thereby p. 205. What persons ought to be Jury men and how Qualified p. 209. Jurors in Antient Law-books call'd Judges p. 211. Of the Duty of Grand Juries p. 212. Their Oath p. 213. That Juries are Judges of Law in some respects as well as Fact p. 220. to p. 223. That Juries are not fineable or any way to be punished under pretence of going contrary to Evidence or against the Judges Directions p. 223. The Conclusion Bushels Case reported by the Learned Sir John Vaughan Licensed by the present Lord Chancellor the Lord Chief Justice North and all the Judges then in England THE PROEM THE Constitution of our English Government the best in the World is no Arbitrary Tyranny like the Turkish Grand Seignior's or the French Kings whose Wills or rather Lusts dispose of the Lives and Fortunes of their unhappy Subjects Nor an Oligarchy where the great ones like Fish in the Ocean prey upon and live by devouring the lesser at their pleasure Nor yet a Democracy or popular State much less an Anarchy where all confusedly are hail fellows well met But a most excellently mixt or qualified Monarchy where the King is vested with large Prerogatives sufficient to support Majesty and restrain'd only from Power of doing himself and his People harm which would be contrary to the very end of all Government and is properly rather weakness than power the Nobility adorn'd with Priviledges to be a Screen to Majesty and a refreshing Shade to their Inferiours and the Commonalty too so Guarded in their Persons and Properties by the fence of Law as renders them Free-men not Slaves In France and other Nations the meer Will of the Prince is Law his Word takes off any mans Head imposes Taxes or seizes any mans Estate when how and as often as he lists and if one be Accused or but so much as suspected of any Crime he may either presently Execute him or Banish or Imprison him at pleasure or if he will be so Gracious as to proceed by Form of their Laws if any two Villains will but swear against the poor Party his Life is gone Nay if there be no Witnesses yet he may be put to the Rack the Tortures whereof make many an Innocent Person confess himself Guilty and then with seeming Justice he is Executed or if he prove so stout as in Torments to deny the Fact yet he comes off with Disjoynted Bones and such Weakness as renders his Life a Burthen to him ever after But in England the Law is both the Measure and the Bond of every Subjects Duty and Allegiance each man having a fixed Fundamental Right born with him as to Freedom of his Person and Property in his Estate which he cannot be deprived of but either by his consent or some Crime for which the Law has Impos'd such a Penalty or Forfeiture For all our Kings take a solemn Oath At their Coronation to Observe and cause the Laws to be kept which was done by our present most Gracious Soveraign Likewise all our Judges take an Oath wherein amongst other points they swear To do equal Law and Right to all the Kings Subjects Rich and Poor and not to delay any Person of Common Right for the Letters of the King or of any other Person or for any other Cause But if any such Letters come to them they shall proceed to do the Law the same Letters notwithstanding Therefore saith Fortesoue who was first Chief Justice and afterwards Lord Chancellor to King Henry the 6th in his Book de Laudibus Legum Angliae cap. 9. Non potest Rex Angliae c. The King of England cannot alter nor change the Laws of his Realm at his pleasure For why he Governeth his People by Power not only Royal but also Politick If his Power over them were only Regal then he might change the Laws of his Realm and charge his Subjects with Tallage and other Burthens without their consent and such is the Dominion that the Civil Laws purport when they cry Quod principi plecuit Legis habet Vigorom The Princes pleasure has the force of a Law But from this much differeth the power of a King whose Government over his People is Politick For he can neither change Laws without the consent of his Subjects nor yet charge them with Impositions against their Wills Wherefore his People do frankly and freely enjoy and occupy their own Goods being Ruled by such Laws as they themselves desire Thus Fortescue with whom Accords Bracton a Reverend Judge and Law-Author in the Reign of King Henry the third saying Rex in Regno suo superiores habet Deum Legem The King in his Realm hath two Superiors God and the Law for he is under the Directive though not Coercive Power of the Law and on the same Score Judge Vaughan speaking of our Fundamental Laws which are Coeval with the Government sticks not to say The Laws of England were never the Dictates of any Conquerors Sword or the Placita or good Will and pleasure of any King of this Nation or to speak Impartially and Freely the Results of any Parliament that ever sate in this Land And the late cited Fortescue in his 13 chap. has a very apt similitude to Illustrate and Demonstrate this The Law says he taketh its name a Ligando to bind for thereby the Politick Body is knit and preserv'd together as the Natural Body by the Bones and Sinews and Members which retain every one their proper Functions And as the Head of a Body Natural cannot change his Sinews nor cannot deny or with-hold from his inferiour Members their peculiar Powers and several nourishments of Blood and Spirits no more can a King which is the Head of a Body Politick change the Laws of that Body nor withdraw from his People their proper Substance against their Wills and Consents in that behalf 'T is true the Law it self affirms The King can do no wrong which proceeds not only from a presumption that so Excellent a Person will do none But also because he Acts nothing but by Ministers which from the lowest to the highest are answerable for their doings so that it a King in Passion should command A. to kill B. without process of Law A. may yet be prosecuted by Indictment or upon an Appeal where no Royal Pardon is allowable and must for the same be Executed such Command notwithstanding This Original happy frame of Government is truly and properly call'd an English mans Liberty a Priviledge not to exempt from the Law but to be freed in Person and Estate from Arbitrary Violence and Oppression A greater Inheritance saith Judge Cook is deriv'd to every one of us from our Laws that from our Parents For without the former what would the latter signifie And this Birth-right of English-men shines most conspicuously in two things 1. Parliaments 2. Juries By the first the Subject has a share by his chosen Representatives in the Legislative or Law-making Power for
in custody to procure their Liberty But before this statute was Rendred far less useful than it ought to be partly by the Judges pretending a power to Grant or deny the said Writ at their pleasure in many cases and Especially by the Ill practises of Sheriffs and Gaolers by putting the prisoner to the charge and trouble of an Alias and pluries that is a second and third Writ before they would obey the first for there was no penalty till the Third and then at last the Judges would oft-times Alleadge That they could not take Bail because the party was a prisoner of State c. Therefore to Remedy all those mischiefs This most wholsome Law was provided Which we shall briefly Endeavour to Divide into its several Branches and Explain it to the meanest Capacities since no Man is sure but one time or other he may have occasion to make use of it This Act concerneth either first persons committed for some other Criminal or supposedCriminal matter besides Treason or Felony and these are to have an Habeas Corpus Immediately 2ly such who in their Mittimus are charged with Treason or Felony these shall have the benefit of the said Writ after the time herein Limited 1st If any Gaoler or Under-Keeper shall not deliver a trueCopy of the Mittimus within 6 hours after the prisoner demands it the Head-Gaoler or Keeper forfeits to the prisoner for the first Offence 100l for the second Offence 200l and loses his place Nor is there any Fee to be paid for the same the Turn-key must deliver it at his peril And note if the prisoner should be lockt up or none suffered to come at him any friend of his may demand the same on his behalf 2. Whatever the Criminal matter be If Treason or Felony be not Expresly charged any person on the prisoners behalf carrying such true Copy of the Commitment to the Lord Chancellor or any one of the Judges or Barons of the Exchequer or upon Oath made that a Copy was demanded and denied he shall Grant an Habeas Corpus or forfeit 500l to the prisoner But note the Request must be made to such Judge in Writing and Attested by two witnesses 3. If the Sheriff or Gaoler do not carry up the prisoner and Return the true causes of his detainour within three days If under twenty miles distance or within ten daies if above twenty and under an hundred miles or within twenty daies if above an hundred miles he forfeits 500l to the prisoner Note the prisoner must pay the Charges of his carrying up and the Judge when he Grants the Writ may order how much but it must not be above 12 d. a mile If upon the Return of such Habeas Corpus it appear the prisoner is not charged with Treason or Felony specially and plainly Expressed or for such matters as by Law are not Bailable the Judge shall discharge the prisoner upon Bail 4. If a person once so Bailed out shall again be Imprisoned for the same Offence those that do it forfeit 500 l. 5. If there be High Treason or Felony plainly and specially Expressed That is not only Generally for Treason or Felony but Treason in conspiring to kill the King or in Counterfeiting the King's Coin or Felony for stealing the goods of such an one to such a value c. Then the Prisoner cannot have his Habeas Corpus till first he has on the first week of the Term or first day of Sessions of Oyer and Terminer or General Gaol-delivery petitioned in open Court to be brought to his Tryal and then if he be not brought to Tryal the next Term or Sessions following on the last day thereof he shall be Bailed and if not Indicted the second Term or Sessions shall be discharged 6. This Act extends to all places within England and Wales the Tower cannot be supposed to be exempted nor Windsor Castle nor any such Royal Forts for the words are general And besides there is a special Act of Parliament that unites the King's Castles to the Counties wherein they stand there having been it seems some pretensions and ill practices to hold them district that therein they might detain men prisoners against Law and not admit any Writ to enlarge them For Remedy whereof it was thus Enacted Anno 13. Rich. Secundi Item It is Ordained and Assented That the King's Castles and Gaols which were wont to be Joyned to the Bodies of the Counties and be now Severed shall be Rejoyned to the same Counties Lastly No person shall be sent Prisoner out of England or Wales into Scotland Ireland Jersey Guernsey Tangier or any other place beyond the Seas The Proviso's and other Clauses of this Act may be easily apprehended by the meanest capacities AND As the Law provides thus for our Liberty so it takes care that those that are in Custody shall not be abused or oppressed to which purpose I shall here insert so much as is material necessary to be known by all persons who are so unhappy as to be prisoners out of the Statute of the 22d and 23d Car. 2. Cap. 20. The words wereof are as follows WHEREAS Persons that are under Arrests or committed to the custody of Sheriffs Bailiffs Gaolers Keepers of Prisons or Gaols are much abused and wronged by Extorting of great Fees Rewards and other Exactions and put to great Expences under pretences of favour or otherwise whereby they are greatly Oppressed and many times Ruined in their Estates 2. For Remedy thereof Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any Under-Sheriff Bailiff Serjeant at Mace or other Officer or minister whatsoever shall at any time or times hereafter have in his or their Custody any person or persons by vertue or colour of any Writ Process or other Warrant whatsoever it shall not be lawful for such Officer or Officers to convey or carry or cause to be conveyed or carried the said person or persons to any Tavern Ale-House or other publick Victualling or Drinking-house without the free and voluntary consent of the said person or persons so as to charge such Prisoner with any sum of Money for any Wine Beer Ale Victuals Tobacco or any other things whatsoever but what the said person or persons shall call for of his her or their own accord 3 And shall not demand take or receive or cause to be demanded taken or received directly or indirectly any other or greater Sum or Sums than what by Law ought to be taken or demanded for such Arrest taking or waiting until such person or persons shall have procured an Appearance found Bail agreed with his or their Adversaries or be sent to the proper Gaol belonging to the County City Town or Place where such Arrest or taking shall be 4. Nor take and Exact any other Reward or Gratuity for so keeping the said person or persons out of the Gaol or Prison than what he she or they shall or will of his her or their own
what they Swear or if we do not find as the Judge directs we may come into trouble the Judge may Fine us c. I Answer this is a vain fear No Judge dare offer any such thing you are the proper Judges of the matters before you and your Souls are at stake you ought to Act freely and are not bound though the Court demand it to give the Reasons why you bring it in thus or thus for you of the Grand-Jury are sworn to the Contrary viz. To keep secret your fellows Counsel and your own and you of the Petty Jury are no way obliged to declare your motives it may not be convenient T is a notable Case before the Chief Justice Anderson in Q. Eliz. daves A Man was Arraigned for murder the Evidence was so strong that 11. of the Jury were presently for finding him Guilty the 12th man refused and kept them so long that they were ready to starve and at last made them comply with him and bring in the Prisoner not Guilty The Judge who had several times admonisht this Jury-man to join with his Fellows being surprized sent for him discoursed him privately to whom upon promise of Indempnity he at last own'd that he himself was the man that did the Murder and the Prisoner was Innocent and that he was resolv'd not to adde Perjury and a second Murder to the first But to satisfie you that a Jury is no way punishable for going according to their Conscience though against seeming Evidence and the Reasons why they are and ought not to be question'd for the same I shall here Recite an Adjudged Case that of Bushel in the two and twentieth year of His Majesty Reported by the Learned Sir John Vaughan whose Book is Licensed by the present Lord Chancellor the Lord Chief Justice North and all the Judges then in England the said Case begins fol. 135. and continues 150. The whole well worth Reading but I shall only Select Certain Passages The Case was this BUshel and others of a Jury having at a Sessions not found Pen and Mead Two Quakers Guilty of a Trespass Contempt Vnlawful Assembly and Tumult whereof they had been Indicted were fined forty pound a man and Committed till they should pay it Bushel brings his Habeas Corpus and upon the Return it appeared he was Committed For that contrary to Law and against full and Clear Evidence openly given in Court and against the Directions of the Court in matter of Law they had Acquitted the said W. P. and W. M. to the great Obstruction of Justice c. Which upon solemn Argument was by the Judges Resolved to be an Insufficient Cause of fining and committing them and they were discharged and afterwards brought Actions for their Dammage The Reasons of which Judgment are reported by Judge Vaughan and amongst them he Useth these that follow which I shall give you in his own words Fol. 140. One fault in the Return is That the Jurors are not said to have Acquitted the persons Indicted against full and manifest Evidence Corruptly and Knowing