Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n ghost_n holy_a son_n 5,168 5 5.9174 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A64622 A body of divinitie, or, The summe and substance of Christian religion catechistically propounded, and explained, by way of question and answer : methodically and familiarly handled / composed long since by James Vsher B. of Armagh, and at the earnest desires of divers godly Christians now printed and published ; whereunto is adjoyned a tract, intituled Immanvel, or, The mystery of the incarnation of the Son of God heretofore writen [sic] and published by the same authour.; Body of divinity Ussher, James, 1581-1656.; Downame, John, d. 1652. 1645 (1645) Wing U151; ESTC R19025 516,207 504

There are 6 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

they did at the first from the Creation untill the time of Moses for the space of 2513. years First because then God immediately by his voice and Prophets sent from him taught the Church his truth which now are ceased Heb. 1. 1. Secondly traditions might then be of sufficient certainty by reason of the long life of Gods faithfull witnesses for Methusalem lived with Adam the first man 243. years and continued unto the Flood Shem lived at once with Methusalem 98. years and flourished above 500. yeares after the Flood Isaac lived 50. years with Shem and died about 10. years before the descent of Israel into Aegypt So that from Adams death unto that time three men might by tradition preserve the purity of Religion but after the comming of Israel out of Aegypt mans age was so shortened that in the dayes of Moses the first Penman of the Scriptures it was brought to 70. or 80. years as appeareth by the Psal. 90. 10. Thirdly God saw his true religion greatly forgotten in Aegypt Israel then falling unto Idolatry Ezekiel 20. 8. and having brought Israel then his people from thence did not onely restore but also encreased the same adding thereunto many more particulars concerning his service which were needfull for mens memories to be written Fourthly God having gathered his Church to a more solemn company then before it was his pleasure then to begin the writings of his will and therefore first with his own finger he wrote the ten Commandements in two Tables of stone and then commanded Moses to write the other words which he had heard from him in the Mount Exod. 34. 27 28. Fiftly thus God provided that the Churches of all ages and times might have a certain rule to know whether they embraced sound Doctrine or no and that none should be so bold as to coin any new Religion to serve him with but that which he had delivered in writing What is Scripture then The Word of God written by men inspired by the holy Ghost for the perfect building and salvation of the Church or holy Books written by the inspiration of God to make us wise unto salvation 2 Tim. 3. 15 16. 2 Pet. 1. 21. 1 Pet. 20. 21. Joh. 20. 31. If that the Scriptures be written by men which are subject unto infirmities how can it be accounted the Word of God Because it proceeds not from the wit or mind of men but holy men set apart by God for the work of God spake and writ as they were moved by the holy Ghost therfore God alone is to be counted the Author therof who inspired the hearts of those holy men whom he chose to be his Secretaries who are to be held only the Instrumentall cause thereof When Jeremy brought the Word of God to the Jews they said it was not the Word of the Lord but he spake as Baruc the son of Neriah provoked him Jer. 43. 2. and so some perhaps in these days are so ungodly as to take the Jews part against Jeremy and all his fellowes How may it appeare therefore that this Book which you call the Book of God and the holy Scriptures is the Word of God indeed and not mens policy By the consonant testimony of men in all ages from them that first knew these Penmen of the holy Ghost with their writings untill our time and reasons taken out of the Word themselves agreeable to the quality of the writers both which kind of arguments the holy Scriptures have as much and far more then any other writings wherefore as it were extream impudency to deny the works of Homer of Plato Virgil Tully Livy Galen c. when as consent of al ages have reached delivered them unto us which also by the tongue phrase matter and all other circumstances agreeable are confirmed to be the works of the same Authors whose they are testified to be so it were more then brutish madnesse to doubt of the certain truth and authority of the holy Scriptures which no lesse but much more then any other writings for their Authors are testified and confirmed to be the sacred Word of the ever-living God not onely testified I say by the uniform witnesses of men in all ages but also confirmed by such reasons taken out of the writings themselves as doe sufficiently argue the Spirit of God to be the Author of them for we may learn out of the testimonies themselves as David did Psa. 119. 