hous of York that challenged the Crown and died in the quarrel His son was Edward the 4. The Issue of the Duke of Glocester Thomas of Woodstock had onely one childe Anne married to the Lord Stafford whose issue came after in regard of this marriage for Thomas was Earl of Buckingham too to bee Duke of Buckingham som of whose blood are yet in England The Issue of John of Gant by his first Wife John of Gant had three Wives 1 Blanch the heir of Lancaster aforesaid by whom hee had Henry 4. and Philippe married to John King of Portingal from whom are lineally descended such as at this day claim interest in that Crown and Elisabeth married to John Holland Duk of Exceter whose grand-childe Henry left onely Anne married to Sir Thomas Nevil Knight from whom the Earl of Westmerland is lineally descended By his second Wife By his second Ladie Constance daughter of Peter King of Castile hee had onely one daughter Katharine married to Henry the third King of Castile of whom the King of Spain that now is is lineally desended By his third Wife Henry 7. his Title His third Katharine Swinford daughter to a Knight of Henault and attending on his wife Blanch hee used as his Concubine in his wife Constance's time and begat of her three sons and one daughter and after married her to Swinford an English Knight who dead and his wife Constance also hee married her Anno 1396 and caused his said children by her to bee legitimated by Parlament Anno 1397. Henry 7. his Title from Lancaster His sons were 1. John Duke of Somerset 2. Thomas Duke of Excester 3. Henry Bishop and Cardinal of Winchester His daughter Jane married to the Earl of Westmerland The Issues of all these were soon spent except of John of Somerset who had two sons John and Edmund John one onely daughter Margaret married to Edmund Tidder Earl of Richmond by whom hee had Henry 7. Edmund and his three sons all died in the quarrel of the Hous of Lancaster without Issue The line of Clarence and Title of the Earl of Huntington George Duke of Clarence second brother of Edw. 4. had Issue Edw. Earl of Warwick put to death by Henry 7. and Margaret Countess of Salisbury married to Sir Richard Poole of Wales by whom hee had Henry Arthur Geoffroy and Reynald after Cardinal Henry Lo. of Montague put to death with his mother by H. 8. had Katharine married to the Earl of Huntington they the now Earl c. and Wenefred married to Sir Tho. Barrington Arthur Marie married to Sir John Stanny and Margaret to Sir Tho. Fitzherbert Geoffrey Geoffrey Poole hee Arthur and Geoffrey which yet live in Italie Henry 7. his Issue The Title of Scotland and of the Ladie Arbella Henry 7. had by the eldest daughter of Edw. 4. for of all the other three remaineth no issue besides Hen. 8. Margaret first married to the K. of Scots they James 5. who Mary mother to the now King After married to the Earl of Anguis they Margaret married to the Earl of Lenox they Henry married to the last Queen and murthered 1566. and Charles married to Elisa Ca4dish by whom the Ladie Arbella The Title of the Lord Beacham and his brother Marie the second daughter first married to Lewis 12. of France without issue then to Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolk they Francis married to Henry Gray Marquis Dorset after Duke of Suffolk beheaded by Q. Mary they Jane married to Dudley both beheaded Katharine first married to the Earl of Pembroke and left by him to the Earl of Hartfort as themselves affirmed in the Tower from whom descendeth the Lord Beacham and Edward Seymer his brother The Title of the Hous of Derbie Eleonor second daughter to Ch. Brandon and the Queen of France was married to Henry Clifford Earl of Cumberland they had issue Margaret married to Henry Earl of Derbie who had issue the last and the now Earl CAP. IV. The Controversie between the Houses of Lancaster and York The Pretence of the Hous of York BY Richard Duke of York son of Richard Earl of Cambridg aforesaid c. That considering hee had by descent joined in him the right aswell of Lionel Duke of Clarence second son to Edw. 3. as of Edward Duke of York the fourth son of Edw. 3. hee was to bee preferred before the Hous of Lancaster claiming onely from John of Gant the third son of Edward 3. Richard 2. Deposed Edward 3. in his old age for the love hee bare to the black Prince confirmed the Succession by Parlament to Richard 2. his son and caused the rest of his sons to swear thereunto Richard 2. for his misgovernment was deposed by common consent and Henry 4. chosen in his place which himself and his issue possessed about 60 years The question is Whether King Richard were rightfully deposed or no That a King may bee deposed on just causes First that a King on just causes may bee deposed is proved by Reason becaus the rule beeing given by the Common-wealth on condition of just government that much violated the condition is broken and the same Common-wealth may take the forfeiture This proved by the autoritie of all Law-makers Philosophers Divines and Governors of Common-wealths and by example of divers Depositions which God himself hath blessed with good success Proved by reasons and examples of Divinitie An ill Prince is an armed enemie with his feet set on the Realm's head whence hee cannot bee plucked but by force of Arms Object God may cut him off by sickness or otherwise and therefore wee are to attend his good pleasure Answ. God alwaies bindeth not himself to work miracles nor often with extraordinary means but hath left upon earth unto men and Common-wealths power to do justice in his Name upon offendors Examples hereof are Ehud stirr'd up by God to kill Eglon King of the Moabites by a stratageme Judg. 3. and the Philistins to kill David to persecute Saul Jeroboam to rebell against Roboam the son of Solomon 2 Reg. 11. 