our mediatour Iesus Christ as that hereby our heartes breake and rente a sunder for sorrowe we make euident demonstration that we are more blockish and sencelesse than these sencelesse creatures so we shal proue that we are none of those to whome Christ here speaketh But if here by as Ioel hath taught vs Cap. 2. ver 13. we take occasion to rent our hearts and not our garments and so to hunger and thirst aright for comforte from Christ then whatsoeuer we haue beene before of Christ it hath beene said vnto vs both for good direction herein and euerlasting comforte A brused reed shall he not breake and smoking flaxe shall he not quench Esaie 42.3 when the Lorde therefore by reading or preaching of his worde or by any other meanes that it shal please him to vse to that purpose bringeth all these or any of these to our remembrance then we are to make our reckoning that of his good grace fauor therby he giues vs iust occasion so to see our sins that in the sight feeling of the burthen therof we should thus hunger thirst after him that through him we might be deliuered from them And the more and better we dwell vpon the mediation of these fower thinges the Lord withall opening our eyes and heartes rightlie to vnderstand them and the vse thereof to this ende the more forcible we shall finde them to worke this effect But the trueth is through our originall sin we haue brought with vs into the world such a generall forwardnesse to all euill and backwardnesse to all good ioyned with such grosse blindnesse in thinges spirituall and by actuall sinnes daily flowing from this bitter fountaine in vs we haue al of vs so hardned our owne heartes that though the Lord by sounding these thinges outwardlie in our eares may make vs without all excuse if hereby we take no occasion thus to be humbled before him yet most certaine is it that the hearing of these things neuer so often outwardlie beaten vpon will neuer prooue forcible and effectual inwardly to breede in vs this true spiritual hunger and thirst vntill the Lorde himselfe of his speciall fauoure and grace both open the eyes of our mindes and mollifie and soften our hard heartes and so indeede himselfe by his owne hand and power heereby worke this in vs. This taught Moses the Iewes saying yet the Lord hath not giuen you an heart to perceiue and eies to see and eares to heare vnto this day Deut. 29.4 And yet this is in deede the Lordes speciall worke he sheweth the same people againe by his prophet Ezechiell saying I will put a newe spirit within their bowels I wil take away the stonie heart out of their bodies and will giue them an heart of flesh Cap. 11.19 when therefore we finde that neither the meditation of the lawe nor yet of the iudgementes threatned nor executed against the breakers thereof nor the hearing nor thinking of Christes passion with the cause thereof can breede or prouoke this to be in our harts we crie vnto God with Ephraim Ier. 31.18 Conuert thou me I shal be conuerted for thou art the Lord my God and with Dauid Psal 119.18 open mine eies that I may see the wunders of thy lawe And so in his good time if we be his doubtlesse we shall finde all these so worke together to the breaking of our hard hearts with remorse for our sinnes that euen in respect thereof we may say with him also Haue mercy vpon me O Lord for I am weake O Lord heale me for my bones are vexed my soule is sore troubled I fainted in my mourning I cause my bedde euerie night to swimme and water my couch with my tears Psalm 6.2 c. yea with a good conscience without all dissembling we shall be able to say with him as the hearte brayeth for the riuers of water so panteth my soule after thee O God euen for the liuing God Psal 42.1.16.2 For when we haue the due sence and feeling in deed of our sinnes that we ought to haue before euer we will seek after Christ as we should we will and must as I haue shewed before be vndoubtedly wearie thereof and desirous to be easd of the most heauie burden of them And let vs not thinke that it is inough thus to be once in al our life namelywhen first we come to Christ and turne vnto him aright For though then it be most necessarie in respect both of our originall and actuall sinnes wherein perhaps we haue liued a long while before thus to be affected when we seeke first pardon and remision thereof in him yet for as much as after we be come vnto him and haue put him on though thenceforth sin shall reigne no more in our mortall bodies it will yet doe what we can be found so cleauing vnto vs dwelling in vs that if we should say we haue no sinne we should deceaue our selues 1. Ihon 1.8 For that when by experience we are enforced the best of vs with Iames. 3.2 to confeste that in many thinges we sinne all we are still from time to time as long as we liue so to looke into the glasse of the lawe and to meditate vpon the rest as that thereby we may take occasion continually to nourish earnest hunger and thirst after Christ that for our newe and daily sinnes we may more and more seeke vnto him and applie him dayly afresh vnto vs. For both Dauid and Paule long before they wrote the one the 51. Psalme the other the 7. to the Romaines were in the state of grace and the fauour of God the former by faith in the messias to come the other by faith in him alreadie come and yet as it is euident in both those places both these conferring the pure and spirituall lawe of God with their owne liues take occasion thereby not onely to see and confesse their owne sinnes but also in a spirituall manner to hunger and thirst after forgiuenesse thereof and therefore to fly to God in the person and mediation of Christ Iesus for that they were perswaded that if he tooke in hād the washing of them in his precious bloodshed they shoud be whiter then snow be cleandeliuered frō the sinful body of the flesh Let vs therefore first and last and when souer we would come vnto Christ which we shall haue neede to doe continually as long as we liue here this way that I haue shewed you both seeke to beginne and still to continue this spirituall hunger and thirst in vs after him Sathan our malitious olde and subtile enemie knoweth full well all this to be most true Sathans deuises take vs from thirsting First shewed and then confuted and therfore whereas he was too weak to stay God from prouiding vs thus in his sonne meate and drinke to satisfie our hungrie and thirstie soules withall and to seed on to saluation we may be sure yet that he will doe
the price thereof not according to the worthinesse thereof but according to mens purses will euer seeke to get heauen And further seeing that the lawe is the lawe of God who for that he made vs able at the first to keepe it may by good right still call for the keeping of it at our handes though before he call for it he knoweth now that such is our corruption of the one side and the perfection of it of the other side that we can not keepe it thereby we are to learne to fall downe before him and with the teares of our soules to confesse our debt that therin he demaundeth indeede to be due debt vnto him in regard of the state wherein he created vs but that by our owne fault we are growne now vtterly vnable to pay it and therefore that there is nowe no other way for vs to escape the danger of his infinite iustice but by flying to the throne of his mercy in his sonne Christ Iesus O if we would breake vp the fallowe landes of our heartes as we are counselled to doe Iere. 4.4 by causing this sharpe plowe of the law to make deepe forrowes in it For then so much good feede of the gospell as is woulde not daily be spilt and lost vpon vs for that our heartes for lacke heereof are either like the high way or like to stony or thorny ground But finding that the hardnesse of our hearts is such that this plough alone wil not pearce deep inough to breake them vp let vs adde thereunto the weight of Gods threatned iudgementes against the transgressours of the lawe Entering into which meditation we shall finde first generally Gods curse denounced against all those that doe not obserue and keepe all the words of the law Deut. 27.26 And to goe no further then to that Chapter and the next in particular we shall finde so manie most fearefull iudgementes threatened to all transgressours of the lawe as that thereby wee may easelie perceiue that to all transgressours thereof the Lorde would haue vs to vnderstande that infinite and most intollerable are the plagues both in this life and that which is to come that be threatned and due And in verie reason we must needes see it must bee so for sinne or transgression of the lawe beeing as it is an offence against the almightie and so a meanes directlie to deserue the seueritie of his iustice to be shewed against the same who is so simple but he must needes see that all miseries in this life and eternall death and damnation in the life to come are but iusty threatned against all that breake the law Nowe these thinges thus beeing may we thinke that those beeing both due and threatned that the infinite iustice of GOD is such that it will not inflict or execute the same when or vpon whome he list To what end tende all the fearefull examples of Gods vengeance executed vppon men that wee reade of in the scriptures and in other bookes and daily seeby experience but to teach vs that God is not a bare threatner but that he both can and wil be as seuere as his threatnings come vnto if there be not a iust and sufficient stop to stay the fiercenesse of his iust wrath from breaking out against all the generation of mankind Yf al this will not serue to make vs haue broken and contrite heartes for our sinnes and so to hunger and thirst after Christ let vs further yet behold the vglinesse of our sinnes and the extreeme danger that we were in by the meanes of them in this that God hath not spared his onely begotten sonne to giue him to vs to be