Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n good_a reward_n work_n 2,765 5 6.8633 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A61799 A consultation about religion, or, What religion is best to be chosen with an appendix upon this question, whether every one may be saved in his own religion / translated out of Latin in which it was written by an eminent professor of divinity. Lechmere, Edmund, d. 1640? 1693 (1693) Wing S5928A; ESTC R27505 93,395 238

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

of our Lord what was necessary to Salvation and to know his Divine Will in all things that they might do it and yet were never the nearer and got nothing That Speech of our Blessed Saviour will likewise prove false If you being evil know how to give good Gifts unto your Children how much more shall your Heavenly Father give the good Spirit to them that ask him Joh. 11.13 For the good Spirit cannot be had without a good Religion I omit other things which to this purpose might be alledged But if it be Blasphemy to say that God's Promises are false we must needs confess that these Men received of our Lord the true Faith and Religion Wherefore since 't is manifestly apparent that they were of the Roman Catholick Religion and stedfastly adher'd to the Church of Rome and detested any other Faith and Religion contrary to it 't is not to be doubted but that the Roman Catholick Religion is the true Religion and inspired of God and all other false and invented by the Devil To conclude if their Religion were false and that of any of our Adversaries true we must necessarily grant that all those men aforesaid whom the World ever esteemed Saints were not only no Saints nor the Friends of God but also impious and Enemies of God and for that cause damn'd to eternal Torments For without the true Religion it is impossible to please God Heb 11. Neither can it be said that they were excusable for their Ignorance Because Ignorance excuseth not but only in some less principal things and which are less necessary being so only by reason of some positive Precept and not in Fundamentals and first Principles Otherwise every one might be saved without any knowledge of God or Christ which is contrary to Scripture But if these erred as our Adversaries would have it they erred in the chiefest Points 1st because they did not acknowledge a special Faith by which alone we are justified and made partakers of Christ's Redemption and Justice and Sins not imputed to us as the Authors of these new Religions teach Therefore they remain'd in their Sins were destitute of Christ's Justice and consequently the Children of Hell 2dly Because by their own Judgment and Confession they were not of the Church of Christ out of which by the consent of all there is no Salvation but adher'd to the Whore of Babylon for so they call the Church of Rome and were the Ministers and chief Instruments of Anti-Christ 3dly Because they were Idolaters worshipping the Creature namely Bread and Wine in the Eucharist instead of Christ honouring Saints and their Images c. There is no Ignorance which can excuse these things Therefore all these Men were wicked and condemned to Hell-Torments But how improbable and incredible is all this and even against the Common Sence of all Christians that have hitherto been Mean while in all other Religions it is sufficiently manifest that none have ever appear'd of such eminent Sanctity in their Life and Conversation as to breed Admiration in the World For none could ever be named Their first Authors were earthly minded and addicted to Worldly Pleasures nothing exceeding in their Lives above the Vulgar nay rather guilty of the greatest Crimes But of this more shall be said hereafter Nor does it signifie any thing to say that also amongst Catholicks there are many An Objection refuted which are so far from leading holy Lives that they defile their Souls and Bodies with fundry Vices For they do not this by the grant and leave of their Religion which prohibits them and uses all means possible by threats punishments and promises to prevent and deter them Therefore their evil Life is in no wise to be attributed to their Religion nor can it argue the same to be imperfect For since there are three things to divert Man from Evil and excite him to Good that is the fear of Punishment hope of Reward and the beauty of good Works these three things the Catholick Religion most excellently propoundeth and inculcates every where to her Professors Therefore it omits nothing to make them sly Sin and encourage them to Vertue and Holiness And if any don't aspire to it we must not impute it to their Religion but