12. Jehu to depose Joram and Q. Jezabel his mother 4. Reg. 9. The Captains of Jerusalem at the persuasion of Jehoiada the high-Priest to conjure against Q. Athalia whom they deposed and Joash chosen in her room 4. Reg. 11. All which hee might have removed without blood-shed if hee would But hee appointed men to work his Will by these violent means to deliver that Common-wealth from oppression and for the greater terror of all bad Princes Allegations of the Lancastrians that King Richard 2. was justly Deposed Just causes of Deposing Richard 2. were Hee murthered his Uncle the Duke of Glocester without form of Law or process Hee put to death the Earl of Arundel banished Warwick Thomas Arundel Archbishop of Canterbury and Henry Duke of Hereford and Lancaster and after King whose goods and inheritance descending to the said Henry from his Father hee wrongfully seized on Hee suffered the Earl of Oxford
his minion to put away his wife a goodly young Ladie daughter of Isabell his father's sister and to marrie another openly to her disgrace And in the last evil Parlament hee made would needs have all absolute autoritie granted to 6 or 7 his favorites to determine of all matters Grieved with these exorbitant indignities the more or better part of the Realm called home by their Letters Henry 4. deposed Richard 2. by Act of Parlament by his own confession of unworthie Government and his voluntarie resignation of the Crown to the said Henry by publick instrument All this without blood-shed And in almost all this Edmund L. D. of York the head of that familie together with Edward Duke of Aumale his eldest son and Richard Earle of Cambridge his yonger the Grand-father of Edward 4. assisted the said Henry That Henry 4. had more right to Succeed unto Richard 2. than Edmond Mortimer heir of Clarence much more any other King Richard 2. deposed the question is Whether Edmond Mortimer then alive his Father Roger being slain in Ireland a little before Nephew removed of Lionel Duke of Clarence or Henry Duke of Lancaster son of John of Gant should have Succeeded in right For Henry is alleged his being neerer to the former King by two degrees and proximitie of Blood though not of the elder Line is to be or hath been preferred in these cases 2. His Title came by a Man the others by a Woman not so much favored by Law nor Reason 3. The said Edmond being offered the Crown by Richard Earle of Cambridge who had married his Sister Anne and other Noblemen at Southampton he judged it against equitie discovered the Treason to Henry the fifth by whose command those Noblemen were executed 1415. Thirty years after which Richard Duke of York son of the aforesaid Earle and Anne for Edmond her brother died without issue set his Title on foot And whereas Roger Mortimer Father of this Edmond was declared Heir apparent by a Parlament 1382 that was done by Richard 2. from the hatred he bore to John of Gant and his son Henry rather than for the goodness of the others Title the cause whereof was Because immediately after the death of the Black Prince divers learned and wise men held opinion That John of Gant eldest son of Edward 3. then living should rather succeed than Richard jure Propinquitatis This made the old King Edward 3. confirm the Succession to Richard 2. by Parlament and the Oaths of his Uncles and made the yong King Richard 2. hold first and his son in jealousie and hatred ever after as distrusting the likelihoods of their Title Declaration of the Heir Apparent in the Princes life being Partial no sure president Partial establishing of Succession by Parlament is no extraordinary thing with Princes which yet most commonly have been to little purpose So did Richard 3. cause John de la Pole Earle of Lincoln and Son to his sister Elisabeth Dutchess of Suffolk to be declared Heir apparent thereby excluding his Brother Edward's four Daughters c. So did Henry 8. prefer the issue of his yonger sister before that of his elder So did Edward 6. declare the Lady Jane Gray his cozen Germain removed to be his Heir and Successor excluding his own two sisters Such say they was the aforesaid Declaration of Roger Mortimer by Richard 2. to as little purpose as from little equity Uncle preferred before the Nephew divers times Contra Sect. 83. That John of Gant should have in right succeeded his father rather than Richard himself as neerer to his father is proved by the course of divers Kingdoms where the Uncle was preferred before the Nephew 1. In Naples much about the same time Robert before Charles the son of Martel his elder Brother 2. In Spain Don Sancho Bravo before the Children of Prince Don Alonso de la Cerda from whom the House of Medina Celi is discended by sentence of Don Alonso the wise and of all the Realm and Nobility Anno 1276. 3. In the Earldom of Arthois Mande before Robert son to her Brother Philip by sentence of Philip le Bel of France confirmed by the Parlament of Paris and by his Successor Philippes de Valois whom he the said Robert had much assisted in the recovery of France from the English 4. In Britanie John Breno Earle of Montfort before Jane Countess of Bloys Daughter and Heir of Guy his elder brother by sentence of Edward 3. and the State of England who put him in possession of that Dukedom 5. In Scotland where albeit Edward 1. of England gave sentence for John Baliol Nephew to the elder Daughter excluding thereby Robert Bruse son to the yonger yet that sentence was held to be unjust in Scotland and the Crown restored to Robert Bruse his son whose posterity holds it to this day 6. The like whereof in Naples Lewis Prince of Taranto son to Philip prevailed before Joan the Neece of Robert aforesaid who was Philip's elder brother though Philip died before Robert because he was a man and a degree neerer to his Grand-father than Joan. 