125. That God hath established them for ever Let me hear some of those reasons which prove that God is the Author of the holy Scriptures First the true godlinesse and holinesse wherewith the writers of the Scriptures shined as Lamps in their times and far surpassed all men of other religions which sheweth the work of Gods Spirit in them and how unlikely it is that such men should obtrude into the Church their own inventions in stead of Gods Word Secondly the simplicity integrity and sincerity of these Writers in matters that concern themselves those that belong unto them doing nothing by partiality 1 Tim. 5. 21. neither sparing their friends nor themselves so Moses for example in his writing spared not to report the reproach of his own Tribe Gen. 34. 30. 49. 5. 7. nor the incest of his parents of which he himself was conceived Exod. 6. 20. nor the Idolatry of his brother Aaron Exod. 32. nor the wicked murmuring of his sister Miriam Numb 12. nor his own declining of his vocation by God to deliver the Children of Israel out of Egypt Exo. 4. 13 14. nor his own murmuring against God in his impatiency Num. 11. 11 12 13 14. nor his want of faith after so many wonderfull confirmations Num. 20. 12. 27. 14. Deut. 32. 51. And though he were in highest authority and having a promise of the people to beleeve whatsoever he said Exod. 19. 8. 20. 19. 24. 3. he assigneth no place for his own sons to aspire either to the Kingdome or to the high Priesthood but leaveth them in the mean degree of common Levites all which things declare most manifestly that he was void of all earthly and carnall affections in his writings as was meet for the Penman and Scribe of God hereunto also may be added that he writeth of himself Numb 12. 3. that he was the meekest of all the men that were upon the face of the whole earth which no wise man would in such sort report of himself if he were left to his own discretion Thirdly the quality and condition of the Penmen of these holy writings some of whom were never trained up in the school of man and yet in their writings shew that depth of wisdome that the most learned Philosopers could not attain unto Some also were before professed enemies to the truth whereof afterwards they were Writers Amos was no Prophet but an Heard-man and a gatherer of wilde figges Amos 7. 14. Matthew a Publicane
justified us from all the sins for which Satan can accuse us Secondly by all those comfortable promises of forgivenesse of sins which in Christ name are made unto us What is the third assault of Satan against us He seeketh by manifold inward terrors and outward troubles to swallow us up and therefore is called a roaring Lyon How shall we overcome him in these terrors and troubles 1. By faith in Iesus Christ who was heard in all his troubles to give us assurance that we shall not be overcome in them Secondly by faith in Gods providence whereby we know that Satan can doe no more harme unto us then the Lord doth permit him for our good So much of Satan our first enemy What call you the World The corrupt state and condition of men and of the rest of the creatures which Satan abuseth as his store-house or armory of temptations 1 Iohn 2. 15. How doth the World fight against us By alluring and withdrawing us to the corruption thereof What meanes doth it use First it allureth us to evill with hope of false pleasures gaine and profit preferment and glory of this world drawing us from our obedience to God 1 Joh. 2. 16. Secondly otherwhiles with feare of paines troubles losses reproaches it discourageth us from our duty and allureth us to distrust Gods promises Joh. 16. 33. How may we withstand these temptations of the world By our faith 1 Joh. 5. 4. which setteth a better world even Gods heavenly kingdom before our eyes and so enableth us both to contemne Heb. 11 24 c. and crucifie Gal. 6. 14. the love of this present world and to endure manfully the threats and wrongs the reof Heb. 11. 36 37. both confessing Christ in perill and suffering martyrdome for his sake if we be thereto called Rev. 12. 11. How are then the pleasures profits and glory of this world to be overcome First by a true faith in Iesus Christ who despised all these things to worke our salvation and to make us overcome them Secondly by faith in Gods word that feareth us from doing any thing that is against his will And how shall we overcome the paines losses and reproaches of this world First by a lively faith in Iesus Christ who suffered all these things to worke our salvation and to enable us to suffer them Secondly by a stedfast faith in Gods promises and providence that we shall want no good thing and that all things seeming hurtfull shall bee turned to the furtherance of our salvation So much of the World the second enemy What call you the Flesh The corruption of our nature wherein we were borne and conceived Doth that remaine after Regeneration Yea it dwelleth in us and cleaveth fast unto us so long as we carry the outward flesh about us How doth the flesh fight against the Spirit As a treacherous parte within us being by Satan stirred up and invegled with the baits of the world or discouraged with the evill entreaty thereof it fighteth on his side against our soule 1 Pet. 2. 