satisfy the laâ—e of god And besydes ther may be done â—orkes of superogation Therfore men maye nat only satisfy and fulfyll the lawe of god but also do more theÌ„ fulfyl it And because Monkes and Freers do more than fulfyl the lawe therfore they haue merites more then they nede them selues And because it is liberalalite to gyue vnto other of that whiche thou haste aboue thyne owne necessitie therfore they may gyue those merites to other men They deuise also a sacrament that is to say a wytnes and a marke of this gyuyng for wheÌ„ men be deade they put about them the habites of theyr relegious men to witnesse that other mens merites be applyed vnto them With suche coaceruatioÌ„s our aduersaries do deface the benefite of Christe and the iustice of faythe ⧠We do nat here rayse vp vayne pratyng about the worde But we stryue about a greate thiÌ„g that is to weâ—e wherof godly myndes ought to conceyue sure and vndoubted hope of saluation whether good workes maye set consciences at peace and quyetnes Whether they ought to thynke that eternall lyfe is so gotteÌ„ if they do set theyr good workes agaynste the iudgement of god orels they ought to thynke that through mercy for Christes sake they be reputed ryghtous do obtayne eternall lyfe These thyngê do come into controuersie whiche onleâ— the coÌ„science do discusse and iudge it can nat haue any stronge and sure consolation But we haue declared euideÌ„tly ynough that good workes do nat satisfie the lawe of god but that they haue nede of mercye that by faythe we be accepted with god for Christê sake also that good workes do nat set the coÌ„science at reste and peace Of all these thyngê it foloweth that we ought to thynke that for Christes sake through mercy and nat for the lawe they that be iustified do obtayne eternal lyfe What shall we say then as touchyng the name of rewarde Fyrste if we shulde say that eternall lyfe is called a rewarde because it is due to them that be iustified by reason of the promyse we shulde nat speake any thynge amysse For these gyftes be ordered among theÌ„ selues as AugustiÌ„ne sayeth Dona sua coronat deus in nobis .i. God crowneth rewardeth hys owne gyftes in vs. But the scripture calleth eternal lyfe a rewarde nat because it is due for our workes but because it dothe recompense the affections and workes albeit yet it is gyuen for another cause Lykewyse as the inheritaunce commeth to the good mans sonne of the howse nat for his owne workes or seruice and yet neuertheles it is a rewarde and recoÌ„pense of the warkes and seruice of the son It is sufficieÌ„t therfore that the name of rewarde dothe for thys cause agre to eternall lyfe be cause eternall lyfe dothe recompence good workes and afflictions Eternall lyfe therfore is nat a rewarde because our workes be sufficient or because it is due for workes but consecutiuely because although it be due for another cause yet neuertheles it dothe recompense good workes and afflictions ⧠Besydes thys we do graunte that workes be in very dede meritorious nat of remission of synnes or of iustificatioÌ„ for workes do nat please but in theÌ„ that be iustified and that because of faythe Neyther be they worthy of eternall lyfe For as iustification commeth by faythe for Christes sake so dothe viuificatioÌ„ but they be meritorious of other rewardê corporall and spiritual whiche are gyuen partly in this lyfe and partly after thê lyfe For god differreth the most parte of hys rewardes vntyll he dothe glorifie sayntes after thys lyfe because he wyl that they be excercised in this lyfe to mortifye the olde man The gospell dothe frely set forth and exhibete the promise of iustification and viuification for Christes sake But in the lawe rewarde is offered and is due nat frely but for workes For asmuche therfore as workê be a certayne fulfyllyng of the lawe they be well called meritorious and it is well sayde that rewarde is due vnto them And this rewarde engendereth degrees of rewardes accordyng to that sayeng of Paule Euery man shall receyue rewarde accordynge to hys owne labour These degrees be rewarde of warkes and of afflictions But our aduersaries do contende and styffly affyrme that eternall lyfe is only due for workes because Paule sayeth He shall rendre to euery man accordynge to hys work In the fyfthe of Iohan. who so euer haue wrought well shall ryse agayne to the resurrection of lâ—fe In the .xxv. of Mathewe I was hungry and ye gaue me meate In all these places in whiche workes be commeÌ„ded and praysed it is necessary to haue recourse to the rule a boâ—â—remembred