the said Evidence to be full and manifest against the Persons Indicted For how manifest soever the Evidence was if it were not manifest to them and that they Believed it such it was not a Finable fault nor Deserving Imprisonment Vpon which Difference the Law of punishing Jurors for false Verdicts principally Depends And Fol. 141. I would know whether any thing be more Common than for two men Students Barristers or Judges to deduce Contrary and opposite Conclusions out of the same Case in Law And is there any Difference that two men should Infer distinct Conclusions from the same Testimony is any thing more known than that the same Author and place in that Author is forceably urg'd to maintain contrary Conclusions and the Decision hard which is in the Right is any thing more frequent in the controversies of Religion than to press the same Texts for Opposite Tenets How then comes it to pass that two persons may not apprehend with Reason and Honesty what a Witness or many say to prove in the Vnderstanding of one plainly one thing but in the Apprehension of the other clearly the contrary thing must therefore one of these Merit Fine and Imprisonment because he doth that which he cannot otherwise do preserving his Oath and Integrity And this is often the Case of the Judge and the Jury And Fol. 142. I conclude therefore That this Return charging the Prisoners to have Acquitted P. and M. against full and manifest Evidence first and next without saying that they did know and Believe that Evidence to be full and Manifest against the Indicted persons is no Cause of Fine and Imprisonment In the Margent of that Fol. 142. it is thus Noted Of this Mind were ten Judges of Eleven the Chief Baron Turner gave no Opinion because not at the Argument And in the same fol. 142. he saith The Verdict of a Jury and Evidence of a Witness are very Different things in the Truth and Falshood of them a Witness swears but to what he hath heard or seen generally or more largely to what hath fallen under his Senses But a Jury-man swears to what he can Inferr and conclude from the Testimony of such Witnesses by the Act and force of his Understanding to be the Fact Inquired after which differs nothing in Reason though much in the Punishment from what a Judge out of Various Cases consider'd by him Infers to be the Law in the question before him If the meaning of these Words finding against the Direction of the Court in matter of Law be That if the Judge having heard the Evidence given in Court for he knows no other shall tell the Jury upon this Evidence the Law is for the Plaintiff or for the Defendant and you are under the pain of Fine and Imprisonment to find accordingly and the Jury ought of duty so to do then every man sees that the Jury is but a troublesome delay great Charge and no use in determining Right and Wrong and therefore the Tryals by them may be better Abolished than continued which were a strange new found Conclusion after a Tryal so Celebrated for many hundred Years It is true if the Jury were to have no other Evidence for the Fact but what is Deposed in Court the Judge might know their Evidence and the Fact from it equally as they and so direct what the Law were in the Case though even then the Judge and Jury might honestly differ in the Result from the Evidence as well as two Judges may which often happens but the Evidence which the Jury have of the Fact is much otherwise than that For 1. Being Returned of the Vicinage where the Cause of Action ariseth the Law supposeth them thence to have sufficient Knowledge to Try the matter in Issue and so they must though no Evidence were given on either side in Court but to this Evidence the Judge is a stranger 2. They may have Evidence from their own Personal Knowledge by which they may be assured and sometimes are that what is deposed in Court is absolutely false but to this the Judge is a stranger and he knows no more of the Fact than he hath Learned in Court and perhaps by false Depositions and consequently knows nothing 3. The Jury may know the Witnesses to be Stigmatized and Infamous which may be unknown to the parties and consequently to the Court. Fol. 148. To what end is the Jury to be Returned out of the Vicinage where the Cause of Action ariseth to what end must Hundredors be of the Jury whom the Law supposeth to have nearer knowledge of the Fact than those of the Vicinage in General to what end are they Challenged so scrupulously to the Array and Poll to what end must they have such a certain Free-hold and be Probi Legales homines and not of Affinity with the party concern'd to what end must they have in many Cases the View for Exacter Information chiefly to what end must they undergo the Punishment of the Villanous Judgment if after all this they Implicitly must give a Verdict by the Dictates and Authority of another Man under Pains of Fines and Imprisonment when Sworn to do it according to the best of their own Knowledge A man cannot see by anothers Eye nor hear by anothers Ear no more can a man conclude or Infer the thing to be Resolved by anothers Vnderstanding or Reasoning and though the Verdict be right the Jury give yet they being not assured that it is so from their own Vnderstanding are Forsworn at least in foro Conscientiae Fol. 149. And it is Absurd to Fine a Jury for finding against their Evidence when the Judge knows but part of it for the better and greater part of the Evidence may be wholly unknown to him and this may happen in most Cases and often doth Thus far Judge Vaughan whose words I have faithfully Recited and with it shall conclude this Subject Recommending those that would be further satisfied in the Law touching the Power and Duty of Juries to those two Excellent Learned Treatises lately published the one Intituled A Guide to English Juries c. to be Sold by Mr. Cockeril at the Three Legs over against the Stocks-Market the other The Security of English-mens Lives or the Trust Power and Duty of the Grand Juries of England Printed for Benj. Alsop in the Poultrey both which are extreamly well worthy of every English mans Perusal that is liable to be call'd to that Office And now I shall take Leave of the Reader who I hope will join with me and all English Protestants in this Prayer THat Almighty God would preserve our Religion put a stop to the Growth of Popery Confound all their Plots Protect our present Gracious King Defend us both from a Forreign Yoak and Domestick Slavery but continue to us the Enjoyment of our good old Laws Liberties and Priviledges and bring all those to exemplary Justice that have or shall dare attempt to Subvert Diminish or Vndermine them Amen FINIS 1 See Book of Oaths p. 1. 3. 2 Bakers Cron. sol 741. 3 Book of Oaths p. 216. ☞
place then under pretence of Service as Ambassador or the like he might send him into the furthest part of the World which being an Exile is prohibited by this Act. 5. No Man destroyed That is forejudged of Life or Limb or put to Torture or Death every oppression against Law by colour of any usurped Authority is a kind of destruction And the words Aliquo modo any otherwise are added to this Verb destroyed and to no other Verb in this Chapter and therefore all things by any manner of means tending to destruction are prohibited as if a Man be accused or Indicted of Treason or Felony his Lands or Goods cannot be granted to any no not so much as by promise nor any of his Lands or Goods seized into the Kings hands before he is Attainted For when a Subject obtaineth a promise of the forfeiture many times undue means and more violent prosecution is used for private Lucre tending to destruction than the quiet and just proceeding of the Law would permit and the party ought to live of his own until Attainder 6. By Lawful Judgment of his Peers That is by his Equals Men of his own Rank and Condition The general division of Persons by the Law of England is either one that is Noble and in respect of his Nobility of the Lords House of Parliament or one of the Commons and in respect thereof of the House of Commons in Parliament And as there be divers degrees of Nobility as Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons and yet all of them are comprehended under this word Peers and are Peers of the Realm so of the Commons there be Knights Esquires Gentlemen Citizens and Yeomen and yet all of them of the Commons of the Realm And as every of the Nobles is one a Peer to another though he be of a several degree so it is of the Commons and as it hath been said of Men so doth it hold of Noble Women either by Birth or Marriage And forasmuch as this Judgment by Peers is called Lawful it shews the Antiquity of this manner of Trial It was the ancient accustomed Legal Course long before this Charter Or by the Law of the Land That is by due process of Law for so the words are expresly expounded by the Stat. of 37 Edw. 3. chap. 8. And these words are specially to be referred to those foregoing to whom they relate As none shall be condemn'd without a lawful Trial by his Peers so none shall be taken Imprison'd or put out of his Free-hold without due process of the Law that is by the Indictment or Presentment of good and lawful Men of the place in due manner or by Writ Original of the Common-Law Now seeing that no Man can be Taken Arrested Attached or Imprisoned but by due process of Law and according to the Law of the Land these conclusions hereupon do follow 1. That the Person or Persons which commit any must have lawful Authority 2. It is necessary that the Warrant or Mittimus be lawful and that must be in Writing under his Hand and Seal 3. The Cause must be contained in the Warrant as for Treason Felony c. Suspicion of Treason or Felony or the like particular Crime For if it do not thus specifie the Cause if the Prisoner bring his Habeas Corpus he must be discharged because no Crime appears on the Return Nor is it in such Case any offence at all if the Prisoner make his escape whereas if the Mittimus contain the Cause the escape would respectively be Treason or Felony though in Truth he were not Guilty of the first offence And this mentioning the Cause is agreeable to Scripture Acts 5. 4. The Warrant or Mittimus containing a lawful Cause ought to have a lawful conclusion c. And him safely to keep until he be delivered by Law c. and not until the party committing shall further Order If any Man by colour of any Authority where he hath not any in that particular Case shall presume to Arrest or Imprison any Man or cause him to be Arrested or Imprisoned this is against this Act and it is most hateful when it is done by Countenance of Justice King Edw. the 6th did Incorporate the Town of Saint Albans and granted to them to make Ordinances c. They made a by-Law upon pain of Imprisonment and it was adjudged to be against this Statute of Magna Charta so it had been if such an Ordinance had been contained in the Patent it self We will sell to no Man deny to no Man c. This is spoken in the Person of the King who in Judgment of Law in all his Courts of Justice is present And therefore every Subject of this Realm for injury done to him in Bonis Terris vel Persona in Person Lands or Goods by any other Subject Ecclesiastical or Temporal whatever he be without exception may take his Remedy by the course of the Law and have Justice and Right for the Injury done him Freely without sale Fully without any denial and Speedily without delay For Justice must have three Qualities it must be Libera Free for nothing is more odious than Justice set to sale Plena Full for Justice ought not to limp or be granted Piece-meal and Celeris speedy Quia Dilatio est quaedam negatio Delay is a kind of denial And when all these meet it is both Justice and Right We will not deny nor delay any Man c. These words have been excellently expounded by latter Acts of Parliament that by no means common right or common law should be disturbed or delayed no though it be commanded under the Great Seal or Privy Seal Order Writ Letters Message or Commandment whatsoever either from the King or any other and that the Justices shall proceed as if no such Writs Letters Order Message or other Commandment were come to them all our Judges swear to this for 't is part of their Oaths so that if any shall be found wresting the Law to serve a Court Turn they are perjur'd as well as unjust The Common-laws of the Realm should by no means be delayed for the Law is the surest Sanctuary that a Man can take and the strongest Fortress to protect the weakest of all Lex est tutissima Cassis the Law is a most safe Head-piece and sub Clipeo legis nemo decipitur no man is deceived whilst the Law is his Buckler but the King may stay his own suit as a Capias pro fine for the King may Respit his Fine and the like All Protections that are not Legal which appear not in the Register nor warranted by our Books are expresly against this Branch nulli diffâ—remus we will not delay any Man As a Protection under the Great Seal granted to any Man directed to the Sheriffs c. and commanding them that they shall not Arrest him during a certain time at any other Mans suit which hath words in it Per Prerogativâ—m nostram
shall be tryed for any Offence against this Act by his Peers but if Convicted shall be disabled to sit in Parliament during Life And thus much for what is Treason at this day By the Statute of 1 and 2 Phil. and Mar. cap 10. All Trials for Treason shall be only according to the Course of the Common Law And though the greater part of that Statute being Temporary be expired yet this Clause is still in Force The Judgment in all Cases of High Treason except for Counterfeiting Coin for a man is That he shall be drawn on an Hurdle or Sledge to the place of Execution and there be Hanged by the Neck to be cut down being yet alive his Privy Members cut off his Bowels ript up taken out and burnt before his face his Headsevered from his Body his Body divided into four Quarters which are to be disposed of as the King shall order But for Counterfeiting Coin only Drawn and Hanged And in both Cases for a Woman for Modesty sake it is only that she shall be Burnt The reasons or signification of this horrid Judgment on a man for Treason are thus by some rendred and Interpreted 1. He is drawn on a Sledg or Hurdle on the ground in the Dirt to shew that his Pride is brought down for Treason commonly springs from Ambition 2. On this Hurdle he is drawn backward to shew that his Actings have been contrary to Order unnatural and Preposterous 3. He is Hanged between Heaven and Earth as unworthy of either 4. He is cut down yet alive and his Privities cut off to shew that he was unfit to Propagate any Posterity 5. His Head is severed from his Body because his mischevious Brain contrived the Treason 6. His Body is divided to shew that all his Machinations and Devices are torn to pieces and brought to nought and into four parts that they may be scattered towards the four Quarters of the World Heading being part of the judgment in Treason the King commonly to persons of Quality Pardons all the rest of the Sentence and so they are only Beheaded But if a person be Attainted of Murder or any other Felony if he be Beheaded 't is no Execution of the Judgment because there the Judgment always is that he be Hanged till he be dead which cannot be altered So that had Count Conning smark lately been Convicted and Condemned for the Murder of Esquire Thynn all his Guinies or his Friends could not have preserved him from the Gallows unless they could have got an intire Pardon Any person being Indicted for Treason may Challenge that is except against or refuse Five and Thirty Jurors peremptorily that is for his pleasure or for reasons best known to himself and without assigning any Cause to the Court But if he Challenge more that is above three full Juries he Forseits his Goods and Judgment of Peinfort dure that is of being pressed to Death shall pass upon him as one that refuseth the Trial of the Law In Cases of Murder and Felony a man cannot Challenge peremptorily above the number of Twenty But with Cause he