workes whereas these are two divers propositions to bee without workes and to iustifie without workes The third Argument is taken from the removal of the Causes whereas Faith alone Iustifieth which causes are of Bellarmine referred to three heades cap. 16. The first is the authority of the word whervnto the Adversary answereth That it is no where taught in the scripture That wee are iustified by faith onely Answ Though the Particle alone be not expressed in the Scripture yet the signification of that word is expressed by Synonimall formes of speaking which are these 1. Without Workes 2. Of Grace freely by Grace 3. The exclusiue Particles which are two particulars Galat 2.16 but by Faith Luc. 8.30 By beleeving onely by which formes of speaking as all works aswell Ceremoniall as Moral are excluded so faith alone is included as the only Instrument of Iustification The second head is the will of God who will haue vs iustified with the alone condition of faith The Adversary answereth that it contradicteth the Scripture which layeth downe also the condition of Repentance Answere 1. Repentance is the condition of faith and of the person justified but not properly of Iustification 2. It is one thing to treate of the condition of Iustification but another thing of the cause and Instrument therof for a condition noteth a consequent or effect but a cause the Antecedent or Efficient 3. Neyther is our Iustification with the condition of Faith as Faith is a habite in vs but as it apprehendeth Christ out of vs. The third is the nature of faith which alone hath that property that it apprehendeth Iustification The Adversary answereth that Faith doth not properly apprehend Answ There is a double apprehensioÌ„ the one of knowledge in the vnderstanding the other of trust in the Will both these Faith includeth which in respect of the vnderstanding and the will apprehendeth Christ but the nature of the Sacramentes is otherwise which were instituted not that they might iustifie but that they might confirme the party iustified in the feeling of his Iustification The fourth Argument is from the maner of Iustifying for we affirme that faith Iustifieth not by the maner of cause worthinesse or merite but by relation onely which Bellarmine denyeth and proveth by three arguments that faith iustifieth by the manner of merite and cause cap. 13. The first is taken from testimonies which teach that faith is the cause of iustification Rom. 3. Rom. 5. Ephes 1. Answer First for Faith is one thing and by Faith is another thing The one is of the cause the other of the Instrument Secondly neyther is the maner of works the same with that of faith in opposition because workes haue the nature of righteousnesse inherent in vs but faith the nature of righteousnesse imputed vnto vs. Thirdly nor doe the places which are alleadged note the cause of Iustification but eyther the Instrument thereof or the quality and state of a man iustified The second is taken from those testimonies which testifie that faith is the beginning of righteousnesse and hereby the formall cause of Iustification Rom. 4. First there is a two-fold imputation as in that very place the Apostle noteth the one of debt the other of grace and the Apostle treaâ—eth of this and not of that Secondly â—â—th Faith is the instrumeÌ„t it is no strange â—hing if as it is vsually the manner of â—nstruments the name and the office of the thing whereof it is but the Instrument bee attributed vnto it 1. Cor. 3. First A foundation is vsually considered two wayes properly or by a Metalepsis properly Christ is so but by a Metalepsis Faith which hath respect to Christ For distinctions sake the one may bee called i Primum ad primuÌ„ the first the other to the first Secondly a foundation is eyther vnderstoode to bee as a part of a building or a ground of a building Christ and Faith are sayd to be the foundation of the Church not properly as they are a part thereof but as they are the Ground and Base of the same Act. 15. First the hearts are justified by faith not as the cause but as the Instrument not by effecting but by affecting or applying Secondly the place it selfe doth manifestly distinguish Faith which is onely the inner instrumeÌ„tal cause from the cause properly Efficient to witte the Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost The third is taken from those Testimonies which teach that Remission of sinnes is obtayned by Faith Luke 7. Ans First men are sayde to bee saved both properly of God our onely Saviour and figuratiuely by the meanes which it hath pleased God to vse eyther inward as faith or outward as the voyce of the Gospell and the signes thereof Secondly the efficacy of faith wholy dependeth vpon the object which it apprehendeth and it is sayde to saue for that it is the effectuall and necessary Instrument of Salvation like as the Gospell is called the power to every one that beleeveth vnto salvation Rom. 4. Ans First The Particle wherefore noteth not the cause of the Consequent but of the Consequence Secondly it is there shewed not what the habite of faith deserveth sith faith and merites are opposites but what is the vse and effect of true naturall faith Rom. 10. Answ First the Apostle doth neyther make preaching the cause of faith nor faith the cause of invocation and salvation but teacheth that as that is the Instrument of the one so this is of the other SecoÌ„dly the degrees of Salvation are reckoned vppe by the Apostle which are badly confounded with the causes thereof Thirdly those things which Faith obtayneth by Invocation it obtayneth as an Instrument and not as a Cause because all the power of Faith consisteth in Relation Heb. 11. Ans First men please God by faith not for faith Secondly whatsoever examples are cited they note not the merite of Faith but the vse and effect thereof The Fift Argument is fee from two principles the first whereof is the Formal Cause of Iustification which the Adversary affirmeth to bee righteousnesse inherent in vs The second is the merite and necessity of good workes Of the former wee shall treate in the explication of the Formall Cause of the latter in the place concerning good workes DISTINCTIONS IN DEfence of the Materiall Cause I. THere is one Iustice Create and another Increate the one is of God of Christ as hee is God the other of the Creature and of Christ as hee is a creature II. THe Create righteousnesse is eyther of the Person or of the cause by that some person is judged just by this a righteousnesse of the Cause of some controversie is vnderstoode the righteousnesse of the Person to speake properly is in Christ III. OF the person there is one inherent another Imputatiue that was in Christ this is in vs by the worke of the Spirite for Christ IIII. INherent righteousnesse is eyther originall or habituall or else
