Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n ghost_n holy_a sin_n 3,325 5 4.9847 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A17319 Certaine questions and answeres, concerning the knovvledge of God vvhereunto are adioyned some questions and answeres, concerning the right vse of the law of God : taught publikely by vvay of catechising / by William Burton ... Burton, William, d. 1616. 1591 (1591) STC 4167; ESTC S260 79,192 160

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

all had a like we would contemne this goodnes thinking that he were bound to be good to vs of necessitie 4. From the consideration of Gods speciall goodnes towards vs his electe by Christ to saluation wee must arise to the studie of good works whereby Gods goodnes may be glorified as Paul teacheth Of the grace of God Q. When you speake of the grace of God what meane you by grace A. This word Grace is vsed in the Scriptures and hath 3. speciall significations Sometimes it is put for comelines stature meekenes or mildenes Sometimes for free fauour whereby one embraceth another pardoning former iniuries and receiuing the partie offending into fauour again Thirdlye it is taken for all kinds of giftes and graces which of this free fauour are bestowed whether temporall or eternall Q. Whether is there grace in God according to the first signification of grace or no A. Yea for God is of his own nature most gracious and grace it selfe which grace was in Christ Iesus from his infancie as he was man and did euery day more and more encrease and amongst all thinges which were created there was nothing endued with such grace as was the humane nature of Christ and that was by the fulnes of the godhead which dwelt boldly in him Q. Whether is grace properly attributed to God in the 2. sence or no A. Yea most properly for God doth iustifie vs that is he doth account vs for iust through his sonne Iesus Christ and that of his free grace and fauour without any deserte of our partes or any thing in vs which appeareth to be true by these Scriptures Ro. 3.20.24 Ro. 4.16 Q. What be the causes of this grace or fauour of God A. Th'efficient cause is his goodnes and free will the finall cause therof is the saluation of his chosen children and the glory of himselfe and of his Sonne Christ Iesus The effects of Gods grace Q. What be the effects of Gods grace to vs ward A. In generall the grace of God wherof there is no cause in vs but onelye his owne goodnes and will is the first cause the middle cause and the last cause and the onelye cause of all the belongeth to our saluation And particularly it is the cause of our election predestination of our redemptiō of the sending of Christ into the world of our calling of the preaching of the Gospel it was the cause why the Apostles were called to the preaching of the Gospell it is the cause of our faith of the forgiuenes of our sinnes of our whole iustification of our regeneration of our renouation of our loue to God and our neighbour of the holy ghost in vs of our good works of our obedience of our perseuerance of the feare of God and of eternall life and of life it selfe and in a word the beginning the continuance and th'accomplishment of our whole saluation doth depend wholy vpon the grace and fauour of God and what good thing soeuer we haue or haue had or may haue belonging either to this life or to the life to come is to be attributed wholy to the grace and fauour of God Of the loue of God Q. What is meant by the loue of God in the Scriptures A. That we may the better know what the loue of God is it will not be amisse first to consider what loue is in our selues Q. Very well declare then what loue is A. It is a passion of the minde wherby we are so affected toward the partie whome wee loue that we are rather his then our owne forgetting our selues to do him good whom we loue Q. And is loue such a thing in God A. No the loue of God is not such as our loue is Q. What difference is there A. There is great difference two waies First in time for loue was in God before it was in vs or in any thing created for he loued himselfe and vs also before the world was Secondly they differ in nature and qualitie for that loue which is in God is most perfect and pure without any passion but in vs it is imperfect and matched with passions with impure affections and greefes of the minde Q. After what manner doth the Scripture expresse the loue of God A. In the Scriptures God doth compare himself to a Father and a mother louing their Children to a Hen gathering her Chickens together vnder her winges to a good Shepheard seeking vp his Sheepe and to diuers other things Q And wherfore serue these comparisons A. They are for our profit two waies 1 To shew vs that Gods loue towardes vs is most vehement and sincere 2 To make vs bolde in comming to him and calling vpon him So for this loue Christ Iesus calleth vs by al the names of loue as his Seruants his kinsemen his frēds his spouse his bretheren by many names moe to shew that he loueth vs with all loues the fathers loue the mothers loue the maisters loue the husbandes loue the brothers loue c. if al loues were put together yet his loue exceedeth them al for al could not do so much for vs as he alone hath done What the loue of God is Question If loue doth not signifie any affection or passion in God as it doth in vs what then doth is signifie Answere In God it signifieth three things most perfect 