borne and to liue and die for vs as he did For heerein as the loue and bountifulnesse of our God towardes man hath most gloriously appeared as Paule noteth Titus 3.4 so therein and thereof we may say with the Psalmist that mercy and iustice haue most notably mette and kist each other Psal 85.10 for doubtlesse such was the loue of the father towardes the sonne that if in his wisedome any other phisition or any other meanes could or woulde haue serued to haue recouered and cured vs of our sinnes he woulde neuer haue so farre debased his sonne as beeing God to appoint him to become man and in his manhoode to haue endured liuing and dying for vs that which he did O then in that the office of a sauiour was committed vnto him in that he taking vppon him to goe through therewith as he did beeing as he was in person not man onely but God also yet found it so heauie and difficult a thing we haue most iust cause to see and beholde that it is a thing of the greatest difficulty that may be to satisfie the iust wrath of God for sinne In him we knowe there was no sinne and in his mouth there was no guile Esay 53.9 1. Pet. 2.22 for such an high priest it became vs to haue that was seperate from sumers and needed not as the priestes of the olde Testament first to offer for his owne sinnes and then for the peoples Hebr. 7.26.27 And yet in that he bare our infirmities he was surely driuen to carrie our sorrowes insomuch that he was debased as he was and wounded and broken as he was for our transgressions and iniquities Esay 53.3.4.5 In that therefore his pure and holy manhoode though it had personally vnited vnto it a Godhead to enable it to goe thorow with that which it had to doe and suffer going vnder the burthen but of our sinnes was driuen into those bloodie sweates and agonies that it was in the garden Luke 22 44. and both there and after vpon the crosse before he coulde say all is finished Iohn 19.30 to say Father if it be possible let this cup passe from me my soule is heauie vnto death Math. 26.39 and 38. and my God my God why hast thou forsaken mee Mathewe 27.40 it was made manifest vnto the whole worlde that infinite is the seueritie of Gods iustice against fin that none but such an one was euer able to haue borne the burden thereof and to haue gotte from vnder it againe to triumphe ouer it as he hath proued that he did by his most glorious and comfortable resurrection and ascention into heauen after his death and passion when thus the iustice of GOD and his wrath against sinne was manifested in his suffering thorowe astonishmente thereat from the sixte howre vnto the ninthe there was darknesse ouer the whole earth the vaile of the temple rente from the toppe to the bottome the earth did quake and the stones were clouen and the graues did open themselues Math 27 45.51 52. if these then and all the former laide togither will not or cannot so astonishe or amaze vs at the sight of our sinnes and of all Gods wrath due vnto vs and most surely ready we cannot tell how soone to destroy vs if it be not stayed by this
natures together to the constitution of a man as they doe though infinitely it come short of the reaching to the excellencie of this mysterie that we now speake of may truely be said in diuerse respectes to be a heauenly creature and an earthly mortall and immortall heauenly and immortall in respect of his soule and earthlie mortall in regard of his bodie and diuerse thinges that are proper to the bodie are yet saide of the soule and contrarie they which are speciall to the soule are affirmed of the bodie as for example we say somtimes the soule of man awaketh or sleepeth which are properly saide of the bodie and we say the bodie heareth seeth or vnderstandeth when as in deede the body can doe none of these but by the soule and yet as wee thinke they destroy the nature of man that eyther for the vnion or coupling of these two together to make a man or for any of these phrases woulde eyther turne the one of these into the other confounde one of these with the other or inuest the one nature reallie with the properties that be speciall and peculiar vnto the other so holde we it most firmely in this case that it is plainely hereticall to doe the like These things therfore thus weied and considered we haue iust cause to say and thinke with the Apostle That great is the mysterie of Godlines namely euen this that God is manifested in the flesh and yet iustifyed in the spirit seene of Angels preached vnto gentiles beleeued on in the worlde and receiued vp into glorie 1. Tim. 3.16 And by these thinges we may so clearely see our Christ in person to be verie God and verie man and yet for all that but one person as that both with the Apostle Paul we may call him The mightie and blessed God for euer 2. Tim. 2.13 and the man Christ Iesus 1.2.5 and yet still speake of him as but of the one person as hee doth in both these places And to conclude this pointe heereby also euen sufficientlie we may see and heare all the heretiques and their heresies confuted that euer yet haue sette themselues against anie pointe or parte of the trueth of this doctrine of his person For heereby againste Ebion Cerinthus and Photinus denying his Godheade that hath beene a duouched and against Marcion confessing that and denying the truth of his manhoode that hath beene likewise plainely prooued and consequently Arrius that held rightly of neyther affirming that in respect of the one he was but a created spirit and in regard of the other a bodie onely without any other soule then his created Godhead and Apollinaris that denied that he had the minde or reasonable soule of a man howsoeuer he granted him the sensitiue and growing soule are confounded also especially remembring further that Christ himselfe as plainely to teach them by his wordes that he had a verie soule of a man as by experience they sawe and found he had the very body of a man said not onely that his soule was heauy vnto death Math. 26.38 but dying as Luke reporteth 23.46 cryed with a lowde voyce Father into thy handes I commend my spirit And Nestorius that helde the two natures in him only to be vnited by consociation and assistance and that therefore he had stil a Godhead and a manhood not onely distinct in their natures but also so that in him the sonne of God was one and the sonne of the virgin an other as he was condemned in the counsel of Ephesus for one that was led by the spirit of Antichrist for his so loosing or dissoluing of Iesus so hath the Apostle directly confuted him in this place to the Phillipians and Iohn also as I haue shewed in setting downe plainely that he that was in the forme of God whome Iohn called the worde so tooke vnto himselfe the forme of a seruant that he was made very man or flesh Eutiches also who to ouerthrowe Nestorius taught that the two naturs are so vnited after the incarnation that howsoeuer they were two before after they are but one cannot stand with the apparant distinction that Paule hath made betwixt the assumer and assumed nature both before in and after the assuming of the one by the other vnto himselfe And whereas if this opinion of his were true it should thereupon follow that then eyther the Godhead shoulde be turned into the manhoode or the manhoode into the Godhead for that of the commixtion of both a third thing should growe Euerie one of these absurd consequentes Paule hath refelled also by teaching vs both to remayne without eyther turning of the one into the other or confounding one of them by anie commixtion or otherwise one with an other as we haue hearde And consequentlie heereby both the Lutherans and Papistes who for the maintenance of their grosse reall presence and mouth eating of Christ both God and man doe most eagerlie striue and contende to entitle the manhoode of Christ with the peculiar properties of the Godheade as to be muisible incircumscriptible c. are most plainly prooued to teach heerein hereticall and damned doctrine for that thus confounding the properties with Eutiches in deede and trueth they confounde the natures themselues and therefore let them as they may iustly take the condemnation of Eutiches in the councell of Calcedon to bee also directly their condemnation Vnder this same condemnation come the heretiques 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so called because Eutiches being condemned they durst not say whom they followed though with him they hold but one nature after the incarnation to remaine and the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that thought the diuine nature was turned into the humaine and that therfore they might say that it suffered and the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 also which holding that there was nothing lefte but the diuine nature and that the other was absorpte of that yet helde that that nature was ignoraunte of manie thinges and the Aphterdoxitae who helde that the humaine nature was impassible for the coniunxion that it had with the diuine and also the Monothelites who therefore taught that there was but onelie will in the person of Christ For all these stumbled and fell with Eutiches in vrging so the vnion of the two natures that they in effecte one waie or other ere they had done eyther by confounding the natures or the properties left but one in effecte Let vs therefore whatsoeuer heretiques eyther olde or newe haue thought or doe or shall thinke to the contrarie moste constantlie holde this as the verie rocke and foundation whereupon if we bee builte and stande faste the verie gates of hell shall neuer preuaile against vs that Christe Iesus in person is verie GOD the seconde person in the trinitie and also verie man the sonne of the blessed virgine Marie and therefore that both these two are so personally vnited in him that he is one person and that without any conuersion of the one nature into