their Free Will which frustrates and contradicts all these motives and encouragements But indeed if Catholick Religion should take away the fear of Punishment and hope of Reward and declare all good Works to be polluted with the stain of Sin then the pravity of Men's Lives and neglect of good Works might worthily be ascrib'd to it For as he that takes away the buttresses and props of a house which keeps it from falling is the cause of the house's Ruine so he that subtracts the fear of God or future Punishment whereby Men are restrain'd and kept back from falling into the gulph of Sin is the cause of their ruine Likewise he that takes away all that which is wont to animate to the study and practice of good Works is the occasion of such neglect and contempt of good Works Hereby is manifest that the neglect of good Works and the evil Life which are discerned in some Catholicks are not to be referred to their Religion but only to the liberty of their Will But in Lutherans Presbyterians and other Professors of new Religions it is to be imputed properly to their Religion which takes away all those things that are a hindrance to Evil and encouragement to Good as plainly appears by their Principles in their Books afore mentioned not excluding also in them that Free Will by which they become guilty in chusing and adhering to such a false Religion The Fourth Consideration from the Miracles of its Professors THat Religion wherein most Miracles have been done in all Ages is to be preferred before others which are without Miracles For Miracles are a kind of Seals and certain divine Evidences whereby Religion is authoriz'd and approv'd For since many things in Religion are above Nature exceeding humane Capacity and cannot be prov'd by natural reason there is need of certain supernatural Arguments to convince Men. These are Miracles But the Catholick Religion only is famous for Miracles therefore the only true Religion and to be esteemed above all others as that only which hath God for its Witness Now that many Miracles have been done in Confirmation of the Catholick Religion throughout all Ages since Christ's and his Apostles time is evident to all Christians by divers Histories the Annals of Kingdoms and the Lives and Acts of Saints But our Adversaries say these Miracles are not true Calv. p. fac in Instit but partly feigned and partly diabolical The which is void of all probability For it is against the Judgment of the whole World and of so many Ages For all Nations so many hundreds of years have without any scruple accounted them true Miracles For whoever doubted the Miracles of St Gregory Thaumaturge St. Anthony the
this special Faith alone to be the cause of Justification that is that man is justified before God in that he believes stedfastly that Christ has fully satisfied for their sins for by this Faith Christ's satisfaction is applied to them and made as it were their own so that by it they are reputed just before God although their Will is not inwardly changed Therefore whilst this Faith remaineth no sin can hurt them because they remain in the righteousness of Christ which they retain firmly by Faith Upon this Doctrine there is no reason to fear the commission of any sin for no punishment no vengeance of God is to be feared since God imputes no guilt to them by reason of Christ's satisfaction communicated to them by Faith Can any Atheist desire a greater liberty to sin and lead as wicked a life as he pleases Certain Presbyterian Ministers in England confess this sufficiently who from this Opinion of Calvin tounhing Justification by Faith only among others deduce and defend these Conclusions 1. That all those err Refert ex Fono Guil. Reinold l. 10. p. 120. which think to be saved for doing many good works 2. That there is no need of labouring to do good Works for the obtaining Eternal Life because we have it already 3. This is one of the chiefest errors reigning in the Christian World to imagine that good Works can any whit avail to Salvotion 4. That our sins nothing diminish the Glory of God all the damage of sin is placed in the scandal of our Neighbour 5. Christh as redeemed us with his Blood and delivered us from all Sins and Laws so that there is no Law which obliges us in Conscience Here we are clearly freed from the Decalogue or Ten Commandments and from all the Sacraments 6. That you are nothing to God but by Faith as to confess Jesus Christ and believe that he is risen from the dead for so you shall be safe in all other things God has left you at liberty to do what you will for you may do all things without any scruple of Conscience Neither can you Perish or be Damned for