Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	justification_n	justify_v	sanctification_n	1,666	5	10.7958	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A09434	A godlie and learned exposition upon the whole epistle of Iude, containing threescore and sixe sermons preached in Cambridge by that reverend and faithfull man of God, Master William Perkins, and now at the request of his executors, published by Thomas Taylor, preacher of Gods word ; whereunto is prefixed a large analysis, containing the summe and order of the whole booke, according to the authors owne method, to which are further added, foure briefe tables to direct the reader ...	Perkins, William, 1558-1602.; Taylor, Thomas.	1606 (1606)	STC 19724.3; ESTC S100865	274,393	200

receiue it First God giueth it vnto vs when he giueth vs Christ himselfe for it is giuen with him and it is made ours when God in mercie esteemeth iudgeth and accounteth it to be ours for it is ours by imputation which appeareth by these two reasons First as Christ is made out sinne so are we made his righteousnes 2. Cor. 5.21 but hee is made our sinne by imputation and therefore his iustice being inherēt in him is made ours by imputation Secondly as the first Adams disobedience is made ours so Christs the second Adams obedience is ours Rom. 5.17.18 but that is ours by imputation and therefore Christs obedience also Secondly to make this obedience ours we must receiue it and that can be onely by faith which is the hand of the soule receiuing into it the things that are giuen vs of God where note by the way that a sinner is not iustified by the dignitie of his faith but as it is an instrument whereby Christs obedience is applied vnto the soule III. Point What workes are excluded from iustification Ans. The workes of Morall and Ceremoniall law workes of nature and grace That euen workes of grace are excluded appeareth by these reasons First a sinner must so bee iustified that all cause of boasting may be cut off Rom. 3.27 But if a man were iustified by workes of grace he might boast still yea though hee acknowledge the workes to be of God see the Pharisies example Luk. 18. Secondly if a man were iustified by the workes of the law then our iustification should stand by the law but that it doth not Rom. 4.14 for then the promise were made voide yea the tenour of that whole Chapter prooueth that Abraham hauing store of good workes was yet iustified by faith without the works of the law the which thing also that obiection in chap. 6.1 witnesseth What then shall we continue in sinne drawne out of the fiue former chapters thus If a man may be iustified by faith without workes we may continue in sinne which obiection were no obiection if that had not been the intent of the Apostle to prooue iustification by faith onely without the workes of the law Thirdly Paul was not iustified by any workes 1. Cor. 4.3 I know nothing by my selfe yet am I not therby iustified where he noteth two things of himselfe first that hee had a good conscience within him secondly that he was not thereby iustified where hee debarreth all works of grace Fourthly we are saued by grace without workes these workes excluded are workes of grace for they are all such as God hath prepared to walke in Ephes. 2.8 Fiftly a man must first be iustified before he can doe a good worke and therfore works follow iustification and cannot cause it Yea and as all workes are excluded so al vertues also excepting faith are here reiected For as in a man that standeth to receiue a gift no part doth any thing to receiue it but the hand yet hauing receiued it all other parts testifie thankfulnes the tongue the feete and all the bodie euen so wee receiue the matter of our iustification by faith alone not by hope or loue but after the receiuing of Christ these with the other graces work and shew themselues The second point in this ground is the weight of it appearing herein that he that ouerthroweth it ouerturneth the faith Rom. 4.14 If they of the law be he●res of life faith is made voide and the promise of none effect And Galath 2.21 If we be iustified by workes Christ died in vaine Aduersaries hereof First the home-aduersarie is the common sort of ignorant people and all naturall men who with the young man say What shall I doe to be saued They say they will be saued by faith in Christ but when it commeth to the point they will be doing somewhat and stand much vpon their good meaning and righteous dealing Secondly the forreine enemie is the Popish doctrine Romish religion which teacheth that there be two iustifications First when a man of an euil man is made a good man this is by grace of the holy Ghost put into the heart the latter is whereby a man is made of good better which is by good workes But what Church soeuer holdeth this is fallen from grace This is a peremptorie sentence will some say and no generall Councell hath so determined Ans. The more is the pitie But Gods word hath peremptorily determined it Galat. 