overturn overturn overturn it and it shall be no more untill he come whose right it is and I will give it him 2. That after their return from their captivity in Babylon though in the principalitie of Zorobabel and perhaps of some of his posterity there was a little reviving of the dignitie of Judahs tribe yet within few years the supreme yea the regall power came into the hands of the Macchabees who were of the tribe of Levi and yet ruled many of them as kings over the Jews untill Herod did wholly take away their principality from them Now to this objection some answer That though in the time of the Macchabees who were indeed of the tribe of Levi the chief power was removed from the tribe of Judah yet there was then a Lawgiver from between his feet to wit the Sanhedrin that great Councell of seventy Elders to whom the cognizance of the weightiest causes appertained and the establishing of laws and who were still elected out of the tribe of Judah and continued constantly in the exercise of this power untill a little before the birth of Christ Herod who was a mere stranger became king of Judea and rooted them quite out yet because the chief thing alledged in this answer to satisfie the objection to wit that the Sanhedrin were all chosen out of the tribe of Judah is taken for granted but cannot be well proved a more full answer I conceive is given by others in these following particulars 1. That by Judah here is meant the whole nation and kingdome of the Jews after the ten tribes of Israel were separated from them and became a kingdome apart by it self and that because although there were of the tribes of Levi and Benjamin amongst them yet they were as it were incorporated into the tribe of Judah and the whole commonwealth had their name from Judah and was called the kingdome of Judah insomuch that in the eleaventh chapter of the first book of the kings three severall times to wit vers 13 32 36. it is said that there should be onely one tribe reserved to the kings that were of the posteritie of David and 1. King 12. 20. it is said There was none that followed the house of David but the tribe of Judah onely yea and after their return from the captivitie out of Babylon they were all chiefly planted in the lot and territory that appertained to the tribe of Judah whence it is that though after Nehemiahs time the chief government was in the hands of the priests yet because the whole people were called by the name of Judah the kingdome and commonwealth of Judah therefore still the government may be said to be in Judah yea and this therefore may well be thought to be the main thing intended in this prophecie that whereas those of the kingdome of the ten tribes of Israel after they were carried away captive into Assyria did never return thence again to become a kingdome and commonwealth as before yet those of Judah after seventy years captivity in Babylon returned again into their own land and became a kingdome and commonwealth as before though not so glorious living under the government of their own lavvs and the command of their own rulers and so continued untill a little before Christs coming the government vvas vvholly taken from them and not long after the death of Christ their kingdome and commonvvealth vvâ—s by the Romanes utterly destroyed 2. That even at that time vvhen the supreme povver vvas in the priests they had it by the choice and appointment of the people of Judah vvho conferred this honour upon the Macchabees because of their zeal and valour in fighting against their enemies 3. Though all the Sanhedrim vvere not of the tribe of Judah yet doubtlesse the greatest part of them vvere of that tribe as it is evident because the greatest part by farre of those that returned from Babylon vvere of that tribe vvhich is sufficient to make good this prophecy That there should not cease to be a Lawgiver from between Judahs feet that is of his seed and progeny untill the Messias came And unto him shall the gathering of the people be That is vvhereas a little before the coming of Christ Judah shall seem to have lost his authority in Christ it shall be recovered again to vvhom not onely the Jevvs but all other nations shall come in as to their king and submit themselves to his sceptre Vers 11. Binding his fole unto the vine c. This last passage of Judahs blessing is vvholly a prophecy concerning the vvondrous fruitfulnesse of that part of Canaan vvhich should fall to Judahs lot and portion to vvit that it should abound vvith vines and fat pastures insomuch that vvine and milk should be as plentifull and common in a manner as vvater amongst them Vers 13. Zebulâ—n shall dwell at the haven of the sâ—a Though Issachar vvere older then Zebulun yet Jacob blesseth him first because his lot vvas next in the division of the land Josh 19. 10. And the third lot came up for the children of Zebulun c. and prophesieth of his dvvelling by the sea alluding to his name which importeth dwelling Gen. 30. 20. Now will my husband dwell with me c. and she called his name Zebâ—lâ—n and indeed his borders were both to the main sea Westward and to the sea of Galilee Eastward Josh 19. 10. And their border went up toward the sea c. Isa 9. 1. When at the first he lightly afflicted the land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali and afterward did more grievously afflict her by the way of the sea beyond Jordan in Galilee of the nations Vers 14. Issachar is a strong asse c. Jacob here foresheweth how different the disposition of this tribe of Issachar should be from that of Zebulun whereof he had before spoken as Moses also doth Deut. 33. 18. Rejoyce Zebulun in thy going out and Issachar in thy tents to wit that whereas those of Zebulun should be altogether for tradin gand trafficking abroad at sea these of Issachar should be wholly for a quiet life and countrey imployments at home Issachar is a strong asse c. The meaning is that this tribe should be of great strength but of a more servile disposition that his portion should fall in a fertile and fat soil and that accordingly his strength should be imployed in tilling the ground and other countrey labours and last of all that he should rather undergo any tributes and taxes that should be laid upon him then be drawn from that quiet which at home he did enjoy But then withall we must know that this is spoken onely concerning the condition of this tribe for the generall for even in this tribe there were sometimes some that were of a more noble and a more heroicall spirit Judg. 5. 15. it is said That the princes of Issachar were with Deborah even Issachar and also Barak and 1. Chron. 12. 32. it
Egypt Gen. 12. 10. so Aram-Naharaim is in Greek called Mesopotamia because it lay between the rivers Vnto the citie of Nahor That is the city where Nahor dwelt so that is called Christs city wherein he dwelt Mat. 9. 1. And he entred into a shippe passed over and came into his own citie And this city here spoke of was Haran whereby it is evident that if Nahor came not to Haran with Abraham from Ur of the Chaldees as it seems he did not Gen. 11. 31. Terah took Abraham his sonne and Lot the sonne of Haran and Sarah his daughter in law his sonne Abrams wife and they went forth with them from Vr of the Chaldees c. and they came unto Haran and dwelt there yet afterwards he removed thither Vers 11. And he made his camels to kneel down That is it being now evening he caused them to lie down to rest themselves This phrase of kneeling down is used because after this manner camels use to lie down first to fall down on their knees and then to cast their bodies on the ground to rest themselves Vers 12. And he said O Lord God of my master Abraham c. It is said this was but a speaking in his heart vers 45. As for that which he now desired of God to wit that the damsel who should when he desired drink of her answer him Drink and I will give thy camels drink also might be the maid whom God had appointed to be Isaacs wife no doubt it came into his mind to desire this by the speciall instinct of Gods spirit yet he chooseth such a token as might be withall a probable signe of an ingenuous disposition in her that did it Vers 17. And the servant ran to meet her He was at the well before Rebekah came thither vers 13. Behold I stand here by the well c. but having stood a little aloof off the well till she had filled her pitcher and was going away he then ranne to meet her c. Vers 28. And the damsel ranne and told them of her mothers house these things It seems that it was the custome of those times and places for the women to dwell apart by themselves vers 67. And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarahs tent Vers 29. And Laban ranne out unto the man to the well By the appointment happely both of his father Bethuel and his mother Vers 48. To take my masters brothers daughter unto his sonne For Rebekah was the daughter of Bethuel the sonne of Nahor Abrahams brother and it is usuall in the Scriptures to call grandchildren sonnes and daughters Vers 49. Tell me that I may turn to the right hand or to the left That is that I may somewhere else look out for a wife for my masters sonne And thus he opposeth the right hand and the left to that right way mentioned in the former verse wherein the Lord had led him to take his masters brothers daughter unto his sonne Vers 50. Then Laban and Bethuel answered The sonne is set before the father because as it seems he spake in the name of them all his father being old and therefore it may well be not so able to return the answer We cannot speak unto thee bad or good That is we cannot speak any thing at all against it he speaks good against any thing propounded that contradicts it upon good ground he evil that speaks against an apparent good motion out of some evil affection Laban therefore in this proverbiall speech acknowledgeth that good could not be said against this motion and evil he would not speak Vers 51. Let her be thy masters sonnes wife as the Lord hath spoken That is we perceive plainly by the whole carriage of this businesse that this match is made in heaven God hath decreed that she shall be his wife and therefore God forbid that we should oppose it Let it be as the Lord hath spoken The same phrase David useth speaking of Gods decree 2. Sam. 16. 10. The Lord hath said unto him Curse David Vers 59. They sent away Rebekah their sister and her nurse Whose name was Deborah Gen. 35. 8. But Deborah Rebekahs nurse died c. Vers 60. Let thy seed possesse the gate of those that hate them See the notes upon Gen. 22. 