the other or confusion eyther of the natures themselues or of the seuerall and speciall properties the one with the other For most necessarie it is that in euery respect he shoulde be such an one or else he neyther can be an able nor fit person to be our Iesus For though the sinne of man there being growne of Gods parte such iust cause of enimitie against man of mans such alienation and auersion of minde from God as there is it was first most meete that he that should be the attonement-maker twixt these shoulde first in himselfe haue the two natures at vnity and one And then seeing the order of Gods iustice required that as man had offended it man againe shoulde appease it by vndergoing the burthen of the sinnes of man to satisfie fullie the same for them as it was necessarie that he that woulde be mans sauiour shoulde therefore be a verie man so likewise because no nature but that which is of power infinite and therefore none but very God coulde euer haue beene able to haue enabled the nature of man to vndertake and effectuallie to go through with this most greate and hard worke to satisfie fully the infinite iustice of God for the sinnes of the world it was as needfull that he shoulde be true and very God Yea for these causes it was most requisite that these two verie God and the nature of man shoulde be so vnited as that thereof shoulde consist but onely one person as I haue said that so the passible nature might beare as Esay speaketh the chastisment of our peace Esay 53.5 and that the other which is impassible by the power and dignitie thereof hauing it so personally subsisting in and with it selfe might fit it for that purpose not onely contributing vnto it power and strength sufficient therefore but also communicating vnto the thinges done and suffered to that end by that nature though in number and for the time of the accomplishing the same fruite an infinite dignity and worthynesse to satisfie the infinite iustice of God for the purchassing and compassing of mans saluation For otherwise if that nature by this means had not been the manhode of one that was and is very God also it might well haue entred into this worke but doubtlesse in wrastling vnder the burthen of our sinnes against hell death and deuil to satisfie the infinite iustice and wrath of God for the same it might well haue been swallowed vp of death and of the sorrows of hel but it neither shoulde nor coulde euer haue valiently and triumphantly ouercome all these and nailed as it were out sins and the hand writing that was against vs for the same to his crosse as Paule speaketh Colos 2.14.10 Begote vs againe vnto a liuelie hope that is to assure vs that he had gone through the worke that he tooke in hand as nowe through the power thereof by rising againe the third day from death to life and by ascending visibly as a conqueror into heauen fourty daies after and by sitting euer since at the right hand of his father in the heauenly places most euidently he hath For it is the spirite that quickneth and without that so vnited vnto it as it was His flesh could haue profited nothing Io 6.63 Therefore verse diuinely saith the apostle that by his eternall spirite it was thereby vnderstanding plainly his Godhead that he offered himselfe without spot to God to purge our consciences from dead workes to serue the liuing God Heb. 9.14 And hence is it as the former saying of Christ sheweth plainlie inough that he saith my flesh is meat indeed and my bloode is drincke indeed Ioh. 6.55 and againe 53.54 except yee eate the flesh of the sonne of man and drincke his blood yee haue no life in you but whosoeuer eateth my fleshe and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and I will raise him vp at the last day For howe can it be otherwise but that he being as he is God and man in one person by the meanes of this most high vnion of his Godhead with his manhoode but that from the same Godhead there must needes proceed and flowe throgh his manhoode infinite power to quicken and saue all those that be partakers thereof And how can it be possible but that the heauenlie father must needs account this his welbeloued sonne in whome he is well pleased a fit and most sufficient meanes to make him also to be well pleased with all these that confesse and acknowledge him to be in person as he is and confidently repose their redemption and saluation Whatsoeuer therefore others haue done or yet doe let vs learne by thus knowing and acknowledging Christ to be in person to come vnto him Nowe concerning his office the same light of the gospell will most clearely direct vs what also to holde and to beleeue touching that What Christ is in office and first in generall both in generall and in particulare In generall it sets him before vs to be the Christ the Messiah the sauiour of the world And this it doth also in such sorte as that it teacheth as solie and wholy sullie and freely to account him so to bee For most plainly we read as we cannot heare too ofte that saint Peter most confidently to the faces of his stowtest enimies hath aduouched that there is noe saluation in any other for amongest men there is giuen no other name vnder heauen whereby saluation commeth but his Act 4.12 And therefore in this respect he is called The author and finisher of our faith Heb 12.2 and ∠and ◠the beginning and the ending Reue. 1.8 Besides he himselfe that best knewe himselfe what he was and is tels vs plainly to this purpose that he is the way the trueth and the life Io. 14.6 yea that he is so the dore of the sheepfold that whosoeuer he be that climmeth vp and seeketh to get in by anie other way he is a theefe and a murtherer Ioh 10. vers 1. and 7. againe Mat. 22. comparing the kingdome of heauen to a mariage that a king made vnto his sonne and the true ministers of God to the bidders vnto that mariage he shewes that his heauenlie father to illure his guestes to come therevnto hath willed them to say vnto them all thinges are prepared already vers 4. therby shewing that in that that this mariage is so consummat betwixt him the sonne of the heauenly king and our nature as by the personall vnion thereof we haue heard it is we may be sure that if nowe we will come and feed of the heauenly cheare that in and by this mariage is prouided for vs that euen therein we shall finde all thinges necessarie to feed vs to eternall life so sufficiently prouided for vs before hand already that we need speake no further And this he had an eie vnto when he said to the woman of Samaria Ioh 4.14 whosoeuer drincketh of the water that I shall giue him
his inner man he consenteth vnto the lawe that it is holie and good yet he doth sometimes the euill that he hateth and findeth no meanes as he shoulde to performe that which is good Vers 14. c. And by workes done after grace flowing as they say from our owne freewill in great part if iustification should come at all how then could we be excluded from all reioyeing in that respect in our selues how coulde our iustification come freely and of sauour and not at all of debt as Paule teacheth it must how could it be but in some sorte we shoulde be heires by the lawe and not onely by faith and the vertue of the promise neyther of which can be sure and certaine if they rested vpon the condition of the workes that we at any time can doe which we can neuer be sure that we haue attained vnto eyther in that measure or manner as they themselues are driuen to confesse as is required of vs. Yea if thereby at all our iustification coulde come why then was not the promise made vnto vs in the plurall number in seedes and not in seede to warrant vs as especially to looke for the benefitte thereof by the merites of the seede of the woman of Abraham Isaac and Iacob so partly and secondarily at least by our selues and our owne merits or workes ioyned with his But to ende this point what can be more cleare to put vs out of all doubt that Paule shuts not from this office of iustifying onely workes of the lawe done before grace but also the best workes done in grace then that he himselfe in the third of the Philippians as we heard before in this respect doth not onely in the time past disable his own good workes done according to the lawe before his conuersion vnreproueable but also in the verie present time when he wrote that Epistle which was not long before his death his workes or righteousness which he then had as dung that so he might be iustified by another righteousnesse to be founde and attained vnto by faith in Christ In that also 1. Cor. 4.4 First he confesseth that he knew nothing by himselfe speaking then of himselfe as he was in the state of grace and then by and by he addeth that he was not thereby iustified he plainely shewed that though he had liued so in the execution of his Apostleship that his conscience accused him not of transgression therein any way within the compasse whereof laye moste of the workes that he had done in grace yet he thought not thereby to be iustified at all Wherefore from whom soeuer these our aduersaries haue sucked or learned this glose or interpretation of Paules wordes euidentlie heereby it appeareth that it is a cursed glose for that it so directly corrupteth the text and therefore vpon whom soeuer they would father it to put the enuie and shame thereof from themselues both of them must giue vs leaue rather to forsake them heerein then the plaine euidence of the scriptures themselues which I am fullie perswaded though they hardlie or neuer will be brought vnto they haâ—â—e so vowed themselues obstinately to resist the trueth that yet the ancient writers in whose writinges sometimes they finde something that soundeth too much this way if eyther they were in these times or when they liued had heard but halfe so much as they haue to the contrarie they would most readily and willingly haue retracted and recanted the same For so