1 The eternall and good will of God towards some bodie for the loue of God suppose towards the elect is his euerlasting good will or his purpose and determination to shewe them mercie to do them good and to saue them as in Rom. 9.11.13 2 The effects themselues of this loue or good will whether they be temporall concerning this life or eternall concerning the last life to come as in 1. Iohn 3.1 3 The pleasure or delight which he taketh in that which he loueth and so it is taken in Psa. 45.7.23 Q. What things doth God loue besides himselfe A. Besides himselfe God loueth all thinges else whatsoeuer he made but he loueth not sinne and iniquitie for he neuer made it as S. Iohn saith Againe he loueth his sonne being manifested in the flesh and he loueth his chosen Children for his sonnes sake with whom he is well pleased Obiection The Scripture saith that God doth hate al that worke iniquitie how then can God both hate and loue one and the same man Answere In euerye wicked man we must consider two thing First his nature second his sin his nature is the worke of God and that he loueth but his iniquitie is not of God and that he hateth Obiection God doeth afflict his children therefore he doth not loue them Answere Whom he loueth he correcteth and therfore he correcteth them because he loueth them euen as a Goldsmith trieth his gold in the fire because he loueth it Whether God loueth all alike Q. Whether doeth God loue all alike or
CERTAINE QVESTIONS AND Answeres concerning the knowledge of God Whereunto are adioyned some Questions and Answeres concerning the right vse of the law of God Taught publikely by way of Catechising By William Burton Minister and Preacher of the worde of God in the Cittie of Bristoll Ioh. 17.13 And this is eternall life that they know thee to be the only very God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ. AT LONDON Printed by Iohn Windet for Tobie Cooke 1591. Faults escaped FOlio 9. a. line 27. read the euerlasting sonne c. Fol. 11. b. l. 33. for speaying reade speaking f. 12. a. l. 12 for name read naming f. 16. a. l. 2. left out and of the sonne speaking in the new testament f. 19. a. l. 16. for criptures read scriptures f. 21. b. l. 23. that read that is f. 24. a. l. 13. for his good pleasure read the good pleasure l. 18. b. for or sufferings read sufferings f. 32. a. l. 26. for all thing read all things f. 33. b. l. 22. for Alethios read Alethinos f. 36. b. l. 6. read by deliuering him to c. f. 38. b. l. 12. for therin read them f. 43. a. l. 17. the cōma which is after will set is after properlie f. 49. a. l. vlt. for boldly read bodilie f. 51. a. l. 32. for thing read things in the same line for second read secondly f. 55. b. l. 27. put out for f. 57. a. l. 26. for dy read by f. 58. a. l. vlt. read of how many sorts c. f. 62. b. l. 9. for as father read as a father f. ●9 b. l. 19. for was read we TO THE RIGHT reuerend Father in God Richard by Gods permission Bishoppe of Bristoll W. B. wisheth the continuance of the grace of God with the increase of all heauenlie felicitie NOt in vaine doth our Sauiour Christ cal his father an husbandman For when he perceiueth that his trees doe not beare fruite kindlie in one place he translateth thē to see if they may be more fruitfull in another as a husbandman doth Some he purgeth saith Christ although they beare fruite that they may bring foorth more fruite as a husbandman doeth And some he supplanteth also as doeth the husbandman some for euer some for a while for what causes it is best knowen to his vnspeakeable Maiestie sometime for their owne vnfruitfulnes sometime for the barrennesse and for the vnworthinesse of the ground where they grewe and sometime for neither but for some other secrete cause best knowen to himselfe in his infinite wisdome As the man in the Gospell was made blinde neither for his owne sinnes nor for the sinnes of his Parents but that the workes of God might be shewed vpon him The trueth whereof doeth sufficiently appeare by the late and yet daylie experience both of my selfe and some others of my brethren But to speake onely of my selfe of all the most vnprofitable when as the lord might vtterly and yet iustlie haue supplanted me he hath in mercie onely remooued me that I might hereafter labour which haue as yet but loytered in his haruest The Lorde in mercie laye not my negligence to my charge Now when as by your Lordships meanes and appointment I was placed where I am for the building vp of the Church of God in this Citie I thought it most conuenient first to lay this foundation of the knowledge of God that so the rest of the building might goe the better forward The which as my first fruites I haue presumed to present vnto your Lordship for two especiall causes First that hereby I might witnes my thankfull mind to your L. for the exercise of my ministery the ministery of my brethrē in our places which we enioy vnder your L. gouernment And besides that which I may in no wise forget that fauour which you shewed me which as it was altogether vndeserued and vnlooked for so it was not as some haue vntruely reported conditionall but only with desire that I might employe my endeuour to the Lords greatest aduātage in feeding his people cōmitted to your care ouer sight with doctrine most necessary for that people Secondly that your Lo. might rest satisfied concerning some complaintes which haue beene offered by certain vnderminers touching the