person of an Apostolical Spirit consonant unto the stile and writings of the Apostles themselves a precious Jewel and just Representation of the state and order of the Church in those days And sundry things we may observe from it 1. There is nothing in it that gives the least intimation of any other Church-State but that which was Congregational although there were the highest causes and Reasons for him so to do had there been any such Churches then in being The case he had in hand was that of Ecclesiastical Sedition or Schism in the Church of Corinth the Church or Body of the Brethren having unjustly deposed their Elders as it should seem all of them Giving advice herein unto the whole Church using all sorts of Arguments to convince them of their sin directing all probable means for their Cure he never once sends them to the Bishop or Church of Rome as the Head of Vnity unto all Churches makes no mention of any Metropolitical or Diocesan Church and its Rule or of any single Bishop and his Authority No one of any such Order doth he either commend or condemn or once address himself unto with either Admonitions Exhortations Encouragements or Directions He only handles the cause by the Rule of the Scripture as it was stated between the Church itself and its Elders I take it for granted that if there were any Church at Corinth consisting of many Congregations in the City and about it or comprehensive as some say of the whole Region of Achaia that there was a single Officer or Bishop over that whole Church But none such is here mentioned If there were any such he was either Deposed by the people or he was not If he were Deposed he was only one of the Presbyters for they were only Presbyters that were Deposed If he were not why is he not once called on to discharge his duty in curing of that Schism or blamed for his neglect Certainly there was never greater Prevarication used by any man in any cause than is by Clemens in this if the state of the Church its Rule and Order were such as some now pretend For he neither lets the people know wherein their sin and Schism did lye namely in a Separation from their Bishop nor doth once mention the only proper cure and remedy of all their Evils But he knew their state and order too well to insist on things that were not then in rerum natura and wherein they were not concerned 2. This Epistle is written as unto the whole Church at Corinth so in the name of the whole Church of Rome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Church of God which dwelleth or sojourneth as a stranger at Rome in the City of Rome to the Church of God that dwelleth or sojourneth at Corinth For although that Church was then in disorder under no certain Rule having cast off all their Elders c. yet the Church of Rome not only allows it to be a sister-Church but salutes the Brethren of it in the following words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 called and sanctified through the will of God by our Lord Jesus Christ. The Churches of Christ were not so ready in those days to condemn the persons nor to judge the Church-state and condition of others on every miscarriage real or supposed as some have been and are in these latter Ages 2. This Address being from the body of the Church at Rome unto that at Corinth without the least mention of the Officers of them in particular it is evident that the Churches themselves that is the whole entire Community of them had Communion with one another as they were sister-Churches and that they had themselves the transaction of all Affairs wherein they were concerned as they had in the days of the Apostles Acts 15.1 2 3. It was the Brethren of the Church at Antioch who determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain others should go up to Hierusalem to consult the Apostles and Elders See also Chap. 21.22 This they did not nor ought to do without the Presence Guidance Conduct and consent of their Elders or Rulers where they had any But this they were not excluded from And that Church the whole Body or fraternity whereof doth advise and consult in those things wherein they are concerned on the account of their Communion with other Churches is a Congregational Church and no other It was the Church who sent this Epistle unto the Corinthians Claudius Ephebus Valerius Bibo Fortunatus are named as their Messengers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that are sent by us our Messengers our Apostles in these matters Such as the Churches made use of on all such occasions in the Apostles days 2 Cor. 8.23 And the persons whom they sent were only Members of the Church and not Officers nor do we any where hear of them under that Character Now they could not be sent in the name of the Church but by its consent nor could the Church consent without its Assembling together This was the state and order of the first Churches in that Communion which was amongst them according to the mind of Christ they had a singular concern in the welfare and prosperity of each other and were solicitous about them in their trials Hence those who were planted at a greater distance than would allow frequent personal converse with their respective Members did on all occasions send Messengers unto one another sometimes meerly to visit them in love and sometimes to give or take Advice But these things as indeed almost all others that bâ—long unto the Communion of Churches either in themselves or with one another are either utterly lost and buryed or kept above ground in a pretence of Episcopal Authority Churches themselves being wholly excluded from any concernment in them But as the Advice of the Church of Rome was desired in this case by the whole Church of Corinth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it was given by the Body of the Church itself and sent by Messengers of their own 3. The description given of the state ways and walking of the Church of Corinth that is that whole Fraternity of the Church which fell afterwards into that disorder which is reproved before their fall is such as that it bespeaks their walking together in one and the same society and is sufficient to make any good man desire that he might see Churches yet in the world unto whom or the generality of whose Members that Description might be honestly and justly accommodated One Character which is given of them I shall mention only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There was a full or plentiful effusion of the Holy Ghost upon you all so that being full or filled with an holy will holiness of will and a good readiness of mind with a pious devout confidence you stretched out your hands in Prayers to Almighty God supplicating his clemency or Mercy for the pardon of your involuntary sins sins fallen into by infirmity or
to be given of any man charged with Schisme for a Dissent from such a Rule Any such Rule and any Ecclesiastical Censure upon it is apocriphal not only unto the Scripture but unto that which I call primitive Antiquity The first Attempt of any thing in this kind was in reference unto the time and day of the Observation of Easter This was the first Instance among Christians of an endeavour to impose the Observation of humane or Church Constitutions or groundless Traditions on any Churches or Persons in them And whereas that which was called a Schisme between the Churches of Italy and Asia or some of them did ensue thereon we have a most illustrious Testimony from the best the Wisest and the Holyest of that Age for Irenaeus in France and Polycrates in Asia were not alone herein that the blame of all that Division and Schisme was to be charged on them who attempted to deprive the Churches of their Liberty and impose on them a necessity of the Observation of the Time and Season which they had determined on After a Rebuke was given unto the Attempt of the Judaizing Christians to impose the Observation of Mosaical Ceremonies from the pretence of their divine Institution on the Churches of the Gentiles by the Apostles themselves this was the Original of all endeavours to impose humane Constitutions for which there was no such Pretence upon the Practise of any And as it was an Original not unmeet for the beginning and foundation of such Impositions being in a matter of no Vse unto the Edification of the Church so it received such a solemne Rebuke at its first entrance and Attempt that had it not been for the Ignorance Pride Interest and Superstition of some in the following Ages it had perished without Imitation The Account hereof is given in Eusebius lib. 5. cap. 21 22 33 as also of the Rule which then prevailed though afterwards shamefully forsaken namely that an Agreement in the Faith was the only Rule of Communion which ought to be kept under any diversity in voluntary Observations And the Discourse of Socrates on this Occasion lib. 5. cap. 21 Concerning the Non-Institution of any days of Fastings or Feastings or other Rites or Ceremonies then in use with the Liberty which is therefore to be left in such things unto all Christians is the plain Truth whatever some except against it declared with much Judgement and Moderation This Beginning I say had the Imposition of unscriptural uninstituted Rites Ceremonies and Religious Observations among the Churches of Christ and this solemn Rebuke was given unto it Howbeit the Ignorance Superstition and Interest of following Ages with the contempt of all Modesty brake through the boundaries of this Holy Rebuke until their own Impositions and Observations became the substance of all their Church Discipline unto the total subversion of Christian Liberty Wherefore to allow Church Rulers or such as pretend so to be a Liberty and Power to appoint a Rule of Communion comprizing Institutions and Commands of sundry things to be constantly observed in the whole Worship and Discipline of the Church not warranted in themselves by divine Authority and then to charge Beleivers abiding firm in the Doctrine of the Faith with Schisme for a Non-compliance with such Commands and Appointments is that which neither in the Scripture nor in Primitive Antiquity hath either Instance Example President Testimony Rumour or Report to give Countenance unto it The Pedigree of this Practise cannot be derived one step higher than the fact of Victor the Bishop of Rome in the Excommunication of the Churches and Christians of Asia which was solemnly condemned as an Entrenchment on Christian Liberty 3. After these things the Notion of Schisme began to be mannaged variously according unto the Interest of them who seemed to have the most Advantage in the Application of it unto those who dissented from them It were an endless thing to express the Rise and declare the Progress of these Apprehensions But after many loose and declamatory Discourses about it they are gerally issued in two Heads The first is that any kind of Dissent from the Pope and Church of Rome is Schisme all the Schisme that is or can be in the World The other is that a causeless