may except against more And this is by the Stat. of 22. H. 8. cap. 14. And certainly since the Law of England which is a Law of Mercy does in Favour of Life not only order a man to be Tryed by a Jury of his Country and Equals but also allows him to refuse and have Liberty of excepting against so many of those as shall be Impanelled for that purpose It cannot be supposed that the same Law ever intended that the Prisoner should be denyed a Copy of the Pannel of his Jury that so by the Information of his Friends or otherwise he may know their Qualities Circumstances and Inchnations for how else shall he know whom to Challenge peremptorily and whom to Challenge with Cause to allow a man such Liberty of Challenge and give him no opportunity of such Inquiry is but to mock the Prisoner to whom possibly the whole Jury by face and name may be utter Strangers and sure the wisdom of our Laws never thought every Prisoner so skilled in Metoposcopy that meerly by looking on a parcel of men he could tell which of them were indifferent and which biassed against him Another Statute of King Edward the third Anno 2. Edw. 3. cap. 2. In what Cases only Pardon of Felony shall be granted c. ITem Whereas Offendors have been greatly encouraged because the Charters of Pardon have been so easily granted in times past of Man-slaughters Roberies Felonies and other Trespasses against the Peace 2 It is ordained and Enacted that such Charters shall not be granted but only where the King may do it by his Oath that is to say where a man slayeth another in his own Defence or by Misfortune 3 And also they have been encouraged because that the Justices of the Goal-Delivery and of Oyer and Terminer have been procured by great men against the Form of the Statute made in the 27th year of the Reign of King Edward Grandfather to our Lord the King that now is wherein is Contained that Justices Assigned to take Assizes if they be Lay-Men shall make deliverance and if the one be a Clerk and the other a Lay-man that the Lay-Judge with another of the Countrey associate to him shall deliver the Goals 4 Wherefore it is Enacted that Justices shall not be made against the Form of the said Statute 5 And that the Assizes Attaints and Certifications be taken before the Justices commonly Assigned which should be good men and Lawful having knowledg of the Law and none other after the Form if another Statute made in the time of the said King Edward the first 6 And that the Oyers and Terminers shall not be granted but before the Justices of the one Bench or the other or the Justices Errants and that great hurt or horrible Trespasses and of the Kings special Grace after the Form of the Sâ—atute thereof ordained in time of the said Grandfather and none otherwise The Comment Touching this Statute and several others to the same purpose as 14. Edw. 3. cap. 14. and 10. Edw. 3. cap. 2. and 13. R. 2. cap. 1. and 16. R. cap. 6. c. We shall only give you the words of Cook in the third part of his Instit fo 236. What things the King may pardon and in what manner and what he cannot pardon falleth now to be treated of IN case of death of man Robberies and Felonies against the Peace divers Acts of Parliament have Restrained the power of granting Charters of pardons first that no such Charters shall be granted but in case where the King may do it by his Oath Secondly That no man shall obtain Charters out of Parliament Stat. 4. Edw 3. cap 13. And accordingly in a Parliament Roll it is said for the Peace of the Land it would much help if good Justices were appointed in every County if such as be let to mainprize do put
in good Sureties as Esquires or Gentlemen And that no pardon were granted but by Parliament Thirdly For that the King hath granted Pardons of Felonies upon false Suggestions it is provided that every Charter of Felony which shall be granted at the Suggestion of any the name of him that maketh the Suggestion shall be comprised in the Charter and if the Suggestion be found untrue the Charter shall be disallowed And the like provision is made by the Statute of 5. H. 4. Cap 2. for the Pardon of an Approver Fourthly It is provided that no Charter of Pardon for Murder Treason or Rape shall be allowed c. If they be not specified in the same Charter Statute 13. R 2. Before this Statute of 13. R 2. by the Pardon of all Felonies Treason was Pardoned and so was Murder c. At this day by the Pardon of all Felonies the death of man is not Pardoned These be excellent Laws for direction and for the Peace of the Realm But it hath been conceived which we will not question that the King may dispence with these Laws by a Non Obstante notwithstanding be it General or Special albeit we find not any such Clauses of non Obstante notwithstanding to dispense with any of these Statutes but of late times These Statutes are excellent Instructions for a Religious and Prudent King to follow for in these Cases Vt summae potestatis Regiae est posse quantum velit sic Magnitudinis est velle quantum possit As it is the highest Kingly power to be able to Act what he Wills so it is his Greatness and Nobleness to Will only what he lawfully can Hereof you may Read more in Justice Standford Lib. 2. Cap. 35. in diverse places of that Chapter of his grave Advice in that behalf Most certain it is that the Word of God has set down this undisputable General Rule Quia non profetur Cito Contra malos sententia filii hominum sine timore ullo perpetrant because Sentence against evil men is not speedily Executed therefore the hearts of the Children of men are set in them to do evil And thereupon the Rule of Law is grounded Spes Impunitatis Continuum Affectum tribuit delinquendi the hope of Impunity encourageth Offenders Et veniae facilitas Incentivum est Delinquendi and the facility of obtaining Pardon is an Incentive to Commit Offences This is to be Added that the Intention of the said Act of 13. R. 2. Was not that the King should grant a Pardon of Murder by express Name in the Charter but because the whole Parliament conceived that he would neuer Pardon Murder by special Name for the Causes aforesaid therefore that provision made which was as in other Cases I have observed grounded upon the Law of God Quicunque effuderit humanum sanguinem fundetur sanguis illius ad imaginem quippe Dei creatus est homo nec aliter Expiati potest nisi per ejus sanguinem qui alterius sanguinem effuderit whosoever shall shed mans blood by man also shall his blood be shed because man was Created after the Image of God neither can it be expiated otherwise then by his blood who spilt the blood of another And the words of every Pardon is after the Recital of the offence nos pietate moti c. we being moved with Piety c. But it can be no Piety to violate an express Law of God by letting Murder scape unpunisht Thus Coke whereby we see what opinion he had of such Pardons A brief digression concerning the Nature of APPEALS THis Discourse of Pardons puts us in mind of another kind of Legal Prosecution called an Appeal of which it may be very convenient to give the Reader some brief account You must know then for several Offences for which a man deserveth death and particularly for Murder there are two ways to bring him to Answer for the same one by Indictment which is at the Kings Suit and the other by Appeal which is at the Suit of a Party which is wronged or injured by the Murder as a Woman whose Husband or a Child or Brother whose Father or Brother is Killed Now upon an Indictment if the Offender be found Guilty because it s to be at the Suit of the King it has been said by some may be and too often a Pardon has been obtained tho even That too be against Law as appears by the Premisses But in an Appeal all agree the King can grant no Pardon Nay if a person be tryed by Indictment and Acquitted or Convicted and get a Pardon yet an Appeal may be brought and if he be thereupon Convicted notwithstanding such his former Acquital or Pardon he must be Hanged The word Appeal is derived from the French Verb Appeller to Call because he or she that brings it Calls the Defendant to Judgment but the meaning thereof is all one with An Accusation And is peculiarly in Legal signification applyed to Appeals of Three sorts First an Appeal brought by an Heir Male for some wrong done to his Ancestor whose Heir he is Secondly Of wrong done to an Husband and is by the Wife only if it be for the death of her Husband to be Prosecuted The third is of wrongs done to the Appellants themselvess as for Robbery Rape or Maim Coke 1. Instit Sect. 500. Note that this Appeal must be brought within a year and a day after the Murder is committed For afterwards it cannot be brought at all And antiently it was customary not to bring an Indictment for the King till after the year and the day waiting in the mean time for the Prosecution of the Party but this was found very inconvenient for the Party was frequently compounded with and at the years end the business was forgot and so Offenders escaped Justice And therefore the same was altered by the Statute 3. Hen. 7. Cap. 1. Whereby it is Enacted That the Coroner shall do his Office and the Offenders may be Arraigned at any time within the year at the Kings Suit but if Acquitted yet the party within the year and day should have liberty to bring an Appeal against such person either Acquitted or Attainted if the benefit of the Clergy be not before thereof had And in order thereunto that when any person happened to be Acquitted for the death of a man within the year the Justices before whom he is Acquitted shall not suffer him to go at large but either to remit him again to the Prison or else to let him to Bail after their discretion till that the day and the year be passed that so he may be forth coming to Answer an Appeal if it shall happen to be brought Thus that Statute as to the latter Clause whereof you see the Judges have power in Case of Acquittal to keep the Party in Prison still till the day and year be over Or else to admit him to Bail and tho this be left to their Discretion yet it must
betwixt the said Sheriffs and the said Chusers so to be made 5 and every Sheriff of the Realm of England shall have power by the said authority to examine upon the Evangelists every such Chuser how much he may expend by the year 6 and if any Sheriff returned Knights to come to the Parliament contrary to the said Ordinance the Justices of Assizes in their Sessions of Assizes shall have power by the authority aforesaid thereof to enquire 7 and if by inquest the same be found before the Justices and the Sheriff thereof be duly attainted that then the said Sheriff shall incur the pain of an hundred pounds to be paid to our Lord the King and also that he have Imprisonment by a year without being let to mainprise or bail 8 and that the Knights for the Parliament returned contrary to the said Ordinance shall lose their wages Provided always that he which cannot expend forty Shillings by year as afore is said shall in no wise be Chuser of the Knights for the Parliament 2 and that in every Writ that shall hereafter go forth to the Sheriffs to chuse knights for the Parliament mention be made of the said Ordinances Note Though this Statute make the penalty on a Sheriff but 100 l. for a false Return yet the House may further punish him by Imprisonment c. at their pleasure by the Law and Custom of Parliaments We shall now proceed to certain excellent Laws of a latter Date made for the explanation and conservation of our Liberties and in the first place present you with that excellent Petition of Right granted by King Charles the first Anno Regni Caroli Regis Tertio The PETITION exhibited to His Majesty by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament assembled concerning diverse Rights and Liberties of the Subjects To the Kings most excellent Majesty HUmbly shew unto our Soveraign Lord the King the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in Parliament assembled That whereas it is declared and enacted by a Statute made in the time of the Reign of King Edward the first commonly called Statutum de Tallagio non Concedendo that no Tallage or Aid shall be laid or Levyed by the King or his Heirs in this Realm without the good Will and Assent of the Arch-bishops Bishops Earles Barons Knights Burgesses and other the Freemen of the Commonalty of this Realm 2 and by authority of Parliament holden in the five and twentieth year of the Reign of King Edward the third it is declared and Enacted that from thenceforth no person should be Compelled to make any Loans to the King against his Will because such Loans were against Reason and the Franchise of the Land 3 And by other Laws of the Realm it is provided that none should be Charged by any Charges or Imposition called a Benevolence nor by such like Charge 4 By which the Statute before mentioned and othe the good Laws and Statutes of this Realm your Subjects have Inherited this Freedom that they should not be Compelled to Contribute to any Tax Tallage Aid or other like Charge not set by Common Consent in Parliament 2. Yet nevertheless of late divers Commissions directed to sundry Commissioners in several Counties with Instructions have Issued by means whereof your people have been in divers places Assembled and required to lend certain Sums of Money unto your Mejesty and many of them upon their refusal so to do have had an Oath administred unto them not warrantable by the Laws or Statutes of this Realm and have been Constrained to become bound to make Appearance and Attendance before your Privy Council and in other places and others of them have been therefore Imprisoned Confined and sundry other ways molested and disquieted 2 and divers other Charges have been laid and levyed upon your people in several Counties by Lord Lieutenants and Deputy Lieutenants Commissioners for Musters Justices of Peace and others by Command or direction from your Majesty to your Privy Council against the Law and free Customs of this Realm 3. And where also by the Statute called the great Charter of the Liberties of England it is declared and Enacted that no Freeman may be taken or imprisoned or be disseised of his Freehold or Liberties or of his free Customs or be outlawed or Exiled or in any manner destroyed but by the lawfull Judgment of his Peers or by the Law of the Land 4. And in the eight and twentieth year of the Reign of King Edward the third it was declared and Enacted by Authority of Parliament that no man of what Estate or Condition that he be should be put out of his Land or Tenements nor taken nor Imprisoned nor disherited nor put to death without being brought to answer by due process of Law 5. Nevertheless against the tenor of the said Statutes and other the good Laws and Statutes of your Realm to that end provided diverse of your Subjects of late have been Imprisoned without any cause shewed 2 and when for their deliverance they were brought before Justices by your Majesties Writs of Habeas Corpus there to undergo and receive as the Court should order and their keepers commanded to certify the causes of their detainour no cause was certifyed but that they were detained by your Majesties special command signified by the Lords of your privy Council and yet were returned back to several prisons without being charged with any thing to which they might make answer according to the Law 6. Whereas of late great Companies of Souldiers and Mariners have been dispersed into diverse Counties of the Realm and the Inhabitants against their wills have been compelled to receive them into their Houses and there to suffer them to sojourn against the Laws and Customes of this Realm and to the great grievance and vexation of the People 7. And whereas also by authority of Parliament and in the five and twentieth year of the reign of King Edward the third it is declared and enacted that no man shall be forejudged of life and limb against the form of the great Charter and Law of the Land 2 and by the said great Charter and other the Laws and Statutes of this Your Realm no man ought to be Judged to death but by the Laws established in this your Realm either by the Customes of the Realm or by Acts of Parliament 3 And whereas no offendor of what kind soever is exempted from the proceedings to be used and punishments to be Inflicted by the Laws and Statutes of this your Realm nevertheless of late diverse Commissions under Your Majesties great Seal have Issued forth by which certain persons have been Assigned and appointed Commisioners with power and authority to proceed within the Land according to the Justice of Martial Law against such Souldiers and Mariners or other dissolute persons joining with them as should commit any Murder Robbery Felony Mutiny or other Outrage or Misdemeanour whatsoever and by such summary Course
