own Opinion to misrepresent mine or else he had gained little by calling it Damning The Difference is not 1. Whether all true Believers are in a State of Salvation 2. Whether they shall Persevere 3. Whether it be by the Influences of Christ through the Spirit that they do Persevere 4. Nor whether the Influences of the Spirit and Perseverance and the Certainty of their Salvation thereupon be the Effects of Christ's Righteousness and purchased by his Obedience All these I affirm But the real Difference is 1. Whether God require Believers to Persevere in Faith and Holiness as the means of their continuing in a State of Salvation 2. Whether it be a blameably legal Fear to be Solilicitously Cautious in resisting Temptations and striving in Christ's Strength to Persevere least we Eternally Perish 3. Whether if a Man have once believed yet if he should fall under the reigning Dominion of Sin and Corruption he ought to suspect that he is not in a State of Salvation These three I affirm and Mr. M. denies or I can make nothing of his words which thou must joyn together P. 50. If thou hast indeed believed with the Faith of the Operation of God and they Conscience knows it thou mayst then conclude assuredly That whatever thy Sins have been or whatever thy Defects and Corruptions now be yet this Righteousness of God is upon thee thou hast it and dost stand in it Reply The Faith is an Act past the Conclusion is at present whatever a Man's Corruptions be the only Evidence of the past Faith is â—he Knowledge of Conscience which is not Infallible And by the way I can prove That by his Opinion as that first Act is before Regeneration so no other or after-Act of Faith is necessary to continue our Justified State Again He exposeth such P. 63. as hold that we stand in it this Righteousness by our own Faith And P. 64. their Continuance in Obedience and the not failing of their Faith is one of the Privileges of their State and the Effect and Fruit of their having this Righteousness of Christ upon them and not the Means or Cause thereof You see the not failing of Faith is not so much as the Means of our continuing to have this Righteousness on us for of its first being on us he makes Faith a Cause P. 51 52. I need not shew how oft he calls all Fears about this Perseverance in our State Legal I have not time to argue these therefore shall only touch on each 1. God doth require Believers to Persevere in Faith and Holiness as a Means of their Continuance in a State of Salvation Rom. 11.20 22. Because of Vnbelief they were broken off and thou standest by Faith Be not high-minded but fear Towards thee goodness if thou continue in his goodness otherwise thou shalt be cut off 2 Cor. 1.24 By Faith ye stand How Conditionally is it proposed Col. 1.22 23. Now to present you Vnblameable in his sight If ye continue in the Faith and be not moved away from the Hope of the Gospel Here our Unreprovableness and Reconciliation in the Body of Christ's Flesh through Death as to Continuance is stated on this If you continue in the Faith Heb. 10.35 to 39. Now the Iust shall live by Faith but if any Man draw back my Soul shall have no Pleasure in him But we are not of them that draw back to Perdition but of them that believe to the Saving of the Soul It 's by Faith we live this Believing is to Salvation as drawing back is to Perdition How many are the Promises of Salvation to Perseverance and Threatnings of Death against Apostasie And these uttered to Believers Yea are
to his particular Flock is at an end Nay he is of so Rash a Spirit small Skill in the Reason of Names and lavishly disregardful of Truth in this Matter that a Nick-name must be the Effect of his giving any to such as are not of his own Faction 2. He quits all Truth and Modesty in giving us the Name of Socinians or Semi-socinians He saith our Opinions are the Off-spring of Socinianism What meaneth he by Off-spring Is it 1. only that Socinianism was the occasion thereof Or 2. That they are of the same Genuine Nature with Socinianism The last is an abominable Slander hatch'd by no good Spirit 1. The former may be pretended but then an immediate Descent must be denied Socinianism tempted weak Men to the opposite Extream of Profane Antinomianism This Extream was perceived equally â—atal to the Vitals of Practical Christianity as Socinianism and also to give Advantage to the Socinians by its wild Positions and weak Arguments consonant thereto Therefore our best Learned Divines at once to prevent the Triumph of the Socinians and the growth of Antinomianism waved many of those Terms which had obtained among the Orthodox in speaking of Christ's Satisfaction without any due regard to either of these fatal Errors Hence Dr. Owen of the Trinity and Satisfaction P. 153. It appears from what hath been spoken that in this matter of Satisfaction God is not considered as a Creditor and Sin as a Debt and the Law as an Obligation of that Debt and the Lord Christ as paying it He then shews the difference and tells us God must be considered as a Rector c. p. 113. and p. 141. There is an allusion to them the Socinian Argument to a Debt and Payment which is the most improper expression used in this matter The same you 'll find Essenius Triumphus Crucis p. 391 399. Turretin Instit. Theol. par 2. p. 264. 