Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	great_a	king_n	war_n	4,472	5	6.2395	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A90635	The divine catastrophe of the kingly family of the house of Stuarts or, a short history of the rise, reign, and ruine thereof. Wherein the most secret and chamber-abominations of the two last kings are discovered, divine justice in King Charles his overthrow vindicated, and the Parliaments proceedings against him clearly justified, by Sir Edward Peyton, knight and baronet, a diligent observer of those times.	Peyton, Edward, Sir, 1588?-1657.	1652 (1652)	Wing P1952; Thomason E1291_1; ESTC R208989	41,016	159

should have questioned him for his life And to sound King Charles his heart it is probable King Charles was in his heart a Papist by the Queens perswasion and her mother for after going from the Parliament he sent Pardons for divers Priests condemned who ingeniously finding this would make a rupture 'twixt King and Parliament the Prisoners petitioned the Houses sending the Pardons to the House and desired rather then there should be a breach between them to suffer death for which prudence the Parliament would not let them die In both these kings times swearing was in such esteem principally from king Iames his example cursing the People with all the plagues of Egypt though king Charles granted twelve pence an Oath through the Kingdome to Robin Lashly which was observed more to get money then suppress swearing for such a negligence was in the Magistrates seeing the great Courtiers garnished their mouthes with God-dammees as if they desired Damnation rather then Salvation Bribery the nurse of Justice was so rife in those days that right was not distributed to the owner a vice augmented by Knights of the Post very frequent in City and Country And Lawyers would take sees and never plead for their Clients and sometimes on both sides insomuch as in a Suit depending 'twixt my self and my Son we gave fees to one and the fame person Wherefore on these times God hath brought on us a lamentable war Now let all the world behold how king Charles violated the rights of Parliaments coming into the House with great power to carry away the five members To prove how great a breach of priviledge of Parliament this was the Author hereof wrote a discourse against it affixing his hand it being taken in his Waggon at Banbury by the kings party for which he was condemned to die by Sir Robert Heath and his Estate given away I will not repeat how much he hath suffered for being faithful to Parliaments both afore since the access of this onely I will rehearse that being taken Prisoner by the Cavaliers he lost four hundred pounds in money apparel waggon and fourty horses and likewise in Wiltshire at Broad Choak in houshold-stuff four hundred pounds which was carried into Langford after a Garrison taken by Colonel Ludlow for the Parliament which he had never restored although he often petitioned Another wrong long since he had when Sir Robert Heath had inclosed two thousand acres of Common as Lord of Soham one named Anne Dobbs was kept with bread and wain Cambridge Castle by a Justice of Peace a Creature of Sir Roberts to confess the Author of this Discourse counselled her with others to pull down the Enclosure taken from the Common by that means to take away his life as a Rebel when it was well known he had no hand in it but then was sitting in Parliament as a member By this it appeares the king chose good Judges and Justices which were so corrupt The reason was that the Author being condemned he might forfeit a Mannor next adjacent This Justice of Peace was a mortal enemy of his Sir Robert Heath having bought four hundred pound a yeer of the Justice where the accused was Lord that Sir Robert might beg it of the king And if we examine the king of Denmark brother of Queen Anne the first time he was entertained into England what debauchedness was exercised in his welcome to king Iames to add punishment to the family who both were so drunk at Theobalds as our king was carried in the armes of the Courtiers when one cheated another of the Bed-chamber for getting a grant from king James for that he would give him the best Jewel in England for a Jewel of a hundred pound he promised him and so put king Iames in his arms and carryed him to his lodging and defrauded the Bed-chamber-man who had much ado to get the king into his Bed And Denmark was so disguised as he would have lain with the Countess of Nottingham making horns in derision at her husband the high Admiral of England which caused a deep discontent between them And generally the Courtiers were then so debauched in that beastly sin as at that time in the wayters chamber at supper a Courtier was found dead on the Table the wine foaming out of his mouth a horrid sight to behold And it is worthy of observation to consider the carriage of the king of Denmark and his Son usually in his own Country for at my being there I saw the old king as his custome was to call for the Master of his houshold when he made a voyage or progress wrote on a Pastboard what he should doe and so