and Order as is agreable to Martial Law and as is used in Armies in time of war to proceed to the Tryal and Condemnation of such Offeuders and them to cause to be executed and put to death according to the Law Martial 8. By Pretext whereof some of your Majesties Subjects have been by some of the said Commissioners put to death when and where if by the Laws and Statutes of the Land they had deserved death by the same Laws and Statutes also they might and by no other ought to have been Judged and Executed 9. And also sundry greivous offenders by colour thereof claiming an exemption have Escaped the punishments due to them by the Laws and Statute of this your Realm by reason that divers of your Officers and Ministers of Justice have unjustly refused or forborne to proceed against such Offenders according to the same Laws and Statutes upon pretence that the said Offenders were punishable only by Martial Law and by Authority of such Commission as aforesaid 2 which Commissions and all other of like nature are wholly and directly Contrary to the said Laws and Statutes of this your Realm 10. They do therefore humbly pray your most Excellent Maiesty that no man hereafter be compelled to make or yield any Gift Loan Benevolence Tax or such like Charge without Common consent by act of Parliament 2 and that none be called to make answer or take such oath or to give attendance or be confined or otherwise molested or disquieted concerning the same or for refusal thereof 3 and that no Freeman in any such manner as is before mentioned be Imprisoned or detained 4 And that your Majesty would be pleased to remove the said Souldiers and Mariners and that your people may not be so burthened in time to come 5 and that the foresaid Commissions for proceeding by Martial Law may be revoked and annulled and that hereafter no Commissions of like nature may Issue forth to any person or persons whatsoever to be executed as aforesaid lest by colour of them any of your Majesties Subjects be destroyed or put to death contrary to the Laws and Franchise of the Land 11. All which they most humbly pray of your most Excellent Majesty as their Rights and Liberties according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm and that your Majestie would also vouchsafe to declare that the awards doings and proceedings to the prejudice of your people in any of the premisses shall not be drawn hereafter into Consequence or Example 2 and that your Majesty would be also graciously pleased for the further comfort and safety of your people to declare your Royal Will and Pleasure that in the things aforesaid all your Officers and Ministers shall serve you according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm as they tender the honour of Your Majesty and the prosperity of this Kingdom Which Petition beâ—ng Read the second of June 1682. the Kings Answer was thus delivered unto it The King willeth that Right be done according to the Laws and Customs of the Realm and that the Statutes be put in due Execution that His Subjects may have no Cause to complain of any wrong or oppressions contrary to their just Rights and Liberties To the Preservation whereof he holds himself in Conscience as well obliged as of his Prerogative But this Answer not giving satisfaction the King was again Petitioned unto that he would give a full and satisfactory answer to their Petition in full Parlinment Whereupon the King in Person upon the seventh of June made this Second Answer My Lords and Gentlemen The Answer I have already given you was made with so good Deliberation and approved by the Judgment of so many Wise Men that I could not have Imagined but that it should have given you full satisfaction but to avoid all ambiguous Interpretations and to shew you that there is no doubleness in my meaning I am willing to please you in words as well as in substance read your Petition and you shall have an Answer that I am sure will please you And then causing the Petition to be read distinctly by the Clerk of the Crown the Clerk of the Parliament read the Kings Answer thereto in these words Soit Droit Fait Come est desire which is Let Right be done as is desired This Answer and the manner of Confirming this Law I have the rather recited because the Kings Answer and Circumstances relating thereunto are wholly left out in our last Printed Book of Statutes The Petition it self is so plain that there needs no Comment thereon only the Reader may observe that the things therein mentioned were the antient Rights of the people and therefore they expresly demand them of the King as their Rights and Liberties In the next place we shall add the late excellent Habeas Corpus Act because relating to the same Subject viz. The freeing of the Subject from causeless tedious and Arbitrary Imprisonments Anno Tricesimo primo Caroli Secundi Regis CHAP. II. An Act for the better securing the Liberty of the Subjest and for prevention of Imprisonments beyond Seas Comonly called the Habeas Corpus Act. I. VVHereas great delays have been used by Sheriffs Goalers and other Officers to whose Custody any of the Kings Subjects have been committed for Criminal or supposed Criminal matters in making Returns of Writs of Habeas Corpus to them directed by standing out an Alias and Pluries Habeas Corpus and sometimes more and by other shifts to avoid their yielding obedience to such Writs contrary to their duty and the known Laws of the Land whereby many of the Kings Subjects have been and hereafter may be long detained in Prison in such Cases where by Law they are Bailable to their great Charges and Vexation II. For the prevention whereof and the more speedy relief of all persons Imprisoned for any such Criminal or supposed Criminal matters 2 Be it Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament Assembled and by the Authority thereof That whensoever any person or persons shall bring any Habeas Corpus directed unto any Sheriff or Sheriffs Goaler Minister or other person whatsoever for any person in his or their Custody and the said Writ shall be served upon the said Officer or left at the Goal or Prison with any of the under Officers under Keepers or Deputy of the said Officers or Keepers that the said Officer or Officers his or their under Officers or Keepers or Deputies shall within three days after the service thereof as aforesaid unless the Commitment aforesaid were for Treason or Felony plainly and specially expressed in the Warrant of Commitment upon payment or tender of the Charges of bringing the said Prisoner to be Ascertained be the Judge or Court that awarded the same and Endorsed upon the said Writ not exceeding twelve pence per Mile and upon security given by his
own Bond to pay the Charges of carrying back the Prisoner if he shall be Remanded by the Court or Judge to which he shall be brought according to the true intent of this present Act and that he will not make any Escape by the way make Return of such Writ 3 And bring or cause to be brought the Body of the party so Committed or Restrained unto or before the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England for the time being or the Judges or Barons of the said Court from whence the said Writ shall Issue or unto and before such other person or persons before whom the said Writ is made returnable according to the Command thereof 4 And shall then likewise certifie the true Causes of his Detainer or Imprisonment unless the Commitment of the said party be in any place beyond the distance of twenty Miles from the place or places where such Court or Person is or shall be Residing and if beyond the distance of twenty Miles and not above one hundred Miles than within the space of twenty days after such the delivery aforesaid and not longer III. And to the Intent that no Sheriff Goaler or other Officer may pretend ignorance of the import of any such Writ 2 Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all such Writs shall be marked in this manner Perstatutum Tricesimo primo Caroli Secundi Regis and shall be signed by the person that Awards the same 3 And if any person or persons shall be or stand Committed or Detained as aforesaid for any Crime unless for Felâ—ny or Treason plainly expressed in the Warrant of Commitment in the Vacation time and out of Term it shall and may be lawful to and for the person or persons so Committed or Detained other than persons Convict or in Execution by Legal Process or any one on his or their behalf to Appeal or complain to the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper or any one of His Majesties Justices either of the one Bench or of the other or the Barons of the Exchequer of the degree of the Coif 3 And the said Lord Chancellor Lord Keeper Instices or Barons or any of them upon view of the Copy or Copies of the Warrant or Warrants of Commitment and Detainer or otherwise upon Oath made that such Copy or Copies were denied to be given by such person or persons or any on his her or their behalf attested and subscribed by two Witnesses who were present at the delivery of the same to award and grant an Habeas Corpus under the Seal of such Court whereof he shall then be one of the Judges 5 To be directed to the Officer or Officers in whose Custody the party so Committed or Detained shall be returnable immediately before the said Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper or such Justice Baron or any other Justice or Baron of the Degree of the Coif of any of the said Courts 6 And upon service thereof as aforesaid the Officer or Officers his or their under Officer or under Officers under Keeper or under Keepers or Deputy to whose Custody the party is so Committed or Detained shall within the times respectively before limited bring such Prisoner or Prisoners before the said Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper or such Justices Barons or one of them before whom the said Writ is made Return able and in case of his absence before any other of them with the Return of such Writ and the true Causes of the Commitment and Detainer 7 And thereupon within two days after the party shall be brought before them the said Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper or such Justice or Baron before whom the Prisoner shall be brought as aforesaid shall discharge the said Prisoner from his Imprisonment taking his or their Recognizance with one or more surety or sureties in any sum according to their discretion having regard to the Quality of the Prisoner and Nature of the Offence for his or their appearance in the Court of Kings Bench the Term following or at the next Assizes Sessions or General Goal-delivery of and for such County City or Place where the Commitment was or where the Offence was Committed or in such other Court where the said Offence is properly Recognizable as the Case shall require and then shall Certifie the said Writ with the Return thereof and the said Recognizance or Recognizances into the said Court where such appearance is to be made 6 Unless it shall appear unto the said Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper or Justice or Justices Baron or Barons that the party so Committed is Detained upon a Legal Process Order or Warrant out of some Court that hath Jurisdiction of Criminal matters or by some Warrant Signed and Sealed with the Hand and Seal of any of the said Justices or Barons or some Justice or Justices of the Peace for such matters or offences for the which by the Law the Prisoner is not Bailable IV. Provided always and be it Enacted That if any person shall have wilfully neglected by the space of two whole Terms after his Imprisonment to pray a Habeas Corpus for his Enlargement such person so wilfully neglecting shall not have any Habeas Corpus to be granted in Vacation time in pursuance of this Act. V. Be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any Officer or Officers his or their Under-Officer Under-Officers Under-Keeper or Under-Keepers or Deputy shall neglect or Refuse to make the Returns aforesaid or to Bring the Body or Bodies of the Prisoner or Prisoners according to the Command of the said Writ within the Respective times aforesaid or upon demand made by the Prisoner or Person in his Behalf shall Resuse to deliver or within the space of six hours after demand shall not deliver to the Person so demanding a true Copy of the Warrant or Warrants of Commitment and detainer of such Prisoner which he or they are hereby Required to deliver accordingly all and every the Head Gaolers and Keepers of such Prisons and such other Person in whose Custody the Prisoner shall be detained shall for the first Offence forfeit to the Prisoner or Party Grieved the sum of one hundred pounds 2. And for the second Offence the sum of two hundred pounds and shall and is hereby made Incapable to Hold or Execute his said Office 3. the said penalties to be Recovered by the Prisoner or Party grieved his Executors or Administrators against such Offenders his Executors or Administrators by any Action of Debt Suit Bill plaint or Information in any of the King's Courts at Westmin wherein no Essoign Protection priviledge Injunction Wager of Law or stay of Prosecution by Non vult ulterius prosequi or otherwise shall be Admitted or Allowed or any more than one Imparlance 4. And any Recovery or Judgment at the Suit of any Party Grieved shall be a sufficient Conviction for the first Offence and any after Recovery or Judgment at the suit of a Party Grieved for