17. Thy seed shall possesse the gate of his enemies Vers 65. Therefore she took a veil and covered her face A sâ—gne of modestie as also of subjection 1. Cor. 11. 5 6 10. But every woman that prayeth or prophâ—sieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head for that is even all one as if she were shaven for if the woman be not covered let her also be shorn but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven let her be covered For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head c. Vers 67. And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarahs tent and took Rebekah That is having conducted her into the tent of Sarah his deceased mother which it seems had been reserved ever since Sarahs death for Isaacs wife within some convenient time after he took her that is he was in a solemn manner after the rites of those times married to her and so she became his wife CHAP. XXV Vers 1. THen again Abraham took a wifâ— and her name was Keturah That is after Sarah was dead and that weighty businesse of his sonnes marriage dispatcht But how then doth the Apostle say that Abrahams body was dead in the hundredth year of his age for matter of begetting children if now by another he have so many children fourty years after I answer 1. By the deadnesse of his body is meant his unlikelyhood to have children in regard of great age not that it was absolutely impossible by the ordinary course of nature 2. That grace of God that strengthened him for the generation of Isaac did continue unto him this vigour of nature for many years after for farther procreation of children Indeed considering 1. that there is no mention neither of Keturah nor of her children in all the foregoing story 2. that Sarah caused Hagar and Ishmael to be cast out and therefore much lesse would have endured another 3. that when Isaac was to be sacrificed he is called Abrahams onely sâ—nne I see not how we can hold that Abraham married Keturah in Sarahs life-time Vers 6. But unto the sonnes of the concubines which Abraham had Abraham gave gifts c. That is unto the sonnes of Hagar and Kâ—turah The Hebrew word signifieth a half-wife or a divided and secondary wife and it seems by this place that not onely they were called concubines who as Hagar were taken after a man was married to be as it were partner-wives for the right of the bed though not for honour and government of the family but also second wives married after the first was dead because their children also had no right of inheritance And sent them away from
born he came out of his Mothers womb immediately after his brother that was born before him holding him by the heel as if he would have pulled him back that he might be born before him which doubtlesse was purposely so disposed by the providence of God as a signe presaging what should afterward come to passe to wit that he should by cunning supplant his brother and get the preheminence of the birthright and blessing from him Vers 27. And Esau was a cunning hunter c. Their different conditions are herein expressed Esau was a man that followed his pleasure a cunning man and valourous Jacob a plain man that is a man of little note in comparison of his brother there was not that shew of outward strength and valour in him he was a good plain man dwelling in tents that is he lived a plain shepherds life and was not so conspicuous for outward glory It is true indeed that the word in the Originall here translated plain signifies upright sincere and without gulle neither do I deny but that this also may be intended in this place to wit that Jacob was a candid plain-hearted man for such Jacob was doubtlesse in his whole conversation though in that particular of getting away the blessing from his brother being carried away with his mothers counsel and his desire of the birthright he failed through infirmity and used more disseâ—bling and fraud then upright and plain-hearted men can in any businesse well endure to use But yet I say that exposition concerning the plainnesse of his course and condition of life doth best suit vvith the drift of this place as is evident by the opposition vve may note betvvixt that which is said of Esau and that vvhich is said of Jacob Esau was a cunning hunter a man of the field and Jacob was a plain man dwelling in tents Vers 28. And Isaac loved Esau because he did eat of his venison That is he loved him best his affection vvas most to him as Rebekahs vvas most to Jacob though she loved Esau too Novv because it may vvell be thought that it did not beseem so great and so good a man as Isaac vvas to preferre Esau in his affection npon so slight a ground and so poâ—re a reason as this was because his venison pleased his palate it is conceived by some Expositours that it was not merely for the venison sake that he loved him so dearly but because his sonne Esaus care and diligence in providing for him the meat which he saw he delighted in was in his apprehension a signe that he did greatly reverence respect and love his father and that he would prove the most able and active the fittest for great imployments and the best and stoutest stay and support of their family Vers 30. And Esau said to Jacob Feed me I pray thee with that same red pottage The word Pottage is not in the Hebrew but onely the word red is doubled with that red red and the cause of this was either that not knowing what to call it he onely describes it by the colour and that doubtlesse because it was very red or else because coming home weary and ready to faint vers 29. he speaketh as one in haste and greedily longing for it undoubtedly he might have had other food in his fathers house and therefore this so sudden and earnest desire of that food which his brother had provided for himself must needs proceed 1. from the extremity he was in being ready to faint 2. from the eager desire of his appetite towards that meat which in this extremitie his eye first pitched upon Therefore was his name called Edom. That is Red. When and by whom this name was given him it is uncertain happely it was in processe of time when he had lost his birthright which might make this passage the more seriously thought on but however this was the occasion because of this his immoderate desire of this red broth he was called Edom and so this name was a kind of brand set upon him for his greedinesse and profanenesse Vers 31. Sell me this day thy brithright The birthright made them first in honour under their parents Gen. 49. 3. Reuben thou art my first-born my might and the beginning of my strength the excellency of dignitie and the excellencie of power 2. it gave them a double portion of their fathers goods Deut. 21. 17. He shall acknowledge the sonne of the hated for the first-born by giving him a double portion of all that he hath 3. it advanced them to the government of the family Gen. 4. 7. Vnto thee shall be his desire and thou shalt rule over him and as some think to the Priesthood too and withall it was an outward signe and pledge of being one of those first-born Heb. 12. 23. which are written in heaven fellow-heirs together with Christ of the heavenly kingdome the heavenly Canaan Jacob therefore upon this advantage of Esaus desiring his pottage bargains with him for the birthright and gets it from Esau in the managing whereof to free him from sinne is a needlesâ—e labour since we know that God is often wont to bring good out of evil Vers 34. And he did eat and drink and rose up c. Never troubled at all for that which he had done CHAP. XXVI Vers 1. ANd Isaac went unto Abimelech c. See the note upon â— chap. 20. vers 2. Vers 2. Go not down into Egypt c. God would not allow him to remove into Egypt whâ—ther it seems he was purposed to have gone but limits him to Palestina both because he would thereby shew him how his affections should cleave to the land promised to him and to his seed and also that he might try his faith with bringing him to rest upon his promises whilst he lived in a land where the famine did perhaps in part prevail Vers 3. And I will perform the oath which I sware c. To wit the oath which I sware to thy father Abraham whilst thou wert by For immediately after Isaac should have been offered as a sacrifice did the Lord swear this to Abraham chap. 22. 15 16 17 18. Vers 9. And Abimelech called Isaac and said Behold of a surety she is thy wife This he had said because vers 8. he saw Isaac sporting with Rebekah so holy and unblamable was Isaacs life that worse then this he never suspected Vers 15. All the wells which his fathers servants had digged c. the Phiâ—istines had stopped them c. This injury was great because of the scarcitie of waters and against their covenant and oath Gen. 21. 30. For these seven ew-lambs shalt thou take of my hand that they may be a witnesse unto me that I have digged this well c. Vers 24. And the Lord appeared unto him the same night As it seems to comfort him in regard of the envious proceedings of the Philistines against him Vers 29. Thou art now the blessed
