from the last day of this Session of Parliament deemed and remain utterly repealed void and of none effect to all intents and purposes Any thing in the said several Acts or any of them contained or any other matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding Stat. Sect. 4. The abolishing of Forreign Authority And to the intent that all usurped and Forreign Power and Authority Spiritual and Temporal may for ever be clearly extinguished and never to be used or obeyed within this Realm or any other your Majesties Dominions or Countries may it please your Highness That it may be further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no Forreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate Spiritual or Temporal shall at any time after the last day of this Session of Parliament use enjoy or exercise any manner of Power Iurisdiction Superiority Authority Preheminence or Priviledge Spiritual or Ecclesiastical within this Realm or within any other your Majesties Dominions or Countries that now be or hereafter shall be but from thenceforth the same shall be clearly abolished out of this Realm and all other your Highnesses Dominions for ever Any Statute Ordinance Custom Constitutions or any other matter or cause whatsoever to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding By the abrogating the Jurisdiction of any Forreign Prelate Archbishop of Canterburies concurrent Jurisdiction abrogated all Jurisdiction derived from such Forreigner is abrogated likewise And therefore the concurrent Jurisdiction which the Archbishop of Canterbury is supposed to have in the inferiour Diocesses ought not now to be exercised by him but is utterly taken away by this Act For he had it not as Archbishop but as Legatus natus to the Pope and if continued to be exercised is a meer Usurpation Hobart 17. Dr. James's Case And that also it may likewise please your Highness Stat. Sect. 5. Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction annexed to the Crown that it may be established and enacted by the Authority aforesaid that such Iurisdictions Priviledges Superiorities and Preheminences Spiritual and Ecclesiastical as by any Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Power or Authority hath heretofore béen or may lawfully be exercised or used for the Visitation of the Ecclesiastical State and Persons and for Reformation Order and Correction of the same And of all manner of Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities shall for ever by Authority of this present Parliament be united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm Sir Edward Coke 4. Inst 325. calls this an Act of Restitution of the ancient Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical which always belonged of Right to the Crown of England That is a restitution of the exercise of it For in truth this Statute is not introductory of a new Law The Kings ancient Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical but declaratory of the old and annexes not any Jurisdiction to the Crown but that which was or of right ought to be by the ancient Laws of this Realm parcel of the Kings Jurisdiction By which Laws the King as supream Head hath full and intire Power in all causes Ecclesiastical as well as Temporal For the Ecclesiastical Laws are the Kings Laws as well as the Temporal And the Judges of either of those Laws derive their Authority from him alone Co. 5.8 9. Cawdries Case where are several instances of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction exercised by the Kings of this Realm in several Ages Moore 755. b. 1043. The King is Persona mixta And in this respect the King is said to be Persona mixta and Persona mixta unita cum Sacerdotibus for that he hath both Ecclesiastical and Temporal Jurisdiction 10 H. 7.18 Co. 2.44 Bishop of Winchesters Case Coke 13.17 Case of Modus Decimandi Vid. Co. lib. 6. Praefac ' And supream Ordinary The King is the supream Ordinary and by the ancient Laws of this Realm may without any Act of Parliament make Ordinances and Institutions for the Government of the Clergy and may deprive them if they obey not Moore 755. C. 1043. Cro. Trin. 2. Jac. 37. And if there be a controversie between Spiritual Persons concerning their Jurisdiction the King is Arbitrator and 't is a right of his Crown to distribute to them and to declare their Bounds Hobart 17. Dr. James's Case Laws to be administred distinctly And yet although these Jurisdictions Ecclesiastical and Temporal are both in the King they are not to be confounded For although both Laws are the Kings Laws yet they are to be administred distinctly so that he who hath Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction derived from the King ought not to usurp upon the temporal Law And the Ecclesiastical Judge who meddles in Temporal Causes or Suits and draws the Interest or Cause of the Subject which ought to be determined by the Common Law ad aliud examen viz. to be decided by the Ecclesiastical Law offends contra Coronam dignitatem Regiam In confounding those Jurisdictions of the King which ought to be kept separate and distinct Prohibition And in such Cases not only a Prohibition lies but the Ecclesiastical Judge if the Cause originally belongs to the Common Law Pramunire and not to the Ecclesiastical Court incurs a Praemunire for depriving the Subject of the benefit of the Common Law which is his Birthright Co. 12.37 38 39 40. Co. 3. Inst 120. And therefore it was Resolved That if a man be excommunicated in the Bishops Court for a matter which belongs to the determination of the Common Law 't is no less than a Praemunire Praemunire And that by force of the word elsewhere in the Statute of 16 R. 2. cap. 5. Stat. 16 R. 2. 5. If any man pursue in the Court of Rome or elsewhere c. 5 E. 4.6 The King may do what the Pope might by the Canon Law By this and the former Clause which restores to the King the Title and Exercise of the Power of Supream Head of the Church of England and annexes to the Crown all Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction heretofore exercised by any Forreigner The King as supream Head may do whatever the Pope might formerly do within this Realm by the Canon Law And upon this ground it was resolved Trin. 39 Eliz. in Hollingworths Case in the Kings-Bench That notwithstanding the Statute of 25 H. 8. cap. 19. Stat. 25 H. 8. 19 which makes the sentence of the Delegates definitive and saith that no further Appeal shall be had yet the King after such definitive Sentence may grant a Commission of Review Commission ad revidendum For that after a definitive Sentence the Pope as supream Head by the Canon Law used to grant a Commission ad revidendum Co. 4. Inst 341. Upon this ground it was likewise resolved in the Case of Grendon versus the Bishop of Lincoln al' That the King with the consent of the Patron and without the Bishop may make an Appropriation Appropriation And in such Case the King doth it Authoritate sua regia
had never béen had nor made Any thing herein contained to the contrary thereof notwithstanding Stat. xxiii Eliz. cap. i. An Act to retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience WHere sithence the Statute made in the thirteénth year of the Reign of the Queén our Soveraign Lady Entituled Stat. Sect. 1. An Act against the bringing in and putting in Execution of Bulls Writings and Instruments and other Superstitious things from the See of Rome divers evil affected persons have practised contrary to the meaning of the said Statute by other means than by Bulls or Instruments Written or Printed to withdraw divers the Queéns Majesties Subjects from their natural Obedience to her Majesty and to obey the said usurped Authority of Rome and in respect of the same to perswade great numbers to withdraw their due Obedience to her Majesties Laws established for the due Service of Almighty God For Reformation whereof Stat. Sect. 2. Treason to withdraw any from the Religion Established to the Romish Religion and to declare the true meaning of the said Law Be it declared and enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That all persons whatsoever which have or shall have or shall pretend to have power or shall by any ways or means put in practice to absolve perswade or withdraw any of the Queéns Majesties Subjects or any within her Highnesses Realms and Dominions from their natural Obedience to her Majesty or to withdraw them for that intent from the Religion now by her Highnesses Authority established within her Highnesses Dominions to the Romish Religion or to move them or any of them to promise any Obedience to any pretended Authority of the Seé of Rome or of any other Prince State or Potentate to be had or used within her Dominions or shall do any overt act to that intent or purpose and every of them shall be to all intents adjudged to be Traytors And being thereof lawfully convicted shall have Iudgment suffer and forfeit as in case of High Treason And if any person shall after the end of this Session of Parliament by any means be willingly absolved or withdrawn as aforesaid or willingly be reconciled It shall be Treason to be reconciled or withdrawn to the Romish Religion or shall promise any Obedience to any such pretended Authority Prince State or Potentate as is aforesaid that then every such person their Procurers and Counsellors thereunto being thereof lawfully convicted shall be taken tried and judged and shall suffer and forfeit as in Cases of High Treason Perswade or withdraw It was held in Lovett and Faulkners Case Mich. 12. Jac. B. R. That if a man were Indicted for endeavouring and practising voluntarie felonice proditorie to perswade and withdraw any of the Kings Subjects from his Obedience unto the Romish Religion and was afterwards debito modo acquietatus yet an Action upon the Case in nature of a Conspiracy would not lye against the party who procured him to be Indicted Cro. Mich. 12. Jac. 357 358. Rolls 1. 209. C. 49. Bulstrode 2. 271. and the main reason given was That forasmuch as every man is bound to discover Treason and 't is dangerous to conceal any thing which may tend to Treason therefore the procuring one to be Indicted concerning it was no Cause of Action And in that Case Coke Chief Justice said That such an Action was never before that time brought But later Resolutions have been to the contrary of this Opinion Action lies for indicting a man of High Treason And 't is held for Law at this day That if a man procures another to be Indicted of High Treason an Action upon the Case in nature of Conspiracy lies against him that procures it as well as if it were for Felony The first leading Case of this nature which was resolved upon any solemn argument or debate was that of Smith versus Cranshaw or Crashaw and others where it was adjudged upon great deliberation by all the Four Judges of the Court of Kings Bench Hill 1. Car. 1. That an Action in nature of a Conspiracy doth well lye in such Case and that not only in Case of Acquittal upon Trial but upon the exhibiting a Bill of Indictment for High Treason to the Court or Jury if the Jury bring in Ignoramus although in this last Case a Writ of Conspiracy lyeth not And Lovett and Faulkners Case was denied to be Law Addition to Bendloes 152. Latch 79 80. Jones 93 94 95. And Justice Dodderidge who concurred in Opinion with the other Judges in the Case of Lovett and Faulkner changed his Opinion in that of Smith and Cranshaw and held that the Action was maintainable Bulstrode 2. 271 272. so that whosoever of meer malice without probable cause causes any person to be Indicted upon this Statute Stat. 3. Jac. 4. or that of 3 Jac. cap. 4. for endeavouring or practising so to perswade or withdraw any Subject or prefers a Bill to the Court or Jury for that purpose is liable to an Action of the Case for so doing if the party be acquitted or the Jury bring in Ignoramus as in other Cases of Felony Any of the Queens Majesties Subjects Queens Subjects Stat. 3 Jac. 4. What is meant by the Queens Subjects Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 19. And be it likewise Enacted and declared Stat. Sect. 3. The penalty of aiders maintainers and concealers That all and every person and persons that shall wittingly be aiders or maintainers of such persons so offending as is above expressed or of any of them knowing the same or which shall conceal any offence aforesaid and shall not within twenty days at the furthest after such persons knowledge of such offence disclose the same to some Iustice of Peace or other higher Officer shall be taken tried and judged and shall suffer and forfeit as Offenders in misprision of Treason These words And shall not within twenty days Aiders or maintainers punishable though discoverers c. disclose the same have no reference to those who are aiders or maintainers of the Offender but only to those who have barely a knowledge of the Offence without aiding or maintaining the party And therefore if such as are aiders or maintainers of the person offending discover the offence within twenty days yet such discovery shall not free them from the guilt of misprision of Treason as Wingate mistakes in his Abridgment of this Clause tit Crown numb 42. but if they once aid or maintain the party knowing him to be an Offender they are guilty whether they disclose or conceal the offence and shall have no benefit of the twenty days And be it likewise Enacted Stat. Sect. 4. The forfeiture for saying or hearing of Mass That every person which shall say or sing Mass being thereof lawfully convicted shall forfeit the sum of Two hundred Marks and be commited to Prison in the next Goal there to remain by the space of