any Offence after the first Judgment shall be a sufficient Conviction to Bring the Officers or Person within the said penalty for the second Offence 6. And for the prevention of unjust Vexation by Reiterated Commitments for the same 2. Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no Person or Persons which shall be delivered or set at Large upon any Habeas Corpus shall at any time hereafter be again Imprisoned or Committed for the same Offence by any Person or Persons whatsoever other than by the Legal order and process of such Court wherein he or they shall be Bound by Recognizance to appear or other Court having Jurisdiction of the Cause 3. And if any other Person or Persons shall knowingly contrary to this Act Recommit or Imprison or knowingly procure or Cause to be Recommitted or Imprisoned for the same Offence or pretended Offence any Person or Persons delivered or set at Large as aforesaid or be knowingly aiding or Assisting therein then he or they shall forfeit to the Prisoner or Party Greived the sum of five hundred pounds any colourable pretence or variation in the Warrant or Warrants of Commitment notwithstandin to be Recovered as aforesaid 7. Provided alwayes and be it further Enacted That if any Person or Persons shall be Committed for High Treason or Felony Plainly and specially Expressed in the Warrant of Commitment upon his prayer or petition in open Court the first week of the Term or first day of the Sessions of Oyer and Terminer or General Gaol delivery to be Brought to his Tryal shall not be indicted sometime in the next Term Sessions of Oyer and Terminer or General Gaol delivery after such Commitment It shall and may be Lawful to and for the Judges of the Court of Kings Bench and Justices of Oyer and Terminer or General Gaol delivery and they are hereby Required upon motion to them made in open Court the last day of the Term Sessions or Gaol delivery either by the Prisoner or any one in his Behalf to set at Liberty the Prisoner upon Bail unless it appear to the Judges and Justices upon Oath made that the Witnesses for the King could not be produced the same Term Sessions or General Gaol delivery 2. And If any person or persons Committed as aforesaid upon his prayer or petition in open Court the first week of the Term or first day of the Sessions of Oyer and Terminer and General Gaol delivery to be Brought to his Tryal shall not be Indicted and Tryed the second Term Sessions of Oyer and Terminer or General Gaol delivery after his Commitment or upon his Tryal shall be Acquitted he shall be discharged from his Imprisonment 8. Provided alwaies That nothing in this Act shall Extend to discharge out of prison any person charged in debt or other Action or with process in any Civil Cause but that after he shall be discharged of his Imprisonment for such his Criminal Offence he shall be kept in Custody according to Law for such other suit 9. Provided alwaies and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any person or persons subâ—ects of this Realm shall be Committed to any prison or in Custody of any Officer or Officers whatsoever for any Criminal or Supposed Criminal matter That the said person shall not be Removed from the said prison and custody into the custody of any other Officer or Officers 2. unless it be by Habeas Corpus or some other Legal writ or where the prisoner is delivered to the Constable or other Inferiour Officer to carry such prisoner to some common Gaol 3. or where any person is sent by â—rder of any Judge of Assize or Justice of the peace â—o any Common workhouse or house of Correction 4. or where the prisoner is Removed from one prion or place to another within the same County in order to his or her Tryal or discharge in due Course of Law 5. or in case of sudden fire or Infection â—r other Necessity 6. And if any person or persons â—hall after such Commitment aforesaid make out and â—ign or Countersign any Warrant or Warrants for â—uch Removal aforesaid contrary to this Act as well â—e that makes or signs or Countersigns such Warrant or Warrants as the Officer or Officers that obey or Execute the same shall suffer and Incur the pains and Forfeitures in this Act before-mentioned both for the first and second Offence Respectively to be Recovered in manner aforesaid by the party Grieved 10. Provided also and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall and may be Lawful to and for any prisoner and prisoners as aforesaid to move and obtain his or their Habeas Corpus as well out of the High Court of Chancery or Court of Exchequer as out of the Courts of Kings Bench or common pleas or either of them 2. And if the said Lord Chancellour or Lord Keeper or any Judge or Judges Baron or Barons for the time being of the degree of the Coif of any of the Courts aforesaid in the Vacation time upon view of the Copy or Copies of the Warant or Warants of Commitment or Detainer or upon Oath made that such Copy or Copies were denied as aforesaid shall deny any writ of Habeas Corpus by this Act Required to be Granted being moved for as aforesaid they shall severally Forfeit to the prisoner or party Grieved the sum of five hundred pounds to be Recovered in manner aforesaid 11. And Be it Enacted and declared by the Authority aforesaid That an Habeas Corpus according to the true Intent and meaning of this Act may be directed and Run into any County Palatine the Cinquâ—… ports or other priviledged places within the Kingdom of Engl. Dominion of Wales or Town of Berwick upon Tweed and the Isles of Jersey or Guernsey any Law or Usage to the Contrary notwithstanding 12. And for preventing Illegal Imprisonments in prisons beyond seas 2. Be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no subject of this Realm that now is or hereafter shall be an Inhabitant or Resiant of this Kingdom of England Dominion of Wales or Town of Berwick upon Tweed shall or may be sent prisoner into Scotland Ireland Jersey Guernsey Tangier or into any parts Garrisons Islands or places beyond the seas which are or at any time hereafter shall be within or without the Dominions of His Majesty His heirs or successours 3. And that every such Imprisonment is hereby Enacted and adjudged to be Illegal 4. and that If any of the said subjects now is or hereafter shall be so Imprisoned every such person and persons so Imprisoned shall and may for every such Imprisonment maintain by vertue of this Act an Action or Actions of false Imprisonment in any of his Majesties Courts of Record against the person or persons by whom he or she shall be so Committed detained Imprisoned sent prisoner or Transported Contrary to the true meaning of this Act and against all or any
of the Council Bishop Temporal Lord Privy Councillor Judge or Justice whatsoever shall offend or do any thing contrary to the purport true intent and meaning of this Law Then he or they shall for such offence forfeit the sum of five hundred pounds of lawful Money of England unto any party grieved his Executors or Administrators who shall really prosecute for the same and first obtain Judgment thereupon to be Recovered in any Court of Record at Westminster by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information wherein no Essoign Protection Wager of Law Aid-prayer Priviledge Injunction or Order of Restraint shall be in any wise prayed granted or allowed nor any more than one Imparlance 2. And if any person against whom any such Judgment or Recovery shall be had as aforesaid shall after such Judgment or Recovery offend again in the same then he or they for such offence shall forfeit the Sum of one thousand pounds of lawful Money of England unto any party grieved his Executors or Administrators who shall really prosecute for the same and first obtain Judgment thereupon to be Recovered in any Court of Record at Westminster by Action of Dept Bill Plaint or Information in which no Essoign Protection Wager of Law Aid-prayer Priviledge Injunction or Order of Restraint shall be in any wise prayed granted or allowed nor any more than one Imparlance 3. And if any person against whom any such second Judgment or Recovery shall be had as aforesaid shall after such Judgment or Recovery offend again in the same kind and shall be thereof duly convicted by Indictment Information or any other lawful way or means that such person so convicted shall be from thenceforth disabled and become by virtue of this Act Incapable ipso facto to Bear his and their said Office and Offices Respectively 4. And shall be likewise disabled to make any Gift Grant Conveyance or other Disposition of any of his Lands Tenements Hereditaments Goods or Chattels or to take any Benefit of any Gift Conveyance or Legacy to his own use 7. And every Person so offending shall likewise forfeit and lose to the party grieved by any thing done contrary to the true intent and meaning of this Law his treble Damages which he shall sustain and be put unto by means or occasion of any such Act or thing done the same to be Recovered in any of His Majesties Courts of Record at Westminster by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information wherein no Essoign Protection Wager of Law Aid-prayer Priviledge Injunction or Order of Restraint shall be in any wise prayed granted or allowed nor any more than one Imparlance 8. And be it also provided and Enacted That if any person shall hereafter be Committed Restrained of his Liberty or suffer Imprisonment by the Order or Decree of any such Court of Star-Chamber or other Court aforesaid now or at any time hereafter having or pretending to have the same or like Jurisdiction Power or Authority to Commit or Imprison as aforesaid 2. Or by the Command or Warrant of the King's Majesty His Heirs and Successors in their own Person or by the Command or Warrant of the Council-board or oâ— any of the Lords or others of His Majesties Privy Council 3. That in every such Case every person so Committed Restrained of his Liberty or suffering Imprisonment upon demand or motion made by his Council or other Imployed by him for that purpose unto the Judges of the Court of King's-Bench or Common-Pleas in open Court shall without delay upon any pretence whatsoever for the Ordinary Fees usually paid for the same have forthwith granted unto him a Writ of Habeas Corpus to be directed generally unto all and every Sheriffs Gaoler Minister Officer or other person in whose Custody the person Committed or Restrained shall be 4. And the Sheriffs Gaoler Minister Officer or other person in whose Custody the party so Committed or Restrained shall be shall at the Return of the said Writ and according to the command thereof upon due and convenient notice thereof given unto him at the Charge of the party who requireth or procureth such Writ and upon Security by his own Bond given to pay the Charge of carrying back the Prisoner if he shall be Remanded by the Court to which he shall be brought as in like cases hath been used such Charges of bringing up and carrying back the Prisoner to be alwaies Ordered by the Court if any difference shall arise thereabout bring or cause to be brought the Body of the said Party so Committed or Restrained unto and before the Judges or Justices of the said Court from whence the same Writ shall Issue in open Court 5. And shall then likewise certifie the true Cause of such his Detainour or Imprisonment and thereupon the Court within three Court-daies after such Return made and delivered in open Court shall proceed to Examine and Determine whether the Cause of such Commitment appearing upon the said Return be Just and Legal or not and shall thereupon do what to Justice shall appertain either by Delivering Bailing or Remanding the Prisoner 6. And if any thing shall be otherwise wilfully done or omitted to be done by any Judge Justice Officer or other Person aforementioned contrary to the direction and true meaning hereof then such person so offending shall forfeit to the party grieved his treble Damages to be Recovered by such means and in such manner as is formerly in this Act limited and appointed for the like penalty to be Sued for and Recovered 9. Provided alwayes and be it Enacted That this Act and the several Clauses therein contained shall be taken and Expounded to Extend only to the Court of Star-Chamber 2. And to the said Courts holden before the President and Council in the Marches of Wales 3. And before the President and Council in the Northern parts 4. And also to the Court commonly called the Court of the Dutchy of Lancaster holden before the Chancellor and Council of that Court 5. And also in the Court of Exchequer of the County Palatine of Chester held before the Chamberlain and Council of that Court 6. And to all Courts of like Jurisdiction to be hereafter Erected Ordained Constituted or Appointed as aforesaid and to the Warrants and Directions of the Council-board and to the Commitments Restraints and Imprisonments of any person or persons made commanded or awarded by the King's Majesty His Heirs or Successors in their own Person or by the Lords and others of the Privy-Council and every one of them And lastly Provided and be it Enacted That no person or persons shall be Sued Impleaded Molested or Troubled for any Offence against this present Act unless the party supposed to have so Offended shall be sued or Impleaded for the same within two years at the most after such time wherein the said Offence shall be committed The Comment THE Court of Star-Chamber so called because held in a Chamber at Westminster the Roof of which
Sheriff or other Officer by whom the said VVrit of Capias or any of them shall be Returned as is aforesaid do make an untrue Return upon any the said VVrits that the party named in the said VVrit hath not yielded his Body upon the said Proclamations or any of them where indeed the party did yield himself according to the effect of the same that then every such Sheriff or other Officer for every such false and untrue Return shall forfeit to the party grieved and damnified by the said Return the Sam of 40 l. 2. For the which Sum of 40 l. the said party grieved shall have his Recovery and due Remedy by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Queens Courts of Record in which Action Bill Plaint or Information no Essoign Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed for the party Defendant 10. Saving and Reserving to all Arch Bishops and Bishops and all others having Authority to certisie any person Excommunicated and like Authority to accept and receive the submission and satisfaction of the said person so Excommunicated in manner and form heretofore used 2. And him to Absolve and Release and the same to signifie as heretofore it hath been accustomed to the Queen's Majesty Her Heirs and Successors into the High Court of Chancery 3. And thereupon to have such VVrits for the deliverance of the said person so absolved and released from the Sheriff's Custody or Prison as heretofore they or any of them had or of right ought or might have had any thing in this present Statute specified or contained to the contrary hereof in any wise notwithstanding 11. Provided alwayes That in Wales the Counties Palatines of Lancaster Chester Durham and Ely and in the Cinque Ports being Jurisdictions and places Exempt where the Queen's Majesty 's VVrit does not run and process of Capias from thence not Returnable into the said Court of the King's-Bench after any Significavit being of Record in the said Court of Chancery The Tenour of such Significavit by Mittimus shall be sent to such of the Head Officers of the said Country of Wales Counties Palatines and places Exempt within whose Offices Charge or Jurisdiction the Offenders shall be Resiant that is to say to the Chancellour or Chamberlain for the said County Palatine of Lancaster and Chester and for the Cinque-Ports to the Lord Warden of the same and for Wales and Ely and the County Palatine of Durham to the Chief Justice or Justices there 2. And thereupon every of the said Justices and Officers to whom such Tenour of Significavit with Mittimus shall be directed and delivered shall by virtue of this Estatute have Power and Authority to make like Process to the Inferiour Officer and Officers to whom the Execution of Process there doth appertain Returnable before the Justices there at their next Sessions or Courts two Moneths at the least after the Teste of every such Process 3. So alwayes as in every degree they shall proceed in their Sessions and Courts against the Offenders as the Justices of the said Court of King's-Bench are Limited by the Tenour of this Act in Term-times to do and Execute 12. Provided also and be it Enacted That any person at the time of any Process of Capias aforementioned Awarded being in Prison or out of this Realm in the parts beyond the Sea or within Age or of non sanae memoriae or woman Covert shall not incur any of the pains or forfeitures aforementioned which shall grow by any Return or Default happening during such time of Nonage Imprisonment being beyond the Sea or non sanae memoriae 2. And that by virtue of this Estatute the party grieved may plead every such cause or matter in bar of and upon the distress or other Process that shall be made for Levying of any of the said pains or forfeitures 13. And if that the Offender against whom any such Writ of Excommunicato Capiendo shall be Awarded shall not in the same Writ of Excommunicato Capiendo have a sufficient and lawful addition according to the form of the Statute of Primo of Henry the Fifth in cases of certain Suits whereupon Process of Exigent are to be Awarded 2. Or if in the Significavit it be not contained that the Excommunication doth proceed upon some cause or contempt of some Original matter of Heresie or refusing to have his or their child Baptized or to recieve the Holy Communion as it is now commonly used to be Received in the Church of England or to come to Divine Service now commonly used in the said Church of England or Errour in matters of Religion or Doctrine now received and allowed in the said Church of England Incontinency Vsury Simony Perjury in the Ecclesiastical Court or Idolatry 3. That then all and every pains and forfeitures limited against such persons Excommunicate by this statute by reason of such Writ of Excommunicato capiendo wanting sufficient Addition or of such Significavit wanting all the Causes afore mentioned shall be utterly void in Law 4. and by way of Plea to be allowed to the party grieved 14. And if the Addition shall be with a Nuper of the place Then in every such case at the Awarding of the first Capias with Proclamation according to the form mentioned one VVrit of Proclamation without any pain expressed shall be Awarded into the County where the Offender shall be most commonly Resiant at the time of the Awarding of the said first Capias with pain in the same VVrit of Proclamation to be returnable the day of the return of the said first Capias with pain and Proclamation thereupon at some one such time and Court as is Prescribed for the Proclamation upon the said first Capias with pain 2. And if such Proclamation be not made in the County where the Offender shall be most commonly Resiant in such cases of Addition of Nuper That then such Offenders shall sustain no pain or forfeitures by vertue of this Statute for not yielding his or her body according to the Tenour afore-mentioned any thing before specified and to the Contrary hereof in any wise Notwithstanding The Comment With a Discourse of the Nature of Excommunication and how to prevent or take off the VVrit De Excommunicato Capiendo THough Excommunications pretend a Title Jure Divino as an Institution of Christ and therefore his Sacred Name is therein made use of and several other Spiritual Phrases purporting that the same and all proceedings thereunto are by his Authority yet they being so commonly thundered out by persons who have immediately no Authority from our Lord or his Word to manage them and for such trivial Crimes as no Law of God hath ordered them against and in such a Light and precipitant manner as no part of Holy Scripture warranteth The wiser sort of men do therefore look upon them rather as Excommunings or a sort of Civil punishment like that in use among