confirmation of some pointes herein conteined And thus leauing my present endeuours to your Lordships due consideration I humblie take my leaue The Lord almightie graunt encrease and continuance of your godlie care ouer that people which Iesus Christ the great Shepheard of the flock hath bought with his blood and committed to your charge so that in the great day of account you may be free from all their bloods receiue that crown of righteousnesse and immortall ioy which shall then be giuen to all that haue fought a good fight and haue kept the faith in a good conscience vnto the end Amen Your Lordships alwaies to commaund in the Lord William Burton To his beloued and Christian Auditors and all other in the citie of Bristoll which desire the true knowledge of God W. Burton wisheth the encrease of all true godlinesse in this life and eternall felicitie in the life to come IF you doe well consider beloued Christians that the ignorance of God the mother of Popish deuotion is the fountaine of all impietie and the authour of eternall confusion Then I hope you will easily confesse that the publishing of these fewe questions and answeres concerning the knowledge of God is no needles thing By the ignorance of God I meane either not to know that there is a God at all or els not to know what is the nature of this God whom we ought to serue Most men will confesse that there is a God but what maner of God he is they cannot tell And therefore while they frame vnto themselues a God after their owne blinde affections they make an idoll of the true God according to that conceipt which they haue of him they lead al their whole life That the ignorance of God and his nature is the principall cause of all vngodlinesse in this life and of euerlasting condemnation after this life it doth manifestly appeare not onely by the testimony of the holie scriptures but also by the light of nature it selfe The scriptures are plaine in this case First the Prophet Dauid painting out a notorious wicked man saith this of him The wicked is so proude that hee seeketh not for God he thinketh alwaies there is no God now marke his life in the seuenth verse His mouth is full of cursing deceipt and fraud vnder his tongue is mischiefe and iniquitie 8. He lieth in the villages in the secret places doth he murther the innocent his eies are bent against the poore c. Read the 11.12.13 and 14. verses to shew the fruites of such as think there is no God Again in the 50. Psalm from the 16. verse to the ende of the 20. noting the hipocrisie the obstinacie
and that was that Israell should not be sent away by Pharao And so that was fulfilled As for the commaundement giuen to Pharao it was a doctrine to teach Pharao what he must haue done if he would auoide so many plagues and yet shewed him his dutie and what was iust and right to be done but it was no testimonie of the absolute will of God Q. Whether doth God will euill or sinne or no A. Before we can answere to this question we must consider of three things 1 How many waies sinne may be considered 2 How many things are to be considered in sinne 3 How many waies one may be saide to will a thing How many waies sinne is considered Q. Goe too then shewe first how many waies sinne is to be considered A. Sinne is to be considered in three waies 1 As it is of it selfe sinne and striuing against the law of God 2 As it is a punishment of sinne that went before for God doth oftentimes punishe one sinne with another 3 As it is the cause of more sinne following for one sinne doth beget another as one Deuill called 7. Deuils Q. Now declare how many things you do consider in sinne A. In euery sinne there be 3. things 1 The action and that is either inward or outward The action which we call inward is threefolde either of the minde as euill thoughts or of the hart as euill affections and desires or of the will as an euill choise or consent to sinne The actions which we call outward are the actions or workes of the sences fighting against the law of God The 2. thing in euerye sinne is the deformitie or corruption of the action that is when the action doth decline from the rule of Gods law and this properly is sinne or the forme of sinne The third thing in euery sinne is the offence or guiltines therof wherby the partie offending is bound to vndergoe punishment This guiltines and obligation wherby we are bound to vndergoe the penaltie of sinne hath his foundation in sinne it selfe but it ariseth from the iustice of God who in his iustice rewardeth sinne with death as iustice indeed giueth to euery one his due Q. Now come to your third point and shew how many waies one is said to will a thing A. Wee are saide to will a thing two waies either properly for it selfe or improperly for another end Q. What meane you by a proper willing of a thing A. We do will a thing properlye for it selfe or for it owne sake when the thing which we will or desire is of the owne nature to be wished and desired as for the body health food apparrell and such like or for the Soule faith repentance pacience c. We doo will a thing improperlye when the thing which we will is not of it selfe to be wished but yet we will haue it for some good that may come thereof as for example we will the cutting of some member of the bodye not because of it selfe it is to be wished but for the health of the body which doth followe that cutting Q. What difference is there betweene these two willes