462. In like manner they place Satisfaction in an equivalent in many things and not the same for kind in all Essenius p. 340. Dr. Stillingfleet of Sufferings of Christ p. 244 245. Many more instances might be given 2. But our Principles are far from being the Off-spring of Socinianism as being of the same Nature with it which he meaneth They are nothing which is properly Socinian or condemned as such by either Synod or Men of Learning So far are we from being half Socinians The Socinian Principles are summarily reduced to that of the Trinity and that of Christ's Satisfaction They deny the Deity of Christ as the Son of God by eternal Generation We affirm it they deny the Personality of the Holy Ghost we affirm it The Malice of our Author cannot pretend to touch us there The Socinians deny that Christ died a proper Sacrifice for Sin we affirm it They deny that Christ's Sufferings were the Punishment of our Sins we affirm it They deny that Christ satisfied Divine Justice or died in our Place We affirm he satisfied Justice and that Christ died in our Place and in our stead He died that we might not die who were liable to die He gave his Life for ours They say Christ died for our Good not by way of Merit at all strictly We affirm that Christ properly merited all the saving Good we enjoy The Good they say Christ died for is the giving us an Example of Patience confirming his Doctrin and at highest the ratifying the Covenant wherein our own Faith and Obedience is by Acceptilation accepted instead of a perfect legal Righteousness and this exclusive of Christ's Satisfaction and Righteousness and that he attends to this is what they mean when they say Christ in some sort may be said to give us Life But we affirm that the good Christ merited is Reconciliation with God Pardon of Sins and eternal Glory c. as well as that he gave us an Example of Patience c. And we truly affirm that we have no Righteousness that answers the Law but Christ's and that Christ's Righteousness is imputed to us as that wherein we stand before a just God and is as available to us for Salvation as if we had done and suffered what Christ did and we renounce all our own Obedience and Works legal and evangelical as any Part of that Righteousness in or for which we are pardoned accepted or glorified Our very Faith and much less our Repentance or other good Works is not any merit or procuring cause of our Justification The whole use and place we assign to Faith in our Justification and to Repentance in the pardon of sin is that they are the things which the Gospel requireth in those whom God will impute the Righteousness of Christ to for actual Pardon and a Title to Eternal Glory as promising to impute Christ's Righteousness to Believers and actual Pardon to the believing Penitent as also the possession of Glory to such as persevere in Faith and Holiness and all in by and for the only Righteousness of Christ as the sole meriting enclining and procuring Cause Reader judge between us yea let the searcher of Hearts judge whether we are not wronged by this Brother I have in this Book as well as formerly shewed that by Reward is meant no more than an encouragement to a Duty established by the Gospel as a Law not whereby governing Iustice enjoineth us to work out a Righteousness as our Title to Eternal Life but a Law wherein Grace in a way of Government appoints Conditions that render us the subjects of saving Benefits as the Effects of Christ's Righteousness and to be received and enjoyed in his Right Again whereas some call Faith our subordinate Righteousness I have evidenced that they intend no more than a performed Condition of the Gospel and no way a Righteousness of the same kind or to the same End or Purpose with Christ's Righteousness Also when any of us say that we are justified by Faith as an Act Justification is then taken in quite another sense from Justification by Christ's Righteousness the last being universal as to our Persons and State the former being only of a particular Cause viz. Are we Believers and but consequently are we the Persons the Gospel promiseth to deal with as Believers Also I have shewn that Justification is entire in all its Causes and that Faith doth no more than connote us the Objects or Subjects on whom this Justification is conferred by God as a Benefit or the Object on whom the Justifying Act terminates by the Gospel If these be Semisocinian Principles I undertake to shew that all or most of the noted Protestant Confessions of Faith and the Body of our Protestant Divines of Name yea especially such as have written against Socinianism are Semisocinian Sure then our Author either reads our Principles in a false Glass or he knows no more of Socinianism than that it is a scandalous word and so fit to brand those with whose worth acceptance and usefulness he beholdeth with an envious Eye