the Romans Interdico tibi aqua igni than one of the solemn Institutions of God And therefore waving any discourse of what Spiritual Influence or Effect may be dreaded from the same in our dayes which we hope are wise enough not to be Bug-Bear'd with that Maxim of the Canonists Excommunicatio sive Justa sive Injusta est timenda A Church-Curse be it Just or Unjust is to be feared All that we shall speak to is matter of Law for so it is that there are Legal Bars and punishments formed by our Temporal Laws as long as the Legislative Power shall not be at leisure to consider of them and if they find it requisite Repeal them For 1. A person Excommunicated is forthwith disabled to Sue in any of His Majesties Courts not that thereby he loses his Right for ever but the Excommunication may be pleaded in Abatement of his present Action till the same is taken off by an Absolution Yet note That whosoever is Instrumental in procuring solliciting decreeing or pronouncing the Excommunication shall never be allowed to plead it nor shall it be pleaded unless the Excommunication be signified by the Bishop himself for the Court will receive no Certificate from any to whom they cannot write to Absolve the person if they find cause 2. Likewise though a person Excommunicated may be appointed an Executor and is capable of having a Legacy given him yet so-long as he stands Excommunicated he is not to be allowed to prove the Will nor Sue for his Legacy in the Spiritual Court But note whereas some say a man Excommunicated cannot Marry 't is Non-sense for Marriage is de Jure Naturali and alike absurd it is for any to pretend that such a person cannot give his Suffrage in any Election as for Example of Parliament-men for the same is an idle dream the Law allows him a Voice so long as he hath a Free-hold of Forty Shillings per Annum though he were under forty Curses 3. If a person justly or unjustly Excommunicated continue so by the space of forty dayes then by the Common Law the Bishop certifying the same into Chancery which is called a Significavit there shall issue forth a Writ from thence to the Sheriff of the County where the party lives to Imprison him without Bail or Mainprize till he hath made satisfaction to Holy Church This is called a Writ de Excommunicato Capiendo and such Imprisonment of a person Excommunicated by a Civil Sanction is not practised in any Nation in the world but ours and if it had here too been Buried with its Brother de Haeretico Comburendo I believe it would have had few Tears at its Funeral But at Common Law the same Writ being not Returnable in any Court the Sheriffs took their own time and used their discretion in Executing it to inforce which this Statute was made whereby it is Enacted 1. That the said Writ shall be Returnable in the King's Bench yet the Sheriff need not bring thither the Body 2. If the Sheriff Return Non est Inventus a Capias shall be Awarded with Proclamation to come in with six dayes if the party do not he forfeirs 10 l. and thenceforwards Capias after Capias and 20 l. forfeited on each 3. But note there are two Cases in which though a man stands out never so many Proclamations he shall forfeit nothing And they two are these 1. VVhere the Party against whom the VVrit De Excommunicato Capiendo is Awarded hath not therein a sufficient and lawful Addition That is saith Cowel a Title over and above his Christian and Sirname shewing his State Degree Trade Occupation or Mystery as Lord Knight Gentleman Yeoman Clothier and the like and the Hamlet Town Parish and County where he is or lately was conversant and dwelling And if it be with a Nuper late of such a place then you see there must be made out one Capias without any penalty 2. VVhere it is not expressed in the Bishops Certificate that the Cause for which the party was originally Cited into the Spiritual Court was for one of these 10 Causes following viz. 1. Heresie 2. Refusing to have Children Baptized 3. Refusing to Receive the Communion 4. Refusing to come to Divine Service 5. Errour in Religion or Doctrine 6. Incontinency 7. usury 8. Simony 9. Perjury in the Ecclesiastical Court or 10. Idolatry To know whether there be such cause expressed you may have a Copy of the Significavit at the Cursitors Office in Chancery-Lane Then in either of these cases all pains and forfeitures limited by this Statute by reason of such VVrit of Excom Cap. wanting such an Addition or Significavit wanting all the causes aforesaid shall be utterly void in Law and by way of plea to be allowed to the party grieved Touching the Authority of the Courts called Spiritual or Ecclesiastick whether they have truly any at all by our present Laws I shall not here debate they that have a mind to hear what is to be said on that Theme may read Mr. Hickeringil's Book of Naked Truth or Mr. Care 's Book written in the year 1664. entituled A true Guide for all persons concerned in Ecclesiastical Courts neither of which I ever yet saw sufficiently Answered yet still since most certain it is that such Courts do proceed and Act we shall suppose them to have some Power and only inform our Reader of the course of their practice as it is used at this day and his best course to defend himself You must note that persons are usually Excommunicated upon Contempt or Contumacy which may be 1. If the party being duly Cited Denieth or Omitteth to appear For if he be not personally summoned he needs not appear the first time but then their way is to Cite him by a Writ called Viis Modis set up at the Doors of his House or at the Church Doors Citing him at a certain day to appear to answer c. But being personally Cited if he doth not appear the first time or whether he be or no if he doth not appear the second time he is Excommunicated for Contempt If he be Cited generally the Law is That he shall appear the third day after the Service of the Citation The Law also is that if he he will give the Apparator 6d he must bring him the full and true Copy of the Citation If a day of appearance be mentioned and the same be not at least the third day from the Citation or if he hath before witnesses given the Apparator 6d to bring him a full and true Copy of the Citation and he doth not I conceive he needs not appear but listen what they do and if they decree him Excommunicated he may Appeal within 15 daies and bring from the Superiour Court an Inhibition to stop their proceedings against him And further the Rule in that Law is Totus dies debetur Delinquenti It is enough for a person to appear any hour of
the day provided it be a Court-hour wherein he is Cited to appear so as though he be called before he comes vet if he appeareth that day he shall be discharged or he may Appeal 2. When he appeareth he shall demand his Charge which is either by a Presentment from Church-Wardens or by a Libel or Articles which are exhibited by a Promoter Be it which it will he shall demand a Copy if it be denyed or delayed he may bring if he will a Prohibition from the King's Court at Westminster forbidding them to proceed in that Cause till they have given a full and true Copy of his Charge according to the Statute of 2 Hen. 5. Ca. 3. If he appeareth in person he ought to have his Charge the first Court-day if he appeareth by a Proctor they will usually to get the Proctor more Fees give to the second Court-day to bring in the Libel or Articles 4. If they deliver him not his Charge the second Court-day he may Appeal if upon his demand the Judge will not dismiss him or he may if he will bring his Prohibition for want of Articles and stop their further proceedings 5. If the proceedings be upon a Promotion and the Promoter hath Imployed a Proctor in the Case the party accused must know that no Proctor can be admitted without a Proxy that is Letters Procuratory under the Promoter's Hand and Seal authorizing him to act for him in the Case and when he hath that there must be an Act entred in Court to admit such a person Proctor in the Case The party charged may go or send to the Register and demand a sight of both those the Reason in Law is this because any Proctor is liable to the Parties Action if he molesteth any person in the name of another without Authority from him And secondly If there be no Act of Court admitting him as a Proctor though the party accused be Conqueror in the case yet he cannot Recover Costs because there is no Legal Adversary against whom they can be Recovered 6. According to the Statute-Law Every Informer if overthrown shall pay charges According to the Civil and Canon Law none ought to be admitted as a Voluntary Promoter till he hath given security to pay the Charges If overthrown The Party Accused therefore shall before he answereth the Articles demand this if it be denied by the Judge he may Appeal to the Superiour Court It is also worth the persons Enquiry who is Accused to be well advised whether the Promoter in the Ecclesiastical Courts be not obliged to all those things that an Informer in the Secular Courts is tied to by the Statutes 31 Eliz. 5. 18. Eliz. 5. 21. Jac. 4. The Reason is because those Statutes say Informers Upon any Penal Statutes and commonly Promoters in the Ecclesiastical Courts say such and such things are done contrary to the Statutes of this Realm as well as contrary to the Canons now what things the Statutes which also name Promoters Require of such Informers and Promoters the Statutes do declare 7. VVhen the Party Accused hath a Copy of his Libel let him demand time to answer If the Judge denies him time at least till the next Court-day let him Appeal Having due time granted in the mean time let him duly consider the matter and form of his Libel As to which let him amongst other things observe these that follow 1. VVhether the matters he be Charged with belong to the Cognisance of the Ecclesiastical Court If Lawyers tell him no let that be his Answer and let him hasten to bring his Prohibition which Lies in all such Causes 2. VVhether they have put into the Libel the Promotors Petition for Right and Justice to be done him it is oft times left out It is a Rule in their Law Libellus est ipso Jure nullus ubi nihil Petitur If he finds that this is wanting let his Answer only be That the Libel is in Law utterly void and Insufficient and desire to be dismissed If the Judge refuseth to dismiss him let him Appeal 3. Let him also Observe whether he be in the Articles laid to be one of the Diocess or a Parishoner of such a Parish for it be not laid it can never be proved and so the Promotor must fail in his Suit for what is not laid cannot be proved Quicquid deponitur Extra Articulum deponitur Extra Legem is a Rule in their Law If he be said to be a Parishioner of such a place within such a diocess let him not in his Answer Confess it but say He cannot determine the Bounds of Diocesses and parishes but for that he Referreth himself to the Law 4. Let him also observe if the things he be Charged to have done or omitted be within the compass of a year and whether there hath been since no Act of Grace or Oblivion which hath pardoned them and whether they be not such things as he hath been punished for or such things as the Statute-Law hath Limited the prosecution of to a less time than a year For if any of these things be they may be given in answer to avoid eithor the whole or any part of the Charge If the Judge will not accept the Answer the party may Sue out a Prohibition and stop them 5. Let him also observe whether he be charged certainly or particularly as to time and place or only generally and incertainly if he be charged only generally as for the most part he is in Church-VVardens Presentments not mentioning time and place or incertainly with Or 's that he did not come to his Parish-Church such and such months and daies or was absent in some one or more or most of them Let his Answer be that this Charge is void in Law for the generality or incertainty of it If the Judge will not Receive his Answer let him Appeal for the Law of England alloweth no such Charges from which can be no Discharge or where the Crime is not fixed to a certain time But it may be in this Case a Prohibition will be his best Remedy 6. Let him observe whether he be charged only upon Statute-Law or upon Canons if upon Canons let him in his Answer modestly refer himself to Persons Learned in the Statute-Laws whether any such Canons were ever Enacted Ratifyed Allowed or Confirmed by Parliament or by the Established Laws of the Land as they stood in the year 1639. and if not whether they be not made void by the Statute 13. Car. 2. 10. When he hath given his Answer which must be subscribed by his own hand it is usual for the Adverse Proctor to demand a time to prove his Articles for which the Judge at his pleasure granteth two three four or six Court-daies usually but two let him also at the same time move that he may have liberty within that time also to produce any Witnesses for his Defence if it be denied let him Appeal 11. Let him observe what time