A. There is great differēce for those things which we wil properly we loue approue them we incline vnto thē and we delight in them but that which is knowen of it selfe to be euill our will is not carried vnto that with loue and liking but doth decline from it and wheras a man willeth a member of his bodye to be cut or cut off wee maye rather call it a permission then a willing and yet a willing permission Q. You haue shewed how many waies sinne is to be considered how many things are to be considered in euery sinne and how we are saide to will a thing now let me heare what you say to the matter in question that is whether God doth will sinne or no A. Before I answere directly to your question I think it not amisse to shewe what euerye one must carefully take heed of in answering to this question for in answering there is danger Q. Let me heare what dangers must be auoyded in answering A. There are two and euerie one must auoyde them and sayle betweene them as between two dangerous rocks The first is this wee must take heede least we make God the authour of sinne by affirming that he willeth sinne as the Libertines doe and as Adam did for that were the next way not onely to put of our sinnes from our selues and lay them vpon God but also to cast of all conscience of sinne and all feare of God then the which nothing can be more blasphemous against God or pernicious to our selues Question What is the second thing to be auoyded Answere The other is this wee must take heede that wee affirme not any euill to be in the worlde which God knoweth not of or whether God will or no for that were to denie Gods omnipotencie and all knowledge Question These are two dangerous rockes and heresies indeede but nowe Iexpect a direct answere to the question Answere That cannot be at once but by going from point to point according to our former distinctions of sinne and willing Quest. Very well Then declare first of all what thinges God doeth properlie wil which of themselues are to be willed A. God doeth first and chieflie will himselfe that is his own glorie and maiestie as the end for which all things are and this hee is saide to will properly that is he loueth it aduanceth it and delighteth in it to this purpose serue all those Scriptures which commande vs to sanctifie his name and to aduaunce his glorie as in Esai 48. 11. Pro. 16.4 Rom. 11.36 1. Cor. 10.31 Secondly besides him selfe he doeth properlie will all other things which he made and which he doth himselfe in so much as he doth approue them loue them as appeareth by these places following God sawe all that he made and it was good and therfore gaue a commandement that one should preserue another by multiplying and increasing Againe it is said Whatsoeuer the Lord wil that he doeth therfore whatsoeuer he doth that he will And although hee hateth euill yet he doth properly will and loue that good which commeth of euill that is his owne glorie and the saluation of his people Q. Whether doeth God will punishments or no A. Yea his will is the first and efficient cause of all punishment which is proued by this reason argument Euery good thing is of God Euery punishment being a worke of iustice is a good thing therfore euery punishment is of God and hee doeth will it Q. What say you then to the words in Ezechiel I will not the death of a sinner A. That place is to be vnderstood onely of the elect for properly indeed God doth not will their death therfore to keep them from death meaning eternal death he geueth them repentance Q. Whether doeth God
will sinne as it is a punishment of sinne that went before A. Yes he doeth and it is vsuall with God to punish one sinne with another as for example the hardning of Pharaos heart was a sinne in Pharao and God brought it vpon him not as a sinne but as a punishment of his former sinnes God doth not properly will sinne Q. You saide that in euery sinne is an action or deede which is either inward or outward whether doeth God wil that or no A. So farre foorth as it is an action onely God doeth will it but not the corruption and deformitie of the action for in him we liue moue and haue our being Q. But whether doeth God will sinne properly as it is a transgression of the law and a corruption in the action or no A. No he doeth not neither can he for it is against his nature and to this effect serue these places of Scripture following Psal. 5.5 Hab. 1.13 1. Iohn 1.4 And reason doeth confirme it many wayes for looke what God doeth will properlie he loueth and alloweth it but God hateth and damneth sinne as the Scriptures witnes therefore he doeth not will it properlie Againe he hath sent his sonne to take away the sinnes of the world and to destroy the works of the deuill therefore hee doeth not will them Lastly if God should properly will sinne then he must be the author of sinne but he is not the author of sinne for the Scriptures doe neuer attribute sinne vnto God but vnto the deuill and vnto men Q. But although God doeth not properly will sinne yet he doeth willingly permitte it doeth he not A. Yes But for the better vnderstanding how God doeth permitte sinne we must consider how many waies or in how many sences one is said to permitte a thing and that is three waies 1 To permit is sometime of two good things to graunt that which is lesse good as it were against our will as for example a man woulde bring vp his sonne in learning rather then in warfare or any occupation but