any thing you outwardly do or leave undone All these things they infer and that rightly from Luther and Calvin's Foundation namely that Man is Justified by Faith only in whose Writings all these things are to be seen almost verbatim Who can wish or desire a greater liberty to be vicious Add hereunto what is above-said in the second Consideration where we have mentioned three other ways whereby this liberty is granted I omit also that Window which Calvin has opened when he teaches F. 3. C. 25. S. 12. That the pain of the Damned is nothing else but to apprehend God to be angry with them and terrifying them although thit punishment is represented to us by corporal things as darkness weeping gnashing of Teeth unquenchable fire c. by which words he sufficiently and clearly shews that Hell is nothing else but a vain fear for if God inflicts no punishment upon the Damned but only terifies them surely that fear is vain and ridiculous and Hell Torments nothing to be regarded The Tenth Reason from raking up and reviving old Heresies EVery Religion is to be avoided which conteins Heresies condemned of old by the Catholick Church which have been always taken for Heresies But these New Religions contain such Heresies yea they seem to be nought else but the very Scum of divers Heresies broach'd by several Arch-Hereticks in former Ages and of old condemned by the Catholick Church therefore we ought to fly them The Minor is to be proved Let us consider then the chiefest Tenets of these Religions First Both Luther and Calvin teach that there is no Free-will And Luther in his Thirty sixth Article affirms this to be the chief Foundation of his Religion But this was the old Heresie of Simon Magus and Valentine as St. Augustine witnesseth August Heres 46. Hier. in Prolog contr Pelag. Clemens l. 3. recognit Concil Const Sess 8. Secondly Both teach That God is the impulsive Cause of all Sin and that all Wickedness is done by the Divine Decree This was the old Heresie of Simon Magus and Florinus Vincen. Liri Euseb l. 5. c. 21. Thirdly They both teach That Good Works are not necessary to Salvation but Faith alone is sufficient This likewise was the old Heresie of Simon Magus and of the Eunomians about the year of our Lord 360. Iraen l. 1. c. 20. August Heres 4. Fourthly They hoth teach That no Sins be they never so many and great can hurt them that have Faith because the Malice of them is not imputed to Believers Which was formerly the Heresie of the Eunomians and of Basilides Carpocratis Witness Irenaeus l. 1. c. 23. 24. August Heres 54. Fifthly Calvin denies the Real Presence of Christ's Body in the Eucharist This was formerly the Heresie of Berengarius about the year of our Lord 1051. where you must note First that although some privately doubted of the matter before Berengarius and raised Questions yet none was so bold as publickly to profess the same Witness Hugo Lingonensis Aldelmanus Brixiensis in Epist suis ad Bereng Paschasius l. de verb. instit hujus Sacram. So that this was the constant Doctrine of the Church untouched by all Hereticks till the time of Berengarius And the Opinion of Berengarius was in his Life-time condemned by Five Councils and himself three times renounced his Opinion and at length died in the Catholick Faith very penitently who being dead this Heresie was extinguished almost 200 years till the Lollards revived it as Trithemius observes in his Chron. to the year 1315. The same Heresie after Wickliff held as 't is manifest in his Third Article When Wickliff died then this Heresie died also for about one hundred years till Zwinglius revived it whom Calvin and some others followed Whereby it manifestly appears that the said Opinion was always reputed in the Church for a notorious Heresie Therefore either the Church always erred in the chief Article of her Faith and so was never the Church of Christ or this Opinion which denies the Real Presence of Christ's Body in the Eucharist is truly a Heresie Sixthly Both of them take away all Traditions and will have all things contained in the Scriptures only This was the Heresie of the Arrians as appears by St. August l. 1. cont Maxim c. 2. ult Also of Nestorius Dioscurus and Eutyches as you may see in the Seventh Synod Act. 1. Seventhly They both deny the Sacrament of Pennance and Confirmation The same Heresie the Novatians taught of old Witness St. Cyp. and Theodor. l. 4. Epist 2. l. 3. Heret Fabul Eighthly They both teach That the Church consists of the Good only That at first it was visible but for many Ages perished yet all that while to exist in them only This was plainly the Heresie of the Donatists as St. Augustine Witnesseth l.