THE YONGER BROTHER HIS APOLOGY BY IT SELFE OR A Fathers free power disputed for the disposition of his lands or other his fortunes to his Sonne Sonnes or any one of them as right reason the Laws of God and Nature the Ciuill Canon and Municipall lawes of this Kingdome do command By I. Ap-Robert Gent. Nisi Dominus aedificauerit domum in vanum laborauerunt qui aedificant eam Psal 126. Vnlesse our Lord build the house they haue laboured in vayne that build it ¶ Imprinted Anno M. DC XVIII TO ALL FATHERS AND SONNES OF WORTHY FAMILIES VVhome Vertue Birth and Learning haue iustly stiled Gentlemen Health Happinesse and Increase of the best Knowledge AS in the front of this briefe Discourse there is Right Worthy Gentlemen already deliuered vnto you some light of that which concerneth the Quality Reason and Scope of the same so do I heere sincerely professe that I did not priuately write it at first but for priuate satisfaction neither do I now make it publique but with due relation to the generall good of Great Britaine and for the exercise of Honourable Spirits in this our much-speaking Paradoxicall Age. Not vpon the least presumption of a self-sufficiency to confront thereby any receiued Custome if any such bee nor to diminish the naturall Reuerence due by Younger Brothers to their Elder not to enkindle emulatiōs in families nor to innouate any thing to the preuidice of publique or priuate quiet which none I hope wil be so ill affected as to suppose neither myne inoffensiue zeale for younger brothers among whom I am rancked one nor the absolute consent of Imperiall and Ecclesiasticall Laws which I hauing a little studied do not a little respect nor the particuler honour I beare to the vsages in this point of our anciēt Britans from whom I am descended nor disire to maintaine and iustify an act in this Kind done by a Friend whom I must euer reuerence nor yet the hope of bettering my priuate fortunes which mooues men much in these our tymes hath drawne me to this vndertaking but principally as before is sōwhat touched the singuler Respect which as a Patriote I beare to the glory and good of Gentlemens Houses whose best Originalls surest means of Maintenance and principal Ornaments are Vertue or Force of mynd The want whereof is a comon cause of ruine The free Power therefore of You who are Fathers is heere in some special cases argued and defended to giue you occasion therby to consider with the cleerer eye-sight for the establishment and continuance of families Heere also the Naturall rights of vs that are children be so discoursed and discussed as that we younger Brothers may haue cause and courage to endeauour by vertuous means to make our selues without the least wrong to any capable if need shal be of the chiefest vses And both and all are so handled as that no offence can reasonably arise in any respect much lesse for that the whole is conceiued and written in Nature only of an Essay or Probleme to which I bynd no man to affoard more beliefe then himselfe hath liking of is free to refute the whole or any part at his pleasure as he feeles himself able and disposed If I may seeme among some to haue handled this subiect with more earnestnesse and acrimony then they think expedient let them be pleased to weigh the Decorum of Disputes which is principally herein obserued their Nature absolutly requiring quicknes and vehemency on whether syde soeuer Neither let this length of Epistle seeme vnto you like the gates of Myndus which were so great and the Citty so little that they ministred occasion to the Cynick to scoffe at the disproportion bidding the Townsemen shut their Gates for feare the Citty should run out through them seeing that in a new Matter a necessity lyeth vpon me to vse so large a Preparation As for the remedies of Euils by way of enacting Lawes that is the proper office of Magistrates and Courts of publick Counsell neuerthelesse to speak and treat of them vnder the fauour and correction of Superiours to whome I do alwaies very dutifully submit is a thing which may well belong to euery man But as for those graue and learned Censors vnto whom I may seeme to haue bestowed my paynes in very needlesse arguments because no lesse then I my self they hould the case as heere it is put to be most cleere and out of Controuersy to such I answere that I wrote it not for them vnlesse perhaps to confirme their iudgments but for others who are not altogeather so perswaded Nor to any as to prescribe or bynd further then their owne Consciences shall thinke good For that were far too peremtory Finally nothing being heer defended but by Authority Reason and Exāple nor any person taxed nor particuler personall vices if neuerthelesse I haue not performed my part in the worke so well as I desyre or as the Cause deserues which I feare I haue not yet my hope is Right Worthy Fathers and Worthy Sonnes of Right Worthy Families that for my honest meaning and