Separation from a true Church is Schisme and this only is so But whereas in this pretended Definition there is no mention of any of its internal Causes nor of its formal Reason but a bare Description of it by an outward Effect it serves only for a weapon in every mans hand to perpetuate digladiations about it For every Church esteems itself true and every one that separates himself esteems himself to have just Cause so to do In the following Times especially after the Rise and Prevalency of the Arian Heresie it was ordinary for those of the Orthodox Perswasion to forsake the Communion of those Churches wherein Arian Bishops did preside and to gather themselves into separate Meetings or Conventicles for divine Worship for which they were accused of Schisme and in sundry places punished accordingly yea some of them unto the Loss of their Lives Yet I suppose there are none now who judge them to have been Schismaticks The Separation of Novatus and Donatus from the Communion of the whole Catholick Visible Church on unwarrantable Pretences is that which makes the loudest noise about Schisme in Antiquity That there was in what was done by them and their Followers the General Nature and Moral Evil of Causeless Schismes and Divisions will be easily granted But it is that wherein we are not concerned be the especiall nature of Schisme what it will Nor did they make use of any one Reason whereon the Merit of the present Cause doth depend The Novatians the modester Sect of the two pretended only a Defect in Discipline in granting Church Communion unto such as they would not have received though they were apparently in the wrong proceeding on mistaken Principles The Donatists pleaded only some Personal Crimes in some few Bishops fallen into in the time of Persecution which they could never prove and thereon grew angry with all the World who would not condemn them and renounce their Communion as well as they These slight Pretences they made the Occasion and Reason of renouncing the Communion of the whole visible Catholick Church in all its distributions for Communion that is all particular Churches and confined Sacraments and Salvation absolutely unto their own Parties And hereon they fell into many other woful Miscarriages especially those of the latter sort It is indifferent by what Name any are pleased to call this Evil and Folly A Sin and Evil it was Schisme or what you please to term it and justly condemned by all Christians not joyning with them in those days And that which was the animating Principle of the Tumult of the Donatists was a Supposition that the Continuation of the true Church state depended on the Successive Ordination of Bishops
part of the Churches Unity doth or ever did consist in them In his Procedure hereon our Author seemes to embrace occasions of contending seeking for Advantages therein in things not belonging unto the Merit of the Cause which I thought was beneath him From my Concession that some at least of our Parochial Churches are true Churches he asks in what sense Are they Churches rightly constituted with whom they may joyn in Communion as Members I think it is somewhat too late now after all this dispute about the Reasons of refraining from their Communion and his severe Charges of Schisme upon us for our so doing to make this Enquiry Wherefore he Answers himself No but his Meaning is saith he that they are not guilty of any such heynous Errors in Doctrine or Idolatrous Practise in Worship as should utterly deprive them of the Being and nature of Churches which I suppose are my Words But then comes in the Advantage doth saith he this Kindness belong only unto some of our Parochial Churches I had thought that every Parochial Church was true or false according unto its frame and constitution which among us supposeth the owning the Doctrine and Worship established in the Church of England I answer briefly it is true every Church is true or false according unto its Original frame and Constitution This frame and Constitution of Churches if it proceed from and depend upon the Institution of Christ it is true and approveable If it depend only on a National Establishment of Doctrine and Worship I know not well what to say unto it But let any of these Parochial Churches be so constituted as to answer the legal establishment in the Land yet if the Generality of their Members are openly wicked in their Lives and they have no lawful or sufficient Ministry we cannot acknowledge them for true Churches Some other things of the like nature do ensue but I shall not insist on them He gathers up in the next place the Titles of the Causes alledged for our refraining Communion with those Parochial Assemblies which he calls our Separation from them And hereon he enquires whether these Reasons be a ground for a Separation from a Church wherein it is confessed there are no Heynous Errors in Doctrine or Idolatrous Practise in Worship that is as he before cited my words as should utterly deprive them of the Being and Nature of Churches And it they be not then saith he such a Separation may be a formal Schisme because they set up other Churches of their own The Rule before laid down that all things lawful are to be done for the Churches Peace taking in the supposition on which it proceeds is as sufficient to establish Church Tyranny as any Principle made use of by the Church of Rome notwithstanding its plausible Appearance And that here insinuated of the Vnlawfulness of Separation from any Church in the World for that which hath pernicious Errors in Doctrine and Idolatry in Worship destroying its Being is no Church at all is as good Security unto Churches in an Obstinate Refusal of Reformation when the Souls of the People are ruined amongst them for the want of it as they need desire And I confess I suspect such Principles as are evidently suited unto the security of the Corrupt Interests of any sort of Men. I say therefore 1. That though a Church or that which pretends itself on any Grounds so to be do not profess any heynous Errour in Doctrine nor be guilty of Idolatrous Practise in Worship destroying its Nature and Being yet there may be sufficient Reasons to refrain from its Communion in Church Order and Worship and to joyn in or with other Churches for Edification That is that where such a Church is not capable of Reformation or is obstinate in a Resolution not to reform itself under the utmost Necessity thereof it is lawful for all or any of its Members to reform themselves according to the Mind of Christ and commands of the Gospel 2. That where Men are no otherwise Members of any Church but by an inevitable Necessity and outward Penal Laws preventing their own choice and any act of Obedience unto Christ in their joyning with such Churches the Case is different from theirs whose Relation unto any Church is founded in their own voluntary choice as submitting themselves unto the Laws Institution and Rule of Christ in that Church which we shall make use of afterwards 3. The Doctor might have done well to have stated the true nature of Schisme and the formal Reason of it before he had charged a formal Schisme on a Supposition of some outward Acts only 4. What is our Judgment concerning Parochial Assemblies how far we separate from them or refrain Communion with them what are the Reasons whereon we do so hath been now fully declared and thereunto we must appeal on all occasions for we cannot acquiesce in what is unduely imposed on us either as unto Principles or Practise To shew as he saith the Insufficiency of our Cause of Separation he will take this way namely to shew the great absurdities that follow on the allowance of them and addes These five especially I shall insist upon 1. That it weakens the Cause of Reformation 2. That it hinders all Vnion between the Protestant Churches 3. That it justifies the antient Schismes which have been always condemned by the Christian Church 4. That it makes Separation Endless 5. That it is contrary to the Obligation that lies on all Christians to preserve the Peace and Vnity of the Church Now as I shall consider what He offers on these several Heads and his Application of it unto the case in hand so I shall confirm the Reasons already given of our Separation if it must be so called from Parochial Assemblies with these five Considerations 1. That they strengthen the Cause of Reformation 2. That they open a way to Vnion between all Protestant Churches 3. That they give the just Grounds of condemning the antient Schismes that ever any Christian Church did justly condemn 4. That they give due bounds unto Sâ—paration 5. That they absolutely comply with all the Commands of the Scripture for the Preservation of the Peace and Vnity of the Church I shall begin with the consideration of the Absurdities charged by Him on our Principles and Practise The first of them is That it weakens the Cause of the Reformation This he proves by long Quotations out of some French Divines We are not to expect that they should speak unto our Cause or make any Determination in it seeing to the principal of them it was unknown But they say that which is contrary unto our Principles so they may do and yet this not weaken the Cause of the Reformation For it is known that they say somewhat also that is contrary to the Principles of our Episcopal Brethren for which one of them is sufficiently reviled but yet the Cause of Reformation is not weakened thereby The first