that is to saye that workes please nat without Christe nor that Christe the mediatour is nat to be excluded Wherfore when the texte sayeth that eternal lyfe is gyuen to warkes It meaneth that it is gyuen to them that be iustified For good workê do nat please god but in them that be iustified that is to say in them whiche thynke them selues accepted to god for Christes sake And they that be iustified do necessarily bryng forthe good workes or good frutes as I was hungry and ye gaue me meate Here when it is sayde that eternall lyfe is giuen to these workes the meanyng is that it is gyuen to ryghtuousnes Therfore he coÌ„prehendeth fayth when he nameth the frutes And the scripture nameth the frutes to shewe that god requyreth nat hypochrisy but iustice whiche is full of efficacitie and workyng and a certayne newe lyfe bryngynge forthe good frutê Neyther do we couet here any vayne or vnfrutful subtilite For they be very wayghty causes for whiche we do dispute these thyngê For if we do graunt to our aduersaries that workes do deserue eternall â–ª lyfe anone they adde these false and inconueniente thynges that workes satisfie the lawe of god that they haue no nede of mercy that we be ryghtuous that is to saye acceptable in the syght of god for our owne workes and nat for Christê sake â–ª that men maye do more then fulfyll the lawe So all the doctrine of the iustice of faythe is quyte ouerthrowne And vndoubtedly it is necessary that the pure doctrine of the iustice of fayth be reserued in the churche Wherfore we be compelled to rebuke the phariseicall opinions of our aduersaries bothe to the entent that we may set forth the glory of Christ and also that we maye set forthe vnto consciences ferme and sure comfortes For howe shall the conscience conceyue certayne hope of saluation whan it shal perceyue that in the iudgement of good workes be vnworthy Onles it knoweth that men be reputed ryghtuous and saued throughe mercy for Christê sake nat for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe Dyd S. Laurence lyeng on the grydyron thinke that through the worke he satisfyed the laweof god and that he was voyde of syn and neded nat Christ the Mediatour nor the mercy of god No verely he
also do dissolue breake those whiche were alredye contracted And this appereth euidently to be contrary to the coÌ„maundemente of Christe whiche saythe Whom god hath ioyned let no man departe in sondre Our aduersaries cry out in the confutation that to lyue single without wyues is coÌ„maunded by the councelles We do not accuse the the decrees of the councelles For these decrees vnder a certeyne condition do permitte wedlocke but we do accuse the lawes whiche the byshoppes of Rome haue made syns the olde generall couÌ„cels contrary to the auctoritie of the sayde councelles Thus do thÌ„e byshoppes of Rome despise the auctorities of the couÌ„cels whiche they wyll that other men shulde thynke to be mooste holy inuiolable This lawe therfore of perpetuall absteynyng from mariage is onely the lawe of this newe domination of the pope And that not without a cause For Daniel gyuethe this marke and token to the kyngedome of Antichriste that they shall contemne women Fyftelye althoughe oure aduersaries do not defende the lawe because of superstition forasmoche as they se that it is not wonte to be obserued yet neuertheles they sowe superstitious opinions whyles they pretende religion holynes They saye that they require the single lyfe and absteynyng from mariage because it is puritie clennes as who shulde say that mariage were vnclennes and synne or as though single lyfe dyd merite remission of synnes and reconciliation and wedlocke dyd not so And to this purpose they alledge the ceremonies of Moyses lawe that syth in the lawe durynge the tyme of theyr ministration the preestes were seperated from theyr wyues moche more in the newe testameÌ„t the preeste forasmoche as he oughte alwayes to pray ought always to conteine lyue chaste This folyshe vnmete similitude is alledged as it were a demonstration and a most stronge and euident proffe that preestes ought neuer to mary And yet in the similitude it selfe wedlocke is permitted and graunted onelye the vse of the wyfe is forbidden duryng the tyme of theyr ministerie And they be two sundrye thynges to praye and to ministre The holy men dyd praye euen than also whan they dyd not exercise any publike or open ministerie or office Neyther dyd the companyenge with theyr wyues let them that they myghte not praye But we wyll answere in ordre to these fayned tryfles and