actuall both of these were in Christ yet properly he imputeth this onely V. ACtuall righteousnesse is eyther perfect or imperfect this is in vs that in Christ VI. PErfect actual righteousnesse of Christ consisteth in a double obedience whereof the one is called the obedience of the Law the other obedience vnto death VII THe obedience of the law which is truely and properly the effect of the person being the mediator neyther ought nor can bee called eyther a part making the person or a quality pertayning to the making of that person VIII THe places of Scripture which treat of Christes death are not to bee taken exclusiuely or oppositely but figuratiuely or Synecdochically for the last accomplishment of the whole obedience DISTINCTIONS in defence of the Formall Cause The Arguments which Bellarmine bringeth against the truth of this cause are of two sorts for first hee endeavoureth to proue by certaine reasons that our inherent righteousnesse is the formall cause of our righteousnesse Secondly he impugneth the imputation of Christs righteousnesse The first he endeauoureth to perform by 8. Testimonies Cap. 3. Lib. 2. De Iustificatione The first is in Rom. 5. Of which wee haue treated in the explication of those places which were alleadged against the true nature of the name or word The second is in Rom. 3. Answ First the Grace of God is taken in Scripture aequivocally First for the free and eternall favour of God wherby hee made vs acceptable to him selfe in his beloved Sonne and this is the Grace that maketh acceptable Secondly for the giftes by Grace whether outward or inward whether generall or particula and that in the place cited it is taken in that signification and not in this three thinges doe proue First because the Apostle excludeth the righteousnesse of the law which is of works to the end hee might establish the righteousnesse of faith the causes whereof hee reckoneth vp Secondly because what hee called freely hee expounded by grace that not onely the workes that goe before but also those that follow after faith might bee excluded Thirdly because the Apostle opposeth the very same Grace cap. 4.2.4 against Abrahams works howsoever proceeding from the renuing of the Spirite Secondly neyther in deed doth the conjoyning of those two words Freely and by Grace sith the one expoundeth the other according to the Scripturall Phrase of speaking nor doth the force of the Preposition by which is not found in the originall Text and very often in the Scripture noteth the efficient nor doth the Efficacy of Gods grace the effect whereof ought necessarily to be distinguished from the Cause nor lastly doth it because loue in Scripture is called any Grace whereas both the loue of God towards vs is a grace making acceptable and ours towardes God is a grace freely given any way infringe that interpretation The third 1. Cor. 6. To this wee haue aboue answered The fourth Titus 3. Answ First the Effect is badly confounded with the cause to witte Iustification with Regeneration and Renovation for the matter of that is the righteousnesse of Christ but of this our Inherent righteousnesse Secondly neyther doth the Apostle call Renovation Iustification sith hee expresly distinguisheth the one from the other Thirdly the Apostle sheweth not the cause but the vse of Renovation or good workes when he sayeth that being justified by the grace of God wee might bee heyres according to the hope of everlasting life The fift Heb. 11 Ans First there is a two-folde righteousnesse Imputed and Inherent by both they are called Iust or righteous but after a divers manner by that by way of Relation and perfectly before God by this Inchoatiuely Subjectiuely and vnperfectly Secondly the perfection which is ascribed vnto the faithfull in the Scripture hath a three-fold respect the first of Gods councell from everlasting Secondly of the foundation in Christ lastly eyther of comparison and opposition vnto other mēs vnrighteousnes or of the end or tearme of perfection vnto which it tendeth besides these respects there is no perfection of the faithfull in this world Thirdly the nearest cause in deede of a righteous worke is inherent righteousnesse but the chiefe and principall cause is the Spirit of Christ imputing his righteousnes to vs and by the power of that imputed righteousnesse working this inherent righteousnesse in vs. The Sixt Rom. 8. 1. Cor. 15. Ans first our Conformity with the Image of Christ whereof mention is made in the Scripture is threefold the one vnto the image of glory being opposite to that which is vnto the image of Christs afflictions And of this the Apostle treateth in the cited places The second vnto the image of Christs obedience which in deede in this world we performe vnperfectly but Christ applyeth the same to vs as perfectly performed for vs. The third is of the death buriall and resurrection of Christ Secondly of Christs righteousnesse there is a double vse the one principall of satisfaction and merite the other exemplary and of document as touching satisfaction Christs righteousnesse is imputed to vs as touching example it is the rule of our inherent righteousnesse Thirdly the opposition which is made betweene the image of the first Adam and the second according to the sense of the Apostle in both places hath respect vnto the mortality and immortality the earthly and heavenly qualities of the body not properly vnto sinne and Christs imputed righteousnesse The seaventh Rom. 6. Ans The word Iustification is taken two wayes properly and improperly Properly when wee are sayde to bee justified by the cause Improperly when wee are sayde to bee justified by the effects Secondly the Apostle treateth of our Sanctification and the two parts therof the mortifying of the old man and the quickning of the new of both which partes hee giues vs an example in the death and resurrection of Christ Thirdl◠to bee justified signifieth to bee freede according to the proper phrase of the Hebrewes who comprehend the Consequent with the Antecedent The eight Rom 8. Answere First the degrees of our Salvation Adoption and Iustification are badly confounded together Secondly of Adoption there are two considerations the one according to the truth and foundation thereof in the eternall counsell of our Election the other according to the fruition and accomplishment thereof in the other life In that signification Adoption goeth before Iustification but in thi Adoption is the bound and end of Iustification Thirdly it is one thing to call Iustification Putatiue and another Imputatiue that as being false is falsely also faigned vnto vs this is no lesse true then if we our selues had it subiectiuely because of the truths sake both of Gods promise and our coniunction with Christ That the FORMAL CAVSE of our Iustification is not the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse Bellarmine proveth by ten Arguments Cap. 7. Lib. 2. de Iustificatione To the FIRST IT is false for whereas there are two sorts of testimonies some expressed and some by
