a sufficient replication on his part the said William prayeth Iudgement and that the said Robert from his action aforesaid against him to have be barred and the said Robert in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to him the said Robert his action aforesaid against the said William to have and maintain above by replying hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid William doth not deny nor to the same in any wayes answereth but the averment aforesaid to admit doth altogether refuse as at first prayeth Iudgement and his debt aforesaid together with his damages by occasion of detayning his debt to be adjudged unto him c. And because the Iustices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here on 8 dayes of Saint Michael to â—ear their Iudgment thereof because the Iustices here thereof not yet c. Debt Trinity Term. Anno 10. of King James Rott 2413. In Brownlow the Common Pleas. The Case of the Mayor and Burgesses of Kings Lynne Concerning Misnaming of Corporations C. 10. part fol. 120. a. IOhn Payn late of Catton in the County aforesaid Gent. Executor of Norff. the Testament of John Payne late called John Payne of Kings Linne in the County of Norffolk Esq was summoned to Answer to the Mayor and Burgesses of Kings Lynne in the County of Norfolk of a Plea that he render to them 3000. pound which he unjustly deteineth from them c. And whereupon the said Mayor and Burgesses by Henry Bastard their Attorney say That whereas the aforesaid John Payne the Testator in his life the 27 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is c. The 6 th at Gaywood by his writing Obligatory had granted himself to be bounden to the said Mayor and Burgesses in the aforesaid 3000. pound to be paid to the said Mayor and Burgesses when thereof he was required yet the said John Payne the Testator in his life time the aforesaid John Payne the Executor after the death of him the Testator John Payne although often required the aforesaid 3000. pound to the said Mayor and Burgesses rendred not but the same denyed to them to render and the aforesaid John Payne the Executor doth deny the same yet to render to them and unjustly deteineth the same whereupon they say that they are the worse and have damage to the value of 100. pound and thereof bring Sute and bring here into Court the writing aforesaid which the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid testifieth c. whose date is the same day and year aforesaid c. And the aforesaid Iohn Payne Executor by Thomas Blofield his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And saith that hee of the debt aforesaid by virtue of the writing aforesaid ought not to be charged Because he saith That it is not the Deed of the said Iohn Payne the Testator and upon this puts himself upon the Countrey and the aforesaid Mayor and Burgesses likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from the day of Holy Trinity in 3. weeks â—2 c. By whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. At which day the Jurors between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid were put between them in respite here untill this day that is to say in 8. dayes of Saint Michael then next following unlesse the Justices of the Lord the King to Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. upon Monday the 27 th of day Iuly next following at the Castle at Norwich in the County aforesaid first shall come And now at this day comes as well the aforesaid Mayor and Burgesses as the aforesaid Iohn Payne the Executor by their Attorneys aforesaid and the aforesaid Justices to Assises before whom c. Send here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within conteined before Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Bench and Iohn Croke Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned Justices of the said Lord the King to Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. come as well the within named Mayor and Burgesses as the within written Iohn Payne the Executor by their Attorneys within written and the Jurors of the Jury wherefore within is made mention being called likewise come who to say the truth of the within conteined chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That long before the making of the writing Obligatory within written The Lord Henry late King of England the 8 th the 7 th day of Iuly in the year of his Reign the 29 th By his Letters Patents under his Great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the same day and year and to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed Reciting by the said Letters Patents That whereas the said late King by his Letters Patents whose date was the 27 th day of Iune in the 16 th year of his Reign of his special grace and of his meer motion late had granted and by the said his Letters Patents confirmed for him his Heirs Successors to the Mayor and Burgesses and Inhabitants of his