the Synedry for by the Septuagint the word is given to every Company and in Moses by all the Congregation the Synedry of the Seventy Elders is signified as Aben Ezra and Rabbi Solomon have long since noted This also we know that the Corinthian who had defiled himselfe with incest was censured of many We 02 know that Timothy is enjoyned to rebuke them that sin before all that the rest may fear Which place seems by that which goes afore to be understood of Presbyters that sin who in the hearing of the other Presbyters were rebuked by the Bishops But although we understand it generally it is certain these indefinite Rules admit their restrictions and limitations according to the quality of the persons An Elder saith Paul rebuke not but entreat him as a Father and the yonger men as brethren Much more honour is due to the Soveraign Power and to Magistracy than to age Adde here which many have noted and is congruent to the Custome of the antient Church that the Prelats of the Church are not to bee reproved before the multitude how much lesse the King who is as Constantine said constituted by God as it were an universall Bishop Now as ignominious traduction so all coaction too against the Highest Power is unlawfull because all right of compelling proceeds from it there is none against it That which is objected concerning Uzziah is answer'd by interpreting the text according to the Originall thus And Azariah the chief Priest and all the Priests looked upon him and behold he was leprous in his forehead and they made him hasten thence yea also himself was compelled to goe out because the Lord had smitten him By the Divine Law it was not permitted for a leprous man to be in the Temple the Priefts were therefore earnest in hastning the King away because he was struck with leprosy and the disease it self encreasing upon him made him depart of his own accord The Priest declares God compels We have said what may be done by Authority of Divine Right the rest that hath been added by the Canons either naked or cloth'd with Law as it may wee confesse to good purpose be used upon the Emperour sometimes so if he oppose it or forbid by what right or with what prudence it may be used we doe not see For that all Government which ariseth from consent is under the Supreme Command and that all Jurisdiction is not only under it but also floweth from it is demonstrated afore nor is that in question that the Soveraign is not bound by penall Statutes Whence the antient Fathers have interpreted that of David To thee alone have I sinned to be spoken because he was a King whence also is that note of Balsamon to the twelfth Canon of the Ancyran Synod The Imperiall unction drives away penance that is the necessity of publick satisfaction Meane while 't is true that Kings to their great honour as in Civill affairs to their Courts and Parliaments so in Sacred they may submit themselves to Pastors even as to publick Judges For it is current saith Ulpian and a thing in practise that if the greater or equall subject himself to the Jurisdiction of the other sentence may bee given for him or against him But this subjection because it depends upon the Kings will and may be revok'd at pleasure diminisheth not a jot of his Supreme Command as it hath been proved by very learned men Whether or no it be expedient that a King should suffer this Jurisdiction to be exercis'd upon him is wont to be disputed They that affirme shew how by this submission of Kings much strength Authority accrueth to the Discipline of the Church 'T is true and spoken to the purpose As the Princes so will the People be and the Rulers example hath the sweetest influence But for the Negative it is said That the Common-wealth stands by the Authority of the Governour and as Aristotle the consequence of contempt is dissolution Certainly if any credit may be given to them that have recorded the affairs of the Emperour Henry and among them to Cardinall Benno the Rise of his calamity was that publickly with lamentable penance naked feet and course apparell in an extreme cold winter he was made a spectacle of men and Angels and at Canusium for the space of three dayes endured the scorne of Hildebrand A difference therefore must be made between those things which are needfull to the publick profession of repentance and the more grievous and ignominious punishments To the former some of the Emperours before Henry rare examples of Christian meeknesse have yielded willingly but Henry was the first of all upon whom any thing so ignominious was imposed or any thing at all without a voluntary submission And Hildebrand or Gregory VII was the first of all the Popes that took upon him so great a boldnesse toward the Imperiall Majesty as Onuphrius tels us who also saith that the Kings and Emperours who either upon just or unjust cause exempt themselves from these Positive censures are to be resigned up to the Judgement of God And so the Kings of France for many ages have challenged to themselves this right That they cannot be excommunicated In what fort a Pastor without such coaction may satisfy his conscience in the use of the Keys Ivo Carnotensis hath declared Let him say to the Emperour I will not deceive you I permit you at your own perill to come into the visible Church the Gate of Heaven I am not able to open for you without a better reconciliation It remains now to shew what is the Right and Office of the Highest Power about those actions which we have ascribed unto Pastors and Congregations And first as to those actions which by the only Right of Liberty and Privilege of Divine Law are exercised seeing by them also injury may be done to others it is certaine they are comprehended within the sphere of the Supreme Jurisdiction For not only the Actions which proceed from the Authority of the Highest Power but all Actions whatsoever capable of externall morall goodnesse or evilnesse are called to the judgement of the Highest Power If married persons performe not to each other what the Law of Matrimony requires and if the Master of a Family neglect his charge in these cases the Courts of Justice are of use Of all evill the Power is ordein'd the Avenger One among evils and not the least is the abuse of the Keys and unjust separation or denegation of the Sacraments There is an Imperiall Law prohibiting the Bishop that hee Sequester no man from the Holy Church or the Communion unlesse it be upon just ground And Justinian in his Novell forbids all Bishops and Presbyters to segregate any one from the Holy Communion before cause bee shew'd wherefore the Sacred Rules will have it to be done Mauritius the Emperour commands Gregory the Great to
