of himself as it is a great sin for the greatest sinner to be without hope in respect of Christ Carnal presumption of mercy because our sins are comparatively little lessens the demerit of sin Despair of mercy because our sins are great lessens the Merit of Christ A mans nearness unto or remoteness from the participation of grace according to Gods ordinary Dispensation is not to be judged according to his Commission of more or fewer sins but according to his proceeding in the preparatory work A man may have committed many sins yet being Ministerially disposed in respect of the receiving of Grace he is near to salvation A man may have committed fewer sins yet being without the preparatory Work of Law and Gospel he is far from salvation 'T is not a mans former commission of sin but his continuance in sin that keeps him far from salvation For the fuller clearing the description of Free-grace some Objections are to be removed the former whereof concern the Freeness of grace in respect of Election the other in respect of the Application of the good of Election i.e. that good whereunto we are elected Obj. 1. Ephes 1.4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the Foundation of the world Here the Apostle seemeth to make Christ the Cause of Election therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Though it be be rendred through in English 'T is in in the Greek Election is not a free act Ans The Particle In is not always taken causally 2 Thes 2.13 Because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation in sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth i. e. in sanctification and belief of the truth as the way not as the cause of salvation True the Apostle saith We are elected in Christ but he saith not That we are elected for Christ We are said to be elected in Christ because Christ is the Meritorious cause of the Application of the good of Election so that in Christ in this place is the same with by Christ 1 Thes 5.9 For God hath appointed us to wrath but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ 'T is here said We are saved for Christ because Christ is the cause of our salvation but 't is not said We are elected for Christ because Christ is not the Cause of Election To be elect in Christ and to be elect for Christ are not to be confounded * Est quaedam Dei Dilectio erga nos unde profecta est Missio Christi John 3. Twiss vind grat de elect lib. 1. part 2. deg 3. Sect. 1. Etenim ex dicto Petri constat ChristuÌ„ ut MediatoreÌ„ qualis hic consideratur non esse praedèstinationis causam sed effectum 1 Pet. 1.20 Pisc de praedest N. 97. Meritum Christi nonest absolutum Cham. To. 3. l. 9. c. 1. S. 7. That we may rightly discern this truth of so spiritual and high a nature we must carefully distinguish between Election and the Application of the good of Election between Gods Act of willing grace and glory to be applyed and the actual application of grace and glory willed by God God electeth that is he willeth grace and glory to be applyed unto his people without any respect of the Merit of Christ as a Cause or Motive of that volition but the actual Donation and Application of that grace and glory is for the Merit sake of Jesus Christ Christ is the Effect of Election or of the Love of God but he is the Cause of the salvation of the Elect. He is the Effect of Election therefore called a Servant and said to be elect of God Behold my Servant whom I uphold my Elect in whom my soul delighteth Isai 42.1 His Incarnation Heb. 10.5 His Office John 6.27 His Acceptation in that Office Jes 53.10 all proceeds from the Love of God Election is God himself electing according to that received and regulating Proposition Whatsoever is in God is God To say then That Christ is the Cause of Election or of the Love of God were to say There might be given a Cause of God yea that God is an Effect and consequently that God is not God God hath ordained that the Merit of Christ should be the cause of our salvation but he hath not ordained that Christ should be the Meritorious cause of his so ordaining which implyeth a manifest contradiction Christ then is the Cause of the gift of Eternal life but not of Gods Will to give Eternal life unto us Christ is the Cause of salvation but not of Gods Decree to save Christ Ephes 1.4 is made the Cause of Sanctification And 1 Thes 5.9 he is made the Cause of Salvation but he is no where made the Cause of our Election Christ is the Meritorious Cause the Application of all spiritual Benediction in Heavenly places but not of Election Obj. 2. Ephe. 1.6 To the prayse and glory of his grace wherein he hath made us accepted in the Beloved If accepted in Christ then loved only in Christ therefore Christ is the cause of Gods Love Ans The Love of God is taken for the Act of Love it self viz. Election or for the effect of his love viz. Vocation Justification c. Christ is the cause of the latter not of the former By Acceptation in this place we are to understand Justification of which Christ is the cause He is the cause why we are justified but he is not the cause of Gods Decree to justifie us Gods special Love is his Will to bestow all saving good upon us All which good he willeth to us without Christ as a cause of his volition but not without Christ as a cause of the application thereof 'T is the same Volition or Act of Willing in God by which he willeth the Being of a Mediatour and the Salvation of the Elect for the Merits sake of this Mediatour The Salvation of the Elect is not the last end of the Merit of Christ but Gods Supream end is the Manifestation of the glory of his grace in a way of mercy tempered with justice whereunto both the Merit of Christ and the Salvation of the Elect conjoyned are the means and make one fit Medium thereunto Like Objections from some other Texts of like nature may receive the like answer Notwithstanding it be a truth That Christ is not the cause of Election yet it is also a fundamental Truth That Christ is the Meritorious cause of the Application of the good of Election 1 Thes 5.9 2 Cor. 1.20 Acts 4.12 Particulo gratis excludu tur merita nostri non Christi Bucan loc 31. quest 16. Foedus graetiae nullaÌ„ propriè dictam aut antecedentem conditimem requirit Med. cap. 22. th 19 Ex tali inquam conditione si pendereÌ„t promissiones Dei actum esset de salute nostra Coron artic 4. cap. 3. Cham. Tem. 3. lib. 15. c. 3. 5. Si feceris hoc vives parâ—icula si est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
thus 1 In what sense the term Justification is here used 2 What Justification by Faith is 3 The causes of Justification viz. Efficient Meritorious Material Formal Final Instrumental 4 Plow Faith justifieth 5 Divers objections satisfied 6 Many mysteries that shine forth in the doctrine of Justification 7 The peace of conscience following thereupon In what sense the term Justification is used in this question Justification is the making of a person just or righteous and it is done either by infusion or declaratively by ajudicial sentence To justifie by infusion Justitia imputata est quoad essentiam idem ille status coram Deo quem perdidimus in Ademo B. ex T. 4. lib. 6. cap. 1. Pemble Treanise of Justification Pag. 2. is to make a person inherently righteous by infusing into him an indwelling principle of holinesse So Adam was made just Eccl. 7.29 To justifie declaratively is when a person accused or both accused and convicted as an offender is justly acquitted by the judicial declaration of his Legal innocency and freedome from guilt and punishment To justifie in this place is not by way of infusion viz. to sanctifie that is of a person unclean unholy and unjust to make him formally and inherently pure holy just by working in him the inherent qualities of purity sanctity and righteousnesse but judicially to absolve a guilty sinner at the Tribunal of Gods Justice from guilt and punishment and to declare him righteous Justification in this place doth not signifie a change of our nature but a change of our state i. e. of our spiritual condition in order to the curse and promise so as the person which was under the Law before is now not under the Law but under grace Rom. 6.14 It is a Court-phrase taken not Physically but Judicially for a Judicial not a Physical act it signifieth a relative Justification of accounting a man just not an habitual Justification of making a man just thus Barrabas a Thief is acquitted judicially whence followed a Legal not a Physical change of Barrabas Justification is sometimes applyed to God when a man justifieth Psal 51.4 Rom. 3.4 Luke 7.29 Matth. 11.19 Luke 7.35 sometimes to man between man and man Deut. 25.1 Isa 5.23 Prov. 17.15 2 Sam. 15.4 In which last places and the like Pemble after others observeth that to justifie is in judicial proceeding to absolve a party from fault and blame whether it be rightly or wrongfully Ezek. 16.52 Luke 16.15 Sometimes unto man between God and man Exod. 23.7 Isa 50.8 Rom. 8.33 34. 1 Cor. 4.4 Act. 13.38 39. which places can intend no other but a judicial or declarative not a physical or infused Justification whereby a person of unjust is made just Infused righteousnesse which is sanctification is distinguished from Justification Though they are inseparable yet they are distinguished as light and heat in the Sun 1 Cor. 1.30 6.11 The subject of our Justification is Christ the subject of Sanctification is the Beleever Justification is onely imputative Sanctification is inherent Justification makes a relative change Sanctification an inherent Physical change Justification is an individuall act all at once Sanctification is gradual by degrees Justification is perfect in this life Sanctification is imperfect It is plain that the Apostle by Justification intends remission of sins therefore not inherent righteousnesse We are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus Rom. 3.23 24. which redemption is remission of sins Eph. 1.7 Col. 1.14 See Rom. 8.33 Act. 13.38 Justification is opposed to Condemnation Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opouitur 3 ad Rom. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Grec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opouitur 3 ad Rom. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lat. Jujtificare opouitur 3 ad Rom. Condemnare Rom. 5.18 As condemnation therefore consists not in infusing a principle of guilt into a person but in a Legal pronouncing of a person to be guilty so Justification is not by infusing a principle of righteousnesse into a person but onely the pronouncing of a person to be righteous To justifie is not to make a person habitually righteous Praeterea nullo nec Hebraico nec Greco nec Latino nec Vernaculo idiomate justificare est habitualiter justum efficere Par. in Rom. c. 3. neither in the Hebrew Greeke Latine nor any other Tongue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used in the Old Testament many times yet it is but once used in any other sense which also is observed of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the New The Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to justifie never signifieth to make inherently but alwayes to make declaratively just excepting Dan. 12.3 where it signifieth not those that pronounce righteous but those who instruct others unto righteousnesse The Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by which the Hebrew is rendred hath the same signification in the New Testamenent and difficult it is to produce it in any other sense except Rev. 22.11 This observation saith Pareus is firmly to be urged against false teachers Haec observatio fermiter tenenâ—a urgenda est emtra Sophistas quia evincit justificationem Apostolo nequaquam significare justificationem seu habitualis justitiae infusionem quod illi contendunt sed gratuitam absolutionem à peccatis justitiae impulationem propter Christi meritum Pareus in Rom. 3.28 Praeter unum locum ex Danielis 12. alterum ex Apocrypho Syracida ecclesiast 18. tertium ex Apocalypsi his exceptis audacter dico non dari posse alium Cham. Tom. 3. lib. 21. c. 5. n. 11. because it doth evince Justification in the Apostles sense in no wise to signifie the making of one righteous or the infusion of habitual righteousnesse which they contend for but a free absolution from sins and imputation of righteousnesse for the merit of Christ These places being excepted viz. Dan. 12.3 Rev. 22.11 Chamier boldly affirms that there cannot be found another place in Scripture where Justification is used in any other sense What Justification by Faith is What Justification by faith is Justification is a gracious act of God upon a beleever whereby for the righteousnesse sake of Christ imputed by God and applied by faith he doth freely discharge him from sin and the curse and accept him as righteous with the righteousnesse of Christ and acknowledge him to have a right unto eternal life The Efficient cause of Justification is the gracious good pleasure of God Efficient cause the Father Son and Holy Ghost In the Scriptures it is called Grace In the Schools grace that makes us acceptable He is God Lord Law-giver and Judge whose will is the rule of righteousnesse Sin as sin In scripturis appellatur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Scholis gratia graâ—â—n faciens is properly committed against God Psal 51.4 and God only can remit sin Mark 2.7 It is called the Righteousnesse of God Rom. 3.22 The righteousnesse
in that day that thou eatest therof thou shalt surely dye Gen. 2.17 that is either in thy selfe or in thy surety therefore Christ performed both active and passive obedience If the Law requireth not only passive but active obedience and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the Law then he in whom they beleeve and that as the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience but the Law requireth active and passive obedience as is evident in the foregoing Arguments and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the righteousnesse of the Law Rom. 8.4.10.4 therefore he in whom they beleeve and that as he is the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience This further appeareth in that Christ was to answer the Law instead of the Elect and that the Law pronounceth every one accursed that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 If Christ had no done what the Command required of us as wel as suffered for our disobedience unto the command Obedientia Christi est una copulativa Alsted Theol Sect 3 loc 22 how wil it appear either that Christ is a perfect Saviour or that any man can be saved the whole obedience of Christ both active and passive make up one intire and perfect obedience why should any particle of the one or the other be excluded As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Rom. 5.19 It were too strait an interpretation to restraine the words to his passive obedience only And for their sake I will sanctifie my selfe Joh. 17.19 Obj. Justification is often in the Scripture ascribed unto the death of Christ Mat. 20.28 and 26.28 Act. 20.28 Rom. 3.24 25. and elsewhere therefore not the active and passive but the passive obedience of Christ only seems to be the matter of our Justification Ans 'T is true that Justification is often ascribed in the Scripture unto the death of Christ but to his death as the Meritorious cause not as the material cause of our Justification neither yet is it ascribed to his death as the Meritorious cause wholly but partly a part being put for the whole viz. the passive for both active and passive obedience a trope often used in the Scripture and as in the places alleged the part or at least that which is as a part is put for the whole in respect of the cause so also is there a part put for the whole in respect of the effect of that cause viz. Justification which is but a part of the good of Redemption is put for the whole good thereof Take for example Mat. 26.28 For this is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins by remission of sins which is but a part of the good of Redemption we are to understand the whole good of Redemption with the application of it Que. If the obedience of Christ be an ingredient into the Meritorious cause and be also the whole Material cause how then doth the obedience of Christ as it is an ingredient into the Meritorious cause differ from the obedience of Christ as it is the Materiall cause of our Justification Ans In the Meritorious cause it is considered together with the Person Office actual execution of that Office and Merit In the Material cause it is considered as distinct from all these They are distinguished as the cause and effect Obedience considered in the Material cause is in part the effect of obedience considered in the Meritorious cause they are distinguished as the whole and the part Christs obedience is but a part only of the Meritorious but the whole of the Material cause in the Meritorious cause it is both a Legal and Evangelical act Christs obeying the Law is Legal but his obeying it for us is Evangelical in the Material cause 't is only an Evangelical act it is given to us freely Willet Synops cent 4. error 56. qu. 1. in that it is considered formally in this vertually though Christ obeyed the Law formally yet 't is not the formal working of obedience or doing of the command but the good vertue and efficacy thereof that is imputed to the Beleever there it is considered as wrought by him for us here as applied to us there it is as a garment made here as a garment put on there it may be compared to the payment of the Mony by the Surety for the Debtor here to the Mony both payed and accompted unto the use of the Debtor The formal cause of Justification is by imputation The formal Cause Imputation is the actual and effectual application of the righteousnesse of Christ unto the Beleever To impute reckon or account in this place intend the same thing the same word in Greek being translated indifferently by any of these three To impute Perkins in Gal. câ—p 3. ver 6. is to reckon that unto another which in way of righteousnesse whether of Justice or Grace or both belongs unto him Imputation is either Legal imputing unto us that which we have done so the word is used Rom. 4.4 or Evangelical imputing unto us that which another hath done thus to impute is for God in his act of justifying a sinner to account the righteousnesse of Christ which is not ours formally not by debt to be ours by Grace as verily and really as if it were wrought by us and in this sense the word is used ten times Rom. 4. v. 3.5 6.8 9 10 11.22 23 24. The justification of a Beleever is either by righteousnesse inherent or imputed but not by righteousnesse inherent therefore by righteousnesse imputed The righteousnesse whereby man is justified before God is perfect but the inherent righteousnesse of a Beleever is not perfect It were destructive to the merit and righteousnesse of Christ to say we were justified by a righteousnesse inherent in us We are made righteous by the obedience of Christ as we are made unrighteous by the disobedience of Adam But this is by imputation therefore All justification of the ungodly that is such as are under the guilt and power of their-sins is by imputed righteousness but the Justification of a Beleever Justificat impios in sensu diviso non in sensu composito Trelcat sen Justificat impios antecedenter non consequenter Paraeus in Rom. 4.5 is the Justification of the ungodly Rom 4.5 therefore God justifieth the ungodly viz. objectively not subjectively that is such who were ungodly until they were justified but doe not remain ungodly being justified That Justification which is by the righteousnesse of another is by way of imputation but the justification of a Beleever is by the righteousnesse of another that is such the matter whereof is the righteousnesse of Christ as we saw largely in the Material cause of our Justification Paul calleth Sanctification his righteousnesse Phil. 3.9 for