Borough of Lynn Bishop in his County of Norfolk that they for ever should be one body Corporate and one Cominalty perpetually in thing and name and that they should have perpetual succession and the name of the Mayor and Burgesses of the Borough of aforesaid Bishops Lynne in the County of Norfolk should have and bear and by the same name should be persons able and capable in Law to have purchase Lands Tenements Goods and Chattels other possessions whatsoever and to plead and to be impleaded answer and answered defend and might and could defend before any Justices whatsoever whether spiritual Judges or temporal in whatsoever Courts and in all and singular Actions Causes Matters Plaints and Demands of whatsoever kind they should be or nature in the same manner as the other the Leige people of the said late King persons able and capable in Law to plead and be impleaded to answer and to be answered defend or might defend and that the said Mayor and Burgesses and their Successors should have or might have one Common Seal for their businesses and others to be done within the Borough aforesaid happening or arising with divers other Liberties Franchisles Grants Articles and immunities in the said Letters Patents conteined and specified as in the said Letters Patents more fully and manifestly is appeared And whereas afterwards by a certain Statute late in Parliament of the said late King at London holden the third day of November in the 21
here untill from the day of St. Michael in one Moneth then next following At which day here cometh as well the said Owen as the said John by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this further prayeth liecnce thereof to imparl here c. Until from Easter day in 15. dayes and hath it c. And the same day is given to the said Owen here c. At which day of 14. dayes of Easter came as well the aforesaid Owen as the aforesaid John by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this The said Owen prayeth that the aforesaid John to his Writ and Declaration aforesaid answer And the said John Drury saith That he for any thing before alleged from having execution of his Debt and Damages against him the said Owen ought not to be barred or delayed Because he saith That after the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the aforesaid Owen out of the custody of the aforesaid Sheriff of Surry to have escaped and before any further execution against the aforesaid Owen by him the said John by Colour of the Judgement aforesaid was sued forth and had that is to say in the Term of St. Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid out of the aforesaid Court of the said Lord the King that now is of the Bench here upon the Outlawry as is before said pronounced Issued forth a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Capias utlagatum against him the said Owen At the Sute of the said John then to the Sheriff of the County of Midd. directed By which Writ The Lord the King commanded the aforesaid Sheriff of Midd. That he should not omit for any Liberty of his County but that he take the aforesaid Owen by the name of Owen Bray late of Cobham in the County of Surry Gent. Outlawed in the aforesaid County of Sussex the aforesaid 19th day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid at the Sute of him the said John by the name of John Drury Doctor of Law Of a Plea of Debt whereof he was convicted if he should be found in his Baliwick and him should safe keep c. So as he have his Body here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid in the aforesaid morrow of All Souls the self same Term of St. Michael in the yeer aforesaid to do and to receive what to the Court of the said Lord the King thereof should consider in that behalf At which morrow of All Souls here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Owen by William Brown then his Attorny And the Sheriffs that is to say George Bolles and Richard Farrington then Sheriffs of the aforesaid County of Midd. then here sent That the aforesaid Owen was not found c. And upon this the said Owen then prayed the hearing of the Writ of Exigent upon which the said Owen at the Sute of the said John Drury aforesaid in form aforesaid stood Outlawed And it was then read to him in these words JAMES by the grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. To the Sherifs of Sussex greeting We command you that you put in Exigent Owen Bray late of Cobham in the County of Surry Gent. from County in County until according to the Law Custom of our Kingdom of England he be Outlawed if he shall not appear And if he shall appear then that you him take cause safely to be kept so as you have his body before our Justices at West in the morrow of the Holy Trinity to satisfie to Iohn Drury Doctor of Law as well of a certain debt of 200. pounds which the said Iohn in the said our Court before our Justices at Westminster Recovered against him as of 33. shillings