figmentes Fyrste our aduersaries muste nedes graunte this that wedlocke is pure clene in them that do beleue because it is saÌ„ctified with the worde of god that is to saye it is a thynge laufull approued by the worde of god as the scripture copiously doth recorde For Christ calleth wedlocke goddes ioynyng or couplyng together whan he saythe whom god hath ioyned together And Paule sayth of wedlocke of meatê and lyke thyngê They be sanctified by worde and prayer that is by the word wherwith the coÌ„science is made sure and out of doubt that god dothe approue and allowe it by prayer that is for to saye by faythe whiche vsethe it with gyuyng of thankes as the gyfte of god Also in the fyrste epistle to the Corinthianes he saythe The vnchristen husbande is sanctified by the christen wyfe c. that is to say the vse and companyeng of them together is laufull holy because of the fayth in Christ as it is laufull to vse meate and drynke c. Also to Timothe he wryteth The woman is saued by generation and by bryngyng forthe of chyldren c. If oure aduersaries coulde brynge forthe suche a place of scripture for single lyfe thaÌ„ wolde they make merueylous triumphes Paule saythe that the woman is saued by generation and bryngynge forthe of chyldren What coulde be sayde more honorable agaiÌ„st the hypocrisie of single lyfe than that a womaÌ„ is saued by workê of matrimonie by vse companye coniugale of the one with the other by bryngynge forthe chyldren and by other workes apê‘teinyng to the orderyng of an house And what is Paules mynde Let the reder obserue and marke faythe to be added and not the offices or workes of orderynge an house to be praysed without faythe if they abyde sayth Paule in the fayth For he speaketh generallye of the holle kynde of mothers Therfore he dothe principallye require faythe by whiche the woman receyueth remission of synnes and iustification Afterwardes he addeth a certain worke of callyng Lykewyse as in euery man there ought to folowe after faythe the good worke of a certein vocation This worke pleaseth god because of fayth So the workes of the woman please god because of fayth and the christen woman is saued whiche in suche sorte of workê of her callyng dothe godly seruise These auctorities testimonies do teache that wedlocke is a lauful thyng If thaÌ„ this worde cleÌ„nes betoken that thyng whiche is laufull and approued before god than be wedlockes clene because they be apê“ued by the worde of god And Paule saythe of laufull thynges Omnia munda mundis i. All thynges be cleane to them that he clene that is to saye to them whiche beleue Christe and be ryghtuous by faythe Therfore as virginitie in wycked men is vnclene so wedlocke in godlye men is cleane because of the worde of god and faythe But if this worde cleÌ„nes be taken as a thyng contrary to concupiscence so wedlocke betokeneth clennes of harte that is for to saye a mortified concupiscence because the lawe doth not forbyd wedlocke but coÌ„cupiscence adulterie fornication wherfore single lyfe is not clennes For there maye be more clennes of the herte in a maryed man as in Abraham or Iacob than in very many of those yea whiche be truely continente Finally if in suche sorte they vnderstaÌ„de single lyfe to be cleÌ„nes because it doth merite iustification more then â—edlocke we than playnly with open voyce say agaynst them For we be iustified neyther for cause of virginitie neyther for cause of wedlocke but freelye for Christis sake whan â—e beleue that for his sake we haue god good and gracious to vs. Here peraduenture our aduersaries shal crye out that after the maner of Iouiniane wedlocke is of vs made egall to virginitie But we wyll nat for these rebukes and reuiling wordê caste away the truthe of the ryghtousnes of fayth whiche we haue before declared And yet we do nat make virginitie egall to matrimonye For lykewyse as one gyfte is better then another as prophecy is better then eloquence eloquence is better then carpenters crafte so virginitie is a more excellent gyfte then wedlocke And yet as an Oratour is nat more rightuous before god for cause of hê eloqueÌ„ce then a carpenter because of his carpentrie so lykewyse a virgine meriteth nomore iustification with her virginitie then a wyfe doth with the workes apperteinyng to a wyfe but euery one in theyr gyfte ought to serue faythefully â–ª and to thynke that by fathe for Christes sake they obtayne remission of siÌ„nes and by fayth be reputed ryghtuous before