11. That is our spirituall life and welfare by continuall lusting against the Spirit Gal. 5. 24. How is that First by hindring or corrupting us in the good motions words and deeds of the Spirit Secondly by continuall moving us to evill motions words and deeds What call you the Spirit The holy Spirit which God in Christ hath given us whereby we are begotten againe Doe we not receive the Spirit in full measure and perfection at the first No but first wee receive the first fruits and afterward daily increase of the same unto the end if the fault be not in our selves How doth the Spirit fight in us By lusting against the flesh How doth it lust against the flesh First partly by rebuking and partly by restraining in us the evill motions and deeds of the flesh Secondly by continuall enlightning and affecting us with thoughts words and deeds agreeable to Gods will How may we withstand the temptations of our flesh By setting before our eyes the patterne of the death of Christ and arming our selves with the same minde that it behoveth us also to suffer in the flesh ceasing from sinne 1 Pet. 4. 1. hereto craving and imploying the power of the same death of Christ to subdue and crucifie our carnall lusts and affections Rom. 6. 2. c. Whereto also belongeth the helpe and assistance of the Spirit for the repressing of our inordinate desires of nature 1 Cor. 9. 25. So much of the spirituall fight what followeth after a man hath gotten the victory in any tempatation or affliction Experience of Gods love in Christ and so increase of peace of conscience and joy in the holy Ghost Rom. 5. 3. 2 Cor. 1. 5. What followes if in any temptation he be overcome and through infirmity fall After a while there will arise godly sorrow which is when a man is grieved for no other cause in the world but for this onely that by his sin he hath displeased God who hath been unto him a most mercifull and loving father 2 Cor. 7. 8 9. Matth. 26. 75. What signe is there of this sorrow The true signe of it is this when a man can be grieved for the very disobedience of God in his evill word or deed though he should never be punished and though there were neither heaven nor hell 1 Pet. 2. 18 19. What followes after this sorrow Repentance renewed afresh 1 Cor. 7. 11. By what signes will this repentance appeare By seven 2. Cor. 7. 11. 1. A care to leave the sin whereinto he is falne 2. An utter condemning of himselfe for it with a craving of pardon 3. A great anger against himselfe for his carelesnesse 4. A feare lest he should fall into the same sin againe 5. A desire ever after to please God 6. A zeale of the same 7. Revenge upon himselfe for his former offences Thus farre of repentance and the spirituall warfare accompanying the same What are those good workes wherein our new obedience is exercised That which proceeding from a person acceptable is something of God commanded performed in right manner and directed unto a good end namely whatsoever thing is done of us not by the force or conduct of nature 2 Cor. 3. 5. but by the power of the Spirit of Christ dwelling in us Rom. 8. 10. and according to the rule of the knowne will of God Rom. 12. 2. unto the glory of God 1 Cor. 10. 31. the assurance of our election 2 Pet. 1. 10 c. and the edification of others 1 Cor. 10. 23. How many things then are needfull for the making of our actions good and what properties are to be required in good works Five 1. They that doe them must first be such as are ingraffed into Christ and continue in him that so their persons may be acceptable unto God 2. They must be agreeable to the Law of God and he that doth them must know that
9. Whether is grace properly attributed to God in the second sense or no Yea most properly for God doth justifie us that is he doth account us for just through his Sonne Jesus Christ and that of his free grace and favour without any desert of our parts or any thing in us Rom. 3. 20. 24. 4. 16. What be the causes of this grace or favour of God The efficient cause is his goodnesse and free will the finall cause cause thereof is the salvation of his chosen children and the glory of himselfe and of his Son Christ Jesus What be the effects of Gods grace to us wards In generall the grace of God whereof there is no cause in us but onely his own goodnesse and will is the first cause the middle cause and the the last cause and the onely cause of all that belongs to our salvation Rom. 9. 11. And particularly it is the cause of our Election of our Redemption of the sending of Christ into the world of our Calling of the preaching of the Gospell Eph. 1. 4. John 3. 11. 34. Rom. 5. 8. It was the cause why the Apostles were called to the preaching of the Gospell Gal. 1. 