aforesaid Stat. Sect. 5. Sending relief to any Jesuit Priest or other person abiding in a Seminary If any person under her Maiesties Subjection or obedience shall at any time after the end of the said forty days by way of Exchange or by any other shift way or means whatsoever wittingly and willingly either directly or indirectly convey deliver or send or cause or procure to be conveyed or delivered to be sent over the Seas or out of this Realm or out of any other her Majesties Dominions or Territories into any Forreign parts or shall otherwise wittingly and willingly yield give or contribute any money or other relief to or for any Iesuit Seminary Priest or such other Priest Deacon or Religious or Ecclesiastical person as is aforesaid or to or for the maintenance or relief of any Colledge of Iesuits or Seminary already erected or ordained or hereafter to be erected or ordained in any the parts beyond the Seas or out of this Realm in any forreign parts or of any person then being of or in any the same Colledges or Seminaries and not returned into this Realm with submission as in this Act is expressed and tontinuing in the same Realm That then every such person so offending for the same offence shall incur the danger and penalty of Praemunire mentioned in the Statute of Praemunire made in the sixteenth year of the Reign of King Richard the Second Convey Deliver Conveying or delivering relief to a Jesuite c. So that he who is barely a Messenger or Instrument to convey or deliver such money or other relief is within the danger of this Law as well as the sender or giver Then being of or in the same Colledges or Seminaries To what persons this extends to what not This Clause extends not to every person brought up in such Colledge or Seminary as Wingate tit Crowne n. 54. mistakes For if such person afterwards quits his Colledge or Seminary and hath no longer any relation thereunto but abides elsewhere beyond the Seas he who gives or conveys relief or maintenance to him is not within this branch of the Statute because the person relieved or maintained is not then of or in any Colledge or Seminary And yet perhaps this may be an offence within the Statute of 3 Car. 1. Stat. 3 Car. 1. 2 cap. 2. quod vide postea Stat. Sect. 6. None shall send his Child or other beyond the Seas without licence And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall not be lawful for any person of or under her Highness obedience at any time after the said forty days during her Majesties life which God long preserve to send his or her Child other person being under his or her Government into any the parts beyond the Seas out of her Highness obedience without the special Licence of her Majesty or of four of her Highness Privy Councel under their hands in that behalf first had or obtained except Merchants for such only as they or any of them shall send over the Seas only for or about his her or their Trade of Merchandize or to serve as Mariners and not otherwise upon pain to forfeit and lose for every such their offence the sum of One hundred pounds Where the Offences committed against this Act shall be inquired of and determined And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every offence to be committed or done against the tenor of this Act shall and may be enquired of heard and determined as well in the Court commonly called the Kings-Bench in the County where the same Court shall for the time be as also in any other County within this Realm or any other her Highness Dominions where the offence is or shall be committed or where the Offendor shall be apprehended and taken Transporting of Jesuits Priests c. Provided also and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall and may be lawful for and to every Owner and Master of any Ship Bark or Boat at any time within the said forty days or other time before limited for their departure to Transport into any the parts beyond the Seas any such Iesuit Seminary Priest or other such Priest aforesaid so as the same Iesuit Seminary Priest or other Priest aforesaid so to be Transported do deliver unto the Mayor or other Chief Officer of the Town Port or Place where he shall be taken in to be transported his Name and in what Place he received such Order and how long he hath remained in this Realm or in any other her Highness Dominions being under her Obedience Stat. Sect. 7. A Jesuit or Priest submitting himself taking the oath and obeying the Laws Provided also That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend to any such Iesuit Seminary Priest or other such Priest Deacon or Religious or Ecclesiastical person as is before mentioned as shall at any time within the said forty days or within threé days after that he shall hereafter come into this Realm or any other her Highness Dominions submit himself to some Archbishop or Bishop of this Realm or to some Iustice of Peace within the County where he shall arrive or Land and do thereupon truly and sincerely before the same Archbishop Bishop or such Iustice of Peace take the said Oath set forth in Anno primo and by writing under his hand confess and acknowledge and from thenceforth continue his due obedience unto her Highness Laws Statutes and Ordinances made and provided or to be made or provided in Causes of Religion Continue his due Obedience The person submitting must continue his obedience The taking of the Oath by such Jesuit Priest or other Ecclesiastical person and his acknowledgment of his due obedience doth not exempt him from the danger of this Law as Wingate mistakes tit Crowne numb 57. but he must continue his due obedience to the Laws made in Cases of Religion And this seems to be clearly the meaning of the makers of this Law so that if afterwards he shew his disobedience to any of those Laws by forbearing to come to Church c. he may be indicted as a Traitor for coming into the Realm as if he had never made any such submission and acknowledgment Vnto her Highness Laws That is Where King or Queen includes successors the Laws of her and her Successors and not only those which were made in her own time but such likewise as should be made afterwards For in Acts of Parliament King or Queen if a Sovereign includes Successors unless there be express words of restraint to that individual person Plowden 176. Hill versus Grange Co. 6. 27. Cases de Soldiers Co. 12. 109. Co. 1. Inst 9. 2. Inst 742. 3. Inst 6. 4. Inst. 352. And so it is of the Kings Grants if in his politick capacity for there his Successor shall be charged though the Grant mention neither
perswades others so to do and not then neither unless he hath been absent from Church by the space of a month Where this Act extends to Popish Recusants Vnder colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion Although this Act is commonly called the Act against Sectaries as distinguished from those of the Romish profession yet in truth it extends to all Recusants whatsoever as well Popish as other except in the point of abjuration For the Popish service is performed under colour or pretence of exercise of Religion and the Assembly or Meeting of Popish Recusants under such colour or pretence is an Assembly or Meeting contrary to the Laws and Statutes And they as well as others may be Indicted upon this Statute if they forbear to come to Church for the space of a moneth and be present at any part of the Popish service or move or perswade ut supra And may be imprisoned without Bail until they conform and make submission as by this Act is appointed But they cannot be required to abjure unless they offend against the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Stat. 35 Eliz. 2 A Popish Recusant is likewise subject to the Action of Debt c. given to the Queen by this Statute Being thereof lawfully convicted That is What conviction sufficient convicted both of his absence from Church and of that other Offence which makes him punishable by this Act viz. going to Conventicles or moving or perswading c. for his absence from Church for a month must be laid down precisely in the Indictment for without that the other is no Offence within this Act as hath been said And 't is not necessary that the party be convicted of such absence upon any Prior Indictment for although there was never any former conviction of him for Recusancy yet if he offend against this Act in any of the other particulars he may be convicted both of that Offence and of his absence upon one and the same Indictment And so was the Indictment in the Case of Lee and others who were Indicted upon this Statute at the Sessions of the Peace in Essex for absenting themselves for a month from Church and resorting to Conventicles To which they pleaded not guilty and the Indictment was removed into the Kings-Bench to be tried there Cro. Mich. 16 Car. 593. Trial. Provided always Stat. Sect. 2. An Offender not conforming himself abjure shall the Realm and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any such person or persons which shall offend against this Act as aforesaid shall not within thrée months next after they shall be convicted for their said Offence conform themselves to the obedience of the Laws and Statutes of this Realm in coming to the Church to hear Divine Service and in making such publick Confession and Submission as hereafter in this Act is appointed and expressed being thereunto required by the Bishop of the Diocess or any Iustice of the Peace of the County where the same person shall happen to be or by the Minister or Curate of the Parish That in every such Case every such Offender being thereunto warned or required by any Iustice of the Peace of the same County where such Offenders shall then be shall upon his and their Corporal Oath before the Iustices of the Peace in the open Quarter Sessions of the same County or at the Assizes and Goal delivery of the same County before the Iustices of the same Assizes and Goal delivery abjure this Realm of England and all other the Queéns Majesties Dominions forever unless her Majesty shall licence the party to return And thereupon shall depart out of this Realm at such Haven or Port and within such time as shall in that behalf be assigned and appointed by the said Iustices before whom such abjuration shall be made unless the same Offender be letted or stayed by such lawful and reasonable means or causes as by the Common Laws of this Realm are permitted and allowed in Cases of abjuration for felony And in such cases of let or stay then within such reasonable and convenient time after as the Common Law requireth in Case of abjuration for Felony as is aforesaid And that the Iustices of Peace before whom any such abjuration shall happen to be made as is aforesaid shall cause the same presently to be entred of Record before them and shall certifie the same to the Iustices of Assizes and Goal delivery of the County at the next Assizes of Goal delivery to be holden in the same County In what case the offender is not bound to abjure Being thereunto required by the Bishop c. or any Iustice of the Peace c. But put the Case that the Offender is convicted and the Three months next after his Conviction elapse before he is required by the Bishop or any Justice of Peace or the Minister or Curate of the Parish to conform and make the submission here appointed and afterwards he is required by one of them so to do It seems in this Case such request comes too late for he ought to conform and submit within the three months if he be required but if he be not required he is not bound to abjure for omitting it although he shall remain in prison till he conforms and submits But if within the three months he be required to conform and submit and refuse there is no question but he may be at any time afterwards warned or required to abjure Abjuration Abjure this Realm of England c. Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 6. Stat. Sect. 3. The punishment for refusing to abjure not departing or returning without Licence And if any such Offender which by the tenor and intent of this Act is to be abjured as is aforesaid shall refuse to make Abjuration as is aforesaid or after such Abjuration made shall not go to such Haven and within such time as is before appointed and from thence depart out of this Realm according to this present Act or after such his departure shall return or come again into any her Majesties Realms or Dominions without her Majesties special Licence in that behalf first had and obtained That then in every such Case the person so offending shall be adjudged a Felon and shall suffer as in Case of Felony without benefit of Clergy Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 7. Stat. 35 Eliâ— â— And furthermore be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament Stat. Sâ—ct 4. An Offender shall be discharged upon his open submission That if any person or persons that shall at any time hereafter offend against this Act shall before he or they be so warned or required to make Abjuration according to the tenor of this Act repair to some Parish Church on some Sunday or other Festival day and then and there hear Divine Service And at Service time before the Sermon or reading of the Gospel make
