Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	heart_n	lord_n	see_v	3,172	5	3.4596	3	true

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A14450	A learned and excellent treatise containing all the principall grounds of Christian religion Set downe by way of conference in a most plaine and familiar manner. Written first in French by maister Mathew Virell, after translated into Latine: and now turned into English for the vse of our country-men.; Religion chrestienne declarée par dialogue. English	Virel, Matthieu.; Egerton, Stephen, 1555?-1621?	1594 (1594)	STC 24768; ESTC S119631	209,162	292

then he spake to Peter onely But as a little before Peter not onely in his own name but also in the name of all the rest of the Apostles which had that one faith had confessed that Iesus was the Christ and the sonne of the liuing God in like manner when Christ promised the keyes to Peter hee meant that they were also promised to the rest of the Apostles which hee doth sufficiently declare in the deliuerie of theÌ„ for he saith to all at once Receiue the holy Ghost Whose sins you remit they be remitted to theÌ„ whose sinnes you retaine they be retained I same also did the other Apostles and all Pastors confirme when exercising their ministerie they vsed those keyes Theoph. Wherefore doth Christ call the ministerie of Pastors by the name of keyes Matth. To the end we might vnderstand that the kingdome of heaueÌ„ as we haue declared before is by the ministery of the Church set open to the beleeuers and penitent and that it is shut against the vnbeleeuers and stubburne namely when as by it the former haue their sinnes forgiuen that so they may come to eternall life but to the other they be retained that so they may be shut from it For God doth ratifie that in heaueÌ„ which the Ministers vpon earth pronounce out of his word eueÌ„ as it appeareth by the words of Christ himselfe vnto Peter for after promise of the keyes presently hee addeth Whatsoeuer thou shalt bind in Mat. 16. 19 earth shal be bound in heauen and whatsoeuer thou shalt loose on earth shal be loosed in heauen And the selfe same thing he repeated after to all the Apostles to shew that they had like authoritie of binding loosing giuen to them with Peter Theoph. Therfore to bind loose is nothing else but to declare the remission of sinnes or to retaine them Matth. What it is to bind and loose Indeede nothing as it is plaine by the interpretation of Christ himselfe for he sayd to his Apostles in the place which euen now we recited Receiue the holy Ghost whose sinnes yee remit they be remitted vnto them whose sinnes you shall retaine they shall be retained For there is no harder bond then sinne forasmuch as being bound with it we be held and indeed willingly vnder the power and tyrannie of the deuill death and it cannot be loosed by any strength of man but by the onely might of Christ Theoph. Why then doth Christ commit the office of binding and loosing to the ministers seeing he himself alone hath the power of binding and loosing Mat. It is that we may vnderstaÌ„d that the Ministers be as it were Ambassadors proclaimers of the will of God which Paule teacheth in these words 1. Cor. 5. 19 God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe not imputing to them their sinnes and hath put in vs this word of reconciliatioÌ„ Therefore we are ambassadors in the name of Christ as God by vs did exhort you we entreat you in Christes stead to be reconciled to God Theoph. I see not therefore that the Ministers haue more power of binding and loosing granted them then any other priuate man For there is none that may not assure the beleeuer and penitent of the forgiuenesse of his sinnes contrariwise which may not set the iudgement of God before the vnbeleeuer and obstinate except he repeÌ„t And that verily shal be confirmed in heauen as it was pronounced by that priuate person for that is the will of God reuealed in his word Mat. Of the authoritie of the Ministers of the Church That is right indeed but there is some speciall thing to be considered in the promise of Christ made to the Ministers namely that by his spirite he will giue more efficacie force to their words theÌ„ to the words of any priuate man so as they shall by faith be receiued of the beleeuer but shall terrifie the conscience of the vnbeleeuer set before his eyes the wrath iudgement of God For otherwise the name of the keyes of the kingdome of heauen should falsely be giuen vnto the ministery of the Church seeing that we may enter into it it is not inough that the doctrine of forgiuenesse of sins beat our eares but especially that it enter into our hearts and be receiued of vs by faith obedience Whereunto is referred that saying of Paul Neither my 1. Cor. 2. 4. speech nor my preaching stood in the entising wordes of mans wisedome but in the demonstration or euidence of spirituall power For this cause also Isaiah calleth the preaching of the word the arme of the Lord Isay 53. that is the instrument by the which he declareth his might and power that he may bring vs to saluation Theoph. I do see indeede that the force and fruite of preaching the word of God is very great For those three steps by the which wee obtaine spirituall health wherof thou diddest entreate in the Chapter of Faith are by it daily called to vse and practise Matth. Thou iudgest right For first the law is preached that wee may acknowledge our deadly disease namely sinne Secondly the Gospell is preached wherin the sauing remedie is offered vnto vs in Christ Last of all faith which is wrought in vs and increased by the preaching of the word applieth that medicine vnto vs so as we obtaine saluation euen the full forgiuenesse of all our sinnes Theoph. The article of remissioÌ„ of sins in the Creede vnlesse I be deceiued is therefore set after the article of the Church to the end we might know that it is offered vnto vs by the ministerie of it Mat. It is indeede and therefore there is no forgiuenesse of sins neither saluation without the Church as in the floud there was no safetie out of the Arke of Noah wherein also at that time the Church of God was then shut vp â—hat being as it were a type of it Theoph. Thou hast hitherto largely inough taught that by the ministery of the word we do truely obtaine forgiuenesse of our sinnes Notwithstanding there be two things behind whereof I will aske thee before we come to the other treatise 1 First whether God do wholy as they say forgiue to the repentant all their sinnes 2 Secondly whether hee forgiue them perfectly namely remitteth the punishment and the fault so as they be not any more imputed vnto vs. Mat. Let vs speake of the former in the first place Iohn saith 1. Iohn 1. 7. All sinnes be forgiuen to the penitent that the bloud of Christ doth wash vs from all sinne He that saith all excepteth nothing Now repentance yeeldeth vnto vs a more certaine testimonie of our faith by the which as hath beene sayd wee be made partakers of Christ and of his gifts Whereupon it followeth that whosoeuer repenteth may most certainly determine that all his sinnes notwithstanding they be grieuous are forgiuen and done away Which also is taught by the examples

the whole man 2 The other is that that particular iudgement may be proclaimed before all men and so there maie be a more manifest declaration of God his righteousnesse Therefore the Scripture affirmeth that in that day both good and bad shal be iudged by Christ according to their workes which without doubt shall bee brought to light as it were manifest testimonies either of the faith or the vnbeliefe lying hid in the heart although faith it selfe or vnbeliefe in those that come to years be special causes either of the saluation or damnation of men as it is declared by the Iudge himselfe Ioh. 3. 18. 5. 24. He that beleeueth in me is not condemned but hee which beleeueth not is condemned alreadie because he hath not beleeued in the name of the onely begotten Sonne of God Theoph. Why Christs death is meÌ„tioned oftner in the Scriptures then the other things he did for vs I do now at length acknowledge all the articles which appertaine to the faith in Christ to be indeed profitable yea necessarie to the establishment of our faith I would notwithstanding know why in the Scriptures his death onely is for the most part spoken of as in that place of Paule Rom. 5. 10. We are reconciled by the death of his sonne Mat. By such kind of speeches the scriptures desirous of breuity and shortnes of the chiefe part nameth the whole Neuerthelesse sometimes his resurrection also Rom. 4. 25. is ioyned because in it Christ ouercame death whereupon it is that the force of Christs death hangeth vpon his resurrection For if Christ be not raised vp saith Paul 1. Cor. 15. 14 our faith is vaine This also is to be noted by the way that the death of Christ is not seldome vnderstood by his bloud because that powring out of his bloud amongst other things which he suffered for vs is verse excellent and notable Theoph. Bring forth some testimonies for it Mat. They are to be found euerie where in the holy writings Peace being made by the bloud of Christ by him he hath reconciled all thinges to him selfe as well those that bee in earth as those that be in heauen that is to saie both those that be in the Church alreadie receiued into heauen as those that bee yet in the militant Church below 1. Pet. 1. 19 We were redeemed not with corruptible things as siluer or gold but with the precious bloud as of a Lambe without spot and vndefiled euen of Christ Rom. 5. 9. We are iustified by the bloud of Christ The third part of the Apostles Creed which is faith in the holy Ghost Theoph. Wee haue proceeded farre inough concerning faith in Christ Now therefore wee must come to the third part of the Creed which is of the holy Ghost whereunto thou did dest attribute that it doth sanctifie vs and ioyne vs with Christ But there bee two things which I wil propound vnto thee to be declared 1 First wherein that sanctification standeth 2 Secondly in what sence thou saiest that wee are by the holy Ghost ioyned with Christ forasmuch as euen now thou ascribedst that vnto faith Math. The sanctification which the holy Ghost worketh in vs standeth herein that it amendeth the corruption planted in our mindes and repaireth the decay of our soules otherwise cast away and vndone by originall sinne Theoph. Declare to mee the effects of that repairing Mat. First of all it lightneth our minds so as we do acknowledge the true God in Christ and yeeld him the worship due to his maiestie Secondly it reformeth our hearts working faith in them which pietie or godlinesse followeth that is to say the loue and feare of God from whence also springeth repentance it selfe For this faith which lieth hid in the heart sheweth it selfe as it were visible to the eyes But the sanctification whereof we speake is not seldome called by the name of regeneration Theoph. Why is it called also by this name Math. Because when the holy Ghost by his grace and vertue worketh in vs stedfastly to beleeue the things which in former times wee condemned and that truely repenting wee do the things which be directly contrarie to our former actions Ephe. 4. 24. 2. Cor. 5. 17 we do in verie deede seeme to be borne againe and to be made new men as Paule speaketh And verily then all the parts and qualities of our soule are so reformed as they may seeme to be altogether changed Theoph. What our regenetatioÌ„ or sanctification is Therefore this sanctification or regeneration is nothing else but the repairing of the image of God which we lost in Adam Math. Thou iudgest rightly and Paule himselfe testifieth this wheÌ„ he saith Col. 3. 10. that we haue put on the new man which is renued into knowledge agreeable to the image or likenesse of him that created him But Christ is he by whom that likenesse of God is brought from Heauen vnto vs and communicated by spirituall regeneration euen as Adam by carnall generation had made vs partakers of sinne with him Theoph. Thou speakest of two generations verie much differing the one from the other I meane the first which wee haue from Adam from that which Christ worketh in vs by his spirit Mat. Verily by that first generation wee are borne vnto sinne but by this latter we are borne vnto righteousnesse 2 By the first we are borne children of wrath by the later children of God 3 By the first we are borne vnto death by the later vnto euerlasting life And for this cause Christ said to Nicodemus Ioh. 3. 3. Except a man be borne againe hee cannot not see the kingdome of God Theop. Hitherto I haue heard what sanctification or regeneration is namely that it consisteth in the vnderstanding of heauenly things concerning our saluation and in the reformation of our heart will which causeth vs to beleeue in God through Christ to obey him But how is it that the Apostle whom thou citedst speaking of this repairing maketh mention only of the vnderstanding and not of the wil For he saith that we haue put on that new man which is renued into knowledge Col. 3. 10. agreeable to the image of him that created him Mat. In that place indeede there is onely mention of knowledge but vnder the name of knowledge are vnderstood both holinesse of life reformatioÌ„ Which also in another place are by name spokeÌ„ of by the same Apostle when he saith Ephes 4. 24. that that newe man is put on which is created after God in righteousnesse and true holinesse Thou seest that in those places one part is taken for both because they are at once or together reformed by the holy Ghost although in diuerse maner For to some he giueth more knowledge then reformation And contrariwise to some others more zeale and reformation then knowledge Theop. But how is it that there be many also found vnto whom there is giuen more

