Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n great_a king_n people_n 5,231 5 4.6713 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A97208 A just vindication of the armie wherein all that doubt may have large satisfaction, in relation to their late proceedings. As touching the cause, beginning, continuance, and their end therein. Or, a book entituled, The examination of the late passages of the armie (especially of the grounds laid down for their justification in their declaration, June 14. 1647). / Examined, refuted, by A. Warren. Warren, Albertus. 1647 (1647) Wing W952; Thomason E410_18; ESTC R204455 39,961 61

There are 7 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

King for his Summons 2 The Kings Summons for the calling of a Parliament 3 The peoples Election of their Members 4 The Members appearance upon the foresaid Summons and the peoples Election to any place appointed by the King for to order and dispose of the great Affairs of the Kingdom Now when this Assembly thus lawfully gathered shall forget the ends of their Constitution and not rectifie or cause to be rectified the known wrongs and greivances of the People and restore liberty to the enslaved the people may and are bound thereunto by the Lawes of Religion Reason Nature and Nations sue and Petition for their just rights Neither have the Parliament power to Act Ier. 38.5 or order any thing but that which tends to the mutuall good and known weal of the people If King Zedekiah by his own confession could not imprison a man without or against the advice of his Princes then by what Law can the King or Parliament of England or both together assume such a power to themselves as bereave the people of their liberties and birthrights The people of this Nation and so the Army as a substantiall part thereof being equally born free may refuse obedience to any Acts or impositions of King or Parliament whose apparent tendency is to their own ruine and overthrow and if it be so that the Kingdom and Army must neither refuse obedience to unjust commands nor Petition for redress of manifest wrongs without being branded with disobedient opposers infringers of the peace of the Kingdom and enemies to the State and that which will be the sad consequence of all these even the whole Kingdome and Army exposed to the limitlesse pleasures of mercilesse men whose tender mercies as the wise man saith are cruell then farewell indeered Freedomes for ever Object But to this you will happily object Who shall judge when the Acts of the Parliament be destructive to the people Answ In this case I know at present no better judge then their owne common and frequent experience that undergo oppression and wrong who can better informe a man that he hath lost the use of one of his joynts or members then he that wants it But not to stay longer here I shall proceed to your next clause to wit by * Parliament whose Commission they are an Army and are but a tumultuous number of men when they act or do any thing that is not in order to or within the limits of that Commission which I take to bee the utmost bounds of their calling as an Army and when any man or number of men step out of their calling or if in their calling run out into by and unwarrantable waies they can upon no good grounds looke either for protection or expect a blessing c. It is true it was by the Parliaments Commission and none others they were an Army yet that was not the onely cause of their being an Army but something in relation to the Kingdome in generall and something also in relation to themselves in particular and therefore observe these things considerable in the raising and levying of a lawfull Army Three things to be considered in the raising of a lawful Army 1. The lawfulnesse of the Cause 2. The lawfulnesse of the Call or Commission 3. The collection or gathering together of the people in a formidable posture For the cause of raising this Army it was the preservation of His Majesties Royall Person and Kingdome restauration of our almost lost Lawes and Liberties defence of the just Rights and Priviledges of Parliaments c. their Commission was from the Parliament and their collection from themselves freely and willingly without constraint or force and this last they were induced and provoked unto by vertue of the two former to wit the Cause and Commission all which have a necessary dependence each on the other and are inseparable in the levying of a lawfull Army insomuch that a Commission without the peoples free consent cannot raise an Army nor both of them as some have untruly said make a lawfull Army without a lawfull Cause And now I appeale to you and the whole Kingdome if the Army have not to their power inviolably observed and with the price of their blood effected the substantiall end of their Commission which was for the defence of the Kingdome c. as their owne Ordinances import Ordin Feb. 15 1644. Apr. 1. 1645. and if some dis-affected Members in both or either House of Parliament did betray the confidence and trust reposed in them and by their too effectuall insluence on others who perchance have no great desires to close with or can discerne their base ends therein so carry on their deep and darke designes that the Kingdome suffers too much prejudice by them must this constraine the Army to doe so likewise Shall none be ready to stand in the gap in behalfe of this almost ruined Kingdome and stop that inevitable inundation of misery ready to overwhelme us through the inhumane malice of those who make their lust their Law Is there no meanes left of freedome from Aegyptian Task-masters Was it lawfull for the Army to oppose vassallage and thraledome to the death in the Kings party and shall they so easily subject themselves and by their meanes the whole Kingdome to a farre worse tyranny in some Members of Parliament Or shall they out-strip their Commission which is just and equitable which is still in force till the ends thereof bee performed by the Parliament as well as by them and now run themselves into extravagant courses of Injustice and Tyranny because others doe so Must they bid adieu to their Commission and the fruits of their labours because they have laboured and those who gave them their Commission command them But I shall retort this assertion into your owne bosome againe thus The Parliament are a Parliament by the