embrace Communion with John of Constantinople In France the antient usage was by seizing on their Lands and other wayes to compell the Bishops to the Administration of Sacraments And the Princes of Holland have often layd their Commands upon the Pastors to execute Divine service Much more then may the Highest Power challenge this right over such Actions as have their force not by Divine but Canon Law For under the pretext of Canons it sometimes happens that the Canons are violated and 't is possible the Canons themselves may be exorbitant from the Divine prescriptions If either be the Highest Power cannot deny the Plantifs to take knowledge of the case Now concerning those actions which flow from Humane Law and oblige men whether they will or no and draw after them coaction there is much lesse cause of doubt For all Jurisdiction as it flows from the Highest Power reflows unto the same But as it is a part of Jurisdiction noâ— only to Judge but to appoint Judges so belongs it to the Highest Power to doe both Thus Amaâ—â—iah and the other 02 Priests with him are constituted Judges by Jehoshaphat Neither can be shewed more evidently the Jurisdiction of the Supreme in this kind of causes than that all degrees of appealing depend upon his pleasure Otherwise why doe the Pastors of England appeale unto this or that Bishop all the Bishops unto the two Archbishops And there is the same subordination of the consistories Classicall and the Nationall Synods Nor is the last terme of appealing limited by any Law Naturall or Divine Wisely said the King of Britaine in his judgement every Christian King Prince and Common-wealth have it in their Power to prescribe unto their subjects that externall forme of Government in Church affairs which may suit best with the forme of Civill Government And truly of old it was so done by the Christian Emperours Otherwise whence came that so great Prerogative of the Constantinopolitan Church Whence had the Synod of Chalcedon power to abrogate the acts of the second at Ephesus Now as in Civill businesses the judgement is permitted by the Highest Power for the most part to the appointed Courts and at last upon Petition against the greatest of them the matter is referr'd to men most skilfull in the Law or more rarely the Highest Power it self advising with learned Counsell gives finall judgement but very seldome upon suspition of some Court cals forth the cause unto it self so also in these controversies about Sacred things it hath been most usuall by the ordinary Synods and upon appeal from their decree by a certaine Assembly called for the purpose to put an end unto them it hath been lesse usuall yet sometimes usefull for the Emperour himself to judge of the Religion and equity of the former Judges Thus in the case of the Donatists after a double judgement of Bishops Constantine did who although he approved not the appeale yet he refused not the tryall of it But this is somewhat more rare and yet not without right that if a Synod upon probable causes be declined the Highest Power cals the cause before it self and weighing the opinions of most eminent Divines pronounces what is most equitable The Synod of Antioch prohibits him that complains of injury received from a Synod to trouble the Emperour with the hearing of his Case so long as the matter may be rectified by a greater Synod Yet this takes not from the Emperour the Power to heare the cause if it be brought before him Moreover the modesty of the antient Bishops hath attributed Power to Kings not only to examine the right or wrong of Excommunication but to pardon also and abate the punishment thereof for so much as belongs to Positive Law Ivo Carnotensis a Bishop and a stout desender of the Churches right against Kings was not afraid to write unto his fellow-Bishops that he had received a certain person into Communion in contemplation of the Kings favour to him according to the Authority of a Law that saith whosoever the King receiveth into grace and admits unto his Table the Priests and Co gregation must not refuse The Kings of France and the Vindicators of the Regall Right the Judges of the Supreme Courts have often constituted and decreed that publike Magistrates by occasion of that Jurisdiction they exercise are not subject unto those Ecclesiasticall penalties So in the Decrees of Hungary of the year 1551. the Ecclesiasticks are forbidden to send out without the knowledge and permission of his Majestie any sentence of Excommunication against the Nobles of that Kingdome And in an antient Law of the English it is read that none of the Kings Ministers be Excommunicated unlesse the King be first acquainted with it Which I see the Princes of Holland have thought sit to imitate for the same was promulged by Charls the Fift by his edict in the year 1540. Neverthelesse such use of the Keys as is congruent to Divine Law and such injunction of penance as is consentancous to the Laws and Canons the Highest Powers are wont to approve And this is the Imperiall Anathema mentioned in sundry of Justinians Laws We conclude