corner stone elect precious in whom whosoeuer beleeueth shall not be ashamed Hee addeth also out of the Psalme The stone which the builders refused is made the head of the corner that is to say vpholdeth all the building Theoph. Hitherto we haue heard sufficiently of the second thing testified in the praise of the church wee must come to the third Why is it called the mother of vs all Mat. First because God therein hath begotten vs with the incorruptible seede of his word And then because he hath put vs ouer vnto it as to a speciall good mother to be guided and brought vp that wee may daily wax elder in faith vntill we come to the inheritance of our heauenly father Wherefore whosoeuer refuse the gouernment of this mother can neither haue God for their father nor claime to themselues any right in his inheritance Theoph. Why the Church is called holy Let vs consider the verie words of the creed and first of all Why is the Church called holy Mat. For two causes the first whereof and the chiefest is this because as Paule speaketh It is sanctified after that hee hath cleansed it by the washing of Ephe. 5. 26. water through the word As if he should say that it was made cleane from all sinne by the precious bloud of Christ which is daily presented vnto vs both in the word and in the Sacraments The other cause is for that the members of it which indeede are regenerated of the holy Ghost and sanctified do apply themselues diligently to holinesse of life wherein by the benefit of the ministerie of the Church they go forward euerie day somewhat Notwithstanding in themselues it is certaine they bee defiled with manie filthinesses and sinnes which indeed are not imputed vnto them for they are partakers of Christes merit by whose helpe they obtaine forgiuenesse of sinnes Theoph. Let vs come to the other title of the church why is it called catholicke or vniuersall Mat. Why the Chuch is called catholicke That wee may vnderstand it is not now tyed to anie certaine place or people as wee read it was vnder the Law before the comming of Christ but that it is dispersed and scattered throughout the whole world and distinguished into manie members which are particular Churches gathered together in sundre places which notwithstanding make one bodie of the Church for they bee endued with the same faith and hope in Christ Theoph. Of the church before Christ It may seeme then that the Church which was before the comming of Christ was diuerse from ours Mat. Thou gatherest ill for although in some circuÌ„stances it differed from ours yet it was one Church in substaÌ„ce for as much as both of them acknowledge 1 One and the selfe same father God 2 One Iesus Christ redeemer and mediator 3 Because also that old Church had the same hope with vs namely to obtaine saluation by faith in him by the which faith the beleeuers euen then coÌ„municated with his bodie and therefore were partakers of all his gifts 4 Because they had the same ministery of the word and sacraments with vs as concerning the substance Theoph. But how could this bee that the faithfull should bee partakers of the true body of Christ which was not yet borne Mat. It was then indeede spiritually receiued by faith as it is this day of vs this only is the difference that our faith looketh to Christ now loÌ„g ago manifested but the faith of those auncients looked to Christ which was not then come Neither were they therfore excluded from the true partaking of him For all things are present with God Hence is that of Iohn The Lambe meaning Christ slaine euen from the Apoc. 13. 8. foundations of the world Christ also confirmeth the selfe same thing when he saith Ioh. 8. 56. Abraham reioyced to see this my daie and he saw it and was glad Theoph. But be there anie places of scripture whereby this may bee determined that the faithfull which were vnder the law were in deed and truly partakers of Christes body Math. 1. Cor. 10. 3 There be For Paule saith That all the fathers did eate the same spirituall foode with vs and that they all dranke the same spirituall drinke for they dranke of the spirituall rocke that followed them and that rocke was Christ By which wordes hee meaneth that the fathers by their Sacraments did no lesse communicate with the body of Christ and his gifts theÌ„ we do at this day by outs Theoph. What therefore is the difference betweene their and our church Mat. There be reckoned not one but foure 1 First because the old church did set forth Christ his death and resurrection darkely by certaine outward ceremonies as sacrifices lights washings and such other Col. 2. 17. which of the same Apostle are called shadowes of things to come but the body is Christ Wherefore seeing that by his comming hee hath put an end vnto those ceremonies he hath now laide himselfe open vnto vs farre more plainly For he commeth forth as it were in the mid-day abounding with his gifts that euerie one may see and know them For this cause the Apostle compareth the fathers which liued vnder the Law vnto children which did learne as it were their letters and first grounds to giue vs to vnderstand that wee may be called learned and skilfull if we be compared with them This therefore is the first difference Theoph. Declare the second Mat. This consisteth in reformation of life for as the knowledge of Christ is greater so also the efficacy and working of the holy Ghost is farre greater which mortifieth our flesh so as we do more earnestly obey his commandements according to the promises declared by the Prophets This is the couenant Ier. 31. 33. which I will make with the house of Israell After those daies saith the Lord I will put my Law in their inward Eze. 36. 27. parts and will write it in their hearts I will put my Spirit within you and wil cause you to walke in my statutes and to keepe my iudgements that you may do them Yet not that the godly before the comming of Christ were without the Spirit of regeneration but that we might be taught how the Lord in the very coÌ„ming of Christ by whose bloud hee renewed the couenant with vs did more aboundantly bestow his giftes vpon his people For this cause the Lord did suffer not a few blemishes of the Israelites which among vs were not to be borne no otherwise then as a most wise Father will beare with many childish faults of his sons as long as they be children but when they be come to yeares he will in no case beare them Theoph. I would haue thee shew me some example Mat. Mat. 19. 8. I will alledge one The bill of diuotsement which was nothing else but a libertie to put away the wife euen for the smallest cause But the Lord affirmeth

so wholly occupied in their superstitions ioyned most nearely with Idolatrie and do so swell with a vaine opinion of merite that they easily despise and set light by the lawfull keeping of Gods commandements which daily experience doth plentifully witnesse The third commandement Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vaine for the Lord will not hold him guiltlesse that taketh his name in vaine Theoph. We haue beene long in the exposition of the second commandement because the matter it selfe required it Now we are to come to the third And first let vs see how many parts there be of it Mat. Three as of the former In the 1 First is forbidden the rash vse of Gods name 2 In the second is commanded the sanctifying of it and this is contained vnder the prohibition 3 The third is a threatning against the breakers of this commandement Theoph. That the exposition of this commandement may be the easier I will demand three things 1 First in what sence the name of God is taken in this place 2 Secondly what it is to take the name of God in vaine 3 Thirdly how many waies it may bee taken in vaine declare what the name of God signifieth Mat. The first part of the third command of Gods name It is first taken for God himselfe as it easie to gather out of the words of Moses Deu. 28. 58 If you shall not keep to do all the words of this Law which are written in this booke to fear that glorious and terrible name the Lord thy God the Lord will make thy plagues wonderfull Secondly it signifieth all those things which concerne his glorie as his word and workes Theoph. But now what is it to take the name of God in vaine Mat. How the name of God is takeÌ„ in vaine To speake of God or his wordes or workes contemptuously lightly and rashly that is to misuse and to do wrong to his Maiestie For this cause he sayd rather the name of the Lord thy God then my name For this he meant that seeing the Lord is our God we ought to thinke so reuereÌ„tly of his Maiesty that to vs it should be most holy without all pollution or disdain Theoph. How manie waies it is taken in vaine Nowe we are to see how manie wayes the name of God is taken in vaine which is the third point of the first part of this commandement Mat. It may indeed be taken in vaine sundrie wayes which notwithstanding I will reduce vnto fiue 1 The first which is also the most grieuous is blasphemie that is rayling namely when a man doth not onely speake contemptuously of God but doth also vse reprochfull wordes and such as sauour of contempt against his Maiestie as they do that renounce God To whom also wee do ioyne all those that trample vnder their feete the most holy mysterie of our saluation that Christ hath wrought for vs and euery where do sweare by his death blood bodie and parts therof as his head and belly and that most commonly purposely not being stirred and moued by anger although indeed there be no anger which can excuse so horrible blasphemie before God Theoph. Such men verily be far off from giuing those thankes which we owe vnto him that he vouchsafed to take vpon him our humane nature and that in it to deliuer vs from euerlasting death he would be abased to the death of the crosse full of reproch Mat. Thou sayest true And therin they shew themselues worse then the very Iewes of whom he was crucified For if they had known him they would not haue 1. Cor. 2. 8. crucified the Lord of glorie saith Paule Therefore except they repent it will atogether come to passe that to their great euill they shall feele his most iust wrath iudgement for as much as they do purposely so profane the benefit of redeÌ„ption procured vnto vs by him Theoph. Let vs examine another way by the which the name of God is taken in vaine Mat. The prophaning of gods word When we do abuse the holy Scripture which is done specially three wayes 1 First when it is prophaned by ridiculous scoffes and mockings as drunkards and vngodly persons are wont 2 Secondly when it is corrupted that is wrested otherwise then the true sense is as hereticks do 3 Thirdly when any abuseth it to enchantments or sorceries for the healing of men or beastes such like Theoph. But they which heale diseases especially of men by that meanes say that there is no sinne in it seeing they vse good works whereof there followeth a verie good effect namely good health for the most part restored to the sicke Theoph. The deuill vseth to assaile men disguised that is to say he changeth himselfe into an Angell of light to the end he may be the better receiued 2. Cor. 11. 14 For he knoweth that if he were knowne all would abhor him Therfore he can find no better colour then if he make shew of the word of God which neuerthelesse is both corrupted by him and wrested from the true meaning euen as he doth with hereticks or else it is turned from the right and lawfull vse namely doctrine reproof correction and instruction to the healing of bodies and such other delusions wherewith both it is prophaned and the name of God is taken in vaine Whereupon it is plaine that the healing which sometimes followeth those deceipts and iuglings be not of God against whoÌ„ there is that way great sinne committed but from the Deuill Theoph. Canst thou proue that those kinde of healings be of the Deuill Mat. Yea indeed and that most easily For God vseth onely two wayes to the curing of diseases whereof one is naturall and ordinarie namely by the helpe of medicines whereinto he hath put that vertue force the other is besides the course of nature miraculous when God him selfe doth it by his owne power But that way of healing by rehearsing wordes of the holy Scriptures cannot be called ordinarie or naturall for as much as the word of God is not giuen to heale bodies but soules neither can it bee reckened among the miracles which proceed from the power of God For the power of God is not tyed to the vttering of certaine words notwithstanding they bee verie good or else there were not anie which might not doe miracles at his pleasure which in verie deede is most absurd For thereupon it should followe that God declareth his power not according to his owne will but according to our pleasure Therefore no man ought to doubt but that these kinds of healings be of the Deuill and not of God Theoph. They obiect that it is not like that the Deuill the enemie of mankind should regard and care for the good health of men Mat. That which traitors and poisoners are wont to do namely to flatter thee for a time to the ende they may afterward lay handes vpon thee the

deserue somewhat Matth. It followeth not For that reward proceedeth of his meere grace and vndeserued fauour without any desert of ours Theoph. Doest thou take from the faithfull all meriting with God Mat. Not I but the word of God wherein his owne mercie is established and merit is ouerthrowen euen to the very ground For these two can not stand together Furthermore if any a litle more diligently examine the nature of merit or desert he shall neuer find that it hath any place before God Theoph. Why so Mat. Because that we may deserue any thing this is 1 First required that we be nothing in his debt of whom we desire to deserue 2 Secondly that we bring him such things as be our owne 3 And last of all that that which we bring or bestow be equall or as much worth as the thing that we seeke to deserue If but anie one of these conditions fayle it can be no merit or desert How much lesse therefore if they be all wanting together But they be wanting in all our good works Theoph. Declare that vnto mee one after another particularly Matth. The examination of the merit of works First whatsoeuer good works may be performed of vs are due vnto God by a double right namely of our creation and adoption Hereupon is that saying of Christ warning his Disciples Luc. 17. 10. When yee haue done all the things that are commanded you say We be vnprofitable seruants for we haue done nothing but that which was our dutie to do Moreouer it is certain that whatsoeuer good thing can be done of vs is from God which worketh in vs both the will and the deede Phil. 2. 13. Therefore it was notably sayd of one of the ancient fathers God rewardeth his owne good workes in vs and not ours Paule also saith 1. Cor. 4. 7. What hast thou that thou hast not receiued and if thou haue receiued it why dost thou boast as though thou hadst nor receiued it Therefore among men indeede there may be merit or desert For the husbandman after hee hath digged all day in the vineyard shall receiue his reward by desert But with God we can deserue nothing but that he should punish vs for our offences Theoph. The objectioÌ„ of the defenders of merit The defenders of the opinion of merits do obiect that good workes be not meritorious of themselues but in respect of the promise of God him selfe wherein he hath promised those things which otherwise were not due Matth. The answer to it They are not by this pretence acquit of sacriledge or robbing God For they attribute that to themselues which appertaineth to God alone For when God made that promise vnto vs hee did it of his meere grace and fauor and therefore merit or desertis shut out But I will make the whole matter plaine by a familiar example If any king should promise his bond-slaue an hundred thousand crownes vpon condition that he diligently do a businesse committed to him the bondslaue hauing done the commandement may require the gold yet not because he hath deserued it But we that haue not fulfilled the condition enioyned vs how much lesse haue we deserued the reward promised to our workes Theoph. What letteth that we fulfill it not when we obey the Lord from the heart Matth. Of ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ perfection ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ our workes The cause hath bin declared already before namely for that there can be no good thing done of vs that is not vncleane and defiled For as the most pure water if it run through an vncleane conduit is corrupted with the stincke of it so the good workes that God worketh in vs be soiled and stained with the filthinesse of our flesh Therefore euen as the promise of reward is altogether free and without respect of anie desert so is the fulfilling of that promise Theoph. Why therfore doth God promise reward to our works which he may by right require of vs Mat. That that promise may be as a spurre vnto vs by the which we might be driuen forward to the desire and doing of them and that indeed not without cause for we are by our nature verie slacke vnto them Theoph. There is one thing behind which I will demand of thee namely concerning that which was said of thee before that the obedience which is vndertaken vpon hope of reward is not acceptable vnto God Mat. This also is indeed true if that affection raigne in vs as it doth in the vnfaithfull Howbeit it shall not hurt so as the loue and feare of God go before if we be allured and drawen on to his seruice by the hope and looking for of the reward And on the other side be kept and held from disobeying him by the feare of the punishment that is of eternall death Theo. But ought not the loue of God to be sufficient to bring forth that obedience in the harts of the faithfull without borrowing anie other spur froÌ„ elsewhere Mat. If our regeneration were perfect as is the regeneration of them which liue blessedly in heauen we should know God perfectly whereby we should be stirred vp to obey him perfectly But because there is alwayes behind in vs something not regenerated which of it owne nature is in bondage full of ignorance without loue of God it is necessarie that we should be stirred vp to that obedience by the hope of reward and on the other side by feare of punishments be held backe and kept in obedience Hereupon it is that God both rewardeth our good works in this life according to his promises and also correcteth our slacknesse and insolencie by diuerse afflictions which hee sendeth dayly whereby it appeareth that he is true as well in his promises as in the execution of his threatnings But seeing thou hast nothing more to propound I would aduise that wee put of the rest of the disputation till another time for I see that it is now almost noone Theoph. I haue heard thy discourse of Good workes as also the exposition of the morall law with so great delight that the time of thy speech hath seemed to me verie short Mat. Indeed it is a most pleasant thing to intreat of Good workes so as it be done holily and by the rule of Gods word Howbeit that shall be litle except the practise be ioyned which verily getteth praise with men The vse of the doctrine of Good-workes pleasure to the conscience profit with God Therefore true and sound vertue is greatly commended before vaine pratling or the vnprofitable idle knowledge of it Theoph. I do remeÌ„ber an excellent similitude which I haue oftentimes heard of thee and it is this As a precious garment shut vp in a chest is altogether vnprofitable but if it be put on it is honour delight and profit vnto vs so it is with Good works for the knowledge and vaine discoursing of them is of no vse except they be brought to practise Matth. It is