Kings Warrant and the Peoples Election for hearing complaints and redressing wrongs in the Kingdome But when they act or doany thing that is not in order to or within the limits of that Warrant or Commission unlesse they pretend a Commission limitlesse as the sequele of your discourse imports and tending also to the peoples benefit by whom they were chosen which I take to be the utmost bounds of their calling as a Parliament they are but a tumultuous number of men and though any particular man or number of men in the Parliament step out of their calling or if in their calling run out into by and unwarrantable waies they can upon no good grounds that I know of either looke for protection or expect a blessing And then as you import in the next place however such proceedings being back't with policy and power may have successe at present yet they are sure to be bitternesse in the end For the rest of your Exordium or Introduction into your discourse or pretended Examination I shall leave as impertinent my ordinary imployments not favouring
according to Magna Charta Pet. of Right and their own many and frequent Declarations but alas how hath this been perfideously perverted as if there were not the least knowledge or feare of God amongst men and the people under a faire coloured pretence of peace and freedom altogether subjugated to warre vassalage and thraldome had not the wisdom and power of God prevented it this appeared by the late commotions occasioned by some Members of Parliament and their unjust refusall of severall legall Petitions precented unto them which notwithstanding the Lawes of the Kingdome and their own Declarations to the contrary were rejected yea and with the greatest infamy and shame that could be consumed with fire in severall parts of London by the hands of the common Hangman so insolently and proudly have some of them behaved themselves towards the free people of England Therefore I say if the Parliament shall declare to the whole Kingdome what their immunites rights and freedoms are and also what of due belongs to thmeselves whilst sitting in Parliament and then shall goe about under the painted shew of breach of priviledge to anticipate and subvert the antient priviledges of the people of England must not the Army who were raised by the Kingdome for their defence as in the strictest bonds of duty and conscience they are obliged once open their lips to crave and begg for the people their proper rights but they must in an infamous manner be tearmed Judges And now Sir I appeale to your selfe if the Army ever went about to determine any causes in the Kingdome except what they did by the Parliaments permission with their Swords against the publike enemy onely they have represented their owne and the peoples often rejected grievances to them by way of humble Petition and if this be a contracting power or right from the Parliaments Declarations of being Judges of their own and the peoples liberties powers and rights let the world judge betwixt them and you For that you say the Army can onely do what your erring fancy hath suggested to you by the length of their Swords which can be no good Standard for it will be lyable to alteration when a longer Sword comes I say their Swords are so long and so good a Standard that it never yet I know not what it may do met with a longer to remove or alter it from prosecution with zeale to Gods glory and the Kingdome benefit the righteous cause they have in the sincerity of their hearts undertaken in behalfe of the King Parliament and Kingdome Then you proceed thus And when the people of this Kingdome have understood and considered this it is not likely they will leave the setled course of Law and Justice in the knowne Courts of the Kingdome to be judged by any one who can raise the greatest tumult Indeed now you have paid the Army to some purpose if the people were surprised with such a spirit of delusion as to believe the deviating dictates of your thoughts and now I desire you or any of your Competitioners to demonstrate in any one particular or confesse you injure them wherein this Army have taken upon them the place or authority of Judges or hindered the people from following the setled course of Law and Justice in the known Courts of the Kingdome Or that his Excellency Sir Thomas Fairfax at whom you chiefly aime ever intended or offered to judge any thing but what the Parliament have determined already unlesse those things which conduce to the weale of his Army the very terrour of Englands enemies and all other Souldiers in England and Wales which in duty and conscience he is bound to do And whereas you speak of a tumult by which you meane this Army or otherwise you overthrow the rest of your discourse you do the Parliament themselves more wrong and injustice under the specious pretence of a friend in one word then ever the Army did or durst though they could do them in their whole life time nay as much as the Kings party have ever done in expression since the warre began For if the Army be a Tumult they were raised by the Parliament whereby it appeares you make them whom you se strive to defend the Authours of this Tumult Which must needes follow say you if they meaning the Kingdome allow this Army suppose it 14000. men to be Judges now then any 150000. in the Kingdome may judge the Army and a greater number then ad infinitum by which it doth appeare that the Army making themselves Judges in these cases doth overthrow and take away the Ordinance of God and Magistracy then which amongst men I cannot imagine what is a greater impiety Truly Sir I know no greater impiety amongst men tending to publike harme and prejudice then to misapprehend the serene and candid thoughts of others if what preceeds this consequence of yours had been true as appeares it is not then this would have held good for it is a certaine maxime that if 14000. men in a tumultuous way be Judges now then any 150000. men in the Kingdome may judge the Army and a greater number them ad infinitum But your misapplication of this conclusion is the spoyle of it had you but turned this from the Innocent and layd it on the guilty I meane the impeached Members then rem acu tetigoras you had laid the saddle on the right horse and if that course of theirs were not directly to overthrow the Ordinance of God and Magistracy when they went about