that Christian Powers at this time doe not innovate which will not unlesse upon causes approved by themselves suffer Excommunication being joyned with publick shame to proceed unto effect which by their command inhibit censures manifestly unjust for it is their Duty to save every one from injury and to keep the Church from Tyranny CHAP. X. Of the Election of Pastors REmains that part of Empire which as we have said consisteth in assigning Functions The perpetuall Functions in the Church are two of Presbyters and Deacons Presbyters with all the antients I call them that feed the Church by preaching of the Word by Sacraments by the Keyes which by Divine Law are individuall Deacons which in some sort serve the Presbyters as the Levites did the Priests of old To this order are referr'd the Readers who were in the Synagogues as the Gospel and Philo shew and were retained in the Church as appears by History by the Canons and by the writings of the Fathers In the Gospel he that keeps the Book is call'd the Minister which is even all one with Deacon and the same appellation is given by the Synod of Laodicea to the Deacons of of Inferiour degree which were afterward called Subdeacons But the most laborious part of Deaconship is about the care of the poore Presbyters the antient Latin Church translated Seniors Deacons I think cannot otherwise be stil'd than Ministers although there be some who as their manner is in other things had rather carp at this than acknowledge it to be true I am deceiv'd if Plinius Secundus did not understand both Greek and Latin yet he relating the Institutes of Christians rendring word for word names them Shee-Ministers whom Paul entitles Sheedeacons and the Church afterward Deaconesses Now as the Levites could doe nothing but
Election inferrs thus Yet I will not thence conclude that the right of electing Bishops is to be reduced to the promiscuous Votes of the common people for whether it be better that the Bishop be design'd at the meeting of the whole Church or by the suffrages of a few no right Constitution can be prescribed to all Churches for severall Countries have severall Laws Customes and Institutes If any in whom the right is abuse it by Tyranny they are compelled into order by the Holy Magistrate or the right of designing Ministers may be transferr'd from them to others for it is sufficient that some Elders performe that office of Electing upon command of the King or Magistrate by the advise and Counsell of men who understand what the function of a Bishop is what is the condition of that Church or People over which a Pastor is to be appointed who also can judge of the endowments the learning and manners of every one By this right Justinian as we have said Constituted a manner of Electing somewhat receding from the former usage and the antient Canons by this right after the Nicene Canon were many Bishops elected by the Clergy and the People The Lawes of Charles the Great and other Kings are extant containing divers wayes of Electing so that Bucer said most truly The form of Election is prescribed by pious Princes Let us now consider whether the Highest Power it self may make Election the question is not whether it ought to make it nor whether it be alwayes expedient to doe so but whether if it doe make Election it commit any offence against the Law Divine We say with the excellent Marsilius Patavinus The Law-giver or Prince is not by any Law of God prohibited from the Institution Collation or Distribution of Ecclesiasticall offices Whosoever affirm the contrary doe accuse of impiety innumerable pious Princes of antient and of this age which truly is a point of great temerity when no Divine Law can be produced to prohibit it as hath been abundantly by others and by us in some part demonstrated Although this might suffice for whatever is not circumscrib'd by Divine Law is within the sphere of the Highest Power yet for the desending of our sentence both reasons and examples are in readinesse The first reason is taken hence that all actions even those that naturally belong to others not having causes determined by nature we see are rightly exercised by the H. Power Naturally men choose teachers for their children and give them Guardians sick persons make use of what Physician they please Merchants elect the Curators of their Company Yet in many places Guardianship is appointed by Law alone or the will of the Magistrates Physicians are constituted by publick Order and Informers of Youth too with interdiction of others from the practice of those faculties and to the Commanies of Merchants are fit Curators also appointed by the Highest Power without blame of any any But if this right be competent to the Highest Power over those things which did belong to every one much more over those things that belong unto the People because the power of the people is devolved upon it as all men know that have any knowledge of the Lawes That sometimes there may be just causes why the H. Power should challenge to it self the Election of Pastors no wise man will deny For often errours introduced into the Church against the word of God cannot be rooted out by other means often there is no other way to avoid Schism often the suffrages of the Clergy are disturb'd with factions popular election with seditions whereof are extant many examples even of the purer times Adde in the last place that the times are now and then so boisterous that the King will hardly keep the Crown upon his head except hee have a care the Pastors may be most obedient and faithfull to him Verily all Histories doe witnesse how dearly the German Emperours paid for their abdication of this Imperiall Right That we may come to Examples it hath been shewed afore that before the Mosaicall Law and afterward among the Nations without Judaea Kings themselves enjoyed the Priesthood the Divine Law not