to give place unto severe Thoughts of the Church of England and its Communion and withdrawing themselves into forreign Parts openly avowed a Separation from it And if the extremities which many had been put unto for their meer Dissent and Nonconformity unto the Established Rule which with a good Conscience they could not comply with were represented it might if not excuse yet alleviate the Evil of that Severity in Separation which they fell into 6. But hereon a double Inconvenience yea Evil did ensue whence all the Advantages made use of in this Story to load the present Cause of the Nonconformists did arise For 1. Many of those who refused to conform unto the Church in all its Constitutions yet thought it their Duty to wait quietly for a National Reformation thinking no other possible began to oppose and write against them who utterly Separated from the Church condemning its Assemblies as Unlawful And herein as the manner of men is on such Occasions they fell into sharp Invectives against them with severe Censures and Sentences concerning them and their Practice And 2. Those who did so separate being not agreed among themselves as unto all Principles of Church-Order nor as unto the Measures of their Separation from the Church of England there fell out differences and disorders among them accompanied with personal Imprudencies and Miscarriages in not a few Neither was it ever scarcely otherwise among them who first attempted any Reformation unless like the Apostles they were infallibly guided These mutual Contests which they had among themselves and with the Nonconformists who abode in their private Stations in England with their Miscarriages also were published unto the World in their own Writings and those of their Enemies Hinc omnis pendet Lucilius These were the things that gave advantage unto and are the Substance of the History of our Author concerning Separation wherein all I can find unto our present Instruction is that Iliacos intra muros peccatur extra There are and ever were Sins Faults Follies and Miscarriages among all sorts of Men which might be farther evidenced by recounting on the other hand what were the Ways Acts and Deeds at the same time of those by whom the others were cast out and rejected And whereas it was the Design of the Reverend Author to load the Cause and Persons of the present Nonconformists with Prejudice and contempt it is well fallen out in the Merciful disposal of things towards and amongst us by the Providence and Grace of God that he is forced to derive the principal Matter of his Charge from what was done by a few private Persons three or fourscore years agoe and more in whose Principles and Practises we are not concerned And as for the Difference that fell out more lately among the Divines in the Assembly at Westminster about the Ways Means and Measures of Reformation and mutual Forbearance which he gives us a large account of in a long Transcription out of their Writings I must have more Health and Strength and Leisure than now I have which I look not for in this World before I esteem my self concerned to ingage in that contest or to Apologize for the one side or other The things in Agitation between them had no Relation unto or present Dissent from the Church of England being here insisted on meerly to fill up the story with Reference unto the General End designed Neither to my Knowledge did I ever read a Book wherein there was a greater Appearance of Diligence in the Collection of Things Words Sayings Expressions Discourses unto other Ends which might only cast Odium on the Cause opposed or give advantage for Arguings unto a seeming Success very little or no way at all belonging unto the Cause in hand than there is in this of our Reverend Author though much in the same way and kind hath been before attempted But Separation it is and Schisme which we are all charged withal and the Evil thereof is aggravated in the Words of the Author himself and in large Transcriptions out of the Writings of others Schisme indeed we acknowledge to be an Evil a great Evil but are sorry that with some a pretended unproved Schisme is become almost all that is Evil in the Churches or their Members so that let men be what they will drenched yea overwhelmed in Ignorance Vice and Sin so they do not separate which to be sure in that state they will not do for why should he who hath Plague Sores upon him depart from the Society of them that are infected they seem to be esteemed as unto all the concerns of the Church very unblameable The Truth is considering the present State and Condition of the Inhabitants of this Nation who are generally Members of the Church of England how the Land is filled with sin against the Holy One of Israel God giving us every day renewed Tokens and Indications of his Displeasure no compliance with his Calls no publick Reformation being yet attempted it seems a more necessary Duty and of more importance unto them upon whom the care of such things is incumbent to endeavour in themselves and to ingage a Faithful Ministry throughout the Nation both to give a due Example in their Conversations and to Preach the Word with all diligence for the turning of the People from the Evil of their ways then to spend their time and strength in the Mannagment of such Charges against those who would willingly comply with them as unto all the great Ends of Religion amongst men But this must be farther spoken unto I say therefore 1. In General that whereas the whole Design of this Book is to charge all sorts of Nonconformists with Schisme and to denounce them Schismaticks yet the Author of it doth not once endeavour to state the true notion and nature of Schisme wherein the Consciences of Men may be concerned He satisfies himself in the Invectives of some of the Antients against Schisme applicable unto those which were in their days wherein we are not concerned Only he seems to proceed on the general Notion of it that it is a Causeless Separation from a true Church which departs from that of the Romanists who will allow no Separation from the Church but what is Causeless To make Application hereof unto us it is supposed 1. That the Church of England is a true Church in its National Constitution and so are all the Parochial Churches in it which can be no way justified but by a large extensive Interpretation of the Word True For there is but one sort of Churches instituted by Christ and his Apostles but National and Parochial Churches differ in their whole kind and therefore cannot both of them be of a Divine Original 2. That we are Members of this Church by our own Consent How we should come to be so otherways I know not If we are so by being born and baptized in England then those who are born beyond Sea and baptized there
and Priviledges by vertue of the Law of Christ. Unto this Church which is his Spouse doth the Lord Christ commit the Keys of his House by whom they are delivered into the hands of his Stewards so far as their Office requires that Trust. Now this which we shall afterwards more fully confirm is utterly inconsistent with the committing of all Church Power unto one Person by vertue of his Ordination by another Nothing that hath been spoken doth at all hinder or deny but that where Churches are rightly constituted they ought in their Offices Officers and Order to be preserved by a successive Ordination of Pastors and Rulers wherein those who actually preside in them have a particular Interest in the orderly communication of Church-Power unto them CHAP. IV. The Especial Nature of the Gospel Church-State appointed by Christ. THE Principal Enquiry which we have thus far prepared the way unto and whereon all that ensues unto it doth depend is concerning the especial Nature of that Church-State Rule and Order which the Lord Christ hath Instituted under the Gospel of what sort and kind it is And hereunto some things must be premised 1. I design not here to oppose nor any way to consider such Additions as men may have judged necessary to be added unto that Church-State which Christ hath appointed to render it in their apprehension more useful unto its ends than otherwise it would be Of this sort there are many things in the World and of a long season have been so But our present Business is to prove the Truth and not to disprove the conceits of other men And so far as our Cause is concerned herein it shall be done by it self so as not to interrupt us in the declaration of the Truth 2. Whereas there are great contests about Communion with Churches or Separation from them and mutual charges of Impositions and Schisms thereon they must be all regulated by this Enquiry namely what is that Church State which Christ hath prescribed Herein alone is Conscience concerned as unto all Duties of Ecclesiastical Communion Neither can a chaâ—ge of Schism be managed against any but on a supposition of Sin with respect unto that Church-State and Order which Christ hath appointed A Dissent from any thing else however pretended to be useful yea advantageous unto Church Ends must come under other prudential considerations All which shall be fully proved and vindicated from the exceptions of Dr. St. 3. There have been and are in the World several sorts of Churches of great Power and Reputation of several Forms and Kinds yet contributing Aid to each other in their respective stations As 1 The Papal Church which pretends it self to be Catholick or Universal comprehensive of all true Believers or Disciples of Christ united in their Subjection unto the Bishop of Rome 2 There were of old and the shadow of them is still remaining Churches called Patriarchal first 3 then 4 then 5 of them whereinto all other Churches and professed Christians in the Roman World were distributed as unto a Dependance on the Authority and Subjection to the Jurisdiction and Order of the Bishops of 5 principal Cities of the Empire who were thereon called Patriarks 3 Various Divisions under them of Archiepiscopal or Metropolitical Churches and under them of those that are now called Diocesan whose bounds and limits were fixed and altered according to the Variety of Occasions and Occurrences of things in the Nations of the World What hath been the Original of all these sorts of Churches how from Parochial Assemblies they grew up by the Degrees of their Descent now mentioned into the height and center of Papal Omnipotency hath been declared elsewhere sufficiently 4. Some there are who plead for a National Church-State arising from an Association of the Officers of particular Churches in several Degrees which they call Classical and Provincial until it extend it self unto the limits of an whole Nation that is one civil Body depending as such on its own supreme Ruler and Law I shall neither examine nor oppose this Opinion there hath been enough if not too much already disputed about it But 5. The visible Church-State which Christ hath instituted under the New Testament consists in an especial Society or Congregation of professed Believers joyned together according unto his Mind with their Officers Guides or Rulers whom he hath appointed which do or may meet together for the celebration of all the Ordinances of Divine Worship the professing and authoritatively proposing the Doctrine of the Gospel with the Exercise of the Discipline prescribed by himself unto their own mutual Edification with the Glory of Christ in the Preservation and Propagation of his Kingdom in the World The things observable in this Description and for the farther Declaration of it are 1 The Material cause of this Church or the Matter whereof it is composed which are visible Believers 2 The formal Cause of it which is their voluntary Coalescency into such a Society or Congregation according to the mind of Christ. 3 The End of it is presential local Communion in all the Ordinances and Institutions of Christ in Obedience unto him and their own Edification 4 In particular these ends are 1 The Preaching of the Word unto the Edification of the Church it self and the Conversion of others 2 Administration of the Sacraments or all the Mystical Appointments of Christ in the Church 3 The Preservation and Exercise of Evangelical Discipline 4 Visibly to profess their Subjection unto Christ in the World by the observation of his commands 5 The Bounds and Limits of this Church are taken from the number of the Members which ought not to be so Small as that they cannot observe and do all that Christ hath commanded in due Order nor yet so Great as not to meet together for the Ends of Institution of the Church before mentioned 6 That this Church in its compleat State consists of Pastors or a Pastor and Elders who are its Guides and Rulers and the Community of the Faithful under their Rule 7 That unto such a Church and every one of them belongs of Right all the Priviledges Promises and Power that Christ doth give and grant unto the Church in this World These and sundry other things of the like Nature shall be afterwards spoken unto in their Order according unto the Method intended in the present Discourse Two things I shall now proceed unto 1 To prove that Christ hath appointed this Church-State under the Gospel namely of a particular or single Congregation 2 That he hath appointed no other Church State that is inconsistent with this much less that is destructive of it 1. Christ appointed that Church-State which is meet and accommodated unto all the ends which he designed in his Institution of a Church But such alone is that Church Form and Order that we have proposed In Christs Institution of the Church it was none of his ends that some men might be thereby advanced to
