Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	fruit_n	good_a	tree_n	4,830	5	9.4106	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A08326	An antidote or treatise of thirty controuersies vvith a large discourse of the Church. In which the soueraigne truth of Catholike doctrine, is faythfully deliuered: against the pestiferous writinges of all English sectaryes. And in particuler, against D. Whitaker, D. Fulke, D. Reynolds, D. Bilson, D. Robert Abbot, D. Sparkes, and D. Field, the chiefe vpholders, some of Protestancy, some of puritanisme, some of both. Deuided into three partes. By S.N. Doctour of Diuinity. The first part.; Antidote or soveraigne remedie against the pestiferous writings of all English sectaries	S. N. (Sylvester Norris), 1572-1630.	1622 (1622)	STC 18658; ESTC S113275	554,179	704

S. Luke confirmed by S. Paul And yet our Sacramentaries reiecting the agrement approbation of them al endeauour to interpret it by far more hard hidden passages Others do not only misconster but vtterly deny most apparent places vndeniable testimonyes For is there any thing more often inculcated or more largly amplifyed by the Prophets then the glory of the Messias and benefites we were to receaue by the comming of Christ Is there any thing more euidently expressed by the Euāgelists then his genealogy his natiuity his humane pedegree from the line of Dauid Yet Faustus the Manichee had his eyes darkned as S. Augustine testifyeth with presumptuous arrogancy that he sayd Searching the Scrippures Aug. lib. 16. con Paust cap. 2. 14. lib. 12. c. 2. lib. 2. cap. 2. I find there no Prophesyes of Christ The Prophets fortel nothing of him the Ghospell mentioneth not his temporall birth or procreation from man Howbeit sayth S. Augustine he euery where auoucheth himselfe the sonne of man But as Faustus was thus blinded and would not see a mistery so cleare what if Protestants be blinded in an article of Faith no lesse cleare and perspicuous We found not in Scripture the predictions of Christ neither do they discerne the Aug. ep 165. ad Donat Church of Christ as plainely described as Christ himself For in the Scriptures sayth S. Augustine we learne Christ in the Scriptures we learne the Church And then How doe we belieue we haue receaued out of the diuin writings Christ manifest Aug. epist 48 ad vin●ēt Rogat ● vnles we haae also receaued from thence the Church manifest Truly we haue receaued it so manifest as all Nations see it all nations flocke vnto it all reuerence and obey it by the direction of Scripture only they see it not who would be ignorāt of nothing by their search of Scripture They see not I say the Catholike vniuersall Church visibly dispersed thoughout all the world lineally descended from the Apostles infallibly assisted by the spirit of God c. often recommended in holy Write vnto vs. 16. Secondly I might alleadge the copiousnes of Gods sacred word how some one 〈…〉 is often tymes so fruitfully impregned that as it is deliuered by the diuine Math. 7. v. 18. Interpreters of many true litterall senses so it is brought forth by priuate expositors with the vntimely birth of sundry heresyes Let that sole text of S. Matthew serue for an example A good ●ee cannot yeild euill fruits c. For by this a Hier. l. 2. aduers Iouin Iouinian vnderpropped his fornamed fancy That a good and iust man could not produce the fruits of sinne The Pelagians b Aug. l. 2. de nup. concup cap. 26. from thence concluded That the good sacred tree of Marriage that the pure and faithfull married couple cannot ●ngender euill Children infected with the contagiou of originall sin Others c Aug. l. 1. de grat Christ c. 18 of that crew by the force of the same wordes and those that follow Nor an euill tree yeild good fruits peruersly inferred That the good tree of Free-will might of it selfe without Gods grace procreate the fruits of goods works as the euill tree blossometh the fruits of euill Others d Aug. l. 3. cont lit Petil. cap●● 44. either Pelagians or Donatists picked from thence That a good Priest could not minister wrongfully the Sacrament of Baptisme nor an euill Priest rightly Out of the same clause e Hier. ●● cōment ad hunc loc Aug. in disp 2. cont Fortunat the Manichees strained their impious dotage That some men were good by nature could not be euill some euill by nature and could not be good From whence also the Caluinists gathered two pernicious heresyes The * See both these obiections proposed answered in the 21. 