Curate of the Parish That in every such Case every such Offender being thereunto warned or required by any two Iustices of the Peace or Coroner of the same County where such offender shall then be shall upon his or their corporal Oath Abjuration before any two Iustices of the Peace or Coroner of the same County abjure this Realm of England and all other the Queéns Majesties Dominions forever And thereupon shall depart out of this Realm at such Haven and Port and within such time as shall in that behalf be assigned and appointed by the said Iustices of Peace or Coroner before whom such abjuration shall be made unless the same Offenders be letted or stayed by such lawful and reasonable means or causes as by the Common Laws of this Realm are permitted and allowed in Cases of abjuration for felony And in such Cases of let or stay then within such reasonable and convenient time after as the Common Law requireth in Case of abjuration for felony as is aforesaid Abjuration to be entred of Record and certified And that every Iustice of Peace and Coroner before whom any such abjuration shall happen to be made as is aforesaid shall cause the same presently to be entred of Record before them and shall certifie the same to the Iustices of Assizes or Goal delivery of the said County at the next Assizes or Goal delivery to be holden in the same County If any such person or persons being a Popish Recusant That is any Popish Recusant within the former Branches of the Statute and none but such What Popish Recusants are within this Branch and which not Dalton V. cap. 45. tit Recusants applies this Clause to Popish Recusants convicted as if it concerned them and them only and so both at once extends and restrains the Statute contrary to its true meaning For these words any such person or persons neither extend to all that are convicted nor are restrained to such only as are convicted For the Popish Recusant who hath a certain place of aboad within this Realm although he be convicted is not within this Statute unless he were a Popish Recusant and in England at the time of his Conviction And the Popish Recusant who hath no certain place of aboad within this Realm is within this Statute although he were never convicted so that either of these sorts of Popish Recusants who have an Estate under value viz. he who hath no certain place of aboad and he who having a certain place of aboad was convicted when a Popish Recusant and in England and no other are liable by this Act to Abjuration Of the clear yearly value Clear yearly value of Twenty marks above all Charges A Rent-charge of 40 l. per Annum is issuing out of Lands worth 100 l. per Annum a Popish Recusant liable to be confined by this Statute purchases for his Life or in Fee parcel of the Lands of the clear yearly value of Twenty marks over and above what his proportion of the said Rent-charge comes to This is an Estate of the clear yearly value of Twenty marks within the meaning of this Act and shall free him from abjuration For although in strictness of Law his Estate be not clearly so much above all charges For that 't is chargeable with an yearly Rent of Forty pounds yet in equity he shall pay no more then his proportion of it which the Land he purchased will discharge and yet yield Twenty marks per Annum clearly besides Or Goods and Chattels This Statute being in the disjunctive Lands or Goods an Estate partly of Lands Goods and Lands not to be valued together and partly of Goods will not satisfie the intent thereof And therefore if a Popish Recusant who offends against this Act hath fifteen Marks per Annum clearly in Lands and be worth Thirty pounds in goods although this taken together be in truth an Estate of more value then is here required yet it shall not free him from Abjuration For the Statute doth not warrant any valuation of the Lands and Goods together so as to supply the defect of the yearly value of the Lands by the Goods or the defect of the value of the Goods by the Lands and therefore the Recusant must have such an Estate in the one or the other as will answer the Statute And this is not like the Case of Jurors upon the Statute of 2 H. 5. Stat. 2 H. 5. 3. cap. 3. where 't is said That the Iuror shall have Lands of the clear yearly value of Forty shillings if the Debt or Damage declared amount to Forty marks in which Case although it be in the disjunctive debt or damage yet it hath been adjudged that where the debt and damages both amount to Forty marks it is sufficient and the Juror must have Forty shillings per Annum Co. 1. Inst 272. For in that Case the word or is cumulative and debt or damage both amount to no more then one intire thing viz. the value of the Cause or Action depending And it appears plainly to be the intent of the makers of the Law that no Cause declared to be of the value of Forty marks shall be tried by Jurors of a less Estate but in our Case the Lands and Goods are things of different nature one real the other personal and cannot be regularly reduced under one and the same head and therefore shall not be valued together unless the Act had expresly appointed such a Valuation But yet if a Popish Recusant hath a Lease for years But leases for years and personal goods may and personal Goods and both do amount in value to above Forty pounds he shall be out of the danger of Abjuration For although the Lease is in the realty and the Goods are personal yet they shall in this Case be valued together For that by this Copulative and the Statute expresly so appoints without distinguishing between the values of either but makes it sufficient if both of them be of that value Money secured upon a Mortgage Mortgage of Lands is within the meaning of these words Goods and Chattels And if the Popish Recusant hath above Forty pounds owing to him upon such Mortgage he cannot be required to abjure Within three months next after such person shall be apprehended or taken Wingate in abridging this Clause tit Crowne numb 80. clearly mistakes the meaning of it For he saith that a Popish Recusant whose estate is under value must make the submission prescribed by this Act within three months next after his arrival at his place of aboad which is a complicated Error For he quite leaves out him who is to repair to the place where he was born or his Father or Mother dwels He makes the party liable to such submission before he becomes an offender by not repairing or not presenting himself and giving in his true name or travelling above five miles He speaks nothing of his being
she should not be doubly punished both that way and at the Suit of the Informer And for the same reason it was urged that this Information would not lye against the Husband and Wife for after the Husbands death she would be liable to pay into the Exchequer all the arrears after the rate of Twenty pounds per month from the time of her Conviction and her goods and two parts of her Lands might be then seized for non-payment thereof And if the Husband and Wife should in the mean time at the Suit of the Informer pay Twenty pounds per month for part of the same time for which the Wife was liable to pay after the Husbands death this would be a double punishment for one and the same offence and it was further said that it was usual where the Wife was Indicted and Convicted for Recusancy Seizure of the Wives Lands and Leases to seize by Exchequer Process the Lands and Leases which the Husband had in her right and one Woods Case was cited to this purpose which proves that a Feme Covert is within the meaning of the Act and therefore after she is once Convicted upon Indictment shall be no more subject to the Informers popular Suit then a Feme sole Cro. Pasch 16 Jac. 481.482 But this last point is much to be questioned for the Lands and Leases of the Wife are the Husbands during the Coverture and 't is a general rule that his Goods or Lands cannot be seized for the forfeiture or penalty where the Wife only is Indicted and Convicted of the Offence See more of this matter antea Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz 1 Sect. 9. A Recusant is Indicted for absenting himself from Church for 12 months and afterwards is Convicted upon that Indictment Where an Informer may sue after Conviction upon Indictment Quaere whether nevertheless the Informer Qui tam c. may not sue him for his absence for the months intervening between the time laid in the Indictment and the time of his Conviction For these words here viz. after such Conviction seem to relate to the proximum antecedens every month and to imply that the penalty here appropriated to the King is only the penalty due for the months which incur after such Conviction upon Indictment at the Kings Suit but not to hinder the Informer after Conviction from suing for the months incurred before Conviction Except in such Cases where the King shall c. refuse the same The King may seize two parts presently after Conviction If a man be Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy the King is not bound to stay till the next Easter or Michaelmas Term to see whether the Recusant will tender twenty pounds for every month contained in the Indictment and incurred after such Conviction for the King having his Election whether he will accept thereof or seize two parts of the Recusants Lands A Commission for seizure of the Lands may issue out presently if the King will wave the twenty pounds per month For he may take his Election as soon as he will after Conviction By Jones Justice in the Case of Standen and the University of Oxford Jones 24. Stat. Sect. 7. Every Conviction shall be certified into the Exchequer And that every Conviction recorded for any Offence before-mentioned shall from the Iustices before whom the Record of such Conviction shall be remaining be certified into the Kings Majesties Court of Exchequer before the end of the Term following such Conviction in such convenient certainty for the time and other circumstances as the Court of Exchequer may thereupon award out Process for the seizure of the Lands and Goods of every such Offender as the Cause shall require And if default shall be made in any part of any payment aforesaid contrary to the form herein before limited that then and so often the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors shall and may by process out of the said Exchequer take seize and enjoy all the Goods and two parts as well of all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms of such Offender as of all other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid by the true meaning of this Act leaving the third part only of the same Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms to and for the maintenance and relief of the same Offender his Wife Children and Family Timber Trees All the Goods A Recusant convicted is Tenant for Life the Remainder to a Stranger in Fee He in the Remainder with the Recusants assent cuts down Timber Trees and sells them In this Case the King can be no ways intitled to the Trees Bulstrode 1.133 Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. Aswell of all the Lands c. Leases and Farms of such Offender Lease in trust for another Elizabeth Bowes was convicted of Recusancy and she standing so Convicted a Lease was made to her in trust which she conveyed over according to the trust The question was whether the King might seize this Lease And the reason given in Lane 39. why the King should have the Term is because the Recusant after she was Convicted was not capable of any trust and therefore the Conveyance made by her was as if it had been voluntary without relation to the Trust Tamen quaere by what Law a Recusant meerly for the matter of Recusancy is incapable of any Trust although Convicted All other the Lands c. liable to such seizure Copyhold Lands Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. or to the penalties aforesaid Whether Copyholds be liable to such seizure vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. Lands are conveyed to A. in trust for B. a convicted Recusant Lands in trust for a Recusant Quaere whether the King may seize such Lands for the Recusants non-payment of the twenty pounds per month for if he make his Election and accepts of two thirds in lieu of the twenty pounds per month there is no question but such Lands are liable to seizure For the words of the subsequent Clause are That the King may seize two parts of all Lands that shall come to any other person to the use of or in Trust for such Recusant But in this Clause which relates to the seizure of two parts for non-payment the words seem to be more restrictive Vide Lane 105. 106. Halseys Case And whereas by an Act made in the Session of Parliament holden by Prorogation at Westminster in the thrée and twentieth year of the Reign of the late Queén Elizabeth entituled Stat. Sect. 8. The Stat. of 23 Eliz. 1. touching a Recusants monthly forfeiture An Act to retain the Subjects of the said late Quéen in their due Obedience It was amongst other things Enacted by Authority of the said Parliament That every person above the age of sixtéen years which should not repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer
Recusant not Convicted who hath no certain place of aboad as of the Popish Recusant Convicted And the benefit of having Licences from the King or three Privy Counsellors by force of this Act is intended as well to the one as the other although the Convicted only are mentioned in the recital and this will plainly appear first by the following words here which impower the Justices of Peace to grant Licences and expresly extend to all persons confined by vertue of the said Statute that is the Statute of 35 Eliz. now it cannot be presumed that the makers of the Law intended any difference between the persons to be licenced by the King or Privy Counsellors and the persons to be Licensed by the Justices of Peace the only difference being in the manner of granting the Licence the power given to the King or Privy Counsellors being more absolute and not under such precautions as is that which is given to the Justices of Peace For the King or Privy Counsellors may grant a Licence to the Recusant to travel without any particular cause shewn in the Licence or the assent of any other person and without any Oath to be made by the Recusant which the Justices of Peace cannot do And there is no reason to think that the Power here given to the King or Privy Counsellors which in all other particulars is so much more absolute and extensive then that given to the Justices of Peace should be yet less extensive as to the persons to be Licensed Secondly It were absurd to think that the Makers of the Law intended to confer a greater priviledge upon the Recusant convicted whose Offence appears upon Record then to such as are not convicted Et ealis interpretatio in ambiguis semper fienda est ut evitetur inconveniens absurdum But if by such Recusant should be meant only such as are mentioned in the recital viz. those Convicted and not all who are Confined by 35 Eliz. It would follow that the Convicted Recusant who is the more notorious Offender may have a Licence without any cause shewn or Oath made But he who is not Convicted is barred of that priviledge and can apply himself only to the Justices of Peace for a Licence clogged with divers circumstances which are not required in a Licence granted by the King or the three Privy Counsellors Shall not impeach 35 El. 2. Much less shall this Recital of the Statute of 35 Eliz. impeach the express words of that Statute as if no other Popish Recusants were intended to be confined thereby but only such as are Convicted because no other are mentioned in the Recital For the Recital of an Act of Parliament in another Act of Parliament being only by way of Preface or Introduction cannot add to or diminish the Act recited or make it liable to any other construction then what shall naturally flow from the Act it self Vide Co. 4. Inst 331. Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 3. Without any other cause to be expressed Here is one difference between a Licence by the King or three of the Privy Counsel Necessary business where requisite to a Licence where not and a Licence by Justices of Peace For by these it ought not to be granted unless the Popish Recusant hath necessary occasions or business But the Kings or Privy Counsellors Licence may be granted in any Case at the Recusants request Seals and Subscription Vnder the Hands and Seals An Indictment was brought upon the Statute of 35 Eliz. 2. for travelling out of the compass of five miles The Recusant pleaded a Licence under the Seals of four Justices of Peace and exception was taken to the Plea For that the Licence ought to have been under their Hands as well as their Seals Cro. Mich. 12 Jac. 352. Maxfeilds Case And this is a good exception for a Licence by Justices of Peace although in Writing is not sufficient without Seals and Subscription both Rolles 1. 108. C. 47. Mucclefields Case Four Justices Peace Of four of the Iustices of Peace And a Licence from less then four will not now serve since the repeal of the aforesaid Branch of 35 Eliz. touching Licences Stat. 35 Eliz. 2 and therefore the Case of Mucclefield Mich. 12 Jac. in Rolles 1. 108. C. 47. is misreported in that particular For there mention is made of a Licence from two Justices of Peace as if no more were then requisite and that Case could not be grounded upon the Proviso in 35 Eliz. which required only two Justices as well for the distance of time being nine years after the Repeal of the said Proviso as for that in the said Case of Mucclefield there is mention of a Licence under the Seals of the Justices of Peace and of the Oath to be taken by the Recusant neither of which was appointed by the said Proviso in 35 Eliz. but by this Statute of 3 Jac. which must therefore necessarily be there intended and not any Statute of 1 Jac. which is another mistake in the Report of that Case Vide the Case and the objections urged against the Licence there in question With the privity and assent in Writing of the Bishop c. the Lieutenant or of any Deputy Lieutenant An Information was brought against a Popish Recusant Convict for removing above five miles from the place of his confinement who pleaded a Licence from four Justices of Peace but the Plea was disallowed saith the Reporter because he did not set forth that the Licence was granted with the privity of the Bishop or Lieutenant Mich. 12 Jac. Moore 836. C. 1127. Mansfields Case Assent of a Deputy Lieutenant sufficient But yet if it had been granted with the assent of any Deputy Lieutenant residing in the County there 's no doubt but it had been good enough The Bishop Lieutenant or Deputy Lieutenant Five persons viz. four to Licence and one to assent who gives his assent must be a distinct person from the Justices of Peace who grant the Licence And therefore if one and the same person be a Justice of Peace and Deputy Lieutenant he cannot Act herein in both Capacities For una persona non potest supplere vicem duarum And if he Sign and Seal the Licence as a Justice of Peace the assent of some other Deputy Lieutenant or of the Bishop or Lieutenant must be had thereto or the Licence is void Cro. Mich. 12 Jac. 352. Maxfields Case Moore 836. C. 1127. Mansfields Case Rolles 1. 108. C. 47. Mucclefields Case And although the Rule be Quando duo jura concurrunt in una persona aequum est ac si essent in diversis yet that Rule holds not in such Cases where distinct persons are necessarily required by the Law Co. 7. 14. Calvins Case and here four persons are necessarily required to grant the Licence and another person to assent to it In Maxfields Case B. R. one exception to the Licence was Licence and
the person Co. 1. Inst 128. Plea in disability is peremptory The Defendant in Debt upon an Obligation pleads that the Plaintiff is a Popish Recusant Convict who replies nul tiel Record Such Plea in disability of the person is peremptory and nul tiel Record is an Issue and Judgment shall be given against the Defendant upon failer of the Record Hetley 18. But yet if there be a Plea of a Conviction of Recusancy had before Justices of Gaol delivery and the Defendant mistakes and takes out a Certiorari Certiorari to the Justices of Peace this shall not be a failer of the Record Failer of Record although the Defendant hath it not at the day For that the issuing of the Certiorari was the Award of the Court But a Certiorari shall be awarded de novo to the Justices of Gaol delivery before whom the Plaintiff was convicted Hobart 135. Pye against Thrill Note if the Defendant be sued in the Common Pleas or any other of the principal Courts at Westminster and he plead a Conviction of Recusancy before Justices of Gaol delivery or Justices of Peace he need not take his Certiorari Certiorari out of what Court out of the Chancery and so bring it by Mittimus But the Court may send a Certiorari immediately to that inferiour Court where the Plaintiff was convicted as was held in that Case of Pye and Thrill vide 19 H. 6. 19. And the Justices themselves And by whom before whom the Conviction was had must certifie and therefore if the Conviction was before Justices of Peace the Certificate cannot be by the Custos Rotulorum Custos rotulorum alone though he keep the Records for the Certiorari is in such Case directed to the Justices of Peace Hobart 135. A Popish Recusant is convicted of Recusancy in a popular Suit and after such Conviction sues the Informer Qui tam c. Who may take advantage of this disability Informer upon some other matter or cause of Action arising between them Quaere whether the Defendant may plead such Conviction in disability of the Recusant For this Conviction disables the Recusant to sue as if he were excommunicated and no otherwise Now if a Bishop Excommunicate any one and the Bishop Bishop be afterwards sued at Law for any other matter or cause by the person so excommunicated the Bishop cannot plead this Excommunication in disability of the Plaintiff who sues him Co. 1. Inst 134. Swinborne Part 5. Sect. 6. p. 305. And the reason given for this in Trollops Case Co. 8. 68. is because the Bishop was a party to the Excommunication and therefore shall take no advantage by it which reason seems to hold likewise in the Case of an Informer Qui tam c. who is a party to the Conviction of the Recusant upon the popular Suit which Conviction renders the Recusant disabled to all intents as an Excommunicant person And therefore he being a party to it by the same Rule shall not take advantage of it in disability of the Recusant in any Action brought by the Recusant against him But yet notwithstanding I conceive the Informer Qui tam c. at whose Suit the Recusant was convicted may well take advantage of this Conviction and plead it in disability of the person of the Recusant And that the true reason why the Bishop shall not be admitted to plead an Excommunication pronounced by himself in disability of the person Excommunicated is not because he is a party to the Excommunication but because in matters of Excommunication the Bishop acts as a Judge and 't is by his Sentence and Authority that the party is Excommunicated and he shall not take advantage in another Suit of a Sentence given by himself judicially And this will not hold in the Case of an Informer who though he be a party to the Suit in which the Recusant is disabled as an Excommunicate person yet is no Judge in the Case whether the party Sued shall be disabled or no as the Bishop is in the other Case where the party is actually Excommunicated by him And if the Bishop should be barred to Plead and take advantage of such Excommunication because he is a party thereunto it would follow that the person who Sues in the Spiritual Court and at whose instance the person Sued is Excommunicated should be barred likewise to take advantage of such disability in the Plaintiff at Law for he is a party to the Excommunication for that he is a party to the Suit upon which the Excommunication is originally founded But the contrary to this is strongly implied in 14 H. 4. 14. where the Case was A. was Excommunicated in a Suit depending between him and B. and afterwards A. Sues B. upon the Statute of Praemunire who pleads this Excommunication in disability of the Plaintiff Here the Plea was disallowed because the principal Suit on which the Excommunication depended was brought before the Pope But in the debate of the Case there was not the least word of exception to the Plea upon this ground because the Excommunication was at the instance of the Defendant or that the Defendant should not take advantage of the Plaintiffs disability for that he was a party to the Excommunication which disabled him Executor or Administrator disabled If an Executor or Administrator becomes a Popish Recusant convict it seems he is disabled by this Act to Sue in either of those Capacities For the Act saith He shall be disabled to all intents as an Excommunicate person Now a person actually Excommunicated cannot Sue as Executor or Administrator as is held in 21 E. 4. 49. 21 H. 6. 30. 14 H. 6. 15. Co. 1. Inst 134. Although there are some opinions to the contrary Vide Finch 27. Stat. Sect. 13. What Suits a Popish Recusant may prosecute Provided nevertheless That it shall and may be lawful for any such person so disabled for and notwithstanding any thing in this Law contained to sue or prosecute an Action or Suit for or concerning only such of his or her Lands Tenements Leases Rents Annuities and Hereditaments or for the Issues and Profits thereof which are not to be seized or taken into the Kings hands his Heirs or Successors by force of any Law for or concerning his or her Recusancy or any part thereof Which are not to be seized or taken into the Kings hands c. These words are not restrained to such Lands Lands seized into the Kings hands c. as cannot be seized into the Kings hands for Recusancy For then the Recusant could in no case Sue for more then the third part for that the King may if he please make his Election and seize the other two parts in lieu of the Twenty pounds per month But they are intended of all Lands c. of the Recusant which neither the King hath seized nor are by Law to be seized by vertue of any thing
the 1 2 Ph. M. 8. and all and every Branches Clauses and Articles therein contained other than such Branches and Sentences as hereafter shall be excepted may from the last day of this Session of Parliament by Authority of this present Parliament be repealed and shall from thenceforth be utterly void and of none effect The Statute of 1. and 2. Ph. Mar. here mentioned repealed The King declared supream Head Stat. 1 2. Ph. Mar. 8. 26 H. 8. 1. 35 H. 8. 3. the Statutes of 26 H. 8. cap. 1. and 35 H. 8. cap. 3. By both which King Henry the Eighth his Heirs and Successors were declared supream Head of the Church of England And by the repeal of that of 1. and 2. Ph. Mar. those other of 26 and 35 H. 8. were revived and are again in force Co. 4. Inst 325. Vide Sect. 5. Stat. Sect. 3. A reviver of several Stat. And that also for the reviving of divers of the said good Laws and Statutes made in the time of your said dear Father it may also please your Highness That one Act and Statute made in the three and twentieth year of the Reign of the said late King Henry the Eighth entituled An Act that no person shall be cited out of the Diocess where he or she dwelleth except in certain Cases And one other Act made in the Four and Twentieth year of the Reign of the said late King entituled An Act that Appeals in such cases as hath been used to be pursued to the See of Rome shall not be from henceforth had ne used but within this Realm And one other Act made the five and twentieth year of the said late King concerning restraint of payment of Annates and First-fruits of Archbishopricks and Bishopricks to the See of Rome And one other Act in the said five and twentieth year entituled An Act concerning the submission of the Clergy to the Kings Majesty And also one Act made in the five and twentieth year entituled An Act restraining the payment of Annates or First-fruits to the Bishop of Rome and of the Electing and Consecrating of Archbishops and Bishops within this Realm And one other Act made in the said five and twentieth year entituled An Act concerning the Exoneration of the Kings Subjects from Exactions and Impositions heretofore paid to the See of Rome and for having Licences and Dispensations within this Realm without suing further for the same And one other Act made in the six and twentieth year of the said late King entituled An Act for Nomination and Consecration of Suffragans within this Realm And also one other Act made in the eight and twentieth year of the Reign of the said late King entituled An Act for the Release of such as have obtained pretended Licences and Dispensations from the See of Rome And all and every Branches Words and Sentences in the said several Acts and Statutes contained The Sentences and Branches in the aforesaid Statutes shall extend to the Queen by Authority of this present Parliament from and at all times after the last