creatures These have bene the causes of my vnwillingnes to give any thing in write and that now being overcome by your request I doe follow a plaine maner of declaration of my minde without contention with anie or direct disputing against anie as being resolved to have no parte in the noysome wrangling of this contentious age But as one desirous to walke honestlie in all things I endevour to keepe mee within the measure of my owne faith and to benefitt the Church of God with that which he hath given me not hindring nor envying that others who have receyved more do more good in our common Lords worke Of whom as hee who is onely able to give it I most humbly crave the gratious direction of his spirit in this and all my labours with his blessing therevpon to your comfort and theirs who shall have the vse thereof His grace be with you Middelburgh 20. Iuly 1615. Yours in the Lord Jo. Forbes A Table of things contayned in this Treatise according to the order of the Chapters CHAPTER I. FOure groundes proponed which serve to make vs conceyve aright of the nature of the benefits dispensed vnto vs by God in Christ 1. The knowledge of Gods Decree 2. Of Christ as Mediator 3. Of the order of the benefits 4. Of their difference Chap. II. Of the two chief things to be considered in Gods Decree to wit the substance and chief cause of it The twofold description of Gods Decree or Predestination And of that which is the most proper Chap. III. Of the substance of Gods Decree consisting in three things 1. the persons who are ordayned 2. that wherevnto they are ordayned 3. the meane whereby Of which the first two are spoken of in this chapter Chap. IV. The third part of the substance of Gods Decree touching the meane of adoption that is IESVS CHRIST Chap. V. Of the cause moving God to decree that is the will of God cleared from the Persons who are ordayned vnto adoption Chap. VI. The same cause cleared from that thing wherevnto they are ordayned Chap. VII The same cleared from the meane whereby they are ordayned to be adopted Chap. VIII Of the second groūd which is touching Christ the Mediator Chap. IX Of the third ground touching the order of Gods benefites specially of Adoption and Iustification and of five things serving to cleare the same Chap. X. Of the first of those fiue touching the order of subsistinge of the persons of the Trinitie Chap. XI Of the second of these five touching the severall obiectes wherein the grace of God is to be considered Chap. XII Of the third of these five touching the difference of order betwixt Gods dispensation and our perception Chap. XIII Of the fourth of these five touching the different extent or largenes of Gods benefites amongst them selves Chap. XIIII Of the last of these five touching the covenant of God Chap. XV. Of the first reason why most men place Iustification in order before Adoption Chap. XVI Of the second reason why most men place Iustificatiō before Adoptiō drawen from Io. 1. 12. examined in the first point that is touching the persons there described Chap. XVII The examination of the same reason from the second and third pointes therein to be considered that is the benefit bestowed and him who bestoweth it Chap. XVIII Of the fourth and last ground serving to cleare the nature of Gods benefites touching the difference of these benefits and first of the divers manner of speach vsed in scripture touching them 2. Of these things wherein they agree and vse hereof Chap. XIX Of the twofold distinction of the benefits 1. according to the maner that we enioy them 2. according to their particular nature Chap. XX. A proposition of the doctrine of Iustification things therein to be intreated And first of the divers opinions of men touching iustification in generall Chap. XXI The foure principall points controverted 1 touching the efficient cause 2. touching the materiall cause 3. touchinge the formall cause 4. touching the subiect iustified and the first handled Chap. XXII Of the second point touching the materiall cause of Iustification the different opinions of men reduced to foure principall and examination of them Chap. XXIII Of the true matter of our righteousnes what it is wherein the first handled shewing that Christ only is the matter therof Chap. XXIIII Of the second point touching that wherein Christ is our righteousnes the different opinions of men therein and the truth examined by six grounds out of the word Chap. XXV Of those things in Christ which are required to make that wherein he is our righteousnes to be righteousnes both in his Person Priesthood and actions Chap. XXVI Of the formall cause of iustification cōsisting in three things 1. in Gods giving 2. in his imputing 3. in the maner of both that is by grace The gift being two fold the first which is faith is first intreated of in foure pointes and first what kinde of gift it is Chap. XXVI Of the second point touching faith to whom it is given and in what part or facultie it is wrought Chap. XXVIII Of the third point touching faith what it is of the divers significations of it of the true signification of it when it is said to be imputed vnto righteousnes of the particular nature thereof both as it is wrought by God in our hartes and as our heartes worke by it Chap. XXIX Of the fourth and last point touching faith that is the end vse wherefore it is given vnto vs consisting in foure things Chap. XXX Of the second gift which God giveth in iustifying which is Christ crucified Chap. XXXI Of the second point touching the forme of Iustification consisting in imputation the signification of the word the thinges that are said to be imputed and what it is that in iustification is imputed Chap. XXXII Of the third point touching the forme of iustification consisting in the grace of God Chap. XXXIII Of the obiect of iustification both what man is in him selfe and what by grace when he is iustified Chap. XXXIIII Of the finall cause of iustification Chap. XXXV Of the description of iustification considered in the particular points thereof gathered out of the former grounds FINIS A Treatise tending to cleare the Doctrine of Justification CHAPTER I. THE Evangelist Luke willing to make Theophilus to acknowledge the certaintie of those things whereof he had bene instructed did search out perfectly all thinges from the beginning and then did write vnto him frō point to point According to whose example for giuing the more full assurāce to mindes desirous of knowledge it shall not be amisse being to treat of the true nature of the Iustification of a sinner that we first beginning at the very foundation do shortlie speak of those points vpon the knowledge whereof chieflie dependeth the light and evidence of this matter Amongst divers others there are foure principall groundes vpon the
to serve vnto our iustification by that wherein he is made our righteousnes And secondly if we shal distinguish the matter of our righteousnes it selfe in Christ from the action of God in iustifying by it wee shall perceyve evidently that the matter of our righteousnes consisteth only in the death and bloud of Christ and that all the rest of Christes obedience doeth serve not as the materiall but rather as the subordinate efficient causes of our iustification And so all the three former opinions touching the obedience of Christ may well agree in one when the question is concerning the action of God in iustifying and not concerning the particular matter of the righteousnes which God imputes vnto vs vnto iustification For there is no parte of Christes obedience which is not as it is said in the schooles causa sine qua non that is a cause without the which wee cannot be iustified For if he had not bene a man and a iust man and a Priest and such a Priest as we have said yea if hee had not risen from the dead and ascended vnto heaven and made intercession for vs his death and bloud could never have iustified vs. And yet still his death and bloud is the only matter of our righteousnes but so as it is the bloud of such a sacrifice offred by such a Priest vpon such an Altar in such a Tabernacle carried in by the same Priest after resurrection from the dead into the heavens And as by vertue of the same bloud the same Priest sittinge at the right hande of God maketh intercession for vs. Thus the matter is not of such moment being rightly waighed and charitablie considered that it needed ever to have bred such bitter contention amongst brethren in the Church of God CHAPTER XXVI HAving thus spoken of the materiall cause of our righteousnes it followeth now that we speake of the formall cause In the which three thinges are specially to be marked for clearing vnto vs how and in what manner wee are made the righteousnes of God by the death and bloud of Iesus Christ our Lord. The first is Gods giving vnto vs. The second is Gods imputation of that which is given vs. The third is the cause moving him both to give and impute For God iustifieth vs by gift by imputation and by grace Neither can the true forme of our iustification bee knowne of vs a right except we acknowledge all these three in it For mā hath no saving grace which he hath not receyved of God according to the saying of the Apostle 1. Cor. chap. 4. ver 7. For who hath seperate thee or what hast thou that thou hast not receyved and if thou hast receyved it why gloriest thou as if thou hadst not receyved it And to the same purpose saith I am 1. chap. 17. All good giving and every perfect gifte is from above Therefore also our righteousnes speciallie is called a gift and a gift by grace Rom. chapt 5. ver 15. 16. 17. as also Rom. chap. 6. vers 23. but the gift of God is eternall life Where the word gift if that place be rightly vnderstood doth signifie righteousnes given vs of God Secondly howsoever many confounde imputation and giving as one thinge as in some sense they may both bee taken for one yet it is expedient for our sounder knowledge that wee distinguish them For howsoever nothing is imputed which is not given yet many things are given which are never saide to be imputed Yea moreover in which imputation hath no place Beside the imputation of a thing if we shall rightly consider it doth alwayes presuppone the thing imputed to be in our possession either by nature working or gift as by Gods grace wee shall heare hereafter And therefore in the forme of our iustification Gods giving of a thing vnto vs is to be distinguished from his imputing of it Specially if we marke one thing which is flat contrarie sayings and yet of equall force vsed by the spirit of God in the description of iustification For sometimes it is defined by imputation of righteousnes and sometimes by not imputation of sinne Thirdly in the manner and forme of our iustification grace is specially to be considered because both the givinge and imputation of the thing given is of meere grace Therefore are wee saide to bee iustified freely by grace so that the perfect forme of our iustification consisteth in this that is in Gods gracious givinge and gracious imputinge of thinge given vnto vs to bee our righteousnes So that whosoever make our iustification to consist without giving of righteousnes or without imputing the thinge given or esteeme eyther the matter of our righteousnes which is given vs to be given otherwise then by grace or to be imputed as righteousnes vnto vs otherwise then by grace doe destroy the true forme of the iustification of a sinner before God And because this is a pointe of speciall moment and bringeth great light in the matter of iustification wee will speake severally of these three pointes And first touching the action of Gods giving Secondly of the action of Gods imputation Thirdly of his grace as the only cause of both Touching the first there be two thinges which are given vs of God vnto iustification The I. is faith The II. is Christ both these giftes of God are necessarie vnto iustification as we shall see by Gods grace hereafter when we speake of iustificatiō it self Therfore in this place wee will onely speake of faith as it is the gift of God in which we have these pointes to be marked First what kinde of gift it is Secondly to whom it is given Thirdly what faith it selfe is And fourthly to what ende and vse it is given First then that it is a gift and the gift of God it is cleere in the Scriptures according as wee have showen before of all the saving graces of God and therefore it is called by the Apostle Heb. chap. 7. vers 4. a heavenly gift and in Ephe. chap. 2. ver 8. it is expresly called the gifte of God And the same Apostle Phil. chap. 1. ver 29. teacheth vs that to beleeve in Christ is a gift given vs. Therefore 1. Cor. chap. 12. It is uombred amongst the giftes of God by his spirit So that in this there is no great contradiction but the speciall question is what kinde of gift it is that is whether it bee a naturall or a supernaturall gift Depending either vpon the naturall power which God hath created in man or vpon the supernaturall power of God For clearing hereof We are to consider that which in the scriptures is spoken concerning faith First touthing the ground and cause of our beleeving Secondly touching the propertie that is attributed vnto faith and which still is in him that beleeveth And thirdly touching certaine effectes attributed vnto faith Besides these things which heereafter will shewe them selves when we treate both to whom faith is given and
vs even by the very appointement of God that which hee did for vs and in our name may not impertinentlie be saide to bee imputed by God vnto vs as done by vs But for myne owne iudgement I esteeme the first interpretation of the word as to bee most sounde and agreeable to the trueth and beeing so taken there shal be no difference in substance betwixt the second and third opinion onely that which is not expressed in the second but vnderstood in the word imputation touching the trueth and effectualnes of it is by similitude expressed in the third and in this sense it is to bee taken in the matter of our iustification and it declareth the forme of our iustification importing this much that God iustifieth vs by accompting vnto vs Christes obedience which is in it selfe perfect righteousnes in such sorte as by this his imputation it is ours as truely and doeth as truely cleere vs before God as if it were our owne in deede and we our selves in deed had performed it Thus we have need to take heed of two extremities whereinto it is evident that many men doe fall in this point some taking imputation too slenderly and others taking it too strictlie each being to other the cause of others stumbling Furthermore wee shall vnderstande the more cleerlie the right meaning of the word imputation if wee doe consider it in the two coÌ„trarie phrases wherein it is vsed al to one sense in the Scriptures For sometimes our iustification is described negatively by not imputing of sinne sometimes affirmatively by imputing of righteousnes For as the word imputation is taken in the negative phrase it must also be taken in the affirmative now in the negative we may know how it is taken by the Apostle 2. Cor. chap. 5. ver 19. where it is saide God was in Christ reconciling the world to him selfe not imputing to them their sinnes As likewise Psal 32. and Rom. chap. 4. where it is saide Blesied is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not sinne In which places not imputing of sinne signifieth the not reckoning vnto vs sinne nor iniquitie and the not accompting of vs to be vnrighteous and so the not laying guiltines to our charge nor exacting punishment of vs for it wherevpon it followeth that imputation of righteousnes must signifie the reckoning of righteousnes vnto vs and accompting of vs to be righteous pronouncing of vs guiltlesse and decerning life vnto vs. For clearer vnderstanding whereof we are to knowe that the word of imputation hath alwayes reference to some other thing fo that it commonly cometh in betwixt two things the one the thing which is imputed the other that wherevnto it is imputed so that imputation hath relation vnto both and to make this manifest we shall consider these 3. phrases The obedience of Christ is imputed vnto iustification conforme to the saying of the Apostle Rom. chap. 5. ver 19. By the obedience of one man many shal be made righteous The second phrase is Faith is imputed vnto righteousnes And the third is Righteousnes is imputed vnto life The equivalent whereof we have Rom. chap. 4. ver 11. and 5. 17. 18. In the first phrase imputation commeth in betwixt Christes obedience as the thing which is imputed iustification as the end wherevnto it is imputed and it hath reference to both In the second phrase imputation coÌ„meth in betwixt faith as the thing which is imputed and righteousnes as the end wherevnto it is imputed In the last phrase imputation commeth in betwixt righteousnes it selfe as the thing imputed and life as the end wherevnto it is imputed Thus we see that imputation in the matter of iustification hath alwayes reference to two things and thus much concerning the meaning of the word Now we are to consider what thinges they are which are said to be imputed coÌ„cerning which there are two extremities wherein men do commonly fall the one holding that nothing inherent in vs can possibly be imputed to vs the other hold the contrarie that nothing is imputed to vs but that which is inherent in vs. That opinion which is betwixt both seemeth to agree most with Gods truth that is that not only things inherent in vs but things that are not inherent in vs are imputed to vs therefore imputation is vsed by the holy ghost when hee speaketh of iustification by grace and of iustification by works as Rom. cha 4. likewise when he speaketh of the accompting of vs sinners because of our workes and corruption inherent And when he speaketh of the accompting of vs righteous by grace through the obedience of Christ Rom. chap. 4. this same is cleare by other examples of Scripture as 2. Sam. chapt 19. vers 19. where Sheâ—ei sayeth to David Let not my Lord impute wickednes vnto me and Rom. chap. 2. ver 26. where it is saide His vncircumcision shal be imputed vnto circumcision This same may bee confirmed vnto vs Psalm 32. and 2. Cor. chap. 5. and Rom. chapt 9 ver 8. and 2. Cor. chap. 12. ver 6. Gal. chap. 3. ver 6. and 2. Tim. chap. 4. 16. And therfeore somtimes righteousnes is said to be imputed by debt and sometimes by grace Rom. cha 4. 4. For vnderstanding whereof we are not only to distinguish betwixt thinges as they are inherent or not inherent in vs but also as they are our owne or not our owne For somethings inherent are so in vs that they are our owne because they consist in these thinges which are in our nature and are the effectes and fruites of our naturall powers somethings againe are so in vs as they are no wayes our owne being no parte nor portion of any naturall power or qualitie nor flowing from any power or facultie in nature but beside and above nature coÌ„ming to vs from God and wrought in vs by the power of his spirit and therefore though they be in vs cannot be said to be our owne because they are no parte nor propertie of our nature nor effectes produced by nature such as is faith for although we be saide to beleeve with the hearte yet neither is faith it selfe any naturall power or facultie in the hearte nor produced by any naturall power or facultie of the hearte neither doe wee beleeve with the heart naturally and by our owne strength as though wee might make our heartes to beleeve or that faith or beleevinge were our owne worke but faith as wee have showen before is an instrument supernaturall and wrought not by our heartes but in our heartes by the supernaturail power of God by the which as by a supernaturall meane given vs of God we beleeve with our harts and so lay hold vpon supernatural things and performe supernaturall workes According to this diverse consideration of thinges in vs or proceeding from any power that is in vs so is there a distinction of imputation in the scriptures One is said to be by debt another is saide to be by