5.4 They are abolished from Christ and fallen from grace whosoeuer will be iustified by the law as the Romane Church at this day They say our doctrine maintaineth loosenes of life by excluding all workes from iustification Ans. Though we exclude the best works from iustification yet we debarre them not from Christian conuersation but therein require them as fruits of the spirit plentifully Ob. But it is absurd say they that one man may be iustified by the righteousnes of another Ans. Adams sinne is made ours and they marueile not at it what greater absurditie is it that the second Adams obedience answering to the first Adams sinne should bee ours in like manner The 16. ground is this Except a man be borne anew of water and of the hol●e Ghost he cannot enter into the kingdome of God Ioh. 3.5 In which obserue first the meaning secondly the weight thirdly the aduersaries In the first consider two points first what it is to be borne againe secondly of what necessitie it is For the former wee must know that there must bee in him that is borne againe three things first a reall change from one estate to another Secondly there must be a roote from whence this change may arise Thirdly a new life First the chaunge is when a man of a meere naturall man is made a new man not in regard of his bodie or soule or powers of them all which a man retaineth the same after his regeneration but in regard of Gods image restored and renewed by Christ Ephes. 4.24 This is the restoring of that new qualitie of righteousnes and holines lost in Adam for so the Apostle describeth this new birth in the place alleaged This change is attributed to water and the holy Ghost wherein by water our Sauiour alludeth to some speeches of the old Testament as Ezech. 36.25 where the Prophet speaketh of the clensing of the Church by powring cleane water vpon it that is infusing new graces into the heart which take place of the old corruption And by the holy Ghost he sheweth that this clensing of vs is by the inward working of the holy Ghost Obiect But it will be said if a man bee a new man hee must haue a new soule Ans. This new qualitie of righteousnes and holines is as it were a new soule for in a regenerate man there is a bodie soule and besides the spirit which is the grace of sanctification opposed to flesh and

of God which if we want we must labour for thē and if wee haue them be thankfull vnto God for them 2. Vse Learne the dutie laid downe by the Apostle Ephes. 4.1 that we should walke worthie of our calling To doe which first we must looke that we frame our liues holily being holy in our whole conuersation as he that hath called vs is holie Secondly there must be the same end of our liues which is of Gods calling that is to bring vs to heauen The end of our being in the world is to be called out of the world and as Abraham to obey God as looking for a citie in heauen not made with hands Now we proceede to the second step of life eternall which is sanctification this name is taken from the Latins and by it is vnderstood Regeneration renouation new creation and to be sanctified is to be made holie and be borne anew That wee the better know this grace consider sundrie points First what sanctification is It is an inward change of a man iustified whereby the image of God is restored in him For the opening of which description marke that first I call it a change of a man to put a difference betweene it and ciuill conuersation which is a gift of God likewise as this is but farre different from it because this onely restraineth the corruption of the heart whereas sanctification reneweth the heart and thus the gifts of God are of two sorts first restraining which doe keepe in the wickednes of the heart such as are all ciuill vertues Secondly renuing or altering the minde which not only represseth but abolisheth corruption of this kinde is sanctification Secondly I call it an inward change namely in the minde will affections as working vpon the inward corruptions and lusts of the heart to distinguish it from outward sanctification which a wicked man may haue whereby he reformeth his outward man and cariage by the ministerie of the word such are they whom the Apostle speakes of Heb. 10.27 which tread vnder their feet● the blood of Christ whereby they were sanctified namely externally this is of another kinde working the inward change of the heart Thirdly I adde of a man iustified for two causes first to shew that iustification and sanctification are two diuers gifts of God and their difference may appeare in three things first in that iustification is out of a man sanctification is within him Secondly iustification absolues a sinner and makes him stand righteous at the barre of Gods iudgement sanctification cannot doe this Thirdly iustification brings peace of conscience so doth not sanctification but followeth that peace Thus the Apostle hath them distinct 1. Cor. 6.11 Ye are washed ye are iustified and sanctified as also 1. Cor. 1.30 Christ is made to vs righteousnes and sanctification Secondly because iustification goes with sanctification though iustification be before in nature yet they are wrought at the same time For when God accepts a mans person then is hee made iust who is also sanctified Fourthly I say the image of God is hereby restored the which that we may know wherein it consisteth consider the three-folde estate of man the first of innocencie the second after the fall and the third vnder Christ. First in innocencie man had three things first substance of bodie soule secondly the faculties of soule as reason and vnderstanding thirdly the image of God standing in the conformitie of the whole man to the will of God Secondly in the state after the fall man hath two of these first substance of bodie and soule secondly faculties as before But the third is wanting standing in righteousnesse and holinesse and in stead of it is found in euery man original sinne which distempereth and disordereth the whole man his minde will and affections and carrieth him