7. And in England it self Henry 1. preferred before William son and Heir of Robert of Normandie his elder brother And King John preferred before Arthur D. of Britanie the son and Heir of his elder brother Geoffrey because he was neerer to Richard his brother then dead than was Arthur Which Right of his the English inclined still to acknowledge and admit and thereupon proclaimed him King notwithstanding that the French and other Forrein Princes of stomach opposed themselves against it King John rightfully preferred before his Brother Arthur Against this last King Richard when he was to go to the Holy Land caused his Nephew Arthur to be declared Heir apparent to the Crown thereby shewing his Title to be the better Answ 1. It was not by Act of Parlament of England for Richard was in Normandie when he made it 2. Richard did it rather to repress the amhitious Humor of John in his absence 3. This Declaration was never admitted in England but renounced by consent of the Nobility in his absence 4. Richard himself at his return disadvowed it appointing John to be his Successor by his last Will and caused the Nobles to swear Fealtie unto him as to his next in blood The Opinion of Civil Lawyers touching the Right of the Uncle and Nephew Contra Sect. 83. This Controversie divided all the Lawyers in Christendom Baldus Oldratus Panormitanus c. for the Nephew Bartolus Alexander Decius Alciatus Cujatius c. for the Uncle Baldus himself at length concludeth That seeing rigor of Law runneth only with the Uncle being properly neerest in blood by one degree and that only indulgence and custom permitteth the Nephew to represent his Father's place whensoëver the Uncle is born before the Nephew and his elder brother dieth before his Father as in the case of John of Gant and Richard 2. he may be
heads For which cause the States of Venice and Genoa which were wont to have simply this Government of Aristocratia were inforced in the end to chuse Dukes The Division and Factions among the Senators of Carthage was the cause why Aid was not sent to Hannibal their Captain in Italie after his so great and important Victorie at Canna which was the very cause of the saving of the Romane Empire and the loss of their own As also afterwards the Emulations and Discord of the Romane Senators in the Affairs and Contentions of Marius and Sylla and of Pompey and Caesar was the occasion of all their Destruction and of their Common-wealth with them Why Helps are given to Kings Therefore it appeareth that of all other Governments Monarchie is the best But for that a King is a Man as others be and thereby not only subject to Errors in Judgment but also to passionate Affections in his Will It was necessarie That the Common-wealth should assign him the best Helps that might be for Directing and Rectifying both his Will and Judgment Lawes the first Help why given The first Help is the Law which Aristotle saith Est mens quaedam nullo perturbata affectu and in the same place addeth That he which joyneth a Law to Govern with the Prince joyneth God to the Prince but he that joyneth to the Prince his Affection to Govern joyneth a Beast So that a Prince Ruling by Law is more than a man or a man Deified and a Prince Ruling by Affections is less than a man or a man Brutified In another place also the same Philosopher saith That a Prince that Ruleth hemself and others by his own Appetite and Affections of all Creatures is the worst and of all Beasts is the most furious and dangerous for that nothing is so outragious as Injustice armed and no Armor is so strong as Wit and Authority Councils the second Help why given The Monarchie of ENGLAND tempered The second Help that Common-wealths do assign to their Kings and Princes be certain Councils as we see the Parlament of England and France the Courts in Spain and Diets in Germanie without which no matter of great Moment can be concluded And besides this commonly every King hath his Privie Council whom he is bound to hear and this was done to temper somwhat the absolute Form of a Monarchie whose danger is by reason of his sole Authoritie to fall into Tyrannie as Aristotle noteth In the Monarchie of England all the Three Forms of Government do enter more or less In that there is one King or Queen it is a Monarchie In that it hath certain Councils which must be heard it participateth of Aristocratia And in that the Commonaltie have their Voices and Burgesses in Parlament it taketh part also of Democratia All which limitations come from the Common-wealth as having Authoritie above their Princes for the good of the Realm Restraint of Kings among the Romans Why Kinglie Government left in Rome This Restraint hath been in all Times and Countries as for example The Romans that began with Kings gave their Kings as great and absolute Authoritie as ours have now adaies but yet their next in Blood Succeeded them not of necessitie but new Kings were Chosen partlie by the Senate and partlie by the People So as of Three * most excellent Kings that ensued immediatelie after Romulus none were of the Blood nor yet Romans born but rather Strangers Chosen for their Virtue and Valor So for the neglecting of their Laws the Senators slew Romulus their first King and cut him in pieces and for the same reason expelled Tarquinius Superbus their last and all his Posteritie and with them the Name and Government of Kings which was changed in the Regiment of Consuls Restraint of Kings among the Grecians In Greece and namely among the Lacedemonians their Kings Authoritie was so restrained by certain Officers of the People called Ephori which commonly were five in number as they were not only chastened by them but also Deprived and somtimes put to death Restraint of Kings in Christendom In Germanie The Emperor can neither make War nor exact