be mans owne but Gods because it is not in the power of man by all that hee is according to nature ever to attayne to the possession of it but by that meane instrument supernaturall which is given him of God to the end he may attayne to the possession of the righteousnes of God Thus we see that the meane whereby we possesse the righteousnes is faith onely and because faith is not our owne therefore the righteousnes that we posses by it cannot be ours vntill both be made ours and this is only done and performed by the Lords gracious imputation of both that is faith and the righteousnes of Christ possessed by faith But first especially faith must be imputed to vs as our own to the intent that the righteousnes that by it we possesse might be our owne For as a man hath right to that which hee possesseth as his owne in equitie and iustice if by his owne meanes he hath obtayned possession but hath no right in equitie and iustice to it although he have it in his possession if by another mans substance given him to be imployed hee doe acquire the possession even so if we could attayne to the possession of righteousnes by our owne meanes then should that righteousnes in equitie and iustice be our owne and therefore the Scripture admitteth debt in accompting wages to him that worketh Rom. chap. 4. ver 4. but because wee doe not attayne to the possession of righteousnes by our owne meanes but by the meanes of GOD which hee hath given vs to vse that is by faith therefore this righteousnes in equitie and iustice is not our owne vntill the Lord doe impute it vnto vs and accompt it our owne So by imputinge faith vnto vs as our owne the righteousnesse which wee possesse by faith is made our owne so that faith beeing reckonned and accompted ours the righteousnes of GOD which wee possesse by faith in Christ is also reckonned and accompted ours and this is the cause why the holy Scripture doeth offtner describe the manner and forme of our iustification vnder the phrase of the imputation of faith then vnder the phrase of the imputation of the righteousnes because the right that is made vs vnto faith in Christ maketh vs to have right vnto Christ him selfe as our righteousnes and all blessings in him which by faith we possesse Secondly it is for this cause that in the description of the forme of our iustification that the spirite of God vseth this phrase to wit That to him that beleeveth his faith is imputed vnto righteousnes Which word vnto beeing commonly rendered for doeth much darken the true sense of the wordes and maketh many to fall into dangerous errour thinking that the verie acte of beleevinge is imputed for righteousnes that is as they take it in the verie same place and as the verie matter of our righteousnes whereas the Greeke worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in this sentence doeth declare the ende wherevnto faith is imputed that is that the obedience of Christ apprehended by faith may bee righteousnes vnto the apprehender For faith and beleeving ever imployeth the possession of Christ and his obedience in our heartes and the imputation of faith vnto righteousnes is the thing that makes Christ possessed by faith to bee our righteousnes I say to be our righteousnes for Christes obedience is righteousnes in it selfe so that it is neyther our faith nor Gods imputation of our faith that maketh his obedience to bee righteousnes but imputation of faith to vs as ours maketh the obedience of Christ possessed by faith beeing righteousnes in it selfe to be our righteousnes for as wee have saide before the making that whereby we obtayne possession to bee ours maketh the thing possessed also to be ours so that imputation of faith maketh Christes obedience to be that vnto vs which it is in it selfe though it were never imputed vnto vs. And that this phrase is so to be vnderstoode it may cleerely bee perceyved by that sentence of the Apostle Rom. chapt 10. ver 10. VVith the heart man beleeveth vnto righteousnes and with the mouth hee confesseth vnto salvation In which sentence the greeke worde which is rendered vnto can not be rendered for without darking and also perverting the true sense and meaning of that place for we are saide to beleeve with the heart vnto righteousnes in that same sense and meaning wherein wee are saide to confesse with the mouth vnto salvation But we cannot bee saide properlie at least cleerely without ambiguitie to confesse for salvation because neyther is our confession the efficient cause of our salvation neyther yet the matter or substance of our salvation neither can it bee put in place of our salvation but we confesse to this ende that wee might attayne to salvation knowing that hee that confesseth not Iesus before men shall not be saved For he that is ashamed of him before men he wil be ashamed of him before his heavenly Father Luke chap. 9. ver 26. And hee who shall denie him before men him shall hee denie before his Father which is in heaven And whosoever shall confesse him before men him shall he also confesse before his Father that is in heaven Math. chap. 10. Luke chap. 12. Therefore knowing that without confession there is no salvation seeing confession is the way and meane whereby we attayne vnto the possession of salvation we doe confesse to this ende that we may attayne to salvation And therefore in the same sense wee must bee saide to beleeve with the heart vnto righteousnes that is because there is no meane to attaine vnto righteousnes except wee beleeve For Christ is righteousnes vnto everie one that beleeveth Rom. chap. 10. ver 4. therefore we beleeve to this ende that wee may enioye righteousnes according to the saying of the Apostle Gal. chap. 2. ver 16. VVee also have beleeved in Christ that wee may bee iustified by the faith of Christ In which place that faith is vnderstood onely instrumentally and not materially it is playne by the next verse following where it is saide If then while wee seeke to bee made righteous by Christ c. Which wordes shewe plainly that Christ is the matter of our righteousnes Nowe there is no reason why faith should be said to bee imputed vnto righteousnes in any other sense as concerninge the worde vnto then wee were saide to beleeve vnto righteousnes but in all reason without contradiction the Greeke worde which we render vnto must in both these phrases bee taken in one and the same sense that is that as we beleeve with the hearte to this end that we might by faith as the onely apt and meete instrument and onely convenient and effectuall meane whereby to apprehende and possesse attayne to the possession of the righteousnes of God in Christ even so the Lord our God imputeth faith to vs as our owne to this end that the righteousnes which we possesse
for vs but as sayth Iohn cha 10. vers 18. He receyved this commandement from the Father to laye downe his life And the Apostle Peter Acts chap. 2. ver 23. sayeth plainly That he was delivered by the determinate counsell and foreknowledge of God And the scriptures doe witnes Hebr. chap. 3. ver 2. Hebr. chap. 5. ver 5. that Christ did not take this office to him selfe to be either King Priest or Prophet of the house of God but that the Father did give it him and as he receyved it from the Father so doeth he performe it not according to his owne will but according to the will of the Father that sent him that is hee layes downe his life for none but such as the Father willeth that is the sheep which the Father giveth him that he should give them eternall life Ioh. chap. 10. 14. 15. 16. compared to Ioh. chap. 17. ver 2. and Esay chap. 8. ver 18. compared with Hebr. chap. 2. ver 13. 14. and 15. 16. 17. neither doth he make intercession for any but for such as the Father had given him but secludeth all who were not given him of the Father from al benefite of his intercession and fruit of his death Ioh. cha 17. ver 9. Thirdly he manifesteth the name of God and giveth the wordes and the glorie which the Father hath given him to no others saving those alone whom the Father had given him In the same chapter 6. vers 22. and 26. Fourthly he giveth eternall life to none but such as the Father hath given him Iohn chapter 6. verses 37. 38. and 39. And Iohn chapter 10. vers 26. 27. 28. 29. And Iohn chapter 17. vers 2. for the worke which he performed on earth the Father did give it him that hee should doe it as he him self witnesseth Iohn chapter 17. and verse 4. Wherefore also in the performing thereof when the bitternes of that cuppe which the Father had given him to drinke maketh him in his agonie to will If it were possible that it might passe from him He rangeth his owne will in order and submitteth him selfe to the will of his Father saying But not my will but thy will be done Mathew chap. 26. vers 39. and 42. Of all which groundes it evidently followeth that what Christ is as Mediatour and what he doeth as Mediatour and to whom he doth any thing by Mediaton and intercession is all by the will and appointement of GOD according to his good pleasure Whose Decree and free election according to his will boundeth and limiteth IESVS Christ the Mediatour in his suffering intercession and whole performance of his office and dispensation of all blessings vnto righteousnes and life as is cleare in the 11. chapt to the Romanes verses 5. and 7. Of all that is spoken touching either the substance or cause of Gods Decree we may easilie perceyve that the whole Decree of God in all the substance of it dependeth vpon nothing but onely vpon the will of God so that he predestinates because it is his will and he predestinates so many and no moe because it is his will And hee predstinates them to adoption because it is his will and he predestinates this adoption to be thorough Iesus Christ because it is his will Whilest men in humble reverence doe not acknowledge this and acquiesce in it as the trueth of this matter they not onely fall in blasphemouse errores against God but involve themselves in the daunger of that curse pronounced by the Prophet Esay chapt 45. vers 10. Woe be to him that striveth with his Maker Woe vnto him that sayeth to his Father what hast thou begotten Or to his Mother What hast thou brought foorth Which surelie they doe which search for a reason of this will of GOD as though the Lord could not be iust in ordayning some vnto adoption and not others vpon his onely will but that some cause there must be in the creatures of this difference of his will what is this else but to buyld the equitie of Gods doeings vpon the creature and not vpon God the Creator him selfe making things iust not because he willeth them but because he willeth them according to that which he findeth in the creature and which in the iudgement of man seemeth to be a iust reason why God should doe so even as though the Potter of one the same lumpe of clay did not freely according to his owne will make one vessel to honor another to dishonor without any respect of any worthines or any reason whatsoever taken frō the clay Surely it is a wretched Divinitie which doth not simply acknow ledge all things iust which God willeth evē because he willeth thē although they not only passe the capacitie but also appeare most cōtrary to humane reason For are not his iudgements vnsearchable his wayes past finding out who thē shal finde out the reason of his counsels and declare the causes of his will We will conclude this point with the saying of Augustin touching these mē lib. pri ca. 2. de Genes cont Manich. They seeke to know the causes of Gods will when as the will of God it selfe is the cause of all things that are for if the will of God have a cause there is something that goes before the will of God which is not lawfull to beleeve The vse we are to make hereof in the doctrine of iustification is great for first heereby wee learne that Gods Decree is not buylded vppon our righteousnes as the cause thereof but by the contrarie that our righteousnes is builded vpon Gods Decree For God doeth not predestinate vs because of our righteousnes but he maketh vs righteous because he hath predestinate vs so that whether our righteousnes consist in Christ and his sufferings or as some doe thinke in workes or as others doe esteeme in faith yet it still holdeth that this righteousnes is never the cause why God predestinateth vs. Secondly wee learne of this point that whatsoever be our righteousnes we must goe aboue our selves aboue our righteousnes to search the cause why it is ours For it is not any thing in vs nor any thing in that that is our righteousnes but the will of God in God himselfe which is the ground of our enioying it Thirdly we learne heereby that whatsoever we seclude from the Meanes of our righteousnes iustification and life yet Christ can never be secluded seeing God Decrees to doe all what he decrees thorough him alone Thus much concerning the Decree of God and the nature thereof CHAPTER VIII NOW followeth the second point which standeth in the knowledge of Christ as he is Mediatour Whereof because divers things have bene already spoken we wil be the shorter The mayne point chieflie to be considered in this head is this that no man is made that vnto the which GOD doth predestinate him in him selfe and through him selfe but in and through another which is IESVS
the selfe same common nature and essence albeit in subsisting and personalitie none be that that the other is and therefore none of them except the Sonne alone can bee a meete Mediatour betwixt GOD and vs in the worke of our adoption For this office of Mediation is not the office of the Divine nature but of a Divine person that hath the Divine nature For if it were the office of the Divine nature which is common to all three alike and as we have said one and the same in all three surely it should no lesse belong to the Father and to the Holy Ghost then to the Sonne but as saith the Apostle 1. to Timoth chap. 2. ver 5. There is but one Mediatour betwixt God and Man that is the Man Christ Iesus But as every common nature is communicate to others by their personall subsisting flowing from a person of that same nature for no nature hath any existing but by subsisting even so we can not be made pertakers of the Divine nature except first we have our subsisting from one that is of the same nature and from that person of that nature which is that in personalitie and subsisting which we are ordayned to be that is fonnes for we must be pertakers of the Divine nature by subsisting the sonnes of God which cannot be naturally neither in nor thorough our selves therefore it is ordayned to be through Christ by making vs one with him who by nature is the onely Sonne of God that by our fellowship with him through grace in that which he onely is by subsisting or personalitie we only consequently by grace be made pertakers of the Divine nature in our conformitie to the Image of God For as among men nature doth not produce nature but one person by procreation of another person doth communicate the same nature even so in the Godhead the nature produceth not nature else there should be many Deities so many Gods but a person produceth a person and production of a person carieth with it communion of nature even so God doth first make vs his children by adoption in Christ in which respect he is saide in the scriptures to beget vs and we are said to be borne of God which birth bringes with it the participation of the Divine nature Thus we have to distinguish our communion and fellowship with Christ which God by his grace bestowes vpon vs in that personall proprietie of his sonne whereby we are made members of his bodie flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones that is the sonnes of God and brethrē of Christ which is our adoption From that communion which foloweth herevpon standeth in our participation of the Divine nature whereby we are made one with Father Sonne and holy Ghost Thus by Gods mercie in calling vs to the felowship of Christ in his sonne-ship the Father of Christ is made our Father and his spirit our spirit and so consequently the nature of all three communicated vnto vs. And for this first vnion with Christ which standeth in the communion of the dignitie of his sonne-ship all Gods children are said in the scriptures to be one in Christ Galath chap. 3. ver 28. And the whole body mysticall is said to be but one and is called Christ 1. Corinth chap. 12. ver 12. and for that cause the promise of God is said to be made to the seede as to one not to the seedes as to many Galat. chap. 3. ver 16. where we may perceyve the vnspeakeable goodnes and infinite wisedome of God in his Decree Goodnes in ordayning vs to be his sonnes and Wisedome in ordayning him onely to be the meane of our adoption who in him selfe only is that which GOD ordayneth vs to be Of which it is manifest that the Decree of our adoption goeth in order before all not only other benefites in Christ but also before the ordayning of Christ him selfe to be a Mediator For if this office of Mediation did not hang and depend vpon that which we are ordeyned to be surely the Father or the holy Ghost should no lesse have bene Mediators then the sonne Besides these things it is also heereby manifest that the benefite of adoption is the first of all benefites in Christ and foundation of all the rest For which cause it is that Gods Decree is most properly defined from it but of this we shall haue occasion to speake hereafter The vse that we haue to make of this point in the doctrine of iustification is that seeing God ordayneth vs to nothing but through Christ our righteousnes can not consist of any thing that is not in Christ for as we are made all other thing whatsoever we are made in him so also are we made the righteousnes of God in him 2. Corint chap. 5. ver 21. which ground wel marked doth cleare many errors specially those which are about the matter of our righteousnes of which it is a wonder that such controversies should be among learned men when as the Scripture of God speaketh plainely that God hath made Christ righteousnes vnto vs. 1 Corinth chap. 1. vers 30. And that hee is all in all things Coloss chap. 3. vers 11. And that he filleth all in all things Eph. chap. 1. vers 23. Wherevpon it followeth that neither in whole nor in part can possibly our righteousnes consist in any thing that is in our selves nor yet in any other thing without our selves but in Christ only And thus much concerning the second point CHAPTER IX THE third thing needfull to be knowne for the right vnderstanding of the nature of Gods saving benefites is the order in the which they are Decreed and accordinglie dispēsed vnto vs. In which point I know there is great neede of circumspect considerate dealing because albeit in my iudgement the mistaking of this point bee no small occasion of the errors which are mantayned by many of great learning as in other things so speciallie in the point of iustification yet notwithstanding the speaking against an error by the most part received and almost contradicted by none must needes at the first bee distastfull to many except their mindes bee by grace sanctified with a greater love of the truthe then of themselves The maine point which cleareth all standeth in this whether adoption or Iustification be in order first The greater part doe holde that Iustification is first so that first we must bee iustified in Christ before wee be adopted to bee sonnes and therefore they devide reconciliation which they make to comprehend both in Iustification as the first part and adoption as the second But what inconvenience may aryse vpon this opinion and what an open entry it maketh to many errors we shall perceyve by these things that follow Some there bee and those but fewe that holde the contrary opinion and doe rather point at it then expresly treate of it esteeming Adoption to be before Iustification or rather to bee as