thy lorde god c. But howe shall they gather hereby that loue iustifieth Mary saye they bycause the greatest vertue iustifieth Nat so for lyke as the greatest or fyrste lawe dothe nat iustify so dothe neyther the greatest vertue of the lawe For there is no lawe whiche more accuseth vs which maketh more that our conscience is angrye with the iudgement of god thaÌ„ this greatest lawe doth Loue thy lorde god with al thy harte For what one of all the sayntes saue only Christe dare boste that he hath satisfyed this lawe Ergo the vertue of the lawe iustifyeth nat But that vertue iustifieth which taketh reconcilement that is gyuen for Christes sake This vertue is fayth nor it iustifyeth nat for the owne worthynes but only because it receyueth mercy by which for Christes sake we be recoumpted iuste For we be iuste that is to saye accepted to god nat for our owne ê‘fectioÌ„ but by mercy for Christ. if it so be that we take it and lay it agaynst the wrathe of god But the aduersaries do gyue iustification to loue for none other cause but for as muche as they teache the lawe dreame that ryghtwisenes is the obedieÌ„ce of the lawe For mans reason only loketh to the lawe and vnderstandeth none other iustice than thobedience of the lawe And the scholemen lyke wytty felowes goyng aboute to seke out a science in diuine matters haue propouned vnto theÌ„ selues the lawe euen as the philosophers in Morall matters do propoune vnto theÌ„ selues preceptes of manners But Paule cryeth out agaynst it and teacheth that iustice is an other thynge that is to were an obedience towarde the promyse of reconcilement gyuen for Christ and that is to receyue mercy gyueÌ„ for Christ. For so be we accepted vnto god so be the conscience pacifyed when we fele that god is merciful vnto vs for Christê sake Wherfore mens myndes must be plucked away from the lawe to the promyse as we haue oft tymes nowe sayde and shal expoune the thyng more largely a lytle here after wheÌ„ we shal examine the scholasticall argumentes of the worde of ryghtwysenes The aduersaries in theyr confutation cyted also thê place of Paule to the Coloss. agaynst vs. Charitie is the bonde of perfection vpon this they reason that loue iustifieth because it maketh men perfyte Althoughe it may here be answered in sundry wyses of perfection yet we wyl simpely recite the meaning of Paule Certayne it is that Paule speaketh of the loue of the neyghbour Nor it is nat to be thought that Paule attributeth eyther iustificatioÌ„ or perfectioÌ„ before god to the workê of the seconde table rather than to the workê of the fyrste Furthermore if loue be the perfyte fulfyllyng of the lawe and satisfyeth the lawe theÌ„ we nede nat Christe to be our mediatour and redemer But Paule teacheth that we be therfore accepted for Christ and nat for the fulfyllyng of the lawe because the fulfyllyng of the lawe is nat perfyte Wherfore syth in other place as he manifestly plucketh from vs perfection it is nat to be thought that he speaketh here of the personall perfection of euery particular persone but speaketh of the comune integritie and vnitie of the churche For to this entent he sayeth yâ— loue is a bonde or knyttyng together â–ª because he wolde signifie vnto vs that he speketh of the couplyng or knyttyng together of all the membres of the churche For as in all families in all publyke weales concorde is to be nouryshed with mutuall officies of loue nor tranquillitie can nat be reteined onles some lytle offensies be wynked at and forgyuen so commaundeth Paule that in the churche be kept loue and charitie to the reteynyng of coÌ„corde and whiche shall beare otherwhyles when nede requyreth the boystous manners of theyr bretherne dissemblyng certayne lyte offensies lest the churche runne into sundry Schismes and dissensions and of Schismes do ryse hatredes secres heresies For it can no otherwyse be but that concorde shal be broken when the byshoppes do laye on the peoples backes harder burdens than is expedyent and haue no manner regarde of the peoples imbecilitye Also discordes do ryse whan the people iudgeth ouer sharpely of the maners of theyr teachers or dispiseth theÌ„ for certayne lyte causes sekinge then an other kinde of doctryne and other teachers On the contrary syde the perfectyon that is to saye the entiernes and vnitie of the churche is kepte whan the stronge do suffer and beare the weake whan the people taketh in worthe certayne incommodities whiche be in the maners of theyr teachers when the byshoppes do permyt somewhat to the imbecillitie of the people Of these preceptes of equitie al the bokes of the wyse meÌ„ be ful to th end we shulde