to judge without the least pre●en●● or shew in the earth for it or reason given not onely the Army but the whole Kingdome with a company of rude deboist Reformadoes who better know how to raise mutinies sweare damne and domineere and make black pots salute each others crownes then to do their Countrey any true and faithfull service in the field then will I forfeit my judgment utterly for they were such good friends to Magistracy that by their unparalleld barbarous behaviour they forced the Speakers of both Houses and the rest of the honest Members to flye for liberty if not for life and make this Army their chiefe refuge and all because they judged it meet They armed and disarmed whom they pleased in London killed one or two whose lives were worth many thousands of theirs manned their workes planted their Ordinance against the Parliament themselves then constrained to reside with the Army and this also was because they judged it fit Had this Army done these or the like incomparable actions against the Parliament and Kingdome then might you have safely said that they overthrew both the Ordinance of God and Magistracy then which amongst men I know not a greater impiety And therefore now see if this Army whom you would make the Kingdome believe would be their Judges to make them more odious in the eyes of the soone deceived vulgar had not instead of being Judges stuck firme and intire to the Parliament
Powers to wit the Law of the Kingdome wherewith men are intrusted some with one part some with another and ought not to exceede the limits thereof King Iames upon this very ground when he was arrested for debt told the Officer that he who made Lawes must himselfe obey Lawes and thereupon payd the debt and never blamed him that arrested him for so doing From all that is spoken in this particular the ensuing Syllogismes are inevitably extracted 1. Paul saith that every Soule must be subject to the higher Powers But King Parliament and all other Magistrates are within the limits of that number Ergo King and Parliament must be subject to the higher Powers All powers that are not given are not of God But Powers usurped are not given Ergo Powers usurped are not of God 3 Every soule ought to be subject to the Higher Powers given and to none else But these Higher Powers that are usurped are not given Ergo No soule ought to be subject to Higher Powers not given 4 Those Powers that be not given from God are no powers But usurped Powers are not given from God Ergo Vsurped Powers are no Powers 5 Those Powers that are no Powers ought not to be obeyed But usurped Powers are no Powers Ergo Vsurped Powers ought not to be obeyed The probation of these Arguments is evident from the very Words of the Apostle and Prophets in the places before quated therefore I will not spend time my ordinary employments not suffering me any longer therein only give me leave to digresse a little and observe as I desire also the Courteous Reader would some passages of Scripture which in my ordinary reading I have met withall very considerable for all mens observation especially those in Authority wherein all my behold what the dismall ends of those Magistrates are who take delight in oppression and unrighteousnesse I shall name divers places and refer them to the deliberate debate of the Reader they are quoted in the Margent I shall onely insist a little on the last Iob. 27.13 14 15 Prov. 14 31 22.16.22 23. Mat 3 5. Amo. 4.1 2 3. Am. 4.1 his words are these Heare this word ye Kins of Bashan that are in the Mountain of Samaria which oppresse the poore which crush the needy which say to their Masters Bring and let us drinke This Prophet though somewhat mysterious and metaphoricall here yet compared with other places will bee made more cleere and intelligible By these Kine Hosea meanes the fore-mentioned Omri which the other wicked Kings of Israel and their pernicious Councels for it was that Omri that bought this Hill Samaria of one Shemer for ten talents of silver and built there on the City Samaria where he lived dyed and was buried Those were they who oppressed the poore and crushed the needy which said to their * In some translations to their Lords 1 King 16.24.28 Mark that expression Masters to wit the oppressed poore and crushed needy Bring and let us drinke But what was the issue of all this The Lord God hath sworne by his Holinesse a greater oath could he not sweate that lo the dayes shall come upon you that he will take you away with bookt v. 2. and your * A sore judgment v. 3. Strange posting from the judgment of God as in Rev. 6.15 16. Posterity with fish-bookt And ye shall go out at the breeches every Cow at that which is before her and ye shall cast them into the Palace some translations have it cast away the things of the Palace saith the Lord. ●Thus much by way of digression let us now proceed to what followeth which you lay down thus For the great complaints made to them although it were false that is reported as I have cause to believe That men are sent from the Army to get hands to Petitions to themselves thereby to draw the eyes of the people after them yet I doe conceive such Petitions ought not to be received by any who either by Protestation or Covenant have sworn to mean the just power and priviledges of the Parliament to whom of right it doth belong to heare and determine all the grievances of the people not remediable in other Ordinary Courts of Justice I perceive now that although you want true matter to tax● the Army with yet you want not ill-will enough to insist upon reports that are meerly groundlesse which I feare did first arise from your own braine nor is there any but will marvell at you for undertaking to examine the lawfulnesse of the Armies proceedings and then to bottome your Examination upon bare and unjust reports This is capable of no other Answer it being so untrue but to assure you and the Kingdome that you have wronged the Army herein and I fear that this is but a meer complement framed to hold up your groundlesse discourse and am apt to thinke that if you had any such thing against the Army they should have heard of it with open mouth ere this day but blessed be God that the mouths of gain-sayers are stopt You proceed and say There meaning the House the people may be heard without the forcible recommendation of an Army I wish you would tell the Kingdome