For there is a great difference betwixt these workes of the Father to witt the bringing of vs to the Sonne or giving of vs vnto him or making vs to receyve him which are all one and the same thing and the Fathers iustifying of vs in the sonne whom now we have receyved The first is the proper worke of God calling vs The other is the worke of God after our calling Which evidētly appeares by the speech of Christ him selfe Math. cha 11. ver 28. where first he invites vs to come vnto him and then promiseth to such as doe come that he will give them rest vnto their soules for God iustifieth none who have not first receyved the sonne For who cā be made the righteousnes of God in Christ who is not first ingrafted in him Now the first worke of faith standeth in our receyving Christ and making him to dwell in our heartes in and through whom now receyved and possest by faith the Lord doth thereafter iustifie and glorifie vs. so to make a Man to be iust before he be a sonne is as much as to make an accident or qualitie to be before or without a subiect or to make a Man wise before he be a Man and this ground the Apostle cleers by his owne speech when he coūted all but dongue that he might gaine Christ and be found in him to this end that he might not haue his owne righteousnes but the righteousnes which is by the faith of Christ Phil chap. 3. thereby playnelie he sheweth vs that we must first gayne Christ and be found in him by faith before we can haue the righteousnes that is by the faith of Christ so that to receyve Christ and to be iustified in Christ are in no sorte to be confounded although they cannot be separated For this is the principall cause why Iustification and all remanent blessings are attributed vnto faith because by faith onely we are made one with Christ and ioyned vnto him who onely is the substance of all our blessings as being made of God vnto vs wisedome righteousnesse sanctification and redemption 1. Corint ahap 1. vers 30 Vpon which vnion with Christ followeth our cōmunion with him both in death and life For being once in him we can not but be pertakers of all blessings in him And of this worke of the Father it is that the Evangelist speaketh in this place which is the first worke of his gracious dispensatiō when as he maketh vs to beleeve in his onely sonne as is manifest by the Evangelistes owne words interpreting the first phrase that is Those that receyved him by these wordes that is Those that beleeue in his Name The second argument lieth in the third phrase of this description which is Those that are borne of God By which wordes both the two former phrases that is those that receyved him those that beleeved in his Name are interpreted thereby teaching vs that this worke is not the worke of Iustification but of Adoption and of our receiving of Christ himselfe by faith that in vnitie with him we may be the Sonnes of God and not our receiving of his obedience by faith vnto righteousnes For by beeing borne of God we are made the Sonnes of God Which birth especially is performed by the Father when by his Spirit he brings vs vnto the Sōne makes vs to receive him by faith in our hearts so making vs one with him By which Vnitie alone it is that we are made the Sonnes of God For as the Vnitie of Christs humane nature in subsisting and personalitie with his divine nature maketh that Iesus Christ the Man is the Sonne of God so our spirituall Vnitie by faith with Iesus Christ the Sonne of God makes vs also to be the Sonnes of God Thus it is plaine by the third phrase that the former two are not rightly taken when they are expounded of those that are iustified If any man would expound this birth not of our effectuall Adoption it selfe but of the preparation of vs therevnto as some most learned and reverent Divines doe Yet never can it make the former opinion true for our beeing borne of God in the Scripturs can never be showen to be meant of our Iustification And if they take it for our Regeneration or Sanctification to the obedience of God then it will follow that wrongly they make Adoption to be a part of Reconciliation If sanctification which is no part of Reconciliation must goe before For they them selues acknowledge that Reconciliation hath but two parts Iustification and Adoption Besides this distinction of Adoption wil hardlie be warranted by the 9. of the Romanes except men will make the Apostle playnely to contradict himselfe who restrayneth the Adoptiō which he ascribes to the Iewes onely to the seed of Abrahā according to the promise and not according to the flesh Because otherwise the trueth of God in his promise would have failed Which consideration likewise appeareth evidently to destroy that distinction of Adoption albeit first devised by one of the auncient Fathers whereby one Adoption is made Adoption but by figure and resemblance the other in substance and effect But it seemeth that the ground of this opinion in some though not in all is buylded vpon this that they esteeme our Righteousnes to consist in the very act of beleeving which may be more iustly said of our Adoption albeit in a circumspect meaning CHAPTER XVI TOVCHING the benefite it selfe which Christ bestowes vpon those that receyve him although we should grant it to be the same in sense which they expound it to be yet it will never inferre that in this place To receyve Christ and beleeve in his name is to be vnderstood of Iustification but according as some of themselves say of the worke of God in making vs to beleeve Of the which followeth the dignitie and prerogative of being sonnes as the first and immediate fruite of faith in Iesus Christ In which sense we denie not but this place may be commodiously interpreted although it seemeth that the spirite of God doth meane somewhat more For vnderstanding whereof we are first to consider the third point which we have said to be the ground of the mistaking of this place which stands in the not distinguishing betwixt the Fathers worke and the Sonnes in our Adoption although in the same place they bee cleerely distinguished by the Evangelist Which oversight maketh great confusion in knowledge For we are to vnderstand that although the three persons of the Trinitie be neither in subsisting nor working to bee separated yet in both they are still to be distinguished and never to be confounded if ever we thinke to have a cleere and vnconfused sight of these great workes of grace which they performe in vs. Now in this place the worke of the Father and the worke of the Sōne in our Adoption are cleerely and distinctly set down Like as in other parts the worke of the spirit
this gift it is that in this place we speake for howsoever by the Fathers givinge Christ vnto the death the full redemption of all Gods elect was wrought Yet in our particular persons we enioye it not vntill wee bee called of God therefore IustificatioÌ„ is placed after our calling Rom. chap. 8. and this giving of Christ is the cause why God firste giveth vs faith because before we receyve faith it is impossible to vs to enioye Christ because we have neyther hande heart nor will to receyve him and in this gift as wee have showen before standeth the matter of our righteousnes and the forme of our iustification consisteth in parte in the giving of it and this is needfull to be marked of vs for their cause that make our iustification to consist in Gods gracious acceptation of our faith and not in his gracious giving of faith vnto vs and Christ by faith Touching this second gift which is Christ in his death and bloud I will speake no more the things preceeding serving sufficientlie to cleare it and therefore we come to the next pointe wherein we have said consisteth the forme of our iustification CHAPTER XXXI THE second thinge wherein consisteth the forme of our iustification is the Lords imputing of the thinges given vnto vs that is both of faith and Christes obedience and for the observation of the imputation of both wee are to marke these two phrases First where it is saide that faith is imputed vnto righteousnes Rom. cha 4. ver 5. 9. Secondly where it is saide that righteovsnes is imputed Rom. chapt 4. ver 11. For the one importes plainely the imputation of faith the oher importes the imputation of righteousnes it selfe which is by faith For we have alreadie shewen that our faith is neither our righteousnes nor called in the Scriptures our righteousnes howsoever our righteousnes be called the righteousnes of the faith of Iesus or by the faith of Iesus and it may be that the not observing hereof hath made some worthie and learned Divines to denie al imputation of Christes obedience to maintaine nothing to be imputed vnto vs but faith only that not vnto righteousnes but as they interprete the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for that is in the place of righteousnes For cleering of this point of Imputation we will first speake of the word imputation what it signifieth Secondly what sorte of things are saide to be imputed in the Scriptures whether thinges that are inherent in vs or thinges not inherent or both Thirdly we will speake of these things which are saide in scripture to be imputed to vs for our iustification Concerning the first the word it selfe signifieth the sentence of our iudgement or resolut opinion of his minde and in this sense it is taken Rom. chap. 3. 28. as also Rom. 6. 11. Secondly it is referred to the reasoning of the minde and the disputing of the vnderstanding as Marke chap. 11. ver 31. Thirdly it is referred to a mans purposing or imagining or plotting any thing as 1. Corint chap. 13. ver 5. Fourthly it is referred to the estimation or accompt of the minde touching any thing as Acts chap. 19. ver 27. in which sense also it may be taken Mark 15. 28. Luke chap. 22. ver 37. Fiftly it is reâ—erred to the laying to a mans charge of any debt or guiltines as 2. Timoth. chap. 4. ver 16. Lastly it is taken in a borrowed sense froÌ„ accompts and reckonings for accompting vnto a man or reputing vnto a man and reckoning to a man any thing to bee his or to be good payement and satisfaction from him in his accompts and in this sense is it taken in the matter of our iustification when as God eyther reckoneth that to be ours which is not ours or when hee esteemeth and accompteth that sufficient which hee giveth vs freely for our iustification before him But in this sense it appeareth that there is a three folde difference in mens taking of the meaninge of the worde imputation The first is when imputation is taken for naked acceptation of a thing although in it selfe insufficient as sufficient by God and this maketh some men to define our iustification to be nothing els but a gracious acceptation of our imperfect faith by God in place of perfect righteousnes but to this wee have answered before and certaine and sure it is that God receyves no righteousnes from vs but gives righteousnes vnto vs. The second meaning is when imputation is takeÌ„ not simply for a naked acceptation of a thing whether in it selfe perfect or imperfect but for accompting that which is perfect righteousnes in it selfe and yet is not ours to be ours The third sense is when imputation is so taken that it signifieth not only the accompting or reckoning to vs as ours the righteousnes which is imputed but so reckoneth and reputeth it to vs as done by our selves The first importeth no more but the Lordes accompting and holding of a thing sufficient which notwithstanding of it selfe is not sufficient nor perfect righteousnes which opinion can never be maintayned with Gods honour The seconde importeth not onely an accompting and holding of a thing which in it selfe is sufficient righteousnes to bee full and perfect but also an accomptinge of that perfect righteousnes vnto vs as ours howsoever it bee onely Christes so that this opinion taketh the word imputatioÌ„ so as when God reckoneth to vs that to be our righteousnes which in effect is not our righteousnes but onely by his accompt and imputation The third importeth that same that the second doeth but in a more strict sense to wit that God by imputing of Christs obedience vnto vs doeth not onely accompt it to be our righteousnes but also doth accompt it as performed and done by vs and this sentence though it seeme hard and to derogate something to the honour of God and praise of his grace yet one word being taken in a charitable which also is a true sense there shal be no fault fouÌ„d in the speech The word is as when it is saide that the Lord imputeth Christes obedience to vs as if we had done it our selves which word is not to be taken as though it imported that God did impute vnto vs. that wee had done this but oely is set downe by similitude to shewe the faithfulnes and trueth of Gods imputation to wit that GOD imputeth Christes righteousnes as truely to be ours and as effectually to iustifie vs as it should have done if wee had in our owne persons actually performed it and in that sense this speech may well be approoved Moreover it may be taken in good parte even although we take it in the strictest sense spoken before if wee consider that Iesus Christ did beare all our persons in his death and therefore he is saide in scriptures to have died for vs so that what he did bearing our persons even in the sight of God and dying for
grace Imputation by debt is When the thing imputed is a naturall thing consisting either in the disposition and properties naturall which are in vs or then the fruites and effectes flowing from our owne naturall powers And in this sense is it that the scripture saith That to him that worketh the wages is not imputed by grace but by debt Rom. chap. 4. ver 4. Imputation by grace touching things in vs is whē the thing imputed is not natural but a supernaturall thing being neither parte nor portion of our nature nor of any power of facultie in nature nor wrought by any power in vs but supernaturally placed in vs by God and given vs above and beside all that is by nature in vs. in this sense faith is said to be imputed to vs. For as a man can with his body or a member of his body vse an instrument such as a sword a knife an axe or a sawe which are no parte or power nor facultie of his body or hande to performe things which he could not otherwise doe by his body or by his hande Even so the soule heart of a mā can vse a spiritual instrumēt such as is faith albeit it be no parte power or facultie of the hearte to performe such things as by it selfe it could never possibly have performed and therefore such a supernaturall instrument whereby our heartes worketh not being any parte nor power of vs nor any thing wrought in vs by our selves nor acquired nor purchased by vs but given vs by God and placed in our heartes by him can not properly be said to bee ours notwithstanding that it be in vs neither can the worke which it doth be properly saide to be our worke except by Gods gracious imputation onely For this cause it is that in the Scriptures that which is by faith is saide to be by grace Rom. chap. 4. ver 16. as likewise that the righteousnes of faith is not our owne righteousnes but the righteousnes of God Phill. chap. 3. ver 9. Rom. chap. 3. ver 21. 22. and that not onely in respect of the righteousnes it selfe which is given vs of God but also in respect of the meane and instrument whereby we receyve it which also is given vs of GOD. Nowe we come to speake of the thirde pointe that is concerning the thinges which are said to be imputed to vs in the worke of our iustification and these be two according to the two giftes that God giveth vs to this ende that wee may bee righteous The first is faith which is the supernaturall instrument given vs of God to apprehend our righteousnes The second is the righteousnes it selfe apprehended by faith that is Christ crucified or his bloud shed for vs For although the Lord hath given vs faith and Christ Iesus his sonne yet albeit we have them we have them not as our owne but by the imputation of God So that Gods gift maketh possession but his imputation maketh our right in proprietie in the thing possessed We say that both faith and Christes obedience is imputed because the scriptures hath these two phrases First that faith is imputed vnto righreousnes and also that righteousnes is imputed Which two phrases are not to be confounded but for the cleere vnderstanding of our iustification are still to be distinguished To make this manifest we are first to consider that vnto our iustification we must first have righteousnes for God iustifieth no man that hath not righteousnes For to iustifie the wicked and condemne the righteous are both abhomination vnto the Lord Prov. chap. 17. ver 15. Esai chap. 5. ver 23. therefore before God iustifie vs wee must have righteousnes in our possession Secondly there is but one of two righteousnes that man can posses that is eyther his owne righteousnes or the righteousnes of God for no third righteousnes is set downe in the booke of God whereby a man can bee iustified so that one of these two we must have before God iustifie vs. Both these pointes are cleere in that one saying of the Apostle Phil. chapt 3. ver 9. Not having myne owne righteousnes which is of the Law but that which is through the faith of Christ even the righteousnes which is through GOD by faith Which sentence sheweth first that wee must have righteousnes and secondly that there is but one of two to bee had that is eyther our owne or Gods Thirdly this place sheweth vs where these righteousnes are Our owne righteousnes is conteyned in the Law the righteousnes of God is conteyned in Christ Lastly not only this place but divers others of the scriptures sheweth vs that as the righteousnes conteyned in the Lawe is obteyned by our owne doing of the workes of the Law and that by our owne strength so the righteousnes of God which is conteyned in Christ is obtayned by beleeving and therefore in the scriptures iustification is saide eyther to be by workes or by faith for as working is the way and meane to attayne to the righteousnes of the Lawe so faith is the meane and instrument whereby we attayne to the righteousnes of Christ And therefore as the righteousnes of the Law is called our owne because the meane whereby wee possesse it that is our working is our owne so likewise the righteousnes of Christ is said not to be our owne because the meane and instrument whereby we obtayne it which is faith is not our owne For both these righteousnesses have their owne proper subiectes wherein they subsist before wee possesse them that is the Law and Christ For mans righteousnes is conteyned in Lawe and Gods righteousnes is conteyned in Christ and therefore mans righteousnes is called the righteousnes of the Law Gods righteousnes is called the righteousnes of Christ as also whē man is iustified by his owne righteousnes he is said to bee iustified by the law and when he is iustified by the righteousnes of God he is said to be iustified by Christ And because man by working the thinges conteyned in the lawe attayneth to the righteousnes of the law therefore is hee said to be iustified by the workes of the lawe even so because by beleeving he attayneth to the righteousnes of Christ therefore is he saide to bee iustified by faith Thus he that worketh and he that beleeveth is opposed Rom. chap. 4. ver 5. in respect of the opposit meanes whereby they attayne to righteousnes the one of the law by working the other of Christ by beleving Wherevpon the last point followeth that is that the righteousnes of the Lawe is called man 's owne righteousnes because he attaynes to it by that which is his owne that is by his owne naturall power doeing of him selfe and by the strength that is in him selfe naturally without any helpe of any supernaturall power or meane given him to assist him to doe the things contayned in the lawe And the righteousnes of Christ is saide by the Apostle not to