Testimony produced is that of Calvin A large Discourse he hath Institut lib. 4. cap. 1. against Causeless Separations from a true Church and by whom are they not condemned No determination of the Case in hand can be thence derived nor are the Grounds of our refraining Communion with Parochial Assemblies the same with those which he condemns as insufficient for a total Separation nor is the Separation he opposed in those days which was absolute and total with a condemnation of the Churches from which it was made of the same nature with that wherewith we are charged at least not with what we own and allow He gives the Notes of a true Church to be the pure Preaching of the Word and the Administration of the Sacraments according unto Christs Institution Where these are he allows a true Church to be not only without Diocesan Episcopacy but in a form and under a Rule opposite unto it and inconsistent with it And if he did at all speak to our Case as he doth not nor unto any of the Grounds of it why should we be pressed with his Authority on the one hand more then others from whom he differed also on the other Besides there is a great deal more belongs unto the pure preaching of the Word and the Administration of the Sacraments according unto Christs Institution then some seem to apprehend They may they ought to be so explained as that from the consideration of them we may justifie our whole Cause Both these may be wanting in a Church which is not guilty of such heynous Errors in Doctrine or Idolatry in Worship as should overthrow its Being And their want may be a just Cause of refraining Communion from a Church which yet we are not obliged to condemn as none at all Calvin expresseth his Judgment N. 12. I would not give Countenance unto Errors no not to the least so as to cherish them by flattery or Connivance But though I say that the Church is not to be forsaken for tristing Differences wherein the Doctrine of the Gospel is retained safe and sound wherein the Integrity of Godliness doth abide and the use of the Sacraments appointed of the Lord is preserved and we say the same And this very Calvin who doth so severely condemn Separation from a true Church as by him stated did himself quietly and peaceably withdraw and depart from the Church of Geneva when they refused to admit that Discipline which he esteemed to be according to the Mind of Christ. It is certain therefore that by the Separation which he condemns he doth not intend the peaceable Relinquishment of the Communion of any Church as unto a constant participation of all Ordinances in it for want of due means of Edification much less that which hath so many other Causes concurring therewith For the other Learned Men whom he quotes unto the same purpose I see not any thing that gives the least countenance unto his Assertion that our Principles weaken the Cause of the Reformation It is true they plead other Causes of Separation from the Church of Rome than those insisted on by us with respect unto the Church of England and indeed they had been otherwise much to blame having so many things as they had to plead of greater importance Did we say that the Reasons which we plead are all that can be pleaded to justifie the Separation of the Reformed Churches from the Church of Rome it would weaken the Cause of Reformation For we should then deny that Idolatry and fundamental Errors in Faith were any Cause or Ground of that Separation However we know that the Imposition of them on the Faith and Practise of all Christians is more pleaded in Justification of a Separation from them then the things themselves But allowing those greater Reasons to be pleaded against the Roman Communion as we do it doth not in the least follow that our Reasons for refraining Communion with Parochial Assemblies doth weaken the Cause of the Reformation However let me not be misinterpreted as unto that expression of destroying our Faith which the Communion required with the Church of England as unto all the important Articles of it doth not do and I can subscribe unto the Words of Daille as quoted by our Author out of his Apology If saith he the Church of Rome hath not required any thing of us which destroys our Faith offends our Consciences and overthrows the Service which we believe due to God if the Differences have been small and such as we might safely have yeilded unto then he will grant their Separation was rash and unjust and they guilty of the Schisme He closeth his Transcription of the Words of sundry Learned Men who have justifyed the Separation of the reformed Churches from the Church of Rome wherein we are not in the least concerned with an Enquiry What Triumph would the Church of Rome make over us had we no other reasons to justifie our Separation from them but only those which as is pretended we plead in our Cause I say whereas we do plead confirm and justifie all the Reasons and Causes pleaded for the Separation of the Reformed Churches from them not opposing not weakning any of them by any Principle or Practise of ours but farther press the force of the same reasonings and causes in all Instances whereunto they will extend I see neither what cause the Papists have of Triumph noâ— any thing that weakens the Cause of the Reformation He adds further how should we be hissed aâ—d laughed at all over the Christian World if we had nothing to alledge for our Separation from the Roman Church but such things as these I answer that as the Case stands if we did alledge no other Reasons but those which we insist on for our refraining Communion with our own Parochial Assemblies we should deserve to be derided for relinquishing the Plea of those other important Reasons which the Heresies and Idolatries and Tyranny of that Church do render just and equal But if we had no other Causes of Separation from the Church of Rome but what we have for our Separation from our Parochial Assemblies at home as weak as our Allegations are pretended to be we should not be afraid to defend them against all the Papists in the World and let the World act like itself in hissing Whereas therefore the Cause of Reformation is not in any thing weakened by our Principles No Argument no Reason solidly pleaded to justifie the Separation from the Church of Rome being deserted by us neither Testimony Proof nor Evidence being produced to evince that it is weakned by us I shall in the Second place as was before proposed prove that the whole Cause of the Protestants Separation from the Church of Rome is strengthened and confirmed by us There were some general Principles on which the Protestants proceeded in their Separation from the Church of Rome and which they constantly pleaded in Justification thereof The first
to separate from a Church thereon shall the People do it themselves are they meet are they Competent for it are they to make such a Judgement on the Doctrine of their Guides do they know what is heresie have they read Epiphanius or Binius How comes this allowance to be made unto them which else where is denied The Third is in Case Men make things indifferent necessary to Salvation and divide the Church on that account But 1. I know not which is to precede or go before their Division of the Church or the just Separation nor how they are to be distinguished but it was necessary to be so expressed 2. There are two things in such an Imposition first the practise of the things imposed Secondly the Judgement of them that impose them The former alone belongs unto them who are imposed on and they may submit unto it without a Compliance with the Doctrine as many did in the Apostles days For the Judgement of the imposers it was their own Errour and concernment only 3. Why is not the imposing of things indifferent so as to make the observation of them necessary unto mens Temporal Salvation in this World so as that the Refusal of it shall really affect the Refusers with Trouble and Ruine as just a Cause of Separation as the imposing of them as necessary unto Eternal Salvation which shall never affect them 4. This making things indifferent necessary unto Salvation and as such imposing of them on others is a thing impossible that never was nor ever can be For it is the Judgment of the Imposers that is spoken of and to judge things indifferent in themselves to be in themselves necessary to Salvation is a Contradiction If onely the Judgment of the Imposers that such things are not indifferent but necessary to Salvation be intended and otherwise the things themselves may lawfully be imposed I know not how this differs from the Imposition of indifferent things under any other pretence In his following Discourse concerning miscarriages in Churches where no Separation is enjoyned we are not at all concerned and therefore shall not observe the mistakes in it which are not a few But may there not be other Causes of peaceable withdrawing from the Communion of a Church besides these here enumerated 1. Suppose a Church should impose the Observation of Judaical Ceremonies and make their observation necessary though not to Salvation Yet unto the Order and Decency of Divine Worship It may declare them to be in themselves indifferent but yet make them necessary to be observed Or 2. Suppose a Church should be so degenerated in the Life and Conversation of all its Members that being immersed in various sins they should have only a form of Godliness but deny the power of it the Rule of the Apostle being to avoid and turn away from them 3. Suppose a Church be fallen into such decayes in Faith Love and fruits of Charity as that the Lord Jesus Christ by his word declares his Disapprobation of it and in that State refuses to reform itself and persecutes them who would reform themselves Or 4. Suppose the Ministry of any Church be such as is insufficient and unable to dispense the Word and Sacraments unto Edification so as that the whole Church may perish as unto any Relief by or from