we finde they were willing to doe when eyther by their owne further reading or learning or by the information of others they had cause giuen them to see wherein for lacke of further aduise they haue erred and neuer did any of these by farre thus interpret Paules wordes to aduance mans merits and to darken and obscure the glorie of Christ as they doe yea if they coulde haue but foreseene that euer after any woulde haue come after them thus to abuse their wordes to driue men from seeking at all to be iustified by the imputation of Christes righteousnesse to the beleeuer in him that then they might trust to their owne righteousnesse inherent in themselues inhabit as to the formall cause of their iustification and in worke wrought as to the meritorious cause of another iustification euen of saluation it selfe I dare be bolde to say they woulde neuer by any meanes haue beene drawen to haue left one sillable behinde them in their writinges sounding that way And this sufficientlie may appeare to any that hath but red their workes therein they are elsewhere so plaine full and pregnant to aduouch iustification freely by faith in Christ through the imputation of his merits and righteousnesse vnto men as in sundrie places of an answere of mine in printe to Iohn de Albïne I haue at large shewed whereunto I therefore nowe referre the Christian Reader And whereas by grace whereby Pauls faith we are iustified they woulde beare men in hand that there by grace is not to be vnderstood the free sauour of God towardes man in Christ Iesus but that speciall gift of that grace the habit of charitie infused or powred into them that beleeue all the reasons and places vsed to confute the former shift of theirs serue also as pregnantly to ouerthrow this And hereof also as of the other their onely ground is sophistrie taking aduantage by the diuerse acceptions and significations of the worde grace here to teach men to vnderstand thereby an effect of grace whereas in deede the verie fountaine it selfe of all these effectes which is the free fauour of God towardes man in Christ is meant in deede To discerne their iugling and treacherie herein let a man but in steede of grace vsed by the Apostle in this argument in these fewe places following place but the habitte of charitie and then againe weye what a violence thereby is offered both to his woordes and sense We are iustified freely by his grace that is by his infused habit of charitie through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus Rom. 3.24 By grace are you saued through faith that is by the habite of charitie infused through saith and not of your selues it is the gift of God not of workes least any man should bost him selfe Eph. 2.8.9 to the praise of the glorie of his grace wherewith he made vs accepted in his beloued that is to the praise of the glorie of his infused habitte of charitie c. who seeth not both the absurdnes and ridiculousnesse of this interplation of grace and withall perceiueth not indeed nothing else in these places can be vnderstood by grace but the free fauour of God had towards his elect in Christ Iesus before the foundations of the worlde were laid Which grace as it was grounded before all times onely vpon the person and office of the sonne of God our fauiour so to shewe vs that in the reuealing of the same vnto vs and communicating the same vnto his he respects not any
matter most cleare that that might be trusted to to worke and to procure these effectes he is so cooled that he concludes the matter but thus that he allowes confidence to be put in good works indeed so that pride therein be auoyded but yet for that that pride is so hardly auoided in this case as it is we are alwaies so vncertaine as we must needes bee whether we haue attained to that measure and manner of righteousnesse that to this purpose is necessary he thinketh it most safe when we haue done all the good works we haue or can that yet we put all our trust and confidence in the onely mercy and goodnesse of God Which what is it else but whē he hath done his worst against the imputation of Christs righteousnesse to make the beleeuer in him righteous by for the establishing of this their own inherent righteousnes in the romphe therof euen then to cast vs the bucklets and for shame to take his heeles and to run away from his cause and to leaue vs both the field the victory But alwaies great is the trueth and it will preuaile Wherfore howsoeuer they thinke of themselues we may plainely inough see that their case is pitifull and lamentable in their striuing thus to darkē to obscure the glorie of Christ for the maintenance and setting vp of themselues and their owne deuises in his romphe and yet when all comes to all to be enforced thus in effect to confesse that all the while they haue but kicked against the prickts and for that whervnto they dare not trust in conclusion God of his mercy make them to see their grosse errours heerein and in the meane time let vs runne by the light of the gospell this way be Christ by acknowledging him both in person and office to be such an one as I haue thereby proued and manifested him to bee which when we haue done then we haue made a good beginning to obey Christes commaundement heere but yet the chefe is behinde for he further addeth and drinke By this drinking Christe must be caten and drunken and there fore there must be had a true cōmunion with him he doubtlesse vnderstoode drinking of himselfe thereby implying eating of himselfe also for as he said in the former chapter Except yee drinke his blood so withall he saith except ye eate the flesh of the sonne of man yee haue no life in you and whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and I wil raise him vp at the last day vers 53. 54. By which figuratiue metaphorical kinde of speach he would teach vs that as it is not inough for him that is hungry and thirsty to come where meate and drinke is to see and behold them yea perfectly to knowe them and be able to say what euery thing is and to what vse it serueth but if he would haue his hunger and thirst satisfied he must thereof both eate and drinke euen so is it in this case For it is not inough to come vnto Christ though we come from point to point as I haue shewed vnlesse that done we goe further yea so farre as that we as surely and verily take him vnto vs and into vs and so make him as certainely our own as meate drinke receiued in and wel digested may be said to be our owne Wherby it most clearely appeareth that as no benefite can arise to the maintenance of this present life by meat and drinke vnlesse they be eaten vpon drunken and as neyther the sap and iuice that is in the meate nor the power nor force of the drinke can be made ours to nourish strengthen our bodies vnlesse we eate drinke the meat and drinke themselues wherein they are lodged contained euen so is it betwixt Christ vs. And therefore Though he be the bread of life his flesh meat indeed his blood drink indeed as we are plainly taught by him they are in the former chap. ver 53 55. yet we can be neuer the nearer therby to the maintenāce of our spiritual life before God vnles by an eating drinking of him fit for that purpose we feed vpon him cat drink himself so cōsequētly by making him wholly God man our very own and so growing into vnion communion with him we attaine vnto all those good things that are prepared for vs in him And to put vs out of al doubt hereof Saint Iohn in his first Epistle Cap. 1.3 sheweth vs that the whole scope of his ministrie and of his fellow Apostles was that there by this communion and fellowship with Christ might be attained saying That which wee haue seene and heard declare wee vnto you that ye may also haue fellowship with vs and that our fellowship may be with the father and with his sonne Iesus Christ Againe most plaine it is to this purpose that he writeth Cap. 5. of that Epistle vers 11.12 where he saith That God hath giuen vs eternall life he that hath the sonne hath life and he that hath not the sonne hath not life For heerby most plainely first we are taught that the chiefe vse that we are to make of the ministrie is thereby to attaine to haue communion with Christ and then as clearely he shewes vs the better to prouoke vs to striue to make that vse thereof indeede that God in his mercy hauing prouided eternall life for vs which we by the fall of Adam and our owne sinnes had lost in his sonne Christ Iesus that yet he would haue the case so stande with vs in respect thereof that we can neuer haue that vnlesse we haue the sonne himselfe in whom it is treasured coffered vp for vs. Wherby questionlesse the Lorde in his wisedome euen of loue towardes vs hath so ordered the matter for our verie best For when Adam and Eue had life in their owne handes in paradice we haue found by experience they very quickly lost it God therfore hauing so costlie and dearely compassed it againe for vs by the death and passion of his owne welbe loued sonne he sawe it in his wisedome neither good nor safe for vs liuing in this dangerous world to trust it any more in our owne handes and therefore he that is the author and purchaser thereof for vs as he hath the best right therunto by his appointment hath it still lodged for vs in himselfe and that so surely and inseparably that none euer shal or can be partaker thereof but by the communication of his verie selfe first and so once beeing sure of him then also he may withall be assured of the other For these two now by Gods ordinance goe alwaies so togither that where Christ is had there the partie in him is sure of euerlasting life and where he is not had there can be no assurance thereof The blessed sacrament of the bodie and blood of Christ was Instituted by him euen