only with other things which the following Tract insists on These he had oft in his own place preached and long endeavoured to make our Ministry hateful to his Hearers yet that I was silent under But serious Thoughts of the Design and Tendency of his open Attempt at Pinners-Hall forced me in my next Turns in that Lecture to preach the Principal Heads of the following Sermons which I enlarged in four Discourses at my own place Yet I had that regard to Peace that as I forbear all Indecent Reflections so I took no notice that any one asserted what I determine against and had never published them except that he had Printed his and that with the Scandalous Name he intends us to be called hereafter by viz. Semi-Socinian Sober Men justly cry out against these Debates but I appeal to their Consciences where the Blame must be laid Can we be Faithful to Christ to our Ministry to Souls that need our help or to our own Name as Ministers if we lye down with these Calumnies and Misrepresentations Though did they only plead for their own Whimsies I should for Peace disregard them but to make it their daily work to Prejudice the People against the Faithfulest Ministry and run them into Confusion of Mind for a Factions sake calls I think for an Industrious Opposition If you ask what in us is it they so exclaim against I answer It 's 1. That though we own Christ's Righteousness is truly imputed to us yet we deny that God esteems us to have done and suffered what Christ did 2. Though we own that God requires nothing of us to be a meriting legal Righteousness or Atonement for Sin yet we say that God in a way of governing Grace requires some Duty to be performed on Man's part to which he enableth us whereupon he applies to us the Beneficial Effects and Fruits of Christ's Righteousness according to the respective Gospel Promises and thereby incourageth us to those Duties governs our Fears and Hopes And that 's the Heart of the Controversie for they think no Duty as a Duty is ordained a means to any Benefit They own no Law but the Law of Works which admitted nothing short of perfect sinless Obedience And because we cannot perform that as the Meriting Condition of Life in the Adjustment of Iustice therefore Men must do nothing as a Condition of enjoying any Benefits in Christ's Right by the Adjustment of Grace in a way of Authority Since we cannot be wholly Sinless it 's all as one whether we are Sincere or no. 3. We own that it is Faith alone is the receiving Condition of Iustification yea I add That it 's the only express'd Condition of the Imputation of Christ's Righteousness in order to Pardon but all is in vain because we say that Repentance is necessary to our actual Pardon Mr. M. falsly pretends that their Notions are the Truth in the Churches Possession since the Reformation But I have proved the contrary by many Quotations in my Defence of Gospel-Truth and the very Iâ—dicious and Learned Apology of the Subscribers of my Book hath added a greater Number I will of Hundreds I could produce give two Testimonies Mr. Perkins 's Order and Causes of Salvation c. Cap. 36. Quest. Whether is Justifying Faith commanded in the Law Ans. It is commanded in the Law of Faith namely the Gospel but not in the Law of Works that is in the Moral Law Rom. 3.27 The Reasons are these 1. That which the Law revealeth not that it commandeth not but the Law is so far from revealing Justifying Faith that it never knew it 2. Adam had fully before his Fall written in his Heart the Moral Law yet had he not Justifying Faith which apprehended Christ. He then proceeds to answer the Objections against the Gospel being a Law Mr. Anth. Burgess in his Doctrine of Justification Part 1. P. 161. denies that Repentance is in a Man as a Sign only that God hath Pardoned But saith We must go further and say it 's the Means and Way which God hath appointed antecedently to Pardon so that where this goeth before the other followeth after This he proves by six Arguments and the Book was Printed at the Desire of the London Synod Calvin oft owneth the Gospel to be a Law and in his Commentaries on Jonas Cap. 3.10 P. 359. saith Forgiveness is Free and yet as oft as God proposeth Forgiveness to Sinners this Condition is still added therewith viz. That they Repent He gives the Reasons of it and calls it a Law by which God so commands Repentance in order to Pardon though not as a Cause of Pardon I have in this Book endeavoured to put the Doctrine of Iustification in a plain Light though I wonder why our Brethren still say I mean what is quite contrary to what I say I suppose it 's because they have so long thought and represented some of our Principles contrary to what they be that they cannot think it possible that they should