most true Therefore I pray God and our heauenly father that as he hath imprinted his law in our mindes so he will engraue it together with his loue and feare in our hearts by the power of his holy spirit that being alwayes clothed with righteousnesse and holynesse we may serue him with due reuerence and humilitie all our life 1 And so he may be glorified of vs. 2 Our neighbour edified 3 Our faith saluation may be confirmed through Iesus Christ our Lord. Theoph. So be it CHAP. II. Of Prayer which hath the chiefe place among Good workes to testifie and confirme our faith Theophilus OVr helpe is in the name of the Lord which hath made both heauen earth Matth. So be it Theoph. Concerning the doctrine of good workes I am sufficiently satisfied most dearely beloued brother for I haue learned that they onely be worthy the name of Good works which be commanded of God in his law also that they be not the causes of our iustification and saluation neuerthelesse that they be profitable both to the glory of God and to the edification of our neighbours very much to the assurance of our saluation and faith Which is the chiefe good work A short description of true prayer Now I demand of thee which hath the first place among Good workes Math. True prayer namely that which is powred from the heart vnto God with this confidence that we shall be heard Theoph. Why giuest thou it the chiefe place among Good workes Matth. Because by the helpe of it we obtaine this The excellencie of prayer that we bee able to performe the other Good workes Moreouer it yeeldeth vs the greatest testimonie of our saluation Theoph. Whereupon is it that it yeeldeth a fuller testimonie of our faith then the other Good workes Matth. Hereupon because prayer with certaine hope of being heard cannot bee made but wee are therewithall perswaded of the loue and good will of God toward vs. For as Paule saith Rom. 10. 13 14. How shall they call vpon him in whom they haue not beleeued For this cause the same Apostle affirmeth out of the prophesie of Ioel Whosoeuer shall call vpon the name of the Lord shall be saued Theoph. But from whence haue we that assurance seeing wee be guiltie vnto our selues of our owne vnworthinesse by the which we deserue that both we our selues our prayers should be driuen backe from the seate of his Maiestie Matth. By the intercession or mediation of Iesus Christ who as it was shewed by vs in the Chapter of faith doth alwayes offer vp to God the Father the merit of his death for full satisfactioÌ„ of all our sins Wherupon it commeth to passe that he is made mercifull vnto vs and such a one as will be entreated of vs so as we shall receiue what soeuer we aske of him And that doth the Scripture teach in these wordes 1. Iohn 2. 1. We haue an aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ Theoph. It followeth therefore that the office of the mediatour is by a most straight band ioyned with the office of the redeemer Mat. It is so and therefore Iohn after those words We haue an aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ the righteous presently addeth and he is the propitiation 1. Iohn 2. 2. for our sinnes Hereupon it is that Paule ioyneth both the offices together when he saith 1. Tim. 2. 6. There is one mediatour of God and men the man Christ Iesus which gaue himselfe a ransome for all men Theoph. Seeing therefore one is our redeemer euen Christ Iesus it seemeth to follow that he alone can also fulfill the office of the mediatour for vs with the Father Matth. The confutation of the error about prayer to Saints It followeth and that indeed necessarily and for this cause in the places which we haue heard we reade it written One aduocate one mediatour for the word one is expresly added to the end we might know that besides him alone there can be no other Theoph. Therefore they deale foolishly and without any good ground whosoeuer seeke other patrons and mediatours besides Christ Matth. Verie foolishly For they forsake the Creatour to go to the creature the Lord to go to the seruant the most dearely beloued Sonne of the Father which is in the highest authoritie and fauour with him to pacifie his wrath to go to those which lacke all the things that be required to wash away sinnes and therefore bee vnable to make our prayers acceptable and of force Moreouer they do esteeme Christ as it were not sufficient enough for the office of the mediatour and therefore denie him to be our true Sauiour For if he be fit and sufficient for so great an office why doe they take to themselues other mediatours beside him If they say they doubt not but that he is both most power-full and most fit for this thing but doe doubt somewhat of his will they do therein very much bewray themselues to be vnbeleeuers which refuse to giue credit vnto him after that he hath giuen vs so notable a pledge of his exceeding loue Namely when he vouchsafed both to take vpon him our humane nature and to suffer the death of the Crosse for our redemption Adde hereunto that most louingly he calleth vs vnto himselfe by his word when he saith Mat. 11. 28. 30. Come vnto me all that labour and be laden and I will cause you to haue ease yee shall find rest vnto your soules Finally whither soeuer they turne themselues they shall neuer escape but be fouÌ„d iniurious against Christ for as much as they take froÌ„ him the office of the mediatour purchased by his owne bloud to giue it to blessed creatures that be in heauen Theoph. They obiect that the office of Christ is not translated by them to the dead Saints seeing they end all the prayers they make to God with these wordes Through Iesus Christ our Lord whereby they say is declared that the chiefe honour is giuen to Christ himselfe Mat. The confutation of it It is a craft of Sathan by the which he would haue the wickednesse of praying to Saints to be hidden and so the manifest wrong that they offer vnto Christ which put ouer his office vnto Saints while they pray God that by their merites and intercession he will grant the things that they desire and at length ad through Iesus Christ our Lord. Wherein they imitate follow him who after he hath giuen his Prince a blow would humbly do him reuerence Theoph. Is it therefore vnlawfull for the faithfull being a liue mutually amoÌ„g themselues the one to commend the saluation of the other vnto God by prayer seeing it cannot be but some thing is taken away from the intercession of Christ Matth. The confutation of the obiection Not so for many causes may be alledged for the which the one is not onely vnprofitable but also forbidden and therefore to

God From wheÌ„ce it is easie to gather that Christ is the onely foundation of our faith which the holy Ghost hath ingrauen in our hearts And this is as it were the summe of the ChristiaÌ„ faith which commonly is called the Apostles Creede The exposition of the Apostles Creede Theoph. Let vs therefore speake of this confession of faith the whole whereof I desire thee to expound vnto me But before I come to the partes of it I will propound three things wherein I desire to be satisfied of thee proposition 1 First why it is called the Apostles Creede proposition 2 Secondly seeing the doctrine which is contained in it generally belongeth to all the faithfull why we say I do beleeue in God not we beleeue in God proposition 3 Thirdly what properly it is to beleeue in God Mat. The word Symbolum which in English sometimes we translate Creede in this place signifieth as it were the gathering together of many parts into one which terme doth not vnfitly agree to the confession of faith which we see is made of many articles Now it is called the Apostles Creede because it containeth as it were a brief summe of all the Apostolicall doctrine written in the bookes of the old and new Testament Theoph. Let vs come to the other point whereof I doubted why do we say rather I beleeue in God then we beleeue seeing this doctrine is generall and all Christians are bound to beleeue it Mat. That is for two causes cause 1 First because every man can giue testimonie of his owne faith but of another mans faith he cannot cause 2 Secondly to the end we should vnderstand that these articles were not written so much to teach vs as that by them we should be built vp to saluation otherwise they should profit vs no more then if a sicke man saw a medicine hauing vertue to driue away a maladie the working whereof he knew and yet did neglect to take it Now we professe that applying of it to our selues when euery of vs saith I beleeue Theoph. As farre as I perceiue there is no little likenesse betweene the sickenesse of the body and the sicknesse of the mind as also betweene the way of attayning the health of the one the health of the other Mat. Yea indeed there is great likenesse For as in the sicknesse of the body there be three degrees to the obtaining of health that is to say the 1 Knowledge of the sickenesse 2 The knowledge of the remedy 3 And the applying of it So also it fareth with our spirituall sicknesse sinne For whosoeuer knoweth that sicknesse is come to the first degree of health If he know the remedy which is Christ he is in the second But all this is to no purpose except the remedy by applied by faith Theoph. Let vs therefore come to the third What is it properly to beleeue in God Mat. To beleeue in God When we speake of God we say that we beleeue three manner of wayes belief 1 First to beleeue one God belief 2 Secondly to beleeue God belief 3 Thirdly to beleeue in God Wherof the first two degrees are they by the which at length we come to the third To beleeue one God is as much to say thou beleeuest that there is one God To beleeue God is to beleeue that God is true concerning his promises declared in his word To beleeue in God is according to those promises to put thy whole trust and hope in God which belongeth to the faithfull only who by true faith apply those promises to themselues Theoph. Thou doest then account them infidels that stand still in the first or second degree Mat. I do indeed for they beleeue no more then the deuils themselues do Theoph. Thou hast satisfied me we are therefore to come to the parts of the Creede Mat. The parts of the Creede They are foure 1 Of faith in God the Father 2 Of faith in his sonne Iesus Christ 3 Of faith in the holy Ghost 4 And concerning the Church Theoph. Why our faith is referred to each person by it selfe But why is our faith distinctly referred to euery person by it selfe seeing that it is one God in whom we beleeue Mat. That our faith may be the better strengthened which is then done when seuerally we perceiue what each person by his distinct propertie hath wrought in our saluation Our faith notwithstanding is referred to one God Theoph. How Mat. It is all one as if a man should say I put all my hope and trust in one God of whose loue I can not doubt For whereas he is distinguished into three persons euery one of them confirmeth in me the assurance of that loue For the Father hath both created me by his omnipotencie and doth also guide me by his mercifull prouidence The Sonne hath redeemed me by his death reconciled me to God the Father and euen now maketh intercession to him for me The holy Ghost by his diuine power hath sanctified me ioyned me with Christ his Church that with it I might be partaker of all his giftes vntill he bring me vnto eternall life The first part of the Apostles Creede which is of faith in God the Father Theoph. In this exposition of the Creede which thou hast euen now made there be some few things whereof I will aske thee I will keepe the order of the parts in propounding my questions Whether the Father onely created vs. I wil therfore begin with God the Father by whose gracious prouidence thou saidest that we are ruled question 1 First I demand therefore whether the Father onely created vs question 2 SecoÌ„dly why thou makest here mention of his mercifull prouidence whereof there is no one word in the Creede Now answer me to the first Mat. Those three persons for as much as they haue all one essence namely the Godhead and therfore are one God do nothing apart or a sunder one from the other Therfore both in our creation redemption and sanctification euery one of the persons wrought according to their distinct propertie Theoph. In those three diuine workes shew me this distinctly Mat. Psal 33. 6. Concerning the creation the Scripture doth teach vs that the Father made all things by his word that is to say by his Sonne and by his spirite Concerning our redemption the Father saith Christ so loued Iohn 3. 16. the world that he gaue his onely begotten Sonne to the death for our redeÌ„ption which death the Sonne suffered by the power of the holy Ghost The same also Heb. 9. 14. so is to be vnderstood of our sanctification whereof the Father is as it were the beginning For Christ praying for the faithfull saith Father sanctifie them The matter of our sanctification is in the Sonne for he addeth Iohn 17. 17. 19. I sanctifie my selfe that they also may be sanctified And the holy Ghost is as it were a coÌ„duit through the which that holinesse floweth

