Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	justification_n	justify_v	sanctification_n	1,666	5	10.7958	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A34979	Christ alone exalted in Dr. Crisp's sermons partly confirmed in answering Mr. Daniel Williams's preface to his Gospel truth stated, by alledging testimonies from Scripture and the doctrine of the Church of England, in the Book of homilies establish'd by law and other orthodox authorities : shewing how he hath wronged as well the truth as the said doctor in the great point of justification by the Neonomian doctrine / humbly offer'd by S.C., an unworthy son of the said doctor, author of a book entituled, Christ made sin, reflected on by Mr. Williams.	Crisp, Samuel, 17th cent.	1693 (1693)	Wing C6916; ESTC R8981	77,379	52

Justification is the Righteousness of God not wherewith be himself is righteou● but whereby he makes us righteous I know Mr. Williams in words denies our Sanctification to be a part of our Justification but in the whole scope of his Argument he makes our gospel Holiness to be lookt upon by God as having a concurrence in our Justification and this is his gospel Ordination and in full conformity to the Popish Justification by God's Righteousness whereby we are renewed His last clause of the Popish Article about Justification suits extremely with Mr. Williams's fling at Doctor Crisp as dethroning Christ for making Christ the alone cause of our Salvation without any thing of our works concurring And thus saith the Council of Trent If any one shall say that a Man is justified by the s●le imputation of the Righteousness of Christ or in the sole remission of sin excluding grace and charity which is shed abroad in their hearts by the holy Spirit and is inherent in him or that the grace whereby we are justified is only the savour of God let him be accursed This I take to be asserted by the Papists in opposition to the Protestant Doctrine so that the Protestant Doctrine was what they accurst and what Mr. Williams in effect accurseth saying the holding it is dethroning Christ VVell then the Papists curse those that say a man is justified by the sole imputation of Christ's Righteousness without any grace or charity VVhat 's become then of Mr. Williams's gospel Holiness sincere Obedience that God looks at in the gospel Rule to obtain the gospel Promise again they curse those that say our Justification is by the alone savour of God or freely by his grace Rom. 3.25 VVhat doth Mr. Williams less in falling foul on Doctor Crisp and all that wholly exclude every thing of man in the business of Justification and say they enerv●te Christ's government and open a door to all Licentiousness Whereas the contrary is most true that the grace of God appearing teaches to deny all ungodliness My next Opposer of Mr. W's Gospel Ordination is a great maul to Arminianism that is the Learned Pious Mr. Perkins who saith in fol. 576 of Vol. 1. Thus the Papists say Christ merited that our good Works merit And answers This is a dotage of their devising for Christ merited pardon for sin impuation of his Righteousness and Life eternal And fol. 104. To say Christ merited that our works merit this takes away Christ's Intercession I may add to say our Holiness comes in toward our Justification doth the same Mr. Perkins comes closer in Vol. 2 fol. 205. It may be objected saith he there is a co-operation of works and faith I answer That this co-operation is not in the Act of Justification nor in the Work of our Salvation but in the manifestation of the truth and sincerity of our Faith and for the declaration of this Faith and Works jointly concur Here then is a pestilent and damnable Doctrine of the Papists when they teach Justification by the Wo●ks of the Law And what is it to teach Justification by the Works of the Gospel which never had a Promise of Justification to it whereas the Works of the Law once had before Adam's Fall In Fol. 236. He turns perfect Antimonian with our Homilists if some men may censure him and saith thus The Gospel promises Life to him that doth nothing in the cause of his Salvation but only Believes in Christ This is dangerous Doctrine in Doctor Crisp because it spoils Mr. W's Gospel Ordination of Works and Faith going together in Justification but hath for this 100 years been good sound Doctrine in Perkins and the Homilies too He proceeds in fol. 237. and saith thus Believing and doing are opposed in the Article of our Justification In our good Conversation they agree Faith goes before and doing follows but in the Work of Justification they are as Fire and Water This is a fatal stroke to the new Gospel Ordination and a full concurrence with Dr. Crisp though Mr. Williams call this a dethroning Christ Mr. Perkins could not expect to be taken for an Oracle so that by his ipse Dixit that every one should receive his Positions tho' he grounded them on plain Scripture therefore he strengthens his Assertion by the sayings of the Fathers with which I farther oppose Mr. W's Gospel Ordination and confirm Dr. C. in fol. 537. Mr. Perkins saith The Fathers do hold Faith only to be requisite to Justification even without the Works of