him or to deliver him if he be apprehended only this must be within a Year after his Appeal that it may appear to the Court he hath not deserted his Appeal you may find forms of such a Supersedeas also in the Register of Original Writs both these are founded upon excellent Reason The Law of England will not suffer Ecclesiastical Judges either to invade their Right or to exalt themselves against their Authority nor yet suffer Inferiour Ecclesiastical Courts to invade the Right Power and Authority of Superiour Courts in their own Order 3 If a Person be sued in the Ecclesiastical Courts for a matter not within their Jurisdiction and they have caught him upon contempt in not appearing or not obeying their Sentence Upon a suggestion to the Kings Courts if it appear to them that the Original matter was not cognoscible in the Ecclesiastical Courts they will supersed the Proceedings and order the imprisoned Person to be discharged 4. If the imprisoned Person or he against whom the Writ is out though he be not taken bring a Copy of the Bishops Significavit into the Courts at Westminster and make it appear to the Judges there that the cause of Excommunication is not therein expressed together with the day when it was pronounced if he be not said to be excommunicated Majori Excommunicatione if it be not signed by the Bishop or said to be done Authoritate nostra ordinaria if the Party Excommunioated be not expressed by name the Court will deliver the person Dr. Cozens mentions three of these cases and the Reader also may find them in the Register of Writs The first he saith he cannot find in the Register viz. That the Articles or matter of the Libel must be expressed nor indeed do I find it there but it is in several Reports The reasons are 1. Because the Law will not suffer men to be imprisoned for every light offence this Dr. Cozens gives 2. Because the Kings Courts can recieve Significavits from none but the person to whom if need be they may write to discharge the Prisoner Nor will the Court suffer a person to be Excommunicated and lye in Prison for a Crime which the Ecclesiastical Court hath no judgment in nor yet unless it appeareth to the Court he hath stood Forty dayes excommunicated Again heretofore whole Cities and Communities have been excommunicated therefore the person must be expressed by name or he shall not lie there 5. Let him procure the Copy of the Writ de Excommunicato Capiendo and observe first if it be issued in Term-time 2. If there were full twenty days betwixt the Test and Return 3. If it be made Returnable the next Term. 4. If there be due Additions in it 5. If before it was delivered to the Sheriff it were Entered upon Record in the Kings-Bench and made Returnable into that Court. All these things are Required by the statute 5 Eiz 23 If any of these Errours be found he shall upon motion in the Kings Bench be discharged and the Writ will be declared Illegal Lastly If he can be delivered by none of these ways he may at any Sealing in the Chancery whether it be in Term or out of Term upon a petition to or motion before the L. Chancellor have the VVrit de Cautione Admittenda granted him in case he hath before offered the Bishop a Bond of 10. l or 20 l. with Sureties stare parere mandatis Ecclesiae in forma Juris when he hath it let him by some Attorney or Attorneys Clerk send it and tender a Bond and Sufficient Sureties with it to the Bishop and demand the Discharge of the Prisoner If it be not presently done let him certifie so much and at the next Seal move for a second Writ to the Bishop or which it may be is more adviseable let him move for a second Writ to the Sheriff the form of it is in the Register In that the King commandeth the Sheriff to admonish the Bishop to accept the Caution to deliver the Prisoner and further commands him that in case he doth it not in his presence the Sheriff should do it himself If the Sheriff yields not Obedience upon another Motion he ought to have a Writ to the Coroners commanding to take security of the Sheriff to appear at Westminster such a day to shew reason why he hath contemned the Kings Writ and further it commandeth the Coroners to take the Caution of the Prisoner and to deliver him The Reader may find all this in the Register where are the Forms of all these Writs and also in Dr. Cozens Apology p. 1. C. 2. who being himself a Judge in the Ecclesiastical Courts cannot be presumed to have told us any thing but what is Law contrary to their own Interest It is true the Bishop upon taking such Cautionary Bonds doth ordinarily Insist upon the persons paying the Prosecutors charges but it is unreasonable 1. Because he hath nothing to do but to Execute the Command of the Writ which speaks not a word of charges 2. Because if the charges be legally due the Promoter must have also a legal way to Recover them if not it is Extortion for the Ecclesiastical Judge to Exact them 3. Because it is no sufficient Return to the King 's Writ which mentioneth no such thing to say He could not discharge the Prisoner because he would not pay the Promoter's Charge But because the Legal Charges are small usually the Prisoner for his Liberty will pay the charges which are as follow  l. s. d. For the Adversary's Proctor every Court-day until he was Excommunicated and that day when the Significavit was decreed For every day 00 01 00 For the Proctor's Procuratory Letter Seal and VVax 00 01 08 For certifying the Service of the Citation 00 00 06 For the Articles if there were any 00 05 00 For an Act of Court for every day 00 00 02 For the Significavit 00 05 00 For the Significavit to deliver the Prisoner 00 05 00 For the Excommunication and the Schedule 00 02 04 For the VVrit de Excommunicato Capiendo and the charge of Entring it upon record in the King's-Bench about 01 01 00  02 01 08 If the business have proceeded no further than a Libel and Articles this is all the Legal Charges but if it hath proceeded further there may be for the Copy of the Answer 00 00 09 For every Witness Examined 1 s. and for the first 00 01 06 For a Fee to the Proctor at Inform. 00 03 00 For a Definitive Sentence 00 11 00 For the Advocate at the Sentence 00 10 00 But note the Charges are more or less as the Cause went further or lesser way before the Excommunication But if the Bishop will not take the Caution and discharge you you may have a second Writ directed to the High-Sheriff commanding him to go to the Bishop and require him to take the Caution and to deliver the Prisoner and
mans Guilt is enough to Condemn him I see not why their personal knowledge of a Prisoners Innocency or of the Witnesses Swearing falsely should not be sufficient to Acquit him 2. The other ground upon which the Grand Juries are to Proceed is Testimony of Witnesses and this is call'd EVIDENCE because it ought to be such as may make the matter clear manifest plain and evident to the Jury and of this Evidence the Jury are the proper and only Judges therefore they ought according to their Oath diligently Inquire into the Quality Repute and Circumstances of the Witnesses the likelyhood of what they Depose and whether they do not Swear out of Malice Subornation Self-Interest Combination or some ill design which to Discover they will do well to Examine them apart to note their Variations and Contradictions to ask them sudden questions and what questions are pertinent not the Judges but the Jury only can determine for they may know how to make use of them towards Discovery of the Truth thô the Judge does not and 't is They are upon their Oaths not he 't is they must satisfy their own Consciences the Judge has nothing to do to Intermeddle he is bound by their Verdict Let Witnesses be never so rampantly positive yet if the Jurors have good and reasonable grounds not to believe them they will they must remain as Ignorant to the parties Crime as before we find this expresly asserted for Law in our Books as Stiles's Reports L. 11. thô there be Witnesses who prove the Bill yet the Grand Inquest is not bound to find it if they see cause to the contrary so Coke L. 6. The Judges use to determine who shall be Sworn and what shall be produced as Evidence to the Jury but the Jury are to consider what Credit or Authority the same is worthy of If a Grand Jury are not Judges of Evidence they signifie nothing If as some would perswade us because People Swear desperately thô they do not believe them they shall be bound to find the Bill then they signifie nothing and are no security to preserve Innocency A lewd Woman once resolv'd to Indict the then Arch-bishop of Canterbury for a Rape she Swore it no doubt very heartily according to this new Doctrine of going according to Evidence the Jury must presently have found the Bill the Arch-bishop must have been Committed to Prison Suspended from Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction his Goods and Chattels throughout England Inventoried by the Sheriffs would it think you in that Case have been a good Excuse for the Grand Jury to have said that thô they believ'd in their Conscience the Baggage swore false yet she Swearing it positively they as so many Parish Clerks were but to say Amen to her Oath of the Fact and to find Billa Vera against that eminent Prelate And if the Jury be Judges of the Credibility of Evidence in this Case and may go contrary to it why I pray may they not have the same Liberty where they find good Cause in others If an Indictment be laid against a man for Criminal words said to be utter'd in a Colloquium or Discourse thô the Witnesses roundly Swear all the express words in the Indictment yet unless they will Relate and set forth the Substance of the whole talk 't is impossible the Jury should Judge of the matter for the foregoing and subsequent words may render Expressions that are Innocent and Loyal which taken to halfs may be rank Treason as if one should say To affirm the King has no more Right to the Crown of England than I have which is the Opinion of the Jesuits of his Majesty if once Excommunicated by the Pope is detestable Treason And two men at some distance not well Hearing or Remembring or Maliciously designing against his Life should Swear That he said The King had no more Right to the Crown than he had Now that the Man did utter these very words is true but if you ask the Evidence the rest of the Colloquium they shall tell you there was much more Discourse but they cannot remember it what satisfaction is this to a Jury or would it not be hard for a Man to be put to hold up his Hand at the Bar under the frightful Charge of Treason in this Case Or if a Minister in his Sermon should Recite that of the Psalms The Fool hath said in his Heart there is no God Jesuited Evidence now may come and Charge him with Blasphemy and Swear that he said There was no God and ask them what Expressions besides he used may excuse themselves and say 'T is a great while agoe we cannot remember a whole Sermon but this we all positively Swear He said there was no God The Inquiry of a Grand Jury should be suitable to their Title a Grand Inquiry else instead of serving their Countrey and presenting real Crimes they may Oppress the Innocent as in the Case of Samuel Wright and John Good at a Sessions in the Old Baily about December 1681. Good Indicts Wright for Treasonable words and Swore the words positively but after a Grand Enquiry the Grand Jury found that Wright only spoke the words as of others thus They say so and so and concluded with this They are Regnes for saying it and also Good at last Confessed that Wright was his Master and Corrected him for Misdemeanours and then to be Reveng'd he comes and Swears against him which he Confessed he was Instigated to by one Powel so the Grand Jury finding it to be but Malice Return'd the Bill Ignoramus whereas if they had not Examin'd him strictly they had never discover'd the Intreigue and the Master had Causelesly been brought to great Charge Ignominy and Hazard The Judicious Dalton p. 539 says well No less care or Concern at all lies on the Grand Jury than does on the Petty Jury People may tell you That you ought to find a Bill upon any probable Evidence for 't is but matter of Course a Ceremony a Business of Form only an Accusation the party is to come before another Jury and there may make his Defence But if this were all to what purpose have we Grand Juries at all why are the wisest best men in a County for such they are or should be troubled why are they so strictly Sworn Do not Flatter your selves you of the Grand Jury are as much upon your Oaths as the Petty Jury and the Life of the man against whom the Bill is brought is in your Hands The Lord Cook 3. Iustit 33. plainly calls the Grand Jury-men all wilfully forsworn and Perjured if they wrongfully find an Indictment and if in such a Case the other Jury thro Ignorance c. should find the person Guilty too you are Guilty of his Blood as well as they but suppose he get off there do you think it nothing to Accuse a man upon your Oaths of horrid Crimes your very doing of which puts him thô never so Innocent to
Disgrace Trouble Damage danger of Life and makes him liable to Outlawry Imprisonment and every thing but Death it self and that too for ought you know may wrongfully be occasion'd by it your rash Verdict gaining Credit and giving Authority to another Jury to find him Guilty for if the Petty Jury find a man Guilty never so unjustly the Law suffers no Attaint or other Punishment to lie against them for this very reason because another Jury viz. the Grand Inquest as well as they have found him Guilty If a Grand Jary find a Bill wrongfully against a person and it prove never so much to his damage he has no Remedy for being upon their Oaths the Law will not suppose any malice One of the Grand Jury cannot afterwards be of the petty Jury and why Because says the Law he has once already found the party Guilty and if he should not again he must perjure himself From all which it appears what a weigh and stress the Law puts upon the Verdict of a Grand Jury and 't is remarkable too that the Law directs them only to say either Billa vera It is true Or Ignoramus We know not and never That it is not true Which shews That if they be doubtfull or not fully satisfied The Indictment must be Endorsed not Billa Vera We know 't is true but Ignoramus We doubt it We do not know it We are not certain it be true If they find a Bill where they ought not they wound their own Consciences and do an irreparable damage to the party but where they do not find the Bill there is no harm done to any body for another Indictment may be brought when there is better Evidence SECT IV. That Juries are Judges of Law in some respects as well as Fact AMongst other devices to undermine the Rights and Power of Juries and render them Insignificant there has an opinion been advanced That they are only Judges of Fact and are not at all to Consider the Law so that if a Person be Indicted for a Fact which really is no Crime in it self by Law but is workt up by Words of form as Treasonably Seditiously c. if the Fact be but proved to be done though the said wicked Circumstances do not appear they shall be supplied by the Law which you are not to take notice of but find the Bill or bring in the Person Guilty and leave the Consideration of the Case in Law to the Judges whose business it is Thus some people argue but this is an apparent Trapp at once to Perjure Ignorant Juries and render them so far from being of good use as to be only Tools of Oppression to Ruine and Murder their Innocent Neighbours with the greater Formality For though it be true that matter of Fact is the most common and proper Object of a Juries determination and matter of Law that of the Judges yet as Law arises out of and is complicated with Fact it cannot but fall under the Juries Consideration Littleton Sect. 368. teaches us That the Jury may at their Election either take upon them the Knowledge of the Law and Determine both the Fact and Law themselves or else find the matter specially and leave it to the Judges 'T is by applying matter of Fact and Law together and from their due Consideration of and right Judgment upon both that a Jury brings forth their Verdict Do we not see in most General Issues as upon Not Guilty pleaded in Trespass breach of the Peace or Felony though it be matter in Law whether the party be a Trespasser a breaker of the Peace or a Felon yet the Jury do not find the Fact of the Case by it self leaving the Law to the Court but find the party Guilty or Not Guilty generally so that though they Answer not to the Question singly what is Law yet they determine the Law in all matters where Issue is Joined Is it not every dayes practice when persons are Indicted for Murther the Jury does not only find them Guilty or Not Guilty