II. THe Calling which is common to all by naturall Grace is wrought by God according to the a Esse naturae being of Nature as the Schoole-men speake generally but that which happeneth to those that are called Supernaturally is concluded in two partes for it proceedeth generally from the caller belongeth particularly to the called III. THe Formall of the calling ought to bee distinguished from the Materiall thereof because the Subject of that is particular but the Subject of this belongeth to all men alike OF MANS IVSTIFIcation before GOD. The Part Confirming CHAP. IX THe Second degree of Application which is here made on the behalf of God is Iustification It is needefull that the verity of this Iustification bee declared two wayes by Anotation of Words wherof there is vse in the explication of this doctrine as also by definition of the thing it selfe according to all the causes The Words whose doubtfull signification is to bee taken away lest they should in the doctrine it selfe breed any difficulty are chiefly two Iustice and Iustification Iustice which indeede is of the Person is two wayes vsually considered one way in the manner of quality or Inherence and it is the obedience of the Law which wee performe to it the other in manner of Relation or Imputation and it is a gracious giving of another mans obedience for vs performed that is called the righteousnesse of the law or Works this of the Gospell or Faith that is in the person subjectiuely this of the Person by Grace of Imputation It is needefull that both bee distinguished because there is a diverse vse of both of this in the Private and inward court of the conscience before God of that in the publicke and outward Court of christian profession before men Iustification generally considered is the very application of righteousnes but specially if wee treate of righteousnesse inherent it is the effecting of a certaine habituall holines in man which signification is most vnusuall and vnproper if wee treate of the righteousnesse of Imputation it is a gracious Imputation of another mans righteousnes by faith and so an absolving of a man before God And this signification as most proper and vsuall both the common custome of tonges a Idiotismus the proper phrase of the holy Scriptures doe confirme The common custome of tongues for as with the Grecians to justifie hath two significations besides or without the doctrine of Iustification the one to judge and pronounce one just by publicke judgement the other after the cause is judged judiciously to punish one so that there is the same vse of the word with the Hebrewes two things doe most evidently proue first the direct and most frequent vse of that word in court or pubilcke judgements causes and actions b 2. Kin. 15.4 Deut. 25.1 Esa 43.9 secondly the manifest c Pro. 17 15. Esa 50.8 Rom. 8.33 â—4 opposition of condemnation and justification as being contraries d Antithesis And in this signification the word to Iustifie commonly importeth three thinges To absolue a person accused e Esa 5.23 Exod. 23. Luc. 7.29 to iudge one for righteous to giue a testimony to one already Iustified as also rewardes which are due to the iust and innocent If you respect the proper phrase of the Scripture by iudiciall proceeding it proposeth the whole doctrine of Iustification this the Phrases of speaking which the Scripture vseth as also that whole manner and course of our Salvation which it describeth doe proue The Phrases which in this point the Scripture vseth do proue some by way of deniall that hee which is iustified is not condemned not iudged and that sinnes are not imputed vnto him f some by way of affirmation doe proue that hee is made iust is freede from the accusation and condemnation of the law that righteousnesse is imputed vnto him c. g Rom. 5.18 8.33 The whole course and manner of our Salvation is fully performed as it were by two degrees by the knowledge of our misery and the trust of Gods mercy Of our misery there are three partes the Offence the Guilt and the Punishment Of Gods mercy there are three opposite parts the foregiuenesse of the fault the absolving from the guilt and the freeing from the punishment That whole course or proceeding froÌ„ our misery to Gods mercy is caled IustificatioÌ„ by a signification taken from common pleadings h Forensi or from the Lawyers Iustification therefore is properly a free iudiciall action of God whereby hee iudgeth the elect in themselues subiect to the accusation and malediction of the Law to bee iust by faith through Christ by imputation of his righteousnesse vnto the prayse of the glory of his Grace and their owne salvation i Rom. 3.24.25 That this definition might be rightly vnderstoode it is needefull that the Causes which are orderly noted in the same bee two wayes considered according as Iustification is taken eyther Actiuely in respect of God who iustifyeth or Passiuely in respect of man who is iustified The Efficient cause of Iustification taken actiuely is God the Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost k 2. Cor. 5.19 2. Cor. 6.21 for it is in him to absolue or acquite the guilty person by whose Iustice hee is made guilty in him to pronounce one iust whose will is a rule of Iustice Lastly in him to giue iudgement of life or death who by nature right and office is supreme iudge l Esa 59 1 Psal 5â— 4 Esa 43.21 Mar 27. Of this Efficient there is a double Impulsiue cause Outward and Inward the Inward is the onely mercy of the father m Rom. 3.23 both in regard of his good plesure which predestinated vs n Ephe. 1.5 into the adoption of sonnes o Rom. 3.23 as also in regard of the p Oeconomiae disposing and dispensation which both ordained the Sonne for this end and applyed the benefite obtayneâ— by the Sonne vnto vs q Coloss 1.12 And this is the grace which in Scripture if called the Grace of r Free gifts in Schooles the Grace that maketh one acceptable and among the common sort the Grace that freely giveth and is alwayes opposed vnto workes which are called the gifts by grace or of grace freely giveÌ„ because God tooke not the first cause of Iustification from vs or our workes but in himselfe and from himselfe for the vnsearchable riches of the glory of his grace Wherefore there can bee from vs no disposition and preparation which of the Popelings is surmised to be necessary for the bringing in of the forme of Iustification Å¿ Eph. 2.8.9 Tit. 3.5 Eph. 2.4 for albeit there bee two speciall degrees of preparation if not in time at leastwise in nature going before Iustification to witte the feeling of our misery and a confused knowledge of Gods mercy yet none of these maketh for the manner of the Efficient Cause not