then forbidding it at which time there can be no doubt the Priesthood might also have been committed by them to others as we read the Pontifs and Flamens were created by the Kings of Rome But among the Hebrew people after Moses Law no man except of Aarons family could be admitted to the office of a Priest nor to the service of the Temple unlesse he were a Levit. Hence is Jeroboam justly blam'd for choosing Priests who were not Levits for the Law did not allow it nor was it in the King to command Sacrifices to be offered in any place but the accustomed which after David was Jerusalem Other Functions or the places for them the King might assigne to the Priests and Levits So were some Levits appointed by David for preaching others for singing And that there should be Singers with Harps and other Instruments was God's precept by the Prophets as the application of persons to the severall offices is every where attributed to David under the name of King and after David to Solomon and Jehoshaphat the King not the Prophet by name electeth Priests and Levits whom he might send forth to the Cities of Juda to instruct them The very same thing that is here debated For as some Fathers were of opinion the right of blood in the Moisaicall Law is correspondent to the Imposition of hands in the Christian Law As then the Hebrew King may apply certain persons to a certain office and place but only such as were of Aarons family and Levits so the Christian King rightly makes a Presbyter or Bishop of a certain City but of them which are ordain'd or to be ordain'd And so did Nehemia's Lieutenant to the Persian King leave some Levits in the particular Cities others hee called forth unto Jerusalem Yea the High Priest attained not that dignity by Succession but Election of the great Synedry yet confined unto certain families which Election seemeth to have been the regall right when the Kings reigned the most learned of the Hebrews Maimonides hath observed But let us proceed with the Christians Before Constantine no man will wonder that no Christian Pastors were elected by the Emperours when the Emperours either were enemies to the Church or had it in contempt and accounted it not worthy of their care Constantine gave the force of a Law to the Nicene Canon of Election to be made by Bishops other Emperours after him did the like either by renewing the Canon or not abrogating of it And 't is manifest this manner of Election was long in use the Empire being of greater extent than that the Emperours diligence could provide for all the Churches Notwithstanding this it was lawfull for the Emperours if they pleased to Elect by themselves For seeing it
just causes it be granted unto Kings to recede from the Canon yet to forsake the Canon with intention of promoting to Episcopacy the favourers of the Arrian party was not the part of a pious Emperour This way of electing is the more justly reprehended if Ordination also being omitted Bishops were obtruded upon the Churches which is very credible to have been done for it was not probable the Orthodox would ordain Arians or such as used Collusion with them Verily not any one of the Fathers hath hitherto been found who said there was any Divine Law to hinder the King from choosing the Pastor It appears the most holy Bishops above mentioned who condiscended to the Election made by Theodosius were of another mind And thus much be spoken of the Highest Powers embracing the true Religion As to the Kings that give no assent to the saving Faith pious Assemblies never made addresse unto them for election of their Pastors For how could they expect defence of the Church from the enemies of the Church And suppose the matter should succeed most happily yet would it be an indecorum that the Affaires of the Church should be judged before the unjust and not before the Saints Yea if Kings that are aliens from the Faith arrogate to themselves any such thing without question they bring upon themselves the greater Judgement Notwithstanding if Infidel Kings will not at all admit any Pastor or Bishop except Elected by themselves and in the mean time leave to the Church the Probation and to other Pastors the Imposition of hands I cannot think it convenient for Christians to refuse men otherwise fit for this only reason because they are commended by Infidels For the good God doth effect his good work even by evill men I am not a man of that confidence that I dare condemn so many Christian Churches in Thrace in Syria in Egypt which doe receive Patriarchs or lesser Bishops from the King of the Turks and that this patience of the Christians is no new thing is shewed by Barlaamus Cyracensis Clearly 't is better to entertain a worthy Pastor adorned with good report of the common People ordained by other Pastors from the hand of a Prince though an unbeliever then to suffer the wast of Churches Esdras we are sure did not decline the office of restoring Gods worship imposed on him by the Pagan King Artaxerxes But that we may return unto our own that is unto Christian Powers for that was aspersed on the by to give others occasion of better thoughts upon this businesse we must advertise the Reader that in all this Treatise we enquire what is lawfull not what is at every time expedient For whether we reflect upon antient or later times we shall see great variety in the manner of election nor only through ages and Provinces but through years and particular Cities So much uncertainty there is in that which the Law Divine hath left uncertain And truly where the question is not of the right but of the best manner of Election 't is marvellous how many things may probably be discoursed on every part Give me Cyprian and those of his time there will be no fear of popular election Give me the Nicene Fathers I would gladly ascribe the election unto Bishops Give me such Emperours as Theodosius