remission of our sinnes And yet heereby it is most euident that the bodie and bloode of Christ in respect of this their estate and condition are the bodie and blood of his that expresly by the words of the institution we are heere to seeke for and to feede vpon How can this then be otherwise but as we teach by calling heereby to our remembrance that once most certainely they were thus handled for vs and by beleeuing that therby our saluation was wrought which as oft as we doe we are fed and nourished therewith to eternall life Thus then you see the matter in hand the Analogie of faith and good manners and not onely other Scriptures but the verie words of the institution lead strongly to the maintenāce of our expositiō of Christs words in the institution of this Sacrament and to the vtter ouerthrow of theirs And truely the ancient Fathers as we haue a thousand times shewed thē are wholly also of our side against them It were infinite to bring al that might be found in them to this purpose as by large volumes written and published by vs about this matter we haue made it euident Howbeit somwhat yet now againe let vs heare what some of the chiefe of them haue said Christ tooke bread which comforteth mans heart that he might therby represent the trueth of his body saith Hierome vpon the 26. of Mathew Christ in his last supper saith Cyprian in his sermon de vnctione Chrismatis with his owne hands at his table gaue his Apostles bread wine but vpon the crosse he gaue his body to be woūded by the hands of the souldiers that sincere trueth more secretly imprinted in the Apostles the true sincerity might expound vnto the nations how bread wine was the body blood and after what sort the causes and their effects agreed and diuers names and kindes should be reduced to one essence and the things signifying and the things signified were called with one selfe same names And Ambrose in his 4. booke 4. chapter of Sacraments writeth that as in Baptisme we receiue the similitude of death so in this sacramēt we drink the similitude of Christs blood And Chrysostome most plainly saith in his 11. Homily vpō Mathew that Christ his body it selfe is not in the holy vessels but the mysterie Sacrament therof Augustine in his 57. question vpon Leuiticus prescribeth for a rule that the thing that signifieth is wont to beare the name of the thing which it singifieth as Paule said saith he the rock was Christ not ti signified Christ but euē as it had bene indeed which neuerthelesse was not Christ by substance but by signification And in his 23. Epistle he saith that the similitude betwixt the signe and thing signified is the verie cause why the one beareth the name of the other in Sacramentes and therefore in his third booke of Christian doctrine he saith it is a miserable slauerie of the soule to take the signes for the thinges signified Cap. 5. Christ honored the signes and representations which are seene with the names of his bodie and blood saith Theodoret in his second dialogue Gelasius against Eutiches affirmeth the image similitude of the body and blood to be celebrated in these mysteries Bede vpon Luke 22. writeth that because bread doth comfort mans heart and wine doth make good blood in his bodie therefore the breade is mystically compared to Christs bodie and the wine to his blood And who hath not heard vs an hundred times tell them that Tertullian in his fourth booke against Marcion interpreteth This is my body saying that it is to say this is a figure of my bodie and that likewise Augustine against Adimantus the Manichee writeth that Christ doubted not to say This is my body when he gaue a signe of his bodie and vpon the third Psalme that he saith that Christ admitted Iudas to a banquet where he commended a figure of his bodie to his disciples And what can be plainer then these eyther against them or for vs All these thinges considered therefore we may boldlie conclude that they haue no ground from Christes wordes for their grosse reall presence And surely as little haue they eyther from his omnipotencie Neither his omnipotency nor glorified body will helpe them or from the state of his glorified bodie For he will not shew his omnipotencie in whatsoeuer we list but in effecting whatsoeuer himselfe pleaseth and therefore they failing in the proofe as they haue that it is his pleasure to haue it as they would it is in vaine for them to thinke that this can or will helpe them out But indeed and trueth howsoeuer they would seeme to grounde much vpon his almightinesse to haue a strong faith therein and seeke to discredit our faith in the same yet in this verie point lot theirs and ours be but a little indifferentlie compared togither and ours soone will prooue farre the stronger For I woulde haue them tell me in good sadnesse whether the Centurion Math. 8.8 that professed that he beleeued that though Christ came no nearer his house then he was in respect of his bodilie presence that yet he was perswaded that if he but spake the word his scruant should be healed or Iairus that said come and lay thy handes on my daughter and she shall liue Math. 9.19 shewed themselues to be better perswaded of Christes omnipotencie Sure I am both reason and Christes magnifying of the Centurions faith ought to leade them and all men to giue the preeminence to the Centurion aboue the other many degrees Why should they not then see and confesse that we shewe our selues more strongly perswaded of his omnipotencie then they in that we shew by our doctrine that we firmly beleeue that he can wil euen remaining stil in heauen feed vs with his body brokē blood shed though that were so with them so long agoe as it hath or they that by theirs seeme to be perswaded that this cannot be vnlesse according to their fancy to the shaking and crossing needlesly of so many groūds both of good māners faith as we haue heard he conuey himself into our mouthes And to what purpose is it for the maintenāce of this their opinion for thē to labour as they do to put infinite difference betwixt his body vnglorified glorified and to seeke to perswade men that it may be as they say in respect of his body now glorified though not in respect therof before seing it is most certaine that when Christ instituted this Sacrament his body was not glorified and by his words expresly as I lately shewed he instituted this to be a Sacrament of his body broken and bloode shed For who doth not or at least may not heereby perceiue that we haue not here any otherwise to deale with his estate glorified thē therby now the more strōgly to be perswaded that indeed he is able to feede vs with his broken
body blood shed once to our eternall saluation For that falling out sence and succeeding the institutiō of this Sacrament wherin both by audible word and visible action in breaking bread powring forth of wine calling them as he did he promised vs that proues vnto vs inuincibly that whatsoeuer here he offred promised vs either by word or deed that he hath gone through with for vs and so now that he by his resurrection ascention sitting at the right hand of his Father hath begot vs againe to a liuely hope But vnles we would haue Christ otherwise now to be present to vs and our mouthes then he was when he himself ministred it to the disciples and their mouthes in the state and time of his passible and vnglorified bodie let them neuer talke more of the state of his glorified bodie His wordes shew that this was and is a Sacrament of him dying for vs and so a memoriall of his death and abasement that he vndertooke to merit our saluation by and not of his glorie and of the life that he now hath therein and therefore is able to bestow vpon his and to apply vnto them whatsoeuer in his former estate he deserued The bread called his bodie broken and the wine called his bloode shed as I haue said are both heere set before vs seuered the one from the other and by his commaundement we are bound to take as wel the one as the other and yet the one after the other the more forceably thereby to leade vs to the meditation of his death and passion and to feede vpon his bodie and bloode so handled for vs. And as his hauing not yet so suffered letted not the Apostles when he first did institute it from yet taking occasion thereby and by his administring of it vnto them by faith from feeding vpon his broken bodie and blood to the confirming of their communion with him so no more doth his hauing had his bodie broken and bloode shed nowe aboue a thousand and fiue hundred yeares agoe and neuer since hinder vs from feeding vpon the same by faith through the mightie working of his Spirit For the same Christ that then coulde make that which was not yet done as verelie done to their faith and so to bee fed vpon as done the same nowe doubtlesse is able as easily to make that which was done so long agoe present to our faith to nourish vs to eternall life By this then you see both their reall presence that they talke of to be fonde and to too grosse and the groundes that they hold in common for the same to be as bad The speciall groūds of the Lutherans confuted And to goe on now to scan and examine likewise what they holde seuerally in this case against vs it is notoriously knowne the one sorte the fond imitators of Luther I meane would maintaine their reall presence of his body and blood together with bread and wine in this Sacrament when these common groundes of theirs that they haue with the papistes as they feare will not serue their turne by the force and strength of the trueth of the personall vnion of the two natures in Christ Whereupon as it appeares by their bookes extant and confidently published about this matter I speake it with griefe and cōpassion towards thē because otherwise in the chiefest points of Christian faith we account them our brethren and fellow souldiers against the Antichristian Synagogue of Rome they boldly vrge aduouch teach that immediatly vpon this vnion consummate in the Virgins wombe the natures properties of his