tractable and do obey admonitions Theoph. It commeth to my remembrance that the article of the Church is set after the article of the holy Ghost because the holy Ghost beareth witnesse within vs that we be members of it Mat. Not only for this cause but especially because it is gathered together by the diuine working of it by the which indeede we are knit together into one bodie with Christ and are partakers of all his giftes that is to say the merit of his death is communicated vnto vs by the which wee obtaine forgiuenesse of sinnes the force also of his resurrection is imparted by the which we shall rise againe in that last day shal liue eternally with him All which things are in the Creed in exact order declared presently after the article of the church Theoph. Hitherto we haue spoken sufficiently of the true Church therefore we haue dispatched the first point that I propounded Of the communion of Saints Let vs therfore come to the other What is the cause that thou saydest we were no lesse ioyned by the holy Ghost with the Church then with Christ Mat. Because it cannot ioyn the faithful with Christ but it doth also ioyne them together among theÌ„selues euen as the members cannot be ioyned with the head but they be also vnited together into the bodie Now this is a most fit similitude and best agreeth to the vnioÌ„ which we haue with Christ For as the head if it be ioyned with the members guideth them nourisheth them and giueth them life and motion euen so Christ perfourmeth all these things to his Church with the which he is made one by the working of the holy ghost For this cause is this sentence so often repeated of the Apostle Col. 1. 18. 1. Cor. 12. 27 Christ is the head of the bodie of the Church The faithfull are the bodie of Christ and members for their part Therefore also Christ him selfe giueth his owne name to the Church as when he reproued Paul Act. 9. 4. Saule Saule why persecutest thou me and this he doth because the head and members be one A short exposition of the Apostles Creede Theoph. Thou hast made mee to vnderstand all the articles of the Apostles Creed Neuerthelesse I do desire to the ende the things which thou hast sayd may the better stick in my mind that the summe of the same articles should againe be declared in some short Paraphrasis or exposition as also to be taught how the faithfull may apply them to them selues Mat. Thou desirest a thing except I be deceiued not vnprofitable Therefore euerie one may comprehend the summe of the Creed and apply it to himselfe in these words I put my whole trust in God the father I beleeue in God the Father as in him which will blesse me For I doubt not seeing he is the Father of Iesus Christ but he is also my father and therefore loueth me perfectly and infinitely euen as he him selfe is perfect and infinite Now that will of his cannot be hindered by impotencie Almightie maker of heauen and earth or weakenesse as our earthly parentes are often wont For he is omnipotent and hath all creatures as well those that be in heauen as those that be in earth in his hand to do me good to keepe me safe from all sinnes and to helpe me in all my necessities so far forth as he him selfe shall know to be expedient for me who also doth so keep in bridle and hold backe the deuill all mine enemies that they cannot by any meanes hurt mee And in Iesus Christ his only Sonne our Lord. I do also put my whole trust in Christ Iesus our Lord the onely Sonne of God of the same essence with the Father and the holy Ghost who came downe into the earth that he might lift me vp into heauen which was made man to the ende he might haue the same God with me and I might haue the same Father with him For these be his words I ascend or go vp to my Father Ioh. 20. 17. and your Father and my God and your God Which was conceiued by the holy Ghost born of the virgin Mary suffered vnder Pontius Pilate Who also that he might reconcile mee to God the Father was conceiued by the holy Ghost and borne of the Virgine Marie Moreouer vnder Pontius Pilate he suffred all the reproches which I had deserued For he was bound as a guiltie person that I might be loosed out of the chaine of the Deuill and sinne He was condemned of an earthly Iudge notwithstanding he were most iust and innocent that I which am guilty of innumerable transgressions might be discharged before the tribunall seate of the heauenly Iudge Who in scorne was clothed with purple and crowned with a crowne of thornes that he might make me partaker of his glorious crowne and kingly dignitie Crucified dead and buried Who was nayled to the crosse dead and buried that he might deliuer me from the curse of death and slauerie of sinne and the tyrannie of the deuill Who for me descended into hell while as in the verie time of that passion he suffred both in soule and bodie He descended into hell the fearefull torments of the wrath of God which I had deserued and wherewith I should for euer haue beene ouerwhelmed in hell who also the third day rose againe from the dead that for my sake death being The third day he rose againe from the dead He asceÌ„ded into heauen fully ouercome he might giue me life Who finally ascended into heauen from whence I was banished for my sinnes that he might set open a passage for me into it and might in my name take possession of the heauenly kingdome Sitteth at the right had of God the Father almightie But now he sitteth at the right hand of God the Father almighty and there continually maketh intercession for me with his Father and offreth for me the merite of his death that so he may become mercifull vnto me From theÌ„ce he shall come to iudge the quicke and dead I beleeue also that at the last day he shall come visibly downe from the heauens to iudge both quicke and dead Neither is there any cause why I should feare or be afrayde of condemnation seeing I shall stand at the iudgement seate of that Iudge which is also my patron and aduocate I do therefore assuredly know that he will giue sentence on my side and absolue me that I may be partaker of his glory I beleeue in the holy Ghost I do also put my whole trust in the holy Ghost which is God of the same essence with the Father and the Sonne who also hath ioyned me with Christ and sanctified me in him Which beareth witnesse with my Spirite that I am the child of God Which maketh request for me with sighs that caÌ„not be expressed Which comforteth me in aduersitie Which kindleth a desire

the sonnes of Helie Experience also confirmeth the thing of stubburne disobedient children for they be for the most part seene either in prisons or vpon the gallowes Contrariwise the well aduised and obedient for the most part haue long life with great quietnesse and peace But if at any time it fall out to be otherwise we must remember that all the promises of God concerning earthly things be with condition namely so farre forth as he shall know them to be expedient both for his owne glorie and for our saluation When therefore God doth betimes call his out of this life vnto himselfe he prouideth farre better for them then if he gaue them long life For he taketh them from the miseries of this world and putteth them into the possession of eternall life On the other side sometimes he giueth the wicked long life but so weake and full of miserie that it is more grieuous then death it selfe For this cause Moses repeating the law of God Deut. 6. 2. declareth that promise in these wordes That it may be well with thee vpon the land which c. But if it fall out otherwise it was for the cause which was at large set forth by vs when we intreated of afflictions For in that place we taught wherefore the Lord will haue the wicked somtimes to liue long happily in this world and the godly to suffer all kind of afflictions Yet notwithstanding that saying of Salomon abideth true Although Eccles 8. 12 the sinner commit euill an hundred times and God prolongeth his dayes yet I know that it shall be well with them that feare the Lord. The sixt Commandement Thou shalt not kill Theoph. Hauing finished the treatise of the fift commandement we are now to come to the sixt How many parts be there of it Mat. Two 1 First the forbidding of murther 2 The commanding of keeping peace and friendship with our neighbours Theoph. How large is the word killing Mat. The exposition of the first part It containeth all the degrees and steps by the which we come to it yea indeed all those things by the which we are procured stirred to commit murther according to the third rule Theoph. Rehearse those steps or degrees Mat. They be three The first whereof is hatred conceiued in the heart forasmuch as it is in plaine words forbidden in Moses Thou shalt not hate thy brother in Leu. 19. 17. thy heart Theoph. What if our enemie be a wicked man is it not lawfull to hate him Matth. We may indeed hate his sinnes but not his person But we must diligently beware of two extremities wherein we do sinne on either side The first is that we hate not the person of the sinner The other that we loue not the sinne for the persons sake Theoph. Let vs come to the second degree by the which we come to murther Matth. It is anger for it is a declaration of the hatred lying hid in the heart Theoph. Thinkest thou it to be altogether vnlawfull to be angry with any Mat. I do not thinke so for anger is a naturall affection wherein if moderation be kept it deserueth as much prayse as the two extremities deserue disprayse Theoph. What is that moderation Matth. When with zeale for the glory of God or with iust sorrow we be angry because iniurie is done vnto vs without our desert that keeping a meane with this caution that we neither speake nor do any thing that is against the honour of God Christian modestie and the loue of our neighbour In which sence Paule commandeth Ephes 4. 26. Be angry and sinne not Theoph. Let vs consider of the two extremities of anger and first let vs speake of that which sinneth in exceeding Mat. We doe then fall into it when we be angry rashly that is without a lawfull cause or else when being moued for a iust cause we do passe the bounds of moderation speaking or doing the things that be against the honour of God neighbourly charitie and Christian modestie But that falleth out when we be so taken vp with that affection that the iudgemeÌ„t is troubled and reason it selfe is darkened for then for a time we are like vnto mad meÌ„ that know not what they do For this cause Iames saith Iam. 1. 20. The wrath of man performeth not the righteousnesse of God Theoph. Let vs come to the other extremitie How do we sinne in the defect or want of anger Matth. When perceiuing that God is offended or our credit hurt without cause we are notwithstanding not moued as our dutie requireth which would haue vs not to suffer euils but that according to our callings we should set our selues against them Hence it was that Moses was so angry in the wildernesse with the Israelites whom he saw worshipping the golden Calfe with the Idolatrous worships Iohn Baptist with the Scribes and Pharisies and Iacob with his father in law Laban Moses indeede being moued with most iust anger drew out the sword because he was a Magistrate Iohn vsed most sharpe and vehement reprehensions because he was a minister of Gods word and had to do with hypocrites and men hardened in their sinnes Iacob dealeth with moderate and gentle admonitions because he was a priuate person and his owne matter was in question Theoph. The third step by the which men come to murther is behind Matth. It is euery hurt offered to the person of our neighbour whereupoÌ„ also sometimes ensueth murther it selfe which fault is indeed most grieuous in the sight of God as appeareth by that which the Lord saith that he abhorreth the man-slayer and by the penaltie appointed by himselfe vnto men-killers For he ordained that not onely men but also the very brute beasts that had slaine man should be put to death For which cause he forbad his people the eating of bloud Leuit. 7. 26. for by that ceremonie he would shew how much he abhorred the shedding of bloud and therefore murther Theoph. Is there any speciall cause which maketh murther to be esteemed so hainous a sin before God Matth. There is and he doth declare it himselfe in the ninth Chapter of Genesis For after these wordes Who so sheddeth mans bloud by mans his bloud shall be shed presently he addeth because in the image of God made he man By which words he teacheth that his owne image which he hath engrauen in man is wronged and misused by man-slaughter Theoph. But whether was that image or likenesse of God blotted out in man by originall sinne as it hath beene sayd by thee in the second Chapter of the former booke Mat. It was indeede but not so farre that there be no steps of it at all remaining for the spirituall gifts as one of the auncients saith giuen of God to men for their saluation were by original sinne taken away such as be the true knowledge of his Maiestie and of the worship due vnto him But the

Theoph. Let vs come to those two last things which the Lord requireth of vs to the fulfilling of this commandement Declare the first Mat. That we should go to him with whom we be at variance to be reconciled according to the commandement of Christ If thou bring thy gift vnto the altar Mat. 5. 23. and there remembrest that thy brother hath ought against thee leaue thy gift there before the altar go thy wayes first be reconciled to thy brother and then come and offer thy gift Now he teacheth by that ceremonie of the Law which was then in vse that all the worship which we offer vnto God is displeasing vnto him so long as we be at vaniance with our neighbours Moreouer Paule warneth that this reconciliation is soone to be made and not to be put off from daie to day For he saith Ephes 4. 26 Let not the Sunne go downe vppon your wrath Which indeede is the most fit remendy to breake off hatred and to bridle reuenge For euen as diseases and sores at the first easie to be cured by delaie are made incurable and that more is deadly so hatred will grow past cure if thou represse it not speedily For this cause Paul after these words let not the Sun go down vpon your wrath by and by addeth neither giue place to the Diuell Theoph. Wherefore doth he adde these wordes Math. Because hatred if it bee neuer so little a time hidden in our mindes maketh an entrance for the Deuill who hauing entred vppon our hearts doeth so wholly possesse them that refusing reconciliation hee stirreth vs vp to the desire of reuenge till at length hee haue throwen vs headlong to destruction Seeing therefore hee is so hurtfull a guest there is cause that betimes we shut the doores against him by vnfained reconciliation Theoph. The other point is remaining of the thing which wee are bound to doe for the fulfilling of this commandement Mat. It is that after we haue diligently done our duety if our aduersarie doe obstinately refuse reconciliation we leaue not to loue him to pray vnto God for him and in all things to pleasure him according to the commaundement of Christ Loue your enemies Mat. 5. 44. blesse those that curse you do good vnto them that hate you and pray for them that hurt you and persecute you that you may be the children of your father that is in Heauen Hither also may be referred the exhortation of Paul Rom. 12. 20 21. If thine enemy hunger giue him meate if he thirst giue him drinke For if thou doe this thou shalt heape coales of fire vpon his head Finally that also is to be marked that Paul presently addeth Be not ouercome of that which is euill but ouercome euill with goodnesse The seuenth commandement Thou shalt not commit adulterie Theoph. Let vs come to the seuenth commandement of the Law How manie parts be there of it Mat. Two In the first hee forbiddeth adulterie in the last he commandeth chastity Theoph. What doth the Lord vnderstaÌ„d by the name of adulterie Mat. The exposition of the first part Not onely the companie of man with woman out of mariage but also all kinde of filthinesse by the which man may be defiled Moreouer all the affections of concupiscence and finally whatsoeuer stirreth vp vnto lust and nourisheth it Of which sort are Vnlawfull touchings Wanton apparelling of the body Filthie speach Vncleane songs Filthy reading Too familiar companie with those of whom it is verie like that they be tempted with lust Wanton lookes Idlenesse that is the mother of all vices and namely of whooredome Dancings which are most manifest stirrers and prouokers of lust Seeing therefore it is certaine according to the saying Eccle. 3. 27. He that loueth danger shall perish in it that wee are by nature prone vnto lust except wee diligently take heede of all these prouocations it will verily come to passe that at length we shall be driuen to the verie act it selfe which sin notwithstanding is before God esteemed most hainous especially in those that professe the name of Christ Theoph. Why so Matth. Paule giueth a reason in these wordes 1. Cor. 6. 15. Do you not knowe that your bodies are the members of Christ Shall I therefore take the members of Christ and make them the members of an harlot God forbid Know you not that hee which is coupled with an harlot is one body with the harlot For he saieth they which were two shall be one flesh But he which is ioyned to the Lord is one Spirite Flie fornication euery sinne that a man doth is without the bodie but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body But if the iniury be great that is done vnto Christ verily that must not bee thought little that is done to our neighbour For there followeth vppon this the staine of honest families Moreouer maidens otherwise to haue beene well bestowed are thus not seldom brought to an haynous offence to their dishonour and punishment But the iniury shall be greatest if adultery be committed that is if either the man or the woman or both of them be married For so the faith of mariage is shamed and the band broken the whole family is ouerthrowen and sometimes bastards be suborned for lawfull children vnto whom the inheritance commeth For this cause the Lord ordained in the Law Leu. 20. 10. Deu. 22. 22. that the adulterer should die the death Theoph. The exposition of the second part Let vs come to the other part of this commandement Is there any other thing to be obserued in it besides the chastitie which we ought to keepe Mat. There is Namely that God commandeth mariage to all those that are not euen inwardly endued with the gift of continency For as Paul saith 1. Cor. 7. 9. It is better to marrie then to burne Theoph. Seeing thou hast made mention of marriage I will haue thee shew the causes why it was ordayned Math. They be three 1 First procreation of children 2 Mutuall helpe one to another 3 The auoiding of fornication Theoph. Which is the chiefest of these causes Mat. The first in respect of God namely the increase of mankinde but in respect of vs the last namely the auoiding of fornication Theoph. Why saiest thou that this is the chiefe in respect of vs Mat. Because it layeth vpon vs a necessity of marying which the other two do not For this cause Paul saieth For the auoiding of fornication let euery man haue his own wife and let euery woman haue her own husband Howbeit he speaketh to those that haue not the gift of continency whom he expresly commandeth in those wordes to marrie Notwithstanding heed must be taken that wee defile not so holy an ordinance by dissolute wantonnesse Of the which thing we be warned by the Apostle when he saith Mariage is honourable amongst all and the bed vndefiled Theoph. What noteth he in this testimony