though we are made partakers of it by a power which is without us yet it is inherent in us as in its proper subject and in that notion is opposed to the righteousnesse of Christ whereby we are justified whereof he is not only the worker but which also is inherent in him as its proper subject therefore the justification of a Beleever is by way of imputation No sinner remaining a sinner when he is justified can be justified otherwise than by imputed righteousnesse but all Beleevers though justified yet remain sinners while they live in this world 1 Joh. 1.8 therefore all Beleevers are justified by an imputed righteousnesse The final cause is the manifestation of the glory of grace The finall cause in a way of Mercy tempered with Justice in a way of Mercy in that he justifieth the ungodly Rom. 4.5 and that freely Rom. 3.24 tempered with Justice in that he justifieth not without Christs full satisfaction unto the Law Rom. 3.26 The instrumental cause or instrument of our Justification The instrumental cause or instrument for faith here is but a meer instrument is faith the fuller understanding of this Proposition followeth in the next particular Here observe the intent and consent of such Scriptures as speak diversly of the cause of Justification we are sayed to bee justified by grace Rom. 3.24 i. e. as the Efficient cause by his Blood Rom. 5.9 i. e. as the Meritorious cause by his obedience Rom. 5.19 i. e. as the Material cause by imputation of his obedience Rom. 4.6 i.e. as the Formal cause by faith Rom. 5.1 i. e. as the instrument This Proposition We are justified by faith is figurative How Faith justifieth i.e. Metonymical whereby that which belongs to the principal cause is attributed to the instrumental cause Faith justifieth not for its own worth but for the worth of the object which it apprehends Faith doth not justifie as an act of ours but all the vertue thereof proceedeth from its object the vertue that healed the Israelites proceeded from the object viz. the brazen Serpent they looked upon not from the looking upon the Brazen Serpent and the vertue that healed the Woman Luke 8.46.48.50 proceeded out of Christ who was touched not out of the Womans touch we are declared righteous upon our beleeving Faith in the matter of our Justification is the instrument apprehending and applying that which doth justifie the proper act of Faith is to receive the righteousnesse of another we are justified by faith correlatively that is we are justified by that which is the correlate of faith namely the obedience of Christ the meaning is it is the Obedience of Christ not Faith that justifieth that which is apprehended not that which apprehendeth Faith alone justifieth that is faith as it justifieth is alone but justifying faith is not alone that is faith as it justifieth is without workes but the faith that justifieth is a working faith We are justified by faith alone 1 Because as it justifieth it is not a work Rom. 4.5 2 Because we are not justified by our own righteousnesse i. e. that righteousnesse whereof we are the subjects 3 Because we are justified by the righteousnesse of another sometimes called the righteousnesse of God viz. that whereof God is the Author and Ordainer sometimes the righteousnesse of Christ viz. that whereof he who is God-man is both the Worker and the Subject 4 Because we are justified by a righteousnesse that is made ours by imputation not by infusion as Abraham was justified 5 Because we are justified by a righteousnesse that is actually procured before we doe beleeve Our righteousnesse is compared unto a garment Reval 19.8 Rom. 13.14 Gal. 3.27 which we put on by beleeving yet faith never took stitch in it What was accounted to Abraham for righteousnesse Zanch. in Phil. 3. Not the action by which but that which he did beleeve or as others speak faith not in respect of it self apprehending but in respect of the object apprehended Zanchy Gen. 15.6 Quid reputatum ad justitiam non actio quâ sed id quod credidit seu ut alii loquuntur ipsa fides non sui apprehendentis sed objecti apprehensi respectu This Proposition We are justified by faith understood legally with the Papists is not true but Blasphemous but being taken correlatively it is true Vrsin Haec propositio Ursin explicat catech part 2. qu. 63 fide justificamur legaliter intellecta cum Papist is non est vera sed Blasphema correlativè autem accept a hoc est Evangelicè est vera Faith as a quality doth not justifie but as an instrument receiving and applying to us the imputed righteousnesse of Christ Rivet Fides pro qualitate sumpta Rivet Cathol orthod tract 4. q. 10 non justificat nos sed justificat tanquam instrumentum recipiens applicans nob is imputatam Christi justitiam Faith justifies relatively to wit by a Metonymy whereby the effect of the principal is attributed to the instrumental cause Faith justifieth not habitually as a quality but relatively Paraeus Fides justificat relatè Paraeus in Rom. 3. phrasi nimirum Metaleptica quâ effectus causae principalis tribuitur instrumentali Fides justificat non habitualitèr ut qualitas sed Relatè Faith justifies not simply but relatively after the manner of an instrument applying Chamier Fides justificat Cham. Tom. 3. l. 22. c. 11 non simpliciter sed Relatè per modum instrumenti applicantis He saith Calvin shal be said to be justified by faith that being excluded from the righteousnesse of workes doth by faith take hold of the righteousnesse of Christ wherewith when he is cloathed he appeareth in the sight of God not as a sinner but as righteous and saith he after a few lines we say that the same consisteth in the forgivenesse of sins and imputation of the righteousness of Christ Contra justificabitur ille fide Calvin institut lib. 3. cap. 11. s 2. qui operum justitia exclusus Christi justitiam per fidem apprehendit qua vestitus in Dei conspectu non ut peccator sed tanquam justus apparet ita nos justificationem simpliciter interpretamur acceptionem qua nos Déus in gratiam receptos pro just is habet eámque in peccatorum remissione ac justitiae Christi imputatione positam esse dicimus Confer Sect. 21. 23. Faith doth not justifie as a work Welleb comp l. 1. c. 30. but as an instrument apprehending Christ Wollebius Etsi igitur fides sola non sit sed cum operibus conjuncta sola tamen justificat Fides non tanquam opus sed tanquam instrumentum Christum apprehendens Justification consists in faith organically Spanh de gr un erot 21. in the obedience of Christ objectively and meritoriously Spanhemius Justificatio consistit in fide organicè in Christi obedientia objectivè meritoriè We say with the Apostle Beza in confe majore c.
THE Orthodox Evangelist OR A TREATISE Wherein many Great EVANGELICAL TRUTHS Not a few whereof are much opposed and Eclipsed in this perillous hour of the Passion of the Gospel Are briefly Discussed cleared and confirmed As a further help for the Begeting and Establishing of the Faith which is in Jesus As also the State of the Blessed Where Of the condition of their SOULS from the instant of their Dissolution and of their Persons after their Resurrection By JOHN NORTON Teacher of the Church at Ipswich in New England For I determined not to know any thing amongst you save Jesus Christ and him crucified 1 Cor. 2.2 Moreover I will endeavour that you may be able after my decease to have these things always in remembrance 2 Pet. 1.15 LONDON Printed by John Macock for Henry Cripps and Lodowick Lloyd and are to be sold at their shop in Popes head Alley neer Lombard street 1654. Norton's Orthodox Evangelist To the Church and Inhabitants of Ipswich in New-England Grace and Peace in our Emanuel Worshipful Reverend and dearly beloved in our Lord and Saviour PAuls desire to make known nothing but Christ unto the Corinths his Travail until Christ was formed in the Galatians with other like speeches of him that breathed nothing but Christ What were they else but the effects of that Savior-like disposition wherewith the Lord Jesus still inspires the Instrumental Saviours of Mount Sion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This Ministerial Spirit rested not only upon that great Doctor of the Gentiles but also rests and acts in its measure in all the Ministers of the Gospel for the calling and compleating of the Elect until we all come to be a perfect man So as there is not to be found a more vigorous effusion of the Bowels of Jesus in any of the hearts of the children of men then is in the souls of the Ministry no bowels either of civil or natural relations exceed theirs the love of them is wonderful surpassing the love of Ionathan that passed the love of women By the unbosoming hereof as with a key the Apostle in his Epistle opens the heart of the Reader whilst the Colossians behold the spirit of the writer Col. 2.2 I would to God ye knew what great conflict I have for you Hence I hope in its measure is this present labor for the truths sake for your sake for the sake of any that in the Lord shall accept thereof and for conscience sake To this end was I born and for this cause came I into the world to bear witness unto the truth So our Lord Jesus notwithstanding the Truth was that which the Jews then maligned and Pilate derided see the Spirit of Christ an Hypocrite and a Moralist the difference between piety Malignity and neutrality concerning the truth Nothing is more contended for nothing more contended against then the truth The Gospel truth as it is most dear to God so is it most oppugned by Satan As the Attribute of the Holy One is the Spirit of truth So the wicked one is called a lyar from the beginning Concerning it are the greatest thoughts of heart the most intense endeavors of Tongues Pens and Swords It being much more beloved of its followers then Life and more hated of its opposers then death Truth is the excellency of things where truth is there may be a bad action but where truth is not there cannot be a good action Paul supposeth a man may give his Body to be burned in a good cause and it profit him nothing 'T is not the suffering and the cause alone both suffering cause and Spirit must concur to make a Martyr In a bad cause it holds universally Who hath required these things at your hand Mans interpretation of the Scripture is not Gods mind but mans mistake To confess and suffer in testimony to an error is to be a false-witness not truths witness Pleaders for error not Pillars of the truth To add to the profession of error suffering for it is to add sin unto sin The latter error worse then the first Such sufferers are so far selfe-vassals not Christs Martyrs Such sufferings unto spoyling of goods bonds exile the wilderness or whatsoever are worse then lost a dead birth after sore travel is a double wo Such tears must be wept for again this ungodly sorrow is not to be undone without godly sorrow We may build and work but if it be Wood Hay Stubble we shall suffer loss our work must be burnt though our selves be saved yet as by fire The Scripture mentions Little children Children young-men men Fathers and a perfect man in Christ as concerning your selves unto whom the dreadful bond of office hath endebted me the weakest of many to make known unto you the truth of the Gospel what hath my soul longed or labored for more after your birth in Christ then that you should be not only Babes but men both sound and strong in the faith Sincere and distinct that Christ might not only be formed but perfected That you might not onely have a saving but a satisfactory knowledg of him in whom you beleeve The end of the Gospel is to be known the duty and disposition of the Beleever is to know Even Fundamental Truths which have been the same in all generations have been and shall be transmitted more clear from age to age in the times of Reformation until that which is perfect is come and that which is imperfect be done away Vid. Greynaei praefat locis com Zeged praefix pag. 5. The truth held forth is the same though with more of Christ and less of man Such addition is no innovation but an illustration not new light but new sight The looking glass slurred and cleared more or less is the same glass Columbus did not make a New World when he made a new discovery of the old World Truth wants so much of its glory as it is unseen The understanding wants so much of its perfection as it is short in seeing thereof The Members of the New man have their joynts joynts not fully set are painful and less useful All unbeleif is presumption not faith which hinders nourishment and genders humor Grace Glory and Glorification hold proportion with the truth Though knowledg may be without grace yet there can be no grace without knowledg According to the measure of our approach to an exact total and Adequate Union of the understanding with the truth of the Gospel So is the glory of the truth beleeved and the Communion of the Soul beleeving Men need strong meat at well as Babes need Milk though he who is but a Babe hath not the knowledg of a man yet he that is a Babe labours after the knowledg of a man Babes rest not in being Babes I have endeavored to say something that might entertain the stronger yet so as I hope I have scarce said any thing that weaker capacities may not with due attention attain unto Solid meat
clearly seen in respect of its divers created objects which as they have their being from Gods good pleasure so had he so pleased they had never been but continued for ever in their nothing himself notwithstanding eternal all blessed and all glorious Omnipotency is God able to do whatsoever his wisdom doth conceive Gen. 18.14 Matth. 19.26 Isai 46.10 All Contradictions Impossibilities and Repugnancies unto the revealed Will of God are excluded in this Proposition God is Omnipotent or God can do all things That things which imply a contradiction as namely for the same thing to be and not to be and impossibilities as namely for a man not to be a reasonable creature and the like fall not under the compass of Omnipotency is not from any defect it is indeed from the perfection of power in God but from the impossibility of the things so that concerning matters of this nature it is more convenient to say Vnde convenientius dr Ea non possunt fieri quam quod Deus ea non possit facere Tho. Part. qu. 25. art 3. that they cannot be which sheweth their non-possibility to be then that God cannot do them which seemeth to touch upon Omnipotency So likewise that God cannot sin lye or deny himself is not from defect but from the Eminency of his Power and Absolute Perfection whence he is uncapable of being touched with any imperfection Obj. God cannot destroy Sodom until Lot be gone out of it Gen. 19.22 Like speeches whereunto are used elsewhere it seems therefore God is not Omnipotent Ans The Power of God is either absolute and unlimited by it he is able to do all things that are possible though he never do them or ordinate and limited by his Decree and revealed Will according to which God having freely bounded himself changeth not being immutable These words and the like spoken elsewhere are to be understood of his limited not of his unlimited power Though God be Omnipotent yet he is not Omnivolent that is though God can do whatsoever he pleaseth yet God is not pleased to do whatsoever he can Perfection is God all-sufficient and all-excellent not having need of any thing giving sufficience unto and having in him the perfection of all things Gen. 17.1 2. Exod. 6.3 This Attribute renders God as that infinite Sea of all happiness Perfection is increated Glory that is all the Attributes in one word as Happiness is the Sum of Mans good so Glory is the Sum of all Gods Attributes The Perfection of God is Essential Independent Unlimited without increase or decrease As the Power of subordinate causes is contained in the first cause virtually and as the Authority of Under-Officers is in the Prince after a more excellent manner so the virtue of all second causes is contained in the first cause eminently The word Eminently taken in its strict and proper sence seemeth to intend the effect to be in the cause not only in a more excellent manner then in it self but also in a super-created manner Things are in God agreeable to the Nature of God in themselves according to their proper natures Eminential Continency and Virtual Continency that is for one thing to be contained in another eminently as the Excellency of the creature is in the Creator Or Virtually as all things saleable are in money Eccles 10.9 are not the same the first is proper to the Creator the second is found in the creature The Essential Perfection of God is Increated Glory Eternal alwayes the same from which nothing can be taken to which nothing can be added The acknowledgement of the manifested Perfections of God is Glorification viz. The Act of the creature done in time admitting more or less according as God is known or acknowledged CHAP. II. Of the Trinity FOr our better proceeding in searching into this Mystery of Mysteries Consider 1. The Clearness of the Truth from Scriptures 2. What a Person is 3. What it is that constitutes a Person 4. What a Personal Act is the attending whereunto helps much to clear both the Nature of a Person and the Trinity of Persons 5. The Names or Appellations ascribed to the several Persons in the Scripture 6. The Distinction between a Person the Essence 7. The Distinction between a Person and a Person 8. What terms we are to avoid in speaking of the Trinity 9. Satisfaction to some few Objections 10. The Usefulness of this Doctrine Amongst the Multitude of Scriptures The Clearness of this Truth from the Scriptures holding forth the Doctrine of the Trinity of Persons in the Divine Essence Let it at present suffice to transcribe these And God said Let us make man in our image after our likeness Gen. 1.26 And the Lord God said Behold the man is become as one of us to know good and evil Gen. 3.22 Go to Let us go down and there confound their language that they may not understand one anothers speech Gen. 11.7 But none saith Where is God my Makers so is the Hebrew who giveth Songs in the night Job 35.10 And one cried unto another and said Holy holy holy is the Lord of Hosts the whole Earth is full of his Glory Isai 6.3 And the Heavens were opened unto him and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a Dove and lighting upon him and lo a voyce from Heaven saying This is my Beloved Son in whom I am well pleased Matth. 