Godhead were are so vnited vnto his manhood that as the Godhead is eueriwhere almighty of infinite maiesty c. so is the manhood and therfore in this Sacramēt as they teach Especially they insist vpon the being euery where of his manhood as his Godhead is to this purpose Suppose the antecedent were graunted them yet they could neuer thereupon inferre their consequent For when will they be able to prooue that his Godhead is so present heere with bread wine that the receiuer of thē by his mouth alwaies receiues the other But indeede their antecedent is vntrue absurd verie hetetical but that I know it is a most fearful thing before God to haue our faith in respect of persons contrary to the rule of the holy Ghost Iam. 2.1 and that the Lord will therefore most seuerely punish it especially when wilfully men will set themselues to defende that which they haue but receiued from some person or persons whom they haue in admiration against a clearer trueth crossing the same I should neuer make an end of wondring that men otherwise of such learning and iudgement as some of these bee euer should dare in these daies of so great light and after so often and manifest solemne sentences of condemnation giuen of this their conceit in the auncient and primitiue Churches of Christ set abroach such an assertion The vntrueth thereof appears enough euen by that the Angels saying when he was risen He is risen and is not heere Math. 28.6 For seeing that cannot be vnderstood of his Godhead which is euery where and alwaies was it must of necessitie be vnderstood of his manhood But besides that we haue his owne saying The poore ye haue alwaies with you but me ye shall not haue alwaies Iohn 12.8 to backe the speach of his Angels which as they knowe well inough all the auncient Fathers conferring with that of Math. 28.20 also so vnderstand that by this the presence of his manhood they shewe we may not looke for heere in the earth vntill his second comming after once he had left the world and gone to his father as he said he would Iohn 16 28. by the other yet to our comfort they shew heere we inioy his Godhead Let any man but read Fulgentius his second Booke to King Trasimund Vigilius his fourth Booke against Eutiches Chap. 4. and Augustines 57. Epistle and there he shall find notwithstanding they were as soundly and truely perswaded of the vnion of the two natures in Christ as any of these men be the veritie localitie and circumscriptiblenes of Christes manhoode by these and otherplaces and argumentes so vrged that any man may perceiue this their position was counted verie false in those daies The absurditie thereof appeares in that heerein they take that to be the cause sufficient of his beeing euerie where in his manhood that can be no cause thereof indeed For see we not naturally and inseperably the Sunne and light and heat to be conioyned and yet who findes not daily by experience that the globe of the bodie of the Sunne remaining still in heauen yet we heere in earth inioy both the other Yea many other thinges there are which though they be vnited together yet whereof one streacheth and reacheth further then the other as the sight of the eye reacheth further then the eye it selfe the
most plainely he confesseth that the principall ground of interpreting Christes wordes by transubstantiation is this that de sacramentis tenendum est sicat tenet sancta Ecclesia Romana of sacraments we must hold as the holy Romaine Church holdeth For the which axiome or rule in so weightie a matter in his next wordes he shewes that the best grounde he had was an Extrauagant de haereticis Cap. ad abolendam wherein some such things be determined by a sauorite of the same Which is as good ouidence as if we shoulde aske a theoues follow whether he be a theife if not worse Gabriell Biell another great Doctor of theirs writing vpon the Canon of the Masse confesseth that it is not expressed in the Canon of the Bible whether by transubstantiation or consubstantiation the bodie of Christ be there And Iohn Fisher a bishop and martyr of theirs as they count him writing against Luthers booke of the captiuitie of Babilon thinketh that euerye man vnderstandeth that the certaintie of that matter dependes not so much of the Gospell as it doth vpon the vse tradition and custome of the Church And more truely and easilye in show if it had pleased the Church might those wordes of Christ otherwise haue beene expounded saith Scotus in the forefaide place These things saide togither and conferred with that saying of Christ They worshippe me in vaine reaching for doctrines mens praecepts Math. 15.9 and with Peser 1. Epist ◠Cap. 14. Vers 18. where he telles all them to whome he wrote that generall Bpistle that Christ had redeemed them from the vaine conuersation which they had receiued by the traditions of the Fathers we shall soone see that it is noe rocke whereupon they builde this their transubstantiation but a very sand and a rotten foundation Yet because they are so confident in this matter as they are I will not leaue them thus Will you then know the first author that gaue them any inkling or grounde of inuention heere of Truely it was not Marke the Euangelist nor any such but yet vnlesse I be much deceiued one Marke markt them out the way the first of all others to finde it out This Marke that I speake of was a samous Magition and a damnable filthie heretique of the brood of Valentilians a verie ancient one I must needs confesse For I finde that he liued in the time of the Emperor Antarinus Pius which was but 150. yeares after Christ Of this wretch writeth Epiphanius in his 34. heresie prouing that which he saith out of Irenaus his 9. chapter against the heresies of the Valentinians where indeed it is so testified of him that when by his enchantment or inkling he had caused a cup of white wine to beare the colour of blood that thē he made his fellowe beleeue that by his inuocation ouer it it was so transubstantiated into blood that so by his meanes it might be thought that the grace that is super vniuersa that is oner all had instilled sanguinem suum in illud poculum his bloode unto that cup by which meanes when he had made them in admiration of him and so desirous to drinke there of he gaue them as it is there noted with greate solemnitie of wordes and so wonderfully bewitched many And the rather was I led and am thus to thinke because the same Irenaeus in the 8. chapter of the said booke secretly directed as I take it by the spirit of prophecie said that he was verè pracursor Antichristi that is truely Antichristes forerunner If therefore the former nouitie of their transubstantiation please them not let them hence fetch the petigree therof and so let Marcus be the first conceiuer of it and Innocentius he that bore and brought it forth Or if this be not to their mindes I will confesse that it may be that they learned it of the heathen who as they imagined with certaine words gestures could call downe their Hecate Iupiter and Elicius as oft as they list For neuer made or at this day maketh any heathen man more adoe then they about this businesse about the most idolatrous toy of superstition that euer they went about For the wordes must be pronounced with one breath and they vse such crossing such bending and bowing breathing and haling of the wordes to the elementes as they make themselues verie ridiculous to any that are wise that see them marke their doings No iugler nor sycophant vpon a stage are more full of fond and trifling actions and gestures then a Priest at Masse and all to effect this their transubstantiation Who can be perswaded that the Lord of heauen and earth that delighteth in no vanitie but altogether in sinceritie and simplicitie can take delight in this geare Whiles they haue beene so busie to establish the credite of this their deuise by fonde tales of diuerse miracles showed heere and there and I cannot tell where it had beene more needefull for them to haue laboured first to agree amongest themselues about the matter and to cleare the doubtes that they haue moued themselues by occasion thereof But this hitherto they haue founde so combersome a thing to doe that I dare be bolde to say by that which I haue red and coulde set downe thereof the varieties of their opinions and intricate doubtes heereupon moued by themselues and vnanswered and vnsatisfied as yet would require a longer time than I haue yet spent since I began to talke of this Sacrament to set them downe in Yea though they vse and like the word Transubstantiation neuer so well yet though they know that both by the words of the institution and by Saint Paules speaches had thereof 1. Cor. 10.11 and by the testimonies with one consent of all the ancient Fathers as we haue often shewed them Christ called vndoubtedly the bread which he brake and gaue his bodie broken and the wine in the cup his bloodshed they cannot yet be brought to tell vs or to agree amongst themselues what it is that should be or is heere transubstantiated and conuerted into his body Nay in trueth they dare not say that eyther bread or wine or any thing else are the thinges and yet we must yealde to a transubstantiation though no man yet could or would tell vs and stand to it when he hath done whereof it is Howsoeuer eyther they must say it is of some thing or not if of any thing then they know that therupon it will follow that of that thing whatsoeuer it be here Christs bodie is made which is absurd they themselues seeme to thinke to say nothing is turned or transubstantiated into it is quite to loose their cause In very deed they are inforced to see that if they should once by the demōstratiue particle This that Christ vsed vnderstand the bread wine that then it would most cleerly follow that there is a Trope or figure in the speech of Christ or that else they must confesse bread and wine