when the Army did by force recommend any Petition or thrust on those things that upon serious debate have beene rejected as prejudiciall to the Publique as you affirme or else you will bring such a calumnie upon your selfe for these reports and in print too without the least probation of them in any circumstance of time or otherwise that were your Name to your Booke you could never wipe off againe Now to the last clause in this part of your Examination I only say this That the Army never gave encouragements to such Petitions nor Went about to set themselves as a new Tribunal which is and ought to be believed till the contrary be proved by you who accuse them which will never be whilest the Sun and Moon indure Now wee will goe forward to the next place For the examples of Scotland Netherlands Portugal and some proceedings in this Parliament which you urge for your Warrant I must answer ingenerall that presidents are poore proofes to justifie actions and if admitted there is nothing so bad that might not obtain such a Iustification It is a warrant from some law that must make every action lawfull And although my businesse be not to search into the grounds or proceedings upon which other Nations have taken up armes yet being called unto it I must cleere the misapplication to Scotland c. To this I answer that your examination is full of misapprehensions and you make your mistakes the Armies meaning who intended not that examples should be proofes but presidents neither do they diminish ought from the lawfulnesse of their Cause for Exempla illustrant non restringunt Legeem and that they ground not the lawfulnesse of their actions on them but upon their Commission and
well-grounded purposes and principles of the Army and what those late proceedings of theirs should be whereat you take occasion to with-draw your first love I am altogether ignorant of unlesse because the Army are by divine power contriving how righteousnesse and peace might kisse each other justice and judgement run downe our streets like a mighty streame and for your studying to serve the Army according to your place and ability and not persisting therein whilst they in the whole progresse of this late businesse have not in the least desired ought but what the Parliament in their many Declarations have faithfully promised I wish they had been as really performed then our troubles had ceased might be sufficient cause of sorrow and sadnesse unto you And to speake in justification of their very adversaries in this one respect I dare boldly affirme it the Army have received more civill usage curteous respect and affectionate expressions of love from them then from many of the neare pretended friends of the Parliaments Cause and this not out of any hopes they have that the Army should effect that at last which at first they opposed and the other partie stood for or that they looke for any curtesie or favour from them more then what in conscience and equity they are bound to allow them but meerly from the observation of their good ends whereof many are convinced civill deportments and honourable performances of Articles and Covenants which merits no lesse then cordiall affection from very Enemies But now you say all your glorying in them is turned into shame and your prayers and praises to God for them into mourning and astonishment I had rather heare this were for the fore-cited reason to wit your strange revolting from the Kingdomes cause then that you seem to mention viz. to see that under the generall notions and colours of Gods glory and good intentions to the Liberties and peace of the people of this Nation the late actions and practices of the Army in disobeying and opposing the Parliament if persisted in will appeare to be contrary to the Lawes of God and the Kingdome and to their duty trust and ingagement to the Parliament of England c. I am sorry the eye of your judgement is so much obscured and you so much mistaken in the affaires and proceedings of the Army Doth it derogate more from Gods glory when the Army present their humble desires to the Parliament by way of Petition then it did when they freely powred forth their blood against the stubborne Adversaries of our Tranquillity and Freedome Are the good intents of the Generall to the Liberties and peace of this Nation lesse good because he hath gained them vi Armis from the irreconcileable enemies thereof and now desire the enjoyment of them for the Nation from those who arbitrarily and unjustly detaine them Is it more disobedience or opposition in the Army to demand the price of their blood even their hardly gotten Liberties of the Parliament then it was in the Parliament at first to raise warre against the King The Army might say to the Parliament in relation to their late proceedings as they said to the King at the beginning of this unhappie fraction It is a levying of warre against the King when it is against his Lawes and Authorities Book Dccl. part 1. pag. 276 where by the Statute of 25. ●●d 3. though it be not immediately against his Person and the levying of force against his personall commands though accompanied with his presence if it be not against his Lawes and Authority but in maintenance thereof is not levying warre against the King but for him c. So and no otherwise it is disobedience and opposition against the Parliament when it is against their Lawes and Authorities though it be not immediately against their persons and disobedience and opposition to their personall commands though accompanied with their presence if it be not against their Lawes and Authorities but in maintenance thereof is not disobedience and opposition to the Parliament but the defence of the Parliament and their due Priviledges In the judgement of any ingenuous man that which you call disobedience and opposition in the Army is no more then what the King called Rebellion in the Parliament and their actions then will appeare as contrary to the Lawes of God and the Kingdome and to their duty trust and ingagement to the King and Kingdome of England as the present progressions of the Army will to the Parliament of England for it is evident to all the world that the Army are guided by the very selfe-same principles now that the Parliament were grounded on at the beginning of this unhappy distraction Novemb. 2. 1646. Declar. 