day of this Session of Parliament shall be revived and shall stand and be in full force and strength to all intents constructions and purposes And that the Branches Sentences and Words of the said several Acts and every of them from thenceforth shall and may be judged déemed and taken to extend to your Highness your Heirs and Successors as fully and largely as ever the same Acts or any of them did extend to the said late King Henry the Eighth your Highnesses Father And that it may also please your Highness that it may be enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That so much of one Act or Statute made in the two and thirtieth year of the Reign of your said dear Father King Henry the Eighth entituled An Act concerning Precontracts of Marriages and touching degrees of Consanguinity as in the time of the late King Edward the sixth your Highnesses most dear Brother by one other Act or Statute was not repealed And also one Act made in the seven and thirtieth year of the Reign of the said late King Henry the Eighth entituled An Act that Doctors of the Civil Law being married may exercise Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction And all and every Branches and Articles in the said two Acts last mentioned and not repealed in the time of the said late King Edward the sixth may from henceforth likewise stand and be revived and remain in their full force and strength to all intents and purposes Any thing contained in the said Act of repeal before mentioned or any other matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding What Stat. repealed by the Stat. of 1 2 P. M. 8. shall continue repealed And that it may also please your Highness that it may be further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all other Laws and Statutes and the Branches and Clauses of any Act or Statute repealed and made void by the said Act of Repeal made in the time of the said late King Philip and Quéen Mary and not in this present Act specially mentioned and revived shall stand remain and be repealed and void in such like manner and form as they were before the making of this Act any thing herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding A reviver of the Stat. of 1 Ed. 6. 1. And that it may also please your Highness That it may be enacted by the Authority aforesaid that one Act and Statute made in the first year of the Reign of the late King Edward the sixth your Majesties most dear Brother entituled An Act against such persons as shall unreverently speak against the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ commonly called the Sacrament of the Altar and for the receiving thereof under both kinds and all and every Branches Clauses and Sentences therein contained shall and may likewise from the last day of this Session of Parliament be revived and from thenceforth shall and may stand remain and be in full force strength and effect to all intents constructions and purposes in such like manner and form as the same was at any time in the first year of the Reign of the said late King Edward the Sixth any Law Statute or other matter to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding A repeal of the Statute of 1 2 P. M. 6. and several other Statutes And that also it may please your Highness That it may be further established and enacted by the Authority aforesaid that one Act and Statute made in the first and second years of the late King Philip and Queen Mary entituled An Act for the reviving of three Statutes made for the punishment of Heresies and also the said three Statutes mentioned in the said Act and by the same Act revived And all and every Branches Articles Clauses and Sentences contained in the said several Acts and Statutes and every of them shall be
Act of Repeal made in the said first and second years of the Reigns of the said late King Philip and Quéen Mary as doth in any wise touch or concern any matter or cause of Praemunire or that doth make or ordain any matter or cause to be within the Case of Praemunire but that the same for so much only as toucheth or concerneth any Case or matter of Praemunire shall stand and remain in such force and effect as the same was before the making of this Act Any thing in this Act contained to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Provided also and be it enacted by the Authority aforesaid Offences committed against Statutes revived That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend or be prejudicial to any person or persons for any Offence or Offences committed or done or hereafter to be committed or done contrary to the tenour and effect of any Act or Statute now revived by this Act before the end of thirty days next after the end of the Session of this present Parliament Any thing in this Act contained or any other matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding Stat. Sect. 11. Trial of Peers And if it happen that any Peér of this Realm shall fortune to be indicted of and for any Offence that is revived or made Praemunire or Treason by this Act that then he so being indicted shall have his Trial by his Péers in such like manner and form as in other Cases of Treason hath been used Provision for Trial of Peers The provision made in this and other Acts of Parliament for the Trial of a Peer by his Peers in case of Treason where he was to be tried according to the course of the Common Law is Ex abundanti and he should have such Trial if no such Proviso were inserted the like in the Case of Felony Stamford Pl. Coron 153. Stat. Sect. 12. No matter of Religion c. made by this Parliament shall be adjudged Error Heresie or Schism Provided always and be it enacted as is aforesaid That no manner of Order Act or Determination for any matter of Religion or cause Ecclesiastical had or made by the Authority of this present Parliament shall be accepted deémed interpreted or adjudged at any time hereafter to be any Error Heresie Schism or schismatical Opinion Any Order Decreé Sentence Constitution or Law whatsoever the same be to the contrary notwithstanding What things the Commissiners may adjudge to be Heresie Provided always and be it enacted by the Authority aforesaid That such person or persons to whom your Highness your Heirs or Successors shall hereafter by Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England give Authority to have or execute any Iurisdiction Power or Authority Spiritual or to visit reform order or correct any Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses or Enormities by virtue of this Act shall not in any wise have Authority or Power to Order determine or adjudge any matter or cause to be Heresie but only such as heretofore have been determined ordered or adjudged to be Heresie by the Authority of the Canonical Scriptures The Scripture Four general Counsels or by the first four general Counsels or any of them or by any other general Counsel wherein the same was declared Heresie by the express and plain words of the said Canonical Scriptures or such as hereafter shall be ordered judged or determined to be Heresie by the high Court of Parliament of this Realm with the assent of the Clergy in their Convocation Any thing in this Act contained to the contrary notwithstanding None shall be indicted or arraigned but by Witnesses And be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no person or persons shall be hereafter indicted or arraigned for any of the Offences made ordained revived or adjudged by this Act unless there be two sufficient Witnesses or more to testifie and declare the said Offences whereof he shall be indicted or arraigned And that the said Witnesses or so many of them as shall be living and within this Realm at the time of Arraignment of such person so indicted shall be brought forth in person face to face before the party so arraigned and there shall testifie and declare what they can say against the party so arraigned if he require the same Provided also A Proviso for them that give relief to Offenders and be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any person or persons shall hereafter happen to give any relief aid or comfort or in any wise be aiding helping or comforting to the person or persons of any that shall hereafter happen to be an Offender in any matter or case of Praemunire or Treason revived or made by this Act that then such relief aid or comfort given shall not be judged or taken to be any Offence unless there be two sufficient Witnesses at the least that can and will openly testifie and declare that the person or persons that so give such relief aid or comfort had notice and knowledge of such Offence committed and done by the said Offender at the time of such relief aid or comfort so to him given or ministred Any thing in this Act contained or any other matter or cause to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding And where one pretenced sentence hath heretofore béen given in the Consistory in Pauls before certain Iudges De Legate by the Authority Legantine of the late Cardinal Poole by reason of a Forreign usurped Power and Authority against Richard Chetwood Esq and Agnes his Wife Chetwoods Appeal to the Court of Rome by the name of Agnes Woodhull at the suit of Charles Tyrrel Gent. in a Cause of Matrimony solemnized betweén the said Richard and Agnes as by the same pretended Sentence more plainly doth appear from which Sentence the said Richard and Agnes have appealed to the Court of Rome which Appeal doth there remain and yet is not determined May it therefore please your Highness that it may be enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if Sentence in the said Appeal shall happen to be given at the said Court of Rome for and in the behalf of the said Richard and Agnes for the reversing of the said pretenced Sentence before the end of threéscore days next after the end of this Session of this present Parliament that then the same shall be judged and taken to be good and effectual in the Law and shall and may be used pleaded and allowed in any Court or Place within this Realm Any thing in this Act or in any other Act or Statute contained to the contrary notwithstanding And if no Sentence shall be given at the Court of Rome in the said Appeal for the reversing of the said pretenced Sentence before the end of the said thréescore days that then it shall and may be lawful for the said Richard and Agnes and either of them at any time hereafter to
one as conceals his true Name or Quality or cannot give a good Accompt what he is For so it must be reasonably intended and not of all Travellers through the Country as Wingate tit Crowne numb 106. mistakes for it appears by the other qualifications here enumerated that the intent of the Act is that it shall be offered by the Bishop or two Justices to such only of whom there is any just cause of suspition Stat. Sect. 11. Refusal of the Oath And be it further Enacted That if any such person or persons other than Noblemen or Noblewomen shall refuse to answer upon Oath to such Bishop or Iustices of Peace examining him or her as aforesaid or to take the said Oath so duly tendred unto him or her by such Bishop or two such Iustices of Peace out of Sessions that then the said Bishop or Iustices of Peace shall and may commit the same person to the common Goal there to remain without Bail or Mainprize until the next Assizes or General or Quarter Sessions to be holden for the said Shire Division Limit or Liberty where the said Oath shall be again in the said open Assizes or Sessions required of such person by the said Iustices of Assize or Iustices of Peace then and there present or the greater number of them And if the said person or persons or any other person whatsoever other then Noblemen or Noblewomen of the age of Eightéen years or above shall refuse to take the said Oath being tendred unto him or her by the Iustices of Assize and Goal delivery in their open Assizes or the Iustices of Peace or the greater part of them in their said general Quarter Sessions every person so refusing shall incur the danger and penalty of Praemunire mentioned in the Statute of Praemunire Praemunire made in the sixtéenth year of the Reign of King Richard the Second except Women Covert Women Covert who upon refusal of the said Oath shall be by the said Iustices of Assize in their open Assize or Iustices of Peace in their General or Quarter Sessions for the said Offence committed only to the common Goal there to remain without Bail or Mainprize till they will take the said Oath There to remain without Bail or Mainprize Sureties cannot be taken The Bishop or two Justices cannot take Sureties of him who refuses the Oath for his appearance at the Assizes or Sessions as Wingate tit Crowne numb 107. mistakes but must commit him immediately to Goal nor can any other Court or Justices Bail him in this Case Vntil the next Assizes or General or Quarter Sessions This being in the Disjunctive Commitment till Assizes or Sessions the Bishop or two Justices have their election to commit the party refusing the Oath either until the next Assizes or until the next Sessions as they shall think fit For some may be more aptly committed until the next Assizes and some until the next Sessions Co. 12. 131 132. What Sessions is here meant Sessions Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 7. And if the said person or persons or any other person whatsoever c shall refuse These words any other person whatsoever are exclusive of the said person or persons who are committed for refusal For 't is here in the disjunctive To whom the Oath may be tendred so that it seems that if any person whatsoever of the age of eighteen years or above and under the degree of a Nobleman or Noblewoman be at the Assizes or general Quarter Sessions of the Peace whether voluntarily or brought in upon Process on an Indictment of Recusancy or for any other matter and be there tendred this Oath and refuse to take it although it were never tendred to him before yet upon his refusal there he incurs a Praemunire And in this respect this Statute is more extensive then that of 7 Jac. cap. 6. Stat. 7 Jac. 6. where there must be a Prior tender and refusal of this Oath otherwise a refusal of it at the Assizes or Sessions doth not make a Praemunire by that Act. Vide Co. 12. 