and 4. pence which to the said Iohn in the same our Court were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of the detaining the same Debt whereof he is Convicted And sent to our Justices at Westminster in 8. dayes of St. Hillary That the aforesaid Owen is not found in your Baliwick And have here this Writ witnesse Edward Coke at Westminster the 25th day of Ianuary in the yeer of our Reign of England France and Ireland the 5th and of Scotland the 41. Which being read and heard The said Owen said That he of the Outlawry aforesaid ought not to have him charged because the said Writ of Exigent had not any certain day of Retorn these words Saint between the word morrow and Trinity not having any signification as by the Writ aforesaid then it appeared And for the same Cause the said Owen then prayed Judgement and that the Outlawrie aforesaid in form aforesaid pronounced and had be annulled made void and altogether holden for nought Upon which the Writ aforesaid then being seen And by the Justices here then fully understood To the same Justices it then appeared That the Allegation of the aforesaid William Brown in discharge of the aforesaid Owen of the Outlawry aforesaid was true Therefore then it was considered in the said Court here that the said Owen by occasion of the Outlawry aforesaid should not be be molested or troubled but should go thereof acquitted c. as by the Record thereof in the said Court here remaining fully appeareth And so the said John Drury saith That there is not any such Record of the Outlawry aforesaid as the said Owen by his Writ and Declaration aforesaid above supposeth And this he is ready to aver whereupon he prayeth Judgement if he from execution of his Debt aforesaid and damages aforesaid against the aforesaid Owen ought to be barred c. and the aforesaid Owin saith that the aforesaid plea of the aforesaid John in form aforesaid above pleaded is not sufficient in Law to the said John his execution by Colour of the Iudgment aforesaid to have and maintain and that he to that plea in manner and form aforesaid above pleaded needs not nor by the Law of the Land is bound to answer and this he is ready to aver wherefore for default of sufficient plea of the aforesaid John in this behalf the said Owen as at first prayeth Iudgement and that the said John from his execution by colour of the Iudgment aforesaid be barred and that the said Owen be thereof charged c. and the aforesaid John in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to him the said John his execution by colour of the Iudgment aforesaid against the said Owen to have and maintain above hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the said Owen doth not deny nor to the same any waies answereth but the said averrant altogether refuseth as before prayeth ludgement and execution of his Debt and damages aforesaid against the said Owyn to him to be adjuged c. and because the Iustices here will avise
appurtenances as before is said being seised dyed thereof so seised And farther by the same Inquisition it is found that the Manor of Yoke otherwise Yokes Court aforesaid the appurtenances in Lenham and Frensted in the said County of Kent at the time of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid and at the time of the death of the aforesaid Thomas Digges were holden of Warham St-leger Knight as of his Castle of Leeds by the half of a Knights Fee and were worth by the yeer in all reprofits above reprises 5 pound 14 shillings And that the Manor of Fokeham and other the premises to the said Manor belonging in Framsted and Lenham at the sayd time of the taking of the said Inquisition and at the time of the death of the said Thomas Digges of whom or by what services the Jurors of the same Inquisition were altogether ignorant and they were worth by the yeer in all the profits above reprises 7 pound And that the aforesaid Manor of Outlemestone and other the aforesaid premises whatsoever with the appurtenances to the said Manor belonging and appertaining at the time of the taking of the said Inquisition aforesaid and at the time of the death of the said Thomas Digges were worth by the yeer in all the profits above reprises 20 pound and that the said Land called Eastendown and Beacondown in Burham and Kingstone aforesaid were holden of the Arch Bishop of Canterbury in the right of his Bishoprick aforesaid but by what services the aforesaid Jurors are altogether ignorant and they were worth by the yeer above reprizes 3 pound 6 shillings 8 pence and that the aforesaid Lands called the Haute and Reed late percel of the aforesaid Manor of Bishopsborne and purchased by the aforesaid Christopher Digges of the aforesaid William Awcher Esquire were holden of the said Lady the Queen in Capite by Knights service that is to say by particular according to the rate and quantity of the said Manor of Bishopsborn and that the said Lands and Pasture called Throughly