15 16. Eph. 3. 8. 9. It is the cause of our Faith of the forgivenesse of our sinnes of our whole justification of our regeneration of our renovation of our love to God and our neighbour of the Holy Ghost in us of our good works of our obedience of our perseverance of the feare of God of eternall life and of life it selfe 2 Tim. 1. 9. Phil. 2. 13. Rom. 12. 6. 1 Cor. 12. 9. Rom. 3. 24. Tit. 3. 5. 1 John 4. 9. Ezek. 36. 27. Jerem. 32. 40. and in a word the begining the continuance and the accomplishment of our whole salvation doth depend wholly upon the grace and favour of God and what good thing soever we have or have had or may have belonging either to this life or to the life to come is to be attributed wholly to the grace and favour of God What is the love of God It is an essentiall property in God whereby he loves himselfe above all and others for himselfe 1 John 4. 16. Rom. 5. 8. John 3. 16. Tit. 3. 4. Mal. 1. 2 3. What learn you from hence That wee should love him dearely and other things for him That we may the better know what the love of God is declare first what love is in our selves It is a passion of the mind whereby we are so affected towards the party whom we love that we are rather his then our own forgetting our selves to doe him good whom we so love And is love such a thing in God No the true love of God is not such as our love is What difference is there There is great difference two wayes First in time for love was in God before it was in us or in any thing created for he loved himselfe and us also before the world was John 17. 23. Secondly they differ in nature and quality for that love which is in God is most perfect and pure Rom. 9. 13. without passion but in us it is imperfect and matched with passions with impure affections and grief of the mind After what manner doth the Scripture expresse the love of God In the Scriptures God doth compare himselfe to a father and to a mother loving their children to a hen gathering her chickens together under her wings to a good shepherd seeking up his sheep and to divers other things And wherefore serve these comparisons They are for our profit two wayes First to shew us that Gods love towards us is most vehement and sincere Secondly to make us bold in coming to him and calling upon him so for this love Christ Jesus calleth us by all the names of love as his servants his kinsmen his friends his spouse his brethren and by many names moe to shew that he loveth us with all loves the fathers love the mothers love the masters love the husbands love the brothers love c. and if all loves were put together yet his love exceedeth them all for all could not doe so much for us as he alone hath done If love doth not signifie any affection or passion in God as it doth in us what then doth it signifie In God it signifieth three things most perfect first the eternall good will of God towards some body for the love of God supposed towards the Elect is his everlasting good will or his purpose and determination to shew them mercy to doe them good and to save them as in Rom. 9. 11. 13. Secondly the effects themselves of his love or good will whether they be temporall concerning this life or eternall concerning the life to come as in the 1 John 3. 1. Thirdly the pleasure and delight which he taketh in that which he loveth and so it is taken in Psal. 45. 7. 23. What things doth God love besides himselfe Besides himselfe God loveth all things else whatsoever he made but he loveth not sinne and iniquity for he never made it as Saint John saith 1 John 2. 16. Again he loveth his Son being manifested in the flesh and he loveth his chosen children for his Sons sake with whom he is well pleased Mat. 3. last verse Obj. 1. The Scripture saith that God doth hate all that work iniquity how then can God both hate and love one and the same man In every wicked man we must consider two things First His nature Secondly his sinne His nature is the work of God and that he loveth but his iniquity is not of God and that he hateth Obj. 2. God doth afflict his children therefore he doth not love them Whom he loveth he correcteth and therefore he correcteth them because he loveth them even as a gold-smith tryeth his gold in the fire because he loveth it Whether doth God love all alike or no No he preferreth mankind before all his other creatures for which cause God is called Philanthropos that is a lover of men and this appeareth by three effects of his love First he made him according to his own Image that is in righteousnesse and true holinesse Gen. 1. 26. Eph. 4. 24. Secondly he made him Lord over all his creatures Psal. 8. 5 6. Thirdly he gave his own Son to death for his ransom Doth God love all men alike No for he loveth his Elect better then the Reprobate for the Elect he calleth effectually by his Spirit in their hearts when he calleth others but by the outward voyce of the Gospell c. Again amongst the Elect themselves some are actually wicked and not yet reconciled nor called as was Paul before his conversion but the rest are called and already made holy by Faith in Christ as Paul was after his conversion and of these he loveth the latter sort with a greater measure of love then the former as the Scripture testifieth in Prov. 8. 17. What manner of love doth God beare