Grace Chrysostom saith in Hom. 7. in Cap. 3. Rom. What is the Law of Faith saith he To be saved by Grace here he sheweth the Power of God in that he not only saved us and that without use of any works exacting only Faith of us And Theodoret on Eph. 2. We have not believed of our own accord but came being called and when we are come he doth not exact Purity and Innocency of Life but hath Pardoned our sins accepting of Faith only And Basil Ser. de hum This it is to glory in the Lord when a man is not puffed up with his own righteousness but acknowledgeth himself destitute of all true righteousness and Justified by Faith alone in Jesus Christ They are justifyed before God saith Ambrose on Rom. 4. Without any labour or Toyl by only Faith no Works of Penitence being hereto required but only that they believe This Cloud of Witnesses is enough to cover and wholly extinguish the Gospel Ordination of Mr. Williams without any Comment on them Mr. Williams next Assertion is a Chip of the same block thus His Christs Righteousness imputed is the cause for which we are Justified when we do answer the Gospel Rule Here 's no mincing the matter of bringing in our Sanctification into our Justification for Mr. Williams tells us plainly what our answering the Gospel Rule is viz. Some degrees of Obedience Repentance Love imperfect Faith Persevering c. Thus while in words he pretends to separate Sanctification from Justification yet here he really joyns them and confounds them making our justification to be by Christs Righteousness imputed when we are holy when we be sanctifyed inferring that it is not till then and not only so but that that is the Condition of our justification Is this the Apostles justifying the Ungodly to be justified when we answer Mr. Williams Gospel Rule Whereas the Gospel makes no such Rule as he lays down of our sincere Obedience concurring to justification or God's having regard to our Gospel Holiness which is Mr. Williams own word I will not stand to refell this but do aver nothing can be clearer to me than this that by this expression we are justified when we answer that Gospel Rule which Mr. Williams laid down there is a downright mingling our Sanctification with our justification which the Apostle strenuously

Mr. Frith have insisted on No manner of Works make us right wise and no works make us unright-wise and all good Works must be utterly excluded and stand apart that grace may appear free Now are not Repentance Holiness new Obedience perseverance and Mr. Williams his c. Good works yet they must stand apart and be far from such a Conformity to the Rule of the Promise in our salvation as Perfect Obedience was to the Rule of the Precept O that God would teach Men to lower their high towering Opinions of our Holiness concurring to our Salvation and cry Grace grace to all from the Foundation to th● Top-stone still not of works though this galls proud Flesh lest any boast For a farther satisfaction in this great point let us see what our great Men presently after the down-fall of Popery in this Nation have said as to our works in the matter of Salvation The Homilists say in fol. 27. All good Works spring from Faith and cannot be done without Faith then I argue if they spring from Faith and that we are justifyed by Faith then good works have no hand in our Justification because that is over in order of nature before a good work sprung up then what have we to do with Mr. Williams Gospel Obedience conforming to the Promise in order to pardon The Homilists say farther from those words without me you can do nothing That what work is done without Faith is sin and without Faith all done of us is dead and Austin saith fol. 31. Whether thou will or no that work that comes not of Faith is naught There is one work in which is all good Works that 's Faith This is the Work of God to believe in him so that Christ called Faith the work of God and as soon as a man hath Faith anon he shall flourish in good Works Thus Holy Austin was for Faith alone without the Trumpery of our Obedience with c. in order to pardon Mr. W. fixeth Repentance and Faith with Holiness c. to be the Terms of Pardon How far this c goes it may be Mr. Williams may tell us in the next Edition or by the Athenian Mercury but for the consolation of humble Enquirers into the truth I 'll tell them what our Homilists say of this great grace of Repentance which Mr. W. puts before Faith and which he makes one of the terms of Pardon with his c. in fol. 258. these Homilists say We must return to the Lord yea to him alone and never rest till we have taken bold upon him but this must be done by Faith and he himself in his Gospel doth cry out I am the way the Truth and the Life therefore they are greatly deceived who preach Repentance without Christ so that with the Homilists 't is first Christs ours by Faith then Repentance they that think they have done much of themselves towards Repentance are so much more the farther from God This is not like our new Gospel Truth stated that a man without saving Faith in Jesus may repent of his sins yet say the Homilists but 't is such a Repentance as Judas's such as puts him farther from God and in fol. 