3.16 17. Go therefore and teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost Matth. 28.19 But when the Comforter is come whom I will send unto you from the Father He shall testifie of me John 15.26 The Grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the Love of God and the Communion of the Holy Ghost be with you all Amen 2 Cor. 13.13 For there are three that bare record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Spirit and these three are one 1 John 5.7 A Person viz. an Increated Person is the Divine Essence subsisting in a Relative Property What a Person is The Essence with its Subsistence not the Essence alone not the Subsistence alone 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Subsistentia but both the Essence and the Subsistence constitute a Person this the Greek word holds forth Heb. 1.3 which is translated a Person Subsistence adds unto substances the independing manner of their existing In reasonable Nature it giveth Created in the Divine Nature it is Increated Personality Subsistence considered in its abstract notion as distinct from Essence the manner of the Essence the manner of the Existence for Essence or Being and Existing in God are all one A Relative Property an incommunicable property are Synonima's i. e. they are divers terms and expressions signifying the same thing they give personality and distinguish one person from another The Subsistences in the Divine Nature are relative and individuating that is they are relative properties They are Relative Hae
Liberty of God in the Decree is Of the Liberty of the Decree i. e. Of God decreeing Deus ita liberè nos elegit ut potuerit etiam non eligere Zanch. de Nat. Dei lib. 3. cap. 4. qu. 6. God willing whatsoever is besides himself not of any necessity of nature but out of his meer good Pleasure Rom. 9.16 Ephes 1.4.11 1 Cor. 12.11 Matth. 20.15 and Matth. 11.25 26. The Liberty of God appeareth in his freedom from Necessity Moral Obligation Any Motive thereunto besides himself 1. He was free with freedom from necessity Scot. lib. 1. dist 39. n. 15. Objecta à Deo nequaquam necessariò voliâ—a esse demonstrare possimus quomodo tamen nutus divinus liberè transeat ad Objecta perscrutari non est nostrum Twiss praefat in libros de Sc. Med. Liberty is increated or created Created Liberty is in respect of the Acts themselves so men are said to be free Agents because they are free to act or not to act But Increated Liberty is in respect of the Objects not of the acts that is There is no necessary connexion between the being of the creature and the Being of God He might have been without the creature he had been God blessed for ever although that had been nothing for ever Each possibility which yet shall never be is equally founded in the Sufficiency of God with those things that have an actual being And the things that have an actual being might had God so pleased have remained in their nothing and possibilities that never shall be have had their actual beings God can do whatsoever he will though he will not do whatsoever he can He is Omnipotent but not Omnivolent 2. God is free in respect of any moral obligation so as that he had done the creature no wrong if he had never willed it to be he cannot become a debtor unto the creature otherwise then as he makes himself a debtor of his meer good pleasure 3. Extra Deum nulla causa officiens decreti esse possit quia Decretum Dei re ipsa nil aliud est quam ipsamet Essentia Dei decernens God is free from any Motive thereunto besides his own will There can be no Motive of Gods Will besides himself Not in the creature it self whether we suppose faith or good works foreseen or ought else Either the creature must be considered as it is in God or as it is in its own actual being but this is the effect of the Decree therefore cannot be the Motive thereof If as it is in God the Objective Being of the creature in God is nothing else but God himself considered as able to cause the creature to be as the futurition of the creature is God willing the creature to be Not in Christ whether we consider Christ in respect of his Incarnation Deus vult hoc esse propter hoc sed non propter hoc vult hoc Tho. p. 1. q. 19 art 5 Office or Acceptation he is not the cause but the effect of the Decree See Chap. 9. intitled Faith is the effect of special grace yea notwithstanding the Decree is rightly conceived by us according to the order of the end and the means conducing to that end yet the end willed of God is not the cause of Gods willing the means for that end because God willeth all that he willeth with one single act whether means or end Otherwise there would follow two Acts in God Twiss de Elect. which is inconsisting with his Nature who is one meer act God willeth one creature to be the cause of another Deus hoc vult esse hoc hoc propter hoc non autem propt r hoc vult Hoc est Deus vult effectus esse causas effectus esse pr. pter causas non tamen propter causas vult effectus Twiss lib. 1. de Elect. part 2. and to be for the use of another but yet that other thing is not the cause of Gods so willing God willeth both the Being of the Father and the Son and willeth the Father to be the means to beget the Son yet the Father is not the cause why God willeth the Son God hath willed the Sabbath and other creatures to be for the good and use of man so as man is the subordinate end of their being but yet man is not the cause of Gods willing their being to that end Man is the subordinate end of their being that are so willed but he is not the cause of Gods willing their being to that subordinate end Obj. 1. The Merit of Christ is the Cause of Election The Chiefe Objections made against the Doctrine of the Decree considered answered Christus ut Mediator non est praedestinationis causa sed effectum Pisc Cont. sch Th. 97. Ephes 1.4 6. Therefore the meer good pleasure of God is not the only cause of the Decree Ans We must distinguish between Election it self and the Application of the good of Election The merit of Christ is the cause of the application of the good of Election but not of Election it self Obj. 2 Faith foreseen is the cause of Election therefore the meer good pleasure of God is not the only cause of the Decree Ans Faith as every other creature considered without the Decree is but a possibility a may-be founded in the sufficiency of God who is able to give being to what he pleaseth and consequently to faith That this may-be become a shal-be i. e. That faith yet but a possibility passeth from the condition of a thing possible unto the condition of a thing that shall be can proceed from no other cause then the Decree or the Will of God Which one consideration well observed and applyed affordeth a sufficient answer to all objections arguing for any thing in the creature foreseen as a cause of the Decree This Proposition God electeth for faith foreseen inferreth a Succession of Acts in God Faith foreseen necessarily presupposeth a fore-going Decree concerning the being of that faith which is foreseen according to it Thus 1. God decreeth faith to be Neque enim actus aliqu s vilendi cum fit actus immanens in Deo suboritur de novo Twiss de Elect l. 1. p. 2. 2. Foreseeth that faith 3. Upon that faith foreseen passeth the Decree of Election so as the sight of faith coming between the two Decrees there must needs be two Acts and the second succeed the former But God is one Act in whom there is no succession It is as if one should say God intends to intend or he determineth to determine which cannot be true of God because it would not only imply divers Acts in God contrary to his simplicity and those divers acts to be by way of succession that is one after another contrary to his Eternity Deus voluit sibi rationem esse volendi aliquid praepostere dictuÌ„ Twiss ibid. But also it
affirmeth that one Act of Volition or Willing in God should be the object of another and then by the same reason that again may be the object of another and so in infinitum This Answer unto this Objection concerning faith foreseen may serve in like manner for an answer unto the objection concerning works foreseen being the cause of Election As also unto that of sin foreseen being the cause of Reprobation Good works are the way to salvation not the cause of Gods Decree to save Sin â—is the cause of punishment which is the actual execution of justice for sin but not of Gods intent to punish sin Sin is the cause of damnation and consequent of reprobation Election is not without the sight of faith and new obedience nor Reprobation without the sight of sin yet faith though it be the instrument and means of the application of salvation following thereupon is the effect not the cause of Election and sin though it be the cause of the application of all the evil of punishment yet is it the consequent not the cause of Reprobation Obj. 3. If sin followeth necessarily upon the Decree then God is the Authour of sin But sin followeth necessarily upon the Decree Therefore God is the Authour of sin Ans This blasphemous Inference is in effect the same with what the ancient Enemies of the Doctrine of the Decree of old calumniated the Teachers thereof with thereby through their sides blaspheming the Scriptures and God himself So objected the Adversaries of this great Truth against Paul the greatest Preacher thereof amongst those that were but men Rom. 9.19 Thou wilt say then unto me Why doth he yet find fault for who hath resisted his Will i. e. If Gods Will determining the being of sin be irresistable then man in committing sin is unblameable Prideaux Lect. 1. de absoluto Decreto Bellarmine de Amiss gratiae cap. 4.5 6 7. why is fault found with that which was unavoydable So the Pelagians against Augustin An absolute Decree necessarily concludeth God to be the Author of sin So Bellarmine against Zuinglius Calvin Beza and other Orthodox Divines slandering their Doctrine of the Absoluteness of the Decree with these horrid Criminations viz. That thence it followeth that God is the Author of sin 2. That God sinneth truly and properly 3. That God is the only sinner 4. That sin is not sin For satisfaction of the Objection we must distinguish of Necessity There is a necessity of Coaction and a necessity of Infallibility Sin followeth not the Decree by a necessity of Coaction or Compulsion in which sence the Objection only holdeth but by a necessity of Infallibility which consisteth with and hindereth not the liberty of sin of which afterwards Hence the Decree though it be the antecedent that is the foregoer of sin yet it is not the cause of sin and sin though it be the consequent that is somewhat infallibly following upon the Decree yet it is not the effect thereof The day goeth before the following night and the night foregoeth the following day yet night and day are far from being causes one of another The diligent attending to the difference between an Antecedent and a Cause and between a Consequent and an Effect for the clearing of which sufficient hath been spoken before is of great use to unty many knots in this place But meeting here with this Satanical and abominable Sophism of imputing unto God the being of the Author of sin it will not be unseasonable to remove other Arguments disputing for the same Conclusion though not all of them upon the same grounds Arg. 1. If God hath absolutely fore-determined all Events then God hath willed sin if God hath willed sin then God is the Author â—f sin Answ Though sin as sin he evil yet the being of sin for a better end is good God doth not will sin as sin For thou art not a God that hast pleasure in iniquity neither shall evil dwell with thee Psal 5.4 yet God hath willed the permission of the being of sin for a better end In peceato actus volendi in Deo non transit in rem permissaÌ„ sed in permissionem Twisse Cr. 3. l. 3. Rivet disp 1. Th. 24. Cum dicitur Deus vult peccatuÌ„ esse hoc refugit pia mens non quia quod dicitur non bene dicitur sed quia quod bene dicitur malè intelligitur Vide Twisse Cr. 3. l. 2. The Jews Acts 4.27 did what God had determined to be done in his Decree when they did what he forbad to be done in his Command Those who give their Kingdom to the Beast Revel 17.17 in so doing fulfilled the word of the Decree yet brake the word of his Command The water whilest it runneth his own course serveth the end of the Artificer in turning about the Mill according to his intent For who hath resisted his Will In the mystry of sin the Decree of God saith a learned and judicious Author passeth into the permission but not into the evil that is permitted that is God willeth the permission of sin but he doth not will sin as sin That better End in order unto which God willeth the being of sin is the manifestation of his own Glory the glory of his Mercy upon the Elect the glory of his Justice upon the Reprobate The manifestation of the glory of God is a greater good then the transgression of man is an evil Had not there been sin there had not been a Gospel had not there been sin there were no need of a Saviour if there had been no sin Jesus Christ had not been Arg. 2. If God ascribeth unto himself the doing of actings that are sinful then God is the Author of sin But God ascribeth unto himself the doing of actions that are sinsul Therefore Concerning the selling of Joseph by his Brethren the Scripture saith It was not you that sent me hither but God Of the Egyptians hatred against the Israelites He turned their heart to hate his people to dâ—al subtilly with his servants Psal 105.25 Of the Incest of Absalom I will do this thing before Israel and before the Sun 2 Sam. 12.12 Of the Rebellion of the ten Tribes and Jeroboam This thing is from me 1 Kings 12.24 Of the cruel plunder of the Babylonians I will send them against an hypocritical Nation and against the people of my wrath will I give him a charge to take the spoyl and to take the prey and to tread them down like mire in the street Isa 10.6 the like is to be seen in many other places Answ We must distinguish between the action and the evil of the action God is so the Author of the action Acts 17.28 as that he neither is nor can be the Author of the evil of the action James 1.14 It is impossible either that God should not be the Author of all good or that he should be the Author of any evil The act or effect hath