favour Man neyther any wayes deservinge it by his worthines nor paying any thing to God for it and that this is the meaning of the worde it is most evident by this other word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is indifferently put for grace the one being sometimes interpreted by the other as Rom. chap. 3. ver 24. Being iustified freely by his grace where the word which is rendered freely is dorean which word secludeth both price and merit Concerning price it is cleere Math. chap. 10. ver 8. Yee have receyved freely give freely And 2. Thess chap. 3. ver 8. Neither tooke we bread of any man freely Concerning merite it is likewise manifest that this word secludeth it by Ioh. chap. 15. ver 25. They hated me freely that is without cause or deserving so that this word maketh iustification to be a worke of God freely done And this we marke that we may know it secludeth not the merit of Christ although that merit be imputed to vs by grace and by this consideration we shall learne to reconcile two sayings of scripture that seeme to be repugnant The first is Esay chap. 52. ver 3. Yee shal be redeemed without monie The other is 1. Cor. chap. 6. ver 20. For yee are bought for a price The one seemeth to make our redemption free without price the other seemeth to say the contrarie Yet both are true for in respect of man him selfe hee hath paide no price at all to God for his redemption but as concerning Christ he hath given a deare price even his life bloud for our redemption So the word Grace secludeth not the merit of Christ nor the price that he hath payed for vs nor ought els ordayned of God by his grace as causes and meanes subordinate to his grace for our iustification but onely secludeth whatsoever thinge is in man or can proceed from man who hath nothing of him selfe whereby to deserve righteousnes neither hath any thing to give to God to obtayne righteousnes For who hath given to God first that he should recompence him Rom. chap. 11. vers 35. And this third pointe of the forme of our iustification is necessarie to be added to the other two First for the right knowledge both of Gods giving and imputing of faith and Christ to our iustification Secondly for preserving vs from the errours of those who mistake the true meaning of the word grace in our iustification Concerning the first there is a distinctiō of the giftes of God and also of the imputation of God Touching the giftes they be eyther such as are natuall given by God indifferently to al are belōging to our natural life or thē they are gifts supernatural belonging to a supernatural life The first sorte the Lord giveth by naturall meanes as by procreation by naturall generation and by his generall providence extended over all But the second he giveth not but by speciall grace and by a speciall providence and particular love in the Lord IESVS there being no ground nor cause in them to whom hee giveth them why they should have thē nor any meanes in their power to procure them Thus faith and Christ by faith are given vs of God not for any worthines in vs nor for any thing given to God by vs but the Lord giveth vs both faith and Christ vnto iustification freely of his meere grace Secondly touching imputation there is an imputation by debt and an imputation by grace therefore that it may bee knowne that neither faith nor Christes merite is imputed to vs by debt the scripture plainly sheweth that this imputatiō is by grace that is first that faith which is now givē vs secondly that Christ who is givē vs by faith is ours not by any right that we have vnto thē by iustice that accompting of them ours is not by debt but of meere mercy grace so that our whole iustificatiō in al that is either given vs or imputed vnto vs to iustifie vs both in the giving in the imputing is of Gods free grace The secōd vse of the knowledge hereof is to preserve vs from their errors who take the name of grace in our iustification for the gifts of grace inherent in vs be it faith or sanctification or the fruites of our righteousnes And secondly from their error who take the name of grace for a gratious acceptatiō of our imperfect faith whereas grace in iustification is relative to the giving imputing of faith not to the accepting of it For in respect of faith given by grace and imputed by grace wee are said to be iustified by grace not in respect of Gods accepting of it at our handes by grace And thus much concerning the forme of our iustification CHAPTER XXXIII IT olloweth that we now speake of the obiect of iustification that is the man whom the Lord doeth iustifie who is two maner of wayes to be confidered First as he is in him selfe by nature Secondly what he is by grace before he be iustified As concerning him selfe wee have two places of scriptures which doe manifestly instruct vs what man is in him self when God iustifieth him The first is Rom. 4. 5. where God is said to iustifie the vngodly the other Rom. 5. 10. where God is said to have iustified vs while we were enemies and this sheweth the vanitie of the Papists who wil have a man formalie iust before he be iustified Touching that which he is by grace it is in many parts of the scripture evidently declared that he must beleeve before he be iustified that is must have faith wrought in his heart in that sorte that he may be iustified for like as Acts 14. it is saide that Paul perceyving that the creeple mā had faith to be made whole he did heale him even so the Lord first giveth vs faith to bee made iust and then iustifieth vs. For we are to consider that although faith bee the instrument of Gods power to make vs able to apprehende Christ and all his blessings in him yet in the worke of iustification it is particularly to be restrayned both as it is wrought by God in our heartes and as our heartes worketh by it vnto the particular benefite of righteousnes in Christ like as in all the rest of the benefites faith is alwayes to be particularly restrayned to every one of them in the particular apprehension of them Moreover we see the truth of this same in the order set downe by the Apostle Rom. 8. when he sayth whom he hath called them he also hath iustified whereby it is evident that God iustifieth not a man vntill first he hath obtayned that degree of grace which God bestoweth vpō a man whē he calleth him of which it followeth that he must have Christ reveyled vnto him he must likewise be come to Christ must have embrased him by faith and that not only as the sonne of God for in that point of faith consisteth his
adoption but also as the propitiation for sinne in his bloud which is the ground of Gods iustifying him For as God first openeth our eyes to see Christ to bee the sonne of God and by making vs to beleeve that maketh vs partakers of adoption so secondly by opening our eyes to see him to be ordayned by God a propitiation for sinne in his bloud and by making vs to beleeve that he layeth the foundation of our iustification in our heartes which is finished and accomplished by his gratious and free imputation For vnto the iustification of a sinner by the obedience of Christ in his death not onely faith but also the imputation of faith and that by grace must preceed before that Christ or his obedience can bee our righteousnes not that there is any defect or insufficiencie in Christes obedience but because neither faith hee nor his obedience is iustly ours vntill that by the free imputation and accompt of GOD they be made ours This we are carefully to consider that wee doe not confound the sufficiencie of Christes obedience our right therevnto as many perverslie doe in these dayes for the sufficiencie which is in Christ and his obedience vnto righteousnes is restrayned according to Gods gratious giving and imputinge faith and his obedience by faith and his imputation gift and grace are restrayned to his calling for the promise of God is restrayned to his calling as is cleere Acts chap. 2. vers 29. and all vertue in Christ vnto salvation is likewise restrayned vnto his calling as is cleere 1. Cor. chap. 1. ver 24. and his callinge is restrayned to his Decree and his Decree is restrayned to his purpose of which it appeareth evidently that all sufficiencie of Christes merit how great and infinite soever is no larger in right and efficacie then his calling and so consequently then his Decree and purpose For Gods promise is no larger then his calling and his calling no larger then his Decree and his Decree no larger then his purpose Heerevpon it followeth that Gods purpose is no larger then his applying by â—ustifying and glorifying seeing his iustification is as large as his calling and his calling as large as his Decree and his Decree as large as his purpose This is yet more evident by his promise which wee have shewen to bee of no larger extent then his calling of which it must followe that his purpose can bee of no larger extent then his applying because his calling and applying must bee of equall extent and his purpose of equall extent with his calling Of all these thinges it is manifest that the subiect of Gods iustification is the man indued with faith and this is to bee marked against those who esteeme the beleeving man in the foreknowledge of God to be the subiect of Gods Decree CHAPTER XXXIIII THE next pointe that we have to speake of is touchinge the finall cause of iustification in the which wee purpose to be short seeing it is not a matter controverted but yet it serveth to cleare the trueth of that going before concerninge the ordet of Gods benefites It is receyved vniversallie of all that the finall cause of righteousnes is life for there is no way to attayne vnto life but by righteousnes and for this cause iustification is called The iustification of life Rom. chap. 5. vets 18. and for the same cause it is saide That they who receyve that aboundance of grace and of the gift of that righteovsnes shall reigne in life Rom. chap. 5. ver 17. therefore is salvation called the end of our faith Pet. 1. Epist cha 1. ver 9. Carrying about with you the end of your faith even the salvation of your soules And this is according to the plaine speech of God Ezek. chap. 18. If a man be iust he shall surely live saith the Lord but the soule that sinneth shall die And againe in the same chapter ver 20. The righteousnes of the righteous shal be vpon him and the wickednes of the wicked shal be vpon him selfe And againe In his righteousnes that he hath done he shall live By these testimonies it is plaine that the end of righteousnes is life according to the saying of the Prophet Haba The iust shaell live by faith in the 2. chapter ver 4. and therefore eternal life is called the hope of righteousnes Gall. chapt 5. ver 5. For wee through the spirit waite for the hope of righteousnes through faith And in this same sense is the saying of the Apostle to bee taken Rom. chap. 8. ver 23. VVee doe sigh in our selves wayting for our adoption even the redemption of our bodyes as may easilie bee perceyved by the wordes following wherein hee giveth the reason of this our waytinge when hee sayeth for by hope wee are saved c. where our Adoption is put for our salvation or glorification or redemption in that sense wherein redemption is taken 1. Corinth chap. 1. ver 30. and this is needfull to bee marked to let vs see how diversly Adoption is taken in the holy scriptures of God And that wee may see the trueth of that which wee have saide before concerning the difference betwixt beeing a sonne by faith and by prerogative for as sayeth Iohn 1. Epist chap. 3. ver 2. we are now the sonnes of God but it is not made manifest yet what wee shall bee where he plainly distinguisheth betwixt beeing a sonne and being a glorified sonne for by faith wee are the sonnes of God Gall. chap. 3. ver 26. and yet by faith wee are not the glorified sonnes of God but yet still wayte for our Adoption that is our glorification And this diverse sense of Adoption is evidently cleered by the diverse sense of redemption wherein it is taken in the Rom. chap. 8 ver 23. and Heb. chap. 9. ver 15. For Rom. chap. 8. it is taken in one sense with Adoption that is for the glorification of our bodyes But in the 9. chap. to the Heb. it is taken for iustification which place also confirmeth eternall life to bee the end of our iustification whyle it is sayde that Christ is the Mediator of the New Testament for this cause that through death which was for the redemption of the transgressions that were in the former testament they which were called might receyve the promise of eternall inheritance And this same is made manifest by the Apostles order set downe Rom. chap. 8. where hee sayeth whom he iustifieth them also hee glorifieth For as calling is the fruite of predestination and iustification the fruit of calling so glorification is the fruite of iustification CHAPTER XXXV THus we are brought to the conclusion of the maine point touching iustification what it is which in the scriptures is described shortly and succinctly somtimes by the not imputatioÌ„ of sinne somtimes by the remission of sinne somtime by the covering and hiding of sinne somtime by the imputation of righteousnes sometime by the imputation of faith vnto
Christ onely being the immediate and absolute necessarie Meane appointed of God for the enioying of these blessings as being the onely matter substance of them in him selfe The word Sacraments and Faith being in them selves neither part nor portion of the Matter and substance of these benefites but onely the signes or seales or instrumentes of enioying him who alone is the substance And that onely vnto such as are partakers of the outward dispensation of the covenant others who die before they either heare faith preached or are made partakers of the Sacraments such as are many children of the faithfull such also as are called like vnto the thiefe in the last houre being adopted of God and iustified through Christ without them and therefore when in the Scriptures the spirit of God doth indifferently attribute our adoption iustification salvation c. vnto Christ and vnto â—aith yet they are not of a like large extent nor alike relatiue in all persons adopted iustified and saved c. For albeit actuall beleeving doth necessarily imply Christ yet to be adopted and iustified through Christ doth not alwayes in all persons necessarily imply actuall beleeving seeing that faith commeth of hearing the word preached and therfore is to be restrayned to such as are by outward dispensation called which all that are adopted and iustified are not for we are to distinguish betwixt these two things that is to be partakers of the covenant and to bee partakers of the outward dispensatioÌ„ of the couenant and therefore when it pleaseth God by outward dispeÌ„sation to call those who are within the covenant these meanes are then necessarily required vnto salvation For we are bound to these outward Meanes when it pleaseth God to vse them towards vs for our calling but God is no wayes bound to them nor his grace in Christ but that he may freely by his grace without them performe his Decree through Iesus Christ in vs after the manner knowne to him selfe whose wayes are past finding out els if those meanes were absolutely necessarie in all who are within the covenant then certainly the children of the faithfull who according to the Scriptures are within the covenant dying without externall dispensatioÌ„ of the covenant should contrarie to the scriptures not be accounted holy Of this it followeth that wheÌ„ it is said in scripture that without faith it is vnpossible to please God that wee are to vnderstand that saying prudently least we fall in a dangerous error so as to esteeme the children of whom coÌ„sisteth the kingdome not to be acceptable to God who notwithstanding are baptised as belonging to God in Christ and heyres of that righteousnes which is by faith although they haue never heard saith preached Of all these things we may easily perceive that seeing Christ who is the matter of our righteousnes life is not the cause why but the Meane whereby God doth decree to adopt vs iustifie vs c. that faith which is no material but instrumental Meane can much lesse be the cause why but a meane wherby God doth predestinate vs to be adopted iustified and glorified otherwise faith which is powerfull onely in respect of Christ should be of greater respect with God then Christ himself which were abominable to thinke In danger of which sinne many notwithstaÌ„ding do fall in defining both Gods decree and our iustification When as they distinguish not first betweene the thing which is decreed and the cause moving God to decree that which he decreed Secondly wheÌ„ they distinguish not in the thing which is decreed that whervnto we are ordeyned from the Meane wherby God doth ordayne to adopt vs. thirdly wheÌ„ in the meane they distinguish not betwixt that which is absolutly necessarie in all within the covenant froÌ„ those things which only are necessarie in such as not only are within the covenant but also are called by outward dispensation thereof and which are not substantial partes of our righteousnes but accidentall meanes therof except we will say that to be iustified by Christ and by faith is one and the same thing in proper and not borrowed speach which is impossible except we hold that faith in proper and not figurative speach doth signifie Christ These oversights cause some to make faith the cause moving God to predestinate vs to adoption c. and others to esteeme faith not to be the Meane and that instrumentall that in some case only but the very matter of our righteousnes and that not in borrowed or figurative but in simple and proper speach of which matter we shall have occasion to speak heereafter CHAPTER V. THis much being spoken of the substance of the Decree we are next to consider what is the cause that moved God to make this Decree Where we are to observe that we doe not speak of the final cause which is the prayse of the glorie of Gods grace neither yet of the Materiall cause and that which in the schooles is called causa procataretica that is the formost after the first or after the beginning which in the substance of Gods Decree we haue already declared to be Christ but the cause we inquire of is that which in the schooles is called proegumena that is to say which goeth before all causes and doth leade order guide al the rest Which the Apost setteth down in these words according to the good pleasure of his will by which words it is evident that nothing either in Christ as Mediator or in Man himself or any thing els without God but only Gods owne will in him selfe was the cause that did move God to predestinate such as are predestinate and to predestinate them vnto that wherevnto they are predestinate that is adoption and to predestinate them to be adopted by no other Meane except through Iesus Christ alone so that both Gods action of decreeing the persons who are predestinate and the thing wherevnto they are predestinate the Meanes whereby they are predestinate doth depend vpoÌ„ no cause without God but vpon the cause that is in God him self and vpon no cause in God him selfe except only his will Which sometimes is called in the scriptures his Mercie his love his grace his purpose his gift his good pleasure and counsell of his will And for the clearer vnderstanding of this point we are carefully to marke these two phrases conteyned in the description of predestination The first is that God is said to have predestinate vs in him selfe The seconde is that he is said to haue predestinate vs according to the good pleasure of his owne wil. By the first of these sayings the spirit of God would teach vs that God went not without him selfe neither consulted with anie thing but him self neither looked to any thing that was not in him self when he did predestinate vs. and so coÌ„sequently that the Decree of God or predestination is an action of God not in Christ the Mediator nor in vs that are