263. they confirm their Doctrine of no sound Repentance without Faith in Jesus the way to it and say We must beware we in no wise imagin we can repent aright hy our own strength for this must be verifyed in all Men without me you can do nothing Mr. W. will say he owns that Christ enables us to repent 't is true but doth he own a Man is in Christ believes in Christ before he repent if he do not own that then he comes not up to the Text where Christ speaking of all his to the Branches in him he saith upon that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without me or out of me you can do nothing you cannot repent or do new Obedience if not a branch in me by Faith Again in fol. 268 they say They that preach Repentance without a lively Faith in our Saviour Jesus Christ do teach Judas his Repentance It is evident tho' we be never so earnestly Sorry for our sins acknowledge and confess them all these are but means to bring us to utter despair except we do stedfastly believe that God our heavenly Father will for his Son Jesus Christ's sake pardon and forgive us our Offences To them I add the Testimony of as great a Scholar and as sound a Protestant as Mr. Williams who above 100 years ago gave a better account of Faith and Holiness than Mr. W. doth and that is Mr. Perkins no Antinomian who saith in fol. 236. The law promises life to him that performs Obedience perfect The Gospel promises Salvation to him that doth nothing in the cause of his Salvation but only Believes in Christ yet not for this Faith or for any work else but for the merit of Christ this is a big word what do nothing in the cause of Salvation but believe no nothing saith Mr. Perkins and before Mr. Williams can confute him he must prove Christs Righteousness ours by Faith is meant of our Gospel Holiness that is God saith 't is Christ's Righteousness but he means quite otherwise viz. 't is our Gospel Holiness Mr. Perkins is in good earnest that we are to do nothing for Salvation but believe and answer several Objections as follow Objection 4th saith Mr. Perkins To believe is a work therefore one work is commanded in the Gospel and is necessary to Salvation Answer The Gospel considers not Faith as a Vertue or Work but as a Hand to apprehend Christ for Faith doth not Cause or effect or procure our Justification and Salvation but as the Beggars Hand receives them being wholly wrought and given of God and in fol. 247 he saith we must first be Justified before we can do a good work and in fol. 287. Paul teaches that works set up as Causes of Salvation with Christ make void the grace of God And is not this making them causes of Salvation with Christ to say Christ purchased this Grace that our Sincere Obedience Faith Holiness Perseverance should be accepted to answer the rule of the Gospel Promise for pardon Well doth Mr. Perkins proceed to reject our Righteousness in the matter of Salvation and Saith in fol. 955 of vol. 1st A mans Conscience must in some sort be settled touching his reconciliation with God before he can begin to Repent wherefore Justification and Sanctification in order of Nature go before Repentance but if we respect time then Grace and Repentance are together This is intelligible Doctrine and strenuous for the advancement of Christ alone and the same in effect as Mr. Perkins had asserted contrary to Mr. Williams in fol. 84. Saying From Sanctification Repentance is derived because no man can earnestly repent except he denying himself do hate sin and embrace Righteousness this no man can perform but such an one as is in the sight of God

Co-workers with him for Justification and Salvation Though by his Spirit he makes all his Regenerate ones Co-workers with him in the carrying on the Work of Sanctification Not to multiply Scriptures in a matter so strenuously contended against by the Apostle of our Works concurring to our Salvation I shall only add at present that great Text 2 Tim. 1.9 who hath saved us and called us not according to our Works Here 's a perfect Renunciation of VVorks even VVorks of all sorts before Faith and after Faith He don't say VVho saved us not for our VVorks but not according to our VVorks our VVorks have no accordingness in them to our Salvation they have no concurrence in that point they are left quite out Here 's no room for Gospel Obedience in complying with Gospel Rule to obtain life No not a word of that 't is so far from being for our Works that 't is not according to our works God hath no regard to them in saving and calling He hath saved How He saved by calling us How is that Did he not call us to Salvation upon seeing us comply with the Gospel Rule No he saved us and called us not according to our Works How then Then it is in a way that amazes the Scholastick World a way that will not go down with the wise and prudent of this world It is according to his grace not our grace according I say to his own grace given us in Christ before the world began O be amazed and confounded all that would state Gospel Truth any other way than God hath stated it for the everlasting comfort of all those blessed ones whom God hath shewed their Election to by their effectual Call to come to Christ he hath saved 't is already done and that not according to humane stating Gospel Truth not according to our Works that way would leave us always under Suspitions and Jealousies to our dying day but according to his ancient everlasting Love and that given to us as lookt upon in Christ when chosen in him before they had done good or evil before the world began that the purpose of God according to Election might stand Here the Apostle leaves it and so will I as to Scripture Confutation of his Gospel Ordination and because Mr. Williams may not say This is but one Doctors Opinion when he saith Doctor Crisp Dethrones Christ by rejecting holy Works from concurring to Salvation I shall spend some pains and time begging it may be acceptable Service in the Lord in shewing what several Servants of God of good Name say to this point I begin with Mr. Veale a Gentleman not in the least inclining to Antinomians in his Sermon against Merits Morn Lect. fol. 437. He shuts out gratious Works from having any hand or concurrence in our Salvation by this expression viz. It is muche that he God doth not damn you for your good Works seeing they are all defiled and have something of Sin cleaving to them What becomes of our Gospel Holiness now and sincere Obedience in the case of Salvation What all good works sin then they are dung Well but hath not Christ merited such a Gospel Ordination as our answering the Gospel Rule of holy Obedience though imperfect it shall interest us in Gospel Blessings To this Mr. Veale saith in fol. 417. It is in vain to say that Christ hath merited for the Saints a power of meriting The Papists can never prove that Christ merited any such Power for Believers It is really more for his honour to purchase all for them himself but Mr. Williams will say I do not say Christ merited that we should merit no but he saith Christ merited God should regard our works in Justification and in our Salvation What 's that but coming in as it were by Works not with a down-right rejecting of Christ but with a side-wind bringing in our works Christ merited that we should do something in our salvation And what 's that In plain English they give us a right to the Gospel Benefits which in some sense is worse than down-right Popery in as much as Popery makes our works meritorious of life in that Christ hath put an infinite value on them by his merits and so makes our works so valuable as to compensate the Justice of God for our sins and so still maintain the honour of God's Righteousness in forgiving sin on a valuable consideration of our works made by Christ meritorious of it Whereas the middle way found out by some makes God so gracious as by virtue of Christ's Mediation God accepts of imperfect defective gospel Holiness as perfect for Christ's sake and thereupon Forgives How near this comes to Mr. W's stating the gospel Ordination may be easily be judged Mr. Veale leaves Mr. Williams to stand by himself as to Gospel Holiness giving an Interest in the Blessings and saith 't is only an evidence of Faith and gives no Title in fol. 421. Hope of Life saith he may be helped on by Obedience and good Works because they are an Evidence of his Faith and so of his Interest in Christ but there is a vast difference between a man's taking comfort in his Obedience as the evidence of his Title to glory and Trusting in it as that which gives him Title I come next to Mr. Doelittle fol. 195. of Morning Lecture who gives an account of the Protestants and Papists Doctrine of Justification First he sums up the Apostles Doctrine of Justification not to him that works as D●vid describes the blessedness of the Man to whom the Lord imputes Righteousness not imputing their Trespasses to them for he made him to be sin for us that we might be the Righteousness of God Then he quotes the Protestant Doctrine thus We are accounted righteous before God only for the merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by Faith and not for our Works Those whom God effectually calls he freely justifies not by infusing Righteousness into them mark that against the Gospel Ordination of God's regarding our Holiness but by pardoning their Sins and by accounting and accepting their Persons as righteous not for any thing wrought in them or done by them but for Christ's sake alone imputing the Obedience and Satisfaction of Christ to them they receiving and resting on him and his Righteousness by Faith I think nothing can be more opposite than this Account of Protestant Faith where is not a word of our Holiness to Justification and Mr. Williams's which is made up of Gospel Obedience Gospel Rule Gospel Ordination of sincere Holiness regarded by God in our Justification This Protestant Doctrine he confirms by referring to a cloud of Witnesses against our new Divinity viz. The Helvetian Confession the Bohemian Gallican Augustane Belgick Wittemberg and Basil Then follows the Popish Trent Justification Justification is not only forgiveness of sin but also Sanctification of the sinner whereby a Man of unjust is made just and Mr. Williams like this complying with gospel Rule gives right to gospel Blessing The Papists go on and say the only formal Cause of