more indigent condition than the Angels are or ever were obnoxious unto 2. The general end of that Exinanition and Depression of Jesus it was that he might suffer death 3. His Exaltation unto Power and Authority over all things in particular the world to come crowned with glory and honour 4. A numerous Amplification subjoyned of the end of his depression and the death that it tended unto 1. From the Cause of it the Grace of God 2. The Nature of it he was to taste of death 3. The End of it it was for others And 4. its extent for all That he by the grace of God might taste death for all 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an Adversative intimating the introduction of one singular person in opposition to him or them spoken of in the end of the fore-going verse We see not all things put under his feet which some against the whole context apply unto Christ but we see Jesus Had the same person been spoken of in both verses the expression would have been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but we see him but a new Antecedent being here introduced but we see Jesus another person is substituted as the subject spoken of as the Syriack version declares we see him that it is Jesus How and in what sense he was made lower than the Angels hath been declared in opening the words as they lie in the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comprized in that testimony of the Psalmist Only it may be enquired whether this Exinanition of Christ or Minoration in respect of Angels did consist meerly in his Incarnation and participation of Humane Nature which in general is esteemed beneath Angelical or in the misery and anxiety which in that nature he conflicted withall And the Apostle seems not absolutely to intend the former 1. Because he speaks of Jesus as the subject of this Minoration now that name denotes the Son of God as Incarnate who is supposed so to be when he is said to be made less than the Angels 2. Because the Humane Nature in the very instant of its union unto the Person of that Son of God was absolutely advanced above the Angelical and might have immediately been possessed of Glory if other works in it had not been to be performed And yet neither doth it intend the low condition wherein he was placed exclusively to his Incarnation though that be afterwards verse 14. particularly spoken unto but his being Incarnate and brought forth and in that condition wherein he was exposed to suffering and so consequently to death it self And thus was he made less than Angels in part in that nature which he assumed he was obnoxious unto all the infirmities which attend it as Hunger Thirst Weariness Pain Sorrow Grief and exposed unto all the miseries from without that any person partaker of that nature is obnoxious unto and in summe death it self from all which miseries Angels are exempted This we see know and grant to have been the state and condition of Jesus But saith he this was but for a little while during his conversation with us on the earth ending at his death The Apostle knew that he had now fixed upon that which of all things the Jews most stumbled at the low and mean despised condition of Jesus they having inveterate prejudicate opinions of another manner of state and condition for the Messiah wherefore he immediately subjoyns the end why he was humbled into this condition which he first explains and then vindicates the necessity of it The end then is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the suffering of death he was so humbled that he might suffer death This yet more displeased the Jews the necessity whereof he therefore immediately proves Adding by the way 3. To complete the application of the testimony produced his Exaltation upon his suffering he was crowned with glory and honour referring us to the testimony it self to declare what was contained in that Exaltation namely an absolute Dominion over all things God only excepted and so consequently over the world to come that was not put in subjection to Angels And in these words the Apostle closeth his argument for the excellency of Christ above the Angels from the subjection of all things unto him and proceeds to the amplification of that kind of the Humiliation of Christ which he had before intimated and that in four things 1. In the impulsive and efficient cause which in the acts of God's will are coincident 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denoting the final cause of what was before asserted relating to the whole clause following That which is here called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the grace of God is else-where explained by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tit. 2.11 the saving grace of God And sometimes it is termed his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chap. 3.4 his Goodness Kindness Benignity and love of mankind absolutely his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 3.16 Rom. 5.8 1 Joh. 3.8 9. Love intense love also his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ephes. 1.5 his good-pleasure from the riches of his grace verse 1. and his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 verse 9. Rom. 8.28 or purpose of his will being the same with his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 8.29 30. his prae-designation and predestination of men unto Grace and Glory From all which it appears what this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or grace of God is that was the moving and impulsive cause of the death of Christ even the gracious free sovereign Purpose of the Will of God suited unto and arising from his natural Grace Love Goodness and Benignity Pity Mercy Compassion exerting themselves therein It was not out of any anger or displeasure of God against Jesus in whom his soul was always well pleased not out of any disregard unto him whom he designed hereby to be crowned with glory and honour but out of his Love Kindness and Goodness towards others who could no otherwise be brought unto Glory as in the next verses the Apostle declares that he thus appointed him to die In the manner of his death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he should taste of death so die as to experience the sorrows bitterness and penalties of death To taste of death is first Really to die not in appearance or pretence in opinion or shew as some foolishly of old blasphemed about the death of Christ which could have had no other fruit but a shadow of Redemption a deliverance in opinion See the phrases used Mark 9.