not so much euill as we would Which howsoeuer they speake not they haue it in their mind As it is to be seene in druÌ„kards theeues fornicators ambitious couetous persons whose lust caÌ„ neuer be satisfied Moreouer the wicked waxe euery day worse and worse contrariwise the faithfull make proceedings in goodnesse by the which notwithstanding they be but small it is apparant that sinne is ouercome of them Theoph. But how coÌ„meth it to passe that a beleeuer being regenerated and lightened with the holy Ghost cannot perfectly obey God Matth. Because our regeneration is onely begun in vs but in this life is neuer perfected For by that meanes the Lord will keepe vs in humilitie as also together with it giue place to his owne infinite mercie Therefore so long as we liue here as well our faith as our repentance be very farre off from perfection For there is still behind in vs some part of our corruption which the Scripture calleth flesh and the old maÌ„ it resisteth or standeth against the part that is regenerate which is called the spirite and the new man And all these things Paule notably comprehendeth in these words The flesh lusteth against the spirite and the spirite Gal. 5. 17. against the flesh and these be contrary the one to the other so as you do not the things that you would Theoph. The battell of the flesh and spirit Wherein standeth this striuing of the flesh and the spirit Mat. 1 The flesh is puft vp with ignorance loue of the world but the spirit is endued with the knowledge loue and feare of God 2 The flesh striueth to follow it owne pleasures and wicked affections for it is giuen vnto all sinnes but the spirit giueth it selfe to this one thing that it may obey God and set forth his glorie 3 The flesh is full of distruct and impatience but the spirit humbleth it selfe vnder the mighty hand of God resteth in his mercy fashioneth it selfe vnto his will Finally the flesh holdeth vs in these earthly things but the spirit lifteth vs vp into heauen Moreouer this contrarietie breedeth in vs a continuall warfare for the flesh alwayes stirreth vs vp and setteth vpoÌ„ vs with so many entisements crafts that except we take diligent heed we be easily deceiued ouercome of it For this cause Christ warneth vs that we should watch Watch and pray least ye enter into Mat. 26. 41 tentation that is least you be ouercome of tentation the spirit indeed is ready but the flesh is weake Theoph. Doth the spirit at length go alwayes away with the victorie Mat. It doth indeede but not without great labour for the flesh many wayes woundeth vs for it causeth vs many times to fall into most hainous sinnes Moreouer although we do ofteÌ„ ouercome it ceaseth not to renew the battell For the deuill the enemie of our saluation ioyneth himselfe vnto it who vseth that domesticall or houshold enemie that he may the more easily enter into out hearts and at length ouercome vs. For this cause Paul most feruently desired to be deliuered from it for he saith Rom. 7. 24. O wretched man that I am who shal deliuer me froÌ„ this body of death He calleth it death because he thought that continuall battell more grieuous then death it selfe Theoph. Now I will returne to the order of our discourse For I see that the faithfull cannot fulfill the law of God And this also I grant that the faithful caÌ„not be altogether iustified by their works but may not this be done in part so as Christ supply that which wanteth Matth. I am 2. 10. This indeed cannot be for Iames saith Whosoeuer keepeth the whole law and yet faileth in one point is guiltie of all Therefore Paul intreating of the way whereby we attaine iustification and saluation excludeth works not in part but wholy As for example In the Epistle to the Romains after long disputation of this matter at length he addeth We conclude therfore Rom. 3. 28. that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the law and in the Chapter following To him that Rom. 4. 4. worketh the wages is not counted by fauour but by debt but to him that worketh not but beleeueth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse The same also he writeth in another place Ephes 2. 8. You are saued by grace through faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God not of works lest anie should boast himselfe In which words he doth sufficiently Why we be iustified before God no otherwise then by faith declare that good works be of no account before God to iustifie and saue vs but that all is to be ascribed to the onely mercie and grace of God by faith in Christ Moreouer grace should not be truely grace in respect of God if it be not wholly and altogether free for workes it cannot stand together in the matter of saluation Theoph. Why so Matth. Because the one destroyeth the other as the Apostle testifieth to the Romanes in these words If we Rom. 11. 6. be saued by grace it is no more of workes or else were worke no more worke Where he sheweth that there is no place for the grace of God vntill we haue throwne away all trust and confidence in our owne works which thing the same Apostle testifieth that himselfe did For notwithstanding concerning the righteousnesse which Phil. 3. 6. is by the law he were without reproofe he esteemed all his good workes as dung that he might be found not hauing his owne righteousnesse which is of the law but that which is through the faith of Christ In another place also he warneth vs of the same thing Ye are made voide of Christ as many of you as Gal. 5. 4. be iustified by the law and are fallen from grace Now he speaketh to those that would ioyne the righteousnesse of the law with the righteousnesse of faith Theoph. But some do obiect that the Apostle when soeuer he saith we are not iustified by the workes of the law speaketh of the ceremoniall law that was then abolished by the comming of Christ but not of the morall law Matth. That is a vaine shift which also is most easie to coÌ„fute by the order of the Apostles speech and first of all in the Epistle to the Romains before he draweth out this conclusion that is in the third Chapter By the workes of the law shall no flesh be iustified in the sight of God In the first Chapter indeed hee proueth that all the Heathen were full of all vnrighteousnesse fornication wickednesse couetousnesse other innumerable sins But in the second he sheweth that the Iewes notwithstanding they made a faire shew of outward holinesse yet were infected stained with the same sins they coÌ„demned in others Whereupon it is plaine that in that place there is only mention of moral works and

workemanship created in Christ Iesus vnto good workes which God hath prepared that we should walk in theÌ„ And againe in another place The grace of God that Tit. 2. 12. bringeth saluation vnto all men hath appeared teaching vs that denying vngodlinesse and worldly lusts we should liue soberly and iustly and godly in this present world Thou seest how diligently good works be commended in the Scripture as those that bee acceptable vnto God through Christ by whose holinesse all their filthinesse and vncleannesse is couered Theoph. But what vse is there of them Mat. A three fold vse of good workes The vse is three-folde and those indeed most profitable The first which is also the chiefe respecteth the glorie of God that ought to be dearer vnto vs theÌ„ our owne saluation But by them it is especially aduanced as it appeareth by the wordes of Christ Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good Mat. 5. 16. works and glorifie your father which is in heauen For this cause Paul warning the Philippians to be ful of the fruits of righteousnesse which are by Christ Iesus addeth Phil. 1. 11. to the glorie and praise of God The second vse respecteth our neighbour For by the vprightnesse and integritie of our life he is prouoked to the same earnest desire and exercise of godlinesse I passe ouer the good turnes which hee hath by our charitie and good workes The third vse standeth in this that by them our conscience is quieted For they be testimonies and witnesses of our faith therfore of our saluation Theoph. But how can it be that good works shall be witnesses of our faith Mat. The cause hath already bene shewed of vs before namely for that the holy Ghost doth neuer work faith in our hearts without repentance from whence good works do flow which therefore be visible or seen testimonies of our inuisible or vnseene faith euen as the goodnesse of the tree is iudged by the good fruite and the inward health or soundnesse of a mans bodie by the outward disposition of all the parts Theoph. Therefore vnlesse I be deceiued this thou saiest that faith cannot be without good works Matth. I say so Euen as fire cannot be without heat and the Sunne without light And verily faith of it own Faith caÌ„not bee without good works nature bringeth forth good workes For how can it be that our hearts should be reformed by faith so as wee do embrace the loue wherewith God loueth vs in Christ but that they be also stricken with loue toward him again by meanes whereof they both earnestly desire to obey him and doe labour to auoide rebellion against his maiesty I doe adde moreouer that faith can no more stand together with an euill conscience then water with fire For it cannot bee that so long as sinne raigneth in vs and we willingly offend God that wee should be assured of his loue so as wee may put our whole trust in him and repose our hope in his fauour and goodnesse notwithstanding that infinite merite of Christes death be knowen and perceiued of vs. Theoph. As farre as I see faith bringeth foorth good workes by the which it is afterward preserued in our hearts M. Faith the mother of good works of wich it is after preserued Yea verily euen as fire causeth ashes wherewith it is afterward cherished fed and maintained But by these things it is plaine that it is so farre off that faith which notwithstanding some say should destroy good works that rather by it they are built vp and fortified Theoph. Seeing then faith cannot bee without good works it followeth that all they which boast of it do not good workes be liers and deceiue themselues Matth. It followeth and that is the disputation of Iames the Apostle against the Libertines whome hee speaketh vnto in these wordes Shew mee thy faith Iam. 2. 18. without thy workes and I will shew thee my faith by my workes whereby hee sheweth that no man can be certaine of his faith which is inuisible but he hath visible testimonies of it namely good workes Whereuppon it is that the same Apostle in the end of that Chapter concludeth thus As the body without the vers 26. spirite is dead euen so that faith that is without good workes is dead that is it is not true but a shadow and a vaine empty likenesse of it Theoph. Therefore we are neither iustified nor saued without good workes although neither of them nor by them Mat. I graunt it For although the kingdome of heauen be not the wages of seruants but the inheritance of children yet no man is reckned among the children of God that is not lead by the spirite of God as Paul speaketh Rom. 8. 14. and therefore doth the workes of the spirit such as be these Loue ioy peace long suffering gentlenesse Gal. 5. 22. 23. goodnesse faith meekenesse temperance and such like Therefore the same Apostle in another place giueth warning Be not deceiued neither 1. Cor. 6. 9. fornicators nor Idolaters nor adulterers nor wantons nor theeues nor couetous nor drunkards nor railers nor extortioners shall inherite the kingdome of God The same thing also doth Christ himself confirme when hee saieth not euerie one that saieth to Mat. 7. 21. me Lord Lord shall enter into the kingdome of heauen but he that doth my fathers wil that is in heauen Mat. 5. 20. And againe in another place I saie vnto you except your righteousnesse exceede the righteousnesse of the Scribes and Pharisies you shal not enter into the kingdome of heauen Theoph. Now do I consent vnto thee do acknowledge that good workes be not vnprofitable although we be neither iustified nor saued by them Yea rather that they bee of speciall vse and therefore that the faithfull with al their hearts should giue themselues to them for as much as they serue 1 To the glorie of God 2 The edification of our neighbour 3 And to the confirmatioÌ„ of our faith saluatioÌ„ Mat. Adde hereunto that God to whom they be acceptable through Christ rewardeth them with sundry blessings both spirituall temporall according to the promises almost without nuÌ„ber contained in his word Moreouer hither is to be referred the word of Reward which is vsed in many places in the Scripture as when Iohn exhorteth the faithfull to perseuerance he saith 2. Ioh. 8. Looke vnto your selues that we loose not the thinges we haue wrought but that you may haue a ful reward Christ also speaking of those which suffer persecution for righteousnesse sake saith Mat. 5. 12. Great is your reward in heauen In another place also Mat. 10. 42. Whosoeuer shall giue a cup of cold water only to one of these litle ones in the name of a disciple shall not lose his reward Theoph. The confutation of merite Seeing therefore God promiseth reward to our workes it seemeth they