1 par● 696 page 150. observe but their owne expression That obedience binds not men to cut their owne throats c. had the Army obeyed the groundlesse personall Commands of the Parliament how unhappie had both themselves and the whole Kingdom been The Parliament at first alarumed the whole Kingdom crying Arme arme arme with beating of Drums and soundings of Trumpets the sad precursors of insuing War and woe assuring the people the King and his Counsell then intended to destroy their Religion subvert their Lawes enslave themselves c. Whereupon the people suddenly set themselves in a defensive Martiall posture for the Parliament against the King and both parties resolved and to that purpose declared to stand by each other in safe-guarding their Freedoms immunities the justest cause of any War whereupon an Army was immeadiatly sent forth who took upon them to restore or lose their lives the peoples Freedoms this being done and liberty purchased with the effusion of bloud were it not perjury and perfidiousnesse in the Army to suffer some Members of Parliament after all this to inthrall the people and undo themselves Which was evident enough they would have done had they power answerable to their malice as appears by Sir Philip Stapleton who was heard to report when the Army but intended to Petition for their dues That it was come to that passe that either the Army must down or They meaning himself and his corrupt Rivals must downe And if the Armies refusing to forfeit for ever their own and the Kingdoms freedomes and surrender it though earned with the invaluable price of their dearest bloud to an inconsiderable party of Arbitrary merciless men in both or either House of Parliament be disobedience and opposition as you terme it to the whole then how will you define obedience Do you imagine the Parliament cannot oppresse And if they do must not ease be petitioned for but for so doing the Petitioners must be accounted disobedient and opposers Parliaments were called for the benefit and not dis-ease of the people There are severall things Four causes of a Parliaments being which are chiefly the considerable Causes of a Parliaments Being 1 The out-cries of a free people inslaved to their
Militia thereof as at London and so set the Kingdome all on sire againe Was not this the ready way unto it But it is evident to all men that what was done in this particular was in order to a plot of inslaving the free-born people of England and that chiefly by the traiterous impeached Members who well knew that the fore-mentioned honest party were not perfidious enough to serve their designes and rather then they would want help to set them forward would intrust any though never so bad therefore moved the House therewith and by their subtill instigations and malevolent influences on divers Members got this cursed conspiracy passed and ordered to the great discouragement of all the honest sincere party of the City and indangering the ruine of this enough miserable Kingdome Againe the unjust imprisonment of Lievtenant-Colonell John Lilburne without expressing the cause of his commitment in the Warrant though by due course of Law they ought and are bound thereunto and keeping him under miserable restraint not permitting him to have the use of ink and paper nor suffering his wife or any of his friends to come neare him for a long time Then the breaking open M. Overtons doore of his house that stout stickler for Englands Liberties by a company of * Pro. 29.12 uncivill Ruffians and surprising him and his wife in bed and forcing him thence to appeare before the House of Lords without Order or Warrant that he could at that time heare of though much desired but after they pretended a Warrant from the Lords from thence they dragged him head long through the streets through dirt and mire and on the stones all the way most vilely abused and beaten to Newgate and there laid in double Irons where he hath continued from the third of November 1646. till this present time and no kind of reliefe or hearing can be had for this miserable and distressed man Bur further as not content with this and not supposing it woe enough for the poore man they send againe to his house where finding his sad-hearted wife and three small children about her poore soule disconsolate enough God knowes tooke her and his brother away and forced them to appeare at the Lords Barre plundered and ransacked his house exposing the helplesse children to the mercy of the wide streets and all this before any presentment or due processe of Law proceeding and from the House of Lords both of them were sent to the new Prison in Maiden-Lane where he still continues but she under pretence of another Order was dragged in the same manner that her husband was to infamous Bridewell through dirt and mire with an Infant of halfe a yeare old in her armes not regarding her Sex Age or present condition Vir ux●r sune quasi unica persona qula care una sanguis 〈◊〉 c. but abusing her with the nick-names of Whore Strumpet c. where she hath been ever since kept in miserable restraint not permitting her to have the liberty of being imprisoned with her husband notwithstanding Gods Command against such separation or as much as once to visit him in all this time or enjoy the comfort of her children about her or suffering her to go a little abroad with her Keeper to take the fresh ayre though her life hath been apparently indangered by the want thereof Then there was Major Balsum who had served the Parliament conscientiously and stoutly under the command of Sir William Waller he was a long time after the dissolution of that Army a humble Petitioner to the Parliament for some part of his Arrears having nought else to depend on for the maintenance of himselfe his wife and three or foure children but he waited so long and to so little purpose as most doe who wait there till at last he died most miserably for want of ordinary sustenance and when he was dead his* Father-in-Law and wife M. Michell knew not how to bury him in foure or five daies for want of money till at last some money was ordered his wife wherewith she buried him There were thirteen or fourteen more souldiers that served in the same Army who were starved in the same manner Pro. 21.7.22.16 which will be proved upon oath the robbery of the wicked shall destroy them because they refuse to doe judgement He that oppresseth the