Close and Tylers in Barham aforesaid late purchased by the aforesaid Christopher Digges by way of Exchange of William Boyes of who or whom or by what services they were holden the Jurors aforesaid are altogether ignorant and that the aforesaid Land and Woods called Haute and Reed and the aforesaid Land Wood and Pasture purchased of the aforesaid William Boyes were worth by the yeer above reprises 4 pound And that the aforesaid 2 Acres of Land in Wemings Woold aforesaid were holden of who or whom or by what services the aforesaid Jurors were altoge-Ignorant and they were worth by the yeer above reprises 2 shillings and that the said Thomas Digges had not nor had more or other Lands and Tenements in the said County of Kent in demesn or service of us nor of any other the aforesaid dayin which he dyed and that the aforesaid Tho. Digges dyed the 10th day of April in the yeer of our Reign the 32th leaving the said Margaret his wife w th child with Tho. Posthumus Digges And that the said Thomas Posthumus Diggs born the second day of July in the 32 year aforesaid was Son and Heir of the said Thomas Digges and that the said Thomas Posthumus Digges the Son at the time of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid was of the age of 2 yeers 9 weeks and 6 dayes as by the Inquisition aforesaid in our Chancery retorned and in the Files there remaining of Record it more fully appeareth And whereas afterwards that is to say the 23th day of January in the Term of Saint Hillary in the yeer of our Reign the 39th before us in our Chancery aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid then being came Christopher Digges and Edward Digges Sons of the said Christopher Digges in the Inquisition aforesaid named and prayed the hearing of the Inquisition aforesaid which was read unto them which being read and heard and by them fully understood the said Christopher and Edward complained them by colour of the said Inquisition aforesaid to be grieved and molested and that they from the possession of the said Lands and Tenements with the appurtenances to the said lands called Eastendown and of two parts of so much of the demesn and of the said Manor of Owtelmestone with the appurtenances to the said Lands called Eastendown adjoyning in 4 parts to be divided as with the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown extend to the third part of all the Mannors Lands and Tenements whereof the aforesaid Christopher the Father dyed seised for the part of the aforesaid Christopher and Edward of the premises aforesaid to be expelled and amoved and that they from the possession thereof and of every parcel thereof by colour of the said Inquisition to be held out and that unjustly by cause they take it by Protestation That the Inquisition aforesaid and the matter in the same contained was insufficient in Law to which they needed not nor by the Law of the Land were holden any waies to Answer And shewing of their Right in that behalf The said Christopher and Edward said That the aforesaid Christopher Digges Father of them the said Thomas Christopher and Edward was in his life time seized in his Demesn as of Fee of and in the aforesaid Mannor of Owtelmeston in Barham in the County aforesaid and of all and singular the Rights Members parcel and appurtenaces whatsoever containing 200 Acres of Land Meadow Pasture and Wood And also was seized of and in the aforesaid Mannor of Yoke and Fockham lying and being in the Parish of Lenham Frensted and Harrisham with his Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever containing 800. Acres of Land Meadow Pasture and Wood And of and in the Mannor of Marton lying and being in the Parishes of Sturrey Hackington and Saint Stephen in the said County containing by estimation 40. Acres of Land Pasture Meadow and Wood And of diverse Gardens in the City of Canterbury containing half an Acre of Land And of and in the Mannor of Netherherds with the Appurtenances in the County aforesaid containing 200. Acres of Land And also of a certain peece of Land called Eastendown lying and being in Barham aforesaid containing by Estimation 110. Acres And of another peece or parcel of Land called Haute and Reed lying and being in the Parish of Barham aforesaid containing 61. Acres and a half and in another peece of Land lying in Barham aforesaid late as before is said purchased by Exchange of the aforesaid William Boyes containing 40. Acres of Lands which said Mannors Lands and Tenements and other the premises amount in the whole to 2500. Acres of Lands and the said Christopher Digges the Father of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized The first day of February in the yeer of our Reign the 19th made his Testament and last Will in Writing and by the said Testament and last Will declared and limitted as to the disposition of the third part of all