vse and estimation Bertram in a set treatise written of this matter as it is thought in Carolus Calunus time by manie argumentes proues bread and wine still to remaine And Elfricke about the yeare 996. as Fox noteth in two Saxon Epistles which to that ende he recordes therein taught bread and wine heere no otherwise to be the bodie and bloode of Christ then Manna and the water of the rocke in the wildernes were Christ which all men knowe they were but by representation and signification and not really for that then Christ was not become man And the same man as maister Fox noteth translated a sermon out of Latine into the Saxon tongue which he insertes wholly in his story also by him then appointed to be red on Easter day to the Saxons inhabiting then this land which who so readeth shal finde that it contains much direct matter proofe both against transubstantiation and grosse reall presence built thereupon In Bedes time also who died about the yeare 734. the same doctrine was continued heere and elsewhere as it appeareth by that which he hath written vpon the institution as it is set downe by Luke 22. where he shewes as I haue noted before not onely the likelyhoode of the vse of bread and wine in nourishing and cheering our bodies to be the cause they beare the names of the bodie and blood of Christ which semblablie nourish and feede our soules but also he so speaketh and writeth thereof that yet he shewes he tooke them to be bread and wine still And as by this you may see then that both Scriptures and Fathers are against them herein so questionles is all sound reason most stronglye which as long as it is not controwled or crost either by the doctrine of faith or good manners taught in the Scriptures is worth the listening vnto Now reason and all our sences and the experience that we haue had and may haue of the sowreing of the wine of the mouling and corrupting of the hoasts so that wormes may and haue bred thereof and that Dogges Battes Rattes and Mise and so not onely vnbeleeuers can feede thereof are most sure euidence vnto vs that for all their great brags to the contrary with all their crossing whispering breathing becking and doucking and demure pronuncing of the words they cānot neither once remoue the substances of bread and wine away nor bring Christes bodie or blood into the romphs thereof For neither can these things that I haue spoken of all or any of thē be incident to bare accidents neither yet to the most precious body blood of Christ Iesus God and man For who knoweth not that bare accidents are not nor can be subiectes of such accidents as these bee Neither can they be matter to nourish and feed eyther man or beast withal or to breede any such thinges vpon And howsoeuer these men can finde in their heartes to grant that the bodie of the Christ whom they serue may be subiect to all these thinges sure I am the bodie of the true Christ that the saying of the Psalmist might be verified therof Thou wilt not suffer thy holie one to see corruption Psal 16.10 could not possiblie be helde of death vntill it rotte and therefore much lesse will the heauenly Father now that it is glorified let it be eyther meat for such filthie vermin or for the mouthes of wicked men or to be subiect to putrefaction that wormes shal breede theron But I knowe though some of them haue not beene ashamed to saie that he can and may be eaten of such beastes as well as of such men whereof none of them now doubt yet generally they say when such thinges fall out with the outward elements as I haue spoken of then Christ by his almightie power conueyeth himselfe away and lets the olde substances come againe and ioyne themselues with their accidentes In the meane time then I would the best studied of them in this point could eyther tell vs what was becomde in the meane time of the substances or how their accidentes were kept or vnderpropt without substances and so subiectes to be in And if it were granted then that Christ to exempt and to preserue his bodie from these inconueniences remoues it away before any of these can fal out vnto it yet then they graunt that the best shift that their popish Christ hath in this case is to runne away or to giue place Such a Christ may become such kinde of Christians but surely the wise hearted Christians would be loth to trust to such a Christ for their saluation whose best shift is thus to flie that a Mouse eate him not and I would aduise them not to trust themselues too much to such a dastardly Christ I would thinke that they should would rather hold that he driues all these away then that indeede he should be driuen away of any of them and that therefore when any such thing seemeth to fall out otherwise eyther the priest consecrated not well and so failed and came short of transubstantiation or that the sences are deceiued in thinking any such thing in haue happened But seeing they like better to prouide for their Christ by his suddaine departure I would haue them to tell mee whether they worke a greater miracle in transubstantiating breade and wine into him or these kinde of cattell in trasubstantiating him againe into the old bread and wine And I would be glad once to here a substantiall reason why Christs wordes should not or did not proue as powerfull to driue the accidents away as the substance or why they beleeuing notwithstanding Christs plaine wordes that accidents of bread and wine remaine because the senses telles them so they should not or will not beleeue the same senses as plainly assuring them that the substances themselues also remaine that therefore they are there also But what should I trouble my selfe by reason and sense to confute them which as it should seeme haue herein for the maintenance of their owne wilful conceit pride pompe cōmoditie lost both sense reason and religion Notwithstanding to all such as haue these I trust I haue said sufficient to make not onely the verity of our owne doctrine touching this Sacrament sufficiently to appeare but also to the full displaying disgrasing for euer with such of the vanity of both these our aduersaries herein Wherefore to returne to my text and so to goe on againe therewith I hope yet by this that I haue saide of this matter you now plainly perceiue that notwithstanding the doctrine and vse of this Sacrament the vnion and communion that we must seeke to haue with Christ though it be true reall in respect of him and vs the persons things to be vnited that yet it is not grosse carnall to be attained vnto by the instruments or members of our bodie at all as these our aduersaries teach but that by the worde Sacraments God offers him
fruite in hir age as the tree planted in the house of God whereunto such are compared Psal 92.13.14 vseth to doe For to the vnspeakable comfort of all such the giftes and graces of the holy spirit vndoubtedly accompanying their right comming vnto Christ and beleeuing in him are heere resembled vnto riuers of waters of life not onely for that they come from the true fountaine of life and will leade and guide the owner therof therunto but also for that in such in whom they are once founde they will neuer eyther wholly or finally faile or drie vp As therefore such may be sure that the foundation of God remaineth sure The Lorde knoweth who are his 2. Tim. 2.19 so they may be by these fruites of the Spirit without hypocrifie founde in them most certaine that according to Saint Peters counsell they haue ioyned vertue to their faith and so consequently haue made their own election so sure vnto themselues which alwaies before was sure with God as that they shall neuer fall For this is the indissoluble chaine of God whereof one linke can neuer at all be seuered or sundred from an other after that but once the first two be coupled whom he knewe before and predestinated to be like to the image of his Sonne and so elected in him before the foundations of the world those he first calleth then iustifieth then sanctifieth and lastly glorifieth Rom. 8.29.30 Ephe. 1.4 Whom therfore indeed we finde once by these riuers of waters of life sanctified we may be out of doubt that thē God hath elected called and iustified and that also them he wil glorifie For this sanctifying spirit beareth witnes with their spirits that they are the children of God and so imboldneth them to cal vpon him saying Abba Father Rom. 8.15.16 and it is the holy Spirite of promise that sealeth them and is the earnest of their inheritance and redemption in Christ Iesus Ephe. 1.13.14 Though therefore such to their own sence and feeling and perhaps also in the conceit of others may haue not onely these graces of the Spirite more eclipsed at one time than at another yea may thinke that they are quite dried vp and vanished yet forasmuch as whom God once loues as doubtlesse he doth all them whom once truely he doth thus qualifie he loues to the end Iohn 13.1 let all such be most firmelie resolued that this is but the better to humble them and to prouoke them when they finde these graces reuiued in them againe to worke out their owne saluation with the more trembling and feare because he that hath begunne this good work in them will neuer giue it ouer vntill he haue brought it to perfection and he it is that will worke in them both the will and the deede of his good pleasure Phil. 1.6 2.12.13 For such haue the infallible markes of Christes elect and chosen sheepe whereof he himselfe most plainelie teacheth that it is impossible that any shoulde eyther take them out of his handes or that any of them should finallie perish Matth. 