the Administration of the Ordinances of the Gospel I say in these and such other Cases a peaceable withdrawing from the Communion of such Churches is warrantable by the Rule of the Scripture SECT III. THE third Part of the Drs. Discourse he designs to examine the Pleas as he speaks for Separation And these he refers to four Heads whereof the first respects the Constitution of the Church And those which relate hereunto are four also 1. That Parochial Churches are not of Christs Institution 2. That Diocesan Churches are unlawful 3. That our National Church hath no Foundation 4. That the People are deprived of their Right in the Choice of their Pastors The first of these Namely that our Parochial Churches are not of Christs Institution he begins withal and therein I am alone called to an Account I wonder the Dr. should thus state the Question between us The meaning of this Assertion that our Parochial Churches are not of Christs Institution must be either they are not so because they are Parochial or at least in that they are Parochial But is this my judgement have I said any thing to this purpose yea he knows full well that in my judgment there are no Churches directly of divine Institution but those that are Parochial or particular Churches We are not therefore to expect much in the ensuing disputation when the state of the Question is so mistaken at the entrance If he say or intend that there are many things in their Parochial Churches observed practised and imposed on all their members in and about the Worship of God which are not of divine institution we grant it to be our judgment and part of our plea in this case But this is not at all spoken unto Wherefore the greatest part of the ensuing discourse on this Head is spent in perpetual diversions from the state of the case under consideration with an attempt to take advantage for some reflections or an appearance of success from some passages and expressions belonging nothing at all unto the merit of the cause a course which I thought so Learned a Person would not have taken in a case wherein Conscience is so nearly concerned Some mistakes occurring in it have been already rectified as that wherein he supposeth that my Judgement is for the Democratical Government of the Church as also what he alledgeth in the denyal of the gradual declension of the Primitive Churches from their first original Institution hath been examined I shall therefore plainly and directly propose the things which I assert and maintain in this part of the Controversie and then Consider what occurrs in opposition unto them or otherwise seems to be of any force towards the End in general of charging us with Schisme and they are these that follow 1. Particular Churches or Congregations with their Order and Rule are of Divine institution and are sufficient unto all the ends of Evangelical Churches I take Churches and Congregations in the same sence and notion as the Church of England doth defining the Church by a Congregation of Beleivers otherwise there may be occasional Congregations that are not stated Churches 2. Unto these Churches there is committed by Christ himself all the ordinary power and priviledges that belong unto any Church under the Gospel and of them is required the observance of all Church Duties which it is their sin to omit 3. There is no Church of any other form kind nature or constitution that is of Divine institution Things may be variously ordered in and amongst Christians or their Societies may be cast or disposed of into such respective Relations to and dependance on one another
in compliance with the political State and other circumstances of Times and Places as may be thought to tend unto their advantage That which we affirm is that no alteration of their state from the nature and kind of particular Churches is of divine institution 4. Such Churches whose frame constitution and power are destructive of the Order Liberty Power Priviledges and Duties of particular Churches are so farr contrary unto divine Institution and not to be comply'd withall Hereon we affirm That whereas we are excluded from total Communion in our Parochial Assemblies by the imposition of things unto us unlawful and sinful as indispensible conditions of their Communion and cannot comply with them in their Rule and Worship on the reasons before alledged it is part of the Duty we owe to Jesus Christ to gather our selves into particular Churches or Congregations for the celebration of Divine Worship and the observation doing or performance of all his Commands These are the things which in this case we adhere unto and which must all of them be overthrown before any colour can be given unto any charge of Schism against us and what is spoken unto this purpose in the Drs. Discourse we shall now consider Only I desire the Reader to remember that all these Principles or assertions are fully confirm'd in the preceding discourse That which first occurs in the Treatise under consideration unto the point in hand is the exception put in unto a passage in my former discourse which is as follows We do not say that because Communion in Ordinances should be only in such Churches as Christ hath instituted that therefore it is lawful and necessary to separate from Parochial Churches but if it be on other grounds necessary so to separate or withhold Communion from them it is the Duty of them that do so to joyn themselves in or unto some other particular Congregation I have not observed any occasion wherein the Dr. is more vehement in his Rhetorick then he is on that of this passage which yet appears to me to be good sence and innocent 1. Hereunto he says 1. p. 221. That this is either not to the business or it is a plain giving up the cause of Independency If he judge that it is not to the business I cannot help it and he might as I suppose have done well to have taken no notice of it as I have dealt with many passages in his Discourse But if it be a giving up of the cause of Independency I say whatever that be let whoso will take it and dispose of it as it seems good unto them but in proof hereof he says 1. Wherefore did the dissenting Brethren so much insist upon their separate Congregations when not one of the things now particularly alledged against our Church was required of them I Answer 1. If any did in those times plead for separate Congregations let them answer for themselves I was none of them They did indeed plead for distinct Congregations exempt in some few things from a penal Rule then endeavoured by some to be imposed on all But there was no such difference nor restraint of Communion between any of them as it is at present between us and Parochial Churches 2. It is very possible that there may be other reasons of forbearing a conjunction in some acts of Church Rule which was all that was pleaded for by the dissenting Brethren then those which are alledged against total Communion with Parochial Churches in Worship Order and Discipline 2. He adds secondly but if he insists on those things common to our Church with other reformed Churches then they are such things as he supposes contrary to the first institution of Churches c. I fear I do not well understand what this means nor what it tends unto but according as I apprehend the sence of it I say 1. I insist principally on such things as are not common unto them with other reformed Churches but such as are peculiar unto the Church of England These vary the terms and practice of our Communion between them and it 2. The things we except against in Parochial Churches are not contrary to their first institution as Parochial which as hath been proved is the only kind of Churches that is of divine institution but are contrary unto what is instituted to be done and observed in such Churches which one observation makes void all that he would inferre from the present suppositions as 3. He enquireth hereon what difference there is between sâ—perating from our Churches because Communion in Ordinances is onely to be enjoyed in such Churches as Christ hath instituted and separating from them because they have things repugnant unto the first institution of Churches The Dr. I fear would call this Sophistry in another or at least complain that it is somewhat odly and faintly expressed But we shall consider it as it is 1. Separation from Parochial Churches because Communion in Ordinances is only to be enjoyed in such Churches as Christ hath instituted is denied by us it is so in the assertion opposed by him and I do not know whether it be laid down by him as that which we affirm or which we deny 2. There is great Ambiguity in the latter clause of separating from them because they have things repugnant unto the first institution of Churches For it is one thing to separate from a Church because it is not of divine institution that is not of that kind of Churches which are divinely instituted and another to do so because of things practised and imposed in it contrary to divine institution which is the case in hand 4. But he after saith Is not this the primary Reason of separation because Christ hath appointed unalterable Rules for the Government of his Church which are not to be observed in Parochial Churches I answer no it is not so for there may be an omission at least for a season in some Churches of some Rules that Christ hath appointed in the Government of his Church and we judge his Rules as unto Right unalterable which may not be a just cause of separation So the Church of the Jews continued a long time in the omission of the Observance of the feast of Tabernacles But the principal Reason of the Separation we defend is the practising and imposing of sundry things in the Worship of the Church not of divine institution yea in our judgment contrary thereunto and the framing of a rule of Government of mens devising to be laid on all the Members of them This is the primary Cause pleaded herein But because the Dr. proposeth a Case on those suppositions whereon he seems to lay great weight though indeed however it be determined it conduceth nothing unto his End but argues only some keenness of Spirit against them whom he opposeth I shall at large Transcribe the whole of it Let us then saith he 1. suppose that Christ hath by unalterable Rule appointed that a Church shall