against the will of God In the third condition vnder Christ wee haue three things first substance of bodie and soule secondly faculties of the reasonable soule thirdly a new created holines and righteousnesse before lost but now restored by grace aboue nature and this is a renewed conformitie to the will of God and the image of God againe restored Where note that sanctification is such a gift of God as changeth the man not the substance of the bodie or the faculties of the soule but the corruption disorder and sinfulnes of man it rectifieth but abolisheth not affections if a man be of sad disposition it neither increaseth nor taketh away but moderates his sorrow and keepes it in order so if a man bee of a merrie disposition it depriues him not of his mirth but corrects it that it exceede not so in Choler and other complexions Then those that feare to labour in their sanctification because then they must be solitarie sad and cannot be merrie and those that thus obiect against those who endeuour ouer their owne reformation may see themselues deceiued seeing it onely tempereth the affections to such moderation as becommeth holines The second point is Whence haue we our sanctification whether from our parents or from what originall No it cannot flow from the parents no although they be holy Iob. 1.13 the new birth is not of blood nor the will of flesh nor of man for parents must bee considered two waies first as they are men children of Adam Thus they bring their children and conuey no more to their children than Adam did which is nature together with the corruption of it Holy parents haue no sinne for it is mortified in them therefore they cannot deriue it to their children Notwithstanding their sanctification they conuey the nature and sinne of Adam which comes thus to passe God in the beginning gaue this law that whatsoeuer Adam receiued he should receiue it for himselfe and his posteritie and whatsoeuer he lost he should lose from himselfe and all his posteritie by vertue of which law parents sanctified bring foorth children vnsanctified which may appeare by this cōparison Take wheate make it as cleane as you can sow it and it will come vp not as it was sowen but in stalke blade and eare and it brings vp as much chaffe as euer it did though none were sowen with it what is the reason hereof but onely the order set in nature by God at the first So parents let them be neuer so holie by vertue of the former lawe bring foorth vnholie children Secondly parents must be considered as holy men sonnes of the second Adam by a second birth and thus they produce not their children nor deriue their holines into them although their holinesse may be a meanes to bring them within the Couenant Whence note that the soule of the child is not deriued frō the soule of the father as the body is frō his body for then shuld they haue the same properties with the soule of the parents so euery regenerate man should deriue a regenerate soule vnto the infant which is false

request to God only in the alone mediation of Christ. The second maine poin● of Religion out of this ground is this That religious worship is due to God alone for wee may not giue apparance of religious worship to creatures Cornelius is reprooued for giuing to Peter excesse euen of ciuill worship Acts 10.25 for he knew Peter to bee a man and not God and so seemed to mingle a kinde of religious worship with ciuill This is a maine ground also which whosoeuer denieth he holdeth no● the head Christ Col. 2.18.19 The Aduersaries of this ground also are the professed Papists who worship Saint● and Angels not onely by kneeling before them but praying also vnto them which cannot be denied to bee a religious worship seeing it attributeth vnto them to heare the prayers of all men 〈◊〉 all times in all places ye● and to know the hearts of men vpon earth Secondly they maintaine religious worship of Images they goe on pilgrimage vnto them offer Incense creepe vnto them and kneele before them Yea they worship the Crucifixe with the same worshippe whereby they would adore Christ if hee were liuing vpon earth as also the reliques of Saints Out of all which wee see what to thinke of that Church which onely hath the name of a Church she holdeth not the head Christ seeing for so many hundred yeeres she hath displaied her fornication in worshipping Saints Angels Images and the Virgin Mary so as her Bill of diuorcement is iustly giuen her 2. Thess. 2.10 Reuel 13.8 from whom we must separate if we would not partake with her in her plagues The sixth ground of practise is Esai 8.13 Sanctifie the Lord of hostes which words contain the substance of the third Commaundement in which consider first the meaning secondly the weight thirdly the Aduersaries For the meaning A thing is said to bee sanctified two waies either when it is made holy or when it is acknowledged to bee holie Now this latter must bee heere vnderstood for Gods name cannot be made holie which is holinesse it selfe and the first cause of all holinesse but it is sanctified of vs when wee acknowledge it holie and this our sanctification of God either respecteth God himselfe or the gifts of God Our sanctification of God himselfe the thing intended in this ground is done two waies first when in our mind we acknowledge and praise him in his attributes of wisedome mercie louing kindnes power prouidence and such like 1. Pet. 3.15 Sanctifie the Lord God in your hearts that is acknowledge him in his wisedome power and other his attributes Look