remytte and forgyue many thinges betwixte our selues in thys state of lyfe for a coÌ„mune tranquillitie And of it Paule aswele in thê place as in many other speketh and gyueth commaundement Wherfore thaduersaryes do imprudently fetche forth a reason out of this worde perfection that loue iustifieth syth Paule speketh here of the coÌ„mune vnitie and tranquillitie And so Ambrose expouneth thys place whose wordes be these Siaut ' edificium dicitum perfâ—ctum seu integrum cum omnes partes apte inter seco agmentatae sunt Euen quod Ambrose lyke as a buyldynge is called perfyte or hole wheÌ„ al the partes be aptly framed and coÌ„ioyned togyther cÌ„ It is a shame for the aduersaryes so hyghly to auaunce loue and so litle at any tyme to perfourme it For what do they nowe They disseuer churches or congregations they wryte lawes with mens bloude and propowne theÌ„ to the Emperours maiestie a prynce moste mercyful to be promulgate and inacted They kylle prestes and other good men yf any do but a lytle touche that he doth nat altogyther allowe some manifest abuses But thys agreeth nat with suche auauncemeÌ„tes and hyghe prayses of charitie whiche yf our aduersaryes wolde folowe the churches shulde be in tranquillitie and the publyke weales in vnitie and peace For these tumultes ruffelinges shuld cease if thaduersaryes wold nat thus rigorously exact certayne traditions vnprofytable to godlynes of whiche the most parte not they them selues do kepe whiche do most stoutly defende them They easely pardone them selues but other they wyll not so euen as Meuius dothe in Horace Egomet mi ignosco Meuius inquit I saythe Meuius do forgyue myne owne selfe Undoutedly thys nothynge agreeth with these noble prayses of charytye whiche they here cyte out of Paule and vnderstande hym no more then the walles vnderstonde the voyce that commeth vnto them Out of Peter they cyte also this senteÌ„ce Charite hideth a multitude of sinneâ— But it is also certayne that Peter speaketh of the loue towarde the neyghboure who applyeth this place to the precepte in whiche he commaundeth men to loue eche another Nor truly it coulde nat come to the mynde of any of the Apostles that our loue
not the faythe of them After that this semblaunce of wysedome and iustice hath begyled men than afterwardes ensue infinite hurtes the gospell is defaced concernynge the iustice of faythe in Christe there succedeth in the steade therof a vayne truste and confidence in suche maner workes Afterwardes the coÌ„maundementes of god be defaced and these workes do chaleÌ„ge to them selues the title of perfecte and spirituall lyfe and be farre preferred before the workê of the coÌ„maundement of god as workes of euerye mannes callynge the administration of the comen weale the administratioÌ„ of household the lyfe of maryed folkes the bryngyng vp of chyldren These thynges in comparison of those ceremonies be iudged to be vnholy and prophane thyngê in so moche that many men do exercise these thyngê with a certeyn doubtfulnes and grudge of conscience For it is vndoubtedly knowne that many men haue forsaken the administration and gouernauÌ„ce of the comen weale and also haue forsakeÌ„ wedlocke â–ª and haue taken them selues to these obseruauÌ„ces as vnto better and more holy thynges Neyther is this yet ynoughe but also whan this ê‘suation is ones fixed in mennes myndê that suche maner obseruaunces be necessarye to iustification the conscieÌ„ces be sore vexed and troubled because they can not perfectely fulfyll all obseruauÌ„ces For what man is aâ—le to numbre them all There be bokes oute of numbre yea hole libraries whiche do conteyn neuer one sillable of Christe or of the fayth in Christe nor of the good workes belongynge to euery mannes vocation but onely do gather traditions and the interpretatioÌ„s or gloses of them by whiche interpretations sometyme they be made more greuous somtyme they be released and made more easye Howe sore is that good maÌ„ Gerson troubled whyles he seketh the degrees and the bredthe of the coÌ„maundementê And yet neuertheles he can not set an Epikee or temperament in a degree certayne In the meane season he dothe sore lament and bewayle the ieoperdies of godlye coÌ„sciences whiche this bytter interpretation of traditions dothe engendre We therfore agaynst thys semblaunce of wysdome and rightuousnes in humaine traditioÌ„s and ceremonies whiche begylethe men let vs arme our selues with the worde of god fyrst lette vs knowe for a suertie that they neyther deserue remission of synnes ne iustification in the syght of god