lye intending withall to draw him out secretly afterward and so to restore him to his father Observable indeed it is that Reuben should do this who being Jacobs eldest sonne and that by Leah had most cause to be jealous of and inraged against the suspected superioritie of this sonne of Rachel But herein was the power of God magnified vvho made him the instrument of delivering Joseph that vvas most unlikely to have done it and yet there may be some reasons withall conceived why Reuben above all the rest should seek to rescue Joseph out of their hands for having lately repented him of that his foul incest with Bilhah his fathers concubine for vve cannot think that the Patriarchs vvhen they fell so grievously did also runne on in a state of impenitency he vvas doubtlesse the more tender of having any hand again in such a high degree of vvickednesse and vvas happely glad to have so fair an occasion to assvvage his fathers displeasure conceiving evil against him for his former sinne and fearing lest this intended vvickednesse should it come to his fathers knovvledge vvould be chiefly charged upon him even because of his former offense Vers 28. Then there passed by Midianites The Merchants to vvhom Joseph vvas sold are in severall places called sometimes Ishmaelites sometimes Midianites vvho yet vvere tvvo distinct nations the one of Ishmael Hagars sonne the other of Midian Keturahs sonne Gen 25. 2. but because they dvvelt both in Arabia it is most likely that there vvas in this company of Merchants both Ishmaelites and Midianites vvho did traffick together and to that purpose vvere going together into Egypt and are therefore called sometimes Ishmaelites sometimes Midianites And they drew lift up Joseph out of the pit Reuben being formerly upon some pretence slipped avvay from them that he might go about some other vvay take Joseph out of the pit without their knowledge in his absence they sold him to these Arabian Merchants and chuckerd themselves no doubt with thinking how farre they should be now from crouching to him that was himself made a bondslave Doubtlesse Joseph did both before when they cast him into the pit and now again earnestly beg of them with many tears that they would not do it as is evident by their own confession Gen. 42. 21. And they said one to another We are verily guilty concerning our brother in that we saw the anguish of his soul when he besought us and we would not hear but malice had for the present hardened their hearts Vers 29. And he rent his clothes As the custome was in those times when any grievous calamitie or sorrow befell men either thereby to expresse how their hearts were broken and torn with grief and anguish of spirit or else how little comfort they took in any thing and how little they cared what became of them not minding those things which were most usefull for them Vers 30. And he returned unto his brethren and said The child is not Hereby meaning not onely that he was not in the pit but also that they had slain him in his absence as at first they intended for in Scripture those that are dead are said not to be Jer. 31. 15. Rachel weeping for her children refused to be comforted because they were not Questionlesse Reuben for the reasons before noted upon ver 21. was seriously and heartily distressed for that they had done yet evident it is on the other side that when they had told him that they had onely sold him to the Ishmaelites and had not slain him he consented to conceal this their fact from their father and to deceive him with a forget tale because he should otherwise have stirred up the hatred of all his brethren against him wherein though he cannot be excused from sinning greatly yet he was farre lesse guilty then the rest of his brethren Vers 35. And all his daughters rose up to comfort him He might have other daughters besides Dinah though they be not mentioned but however hereby may be meant his sonnes wives or their daughters But he refused to be comforted That is so farre did his passions prevail over him that he minded not what they said to him but even gave way to the extremitie of his sorrow which is noted as an infirmitie in this good Patriarch but chiefly to aggravate the wickednesse of his sonnes who had brought this sorrow upon their father yea upon Isaac their aged grandfather too for he lived thirteen years after this as is before noted ver 1. and had therefore his share doubtlessâ— in this sorrow CHAP. XXXVIII Vers 1. ANd it came to passe at that time c. It is very hard to determine of what time this is meant when Judah went to his friend Hirah the Adullamitâ— that is that dwelt in Adullam a city mentioned Josh 19. 35. and so by his means married the daughter of Shuah the Canaanite and that because it is evident that from the time of Josephs being sold into Egypt unto the time of Jacobs going down thither to him there were but three and twenty years at the most for he was sold at seventeen years old chap. 37. 1. Joseph being seventeen years old was feeding the flock c. from which time till he was exalted in Pharaohs Court there were but thirteen years chap. 41. 46. And Joseph was thirtie years old when he stood before Pharaoh King of Egypt c. to which if we adde the seven plenteous years that were in Egypt after his exaltation and the two years and upwards that were spent of the famine ere Joseph sent for his father and his family chap. 45. 6. For these two years hath the famine been in the land c. this will make up at the time of his coming into Egypt about three and twenty years and yet it must needs be yielded that all these things related in this chapter were done before Jacob removed out of Canaan into Egypt and how they could be done within the compasse of so few years it may seem very questionable Some Expositours hold that these words And it came to passe at that time must be strictly taken with reference to that which went before in the former chapâ—â—â— â—o wiâ— that Judah did this in that very year or thereabout when Joseph was sold into Egypt and that 1. because the words are so expresse that at that time Judah thus married neither can there be any probable reason given why the relation of those things that concern Joseph should be broken off to insert these things concerning Judah but onely this because presently upon the selling of Joseph Judah made this marriage with the daughter of Shuah 2. Because till Joseph was sold into Egypt Judah dwelt amongst his brethren and therefore as is likely it was after this that he went aside and matched himself with the daughter of Shuah the Canaanite And that all these things here related concerning Judah and his children might well be
he said I have been a stranger in a strange land Gershom is by interpretation a desolate stranger Now so he named his eldest sonne both to testifie his faith concerning the land of promise which he looked upon because of Gods promise as his true countrey and the inheritance of his children and professed therefore that his children were but strangers in the land of their nativitie and likewise to expresse his thankfulnesse to God for affording him this comfort to support him in the time of his affliction when he lived after the manner of a banished man in a strange countrey Another sonne Moses had by his wife Zipporah whom he called Eliezer as we may see chap. 18. 4. but the first-born onely is mentioned here Vers 23. And it came to passe in processe of time that the king of Egypt died and the children of Israel sighed c. The death of the king of Egypt is here mentioned to shew the misery of the poore Israelites who were no way eased of their burdens upon the death of the former oppressing tyrant but had as much cause of sighing under their burdens as ever they had before CHAP. III. Vers 1. NOw Moses kept the flock of Jethro c. the Priest of Mâ—dian Either this Jethro was the same that is before called Reuell chap. 2. 18. or else if Jethro were the sonne of Reuell he also was Priest of Midian as his father had been the sonne succeeding in his fathers office and that happely because Reuell was now dead this being fourtie years after Moses coming thither as we see Acts 7. 30. And when fourtie years were expired there appeared unto him in the wildernesse of Mount Sinai And came to the mountain of God even to Horeb. Horeb is called here by anticipation the mountain of God both because of this following vision wherein God appeared to Moses in so miraculous a manner and also especially because there afterwards the Lord came down to Moses and delivered him the law and made a covenant with his people Exod. 19. for it is said expressely that this apparition was at mount Sinai Acts 7. 30. And when fourtie years were expired there appeared unto him in the wildernesse of mount Sinai an angel of the Lord in a flaming fire in bush and there we know the Law was given Exod. 19. 1. It seems therefore that the whole mountanous track or circuit where mount Sinai stood was called Horeb or else as some of the Jewish Rabbins hold this mountain was formerly called Horeb but after this apparition of God in the bush it was called Sinai from the Hebrew word Sâ—neh which signifieth a bramble bush Vers 2. And the angel of the Lord appeared untâ— him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush c. It is â—vident that it was the Lord God himself that now appeared unto Moses for vers 7. it is said that the Lord Jehovah spake unto him and verse the fixth he saith I am the God of thy father c. and which is most to be observed vers 5. he that appeared to Moses required that worship and honour which is due onely to God namely that he should present himself before him bare-footed as a poore caytiffe not worthy to stand in the presence of so great a Majestie Nor is there any just cause why we should question this because it is said here The angel of the Lord appeared unto him since it is evident that Christ the eternall sonne of God is called the Messenger or Angel of the Covenant Mal. 3. 1. Now as concerning the burning bush wherein the Lord appeared to Moses it was doubtlesse intended not onely to cause Moses with the more reverence and humilitie to attend to what should be said unto him but also to be a signe representing to him the state and condition of his people concerning whom the Lord now gave him a charge to wit that though his Israel had been long in the fire of affliction the enemie seeking with all possible fury to destroy them yet hitherto they had been miraculously preserved and so still should be and that because the Lord was amongst them to preserve and defend them and would now rescue them from the power of their oppressours Vers 3. And Moses said I will now turn aside and see this great sight c. It is hard to say which some affirme that Moses concluded that this was some secret of nature that the bush burned and was not consumed and so out of curiosity did rashly resolve to approch nearer that he might search out the cause of it No such thing can be concluded from these words rather his calling it a great sight may seem to imply that he thought it some vision But indeed the most probable opinion is that he neither concluded the one nor the other but being suddenly stricken with admiration at the sight and not knowing what to think of it he determined at last to approach nearer hoping thereby to be the better informed and waiting with reverence to see what the issue would be Vers 4. God called unto him out of the midst of the bush and said Moses Moses c. This calling of Moses by his name and the redoubling of his name in such a familiar and loving manner was both to make him know that the vision he saw was of God thereby to stirre him up the more carefully to intend what was done and said and also to intimate the great love and favour of God to him and indeed considering how strange and terrible the apparition was and that Moses though all alone and in a desert place was not yet so astonished but that when he heard himself called by name from the midst of the burning bush he could answer so readily here am I we may well think that it was this gracious manner of Gods calling upon him that did thus farre encourage him Vers 5. Put off thy shooes from off thy feet The putting off of shooes was used as a signe of mourning and humiliation Ezech. 24. 17. 23. Forbear to crie make no mourning for the dead c. and put on thy shooes upon thy feet c. 2. Sam. 15. 30. And David went up by the ascent of mount Olivet and wept as he went up and had his head covered and he went barefoot c. Esai 20. 2. 4. Go and loose the sackcloth from off thy loyns and put off thy shooe from thy foot c. So shall the King of Assyria lead away the Egyptians prisoners and the Ethiopians captives young and old naked and barefoot c. And upon this ground no doubt is Moses here enjoyned it both that this outward ceremonie might strike him with the greater aw and reverence of Gods Majestie into whose presence he might not be suffered to approch but in so lowly and submissive a manner and also that it might be an outward expression of the inward religious affection of his mind that he did