be what indeed they are or at least they will suspect us Fools and Lyars rather than seem to own that they could be so long mistaken I request therefore that if Mr. M. will reply to me he would cite my words fully and give the Page as I have done for hitherto my own words would have put their Calumnies to Shame Him while God spares me I will attend to He saith That he is not far from the place where the Weary are at Rest and the Wicked cease from Troubling I wish him Repentance of the Wound he hath injustly given so many fitter to serve their Generation than him or me and whilst he is spared which I desire for Service may be long that he may be less unwearied in hindring and breaking that Blessed Union which promised so much Good though I am sorry he boasts of his own Quietness whilst he createth Broils and Disquiet to so many some known to us both he 'll meet in Glory who were comforted by the above Consideration whilst less able to bear up under his Assaults than by Grace I have been long strengthened to do Nevertheless whilst Conscience binds me to some Sharpness against his Attempt to destroy so many Ministers as to what 's more valuable than their Lives I do from my Heart forgive him and would rejoyce to find him convinced of his Mistake and Misrepresentation of our Principles that we might peaceably concur in promoting the Kingdom of Christ and our common Good and not be the Scorn of such as Glory in our Weakness Reader It 's worth thy notice that there is more Safety in our way than in the contrary for we trust in Christ's only Righteousness for all those Things and Vses it is appointed to even for Satisfaction to Iustice the Pardon of all our Sins and Defects the Acceptance of our Persons and all Performances the Merit of all Good yea and our Legal and Prolegal Righteousness renouncing every Grace and Work
Heaven is another Christ doth not in Heaven assume our Nature Denovo but remains United to that Nature which he assumed in the Womb And the state of this Nature is now Glorious whereas he took our Flesh when it was Inglorious A Prince may humble himself in marrying an ignoble deformed sickly Beggar and yet it will not follow he humbleth himself still because he lives with her as a Wife especially if he hath ennobled beautified healed and enriched her 2. Saying That Christ's Humane Nature is exalted in Heaven is an acknowledgment that Christ was humbled in taking our Nature in the manner and condition he assumed it in Would Christ's Body be in an exalted State if it were in the form it had in its first Conception Yet so it was in the moment of Incarnation Were it exalted if still to be Born Yet so it was Would he be in an exalted State if still an Infant or Child Yet this was necessary from the manner of Christ's Incarnation Would this Nature be exalted if still subject to Weariness Pain Grief Hunger Shame Temptation and Death Yet such was the frame and habit of it when he assumed it This vast difference in the state of Christ's Body in Heaven and when he became Incarnate may convince us that Christ humbled himself in assuming it unless you will suppose it was first a Glorious Body i. e. when he took it and after he assumed it it was deprived of that Glory and humbled and then again exalted But such Conceits I pass by 3. I might add Thô the exalted Body of Christ be now a more fitted Medium whereby the Divine Glory is exerted and manifest and also the Glorious Purposes attained by the Hypostatical Union continued do compensate it Nevertheless the Human Nature is in a sense at present some Vail upon the Glory of Christ as the Eternal Word notwithstanding the Exaltation of the Humane Nature 1 Cor. 15.28 But these things are so beyond our comprehension that an humble Reverence doth best set Limits to our Thoughts But what hath been insisted on without enlarging on this may suffice to give us juster Thoughts of our selves as Men at least so as not to furmise it was no Act of Humiliation in the Lord of Glory to become Man by being Conceived and Born for him to be a Child to assume Flesh subject to Weariness Pain Sorrow Faintness Temptation Death c. for the Creator of the World to assume to a Personal Union with himself the lowest sort of intelligent Creatures and for the Lord of Glory to become a Subject and Servant I shall conclude this Point by giving you the Westminster Assemblies Judgment Less Catech. Q 27. Wherein did Christ's Humiliation consist A. Christ's Humiliation consisted in his being born and that in a low condition made under the Law c. You see that they thought Christ's being boâ—â— was a part of his Humiliation And not only the Miseries that followed his being born nor the Low Condition wherein he was born 〈◊〉 tech. Q. 46. The Estate of Christ's Humiliation was that low condition wherein he for our sakes emptying himself of his Glory took upon him the form of a Servant in his Conception and Birth Life Death and after his Death till his Resurrection Q. 