27. Controuersy one That man being an euill tree hath no freewill to be conuerted to God ayded by his grace nor to cooperate thereunto before he be iustifyed The other That as the fruits do only declare the goodnes of the tree and do not make it good or bad so the vertuous and pious workes of the iust are meere signes and remonstrances but no true causes of their inherent iustice If this short heauenly saying through the rashnes of willfulmen hath bred so many false constructiours al● which notwithstanding were bolstened with other the like misapplyed passages how can Protestants presume to ayme aright at the marke of Truth in all questions controuer●ed by this vncertaine rule of expounding Scripture by Scripture alone 17. Thirdly I might produce the diuersity not only of the literall but of the literall and figuratiue speaches and demand of our Aduersaryes how the Collatours should discerne the one from the other when the words should be literally when figuratiuely vnderstood Origen was more skillfull in tongues more diligent in reading more wise in obseruing the course and connexion Basil hom 3. in Hex st●● in Gonesim of Scripture then euer any Protestant● and yet S. Basil noteth him of grosse ouersight in imagining figures and Allegoryes in the first of Genesis in lieu of the letter ●estorius on the contrary side was dazelled with the letter instead of the figure in that speach of S. Iohn Dissolue Ioan. 2. v. 19. yee this Temple and after three dayes I will rayse it againe Whereby he contended that the Sonne of God only dwelled in Christ as in his Temple Marcions stroue for Rom. 5. v. 20. Ioan. 1. v. 14. Philip. 2. v. 7. Haeb. 4. v. 15. Rom. 8. v. 3. Matth. 3. v. ●● the pure letter where S. Paul writeth The law hath entred that sinne may abound Munichaeus dreamed of a figure where S. Iohn sayd The word is made flesh that is as he proued by conference of sundry places in the habit likenes and similitude of flesh The Iacobits were illuded with the grossnes of the letter when they baptized or rather seared with burning yrons their sect-mates in their foreheads because it is written in the 3. of S. Matthew He shall baptize you in the Holy Ghost and fire Eutychius the Patriarcke of Constantinople was beguiled with the inanity of a figure when impugning the corporall resurrection of our flesh he expounded of a subtile spirituall and ethereall body that which S. Paul spake of a true naturall 18. And the matter is the harder not to be mistaken heerein because some tyme in the selfe same sentence one and the selfe same word ought here properly there metaphorically be expounded as learned Maldonate wisely obserueth Mald. in eum loc Matth. 8. v. 22. Ioan. 3. v. 13. in that saying of Christ Let the dead bury their dead or not to depart from the chiefest articles of fayth of which I haue hitherto spokē The like is shewed in S. Iohn No man hath ascended into heauen but he that descended from heauen the Sonne of man who is

auerreth That the only Catholike fayth quickneth sanctifyeth giueth life excluding not any workes but the false beliefe of Heretikes Origen vpon the third Chapter to the Romans and S. Chrysostome in his booke of Fayth and the law of Nature attribute Iustification to fayth alone without the outward accomplishment of any externall worke or without the precedent obseruation of the law whether it be externall or internall according to Vasquez both exemplifying in the theese vpon the Crosse so that among all the Fathers whom they obiect no one giueth sentence on their side 20. Finally besides these authorityes and the former common obiections one the Aduersarie yet reserueth as his sole Achilles and properly belonging to this place that our pious and godly workes are outward tokens only and manifestations as whitaker calleth them of inward righteousnes but not the causes which augment or make vs more iust for as the tree is not made good by the VVhitak in his answer to the 8. reason of M. Campian fol. 254. fruites it beareth but only declared and knowne to be such no more can a iust man become more iust by the fruits of good workes which he produceth but only be discouered and knowne to be iust because as the fruits presuppose the goodnes of the tree from whence they spring and do not make it good so good workes prerequire iustice in the worker and cannot concurre to constitute Matth. 71 v. 17. Maldon in c. 7. Matt. him iust Whereupon Christ compareth the iust man with a good tree which bringeth forth good fruits and cannot produce euill the wicked to an euill tree which shooteth forth euill and cannot bring good I answere with Maldonate first by retorting the argument vpon my Aduersaryes If by good works we cannot be made but only knowne to be good it followeth by necessary consequence that by euill works we cannot become euill but only declared and signifyed to be such So Adam being once a good tree planted by God either could not degenerate and bring forth the euill fruits of sinne as he did or by sinning was not made euill or worse then before by iniustly transgressing the Commandment of God became A differēce betweene naturall and morall causes necessary to be noted not indeed vniust but was only