In generall a person is one particular thing indivisible incommunicable living reasonable subsisting in it selfe not having part of another Shew me the reason of the particular branches of this definition I say that a person is first one particular thing because no generall notion is a person Indivisible because a person may not be divided into many parts Incommunicable because though one may communicate his nature with one he cannot communicate his person-ship with another Living and reasonable because no dead or unreasonable thing can be a person Subsisting in it self to exclude the humanity of Christ from being a person Not having part of another to exclude the soule of man separated from the body from being a person What is a person in the Trinity It is whole God not simply or absolutely considered but by way of some personall proprieties it is a manner of being in the God-head or a distinct substance not a quality as some have wickedly imagined for no quality can cleave to the God-head having the whole God-head in it Joh. 11. 22. 14. 9. 16. 15. 1. 17. 21. Col. 2. 3. 9. In what respect are they called Persons Because they have proper things to distinguish them How is this distinction made It is not in nature but in relation and order Declare then the order of the persons of the blessed Trinity The first in order is the Father then those that come from the Father the Sonne who is the second and the holy Ghost who is the third person in Trinity How are these three distinguished by order and relation The Father is of himself alone and of no other the Son is of the Father alone begotten the holy Ghost is of the Father and the Son proceeding and the Father is called a Father in respect of the Son the Son in respect of the Father the holy Ghost in respect that he proceedeth from the Father and the Son but the one is not the other as the fountain is not the stream nor the stream the fountain but are so called one in respect of another and yet all but one water What then is the Father The first person of the Trinity who hath his beeing and foundation of personall subsistence from none other and hath by communication of his essence eternally begotten his only Son of himself Joh. 5. 27. 14. 11. 20. 17. Psal. 2. 7. Heb. 1. 3. How is it proved that the Father is God By expresse testimonies of the Scriptures and by reason drawn from the same What are those expresse testimonies John 17. 3. This is life everlasting to know thee to be the only God Rom. 1. 7. Grace and peace from God the Father Eph. 1. 3. Blessed be God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ c. What are the reasons drawn from the word of God That we are bidden to pray to him Mat. 6. 6. 9. that he revealeth the mysteries Mat. 11. 25. 27. suffereth his Son to shine c. Mat. 5. 45. How is it shewed that he begat his Son of himself In that he is called the brightnesse of his glory and the engraven form of his person Heb. 1. 3. and in that his generation being from eternity there was no creature who might beget him In what respects is he called the Father 1t. In respect of his naturall Son Jesus Christ begotten of his own nature and substance Mat. 11. 27. 1 Joh. 1. 14. 1 Joh. 4. 14. whence he is called the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ Eph. 1. 3. 2ly In respect of his adopted sonnes whom he hath chosen to be heirs of heaven through the mediation of his naturall Son Jesus Christ Ephes. 3. 14. John 1. 12. Rom. 8. 14 15. Mat. 6. 9. for as he is by nature the Father of Christ so is he by grace to us that beleeve our Father also What learn you from hence To honour and obey him as a Father and to be followers of God as dear children Mal. 1. 6. 1 Pet. 1. 14. Eph. 5. 1. What other names are given in the Scripture to the first Person The Father spake most commonly in the old Testament for in these last times he hath spoken by his Son and he is called by these names Jehovah that is I am that I am without beginning or ending Esa. 42. 8. Elohim that is mighty and strong Adonah that is Judge or in whose Judgement we rest Lord of Hosts because he hath Angels and men and all creatures at command to fight for him 1 Kings 19. 14. The God of Jacob or of Israel because he made a promise to Abraham that he would be his God and the God of his seed and the Israelites were the seed of Abraham Act. 3. 