is the name whereby God expresseth his essence to us so farre as we are able to conceive him And it implyes 1. his incomprehensiblenesse as we use to say of any thing we would not have others to prie into It is what it is so God saith here to Moses I am what I am 2. his immensitie that his being is without any limits a man is a man an angel is an angel that is every creature hath a being but bounded and defined within such a compasse but God is an immense being that cannot be included within any bounds 3. that he is of himself and hath not a being depending upon any other I am that is by and from and of my self 4. his everlastingnesse I am before any thing was and shall for ever be there never was nor shall be time wherein God could not say of himself I am 5. that there is no succession of time with him for the understanding whereof see John 8. 58. Before Abraham was I am and then 6. that he giveth being to all things Vers 16. Go and gather the elders of Israel together c. That is the heads of their Tribes who doubtlesse had some place of authority and power amongst them for though in Egypt they lived in much disorder and confusion yet it cannot be thought but that they had some kind of government amongst them as is yet more evident chap. 5. 14. where we reade of officers of the children of Israel Now these the Lord commanded Moses to assemble and to deliver this message to them both that they might afterwards acquaint their brethren of the severall tribes with this message which God had sent and also that they might joyn with Moses in the name of all the people to desire of Pharaoh what God enjoyned them to desire Vers 18. And now let â—s go we beseech thee three dayes journey into the wildernesse c. God appoints them to petition onely for so much libertie that the denyall of this might render Pharaoh inexcusable and make the justice of God the more manifest both in destroying Pharaoh and delivering Israel neither was it necessarie that either God or they having other direction from God should reveal their whole counsel See Deut. 2. 28. and 1. Sam. 16. 2. And the Lord said Take an heifer with thee and say I am come to sacrifice unto the Lord. Vers 19. And I am sure that the king of Egypt will not let you go no not by a mighty hand If we reade this place as it is in the margin of our Bibles I am sure that the King of Egypt will not let you go but by a mighty hand the meaning then is plain to wit that Pharaoh would not let the Israelites go till God by a strong hand forced him to let them go But reading it as it is in our Bibles which agrees best with the originall it may happely be questioned how it can be said that the King of Egypt would not let them go no not by a mighty hand since it is evident that he did give them leave to go chap. 12. 31. and so the Lord tells Moses here in the following words I will stretch out my hand and smite Egypt c. and after that he will let ye go To which I answer that though upon the slaying of all the first-born in Egypt Pharaoh gave them liberty to go yet it might be well said that he would not let them go no not with a mighty hand because after that God had with a strong and mighty hand that is by many grievous plagues endeavoured to make him yield yet a long time he persisted in his obstinacy and would not let them go till at last he was even constrained to bid them be gone and indeed even then he said that more out of displeasure then a yielding spirit and therefore he soon repented of what he had said and when they were gone pursued after them with an army to fetch them back again CHAP. IV. Vers 1. ANd Moses answered and said But behold they will not believe me c. That is at first perhaps they will not believe me this being supposed what shall I do then Considering that the Lord had now immediately before told Moses that the Israelites would hearken to him chap. 3. 18. they shall hearkâ—n to thy voyce we cannot well think that Moses did now absolutely question the truth of what God had said but that onâ—ly he objected that it may be at first till they saw something to move thereto they would be shy of giving credit to his words and so intimated his desire to know what in that case he should do And this indeed he had cause enough to suspect because by reason of Pharaohs great power they were like enough to doubt much at first especially whether Moses would be able to rescue them from their bondage the rather because they regarded him so little at first when upon his slaying of an Egyptian in the defence of an Israelitâ— he supposed his brethren would have understood how that God by his hand would deliver them as Stephen said Act. 7. 25. Vers 3. And he said cast it on the ground c. The generall end of this and the other following signes was to confirm the faith of the Israelites concerning the calling of Moses the more speciall end of this first miracle of turning his rod into a serpent and then into a rod again was to assure both Moses and the Israelites that God could and would make his shepherds crook so base and contemptible in it self terrible as a serpent to Pharaoh but comfortable to the Israelites that is that the rod of his government should affright the one but be the means of much good and happinesse unto the other Vers 6. Put now thine hand into thy bosome c. The end of this signe was also to put them in mind of Gods almightie power who was able thus suddenly to change things whereby both the Israelites might be comforted remembring that however they had been despised and abominable in the sight of the Egyptians yet God was able to give them favour in their sight and however to restore them to their former libertie by an outstretched arm and withall Moses might be encouraged as considering that however his estate might now seem base and contemptible even as a thing leprous and vile yet God was able to make him a glorious instrument of Israels deliverance Vers 10. O my Lord I am not eloquent c. That is I am not a man of a free and ready speech as it is fit they should be that are implyed in such a service but of a slow speech and a slow tongue Nor doth this contradict if thus understood that which S. Stephen said of Moses Acts 7. 22. that he was mightie in words and in deeds for a man that is of greatest abilitie to speak wisely learnedly and perswasively may yet have some great imperfection in regard
amongst them it was because the fire brake out onely upon the uttermost parts of the camp and withall it may imply the cause of the punishment because by these words it seems probable that in the uttermost parts of the camp the sinne began amongst those that were faint and weaâ—y with travel as in Deut. 25. 18. How he met thee by the way and smote the hindmost of thee even all that were feeble behind thee when thou wast faint and weary and he feared not God and upon them therefore the judgement did principally fall Vers 2. And the people cried unto Moses The reasons why they ranne to Moses for his intercession may be these 1. the sudden terrour of the plague 2. the guilt of their own consciences stopping their mouthes 3. the opinion they had of his holinesse and speciall interest in God 4. because their repining against him who was Gods instrument in leading them along they might think was now punisht and theâ—efore they come and desire him to forgive them and pray for them Vers 3. And he called the name of the place Taberah This name imposed upon the place where the fire brake out shews that it was not the same where they pitched their tents after their three dayes travel which by occasion of the following story was called Kibroth Hattaavah but rather some other place in the wayes they travelled thither when they were faint and weary a little before they came to Kibroth Hattaavah Vers 4. And the mixt multitude that was among them fell a lusting c. What this mixt multitude was see in the note upon Exod. 12. 38. Amongst them it seems the murmuring began though the Israelites soon joyned with them in the sinne Once before they murmured for want of meat Exod. 16. 2. when upon their murmuring the Lord gave them both manna and quails but that was in the wildernesse of Sin immediately after they were come out of Egypt this was in the wildernesse of Paran above a twelvemoneth after that when not having any other food but manna from â—eaven which now they began to loath they murmured and who say they shall give us flesh to eat where by flesh is meant fish as well as that which we more peculiarly call flesh as is evident in the following words We remember the fish which we did eat in Egypt freely and ver 22. where Moses objects to the Loâ—d Shall all the fish of the sea be gathered for them to suffice them and so the Apostle speaks 1. Cor. 15. 39. There is one kind of flesh of men another flesh of beasts another of fiâ—hes Many indeed are of opinion that the Egyptians at lâ—ast some of them were strictly superstitious therein used not to eat the flesh of â—heep no nor leeks onions and garlick which they worshipped as Gods according to the Poet Porrum cepe nefas violarâ— aâ— frangere morsu O sanctas gentes quibus haâ— nascuntur in hortis Numina lanatis animalibus abstinet omnis Mensa nefas illic foetum jugulare capellae But however the Israelites did use to eat of them freely and wanting them now therefore they murmured against Moses and against the Lord. Vers 6. But now our soul is dryed away That is we languish and pine away having nothing to cat that will either nourish us or satisfie our appetite for the soul is often put for the body or the whole man or for the appetite or desire after meat drink and other things Vers 7. And the manna was as coriander-seed c. See the note upon Exod. 16. 