Queen here are not yet c. Prohibition Michaelmas Term Anno 31. and 32. Eliz. Rot. 447. in the Common-Pleas Co. 4. part Jeffreyes Case Fol. 64. Mâ—morandum That upon Monday next after a Moneth of St. Michael this Term before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came William Jeffrey Cent. in his proper person and informed the Couâ—t of the Lady the Queen that now is here That whereas according to the Law of the Land and the Custom of this Kingdom of England time whereof the Memory of Men is not to the contrary within the said Kingdom had and used The Inhabitants and Residents within any Parish within the Kingdom aforesaid within which any Parish Church is The said Church at their own propper costs as often as need required was repaired and from the whole time aforesaid used to be and ought to be repaired And that every other person or persons inhabiting without the same Parish in any other Parish from the Reparations thereof from the time aforesaid were discharged and acquitted And whereas by the Law of the Land and the Custom aforesaid It is not lawful to any person or persons to impose any Rate or Tax upon any person not dwelling in any Parish where such Church to be repaired is in respect or by reason of any Lands or Tenements which the said person holdeth or occupieth in the said Parish where the said Church is to be repaired as above is said for the Reparation of any Church so unrepaired without his consent And whereas also the Tryal and Determination of the cause aforesaid is a matter determinable at the Common Law and not by the Laws or Censures Ecclesiastical any wayes to be Tryed Ended or Discussed nor used to be time whereof the Memory of Man is not to the contrary Yet Abraham Kenshely and Thomas Foster Church-wardens of the Parish of Haylesham in the County of Sussex not being ignorant of the Premises falsely and subtilely pretending the aforesaid William Jessrey to be an Inhabitant within the Parish of Haylesham aforesaid whereas in truth the aforesaid William Jeffrey is and was dwelling within the Parish of Chiddingly in the County aforesaid and never was dwelling within the Parish of Haylesham aforesaid And the same Church of Haylesham aforesaid by Tenants and Proprietors of Lands and Tenements within the same Parish behoved and ought to be repaired Endeavouring the Queens Majesty that now is and her Regal Crown to desinherit and the Conusance of Pleas which to the said Queens Majesty and to her Regal Crown and not to the spiritual Court doth belong to draw to be determined in the spiritual Court The said William Jeffrey in the spiritual Court aforesaid before Doctor DREWRT Doctor of Law in and throughout the whole Archdeaconry of Lewis of the most Reverend Father in Christ by Divine Providence Thomas Lord Bishop of Chichester lawfully deputed at the procuring of the same Abraham and Thomas in this behalf of and for a certain Tax upon him the said William Jeffrey to and about the Reparations of the Parish Church of Haylesham aforesaid imposed caused to be cited and him the said William in the spiritual Court aforesaid before the aforesaid spiritual Judge to appear and him the said William so appearing to answer to certain Articles of for the Tax aforesaid that is to say for that the said William Jeffrey knew believed heard that within the Archdeaconry of Lewes in the County aforesaid there was a Church commonly called the Parish Church of Haylesham that the said Parish Church as well in the tiling as in the covering thereof as in other things needed and wanted so that unless it were repaired it was feared it would fall to decay and ruine And that as well of Common Right and of an ancient and laudable Custom as also time whereof the Memory of Men is not to the contrary inviolably and unquestoned it was used and observed within the Parish of Haylesham aforesaid That all and singular the Parishoners intending the Reparation of any Church unrepaired according to the Rate and the Quality of their possessions having and occupying in same Parish might or ought to impose a Rate or Tax and also that the said Church mature deliberation being had thereof could not be repaired for lesse sum than Threescore and Ten pounds As also that the Church-wardens of the Parish Church of Haylesham aforesaid for the time being in the yeer of our Lord 1589. and two yeers then last past of and with the consent of all the Parishioners of Haylesham aforesaid or the greater or better number of the same A Rate according to the Quantity and Qualities of the possessions aforesaid and of the Rents within the said Parish being for the Reparation of the said Church of the possessions aforesaid or Rents in the said Parish of all and singular to be imposed and the same to be taxed had decreed and had appointed a day and place for the Rate and Tax aforesaid to be made And that of the same day in which the said Rate should be imposed notice was given to all the Parishioners aâ—oresaid as also to Forreiners having Lands Possessions or