took the waggon to go to his Boares houses and eat Martlemas Beef powdred pork bacon or such like as they had ready and after repast took for a collation the handsomest daughter kinswoman or servant in the house al her kindred adorning her with all sorts of wearing ornaments whom the King carried to one of his Guest-houses where he had not above three or four Lodgings and a Kitchen and solaced himself with this jewel so long as he pleased and after brought her home A fruition made her in much esteem with her friends after so adulterous a fact Likewise it was the custome of his Son to ride on a Sled drawn with horses bells fastned to them which tingled as he passed through the Townes the noise caused the women to run out of doors the Prince beholding one more amiable then the rest beckning to her with his finger presently she came to the Sled and accompanied him to some Hostery till he had satisfied fully his lust Also their usual course is to prophane the Sabbath in such sort as all the Carpenters in the Kingdom that day work gratis to make the Kings ships and the people go to Church in their worst cloaths making no difference 'twixt the Lords day and other daies who in stead of Godly exercises use much prophaness Give me leave to repeat that this King ordinarily would be drunk and namely one time Sir Iohn Peoly being his Servant after an Inhabiter at Wroungay in Norfolk he commanded Pooly to ask any gift to the value of half his Kingdome and he should have it But he finding his Master so beastly out of tune demanded a great pair of Stags hornes for which after so moderate a request the king bestowed on him three thousand Dollars Is it not known to all Germany that his drinking out of reason with his Commanders lost many battels to the Emperous General Wallestine which proved a disaster to the united Protestant Princes so that he was faine to submit to the Emperour with much loss and disgrace to the prejudice of the cause of God In which war his brother king Iames proved a Coward to back a religious cause for he would not raise men nor money yet the Parliament incited and urged him thereto to whom he made this answer He would

turn into the tyring-house for certainly we have great cause to give thanks to God for the Parliaments valourous success of Army and Navy both for General Lieutenant-General Sergeant-Major Generals Colonels Officers and Souldiers as for the Admirals and Captaines at Sea whom God hath miraculously preserved to prevaile over the enemies of the State and so let God have the glory and we tranquillity all our dayes But when I revolve in my thoughte the opinion most are possessed with as with a Divel that Parliament and Army are a punishment for their sins and attribute so great Victories to chance I may justly suspect their Atheisme whose lives I never see more amended by Gods immediate hand on us to make the omnipotent Father of spirits to have no hand in it or if acknowledged in words return not from iniquity and are not thankful for arriving to so safe a harbour as they are in nor see that God is about to mould the world in another fashion as he hath declared by his Prophets of old and so like swine look down to the earth and not to heaven to see a divine cause of a mighty alteration Now to shew that the Parliament proceeded justly in this war I will prove it by arguments Divine and Humane Reason and Law First if we regard the Scripture we shall finde Rehoboam the son of Solomon justly lost the ten tribes because he laid such heavy burdens on the Jews who declared they had no share in David wishing Israel to depart to their tents although God had made a Covenant with David that his posterity should sit on the throne for ever on condition they continued to serve the Lord as they ought which Covenant Rehoboam broke by sins in such sort as God punished sin with sin suffering him to oppress and impose more heavy taxes on the people then his father a reason God disswaded the children of Israel refused God and would have kings to rule over them to enthral them to his will but they persisted not to follow the Counsel of the Almighty therefore it was just the kingdome should be divided for their disobedience or if King Rehoboam did wickedly he could not be stiled Gods vicegerent over the twelve tribes for God whom Governors represent never oppresseth his people but for sin When kings cease to imitate God they cease to Govern or be Governers and represent not God when they are not Gods Deputies they insult over the people without authority for this is an infallible rule not to be gaine said in Scripture that if the people sin against God and the king do not oppose it but yeeld to it they are punished and if the king sin and they concur with him they are punished so that if the Parliament had not opposed king Charles God would have been revenged on them Now when a father wrongfully injureth his children his love to them is at an end and so is his paternal power for children are bound to be obedient to Parents not to be ruined by them so that subjects are bound to obey the Sovereign so long as he keeps himself in bounds of justice