because his sonne hath more minde to an occupation then to learning and doeth craue of his father to go to some occupation or to be a souldier rather then a Doctor his father doeth graunt him his desire but hee had rather haue him to be a scholer and this is a kinde of permission or suffering But this permission ought rather to be called a will in deede for that which is lesse good yet because it is good he doeth will it truely and approoue it and it is the true obiect of his will and it may be called a permission in respecte of that wil which had rather haue had the greater good Q. And is God said to permit sinne in this sence A. No by no meanes for sinne as it is sinne hath no shewe of good in it which can be compared with a greater good Q. Which is your second way of permitting A. 2 Sometimes to permitte is to graunt one euill to goe vnpunished that many and more grieuous euils may be preuented as many times Princes and magistrates are woont to doe And so some doe thinke that God hath graunted some sinne to bee done without daunger or threatening of punishment least more and more haynous mischiefes should els ensue Q. And are not you of that minde A. No God forbid I shoulde for the Apostles rule is both generall and true We must not doe euill that good may come therof lest we be damned iustly therefore no man may by the lawe of God admitte one sinne vnpunishable to auoyde another Q. What is your third way of permitting A. 3 To permitte doeth sometime signifie not to hinder and stoppe euill when one may and so God is said to permitte sinne because he coulde by his grace hinder preuent sinnes that none should be committed and yet he doeth willingly permitte vs in our nature to sinne That God doeth thus permitte sinne it is euident by these places Psal. 81.11.12 Acts 14.16 That hee doeth permitte them willingly and not constrayned thereunto these places doe shewe Rom. 9.19 Esa. 46.10 Q. For what cause doeth not God hinder sinne but permitte it A. Not without cause but that hee may vse our sinnes which is his infinite goodnes wisdome to his owne glorie for hereby his iustice in punishing of sinne and his mercie in pardoning of sinne is made manifest and knowen to the great glory and praise of his name Whether Gods will be mutable or no. Q. Whether doeth God alter his will as any time or no A. For the better vnderstanding of this question we must consider of two things 1 How many waies our will is changeable 2 The causes that moue vs to change our willes Q. Very well declare the first how many waies our wils be changeable A. The wil of any man is changeable two waies First when we begin to will a thing which wee did not will before Secondly when we leaue to will that which we willed before Q. Now shew what be the causes hereof and first why a man doth will that which he willed not before A. The causes of this be two First our ignorance because wee do know that to be good afterward which we knew not to be good before and then we will that which we could not before for ignoti nulla Cupido that is of that which is vnknowne there is no desire The second cause ariseth from the alteration of nature as if that which was hurtfull to vs at one time becommeth profitable to vs at another time then wee will haue that at one time which wee would not at another As for example In sommer our will is inclined to colde places but in winter our will is altered and doth affect or desire the warme Q. Whether is there anie such cause in God to make him change his will or no A. No neither of these causes can bee in God Not the first for that hee doeth most perfectly know al things from all eternitie Not the second for there is nothing in God for the which anie thing may bee founde to bee profitable or hurtfull hee is alwaies the same hauyng neede of nothing and therefore hee cannot will anie thing that is new to him and consequently his will is vnchangeable Q. But what saye you to the 2. waie of changing our willes that is of leauing to will that which before wee had determined whereof commeth that A For this there may be yelded two reasons First we do change our willes of our owne accord because the latter thing doth seeme to bee better vnto vs then the former Secondly beeing constrained or against our mindes we do oftentimes change our willes because our first counsaile was hindered by some crosse euent that it could not haue his due effect Gods Will is immutable Q. Whether are any of these two causes in God that for those he should change his will A. No
for it is most properlie attributed to God Q. When is our anger good A. When it is such as the scripture attributeth to God and commendeth to men when it saith be angrie but sin not How we sin in our anger Q. How manie waies is sinne committed in our anger A. Three waies first when we are angrie for no cause or for a light cause 2. When wee are angrie with sinnes as they are iniuries offered to our selues but not as they are against God 3. When wee turne our anger against our brethren the persons of men which is due against their sinnes Q. What is the second vse that wee must make of it A. Secondlie Gods anger serueth to raise vs vp from securitie Q. What is your third vse A. Thirdlie we must not be slouthfull when we see the signes of Gods anger and his wrath comming but vse ordinarie meanes to preuent it Of the hatred of God Q. Whether may hatred bee properly attributed to God or no A. Yes it may for the