24.24 and Iohn 10.28 The reason is that they are kept by the power of God through faith to saluation 1. Peter 1.5 Indeede meete it is and verie needefull that such that once haue attained to the graces giftes of the Spirit to be as riuers of waters of life in them that they should doe what they may possiblie to nourish and increase the same and they are to knowe that if they doe fayle in doing of their duetie in this behalfe that they are worthilie caused to see and feele to the greate griefe of their soules the decaye thereof yea that they haue done as much as lies in them vtterly to lease them and to prouoke GOD to be their enemie and therefore they are most earnestlie to repente their negligence and carelesnesse in this pointe But yet the force of this Metaphore these places and a number moe in the Scriptures that are as pregnant to this purpose most plainely showe that when thus it falles out with such that yet in the goodnesse of GOD towardes them this their sence feeling and the iudgement of others prooue no stronglier that these giftes of the Spirite are quite gone in them indeede than the eclipsing or hiding away of the sunne from our eies by foggie mistes or cloudes at noone daies the raking vp of the fire when there is store thereof in the ashes the not stirring of a liue and strong childe in the mothers wombe at all times a like or the not appearing of leaues and fruite vpon quicke trees in an orcharde in the deepe of winter proue that there is no Sunne in the firmament no fyre on the harth no childe in the wombe or that then there is no sappe in the roote of the trees As therefore when neyther the moone fogges nor cloudes are betwixt vs and the Sunne it will appeare and shine againe as when the ashes are remoued and the coles hid thereunder are blowne againe therof may growe as greate a fire as euer before as when the childe stirreth againe though it haue life without motion a greate while before the mother conceiueth as certaine hope that she is with childe as euer before and as when the spring time commeth there will be both leaues and fruite vpon the trees in the orchard that seemed deade before in the winter so is it in this case when GOD shall remooue the lettes and causes as most certainelie he will aswell in this as in these other we see naturallie and commonlie they are then the brightnesse heat motion and liuelinesse of his Spirite shall and will in his appeare againe But then the better and the more easilie that they may finde this to be thus lastly I woulde haue all such to remember that it is not inough that to their owne sence and in their owne conceites they haue these giftes of the Spirit as riuers of waters of life but that if they be such indeede as heere are promised and therfore are performed to all that come vnto Christ and beleeue in him that they must flowe out of their bellies Where by their bellies we are to vnderstand as Augustine hath well noted in his 32. tract vpon Iohn the bellie of the inner man which as he there telles vs is the cōscience of the heart And as there also he saith this flowing of riuers of water out of the bellie of the inner man Beneuolentia eius est qua vult consulere proximo si enim putet quia quod bibit soli ipsi debet sufficere non fluit aqua viua de ventre eius si autem proximo festinet consulere ideo non siccat quia manat that is Is his bountifulnesse wherewith he will prouide for the good of his neighbour for if he thinke that that which hee hath drunke must but serue himselfe the water of life flowes not out of his bellie but if he make hast to doe good to his neighbour it drieth
law of GOD forgetting belike that the law is so spirituall that it made Paule to crie out of himselfe O wretched man that I am who shall deliuer mee from this bodie of sinne and death Rom. 7.24 and that Christ most flatly hath said that they worship him in vaine that teach for doctrines mens preceptes Math. 15.9 We vse often to terrifie our hearers from ill workes and from omitting of good by making it manifest vnto them by the iudgements of GOD therefore threatned and executed that so to doe is so daingerous as that thereby they deserue all Gods heauie iudgments to be executed vpon them both in this life and in the life to come and that vndoubtedlye they shall if they repent not Wherein also we goe further than these our aduersaries for they teach that a number of sinnes euen for the littlenes thereof are not deadly or such as deserue damnation which may easily be satisfied for and put away Lastly we forget not to teach them what promises of reward God hath made to such as will carefully walke before him in holinesse and righteousnesse both concerning this life and that which to come assuring them with Paule That godlinesse is profitable vnto all thinges and hath the promise hoth of this life present and of that which is to come 1. Tim. 4.8 wherein we goe so farre that also with Christ we confidently tell them that they shall not lease their rewarde in heauen no not of a cup of colde water bestowed aright in his name vpon any of his Mat. 10.42 For though all that we doe or can doe be infinitelie lesse than we owe to God and are bound to doe for in many things we sinne all Iam. 3.2 yet all that approue themselues to be in Christ by walking not after the flesh but after the spirite in bringing forth the right fruites thereof as Paule teacheth Rom. 8.12.13 c. vndoubtedly for Gods promises sake in Christ Iesus shall both heere and in heauen finde themselues and their workes so liberally rewarded that they shal haue no cause to complaine but rather to wonder at Gods most bountifull crowning of his owne blessinges and graces with further both heere and there Thus then you see that though when the question is in hande why men shall be saued we dare sende them to no other meritorious cause thereof but onelie to Christ and the thinges done by himselfe for vs because we know that his name is the one lie name whereby commeth saluation Act. 4.12 yet when it is demaunded who they are which for Christes sake shall indeede be saued and so rest in Gods tabernacle and for euer dwell vpon his holy hill we are boulde to teach that none but they that according to the time and occasion they haue after they be in him proue themselues to be such by the riuers of water of life flowing out of their bellies as you haue heard and therefore are such as are described to that ende Psalm 15.2 c. And beeing such we counte it no presumption but most commendable faith in them to be fully perswaded because they haue not onelie Gods worde and promise generally offered vnto them and particularly sealed in the administration of the worde and Sacramentes outwardlie but also most effectually inwardly testified vnto their spirites by Gods owne Spirit by these newe fruites thereof to appertaine particularly vnto them to ground this their perswation vpon that for Christes sake vndoubtedly they shal be saued These arguments therefore we doubt not will bee sufficient to moue and to perswade all that vnfainedly be the Lordes euen of loue and thankefulnes towardes him for his vnspeakable loue and mercies towardes them to striue both day and night by all possible meanes so to stirre vp the graces of the spirit in them that indeede worthylie they may bee counted as Riuers of waters of life flowing out of their bellies Thus then at last welbeloued in the Lorde we haue hearde first the circumstances of a notable sermon made by Christ our Sauiour himselfe as where when vpon what occasion and in what manner he made it namelie at Hierusalem in the temple in and vpon the last and most solemne day of the feast of Tabernacles to draw them that were there from their owne vaine superstitions that led them from him to himselfe vttered by him standing and that with a crying voice Secondly you haue heard that he spoke therein to all that be thirstie and to none else that is to all that are truely broken and contrite hearted vnder the burthen of their sinnes and so earnestly long for redemption and deliuerance from the same Thirdly you haue heard that he commaunded such what to ease them of this their spirituall thirst they shoulde doe and that that was and is first to come vnto him that is to know and acknowledge him what he is in person and office and then to drinke of him that is rightlie to beleeue in him and so thereby to make him with all the mercies of God prouided for mans saluation in him their owne which they hauing done lastly you haue heard that he promiseth all such that his Spirit in them all should be as riuers of water of life flowing out of their bellies which was not nor had not beene as yet then because when Christ made this sermon hee was not yet glorified And in handling of all these withall you haue beene shewed what we are to learne euerie one of vs thereby both ministers and people which haue beene such and such and so manie good thinges as that if we haue heard as we ought to doe we haue all of vs I hope euen sufficiently to our saluation learned both howe to beleeue and how to liue to be saued For first we haue beene taught howe by the lawe we are to be humbled and throwne downe that we may be fit patients for Christ Iesus secondly we haue heard by the Gospell how we are to rise againe and to recouer a better standing than euer we had in the first Adam by knowledge and faith of the second Christ Iesus our Lord and Sauiour For we haue beene shewed how the Spirit of God by the ministrie of the worde and Sacramentes through this faith of ours grounded vpon sounde knowledge vnites Christ Iesus himselfe and vs togither though after a spirituall manner yet most truelie and effectually to our saluation and the contrarie doctrine hath at large bene confuted And by the way it hath most plainely beene laide before vs howe we ought to be qualified both in faith and manners both in hearing of the worde and in the vse of the Sacraments that thereby still we may growe vp in the house of GOD in Christ Iesus to be perfect men and acceptable in the sight of his heauenlie father Lastlie by the viewe of the promise we haue beene I trust thorowlie taught what manner of liues we ought to leade as long as we liue after that once we bee got