47. Christ humbled himself in his Conception in that being from all Eternity the Son of God in the Bosom of the Father he was pleased in the fulness of Time to become the Son of Man made of a Woman of a low Estate and to be born of her with divers Circumstances of more than ordinary Abasement You see his very becoming the Son of Man and his Conception whereby he was Incarnate were Parts of Christ's Humiliation 3. Enq. Did Christ by his Death and Sufferings merit any thing and that for us A. Christ by his Death and Sufferings merited yea even saving Blessings for us I shall 1. Premise somewhat that may tend to clear this 2. I shall prove the Thing I affirm 1. Let this be premised Christ's Death and Sufferings may be conceived of first as Satisfactory and then Meritorious On the other hand Christ's active Obedience is to be conceived as first fit to be Meritorious and then Satisfactory The reason of the former is this Had not Christ's Death and Sufferings been for to make satisfaction God had not admitted them or delighted therein as the merit of any Benefits nay God would have looked at them with dislike in stead of accounting them a meet Price of Blessings The reason for the later is That had not Christ's Active Obedience been perfect and so fit to merit it could not satisfie or be a recompense for Man's Disobedience by vindicating the injured Glory of God's righteous Government Imperfect Obedience had tempted Creatures to offend instead of atoning God for the Offence 2. I shall prove that Christ's Death and Sufferings did merit greatly and that for us Short Hints will suffice to confirm a Position to plain 1. R. That for which Christ was rewarded both as to himself and as to us did truly merit and that for us But Christ was rewarded both as to himself and us for his Death and Sufferings That Christ was rewarded for his Death and Sufferings as to himself is past Question Phil. 2.9 Wherefore God hath highly exalted him and given him a name above every name The Covenant of Redemption adjusteth this Christ claimeth this oft as of Right and the Father is oft said to perform it as of Justice That Christ was for his Death and Sufferings rewarded as to us is as evident All the saving Benefits we receive are part of Christ's Reward and dispensed as such Isa. 53.11 12. He shall see of the travel of his soul and shall be satisfied by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justifie many for he shall bear their iniquities Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great and he shall divide the spoil with the strong because he hath poured out his soul untâ— death c. I shall presently instance the Saving Blessings which we receive for the Sufferings of Christ as the procuring Caâ—se thereof 2. That which is the Price of our Redemption did merit for us but Christ's Death and Sufferings were the Price of our Redemption c. 1 Cor. 6.20 For ye are bought with a price 1 Pet. 1.18 19. Ye were not redeemed with corruptible things but with the precious blood of Christ c. Acts 20.28 To feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own blood You cannot doubt but that by which we are redeemed and bought did merit the just God was a detainer of us as guilty Offenders until Christ by Death made reparation to his Glory 3. That which is part of the Righteousness of Christ for which we are justified did merit for us But Christ's Death and Sufferings are part at least of the Righteousness of Christ for which we are justified c. Rom. 5.9 We are
a way of Satisfaction Impetration Merit or Intercession it were true but as he words it it may be very Erronious and it is to Scrue an Error he doth thus express it Hence because he finds Repentance and Faith are so necessary to our Salvation he hath in his Pulpit endeavoured to inform Men how Christ repented and that he repented for us and though he doth not-publish it in this Sermon as he did elsewhere That Christ believed for us yet you 'll see presently how much he endeavours to convince us that he did so for if he believed whilst humbled it was for us and it 's imputed to us as he oft in this Book affirms Had I Mr. M's liberty what would I call this Error for though it 's in Christ's Strength and Grace that we Repent Believe turn to God and do good Works yet if we do not these as our Personal Acts Misery will be our Portion If you not I believe not you shall die in you Sins John 8. 24. Except you not I repent you shall all perish saith Christ Luke 13. 