any Contribution of men or Money thereunto but by the free leave and Consent of all the States of the Germane Dyet or Parlament And for his Children or next in Kinn they have no action interest or pretence to Succeed but only by free Election if they shall be thought worthie Nay one of the chiefest Points that the Emperor must Swear at his entrance is this That he shall never go about to make the Dignitie of the Emperor Peculiar or Hereditarie to his Familie but leave it unto the Seven Electors free in their power to Chuse his Successor according to the Law made by the Pope Gregory the Fift and the Emperor Charles the Fourth in this behalf In Polonia and Bohemia The Kings of Polonia and Bohemia can neither do any thing of great Moment without the consent of certain principal men called Palatines or Castellans neither may their Children of next Blood Succeed except they be Chosen as in the Empire In Spain France and England In Spain France and England the Privileges of Kings are far more eminent both in the Power and Succession for their Authoritie is much more absolute and their next in Blood do ordinarily Succeed for as touching Authoritie it seemeth that the Kings of France and Spain have greater than the King of England for that everie Ordination of these Two Kings is Law in it self without further Approbation of the Common-wealth which holdeth not in England where no general Law can be made without Consent of Parlament But in the other Point of Succession the restraint is far greater in those other Two Countries than in England For in Spain the next in Blood cannot Succeed be he never so lawfully Discended but by a new Approbation of the Nobilitie Bishops and States of the Realm as it is expresly set down in the Two ancient Councils of Toledo the Fourth and Fifth Nor can the King of Spain's own Son at this day be called Prince except he be first Sworn by the said Nobilitie and Estates as we have seen it practiced in the King Philip's Children In France Women neither any of their Issue though Male are admitted to Succeed in the Crown And therefore was Edward 3d. of England though Son and Heir unto a Daughter of France which was left by her Three Brethren Sole Heir to King Phillip * the fair her Father put by the Crown As also was the King of Navar at the same time Son and Heir unto this Womans eldest Brothers Daughter named Lewis Huttin notwithstanding all their allegations And Philip de Valois a Brothers Son of Philip the fair's preferred to it by General Decree of the States of France and by Verdict of the whole Parlament of Paris And albeit the Law Salica
Assertion Fourth The Fourth which hath been touched before is That a Prince once entered to Government and so placed as hath been said is under no Law or Restraint at all of his authoritie but that himself only is the quiek and living Law and that no limitation can be given unto him by any power under heaven except it be by his own will and that no Nation or Common-wealth can appoint or prescribe how they will Obey or how their Prince shall Govern them but must leave his authoritie free from all bands of Law and this either willingly or by violence is to be procured Assertion Fifth The Fifth That albeit the Heir apparent which is next by Birth to any Crown should be never so impotent or unfit to Govern as if for examples sake he should be deprived of his Senses Madd Furious Lunatick a Fool or the like or that he should be known on the other side to be most Malicious Wicked Vitious or abhominable or should degenerate into a very Beast yea if it were known that he should go about to destroy the Common-wealth and drown the Ship which he had to guide yet saith this man he must be Sacred and Holie unto us and admitted without contradiction to his inheritance which God and Nature hath laid upon him and his direction restraint or punishment must only be remitted to God alone for that no man or Common-wealth may reform or restrain him Succession by Birth better than meer Election Indeed Succession is much to be preferred to Election for that as hath been shewed before of the Government of a Monarchie in respect of other Forms Succession hath commonly far fewer and lesser inconveniences Reason First First Election is subject to great and continual dangers of Ambition Emulation Division Sedition and Contention which bring with them evident peril of universal destruction whereas by Succession these occasions of strife are cut off Reason Second Besides The Prince is in present possession knowing that his Son or next of Kinn is to be his Heir hath more care to leave the Realm in good order Reason Third Succession also bringeth less Mutations in the Common-wealth for that the Son following his Father doth commonly retain the same Friends Counsellors and Servants pursueth the same actions and intentions and for the most part with the same manner whereas he which entereth by Election being an Alien and never likely friend to his predecessor doth alter and turn up-side-down all things Reason Fourth Fourthly He that cometh by Succession having been much respected still for his Title to the Crown bringeth with him less Passions of Hatred Emulation Anger Envie or Revenge against particular men than he that entreth by Election who having been equal to others before his advancement and holden contention with many must needs have matter of quarrel with them which he will seek to revenge when he is in authoritie and they on the other side will bear him less respect and more unwillingly be under him Reason Fifth Whereunto may be added the preeminence and priviledge of Premogeniture and ancestrie of Birth so much respected and commanded by holy writ so that although Jacob were ordained by God to inherit the Benediction yet would God have him to procure the said