rule There is no repugnancy between these two propositions 1. It is the duty of man to beleeve 2. It is not the purpose of God to give him grace to cause him to beleeve Obj. 8. The Event out of which according to the Decree of God cometh good yea that great good of the manifestation of the glory of God ought not to be counted sin nor is the doer thereof to suffer vengeance But sin is that event out of which cometh this great good Therefore why should sin be accounted sin or the doer thereof suffer vengeance See Rom. 3.5 7. Ans This Objection is framed in the person of man I speak as a man vers 5. not as from God and being both blasphemous and absurd the Apostle censures it in the same place with an holy abomination God forbid vers 6. Sin in it self tendeth only unto evil it is by accident that it becometh a means of any good 'T is the occasion Lambertus Danaeus censuit periculosam istam Gregorii magni sententiam ubi loquens de culpa Adami sic ait O foelix culpa quae talem tantū habere meruit Redemptorem Twisse de Praed l. 1. part 1. Nisi esset hoc bonum ut essent mala nullo modo sinerentur ab Omnipotente bono August Twiss referente Cr. 3. l. 2. Vid. Cr. 3. l. 2. not the cause of the manifestation of the glory of God That sin which in its own nature tends only unto evil is turned into an occasional commendation of the Righteousness and other Attributes of God doth not at all excuse sin but commends the wisdom and goodness of him that brings good out of evil yea a far greater good out of sin then sin it self is an evil So of the Objections The Decree is to be propounded in the same order in which God hath revealed it in his Word God knoweth best how to reveal his own mind And we speak well when we speak after him In particular these Rules are to be observed Rule 1. What order is to be observed in propounding the Doctrine of the Decree Not Gods Decree but the Command is the Rule of Faith and Obedience Rule 2. Consider of the Decree as proceeding according to the order of the End and the means conducing to that End hereby finding the End of God in them that perish not to be the death of a sinner but the manifestation of the glory of his Justice in punishing man for sin and the blameable cause of death to be sin appears the unwarrantableness as well as the offensiveness of such expressions as God made man to damn him c. together with the groundlessness and sinfulness of blasphemous charging God with cruelty in his Decree of Reprobation O Israel thou hast destroyed thy self but in me is thy help found Hosea 13.9 Here God removeth from himself the being the cause of the destruction of Israel He also denyeth solemnly Ezek. 18.23 32. yea with an Oath Ezek. 33.11 That he taketh any pleasure in the death of a sinner Say unto them As I live saith the Lord God I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked but that the wicked turn from his way and live Turn ye turn ye from your evil ways why will ye dye O house of Israel Death as we saw before is considered as the destruction of the sinner or as an execution and declaration of Justice God delights in it as it is a declaration and execution of Justice but not as it is the destruction of the sinner In the execution of Justice upon a Malefactor we must distinguish between punishment and destruction Punishment is from the Judg destruction is from the evil doer Punishment proceeds from the Author of the Rule of Justice as the efficient Cause but destruction from sin as the meritorious Cause Though punishment as it destroyeth the creature be an evil to Nature yet as it is a declaration of Justice it is a moral good 'T is true Condemnation followeth infallibly upon Reprobation yet so as Reprobation is the antecedent not the cause of sin sin both an antecedent and cause of condemnation None are condemned because reprobated but because they sin Notwithstanding man be reprobated yet if he had not sinned he should not have dyed Rule 3. We must not separate between the end and the means That Diabolical Sarcasme and bitter scoffe invented to the abuse and derision of the Doctrine of the Decree is not only an untruth but implyeth a contradiction viz. If I be elected howsoever I live I shall be saved and if I be not elected live I never so well I shall be damned Satan in this Sophism divides the end and the means asunder which God hath joyned together The Decree consists not of the end without the means nor of the means without the end but of both together Both end and means are contained in one Decree Yea so far is the Decree from admitting such an inference as that the contrary infallibly followeth thereupon and in point of Election is not only necessarily concluded but irresistably caused Faith repentance new-obedience and perseverance being the effects of Election Acts 27.24 God had decreed by the ship-mens staying in the ship to run the ship a ground near the shore so as that all there might escape safe to land He concludes unsafely from thence that saith Do now as they will Stay the ship-men in the ship or not there shall no man perish For except the ship-men abide in the ship ye cannot be saved ver 27. Just so do they reasonlesly and to their own destruction conclude who notwithstanding God hath from the beginning chosen us to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth 2 Thes 1.13 Yet infer if they were elected live as they will whether they believe or not be sanctified or not they shall be saved There was one saith Augustine of our society who when his brethren expostulated with him Quidam in nostro Monasterio qui corripientibus fratribus c. August de bono persever l. 2. c. 75 why he did some things which ought not to be done and why he did not some things that ought to be done answered What kind of one soever I now am I shall be such an one as God hath foreknown me to be Who truly saith that Ancient said the truth and by this truth profited not in good but so much profitted in evil that forsaking the Society of the Monastery he became a Dog returned to his vomit again and as yet what he will be is uncertain Rule 4. We must be carefull to distinguish between the Doctrine of the Decree and the Personal Application thereof in point of Election and Reprobation The Doctrine of the Decree is commanded to be taught and learned and is many ways useful both before and after faith respectively But the Personal Application thereof before faith in point of Election or during this life in point of
of the Proposition is good but both the antecedent and consequent of the Proposition being taken asunder are false sc either that Beleevers could live finally after the flesh or that Beleevers shall dye eternally The Decree being God himself decreeing Of the usefulness of the Doctrine of the Decree and the Cause of all things as it helps our understanding concerning God himself so is it exceeding useful for our better and fuller understanding of the creature and the whole mystery of Godliness As the knowledg of the Cause conduceth to the better knowing of the Effects Foelix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas Other Consectaries for many might be drawn omitted Hence we learn 1. What is the first and universal Cause of all things 2. That the Will of God is one 3. The Absoluteness of the first Cause 4. That no effect nor event falleth out besides the intent and deliberate constant purpose of the first Cause 5. That God knoweth all things and seeth all things always 6. The Soveraignty of God i. e. That God's Will is the first Rule of all things 7. The perfect wise Administration of all things and all events 8. The nothingness of the creature 9. The Dependance of the creature upon the Will of God and especially in matters of grace 10. The Sanctifying of God in all our changes by the due acknowledgement of and quiet subjection to the all-decreeing and all-disposing Will of God 11. Matter of high thankfulness unto the Elect. 1. The Will of God is the Cause of all causes Consect 1. second causes are the effects of the first cause The will of man is an instrument disposed and determined unto its action according to the Decree of God The rod is not more subordinate unto the hand of the Smiter nor the staff to the hand of the Mover nor the Axe to the hand of the Hewer nor the Saw to him that shaketh it Isai 10.5.15 nor any other passive instrument to the hand of a free Agent then the will of man is unto the Decree of God It necessarily following from the perfection of the first cause That no creature can be so subordinate unto its fellow-creature as every creature is unto God As in the Genealogies of men descending from God there is no step in ascending from Son to Father until we come unto God the first and Universal Father in respect of whom all other fathers are sons So in the order of the creature descended also from the same God there is no stay unto the understanding in ascending from effect to cause until we are come unto God the first and universal Cause in respect of whom all other causes are effects 2. The Will of God is one and the same not divers Consect 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Et ipse in uno He is in one mind Job 23.13 There can be but one will in God because there is but one God willing what is willed and that with one Act. This is further confirmed from the Simplicity of God the contrary would argue imperfection and change in God The Will of God in the Decree and the Will of God in the Command are the same not two divers or contrary Wills distinguished only as the Will of God in general whether secret or revealed and the Revelation of some part of that Will The Decree determineth what shall be done the Command sheweth not what shall be done but what is the duty of man to do or leave undone The Command of Judas to believe sheweth that it is the Will of God to make it Judas his duty to believe but not that it is the Will of God that he shall believe The Command that Pharaoh should let the people of Israel go sheweth that God hath willed it to be Pharaoh's duty to let the people of Israel go but not that God hath willed that Pharaoh should let the people of Israel go The Command that Abraham should offer Isaac sheweth That it was God's will to try Abraham concerning the offering of Isaac and that it was Abrahams duty to apply himself to offer Isaac but not that it was Gods will that Abraham should offer Isaac Gods Will is always fulfilled Aug. de praedest Sanct. l. 1. c. 16. he cannot fall short thereof The Jews in crucifying Christ brake the Command Acts 2.23 Him ye have taken and by wicked hands have crucified and slain yet fulfilled the Decree For of a truth against the Holy Child Jesus whom thou hast anointed both Herod and Pontius Pilate with the Gentiles and the people of Israel were gathered together Vnum fuit idem de eadem re Decritum voluntasque Dei aterna sed duabus constat partibus Zanch. de Natura Dei l. 3. c. 4. q. 10. for to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done Acts 4.27 28. Shimei in doing what God had forbidden in the Command Exod. 22.28 doth what God had bidden in the Decree 2 Sam. 16.10 Those ten horns in giving their power to the Beast brake the word of the Command yet fulfilled the Decree Revel 17. It is from the same Will of God that Christ should be crucified by the Jews that it shall be the duty of the Jews not to crucifie Christ and by a Command to impose this duty on the Jews of not crucifying Christ The infallible ordering of the Being of sin for a better end and the forbidding of sin are not at all inconsisting one with the other but fall under the compass of the same one Volition of God 3. The Will of God is absolute Consect 3. Either the Will of God is absolute or conditioned not conditioned Thence it would follow That he were not the first and universal Cause nor immutable nor certain of future events and that all things did not depend upon him Though the application of the thing willed be conditioned yet the willing together with the execution of the application thereof is absolute Faith is the condition of salvation Whosoever believeth shall be saved Deus non potest excidere fine Rhetorf de gratia yet both faith and salvation by faith are willed absolutely The Will of God is irresistable There is no hindering of the execution thereof But he is in one mind and who can turn him what his soul desireth even that he doeth Job 23.13 But our God is in the Heavens he hath done whatsoever he pleased Psal 115.3 The Lord of Hoasts hath sworn saying Surely as I have thought so shall it come to pass and as I have purp sed so shall it stand Isai 14.24 And he doth according to his will in the Army of Heaven Voluntas Dei neque potest mutari neque impediri Zanch. d◠Natura Dei l. 3. c. 4. q. 9. and among the Inhabitants of the Earth and none can stay his hand Dan. 4.35 For who hath resisted his will Rom. 9.19 I know that thou canst do every thing
that is of God the Creator to be the last End Prov. 16.4 Revel 4.11 Isai 41.4 and 44.6 and 48.12 Rom. 11.36 Rev. 1.8 11 17. and 21.6 and 22.13 This appears in that God hath all perfection The final Cause therefore being a matter of perfection God must needs be the final and universal End of all things The same is concluded from the imperfection of the creature the end perfects the thing if the creature were its own end Gods work should end in imperfection As it is impossible that there should be any creature that doth not depend upon the influence of God in its next efficient Cause so it is impossible there should be any creature not depending upon the intention of the glory of God so as to be referred thereunto as unto its last End otherwise there would be a progressus in infinitâ—m an End without an End The goodness of the creature is not placed in its own well-being but in the representation of the Perfections of God Vniversa creatura est speculum in quo reluceat gleria Dei Tho. p. 1. q. 17. Art 2. Twisse Cr. 3. dig 4. S. 11. iteÌ„ de Elect. d. 3. S. 1. Rhetorf de grat Ex. 2. c. 3. The goodness of the creature is considered either in respect of it self or in respect of its end viz. to be a glass wherein the Perfections of God shine forth If it be considered in it self so it might have been better with it then it is Mat. 26.24 It had been good for that man if he had not been born But if it be considered in respect of its last end the present administration thereof is best Obedience is better then disobedience considered in themselves but had there been no disobedience there had not been so great a manifestation of the glory of God had not any sinned there had been no Hell no Gospel no Jesus and albeit God had always been blessed for ever yet he had not been the God and Father of our Lord Jesus The Wisdom of God is a Justice whereby God giveth unto himself that which is his due and consequently orders all things so as may conduce most to his own Glory Cum necesse sit ut quicquid Deus agit ad extra id ipsuÌ„ propter se agat tanquaÌ„ fineÌ„ ultimum cuÌ„ ipse sit summe amabilis postulat justitia Dei naturalis qua sibi tribuit quod suum est ut Leus statuat de mediis maximè cingruenter ad finem c. Twisse de Reprob l. 1. p. 3. dig 1. Tho. p. 1. q. 47. A. 2. Dicitur justitia condecentiae sine congruitatâ— qua Deus quicquid agit agit convenienter sibi Seeing it is necessary that whatsoever God doth without himself he should do for himself as the last End the natural Justice of God whereby he gives unto himself that which is his requires that God appoint such means as most conduce to that End and dispose of them in such a way as is most suitable thereunto This Justice of God say the Learned is nothing else but his Wisdom according to which all things are ordered to their due ends The good of the Elect being included in the glory of God it followeth that God administring things so as serveth best for his own glory he administreth things so as serveth most for the good of his children The way of the Wilderness forty years about when as the Journey might have been gone in a few days there being but eleven days between Horeb and Kadeshbarnea Deut. 1.2 was their right way Psal 107.7 The reason whereof we have Deut. 8.2 3 16. That he might humble thee and prove thee and do thee good in thy latter end He hath made every thing beautiful in his time Eccles 3.11 And we know that all things workt gether for good to them that love God c. Rom. 8.28 God fits his dispensation to our spirits If thy heart be out of frame in thy present condition it would be worse though possibly at more ease in any other 8. Consect 8. Since all things are of God it follows that all things besides God came from nothing and are in themselves nothing God calleth himself I am Exod. 3.14 We saith learned and godly Mr Rutherford are created results of God bits of dependencies upon him Rutherford Survey of the Spirit Antichrist Time-accidents Yesterday-startups branches budding from our Mother-nothing by the alone Will and Pleasure of God Behold all Nations are before him as a drop of a bucket as the small dust of the ballance as a very little thing as nothing as less then nothing as va ity Isai 40.15 17. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Beza in Luk. 2.14 As Creatures we are the effects of his good-pleasure as Beleevers we are men of his special-good-pleasure The difference between a Saint for ever and nothing for ever is the meer good pleasure of God 9. Consect 9. From the perfection of the first Cause namely the Will of God also followeth the universal dependance of the second Cause thereupon both in respect of its Being Conservation and Operation Hence Reason necessarily and clearly concludes every second Cause to be meerly passive in respect of its Being and that notwithstanding in respect of its doing it be active and not only passive yet so as that it is passive before it is active This truth as it holds concerning the whole creature so especially concerning the new-creature whose passive dependence upon its Creator and Actor is so much the more evident by how much it arising from the same nothing excelleth its fellow-creatures in being and doing The evidence of this truth from the doctrine of the Decree may be looked at as no small occasion of the enmity and exasperation of Nature especially of the Enemies of Grace against the preaching thereof 10. Consect 10. Hence we further see cause to sanctifie God in all our changes by the due acknowledgment of him and quiet subjection to the all-decreeing and all-disposing Will of God The consideration that God is God and that we are men should prevail with all men hereunto Man must not contend with God Clay must not strive with the Potter Nay but O man who art thou that replyest against God Rom. 9.20 As this consideration namely that such a thing is the Wil of God ought to still the heart of all men so it doth still the heart of good men Psa 38.13 14. and 39.9 I was dumb I opened not my mouth because thou didst it So now It was not you that sent me hither but God Gen. 15.8 11. Lastly Consect 11. Here we see the greatest cause of thankfulness unto God That common love of God to man whereby when we lay equal with the residue of the Creation in our Mother-nothing he freely gave unto us so excellent a Being after his own Image far above our fellow creatures was unspeakably above what is unspeakable But that special love of