marked figured with the notes of iniustice which cannot be affirmed without plaine impiety Secondly I answere that there is a great difference between naturall and morall causes as euery Nouice in our Schooles can instruct you Naturall causes by their good or euill effects are neither made good or euill better or worse as the fire waxeth not more hoat by the heate it casteth nor the stocke of the vine in it selfe more fruitful by the outward brāches it spreadeth abroad but these only demonstrate the fruitfullnes of the vine or heate of the fire Morall causes do not only worke well or badly because they are good or euill but by vvorking vvell or euilly they grovv good or euill become better or vvorse As vvee do not only liue temperatly because vve are tēperate but by many acts of temperance become Arist l. 2. de mori c. 1. Ibid. c. 2. VVhitak l. 1. 8. aduers Duraeum August l. de fide oper c. 14. in psal 31. S. Thom. in Gal. 3. lect 4. Ambr. in cap. 8. ad Rom. Beda in c. ● ep lac temperate by the like dayly go forward increase in temperance For sayth Aristotle As by building builders by singing to the harpe men arriue to be cunning harpers or musitians so by doing good things men become iust by temperate things temperate by valiant exployts valiant Likewise by accustoming our selues to contemne and endure things fearefull and to be dreaded fortes efficimur we grow stout couragious Therfore although the tree which is a naturall cause of budding fruits receaueth not from them any sparke of life or increase of goodnes yet the iust man who is a morall cause in acheiuing good workes is more quickned in spirituall life and perfected in iustice by achieuing of them 21. Then they vrge out of S. Augustine That good workes go not before the iustifyed but follow him that is iust Out of S. Thomas Workes are not the cause that any one is iust before God but rather the executions and manifestations of Iustice. The like out of S. Ambrose Venerable Bede others I answere they are manifestations and remonstrances of the first iustice of the first infusion of grace as S. Thomas expoundeth himselfe and so they follow and are not the cause S. Thom. in c. 2. ad Gal. that any one is iust in that kind yet this withstandeth not but that they perfect and increase the infused iustice as true meritorious and morall causes thereof which is all that we require all that the Oecumenicall holy Councell of Trent hath enacted touching the Iustice of our works quickned with the seed or watered with the due of Gods celestiall grace The end of the fourth Booke THE FIFTH BOOKE THE XXII CONTROVERSY DISPROVETH The Protestants certainty of Saluation against D. Whitaker and D. Abbot CHAP. I. SO deep and vnsearchable are the iudgements of God so close and inscrutable the inuolutions of mans hart his foldes so secret so many his retraytes his search so weake in matters of spirit so hidden and vnknown the operations of grace the feares the doubts the anxiety so innumerable which the best belieuing Protestants and Ministers themselues feele in their consciences as I am wonderfully astonished at this arrogant speach that they should be all infallibly assured and vndoubtedly certaine of their saluation and my astonishment is the greater when I read the sentence of God and E●●●●● 9. v. 1. 2. verdict of the holy Ghost passe against them in these tearmes vncontrollable There are iust men and wise and their workes are in the hand of God and yet man knoweth not whether he be worthy of loue or hatred but all things are reserued vncertain Prou. c. 20 v. 9. for the tyme to come And who can say my hart is cleane I am pure from sinne Where Salomon doth not affirme as Venerable Bede noteth vpon that place That a man cannot be but that he cannot certainly say or know himselfe to be pure from Beds in eum locum Eccles 5. v. VVhitak l. 8. aduers Duraeum Abbot in his defence c. 4. f. 330. 331. c. Calu. l. 3. instit c. 2. §. 38. sinne Likewise Of sinne forgiuen be not without feare or as whitaker readeth out of the Greeke Of expiation or pardon be not secure To the first of these three testimonyes M. Abbot replyeth with Caluin his Maister That by outward things by thinges that are before our face a man knoweth not whether he be beloued or hated of God howbeit he may otherwise infallibly know it But this answere cannot be shaped to the latter clause of that sentence All thinges are