Priviledge of Eldership from Esau his elder Brother Wherein may also be noted That yet this priviledg is not so inviolable but that upon just causes it may be broken and so in matters of State it was often practiced by God himself as when Juda the 4th Tribe and not Ruben the first was appointed to enjoy the Scepter of the Jews and when Solomon tenth Son of David was appointed to be his Successor not his first or second Election and Succession do help one another And so where in Succession there are inconveniencies as some be or may fall the remedie is First to assist the Prince with Directions and wise Counsel if he be capable thereunto if not to remove him and take in another of the same Blood in his place And by this means Election and Succession do help and moderate one another and remedie one anothers inconveniencies Answer to the first Question propounded at the beginning Now to the first Question made at the beginning of this Chapter What is due to Succession or Prioritie of Blood alone Great honor and respect is to be born unto the same for that it is the principal Condition that leadeth infallibly to the next Succession of the Crown If in the same Person do concur also other necessary circumstances and conditions which were appointed at the same time and by the same authoritie that the Law of Succession was established Answer to the Second To the Second What Interest an Heir apparent hath to the Crown before he be Crowned If he have the Conditions before required he hath the same Interest to the Kingdom which the King of the Romans or Caesar hath to the Germane Empire after his Election who yet is not Emperor before he be Crowned Or as in a Contract of Marriage there is Betrothing made between the parties by words de futuro and is not properly Marriage but espousal only and the Wedding made by words de praesenti or by mutual present consent of both Parties So an Heir apparent before he be Crowned and admitted is but Betrothed to the Common wealth for the time to come and is married afterwards by present mutual Consent and Oaths of both Parties What Respect is due to an Heir Apparent Wherefore the Common-wealth in rigor of Justice oweth no Alleageance to the Heir apparent though his Predecessor be dead until he be Crowned because indeed till then he is not their true King and Sovereign els it were in vain to ask the Realm again three times at their Coronation Whether they will have such a King or no And in the old time they were accustomed to reckon the years of their reign only from the day of their Coronation But in the latter ages for avoiding of Tumults and better keeping of Order it hath been ordained That from the death of the former Princes all matters of Government shall pass in the Name of his next Successor And for better accompt of years That the beginning of his Reign should be reckoned from the day of the Death of his Predecessor A Rare Example of HENRY the Fifth who had Fealtie done unto Him before He was Crowned Again By that in all Countries the Subjects take their Oaths only after the Princes hath Sworn it appeareth that before they were not bound unto him by Alleageance And for the Princes of England it is expresly noted by English Historiographers That no Allegeance is due unto them before they be Crowned and that this Priviledge happened only to Henry the Fifth for his exceeding towardliness and for the great affection of the People towards him to have Homage done unto him before his Coronation and Oath taken Which
both Polydore and Stow do affirm never to have been offered before to any Prince of England Admission is of more importance and hath prevailed against Right of succession Whence it is gathered That the Title of Succession without the Admission of the Common-wealth cannot make a lawful King and that of the two the second is of far more importance which may be proved by many examples As of William Rufus that Succeeded the Conqueror King Henry the first his Brother King Stephen's King John's and others who by only Admission of the Realm were Kings against the Order of Succession Henry and Edward the 4th did found the best part and most surest of their Titles and the defence thereof upon the Election Consent and good will of the People And for this cause the most Politick Princes that had any least suspicion of Troubles about the Title after their deaths have caused their Sons to be Crowned in their own days As Hugh Capetus Robert his eldest Son and Robert Henry the first his second Son excluding his elder Henry also procured the same to Philip the first his eldest Son And Louys le Gros unto two Sons of his first to Philip and after his death to Louys the yonger And this Louys again unto Philip 2. his Son The Prince of Spain is Sworn alwaies and admitted by the Realm during his Father's Reign The same Consideration also moved King David to Crown his Son Solomon in his own days And in England King Henry 2. considering the alteration that the Realm had made in admitting King Stephen before him against the Order of Lineal Succession and fearing that the like might happen also after him caused his eldest Son Henry the third to be Crowned in his life time So as England had two Kings Henry's living at one time with equal Authoritie How the next in succession by Propinquitie of Blood hath oftentimes been put back by the Common-wealth and others further off admitted in their Places even in these Kingdoms where Succession prevaileth with many Examples of the Kingdoms of Israël and Spain CAP. VII Examples of the Jews SAUL David Elected to the prejudice of Saul's Sons ALbeit God made Saul a true and lawful King over the Jews and consequently also gave him all Kinglie Prerogatives whereof one Principle is To have his Children succeed after him in the Crown yet he suffered