131. Shall incur the danger and penalty of Praemunire If a man be committed by the Bishop or two Justices of Peace for refusal of this Oath and the tender and refusal be expressed in the Mittimus the Justices of Assize or Justices of Peace in their Sessions are bound to take notice of this tender and refusal and after they have there made the party a second tender of the Oath and he refuses it Indictments of Praemunire upon this Statute by which he incurs a Praemunire the Indictment against him to convict and attaint him of a Praemunire must contain all the special matter viz. that he stood Convicted or Indicted of Recusancy or that he had not received the Sacrament twice within the year next before or that passing through the Country and unknown being examined upon Oath he confessed or denied not c. as the Case is and that the Oath was tendred to him by the Bishop or two Justices of Peace Quorum unus c. and he refused it and that it was again tendred to him in open Court and he again refused it For in this Case the Mittimus Mittimus is the ground upon which he must be proceeded against at the Assizes or Sessions But if the first tender and refusal be not expressed in the Mittimus or Warrant of commitment there although there was a tender and refusal of the Oath before the Bishop or two Justices yet the Justices of Assize or Justices of Peace in their Sessions can take no notice of it But they must there tender him the Oath without reference to any Prior tender which they may do by force of the said general words any other person whatsoever and if he refuse it he incurs a Praemunire And in this Case the Indictment may be short and general scil that he was tendred the Oath in open Court and refused it c. And so it must be in all Cases where in truth there was never any Prior tender and refusal Co. 12. 131 132. Stat. 7 Jac. 6. Justices of Peace Vide the Statute of 7. Jac. cap. 6. whereby the power of the Justices of Peace is in some particular Cases inlarged in reference to this Oath Stat. Sect 12. The Oath of Allegiance The form of which Oath hereafter followeth I A. B. do truly and sincerely acknowledge profess testifie and declare in my Conscience before God and the World That our Sovereign Lord King James is Lawful and Rightful King of this Realm and of all other his Majesties Dominions and Countries and that the Pope neither of himself nor by any Authority of the Church or See of Rome or by any other means with any other hath any Power or Authority to depose the King or to dispose any of his Majesties Kingdoms or Dominions or to Authorize any Foreign Prince to
all causes where any Bishop or Iustices of the Peace may by force of this Act require and take of any Subject the Oath above mentioned That the Lords of the Privy Counsel for the time being or any six of them whereof the Lord Chancellor Lord Treasurer or the principal Secretary for the time being to be one shall have full Power and Authority by force of this Act at any time or times to require and take the said Oaths before mentioned of any Nobleman or Noblewoman then being above the age of Eighteén years And if any such Nobleman or Noblewoman other then Women married shall refuse to take such Oath or Oaths that in every such Case such Nobleman and Noblewoman shall incur the pain and danger of a Praemunire Where any Bishop or Iustices of the Peace The Justices of Peace Justices of Peace have a twofold power given them by this Act in reference to the Oath of Allegiance 1. Out of Sessions and so any two Justices of Peace quorum unus c. may tender the Oath to any person eighteen years old or above other then Noblemen or Noblewomen 2. In their general or Quarter Sessions and there they may tender the Oath to any such person who hath before refused it or to any person whatsoever of or above that age other then Noblemen or Noblewomen Now whether the six Privy Counsellors Six Privy Counsellors here mentioned may require this Oath of Noblemen and Noblewomen in all Cases where the Justices of Peace may require the same of any Subject either in or out of Sessions or only in such Cases where they may require it out of Sessions seems to be a Question For if the power here given to the six Privy Counsellors be the same with that of the Justices of Peace in their Sessions they may by force of this Act tender it to any Nobleman or unmarried Noblewoman whatsoever above eighteen years old For the Justices of Peace in their Sessions may tender it there to any other person whatsover But if it be meant of the power given the Justices of Peace out of Sessions then the six Privy Counsellors can tender it by force of this Act to such Noblemen or unmarried Noblewomen only who stand Convicted or Indicted of Recusancy for not coming to Church or who have not received the Sacrament twice within the year next before or who passing through the Country unknown shall upon examination confess or not deny their Recusancy or that they have not so received the Sacrament To whom they may tender this Oath For the solving of which doubt it is to be considered 1. That the Bishop and not the Justices of Assize are here joyned with the Justices of Peace And these words where any Bishop or Iustices of Peace seem to bear this Construction viz. where any Bishop or Justices of Peace either the one or the other indifferently may require the Oath and that can be intended only of the power given out of Sessions For in Sessions the Bishop hath nothing to do But had the Justices of Assize been here added scilicet in all Causes where the Bishop Justices of Assize or Justices of Peace may require this Oath it had been clear that the Power here given the six Privy Counsellors was as extensive as that which is given the Justices of Assize or Justices of Peace in their Sessions and they might have required the Oath of any Nobleman or unmarried Noblewoman whatsoever of competent age so if the Justices of Peace only had been here named it had been clearly intended of the Justices of Peace in either Capacity either in or out of Sessions But Bishop seems here to be a restrictive word and to give the Privy Counsellors no more power in respect of the Nobility then the Bishop had in reference to any other Subject 2. These words in all causes where c. seem to be restrictive likewise and exclusive of some Causes But the Power of the Justices of Peace in Sessions extends to all Causes and Persons under the Degree of Nobility whatsoever which therefore cannot be here intended but only some particular Causes ejusdem generis which can be no other then the Causes before mentioned wherein the Bishop or two Justices out of Sessions may deal viz. where the party was before Convicted or Indicted or had not received the Sacrament or passed unknown and confessed c. And yet as 't is reported in Bulstrode 1. 197. the Case of the Lord Vaux Pasch 10. Car. 1. is to the contrary For 't is said there he was committed to the Fleet by the Privy Council for refusing this Oath and afterwards Indicted in the Kings Bench of a Praemunire for such his refusal he being then of the age of eighteen years and above And the said Oath being lawfully tendred c. All which was certified to the Court by divers of the Privy Council upon which Indictment he was attainted and no word in the Indictment of his standing Convicted or Indicted of Recusancy or not having received the Sacrament c. and yet the Indictment was grounded upon this Statute and not upon that of 7 Jac. 6. For by that Statute of 7 Jac. he could not have been Indicted of a Praemunire for the first refusal but must have been Committed until the next Assizes or Sessions and if he had there refused it the second time he might have been Indicted of a Praemunire and not otherwise But whether this Indictment were according to Law or only passed sub silentio Quaere Note by the Statute of 7 Jac. cap. 6. any Privy Counsellor Stat. 7 Jac. 6. or the Bishop of the Diocess may now require this Oath of any Baron or Baronesse of or above the age of eighteen years in all Cases And in some Cases three Privy Counsellors Quorum unus c. may require it of persons above the said Degree vide the Statute A Noblewoman by Marriage Noblewoman A Noblewoman who was such by Marriage only becomes a Widow and takes to her second Husband a person under the Degree of Nobility By this her second Marriage she hath lost her Nobility And if she again becomes a Widow the Oath shall not be tendred her by Privy Counsellors But the Bishop or two Justices of Peace quorum unus c. may by force of this Act require her to take it and upon her refusal may proceed against her as is above directed in the Case of a common person see more of this matter Stat. 7 Jac. cap. 6. Sect. 4. Age. Then being above the age of Eightéen years In this Case that day Eighteen years on which the party was born must be wholly elapsed for before this Oath cannot be tendred although the hour of his birth be elapsed For the Law rejects all Fractions and Divisions of a day for the incertainty Fractions of a day rejected which is always the Mother of Contention Co. 5.1 Claytons Case
a farther distance although they inhabited in that which was within London or ten miles for three months next before that Session of Parliament yet if they were not Tradesmen at the time of making of this Act they should have had no benefit by this Proviso but ought within ten days after such Indictment or Conviction for Recusancy to have removed out of the compass of ten miles Stat. Sect. 7. And whereas by a Statute made at Westminster in the Five and thirtieth year of the Reign of Queén Elizabeth Intituled An Act for the restraining of Popish Recusants to some certain place of abode it was amongst other things Ordained and Enacted That every Popish Recusant then or after Convicted for not repairing to Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer A Recusant confined having any certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm should within the time limited by the said Statute repair to their place of usual dwelling and abode or not having any certain place of dwelling or abode within this Realm should likewise within the time limited by the said Statute repair to the place where such person was born or where the Father or Mother of such person should be dwelling and not at any time remove or pass above five miles from thence under the pains in the said Statute limited and provided Which Statute by reason of sundry Licences given unto such Recusants under colour of a Proviso in the said Statute contained hath not wrought that good effect in the Commonwealth as was hoped Be it therefore Enacted Ordained by this present Parliament and by the Authority of the same That the said Statute made in the said Five and thirtieth year of the said Quéen Elizabeth for and concerning the confining of the said Recusants under the pains and penalties therein contained shall by this Act and by the Authority of the same be confirmed and be hereafter put in due execution according to the tenour true intent and meaning of the said Statute in that behalf made Repeal of a Proviso in 35 Eliz. 2. And that the said Proviso in the said Statute contained giving power to grant Licence or Licences unto the said Recusants to go and Travel from or out of the compass of the said five miles shall be from and after the end of this present Session of Parliament utterly repealed and void Any thing in the said Statute to the contrary notwithstanding Then or after Convicted Vide Sect. 8. infra Giving power to grant Licence or Licences unto the said Recusants The Proviso in the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 2. here repealed is only that which there impowers the Justices of Peace For that is the only Proviso which gives power to grant Licences And the cause here alledged for the Repeal is the giving of sundry Licences to Recusants under colour of a Proviso in 35. which can be construed only of those which were to be given by the Justices of Peace and not of the other Licences given by 35. in several other cases so that the Proviso's there permitting the Popish Recusant to Travel in case of Process or commandment by Privy Counsellors or the Queens Commissioners or Proclamation to render his body to the Sheriff remain still in force and unrepealed and the Recusant may take the benefit thereof at this day Stat. Sect. 8. Provided nevertheless and be it further Enacted by this present Parliament and by the Authority of the same That it shall and may be lawful for the Kings most excellent Majesty his Heirs and Successors or for thrée or more of his Majesties most Honourable Privy Council or for threé or more of the Privy Council of his Heirs or Successors in writing under the hands of the said Privy Counsellors Licence to a Popish Recusant confined to give Licence to every such Recusant to go and Travel out of the compass of the said five miles for such time as in the said Licence shall be contained for their travelling attending and returning and without any other Cause to be expressed within the said Licence And if any of the persons which are so confined by virtue of the said Statute as is aforesaid shall have necessary occasion or business to go and Travel out of the compass of the said five miles That then and in every such Case upon Licence in writing in that behalf to be gotten under the Hands and Seals of four of the Iustices of Peace of the same County Limit Division or place next adjoyning to the place of abode of such Recusant with the privity and assent in writing of the Bishop of the Diocess The effect of a Licence to be granted by four Justices of Peace or of the Lieutenant or of any Deputy Lieutenant of the same County residing within the said County or Liberty under their Hands and Seals In every of which Licence or Licences in writing so to be had and made shall be specified and contained both the particular cause of the said Licence and the time how long the said party licensed shall be absent in travelling attending and returning It shall and may thereupon be lawful for every such person so licenced to go and Travel about such their necessary business and for such time only for their travelling attending and returning as shall be comprized in the said Licence the said party so licenced first taking his corporal Oath before the said Four Iustices of the Peace or any of them who shall have Authority by virtue of this Act to minister the same that he hath truly informed them of the Cause of his Iourney and that he shall not make any causless stays And that all and every Licence hereafter to be made in this behalf contrary to the tenor effect and true meaning of this Statute shall be utterly void frustrate and of none effect Any thing in the said former Act or in this Act to the contrary notwithstanding And every person so confined which shall depart or go above five miles from the place whereunto he is or shall be confined not having such Licence and not having taken such Oath as aforesaid shall incur the pain and penalty and forfeit as a Recusant Convicted and passing or going above five miles from the said place whereunto he is or shall be confined by the said Statute of tricesimo quinto Elizabethae should do For the Kings most Excellent Majesty c. or for thrée or more of his Majesties most Honorable Privy Councel c. to give Licence to every such Recusant What recusants may be Licensed to travel above five miles By such Recusant is intended here such Recusant as is confined by the Statute of 35 Eliz. 2. and not only such as was mentioned in the foregoing Clause of recital For that recital is imperfect in that it mentions only the Popish Recusant Convicted Stat. 35 Eliz. 2 Imperfect recital here whereas 35 Eliz. speaks as well of the Popish