Obedience unto the Commands of Christ in its Integrity For the First the Scripture is full of Predictions all confirmed in the Event that after the days of the Apostles there should be various Attempts to wrest corrupt and pervert the Doctrine of the Gospel and to bring in pernitious Errors and Heresies To prevent or reprove and remove them is no small Part and Duty of the Ministerial Office in the Dispensation of the Word But whereas those who taught such perverse things did for the most part arise at first in the Churches themselves Act. 20.30 2 Pet. 2.1 1 John 2.19 as the Preaching of the Word was appointed for the rebuke of the Doctrines themselves so this Discipline was ordained in the Church with respect unto the Persons of them by whom they were taught Rev. 2.2.14 20. 3 Joh. 8.9 Gal. 5.12 And so also it was with respect unto Schisms and Divisions that might fall out in the Church The way of suppressing things of this Nature by external force by the Sword of Magistrates in Prisons Fines Banishments and Death was not then thought of nor directed unto by the Lord Jesus Christ but is highly dishonourable unto him as though the ways of his own appointment were not sufficient for the Preservation of his own Truth but that his Disciples must betake themselves unto the secular Powers of this World who for the most part are wicked Prophane and ignorant of the Truth for that end And hereunto belongeth the Preservation of his Commands in the Integrity of Obedience For he appointed that hereby care should be taken of the Ways Walkings and Conversation of his Disciples that in all things it should be such as became the Gospel Hence the exercise of this Discipline he ordaâ—ned to consist in Exhortations Admonitions Reproofs of any that shouâ—d offend in things Moral or of his especial Institutâ—on with the total Rejection of them were obstinate in their Offences as we shall see afterwards 2. The second End of it was to preserve Love entire among his Disciples This was that which he gave in especial charge unto all that should believe in his Name taking the Command of it to be his own in a peculiar manner and declaring our Observance of it to be the principal Pledge and Evidence of our being his Disciples For although mutual Love be an old Commandment belonging both unto the Moral Law and sundry Injunction under the Old Testament yet the Degrees and Measure of it the Ways and Duties of its exercise the Motives unto it and Reasons for it were wholly his own whereby it becomes a new Commandment also For the preservation and continuance of this Love which he lays so great weight upon was this Discipline appointed which it is several ways effectual towards As 1 In the Prevention or Removal of Offences that might arise among Believers to the impeachment of it Matth. 18.15 16 17 2 In that Watch over each other with mutual Exhortations and Admonitions without which this Love let men pretend what they please will not be preserved That which keepeth either Life or Soul in Christian Love consists in the exercise of those Graces mutually and the Discharge of those Duties whereby they may be Partakers of the fruits of Love in one another And for the most part those who pretend highly unto the Preservation of Love by their coming to the same Church who dwell in the same Parish have not so much as the carcase nay not a shadow of it In the Discipline of the Lord Christ it is appointed that this Love so strictly by him enjoyned unto us so expressive of his own Wisdom and Love should be preserved continued and encreased by the due and constant Discharge of the Duties of mutual Exhortation Admonition Prayer and watchful care over one another Rom. 15.14 1 Thes. 5 11 12. 2 Thes. 3.15 Heb. 3.12 13. Ch. 12.15 16. 3. A third End of it is that it might be a due Representation of his own Love Care Tenderness Patience Meekness in the acting of his Authority in the Church Where this is not observed and designed in the exercise of Church Discipline I will not say it is Antichristian but will say it is highly injurious and dishonourable unto him For all Church Power is in him and derived from him nor is there any thing of that nature which belongs unto it but it must be acted in his Name and esteemed both for the manner and matter of it to be his Act and Deed. For men therefore to pretend unto the exercise of this Discipline in a worldly frame of Spirit with Pride and Passion by tricks of Laws and Canons in Courts Forein to the Churches themselves which are pretended to be under this Discipline it is a woful and scandalous Representation of Christ his Wisdom Care and Love towards his Church But as for his Discipline he hath ordained that it shall be exercised in and with Meekness Patience Gentleness evidence of Zeal for the good and compassion of the Souls of men with Gravity and Authority so as that therein all the holy Affections of his mind towards his Church or any in it in their mistakes failings and miscarriages may be duly represented as well as his Authority acted among them Isa. 40.11 2 Cor. 10.1 Gal. 5.22.23 1 Thes. 2.7 2 Tim. 2.24 25 26. Jam. 3.17 1 Cor. 13. 4. It is in part appointed to be an Evidence and Pledge of the future Judgment wherein the whole Church shall be judged before the Throne of Christ Jesus For in the Exercise of this Discipline Christ is on his own Judgment Seat in the Church nor may any man pronounce any Sentence but what he believeth that Christ himself would pronounce were he visibly present and what is according to his mind as declared in his Word Hence Tertullian calls the Sentence of Excommunication in the Church futuri judicii praejudicium A Representation of the future Judgment 4. In all that Degeneracy which the Christian professing Church hath fallen into in Faith Worship and Manners there is no Instance can exceed the corruption of this Divine Institution For that which was the Honour of Christ and the Gospel and an effectual means to represent him in the Glory of his Wisdom and Love and for the Exercise of all Graces in the Church unto the blessed Ends now declared was turned into a Domination Earthly and Secular Exercised In a Prophane Litigious Unintelligible Process according unto the Arts Ways and Terms of the worst of Law Courts by Persons for the most part remote from any just Pretence of the least Interest in Church Power on causes and for ends forein unto the Discipline of the Gospel by a Tyranny over the Consciences and over the Persons of the Disciples of Christ unto the Intolerable scandal of the Gospel and Rule of Christ in his Church as is evident in the State and Rule of the Church of Rome As these are the general Ends of the Institution
which is become a principal Article of Faith in the Roman Church There was a Reformation attempted and attained in some measure by some Nations or Churches in the last Ages from the Corruption and Impositions of the Church of Rome However none of them ever pretended that it was compleat or perfect according to the Pattern of the Scripture as unto the Institution and Discipline of the Churches no nor yet to the Example of the Primitive Church of after Ages as is acknowledged by the Church of England in the beginning of the Commination against Sinners But suppose it to be compleat to conclude that because an outward Rule of it was established so long as that outward Rule is observed there can be no need of Reformation is a way to lead Churches into a Presumptuous Security unto their Ruine For whereas Men being secured in their Interests by that Rule are prejudiced against any Progress in Reformation beyond what they have attained which that it should be a Duty is contrary unto the whole nature of Christian Religion which is the conduct of a Spiritual Life in the growth and encrease of Light and a suitable Obedience so they are apt to think that whilst they adhere unto that Rule they can stand in no need of Reformation which is but a new name for trouble and Sedition though it be the Foundation on which they stand But generally Churches think that others stand in need of Reformation but they need none themselves If they would but give them leave to Reform themselves who judge that it is needful for them without the least Prejudice unto their Church Profession or secular Interest it is all that is desired of them 2. Where Churches do so stand in need of Reformation and will not Reform themselves being warned of their Duty the Lord Christ threatens to leave them and assuredly will do so in the time that he hath limited unto his Patience This is the Subject of five of his Epistles or Messages unto the Churches of Asia Rev. chap. 2 3. And where the Lord Christ doth on any Cause or Provocation withdraw his Presence in any kind or degree from any Church it is the Duty of any of the Members of that Church to remove from themselves the Guilt of that Provocation though it cannot be done without a Separation from that Church It it safer leaving of any Church whatever then of Jesus Christ. I suppose most men think that if they had a Warning from Christ charging their defection and calling for Reformation as those Churches of Asia had they would Repent and Reform themselves But whereas it doth not appear that some of them did so whereon they were not long after deserted and destroyed it is like that there are others who would follow their steps though one should rise from the dead to warn them of their danger But this Instruction that Churches who lose their first Faith Love and Works who are negligent in Discipline and tolerate offensive Evils in Doctrines and Manners among them who are Luke-warm as unto Zeal and dead for the greatest Part of their Members as unto the Life of Holiness are disapproved by Christ and in danger of being utterly deserted by him is given unto all Churches no less divinely then if they had an immediate Message from Heaven about these things Those therefore who being under the Guilt of them and do not reform themselves cannot claim the Necessity of a continuance in their Communion from any Disciples of Christ as we shall see afterwards 3. Reformation respects either Doctrine and Worship or Obedience becoming the Gospel The Debates about such a Reformation as concerns the retaining or removing of certain Ceremonies we concern not ourselves in at present Nor shall we in this Place insist on what concerns Doctrine and Worship which may afterwards be spoken unto But we shall confine our selves here unto the consideration of Gospel Obedience only And we say That the Church of England in the Generality of its Parochial Assemblies and in itself stands in need of Reformation by reason of the woful degeneracy of the Generality of its Members that is the Inhabitants of the Land from the Rule of the Gospel and Commands of Christ as unto Spiritual Light Faith Love Holiness Charity and abounding in the fruits of Righteousness unto the Praise of God by Jesus Christ. These things are the immediate ends of Church Societies the principal means whereby God is glorified in the World Where they are neglected where they are not attained where they are not duely improved by the Generality of the Members of any Church that Church I think stands in need of Reformation This Assertion may seem somewhat importune and severe But when the sins of a Church or Nation are come to that height in all Ranks Sorts and Degrees of Men that all Persons of Sobriety do fear daily that desolating Judgements from God will break in upon us it cannot be unseasonable to make mention of them when it is done with no other design but only to shew the Necessity of Reformation or how necessary it is for some if all will not comply therewith For if a City be on fire it is surely