good intentions sake your will euer conceiue well of and taken into your speciall protection Your vnfayned vvel-vvisher I. Ap-Robert THE YOVNGER BROTHERS APOLOGIE CHAP. I. The Occasion of writing this Apology is to proue that Fathers may in some cases dispose of their worldly Estates to which of their Sonnes shal reasonably please c. for so much therof as they will and that to be Lawfull by the Law of God of Nature and of Nations NOT many moneths since being inuited by a deare friend of myne to a solemne Feast made by him to many of his well-deseruing friends it was my fortune at that Meeting to acquaint myselfe with many gentlemen of no meane discourse Whereby I feasted as well my vnderstanding with their pleasant society as my taste with the variety of most excellent meates With what our Senses were delighted I let passe to recoumpt since neither profit pleasure nor praise can arise thereof either to the writer or reader Only my intent is to make my Reader acquainted what accident caused me to write this small Treatise and imbouldned me to publish the same to the cōmon view of this al-reprehending age In which neuertheles I do rather hope for allowance then in any sort to feare displeasure For though my subiect be new yet I hope it shal want at the first rather age strēgth which growes by yeares then probable arguments yea forcible reasons to defend it selfe As for friends I hope it will fynd some and peraduenture more then enemyes if it deserue well For as younger Brothers be more in number then elder so are they generallie more free in bestowing their deserued loue For want breeding vnderstanding makes them knowe prize their friends according to their worth Whereas the elder either seated in their Fathers wealth and possessions with more then hopes to enioy their Fortunes do somtynes neyther
heritance should be left to any one particuler person and namely to the elder Brother yet in some Cases it would not bynd the Father to obserue it For as in the former Cōmandements vpon some considerations the Cōmandement may be dispensed withall so in this For it is not sufficient to be the elder Brother or the nearest in bloud to gaine an inheritance in the Case which I haue now proposed for other circumstances must concurre which if they be wanting bare propinquity or ancienty of bloud may iustly be reiected and he that is second third fourth fifth or last may lwafully be preferred before the first and this by al law diuyne and humane and by all Reason Conscience and Custome of nations Christian For if it should fall out that the next in bloud should be a Naturall foole or a madman or being taken by the Turkes or Mores in his infancy and brought vp in their religion would maintaine the same or if any other such accident ministring cause of iust exception should fall out is it likely that any law would allow that such a man should be admitted to the inheritance Wherefore how idly should they talk that would haue that it was his birthright or that God and Nature had made him heire since that neither God nor Nature doth imediately make heires as I haue sayd before True it is that God and Nature makes men who by the mediation of the lawes and customes of nations may come to be heires Vpon which ground our cómon Lawyers say that no heyres are borne but men and law make them True it is that in holy Writ great respect is had of the first begotten a blessing is held to come to parents thereby But this blessing I presuppose to be that therby the feare of sterility was taken away which in the old Law was held to be a great punishment of God and in respect thereof parents had of themselues and by the nationall lawes and customs a great regard of their first begotten and preferred them to the better part of their possessions yet not by any commaund from God as a precept to bind his elect people vnder paine of sinne For had any such Law bound them vnder such a penalty then should it bynd all Christians now on the same conditions For we see it by generall practise of all countryes to be otherwise Therefore it followes directly that it was not Gods Comaundement but a Nationall Law For God both is and ever was one without chaunge to all his people and so euer were and wil be his Lawes positiue made for them that truely worship him The clayme which Esau made to his Birthright was not by the law of God as some ignorantly affirme but by the lawes of his country For should the law of God haue commaunded it it had bene sinne in his Mother and brother by cunning to haue gotten it from him Neither could the Father or the State wherin they liued vpon no iust cause knowne but to God alone without sinne haue setled the same vpon his Brother Iacob as it was and as it may seeme by allowance from God and as it may be iudged by the sucesse Whereby it is thought that God ordained it as a punishment of the one and blessing of the other which by the permission of sinne to be