Christ onely who being ordeyned of God the Meane of al his mercie to Mākinde he commeth in as Mediatour betweene God vs in all things decreed of God for vs so as we are to expect nothing of all that is decreed concerning the vessels of honour whether it bee in making of vs sonnes or making vs cōforme to the Image of his Sonne in righteousnes and glorie but only in and through Iesus Christ our Lord in whom alone all the promises of God are yea and amen For he is the first borne among all the sonnes of God and the beginning and first begotten of the dead for it is the Fathers will that in all things hee have the praeeminence Rom. chap. 8. ver 29. Col. chap. 1. ver 18. Thus albeit God in him selfe and of him selfe ordayne vs to great dignitie and manifold vnspeakeable blessings yet this honour doeth he reserve vnto his only begotten sonne that of all these blessings we shall enioye none except in through him onely so that it is true that we are ordayned to nothing without Christ but not in that deceitfull sense whereby the mindes of many are deluded as though he were the cause why GOD doth ordeyne vs to adoption The Scripture teacheth vs farre otherwise distinguishing betwixt the cause why God decreeth vs to adoption and the cause why he ordeyneth vs to this adoption through Christ onely Setting downe the cause of the Decree to be his owne will good pleasure in him selfe And declaring the cause why he ordeyneth vs to be adopted through Christ to be this that Christ might be the first borne among manie brethren and that he might have the praeeminence in all things wherevpon it followeth that albeit he be not the cause why we are ordeyned to adoption yet notwithstanding seeing it is Gods will to performe towards vs his gracious purpose and good pleasure of his wil only in and through Christ that of necessitie we must first enioy him before we can enioy any thing of that that is decreed And therefore it was the Fathers will that in him should all fulnes dwell Coloss chap. 1. vers 19. That out of his fulnes we all should receyve Iohn chapt 1. vers 16. And for this same cause is it said That God hath made him wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption and that vnto vs 1. Corinth chapt 1. verse 13. For whatsoever God hath made Iesus Christ the Mediatour he hath made him that for our cause so that the love of God to vs and the good pleasure of his wil towards vs is the cause why Christ is made of God the meane of our salvation And therefore in the consideration of Gods Decree Christ as Mediatour commeth in order after the consideration of that wherevnto we are ordayned although in the executiō and performāce of Gods Decree Christ in vs must goe before all other things ordayned for vs for that is the nature of all Meanes which are subordinate to that whereof they are appointed to be Meanes Thus God first in order purposeth and decreeth what to doe to vs and secondly by what Meanes but when hee performeth his Decree he first prepareth the Meanes and then accomplisheth thereby his purpose and decree towardes vs. For if the Lord had never ordayned vs that are men to bee made his sonnes he had never ordayned his sonne to bee made a Man this is cleere by the Apostles speech wherein he declareth the cause why the sonne of God did take mans nature vpon him Hebr. chap. 2. ver 14. saying For asmuch therefore as the children were partakers of flesh and blood even he likewise tooke part with them And thereafter shewing the cause why not only he tooke our nature◠but also did take it with the same infirmities sinne only except wherewith our nature is indued he vseth these speeches For it became him in all thinges to be made like to his brethren Hebrewes chap. 2. vers 17. according to which grounde it is saide in another place That God sent his Sonne in the flesh in the similitude of sinnefull flesh Roman chap. 8. vers 3. This point is evidently cleare by the same Apostles speech Galath chap. 4. verses 4. and 5. when hee sheweth the ende wherefore God sent his sonne in the flesh saying VVhen the fulnes of tyme was come God sent foorth his owne Sonne made of a woman c. that we might receyve the adoption Letting vs see that in Gods execution hee giveth vs the adoption to the which he ordayned vs by the same Meane thorough the which he ordayned to give it vs. Thus we may see evidently that that parte of Gods Decree touching the Meane of our adoption doeth in order of Decreeing depende vpon the former parte touching the adopting of vs but in order of performing the sending of Christ made of a woman and made vnder the Law and made righteousnes sanctification and redemption c. doth goe before our adoptiō For he was not made the cause of eternall salvation to his owne till he was perfited Hebr. chap. 5. vers 9. For which cause the Apostle sayeth Hebr. chap. 2. vers 10. when hee gives the reason why he was made to taste of death That Christ being to bring many children to glorie it became him for whom are all these things and by whom are all these thinges to perfite or to consecrate the Prince of their salvation through afflictions This shall be yet more cleare if wee consider who it is that is appointed the Meane of our adoption that is not the Father nor yet the holy Ghost but the Sonne only and that because hee onely is that vnto the which wee are ordayned For this grounde we must holde that what so ever wee are made by grace it must firste bee in GOD him selfe and then made ours by our communion and fellowship with GOD. Now this blessing of sonne-shippe which is ordeyned vnto vs is no propertie of the Father nor yet of the Holy Ghost but of the seconde person onely who by that propertie is distinguished both from the Father and from the Holy Ghost and therefore although the Father and the Holy Ghost doe with the Sonne not onely ordeyne vs to adoption but also adopt vs yet they neither ordeyne vs to adoption neyther doe adopt vs through any but the Sonne alone for the Father and the Holy Ghost are not the Sonne neither can be because their personall properties are incommunicable howsoever their naturall properties bee common yea one and the same in all three because the nature of all three is most simply one and the same Of which it commeth to passe that we being adopted thorough Christ and so consequently called to the communion of Christ in that which he is by subsisting that is sonnes wee are also made partakers of the Divine nature as sayeth the Apostle Peter that is we are made like to all three in that which they are by nature for all three have but
Rom. chap. 11. vers 16. If the first fruites be holy so is the whole lumpe And this is that which the Apostle will signifie when hee sayeth that Christ is the beginning first be gotten of the dead that in all things he might have the preeminence Coll. chap. 1. vers 18. Revel chap. 1. ver 5. As also when he sayeth that Christ was made the first fruites of them that sleepe 1 Corinth chap. 1. vers 20. this same thing doth the Apostle declare in the 8. to the Romanes When hee sheweth the reason why God hath predestinate vs to bee made like to the Image of his Sonne which is that he might bee the first borne amongst many Brethren For his prerogative in birth is made manifest by this that in his consecration we are consecrated according as sayeth the Apostle Hebr. chap. 10. vers 14. with one offring hath he consecrated for ever those that are sanctified Thus the very lawe of God doth teach vs that as the first borne Male did consecrate all the rest of the same wombe that is brethren begotten of the same parents and no other and every first ripe fruite of every mans ground and in heritance did consecrate to God the remanent fruite of the same ground and inheritance and no other eaven so Iesus Christ is consecrate for none but for his brethren and none are consecrate by him who are not brethren with him For it is not his oblation that maketh brotherhood but it is brotherhood that maketh his oblation Wherevpon it must follow that seeing Christ must first be our Brother before he redeeme vs that we also must first be adopted before we bee iustified This same the Lord would seeme to declare by the lawe of redemption which he established in Israel whereby all right of redemption is given to the neerest kinsman As also by the law touching the prerogative of the first borne whereby he is made Lord amongst his brethren but amongst none other by which it appeareth cleerly that brotherhood is both the ground and limitation of Christs office both as Redeemer and Head of the Church and this same brotherhood is the ground of all right that we can pretend vnto the death or life of Iesus Christ ourhead CHAPTER XII THE third ground serving to cleere the order of the blessings of God is the difference betwixt the order of Gods dispensation and our perception or sense of his benefites For that is not alwayes formost in order of dispensation which is first perceyved by our sense for in our conception of Gods benefites we ascend from the later in order to the former Gathering the knowledge and certeintie of the blessings going before by the sense and feeling of those which follow after Hereof we have many examples in Scripture For as Christ teacheth vs it is with every man that is borne of the Spirit as it is with him who heareth the sound of the wind blowing but cannot tell whence it commeth nor whither it goeth Iohn cha 3. vers 8. Thereby informing vs that the man begotten of God knoweth neither from whom the working of the Spirit is nor yet what is the end of it at the first vntill afterward that the effects following manifest both the Author the worke and the end thereof According to which Iohn sayeth 1 Epist chapter 1. vers 6. By this we know we have fellowship with God because we walke in the light and againe by keeping his commandements we know that we know him and yet surely wee must have fellowship with him and knowe him before wee either walke in the light or keepe his commandements So also by confessing that Iesus is the Sonne of God we know that God abideth in vs we in him as saith the same Apostle Ephe. chap. 1. ver 15. yet God must be in vs by his spirit we in him before we can give any such confession for no man can doe so much as call Iesus Lord but speaking by the spirit 1. Corint chap. 12. ver 3. Likewise it is said that we know that God loveth vs because we love him and yet as saith the same Apostle we love him because he loveth vs first 1. Epistle chap. 4. vers 19. For the former blessings lying in our heartes vnperceyved are made manifest vnto vs by these effects following For as Iohn sayeth Heereby do we perceyve Gods love to vs by giving his sonne for vs 1. Epistle chap. 4. ver 9. For the love of God towardes vs which did goe before as the cause is not perceyved of vs but by the giving of his sonne for vs as the effect following And to this end is it that Peter 2. Epist chap. 1. ver 10. willeth vs by our succeeding holines as the fruite of our righteousnes to make our calling and our election sure Thus wee see that the blessinges of GOD are not at the first perceyved of vs in the order wherein they are dispensed For there is a cōtrarie course of order betwixt the Lords dispensing of his grace to vs in Christ and of our perceyving of the graces imparted vnto vs. for we ascend vpward vnto God the fountayne of all blessing backe agayne by the same steps by the which he did descend first vnto vs. The ladder of God reaching from heaven vnto earth doeth bring GOD downe to vs from the vpmost steppe to the lowest but it leadeth vs vpwarde to God from the lowest to the vpmost Therefore God doeth not beginne in dispensation to vsward where wee beginne according to our apprehension to rayse our myndes vpwards in the collection of the benefites dispensed But if we will rightlie know how God hath made that ladder we must beginne at the vpmost nearest vnto God steppe downe to the lowest where first wee began to steppe vp vnto God so shall we know the right order of Gods dispensation towards vs. It may be probablie thought that the negligent consideration of this point maketh many to mistake the right place of adoption For although we doe not thoroughly perceyve neyther have the cleere knowledge of our adoption vntill the time that we have remission of sinnes and feele the peace of God and ioye of his Spirit in our heartes and that confidence and boldnesse whereby we may crye Abba Father yet it followeth not that these goe in order before our adoption But even as our Iustification is thoroughly perceyved and confirmed in vs by our succeeding sanctification for hee that doeth righteousnes in righteous Iohn first Epistle chapter the thirde verse 7. eaven so our Adoption is cleered and confirmed vnto vs by our succeeding Iustification and fruites thereof For our Adoption hath the accomplishment of it partly in everie one of the remanent blessings of God and wholy in the ioynt and full accomplishment of them all Therefore are wee saide still in this life to waite for our Adoption Rom. chapt 8. vers 23. because our Adoption is not fully finished vntill our full
efficient cause which is God alone for he is the Father of lights from whom commeth down all good gifts and every perfect donation Iam. chap. 1. vers 17. This may be confirmed by particular testimonies of Scripture touching every particular benefite as of Faith Adoption Iustification Peace or Reconciliation Sanctification Glorification and our whole Redemption For they are neither bred in vs by nature nor acquired by our industrie nor ministred by humane education but are all the gifts of God The second thing wherein they all agree is the cause which moueth God to give them which is nothing but his grace and good pleasure For none of them is obtayned by our desert or meritt For as sayeth the Apostle 2 Tim. chap. 1. vers 9. God hath saved vs and called vs with an holy calling not according to our workes but according to his owne purpose and grace and this likewise is cleere by particular testimonies of the Scriptures touching every one of these benefites The third thing wherin they all agree is the meanes through which God of his grace doth give them which is Iesus Christ the Sonne who is made of God vnto vs all these blessings For in him all fulnes dwelleth and out of his fulnes we all receive grace Which point also is most evident throughout all the Scriptures in everie particular benefite The fourth thing wherein they all agree is the instrument by the which God maketh vs to apprehend them all in Christ which is Faith only The fift thing wherein they all agree is that they are inseparable one from another so that none can have one of them but he must needs have all for whom he calleth them he Iustifieth and whom he Iustifieth them he glorifieth Rom. chap. 8. vers 30 And as sayeth the Apostle by the grace of God which is given vs in Christ Iesus we are made riche in him in all gifts 1 Cor. cha 1. ver 4. 5. And the same Apostle gives thankes to God because he hath blessed vs with all blessings in Christ Eph. ch 1. ver 3. The last thing wherein they all agree is that they are never taken away againe from those that receive them For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance Rom. ch 11. ver 29. And whom Christ loved hee loveth to the end Iohn chap. 13. vers 1. Now followeth the third thing to be considered of vs which is touching the vse arising vpon those former 6. points which wee are to marke for our right vnderstanding of the nature of Gods saving benefites and this vse is sixe fould The first is that none of these blessings is in vs by nature nor from nature nor any power or facultie in nature but are all the supernaturall gifts of God The second vse is that we are to acknowledge the good will of God and his free grace to bee the only cause moving God to give these benefites For by his grace he hath made vs freely accepted in his beloved so that even what in Christ hee gives vs he gives it freely of grace so that all respects is removed why God should bestowe his blessings in Christ except his owne grace in himselfe Which we are carefully to marke that we may keepe our selves from the error of these who confound either the subordinate meane through which or the subordinate Instrument by which God bestowes his blessings with the cause moving God to bestow them For although Christ be the meane through which faith be the instrument by which God gives all spirituall blessings yet the cause moving him to give all is his grace For hee gives Christ and the righteousnes that is in him and faith freely to whom he will and withouldes them from whom he will Thus although the subordinate meanes in and by which God dispenseth his blessings are not to be separate from his grace yet they are never to bee confounded with it but even Christ himselfe and all blessings in him and the merit of his sufferings and faith by the which wee apprehend all are still to bee distinguished from the grace of God which is the only cause why eyther Christ himselfe or the meritt of his suffrings or faith to apprehend it is given vs of God Therefore in Gods working the Scriptures still ioyne these three together to wit grace Christ and faith Faith as the instrument whereby we apprehend and Christ as the subiect in which wee apprehend the blessings of God and the grace of God as the only cause moving God both to giue faith and Christ by faith and in Christ al these blessings So that it is a greevous sinne against the grace of God for the prayse of the glory whereof the Lord doth bestowe vpon vs all spirituall blessings when we spoyle it of this prayse due to it alone by making any other thing to bee the moving cause why God doth blesse vs. As likewise it is a great sinne when separating this grace from the subordinate meanes wee doe despise the meanes and turne the grace into wantonnes The third vse is that no where except in Christ alone is any of the saving blessings of God to bee found And therefore it never can be accompted to be Gods Adoption Gods Righteousnes Sanctificatian Reconciliation or Redemption which is placed in any thing without Christ Wherevpon it must follow that they erre farre from the trueth who place their righteousnes either in their faith or workes or who place reconciliation in their owne satisfaction For though Christ be the obiect of faith yet it hath the being of it in mans hart concerning works and our own satisfactions It is cleere that they are not in Christ who notwithstanding is all in all things and filleth all in all things The fourth vse is that without faith God by his grace communicates noe blessing in Christ in ordinarie dispensation Therefore they must erre who thinke that Christ and the blessings of God in him may be apprehended by the externall bodily action of man in receyving the Sacraments that is as they call it by the very externall worke wrought This likewise teacheth vs to perceive their error who doe make Faith which is but the apprehending instrument to bee the blessing it selfe thereby apprehended in Christ Of which sort they all are who place the matter of our righteousnes in the act of our beleeving The fift vse is to teach vs to be wise in iudging of our selves whether we be truly in the state of grace or no for he that is destitute of any one of these saving blessings he is destitute of them all whatsoever foolish confidence he have to the contrarie For as sayeth the Apostle Peter 2. Epi. chap. 1. vers 3. God through the knowledge of him that hath called vs hath given vnto vs al things that appertayne to life and Godlines And therfore Iames sheweth that it profits nothing that a man say he hath faith if he have no workes And Iohn 1. Ep.