Caluinian God Because our true and soueraigne God who is essentially good yea goodnes it selfe if it were possible for him vpon any proiect neuer so holy to purpose or desire euill yet that intended euill he could not do being essentially opposite repugnant to his nature The good tree cannot bring forth euill fruite nor the tree of life the blossomes of death No contrary sayth S. Basil can be engendred by his contrary For neither Matt. 7. is life wont to breed death nor darcknes affoard beginning to light nor doth sicknes cause health And S. Gregory Nissen The good Basil hom 2. in hexa Gregor Ni●●ē hom 2. in Eccl. man out of the aboundance of his hart vttereth not euill thinges but such as are agreable and conuenient to his nature how much more doth the fountaine of goodnes dispense from his naturall bosome nothing that is euill It is impossible from the well-spring of purity any mudde of vncleanes from the splendour of the sun any mo●e of darcknes from the center of rectitude any line of obliquity from the only rule and square of all actions any detorted worke oraction should be drawne to how good a purpose or holy an end soeuer it be directed yet this proceedeth not from any imbecility or weaknes but from the power it selfe and omnipotency Ambr. l. c. Ep. ep 37. of God in so much as we may auouch with S. Ambrose This impossible thing is no signe of infirmity but of vertue power Maiesty Likewise S. Augustine God is omnipotent c. Aug. li. ● de symb ad catechu c. ● how many thinges can he not do yet he is omnipotent and therefore he is omnipotent because he cannot accomplish these thinges For if he could die he were not omnipotent if he could lye if be deceaued if d● vniustly he were not omnipotent because if this were in him he were not worthy to be omnipotent Which reason conuinceth also that he cannot as a righteous Iudge or for any good purpose lye deceaue do euill or work any sinne For if his purpose and intent be good why doth he not contriue and execute it by some good vertuous honest meanes Is it becaause he will not cannot or thinketh not of it choose which you will For one of them must needes be the cause Wil he not It is wāt of goodnes Can he not It is want of power and omnipotency Thinketh he not of it It argueth ignorāce and inconsideration Plato l. 2. derepub To which effect it is recorded in Plato That man may haue some profitable inducement to lye because he cannot otherwise compasse his designed plots but nothing can moue God thereunto For nothing can he approue which he cannot effectuate by the best meanes he listeth Fy then on these pernicious and hellish dotages that God is the causer of heresies the contriuer of sinne Fy on them that thinke God yoke-mate with the diuell in the accomplishment of sinne to atchieue his holy designes 5. The second herefie by part interla●ded in the former partly expressed in other passages is that euen as the diuine pietie of his own accord predestinateth some to glorie so he reprobateth others from all eternitie purposly intending their damnation Fulk Gods election and Fulk in c. 9. ad Rom. sect 21. ibid. sect 5. reprobation is most free of his owne will not vpon the fore-sight of the merits of eyther of them Then Pharao was a vessell of wrath ordeined to destructiō his reprobation was for the glorie of God and antecedently intēded and appointed to that end Caluin Caluin l. 3. cap. 12. §. 5. ibid cap. 23 §. 4. 7. 8 9. Decretum quidē horribile fa●eor To some eternall life and to some eternall damnation is fore-appoynted He likewise affirmeth that Adam and his posteritie fell by by Gods decree which he confesseth to be an horrible decree yet ordeyned by God Gods election I let passe because it tendeth to good it requireth not the preuision of workes but for reprobation which is the deputation of man the only image and similitude of God vpon earth to eternall punishment for this to be done without any fore-sight absolute or conditionall of his demerits and being done that man hath not power to escape or free will to auoide the sinnes which lead him head-longe to destruction is more then Barbarian more then Neroniā cruelty because euery punishment iustly taxed presupposeth an offence but both men and Angells in that priority considered are free from all offence free from ill desert therfore to preordain those harmles and noble creatures to euerlastinge torments which of necessitie they must incurre before the preuision of any misdeed is such wild sauage and outragious Caluinisme as I know not whether it hath euer sound liking in the thoughts of any but some hereticall and Fulkish Caluinists Certayne it is that the Predestinats were longe since cōdemned for the like assertions and one Godescalcus a monke of Rhemes at a Synode of Magunce a cittie in Germanie See Fr●doard lib. 3. c. 13. Serraen l. 1. rerum Mogunt c. 33. Baron an Domini 400. 818. Conc. Araufic c. 25. Ezech. 18. v. 32. c. 33. v. 11. osee 13. v. 9. Sap. 1. v. 13. 