Valentinian and Charles the Great there will be no danger in the election Regall or Imperiall But we are fallen into the lees of the Church and after we have with circumspection viewed all things we find nothing but some incommodity is annexed to it Therefore nothing at all can be here prescribed as perpetuall That which is indefinite must have an indefinite Rule Yet if I were in this respect to give my advise the manner of Justinian's times is not displeasing to me with this caution that a Pastor be not obtruded upon the people against their will and also saving the right of the Highest Powers to rescind and make void Elections if any errour be committed pernicious to the Church or Common-wealth Which right not only the French Kings but also the antient Roman Emperours very frequently have used as is most easie to be proved They do much erre who confound this will and pleasure of the H. Powers whereby the Election made is approv'd or disapporv'd with that consent where with the Magistrate of every City according to the Lawes or Canons concur to the Election in the next place to the Clergy and sometimes with the People For here is a wide difference The pleasure of the Highest Powers is over the Election the Magistrates consent is a part of the election That agrees to the Highest Powers as such this to the Magistrates by Positive Law nor properly as Magistrates but as an honoured part of the City Therefore the Election by the Magistrates stayes within the bounds of their City but Emperours and Kings exercise their right not only in Cities which they dwell in and whose Churches they frequent but if they see it needfull through all places of their Dominions Again the Magistrates may be overcome with suffrages the Highest Power cannot Certainly although the election be permitted to others that right of free approbation cannot safely be abdicated by Him that rules in Chiefe Also after Election made the right of removing a certain person from the Ministry of a certain place although it may be in others too ought alwayes to remain in the Highest Power So Solomon ejected Abiathâ—r from being the Priest of God So the Bishops of Rome were more then once deposed by the Imperial Power as Bellarmine himself confesseth The proof whereof is easie For if the Highest Power hath right to interdict any one the City or Province hee must needs have a right also to interdict him the Ministry of this City or Province For this is included in that and in whose Power the whole is in his power the part cannot choose but be Nor only may the Highest Power doe this by way of punishment but by way of caution too to wit if any Pastor be drawn by the People into matter of tumult which perhaps may come to passe without his fault For unlesse the Highest Power could doe this the Common-wealth were not sufficient to secure it selfe The last errour is of those that think it belongs unto the same Person to elect and to remove For the Highest Power may interdict not only publick acts but private too to which it electeth not the Persons namely in negotiation and conduction as above is said when we spake of Jurisdiction and is manifested by Examples For eight or more Roman Bishops it is certain have been depos'd by Emperours sometimes with a Synod sometimes without whereof a good part were elected by the Clergy and people of Rome CHAP. XI Concerning offices to the Church not alwayes necessary IT is of much concernment for the keeping of peace in the Churches vtâ— distinguish accurately between the
instance in Civill affaires For Kings unto whom supplication is made against the sentence of the Praetonian Prefects or of the chief Senate do for the most part commit the last hearing of the Cause to men of Law whose sentence unlesse it be suspected they confirm sometimes they command the Cause to be pleaded all again before themselves So in causes Ecclesiasticall it was the Custome for Emperours to commit the matter to the examination of other Bishops for their religion and wisedome most noted and taking account of them to confirm what in their own discretion they judged best And this is the cause why against former Synods other new and these not greater than the former were so often called not because this Synod by it self was Superiour unto that but these men had greater credit with the Emperours than the former It was but seldome that the Emperours heard all the Cause again themselves as Constantine after the Church had judged twice himself examin'd the Gause of Coecilian and gave finall Judgement in it He also call'd before him the Bishops who had met at Tyrus to render him an account of all their doings Wherein he is justly defended by our Men against the Patrons of the Roman Sea It is true in Sacred no lesse than in other matters that an Appeale strictly taken which inhibites the execurion of Sentence given may by the Civill Law be taken away but then there is left open another way to implore the Hearing of the Highest Power by Complaint or Supplication For if this be denyed the King could not scatter away all evill from his throne Hee could not be a terrour to all evill which is his perpetuall office so that the old woman said well to Philip of Macedon If he were not at leisure to be Judge Hee should not be at leisure to be King Maecenas saw this of old who sheweth to Augustus that no man under the Highest ought to have so much Power committed to him as that from him there should be no appeal One thing more must be remembred here that the right of the H. Power after the Synod to determine any thing against the Synod cannot be contracted only unto those Controversies wherein as it were the whole body of Religion is in Question For there is the same right in the parts as in the whole and the reasons before alleged give unto the H. Power a free finall Judgement in single Questions as well as in all together For also in single Questions Synolds may erre neither ought the H. Power to yield blind obedience to them much lesse by its Authority to defend a false and hurtfull doctrine or suffer the truth to be oppressed nor can the wisdome of the Highest Power permit errours to encrease by little and little and as their nature is one beget another till their number be so great that they cannot be rooted out without hazard of the Common-wealth CHAP. VIII Of Legislation about Sacred things HItherto we have spoken generally now let us more neerly view the severall parts of Authority The Act of Authority either respects all or single persons that is Legislation this if an occasion of Sute is Jurisdiction if otherwise it is called by the generall name because it wants a speciall Of this last sort the commands are such as the Centurions I say unto this man Goe and he goeth to another Come and he cometh to my servant Doe this and he doth it but the principall act is the Injunction of Functions permanent In what things Legislation is may be understood by the precedent part of our discourse for almost all things belonging to Authority we have explained by examples of Legislation as the more noble Thence it appears that a Law is made either of the things defined by Law Divine or of those that are left undefined The Laws that are made either respect the whole body of Religion or the parts of it In nothing more shines forth the vertue of Supreme Authority than in this That it is in the power and choice thereof what Religion shall be publickly exercised This all that have written Politicks put in the chiefest place among the Rights of Majesty and experience proves the same For if you enquire Why in England under Queen Mary the Roman Religion was set up but under Queen Elisabeth the Evangelicall the nearest cause cannot be rendred but from the will and pleasure of the Queens or as some will have it of the Queens and Parliament Enquire why one Religion is in Spaine another in Denmark another Sweden you must have recourse to the Supreme Governours will But many doe object If that be so the State of Religion will be very unconstant especially where one is Ruler over all for upon change of the Kings mind Religion also will be changed 'T is true indeed that they say but that danger is in all other things as well as Sacred The work will be like the work-man and the Law be as the King Yet no mans right is to be denyed him for the danger of abusing it for then no mans right shall be safe Besides although the Highest Power should transfer that right upon another which we have shewed he may not the same danger would still remaine for the right would but passe from men to men and every man may be deceived Here then our only comfort lyes in the Divine providence Indeed the hearts of all men God hath in his power but The Kings heart is in the Lords hand after an especiall manner God doth his work both by good and evill Kings Sometimes a calme sometimes a storme is for the Church more useful If the Governour be pious if a diligent reader of the Scriptures if assiduous in prayer if Reverent to the Catholick Church if ready to heare wife Counsels by him will the truth be much advanced But if he be of a perverse or corrupt judgement it will be more hurtfull to himself than to the Church for he must expect a heavy judgement from the King thereof who will not suffer his Church to be unrevenged The Church in the meane while ceaseth not to be the Church yea if the King rage against it it will gather strength and inciease under persecution Certainly 't was never lawfull for Subjects to gaine by force the publick exercise of their Religion the antient Christians when they were at strongest when they had Senators and Presidents very many of their mind never took such right unto themselves 'T is the Office of the Highest Power alone publickly to authorize the true Religion and to remove the false To remove Idols out of private places belongs to the Lord of the place and upon his neglect to the King as the Lord generall but to remove them out of the publick place is the right of the Highest Power and to whomsoever it shall delegate that office And thus is that Law of Deut. to be
imitate the Sacred Canons For in things not defined by Divine Law the Canons are usefull to the Law-giver two wayes They doe both contain the Counseis of wise men and make the Law more gracious in the subjects eye This as it is not necessary to the right making of a Law so if it may be obtained is very profitable Justinian's Novel is Extant wherein he gives the force of Lawes to the Ecclesiasticall Canons set forth or confirmed by the four Synods the Nicene the first of Constantinople the first of Ephesus and that of Chalcedon Where by the word Confirmed we must understand the Canons of the old Provinciall Councils which being generally receiv'd were therefore contained in the Code of the Catholick Canons Now to that which some Enquire whether the Church hath any Legislative Power the Answer may be given out of our former Treatise By Divine Law it hath none Before the Christian Emperours the Decrees of Synods for the order or the ornament of the Church are not called Lawes but Canons and they have either the force of Counsell only as in those things that rather concern single persons than the whole Church or else they bind by way of Covenant the willing and the unwilling being the fewer by necessity of determination and therefore by the Law of Nature not by any humane Authority This notwithstanding some Legislative Power may be granted by Humane Law to Churches Pastors Presbyters or Synods For if to other Companies and Colleges whose usefulnesse is not to be compared with the Church that Power as we have said above may be granted by the Supreme Governour why not also to the Church especially when no Divine Law is against it But two things