31. it was therefore pleasant to the eye delightfull to the taste and was fit to be dressed severall wayes and therefore not to be thus loathed and despised Vers 10. Then Moses heard the people weep throughout their families every man in the doore of his tent That is openly as desiring to make known their discontent and to stirre up discontent in others also that should heare their complaints Vers 15. And let me not see my wretchednesse That is let me not see my self slain by the people in a shamefull and disgracefull manner or rather let me not live to see my self thus miserable for it is all one as if he had said that it were better for him to be killed out of hand then living to see so many heart-breaking miseries continually befalling him day after day Vers 16. And the Lord said unto Moses Gather unto me seventy men c. Though the speech of Moses to the Lord in the foregoing verses were so full of distemper passion yet the Lord commiserating his condition commands him here to chuse and gather together seventy choice men of the elders of Israel whom he knew to be elders of the people and officers over them that is whom he knew to be not onely elders in regard of their years but also men of singular gravitie and wisdome and for that chosen to be governours over the people and these were by Gods appointment which the better to testifie they were to be presented before the tabernacle to undertake the government as helpers to Moses that so his burthen might be the lesse Indeed once before upon Jethroes counsel there were certain men chosen to be rulers and judges over the people for the case of Moses Exod. 18. 25 26. But those were onely chosen to determine of small matters but these now were to be judges in the greatest and most difficult causes both of religion and civil affairs which were formerly wholly referred to Moses and were therefore chosen amongst those that were already in those inferiour places of government because by reason of their experience therein they were the fitter to be imployed in the weightier works And this many conceive was the originall of that great councel of the Jews which they called their Sanhedrin and was continued amongst them till Herods dayes Vers 17. And I will take of the spirit which is upon thee and will put it upon them That is I will give of the same spirit to them which I have given to thee It is not to be thought that there was now any impairing of Moses gifts as some conceive for how could the joyning of these with him be then any advantage to him or where do we find any thing in the following story that argues the least abatement in the gifts of Moses but becauâ—e the Lord intended to give the same gifts to them which he had given to Moses as if some part of Moses spirit dwelt now in them therefore is this expression here used I will take of the spirit which is upon thee and will put it upon them Vers 18. Sanctifie your selves against to morrow and ye shall eat flesh c. The originall word doth sometimes signifie to prepare and so might intend that they should prepare themselves for the receiving of the flesh which God would give them the next day in abundance But being rendred sanctified it must needs be
John 1. 18. nor can see him 1. Tim. 6. 16. It is not possible for any mortall creature to behold the very essence of God as he is in himself even Moses himself could not so see the face of God Exod. 33. 20. Thou canst not see my face saith the Lord to Moâ—es for there shall no man see me and live and secondly neither could there be at any time presented to Moses any similitude or likenesse of Gods essence and being for no materiall visible thing can be a representation of the spiritall and invisible essence of God To whom willye liken God or what likenesse will ye compare unto him saith the prophet Esa 40. 18. that therefore which is said here concerning the priviledge of Moses above all present and succeeding prophets consists in two things first that God manifested not his will to Moses in dâ—eams and visions as to other prophets in both which they had onely imaginary representations set before the eye of their minds but that he spake to him with an audible voice out of the cloud and out of the tabernacle and that he did oftentimes appear to him in a visible shape and spake to him in a familiar manner mouth to mouth as one friend should speak to another and had at times discovered to him more of his glory then ever he did to the eye of mortall man as we see in that story of his seeing Gods back-parts Exod. 33. 20. And then secondly that when he spake to him he did not make known his mind to him in obscure figurative expressions as he did to the prophets as when he told Ezekiel of a great eagle with great wings c. Ezek. 17. 3. but plainly and clearly apparently and not in dark speeches as it is here expressed Vers 9. And the anger of the Lord was kindled against them and he departed Not abiding their answer which was a signe of great displeasure Now this departing of the Lord wâ—s by removing the signe of his presence the cloud out of which he had spoken to them as it is explained in the following words vers 10. And the cloud departed from off the tabernacle Nor yet did the cloud remove away from the tabernacle for when it did so that was a signe that the people were to remove but it removed from the doore of the tabernacle whither it did usually descend when God meant to speak unto them and so rising up did hang over the tabernacle as at other times Vers 10. And behold Miriam became leprous white as snow Though Aaâ—on joyned with Miriam in speaking against Moses yet onely Miriam was punished 1. because she began the quarrel and 2. because he was the high priest and so the Lord would not strike him with leprosie lest in his dishonour the priesthood should suffer but chose rather to punish him in his sister As for the leprosie wherewith Miriam was stricken it did well answer her sinne a virulent envious murmuring tongue being like a fretting leprosie that spreads where it comes if it be not prevented to the infeâ—tion of many And indeed how memorable a thing this was we may see by the Lords putting them in mind afterwards of it Deut. 24. 9. Remember what the Lord thy God did unto Miriam by the way after that ye were come forth out of Egypt Vers 12. Let her not be as one dead c. Miriam stricken with this white leprosie was like a child that hath been sometime dead in the wombe when it comes into the world the flesh of such a child will be white putrified as if it were sodden and half consumed and so was Miriams And though she were still alive yet as one dead she was to be carried out from the communion of the Church as one that must needs defile all that touched her Numb 5. 2. Command the children of Israel that they put out of the camp every leper and besides this fretting plague would in the end have utterly consumed and killed her if God had not healed her Vers 14. And the Lord said unto Moses If her father had but spit in her face should sâ—e not be ashamed seven dayes c. God having immediately heard the prayer of Moses and healed her gives order notwithstanding that she should be shut out seven dayes from the camp Indeed other lepers being cleansed were yet shut up by themselves seven dayes but it was in the camp Lev. 14. 8. And he that is to be cleansed shall wash his clothes and shave off all his hair and wash himself in water that he may be clean and after that he shall come into the camp and shall tarry abroad out of his tent seven dayes But sayes the Lord if her earthly father had in great displeasure spit in her face she would have been ashamed to shew her face for a time and therefore much more is it fit in this cause both as an expression of her shame and sorrow for that she had done and that his secluding her from others may be a reall instruction to all the people that he would have them take heed of being corrupted with the same sinne now this expression of spitting in her face God useth because spitting is a signe of anger shame and contempt Job 30. 10. They abhorre me they flee farre from me and spare not to spit in my face Isa 50. 6. I hid not my face from shame and spitting and God by this punishment had shown his anger against her and had poured shame and contempt upon her Vers 15. And the people journeyed not till Miriam was brought in again But stayed mourning for her which was a speciall honour unto Miriam above other lepers for whom the people stayed not Numb 5. 2 4. Command the children of Israel that they put out of the camp every leper c. And the children of Israel did so and put them out without the camp Vers 16. And afterwards the people removed from Haxeroth and pitched in the wildernesse of Paran Which I conceive to be all one as if he had said and pitched again in another place but still in the wildernesse of Paran for that they came not now first into that wildernesse is evident because it is said before chap. 10. 12. And the children of Israel took their ioxrneys out of the wildernesse of Sinai and the cloud rested in the wildernesse of Paran and the place where they pitched in this wildernesse is called Rithmah chap. 33. 18. and Kadesh-Barnea chap. 13. 26. Deut. 1. 19. which was close upon the borders of the land of Canaan CHAP. XIII Vers 1. ANd the Lord spake unto Moses saying c. In Deuteronomie it is said that the people desired that some might be sent to search the land Thus therefore it was When God had led his people from mount Horeb to Kadesh-Barnea through the great and terrible wildernesse and they were come to the mountain of the Amorites Moses assembled the people and encouraged them
