Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	great_a	see_v	time_n	5,907	5	3.3926	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A14979	The repaire of honour, falsely impeached by Featlye a minister Wherein (by occasion) the apostles disciple S. Ignatius Bishop & martyr, his religion, against Protestantisme, is layd open. By Ed. Weston Doctour of Theology: in a letter, by him written vnto two fathers of the Society of Iesvs, in England.	Weston, Edward, 1566-1635.	1624 (1624)	STC 25289; ESTC S101852	8,994	34

THE REPAIRE OF HONOVR Falsely impeached by Featlye a Minister Wherein by occasion the Apostles Disciple S. Ignatius Bishop Martyr his Religion against Protestantisme is layd open By Ed. Weston Doctour of Theology In a Letter by him written vnto two Fathers of the Society of IESVS in England Imprinted at Bruges ANNO 16●● VERY REVEREND FATHERS I most hartily salute your persons and also ioyfully congratulate you in regard of your pious and charitable indeauours there in England for the cause and right of the Catholike Church Neither neede I your knowne zeale considered by letters to encourage you to labour in that kind or with vndausited mindes valiantly to beare the slaunders false reports of the common aduersary Seing that as one you imbrace so the other you may iustly contemne with great reason reioyce in both The cause at this present of my wryting vnto you hath beene occasioned by one Featlye a Minister-Doctour who by a diuulged Pamphlet in print hath raised a scandall with you out of a report of the Earle of VVarwicke made of me concorning some words I vttered vnto him at such time as hee was heere in Bruges Featlye then auoucheth to the world that the saide Earle tould him that I talking of a disputation in London passed betwixt you and a couple of Ministers VVhite Featlye affirmed that in regard the actiō was well performed by you and basely by them two English Earles present at your dispute thereby to haue beene cōuerted to the Catholike fayth Wherevpō Featlye as I am tould both to the preiudice of my persō reproach of the Catholike cause hath in print auouched that wee by no other meanes maintaine our quarrel against them then by lyes false inuentiōs I haue therfore thought it conueniēt in few words to expresse the truth also to craue your assistance that by your meanes the same may appeare to confront cōfound the slāderer Concerning then the report of the Earle and Featlye I protest vnto you and to the world vpon the word of a Priest that for the present I cannot call to mind any such words I vttered vnto the said Earle yet do I not absolutely affirme that I spake thē not But this I say for a certainty that if I tould him any such thing withall I added that such a bruite was reported to mee by some that came out of England and passed by mee heere in Bruges Which particularity as it seemeth to me should haue beene specified to Featlye by my Lord according to the quality of that Honourable Estate he pretendeth Wherevpon I affirme that the dealing of Featlye towards mee although I vtterly cōtemne it to haue beene childish vnciuill no small demonstrance of the greate weaknes of his Religion constrayned against good manners substance of iudgement to lay hould vpon such toyes meere aeriall babblements Which my contempt of such dealing the world should know by my silence if the good of others impeached by his scādall did not cōmād mee to speake Supposall thē be that I made such a relation to the Earle of VVarwicke what ground or good occasion proceedeth thence to argue against mee or against Catholiks If I had beene in London at such time as the disputation was performed where I might haue beene informed concerning the truth in all points then I might haue beene in some shew blamable if I had vented forth such a thing but being in Bruges speaking familiarly to my Lord what I heard from passengers out of England there is no appearance of any euill carriage on my part or any sinistrous meaning to disgrace eyther Featlye or any of his faction But something they must say to stoppe vp the gappe breach of their cause made by our battery at least to the eares of the simple easily deceaueable popularity Assuredly it is not the practice of our Professours to make lyes to raise slaunders for our defence or thereby to impugne thē for our argumēts to that effect are copious pregnāt in the view of the best intelligēt Rather it is the Protestant being in affection furious in iudgment superficiall to inuent blaze out lyes and that in print to iustifie themselues and impeach vs. Let them to this effect take only a view of the lyes cauils falsities discouered of late in the writings only of Hall and Collins by Fa. Coffin and Fa. Fitzherbert and they shall in their best iudgements confesse them guilty impudent moreouer disgracious to the syncerity of Englād yea and to mankind What a villany was it for one of that crew to print that in Antwerp he saw a Priest saying Masse in the shābles that in the same place where the Butcher made his slaughter framing blasphemously an Antithesis betwixt the Priest and the Butcher But if aduantages be to be made absolutely vpon reports doubtlesse then in this very present Case we haue much for vs. I haue heard heere in this Citty from the mouthes of many English lately come from England that you both were so eneombred by the Ministers in disputation that you had not a word to say for your defence Which report must needes bee most false both your worthes in learning considered and also the quality of the argumēt then put in dispute examined For what had you otherwise to doe but out of the Ecclesiasticall History to repeate the auncient and continued profession of the Catholike Roman fayth frō the Apostles tymes to our dayes and out of the same Histories to require of your Aduersaries a like recitall of age and continuance for the profession of their Protestantish Religion in which matter what could bee wanting for you or sufficient for thē No History recordeth euer any mā Ecclesiasticall or secular since the Apostles dayes to haue accorded in all poynts with Luther Caluin Onely this they may say That what they maintayne now against vs they learned it of Manichaeus of Heluidius of Vigilantius of Image-breakers of Beringarius of VVickcliffe of Husse such like condemned baggages by the Church of God Thē was it most slaunderous what was diuulged by Protestants cōcerning your fayle in disputation Now then seing it hath pleased Featlye to work a feate against vs vpō the foundatiō of things misreported I shall come neere vnto his owne person not vpon the maintenance that rumours and news may affoard but vpō that which wee may suppose hee hath printed by himselfe or his friends I would then haue him vnderstand that I haue seene a Pāphlet set out purporting the issue of the disputation hee had with you And assuredly I neuer in all my life beheld a more liuely representation of a Ministers folly short sight and sleight braines then therein Wherefore to omit how according to his owne fabulatory Relatiō it is most manifest that still hee flieth from the state of the question and wholly refuseth to make an absolute Catalogue of men since the Apostles dayes professing his Religion