beings themselves as appeared but now from the instance of fire and may further be seen in the example of the Sun which whilest experience witnesseth to warm and heat us upon Earth with the presence of its virtue yet Sense and Reason shews to be far absent in respect of its body being in the Heavens Yet such is the nature of the first Cause as that wheresoever it worketh it worketh immediately both with the immediation of his virtue without which there could be no effect and with the immediation of his presence because he is in every place Although the first Cause worketh immediately in respect of the immediation of its being and virtue yet in respect of those things which it acts by means of second causes whether by the mediation of the beings themselves Ames Med. lib. 1. cap. 9. or of their virtues into which things the second agents do send their influence by virtue of their proper forms I say in respect of such things it worketh mediately whence the first Cause is said to be a mediate cause in respect of the order of the second causes Vna estactio I ei creaturae respectu operis sed non respectu modi agendi 4. Determining For though as the beings so the operations of the second causes are from the first Cause efficiently yet they are from their next causes formally God causeth the burning of the fire yet we do not say God burneth but the fire burneth God worketh repentance in the Soul yet it is not a truth to say God repenteth but man repenteth God is the next efficient Cause but not the next formal Cause 4. The first Cause so concurreth as it determineth the second cause in its operation This is readily granted in natural agents in free-rational agents it is proved thus If the futurition of the operation of the second cause is determined by the Decree of God then the operation it self is determined by the Efficiency of God 1. Because the Efficiency is adequate to the Decree 2. Because there can be but one absolute Determiner 3. If the operation of the second cause were not absolutely determined by the Decree God might suffer disappointment in respect of the Decree Either the Will is determined by God in its operation or else it would follow either that there were not an essential subordination of the second cause unto the first that is of man to God which were repugnant to the nature of the second cause it being imperfect and dependent or that the first Cause were subordinate to the second which were repugnant to the nature of the first Cause being perfect and universal If as often as the Will doth not will it therefore doth not will because God hath not determined that it should will then as often as it willeth any thing it therefore willeth because God hath determined that it should will But as often as the Will doth not will it therefore doth not will because God hath not determined that it should will Therefore the Minor appeareth in two particulars 1. As often as the Will doth not will God hath not determined it to will 2. The Non-determination or Suspension of the Determination of God is the Antecedanious Cause in respect of God this cause cannot be positive A positive cause cannot be terminated in a Non-ens such as mans Non-volition i. e. Not-willing is it must therefore be suspensive The meer Suspension or withholding of the Influence of God without any positive action sufficeth to the annihilation of the creature that is Twiss lib. 2. crim 3. therefore the Suspension of the Determination of God sufficeth to the preventing of that operation of the creature which yet is not Obj. 1. If All-efficiency be from the first cause Against the All-Efficiency of God then the second cause hath no efficiency it doth nothing neither good nor evil man neither sinneth nor obeyeth no difference between good and evil the high way to confusion Thus the Libertines Ans Causes are either co-ordinate namely such as in respect of their Efficiency depend not upon their co-working cause or subordinate namely such as in respect of their efficiency depend upon their co-working cause In co-ordinate causes the Argument holds but second causes in respect of the first being subordinate and therefore as in their being so also in their working depending upon the first cause the Argument is of no force To deny the Efficiency of the second cause Tho. Part. 1. q. 105. art 5. Calvin contra libert c. 13 14 15 16 Suarez Metaph Tem. 1. disp 17. S. 1. is to deny that which experience proclaimeth namely That the Sun shineth or the fire burneth The denyal of the proper and formal efficiency or working of the second cause is repugnant to the whole Order of Nature Things that have not life it depriveth of their first qualities which are nothing else but active principles as power to heat in the fire power to cool in the water It disinables us from collecting effects from second causes or second causes from effects because it denyeth all such causes and effects It makes void all those dispositions in several creatures that tend to action Vain is the disposition in fire to ascend or in the earth to descend if there be no motion of ascent nor descent by them It takes away all perfection from those creatures as also from all other which consists in action Lastly If action be only the first cause in the presence of such a creature and not by the second cause we can no better conclude that the fire is hot from its burning nor that the water is cold from its coolness then we can conclude that the fire is cold or that the water is hot from such operations of heat and cold The reason is the first cause can as well make hot in the presence of water or make cold in the presence of fire as the contrary It takes away all difference between things that have life and things that have no life that which takes away action takes away life Take away action from the second cause and you take away the vegetative soul and its operations from living creatures You take away the sensitive soul and its operations from the sensitive creature The reasonable soul and its operations from the reasonable creature There is no difference to be found between reasonable creatures and sensible creatures between reasonable sensible and those creatures which are vegetative only having life Between reasonable sensible and vegetative and those that are lifeless in respect of their formal and most noble difference which is a principle of action with the operations thereupon ensuing There remains indeed a difference between them in respect of their outward shape but not in regard of the respect fore-mentioned It takes away the distinction between good and evil actions for that which denyeth actions simply denyeth all kind of actions whether good or evil therefore man in all
God governeth according to his Law nor how his Word and Works of Providence do agree the error is in our Judgment not in his Government We know that God is just in all his ways though the reason of the Justice of some of his ways we know not That Gods Word and his Works agree is manifest unto us though how they agree is sometimes hidden from us The seeming defects of Beauty or Justice in the Works of God proceed from the error of our understanding not from any want in Providence The offence that man takes at the Providence of God is taken not given A preservative against temptations arising from difficulties concerning the Justice of the Government of God is to captive Reason unto Faith and to hold these three Conclusions firm though we see not the reason of the premisses 1. That God is righteous Righteous art thou O Lord when I plead with thee yet let me talk with thee of thy Judgments Jer. 12.1 2. That godliness doth us good and no hurt Truly God is good to Israel even to such as are of a clean heart Psal 73.1 3. That sin doth us hurt and no good Though a sinner doth evil an hundred times and his days be prolonged yet surely I know that it shall be with well them that fear God which fear before him But it shall not be well with the wicked neither shall he prolong his days which are as a shadow because he feareth not before God Eccles 8.12 13. Obj. Some things in Scripture are ascribed unto Chance Eccles 9.11 Luke 10.31 therefore all things are not ordered by God Ans Chance is taken for an Event Túxn non legitur in N. T. Fortuna gentilium est blasphemia quam Diabolus expuit in divinaÌ„ providentiaÌ„ unde bea uÌ„ AugustinuÌ„ paenituit se toties impiâ hac voce usum fuisse supposed to fall out by a meer contingent efficiency or casual working of the second cause besides the intent and therefore without the Efficiency of the first Cause Such Events the Heathens ascribed unto Fortune in this sence there is no Chance It is not unworthy our observation that the word properly signifying Fortune is not used in the New Testament Or else Chance is taken for such an Event good or bad as falleth or meeteth a man in his way unlooked for viz. unexpectedly in respect of men but not unintendedly in respect of God The word used Ecclesiast 9. verse 11. is translated an occurrent 1 Kings 5.4 a Metaphor taken from something meeting of a man or one meeting another upon the way unexpectedly So that Solomons scope in the place objected is to shew that the event of humane affairs is not in the power of man however furnished thereunto with second helps but depends upon the Decree and efficient Providence of God This the Wise-man holdeth forth by an enumeration of some particulars whence as by several instances God would teach this truth by denying success to such persons who according to second causes might expect it and giving it to them who according to second causes could not expect it I returned and saw under the Sun that the race is not to the swift nor the battel to the strong neither yet bread to the wise nor yet riches to men of understanding nor yet favor to men of skill but time and chance happeneth to them all Eccles 9.11 The word used Luke 10.31 and translated it chanced is of the same signification with the Hebrew word used Eccl. 9.11 turned Chance and with that vers 2. turned Event 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 aeb Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Pisc in loc from the root whereof the Greek word is by some thought to come it is taken for a good event Ruth 2.3 for a bad event 1 Sam. 6.9 Those things that fall out casually or necessarily in regard of the second cause fall out alike infallibly and therefore alike intendedly in regard of Gods Decree Those effects which proceed from second necessary causes as heat from fire are said to fall out necessarily Those effects which proceed from second contingent causes that is such whose effects in respect of their second cause was likely not to be as to be as namely the elicit acts i. e. the free choyce of the will or the tyle falling from the house to alight upon the head of the passengers are said to fall out casually These modifications or qualifications of things namely Necessity and Contingency as they stand opposed one unto another are only found in things in respect of the second causes not in respect of the first Cause Those things which fall out most necessarily in regard of the second cause in respect of the first cause they may be said to fall out freely rather then necessarily In like manner those things which fall out contingently in regard of second causes upon supposition of the Decree so predetermining them may be said to fall out necessarily No necessary act of the creature is necessary simply an experiment whereof is the Babylonish furnace Every contingent act of the creature is necessary upon the supposition of the Decree The same effect is contingent and casual in respect of the second cause and necessary in respect of the Decree Contingent or casual because in respect of the natural agency or causality of the second cause it might not have been but necessary in respect of the Decree all whose volitions infer a necessity of infallibility The Doctrine of the Efficiency of God affords an Antidote or Preservative against many pestilent Errors concerning the Providence of GOD The Vse of this Doctrine The chief whereof are 1. Atheism concluding from the seeming disorder of second causes that there is no God 2. Epicurism concluding from the appearing confusion of humane affairs that God neither governs nor regards them and thereupon looks at it as the only good to take its fill of pleasure during life 3. Stoicism Non Deus est numen parcarum carceclausum Qâ—ale putabatâ—r stâ—icus esse Deus which maketh the first Cause to be depending upon and determined by the second causes in respect of their operations 4. Such who ascribe the administration of things unto Fortune that is neither unto the irresistable order of the second cause with the Stoicks nor unto God with the Truth but unto that blind Idol devised by the Heathen and justly censured to be the spittle of the Devil upon the face of divine Providence 5. Libertinism denying the Efficiency of the second cause and thereby introducing that Chaos of confusion and transgression Bellar. de amiss grat stat pec lib. 2. cap. 18. Vasquez in 3. disp 14. cap. 8. ex Twiss câ—im 3 Suarez Mâ—taph disp 22. Sect. 2. of which before 6. The Doctrine of the Jesuites who albeit they teach the concurrence of the first cause to be necessary unto each operation of the second cause yet so as
it doth not determine but is determined by the second cause thus Bellarmine So as not fore-going only accompanying of the second cause thus Vasquez So as it co-operates with the second cause not after the manner of a principle but after the manner of an action thus Suarez It determineth the second cause say they negatively Hurtado Phys disp 10. Sect. 4. N. 53. not by way of influence which mystical sence of the Jesusuits Hurtado himself also a Jesuite opens by a familiar comparison thus As saith he in case you can write with two pens and I holding one of them hinder you writing with it permitting you to write with the other this permission compelleth not you to write you are free to both but if you write it must be with that pen which I leave not with that which I hold in my hand 7. The Doctrine of the Arminians Profunda subtilitas Twiss de praed digr 10. Sect. 6. who with the Jesuites yeild a concurrence of the Spirit to be necessary unto each act of obedience yet so as they make it subsequent not antecedent following not fore-going lackquying not leading of the operations of the Will Whence according to them the beginning of every good work or act of new-obedience is from the creature As this Doctrine ministreth an Antidote against many pernicious errours so is it also a principle whence we may deduce many precious truths Amongst many take these God's Decree is the Rule of his Efficiency Who worketh all things according to the Counsel of his own will Ephes 2.11 God's Efficiency is answerable unto his Decree The universal Efficiency of the first cause and the subordinate Efficiency of the second cause consist together Workout your own salvation with fear and trembling For it is God which worketh in you to will and to do of his good pleasure Philip. 2.12 13. The second cause acts and doth its actions as properly really and formally as if upon a supposition which yet is impossible there were no first cause The first cause acts and doth all things as properly and really as if there were no second cause Notwithstanding the creature in regard of its formal free-efficiency is somewhat distinguished from a meer instrument yet even those effects wherein God useth the second cause as a subordinate free-agent depend upon and are determined by the first cause as much as where the second cause is a meer passive instrument because the free-efficiency of the second cause is the effect of the first cause And as much as those effects for the producing of which a man makes use of a meer instrument depend upon and are determined by the man who used that instrument Because an instrument being a creature cannot depend upon its fellow-creature so much as every creature depends upon its Creatour And hence it is that second free-agents are sometimes compared unto meer instruments Notwithstanding sin is wholly of man and subordinate efficiency in sinful actions belongs formally unto the second cause yet the infallible futurition and execution of all effects the infallible futurition and ordering the execution of all events is as fully ascribed unto God as if man had no hand therein So then it was not you that sent me hither but God Gen. 45.8 As it is a truth that God is not the Authour of any evil so it is a truth that God is the Authour of all good God is the Eternal and only Independent the creature is a time-dependent He is the only all we are of our selves nothing The second cause is in respect of its being Nam si tu lumen facici averteris a me Mox abeo in nihilum qui nihil antefui Non secus ac vultu substracto aufertur imago In speculo corpus cum later umbra perit and continuance in its being so also in respect of its operation essentially dependeth upon the first cause This is true in spiritual actions John 15.5 For without me you can do nothing In all actions both Natural Civil Moral and Holy For in him we live and move and have our being Acts 17.28 All disorder in the second cause falleth under the order of the first cause yea the most ungoverned actions of the reasonable creature are governed by the Creatour and that not only according to his Decree but also according to his Law prescribed to them where the Gospel hath not been heard According to both Law and Gospel where the Gospel hath been promulgated It is the duty of man to sanctifie God by acknowledging of and acquiescing in his Decree and his All-glorious essicient execution thereof By Creation and Providence applying our selves to the care of our duty and leaving unto him the care of the event to be effected according to the All-predetermining Counsel of God This is the substance of Hesters answer to Mordecai Go gather together all the Jews that are present in Shushan and fast ye for me and neither eat nor drink three days night nor day I also and my Maydens will fast likewise and so will I go in unto the King which is not according unto the Law and if I perish I perish Hest 4.15 16. See Gen. 43 14. 2 Sam. 10.12 Acts 21.14 Prov. 29.26 There is grace enough in the Promise In hac fiducia recumbere unicum est reelè agendì compendium Calv. Epist ante Pralect in Daniel to enable believers to run the race of Providence Let us run with patience the race that is set before us looking unto Jesus the Authour and Finisher of our faith Heb. 12.2 There is also comfort enough in the Promise to support believers so running concerning all events of Providence And we know that all things work together for good unto them that love God to them that are the called according to his purpose Rom. 8.28 So much hath God revealed as that he who believeth and walketh according to the rule needs not be afraid of his secret Will Both the Decree and the Execution thereof though yet unknown as touching infinite particulars are for them not against them Unmortified discontent at the Providence of God is an Argument of an ungodly man the character and disposition of a sinner Eccles 2.26 Contentment therewith is the special gift of God unto his Saints The character and life of the life of a godly man As concerning all the infallible changes that pass upon us in their appointed time according to Gods Eternal Decree I know there is no good in them but for a man to rejoyce and do good in his life and also that every one should eat and drink and enjoy the good of his labour this is the gift of God Eccles 3.11 12. To speak properly no man is content with his estate but a godly man no godly man but is content with his estate CHAP. VI. There are certain Preparatory works coming between the carnal rest of the soul in the state of sin and effectual vocation Or Christ in