13. Hitherto of the Father doe the other Persons that are of the Father receive their essence or Godhead from him They doe for howsoever in this they agree with the Father that the essence which is in them is of it selfe uncreated and unbegotten yet herein lieth the distinction that the Father hath his essence in himself or originally and from none other the Son and the holy Ghost have the self-same uncreated and unbegotten essence in themselves as well as the Father otherwise they should have had no true Godhead but not from themselves Essentia Filii est à seipso hac ratione dici potest Autotheos persona tamen Filii non est à seipso ideoque non potest hac ratione dici Autotheos persona enim ejus genita est à Patre accipiendo ab eo essentiam ingenitam that is the essence of the Son is of himself and for this cause he may be said to be God of himself notwithstanding the person of the Son is not of himself and therefore for this cause he cannot be said to be God of himself for his person is begotten of the Father by receiving from him an unbegotten essence If these Persons that come from the Father have a beginning how can they be eternall They have no beginning of time or continuance but of order of subsistence and off-spring and that from all eternity Are you able to set down the manner of this eternall off-spring We find it not revealed touching the manner and therefore our ignorance herein is better then all their curiosity that have enterprized arrogantly the search hereof for if our own generation and frame in our mothers womb be above our capacity Ps. 139. 14 15. it is no marvell if the mystery of the eternall generation of the Son of God cannot be comprehended And if the winde which is but a creature be so hard to know that a man knoweth not from whence it commeth and whither it goeth John 3. 8. it is no marvell if the proceeding of the holy Ghost be unsearchable Thus much in generall touching the Persons which come from the Father Now in speciall what is the Son The second Person of the Trinity having the foundation of
neither God nor man for things mingled together cannot retain the name of one of the simples as hony and oyle being mingled together cannot be called hony or oyle 2. The properties of the Godhead cannot agree to the properties of the Manhood nor the properties of the Manhood to the Godhead For as the Godhead cannot thirst no more can the Manhood be in all or many place at once therefore the Godhead was neither turned nor transfused into the Manhood but both the divine nature keepeth entire all his essentiall properties to it selfe so that the humanity is neither omnipotent omniscient omnipresent c. and the humane keepeth also his properties and actions though oft that which is proper to the one nature is spoken of the person denominated from the other which is by reason of the union of both natures into one person The glory of the Godhead being more plentifully communicated with the Manhood after his resurrection did it not then swallow up the truth thereof as a whole sea one drop of oyle No for these two natures continued still distinct in substance properties and actions and still remained one and the same Christ. Why did he not take the nature of Angels upon him Heb. 2. 16. Because he had no meaning to save Angels for that they had committed the sin against the holy Ghost falling maliciously into rebellion against God without temptation Are not the elect Angels any way benefited by the humane nature of Christ No his humanity only reacheth to sinfull mankind for if he had meant to have benefited Angels by taking another nature he would have taken their nature upon him How is it then said Eph. 1. 10. Col. 1. 20. that he reconciled things in heaven That is to be understood of the Saints then in heaven and not any way of the Angels although by the second Person of the Trinity the Angels were elected and are by him confirmed so that they shall stand for evermore Why was it requisite that our Mediatour should be Man was it not sufficient that he was God No it was further requisite that he should be man also because 1. Our Saviour must suffer and die for our sins which the Godhead could not doe 2. Our Saviour also must perform obedience to the law which in his Godhead he could not doe 3. He must be man of kin to our nature offending that he might satisfie the justice of God in the same nature wherein it was offended Rom. 8. 3. 1 Cor. 15. 21. Heb. 2. 14 15 16. For the righteousnesse of God did require that the same nature which had committed the sin should also pay and make amends for sin and consequently that onely nature should be punished which did offend in Adam Man therefore having sinned it was requisite for the appeasing of Gods wrath that man himself should die for sin the Man Christ Jesus offering up himself a sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God for us 1 Tim. 2. 5. Heb. 2. 9 10. 14. 15. Rom. 5. 12. 15. Eph. 5. 2. 4. It is for our comfort that thereby we might have free accesse to the throne of Grace and might find help in our necessities having such an high Priest as was in all things tempted like unto our selves and was acquainted with our infirmities in his own person Heb. 4. 15 16 5. 2. 