3. I say Except your Righteousness not mine exceed the Righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees you shall in no case enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Matt. 5.20 Had Mr. M. been an Auditor he had not said Lord thou understandest not the Gospel it 's thou art to do these things this is the deep Counsel of God however legally thou speakest He might as well say it 's thou Christ shall perish as thou Christ art to repent 2. Faith is a prime and principal part of our Being conformable to the Image of Christ c. He is the first Pattern and original Copy of Believing P. 62 63. Reply Is Christ's Faith the Pattern of Faith in Christ I remember somewhere Dr. Goodwin speaks of God's trusting Christ till he was Incarnate and of Christ's trusting the Father since the time of his Sufferings Yea we may easily grant that Christ believed God's Promise and as a Man depended and relied on God's Power and Truth But this is no other Faith than Adam in Innocency acted than the Law of Works directed to By this account we may think better of the State of Pagans than most do for without Gospel-Revelation they may believe in God trust him and depend on him But what is this to the account the Scripture gives of Faith in Christ Did Christ come to himself as a Saviour Did he receive himself as a Crucified Redeemer Did he eat his own Flesh and drink his own Blood for Eternal Life Did he plead his own Merits and rely on his own Righteousness for Pardon and restored Peace Did he consent to be married to himself Did he look to himself for Healing Or to use Mr. M's account of Faith in this very Page Did he go out of himself unto himself for all Yea take part of his Description of Faith in Christ p. 39 40.1 The Subject of Faith is the Heart of a convinced broken-hearted Sinner c. The very Nature of Faith and the acting of the Soul in it is such as doth imply and include a Sight and Sense of Sin and Misery and a lively heart-influencing Conviction of utter Helplesness in a Man's self and unworthiness to be helped by God c. Reader Doth Christ's Faith in the Nature of it imply a Sense of utter Helplesness and Unworthiness in himself or of his Sin and Misery The Reason he gives for Justling out such as Abram and setting up Christ for the original Copy of believing in himself is this The Humane Nature of Christ lives and subsists in the second Person leaning on the Eternal Deity of the Son of God it hath its Subsistence in the Bosom of the Godhead c. and hath the Eternal Power of the Deity clasping about it P. 63. The Apostle did not know this Faith when he said that Charity was greater than Faith Well as Sublime as this Reason seems to be I will venture to say This is not that Faith in Christ which the Gospel requires of Sinners 1. I will give you a Reason of Mr. M's which besure is none of the best P. 7. Christ's dwelling in our Nature is no part of the Punishment of Sin for then the Divine Nature only is punished and not the Humane at all nor the Person It 's a bad one for what he brings it since that Assuming the Nature and dwelling in it differ and I have answered it before and it needs a great Allowance to keep it from But if the Sufferings or Acts of only one Nature be not the Sufferings or the Acts of the Person of Christ then the acting of Faith of the one Nature on the other Nature is not acting of Faith upon the Person of Christ and consequently not Gospel-Faith which is to be acted on the Person of Christ here the Humane Nature believes but that is not with him Christ that believes it believes on the Divine Nature and that with him is not Christ who is believed on What now is become of Christ's Believing even by his own Reasoning 2. The Object of Faith in Christ is God-Man Mediator a Crucified Christ c. but the Deity of the Son of God abstractedly considered is not God-Man Mediator c. Truly if our Gospel-Faith is specified by this I see not the need of Christ's Incarnation or Death yea or regard thereto 3. This leaning and especially to the purposes assigned to this Act of Christ's Humane Nature is not all that which is Essential to the Faith in Christ which the Gospel requires But why should I Scribble the little Paper left It 's like the Reasons he gave for Christ's Repenting viz. The reproaches of them that reproached thee are fallen upon me and he was a Man of Sorrows and acquainted with Grief 3. He plainly discovers his Mind to be that Faith is an Act of the Soul whilst spiritually dead and unregenerate P. 61. He joins with such as say Faith is the means and way of our being made spiritually alive rather than our acting Life as being already brought into a state of Life as the Bodies Clasping hold on the Soul by the animal Spirits which are Corporeal things is rather the means of Life than an act of Life c. P. 62. Suppose that the principle of Grace begotten and created in us in Regeneration contain in it the Habit of Faith which I will not now call in question Yet c. P. 32. All our new Obedience and all the Graces of the Spirit comprized under that one word Love are the Effects and Fruits of our being justified P. 60. In Vnion by Faith which is the cause of this Union we are brought immediately into a state of Spiritual Life first Relative then Qualitative c. Repl. Here with the Arminians he denieth the habit of Faith necessary to the actings of Faith He is contrary to the Assembly of Divines who tell us That God in effectual Vocation takes away