as good subiects speaking of and mentioning their Prince will put off their hats in reuerent opinion of him so we religiously should thinke and speake of these Iob fearing only and but suspecting that his sonnes in their feastings had dishonoured this name of God sanctified them When Hez●k●●h heard the blasphemies of Rabshak●h against God be humbled himself rent his cloathes and put on sackcloath 2. King 19.1 Yea wicked Ahab hauing heard though falsely that Nab●●● had blasphemed God he rent his cloathes and proclaimed a fast which sheweth whatsoeuer his fact was the vse and manner of holy men in his time when Gods name was dishonoured and blasphemed Secondly wee sanctifie God himselfe when wee with reuerence acknowledge his titles as God Lord Iehoua Father Christ Iesus Holy Ghost and not without religious and obedient affection speaking or thinking of them Our sanctification of Gods gifts which are many as the Word preached Prayer Sacraments Meate Drinke and all things seruing for the good of bodie or soule is not by giuing or adding any holines vnto them which in themselues are all holie but when we acknowledge them holie by preparing our selues to a holie vse of them and vse them accordingly with good conscience for euery creature of God hath a double vse first a lawfull vse when God permits a general vse of his creatures thus all may vse meate drinke apparell c. Secondly a holy vse when a creature in his lawfull vse is vsed in a holy manner for this includeth the former though that may be without this For example all the Iewes kept the Passeouer lawfully but onely those celebrated it holily who prepared themselues according to the commandement which holy vse is obtained by the word and prayer 1. Tim. 4. The word directeth vs to vse these gifts of God in obedience and prayer obtaineth grace to vse them according to the worde vnto which holy vse of Gods creatures we are to be mooued by these reasons first we must distinguish our selues from the bruite beasts the swine in the forrest ●●teth vp the maste but looketh not vp to heauen no not to the tree whence it falleth Secondly because we haue lost our title to all the creatures in Adam which onely is in this vse restored Thirdly because they are the gifts of God we must thus acknowledge them to be his and in him learne to vse them Fourthly that vice may auoide the common abuse of them whereby hee is prouoked to displeasure The second point is the weight of this ground which may appeare in the con●●●rie seeing the blasphemer doth what hee can to ouerthrow the Godhead it selfe whence euery such one is called by such a name as signifieth a 〈◊〉 of God or one that thrusteth God thorough and therefore the sanctification of God is a ground of moment Secondly the first petition of the Lords Prayer is sanctified be thy name wherein wee are taught to preferre and pray for the hallowing of Gods name before our own saluation Thirdly the scope of the third Commandemēt is the same which whosoeuer obserueth not reuerseth both the former And lastly the Lord is so iealous of his glorie that he will bee sanctified of all them that come neere him else hee will sanctifie himselfe in their confusion Leuit. 10.3 Thirdly The Aduersaries of this ground are first though by Gods mercie the religion of the Church of England is no aduersary vnto it yet the liues of the most fight against it for although when we mention earthly Princes wee can vse all reuerence yet Gods name is most fearfully abused and tossed in wicked mens mouthes by oathes and cursed speakings besides that many abuse the same to Charmes and Spels in their sorceries and men thinke all is well because herein they vse good words but the truth is the better the words be the greater is the sinne yea it is noted to be a signe of a low and base spirit not to sweare and blaspheme vpon any occasion many souldiers thinke they cannot be couragious enough vnlesse they pierce God rent Christ by detestable oathes such as would cause wicked Ahab himselfe to rend his cloathes at the hearing Secondly the great aduersarie is the Papist and that diuers waies first in that they teach that the very doing of some worke is a sanctification of God as the outward worke of

the mother of their errors was accompanied with a desire of knowledge for they were euer questioning with him desiring him to open vnto them his parables and resolue their doubts instantly listning vnto the gratious words of his mouth and in a word were blessed euen in hungring and thirsting after righteousnesse The persons then here aimed at are absolute perfect Papists against whom alone this graue Author dealeth in all such places of this or other his Workes where in he may seeme seuere against them as himselfe here and there thorough his writings hath described them to be such as acknowledge the Pope their head hold and maintaine the doctrines and deuices of the Councell of Trent and therein are become ouerturners and rasers of the foundation of Christian religion members of Babylon Idolaters not onely outwardly towards Saints and Images but inwardly sacrificing to their own nets these zealous Papists especially the Teachers among them are the deceiuers so liuely described throughout the Epistle The second point is our consequent dutie standing in our standing out with these aduersaries of Gods grace and Gospell neuer offering to communicate with them in their cup of fornications nor once bethink vs of leaguing such abhorring natures as are light and darknes and truth