Pethor of Mesopotamia to curse thee But that last clause happely is meant onely of the Moabites which indeed we may the rather think because there is not in this story the least mention of the Ammonites Now shall this company lick up all that are round about us as the ox licketh up the grasse of the field This is the argument whereby the Moabites sought to perswade the Midianites to joyn with them against the Israelites namely because if they were let alone they would doubtlesse devour both them and all the neighboâ—ring nations It is all one as if they had said By what this people have already done in the two kingdomes of Sihon and Og you may see that they do not content themselves to subdue a people and make them tributaries but where they conquer they â—tterly destroy all the inhabitants and this therefore they will do to us because of their multitudes if we joyn not our forces together as easily as a company of oxen will lick up the grasse of a field they are put into leaving the ground bare where they go so that it is high time for us to look about us and to bandy our selves to fight with them And indeed however their fear were causelesse now because the Lord had charged the Israelites not to meddle with the Moabites as is before noted yet in future times even this people of Moab were subdued by the Israelites though not utterly destroyâ—d to wit in the dayes of David 1. Chron. 18. 2. Vers 5. He sent messengers therefore unto Balaam the sâ—nne of Beor c. This Balaam was a Southsayer famous for his inchantments and divinations in those times as is evident Josh 1â— 22. Balaam also the sonne of Beor the Southsarâ—r and Numb 24. 1. And when Balaam saw that it pleased the Lord to blesse Israel he went not as at other times to seek for inchantmâ—nts he is called a propâ—et 2. Pet. 2. 16. The dumb aâ—sâ— speaking with mans voice forbad the madnesse of the prophet not onely because he used by his divinations to foretell things to come but also because God did at present in the passage of this story guide him to prophecy of things that were long after to come to passe and we know the gift of prophecy is a common gift which may be conferred upon a wicked man and it is like Balack sent to him as to a prophet that had from God this gift of divining and that by his curses and inchantments the Israelites might be weakened and the more easily overcome He is here described by his parentage that he was the sonne of Beor who is also called Bosor 2. Pet. 2. 15. Following the way of Balaam the sonne of Bosor secondly by his countrey whither Balak sent to him to wit Pethor which was a city in Mesopotamia or Aram Deut 23. 4. Because they hired against thee Balaam the sonne of Beor of Pethor of Mesopotamia to curse thee in the East countrey Numb 23. 7. Balak the king of Moab hath brought me from Aram out of the mountains of the East and the Eastern land was infamous for divinations and such like arts Esa 2. 6. Therefore thou hast forsaken thy people the house of Jacob because they be replenished from the East and are southsayers like the Philistines and was seated nigh to the river of that land which was Euphrates for that was the great river of Mesopotamia Behold there is a people come out of Egypt That is injuriously invading countreys they have no right unto this he seeks to perswade Balaam by shewing him the justnesse of his cause Behold they cover the face of the earth they abide over against me That is in a countrey bordering upon mine Vers 6. Come now therefore I pray thee curse me this people c. This he speaks as supposing his presence necessary for the accomplishment of that great work for which he sent to him whence is that also ver 41. Balak took Balaam and brought him up into the high places of Baal that thence he might see the utmost part of the people Amongst other grounds of this conceit one might be that beholding the Israelites his speech might have more vehemency of spirit and better effect as he supposed and indeed it is said concerning Elisha when he cursed the children that mocked him 2. Kings 2. 24. that he turned back and looked on them and cursed them in the name of the Lord how effectuall curses duly pronounced by the Prophets of God were we may see in that 2. Kings 2. 24. And he turned back and looked on them and cursed them in the name of the Lord and there came forth two she-bears out of the wood and tare fourtie and two children of them Balak had the like conceit of this famous false prophet and therefore desires that he would curse Israel that is that he would first by his inchantments procure them to be accursed of God and then pronounce this curse against them Vers 8. Lodge here this night and I will bring you word again as the Lord shall speak unto me It is evident that Balaam was a sorcerer as is noted from Josh 13. 22. and he was likewise an idolater for we see afterwards chap. 23. 12. that he offered sacrifices upon Baals high places and how then doth he speak here of the Lord Jehovah as it is in the text I will bring you word again as the Lord or Jehovah shall speak unto me I answer first that it is most probable that some small remainders of the knowledge of the true God were still left amongst these idolatrous nations that were the posterity of Abraham and Lot yea and that they did make profession of worshipping the true God though withall they worshipped other false gods too and so I conceive it was with Balaam and therefore vers 18. he calls God the Lord his God and so though he were an idolater and a southsayer yet he might pretend himself to be a Prophet of the Lord Jehovah too and secondly this amongst other things was a part of the magick skill of their southsayers in former times that when they were by inchantments to seek the ruine of any people they used to deal with that God who was the defender of that people whom they called their tâ—telary God for this is clear in profane Writers that when the Romanes intended to besiege any city their priests were wont first to call out that God under whose tutelage or protection that city was and to promise him more ample place and honour among them and thus some conceive that Balaam undertook to enquire of the Lord Jehovah whom he knew to be the God of the Hebrews to see whether he might be taken off from defending them But the first I conceive is the truest answer However the reason why he desired these men to stay all night was because in the night he used to have his revelations and to practise his inchantments Vers 9. And
slain and for the satisfaction of the people that they may know he did it by the speciall motion of my spirit because I the Lord have thus both approved and rewarded the fact say that is make it known that behold I give unto him my covenant of peace where Gods covenant with Phinehas for the settling of the priesthood in his posterity is called a covenant of peace first because they should peaceably enjoy it and secondly because the work of the priesthood was to make peace betwixt the Lord and his people Vers 13. And he shall have it and his seed after him even the covenant of an everlasting priesthood That is a priesthood that shall be continued to his seed as long as ever the Leviticall priesthood shall continue But the dignity of being high priest should have come to him and his by descent may some say because he was the sonne of Eleazar Aarons eldest sonne I answer though he was so yet that it should not be removed to another family for want of his issue that was of Gods goodnesse and is here promised as the reward of his zeal Indeed the greatest doubt concerning this promise is whether it were continued in his posterity or no. Concerning which all that we find in the Scripture is this first that we find the posterity of this Phinehas recorded unto the time of the Israelites captivity in Babylon 1. Chron. 6. 4 15. secondly that if it be true which some hold that in the dayes of the Judges the high priests office was wrested from the sonnes of Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar and conferred upon Eli who was of the stock of Ithamar yet in the dayes of Solomon it was again taken from Abiathar who was of Elies house and settled upon Zadok and so it came again into the line of Phinehas and so continued unto the Babylonian captivity 1. Kings 2. 25. and thirdly that though it be no where expressely said of what stock the high priests were after the Israelites return out of Babylon yet we find that Esra that great priest and scribe was of his line Ezra 7. 1 c. and it may be probably thought that the high priests still continued in that line unlesse it were in those times when there was nothing amongst them but disorder and confusion Neither indeed is there any cause why we should understand this promise to be so absolute but in case of the sinnes of his posterity they might for a time be deprived of this dignity Vers 14. Zimri the sonne of Salu a prince of a chief house among the Simeonites It is particularly expressed how great a man he was whom Phinehas slew because herein the zeal of Phinehas was notably discovered Vers 15. He was head over a people and of a chief house in Midian He is reckoned one of the five Kings of Midian chap. 31. 8. Vers 17. Vex the Medianites and smite them c. These words smite them imply a promise of victory But why are they not to smite the Moabites as well as the Midianites first because he had already forbidden Israel to distresse the Moabites Deut. 2. 9. And the Lord said unto me Distresse not the Moabites neither contend with them in battel secondly because the Midianites had the chief hand in the mischief as seems probable first by Balaams stay amongst them whâ—n Balak had left him in displeasure and secondly by this partiâ—ular fact of Cozbi who was a Kings daughter amongst them c. CHAP. XXVI Vers 2. TAke the summe of all the congregation of the children of Israel c. Of the two first numbrings of the people see Exod. 30. 11 12. and Numb 1. 1 2. But now the reasons of this third numbring of the people as we may gather by some passages were these first because this would make way to the more equall dividing of the land which they were presently to go about according as they found the tribes more or lesse in number see vers 53 54. Unto these the land shall be divided for an inheritance according to the number of names c. secondly to manifest how fully that which God had threatned chap. 14. 