thereof in it selfe and the manner of the truth thereof in vs. Of the truth in it selfe there are two bounds Righteousnesse and the Imputation thereof between these there is a relation because Christ hath perfect righteousnes for no other end then that hee might impute it nor imputeth any other thing then righteousnesse nor is our righteousnesse any otherwise then by Imputation The manner of the truth thereof in vs is in the Scripture two wayes limitted whereof the former teacheth vs that wee are iust not in our selues not in our owne righteousnesse but by the righteousnesse of Christ which being out of vs is made ours by right of giving Hence wee are sayde to be made the righteousnesse of God in him n Cot. 5.21 the second teacheth vs that we haue righteousnesse as Christ hath our sinne now he hath it not subiectiuely or inherent but by imputation Hence is that o Autithesis oppositioÌ„ made by the Apostle in the place already cited to wit of Christ whome God made sinne for vs and of vs who were made the righteousnesse of God in him And according to this forme of Iustification there is one and alike Iustification in all men though in diverse according to the measure of him that apprehendeth it be after a divers maner modified The former â—efore of Iustification is not an haâ—â—â—al saÌ„ctity inherent in vs for albeit Iustification Sanctification agree in the Efficient causes as well Gods grace as Christs merit in the Instrumentall cause to wit faith by receyving that of the one and by effecting that of the other Lastly in the scope and end for they tend to one end saue that the one is as the cause the other as the way yet they much differ both as touching the substance and as touching the Adiuncts As touching the substance that is as touching all the causes for the matter of IustificatioÌ„ is the obedience of Christ of Sanctification our owne obedience the one perfect the other vnperfect the forme thereof that is the Imputation of Christs obedience but of this the drawing backe of our minds from vnpure to pure qualities Of Iustification there is no neerest and inward efficient cause but of this Sanctification the wil of man is being the beginning of human actions the end of that is the peace of conscience but of this an open testifying of the reconciling of our selues with God As touching the Adiuncts because they differ first in the maner of effecting for that is effected by right of donation this by maner of alteration secondly by the Effects that absolveth vs in the iudgement of God This doth not Thirdly and lastly in continuance for That shall haue an end with this life This shall endure for ever The Forme of Iustification taken passiuely is the application of Faith Hence it is that wee are sayde to bee saved p Per fideÌ„ fide ex fide by faith through faith of faith of which wee haue spoken in the cause Instrumentall q Mar. 5.39 Rom. 3.7 Gal. 1.16 Eph. 2.8.9 Tit 3.5 The End of Iustification taken actiuely is the glory of God in the wonderfull tempering of his Iustice and mercy r Eph. 1.5.6.7 Rom. 3. â—6 Of his iustice that he would haue his Sonne to satisfie it of his mercy that he would impute his sonnes satisfaction vnto vs. Å¿ Rom. 5.1 Tit. 3.7 The End of Iustification taken passiuely is peace of Conscience and eternall salvation OF MANS IVSTIFICATIon before GOD. The Confuting Part. Distinctions in defence of the Definition of the Name or Word I. IN the searching out of the interpretation of a Word the derivation and composition of the Word is not simply to bee looked vnto but the vse and the propriety of the same II. THe vse of the Word Iustification is vsually two-fold for eyther Iustification is taken properly or in a signification translated from the speciall to the generall by an abuse of speech it importeth all those thinges which follow Iustification III. THere are two orders of Testimonies concerning Iustification the one Legall the other Evangelicall the testimonies of the Legall Iustice do teach what manner of iustice standeth before the Tribunall of God the testimonies of the iustice of faith or those which are Evangelicall doe some pertaine to the causes of Iustification some to the outward signes and testimonies of the person iustified Lastly some to the comprobation of the worke done by faith The Places by which Bellarmine prooveth that to iustifie signifieth to make iust cap. 3. lib. 2. de Iustitia Rom. 5.16.18.19 Ans First there is a manifest opposition of condemnation and justification Now whereas thinges opposite are vnder the same kinde Genere it must needes be that iustification as well as condemnation is a judiciall Act. Secondly as condemnation is never taken out of that signification which belongs to places of judgment and pleading so justification which is made before God is never taken from the effect of infused grace Thirdly the judgement of God is according to truth as well when hee pronounceth vs just for the imputed righteousnesse of Christ as when hee maketh vs just by the power and vertue of his Spirite both truely though diversly the one perfectly the other vnperfectly Dan. 12.3 Ans Iustification in the signification belonging to courts of pleading is two-fold the one immediate the other mediate of this speaketh the Prophet whereby God by his Ministers absolveth sinners as by the same hee bindeth and holdeth sinners and it is a Figure familiar in the Scripture to attribute that to the Instrument which is proper to the cause Esa 53.11 Answ First the Hebrew word in the third conjugation signifieth to pronounce one just as in the first it signifieth to be just positiuely Secondly the Text hath not in his Knowledge but in the knowledge of himselfe whereby is declared not the manner of Iustification but the Instrument or faith expressed by a circumlocution a Per Periphrasm Thirdly it is one thing to treate of Christs righteousnes which in him is inherent subjectiuely and another thing of that which by Grace is imputed vnto vs. Fourthly Christs satisfaction is the meritorious cause of Iustification which is become onely ours by benefite of Imputation Apoc. 22.11 Ans Iustification in the iudicial signification noteth out two things according as there is a two-fold Court the one of Conscience before God the other of holinesse before men for it importeth to bee absolved eyther before God by the righteousnesse of faith or before men by the righteousnesse of workes In the first signification the sense is thus Hee that is iust let him be iustified still to witte by applying vnto himselfe the continuall remission of his sinnes and the imputation of Christs righteousnesse In the second the sense is thus Hee that is iust let him bee iustified still that is he that desireth to bee iust let him bee informed more and more vnto Iustice and