2. Pet. 3. v. 9. Aug. lib. 6. Hypogno Chrysos hom 3. in Genes hom de interdict arboris ad Adā quae habetur post hom in Genes Eulgent li. ad Monim Prosper in lib. respons ad Ga●lorū capitula sub 〈…〉 in ●●nt super cap. 7. Yea the Arausican Councel anathematizeth both them our aduersaries in these words We doe not only beleeue any to be predestinate to euill by diuine power but if there be any who will beleeue so great an euill with all detestation we pronounce them accursed 6. The Prophets and Apostles cry out I will not the death of him that dieth sayd our Lord god I will not the death of the impious but that he conuert from his way and liue Perdition is thine o Israell only in me is thy help God made not death neyther doth he reioyce in the perdition of the liuinge Our Lord is not willing that any perish By which sentences of holie writ it is most euident that the reprobation and destruction of no creature is absolutely and antecedently intended by God but only consequently cōditionally presupposing their obstinacie in sinne and finall impenitence which he from all eternity foreseeing deputeth them accordingly to their deserued punishment God sayth S. Augustin punisheth the reprobate because he foreknew what they wold doe but created them not to be punished S. Chrysostome For this end he framed euery creature and fashioned vs not that we perish nor to torment vs with punishments but to saue vs. And els-where It is manifest that God wold not haue Adam sinne who before his fall did fense and arme him Adam could haue obeyed which he wold not because he chose rather to yield to the diuill

When soeuer such proportion is kept in recompensing the labours we achieue as to greater labours greater crownes to lesser lesser rewards are alloted Thē the crownes and rewards are giuen in respect of the workes done not as signes and conditions but truly according to the merit of our labours as causes of the rewardes But this proportion is obserued by our Soueraigne Iudge in remunerating the good deedes of the Iust which flow from his grace Therefore he rewardeth them not as signes but as causes of our heauenly blisse according to the worthines of their merit The maior is cleere for what other then the dignity of the worke doth God regard in ballancing the measure of them The worthines of Christs merits imputed by faith that is not our owne labour not the thinges we do in our body for which we must receaue eyther good or euill as the Apostle writeth that doth not dignify one aboue another but equally as hath beene sayd is referred to al. The promise which God maketh vnto vs If God had his eye leuelled at that alone it were as much broken in a little as in a greater as faythfully kept in recōpensing a small as in a weighty matter Therein he looketh not to the greatnes of our endeauours but to the fidelity of his owne word in fulfilling whereof the equality of recompensation the proportion of workes the repayment of seruice the reward of labours cannot be as the Scriptures so often insinuate the principall markes aymed at by God Further our vertues are rewarded as worthy of their hire but the promise of God begetteth not any worthines or dignity in our workes more then of themselues belong vnto them For as our Schoolemen teach He that shall Gab. Vasq in 1. 2. tom 2. disp 214 cap. 5. others ibid. in q. 114. D. Tho. promise a Lordship or Dukedome in behalfe of some meane seruice or peece of money of small value doth not thereby enhaunce the price of the coyne or estimate of his obsequious seruice but the estate which is giuen in lieu of that plighted faith although it require the performance of the seruice or payment of the money as conditions necessary to oblige him that promised yet it doth as much exceed the rate of the one and desert of the other as if no promise had beene no couenaunt made at all Moreouer the Deuines proue that if God should threaten to punish with eternall paine an officious lye or other light offence that sinne should not mount thereby to the heynousnes of a mortall crime nor be worthy of more punishment then of his owne nature it deserueth wherefore if the commination and threatning of greater torments then sinnes of themselues require doth not augment the guiltines of their default or change a small sinne into the enormity of a greater neither can the promise of aboundant remuneration increase the dignity of our workes to which it is promised nor the remuneration it selfe be called a reward weighed forth as S. Gregory Greg. Na. orat in san Bap. extrema Nazianzen affirmeth in the iust and euen ballance of God nor equally imparted according to our labours as the Holy Ghost often pronounceth but a free gift liberally giuen through the gratefulnes and fidelity of the giuer vnles besides the promise some worthines or value in our works be acknowledged to which an agreable reward be correspondently assigned 6. The Minor that God obserueth due proportion in 2. ad Cor. 9. v. 6. Clem. Alex. l. 4. strom Matth. 