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall not taste of death that is not die And that which is called to see death Joh. 8.51 is called to taste of death v. 52. where the Phrase is applied to the second death or death eternal And it being death which was threatned unto those for whom he dyed and which they should have undergone he really tasted of that death
to help assist or relieve can in any sense be applied unto the Angels that must be intended if any For the word must denote either any help assistance or relief in general or that especial help and assistance which is given by Christ in the work of Reconciliation and Redemption If the first be intended I much question the truth of the assertion seeing the Angels owe their establishment in grace unto Christ and their advancement in glory Ephes. 1.10 If it be to be taken in the latter sense as is pretended then the nature of the discrete Axiom here used by the Apostle requires that there be the same need of the help intimated in both the disparates which is denied as unto the one and affirmed as unto the other But now the Angels that is the good Angels had no need of the help of Redemption and Reconciliation unto God or of being freed from death or the fear of it which they were never obnoxious unto And what remains for the clearing of the mind of the Apostle will appear yet farther in the ensuing Observations from the words I. The Lord Jesus Christ is truly God and Man in one Person and this is fully manifested in these words For first there is supposed in them his prae-existence in another Nature than that which he is said here to assume He was before he subsisted before or he could not have taken on him what he had not This was his Divine Nature as the like is intimated where he is said to be made flesh Joh. 1.14 to be made of a woman Gal. 4.4 to be manifested in the flesh 1 Tim. 3.16 to take on him the form of a servant Phil. 2.8 9. as here he took the seed of Abraham he was before he did so that is the Son the Word of God the Son of God as in the places mentioned eternally prae-existing unto this his Incarnation For the subject of this Proposition he took on him c. denotes a person prae-existing unto the act of taking here ascribed unto him which was no other than the Son of God 2. He assumed he took to himself another nature of the seed of Abraham according unto the promise so continuing what he was he became what he was not For 3. He took this to be his own nature he so took it as himself to become truly the seed of Abraham to whom and concerning whom the promise was given Gal. 3.16 and was himself made of the seed of David according to the flesh Rom. 1.3 and as concerning the flesh came of the fathers Rom. 9.5 and so was the Son of David the Son of Abraham Matth. 1.1 And this could no otherwise be done but 4. by taking that Nature into Personal Subsistence with himself in the Hypostasis of the Son of God the nature he assumed could no otherwise become his For if he had by any ways or means taken the person of a man to be united unto him in the strictest union that two persons are capable of a Divine and an Humane the nature had still been the nature of that other person and not his own But he took it to be his own nature which it could no ways be but by personal union causing it to subsist in his own person And he is therefore a true and perfect Man for no more is required to make a complete and perfect man but the entire nature of man subsisting And this is in Christ as a man the Humane nature having a subsistence communicated unto it by the Son of God And therefore 6. This is done without a multiplication of persons in him For the Humane Nature can have no personality of its own because it was taken to be the nature of another person who was prae-existent unto it and by assuming of it prevented its proper personality Neither 7. did hence any mixture or confusion of natures ensue or of the essential properties of them for he took the seed of Abraham to be his Humane Nature which if mixed with the Divine it could not be And this he hath done 8. inseparably and for ever Which things are handled at large else-where II. The Redemption of Mankind by the taking of our nature was a work of meer Sovereign grace He took the seed of Abraham he took not the nature of Angels And for what cause or reason Can any be assigned but the Sovereign Grace Pleasure and Love of God nor doth the Scripture any where assign any other And this will the better appear if we consider First That for a sinning nature to be saved it was indispensibly necessary that it should be assumed The nature of Angels being not taken those that sinned in that nature must perish for ever and they that fancy a possibility of saving sinners any other way but by satisfaction made in the nature that had sinned seem not to have considered aright the nature of sin and the Justice of God Had any other way been possible why doth the perishing of Angels so inevitably follow the non-assumption of their nature This way alone then could it be wrought Secondly That we were