committed God doth neuer do Neither did the Nationall law or custome of the Iewes as it is said absolutly commaund the Father to leaue vnto his first begotten all or the greatest part of his goods and fortunes But if in case he died not disposing therof by act in his life or will at his death then the custome of the Nation layd a double portion on the eldest or first begotten prouiding for the rest proportionably By all which you may gather that neither the law of God or man in this case commaunded that Esau should haue the inheritance but power to do the contrary was giuen to the Father in his life tyme euen by the law it selfe For many Deuines hold that Esau selling his Birthright as it is termed sould not goods or lands but his clayme of being high Preist after his Father which by custome was to come to him being his Fathers eldest sonne Of which dignity God seing him vnfit permitted him to passeaway his right in his Fathers life as we read in holy writ and which God seemed to approue And thus I hope this objection is answered Further if it were true that the effect of Eldership were such by the law of God as some passionately defend that is that the whole inheritance should of right pertaine to the eldest thē sure it followeth by good consequēce that there should nor euer could haue bene but one temporall Lord of all the world For of necessity Adams inheritance should haue gone still to the next in bloud which how absurd it is let all men iudge Moreouer we read that Nöe hauing three sonnes and the whole world to leaue vnto them gaue it not all to the Eldest but equally deuided it among them and their posterity as all authenticall histories do witnes God requiring obedience of children to parents promised a reward saying Honour thy Father Mother that thy dayes may be long in the land which the Lord shall giue thee This surely was not spoken to one but to all the children of men For with God there is no exception of persons but as a iust and pions Father he giues euery one according to his deserts Terram autem dedit filijs hominum We read also in holy writ how the prodigall child being weary or his Fathers house came vnto him and boldly sayd Pater da mihi portionem substantiae meae quae me contingit This child of which the Gospell speaks was the yoūger brother yet you see how boldly he sayd giue vnto me that portion of goods which belongs to me By which words it is euident that a diuision or partition of a Fathers fortunes was then in vse and that any child as well yoūger as elder had power by law to demaund his legitimate or childes part according to the Nature of the Ciuill and Canon Law as you haue heard For the words following in the text are these Et diuisit substantiam illis Thus we see that the priuiledge of Eldership was thē excluded which now in our countrey by custome onely is gotten to be of such force But it may be obiected that this was a parable onely as indeed it was and cannot be alledged as law True it is yet it cannot be denied but that all similies parables or examples which euer were alledged by the wise and learned to represent the truth haue euer bene deriued from the customes and nature of things according to the knowne truth in that tyme place and to those to whome the speach or discourse is directed And shall we think that our Sauiour Christ being wisdom and truth it selfe treating of so important an affaire
or principall man of their house being at that time high Sheriffe In other countreys many Noble families from the Romans downward haue cōtinued where this custōe hath beene deemed vniust as by their lawes it is manifest whereas in our contrey in these our tymes if there be one familie in a Shire which is of three hundred yeares continuance verie many others are scarce of fiue descents in a bloud Why should our age then seing the fruit of this custome to be so small imbrace it with such zeale as to deeme the breach thereof being warranted for good and iust by the Law of God of Nature and of man to be a sinne Is it possible that it is held both lawfull and expedient for the preseruation of a family that degrees of kindred should be dispensed with to mary being knowne contrary to the general practise of gods Church and can it be lawfull before God and man for preseruation of our goods to venture our liues and to kill a Theife who shall assault vs and that perhaps for a trifle and yet that for preseruation of our whole estate and maintainance of a family it shal be held sinne to break a bare custome vnder no penalty obligatory yea alwaies allowed by law I haue neuer heard that a custome was of force to abiogate a law so far that it should be deemed a sinne to follow the said law though it haue power to dispense with the law which other wise to break were sinne especially when as the law is both more pious and more naturall then the custom is For how far is it from the law of Nature and from the practise of