5. As we must be saved so likewise must we be sanctified by one of our own nature that as in the first Adam there was a spring of humane nature corrupted derived unto us by naturall generation so in the second Adam there might be a fountain of the same nature restored which might be derived unto us by spirituall regeneration What comfort then have you by this that Christ is man Hereby I am assured that Christ is fit to suffer the punishment of my sin and being man himselfe is also meet to be more pitifull and mercifull unto men What by this that he is both God and man By this I am most certainly assured that he is able most fully to finish the work of my salvation seeing that as he is man he is meet to suffer for sin as he is God he is able to bear the punishment of sin and to overcome the suffering being by the one fit and by the other able to discharge the office of a Mediatour Mans nature can suffer death but not overcome it the divine nature cannot suffer but can overcome all things our Mediatour therefore being partaker of both natures is by the one made fit to suffer by the other able to overcome whatsoever was to be laid upon him for the making of our peace Are these his natures separated No verily for though they be still distinguished as hath been said in substance properties and actions yet were they inseparably joyned together in the first moment the holy Virgin conceived and made not two but one person of a Mediatour 2 Cor. 13. 4. 1 Pet. 3. 18. 1 Cor. 15. 27 28. The holy Ghost sanctifying the seed of the woman which otherwise could not be joyned to the Godhead and uniting two natures in one person God and man in one Christ Luc. 1. 35. 42. Rom. 9. 5. 1 Tim. 2. 5. Joh. 1. 14. a mystery that no Angel much lesse man is able to comprehend Why so For that the manhood of our Saviour Christ is personally united unto the Godhead whereas the Angels of much greater glory then men are not able to abide the presence of God Esa. 6. 2. Was this union of the body and soul with the Godhead by taking of the manhood to the Godhead or by infusing the Godhead into the manhood By a divine and miraculous assuming of the humane nature which before had no subsistence in it self to have his beeing and subsistence in the divine leaving of it one naturall personship which otherwise in ordinary men maketh a perfect person for otherwise there should be two Persons and two Sons one of the holy Virgin Mary and another of God which were most prejudiciall to our salvation What then is the personall union of the two natures in Christ The assuming of the humane nature having no subsistency in it selfe into the person of the Son of God Joh. 1. 14. Heb. 2. 16. and in that person uniting it to the Godhead so making one Christ God and man Mat. 1. 23. Can you shadow out this conjunction of two natures in one person by some earthly resemblance We see one tree may be set into another and it groweth in the stock thereof and becommeth one and the same tree though there be two natures or kind of fruit still remaining So in the Son of God made man though there be two natures yet both being united into one person there is but one Son of God and one Christ. What was the cause that the person of the Sonne of God did not joyn it self to a perfect person of man 1. Because that then there
it is a judiciall sentence opposed to condemnation Rom. 8. 34 35. Who shall lay any thing saith Paul to the charge of Gods elect It is God that justifieth who shall condemn Now as to condemn is not the putting any evill into the nature of the party condemned but the pronouncing of his person guilty and the binding him over unto punishment so justifying is the Judges pronouncing the Law to be satisfied and the man discharged and quitted from guilt and judgement Thus God imputing the righteousnesse of Christ to a sinner doth not account his sins unto him but interests him in a state of as full and perfect freedom and acceptance as if he had never sinned or had himselfe fully satisfied For though there is a power purging the corruption of sin which followeth upon justification yet it is carefully to be distinguished from it as we shall further shew hereafter This for the name of Justification but now for the thing it selfe what is the matter first of our justification The matter of justification or that righteousnesse whereby a sinner stands justified in Gods sight is not any righteousnesse inherent in his own person and performed by him but a perfect righteousnesse inherent in Christ and performed for him What righteousnesse of Christ is it whereby a sinner is justified Not the essentiall righteousnesse of his divine nature but First the absolute integrity of our humane nature which in him our head was without guile Heb. 7. 6. Secondly the perfect obedience which in that humane nature of ours he performed unto the whole law of God both by doing whatsoever was required of us Mat. 3. 15. and by suffering whatsoever was deserved by our sins 1 Pet. 2. 