Rents in the Parish of Haylesham aforesaid and also in the publick Market there And that at the time and place appointed for the imposing of the aforesaid Tax or Rate those Church wardens as also the Parishioners of the said Parish to the Rate and Tax aforesaid to be made proceeded And the sum of 4. pence of every Acre of Land called Marsh-land as also the sum of 2. pence of lawful Mony of England of every Acre of Land called Vpland within the Parish of Haylesham aforesaid being for the Reparations of the aforesaid Parish Church by the havers and occupiers of the aforesaid Acres were imposed to be paid to the Church-wardens of the aforesaid Parish Church As also that the said William 30. Acres of Marsh called Marsh Ground and 100. Acres of Land called Vpland within the Parish aforesaid held and occupyed or Rents for the same then received And that the sum from the havers and occupyers of the possessions aforesaid or Rents within the aforesaid Parish of Haylesham aforesaid did not extend unto above the sum of 50. pounds of good and lawful Money of England according to the Rate and Tax aforesaid to be levied and collected under the name colour of their Office as before is said of upon the premises to answer unjustly bound And although the said William Jeffrey the matter aforesaid above contained in the spiritual Court aforesaid before the aforesaid spiritual Judge in his discharge of the premises often had pleaded alleged and the same with inevitable truth and good Witnesse offered to prove that he by the Law of the Land in form aforesaid ought not to be cited for the payment of the aforesaid sum upon him the said William Jeffrey for the Reparations of the Church of Haylesham aforesaid as before is said taxed and for
should be fully satisfied and paid as by the said Writing amongst other things more fully appeareth By virtue of which Gift and Grant the said Ann was of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid seized in her demesn as of Freehold for the Term of her life And so thereof being seized The said Ann afterwards and before the time in which c. at Suâ—ton Atthone aforesaid took to Husband the aforesaid Dionisius And afterwards and before the time in which it is supposed the taking aforesaid of the Cattel aforesaid to be done that is to say the 20th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th the aforesaid Dionisius at Sutton Atthone aforesaid dyed and the aforesaid Ann him over lived and was of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid seized in her demesn as of Freehold for the Term of her life And because 20. pound of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid by one whole yeer ended at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th and within the space of 40. dayes then next following were not paid to the said Ann but were behind The said George Mason and Francis as Bayliffs of the said Ann do well acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. as in parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the distresse of the said Ann in form aforesaid charged and bound And this they are ready to aver Whereupon They demand Judgement and Retorn of the Cattel aforesaid together with their damages costs and charges by them about their Sute in this behalf put unto to be adjudged unto them c. And the aforesaid John Kettel saith That the aforesaid George Mason and Francis Easterly by any thing before alleged the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which to be just ought not to acknowledge For he saith that long before the aforesaid time of taking of the aforesaid Cattel done and long before the grant of the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid of 40 pound And long before the said Dionisius Mayow had any thing of and in the aforesaid 8. Acres of Pasture with their Appurtenanes One Thomas Mayow was thereof seized in his demesn as of Fee And so being thereof seized The said Tho-Mayow before the time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid long before the Grant of the aforesaid Annuity that is to say the 15. day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen the 19th at Sutton Atthone aforesaid of the said 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. Enfeossed one Thomas Scot of Sutton Atthone aforesaid Gentleman and John Fremling of Dartford in the said County Baker amongst other things By the name of all those his Two Manors of Sawters and Sawley with the Barns Stables Dove-houses and all other the Houses and Buildings to the said Manors belonging Orchards Gardens with the Appurtenances situate lying and being in Sutton Atthone aforesaid then in the Tenure or Occupation of the said Thomas Mayow and also by the name of all other his Houses and Buildings Lands and Tenements Meadow Pasture Woods and Underwoods Rents and Reversions situate lying and being within the Towns Parishes and Fields of Sutton Atthone aforesaid