consequent the thinges that follow proue that both are found in the Scripture and with the fathers concerning the imputation of Christs righteousnesse there are two expresse testimonies among the rest in Scriptures Rom. 4.6 1. Cor. 1.30 And by Consequent these are speciall first That the remission of sinnes which is the second Part of Iustification is expressed in Scriptures by the name of not Imputing Rom. 4.7 8. Secondly that the Apostle denyeth any proper or inherent righteousnesse to the end hee might establish that which is of Imputation by faith Phil. 3.8 Thirdly because looke what the maner of our sinne is in Christ the same is also the manner of Christs righteousnes in vs to wit in both by imputation 2 Cor. 5.21 The testimonies of the fathers are also frequent To the SECOND FIrst whether you respect Gods truth Imputation of righteousnesse is conjoyned with the Remission of sinnes Dan. 9.24 Rom. 4.6 7. Or whether you respect our Salvation it was behouefull also that the two parts of Iustification should bee opposed to a double evill wherevnto wee were subiect to punishment remission of sinnes to offence imputation of righteousnesse Or lastly whether you respect the satisfaction of the Law two things were necessary the first that wee might bee freed from the punishment which the law threatneth secondly that wee might fulfill the law and so might bee made like vnto Christ Secondly neyther doe the places which are cited concerning the Remission of sinnes take away the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse sith the thinges which put themselues one with another cannot duely be put one against another Thirdly the opposition which is made in Rom. 5 hath not respect to the manner of inherence or imputation but to the Causes Effects and Subiects of salvation condēnarion The Causes of salvation being the obedience of the second Adam but of Condemnation the disobedience of the first The Effects that by the one wee are made iust by the other Sinners The Subiects on both sides there are many men found to witte in the cause of condemnation vniversally but in the cause of Salvation generally To the THIRD FIrst there is a double vse of the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse the one is to absolue vs before God the other to cover the imperfection of our righteousnesse that is Primary this Secondary Secondly the perfection which is attributed to Faith Hope and Charity is tearmed so aequivocally and is to bee expounded according to that three-fold respect thereof of which we haue before spoken To the FOVRTH FIrst wee are sayde to be Formally iust eyther subiectiuely or by relation subiectiuely by righteousnesse inherent in vs which is vnperfect relatiuely by Christs righteousnes which is perfectly imputed vnto vs. Secondly it is false that a thing should alwayes haue a name outwardly from the qualities which may bee inwardly sith even in naturall thinges the bodies of the starres shine not with their owne but with a b Ascititio borrowed light that is by the benefite of the Sunne Things subordinate doe not disagree neyther are they two contrary formes to wit the outward and the inherent sith that is both the fore-going and forming cause of this To the FIFT IF you respect the truth of righteousnesse imputed vnto vs wee are accounted truely righteous before God no lesse then Christ but if you respect the quantity and subiect Christ is more righteous then wee because hee is so actually wee imputatiuely hee subiectiuely wee relatiuely in him vnto him and therefore wee cannot nor ought to bee accounted Redeemers and Saviours for that of Christs actions there are two sorts the one is of them which being named in the Abstract or devided do not so much signifie the office of Christ as his benefite obtayned for vs the other of them which in the Concrete or conjunction doe not so much note out to vs the benefite as his personall office The names of those are wont to be changed but the names of these are bounded in the person of Christ To the SIXT OF the restoring of Gods image in vs by Christ there are two parts the abolishing of the depraved Image and the renuance of the same That is performed by the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse This is by the benefite of sanctification or inherent righteousnesse and both wee haue of Christ To the SEVENTH FIRst there is a double consideration of Christ the one as touching himselfe the other as touching vs whose person hee tooke vpon him in respect of the former Christ is sayd to be just holy c. In respect of the latter hee is saide to bee made sinne the curse c. Secondly albeit it sinne bee called a sacrifice according to the Hebrewes proper forme of speech yet the manner of opposition in the cited place requireth that hee bee rather sayde to be made sinne that is a sinner not in himself but by the guilt of all our sinnes imputed vnto him a figure of which thing the two he Goates were whereof mention is made Leu. 16. To the EIGHT FIrst there is a two-fold fairenesse of the Bride the one which shee hath of her Spouse by perfect imputation the other which shee bath in her selfe by a beginning in this life Secondly the beauty of Christ and of his church differ not in Forme but in the Subj ct and manner of propriety for in Christ is fayrenesse by manner of inherence in the church by manner of imputation Thirdly shee is sayd to bee faire among women not opposed to Christ but to other women To the NINTH FIrst the Purenes wherewith wee are prepared for the seeing of God is as well that which we haue by Imputation as that which is in vs subiectiuely in this life Secondly neyther is imputation a vaine thing onely which may seeme or onely be thought to be for it is in very deede applyed vnto vs whereas Relation is not an idle thing but an application vnto the bound thereof it must needes bee that this Imputation is some what which wholy consisteth in Relation To the TENTH HEb 9. Ephes 5. Tit. 2. Ioh. 16. Ans First the word Sanctification is c Homonyma of divers significations for it signifieth Iustification it selfe or the effect of Iustification and in the first signification it is taken in the cited places but not in the second Secondly these wordes Truely and Imputatiuely are badly opposed the one to the other sith those things also which are imputed vnto vs are as truely ours as if they were in vs subiectiuely OF THE COVENANT of GOD. The Part Confirming CHAP. X. ANd these are the degrees according to which God in this life by calling effectually and iustifying freely disposeth the benefit of redemption Now by order we are to see concerning the outward meanes by which God ordinarily executeth that dispensation The outward meanes ordinarie of the execution thereof on Gods behalfe are two the couenant and the seales and sacraments of the couenant