29. was now accomplished vers 64 65. But among these there was not a man of them whom Moses and Aaron the priest numbred when they numbred the children of Israel in the wildernesse of Sinai For the Lord had said of them They shall surely die in the wildernesse c. Happely all the old company were not dead till this last plague wherein foure and twenty thousand were cut off and therefore it may seem expressely noted ver 1. that it was after the plague that God gave this charge to Moses and Eleazar for numbring the people because then God had exactly brought that to passe which he had long since threatned as they should now see in taking the number of the people thirdly to manifest Gods power and goodnesse in preserving unto them so many notwithstanding they had wandred so many years through a wildernesse wherein they were encountred with so many difficulties and had so often by their sinnes provoked God to cut off many amongst them as also his truth and faithfulnesse who had so wondrously increased them as he promised their forefathers notwithstanding they had often by their rebellion provoked him to destroy them the more seasonable it was to comfort them in this kind because it was immediately after foure and twenty thousand had been taken away by the foregoing plague chap. 25. fourthly it was because they should hereby see Gods care over them and love towards them as Moses at their coming out of Egypt received Gods flock by tale so now before his death he must deliver them up by tale again Vers 4. Take the summe of the people from twenty years old and upward as the Lord commanded Moses c. That is after the same manner as he commanded Moses to number the people when they were newly come out of Egypt so hath he now again commanded to number them before their entring Canaan Vers 7. And they that were numbred of them were fourtie and three thousand and seven hundred and thirty At their last numbring the Reubenites were fourty six thousand and five hundred chap. 1. ver 21. so that this tribe was decreased two thousand seven hundred and seventy which may in part be ascribed to the conspiracy wherein they joyned with Korah Vers 10. And the earth opened her mouth and swallowed them up together with Korah c. This place according to our translation clears it beyond all exception that Korah was swallowed up into the earth together with Dathan Abiram ch 16. And they became a signe That is for an example that others might take warning by them as sea-marks are set up to give us warning of danger 1. Cor. 10. 6. Now these things were our examples to the intent we should not lust after evil things as they also lusted Vers 11. Notwithstanding
if they were nearer to them then the others yea and if the Lord enlarged their coasts and gave them all the land they were to adde three cities more Deut. 19. 8 9. Vers 16. And if he smite him with an instrument of iron so that he die he is a murderer c. That is purposely and presumptuously for otherwise if he killed a man with an instrument of iron unawares not thinking to hit him he was not to be slain vers 22 23. for this is onely added because a man may strike his neighbour purposely with his fist c. of which he may die and yet not be a murderer because he may not happely intend his death But lest therefore under this pretence wilfull murderers should think to escape the Lord gives these following Laws and this in the first place that if it were proved that he did it willingly he must not think to escape by saying that he meant not to kill him for if he struck him with an instrument of iron whatever it be or with a stone or hand-weapon wherewith in any probability a man may be killed it shall be presumed that he intended hiâ— death c. Vers 19. The revenger of bloud himself shall slay the murderer c. That is though the revenger of bloud be but a private person yet he shall slay the murderer that is he may slay him he shall have liberty to do it and shall not be accounâ—ed guilty of murder if he doth slay him yea some think he was bound to do it when he meeteth him he shall slay him that is he shall not need to bring him before a Magistrate c. but he may slay him himself And this is added to shew how necessary cities of refuge were to wit because the avenger of bloud having this power from God might otherwise abuse it and in the heat of bloud fall upon a man that killed unawares unlesse this course were taken to have the Magistrate a judge in the cause Neither need it seem strange as to some it doth that private men should be allowed thus to meddle with the sword of justice for a man being otherwise a private man no Magistrate being thus armed with power from God is for the time to be esâ—eemed as a Magistrate more then a private man Vers 20. But if he thrust him of hatred c. Here is another case given wherein the Magistrate should adjudge a man a murderer yea though he struck him onely with his hand or with some little stone or some other thing which was no way likely to kill him for even in this case if it be proved that he lay in wait for him or that he did it in prepensed malice or lived before in open enmity or hostility with him by whatever means he kill him he shall be adjudged a wilfull murderer for there is a difference made here betwixt enmity and sudden displeasure Vers 21. The revenger of bloud shall slay the murderer when he mâ—eteth him See the note upon vers 19. Vers 24. Then the congregation shall judge between the slayer and the râ—venger of bloud c. That is if a man that had killed another fly to the citie of refuge the avenger must then go and desire justice against him the Levites must bring him to the congregation where the man was slain and then if he found a murderer the congregation that is the Magistrates shall give him up into the hands of the avenger but if they found it as we call it chance-medly then they sent him back to the city of refuge Vers 25. And he shall abide in it unto the death of the high priest c. Even a man that killed another unwittingly was to live a while as a man banished from his family and friends both to shew how hatefull the shedding of mans bloud is to the Lord and withall to prevent further mischief that the avenger be not urged nor provoked with the sight of him and the period appointed for his continuance in the city of refuge was till the death of the high priest and that doubtlesse that this releasing of men exiled by the death of the high priest might be a shadow of our freedome and redemption by the death of Christ Vers 27. He shall not be guilty of bloud c. The Lord here freeth the avenger from punishment if he found the man out of the city of refuge and killed him not as allowing his fact but by this to make the slayer the more carefull to observe this law of keeping within his citie of refuge CHAP. XXXVI Vers 1. ANd the chief fathers of the families of the children of Gâ—lead c. Because the Lord had formerly ordered that Zelophehads daughters should have that portion of the land assigned to the tribe of Manasseh which their father should have had for his share had he lived the children of Gilead who were of that tribe conâ—idering that if they married into any other tribe this part of their land would be quite alienated from their tribe they came now and shewed what inconvenience might follow upon this and because it was their tribe that was now likely to receive detriment by the alienation of Zelophehads portion therefore they made it their suit that some order might be taken to prevent this mischief Vers 2. The Lord commanded my lord to give the land for an inheritance by lot to the children of Israel c. As if they should have said To what purpose was this if now our lot shall be diminished and a part of it wholly alienated to another tribe yea by like accidents the portion of every tribe may in time be changed and disturbed and so all at length may come to confusion and the very end of Gods appointing every tribe to have their portion apart by themselves may be quite made void Vers 4. And when the Jubile of the children of Israel shall be then shall their inheritance be put unto the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received c. The drift of these words is to put Moses and the Princes in mind that whereas by the law of God at the year of Jubile which was every fiftieth year whatever land was sold away out of the tribe should return to the tribe and that law of the Jubile seemed purposely intended to prevent the confusion of the inheritance of the tribes the very end of this law by such marriages as these would be quite disannulled Vers 5. And Moses commanded the â—hildren of Iâ—rael according to the word of the Lord c. That is having asked counsel of God he anâ—wered them as God had commanded him ANNOTATIONS On the fifth book of MOSES called DEUTERONOMIE CHAP. I. THese be the words which Moses spake unto all Israel on this side Jordan c. Most Expositours hold that the chief drift of this first verse is to shew the places where Moses repeated and explained the law of God to the
great inhumanity and crueltie and a notable contempt of God who is so constantly wont to plead the cause of those that are so barbarously used and secondly in regard of that which God had so lately done for the Israelites in Egypt for when God had so immediately before manifested the speciall love that he bore to this people by taking such vengeance on the Egyptians for their sakes and by those many strange signes and wonders which he had wrought amongst them it argued a high degree of desperate boldnesse in the Amalekites that yet notwithstanding they were not afraid to fight against them and so indeed in fighting against them to fight against God Vers 19. Thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven This judgement God appointed Saul to execute 1. Sam. 15. 2 3. but he failed in the performance of it Afterwards God stirred up the Simeonites in Hezekiahs dayes who smote the rest of the Amalekites 1. Chron. 4. 42 43. And some of them even of the sonnes of Simeon five hundred men went to mount Seir having for their captains Pelatiah and Neariah and Rephaiah and Uzziel the sonnes of Ishi And they smote the rest of the Amalekites that werâ— escaped and dwelt there unto this day and what befell Haman and his sonnes who were of that race is largely related in the third chapter of Esther CHAP. XXVI Vers 2. THou shalt take of the first of all the fruit of the earth This seemeth to have been done by every mâ—n and that every year either at the feast of Pentecost callâ—d also the feast of weeks as seemeth to be implyed Deut. 16. 10. And thou shalt keep the feâ—st of weeks unto the Lord thy God wâ—th atribute of a freewill-offering of thy hand c. or rather at the feast of tabernacles which is called the feast of in-gathering at the years end Exod. 23. 16. when they brought of the first-fruits of their fruit-trees as the bringing of them in a bushel seems to imply And these first-fruits they thus brought unto the Lord first as an acknowledgement thâ—t it was the Lord that had freely given them this land as he had promised to their forâ—fathers which is thaâ— vers 3. I professe c. and that of him they still held it and to him therefore as by way of tribâ—te due to him the Lord in chief they brought these first-fruits secondly to tesâ—isie that the yearly fruitfulnâ—sse of this their land was also from his blâ—ssing c. Vers 3. And thou shalt go unto the priest that shall be in those dayes c. To wit as the figure of Christ in whom onely our services become acceptable wiâ—â— God Hebr. 13. 