Wilmington and Dartford or elsewhere in the aforesaid County of Kent as also the Reversion and Remainder of all and singular the premises Rents and yeerly profits reserved upon whatsoever Demises or Grants of the premises or any parcel thereof before then made To have and to hold the aforesaid Manors and other the premises with the Appurtenances whereof c. To the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John Fremling their Heirs and Assignes for ever to the only use and behoof of the aforesaid Dionise Mayow Son and Heir Apparent of the said Thomas Mayow his Heirs and Assignes for ever of the chief Lords of the Fee by the services thereof first due and of right accustomed upon the Conditions following That is to say That the aforesaid Dionise Mayow or his Heirs should pay or cause to paid to Petronill Martin of Mylton in the aforesaid County of Kent Widow the yeerly Rent of 10. pound for the Term of the life of her the said Petronill Which yeerly Rent of 10. pound the aforesaid Thomas Mayow to the aforesaid Petronill before had granted for and in consideration of a Mariage to be had and solemnized between the aforesaid Thomas Mayow and the aforesaid Petronill after the death of the aforesaid Thomas Mayow And upon Condition That if the aforesaid Thomas Mayow at any time during the natural life of the said Thomas should pay or cause to be paid to the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John Fremling or to either of them or to the Heirs of the longer liver of them 10. shillings of good and lawful Mony of England that then the Feoffment aforesaid should be void and of no force in Law And that then it should be lawful to the aforesaid Tho. Mayow into the aforesaid Two Manors and all the premises with the Appurtenances whereof c. to re-enter and the same to have again in his former Estate and Condition any Act Thing Cause or Matter whatsoever to the contrary thereof notwithstanding By virtue of which Feoâ—fment and by force of a certain Act in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27th of transferring uses into possession The said Dionise Mayow was seized of the aforesad 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which in his demesn as of Fee upon the Conditions aforesaid And so thereof being seized The said Dionise before the aforesaid time of taking the Cattel aforesaid that is to say the 30th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th abovesaid at Sutton Atthone aforesaid by his Writing â—ealâ—d with his Seal bearing date the same day and yeer Gave and Granted to the aforesaid Ann by the name of Ann Maxey of Chigwel in the County of Essex the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid of 20. pound to be issuing out of the aforesaid place in which c. amongst other in manner and form as the aforesaid George Mason and Francis Easterley above in their Conusance abovesaid have allâ—ged And the said Ann afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. At Sutton Atthone aforesaid took to Husband the said Dionise and afterwards and before the time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid that is to say the 30th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th The aforesaid Thomas Mayow at Sutton Atthone aforesaid payed to the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John
Maunsfield exercised and from thence hitherto do exercise and enjoy and all and singular Wages Fees Commodities Profits to the said Office due and by reason of the exercising of the said office within the Manor of Maunsfield aforesaid of right belonging to their own use had and took and the said Earl to exercise the said Office within the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield and the Wages Fees and Profits to the said Office of right belonging and from the whole time whereof the memory of Man is not to the contrary to have and take with force and Arms then and there hindred and as yet doth hinder and other harms to him c. to the great damage c. and against the peace c. and whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 100. pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid Robert and Thomas by William Cragg their Attourny come and defend the force and injury when c. and say that they are not guilty of the Trespass aforesaid as the aforesaid Earl above against them complaineth and of this put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid Earl likewise therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause of come here from the day of the Holy Trinity in 3 weeks 12 c. by whom c. and who neither c. to recognize c. because aswell c. Afterwards the day and place within contained before Peter Warberton one of the Justices of the Lord the King of the bench and Thomas Foster another of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the Bench Justices of the said Lord the King to Assises in the County of Nottingham to be taken by form