10. v. 4. recompensing our seruice more or lesse conformably to the diligence or slacknes thereof is also manifest by the sundry textes already quoted That euery one shall receaue accordinge to his owne labour And by this of Saint Paul He that soweth sparingly sparingly also shall reape and he that soweth in blessinges of blessinges also shall reape Which Clemens Alexandrinus also gathereth out of these wordes of S. Matthew He that receaueth a Prophet in the name of a Prophet shall receaue the reward of a Prophet and he that receaueth a iust man in the name of a iust man shall receaue the rewards of a iust man both receaue rewards yet not both the same but seuerall and vnequall according to the seuerall sanctity of their persons and inequality of their merits whome they receaue Hence the conclusion of my Syllogisme without checke or controle is ineuitably inferred That seeing Almighty God portioneth forth a greater or lesser share of glory answerable to the greatnes or slendernes of our workes as the hire wages or reward of them he truly remunerateth our pious endeauours not as sequells of faith not as meere gifts of grace but as precedent causes or condigne desertes of eternall life Which when our aduersaries gainsay they make our soueraigne God an accept our of persons and not a iust and vpright iudge quit contrary to these texts of holy writ 2. ad Timoth. 4. v. 8. ad Rom. 2. v. 11. 1. Pet. 1. v. 17. Act. 10. v. 34. For acception of persons is a vice directly opposite to distributiue iustice as when a Iudge bestoweth a reward where there is no precedent merit or when he giueth a more large reward then the dignity of the merit in any sort deserueth But God truly recompenseth the labours of his seruants and recompenseth them with due proportion of greater and lesser reward therefore he either presupposeth in thē the diuersity of merits or he violateth Aug. ep 46. ad Valent the lawes of distributiue iustice In so much as S. Augustin● might well say If there be no merits how shall God iudge the world For take away them and take away Iustice take away iudgement take away that article of our Creed that Christ shall come to iudge the quicke and the dead 7. Another Argument or Enthymeme I frame in this sort The sinnes and euill workes of the reprobate are not eternally punished eyther because they are signes of their infidelity or by reason of Gods commination and threates which he promulgateth of punishing them with euerlasting torments But for that they be of themselues the true cause of damnation merit Gods wrath be iniurious and offensiue to his infinite goodnes Therefore the vertuous actes and good deedes of the elect which flow from the streames of heauenly grace are not only recompensed as fruites of faith or in regard of Gods promise made to reward them but because they be true and proper causes thereof because they be pleasing and acceptable in his sight and do deseruedly purchase and merit his fauour The consequence is inferred out of the words of Christ who attributeth after the same manner and with the same causall propositions the crowne of heauen to the pious workes of the iust as he doth the punishment of hell to the hard and vnmercifull hartes of sinners saying Come yee blessed of my Father possesse yee the kingdome prepared for you from the foundation of the world For I

Authours both of the Greek Latin Church if all these famous Writers of the first fiue hundred yeares after Christ agree with vs in the partiall eye of sworne Catholiks freed frō leuity or disaffectiō to their Prince for cleauing to the ancient Fathers enemyes that fayth alone cannot purchase saluation or iustify vs before God I hope my soueraigne Liege King Iames who vouch●afeth to submit his royall wisedome princely iudgment to the censure and tryal of that perfect age will not deeme it any l●uity in Catholikes or disloyalty to his person to whome we owe and are ready to performe all the dutifull seruice which euer any subiects haue yielded to their Prince but feare of God zeale of his honour loue of Religion care of our soules and meere respect of conscience which maketh vs afrayd to wander out of this straite and trodden path of so many our holy and learned predecessours and afraid to follow crooked turnings and by-wayes of Heretikes which winde into the labyrinth of eternall perdition THE TWENTITH CONTROVERSY IN WHICH It is concluded that our Iustification consisteth in the habit of Charity against D. Abbot D. Whitaker and D. Fulke CHAP. I. ALTHOVGH we make not any separation or diuorce between those diuine and louing sisters Fayth Hope and Charity but that they all three concurre to the spirituall marriage of our Vide Scot. in 4. dist 27. q. 1. Vega l. 7. super Conci Concil Trid. c. ●5 Gab. Vas in 1. 2. dis● 198. c. 3. 1. Ioan. 3. v. 1. Luc. 7. v. 47. Ioan. 13. v. 35. 1. Ioan. 4. v. 7. Rom 13. v. 10. Coloss 3. v. 14. VVhitak l. 8. aduns Dur●um in his āswere to 8. reason Abbot in his defence cap. 4. Rom. 1. v. 17. 