lawful for any of the Citizens to save and preserve if they can their own houses though the Mayor and Aldermen should neglect the Preservation of the whole City in General It might be easily demonstrated what great numbers amongst us 1. Who have imbibed Atheistical Opinions and either vent them or speak presumptuously according unto their Influence and Tendency every day 2. Who are prophane Scoffers at all true Christian Piety and the due expressions of the Power of Godliness an Evil not confined unto the Laity such things being uttered and published by them as should be astonishable unto all that know the Fear of the Lord and his Terror 3. Who are profoundly Ignorant of the Mysteries of the Gospel or those Doctrines of Christian Religion whose knowledge is of the highest importance and necessity 4. Who are openly flagitious in their Lives whence all sorts of gross Immoralities do fill the Land from one end unto the other 5. Who live in a constant neglect of all more private holy Duties whether in their Families or in Personal Retirements 6. Who are evidently under the Power of Pride Vanity Covetousness Profaneness of Speech in cursed Oathes and Swearing 7. Who instruct the worst of men unto an Approbation of themselves in such ways as these by petulant Scoffing at the very name of the Spirit and Grace of Christ at all Expectation of his Spiritual Aids and Assistances at all fervency in religious Duties or other Acts of an holy Converse These and such like things as these do sufficiently Evidence the Necessity of Reformation For where they are continued the Use and End of Church Societies is impaired or lost And it is in vain to pretend that this is the old Plea of them who â—aused Schismes in the
to choose out from among themselves Persons meet for an Ecclesiastical Office Act. 6. The same People who joyned with the Apostles and Elders in the consideration of the grand Case concerning the continuation of the legal Ceremonies and were associated with them in the Determination of it Act. 15. The same to whom all the Apostolical Epistles excepting some to particular Persons were written and unto whom such Directions were given and Duties enjoyned in them as suppose not only a Liberty and Ability to judge for themselves in all Matters of Faith and Obedience but also an especial Interest in the Order and Discipline of the Church Those who were to say unto Archippus their Bishop take heed unto the Ministry thou hast received in the Lord that thou fulfil it Col. 4. unto whom of all sorts it is commanded that they should examine and try Antichrists Spirits and false Teachers that is all sorts of Hereticks Heresies and Errors 1 Joh. chap. 2.3 c. That People who even in following Ages adhered unto the Faith and the Orthodox Profession of it when almost all their Bishops were become Arian Hereticks and kept their private Conventicles in opposition unto them at Constantinople Antioch Alexandria and other places and who were so many of them burned here in England by their own Bishops on the Judgement they made of Errors and Heresies And if the present People with whom the Dr. is acquainted be altogether unmeet for the Discharge of any of these Duties it is the fault of some body else beside their own This Principle of the Reformation in Vindication of the Rights Liberties and Priviledges of the Christian People to judge and choose for themselves in Matters of Religion to joyn freely in those Church Duties which are required of them without which the work of it had never been carried on we do abide by and maintain Yea we meet with no Opposition more fierce than upon the Account of our Asserting the Liberties and Right of the People in reference unto Church Order and Worship But I shall not be afraid to say that as the Reformation was begun and carried on on this Principle so when this People shall through an Apprehension of their Ignorance Weakness and Unmeetness to discern and judge in Matters of Religion for themselves and their own Duty be kept and debarred from it or when through their own Sloth Negligence and Vitiousness they shall be really uncapable to mannage their own Interest in Church Affairs as being fit only to be governed if not as brute Creatures yet as Mute Persons and that these things are improved by the Ambition of the Clergy engrossing all things in the Church unto themselves as they did in former Ages if the Old Popedome do not return a new one will be erected as bad as the other Thirdly another Principle of the Reformation is that there was not any Catholick Visible Organical Governing Church traduced by Succession into that of Rome 〈◊〉 all Church Power and Order was to be derived I will not say that this Principle was absolutely received by all the first Reformers here in England yet it was by the Generality of them in the other Parts of the World For as they constantly denied that there was any Catholick Church but that invisible of Elect Believers allowing the External Denomination of the Church unto the diffused Community of the baptized World so believing and professing that the Pope is Antichrist that Rome is Mystical Babylon the Seat of the Apostatized Church of the Gentiles devoted to destruction they could acknowledge no such Church state in the Roman Church nor the derivation of any Power and Order from it So farre as there is a Declension from this Principle so far the Cause of the Reformation is weakened and the principal Reason of Separation from the Roman Church is rejected as shall be farther manifested if occasion require it This Principle we do firmly adhere unto and not only so but it is known that our fixed Judgement concerning the Divine Institution Nature and Order of Evangelical Churches is such as is utterly exclusive of the Roman Church as a body organized in and under the Pope and his Hierarchy from any pretence unto Church State Order or Power And it may be hence judged who do most weaken the Cause of Reformation we or some of them at least by whom we are opposed A second Absurdity that he chargeth on our way is that it would make Vnion among the Protestant Churches impossible supposing them to remain as they are Sect. 24. pag. 186. To make good this Charge he insists on two things 1. That the Lutheran Churches have the same and more Ceremonies and unscriptural Impositions then our Church hath 2. That notwithstanding these things yet many learned Protestant Divines have pleaded for Vnion and Communion with them which upon our Principles and Suppositions they could not have done But whether they plead for Union and Communion with them by admitting into their Churches and submitting unto those Ceremonies and unscriptural Impositions which is alone unto the Doctors Purpose or whether they judge their Members obliged to Communicate in local Communion with them under those Impositions he doth not declare But whereas neither we nor our Cause are in the least concerned in what the Dr. here insist upon yet because the Charge is no less then that our Principles give disturbance unto the Peace and Vnion of all Protestant Churches I shall briefly manifest that they are not only conducive thereunto but such as without which that Peace and Union will never be attained 1. It is known unto all that from the first Beginning of the Reformation there were Differences among the Churches which departed from the Communion of the Church of Rome And as this was looked on as the greatest Impediment unto the Progress of the Reformation so it was not morally possible that in a work of that Nature begun and carried on by Persons of all for us in many Nations of divers Tongues and Languages none of them being divinely inspired that it should otherwise fall out God also in his Holy Wise Providence suffered it so to be for Causes known then to himself but since sundry of them have been made manifest in the Event For whereas there was an Agreement in all fundamental Articles of Faith among them and all necessary meanes of Salvation a farther Agreement considering our Sloth Negligence and proness of men to abuse security and Power might have produced as evil effects as the Differences have done For those which have been on the one hand and those which have been on the other have been and would have been from the corrupt Affections of the Minds of men and their secular Interests 2. These Differences were principally in or about some Doctrines of Faith whereon some fiery Spirits among them took occasion mutually and unjustly enough to charge each other with Heresie especially was this done among the Lutherans
they are occasioned by Ambition and desire of Preheminence like those that fell out among the Bishops of those days when their Parishes and claimes were not regulated by the Civil Power as now they are If they do so from a Desire to impose Principles and Practises not warranted in the Scripture on others as it was with Tertullian If for slight Reasons they rend and destroy that Church state and order which themselves approve of as it was with all the antient Schismaticks who were Bishops or would feign to have been if those that make them or follow in them deny Salvation unto all that joyn not with them and condemn all other Churches as being without Gods Covenant and the Sacraments as did the Donatists and those do who deny these things unto all Churches who have not Diocesan Bishops if there be not a sufficient justifiable Cause pleaded for it that those who make such a separation cannot abide in the Communion which they forsake without wounding their own Consciences and do give Evidences of their abiding in the Exercise of Love towards all the true Disciples of Christ we are satisfied that we have a Rule infallibly directing us to make a Judgment concerning it Our Author adds Sect. 26. p. 197. Another Argument against this course of separation is that these Grounds will make separation endless which is to suppose all the Exhortations of the Scripture to Peace and Vnity among Christians useless But why so Is there nothing in the Authority of Christ and the sence of the Account which is to be given unto him nothing in the Rule of the Word nothing in the works of the Ministry and exercise of Gospel Discipline to keep professed Disciples of Christ unto their Duty and within the bounds of order Divinely prescribed unto them unless they are fettered and staked down with humane Laws and Constitutions Herein I confess I differ and shall do so whilst I am in this World from our Reverend Author and others To say as he doth upon a supposition of the taking away of humane Impositions Laws and Canons that there are no bounds set unto separation but what the fancies of men will dictate unto them is dishonourable unto the Gospel and somewhat more To suppose that the Authority of Christ the Rule of the Word and the Work of the Ministry are not sufficient to prescribe bounds unto separation efficaciously affecting the Consciences of Beleivers or that any other bounds can be assigned as obligatory unto their Consciences