cha 2. vers 9. sayeth Hee that sayeth he is in the light and hatetb his brother is in darknes vntill this tyme. and chap. 3. vers 6. VVho soever sinneth hath not seene Christ neither hath knowen him The sixt and last vse is to discover to vs the error of those who prophainly affirme that the Saints effectually called may fall from grace which is a blasphemous denying of Gods faithfulnes his righteousnes and the stablenes of his counsell vpon which the Scriptures so often build the certayntie of the saints persevering vnto the end Vpon his faithfulnes 1. Cor. chap. 1. ver 8. 9. who also shall confirme you vnto the end for God is faithfull by whō ye are called And 1. Thess chap. 5. ver 24. Faithfull is hee who calleth you and will also doe it vpon his righteousnes 2. Thess chap. 1. vers 6. 7. For it is a righteous thing with God to render to you which are troubled rest with vs in the revelation of the Lord Iesus from heaven And Heb. ch 6. ver 9. 10. But we perswade our selves better things of you and such as accompanie salvation for God is not vnrighteous c. and vpō the stablenes of his counsell in the 17. and 18. verses of the same chapter saying Wherein God willing more aboundantly to shewe vnto the heires of promise the vnchaingeablenes of his counsell did binde himselfe by an oth that by two immutable things wherein it is impossible that God should lye we might have strong consolation which have our refuge to lay holde vpon the hope that is layde before vs. CHAPTER XIX THvs having spoken of these 3. points it followeth now that we speake of the particular difference whereby the blessings of God are every one distinguished frō another The difference that is amongst these benefites is of two sorts The first is more general depending vpon the different manner that we enioy them The second is more particular rising vpon the particular nature of every benefite Touching the first the benefites of God in Christ are either such as are made ours only by imputation and Gods gracious accompt the thing imputed remayning still in substance inherent in Christ and not in vs. for then they are such as flowing from the vertue of Christ doe abide inherent in our soules and bodyes eternally Of the first sort are Adoption and Iustification which never can be said properly to be inherent in vs Adoption beeing taken in the proper sense whereby it is distinguished from the rest not in that general sense mentioned before for Christ alone remayneth in himselfe the only Sonne of God and only righteous without sinne wee beeing sonnes and righteous never by any inhesion of these blessings in vs but only by the imputation of that sonne-ship and righteousnes which is Christs alone vnto vs. Therefore the Scriptures touching these 2. benefites doeth specially vse this phrase to witt that wee are the sonnes of God in him and that we are made the righteousnes of God in him Of the second sort are these benefits which necessarily follow vpon the two former as being the end wherefore we are Adopted and Iustified and these be peace with God or Reconciliation ioy in the holy Ghost Sanctification and Glorification which is all one with Redemption as it is taken in most particular sense Which all are so given vs in Christ that by the sense and feeling of them inherent in vs they are made to vs sure tokens of our effectual calling or Adoption Iustificatiō Which being blessings not perceyved by any sense of them selves in substance inherent in vs are confirmed in vs by the others as infallible effectes following them For which cause the Apostle Peter willeth vs by them to make our calling and election sure For in this are the children of God knowne and the children of the Divell VVho soever doeth not righteousnes is not of God 1. Iohn 3. 10. And againe Know yee that he that doeth righteously is borne of him 1. Iohn 2. 29. And againe Hee that doeth righteousnes is righteous as he is righteous 3. chap. vers 7. This difference serveth both to cleare the order and nature of the benefites of God For these which are ours by gracious accompt remayning still inherent in Christ only they are both first in order and are the grounds and subordinate causes of all the rest of the benefits inhesively bestowed vpon vs in Christ Therefore vnto these two that is Adoption and Iustification all the rest are attributed as effectes and infallible consequences whyle it is saide If wee bee sonnes then are we also heyres Rom. cha 8. ver 17. And againe Whosoever is borne of God sinneth not 1. Iohn 3. 9. And againe The sonne abideth in the house for ever Iohn 8. 35. so touching righteousnes it is saide The iust by faith shall live Rom. 1. 17. And againe Being iustified by faith we haue peace towards God reioyce in the hope of the glory of God Rom. 5. 1. 2. And againe That we being iustified by his grace should be made heires c. Tit. 3. 7. The second difference ariseth vpon the different nature of the benefites which appeare in the effectes of every one towardes vs. Which effectes may generally bee reduced to two The first is the effect of the making vs the sonnes of God Which is most properly performed in vs in the blessing of Adoption The second is the making of vs like to the Image of the sonne of God Which is performed by the rest of the blessinges that is our Iustification Sanctification and Redemption Which albeit they serve to accomplish our Adoption by making vs to bee the sonnes of God by prerogative dignitie c. yet wee are sonnes before they be accomplished in vs. For as saith Iohn 1. Epist 3. 2. We are nowe the sonnes of God although it is not manifest what we shall be So this generall difference of the nature of Gods benefites is carefully to be marked that we may distinguish betwixt these benefites by the which we are properly made sonnes and so of the seed which onely is Adoption And these benefites by the which we enioye the promise made vnto the seede where by we are not properlie saide to be made sonnes but onely in respect of the condition and estate belonging to the sonnes But properly by them we are made like vnto the Image of the sonne of God But although all these benefites agree in this pointe and they all serve to make vs like vnto the Image of the Sonne yet they differ in nature every one from another according to the difference of these thinges wherein they make vs like vnto the Sonne of GOD. For by Iustification the Lord makes vs righteous and without sinne as Christ is righteous and without sinne and reconcileth vs vnto him selfe making vs one with him selfe as the sonne is one with him For peace or reconciliation with God is the effect and fruite of Iustification
Iustifies a man The third is the nature of the worke it selfe Touching the first the Scripture speaking of Iustification even whereas it is supposed to bee by the workes of the Lawe speakes passivelie of man and never activelie to shewe it is a worke which he him selfe doeth not but which is done vnto him by another as for example Rom. chapt 3. vers 20. by the workes of the Lawe shall no flesh bee iustified And againe Gal. chap. 2. ver 16. Knowing that a man is not Iustified by the workes of the Law And againe Gall. chap. 5. vers 4. And yee are abolished from Christ who soever are Iustified by the Lawe As likewise when Iustification is attributed vnto faith the same passive forme of speach is vsed as Rom. chapt 3. vers 28. VVe conclude then that a man is Iustified by faith without the workes of the Lawe And againe Rom. chap. 5. ver 1. Being then Iustified by faith c. And Tit. chap. 3. ver 7. That beeing Iustified by his grace c. Which forme of speech is most cleerely vsed Matt. chap. 12. v. 37. For by thy wordes thou shalt bee iustified and by thy wordes thou shale be condemned All these testimonies doe shew plainlie that the worke of Iustification is not the worke of man him selfe but of some other And therefore Christ Luke chap 16. 15. layes this to the Pharises charge as a speciall iniquitie saying Yee are those who iustifie your selves And that this is to bee vnderstood not only of a man in iudging him selfe but also of one man in iudging an other it is plaine by the Apostles doctrine Rom. 14. 4. 10. 13. where he takes al power from all men of iudging one another and to conclude this point the Apostles testimonie touching him selfe is sufficient 1. Corint cha 4. ver 3. whereby he cleereth both these pointes to witt that no other man had power to iudge him and that he had no power to iudge him selfe saying I passe little to be iudged of you or of mans iudgement no I iudge not my owne selfe In which places all power of iudging as it is referred either to iustifying or condemning in pardoning or not pardoning sinne in the absolving or not absolving from sinne is vtterly taken from all men whether in respect of them selves or others Touching the second grounde which cleereth who it is that Iustifies there is nothing whereof the holy Scripture giveth more cleere testimonie then of this still affirming that is is God onely who Iustifieth as is manifest Rom. chap. 8. ver 33. where expressely it is sayde It is GOD that Iustifieth and in that same Chapter 30. verse it is saide Those whom hee hath predestinate those hee hath called and whom hee hath called those also hee hath iustified which place sheweth playnely that it can belong to none but to God alone seeing that he who iustifieth must bee he who calleth and hee who calleth must be he who predestinateth which is onely God And againe the same Apostle giveth a cleere testimonie heereof Rom. chapt 3. ver 30. saying For God is one who shall iustifie circoncision of faith and vncirconcision thorough faith The like testimonie is conteyned 1. Corinth cha 4. vers 4. where the Apostle sayeth Hee that iudgeth mee is the Lorde Therefore sayeth the same Apostle Rom. chap. 14. ver 12. That every one of vs shall give accompt of him selfe vnto God Nowe wee come to the third ground which consisteth in the nature of Iustification it selfe which is not as some interprete it to be the making of vs inhesively iust by renovation or change of our nature as though the word Iustificare that is to Iustifie did signifie Iustum facere that is to make just By which opinion our Iustificatiō and our Sanctification are confounded and made one thinge As though to Iustifie were the action of GOD in regeneratinge and recreatinge vs whereas it is the worke of God in iudging vs. so that Iustificar◠doeth signifie Iustum pronuntiare that is to pronounce righteous which is manifest by two reasons The first is because in Scripture Iustification is opposed to condemnation as is cleere by the testimonie cited before Mat. 12. 37. The second reason is taken from the description of Iustification set downe in the Scriptures where sometymes it is defined to consist in the remission of sinnes sometymes in the forgiving of wickednes in the covering of sinne and not imputing of iniquitie sometyme by the imputation of righteousnes Which all doe prove manifestly that Iustification is the Action of him who is the Iudge of mankinde in absolving man from sinne and the punishment thereof Of this it followeth that vnto God onely it belongeth to Iustifie and that for two speciall reasons The first is because the Lord is the onely Iudge of all Hebr. 12. 23. And therefore Acts 17. 31. it is sayd He hath appointed a day in the which he will iudge the world in righteousnes Of which day the Apostle also speaketh Rom. 2. 5. 16. and the reason heereof is given by the Apostle Rom. 14. 7. 8. to witt because hee is our onely Lord to whom we both live and die and therefore according as in that same place the Apostle concludes VVe all shall appeare before the iudgement seate of Christ and every one of vs shall give accompt of him selfe to God Whereby it is cleere seeing God is the onely Iudge of the world that to iustifie and to cōdemne must onely belonge to him The second reason is seeing Iustification consistes in remission of sinnes and not imputing of iniquitie it followeth that not any except God alone can iustifie because none save God alone can forgive sinne as is cleere Mark 2. 7. and Luke 5. 21. therefore doeth the Lord him selfe saye Esa 43. 25. I even I am he that putteth away thy iniquities for myne owne sake And againe 44. cha vers 22. I have put away thy transgressions like a Cloud and thy sinnes as a mist Likewise David doth attribute the not imputing of iniquitie to the Lord Psal 31. 2. saying Blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not iniquitie which also the Apostle cleerely sheweth 2. Corinth 5. 19. saying That God was in Christ reconciling the world to him selfe not imputing to them their sinnes Now whereas it might seeme that in treating of the efficient cause of Iustification we should speake not onely of God himselfe but also of his grace yet because the question touching his grace doeth also fitly belong to the formall cause therefore wee referre it vnto that place CHAPTER XXII NOw followeth that we speake of the materiall cause and in this pointe out of the former thinges it may be easilie gathered that there be foure different opinions The first is that the workes of the Law done by man are the matter of our righteousnes The second is that the onely act of mans heart in beleeving is the matter of it The third is that
partly faith and partly Christes obedience is the matter of our righteousnes The fourth and last is that onely Christ in his obedience is the whole matter of our righteousnes The vanitie of the first 3. opinions will more fully appeare when we speake of the formal cause of iustification when we shall treat of Iustificatiō it selfe as likewise when we shall cleere the truth of the fourth opinion therefore we wil speak the more shortlie of them now Against all three this ground generally serveth to witt that no man is iustified before God by any worke inherent in himselfe or done by him selfe whether it be of nature or of grace or whether it be a worke of the Lawe or of the Gospell The reason is If man be iustified in any sorte by workes Iustification can not be by grace according as sayeth the Apostle Rom. 11. 6. If it be of grace it is no more of workes els were grace no more grace and if it be of workes it is no more grace els were worke no more worke Thus none of these three formost opinions can stande excepte we will destroy the grace of God and abolish it altogether frō the worke of Iustification for grace and workes even though they bee of grace can never stande together in the worke of our Iustification Which also manifesteth the grosse impietie of all these three opinions in placing faith either in whole or in parte in our righteousnes as it is our owne worke seeing by no worke of his owne can man possibly be iustified For otherwise it cannot be but Christ must have died in vaine Secondly our righteousnes consisteth not in Gods acceptation of any thing that proceeds from vs to Godward but in Gods imputation of that that comes from him to vsward by his gift as is cleere Rom. 5. 15. 16. 17. where our righteousnes is still called the gift of God we are saide to receyve righteousnes as a gift Whereby it is most evident that no worke of the Law nor faith as it is the worke of our heart can possibly be our righteousnes For our act of beleeving is an action passing from vs to God-ward and being attributed as it is by them to mans free will is no lesse the worke of man then any other worke of the Law what soever But our righteousnes is called in the Scriptures the righteousnes of GOD and not of man because it goeth not from vs towardes him but it commeth from him to vs. Thirdly it is manifest by the Scriptures that no man is iust in him selfe but in another For among men there is none righteous no not one Psal 14. But if that whereby hee is iustified which is the matter of his righteousnes bee in him selfe he must not onely bee iust but iust in him selfe which both doe playnely contradict the trueth of God which plainlie denies that there is any man righteous and that any man is made righteous in him selfe but whom soever God iustifieth he iustifieth them in Christ and maketh them the righteousnes of God in him 2. Corinth 5. 21. Fourthly the nature of Iustification consisting in the remission of sinne it can not possibly stande in that that is the direct contrarie But all these three opinions maketh it stande in the contrarie that is in Gods acceptation of obedience For whether the Lorde iustifie vs for doeing the workes of the Lawe or for fulfilling the condition of the Gospell required by God of vs vnto Iustification it is alwayes for and by our obedience that he iustifieth vs. so that Iustification shall never consist in pardoning of sinne and covering of iniquitie but by the contrarie in the acceptation of obedience Which saying is so impious that nothing can be devised more contrarie to the grace of God and mans salvation These groundes serve generally to shewe the wickednes of all these three opinions Nowe we come to speake somwhat concerning the first alone against which these groundes conteyned in scripture shall sufficiētly serve of which divers make against the rest also First that which excludes not mans gloriation can not have place in his righteousnes for God will have no flesh to glory in his sight in any thing except in him alone wherevppon it followeth that no man can bee iustified by the workes of the Law For as sayeth the Apostle Rom. chap. 3. vers 27. gloriation is not excluded by the lawe of workes For if Abraham was iustified by workes hee hath wherein to glory Rom. chap. 4. vers 2. and the reason heere of is declared in the fourth verse saying That to him that worketh the wages is not compted by favour but by debt Wherevpon it followeth that if man bee iustified by workes he hath wherein to glorie because he is not iustified by grace but by deservinge and Gods iustifying of him is not a worke of his favour but a worke which hee is indebted to doe And this is the same very thing which the Romish Church doeth meane by their merit ex condigno whereby Gods free grace iniustification is quite overthrowen Secondly man can not be iustified by that which makes the death of Christ of none effect but as sayeth the Apostle Gallat chapter 2. verse 21. If righteousnes bee by the Lawe then Christ hath died without a cause Which place doeth evidently convince them all of errour and proove them all to bee enimies to the crosse of Christ and to his death that make righteousnes to bee by any other thinge then by his death for if Christ died without a cause if righteousnes bee by the Lawe he must have much more died in vaine if it bee by any other thing For righteousnes is not to be found in any other thing but either in the Law of God or Christ By this we may perceyve that the opinion of those men who place our righteousnes in faith properly taken as it is the acte of our heart without relation of it as an apprehending instrument vnto Christ is much more pernitious then the opinion of the Papistes and that by cleere evidence of both their doctrines cōpared together For the Papist placeth his righteousnes in that which conteynes in it selfe perfect righteousnes in deed so that if their other ground could holde wherein also the other sorte doeth agree with them that is that it were in mans power to fulfill the Lawe certaynlie they should be iustified by the works of the Law For the doers of the Lawe shal be iustified Rom. 2. 13. And if there had bene a lawe given which could have given life surely righteousnes should haue bene by the Lawe sayeth the same Apostle Gal. 3. 21. But these other men doe place their righteousnes in that which they them selves confesse to be imperfect and not to contayne in it selfe perfect righteousnes For when faith is not relatively or instrumentally taken in respect of Christ apprehended by it it can never contayne perfect righteousnes and so the Lord can never