1. Ioan. 3. v. 14. Act. 13. v. 39. Ioan. 14. v. 21. Col. 1. v. 23. Ephes 3. v. 17. Hebr. 11. v. 6. 1. 〈◊〉 1● v. ● 1. Ioan. 5. v. 1. ●1 Ioan. 4. v. 7. 1. Cor. 13. v. 13. soules with God yet we assigne to euery one her part or function which she performeth heerein To Fayth the entrance to Hope the progresse to Charity which I suppose as most probable to be all one with grace the complement and consummation of this happy Wedlocke As the holy Scriptures declare when they tearme it the band of our vnion and coniunction with God He that abydeth in Charity abydeth in God and God in him When they attribute vnto it the right of our adoption and title of diuine filiation See what manner of Charity the Father hath giuen vs that we should be named and be ●he sonnes of God The remission of our sinnes Many sinnes are forgiuen her because she hath loued much When they make it the badge and cognizance of Christs faythful seruants In this all men shall know that you are my disciples if you haue loue to one another When thereby we are sayd to be borne a new and regenerated in Christ Euery one that loueth is borne of God and knoweth God When they call it the accomplishment of the Law and summe of all perfection Loue therfore is the fullnes of the Law And Aboue all these things haue Charity which is the band of perfection All these places inuincibly proue that Charity is the vertue which espouseth and marryeth vs vnto God which adopteth reneweth and truly iustifyeth vs in his sight 1. The same I also euince by the like testimonyes by which our Aduersaryes would seeme to challeng it to Fayth alon Of fayth say they it is written The iust liueth by Fayth Of Charity we read the like We know that me are translated from death to life because we loue the brethren 〈◊〉 that loueth not abideth in death Of Fayth Euery one that belieueth is iustifyed Of Charity He that loueth me shall be loued of my Father and I will loue him Of Fayth If yee continue in the fayth grounded stable Of Charity Rooted and founded in Charity Of Fayth Without Fayth it is impossible to please God Of Charity If I haue not Charity I am nothing Of Fayth Whosoeuer belieueth that Iesus is Christ is borne of God Of Charity Euery one that loueth is borne of God Wherefore if Fayth by reason of these testimonyes is not the fruit or sequell in our Sec●●●yes iudgment but the true cause of iustification why should not Charity haue the same pri●iledge which is ouery way warranted with the same authority and with more ample also for S. Pa●● expre●●y preferreth Charity before Fayth saying Now 〈…〉 Fayth Hope and Charity these three but the great●●● of these is Charity Before he insinu●●●th that Charity is such as it shall neuer fayle Fayth imperfect and shal be made voyd when we see God face to face Therefore Fayth cannot be heere that garment of Iustice which shall there Ibid. v. 2. remayne and adorne vs for euer but Charity which shall still abyde and continue with vs. Likewise the Apostle VVhitak l. 8. aduers Duraeum Fulk in c. 13. 1. Cor Abbot c. 4. Origen tract in Matth. 4. Hier. Bed● Strabo in cum lo Aug. l. 15 de Trin. c. 18. Abbot in his defence c. 4. sect 22 p. 479. auoucheth in the beginning of that Chapter If I should haue all fayth so that I could remoue mountains and haue not Charity I am nothing He doth not say as Whitaker Fulke Abbot misconstrue him If I had the gift of Fayth to do miracles but if I should haue all fayth all historicall and dogmaticall all fayth of miracles all whatsoeuer yea quoth Origen S. Hierome Venerable Bede and Strabo If I had that excellent that solide entiere and most perfect fayth of all others which is able to remoue mountaines without Charity it doth no good Whereupon S. Augustine sayth Nothing but Charity maketh fayth it selfe auailable for Fath may be without Charity but it profiteth not without Charity Abbot answereth He speaketh of fayth after the vulgar vnderstanding a● S. Iames did not of true fayth No then neither he nor S. Iames nor the Apostle spake anything at all to the purpose for of what Fayth could there be any questiō but of that Fayth which is a Theologicall vertue hath her proper and intrinsecall forme distinct from Charity of that which vvith Charity auayleth to iustification for of a false and counterfeit fayth no doubt could be made neither was there euer any heretike so mad or bereft of his wits as to imagine a false fayth to be sufficient to iustification what needed then S. Augustine what needed S. Iames what needed the Apostle with such vehemency so often so seriously to inculcate that a fayned beliefe VVhitak l. 1. aduers-Dur●um a diabolicall fayth as Whitaker calleth it which no man dreamed to be sufficient auayleth nothing in the sight of God For ioyne to such a fayth ioyne to your meere historicall fayth to your gift of fayth for the working of miracles as much Charity as may