and doing right but if the king would destroy his people they are no more his subjects nor are they bound to obey but he is a Tyrant God never punished a pious king that used his people well otherwise God should be unjust If God were Author of the conquest over king Charles is so many battels who is the God of Sabbaths that is of battels if he were not the cause of our Victories he were not God of battels in which belief they should give a Deity to the Parliament forces which is blasphemy for they conquered over the Cavaliers By which it appears God sent this as a punishment on the king and the Victory was not a punishment on the Parliament who defended the people in their rights Kings are ordained for the good of their subjects not for their hurt nor were people brought into the world to have kings over them but to honour and glorifie God God is not glorified when inferiours are oppressed by their superiours a sin God highly punished in the Jewes God were the Author of oppression if kings had such a deputation from him This Prince committed a great fault in adhering too much to his unbridled will preferring his passion above the good of his people there may be excuses in youth for want of experience in stealing for the occasion in killing for injuries offered in adultery for perswasions of love and heat of youth in Rebellion for defence but for offences against the Commonwealth there is not satisfaction but a block or a gibbet For a shepherd to sheare the fleeces off his flock may be tolerable but to flea them and cut their throates is abominable before God and man For kings should have the care of a Master love of a Father tenderness of a Protector diligence of a Shepherd to preserve their subjects from wrong for without a Parliament kings have no ears nor eyes to see the injuries of the publicke but by their favorites who for to encrease Wealth raised from nothing are like blood-suckers to drain the people make themselves rich If every member of the commonwealth ought to preserv the State above his own life much more a King is chosen Gods vicegerent on earth to preserve his people committed to his charge in safety Therefore God took from Rehoboam and Belshazzar their kingdoms by his instruments the people and Nebuchadnezzar and Sennacherib both for pride and wronging the Jews the one was reduced to grass with the beasts and the other was overthrown in battel with hundred thousands The example of Attilius Regulus is commendable who rather then the honour of the Roman Senate should suffer prejudice performed his promise and returned to Carthage to undergo exquisite torments If subjects much more a King God hath intrusted with his people should have care of his Parliament and People then much more should be take care of the lives of the people Wherefore the Parliament seeing King Charles did raise an Army to defend ill counsellors and ruine his people the Parliament rather then the king should ruine the people first they employed the Army to take away from him bad Counsellors and bring them to condigne punishment but King Charles justified their destructive advice by a war to ruine the authority Parliaments and by this made himself an enemy of Commonwealth Therefore it was just the Parliament should defend themselves by a war yea subdue the kings power which would destroy the Representative which maintained the liberty of the subject and property of their personall and reall estates And though it may be objected he had most of the gentry and Nobility yet I answer They had the major part of the Electors sided with the Parliament in their purses Also some object that the king had many Members of Parliament but for certaine if they would depart from the lawfully-called

Parliament to ruine the people the remainder in the house were the Representative to adjourn the Parliament from day to day for otherwise it had been sine die and ipso facto dissolved the Parliament then had the whole Nation remained slaves and vassals for ever at the kings mercy And therefore it was most to subdue and put king Charles to death as a mortal enemy who laboured to destroy the Common-wealth with all his power for if a member who hath an inclusive right ought to have sentence of death much more a king who hath an impositive care from God ought to have sentence of death for kings now are not the anointed of God as David was but by the Scripture every Saint is annointed which by the Popish Clergy was usurped to them and after by their policy attributed fasely to kings to maintaine their Hierarchy Whrefore we may justly argue that the Author of spirits had a long time continued patient in suffering three several families to be Superintendents over three kingdoms five hundred yeers when he raised the several houses to the Throne to make an essay of their behaviour to bring up the people in the fear of God whose time was long spent in Idolatry and after reduced to a prophanness and then to a peece and little part of a reformed way and not to a total partly serving Baal and partly God which caused Gods arrows at last to flie abroad and shot the last Prince with a mortal