carrying away all humane nature into endless destruction for so it is intimated whence Christs assumption of it is expressed by his putting forth his hand and taking hold of it to stop it in its course of apostasie and ruine Of Angels only some individual persons fell from God but our whole nature in every one to whom it was communicated from and by Adam was running head-long to destruction In it self there could be no relief nor any thing to commend it unto God Here Sovereign Grace interposeth The love of God to mankind Tit. 3.4 As to the Angels he spared them not 2 Pet. 2.4 He spared not them and spared not his Son for us Rom. 8.32 And if we consider rightly what the Scripture informs us of the number and dignity of the Angels that sinned of their nature and ability to accomplish the will of God and compare therewith our own vileness and low condition we may have matter of eternal admiration suggested unto us And there was infinite Wisdom as well as Sovereign Grace in this dispensation sundry branches whereof the Apostle afterwards holds out unto us Verse XVII XVIII HAving declared the general Reasons why the Son or Messiah was for a little while to be made lower than the Angels in his Incarnation and sufferings and shewed the ends thereof the Apostle proceeds to declare other especial ends of this divine Dispensation and therein makes way unto what he had to instruct the Hebrews in about the Priestly Office of Christ which was the principal ground and foundation of what he intended more fully afterwards to discourse with them about and to inform them in Verse 17 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 V. unde debuit whence he ought So Beza Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for which cause or wherefore it was just meet or equal Others
and consequently to be preferred above them do not at all prove that Solomon of whom they were spoken meerly as he was a Type should be esteemed to be preferred above all Angels seeing he did only represent him who was so and had these words spoken unto him not absolutely but with respect unto that Representation And this removes the fourth Objection made in the behalf of the first Interpretation excluding Solomon from being at all intended in the Prophecy for what was spoken of him as a Type required not a full accomplishment in his own person but only that he should represent him who was principally intended 5. That there is a two-fold Perpetuity mentioned in the Scripture the one limited and relative the other absolute and both these are applied unto the Kingdom of David First there was a Perpetuity promised unto him and his Posterity in the Kingdom as of the Priesthood to Aaron that is a limited perpetuity namely during the continuance of the typical state and condition of that People whilst they continued the Rule by right belonged unto the House of David There was also an absolute perpetuity promised to the Kingdom of David to be made good only in the Kingdom and Rule of the Messiah and both these kinds of Perpetuity are expressed in the same words giving their sense according as they are applied If applied to the successors of David as his Kingdom was a Type of that of Christ they denote the limited Perpetuity before mentioned as that which respected an Adjunct of the Typical state of that People that was to be regulated by it and commensurate unto it but as they were referred to the Kingdom of Christ represented in the other so an Absolute Perpetuity is expressed in them And this takes away the third Reason excluding Solomon from being intended in these words the Perpetuity promised being unto him limited and bounded These considerations being premised I say the words insisted on by the Apostle I will be unto him a Father and he shall be unto me a son belonged first and nextly unto Solomon denoting that fatherly Love Care and Protection that God would afford unto him in his Kingdom so far forth as Christ was represented by him therein which requires not that they must absolutely and in all just consequences from them belong unto the person of Solomon principally therefore they intend Christ himself expressing that eternal unchangeable Love which the Father bore unto him grounded on the Relation of Father and Son The Jews I confess of all others do see least of Typicalness in Solomon But the reason of it is because that his sin was the Occasion of ruining their carnal earthly Glory and Wealth which things alone they lust after But the thing was doubtless confessed by the Church of old with whom Paul had to do and therefore we see that the Writer of the Book of the Chronicles written after the return of the People from their Captivity when Solomon's line was failed and Zerubbabel of the house of Nathan was Governour amongst them yet records again this Promise as that which looked forward and was yet to receive its full accomplishment in the Lord Christ. And some of the Rabbins themselves tell us that Solomâ—â— because of his sin had only the name of peace God stirring up Adversaries against him the thing it self is to be looked for under Messiah Ben-david The allegation of these words by the Apostle being thus fully and at large vindicated I shall now briefly enquire into the sense and meaning of the words themselves It was before observed that they are not produced by the Apostle to prove the Natural Sonship of Jesus Christ nor do they signifie it nor were they urged by him to confirm directly and immediately that he is more excellent than the Angels of whom there is nothing spoken in them nor in the place from whence they are taken But the Apostle insists on this testimony meerly in confirmation of his former Argument for the preheminence of the Son above Angels taken from that more excellent Name which he obtained by inheritance which being