Substance Of his Benefits as well those which are conferred vpon vs by Imputation alone as by reall efficacy of his Substance because all the benefites and that quickning power which sustaineth our soules vnto life eternall cannot bee plucked asunder from the body and bloud of Christ to which it inhereth and so from Christ himselfe no more then the Effect can from his cause which containeth it or the quality from the Subject from which it issueth The Form of the Lords Supper which is inward and proper is the ioyning together of the Signes and the thing signified not naturall eyther by a substantiall touching and knittting together or by the vnion of the Accident and Subjects not locall by a neerenes or beeing in of one thing in the other but Relatiue and Sacramentall wholy consisting in this that the same beeing declared according to Gods ordinance by the Sacramentall word the Signes and the thing signified bee one certaine thing not in number not in speciall not in generall but by an Analogy and a reciprocall relation between themselues This conjoyning of the Relation doth chiefly consist in three thinges in the signification the sealing and presenting of the thing signified and sealed In Signification because of the Analogy or similitude of the properties and effects of the signe and the thing signified both in the very Substances and in the singular attributes of the Substance In the Substances because they haue â— great affinity betweene themselues for that as the bread and wine are the most fitte and chiefest Instrument of carnall nourishment so are also the body and bloud of Christ the onely â—nd alone food of the hungry soules wherevpon it is largely declared by S. â—ohn that the Flesh of Christ is meate â—ndeed and that the bloud of Christ is â—tinke indeed which whosoever shal â—ate and drinke hee should never â—unger nor thirst a Ioh. 6.31.32 and it is most vsuall in the Scriptures that the names â—f the Signes and of the thing signified â—re diversly changed by a kinde of Saâ—ramentall speaking b Exod. 12 11. 1. Cor. 5.7 In the singular Attributes of the â—ubstance because both the breaking â—f the bread and the powring of the â—ine into the cuppe doe mystically lay â—nd represent vnto vs before our eyes â—he truth power and efficacy of the â—illing of Christs body and the shedding of his bloud by which to wit he faithfull behold with the eyes of their mind Christ himselfe as it were beaten and broken vpon the Crosse with exceeding great torments and as though dropping clutters of bloud c 1. Cor. 11 14. Esa 53.3 In Sealing because the Bread Wine both are are to be calâ—d the seales or stampes of his body and bloud both for that they confirme the truth of the Similitude betweene the signe and the thing signified and also because they doe most certainely seale the efficacy of the vnion and conjunction of both together in the lawfull vse for we doe not simply and properly consider the Signe and the thing signified as they are things materiall and substantiall but as mysticall things d Entia rat onis and thinges that haue their being of the manner not naturall but of divine ordination seeing that Faith considering the Signes not in their owne nature but in the sacramentall word of Institution vseth them for the sealing of the partaking fruition of the thing signified In the Presenting or offering because that in very deed is offered which by the Signe is figured for the Sacramentall signes are exhibitiue for that by them Christ yeeldeth Ioh. 6.35 and exhibiteth himselfe the heavenly bread vnto our soules Wherefore in the Supper of the Lord things very different earthly and heavenly are proposed and delivered together in time though not together in place There is then no essentiall changing of the signes in this conjunction as if they should eyther by a dissolution bee resolved into their first matter or even into nothing or if by a simple or absolute change or according to substance they should bee converted into the substance of the true body and true bloud of Christ for the substance and nature of the signs being removed or taken away the affinity relation and Analogy of them to the thing signified should perish but it is wholy Sacramentall that is a change of the quality or condition of the vse and end of the Elements The end of the Lords Supper is two-folde Primary and Secondary The Primary is that wee in the lawfull vse of the Signes celebrating the memory of Christs death may bee confirmed both concerning our communion with him and our nourishmeÌ„t in him f Ioh. 6.57 1. Cor. 5.8 1. Cor. 10.17 vnto life eternall The Secondary that it might be a tokeÌ„ of our resurrection and testimony of our thankefulnesse a pledge of our mutuall loue lastly a publicke note or marke of difference and profession This resolution of the Definition by causes three additions or Corollaryes doe follow one of the Presence the other of the Communication the third of Adoration of the Lords body and bloud For the Presence of Christ in the Supper it is needefull that it bee distinguished and considered two waies First according to the verity thereof Then according to the maner of the verity thereof The Verity of Christs presence in the Supper in that the Supper of the Lord is coÌ„sidered not as an earthly actioÌ„ only but as a heavenly is that whereby in his Body and bloud hee is beleeved to be truely and really present in the Supper and that both in respect of the signes and in respect of the Communicants Of the Signes because the body and bloud of Christ are truly present together with the bread and wine the sacramentall signes not in respect of co-existence and place but in a Sacramentall manner in respect whereof this presence in the Schooles is commonly tearmed Relatiue Of the Communicants because Christ is in very deed present in the heartes of them that beleeue even altogether with the same and such a presence as the communion of his body is exhibited vnto them in the Supper g Mat. 18.20 and this presence is Reall yet neyther presence is corporall for by faith as Ambrose sayth Christ is touched not by body Of this Verity there are two grounds The Divine Promise and the Sacramentall Vnion The Promise for sith Christ in the instituting of his Supper hath promised the eating of his body and bloud and therefore also his Presence we must verily beleeue that Christ accomplisheth and performeth what hee hath promised h Mat. 26.26 Mar. 14.22 1. Cor. 19.23 The Sacramentall Vnion for the Essentiall Forme of the Sacraments i that which maketh Consistence requireth that in the Supper the thing signifyed be no lesse certainely conferred then the very present signes are offered The manner of this Verity is not corporall naturall or Locall eyther by a conversion of the whole Substance