of the Statute c. come aswell the within named Roger Earl of Rutland as the within named Robert Spencer and Thomas Woldwood by their Attorneys within contained And the Jurors of the Jury whereof within is made mention being called some of them that is to say Edward Bould of Holloughton Esquire Edward Coppinger of Francfield Esquire George Hutchinson of Balford Gent. Francis Hollingworth of Stapleford Gent. VVilliam Gresley of the same Nicholas Hamond of Lound Gent. Anthony VVhitwell of VVeyston Gent. Joh. Sturtevant of Calverton Gent. Richard Griggs of Gringly up the Hill and John Seywell of Normanton against Plumtree come and are sworn Jurors of the Jury aforesaid and because the rest of the Jurors of that Jury did not appear therefore others of the standers by chosen by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid at the request of Roger Earl of Rutland and by the command of the Justices aforesaid of new are added whose names are fyled to the Pannel within written according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided and the Jurors of new added that is to say John Hutten and John Templemem likewise come who to say the truth of the premises with the other Jurors aforesaid first impannelled chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England was seised in her demesn as of Fee in right of her Crown of England of and in the Manor of Maunsfield in the County of Nottingham and of and in the Manor of Bolsover and Horsley in the County of Derby and so thereof being seised the 14th day of June tn the year of her Reign the 42th By her Letters Patents under the great Seal of England sealed and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in evidence graunted to the aforesaid Earl of Rutland from the time of the full age of the said Earl of 21 years to the term and for and during the whole term of the natural life of him the said Earl the office of Steward of the Lordships or Manors aforesaid with the Wages and Fees to the said Office of old due and accustomed as in the said Letters Patents is contained the Tenor of which followeth in these words Elizabeth by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen Defender of the Faith c. To all to whom these present Letters shall come Greeting Know ye that we of our special Grace and of our certain Knowledge and meer Motion have given and granted and by these presents for us our Heirs and Successors do give and grant to our Well Beloved Cosin Roger Earl of Rutland the Office of Constable of our Castle of Nottingham and Keeper oâ— the Gates of the said Castle as also the Office of Steward Keeper Guardian and Chief Justice of our Forrest of Sherwood and our Parks of Billow Birkland Romwald Owseland Folwood Beskwood and Clipson with their Aupurtenances in the said County of Nottingham and him the said Roger Earl of Rutland Constable of our Castle aforesaid and Keeper of the Gates of the said Castle as also Steward Keeper and Justice Itinerate of the Forests and Parks aforesaid we â—o make ordain and constitute by these presents giving and granting to the said Roger Earl of Rutland by the Tenor of these presents full power and authority All and all manner oâ— Pleas Quarrels and Causes within the Forest and Parks aforesaid or any of them arising according to the Law and Custom of the Forest to hear and determine To have enjoy use and exercise the Offices aforesaid and every of them To the aforesaid Roger Earl of Rutland by him or by his sufficient Deputy or Deputies from the time of the full age of 21. yeers of the same Earl to the Term and for and during the whole Term of the natural life of the said Roger Earl of Rutland together with power in the said Offices to make and appoint all Officers of old due and accustomed and for the exercising and occupation of the Office aforesaid we give and grant by these presents to the aforesaid Roger Earl of Rutland the Wages and â—ee of 40. Marks by the year from the time of the full age of 21. years of the said Earl to the Term and for the whole natural life of the said Earl of Rutland As also an Annuity or yeerly Rent of 9. pound from the time of the full age of the said Earl to the Term for and during the whole Term of the natural life of the same Earl of Rutland for the Wages or Stipends of 9. Foresters assigned by him the said Earl to keep the Forest aforesaid To be taken yearly to be received the said Wages and Fee of 40. Marks from the Treasury of us our Heirs and Successors at the Receipt of our Exchequer at Westminster by the Hands of our Treasurer or Chamberlains or anâ— oâ— their Hands for the time being at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and Easter by even portions And also the said Annuity or yearly Rent of 9. pound for the Wage and Stipend of the aforesaid Roger Earl of Rutland from the time of the full age of 21. years of the said Earl to the Term and for and during the whole Term of the natural life