the Name of the Son of God he hereby proves that indeed he was so called by God himself Thus then do these words confirm the intention of the Apostle For to which of the Angels said God at any time I will be to him a Father and he shall be to me a Son The words contain a great and signal priviledge they are spoken unto and concerning the Messiah and neither they nor any thing equivalent unto them were ever spoken of any Angel especially the Name of the Son of God so emphatically and in way of distinction from all others was never assigned unto any of them And this as hath been already shewed proves an Eminency and Preheminence in him above all that the Angels attain unto All this I say follows from the peculiar signal Appropriation of the Name of the Son of God unto him and his especial Relation unto God therein expressed Briefly we may adjoyn the intention of the words as in themselves considered and so complete the Exposition of them Now God promiseth in them to be unto the Lord Christ as exalted into his Throne a Father in love care power to protect and carry him on in his Rule unto the end of the world And therefore upon his Ascension he says that he went unto his God and Father Joh. 20.17 And he rules in the Name and Majesty of God Mic. 5.4 This is the importance of the words they intend not the Eternal and Natural Relation that is between the Father and Son which neither is nor can be the subject of any Promise but the Paternal care of God over Christ in his Kingdom and the dearness of Christ himself unto him If it be asked on what account God would thus be a Father unto Jesus Christ in this peculiar manner it must be answered that the radical fundamental cause of it lay in the Relation that was between them from his Eternal Generation but he manifested himself to be his Father and engaged to deal with him in the love and care of a Father as he had accomplished his work of Mediation on the Earth and was exalted unto his Throne and Rule in Heaven And this is the first Argument of the Apostle whereby he proves that the Son as the Revealer of the Mind and Will of God in the Gospel is made more excellent than the Angels whose Glory was a refuge to the Jews in their adherance to Legal Rites and Administrations even because they were given unto them by the Disposition of Angels According unto our proposed method we must in our progress draw hence also some Instructions for our own use and edification As 1. Every thing in the Scripture is instructive The Apostles arguing in this place is not so much from the thing spoken as from the manner wherein it is spoken even that also is highly Mysterious So are
ready to yield obedience unto God in this great work which could not be accomplished by Sacrifices and Burnt-offerings And this readiness and willingness of Christ unto this work is set out under three heads in the ensuing words 1. His Tender of himself unto this work then said he Lo I come in the volume of thy book it is written of me This thou hast promised this is recorded in the head beginning of thy book namely in that great Promise Gen. 3.15 That the seed of the woman should bruise the head of the serpent and now thou hast given me and prepared me in the fulness of time a Body for that purpose Lo I come willing and ready to undertake it 2. In the frame of his mind in this engagement he entred into it with great delight I delight to do thy will O my God he did not delight in the thoughts of it only of old as before and then grew heavy and sorrowful when it was to be undertaken but he went unto it with cheaâ—fulness and delight although he knew what sorrow and grief it would cost him before it was brought unto perfection 3. From the Principle whence this Obedience and delight did spring which was an universal conformity of his Soul Mind and Will unto the Law Will and Mind of God thy Law is in my heart in the midst of my bowels every thing in me is compliant with thy Will and Law There is in me an universal conformity thereunto Being thus prepared thus principled he considered the Glory that was set before him the glory that would redound unto God by his becoming a Captain of salvation and that would ensue unto himself He endured the Cross and despised the shame He. 12.2 He armed himself with those considerations against the hardships and sufferings that he was to meet withall as the Apostle adviseth us with the like mind when we are to suffer 1 Pet. 4.1 By all which it appears that the Good will and Love of Jesus Christ was in this matter of being humbled and made less than Angels as the Apostle sayes expresly that he humbled himself and made himself of no reputation Phil. 2.7 8. as well as it is here said that God humbled him or made him less than Angels Secondly The Scripture peculiarly assigns this work unto the Love and Condescension of Christ himself For although it abounds in sitting forth the Love of the Father in the designing and contriving this work and sending his Son into the world yet it directs us unto the Lord Christ himself as the next immediate cause of his engaging into it and performance of it So saith the Apostle Gal. 2.20 I live by the faith of the Son of God that is by faith in him who loved me and gave himself for me It was the Love of Christ that moved him to give himself for us which is excellently expressed in that doxology Rev. 1.5 6. To him that loved us and washed us in his own blood from our sins and hath made us Kings and Priests unto God and his Father unto him be glory and dominion for ever and ever Amen All this was the fruit of his Love and therefore unto him is all Praise and Honour to be given and ascribed And so great was this Love of Christ that he declined nothing that was proposed unto him This the Apostle calls his Grace 2 Cor. 8 9. Ye know the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ that though he was rich yet for your sakes he became poor that ye through his poverty might be rich He condescended unto a poor and low condition and to suffer therein for our good that we might be made partakers of the Riches of the Grace of God And this was the love of the Person of Christ because it was in and wrought equally in him both before and after his Assumption of our nature Now the Holy Ghost makes an especial Application of this truth unto us as unto one part of our Obedience Phil. 2.5 Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus and what that mind was he declares in the ensuing Verses laying out his infinite condescension in taking our nature upon him and submitting to all misery reproach and death it self for our sakes If this mind were in Christ should not we endeavour after a Readiness and Willingness to submit our selves unto any condition for his glory Forasmuch saith Peter as Christ hath suffered for us in the flâ—sh arm your selves likewise with the same mind 1 Pet. 4.1 Many difficulties will lye in our way many Reasonings will rise up against it if we consult with flesh and blood but saith he arm your selves with the same mind that was in Christ get your souls strengthened and fenced by Grace against all Oppositions that you may follow him and imitate him Some that profess his name will suffer nothing for him if they may enjoy him or his wayes in peace and quietness well and good but if Persecution arise for the Gospel immediately they fall away These have neither lot nor portion in this matter Others the most the best have a secret lothness and unwillingness to condescend unto a condition of trouble and distress for the Gospel Well if we are unwilling hereunto What doth the Lord Christ lose by it Will it be any real Abatement of his honour or glory Will he lose his Crown or Kingdom thereby So far as suffering in this world is needful for any of his blessed Ends and Purposes he will not want them who shall be ready even to dye for his name sake But what if he had been unwilling to be humbled and to suffer for us If the same mind had been in Christ as was in us what had been our state and condition unto eternity In this Grace Love and Willingness of Christ lyes the foundation of all our Happiness of all our Deliverance from misery and ruine and shall we reckon our selves to have an interest therein and yet find our selves altogether unready to a conformity unto him Besides the Lord Christ was really rich when he made himself poor for our sakes he was in the form of God when he took upon him the form of a servant and became for us of no reputation nothing of this was due to him or belonged unto him but meerly on our account But we are in our selves really poor and obnoxious unto infinitely more miseries for our own sins than what he calls us unto for his name Are we unwilling to suffer a little light transitory trouble in this world for him without whose sufferings for us we must have suffered misery and that Eternal whether we would or no And I speak not so much about suffering it self as about the mind and frame of Spirit wherewith we undergo it Some will suffer when they cannot avoid it but so unwillingly so unchearfully as makes it evident that they aim at nothing nor act from no Principle but meerly that they dare not
the Apostles rejoyced thâ—t they had the honour to suffer shame for his Name Acts 5.41 that is the things which the world looked on as shameful but themselves knew to be honourable They are so in the sight of God of the Lord Jesus Christ of all the holy Angels which are competent judges in this case God hath a great cause in the world and that such a one as wherein his Name his Goodness his Love his Glory is concerned this in his infinite Wisdom is to be witnessed confirmed testified unto by sufferings Now can there be any greater Honour done unto any of the sons of men than that God should single them out from among the rest of mankind and appoint them unto this work Men are honoured according to their riches and treasures And when Moses came to make a right judgment concerning this thing he esteemed the reproach of Christ greater riches than all the treasures of Egypt Heb. 1â— 29 We believe that God gave great honour unto the Apostles and Martyrs of old in all their sufferings Let us labour for the same spirit of faith in reference unto our selves and it will relieve us under all our trials This then also hath Christ added unto the way of sufferings by his consecration of it for us All the glory and honour of the world is not to be compared with theirs unto whom it is given in the behalf of Christ not only to believe on him but also to suffer for him 1 Pet. 4.14 15 16. Thirdly He hath thereby made them usâ—ful and profitable Troubles and afflictions in themselves and their own nature have no good in them nor do they tend unto any good end they grow out of the first sentence against sin and are in their own nature poenal tending unto death and nothing else Nor are they in those who have no interest in Christ any thing but effects of the wrath of God But the Lord Christ by his consecrating of them to be the way of our following him hath quite altered their nature and tendency he hath made them good useful and profitable I shall not here shew the usefulness of Afflictions and sufferings the whole Scripture abundantly testifieth unto it and the experience of Believers in all ages and seasons confirms it I only shew whence it is that they become so and that is because the Lord Christ hath consecrated dedicated and sanctified them unto that end He hath thereby cut them off from their old stock of wrath and the curse and planted them on that of Love and Good-will He hath taken them off from the Covenant of works and translated them into that of