be auoided but the other not onely to be lawfull but also profitable and necessarie Theoph. Declare those causes Mat. I will marke foure chiefe 1 Because loue that is so much commeÌ„ded vnto vs is both cherished and increased by praying one for another But this can haue no place in the dead of whom SalomoÌ„ speaking saith Eccles 9. 6. Both their loue their hatred and their enuie is now perished they haue no more portion for euer in all that is done vnder the sunne 2 Because praying one for another we thinke not to be heard for his sake that prayeth for vs which they do that pray to the Saints departed by that meanes giue vnto them the office of Christ Theoph. But it may be that the same thing may befall them which desire to be holpen with the prayers of the godly that be aliue for why may not some thinke that they shall be heard for their holinesse and good workes sake Matth. I grant it is not impossible that some should after that manner abuse the prayers of the godly but there is the least danger in this behalfe if it be compared with the other For it caÌ„not be in any but the ignorant and vnskilfull for whose ignorance we ought not to refuse that so holy an ordinance of God But the intercession of departed Saints doth bring with it most manifest danger for no man can pray vnto them but he thinketh for their sakes to obtaine the things which he desireth of Godâ— The proofe whereof are all the formes of prayers written by such as worshipped them Theoph. Go forward alledge the third cause Matth. cause 3 The faithfull that be aliue may one of them know the necessities of another and pray vnto God for them which the faithfull departed cannot I am not ignorant what they be wont to obiect that the Saints dead do in God as it were in a glasse see all the things that be done in this world but that is altogether to diuine or gesse without any testimonie of Scripture Theoph. Declare the fourth cause Mat. cause 4 That is the chiefe namely because the prayers of the godly being aliue one for another are grouÌ„ded vpon the testimonie of the word of God also vpon examples and promises by the which it is confirmed that they shall not be in vaine but the prayers of the dead are neither grounded vpon any testimonie of Gods word neither vpon promises nor examples Theoph. Sayest thou so Matth. I say it and therefore it is done of faith for the word of God is the onely foundation of it Wherefore Paule affirmeth Rom. 14. 23 that whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne And this reason is sufficient to ouerthrow the intercession of the departed Saints For who can beare this that man should lift vp himselfe aboue God Theoph. I do now confesse that all prayers which are made to dead Saints for this end that they should be our intercessors and mediatours to God are to be driuen out and hissed at and that Christ alone whose office this is is sufficient Matth. Why Christ onely sufficeth the faithfull to do the office of the mediatour with the Father Yea truely it is extreame madnesse for any to seeke to himselfe another mediatour For as much as he can do it most perfectly because he lacketh none of the things that suffice to pacifie God and to cause him to be mercifull vnto vs. Moreouer he loueth vs most dearely and therefore is touched with pitie vpon our infirmities He knoweth our prayers presently when they be conceiued He commandeth that wee should come vnto him as often as we will craue any thing at the hands of God Finally he telleth vs for a suretie that we shall obtaine all the things which wee shall aske in his name when he saith Iohn 16. 23 Verily verily I say vnto you whatsoeuer you shall aske of the Father he will giue it you Hitherto haue you asked nothing in my name aske and you shall receiue And in another place he saith Iohn 14. 13 whatsoeuer you shall aske in my name I will do it Theoph. What meane these words to aske any thing in the name of Christ Mat. It is to pray God to heare our prayers not indeede hauing respect to our vnworthinesse but to the merit that is continually offered to him of Christ Iesus for vs. Therfore to aske any thing of God in the name of Christ is answerable to his intercession with the father for vs and that more is an approbation or allowance of it and the way to be partaker of it Theoph. But ought the promise of Christ wherein he assureth vs that we shall receiue whatsoeuer we aske in his name to be extended to all things that shall come into our minds without putting any exception Matth. Not so For our desires for the most part be euill which if they were fulfilled would be to our destruction rather then to our profit Therefore Christ vnderstandeth onely those things which concerne the glory of God and our commoditie and saluation all which things indeede he hath in few wordes comprehended in that forme of prayer which he hath giueÌ„ to vs namely Our father which art in heauen c. The. Must we therfore vse no other forme of prayer Mat. If thou respect the matter or substance we may vse no other but it is in our libertie to enlarge it whereof the holy Scripture yeeldeth vs many exaÌ„ples in those formes of prayer which it setteth before vs namely the Psalmes which all verily be referred to this forme appointed by Christ The exposition of the Lords prayer Theoph. Let vs examine the forme of prayer that Christ hath deliuered how many parts be there of it Matth. The summe and parts of the Lordes prayer In the beginning it containeth a preface and afterward six petitions The first three whereof do immediatly respect the glory of God But the later three containe those things that appertaine to our selues both for the helpe of this life and for euerlasting saluation And they be therefore placed after those that concerne the glorie of God to the end we might vnderstand that the later three be not rightly conceiued and made vnlesse they be referred to the glory of God as it were vnto their proper end and that therefore they shall not be heard according to the saying of the Apostle You aske and receiue not because you aske amisse Iames. 4. 3. that you might consume it vpon your lustes The Preface of the Lords prayer Our Father which art in heauen Theoph. Let vs consider of the Preface of the Lordes prayer Matth. It is contained in these wordes Our Father which art in heauen Theoph. Who is that Father vnto whom Christ biddeth vs to flie Mat. It is the first person of the holy Trinitie namely the Father of our Lord Iesus Christ Theoph. Is therefore one only person of the Trinitie to be prayed vnto Matth. We must

is of things that concerne our saluation such as the Sacraments be Theoph. Why is it againe required that there bee a promise added Mat. The third condition Because vnlesse there be a promise the Sacraments shal be vnprofitable vnto vs. Now that promise which on the behalfe of God hath the effect is as it were the soule of the Sacraments whereupon all their force and efficacy dependeth and not vppon the holinesse or worthinesse of him of whom they bee ministred or vpon the vertue of some wordes pronounced Therefore without that promise the Sacraments shall be nothing else but vaine and fruitlesse ceremonies Theoph Thinkest thou that the Sacraments if they be ministred of some wicked man and hipocrite haue as much efficacie and force as if they were ministred by some good man Mat. I thinke it so as on our part we bring nothing to hinder it as good seed if it finde good ground will beare fruit notwithstaÌ„ding it be sowen of some naughty Vpon whoÌ„ dependeth the efficacy of the Sacraments The number of the Sacraments and wicked man For the vertue of it hangeth not vpon the lower as the Sacraments do not vpon the Minister but vppon the blessing and grace of God alone Theoph. Let vs come to the number of the Sacraments How many be there in the Christian church Mat. Two namely baptisme and the Lords supper Theoph. Seeing they declare vnto vs one thing euen as the word doth namely the loue of God toward vs in Christ what is the cause that they be two in nuÌ„ber Matth. Because by Baptisme God doeth witnesse that we be receiued of him into couenant through the communion of Christ and his giftes but by the supper hee assureth that wee are held and kept in vntill we bee receiued into the heauenly life And for this cause Baptisme is onely once ministred but the Supper oftentimes Theoph Declare this reason to me more at large Matth. Yet to me it seemeth easie For seeing Baptisme is the assured conueyance vnto vs of the couenant made with vs in Christ if it should be iterated or vsed the second time or oftner it were all one as if we said that God had abrogated or disanulled the first couenant to ordaine or appoint another which indeed is altogether contrary to the verie nature truth and constancy of God For the Apostle saith I am 1. 17. With him there is no changing or shadow of turning But concerning the Supper it is altogether required both for edifying and for comfort that it be oft repeated ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ â—â€¦sed of vs for asmuch as such in the weaâ—nesse of ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ faith wee do euery moment call into doubt whether God will continue in his loue toward vs or no especially when we looke vnto our daily sinnes by the which we are indeed worthie to be excluded by ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ by this Sacrament God would assure vs of hiâ— ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ the which he doth both offer exhibit or giue Iesus christ vnto vs with his treasures in whom alone as hath bin said that couenant and loue hath the foundation Theoph. Whether the Sacraments be necessary to saluation I wil yet demand of thee one question generally pertaining to the Sacraments before wee begin the particular exposition of them both Whether are they so necessarie to saluation that no man can be saued without partaking of them Matth. It is a most absurd opinion of them who think that God hath tyed his grace to the SacrameÌ„ts for they be onely for this end ordained that the grace and fauour yeelded vs before in Christ should be confirmed and ratified therefore it was most excellentlie said of an ancient father Bernard epist 77. That the waÌ„t of Baptisme did not condemne but the contempt of it Theoph. But Christ saith Mar. 16. 16 Whosoeuer beleeueth and is Baptised shall bee saued Out of which words it seemeth may be gathered that Christ determineth Baptisme to be necessarie to saluation no lesse then faith and that the same may bee concluded concerning the Supper out of that which Christ himselfe said in another place Iohn 6. 53. Verily verily I say vnto you except you eat the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his bloud you haue no life in you Matth. In the first place I will answer to those things which thou saidest of Baptisme whereof I say that in that place Christ doth not set downe the necessitie of Baptisme but rather what is that true faith by the which we are saued namely that it is not dead and hidden but liuely and declared by outward confession Insomuch as the beleeuers be ioyned to the church and be partakers of the preaching of the word and administration of the Sacraments wherunto that saying of Paul ought to be referred We beleeue with the heart Rom. 10. 10 to righteousnesse and confesse with the mouth to saluation And that this is the minde of Christ it is gathered by the member following for he saith But whosoeuer beleeueth not shall be condemned For if this had bin his meaning that no maÌ„ could haue bin saued without Baptisme he would haue said thus But whosoeuer shal not beleeue or shall not be baptized shal be condemned Seeing therefore he saith that vnbeliefe is the cause of condeÌ„nation by the contrary he meaneth that faith is sufficient to saluation which hee himselfe oftentimes coÌ„firmeth when he saith Iohn 3. 36. 5. 24. 6. 4. He that beleeueth in the son hath life euerlasting but hee that beleeueth not in the sonne shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth vpon him Concerning the other place of eating the flesh of Christ and drinking his bloud he doth not there entreat particularly of the Supper but generally of the vnion that we ought to haue with his body which indeed is altogether necessarie vnto saluatioÌ„ as hath bin shewed of vs in the first booke But that vnion is wrought no lesse by the word receiued by faith then by the Sacraments as it hath beene said already CHAP. III. Of Baptisme by the which God testifieth that we are receiued into couenant of him whiles hee doth communicate Christ Iesus vnto vs together with his benefites Theophilus NOw wee are to weigh those two Sacraments each by it selfe and in both those three conditions are to bee searched out that are required to make them truely Sacraments Let vs therefore begin with Baptisme what is the institution of it Mat. The institution of Baptisme First indeed it was instituted of God by the ministery of Iohn Baptist which thereupoÌ„ had his name Afterward it was dedicated and sanctisied of Christ in his own body when he would be baptized of him and when he commanded the Apostles to baptize Theoph. Let vs see those three things which thou saidest were required in the lawfull institution of a Sacrament namely 1 The signe and sacramentall rites 2 The signification of them 3 The likenesse and agreement betweene both Matth. The signe