sayd to be that whereby one cannot be compelled to do or suffer any thing against his naturall inclination from Vnchangeablenesse is sayd to be that which can frame it selfe indifferently or contingently to both opposites and so can do and not do suffer and not suffer The first freedom is not in man corrupt the Second is in every man of whatsoever state and condition The third was in man before the fall V. ONe freedome is sayd to be from necessity an other from sinne an other from misery The first is of Nature The second of Grace The third of glory VI. FReedome is eyther properly taken for the freedome which is in the Subject to the Object and from the contrary impediment or vnproperly or Synecdochically for one of these Liberties That Man cannot without faith or the speciall helpe of God perform any morall good against Bel. Li 5. de Grat. Lib. Ar. Cap. 9. I. GOod Workes are two wayes vsually considered eyther according to their outward manner or according to their inward In respect of both God is sayde to reward good workes of the one because they carry a shadow of civill goodnesse which also is acceptable to God as touching it selfe but of the other because they are done in faith according to Gods Rule and Prescript to Gods glory Now God rewardeth not according to the proportion of merite but according to the grace of promise notwithstanding those places of Exodus the 1. because there is noted an antecedent but not a cause of Gods blessing towardes the Mid-wiues Of Ezek. 2.29 and Daniel 4. because the Consequence is of no force from the outward rewarding to the quality of the Worke. For God is wont liberally to recompence an outward obedience with an outward rewarding II. A Thing is sayd to be good Equivocally and that two wayes eyther that it is such indeed or that it appeareth such or else that it is eyther good in it selfe as touching the substance of the worke or that it is sayde to be perfectly good in the Object Subiect End and other circumstances The Workes of the Heathen are called good workes eyther according to the appearance onely or because the substance of the worke is good though it be evill in the Subject obiect end other circumstances III. THe Fathers which seemed to attribute any thing to Nature eyther treated onely of those outward Civill and politicke actions as Basil and Augustine or of the natural good as Chrisostomâ— or of Workes according to the common opinion as Hierome IIII. IN the Works of Heathens all and every of those thinges are wanting which are required of the Adversary for the making of a good worke the circumstance of the end is wanting because that is not don for God which is not done for his commaundement according to his rule or for Gods glory The Action is defiled by the naughtinesse of the cause because whole man is whole sinne wholy not onely as touching himselfe but also as touching his actions Neyther hath a good worke any proportion with the strength of nature because to will and to do good is of grace and not of nature and so good workes are not onely hard but also impossible to Nature Neyther do the absurdities proue the contrary because wee are bound of duety to doe good workes nor are they therefore called evill because they are done simply but because they are not well done That there is no Free-will in godly and saving actions against Bellarmine Lib. 6. cap. 10.11.12 THe Freedome of Will is vsually considered two wayes in man regenerate according as there are in him two divers and contrary beginninges the beginning of good which is the Spirite or the parte Regenerate the beginning of evill which is the flesh or the part vnregenerate Hence the freedome of will in respect of the first beginning freely willeth good in respect of the other it freely willeth evill and in this sence is Free-will in man Regenerate diversly pronounced eyther to be or not to be AND THis is the State of man according to Nature and his naturall condition both in his first originall condition and Creation and in his change and corruption which after followed by sinne Now the other state of maÌ„ in this life according to the Grace of Vocation which is aboue Nature is to be known and discerned Now it ought to be discerned two wayes according as the Châ—istian calling and estate or the condition of a Naturall Christian man is in this life comprehended in two principall heades to wit Faith and good Works For these are the two partes of a Christian calling and the two most conjunct dueties of a Christian man namely to Belieue and to Doe for faith imbraceth the Grace of God in Christ good works doe testifie and performe Thankefulnesse for that Grace OF FAITH The Part Confirming CAP. VI. BY the Name of Faith wee doe vnderstand an outward and hypocriticall profession of Religion and Faith a Mat 13 20.21 Heb. 6.4.5 6. not a temporall knowledge and assent concerning Gods Grace b Act. 8.13 Iac. 2.29 Lastly not a certaine perswasion concerning some miraculous effect conceyved by a singular revelation or promise c Mat. 17.20 1. Cor. 13.2 but we meane that which properly and simply is so called and is pronounced by it selfe concerning the onely Elect and them all Wherevpon it is wont commonly to be called the saving iustifying faith d Rom. 3.28 and is a gift of God or a holy habite e Inditus given inwardly by the Spirite of God whereby the godly in their vnderstanding beleeving Gods truth receiue with a sure and firme assent of Wil the promises of the saving good-will and grace of God in Christ to his glory their salvation The Efficient Cause of faith is two wayes vsually expounded Primary or Instrumentally The Primarie Cause of Faith is God who had his fore-going good pleasure and the onely free affection of his will no preparation of our righteousnes going before or merite of our workes accompanying the same f Ioh. 6.29 Eph. 2.8 Luc. 24.32 The Instrumentall Cause of Faith is two-folde the one inward and chiefe the other outward and furthering The inward chiefe Cause is the holy Ghost who begetteth the same in the Elect by a speciall action next and immediately beyond the order of nature partly by disposing the vnderstanding to the saving knowledge and receyving of Christ partly by induing the will with new qualities and by inclining the same that it might particularly and firmely assent and cleaue to that knowledge and receyving g 1 Cor. 12.9 2. Cor. 4.6 Gal. 5.22 The outward and furthering Cause is the preaching of the Gospell by which the holy Ghost ordinarily formeth confirmeth this very worke of Faith in vs albeit God according to the Liberty of his power and will may beget worke faith without the vse of this ordinary meanes when it pleaseth him and is