but many times upon hearing and weighing of Circumstances brings them in either Guilty of the Murder or else only of Man-slaughter per misadventure or se defendendo as they see Cause Besides as Juries have ever been vested with such Power by Law so to exclude them from or Disseize of the same were utterly to Defeat the End of their Institution For then if a person should be Indicted for doing any Common Innocent Act if it be but Cloathed and disguised in the Indictment with the name of Treason or some other High Crime and proved by Witnesses to have been done by him the Jury though satisfied in Conscience that the Fact is not any such offence as 't is called yet because according to this fond Opinion they have no power to Judge of Law and the Fact charged is fully proved they should at this Rate be bound to find him Guilty And being so found the Judge may pronounce Sentence against him for he finds him a Convicted Traitor c. by his Peers And so Juries should be made meer Properties to do the Drudgery and bear the blame of unreasonable Prosecutions But all this is absur'd and abhorr'd by the Wisdom Justice and Mercy of our Laws In every Indictment Information c. there are certain words of Course called matter of form as Maliciously Seditiously with such and such an Intention c. And these sometimes are raised by a Just and reasonable Implication in Law and sometimes are thrust in meerly to raise a pretence or Colour of Crime where there is really none So that every Jury-man ought well to understand this Distinction where the Act or naked matter of Fact charged is in it self a Crime or offence against Law as killing of a Man Levying of War against the King c. there the Law does in pleadings require and will supply those words and if the Jury do find and are satisfied That the substance of the Charge is such a Crime and the person Guilty thereof they are bound to find it though no direct proof be made of those Circumstantials But where the Act or matter of Fact is in it self Innocent or Indifferent there the purport of these Words as that it was done maliciously or with such or such a design is necessary to be proved For else there is no Crime and consequently no fit matter to be put to Trial. In which Case the Grand Jury is bound in Conscience and Law to return an Ignoramus and a Petty Jury Not Guilty SECT V. That Juries are not finable or any way to be punisht under pretence of going contrary to Evidence or against the Judges Directions MUch of what we have said of Grand Juries is also applicable to Petty Juries so that we need not repeat it only must Answer one Objection Some Jury-men may be apt to say If we do not find according to Evidence though we have reason to suspect the truth of
whereupon he demanded Judgment whether the Plaintiffe ought to maintain that Appeal he had brought To which the Plaintiffe demurred in Law And in this Case three points were adjudged by Sir Christopher Wray Sir Thomas Gawdy and the whole Court First That the matter of the Bar had been a good Bar of the Appeal by the Common Law as well as if the Clergy had been Allowed For that the Defendant upon his Confession of the Indictment had prayed his Clergy which the Court ought to have granted and the deferring of the Court to be advised ought not to prejudice the Party Desendant albeit the Appeal was Commenced before the Allowance of it The second point adjudged was that this Case was out of the Statute of 3 Hen. 7. For that the words of that Act are If it fortune that the same Felons and Murderers and Accessaries so Arraigned or any of them to be Acquitted or the Principal of the said Felony or any of them to be Attainted the Wife or next Heir of him so slain c. may have their Appeal of the same Death and Murder against the Person so Acquitted or against the said Principals so Attainted if they be alive and that THE BENEFIT OF HIS CLERGY THEREOF before be not had And in this the Defendant Holcroft was neither Acquitted nor Attainted but Convicted by Confession and the Benefit of the Clergy only prayed as is aforesaid so as the Statute being penal concerning the Life of Man and made in Restraint of the Common Law was not to be taken by Equity but is Casus Omissus a Case Omitted and left to the Common Law As to the Third is was objected that every Plea ought to have an apt Conclusion and that the Conclusion in this Case ought to have been Et petit judicium si praediit Thomas Holcroft Iterum de eadem morte de qua semel Convictus fuit Respondere compelli debeat And he does ask judgment if the above mentione Thomas Holcroft shall be obliged to answer againe for the same death he was once Convicted of But it was adjudged that either of both Conclusions was sufficient in Law And therefore that exception was disallowed by the Rule of the Court. Note the ancient Law was that when a Man had judgment to be hanged in an Appeal of Death that the Wife and all the Blood of the Party slain should draw the Defendant to Execution and Gascoigne said Issint fuit in diebus nostris so it was done in our Days And thus much occasionally about Appeals which we the rather inserted because the practice thereof through I know not whose negligence has been almost lost or forgot till some few Years ago a Woman in Southwark revived it against one that killed her Husband and got a pardon for it but she Prosecuted him on Appeal had judgment against him and he was Executed since which time the same Course has been frequently talkt of and brought but for the most part to the shame I think of those Women or Children who make such Compositions for their Husbands or Fathers Blood they have been by some secret Bargains or Compensations husht up and seldom effectually followed Two other Statutes of King Edw. 3. Anno 4. Edw. 3. cap. 14. A Parliament shall be holden once every year ITem It is accorded that a Parliament shall be holden every year once and more often if need be Anno 36. Edw. 3. cap. 10. A Parliament shall be holden once in the year ITem for maintenance of the said Articles and Statutes and Redress of dibers MISCHIEFS and GRIEVANCES which daily happen a Parliament shall be holden every year as another time was ordained by Statute The Comment BEfore the Conquest as the Victory of Duke William of Normandy over Harold the Usurper is commonly though very improperly called Parliaments were to be held twice every year as appears by the Laws of King Edgar cap. 5. and the Testimony of the Mirrour of Justices cap. 1. sect 3. For the Estates of the Realm King Alfred caused the Committees some English Translations of that ancient Book read Earls but the word seems rather to signifie Commissioners Trustees or Representatives to meet and ordained for a PERPETUAL USAGE that twice in the year or ostner if need were in time of Peace they should Assemble at London to speak their Minds for the guiding of the People of God how they should keep themselves from Offences live in quiet and have right done them by certain Vsages and sound Judgments King Edward the first says Cook 4. Instit fol. 97. kept a Parliament once every two years for the most part And now in this King Edward the Thirds time one of the wisest and most glorious of all our Kings It was thought fit to Enact by these two several Statutes That a Parliament should be held once at least every year which two Statutes are to this day in full Force For they are not Repealed but rather Confirmed by the Statute made in the 16th of our present Soveraign King Charles the Second Cap. 1. Intituled An Act for the Assembling and holding of Parliaments once in three years at the least The words of which are as follow Because by the ancient Laws and Statutes of this Realm made in the Reign of King Edward the third Parliaments are to be held very often your Majesties Humble and Loyal Subjects the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament Assembled most Humbly do beseech your most Excellent Majesty that it may be declared and Enacted 2 And be it declared and Enacted by the Authority aforesaid that hereafter the sitting and holding of Parliaments shall not be intermitted or discontinued above Three Years at the most but that within three years from and after the Determination of this present Parliament so from time to time within three years after the Determination of and other Parliament or Parliaments or if there be occasion more or oftner Your Majesty your Heirs and Successors do Issue out your Writs for calling Assembling and holding of another Parliament to the end there may be a frequent calling Assembling and holding of Parliaments once in three years at the least Agreeable to these good and wholsome Laws are those gracious Expressions and Promises in His Majesties Proclamation touching the Causes and Reasons of Dissolving the two last Parliaments Dated April 8. 1681. Irregularities in Parliament shall NEVER make us out of love with Parliaments which we look upon as the best Method for healing the distempers of the Kingdom and the only means to preserve the Monarchy in that due Credit and Respect which it ought to have both at home and abroad And for this Cause we are resolved by the blessing of God to have frequent Parliaments And both in and out of Parliament to use OUR UTMOST ENDEAVOURS TO EXTIRPATE POPERY and to Redress all the Grievances of our good Subjects and in all things to Govern according to the
Laws of the Kingdom A DIGRESSION touching the Antiquity Vse and Power of PARLIAMENTS and the Qualification of such Gentlemen as are fit to be chosen the Peoples Representatives THe Recital of these several Laws for frequent calling of Parliaments declaring the same to be of such Importance or Necessity to the safety and wel-being of the Nation Invites us to give the vulgar Reader some further Information touching those most Honourable Assemblies which though a digression will I hope be no Transgression for I am willing at any time to go a little out of my way provided I may thereby meet with the Readers profit and Advantage Of the Names and Antiquity of Parliaments THe word PARLIAMENT is French derived from the three words Parler la ment to speak ones mind because every Member of that Court should sincerely and discreetly speak his mind for the general good of the Common-Wealth and this name saith Cook 1 Instit fo 110. was used before William the Conquerer even in the time of Edward the Confessor But most commonly in the Saxons time it was called Michegemote or Witenage Mote that is the Great Mote Meeting or Assembly whence our Ward-Mootes in London receive their name to this day or the Wise-Moote that is the Assembly of the wise men and Sages of the Land But this word Parliament is used in a double sense 1. Strictly as it includes the Legislative Power of England as when we say An Act of Parliament and in this Acceptation it necessarily includes the King the Lords and the Commons each of which have a Negative Voice in making Laws and without their joint Consent no new Laws can pass that be obligatory to the Subject 2. Vulgarly the word is used for the Two Houses the Lords and Commons as when we say the King will call a Parliament his Majesty has Dissolved his Parliament c. The Lords of Parliament are divided into two sorts viz. Spiritual that is to say the Bishops who sit there in respect of their Baronies parcel of their Bishopricks which they hold in their Politick Capacity and Temporal The Commons are likewise divided into three Classes or parts viz Knights or Representatives of the Shires or Counties where note that though the Writ require two Knights to be chosen and that they are called Knights yet there is no necessity that they should actually have the degree of Knighthood provided they be but Gentlemen for the Statute 23 Hen. 6. cap 15 hath these words That the Knights of the Shires for the Parliament hereafter to be Chosen shall be not able Knights of the same Counties for which they shall be chosen OR OTHERWISE such Notable Esquires or Gentlemen born of the same Counties as shall be able to be Knights and no man to be such Knight which standeth in the degree of a Yeoman and under Secondly Citizens chosen to Represent Cities Thirdly Burgesses that is to say those that are chosen out of Boroughs Note that the difference between a City and a Borough is this a City is a Borough Incorporate which is or has within time of Memory been an Episcopal See or had a Bishop and this althô the Bishoprick be Dissolved as West minster having heretofore a Bishop though none now still remains a City Cook 1. Instit Sect 164. Boroughs are Towns Incorporated but such as never had any Bishops Of the Three Estates in Parliament THere has been a great debate about the Three Estates some zealously pleading That the Bishops are one of the three Estates of the Realm and the Lords Temporal a Second and the Commons-house the Third and the King over all as a Transcendent by himself Others as stifly deny this and assign the King as he his the Head of the Common Wealth to be the first Estate the Lords as well Spiritual as Temporal jointly to be the Second and the Commons-House the Third Non opis est nostrae tant as Componere Lites We shall not presume to undertake a decision of this arduous Controversy but in our poor opinion the matter seems to appear more difficult than really it is by means that the contending Parties do not first plainly set down what it is they severally mean by the word Estate Which may be taken 1. For a rank degree or Condition of Persons considered by themselves different in some notable Respects from others wherewith they may be compared And in this respect my Lords the Bishops may very properly be said to be an Estate or one of the Estates of the Realm for then there will be several Estates above the number of three for so in the House of Commons there may be said to be three Estates viz. Knights Citizens and Burgesses And heretofore in the days of Popery when there were 26 Abbots and Priors that held per Baroniam too as well as the Bishops called to the Parliament and sat in the Lords House see Fullers Church History Lib. 6. 292. Whether they being Religious and Monastical Persons whereas the Bishops were Seculars no small difference in their account might not as well claim to be a distinct Estate by themselves as now the Bishops do may be a question But secondly When we spake of three Estates in the Constitution of our English Government 't is most natural to mean and intend such a poize in the Ballance or such an Order or State as hath a Negative Voice in the Legislative Power For as the King and Commons excluding the Lords so neither the King and Lords excluding the Commons much less the Lords and Commons excluding the King can make any Law but this glorious Triplicity must be in mutual Conjunction and then from their united Influences spring our happy Laws But in this sence the Lords Spiritual by themselves have no pretence to be a distinct Estate That is they have by themselves no Negative Voice which I conceive the proper Characteristick or essential Mark of each of the three Estates For suppose a Bill pass the Commons and being brought into the Lords House all the 26 Bishops should be against it and some of the Temporal Lords yet if the other Temporal Lords be more in number than the Bishops and those that side with them the Bill shall pass as the Act of the whole house and if his Majesty please to give it his Royal Assent is undoubted Law Which demonstrates the Bishops have of themselves no Negative Voice and consequently are none of the three Estates of the Realm But if any will have them called an Estate and mean something else be it if he please to explain his Notion 't is like I shall not contend with him about a fiddle faddle word Touching the Power of the Parliament THe Jurisdiction of this Court saith Cook 1 Instit Sect. 164. is so Transcendent that it maketh Inlargeth Diminisheth Abrogateth Repealeth and reviveth Laws Statutes Acts and Ordinances concerning matters Ecclesiastical Civil Martial Marine Capital Criminal and common And 4 Instit Fol. 36.