which is of an vnstained nature with most foule and deformed falsehood For we cannot drinke of the cup of the Lord of Diuels Which point let me with good leaue a little further declare not that I loue to kindle or keepe in any coales of contention the Lord put farre from me such vnpleasant thoughts but calmely to shew the ouersight of diuers mediatours attempting to reconcile ours with the present religion of the Romish Synagogue esteeming it to bee too much peremptorines so farre as wee doe to depart from them yea censuring it either as wilfulnes on the one hand o● scrupulositie on the other to bee so opposite vnto them as we are reputing it a matter of no difficultie to frame both sides to a meane either side as they say yeelding a little nay it is buzzed out into the eares by the tongues of common men that there is no such discrepance and difference betweene vs in matters of moment as is made but that the substance of both our Religions is not farre from the same so as many are in a mammering whether way may be better whereunto after the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 imitated also by the Greeks and Latins that I may begin with the last for the helping of memorie first wee may bewaile in beholding into what a fearfull if not desperate degree of declining many are alreadie come that after so many yeeres profession of the truth powerfully both published and protected they should not only admit a dangerous deliberation but euen call the very maine grounds thereof into question whereas if it bee in a motion to Idolatrie they ought instantly to say with Sidrach We are not carefull what to answere in this matter But this iudgement of God is iust vpon them that whereas they neuer receiued the truth in loue of it they should lose of their ground and bee left vnto further delusion Good cause haue we all to lament the remembrance of our ruine through this Satanical stratagem If the woman will needes bee so vnwise as not needing to enter parley with Satan whom she ought to haue resisted and that in matter of such moment as wherein Gods truth his glorie and her owne glorious estate must bee questionable most iustly must she bee left of God snared by Satan foyled through her owne follie throwne from her estate though of innocēcie and dispossessed not alone wee all know euen of Paradise it selfe Besides how farre shor● come these men in ●●ale to the truth not onely of our aduersaries the Papists themselues among whome no doubts 〈◊〉 questions in their grou●●● and 〈…〉 tolerable but euen of the law who will admit of no dispute against his Religion yea of the barbarous Turke himselfe who inflicteth d●ath on whomsoeuer they conuin●e to haue called a word of their Alca●on into question Secondly concerning those who cannot discerne such essentiall differences betweene our Religions both of v● as they say professing saluation by the same Christ and all the articles of the same faith I wish them no worse then that their eyes were cleered with the eye salue that they might see that he that seeth not such a Papist as i● mētioned to professe a false Christ and a false faith seeth in Religion sc●rse any thing at all neither doubt I liue to whom malice 〈◊〉 igno●●nt superstition shutteth not their eyes to shew plainl●● in few words that whatsoeuer in words they confesse with vs yet in doctrine and deed they altogether reuerse it and dissent from vs in cases wherein wee may neuer consent vnto thē And first seemeth it a small matter of difference that in generall they charge our whole doctrine of noueltie whence ordinarily they tearme the Teachers thereof Non●●●rs and in speciall first that our doctrine of iustification by faith alone for this striketh at the head and vnbowelleth all their shifting deuices is but a new deuice of ours as appeareth in their Champians challenge But confounded herein was he his cause and abetters our learned men at the conference with him in the Tower not only mightely by the Scriptures conuincing but out of Greeke and Latin Fathers also who liued aboue a thousand yeeres ago oppressing him with those very formall words that faith onely iustifieth so driuing him to ridiculous shift● and newly coyned distinctiōs so neere the Min● was he before vnheard of euen as in this controuersie being much straitned they were forced to cast about for that as false as new distinctiō of iustification into the first and second neuer heard of for the space of a thousand and fiue hundred ye●res after Christ. 2. Let 〈◊〉 ad●oyne hereunto the challenge of our England● Iewell who vndertoo● and performed the proofe that in seuen and twentie points none of them 〈◊〉 the Papists are different not ●nely from ours but from the doctrine of the Primitiue Church and that neue● 〈◊〉 of th●se their new deuices 〈◊〉 once heard of 〈◊〉 receiued i● 〈◊〉 Church of God for the space of sixe hundred yeeres after Christ. If then they chall●nge our doctri●● of Noueltie● and 〈◊〉 proued they not improouing that 〈…〉 of no ancient and not neere Apostolicall authoritical hope this cannot seeme a circumstance● betweene 〈◊〉 for there can be but one truth and that is most mole●● 3. Againe can it seeme so small ● moa●e in the eye of any man of sight that the sacrilegious Synod of 〈◊〉 teacheth cursing the contrarie minded that on their Romish Altars sacrifices propitiatorie are d●●ly properly and truly offered for the sinnes of the quick and dead● seeing that this doctrine vtterly derogateth from yea and abrogateth that most perfect and only