Grace He hath turned their course from death towards life and immortality mixing his Grace Love and Wisdom with these bitter waters he hath made them sweet and wholesome And if we would have benefit by them we must always have regard unto this consecration of them Fourthly He hath made them safe They are in their own nature a Wilderness wherein men may endlesly wander and quickly lose themselves But he hath made them a way a safe way That way-faring men though fools may not erre therein Never did a Believer perish by afflictions or persecutions never was good Gold or Silver consumed or lost in this Furnace Hypocrites indeed and false Professors fearful and unbelievers are discovered by them and discarded from their hopes But they that are Disciples indeed are never safer than in this way and that because it is consecrated for them Sometimes it may be through their unbelief and want of heeding the Captain of their salvation they are wounded and cast down by them for a season but they are still in the way they are never turned quite out of the way And this through the grace of Christ doth turn also unto their advantage Nay it is not only absolutely a safe way but comparatively more safe than the way of Prosperity And this the Scripture with the experience of all Saints bear plentiful witness unto And many other blessed ends are wrought by the consecration of this way for the Disciples of Christ not now to be insisted on There remains yet to be considered in the words of the Apostle the Reason why the Captain of our salvation was to be consecrated by sufferings and this he declares in the beginning of the Verse It became God so to deal with him which he amplifies by that description of him For whom are all things and by whom are all things Having such a design as he had to bring many sons unto glory and being he for whom are all things and by whom are all things it became him so to deal with the Captain of their salvation What is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here intended and what is the importance of the word was declared before This Becomingness what ever it be it ariseth from hence That God is he for whom are all things and by whom are all things It became him not only who is so but as he is so and because he is so There is no reason for the addition of that consideration of God in this matter but that the cause is in them contained and expressed why it became him to do that which is here ascribed unto him We are then to enquire what it is that is principally regarded in God in this Attribution and thence we shall learn how it became him to bring the Lord Christ unto suffering Now the description of God in these words is plainly of him as the first Cause and last End of all things neither is it absolutely his Power in making all of nothing and his Sovereign Eternal Being requiring that all things tend unto his glory that are intended in the words But he is the Governour Ruler and Judge of all things made by him and for him with respect unto that Order and Law of their Creation which they were to observe This Rule and Government of all things taking care that as they are of God so they should be for him is that which the Apostle respects This then is that which he asserts namely that it became God as the Governour Ruler and Judge of all to consecrate Christ by sufferings which must be farther explained Man being made an intellectual Creature had a Rule of Moral Obedience given unto him This was he to observe to the glory of his Creator and Law-giver and as the condition of his coming unto him and enjoyment of him This is here supposed by the Apostle and he discourseth how man having broken the Law of his Creation and therein come short of the glory of God might by his grace be again made partaker of it With respect unto this state of things God can be no otherwise considered but as the Supreme Governour and Judge of them Now that Property of God which he exerteth principally as the Ruler and Governour of all is his Justice Justitia regiminis the Righteousness of Government Hereof there are
two branches for it is either Remunerative or Vindictive And this Righteousness of God as the Supreme Ruler and Judge of all is that upon the account whereof it was meet for him or became him to bring the sons to glory by the sufferings of the Captain of their salvation It was hence just equal and therefore indispensibly necessary that so he should do Supposing that man was created in the Image of God capable of yielding Obedience unto him according to the Law concreated with him and written in his heart which Obedience was his moral being for God as he was from or of him supposing that he by sin had broken this Law and so was no longer for God according to the primitive Order and Law of his Creation supposing also notwithstanding all this that God in his infinite Grace and Love intended to bring some men unto the enjoyment of himself by a new way Law and appointment by which they should be brought to be for him again Supposing I say these things which are all here supposed by our Apostle and were granted by the Jews it became the Justice of God that is it was so just right meet and equal that the Judge of all the world who doth right could no otherwise do than cause him who was to be the Way Cause Means and Author of this Recovery of men into a new condition of being for God to suffer in their steed For whereas the Vindictive Justice of God which is the respect of the Universal Rectitude of his Holy Nature unto the deviation of his rational creatures from the Law of their Creation required that that deviation should be revenged and themselves brought into a new way of being for God or of glorifying him by their sufferings when they had refused to do so by Obedience it was necessary on the account thereof