15. By him therefore lâ—t us offer the sacrifice of praâ—se to God continually that is the fruit of oâ—r lâ—ps giving thanâ—s to his naâ—e The â—ame was likewise taught them in the â—etting down of this basket of first-â—ruits before the altar vers 4. Vers 5. A Syrian ready to perish was my father and he went down into Egypt c. That is Jacob for though he was born in Canaan yet he was of the stock of Syrians for Abram his grandfather came out of Ur of the Chaldees the land of his nativity Gen. 11. 28. which was a part of Syria whence Laban who lived in the same countrey is also called a Syrian Gen. 28. 5. Yea Jacob was not onely born of Syrian parents and onely lived as his fathers had done before him a stranger and pilgrim in the land of Canaan but also abode a great part of his time there for there he dwelt with Laban twenty years at least in hard service Hos 12. 12. And Jacob flâ—d into the countrey of Syria and Israel served for a wife and for a wife he kept sheep When he returned thence into the land of Canaan after a few years by the extremity of famine he was constrained to remove into Egypt to which extremity I conceive the holy Ghost hath here speciall reference in calling him a Syrian ready to perish though withall it may have respect also to the poverty and misery he underwent in Syria and in his going thither wheâ— he fled for his life because of his brother Esau But however this acknowledgement of the meannesse of their originall was doubtlesse thereby to magniâ—y the goodnesse of God in raising them to such a condition as now they did enjoy Vers 10. And thou shalt set it before the Lord thy God and worship bâ—fore the Lord thy God It is said before vers 4. that the man that brought this basket of first-fruits was to deliver it into the hand of the priest and therefore the meaning of this which is said here of his setting it before the Lord is onely this that he should leave it there set down before the altar to wit by the priest who with the rest of his brethren did afterwards eat them all first-fruits appertaining to them as we may see Deut. 18. 4. As for that second clause and worship before the Lord thy God hereby is meant that after he had delivered his basket of first-fruits into the hands of the priest to be set down before the Lord aâ—d had made that thankfull and open profession of Gods great goodnesse to his people which is expressed largely in the foregoing verses he was then to adde such other duties of Gods worship and service as were to be performed as prayer and offering sacrifices and then bowing down before the Lord to depart away Vers 11. And thou shalt rejoyce in every good thing which the Lord thy God hath given unto thee c. Though thâ—s may be extended to the chearâ—ull using of Gods gifts all the year after which â—hey might indeed the more comfortably enjoy when they had in this teâ—tifyed their thankfulnesse as he had appointed yet I conceive it is chieflly intended of their feasting together in Jerusalem after they had done their serviâ—e together with the Levites and strangers with the peace-offerings they had brought thither even as they used to do at all other feasts Deut. 16. 11 15. Vers 12. When thou hast made an end of tithing all the tithes of thine encrease the third year which is the year of tithing c. See the note upon chap. 14. 28. Vers 14. I have not eaten thereof in my mourning Thaâ— is even in my greatest wants and necessities when I was put to the greateâ—t straits I have not ventured to supply my self from them and indeed that which men will not do at other times they will make bold to do when they are in want and diâ—tresse and therefore were they appointâ—d particularly to clear themselves of this or else it may be meant of mourning for the losse of friends I have not eatâ—n thâ—reof in my mourning that is in the time of my mourning for my dead friends for hereby these hallowed things â—hould have been defiled Hos 9. 4. Their sacrifices shall be unto
it was which he was about to say that it was fit all the world should hearken to it secondly to imply how strangely stupid Gods own people were that he had as much hope that the senselesse and unreasonable creatures should hearken to him as they Vers 2. My doctrine shall drop as the rain c. That is look as the dew the small rain and great showrs distilling and falling down upon the grasse and herbs do soften the ground and so cause the grasse herbs plants c. to sprout out and grow up sweetly and to bring forth abundance of fruit so shall my words prove profitable and effectuall for the good of those that heare them softening their hearts making all grace to grow and thrive in their souls and causing them to be abundantly fruitfull in every good work to wit unlesse they fall upon hearts like stones or sandie ground where nothing can grow which is much at one with that which the Lord saith of his word Isa 55. 10. As the rain cometh down and the snow from heaven and returneth not thither but watereth the earth and maketh it bring forth and bud c. so shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth c. Vers 3. Because I will publish the name of the Lord ascribe ye greatnesse to our God Some Expositours by publishing the name of the Lord understand his setting forth the excellencies of God to wit his infinite power wisdome righteousnesse c. and by ascribing greatnesse to our God they understand also glorifying of God and extolling his name and so they conceive the meaning of these words to be as if Moses had said because I intend to shew forth the glory of the Lord the drift of this song being to praise his name by shewing his faithfull righteous dealing with Israel and so to lay the blame of their revolt upon them and to clear God of it therefore let Israel ascribe greatnesse to our God to wit either by obeying his will or else by justifying God and condemning themselves if they be punished for rebelling against them But I rather think that by publishing the name of the Lord is meant onely his speaking to them in the name of the Lord or in Gods stead and so by ascribing greatnesse to our God is meant their regarding the words he should speak as became them that were to heare the great God of heaven and earth speaking to them and so the sense of these words to be this Because I will publish the name of the Lord that is because I shall speak to you in the name of the Lord and what I shall deliver shall be from God the word of God speaking by me ascribe ye greatnesse to our God that is make it manifest that you reverence the Majestie of that great God that now speaks unto you to wit by attending to what is spoken with all humility by laying it to heart and yielding obedience thereto And indeed they that heare God reverently when he speaks and tremble at his word Isa 66. 2. they that are deeply moved with what is spoken and endeavour to obey it with all their might their hearts are effected as they ought to be with the majesty and greatnesse of God and on the other side all irreverence and carelesnesse in hearing Gods word and all slighting and disregarding of what he speaks argues a secret vilifying of God in the heart Vers 4. He is the rock his work is perfect c. These two verses following contain the summe of the greatest part of the song to wit that God was no way to be blamed for his dealing with the Israelites but that all the blame must rest upon them who had causelesly revolted from him and so had given him just cause to poure out his wrath upon them Had God failed or come short in any thing that should have been done had he not made good his promises or had there been any thing to be desired that was not to be found in God their defection from him might have been excused under that pretence But no such thing could be said of God No saith Moses He is the rock his work is perfect c. first he is the rock that is he is an almighty stable sure refuge and foundation to all those that fly to him and rely upon him If God be for us who can be against us Rom. 8. 31. neither indeed is there any sure shelter to be had but onely in him In times of danger men used to fly to rocks to shelter themselves 1. Sam. 13. 6. To shew therefore that in times of danger those that flie to God and are taken into his protection are sure and safe and none but they the Scripture styles him the rock as the coney that flies to the holes in the rocks doth easily avoyd the dogges that pursue her when the hare that trusts to the swiftnesse of her legs is at length overtaken and torn in pieces so those that seek rightly to God in their distresse and trust in nothing but his protection do find him a sure impregnable rock of defence whereas they that trust in their own policy or wealth c. shall at length be surprised and destroyed and there shall be none to help them Thus God is the rock And again his work is perfect for all his wayes are judgement c. that is his dealing with his people hath been exactly just and holy in the highest degree of perfection nor hath there been any the least failing in any thing that he hath done Jer. 2. 5. Thus saith the Lord What iniquity have your fathers found in me that they are gone farre from me c. And indeed because God is infinite in power and wisdome and goodnesse c. and therefore it is not possible that any thing should be better done then as God doth it even in those works of God that have some imperfection in them as in giving children born blind or lame c. yet as they are acts of providence there is a perfection of wisdome holinesse and justice in them and there is nothing at all in them for which he can be blamed Vers 5. They have corrupted themselves Having in the former verse justified God and shown that he was not to be blamâ—d if Israel were destroyed here Moses begins to shew that all the blame belonged to the Israelites themselves and that because they had corrupted themselves that is they had broken covenant with God though they professed themselves his people and called him their father yet they were degenerated from the holy wayes of their fathers and were become a wicked and sinfull people Their spot is not the spot of his children Others translate this clause as it is in the margin of our Bibles that they are not his children that is their blot and then the meaning must needs be this that whatever they had formerly been yet they had now brought this