of the Testament which God hath appointed vnto you Exo. 24. 8. Heb. 9. 20. Nowe it is playne that Iesus Christ in his bloud is our peace and reconciliation with God For no bloud save his bloud alone can purge vs from our iniquities and iustifie vs. And there is no Mediator betwixt God and vs save hee alone For as sayeth the Apostle 1 Timoth. chap. 1. vers 5. There is but one Mediator betwixt God and Man even Iesus Christ the Man Whereby it is playne that none can make a firme and stable covenant of peace betwixt God and vs but hee alone neither can he make this covenant sure by any other meane except his death and blood shedd because no other thing in heaven or earth can purge vs and obtaine remission of sinnes and iustifie vs. Therefore is it said 1 Pet. chap. 3. vers 18. That Christ once suffered for sinnes the iust for the vniust that he might bring vs to God Vpon which respect it is that by him we are said to have accesse to the Father Ephes 2. 18. and 3. 12. Now vpon all these grounds we have to gather of what covenant Christ is Mediator that is whether of the covenant of workes or of the covenant of grace or which is all one thing whether of the covenant of the Law or of the Gospell For God hath never made any other covenant of Peace with man then these two So that in one of these two must consist both our Iustification and Peace with God and of which soever of these covenants hee is Mediator and which of them soever hee hath confirmed by his death in that only must consist our righteousnes and peace But it is manifest by the Scriptures that he is not Mediator of the old but of the new Testam as is cleere by the Apostle Heb. 9. 15. where he sayeth For this cause is hee also the Mediator of the newe Testament And againe Heb. 12. 24. and vnto Iesus the Mediator of the new Testament And this is confirmed by the same Apostle Heb. 7. from the nature of his Priest-hood For as the Apostle there witnesseth in the 12. verse where the Priest-hood is changed of necessitie the Law also must be changed Therefore it must follow that Christ beeing a Priest not after the order of Aaron vnder the which the Law was given but after the order of Melchisedech that he cannot possiblie bee the Mediator of the old Testament that is of the covenant of the Law and therefore in that same chap. ver 22. it is said that Iesus is the Mediator of a better Testament then the Law Herevpon followeth this conclusion that it is not only a vaine opinion but also an impossible that any flesh can ever be iustified by the workes of the Lawe For no covenant whereof Christ is not the Mediator and which hee hath never confirmed by his death can ever possibly serve to our Iustification but of the covenant of workes or of the law Iesus is no wise Mediator neither hath hee died and shed his bloud to confirme it Therefore by the covenant of workes no flesh shall ever bee iustified and have accesse vnto God CHAPTER XXIII NOW for the second and third opinion the discussing of them is coincident with the points following and especially in the next point which concerneth the 4. opinion that is that only Christ is the matter of our righteousnes Whereof now we are to speake which beeing sufficiently cleered is enough to overthrow all other opinions whatsoever Now to make it manifest that in Christ alone is the matter of our righteousnes wee are first to divide this point in two and secondly to set downe the confirmations of both The two partes wherein this point is to be divided be these First that nothing in heaven or in earth in man or without man is the matter of mans righteousnes before God except only Christ The second is touching that wherein in particular Christ is our righteousnes Now for the confirmation of the first point we have these six grounds shortly to be considered First nothing can be our righteousnes but that only which is made by God righteousnes vnto vs. For he is only righteous and the only Author of all righteousnes For as there is no man righteous so there is no man that can make any thing to be righteousnes either to himselfe or to others And therefore wee are to consider what it is that God the Creator and ordayner of all the righteousnes of men hath ordayned and made righteousnes to vs. Nowe in all the trueth of God nothing is ever said to bee made of God vnto vs righteousnes except Iesus Christ alone Neither is there any thing whatsoever that is called our righteousnes whereby wee are iustified by God except Christ alone and his obedience Wherevpon it must follow that he only must be the matter of our righteousnes Therefore is it said by the Apostle 1 Cor. 1. 30. that hee is made of God vnto vs Wisdome Righteousnes Sanctification and Redemption And in the Prophete Ierem. 23 6. This name is given him of God as the name by the which the children of God shall call him while it is said And this is the name whereby they shall call him The Lord our righteousnes And againe chapter 33. vers 16. And hee that shall call her is the Lord ouâ— righteousnes Secondly that only must be our righteousnes which only is all in all things and only filleth all in all things For he that is vnto vs all in all things must needes be our only righteousnes and hee that filleth vs all in all things must needes fill vs likewise in righteousnes Now Christ only in the Scriptures of God hath both these attributed vnto him The first is shewen cleerly Collos 3. 11. And the second is cleerly shewen Eph. 1. 23. Therefore is it that the Apostle Peter Act. chap. 4. vers 12. sayeth That there is not salvation in any other For among men there is given none other name vnder heaven whereby we must be saved And for this same cause doth the Apostle say That we are made the righteousnes of God in him 2 Corinth chap. 5. vers 21. As likewise that in him wee are made perfect or complete Col. chap. 2. vers 10. Therefore also doeth the Apostle blesse God the Father for blessing vs with all spirituall blessinges in Christ Ephes chap. 1. vers 3. And if with all blessinges then also vndoubtedly with righteous in him except wee will denie righteousnes to bee one of the spirituall blessinges of God Therefore the Scripture admitteth nothing to bee ioyned with him neyther hath the Father ordayned any thing to have parte or place with him in the matter of our righteousnes For it hath pleased the Father that in him all fulnes should dwell and that out of his fulnes wee should receyve what soever grace wee receyve from God And this is a parte of that preheminence which Christ
it then that it be the bloud of a man or yet of a iust man For no man that is nothing more but a man can possibly redeeme his brother or give his ransome to God that he may live still for ever So precious is the redemption of their soules and the continuance for ever sayeth the Prophet Psalm 49. For the bloud of no flesh can be able to satisfie the infinite iustice of God For he that liveth not for ever can never be the cause of eternall life vnto others and he that is not eternall can never bring in eternall righteousnes and no righteousnes but that which is eternall can possibly procure eternall life For all being infinit that is the iustice that wee have transgressed infinit our guiltines in trasgressing infinite the punishment of our guiltines infinite as being the iust recompence of the transgression of an infinit iustice proceeding from the iust iudgement of an infinit God it is impossible that a finit creature can performe it seeing he should never be able to loose the sorrowes of death Therefore it is required that the bloude should be the bloud of him who is eternall to the end that hee should not be holden of death eternally Act. chap. 2. vers 24. and that his bloud might be of an infinite value and that our righteousnes might be eternall and make vs eternally righteous therefore is it saide by the Apostle that God hath purchased his Church with his owne bloud Act. chap. 20. 28. thus it is required in the bloud that iustifieth vs before God that it bee not onely the bloud of a man and of a iust man but also that it bee the bloud of him who is God blessed for ever and all these considerations are necessarilie requisit in the bloud vnto our iustification thereby And as in the bloud so in the shedding of it divers things are required in it to the same end Which that wee may the more cleerely perceyve we are first to consider that the shedding of bloud must needes be by way of oblation and sacrifice Therefore Christ is saide to have offered vp him selfe a sacrifice of a sweet smelling favour vnto God Ephe. chap. 5. vers 2. and also he is said to have bin made manifest once to put awy sinnes by the sacrificing of him selfe Heb. chapt 9. vers 26. and therefore also saith the Apostle that Christ our Passeover is sacrificed for vs 1. Cor. chap. 5. ver 7. Now the things requisite in the offering of this sacrifice are partlie to be considered in the nature of the sacrifice it selfe and partly in those thinges which are necessarilie required for the offering of a sacrifice Touching the sacrifice it selfe besides that it must bee by bloud because without shedding of bloud there is no remission it must needes be but one and of such nature as never needeth to be repeated For the sacrifices that are oft repeated can never sanctifie the commers therevnto And therefore it is said That we are sanctified by the offering of the body of Iesus Christ once Heb. chap. 10. ver 10. And againe in that same Chap. verse 12. it is said But hee having offered by one sacrifice for sinne sitteth for ever at the right hand of God Of which it is manifest that this sacrifice alone without anie other thing ioyned therewith and without anie iterating of it contrarie to the blasphemous doctrine of the papistes must needs make vs eternally righteous according to which it is said by the Apostle That Christ is entered into heaven not that hee should offer him selfe often because then it behooved him to die often But as it is appointed that men once die and thereafter commeth the iudgement even so Christ also being once offered to take away the sinnes of many hee shall appeare the second tyme without sinne c And this point is most cleerlie set downe Heb. cha 10. ver 14. where it is said For by one offering he hath consecrated for evermore those which are sanctified Wherevpon it must followe seeing by one offering hee hath obtayned vs eternal remission according to the promise of God in his covenant and their finnes and their iniquities I will never remēber anie more that there remayneth no more sacrifices for sinne For according to the saying of the Apostle VVhere remission of sinnes is there is no more sacrifice for sinne Heb. chap. 10. vers 18. The thinges that are required for the offering of a propitiatorie sacrifice for sinne are especially three The first is a Priest For none but a consecrate Priest appointed by God and not by man might ever offer sacrifice for sinne vnto God The second is the Altar vpon which it must bee offered The third is the Tabernacle or Sanctuarie wherein it must be offered The thinges to be considered in the Priest concerne partly the nature of the Priesthood it selfe and partly the actions to be performed by the Priest Touching the nature of the Priesthood The first thing to be considered is that no man can take this office to him selfe but he who is called of God Heb. cap. 5. ver 4. 5. The second thing to be considered is that it must not bee according to the order of Aaron but according to the order of Melchisedeck For there is no perfection by the Levitical Priesthood Hebr. chap. 7. ver 11. and this that he must bee according to the order of Melchisedeck comprehendeth vnder it these particular pointes First that he is not made a Priest by the Lawe but according to the power of endlesse life For as we have saide if his Priesthood had bene after the Lawe it could never have made vs perfect For the Lawe made nothing perfect Hebr. chap. 7. ver 19. And of this ground followeth other two consequences The first is that seeing hee is made a Priest after the power of endlesse life none save hee alone can ever enioye this Priesthood For as sayeth the Apostle Amongest the Leviticall Priestes many were made Priestes because ther were not suffered to endure by reason of death but Christ because hee endureth for ever hath a Priesthood which can not passe from him to an other Hebr chap. 7. ver 23. 24. The seconde consequence is as saveth the Apostle Hebr. chap. 7. ver 25. That hee is able perfectly to save those that come to God by him seeing hee ever liveth to make intercession for them The third thing to bee considered in the nature of the Priest is as sayeth the same Apostle That he bee without sinne because such a High Priest it became vs to have as is holy harmeles vndefyled and seperate from sinners Hebr. chapt 7. 26. Which also was expreslie commanded in the Lawe Levit. chap. 21. where it is saide VVho soever of the seede of Aaron hath any blemish hee shall not come neare to offer the sacrifices of the Lorde neither shall he presse to offer the bread of his God neither shall he goe in vnto the vayle