neyther he necessary to iustification we haue alledged certayne authorities and testimonies here before and Paule is full of them Fyrste to the Colossianes he sayeth Let no man iudge you in meate drynke or a set holy day or in the feaste of the newe mone or in the sabbot day whiche be shadowes of thiÌ„ges to come but the body is Christes And here he compriseth bothe the lawe of Moyses and also tradicioÌ„s of men leaste our aduersaries myght by theyr elusions seme to avoyde these authorities and testimonies as they be wonte sayeng that Paule only speaketh of the lawe of Moyses But he here clearely witnesseth hym selfe to speake of the traditions of men Howbeit our aduersaries do nat perceiue what they do say For if the gospel denieth that the ceremonies of Moyses lawe do iustify whiche were instituted by the coÌ„maundement of god howe muche lesse then do the traditioÌ„s of men iustifie Neyther haue the byshoppes power and authorite to institute ceremonies as thingê iustifieng or necessary to iustificatioÌ„ Yea the apostles say in the .xv. of the actê why do ye tempte god layeng on a yoke c. where Petre dothe accuse this counsayle of ladyng the churche as an heynous crime a greate syn And Paule forbyddeth the Galathians to be brought agayne vnder bondage The Apostles therfore wyll that this libertie do abyde in the church leste any obseruaunces and ceremonies of the lawe or of traditions myghte be iudged to be necessarye so as in the lawe the ceremonies were necessary for a certeyn season and this libertie they wolde shulde remayne leste the iustice of faythe myght be defaced if men dyd iudge that those obseruaunces merite iustification or els that they be necessarye to iustification Many men do seke Epikees that is to saye moderations and fauourable interpretations in traditions to thentente to remedye and helpe consciences and yet they fynde not the certayne degrees wy whiche they may delyuer conscieÌ„ces from these bondes and snares But lykewyse as Alexandre dyd by the knot called Nodus gordius whiche because he coulde not vndoe he chopped it a sondre with a swerde so the Apostles do at ones delyuer conscieÌ„ces from traditions namely if they be gyuen to deserue iustification Wherfore to be agaynste this doctrine the Apostles compelle vs bothe by theyr teachynge and also by theyr examples They coÌ„straine vs to teache that traditions do not iustifie that they be not necessary to iustification â–ª that no man ought to make or to receiue traditions with suche opinion that they deserue iustification But if any man obserue them let hym than obserue them without superstition as ciuile maners or customes lykewise as without superstitioÌ„ men of warre haue one maner of apparayle scholers a nother The Apostles do breake traditions Christe doth make theyr excuse For an example was to be shewed vnto the phariseis â–ª that those obseruaunces were vnprofitable Wherfore if our men do leaue the obseruynge of any traditions whiche be not profitable they be excused nowe well ynoughe for asmoche as the sayde traditions be required as though they dyd deserue iustification For suche opinion in traditions is wycked and vngodlye But the auncient traditioÌ„s made in the churche for cause of vtilitie we do gladly obserue and kepe and we interprete them to the beste parte and moste laudable excludyng the opinion whiche thinketh that they iustifye And our aduersaries do wrongefully and vntruely accuse vs that we do abolyshe and take away the good ordenaunces and the discipline of the churche For we may boldely and truely say that the publyke and open facyon of congregations with vs is more honest than it is amonge our aduersaries And if any man wyl truely consydre and way the mattier he shall fynde that we do kepe the canones more truelye than do our aduersaries Amonge our aduersaries the preestes do synge or say masses agaynst theyr wylles hyred with money and for the moste parte only for theyr hyre or wages sake They synge psalmes not to th entent to lerne or praye but because to do honour and seruice to god as though that worke were an honoure to god or at the leaste wyse they do it for theyr wages sake With vs many do vse the souper of the lorde euery Sonday but they be first instructed examined and assoyled Chyldren do synge psalmes that they may lerne the people also syngen them to th entent that eyther they myghte lerne or els pray Amonge our aduersaries there is no instructioÌ„ of chyldreÌ„ at al of whiche thiÌ„g yet the canones do gyue coÌ„mauÌ„dement With vs the pastors ministers of the