poore to increase his riches and he that giveth unto the rich shall surely want Mal. 2.3 5. And I will come neere to you to judgement and I will be a swift witnesse against the Sorcerers and against the Adulterers and against false swearers and against those that oppresse the hireling in his wages the widdow and the fatherlesse and that turne away the stranger from his right and fear not me saith the Lord of Hosts Againe the Widdowes and Orphans of those slaine in the service of the Parliament who were well maintained by their husbands and fathers before this warre are now faine to beg their bread from doore to doore in London and elsewhere for want of promised relief from the Parliament Besides their refusing to heare and answer the cries groanes and Petitions of the distressed and those who intrusted them to sit though bound thereunto by the strictest ingagements of the Laws of England of Conscience and Reason which way of Petitioning is one of the greatest priviledges the people of this Kingdome are invested with yet often refused as that of the vertuous Gentlewoman Mrs. Lilburne presented to every Member of the House as they went in but never any satisfactory answer returned The forementioned passages relate only to particular men but they have speciall influence on the whole body of the Kingdome and Army as if they were resolved to make that honest conscientious Gentleman and gallant Souldier for his Countreyes rights her husband a perpetuall slave Then the Petition of the entire Counties of Hereford and Buckingham though just legall and seasonable was cast aside rejected and at last disgracefully burnt by the hands of the Common-Hangman If they will disappoint two whole Counties in their reasonable demands sure a si●gle man shall scarce have audience or right from them Also the Petition of the Army which contained nothing but what was equitable and honest yet before it was presented whilst the Army were but desiring their Generall to solicit for them in behalfe thereof they were declared enemies to the State and obstructers of the reliefe of Ireland if they persisted as if their being an Army and fighting for freedome had deprived them of their freedomes and birth-rights Another maine and more generall oppression is the billeting of Souldiers on the enough wasted Countrey upon Free-quarter the heaviest pressure they undergo for the time and neither giving them their due pay that so they might be able to discharge their quarters nor abateing it in the Taxes and Contributions of the Countrey which are daily continued I shall forbeare to proceed any further in
and againe interposed their lives and fortunes betwixt them and the face of danger and that in the very pinch and nick of hazard and put those grand Judges of England into their own proper places againe with honour and safety what Judges should we have had but a company of impeached Traytors with their rivalls who better deserve a three legg'd stoole to hang on then seates in the Parliament house to sit on and any longer to disturbe the Kingdom by their hellish plots and practices and if this be such an impiety as you would have us imagine it to be then let any impartiall man in England judge But not to stay any longer here let us proceed to the next part of your examination which you say down thus Besides their refusing to obey the Parliament under whose Command they are or ought to be is against many particular precepts Rom. 13.1 1 Pet. 2.13 2 Pet. 2.10 Jud●● 8.11 and directions in the word of God as you may find them laid downe in the Margent 1. To this I answer first that they never refused obedience to the Parliament in any thing except when they commanded them to destroy themselves through the prevalency of a wicked and sinister party in the House and then they did no more then what the Parliaments own Principles led them unto as is already plainely manifested 2. For the Scriptures you alledge I shall i●sist on the first onely as the full scope and substance of all the other the words are these Rom. 13.1 Let every soule be subject to the higher Powers for there is no power but of God the powers that be are ordained of God This Text of Scripture to them who rightly understand it makes nothing at all for you as shall appeare hereafter this power the Apostle speakes of in this place with which the Law of this Kingdom and the Parliaments own forecited Declarations do admirably and truly concurre is not meant the Persons or personall commands of any but the just established lawes of a Kingdome to which obedience active or passive must be given for this power as ●o me the Apostle seemes to dispute it himselfe the better to s●t it ou● of controversie is that which is placed originally Dec. ●un 14.1647 Rom. 13. and fundamentally according to that wise observation of the Armies in the Office and but Ministerially in the persons observe both the first and second verses and you shall finde the Apostle saith nothing of persons as if he did not meane them at all in that place onely enioynes all to yeeld obedience ver 3. and subiection to the higher powers which is the Law of a Kingdome and in the next verse he speakes of the Administration of that higher power in these words for Rulers are not a terrour to good workes but to the evill ver 4. and in the following verse he saith for he is the Minister of God to thee for good but if thou do that which is evill be afraid c. 3. But thirdly the Apostles expression hath an universall extent and there is never a rationall living soule under the Sun exempted therefrom from the Prince to the poorest man that sits on the threshold but every soule must if they disobey not this injunction be subject to the higher powers which powers as is manifest are not the pleasures or wills of great men because they themselves are not acquitted from subjection to the higher powers but of the established well grounded Law of a Kingdome by generall consent and for this cause is that infallible Gramaticall Rule nemo sibi imperare po●est which is the reason Schoolemen cannot frame a prima persona imperativi modi for indeed who is it that can command himselfe and if no man how can a Prince be subject to the higher powers he being the highest power himselfe when he cannot command himselfe unlesse you will allow with me that the Law is the highest power and he is under the Command thereof