signified by the Lord Ier. 32. when he promiseth that he would put his feare in their heartes that they should not departe from him and most cleerly Eze. cap. 36. 26. 27. A newe heart also will I give you and a new spirit will I put within you and I will take away the stonie heart out of your body and will give you a heart of flesh and I will put my spirit within you and cause you to walke in my Statutes For this cause it is that Christ calleth them blessed who honger and thirst for righteousnes For it is most certaine that the earnest desire of the heart to enioye Christ and his righteousnes c. is an vndoubted token of Gods saving grace and of his effectuall calling in the which he bestowes this as a supernaturall gift vppon the elect as the seconde effect of his working power whereby hee changeth our willes which are of them selves rebellious and maketh them willing to come vnto Christ and to obey his voyce Therefore is it saide That God is the worker both of the will and of the deed of his good pleasure in vs Phil. cap. 2. 13. so this is the second parte of that supernatural gift of faith when as our will maketh choise of that which is the will of God and wee submit our willes to his will in all thinges which is most contrarie to the nature of fleshe For as sayth the Apostle Rom. chap. 8. ver 7. The wisedome of the fleshe is not subiect to the Law of God neither can be Therefore doeth the Prophet David say That the man is blessed whom the Lord choses and causes to come Psalm 65. 4. It is for this same cause that David prayeth so often that God would incline his heart to his statutes The thirde parte of Gods workinge in givinge Faith vnto vs is the sanctification of our affections to make vs to love Christ above all thinges and that by the powring of his love in our heartes by his holy Spirit For as hee inclineth our myndes to mynde heavenly thinges by insinuatinge his mynd towardes vs in Christ Iesus into our myndes as by the sense and feelinge and proofe of his good will towarde vs in all thinges hee drawes out willes vnto his will So by the sense of his love in his giving his deare Sonne to the death for vs while wee were his enimies hee enflames our heartes with the love of him againe so that with our affection wee are set vppon Christ more then all thinges and are content to lose all things that we may gaine him Therefore saith Christ Math. cha 10. ver 37. He that loveth father or mother better then mee is not worthie of me c. And Luke chap. 14. ver 26. If any man come vnto mee and hate not his Father and Mother VVife and Children and Brethren and Sisters yea and his owne life also he can not be my Disciple Wherein it appeareth most plainly that faith is a gift supernaturall seeing it bringeth a supernaturall love into the heart which overcommeth all the love and affection which can be in nature especally when it overcommeth the love of man to him selfe and his owne life Fourthly the Lord by working faith doeth imprinte his knowledge and his will and love to vs in our memories working such a stedfast impression in our hearts of his mercie and grace towards vs in Christ as can never be defaced therefore the wicked in the booke of God are noted by this name they that forget God whereas the childrē of God have him alwayes before theit eyes Thus the Lord when he worketh faith in our hearts he worketh it in all the powers of our soule filling the whole heart with such supernaturall vertue and power in all the faculties thereof whereby the heart which of it selfe naturally could never be able to knowe or to desire or to love or to keepe any heavenly thing belonging vnto life and godlines is made able both to knowe and to will and to love and with the will and affection to apprehende and to keepe constantly the Lord Iesus and all blessings in him vnto eternall life And all these pointes are wrought by God in the heart of everie one of his elect particularly as in them selves so also concerning them selves so that their knowledge and assurance of the trueth of the things reveyled touching Christ and redemption in him is not a generall notion perswasion of the heart that God hath given his sonne to be a Redeemer to mankinde and that he hath performed redemption in his death for such a faith not onely the reprobate but Sathan him selfe hath but it is a particular sight and assurance of every mans owne heart concerning him selfe that God hath elected him for him in particular hath given Christ to bee a Redeemer and hath made him particularly vnto him wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption For it is not my faith-concerning the minde of God vnto others nor yet of the minde of God conceyved generally toward all his elect but the particular knowledge and assurance of his minde concerning my selfe that doeth saue mee For the iust shall live by his owne faith Habac. chapt 2. ver 4. But this will appeare more cleerely in the next point while we consider Faith being newe wrought in our hearts howe we are saide with our heart to beleeve In this point we have to consider First that it is the man him selfe who beleeveth Secondly that it is his heart whereby he beleeveth And thirdly beleeving is the action which man performeth with his heart As for the first man is said to beleeue because that this supernaturall gift is given him of God and that in his heart it is effectuall in him in all the points forespoken for by Gods enlightning of him he sees and by his teaching he vnderstandes and by the Lords enclining of his will he willeth and by the Lords sanctifying of his affection he loveth and by the Lords imprinting and writing in his minde and sealing by his spirit whatsoever he reveyleth vnto him he both possesseth retayneth and keepeth Christ and all the blessings promised in him so that faith actively considered is nothing but the motion of mans hearte which is wrought in him by the spirit of God and therfore in substance nothing els but the very action of GOD in man but considered in a divers manner that is passively as it is wrought by God in him and actively as he by this working of God in all the powers of his soule apprehendeth and receyveth grace from God so that the action of man in beleeving with the heart is nothing but his knowing acknowledging of things by Gods making him know and acknowledge them and his willing them by Gods making him to will them and his loving by Gods making him to love them and his apprehending and retayning them by Gods making of him to apprehende and reteyne them GOD imprinting writing and
the worde knowledge is put which is when it signrfieth the naked and bare vnderstanding of thinges that are reveyled but it is taken for an infallible science when as the heart knoweth God and knoweth him vndoubtedly to be God and when as it knoweth Christ and knoweth him vndoubtedly to bee the sonne of God and when it knoweth Gods trueth and knoweth it vndoubtedly to be the trueth of God therefore saieth Iohn the Baptist Hee that receyveth his testimonie hath sealed that God is true Iohn chap. 3. ver 33 And againe Iohn 1. Epi. chap. 5. ver 10. Hee that heleeveth not God hath made him a liar because he beleeved not the record that God witnessed of his soune Neither is this all which is meant by the knowledge of faith but a third thing is yet to be added for the full vnderstandinge thereof For besides the sight and knowledge of the thinges which are reveiled by God and also besides the knowledge of the vndoubted veritie and trueth of them it is required that wee knowe them to bee reveyled by God vnto vs and knowe the vndoubted trueth and veritie of them toward vs in our particular person that is that whatsoever God reveyle to vs he reveyleth it vnto vs as a thing which he hath appointed for vs and when he giveth vs the sight and knowledge of the vndoubted veritie of the things reveyled he maketh vs assuredlie to knowe that they shal be truely verily accomplished in our persons conforme to that ground which we have laide downe before concerning faith that is that what we beleeve we must beleeve it concerning our selves in particular according as it is said of Abraham that he beleeved God that he should bee the Father of many Nationâ—s And as Iob speaketh of him selfe chap. 19. verses 25. 26. 27. I am sure that my Redeemer liveth and I shall see God in my flesh whom I my selfe shall see and my eyes shall beholde and none other for mee According to which certaintie the Apostle Paul speaketh also of him selfe Rom. chap. 8. and for this maner of knowledge which commeth by faith the Fathers doe call faith the eye whereby we see the invisible things of God as also the ingraveÌ„ forme of the sonnes of God and for this same cause it is called by the Apostle Heb. chap. 11. the evidence of things which are not seene where by the word evidence is vnderstoode that faith doeth not onely shew them but by evident demonstration confirme the vndoubted veritie of them and that to vs in particular so that it letteth me not only see life eternall in Christ and this eternall life to belong to all that are in Chtist but particularly it letteth me see my selfe in Christ and this life to belonge to me in him and that so certainlie as nothing in heaven nor earth can bee more certaine and thus much for the first vse of faith The seconde ende wherefore faith is given is possession and this confirmeth evidently and plainely the former ground touching knowledge that it is so to be vnderstood as we have spoken For the knowledge of faith is never without possession according to thar saying of Christ Ioh. cha 14. ver 17. speaking of the spirit whow the world can not receyve because it seeth him not neyther knoweth him but yee knowe him for hee dwelleth with you and shal bee in you According to which ground it is that Ioh. sayth Hee that beleeveth in that sonne of GOD hath the witnes in him self 1. Epist chap. 5. ver 10. Thus faith maketh vs to know nothing but that which it also maketh vs to possesse therefore doeth the Apostle pray to God for the Ephesians that Christ might dwell in their hearts by faith chap. 3. vers 27. For as the heart of man can never know Christ by it owne light but by the supernaturall light of faith so it can never apprehend Christ nor any blessing in Christ by any natural power that is in the will affection thereof Therefore God giveth to his elect the supernaturall gift of faith in their hearts that his elect whose heartes could never by any naturall strength ever attaine to the possession of Christ nor ever desire to have him nor yet embrace him with vnfayned love as their only treasure righteousnes and life might chose him and count all things but dunge to gaine him forsaking them selves and their owne righteousnes and to love him and embrace him with such affectioÌ„ that they prefer him to all things eveÌ„ to their owne life so that man by faith is not only made to know his redeemer but also to possesse him and all blessings in him And for this cause is it that in the scriptures we are saide to be the children of God by faith in Christ to be iustified by faith in him to bee saved by faith in him and as saith the Apostle Peter beleeving in him we carrie about with vs the end of our faith the salvation of our soules 1. Epist 1. 9. And for this working of faith it is called by the Apostle the subsisting of things hoped for Hebr. 11. 1. because it giveth a certaine being and subsisting vnto things that are yet invisible and are yet only expected and hoped for and maketh theÌ„ to subsist in our hearts therfore saith Christ he that beleeveth is alreadie translated from death to life and hath everlasting life Ioh. 5. 24. Thus we see that faith being taken away the heart of man should never be able to possesse nor apprehend Christ nor righteousnes or any other spirituall blessing in him Therefore because it is the effectuall instrument of Gods supernaturall power in our heartes whereby we apprehende and possesse Christ and all blessings in him The Fathers doe call it the hand of a Christian as also the mouth of a Christian and likewise the bound of a Christian because by faith as by a hand we lay holde on him and by faith as by a mouth wee receyve him into our heartes and by faith as by a bande that never can be broken wee are so vnited to him and hee with all the benefites that are in him vnto vs that we never can possibly bee seperated from him nor he or his blessinges from vs for this cause is it that Augustine sayth Beleeue onely and thou hast eaten him And for cleering of this grounde it is that these phrases of speech are vsed to wit that Christ is the ende of the lawe vnto righteousnes to all that beleeve that the promise is given to them that faithfully beleeve That the Gospell is the power of GOD vnto salvation to everie one that beleeveth c. all to teach vs that neither the Gospell can helpe vs to salvation neither is the promise made ours nor Christes righteousnes belongeth vnto vs except we beleeve because there is no mean to make any thing conteyned in the Gospell especially the promise or Christ him selfe to be ours but faith onely And for this same
cause our righteousnes is saide to bee the righteousnes of God which is by faith and the righteousnes which is through the faith of Christ Phil. chap. 3. ver 9. And Christ is saide to bee a reconciliation through faith in his bloud Rom. chap. 3. ver 25. All serving to teach vs that faith is not our righteousnes it selfe but only the meane by the which we attayne to that which is our righteousnes that is Christ in his bloud for in that sense is righteousnes faid to be through faith and by faith Moreover it is for this same cause that faith is called in the Scriptures the faith of Christ Rom. chap. 3. where righteousnes is saide to be the righteousnes of God by the faith of Iesus and that because the whole matter and substance which by faith wee eyther knowe or apprehende vnto righteousnes is onely Christ Sometimes it is called the faith of his name Acts cha 3. ver 16. as also the faith in his name as Ioh. chap. 1. ver 12. because all the vertue strength and power whereby we beleeve to bee iustisied is in Christ alone and in the vertue of his death and resurrection so that the vertue is not in faith it selfe but in Iesus apprehended by faith Sometimes againe it is called the faith towardes Christ Act. chap. 20. ver 21. because faith setteth nothing before it as the obiect but Christ alone for the Gospell which is the worde of faith propoundeth not any thing vnto vs but onely Christ as eyther promised or given vnto vs of God to bee the matter eyther of our righteousnes sanctification or redemption Sometimes againe it is called the faith in Christ Gal. chap. 3. ver 26. and that for two causes First because that wherein by faith our heartes are fastened and in the which our heartes only setleth their full confidence of righteousnes and remission of sinnes is onely Christ in whom onely our faith is and we also by faith for thereby we are made to be in him and hee in vs and therfore in the scripturs to be in Christ to be in the faith are put indifferently Rom. cha 8. vers 10. compared with 2. Cor. cha 13. ver 3. 5. And for this same respect the proper effectes of Christ him selfe are attributed vnto faith The second Reason is because faith neither suffereth vs to rest vpon it nor on our selues nor on anie other thing nor yet in any thing that is in faith or in our selves or in any thing except Christ onely and that which is in him as the ground of our confidence or as the matter of our righteousnes or blessednes therefore are we saide in him to have redemption in him to be made righteousnes and in him to be circumcised For whatsoever we are made by Faith we are made it in Christ and what soever faith maketh to be ours it is also in Christ therefore faith maketh not God our God but in Christ nor vs the children of God but in Christ nor righteous but in Christ c. For whatsoever faith layeth holde on it findeth it in Christ so that the hart of man when it beleeveth vnto righteousnes sendeth out faith fixeth it in Christ thereby laying holde vpon him and his obedience vnto righteousnes bringing him and his obedience with all the vertue both of his death and life into our heartes to dwell in them Sometimes also it is called the faith by Christ because hee is the Author Fountayne and occasion of it not so much because he with the Father and holy Ghost doeth worke it as because hee alone is the meane and occasion of it For as the Father redeemeth vs by Christ and by him maketh vs his sons and righteousnes c. so also he maketh vs to beleeue by Christ so that take mee away Christ all ground and foundation of saving faith in God is taken away for God hath layde the whole foundation of our beleefe in him alone For which cause Pet. 1. Epist chap. 1 ver 21. sayeth That by his meanes wee beleeve in Gâ—d and in that same place it is saide That God hath raysed him from the dead and given him glorie that our faith and hope might bee in God And to this same effect the same Apostle sayeth in the same chapter ver 3. That God hath begotten vs againe to a lively hope by the resurrection of Iesus Christ from the dead Vpon which respect it is that the Apostle Paul 1. Cor. chap. 15. ver 17. sayeth expresly If Christ bee not raysed your faith is vayne Vpon which we may easilie gather that faith is a vaine fooilsh faith whereby a man is made to beleeve or hope for any blessing from God which maketh it not first to bee performed by God in Christ For our faith of our vnioÌ„ with God ariseth vpon the knowledge of Christ his assuming in vnitie of person our nature vnto his the faith of our being the sonnes of God ariseth vpon Christ the man our brother being the very sonne of GOD our faith that God will make vs righteousnes ariseth vpoÌ„ this that God hath made Christ sinne for vs and so foorth of the rest the hope of our resurrection is builded vpon his resurrection the hope of our assention vpon his assention the hope of our glorification vpon his glorification so that the Lord worketh in our heartes neither faith nor hope in him of any blessing whatsoever whereof hee doeth not first reveyle vnto vs a cleere ground and evident fouÌ„dation in Iesus Christ the sonne And therefore it may appeare how detestable a doctrine that is and execrable be the teachers of it that affirmeth that a man may be saved without the knowledge of Iesus Christ our Lord. Thus by all these phrases concerning faith the Lord would teach vs that Christ is the matter and hee is the ground of all whatsoever wee beleeve and that there is nothinge in Christ which is not made ours by faith And for this same purpose in Scriptures it is sometimes called the faith in the bloud of Christ Rom. chap. 3. ver 25. and that to teach vs what is the particular thing in Christ wherein God hath made him our righteousnes and whereby the Lord would haue vs to beleeve remission of sinnes in him for albeit Christ be vno vs all and that in all thinges and doeth fill vs all in all thinges yet as wee haue marked before there is no benefite which wee apprehende by faith in Christ but it hath the owne particular ground and foundation wherevpon it is builded and therefore as his faith is but vaine who expects his resurrection in Christ if he doe not know Christ to bee risen againe so his faith must be vaine who beleeveth the remission of sinnes in Christ and yet knoweth not that Christ did shed his bloud expressely for his iniquities For as God begettes vs to the hope of life by the resurrection of Ieses from the dead so he begetteth vs