not any of his Generation to succeed him but elected David who was a stranger by birth and no kinn at all to the deceased King Rejecting thereby from the Crown not only Isboseth Saul's elder Son though followed for a time by Abner Capt. General of that Nation with eleven Tribes but also Jonathan his other Son who was so good a man and so much praised in holy Scripture Whereby it is evident that the fault of the Father may prejudicate the Son's Right to the Crown albeit the Son have no part in the fault DAVID Solomon to the prejudice of Adonias and his Brethren David being placed in the Crown by Election free Consent and Admission of the People of Israël though by motion and direction of God himself no man will deny but that he had given him all Kinglie Priviledges and Regalities as among other the Scripture testifieth that it was assured him by God That his Seed should Reign after him yea and that for ever Yet this was not performed to any of his elder Sons but only to Solomon his yonger and tenth Son who by the means and perswasions of Queen Bersabé his Mother and Nathan the Prophet was chosen and made King by his Father to the prejudice of his elder Adonias and the rest of his Brethren * Whereby we are taught that these and like determinations of the People Magistrates and Common-wealths when their designments are to good ends and for just respects and causes are allowed also by God and oftentimes are his own special drifts and dispensations though they seem to come from man Jeroboam to the prejudice of Roboam Solomon's Son and Heir After Solomon's death Rehoboam his Son and Heir coming to Sichem where all the people of Israël were gathered for his Admission and having refused to yield to certain Conditions for taking away of some hard and heavie Impositions laid upon them by Solomon his Father which the People had proposed unto him ten Tribes of the twelve refused to admit him for their King but chose one Jeroboam his Servant a meer stranger and of poor Parentage and God allowed thereof for the Sins of Solomon leaving Rehoboam over two Tribes and Jeroboam over ten God's dealing in his Common-wealth a president for all others Although we may say that in the Jewish Common-wealth God almightie did deal and dispose of things against the ordinary course of man's Law as best liked himself whose Will is more than Law and is to be limitted by no Rule or Law of man and therefore that these Examples are not properly the act of a Common-wealth as our Question demandeth yet are they well brought in because they may give light to all the rest For if God permitted and allowed this in his own Common-wealth that was to be the Example and Pattern of all others no doubt but he approveth also the same in other Realms when just occasions are offered either for his service the good of the People and Realm or else for punishment of the sins and wickedness of some Princes Examples of SPAIN Four Races of Spanish Kings Spain since the expulsion of the Romans hath had Three or Four Races of Kings The first is from the Gothes which began to reign about the year 416 and endured by the space of 300. years until Spain was lost to the Moors And to them the Spaniard referreth all his old Nobility The second from Don Pelago who after the Invasion of the Moors was chosen King of Austurias about the year 717. and his Race continued adding Kingdom to Kingdom for the space of 300. years until the year 1034. The third from Don Sancho Mayor King of Navarra who having gotten into his Power the Earldoms of Arragon and Castilia made them Kingdoms and divided them among his Children And Don Fernando his second Son King of Castilia sirnamed afterward the Great by marrying of the Sister of Don Dermudo King of Leon and Asturias joyned all those Kingdoms together and this Race endured for 500. years until the year 1549 When for the Fourth the House of Austria came in by Marriage of the Daughter and Heir of Don Ferdinando sirnamed the Catholick which endureth until this day The First Race For the First Race because it had express Election joyned with Succession as by the Councils of Toledo it appeareth it can yield no valuable examples for this place The Second Race Don Alonso to the prejudice of Don Favila his Children In the Second Though the Law of Succession by Propinquitie
of Blood was established yet many examples do testifie That the next in Blood was oftentimes put back by the Common-wealth upon just causes Don Pelago's Son * being dead after two years Reign only none of his Children though he left divers were admitted because they were yong and unable to Govern But Don Alonso the Catholick his Son in Law who for his valiant acts was sirnamed the Great Don Aurelio and Don Silo to the prejudice of Don Fruela and his Children To Don Alonso succeeded his Son Don Fruela who was first a noble King But for that he declined to Tyrannie and put to death wrongfully his own Brother Don Vimerano rarely beloved of the Spaniards he was himself put to death by them And albeit he left two goodly lawful Children yet in hatred of the Father neither of them was admitted by the Realm to succeed him but his Cozen German Don Aurelio brothers Son to Don Alonso the Catholick who after six years Reign dying without issue a brother in Law of his named Don Silo was admitted Don Vermudo to the prejudice of Don Alonso the Chaste who nevertheless come's in again afterwards very happily This Don Silo being also dead without issue and the Spaniards anger against Don Fruela being now wel asswaged they admitted his aforesaid Son Don Alonso the yonger sirnamed the Chaste though his Reign for this time endured very little being put out by a bastard Uncle of his Don Aluregado with help of the Moors who after six years Reign dying also without issue the matter