ver 10. Had an high esteem of Jesus Christ ver 3.46 Those three thousand Acts 2. ver 37. were pricked in their heart ask what they shall do The like may be observed in the Jaylour Acts 16.29 30. Paul before his conversion was sensible of his sin and death Rom. 7.9 justifieth the Law ver 12. saw the loss of his own righteousness and his need of the righteousness of Christ Phil. 37.8 To this purpose we may read of others else where 'T is certain That many of those who have been converted have had experience of a preparatory work fore-going the conversion but it cannot be proved out of the Scripture That any who have attained unto years of discretion have been converted without some experience thereof Object 1. Objection satissied There is no use of preparatory work because there is no saving work to be wrought upon the Elect which God cannot work without it Answ Were this Objection good there would follow a total uselesness-of any second cause or fellow-creature towards the producing of any effect 2. Not God's Absolute but his Ordinate Power i. e. The common Course of his special Providence is the ordinarily Rule of his proceeding with man the Exercise of his Power is regulated by his Will God is Omnipotent he can do whatsoever he will but he is not Omnivolent he will not do whatsoever he can Obj. 2. Preparatory work seemeth to darken the freeness of grace Ans Preparatory works precede vocation in way of order not in way of causality God giveth Christ after them as the way not for them as the cause Preparatory work is the effect of free common grace as saving work is the effect of free special grace It can therefore be no more prejudice unto grace then a free way is unto a free thing whereunto it is the way No more then freedom prejudiceth freedom i. e. No more then a free act of an inferiour nature prejudiceth a free act of a superiour nature It doth no whit touch it in it self it in many respects cleareth it but no way darkeneth it unto us Obj. 3. The Corinthians 1 Cor. 6.11 that were Idolaters Adulterers Abusers of themselves with mankind received Christ yet we read of no preparatory qualification mentioned Therefore there was no preparatory work Ans It is not said so therefore it was not so is no good consequence 'T is a frequent thing in the Scripture to mention the thing done without mentioning the manner of the doing of that thing Psal 33.9 David speaks of the Creation yet is silent of the Order of creating Matth. 1.2 We read that Abraham begat Isaac but of the manner of his begetting him viz. By faith not considering his own body now dead Rom. 4.19 c. There is no mention Exod. 20.1 The Holy Ghost records the deliverance of Israel out of the Land of Egypt the manner of it namely by signes and wonders and by an out-stretched arme is wholly omitted 'T is in this case between the thing done and the manner of the doing thereof as between the Sacrament instituted and the Order of the institution The Sacrament is sometimes mentioned where the Order of the institution is not observed 1 Cor. 10.16 As therefore he that would inform himself of the Order of the Institution and Administration of the Elements in the Supper is not to learn it from those Texts where though the matter be recited yet the Doctrine of the Order is not held forth so he that would instruct himself concerning Preparatory Work in order to conversion is not to look unto those places where though the work of conversion be recorded yet the teaching of Preparatory Work is not intended but unto such Scriptures where the Doctrine of Preparatory Work is purposely taught Obj. 4. Jeremiah was sanctified before he came out of his Mothers womb Jer. 1.5 John the Baptist was filled with the Holy Ghost even from his Mothers womb Luke 1.15 when they were both uncapable of Preparatory Work Ans Jeremiah's Sanctification from the Womb may be understood not of any actual but only an intentional separation of him to office as Paul speaks in like manner of himself Gal. 1.15 If we understand it actually it seemeth to be but an actual separation of him to the Office of a Prophet By the Holy Ghost whereby John was filled from the Womb we may well understand not the gift of saving grace but eminent gifts of Office to fit this Eliah for that high service whereunto he was appointed Whether we understand by the sanctification of Jeremiah and by the filling of John with the Holy Ghost the grace or gifts of office or the gifts of saving grace The Dispensation of God unto them was extraordinary not ordinary and so teacheth not the question Only in John we clearly see God not only can but doth even in Infants work in a secret manner by his Spirit when he pleaseth CHAP. VII What are the Principal Heads whereunto the Substance of Preparatory Work in the full Extent thereof may be referred IN Answer to this Question Consider 1. What Preparatory Work taken in its Extent is 2. What Parts thereof are wrought by the Ministery of the Law 3. What Parts thereof are wrought by the Ministery of the Gospel 4. Some Cases of Conscience concerning Preparatory Work Preparatory Work taken in its full Extent is the whose frame of inherent Qualifications coming between the Rest of the Soul in the State of Nature and Vocation wrought distinctly and in measure in the Ministery both of the Law and Gospel by the common work of the Spirit concurring therewith whereby the Soul is put into a next disposition or Ministerial Capacity of believing immediately i. e. Of immediate receiving of the Lord Jesus Christ The Parts of Preparatory Work wrought by the Ministery of the Law are 1. Conviction of the Holiness of the Law 2. Conviction of Sin 3. Conviction of Guilt 4. Concluding of the Soul under sin and guilt 5. Conviction of the Righteousness of God in case he should punish us for our sins 6. Inexcusableness 1. The Conviction of the Holiness and Spiritualness of the Law is that Work of the Spirit whereby the Soul is enlightened to see the Conformity of the Command unto the Will of God whether we understand by command the Precept concerning the not eating of the Tree of Life or the Decalogue prescribed unto man in innocency as the rule of life and manners Therefore called the Moral Law or any other Commandement of God Ceremonial Judicial or whatsoever This conviction is called the coming of the Commandement Rom. 7.9 For I was alive without the Law once but when the Commandement came sin revived and I dyed It causeth a Doctrinal Approbation thereof The Law is h ly and the Commandement holy and just and good The Precept is holy the Curse is just the Promise is good I consent unto the Law that it is good 2. Conviction of Sin is the conscience
the sinner either in himself or in his Surety 3. That it is his glory by revealing and impartially executing such a measure of wrath in case of transgression upon the work of his own hands to manifest the Majesty of him who is offended the goodness of the Command that is transgressed the evil of sin and the vileness of the sinner Justice in God is his constant Will to render unto every one that which is theirs The Justice of God Rhetorf de Gratia Exeroit 2. cap. 3. is considered either in respect of himself or in respect of the reasonable creature in order to to himself whereby he is a necessary debtor to himself It is called essential justice in order to the reasonable creature whereby he hath freely made himself a debtor unto them it is called Relative Justice In the Essential Justice of God Vid. Twiss de reprob lib. 1. digress 1. Justitia condescentiâ—e is contained that which is called the Justice of Condecency or Comeliness which necessitates not God to constitute any rule of Relative Justice betvveen himself and the creature only in case he be pleased to constitute any it necessitares him so to do it as becometh such an Agent and as serveth best unto his end and which being done continueth inviolable and infallible The Essential Justice Constancy and Truth of God permitteth not any defect or alteration concerning the Execution of his Decree after he had once decreed it notwithstanding before the Decree he was free to have decreed or not to have decreed that Decree Relative or Moral Justice is an external Work of God whereby he proceeds with man according to the Law of righteousness freely constituted betvveen him and them rendring to every one what is due unto them thereby either by way of recompence in case of obedience or by way of punishment in case of disobedience For our better understanding of this Moral Justice of God in respect of man Consider 1. That nothing can be due from God to man as of himself 2. That which is due from God to man is from the free and meer good pleasure of God Non enti nihil debetur nam valet argumentuÌ„ est id cui aliquid dâ—betur Ergo est Twiss ubi supra 3. That this good pleasure or Will of God is the Rule of Righteousness 4. That God proceeding to Execution according to this Rule of Righteousness constituted by his good pleasure can do no wrong Nothing can be due from God to man as of himself the creature of it self being a meer nothing and God being all he cannot become a debtor to the creature either of good or evil otherwise then he is pleased to make himselfe a debtor Should God be looked at as a necessary Debtor unto the creature it must either be to the creature not yet in being or to the creature in actual being but he cannot be a Debtor to the creature yet not in being for to it nothing can be due but Creation and that should be due unto nothing Thence it would follow that God were bound to create every creature that were possible to be created and that also from Eternity Neither can he be a Debtor to the creature in actual being to which if he can owe any thing it must either be the continuation of it in its being or annihilation In Deo neque est justitia commutativa nedum distributiva propriè Rhetorf ubi supra If God doth not ovve unto the creature its creation he cannot owe unto it its continuation Continuation being nothing else but the continuance of Creation he that is not bound to give a creature its being for one instant which is done in creation is much less bound to give unto a creature its being for many instants which is included in continuation Besides Were God bound to continue the creature in actual being for one year by the same reason he vvere bound to continue them for ever Neither can he ovve unto the creature in actual being annihilation for then neither could the godly enjoy Eternal life nor the vvicked be punished vvith Eternal death to ovve annihilation is to ovve nothing The vvorth of the creature in order unto God is not intrinsecal For who hath first given to him a d it shall be recompensed unto him again Rom. 11.35 2. Whatsoever is due from God to man is from the meer Will and good pleasure of God Moral Justice flovveth from the good pleasure of God the Manifestation of the Glory of God in a way of justice is the end the permission of sin is the means that this should be the means and that should be the end is vvholly of the Will of God The Creation of man is an effect of Gods good pleasure That Prohibition of Adam to eat of the forbidden fruit upon the transgression of vvhich followed the death of mankind vvas an Interdict of Gods free-vvill The Moral Lavv it self is an effect of Gods good pleasure What reasonable man but will yeild that the being of the Moral Lavv hath no necessary connexion vvth the Being of God That this Moral Lavv should be a constant rule of manners and that all mans actions should fall vvithin the compass of this rule Quod talis sit natura illius rei quae est peccatum recurrendum semper est adfont mâ—â—dtissimum â—ei aeternum bene-placitum Idem ibid. Zanch. de Natura Dei lib. 3. cap. 4. quaest 12. cap. 5. qu. 3. is from the meer Will of God That the actions of men not conformable to this Lavv should be sin that death should be the punishment of sin that this punishment should be suffered in our ovvn persons or in our Surety as should seem good unto the Lavv-giver all these are the constitutions of God proceeding from him not by vvay of yecessity of nature but freely as effects and products of his Eternal good pleasure 3. This Good Pleasure or Will of God is the Rule of Righteousness The Will of God is God himself vvillng his Will is the Rule of our vvills Whose Will else should be the Rule The Will of God is the cause of all things the constituted Rule of Righteousness therefore being an effect it must needs proceed from the Will of God othervvise there should be an effect vvhich vvere not resolved to the first cause That vvhich is the Fountain of all good is the Rule of Righteousness but Gods Will is the Fountain of all good All Laws vvhich have their beginning in time as the Lavv of Nature the Lavv of Nations the Moral Lavv all Civil Lavv vvhether fundamental or positive that are conformable to the Moral Lavv as all ought to be flovv from the Will of God vvhich is the Eternal Lavv That vvhich is just in it self is the Rule of Justice to all other things that are just But the Will of God is just in it self because the Will of God is God himself vvilling God is essentially
11. the Man Christ Jesus Extreams come not together but by their middest From the Nature of a just God unto a sinner God in Christ is a tender Father without Christ a consuming fire Mans way to God is by the Man God for he is the Mediatour between God and man the Man Christ Jesus Christ as Redeemer is the mediate not the ultimate Object of Faith For we believe by Christ in God It is the duty of all that hear the Gospel to believe Mark 1.15 John 3.18 John 15.22 and 16.7 1 John 3.23 Those that never hear of the Gospel shall not be condemned for their unbelief in refusing to obey the call thereof but for the transgressing of the Moral Law precisely taken i. e the first Covenant He to whom Christ was never preached shall not be condemned because he hath refused Christ but he shall be judged by the Law which obliged him to believe in Christ if Christ had been preached to him Object 'T is not in our power to believe How then can God require of us that which we are unable to perform Sol. We are enabled in Adam to believe in Christ If the renewing or recreation of us after the Image of God according to which we were created in Adam doth enable us also with a power to believe then our Creation after the Image of God must necessarily include a power to believe But the renewing us after the Image of God according to which we were created in Adam doth enable us to believe Ephes 4.24 Col. 3.10 Where there was a saving power enabling to discern the revealed Will of God and to put confidence in him accordingly there was a power virtually to believe in Christ But in Adam there was a saving power enabling to discern the whole Will of God and to put confidence in him accordingly Therefore in Adam there was a power virtually enabling to believe in Christ As the Faith of the Angels in the first and second Covenant differeth not habitually so neither doth the Faith of Adam in the first and second Covenant differ habitually That which was implicitely and by consequence commanded in the Moral Law that we were some way enabled to yeild obedience unto But Faith in Christ was commanded implicitely and by consequence in the Moral Law by the first Precept Faith in God is commanded absolutely therefore not only concerning what he was pleased to reveal at present but unto what afterwards he should be pleased to reveal Justifying Faith is considered as commanded directly and expresly or indirectly and by way of consequence So Faith in Christ is commanded in the Moral Law indirectly or by way of consequence Willet on Exod cap. 20. Confut. 