that if they were to be delivered from that condition that the Author of their deliverance should suffer for them And this excellently suits the design of the Apostle which is to prove the necessity of the suffering of the Messiah which the Jews so stumbled at For if the Justice of God required that so it should be how could it be dispensed withall Would they have God unjust Shall he fore-go the glory of his Righteousnâ—ss and Holiness to please them in their presumption and prejudices It is true indeed if God had intended no salvation of his sons but one that was temporal like that granted unto the people of old under the conduct of Joshua there had been no need at all of the sufferings of the Captain of their salvation But they being such as in themselves had sinned and come short of the glory of God and the salvation intended them being spiritual consisting in a new ordering of them for God and the bringing of them unto the eternal enjoyment of him in Glory there was no way to maintain the Honour of the Justice of God but by his sufferings And as here lay the great mistake of the Jews so the denial of this condecency of Gods Justice as to the sufferings of the Messiah is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Socinians Schlictingius on this place would have no more intended but that the way of bringing Christ to suffer was answerable unto that design which God had laid to glorifie himself in the salvation of man But the Apostle says not that it became or was suitable unto an arbitrary free decree of God but it became himself as the Supreme Ruler and Judge of all he speaks not of what was meet unto the execution of a free Decree but what was meet on the account of Gods Holiness and Righteousness to the constitution of it as the description of him annexed doth plainly shew And herein have we with our Apostle discovered the great indispensible and fundamental cause of the sufferings of Christ. And we may hence observe that V. Such is the desert of sin and such is the immutability of the Justice of God that there was no way possible to bring sinners unto glory but by the death and sufferings of the Son of God who undertook to be the Captain of their salvation It would have been unbecoming God the Supreme Governour of all the world to have passed by the desert of sin without this satisfaction And this being a truth of great importance and the foundation of most of the Apostles ensuing discourses must be a while insisted on In these Verses that fore-going this and some of those following the Apostle directly treats of the Causes of the sufferings and death of Christ. A matter as of great importance in it self comprizing no small part of the mystery of the Gospel so indispensibly necessary to be explained and confirmed unto the Hebrews who had entertained many prejudices against it In the fore-going Verse he declared the cause 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the inducing leading moving cause which was the Grace of God by the grace of God he was to taste death for men This grace he farther explains in this Verse shewing that it consisted in the Design of God to bring many sons to glory All had sinned and come short of his glory He had according to the exigence of his Justice denounced and declared Death and Judgment to be brought upon all that sinned without exception Yet such was his infinite Love and Grace that he determined or purposed in himself to deliver some of them to make them sons and to bring them unto glory Unto this end he resolved to send or give his Son to be a Captain of salvation unto them And this Love or Grace of God is every where set forth in the Gospel How the sufferings of this Captain of salvation became useful unto the sons upon the account of the manifold union that was between them he declares in the following Verses farther explaining the Reasons and Causes why the benefit of his sufferings should redound unto them In this Verse he expresseth the cause 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the procuring cause of the death and sufferings of Christ which is the Justice of God upon supposition of sin and his purpose to save sinners And this upon examination we shall find to be the great cause of the death of Christ. That the Son of God who did no sin in whom his soul was always well pleased on the account of his obedience should suffer and die and that a death under the sentence and curse of the Law is a great and astonishable mystery all the Saints of God admire at it the Angels desire to look into it What should be the cause and reason hereof why God should thus bruise him and put him to grief This is worth our enquiry and various are the conceptions of men about it The Socinians deny that his sufferings were poenal or that he died to make satisfaction for sin but only that he did so to confirm the Doctrine that he had taught and to set us an
which necessarily infers his prae-existence in another nature their perswasion about the Person of Christ is utterly overthrown Their exceptions in their controversial writings unto this place have been else-where considered Those of Eniedinus on this Text are answered by Paraeus those of Castalio by Beza and the objections of some others by Gomarus We shall in the first place consider what is proposed for the confirmation of their sense by Schlictingius or Crellius and then the exception of a very learned Expositor unto the sense before laid down and confirmed And Schlictingius first argues from the Context Praeter ipsa verba saith he quae hunc sensum nullo modo patiuntur ut postea dicemus contextus ratiocinatio authoris id repudiat qui pro ratione argumento id sumere non potuit debuitve quod sibi hoc ipso argumento ratione probandum sumsisset De eo enim erat quaestio cur Christus qui nunc ad tantam majestatem