as well as the meanest so that it appeares if the Prince be not subject to the Law of the Kingdom as well as others the Apostles words which are expresly that every Soule that is man woman and Child to their abilities must be subject to the higher powers that is the Law whereunto all men are confined are spoke in vaine which were impiety once to imagine 4. Then fourthly if your assersion be true which is in effect thus that all the Commands whether just or unjust or else you had as good said nothing if the Parliament must be obeyed and so make them an unbounded Parliament and without all Law which is more t●●n ever they desired themselves then will you make a cleare antipathy and disproportion betwixt this of Pauls and those of Hosea and Micah with divers other Texts which Scriptures decipher very truly the Apostles meaning and freeth him from your grosse imputation The Prophet Hosea saith Ephraim is oppressed and broken in Judgement Hosea 5.11 1 Kings 16.26 and the reason is because he willingly walked after the Commandement Now what those Commands were examine but the 1. Kings where it is said that Omri King of Israel wrought evill in the eyes of the Lord and did worse then all that were before him for he walked in all the way of Ieroboam the Son of Nobat and in his sin wherewith he made Israel to sin to provoke the Lord God of Israel to anger with his vanities From both which places you may observe that it was not onely accounted to Israel for a sin to obey the unjust Councell and Commands of King Omri though their lawfull King but that they should also be attended with the desert of sin to wit to be oppressed and broken in iudgment c. And that which confirmed both these places Micah 6. from 13. to 16. is that of Micah where he threatens the Children of Israel that they shall eate and not be satisfied sow but not reape c. and in the last verse he gives the reason thereof in these words for the Statutes of Omri are kept and all the workes of the house of Ahab and ye walke in their Councels that I should make thee a desolation and the Inhabitants thereof an hissing therefore ye shall beare the reproach of my people Now how shall these Prophets and the Apostle be reconciled unlesse Pauls meaning in that place is that obedience must be given to the just Law of a Kingdome and onely to that and that Magistrates must not be obeyed in their unjust and illegall Commands though lawfull Magistrates for Paul saith they must be subject to the higher powers the Prophet thunders out threatnings against them for being subject to unjust powers though as I said before a lawful Magistrate So that it is clear that the Apostles meaning is not that subjection must be given to mens persons or personall Commands Pro. 28.4 Zeph. 3.1 2 3 4. but to those higher
creation and constitution of Judges and other Officers of a Republique which meanes are 1 Ordinary and that must be either 1 A Succession by Birth and Generation and so the Lord Mayor of London's Son must be Lord Mayor when his Father is dead 2 Or it must by the generall consent advise and knowledge of the people and thus the major part of the Parliament are lawfully chosen 2 Or secondly God useth extraor linary meanes and instruments as when Warre is in a Kingdome the certaine token of succeeding sorrow Armies are raised to decide the controversie with their Swords betwixt both each party being assured of his own just cause and both wayting with a doubting confidence on which side the hovering Victory will resolve to pitch her Trophees And thus this Army was raised not so much to judge but under the considerations formerly mentioned though you vainly imagine by that meanes to brand them as to execute the just Judgments and Commandes of the Parliament Englands chiefe Pretors And this the Army in cases of necessity may do being called thereunto by the very same power the Parliament were as is formerly instanced injustice unrighteousnesse miscarriages in Government leading them and the providence of God guiding them by putting seasons and oportunities into their hands thereunto Also the manner of their being Judges if they must needes be so considered doth somwhat constraine them to their present actions which is no otherwise then thus they believe and say that those things which are just and equitable and tending to the Kingdomes weale and so judged and deemed upon serious deliberate debate by the Parliament are really and truly so And thereupon they resolved to execute those things so ordered acted and judged by the Parliament or to be executed themselves which resolution I hope for the Kingdomes and their own safety they will still continue which without any imposibilities they may do whilst proceeding upon those sound principles And herein they do no more then the rules of nature and reason to which I am sure the Lawes of England are or ought to be reduced do allow for Lex spectat naturae ordinem non cogit ad imposibilia sed intendit semper quod convenit rationi the Law hath regard to the order of nature and doth not command impossibilities but intends and purposes what doth agree with reason I shall say no more here but this that if the Parliament judge and declare what the liberties proprieties and priviledges of the subject is the contrary whereof is oppression injustice and miscarriage in goverement then the Army may justifiably stand to it with their lives against any without respect to persons You say in the next place when the people conceive any thing to be amisse it is their duty to represent it to those whom God hath appointed to the Office and place of Judgement To this I sadly and concisely answer that there were many cries but few eares to heare or hearts to pitty them and when the people did petition they and their Petitions as before is instanced were rejected some burned I wish it had been otherwise that so righteousnesse and just Judgement might run down our streetes like a mighty streame that every man might sit under his own Vine and under his own figtree so had peace been within our Borders ere this day In the last place you say but if the meaning of this last part of it be that God hath made the former successes and present power of the Army a testimony to its opposing the pretended injustice unrighteousnesse and miscarriage in government then the Turk may have the same argument to justifie his