blow for it is manifest a king could not make a war with his Parliament till it were ended and the king passed an Act not to end it till all the three Estates were agreed and when it ended all he could do should be to indict them by a Jury to finde them guilty but by making a War he leaves them at liberty to defend themselves so that what he did amiss should be complained of in the next Parliament after In the war the kings purpose could not be to make them obedient which is too harsh a way for in so doing he becomes their enemy and then they are out of his protection Or if the subjects war with the king and he oppose they are not subjects A king is not a king when he makes a war against his subjects but he is a Tyrant and they are not Rebels no more then when a king treateth with his subiects are they not subjects by such a war he ratifieth them to have a right and power to contest with him as the fifteen Provinces were made by the king of Spaine in a Negotiation a free State much more the reason holds in a war How many times did the Parliament court the king yea humbly petition him and treated with him by Commissioners to do divers things most necessary for the good of the then kingdom and he remained obdurate If he were so obstinate when he was under the power of the Parliament as in the Isle of Wight how averse would he be or rather domineer over and ruine them when they were in his clutches As if a Partridge being neer to a Faulcon intangled with his varvels might peck and tach her yet would not she yeeld to smal a bird what could the Faulcon do when he had her trussed surely plume on her and at last wring off her head How many times have the people in this Nation assumed the power to themselves for kings over-flowing the rules of moderation as in the times of Henry the third Edward the second Richard the second Henry the sixth and after upon good behaviour they resigned the keyes of Soveraignity to the intrusted keepers as namely in choosing the supream Officers which of right be longed to the Parliament and a long time since by intrusion kept in the hands of the Diadem but in a Parliamentary orbe wherein when the great Officers were fixed they kept their course from Retrogradation by their Aromatical influence upon the good of the people but after they were at the devotion of the chief by that derivation they wronged the people and augmented the power of invassalage as who in name of the Upper insulted over the Inferiour that all the English world was conformed to an incompatible subjection and submission too unjustly imposed Therefore it was impossible that Charles which had his hands in the blood of hundred thousands by his instruments should after that carriage be free from Cruelty Indignation and Injustice no more then a Leper can be made pure or a Blackamore white or a Leopard clear from spots Therefore I will justly conclude the cup of Gods vengeance was filled to the blim for king Charles his family to drink the dregs Now if the war of France and Germany were just especially the last when the Emperour transgressed the laws of the Empire to make the united Princes to raise an Host to defend themselves and rectifie what was amiss by ingrafting another Cion in the Empire which continued too long in one house of Austria much more just is that of the Parliament which hath Legislative power and authority to draw Acts for the good of the Subject to which the king is alwayes injoyned not to end the Assembly till he had signed such Acts and reformed all abuses complained of If the king should retire from the great Counsel and not signe Bils of Right twelve of the Lords and twenty four of the others were to repaire to him to know the cause of his absence and urge the king to signe such bils and remove grievances If he did not sign nor come in the space of fourty days they ought to chuse a Protector And if he did persist in his absence they might justly depose him as appears in the book of the manner and fashion of holding Parliaments And this was the reason of the former kings removal If a master of a Family who hath wife children servants stock and cattel in a madness should go away from his house and bring a force to destroy his family kill his children take away his cattel off his own ground and burn his house he were a mad man and fitter for Bridewell then to be a master of a family as likewise a Protector who ought to protect his people if he would destroy them because they would have a pious and vertuous government he is to be accounted a destroyer no protector But some will say The king had a number of his subjects and the better part But they were such as supported a Power would take away the property of their real personal and vital estates which the King might do if he conquered if there were not Parliaments a check on the Soveraigne to protect inferiours such kingly power would grow to such a height as no moderation might be 'twixt Mercy and Tyranny I have often heard the Cavaliers say They meant not to take away Parliaments knowing they were for their good and benefit But if the King had prevailed by their means they should