assent in one Writing that the assent of the Deputy Lieutenant was contained in the Licence granted by the four Justices of Peace and was not separate and distinct by it self Cro. Jac. supra but to this the Court made no answer And it seems that such an Assent is well enough though in the same Writing with the Licence if it be expressed that the four Justices do Licence and the Deputy Lieutenant doth assent and such Writing be under the Hands and Seals of all five Residing within the said County or Liberty Residence in the County These words seem to refer as well to the Bishop and Lieutenant as to the Deputy Lieutenant so that if a Bishops Diocess extends into divers Counties and he resides in one of them His assent can be good only for the Popish Recusants of that County where he resides and not for those of any other part of his Diocess so if a Lieutenant reside out of the County whereof he is Lieutenant his assent to such Licence is void And that these words residing within the said County or Liberty cannot be restrained to the Deputy Lieutenant only appears by those next beforegoing viz. of the same County which clearly relate to the Lieutenant as well as to the Deputy Lieutenant and by consequence so must the word immediately subsequent viz. Residing And as to the Bishop the inconvenience is the same as in the Case of the Lieutenant For by their remoteness they are disabled to judge of the condition and behaviour of the Recusant to be Licenced and of the circumstances wherein he stands and whether such Licence may be granted to him without hazard of the publick safety which seems to be the reason of this restriction to the County or Liberty where the party who is to assent resides and holds as well in the Case of the Bishop or Lieutenant as of any Deputy Lieutenant residing out of the County Particular cause of the Licence The particular cause of the said Licence In Maxfields Case B. R. another exception to the Licence granted by the four Justices was that it was said to be granted for certain urgent Causes but no particular Cause for the Recusants travel was expressed in the Licence Cro. Jac. supra And this seems to be a good exception for the inserting into the Licence that the Popish Recusant hath urgent or necessary occasion or business answers only the former part of this Proviso which gives the four Justices power to Licence him if he hath necessary occasion or business to travel out of the compass of five miles but withal it ought to be mentioned in the Licence particularly what that occasion or business is which is the cause of the Licence for so this Act here expresly appoints And therefore that form of a Licence for the Recusant to Travel which Dalton V. cap. 124. tit Licences hath set down wherein no other Cause is mentioned but urgent and necessary business seems too short and general and is not to be relied on which defect the Author of the late Additions to Dalton would have done well to have rectified Oath of Allegiance First taking his Corporal Oath In Mansfields Case Moore 836. C. 1127. There is another Oath mentioned for the Popish Recusant to take before he can be Licensed to Travel and that is the Oath of Allegiance prescribed by the Stat. of 3 Jac. cap. 4. Stat. 3 Jac. 4. For it s there said That in an Information brought against the Recusant for Travelling out of the compass of five miles the Defendant pleaded a Licence from four Justices of Peace and his Plea was disallowed because among other things he did not shew that before the Licence he had taken the Oath of Allegiance yet Quaere of this and by what Law the omitting to take that Oath makes the Licence void But I rather think it to be a mistake and that such an exception might be moved but the Plea not disallowed for that reason One Justice may give the Recusant his Oath Before the said four Iustices of the Peace or any of them Mr. Sheapard thinks that no less then two of the four Justices of Peace can minister this Oath to the Recusant Sure guide cap. 14. Sect. 5. But I take it to be clear that any one of the four Justices may minister the Oath in this Case And there is a great difference between any Justices for that denotes the plural number as in the subsequent Clause about Armor where any Justices may imprison the Offender that is any two Justices or more and any of the Justices as here which denotes the singular number and the following words who shall have Authority by vertue of this Act to minister the same may be well enough applied to any one Justice of Peace That he hath truly informed them of the cause of his Iourney Averment that the cause is true If an Information be brought against a Popish Recusant for travelling out of his compass of five miles and he plead a a Licence from four Justices of Peace it seems necessary that he aver in his Plea that the Cause contained in his Licence was true and real Vide Moore 836. C. 1127. And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 9. A Recusant disabled to execute certain Offices and Functions That no Recusant convict shall at any time after the end of this Session of Parliament practise the Common Law of this Realm as a Chancellor Clerk Attorney or Solicitor in the same nor shall practise the Civil Law as Advocate or Proctor nor practise Physick nor exercise or use the Trade or Art of an Apothecary nor shall be Iudge Minister Clerk or Steward of or in any Court or kéep any Court nor shall be Register or Town Clerk or other Minister or Officer in any Court nor shall bear any Office or Charge as Captain Lieutenant Corporal Sergeant Ancient-bearer or other Office in Camp Troup Band or Company of Souldiers nor shall be Captain Master Governor or bear any Office or Charge of or in any Ship Castle or Fortress of the Kings Majesties his Heirs and Successors but be utterly dissabled for the same and every person offending herein shall also forfeit for every such offence One hundred pounds the one moity whereof shall be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors and the other moiety to him that will sue for the same by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoin Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 10. No Popish Recusant shall be a publick Officer That no Popish Recusant convict nor any having a Wife being a Popish Recusant convict shall at any time after the end of this Session of Parliament or any Popish Recusant hereafter to be convict or having a Wife which hereafter shall
Colledges that now are or hereafter shall be received into the same being under the Degrée of a Baron before the President Master Provost Warden or other head or chief Governour of that Colledge Hall or House whereinto he shall be received and in the open Hall And all Doctors of Physick Doctors and Practisers of Physick and all other who practise Physick that now are or hereafter shall be admitted into the Colledge of Physitians in London before the President of the same Colledge for the time being And all Aldermen Sheriffs or Vnder-Officers whatsoever of the Cities and Towns Corporate Aldermen Sheriffs Under-Officers and Freemen of Cities and Towns Corporate and all such as hereafter shall be made Fréemen of the said City or Town Corporate before the Mayor Bailiffs or other Chief Officer of the said City or Town in the open Hall And to the intent that due execution may be had of the premisses without delay When the said persons shall take the said Oath It is further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all the persons beforenamed who have any certain time limited or expressed when to take the aforesaid Oath shall at the time therein prescribed take the same and the rest within six months next after the end of this present Session of Parliament And be it further Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament Stat. Sect. 4. Who may tender the said Oath and to whom That it shall and may be lawful to and for any one of the Privy Council of your Highness or of your Heirs and Successors and to and for every Bishop within his Diocess to require any Baron or Baroness of the age of Eightéen years or above to take the said Oath and to and for any two Iustices of Peace within any County City or Town Corporate whereof one to be of the Quorum to require any person or persons of the age of Eightéen years or above under the Degrée of a Baron or Baroness to take the said Oath And if any person or persons of or above the said age and degrée now stand or hereafter any time shall stand and be Presented Indicted or Convicted for not coming to Church or not receiving the Holy Communion or Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm before the Ordinary or other having lawful power to take such Presentment or Indictment Then thrée of the Privy Council of your Highness your Heirs and Successors whereof the Lord Chancellor Lord Treasurer Lord Privy Seal or Principal Secretary to be one upon knowledge thereof shall require such person or persons to take the said Oath And if any other person or persons whatsoever of and above the said age and under the said degrée now stand or at any time hereafter shall stand and be Presented Indicted or Convicted for not coming to Church or receiving the Holy Communion or Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm before the Ordinary or any other having lawful power to take such Presentment or Indictment Or if the Minister Petty Constable and Church-wardens or any two of them shall at any time hereafter complain to any Iustice of Peace near adjoyning to the place where any person complained of shall dwell and the said Iustice shall find cause of suspition That then any one Iustice of Peace within whose Commission or Power such person or persons shall at any time hereafter be or to whom complaint shall be made as aforesaid shall upon notice thereof require such person or persons to take the said Oath For any two Iustices of Peace within any County City or Town Corporate c. The two Justices of Peace may require this Oath of any person that shall happen to be within their Jurisdiction although his habitation be in another County or Liberty For the Oath of Allegiance sequitur personam non locum This Oath sequitur personam non locum Bulstrode 2. 155. The King against Griffith al' To require any person or persons This is an enlargement of the power given to two Justices of Peace Power of Justices of Peace enlarged by 3 Jac. cap. 4. For thereby they could have required the Oath but only in some particular Cases vide that Statute Sect. 10. But by this Statute they may require it of any person whatsoever of competent age and under the degree of a Baron or Baroness Warrant to bring the party The Justices of Peace in this Case or the Justice of Peace in the following Case may make his or their special Warrant to the Constable to bring the party before the said Justice or Justices to take the Oath For the Statute by giving them power to require the Oath doth implicitely authorize them to make such a Warrant Quando lex aliquid alicui concedit conceditur id sine quo res ipsa esse non potest And it is against the Office of the Justices of Peace and the Authority hereby given them to go and seek the party Co. 12. 130. But the Constable cannot by virtue of such Warrant break the House Breaking the House where the party is For he is no Offender before he refuse the Oath or commit some Contempt to the King Ibid. And if any person or persons of or above the said age and degreée That is of the said age and above the said Degree of a Baron Persons above the degree of a Baron or Baroness For so the words must be taken viz. conjunctively and not of such who are of the degree of a Baron or Baroness and no more For the precedent words appointed that the Oath may be tendred to such by any Privy Counsellor or the Bishop of the Diocess in all cases although they were never Convicted Indicted or Presented But to such Noblemen or Noblewomen as are above that degree it cannot be tendred by virtue of this Act unless they have been before Convicted Indicted or Presented for not coming to Church or not receiving the Sacrament And in those Cases no less then three Privy Counsellors Quorum unus c. can tender it Co. 12. 130 131. And if any other person or persons whatsoever c. under the said Degreé A Baroness or any Woman above that Degree Noblewoman by Marriage who is not Noble by birth but only by Marriage becomes a Widow and takes a second Husband under the Degree of Nobility and is Convicted Indicted or Presented of Recusancy or complained of by the Minister c. to a Justice of Peace who finds cause of suspition The Justice of Peace may require her to take this Oath although she were once Noble For by her second Marriage she hath lost her Nobility and name of Dignity together with the priviledges of her Nobility Quando mulier Nobilis nupserit ignobili desinit esse Nobilis which is to be understood of Nobility acquired by Marriage For that which was gotten by