is what cannot be admitted The Lord Christ hath commanded Love and Vnion among his Disciples he hath ordained order and Communion in his Churches he hath given unto them and limited their Power he hath prescribed Rules whereby they and all their Members ought to walk he hath forbidden all Schismes and Divisions he hath appointed and limited all necessary separations and hath truly given all the bounds unto it that the Consciences of men are or can be affected withal But then it is said if this be all separation will be endless if such a separation be intended as is an unlawful Schisme I say it may be it will even as Persecution and other evils sins and wickednesses will be notwithstanding his severe Prohibition of them What he hath done is the only means to preserve his own Disciples from all sinful separation and is sufficient thereunto Herein lyeth the Original mistake in this matter we have lost the Apprehension that the Authority of Christ in the Rule of his Word and Works of his Spirit is every way sufficient for the Guiding Governing and Preserving of his Disciples in the Church Order by him prescribed and the observance of the Duties by him commanded It hath been greatly lost in the World for many Ages and therefore instead of Faithful Ministerial Endeavours to enforce a sence of it on the Consciences of all Christians they have been let loose from it through a confidence in other devises to keep them unto their Duty and Order And if these devises be they Ecclesiastical Canons or Civil Penalties be not enforced on them all the World is made to beleive that they are left unto the dictates of their own fancies and Imaginations as if they had no concern in Christ or his Authority in this matter But for my part I shall never desire nor endeavour to keep any from Schisme or separation but by the ways and means of Christs appointment and by a sense of his Authority on their own Consciences The remainder of his Discourse on this Head consists in a lepid Dramâ—tical Oration framed and feigned for one of his Opposers wherein he makes him undertake the patronage of Schism before Cyprian and Austiâ— The Learned Person intended is very well able to defend and vindicate himself which I suppose also he will do In the mean time I cannot but say two things 1. That the Imposition on him of extenuating the Guilt of any real Schism is that which none of his Words do give the least countenance unto 2. That the Doctors attempt in his feigned Oration to accommodate his Principles or Ours unto the case of the Donatists for their Justification the weakness whereof is evident to every one who knows any thing of the case of the Donatists is such an instance of the Power of Interest a design to maintain a Cause causelessly undertaken by all manner of Artifices and Pretences prevailing in the minds of men otherwise Wise and Sober as is to be lamented We come at length in the 5th place Sect 28. p. 209. unto that which is indeed of more importance duly to be considered then all that went before For as our Author observes it is that wherein the Consciences of men are concerned This Argument therefore he takes from the Obligation which lyes upon all Christians to preserve the Peace and Vnity of the Church For the confirmation of this Argument and the Application of it unto the case of them who refrain from total Communion with our Parocâ—ial Assemblies which alone is the case in hand he lays down sundry suppositions which I shall consider in their Order although they may be all granted without any disadvantage unto our Cause But they will be so the better when they are rightly stated 1. His first supposition is that Christians are under the strictest Obligations to preserve the Peace and Vnity of the Church This being the foundation of all that follows it must be rightly stated And to that end three things may be enquired into 1. What is that Church whose Peace and Unity we are obliged to preserve For there are those who lay the firmest claim unto the Name Power and Priviledges of the Church with whom we are obliged to have neither Peace nor Vnity in the Worship of God 2. What is that Peace and Vnity which we are so obliged to preserve 3. By what means they are to be preserved 1. We are obliged to follow Peace with all men to seek Peace
impartial Consideration he chargeth on us with great Solemnity as we Love our own Souls Now although that passage in that great and Holy Person be not new unto me having not only read it many a time in his book but frequently met with it urged by Papists against all Protestants Yet upon the Drs. intimation I have given it again the Consideration required The Words as they Lye in the Author are to this purpose We shall also judge them who make Schismes being vain qui sunt immanes or inanes not having the Love of God rather considering their own Profit than the Vnity of the Church who for small or any causes rend and divide the Glorious body of Christ and as much as in them lyes destroy it speaking Peace but designing War straining at a Gnat and swallowing a Camel For there can be no rebuke of things by them to equal the mischief of Schisme Lib. 4. cap. 62. I know not why he should give us such a severe Charge for the impartial Consideration of these words that as we love our souls we should impartially and without prejudice consider them We hope that out of Love to the Truth the Glory of Christ and Care of our own Souls we do so Consider and have long since so considered whatever belongs unto the Cause wherein we ingaged and the Oppositions that are made unto it Nor will we be offended with any that shall yet Call on us to persist and proceed in the same way But why such a Charge should be laid on us with respect unto these words of Irenaeus I know not For although we greatly value the Words and Judgment of that Holy Person that great Defender of the Mystery and Truth of the Gospel and of the Liberty of the Churches from unwarrantable impositions yet it is the Word of Christ and his Apostles alone whereby we must be regulated and determined in these things if we Love our own souls Besides What are we Concern'd in them is every Separation from a Church a Schisme Our Author shews the contrary immediately Is refraining Communion in a Church state not of Divine Institution and in things not prescribed by the Lord Christ in the Worship of God holding Communion in Faith and Love with all the true Churches of Christ in the World a damnable Schisme or any Schisme at all hath the Reverend Author in his whole Book once attempted to prove it to be so though this be the whole of the matter in difference between us is our Forbearance of Communion in Parochial Assemblies upon the Reasons before pleaded especially that of humane impositions of the same Nature with the Schisme from the whole Catholick Church without pretence of any such Impositions Doth he judge us to be such as have no Love unto God such as prefer our own profit before the Unity of the Church I heartily wish and pray that he may never have a share in that profit and advantage which we have made unto our selves by our principles and practise Poverty Distress Ruine to our Families Dangers Imprisonments Revilings with Contemptuous reproaches Comprize the profit we have made unto our selves Is our refraining Communion in some outward Order Modes and Rites of Mens institution our want of conscientious submission unto the Courts of Chancellours Commissaries Officials c. a rending and destroying of the glorious Body of Christ is it Cemented United and Compacted or fitly framed together by these things They formerly pretended to be his Coat and must they now be esteemed to be his glorious Body when they no way belong unto the one or the other Is the Application of these things unto us an effect of that Love Charity and Forbearance which are the only preventive means of Schisme and whereof if men are void it is all one upon the matter whether they are Schismaticks or no for they will be so when it is for their Advantage Wherefore we are not concerned in these things Let whosoever will declare and vehemently assert us to be guilty of Schisme which they cannot prove we can cheerfully subscribe unto these Words of Irenaeus It may not be impertinent on this occasion to desire of some others that as they Love their own Souls and have compassion for the Souls of other men they would seriously consider what state and Condition things are come unto in the Church of England how much Ignorance Profaneness Sensuality do spread themselves over the Nation what Neglect of the most important Duties of the Gospel Yea what scoffing at the power of Religion doth abound amongst us What an utter decay and loss there is of all the primitive Discipline of the Church what Multitudes are in the way of Eternal Ruin for want of due Instruction and Example from them who should lead them How great a necessity there is of an universal Reformation and how securely Negligent of it all sorts of Persons are What have been the pernicious Effects of imposing things unnecessary and unscriptural on the Consciences and Practises of men in the Worship of God whereby the Church hath been deprived of the labour of so many faithful Ministers who might have at least assisted in preventing that Decay of Religion which every day encreaseth among us How easie a thing it were for them to restore Evangelical Peace and Vnity amongst all Protestants without the loss of their Ministry without the diminution of their Dignity without deprivation of any part of their Revenues without the Neglect of any Duty without doing any thing against their light and Consciences with respect unto any Divine Obligation and thereon set themselves seriously to endeavour the Remedy of these and other Evils of the like nature under a sense of that great Account which they must shortly give before the Judgement seat of Jesus Christ. He proceeds to Consider the Cases wherein the Scripture allows of Separation which he affirms to be three The First is in Case of Idolatrous Worship This none can Question they do not see from whom yet we all separate as from Idolaters The second is in Case of false Dostrine being imposed instead of true which he confirms with sundry Instances But there is a little Difficulty in this Case for 1. It is uncertain when a Doctrine may be said to be imposed Is it when it is taught and preach'd by the Guides and Governours of the Church or any of them without controul if so then is such preaching a sufficient cause of Separation and will justifie them who do at present separate from any Church whose Ministers preach false Doctrine How false Doctrine can be otherwise imposed I know not unless it be by exacting an express Confession of it as Truth 2. What false Doctrine it is which is of this Importance as to justifie Separation is not easily determinable 3. If the Guides and Governours of the Church do teach this false Doctrine who shall judge of it and determine it so to be and that ultimately so as