came in deliberation again Whether Don Alonso the Chaste that lived hidden in a Monasterie should be admitted again or rather his Cozen German Don Vermudo Son to his Uncle the Prince Vimerano whom his Father had slain The Realm determined Don * Vermudo though he were much farther off by Propinquity of Blood for that he was judged for the more valiant and able Prince than the other who seemed to be made more acquainted with the life of Monks than of a King Neither do the Historiographers of Spain reprehend this Fact of the Realm But King Vermudo after three years Reign being weary of a Kingly life and feeling some scruple of Conscience that he had forsaken the life Ecclesiastical he Resigned willingly the Government unto his said Cozen Don Alonso the Chast who after all his affliction having been deprived four times Reigned yet 51. years and proved the most valiant and excellent King that ever that Nation had both for his valor and other vertuous deeds and had great friendship with King Charles the Great of France who lived in that time Don Fruela to the prejudice of Don Ordonio's Children Don Ordonio the Second dying left four Sons and one Daughter and yet the State of Spain displaced them all and gave their Kingdom to their Uncle Don Fruela second Brother to their Father And Morales saith That there appeareth no other reason hereof but only for that these Sons of the King deceased were yong and not so apt to Govern well the Realm as their Uncle was And this notwithstanding that the said Morales writeth That at that time and before the Law of Succession by Propinquitie of Blood was so strongly confirmed that the Kingdom of Spain was made an inheritance so intayled and tyed only to the next in Blood as there was no possibility to alter the same Don Alonso 4th Son to Ordonio to the prejudice of Don Fruela his Children And Don Ramiro to the prejudice of the Children of Don Alonso And after a years Reign this King Fruela being dead and having left divers Children at mans state they were all put by the Crown and the eldest Son of the aforesaid Don Ordonio the second named Don Alonso the fourth was chosen for King Who leaving afterward his Kingdom and betaking himself to a Religious habit offered to the Common-wealth of Spain his eldest Son named Don Ordonio to be their King but they refused him and took his Brother Uncle to the yong Prince named Don Ramiro who reigned 19. years and was a most excellent King and gained Madrid from the Moors Don Sancho el Gordo to the prejudice of the yong Son of Ordonio the Third To Ramiro the second succeeded his elder Son Don Ordonio the third who after 7. years reign albeit he left a Son named el Enfante Don Vermudo yet he was not admitted but his Brother Don Sancho 1. sirnamed el Gordo Uncle to the yong Prince And the reason of this Alteration Morales giveth First that the said Enfante was a little Child and not sufficient for Government and defence of the Country But yet after Don Sancho had reigned and his Son Don Ramiro the third after him he was called and made King by the Realm under the name of Vermudo 2. who left after him Don Alonso 5. and he again his Son Don Vermudo 3. who Marrying his Sister Dona Sancha that was his Heir unto Don Ferinando first Earle and then King of Castile who was second Son to Don Sancho * Mayor King of Navar he joyned by these means the Kingdoms of Leon and Castile together which were separated before And so ended the Line of Don Pelago and entered the Blood of Navar The Third Race Dona Berenguela to the prejudice of her elder Sister Dona Blancha and her Son St. Lewis of France For the Third Race Prince Lewis of France who afterwards was King Lewis 8. Son to Philip Augustus having married Dona Blancha of Spain that was Neece to King John of England by her Mother-side upon these Conditions on the part of King John thereby to make Peace with the French that she should have for her Dowry all those Towns and Countries which the said King Philip had taken upon the English in Normandie and Gasconie And on the part of Spain That if the Prince Henry only Brother to the said Lady Blanch should die without issue then she should Succeed in the Crown of Spain got Lewis 9. by her And yet Prince Henry her Brother dying without issue both she and her Son were put by and excluded by the State of Spain against the evident Right of succession and Propinquitie of Blood And her yonger Sister * Dona Berenguela was admitted And the only Reason they yielded thereof was not to admit Strangers to the Crown Don Sancho el Bravo to the prejudice of his Nephews Don Alonso and Hernando de la Cerda The Prince of Spain * Don Alonso Nephew to St. Fernando dying before the King his Father left two * Sons Don Alonso and Hernando de la Cerda whom the Grand-father left Commended to the Realm as lawful Heirs apparent to the Crown Yet for that one Uncle of theirs yonger Brother to their Father named Don Sancho el * Bravo was like to manage the matters of War better than they he was by a general