24. for he was made sin and a curse for us that we might be made the righteousnesse of God in him What is the forme or being cause of our justification and that which makes this righteousnesse so really ours that it doth justifie us The gracious imputation of God the Father accounting his Sons righteousnesse unto the sinner and by that accounting making it his to all effects as if he himselfe had performed it But how can Christs righteousnesse be accompted ours is it not as absurd to say that we are justified by Christs righteousnesse as that a man should be wise with the wisdom of another or live and be in health by the life and health of another No doubtlesse because this righteousnesse is in Christ not as in a person severed from us but as in the head of the Church the second Adam from whom therefore it is communicated unto all who being united as members unto him doe lay claim thereunto and apply it unto themselves Rom. 5. 19. Rom. 10. 4. For if the sin of Adam were of force to condemn us all because we were in his loynes he being the head of our common nature why then should it seem strange that the righteousnesse of our Saviour Christ both God and man should be availeable to justifie those that are interessed in him especially considering that we have a more strict conjunction in the Spirit with him then ever we had in nature with Adam And though it be not fit to measure heavenly things by the yard of reason yet it is not unreasonable that a man owing a thousand pound and not being able to pay it his creditor may be satisfied by one of his friends If Christ have paid our debt how are we then freely justified by grace It is of grace that Christ is given unto us and also that his righteousnesse apprehended by faith is accounted ours It is true that the justification of a sinner considering the case as it is between the Father and Christ no man dare call it free no the price of our Redemption was the deepest purchase that the world ever heard of but what ever it cost Christ it cost us nothing and so to us it is freely of grace from Christ yea and to us it is freely grace from God the Father too not because he acquits us without a full satisfaction to his Justice or accepts that for perfect righteousnesse which is not perfect righteousnes but because he receives full satisfaction from the hands of a surety and that surety being his own Son when as he might have challenged the uttermost farthing at our hands which were the principals and then there had been no possibility for us to have been delivered What gather you from this doctrine of Justification by Christs righteousnesse 1. To condemn the proud opinion of Papists who seek Justification by their owne workes and righteousnesse inherent in themselves whereas though being accepted we must in thankfulnesse doe all we can for God yet when all is done we must acknowledge our selves unprofitable servants the onely matter of our joy and triumph both in life and death must be the imputation of Christs righteousnes not our persons nor the best actions of the holiest men dare appeare in Gods presence but in his name and merit who consecrates all the Lords Jesus 2. We may here take notice that there is no comfort to a Christian soule like that which floweth from this Well of salvation this sweet doctrine of Justification 1. Here we have assurance of the sufficiencie of our Redemption that soule must be throughly acquited that is stated in such a righteousnesse that debt must be fully discharged that hath such a price laid down for it our sinnes though never so great cannot weigh down his righteousnesse and merit Rom. 8. 33. and God having accepted his Sons righteousnes for us will not hold us any longer trespassers but he disables his own Justice from making any further demand 2. Hence there is nothing comes upon the Saints from Gods revenging Justice but all our corrections are medicinall from Gods Fatherly love to purge out that sin out of our nature which he hath already pardoned to our persons 3. Lastly this doctrine may be great comfort to weak Christians in the midst of their troublesome imperfections and sense of their weak measures of Sanctification To consider that the righteousnesse that is inherent in themselves is not the matter of their Justification or that which must appear before Gods presence to be pleaded the righteousnesse of Christ is compleat and perfect that is our main joy and crown of rejoycing to be found in Christ not having our own righteousnesse but that which is in him and made ours by Gods gracious account But how is this great benefit of Justification applyed unto us and apprehended by us This is done on our part by faith alone and that not considered as a vertue inherent in us working by love but only as an instrument or hand of the soule stretched forth to lay hold on the Lord our righteousnesse Rom. 5. 1. 10 10. Jer. 23. 6. So that faith justifieth onely Relatively in respect of the object which it fasteneth on to wit the righteousnesse of Christ by which