The signe of this Sacrament is water which signifieth the bloud of Christ that is the force of his death because it hath that effectuall working in cleansing our soules from the filthinesse of sinne which materiall water hath in clensing our bodies Thereupon this Sacrament hath the name of Baptisme for it signifieth washing Now thou hast the signe The sacramentall rite But the sacramentall rite is that he which is to bee baptized be sprinckled with water or dipped in it which was vsed in formet times and by it two thinges were signified vnto vs. 1 First that our soules are sprinkled with the bloud of Christ that is bee indeed partakers of the merite of his death by the which we obtaine full forgiuenesse of all our sinnes 2 Secondly that we be regenerated into a new life Therefore Baptisme of Paule is called the lauer of regeneration by the which wordes those two giftes of God that we haue by Baptisme are excellently noted Theoph. How can the sprinkling of water be a signe or token of our regeneration Matth. The scripture is wont to set downe two parts of it namely the mortification or death of the old maÌ„ and the rising againe of the new man as it hath beene saide of vs in his place But this mortification which hath the force and working from the death and buriall of Christ is most fitly represented by the sprinkling of water for it is all one as if our old man had the death wound giuen it or being swallowed vp of death it selfe were buried with Christ Then followeth the resurrection of the new man which hangeth vppon the resurrection of Christ and is represented by the waters making cleane For by it is signified that together with him wee doe rise from the graue of death to become new creatures Theoph. There be yet behinde the promise commandement of this Sacrament Mat. The promise and commandement The words of Christ set down by Matthew doe containe both Mat. 28. 19 Go teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost Theoph. The commaundement I see but not the promise Matth. It is contained vnder the commandement For when any is baptised in the name of the Father Sonne and holy Ghost it is as if it were said vnto him By this visible signe I do assure thee that all thy sinnes be washed away and that thou art regenerated not by any power or by the force of this water wherewith thou art forinckled but by the mercy of the heauenly father who for this purpose doth be the power of the holy Ghost communicate vnto thee Christ Iesus his sonne with all his benefites and doth vnite thee vnto him so as thou art made partaker of him Seeing therfore Christ commandeth that these things should bee preached it is not to be doubted but that he promiseth the thing it selfe Baptisme therefore is giuen vs of God as it were writings sealed by the which hee assureth vs of the full forgiuenesse of all our sinnes Theoph. What sinnes thinkest thou bee done away by Baptisme onely originall sinne Matth. What sinnes be put away in Baptisme That indeede is first done away not that it doth not remaine in vs but because it is not imputed The same also we may affirme of other sinnes that bee effects of it for they bee put away by this Sacrament they be put away I say both those that be past those that are to come The words therefore deliuered of the Minister in Baptisme by the commandement of God namely I Baptise thee in the name of the Father Son holy Ghost should alwayes be in our eares euen vntill the last gaspe by them ought we to be assured of the full forgiuesse of our sinnes For the bloud of Christ in the which we are once Baptized is neuer drawne dry but is alwayes fresh as the Apostle speaketh that is full of officacie and strength to the continuall washing away of all our filthinesses and iniquities Theoph. Of our vnion with Christ Thou saydest in the expositioÌ„ of this promise that in this Sacrament the Father did communicate Christ his benefites vnto vs. But both the signe of it the SacrameÌ„tall rites do onely represent vnto vs the participation or fellowship which wee haue with his death but not the community we haue with his body Matth. We haue taught in the first booke that no man can be partaker of Christs benefites which is not made one with him the one therefore followeth vpon the other By these things therefore it is proued that by Baptisme wee bee truely made partakers both of Christs body and of his benefits which also Paul confirmeth in these wordes So many of you as be Baptized Gal. 3. 27. into Christ haue put on Christ Theoph. I come againe to the institutioÌ„ of Baptisme wherein Christ saith to his Apostles Go teach all nations Mat. 28. 19 Baptizing theÌ„ in the name of the Father Sonne and holy Ghost What is the cause that Christ coÌ„mandeth his Apostles to teach first before they Baptize Matth. The reason is most euident for seeing the Sacraments be as seales of the word it is sit that euery Why Christ would haue the word preached before Baptisine he ministred one should be first instructed in the doctrine before he be Baptized or confirmed in the same doctrine excepting onely the childreÌ„ of the saithfull of whom there is another reason which causeth that they be to be Baptized presently after they be borne Theoph. What is that reason Matth. Because God hath promised in the person of Abraham that he will be the God of the faithfull and of their seede which selfe same thing God confirmeth in the law when he saith Evod. 20. That he is such a one as sheweth mercy to a thousand generatioÌ„s of those that loue him and keepe his commandements Seeing therefore the children of beleeuers appertaine to the couenant of God it is not to be doubted but that the Sacrament of it namely Baptisme is to be ministred to them Which is againe confirmed by the example of the Israelites who by the commandemeÌ„t of God Circumcised their children the eight day Theoph. Is there the same reason of Baptisme and of Circumcision Matth. The agreement betweene Circumcision Baptisme Yea altogether and in very deed it is one the selfe same Sacrament as concerning the substance For Baptisme came in stead of Circumcision after the comming of Christ by the which the gifts of God were not diminished but increased vnto vs. For euen as the SacrameÌ„ts of the new Testament are far more easie more significaÌ„t then the Sacraments of the old Testament so the force working of them is farre greater Theoph. But what profit can there come by Baptisme to a child without vnderstanding and knowledge Mat. Much if thou consider both the glory of God the comfort of the parents and finally

the Scripture vnderstandeth all the benefites of Christ but for the most part maketh mention of that only because it hath as it were the first and chiefe place Theoph. Let vs go forward What vnderstandest thou by that spirituall food which thou saydest came by the eating of Christes body and drinking his bloud Matth. Our spirituall foode in the Supper First peace of conscience namely because we are more more assured of the forgiuenesse of our sins promised by baptisme SecoÌ„dly the daily growth increase of the new man begun in vs in our Baptisme so as we haue power giuen vs to serue God better and to resist the temptations that are wont to call vs away from his obedieÌ„ce Whereupon followeth an effect of this spirituall food by name that we are coÌ„firmed daily in the hope of eternall life And by these things appeareth that which I haue said of the difference of the Sacraments that Baptisme doth testifie the beginning of our partaking with Christ and his benefites and the Supper the continuance and increase thereof Theoph. Now we are to come to the commandement and promise of the Sacrament Mat. Both be added presently after the words of institution Take eate drinke you all of this do this in remembrance of me Loe the coÌ„mandement it set down theÌ„ the promise This is my body This is my bloud For the meaning of these wordes is as much as if Christ sayd This bread and this wine doe so represent vnto you my body and bloud that they assure you receiuing the visible signes to bee indeede partakers of those things that be signified by them eueÌ„ my body bloud Theoph. But the words of Christ seeme not to haue that meaning but rather that the bread and wine are transubstantiated or turned into his body and bloud Matth. The exposition of Christes wordes The wordes themselues cannot beare it For if Christ meant to haue signified that he would haue sayd thus Let this be made my body or let it be changed into my body Theoph. What then were the meaning of Christes wordes if they were to be expounded according to the letter as they say Matth. They should rather signifie that his body and bloud were changed into bread and wine For if any saw the piller of salt whereinto Lots wife was turned out of all doubt he would say This thing that is this Piller of salt is Lots wife that hee might declare that she was turned into that Piller and such as heard those wordes would take them in that sence Theoph. I perceiue indeede that those words if they were to be expounded literally doe properly signifie as thou sayest Howbeit that sence agreeth not to the wordes of Christ Mat. Thou thinkest rightly and that former agreeth nothing more namely whereby transubstantiation is builded which indeed the very words do not beare yea rather out of it foure absurdities do follow Theoph. Rehearse them Mat. A consutation of the absurdities following vpon Popish transubstantiation 1 First if the bread wine be turned into the body and bloud of Christ there shal be no signes in the holy Supper and therefore it shall not be a Sacrament which indeed cannot be without a visible signe 2 Secondly Christes bloud shal be separated from his body which is most absurd can neuer be Moreouer the body of Christ should be infinite therefore he should not be a very man neither should he haue truely ascended into heauen by which opinion the chiefe points of our faith should be ouerthrowen Theo. Some do obiect that Christs body is now glorified at one the same time may be in diuers places Mat. This objection is vaine for when Christ instituted the Supper his body was not glorified Adde hereunto that the glorification hath not taken from it the nature of a true body but hath taken away the infirmitie and weaknesse of it which was very well obserued of one of the fathers For this cause Peter saith Actes 3. 21 The heauen must hold him vntill the time of the restoring of all things And the Angels in another place Actes 1. 11. So shall he come as you haue seene him go into heauen Theoph. Shew the fourth absurditie Mat. It is this that the wicked and hypoerites comming to the Supper should bee indeede partakers of the bodie and bloud of Christ which verilie were nothing else but to ioyne God SathaÌ„ together Moreouer contrarie vnto that which the Scripture expresly teacheth the vnbeeleuers should be saued For Christ affirmeth Iohn 6. Whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud hath euerlasting life Theo. Against those who say the reprobatâ—â€¦ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ the Supper be partakers of Christes body bloud But Christ vnderstaÌ„deth those which eate his flesh drinke his bloud worthily For the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 11. 29. He that eateth this bread drinketh this cup vnworthely eateth and drinketh to himselfe damnation Mat. The Apostle saith not who so eateth the body of Christ drinketh the bloud of Christ vnworthely but hee that eateth the bread and drinketh the cup. For Christ should offer his body to be prophaned if he made the vnworthy partakers of it Moreouer his gifts be inseparably ioyned with his person and therefore it is impossible that any should communicate with his body but the same also must bee partakers of all his benefites eueÌ„ of euerlasting life For this cause Iohn saith 1. Ioh. 5. 12 He that hath the sonne hath life He that hath not the sonne of God hath not life Those foure absurdities recâ—â€¦ned vp by vs doe most manifestly ouerthrow the opinion of transubstaÌ„tiation against the which experience it selfe it for as much as the bread wine of the Supper if they be kept long do corrupt WhereupoÌ„ it is plaine that their substance it not changed Theoph. I do indeede perceiue that the wordes of Christ do not establish traÌ„substantiatioÌ„ or the turning of the signes into the things signified both because the wordes themselues cannot beare it and especially in that most grosse absurdities do follow thereupon But by what arguments canst thou proue that the expositioÌ„ brought by thee doth expresse the sence of Christs wordes and that that was his meaning Mat. Of the exposition of Christes words in the Supper Seeing there must be an exposition of them it is not to be doubted but that is true and proper which may be confirmed by the testimonie of the holy Scripture whereof no absurditie followeth But that which I haue brought is such therefore it is true and proper Theoph. If thou prouest these two points thou shalt verily ouercome Mat. First that exposition is confirmed by the testimony of the holy Scripture For Paule thus expouÌ„deth the words of Christ instituting the Supper The cup of 1. Cor. 10. 16 blessing which we blesse is it not the Communion of the bloud of Christ the bread which we breake is it not the

by faith Seeing therefore this spirituall eating is aboundantly sufficient to our saluation and is grounded vpoÌ„ the word of God it ouerthoweth that carnall eating which men by the example of the Capetnaits haue deuised to themselues froÌ„ the which also if it could be there is no other profite to be looked for but that which we do receiue by spirituall eating Therefore notwithstanding Christ in that place speaketh not of the sacramentall eating but of that which is by the word receiued by faith neuertheles it may ought to be referred vnto that because it is one and the same eating and therefore whatsoeuer is said of the one must necessarily agree to the other And indeed seeing the question is of the foode of our soules which is spirituall the meat is spirituall it followeth of necessity that the eating is spirituall euen as we can not nourish our bodies except earthly foode be visibly and sensibly eaten for the preseruation of this life Theoph. What doest thou properly vnderstand by spirituall eating Matth. How wee that be in the earth be partakers of Christ his body which is in heauen That Christ although concerning his humane nature he go not out of the heauens yet by the power of the holy Ghost doth communicate vnto vs his body and bloud and that by faith which is in stead of a spirituall hand and mouth by which wee receiue him and apply him vnto vs as hath bin more at large declared of vs in the chapter of Faith And this is the spiritual eating of christ by faith coÌ„trary to the carnal which som haue dreamed was with the bodily mouth insomuch as the very substance of the body and bloud of Christ was eaten with it Which is a most absurd deuise and yet it is no maruell that some are fallen vnto it For as the spirituall man when he heareth that the body of Christ is to be eaten and his bloud to be drunken vnderstandeth it spiritually for his spirituall hunger and thirst and therefore prepareth his heart by faith so contrariwise the carnall man thinketh nothing but carnally in all this matter and therefore prepareth the mouth of his body to deuour Christ But the saying of Austen is notable Why doest thou make ready thy teeth and belly beleeue and thou hast eaten Theoph But how can it be that Christ which is in heauen should truly communicate his body vnto vs that be conuersant vpon the earth Matth. That ought not to seeme maruelous vnto vs for if the sunne being a creature without life do by his beames communicate the effect and power of it vnto vs that liue vppon the earth by a much more strong reason may Christ which is the sunne of righteousnes by the immeasurable power of the holy Ghost truely make vs partakers of his body in the Supper to whom it is not harder to ioyne thinges together farre distant the one from the other then those that be most nigh Which indeed appeareth euen by that that it ioyneth together all the faithfull notwithstaÌ„ding they be scattered here and there to become one body whereof Christ is the head That also is shadowed in the Supper for the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 10. 17 We which are many are one body for all of vs are partakers of one bread Theoph. An obiectioÌ„ against spirituall eating But some obiect that if in the supper of the Lord we do only spiritually and by faith communicate with the body of Christ there is no great profite of it seeing that is daily fulfilled in vs by the ministery of the word receiued by faith Matth. It followeth not For there be diuerse helps ordained of God to the same end namely to further our saluation in Christ by the holy Ghost Euen as a good Phisition helpeth the health of the patient committed to his trust by sundry meanes Wherefore notwithstanding Christ receiued in the word by faith be alreadie spiritually eaten of vs yet neuerthelesse it is more and more fulfilled in the Supper by the which the Lord so worketh according to his promise that our hearts be more aboundantly inflamed with his loue confirmed in the hope of euerlasting life Theoph. Seeing then it is certaine that we are not otherwise partakers of Christ in the supper but spiritually and by faith it followeth that all they which come to it without faith haue no fruit or benefite by it Mat. That indeede is most true for by their vnbeliefe they refuse Christ whom God oftereth to them in the Supper Wherefore they be onely partakers of the signes and that to their condemnation seeing that so much as in them is they prophane and vnhallow that most holy spirituall banket prouided of God for his children whiles they come vnto it not furnished with that most precious garment namely faith wherby we are iustified before God made the sons of God and bee accompted worthie to sit downe at his table For this cause the Apostle commandeth that euerie 1. Cor. 11. 28 one should prooue himselfe and so eate of that bread and drinke of that cup. Theoph. What is the way whereby each ought to prooue himselfe Matth. Let him try himselfe and see whether hee haue faith which shall bee easie to perceiue by repentance as it hath beene said of vs in the proper place Whosoeuer therefore is not any way touched with repentance is altogether vnworthie to bee admitted to the Supper of the Lord. Theop. But what thinkest thou of him that hath some feeling of repentance notwithstanding it be little Matth. If it be so little that it shew not it selfe by turning vnto God and amendment of life it ought to be suspected for true repeÌ„taÌ„ce notwithstaÌ„ding it be weak doth alwaies shew it selfe by the outward workes In the meane time it is not to bee doubted but that as our faith is alwaies verie weake so the same is true concerning our repentance And this indeed is so in the most regenerate although diuersly for in some it is more in others it is lesse Notwithstanding it is so farre off that that weaknesse should driue vs from the holy Supper that it ought rather to spurre vs forward to come vnto it that by it wee might be strengthened in faith and repentance Euen as the sick man the weaker he knoweth himselfe to be should so much the more earnestly desire meate both to receiue nourishment and to refresh his strength Therefore they onely bee vnworthie to come to the Lords Supper that be ignorant and delight in their sinnes and continue in them for that spirituall foode doeth not as yet belong to them Theoph. But if such men come to the Supper what thinkest thou is to be done Matth. Ecclesiasticall discipline If their vnworthinesse be secret and hidden they ought to be left to the iudgement of God which will one day take vengeance vppon them but if it bee knowen by the order of Ecclesiasticall or Church discipline they ought to be