must be here observed First this Legislation granted doth not at all diminish the right of the H. Power 't is granted Cumulatively as the Schooles speak not Privatively for the H. Power though it may communicate to another the right of making Lawes generall or speciall yet can it not abdicate the same right from it selfe Next the Lawes made by any such Company may if there be cause be nulled and corrected by the H. Power The reason is two Lawgivers both highest cannot be in one Common-wealth and therefore the Inferiour must obey the Superiour Hence it is that for the most part in the constitutions of Synods we see the assent of the Highest Power expressed in these words At the command of the King By the Decrce of the most glorious Prince the Synod hath Constituted or Decreed It may be objected here That Kings sometimes affirme they are bound by the Canons and forbid to obey their Edicts contrary thereto But this is of the same sense as when they professe to live by their own Lawes and forbid their Rescripts if they are against the Lawes to be observ'd For such professions take not away their Right but declare their will As a clause added in a former Testament derogating from the later makes the later of no value not because the Testator might not make a later Testament but because what is written in it is supposed not approved by his free and perfect Judgement And hence it is that if there be a speciall derogation from the derogating clause as the later Testament is of value so is the later Constitution too But that Canons have been nulled and amended by Emperours and Kings and that Synods ascrib'd that Power to them was prov'd sufficiently when we treated of Synods Yea which is more even those Canons which are found in the Apostles writings were not perpetually observ'd The reason is because they were supposed to contain not so much an exposition of Divine Law as Counsell accommodated to those times Such is the Canon to Timothy That a Neophite be not made a Bishop which was renewed in the Synod of Laodicea Yet in the Election of Nectarius this Canon was layd by by Theodosius and by Valentinian in the Election of Ambrose And such is that Canon That a Widow under sixty be not chosen for a Deaconesse which Theodosius also constituted by a Law Yet Justinian permitted one of fourty to be chosen 'T is not to be forgotten here that the Hebrew Kings excepted some actions from the Divine Law it selfe There was a Law That no unclean person should eat the Passeover Yet Ezechius having poured forth his prayers to God granted an Indulgence to the unclean to cat thereof Again the Law was that the Beasts should be slain by the Priests and yet twice under Ezechias the Levites by reason of the want of Priests were admitted to this office Not that the Kings loosed any one from the bond of Divine Law for that can no man doe but that according to equity the best Interpreter both of Divine and Humane Law they declared the Law Divine in such a Constitution of affaires to lose its obligation according to the mind of God himself For such a Declaration as in private actions and not capable of delay it is wont to be made by private men So David and his companions interpreted the Law which permits the Priests only to eat of the Shew-bread to have no binding force in the case of extreme hunger so in publick actions or in private also that may be delay'd it is to be made by the Highest Power the Defender and Guardian of Divine Law according to the counsell of wise and godly men And hither for conclusion I refer that in the time of the Macchees it was enacted that it should be lawfull to give battell to the Enemy on the Sabbath day CHAP. IX Of Jurisdiction about Sacred things TO Legislation Jurisdiction is coherent with so neer a tye that in the highest degree one cannot be without the other Wherefore if the Supreme Legislation about Sacredthings under God agrees to the Soveraign Power it followes that the Jurisdiction also agrees unto it Jurisdiction is partly Civill partly Criminall 'T was a point of Civill Jurisdiction that the Episcopall Sea of Antioch was abjudged and taken away from Paulus Samosatenus The Criminal from the chiefe part of it is call'd the Sword Hee beareth not the Sword in vain but is an avenger upon all that do evill therefore upon them too that doe evill in matters of Religlon Of this sort was the command of Nebuchodonosor the King that they should be torn in pieces who were contumelious against the true God and that of Josias wherby Idolaters were put to Death Relegation also belongs to Jurisdiction So Solomon confin'd Abiathar the Priest without any Council as the Bishop of Ely well notes t was indeed for treason but he had as good Right to punish him if the offence had been against the Divine Lawes So the Christian Emperours banisht Arius Nestorius and other Heretiques Esdras and his associates received Jurisdiction from Artaxerxes whereby they punished the obstinate Jewes with the publication of their goods and ejection out of the