Marriage may also be lost by Marriage Eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur And in such Case she shall not be tried by Noblemen For they are no longer her Peers Co. 2. Inst 50. But if a Woman be Noble by birth By birth or descent whomsoever she marries yet she remaineth Noble For birthright is Character indelebilis vide Co. 4. 118. Actons Case Co. 6. 53. Countess of Rutlands Case Dyer 6 7 E. 6. 79. Bro. Nosme de Dignity 31. 69. Co. 1. Inst 69. And 't is observable that the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 13. Stat. 21 H. 8. 13 provides that a Dutchess Marquess Countess or Baroness Widows which take a second Husband under the Degree of a Baron may notwithstanding such second Marriage take such number of Chaplains as if she were a Widow which she could not have done if it had not been expresly provided for by the Statute and the reason is given in Actons Case because by such Marriage her Dignity is determined But here there being no such provisional Clause she shall not have the priviledge of Nobility but may be tendred the Oath of Allegiance by the Justice of Peace as in the Case of a Common person Shall stand and be Presented Indicted or Convicted Conviction not necessary These words being in the dis-junctive it is not necessary that the party be convicted But if he stand Presented or Indicted for not coming to Church or not receiving the Sacrament and be under the degree of a Baron the Justice of Peace ought to tender him this Oath And the said Iustice shall find Cause of suspition There must be cause of suspicion And not if the party be suspected as Wingate tit Crowne n. 150. mistakes for the bare suspition of the Justice of Peace or any other person is no sufficient ground to require the Oath or commit the party for refusal But there must be some good Cause for that suspition and the same must be alledged in the Justice of Peace his Plea or Justification if he be sued for committing him to Prison for such refusal So if a man be arrested on suspition of Felony and bring his Action for false Imprisonment the Defendant ought to shew some matter in fact to induce his suspition For in these and the like Cases a bare suspition is no sufficient Justification it being a matter secret and not traversable but the Cause of suspition is traversable Bulstrode 3. 284 285. Weale versus Wells 7 E. 4. 20. 17 E. 4. 5. 5 H. 7. 4. It shall be tried by the Justices And whether the suspition be just and lawful shall be tried and determined by the Justices Co. 2. Inst 52. 11 E. 4. 4. That then any one Iustice of Peace What was said by Coke Chief Justice B. R. in the Case of Griffith and others Bulstrode 2. 155. viz. that any one Justice of Peace One Justice of Peace may minister this Oath is to be understood of some Cases only Co. 12. 130. which are no other then those here mentioned as he explains his meaning in his said 12th Part p. 132. where he saith that one Justice of Peace cannot commit any for refusal of this Oath unless they be Prosecuted Indicted or Convicted c. according to this Statute Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 10. 11. Within whose Commission or Power such person or persons shall at any time hereafter be A person complained of and against whom cause of suspition is found by the Justice of Peace flies into another County A person complained of and justly suspected flies into another County Quaere whether a Justice of Peace of that other County can require the Oath of him and commit him upon refusal For he seems to be impowred thereunto by the express words of the Statute for that the party is fallen within his Commission or Power But yet I conceive that by these words any one Iustice of Peace within whose Commission or Power c. is designed or intended no other Justice then a Justice of that County where the party was complained of and suspected The Justices there cannot proceed thereupon And that if he flie into another County no proceedings can be there upon the complaint and suspition in the County whence he came nor any one Justice tender him the Oath or commit him for refusal without a new Complaint and cause of suspition in the County whither he flies For where the party cannot be Indicted of a Praemunire for refusing the Oath upon the second tender at the Assizes or Sessions there the Justice or Justices of Peace out of Sessions cannot tender the Oath or commit for refusal For the Commitment is in Order to a second tender and an Indictment of Praemunire thereupon But in this Case the party cannot be Indicted of a Praemunire in the County where he flies for refusing it upon the second tender For the offence for which the party must be Indicted is a complicated offence consisting of several particulars First In giving just cause of suspition without which the party complained of according to this Act cannot be tendred the Oath by one Justice of Peace then in refusing the Oath before the Justice of Peace who tendred it and lastly in refusing it upon the second tender at the Assizes or Sessions all which must be comprised in the Indictment so that the cause of suspition is pars criminis and that arising in the County where the party dwelt and was complained of cannot be punished in another County unless the Statute had expresly made it examinable there Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap 4. Stat. 5 Jac. 4. Sect. 11. True it is that some Statutes do enable Justices of Peace to punish an offence done in another County but that is where they enable them likewise to examine the truth of the Fact and take proofs and evidence thereof so the Statutes of 1 Jac. cap. 27. and 7 Jac. cap. 11. 1 Jac. 27. 7 Jac. 11. impower the Justices of Peace where the party is apprehended to examine and punish the offence But in our Case the cause of suspition arising in one County is not made examinable and consequently not punishable in another County and if not punishable there no Justice of Peace of that other County can proceed upon that cause of suspition notwithstanding the party happen to be within his Commission or power But yet the party so flying into another County may without any new complaint or cause of suspition be tendred the Oath But yet he may be tendred the Oath there and proceeded against there by two Justices of Peace Quorum unus c. by vertue of the foregoing words of this Clause although he dwell in another County and that for the reason before given viz. because this Oath sequitur personam non locum But Wingate in abridging this Clause tit Crowne numb 150. saves us the labour of this Question for
penalty of Twenty pounds per month to the King for the time to come by the said Statute of 29 Eliz. 6. and 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 3 Jac. 4. that the King cannot bring an Action of Debt or the Informer any popular Suit against the Husband and Wife for any offence of Recusancy committed by the Wife after such Conviction see for this Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. 23 Eliz. 1 Sect. 9. and 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 6. However admitting they may yet now if the King take advantage of this Statute and the Wife be either Imprisoned or the Husband yields the third part of his Lands to the King there is no question but the King and Informer are both barred The King and Informer barred to sue for the Twenty pounds per month for any time incurred after her Conviction For the King hath made his Election to punish her this way and the Informer cannot sue her for she is punished already at the Suit of the King And if the Husband pay the Ten pounds per month the King and Informer are likewise barred for those months of her absence from Church incurred after her Conviction for which the Husband hath paid the Ten pounds monthly to the King for he shall not be twice punished for the same offence Of all his Lands and Tenements By Tenements Tenements what are to be understood Offices Rents Commons Profits apprender out of Lands Advowsons and the like wherein a man hath any Franktenement and whereof he is seized ut de libero tenemento for all these are included under the word Tenement as well as Lands and other Inheritances which are holden Co. 1. inst 6. Perkins Sect. 114 115. 11 H. 6. 22 Bro. Grant 143. Finch 130. Womans Lawyer lib. 3. 188. Anderson 2. 4. But Tenement extends not to a Chattel or Lease for years Bro. Done 41. Grant 87. Bulstrode 1. 101. Turpine against Forreyner So that the Husband need not yield to the King the third part of his Leases for years for the Recusancy of his Wife Shall continue out of Prison A married Woman Imprisonment of the Wife for other cause convicted as a Popish Recusant is after her Conviction and before any further prosecution or any Election made by the Husband whether he will pay the Ten pounds per month or yield the third part of his Lands imprisoned by process of Law or for some other Cause not relating to such Conviction and afterwards is set at Liberty It seems that the Husband shall not pay the Ten pounds per month for the time she was in Prison for the Act speaks only of the time during which she continues out of Prison and although she were not imprisoned for her Recusancy yet seeing she had not during such her Imprisonment the benefit intended to her in consideration of the Ten pounds per month or third part viz. her Liberty the Husband shall not for that time pay the penalty here appointed to save her Imprisonment but if he pay it for the time after she is set at Liberty that is sufficient to satisfie the intent of this Act. But if after such Conviction Covinous Imprisonment the Wife be imprisoned by Covin upon some pretence not relating to such Conviction that shall not save the Husbands payment of the Ten pounds per month for the time she was imprisoned but after she is set at Liberty she may be again Imprisoned by force of this Act unless the Husband pay the Ten pounds per month or satisfie to the King the third part of the profits of his Lands as well for the time of such covinous Imprisonment as for the future for the covinous Imprisonment was upon the matter her own Act and no person shall take advantage of an Imprisonment covinously caused by him or her self 16 E. 4. 5. And here she continued out of Prison in the sence of this Act because her Imprisonment was not by Process of Law in invitam Outlawry by Covin And so if a Man be Outlawed while he is in Prison yet the Outlawry shall not be avoided for that Cause if the Imprisonment were by Covin or consent of the party Outlawed Co. 1. Inst. 259. 38. Assiz Pl. 17. Stat. iii Car. i. cap. ii An Act to restrain the passing or sending of any to be Popishly bred beyond the Seas FOrasmuch as divers ill affected persons to the true Religion established within this Realm Stat. Sect. 1. have sent their Children into Forreign parts to be bred up in Popery notwithstanding the restraint thereof by the Statute made in the first year of the Reign of our late Soveraign Lord King James of famous memory Be it Enacted that the said Statute shall be put in due execution And be it further Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same that in Case any person or persons under the Obedience of the King his Heirs and Successors He that goes himself or sends any other beyond the Seas to be trained up in Popery c. shall be disabled to sue c. and shall lose all his Goods and shall forfeit all his Lands c. for life at any time after the end of this Session of Parliament shall pass or go or shall convey or send or cause to be sent or conveyed any Child or other person out of any of the Kings Dominions into any the parts beyond the Seas out of the Kings Obedience to the intent and purpose to enter into or be resident or trained up in any Priory Abbey Nunnery Popish Vniversity Colledge or School or House of Iesuites Priests or in any private Popish Family and shall be there by any Iesuite Seminary Priest Friar Monk or other Popish Person instructed perswaded or strengthned in the Popish Religion in any sort to profess the same or shall convey or send or cause to be conveyed or sent by the hands or means of any person whatsoever any sum or sums of money or other thing for or towards the maintenance of any Child or other person already gone or sent or to go or to be sent and trained and instructed as is aforesaid or under the the name or colour of any Charity Benevolence or Alms towards the relief of any Priory Abbey Nunnery Colledge School or any Religious House whatsoever Every person so sending conveying or causing to be sent and conveyed as well any such Child or other person as any sum or sums of money or other thing and every person passing or being sent beyond the Seas being thereof Lawfully Convicted in or upon any Information Presentment or Indictment as is aforesaid shall be disabled from thenceforth to sue or use any Action Bill Plaint or Information in course of Law or to prosecute any Suit in any Court of Equity or to be Committée of any Ward or Executor or Administrator