1. It will not be denyed saith Doctor Willet but that this faith also speaking of justifying faith is commanded in the Moral Law Because we are bound by the Law to believe the Scriptures and the whole Word of God for this is a part of Gods Worship to believe his Word to be true And here it is not unworthy our observation that though Christ were not then propounded to be believed in yet he was included in what was revealed under the first Covenant For that threatening Gen. 2.17 In the day that thou eatest thou shalt dye is verified as concerning the elect in Christ who dye in their Surety not in themselves If in Adam we were able to believe in Christ as our preserver from sin and Confirmer in a state of life had Christ then been so propounded to us there can no reason be given why we were not able in that condition to have believed in Christ as a Saviour from sin could he have been so propounded in that estate unto us But in Adam we were able to believe in Christ as our Preserver from sin and Conserver in that estate had Christ then been so propounded unto us Therefore in Adam we were able to have believed in Christ as a Saviour from sin could he have been so propounded unto us in that estate The Minor is proved by comparing Adam in innocency with the elect Angels the Image of God in them both being the same in kind their abilities were the same in kind as therefore the elect Angels by Creation had a principle whereby they were able to believe in Christ their Confirmer as appears by experience in that they believed in Christ their Head and Confirmer being commanded so to do without the inspiring of any new principle so in like manner had Christ been propound unto Adam in innocency to be believed in as his Head and Confirmer therein he by the same concreated Image of God with the Angels was able thereby through like assisting grace to have yeilded like obedience without a new principle inspired Either Adam was able to believe in Christ or else God calling upon man to believe requireth that of man which he never enabled him with a principle to perform but it cannot be proved that God requireth that of man which he never enabled him to perform Therefore c. Object Faith in Christ as a Saviour from sin and the state of innocency are inconsistent Therefore Adam had not a power to believe in Christ Ans This proves that Adam in innocency could not actually believe but not that he could not potentially believe that is that he had not a principle able through assisting grace to believe in Christ had the propounding of him been consisting with that estate The cause of Adams not believing was not through an effect of a principle enabling him thereunto but by reason first of the inconsistency of justifying faith with that estate 2. By reason of the not revealing of the Object of Faith Adam in innocency had a principle enabling him to Parental duties though he was never called thereunto as also to duties of mercy and charity which yet were inconsistent with that estate The Saints in glory have a principle whereby they are able to perform the duties of repentance mortification patience for sure the strength of grace is not weakened by being perfected in glory yet is there no place for those duties in Heaven Christ having received the Spirit out of measure had a principle whereby he was able to have performed the service of repentance and mortification Molin Anat. of Arm. cap. 11. Twiss permiss l. 2. c. 4.63 Spanh Exercit de grat univers Annot in Sect. 22. Num. 3. though he were not only not called thereunto but these and the like services were also inconsistent with his estate This is the Doctrine of the Orthodox generally in their disputations against Arminius who that he might prove that God is bound co give to every man power of believing in Christ doth therefore contend that Adam before his fall had not power to believe in Christ Obj. 2. God is said to harden our hearts and to be the cause why we do not believe John 8.47 and 10.26 and 12.39 40. Wherefore it seemeth not so at least
effects of Election which are proper to the Elect. Saving Grace is of another kind therefore specially distinguished from all common grace which may be found in those who are not elected The Holy Spirit doth not work so much as one degree of saving and justifying Faith in those who are not elected Saving Grace is of the same kind with the created grace in the Manhood of Jesus Christ the Manhood of Christ received of the Spirit out of measure John 3.34 We receive from Christ of that Spirit in measure but he that is joyned to the Lord is one Spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 And of his fulness have all we received and grace for grace John 1.16 The Habits of Grace and Glory both in Christ and us are of the same kind Inherent saving Grace is distinguished from all common grace whether of nature or supernatural In respect of the first cause Est inter Christum omnia Christi membra continuitas quaedam ratione Spiritus Sancti qui plenissimè in Christo capite residens vnus idem numero ad omnia ejus membra diffunditur Dav. Col. 1.18 Cain Servatoris non fuit particeps ut Servatoris nec particeps ejus est impius quisquā Jun. de nat gratia collat confir rat 10.24 27. saving grace is from Election common grace is not from God electing but from him as the Authour of common gifts 2. In respect of the Meritorious Cause Saving Grace is from Christ as so meriting for them common grace is from Christ who did merit but not from Christ as so meriting he did not so i. e. savingly merit for them Saving Grace is from Christ as a Redeemer of them who are made partakers thereof Common grace is from Christ who is a Redeemer but not from Christ as their Redeemer saving grace is from Christ as a Head unto those who partake thereof as a designed Head in the gift of the first saving grace as an actual Head in the gift of following saving grace Common grace is from Christ who is the Head of his Body the Church but not as such a Head unto them who only receive thereof Cain saith Junius was not partaker of a Saviour as a Saviour neither is any other ungodly man 3. In respect of the next efficient cause the next efficient cause of saving grace is a motion of special grace the next efficient cause of supernatural common grace is a motion of supernatural common grace 4. In respect of the Subject the Subject of special grace are only the Elect the Subject of common grace are not only the Elect but also those who are not elected 5. In respect of their formal Nature the Genus or next common Nature of saving grace is a free-saving spiritual gift its Species i. e. it s formal or particular Nature is its sincere disposing the soul to Evangelical obedience as an inherent principle Common grace neither disposeth the soul to obedience nor is it a saving gift 6. In respect of its Efficacy Saving grace reigneth and quickens the new man and gradually mortifieth the old man until sin be wholly expelled Common grace is in this regard powerless neither doing the one nor the other Lastly They are distinguished in respect of their duration common grace is mortal Matth. 25.29 Saving grace is immortal Free-grace What 1 Pet. 1.23 Free grace understanding thereby increated grace is that eternal absolute and constant act whereby God of his meer good pleasure hath willed the infallible application of grace and glory unto elect sinners so as election or the act of willing grace and glory Tua enim omnia à nobis petis nihil nisi salvari 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damasc de Fide Orthodoxa lib. 4. cap. 24. Gratuitas Favor is meerly because it pleaseth him without respect of Christ as any Cause or Motive of Election but the actual application of all that good is with respect to Christ as the Meritorious Cause thereof and both Election and the actual Application of all this good without any respect of good or evil in the Elect themselves as any motive thereunto or hinderance therefrom This grace is briefly called the free favour of God in Christ Jesus By Created Free-grace taken as is usual for saving free-grace we are to understand the Effects of Election that is the saving free-gifts of the spirit viz. Vocation Union Justification Adoption Sanctification Perseverance Glorification c. The Freeness of Grace appears from the first cause viz. the meer good pleasure and will of God For it is God that worketh in you both to will and to do of his own pleasure Philip 2.13 So then It is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy Rom. 9.16 Therefore he hath mercy on whom he will have mercy ver 18. The wind bloweth where it listeth and thou hearest the sound thereof but knowest not whence it cometh and whither it goeth so is every one that is born of the Spirit John 3.4 The Obedience of Christ is meritorious not absolutely in it self but by vertue of the Covenant of God accepting his obedience as meritorious i.e. as that whereunto remission and salvation should be due according to Order of justice The Obedience of Christ was of sufficient value in it self because he was God to redeem all mankind but it could not be a price i. e. a ransom further then as God was pleased to accept The matter offered by Ahab was of equal value with Naboths vineyard but it could not be a price without his acception of it And as the Obedience of Christ becometh merit through the acceptation of the good pleasure of God so the extension of this merit is enlarged and bounded according to the Will of God accepting it for such a number neither less nor more Had there been more to have been redeemed the Merit of Christ was sufficient even for the Redemption of the whole world and if there had been but one to have been redeemed his merit must have been infinite It cost Christ no more blood to save Manasses then to save John the Baptist no less to save Timothy then to save Paul The Freeness of the Application of Grace appears further from the Merit of Christ Grace is given according to the Merit of Christ not with any respect to mans merit of good or demerit of evil The least sin without Christ is incurable the greatest sin by Christ is curable One sting of the fiery Serpent was mortal without looking to the Brazen Serpent and one look thereunto would cure a thousand stings as well as one such is the demerit of sin as that it justly slayes the child that sinned not after Adams transgression such is the Merit of Christ as that it justly saveth Adam the great transgressour No sin is little in it self the Merit of Christ is infinite 'T is a great sin for the least sinner not to be without hope in respect
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sicredideris particula si non est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Buc. loc 21. q. 3. In which respect we are said to be chosen in him Ephes 1.4 Ascribing due glory unto the Father takes not from but adds to the glory of the Mediatour That Name above all names given unto the Mediatour is Jesus Christ the Lord Philip. 2.9 10 11. Gods Name is the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 2 Cor. 1.3 Ephes 1.3 1 Pet. 1.3 Christ is all and in all Col. 3.11 God is all in all 1 Cor. 15.28 Christ is all and in all efficiently and meritoriously God is all in all essciently and originally Obj. 3. The active and passive Obedience of Christ is the condition of the salvation of the Elect Jes 53.10 As Adams personal and perfect obedience was a condition in the first Covenant therefore though grace be free in respect of election yet it is not free in respect of the Application of the good of Election Ans The Application both of grace and glory and all the good of the Covenant of grace are free to us though conditioned unto Christ Free-grace exciudes not Christs Merit but mans merit Obj 4. Faith is a condition though not of it self yet of salvation that in the Elect themselves therefore the Application of salvation seems not to be free in respect of the Elect. Ans A Condition is either a Condition properly so called i. e. an antecedent Condition Or a Condition improperly so called i. e. a consequent Condition A Condition properly so called is a Law or Observation annexed to a business the performance whereof lyeth upon the Covenant and accordingly the business becometh valid or null Such a condition was Works in the first Covenant If Faith were such a condition there would soon be an end of the Covenant of grace yea the Covenant of grace were indeed no Covenant of grace A Condition improperly so called or a Consequent Condition is such a condition whose performance by the Covenantee is absolutely undertaken for and irresistably wrought by the Covenantor and not left in suspence upon the Covenantee to be performed by his own strength Faith is a consequent condition not an antecedent condition So as this Proposition I will give Eternal life unto the Elect if they do believe is aequivolent unto this I will out of my absolute will give unto the Elect Eternal life because I will out of my absolute will give unto the Elect to believe The Condition of Faith depends not upon the Will of the Elect either to be or not to be but upon the absolute and gracious Will of God Obj. 5. Repentance and New-obedience are necessary to salvation Luke 13.3 Heb. 3.14 Therefore the Application of the good of Election seemeth not to be free in respect of us Ans Good Works which is also true of Repentance are necessary as the way appointed of God unto salvation but not as the cause this were to change the Covenant of grace into a Covenant of works Our good works are the effects of grace the reward of our good works is a reward of grace Good Works are necessary to salvation as the way not as an instrument or cause Faith is necessary as the way and as an instrument The term Special why diligently to be observed the active and passive Obedience of Christ is necessary as a Meritorious cause The Reason why the term Special is diligently to be observed in this Proposition is That we may the more distinctly conceive of the nature of grace and both discern and eschew the errour of the enemies of grace who so affirm it as in effect they deny it and whilest they seem to stand for grace they indeed withstand and overthrow it either by an equivocation in or by a sophistical interpretation of the term Grace * Pelagiani naturae vim gratiae nomine nuncupare solebant quo sententiāsuā occultarēt offensam hominū de gratia Dei sanctè sententiā e◠commodiùs vitarent Twiss vind grat errat 9. Sect. 9. The Pelagians Semi-pelagians Jesuits and Arminians all affirm this Proposition viz. That Faith is the Effect of Grace but understanding the word Grace therein in such a various and graceless sence as followeth The Pelagians understand by grace only the grace of nature that is the remainder of the Image of God in man after the fall whereby the Will without any further help from supernatural grace is able to believe Thus the Pelagians confound grace and nature The Semipelagians or Massilienses men of much account for learning their time whom Prosper in his Epistle to Augustine calleth the Reliques of the Pelagians understand by grace the conjunction of supernatural grace with free-will So as they both concure together as Joynt-workers and partial-causes i. e. fellow-causes in working of faith Which help of supernatural grace man according to them merits by the good use of his free-will The Jesuits understand by grace Facientiquod in se est presertim si vivat sub notitia Evangelii Deus non denegat auxilium primae gratiae Smising disp Theol. Tom. 1 Tr. 3. disp 6. Fidelis faciens quod ex se est ex congruo meritur gratiā justific antē idem 623. Justificatus potest de congruo mereri gratiam perseverandi idem 700. N. 518. Justificatus potest de condigno mereri salutem ibid. the conjunction of free-will and supernatural grace So as they both concur as joynt partial or fellow-causes in the working of faith Where also note That they understand not faith as we do but define their faith to be a general knowledge and certainty whereby they conclude the Word of God to be divine and true The Sum of their Doctrine comes to this To the natural man that doth what in him lyes especially if he liveth under the knowledge of the Gospel God will not deny the help of the first grace The believer that doth what in him lyeth merits with the merit of congruity justifying grace i. e. habitual grace according to them The justified person may merit with the merit of conguity the grace of perseverance The justified Person persevering may merit salvation with the merit of condignity The Arminians understand by grace the conjunction of supernatural grace yet that is but supernatural common grace with free-will So as both concur together as co-working joynt partial or fellow-causes of faith as it is with a man and a boy drawing the sameship together So as the work is not wrought by grace alone without free-will nor by free-will alone without grace but by both together Whence it followeth according to them which they also affirm that as much grace on Gods part may be put forth upon one that finally resisteth the motion of grace as there is upon one that yeildeth obedience thereunto And that the last and conclusive reason in such a case why one believeth and the other believeth not is from the free co-operation of