Title to all he hath gotten in Christendome But the wise man teacheth otherwise that no man knoweth love or hatred by all that is afore him Eccles 1. In this severall things are considerable but for want of time I shall answer in generall and briefly No that this as you have layd it downe is not the meaning of that part of the Declaration and though all in this were granted that you would have yet the evill consequence you have drawn thence would prove unsound and feeble the cause considered for the Turkes opposing the Christians is for the enlargement of his Territories and advancement of his Monarchy and greatnesse but the disproportion betwixt the Army and Parliament was for the restoring establishing and confirming the immunities freedomes of the freeborne people of England the Parliament declaring at first what they were which was all they could do then of themselves and the Army neither regarding the painted favour of pretended friends nor civill force of their publike enemies stoutly contending with their lives in their hands for them yet now invaded by some putrified rotten Members contrary to the intent and meaning of the House in their first Declarations are againe defended by the Army and therefore this is no Argument at all for the justification of the Turkes Title to all he hath gotten in Christendom But then againe as it appeares that neither of the two former parts of your examination nor both of them together can make up the Armies meaning in that part of their Declaration so I shall give you my understanding of it they say that supreame end the glory of God which all men should especially aime at is not wanting in these cases but they study how by all meanes to advance it the better to set a price upon all such proceedings of righteousnesse and justice It to wit the glory of God being one witnesse of God in the world that is one maine argument to discover the candid and sincere purposes of them who make that their marke to carrie on a Testimonie against the injustice and unrighteousnesse of men whatever they be and against the miscarriage of Governments wheresoever it is found when corrupted or declining from their primitive and originall glorie that is when they are transported from their primarie brightnesse and lustre into the muddie streames of disorder oppression and miscarriage The scope of all is this That the glorie of God it being their ultimate end is a testimonie of their proceedings against all injustice it being the clearest demonstration of the reall and upright parposes and resolutions of any And to conclude the Army might say as * Iuliamus Emperor of Rome slaine in the Pers. Warres one did on his Death-bed Right joyfull and wi●tingly much more have I stood firmly grounded and resolute whensoever the Common-wealth as an imperious mother hath exposed me to apparent and evident danger as one used to contemn the whirling stormes of all casualties I have now ended this part of your examination and do earnestly desire it may give you and other doubting friends that satisfaction desired it being published for that purpose Finis Certain Quaeries wherein Resolution is desired proposed without any particular by-interests or private respects at all but for satisfaction I. WHether the Army under the present conduct of Sir Thomas Fairfax are not as well bound to resist yea to the death Tyrannie and Oppression in the Parliament as in the King and whether every point and part of their Commission extend not as well to the one as the other II. How the Army can disband till they see those things effected for which the people entrusted them in Military Employments III. Whether the end of their Banding was to free nd acquit the people of this Kingdome from feared slavery or not if it were how will Conscience and the Kingdome be satisfied if they disband before they have done their worke if not then why were they raised IV. Whether the effect or end of any thing is not more honourable and consequently to be preferred before the efficient cause whereby it was procured V. Whether the blood of all the slayne during the late Warre may not be required justly at the hands of this Army since it was spilt in vaine if they endeavour not to bring to passe the just ends for which it was shed VI. Whether a lawfull Cause a lawfull Commission and the peoples willingnesse in cases of necessity be not sufficient to raise a lawfull Army VII Whether the Parliaments lawfull Ordinances are not sufficient warrants for the Army in the prosecution of the Kingdomes Cause in the case aforesaid VIII Whether the Army are bound to observe the will and Command of the Parliament when they are acted by a principle of egoity and selfishnes and for private Causes and interests or the will and Commands of the Law IX Whether the Parliament are better able to judge of the peoples grievances and oppressions then they be of their own X. Whether the Parliament are not bound to heare and give satisfactory answers to their Petitions and whether it be a breach of priviledge as they have somtimes declared so to do or not XI Whether the priviledges of Parliament be inconsistent with the weale of the people XII Whether upon non-satisfaction to the just Demands of the people no reason given but breach of priviledge the Army are not engaged both by Covenant and Command to use all lawfull meanes for the procurement of the peoples reasonable Desires they having employed and maintained them for that purpose XIII Whether the Parliaments expression in the Declaration formerly mentioned to wit that obedience binds not men to cut their owne throats and those so frequently used in Scripture save thy selfe thy wife thy children an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth be not just grounds for the present actions of the Army and why XIV Whether an Act of Indempnity though with the Royall assent for things done in tempore loco belli be sufficient to acquit the Army from those things they have done neque in tempore nec loco belli especially the Parliament having upon no grounds in the earth declared them Traytors enemies in tempore pacis XV. Whether the King and Parliament are not both subordinate to the Law And whether is Supreame the King or Parliament the Head or his Members if the King then why might not the injustice of the Parliament be as warrantably opposed as the Kings FINIS