is beyond the reach of man Mat. It is indeed as Paule himselfe proueth in these words Without controuersie great is the mystery of 1. Tim. 3. 16 godlinesse God manifest in the flesh Theoph. Hitherto wee haue heard sufficiently of the person of Christ nowe let vs speake of the remedie brought by him for our saluation Mat. Of the remedy by Christ Hee hath fully satisfied the iudgement of God for our sinnes and hath so redeemed vs from euerlasting death and hath together made vs capable of the heauenlie life so as we be partakers of his gifts Theop. There come three things to my mind wherof I will aske thee 1 How Christ hath satisfied the iudgement of God for our sinnes 2 How he maketh vs partakers of the heauenly life 3 And why it is necessarie that his gifts should be made ours Mat. To the end it may the more easily bee vnderstood we must remeÌ„ber that whereof we spake before namely that God hath pronounced the curse against all such as transgresse his Law and that wee in two respects haue broken it that is to say transgression 1 by leauing vndone the good which he requireth transgression 2 and by doing the euill which he forbiddeth Now Christ hath prouided a remedie for both for while he was in this earth hee did fully and perfectly fulfill the Law for vs. Moreouer he suffred the death of the crosse with extreme reproch that hee might to the vtmost endure the punishment due to our sins By which meanes hauing abundantly satisfied the perfect iustice of God for vs he maketh a way to his mercy whereby we may obtain the forgiuenes of sins And in this sense it is said 1. Pet. 1. 19 That we were redeemed by the precious bloud of Christ 1. Pet. 2 24 That Christ vpon the tree did beare our sins in his bodie 1. Ioh. 17. That the bloud of Christ doth cleanse vs from all sinne Theoph. I cannot sufficiently wonder at the exceeding great loue of God toward vs that hee gaue his most dearly beloued Son to the death to redeeme vs. Mat. Adde this which were his enemies which also is diligently obserued by the Apostle in these wordes Doubtlesse one wil scarse die for a righteous man for Rom. 5. 7. for one that is profitable to him peraduenture some man will die But God commendeth his loue towards vs that when we were yet sinners Christ died for vs. From whence he draweth this most comfortable conclusion If when wee were enemies we were reconciled Rom. 5. 10. to God by the death of his Sonne much more being reconciled shall we be saued by his life Theoph. But could the iudgement of God bee no otherwise satisfied for our sinnes except his beloued Sonne had taken vpon him our nature therein to suffer death the death I say of the Crosse Mat No for man which hath offended the infinite Maiesty of God doth deserue infinit punishment that is to say eternall death which could not be suffred and ouercome of anie but of the eternall and infinit Sonne of God Moreouer the iustice of God required this that the nature which had sinned should suffer the punishment of sin But because God could not suffer and man could not ouercome death it was necessarie that the Redeemer should be verie God very man to do both Wherein also it is to be marked how neere an atonemeÌ„t God hath entred into with vs by Christ in whom the parties at variance be inseparably ioyned together whereby it is come to passe that God hath turned the fall of man to his great good for thereupon he hath taken occasion to vnite vs more nearly with him selfe Rom. 5. 20. Wherefore where sinne was increased there grace hath abounded much more by Christ Theoph. Hitherto we haue heard sufficiently of the first point namely how Christ hath satisfied the iudgment of God for our sinnes now let vs come to the other which is by what right wee may claime to our selues euerlasting life Mat. By a double right through Christ First because for vs he hath fulfilled the whole Law Leuit. 18. 5. and God hath promised life to such as fulfill it Secondly by the right of inheritaÌ„ce For after that Christ is made ours we are not onely partakers of his spirituall riches as his perfect righteousnesse and obedience whereby wee are accompted iust before God but also of his dignity namely that with him we are reckened and taken for the children of God Rom. 8. 17. Therefore Paule saith If we be sonnes wee are also heires heires indeed of God but heires annexed with Christ And againe in another place he calleth eternall life the inheritance of the Saints and so hee compriseth both the rights by the which wee lay claime to Colos 1. 12. it for our selues Theoph. Therefore in Christ alone we find all things necessarie to saluation Mat. Yea verily For in him there is righteousnesse and the fulnesse of life and without him man full of sinne findeth nothing but euerlasting malediction and Act. 4. 12. curse Therefore Peter saith that neither saluation is in any other and that there is no other name vnder heauen giuen among men whereby we may be saued For this cause also the name of Iesus Christ was giuen him from heauen by the which his office is plainly set forth that is to say all that which he hath performed for our saluation and doth still performe Theoph. Go to therefore tell me what the name of Iesus Christ signifieth as also of whom it was giuen him Mat. The name Iesus signifieth Sauiour and an Angell gaue it to the Son of God because as he himselfe expounded it he should saue his people froÌ„ theyr sinnes Concerning the name of Christ it is to bee vnderstood Mat. 1. 21. that in times past in the old TestameÌ„t Christ was figured or shadowed in the Kings Prophetes and Priests who when they were coÌ„secrated were annointed with oyle which signified the giftes of the holy Ghost Now the Redeemer promised in Hebrew was called Messias but in Greeke it is translated by the Dan. 9. 25. word Christ which in Latine signifieth annointed By which name we are taught that he is the chiefe 1. King Luc. 1. 33. 2. Prophet Deu. 18. 18 3. Priest Psal 110. 4 Howbeit he was annointed not with coÌ„mon visible oyle but with the grace of the holy Ghost that most fully that from him as from the head it might be powred into each member namely into all the faithfull in so much as they also together with him are made Kings Prophets and Priests Now the name of Christ hath bin retained in all tongues because the Apostles them selues wrote in Greeke This therefore is the cause why that name was giuen vnto him as also why all the faithful are called christians euen because they be partakers of his annointing therefore of his kingdome prophesie and priesthood

Theoph. Of the office of Christ First therefore we must see how Christ performed the office of King Prophet and Priest And afterward how hee communicateth the same with the faithfull Mat. He did the office of a king when by his diuine power he deliuered vs from the tyranny of our enemies the deuill sinne and death whom hee ouercame that he might make vs his seruants and subiects to his kingdome which indeed he doth continually exercise in vs when he ruleth vs by the scepter of his word and by the power of his spirite He did the office of a Prophet in that hee declared all the will of God vnto vs by his word he gaue the holy Ghost by the helpe whereof it might be vnderstood of vs and we yeeld our consents vnto it This office also hee exerciseth euerie day when by the ministerie of the word and working of the Spirite he causeth vs daily to profite and to go forward in that knowledge Finallie he did the office of a Priest when vpon the Crosse he offred his body and bloud for vs to God the Father that he might bee a satisfaction for our sinnes The execution of which office is also at this day when he maketh intercession for vs. Now this priesthood of Christ is the truth and fulfilling of all the sacrifices of the old Testament Theoph. Let vs now speake of our kingdome priesthood and prophetship Mat. Apot. 1. 6. We are spiritually kings in Christ that we may ouercome the deuill and sinne 1. Pet. 2. 9. We are Priests through him to offer vp an acceptable sacrifice of praise to God Act. 2. 17. Wee are prophets that being taught the truth wee may teach others and open to them the misteries of the kingdome of Heauen Theoph. It hath bin sufficiently declared how Christ hath deliuered vs from condemnation as also by what means he hath made vs fit to attain to eternal life Now the third point remaineth namely why it is necessary that his gifts should be made ours Mat. Because otherwise they shall no way helpe vs to the satisfying of the perfect iustice of God euen as other mens riches profit not to deliuer vs out of debt except they become ours Theoph. How therefore may his gifts become ours Mat. If we be made one with him For by the benefite of that vnion we are made partakers of all his spirituall Of the vnion with Christ graces and riches which are no lesse imputed vnto vs before God theÌ„ as if they were ours by nature For this cause the Apostle saith Coloss 1. 22. that we are by Christ reconciled in that bodie of his flesh through death By which wordes of his he meaneth that the merite of Christs death pertaineth not to anie but vnto such as be grafted into his bodie and are made his members Theoph. Can therfore no man be partaker of Christs gifts except he be made one with him Mat. He cannot Euen as a woman cannot be partaker of the riches and honor of some great man except she be ioyned with him in mariage that they become one bodie and one flesh the meÌ„bers also cannot draw life from the head if they be not ioyned with it There is therefore no true partaking of Christ except there be an vnion with him For this cause therefore Christ said to the Capernaits Vnlesse ye eate of the flesh of Ioh. 6. the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud ye shall haue no life in you In which words he plainly sheweth that we are not partakers of his gifts vnto saluation except we be as nearely coupled with his humanitie as meate and drinke are ioyned with our bodie which of all others is a most neare vnion For meat drinke when they are digested in our stomach are so turned into our substance that they cannot be distinguished much lesse separated from it Theoph. This doctrine also is aboue the capacitie of man Mat. Ephes 5. 32. It is indeed Wherefore Paule speaking of it saith that it is a great misterie Now if we can neuer so litle see the bodie of the Sunne but our eyes do dazell how can our mindes pierce to that inaccessible light of the diuine maiestie to conceiue his heauenly mysteries such as be the points which we haue haÌ„dled first 1. Concerning the Trinitie 2. Of the vnion of two natures in Christ 3. And of coupling the faithfull with the humane nature of Christ It is therfore our duty rather holily to beleeue these three fundamentall points or principles of Christian religion then curiously to examine them by the rule of our reason CHAP. IIII. Of Faith by the which we are made one with Christ and so be partakers of all his gifts Theophilus HItherto I haue hard First that God which is perfectly iust doth no way absolue the guiltie Secondly that men which are most miserable sinners are before the iustice of God guiltie of eternall death Thirdly that Iesus Christ by his death hath satisfied the exact righteousnesse of God which is imputed vnto vs to the end that being set free from condemnation we may be partakers of eternall life so as we be ioyned with him It remaineth therefore that I vnderstand how we are made one with Christ Mat. By faith euen as he him selfe testifieth in the prayer which he made to God for all the faithfull in these words Ioh. 17. 20. Father I pray thee for such as shal beleeue in me that they may be all one as thou O Father art in me and I in thee that they also may be one in vs. Whereunto also that saying of Paul is to be referred Ephes 3. 17. that Christ dwelleth in our hearts by faith And herevpon it is that these sentences be often repeated in the Scriptures 1 That euery one which beleeueth in him is absolued anâ— discharged Act. 13. 39. 2 Is made the child of God Iohn 1. 12. 3 Doth not perish but hath euerlasting life Iohn 3. 16. In which places those things be attributed to faith which we receiue of Christ alone to the ende we may vnderstand that both he and his gifts are committed to vs by faith Theoph. Thou hast touched a little concerning the righteousnesse of faith which I desire to haue declared Of Iustification by thee somewhat more at large for I perceiue that Paule oftentimes speaketh of it Mat. To be iustified before God is to be accompted iust that is to say without blot vnreproueable Now Paule doth often handle this point because it is one of the speciall groundes of our faith For no man can please God but he that is iustified Theoph. How so Mat. Because as God is perfectly iust and holy so he loueth holinesse and iustice on the other side hee hateth vnrighteousnesse therefore we can haue no fellowshippe with him to be partakers of his heauenly glorie except we be perfectly righteous Therefore he saith that no vncleane thing shall

Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Text snippets containing the quad