Pemble of grace and faith p. 59. in Divine graces goes before the habit is saith Pemble an assertion in Divinity not tollerable which tels us the tree must be good before the fruit can be good and that question which Christ put to the Pharisees Mat. 12.34 How can yee that are evil speake good things is more than any Arminian can tell how to answer Either the Life-operation or Life-act presupposeth life or the Life-act is life it selfe or there may be a Life-act without life But there cannot be a Life-act before life nor is that Life-act life it selfe otherwise there being an intermission or cessation of that act there would be a cessation of life Whence would follow interitus gratiae a falling a way from grace the immortal seed 1 Joh. 3.9 should become mortal the beleever so oft as the act of faith ceaseth by reason of sleep or sinne or what else becometh an unbeleever and dying asleep must either not be saved or be saved without faith therefore the Life-operation necessarily presupposeth life If the Life-act of faith whereby the Soule cometh unto Christ have no habit preceding it in order then it will follow either that there is no infused habit of faith or that this infused habit followeth the act of faith but true it is First that there is an infused habit Secondly that this infused habit followeth not the act of faith as we have already seen Obj. How doth it appeare that there is any habit it being no Scripture terme Ans Though the word Habit were not in the Scripture yet the thing signified by that word being in the Scripture it is sufficient according to that received Proposition Whatsoever is contained in the Scripture either in termes or by manifest consequence is Scripture So Divines defend the use of the terms Effence Person Trinity and Merit c. though the words in so many letters are not there found That the thing which those words habit of faith intend is contained in Scripture is manifest from the nature of a Habit thus An infused inherent permanent quality disposing the subject through assisting grace to supernatural acts is the thing signified or intended by the words Habit of faith the grace of saving faith is such an infused inherent permanent quality therefore the grace of faith is a Habit this inherent quality or habit is in the Scripture called the Spirit of faith 2 Cor. 4.13 a power Eph. 3.20 the will Phil. 2.13 the lust of the Spirit Gal. 5.17 the Divine nature 2 Pet. 1.4 the seed remaining 1 Joh. 3.9 for though the most appellations mentioned seeme not to be given to the grace of faith only but to the whole frame of habitual grace yet in that they are given to the whole frame of habitual grace yet in that they are given to the whole whereof faith is a part they are also given to faith as a part of that whole The word habit is a Scripture terme used Heb. 5.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rendered habit by the Latine Translators generally who by reason of the habit have their senses exercised to discerne good and evil the inherent faculty of doing good and eschewing evil is called an habit The infused and inherent grace of faith whether it be called a power principle or habit no way prejudiceth the truth asserted by which of these termes soever it be called the thing is the same therefore the cause is the same and as firme So cleare is the doctrine of infused habits whereof faith is one that many of the School-men both ancient and late Dispositio aut habit us ille supernaturalis c. requiritur simpliciter ad actum istum supernaturalem Rescript Ames ad Grev. c. 10. attest thereunto Those habits Ad quaestionem tamen dico quod oportet ponere fidem infusam propter auctoritatom Scripturae Sanctorum Scot. lib. 3. dist 33. qu. 1. idem lib. 1. dist 17.9 3. 11.30 whereby man is disposed to such an end as exceeds Nature are of necessity in men by Divine infusion We ought faith Scotus himselfe to beleeve the habit of faith infused for the authority of the Scripture and of the Saints Scotus is commended for deducing out of the Master of the Sentences such inferences as might be apprehended not to have denied all supernatural habits Valentia Valentia Tom. 2. disp 4.9.3 p 4. Vbi fusè tractat quaestionem Utrum aliqui habit us infundant ur nobis supernaturaliter à Deo unwilling that the Council of Trent should bee thought to have denied infused habits notwithstanding he denieth not the testimony of Sotus who was there present to be true namely that the Council no wonder if that were difficult to be pronounced by the Adversaries of the Doctrine of Grace industriously abstained from the word habit yet endeavoureth to prove the thing signified by the word being taught by them not the dislike of the word but rather some other reason mentioned by him to have been the cause why they abstained from the use thereof In the same place hee asserreth the being of Habits from Argument Scripture and Authority and mentions other of the principal School-men like-minded with himselfe The Arminians though they could not be ignorant how much it concerned their cause to oppose the habit of faith yet none of them openly denied it before Grevinchovius Faith faith Fstius both in Infants Fides est habitus à Deo infusus tam in baptismo parvulorum quam in justificatione adultorum Estius l. 3. d. 23. s 1. 11. collat is cum dist 24. s 1. and in persons of discretion is a habit infused of God alone In receiving the habit of Grace In receiving the habit of Grace the Soul is passive whether we are to understand thereby the solitary habit of saving faith or the habitual frame of the New Creature of which before chap. 11. the Soule is passive The proof of this Proposition appeares by Scriptures Arguments Authorities By Scriptures thus Phil. 2.13 For it is God which worketh in you Velle non de substantia voluntatis sed de nova qualitate accipitur Bucanâ—oc 18 qu. 10. both to will and to doe of his owne pleasure The Apostle here distinguisheth between doing and a power to doe which hee calleth the will both these are wrought of God to will or power to doe he worketh without us to doe he worketh by us in the first we are passive and not active manifest it is the Soul cannot actually doe whilst it is but yet receiving power to doe in the second we are not only passive but also active yet so as wee are passive before we are active A second Scripture for the confirming of this truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we have Phil. 3.12 But I follow after if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ The Apostle here expresly as those that understand the Original know makes mention of himselfe in
same Mystical Body or the manner of their meeting together sweetned with more affecting ingredients and circumstances than the meeting of Jacob Joseph and Benjamin together with their ability unity complacency c. and all this mixed with the immediate presence of Christ If Peter but for a smal time seeing and hearing the faces and discourse of Christ Moses and Elias breaks out It is good for us to be here much more cause is there for them so to doe being not only Spectators and Auditors but also Interlocutors with them and the residue of this ful and blessed Society and that for ever As the communion of the Sanits in this life is a great part of our comfort on earth so the communion of the Saints in glory is no little part of the joys of Heaven The duration of this Blessednesse is for ever 3. The Duration of all Duration is Either increated viz. eternity properly so called this is the duration of God Or created viz. eviternity the duration of the Blessed in glory Or time the duration of the Creature in this world Between Eternity Eviternity and Time some who have more accurately considered the natures thereof distinguish thus Eternity is without beginning without end without succession Eviternity is without end but not without beginning and though without succession in respect of the duration of their Persons yet not without succession in respect of their operations and other accidents Time hath both a beginning succession and end In Eternity all is present nothing past nor to come In Eviternity in respect of the duration of their Persons there is nothing past but in other respects there is both past and to come that is the instant that was in some respect passeth not away but alwayes remaineth but in other respects there are instants to be which are not yet come In Time there is both past present and to come Eternity is a Duration consisting of an eternal Now without beginning or ending Eviternity is a Duration having a continuing Now with a beginning but without an ending Time is a successive Duration having a beginning and ending without any remaining Now. The Body is not so miserable under the Curse Consid 5. Of the condition of the Body after the Resurrection as it is blessed in the Promise as in the state of Corruption it is abased lower than all created Bodies so in the state of glory it is exalted higher than all other Bodies Christs excepted The excellency of the glorified Body consists especially in two things 1 In that we shal see Christ as he is Man with these eyes 2 In certain inherent Caelestial qualities That we shal see Christ as he is Man with these eyes Job manifestly testifieth For I know that my Redeemer liveth and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth and though after my skin worms destroy this body yet in my flesh shall I see God whom I shall see for my self and mine eyes shall behold him and not another cap. 19.25 26 27. The sight of Christ as Man is the next object unto the Beatifical Vision it self as the created grace which the Man-hood received was out of measure Joh. 3.34 yet not simply for being a creature it is bounded but respectively in regard of us we being unable to measure it so the glory of the Manhood is out of measure The Humanity of Christ in respect of its personal union farre exceeds all the glory of Angels and glorified Souls The glory of the Man-hood is as much as the Creature is capable of the glory of the Body is derived both from the Divinity and the glory of his Soul The fulness of the God-head dwelling in him bodily doth as it were radiate through his body hence there must needs arise great joy unto the beholder both from the eminency of and our interest in this object Christ in glory and Christ in glory ours as much of the Creator as is possibly visible in the nature of man wil be to be seen in Christ as much contentation as the Creature can be made partaker of by the sight of any one visible object wil be the portion of the beholders of Christ as he is Man The inherent caelestial qualities of the Body at the Resurrection are principally four viz. 1 Impassibility called Incorruption Clari Subtiles Agiles Impassibilesque omnes quadruplici pollebunt dote Beati Estius Sent. lib. 4. dist 44. Vide Scot. Richard c. in lib. 4. d. 49. 1 Cor. 15.42 43. 2 Clarity called Glory 1 Cor. 15.42 43. 3 Agility called Power 1 Cor. 15.42 43. 4 Subtilty called A Spiritual body 1 Cor. 15.42 43. Impassibilitie doth not only exclude Corruption for the bodies of the Damned cannot dye but it freeth the body from all hurtful passions Dos Impassibilitatis either of grievance or infirmity Rev. 21.4 As it was in an extraordinary manner with the bodies of the three Children in the Babylonish Furnace for a time so shall it be with the bodies of the Saints for ever the Fire hath no power upon their bodies neither can the smel of fire passe upon them neither heat nor cold can trouble them nor the Sword pierce them Darts are not counted so much as stubble they laugh at the shaking of the Speare Dos Claritates Glory is a shining brightnesse a resplendent lightsomness or a Caelestial sparkling splendor of the Body whereby it may be thought to exceed all the beauty and splendor of Gems Pearls Heavens Sun Moon and Stars yea even of the Heaven of Heavens though all were put together The third Heavens though exceeding all inferiour Creatures as we saw before are but the place of these Bodies which shall be like unto his glorious Body Philip. 3.21 The joy of the Spirit shineth in the countenance no wonder if the faces of those shine whose spirits are filled with joy by beholding the face of God the Sun radiates and shews it self thorough the Window the Fire sends forth a bright lustre thorough Chrystal Stephens Face in this life was seen as it were the face of an Angel Act. 6.15 behold how Moses his face shone upon a little speech with God in the Mount what then may be concluded from the perpetual and perfect vision of him so as Aaron and all the Children of Israel were afraid to come nigh him Exod. 34.30 but Then shall the righteous shine forth as the Sun in the Kingdome of their Father he that hath cars to hear let him hear Mat. 13.43 not that they shal not out-shine the Sun but because there is no more shining body visible to us therefore are the Bodies of the Saints in glory compared thereunto When Christ upon the Mount put on the apparition of that glory for a little time which now he wears for ever Peter and James and John were unable to bear the sight of that transfiguration and of Moses and Elias appearing with him in glory Mat.
an efficient Cause now God is the cause of all Efficiency the evil cleaving to the action is a defect therefore hath no efficient Kâ—ck Log. lib. 1. sect 1. cap. 15. but a deficient Cause Now God cannot be a deficient Cause because he is the first and absolutely perfect Cause therefore cannot be the cause of a non-ens i. e. a nullity or or that which is defective To say God is the cause of sin is to deny God to be the first and absolutely perfect Cause The Rider that causeth the Horse to go is the cause of his going but not of his halting The ready Scribe that writes upon bad paper is the cause of the letter but not of the blot The Musician that playeth upon an Instrument out of tune is the cause of the sound but not of the untuneableness The heat of the Sun that attracts the secret virtues of the Earth is not the cause of the stink of the dunghil His similibus dictu bo minum Satanae mala opera adse â—ibuistur Deo non absâ—lute sed secundum quid in juantum per eadem occulta sua judicia perfecit Parcus in Apocal. cap. 17. The upper wheel of a Clock going well and turning about the lower wheel out of kilter is the cause of its going but not of its going amiss The child illegitimately begotten is the good creature of God its illegitimation is of its parents Notwithstanding God is no way the Author of the evil of the action yet God ascribeth unto himself the doing of these actions that are sinful 1. Because he is the Author of the act wholly 2. Because he is the fore-determiner Orderer and Governor of the sinfulness of the action to his own glorious and blessed End The action is ascribed to him absolutely the sin cleaving to the action not absolutely but only in such sort and respects That Proposition of Aquinas viz. that the act of sin is of God Twisse Cr. 3. l. 2. is by some conjectured probably to have been the occasion why the unlearned Libertines not distinguishing between the act and the defect did infer that God was the Author of sin Arg. 3. Shimei's cursing of David was a sin Exod. 22.28 God bade Shimei curse David 2 Sam. 16.10 therefore God is the Author of sin Answ The bidding in the text is not a bidding properly i. e. a moral Command obliging Shimei thereunto for God had expresly forbidden the thing that he did and the contrary thereunto was his duty but it is a bidding improperly i. e. a natural Command a part of the Decree a Command as some call it of Providence and intends no more then that God by denying the assistance of his grace and leaving Shimei to his own heart and temptations whereupon sin infallibly and inexcuseably followed did so order the cursing of Shimei as that he used his tongue as scourge to chasten David justly in the self-same action wherein he himself abused his tongue to revile David sinfully These Sophisms thus removed it may be also useful upon this occasion to confirm our hearts with some Arguments in the contrary truth namely that God is not the Author of sin From Scripture God makes a Law against the commission of sin Gen. 2.17 smiteth with a curse for sin in all Gen. 3.17 condemned sin in the flesh of his Son Rom. 8.3 gave Christ for the destroying of sin in all his Rom. 6.6 1 John 3.8 therefore God is not the Author of sin Lo this only have I found that God hath made man upright Eccles 7.29 For all that is in the world the lust of the flesh the lust of the eyes â—â—us nemineÌ„ teniat tentatione ad peccatuÌ„ formaliter Twisse Cr. 3. and the pride of life is not of the Father 1 John 2.16 Let no man say when he is tempted I am tempted of God for God cannot be tempted with evil neither tempteth he any man scil by inticing and moving him unto sin James 1.13 love God The children of God would be troubled if grace should fail though their priviledges should not be cut off you are sure of both For as grace is sure so are also the priviledges of grace This was figured under the Law an Israelite could never wholly alienate his inheritance and title to the Land Levit. 25.23 His title to the Land shall not be cut off nor sold for ever This was a type of our spiritual inheritance in Christ which cannot be alienated from us he might for a while pass it away but it was to return again so those that are made coheirs with Christ are never dis-inherited 'T is true we forfeit it by the merit of our actions but God doth not take the advantage of every offence 'T is true we lose the evidences that are in our keeping peace of Conscience and joy in the Holy Ghost but the estate it self is undefeasible and cannot be made away from us Sometimes we are under a kind of sequestration and there is a suspension of comfort and grace as the Israelite might make away his inheritance for a time but we shall recover possession again though not by our selves yet by our Goel our kinsman or him that is next of blood As under the Law if a person were not able to redeem the inheritance the kinsman was to redeem it so Jesus Christ our kinsman after the flesh he is our Goel he interposeth by his merit and reconcileth us to God Well then You see grace is kept and the priviledges of grace are kept in Christ But now because comforts are never prized but in their season and men that have not been exercised in spiritual conflicts nauseate these sweet truths they know not what it is to be left to uncertainty when troubles come like waves one in the neck of another therefore let us see when this truth will be most sweet and seasonable 1. In great troubles when God seemeth to hide his face Oh how sweet is it to hear him say I will not forsake thee till I have perform d all that I promised thee Gen. 28.15 all this shall better thy heart and hasten thy glory In times of distress we are apt to think that God hath cast us off and will never look after us more though formerly we have had real experiences of his grace What a foolish creature is man to weaken his assurance when he should come to use it to unravel all his hope and experiences in times of trouble which is the only season to make use of them 2. In the hour of temptation and hard conflicts with doubts and corruptions when we are sensible of the power of sin and how difficult it is to remove it out of the heart we are apt to say as David after all his experiences I shall one day perish by the hand of Saul 1 Sam. 27.1 and many times out of distrust give over the combate Oh then remember now you are preserved in Christ and