shall principally be treated of in this place The Felicitie of the Soul is the chiefest End appointed to every Common-wealth First we are to suppose That the first and chiefest End that God and Nature appointed to every Common-wealth was not so much the temporal Felicitie of the Body as the everlasting of the Soul And consequently that all other things of this transitory life are ordained to serve and be directed to that higher End And this was not only revealed to the Jewes by holy Scripture but also unto the Gentiles and Heathens by the instinct and light of Nature it self What End Pagan Philosophers and Law-makers had in their doings For there was never yet Pagan Philosopher that wrote of framing a good Common-wealth neither Law-maker among them that left Ordinances for the same purpose Which besides the temporal end of directing things for the bodie had not special care also of matters appertaining to the minde to wit of nourishing and rewarding virtue and for restraining and punishing of vice and wickedness Institution of Sacrifices by Nature Examples of Noah and Job And Nature did not only teach man that he should serve God but also how he should serve him to wit That the chiefest and supremest honor that could be done unto him in this life was the honor of Sacrifice and Oblations which we see was practiced even in those first beginnings of the Law of Nature before the Levitical Law For so we read in Genesis of Noah That he made an Altar and offered Sacrifices to God upon the same of all the Beasts and Birds that he had in the Ark Odoratúsque est Dominus odorem suavitatis And the like of Job that was a Gentile and lived before Moses Sanctificabat filios consurgénsque diluculo offerebat holocausta per dies singulos Example of the Indians Religion the chief End of a Common-wealth and Magistrates Among the Indians also where never any notice of Moses Law came there was never any Nation sound that acknowledged not some kind of God and offered not some kinde of Sacrifice unto him And though both in distinguishing between false gods and the true God and in the means of honoring him they have fallen into most gross and infinite errors as also the Gentiles of Europe Asia and Africa yet it is evident hereby that by God and Nature the highest and chiefest End of a Common-wealth is Cultus Dei And consequently that the principal care and charge of a Prince and Magistrate even by Nature it self is to look thereunto As among the Antients both Jews and Gentiles their Kings and chief Magistrates for many ages were also Princes And divers learned men do hold that the Privilege and preeminence of Primogeniture consisted principally in this That the eldest Sons were Priests The same proved by Authorities Nulla est gens saith Cicero tam fera nulla tam immanis cujus mentem non imbuerit deorum colendorum Religio And Plutarch writing against a certain Atheist of his time saith thus If you travel far Countries you may chance to finde some Cities without Learning without Kings without Riches without Money But a Citie without Temples and without gods and Sacrifices no man yet hath ever seen And finally Aristotle having numbred divers things necessary to a Common-wealth addeth these words Quintum Primum Circa rem Divinam cultus quod sacerdotium Sacrificiúmque vocant The absurd Atheism of our time in Politicks And therefore we see how false and impious is the opinion of divers Atheists of our time who affirm That Religion ought not to be so greatly respected in a Prince as though it were his chiefest care or the matter of most importance in his Government False and impious opinion specially among Christians who have so much the greater obligation to take to heart this matter of Religion by how much greater light and knowledge they have of God And for this cause also in all the Princes Oaths taken at their Admission as before hath been * recited the first and principal point of all other is about Religion and maintenance thereof not only by themselves but also by their Lievtenants c. The Oath given by the Emperor Justinian to all his Governors to take at their Reception And the Civil Law yieldeth a very solemn Form of an Oath which the Emperor Justinian was wont to give to all his Governors c. of Countries c. before they could be admitted to their Charges which is as followeth Juro per Deum omnipotentem filium ejus unigenitum Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum Spiritum Sanctum per Sanctam gloriosam Dei genitricem semper-virginem Mariam per quatuor Evangelia quae in manibus meos teneo per Sanctos Archangelos Michaëlem Gabriëlem puram conscientiam germanúmque servitium me servaturum sacratissimis nostris Dominis Justiniano Theodosiae conjugi ejus occasione traditae mihi ab eorum pietate administrationis Et quod communicator sum sanctissimae Dei Catholicae Apostolicae Ecclesiae nullo modo vel tempore adversabor ei nec alium quocunque permittam quantum possibilitatem habeam Et si verò non haec omnia servà vero recipiam omnia incommoda hìc in futuro seculo in terribili judicio magni Domini Dei salvatoris nostris Jesu Christi habebo partem cum Juda cum lepra Geizi cum tremore Cain in super poenis quae lege eorum pietatis continentur ero Subjectus Why Princes should be endued with Religion This Oath did all the Governors of Christian Countries take in old time By which Oath and the other Oaths which Emperors and Kings did make themselves at their admission about this point we may see that it is their chiefest and highest end and office to assist their Subjects to the attaining of their supernatural end by knowing and serving God in this life For that otherwise God should draw no other fruit or commodity out of humane Common-wealths than of an assembly of brutish creatures He that wanteth it is guilty of high Treason against God And therefore whatsoever Prince or Magistrate doth not help his Subjects to this end omitteth the first and principal part of his charge and committeth high Treason against his Lord and Master in whose place he is and consequently is not fit for that place and dignitie though he should perform the other two parts of Justice and Valor never so well Lack of Religion the chiefest Cause and justest to exclude a Prince Whereof it ensueth That nothing in the world can so justly exclude an Heir apparent from his Succession as want of Religion nor any cause whatsoever justifie and clear the conscience of the Common-wealth or of particular men that in this cause should resist his entrance as if they judge him faultie in this point If a Marriage may be dissolved