saith he between the State and people was constituted by Authority of the Church Farther we must observe by the word Seniors Ecclesiasticall writers doc often understand not dignity but age It is certaine the Bishops of old seldome disposed any affairs of greater moment without consulting the Church Which course was alwaies profitable in the times of persecution or upon imminent feare of Schisme almost necessary For this cause to lay the murmuring which arose about the daily ministration the multitude of the Disciples were call'd together So after Paul was come to Jerusalem when there was a rumour of him that he taught the Jews to forsake Moses although all the Elders were present it is said the multitude must needs come together Cyprian saith I could returne you no answer alone because ever since I was made Bishop I resolved this word shews it was arbitrary to doe nothing on my own head without your Counsell the Clergy and consent of the people 'T is plaine as in the Ordination of the Clergy so in separating and in reconciling the lapsed the people were wont to be consulted with Not alwaies all the people among whom were Women and the younger sort but the Fathers of Families and not all these neither but the elder and of riper judgement who haply are the Many of whom Paul speaketh These were often consulted with in place of the people In the acts of purgation of Cecilian and Felix are mentioned the Bishops Presbyters Deacons Seniors and after Take unto you your Brethren of the Clergy and the Seniors of the people Some be Seniors then who are not Clerks and therefore Laiks For these are still distinguisht in the Fathers 'T is ill favouredly done of them that take this word amisse for it is no terme of disgrace but is necessarily used to distinguish the Clergy Seniours from the rest Neither have the Fathers only so spoken whose Authority yet at least ought to suffice for the retaining of certaine words but the Prophets themserves in whom the Priests and people are divided Rightly then are they called Laiks who are not Priests that is dispensers of Divine mysteries Austin writes To the Clergy and Seniors of the Church of Hippo and in Turonensis it is Before the Bishop Clergy and Seniors Yet I will not peremptorily deny but by Seniors in those places may be understood Magistrates who as we have even now said were stiled by that name So Leo inscribes an Epistle To the Clergy the honour'd and the common people And as in some places it may be doubted whether by the word Seniors the Magistrates or the Elder in age are meant so in other places question may be made whether by the same word the Elder in age or the Priests are signified As when Gregory appoints If any Clergy man be accused let the truth be inquir'd the Seniors of the Church being present And when Austin mentions them that for ebriety thefts and other errours are rebuked by the Seniors And when Optatus shews the Ornaments of the Church were commended to faithfull Seniors For all this may agree both to Clergymen and Laymen But most worthy of our consideration is that place of an uncertaine Authour commonly reputed Ambrose out of his Commentaries on Pauls Epistles The words are these Old age indeed is honourable among all Nations Whence it is that both the Synagogue and afterward the Church had Seniors without whose advice nothing passed in the Church How this is grown obsolete I know not unbesse perhaps by the dissentions of the Doctors or rather by their pride whilst they alone would seem to be some-body That we may know the writers mind we must see whom he cals Seniors in the Synagogue Whether the Magistrates who were called Seniors sure enough that the Synagogue may be a Bench of Judges as in Matthew They shall scourge you in their Synagogues I think not although many things as we shall shew anone which belonged to the Jewish Magistrates are wont by a certaine similitude to bee applyed to the Christian Presbyters Hear the same Author elsewhere declaring It was a Tradition of the Synagogue that the Seniors in dignity disputed sitting in their Chairs the next on Benches the last in the pavement upon mats I suspect the word in dignity stole out of the margin into the text For Philo describes the same custome thus They that come to be Priests take their places in order according to their age the younger beneath the elder Wherefore the Seniors in age sate first And questionlesse some such order of sitting was observed in the antient Church which James would not have neglected when he reprehends them that give the honour of the highet seats to rich men only the poof being thrust known below or enforced to stand It follows in Philo One of the most â—â—â—â—full passing over the difficult places of the Holy Bible makes an exposition of them 'T is to be noted in the Synagogues of the Jews to every one exercised in Holy Writ and all were so except mechanicks as also among us it was permitted to interpret Scripture By this common liberty Christ taught in the Synagoues and after him the Apostles Memorable are the places Luke iv and Acts xiii There the book is reached forth to Christ here Paul and Barnabas though unknown are asked to speak unto the people If they have any word of exhortation If no stranger or none of the people offer'd himself then the chosen men of the Seniors who were nam'd the Fathers of the Synagogues the Majors and by an excellency the Seniors interpreted the Law And these being not well provided it was the Rulers Office Some what correspondent to this we find in the first Christian Church For they that have the gift of prophecy are permitted by the Apostle to speak unto the people at the Assembly by two or three and the rest to judge That miraculous gift ceasing it was hardly lawfull for any one except the Pastors to teach among the Christians Indeed we read of Origen and a few more not Presbyters who taught in the Church but that was seldome and not without peculiar licence of the Bishops For the Bishop of Caesarea being reprehended for permitting Origen to teach alleged three examples of the like concession adding it was credible though not apparent the same was done in other places Here now we see some difference between the Interpreters of the Law in the Synagogue and the Interpreters of the Gospell in the Church In the Synagogue they taught as many as had any word of exhortations in the Church all what were approved and had obtained the honour of a Testimoniall as Tertullian speaks that is they that were ordained The Judges of the Highest Synedry were wont to be ordained by imposition of hands but of the expounders of the Law the same doth not appeare A reason of the foresaid difference is not only because the Preaching of