Fatherlie piety the Father dying intestate the eldest sonne to become absolute Lord of all his Fathers lands and not to be bound by law to prouide for brother or sister but at his owne good liking Aliud tempus alios mores postutat Men of vertue men of learning vertue both now and in former ages in this our countrey haue broken this custome as the world knowes vpon good consideration and iust causes not vpon spleene or false suppositions perswaded to leaue their fortunes to strangers or to a lustsuil issue as some haue done CHAP. VII That Fathers being tenants in Fee-tayle may likewise without scruple of Conscience discontinue the state-taile vpon cause and deuise the same at their reasonable pleasure HAVING treated largely and as I presume proued sufficiently that lands held in fee-simple may either be parted or vpon iust cause wholy giuē away to a younger sonne I intend now to speak of the lawfull freedome of a Father in like sort and on the same causes moued to dispose of his lands intailed of which there seemes more doubt then of the former Euery humane act which of it self is not forbidden by the law of God or Nature is to be iudged good or euill lawfull or vnlawfull either by the lawe of the place where the act is done or by intention of him who shall do the act For as the law of God commaunds somethings to be done other things to be auoided vnder paine of sinne so the third sort of actions are left free by the said authority from sinne except the law of man shall forbid them and so make them sinne or els euill intention make thē being of themselues lawfull to be a sinne and vnlawful according to that principle of Moral Philosophy Finis specifical actum For as an act of it self lawful being done against law is sinne so a good act comaunded by law yet done with an euill intention may be sinne Out of these grounds let vs see whether the Common law of our Countrey and the intention of a Father which are to be the Iudges of our Cause can allow the cutting offan entaile the parting of an inheritance or vpon proportionable cause the disinheriting of a sonne First it is cleere that the act of it self by law may be done but whether such an act be summū ius which may be summa iniuria that is the doubt What shal be the triall By other lawes it is either made lawfull or left indifferent Our law which makes this tye giues leaue to vndo it without any exception Ergo to a good end and vpon iust cause it may be done But it may be said that the eldest sonne during this entaile is quasi Dominus yet hauing neither Dominium directum nor indirectum he during his Fathers life hath only ius ad rem and not in re Wherby no chaunge is forbidden to be made by the Father according to the forme of the law vnder which he liueth and by which the sonne is to make clayme if the Father shall create no new estate in his life For it is lawfull for euery man to dispose of his owne as far as the law shall permit him if it be not forbidden by some other law but such an act is not forbidden by any other law Ergo it is lawfull and no sinne But it may be said that the intention of him who entailed the land was that it should not be vntyed or the state changed To which I answere That no act done by law can be free from chaung further or longer thē the law that made it a bynding act shall allow And it is well knowne to the learned in our lawes that euery mans intention is to be construed according to law by which his act and intentions are directed Whereupon the Ciuilian saith in like Cases valeat quantum valire potest Neither is it thought that any man who conuayeth his lands by entaile can intend an act beyond law or desyre that his sonne whom he makes tēnant entaile as our lawyers tearme him shall in no case no not for the preseruation of his family or relief of many others of his Children haue power to cut off this entaile and to be able to alien sell or giue his lands as reason law and religion shall permit For it may be iudged that he who doth an act to a good end as namely to preserue his family wil alwaies assent to another act which shall with better assurance then his owne strengthen his intention To the former considerations we may add what incoueniences may follow of this generall position For if in Conscience the whole inheritance of the Father is to come without comtroule to the eldest sonne then must it of necessity be inferied that the Father without this consent cannot giue to pious vses or set out for the aduancement of his other Children any other thing after his death So that if God should blesse a Father with many Children and crosse him with as many misfortunes his other Children and all other his pious intentions should be prouided for only at his sonnes or heyres courtesy Which how absurd it is all men know For hereupon all donations to pious vses and to younger Brothers for their preferment may be called in question It is an ordinary thing in these our