scriptures do saie of God that he hateth iniquitie Psal. 5.5 Obiection If loue bee properlie attributed to God then is hatred improperlie attributed to him for hatred is contrarie to loue and besides that hatred is an euill passion of the minde and therefore it cannot be properly attributed to God A. For the vnderstanding of this question we must note that hatred which is attributed to God may be considered two waies 1. As it is such as is in vs and so it is indeede verie improperly attributed to GOD. For in vs it is a passion and a griefe of the mind but in God is no passion 2. It is to bee considered as the scriptures doe teach it to be in God and in that sense in which they doo attribute it to him and if we take hatred in that sence then it is properly attributed to God Three things vnderstood by Gods hatred Q. Declare then in what sence or signification the Scriptures doo speake of hatred as it is attributed to God A. In the Scriptures the hatred of God hath 3. significations 1 It signifieth his deniall of good will and mercie to eternall saluation I haue hated Esau that is I haue reiected him and haue not vouchsafed him that fauor grace which I haue shewed vpon Iacob And we also are said to hate those thinges which we neglect and vpon which we wil bestow no benefite nor credite but do put them besides other things and therefore it is saide If any man come to me and hate not his father and mother wife and children c. he cannot be my disciple that is he that doeth not put all these thinges behinde mee and neglect them for mee so that the loue that he beareth to them must seeme to be hatred in comparison of that loue which he must shew to me And in this sense it is properly attributed to God Q. What is the second thing that is vnderstood by the hatred of God A. Secondly it signifieth the decree of Gods wil to punish sinne and the iust punishment it selfe which he hath decreed as in Psal. 5.6 and in Iob. 30.21 Thou turnest thy selfe cruelly against mee and art enemy vnto me with the strength of thy hand that is thou doost so sore chastice me as if thou didst hate me And in this sence also it is properly attributed to God for it is proper to God to take punishment of sinners and it is a parte of his iustice Q. What is the third signification of this word A. Thirdlye it is put for Gods displeasure for those things which we hate do displease vs and in this sence also it is properly attributed to God for it is the propertie of a most iust iudge to disalowe and to detest euill aswell as to allow and like that which is good And this may be confirmed by two reasons 1 It is the propertie of him that loueth to hate detest that which is contrarie to himselfe and to that which he loueth for loue cānot be without his contrarie of hatred and therefore as the loue of good things doth properly agree to God so doth also the hatred of euill things as they are euill 2 It is manifest by Dauid that it is no lesse vertue to hate the euill then it is to loue the good And this hatred of sinne as it is a vertue and a perfect hatred cannot be in vs but by the grace of God For euery good gift is from aboue c. And there can be no good thing in vs but it is first in God after a more perfect manner then it is in vs. Whom God doth hate and whom not Q. Now shew vs against whome or what this hatred of God is bent and against whom it is not A. God is said in the Scriptures to haue hated three things 1 The reprobate before they were created 2 The same reprobate when they are become wicked and vngodly 3 Wickednes it selfe Q. How is it means that God should hate the reprobate before they were created A. He is said to hate them euen before the worlde was not simplye but in comparison of the elect for as he is saide to haue loued th'elect because he would their euerlasting happines so he is saide to haue hated the reprobate because he would not vouchsafe them the same happines but did reiect them to eternall woe and that in his iust iudgement although hidden from vs. Q. How is God saide to hate them when they are created and become wicked men A. Two waies First so farre foorth as he detesteth them for their iniquitie and hatred against God for he hateth not their nature which he made himself but the sinne which cleaueth and dwelleth in their nature so God doth hate and abhorre the wicked themselues not as they are men but as they are wicked and rebellious for euery one both in soule and bodie is good as hee is created of God Secondly God is said to hate the wicked men when he doth punish their impietie and hatred against his Maiestie with many plagues both spirituall and corporall both temporal and eternall Therefore the Psalmist after he had saide Thou hatest all them that worke iniquitie presentlie he addeth in the next verse Thou shalt destroy them that speake lyes the Lord will abhorre the bloudy and deceitfull man to shewe that for God to inflict punishment vpon the reprobate and vngodlye is to hate them and to hate them is to destroy them Q. How may it appeare that God hateth iniquitie A. That is most cleer for he doth destroye it in the reprobate by eternall condemnation and he doth take it from the elect by iustification yea he doth so hate sinne that to take it away from his elect and chosen Children he hath laide it vpon his owne Sonne Iesus Christ and hath condemned it in his flesh as Esay saith whereby God hath shewed not only vnspeakeable loue towards his elect