gloriam est evectus non angelicam sed humanam morti variis calamitatibus obnoxiam habuerit naturam bujus vero rei quo pacto ratio redderetur per id quod non angelicam sed humanam naturam assumpserit cum istius ipsius rei quae in hac quaestione continetur nempe quod Christus homo fuit natus nunc causa ratioque quaeratur At vero si haec verba de juvandis non Angelis sed hominibus deque ope iis ferenda intelligamus pulcherrime omnia cohaerent nempe Christum hominem mortalem fuisse non angelum aliquem quod non angelis sed hominibus juvandis servandisque fuerit destinatus But the foundation of this Exposition of the Context is a mistake which his own preceding discourse might have relieved him from For there is no such question proposed as here is imagined nor doth he in his following Exposition suppose it The Apostle doth not once propose this unto confirmation that it behoved the Lord Christ to be a man and not an Angel But having proved at large before that in Nature and Authority he was above the Angels he grants verse 8. that he was for a little while made lower than they and gives at large the reason of the necessity of that dispensation taken from the work which God had designed him unto which being to bring many sons unto glory he shews and proves by sundry reasons that it could not be accomplished without his death and suffering for which end it was indispensibly necessary that he should be made partaker of flesh and blood And this he confirms farther by referring the Hebrews unto the Scripture and in especial unto the great Promise of the Messiah made unto Abraham that the Messiah was to be his seed the love and grace whereof he amplifies by an intimation that he was not to partake of the Angelical nature That supposition therefore which is the foundation of this Exposition namely that the Apostle had before designed to prove that the Messiah ought to partake of humane nature and not of Angelical which is nothing to his purpose is a surmise suited only to the present occasion Wherefore Felbinger in his Demonstrationes Evangelica takes another course and affirms that these words contain the end of what was before asserted verse 14 15. namely about Christs participation of flesh and blood which was not to help Angels but the seed of Abraham and to take them into grace and favour But these things are both of them expresly declared in those verses especially verse 15. where it is directly affirmed that his design in his Incarnation and Death was to destroy the devil and to free and save the children And to what end should these things be here again repeated and that in words and terms far more obscure and ambiguous than those wherein it was before taught and declared For by Angels they understand evil Angels and there could be no cause why the Apostle should say in this Verse that he did not assist or relieve them when he had declared in the words immediately fore-going that he was born and died that he might destroy them Neither is it comely to say that the end why Christ destroyed the devil was that he might not help him or the end why he saved the children was that he might assist them Besides the introduction of this assertion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will not allow that here any end is intimated of what was before expressed there being no insinuation of any final cause in them The Context therefore not answering their occasion they betake themselves to the words Verbum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he significat proprie manu aliquem apprehendere sive ut illum aliquo ducas sive ut sustentes hinc ad opitulationem significandum commodè transfertur quos enim adjutos volumus ne cadant vel sub onere aliquo succumbant aut si ceciderint erectos cupimus iis manum injicere solemus quo sensu Ecclesiastic 4. v. 12. De sapientia dictum est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc est opitulatur quaerentibus se eadem est significatio verbi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quod qui aliquem sublevatum velint illi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 adverso manum porrigere solent It is acknowledged that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth frequently signifie as here is alledged namely to help and assist as it were by putting forth the hand for to give relief But if that were intended by the Apostle in this place what reason can be assigned why he should wave the use of a word proper unto his purpose and frequently so applied by himself in other places and make use of another which signifying no such thing nor any where used by him in that sense must needs obscure his meaning and render it ambiguous Whereas therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies to help and relieve and is constantly used by our Apostle in that sense it being not used or applied by him in this place to express his intention but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies no such thing nor is ever used by him to that purpose the sense contended for of help and relief is plainly excluded The place of Ecclesiasticus and that alone is referred unto by all that embrace this Exposition But what if the word be abused in that place by that Writer must that give a rule unto its interpretation in all other Writers where it is properly used But yet neither is the word used there for to help and relieve but to take and receive Wisdom suscipit receiveth or taketh unto it self suo more those that seek it which is the sense of the word we plead for and so is it rendred by Translators So the Lord Christ suo modo took to himself the seed of Abraham by uniting it unto his person as he was the Son of God In the very entrance also of his discourse this Author acknowledgeth that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