Life but the Instrument and meane to attaine vnto life Neither doe the places which are cited proue any thing else which doe eyther note the quality of them that are to be saved and not the cause of Salvation Heb. 10.1 Tim. 2. Rom. 10. or doe intimate the way of righteousnesse by which men come vnto Salvation Phil. 2. 2 Cor. 4. Or lastly doe treate of the Effects from which as from that which is the a A Posteriori That is from the Effect to the Cause latter judgement both may and should be had of them that are truely justified and hereafter shal be glorified Mat. 25. Iac. 1. 2. Cor. 7. II. NEyther doth the reason alleadged from an absurdity and expressed in the ninth Chapter proue the contrary for Faith alone is sayde to saue vs aequivocally eyther in respect of faith because it is alone or of salvation because it alone saveth Faith is not alone without works but it alone saveth and justifyeth without workes as the eye onely seeth yet not alone but joyned together with the Body That the Law of God is not possible to be fulfilled by vs against Bellarmine Lib. 4. Cap. 11. I. THe Testimonies of Scriptures which are alleadged First Ma◠11. 1. Ioh. 5. treate not of the nature of the Law compared with the power of the Regenerate or not Regenerate for the fulfilling of the same but eyther of the burthē of the Crosse which the inward vertue and efficacy of Christs Spirite and the hope of eternal immortality doe ease or of Gods commandements in Generall aswell in respect of Faith as of good workes which are not so farre grievous that by them the faithfull should be oppressed for both the Spirite becommeth conquerour and whosoever beleeveth i◠freed from the curse of the Law Secondly those in Ioh. 14. Ro. 13 Gal. 5. Ioh. 15. doe not treate of our power for the fulfilling of the Law but eyther of our duety or of the effect of our loue towardes God Or lastly of the loue of our neighbour as a most evident Testimony of the whole obedience of the Law Thirdly in Psalm 118. 1. King 14. Act. 18. 1. Kin. 15. 2. King 23. 2. Chron. 15. 11. There is no speech concerning any perfection of the righteousnesse of those who are named righteous absolutely but eyther respectiuely or by relation vnto others or Inchoatiuely as touching themselues or by Imputation in respect of Gods acceptance Or lastly after a sort in respect of their owne sincerity opposed or set against Hypocrisie II. THe reasons which are alleadged Chap. 13. proue not the question in hand Not the First for it is grounded vpon a false presupposall and vpon that which by the Schoolemen is tearmed Petitio Principij Not the Second because it playeth vpon a false consequent for our bond remayneth albeit our weakenesse or want of power bee admitted like as the debt is wont to remaine though the debtor bee not able to pay Not the Third because God hath his reasons First he doth not require a debt in vaine and we are put in mind of our debt Secondly the Principles of nature are not in vaine stirred vp for the convincing of the wicked and the saving of the godly Not the Fourth because the Apostle discourseth Rom. 8. of the right of the Law not of Iustification and that right is not saide to be fulfilled of vs but in vs. Not the Fift because the operations of the Spirit are produced in vs according to the manner of the Instrument and the measure of our Infirmity Not the Sixt because as being Iustified they are born of God they performe the Law but as they are regenerate vnperfectly they performe and fulfil the same vnperfectly OF MANS ESTATE after this Life The Part Confirming CAP. VIII ANd this is the State of Mā in this life both according to the condition of his first Originall or Naturall corruption as also according to his regeneration by Grace or the truth of Christian calling Now the other State of Man which shal bee after this life next ensueth the same and it ought two wayes of vs to bee considered and declared eyther Generally in respect both of the godly and vngodly or Particularly in respect of these or those Generally the estate of man after this life is knowne by two degrees by the resurrection of the flesh and the last iudgment The Resurrection of the flesh is an iterated and indivisible coupling of the soule with the body wrought by the mighty power of God that when death shall be conquered men made immortall might liue for euer eyther in glory or in torment The efficient cause principal of the Resurrection is the whole Godhead For the father raiseth the dead the sonne quickneth whome he will and the holy Ghost with the father and the sonne giueth a fulnes of life aswell to the body as to the a 1. Cor. 15.12 1. Thes 4 14. 1. Cor. 15.25 soule but the instrumentall or ministeriall are the Angells the effectuall working of whome the scripture signifieth by a Metaphor of a sounding Trumpet The matter is mans body the same in number as touching the substaunce which wee beare in this life whether it bee of them which are dead or of those which shall bee found aliue at the last day b Dan 12.2 Ioh. 5.26.29 1. Thes 4.16.17 The forme according to the consideration of the matter shal be eyther a Restoring of the dead vnto life or that proportionable and conformable transformatiō of those which shal be foūd aliue This form the changing of the qualities of the body doth accompany being indeed a generall incorruption and immortallity but besides these in respect of the faythful there shal bee a particular glory power and spiritualnes of the bodyes The end principall is the glory of the righteousnes and grace of God Subordinate according to the considerations of the persons that rise agayne eyther the salvation and glory of the Elect or the punishment and casting away of the Reprobate The last or extreame iudgement is a iudiciall act whereby Christ in the last day with greate maiesty and glory shal giue sentence vpon all men vniuersally The efficient cause principall as touching indeed the iudiciall power and authority is God the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost but as touching the maner of iudgment or exercise therof Christ is not onely as he is God but also as hee is man both because of the estate of glory which followeth together with the personall vnion of the divine and humane nature as also because of the agreeablenesse and affinitie of himselfe with men c Mat. 24.30 Luc. 21.27 2. Tim. 2.8 The Administring Cause shall bee the Angells whose Service God will vse both in the gathering together and in the separating and singling out of them that shal be judged d Mat. 24.31 1. Thes 4.16 The Matter as it respecteth the subject is the faith or infidellty of every