the invisible things of his power and God-head are seen in this visible fabrick but this is onely of his attributes as a picture discovereth the art but not the Person of the Painter There was indeed some manifestation of God to the Patriarchs of old and as is probably conceived it was the Son of God which did appear unto them yea and that in an humane shape for one of those three men that came to Abraham is not irrationally thought to be the second person in the Trinity but still those apparitions were but at sometimes and to some few persons and indeed were but as Irenaeus calleth them praeludia verae incarnationis forerunners of his incarnation and as it were the dawning of the day wherein the Sun of righteousness did arise Indeed so clearly did the Deity manifest it self in Christ incarnate that when Philip desireth him to shew him the Father Christ tells him he that hath seen me haâ—h seen the Father Thus as the candle giveth its light through the lanthorn and the face is seen through the vail so did the God-head manifest it self through our flesh But perhaps you will say how can this be that the Deity should be manifested in flesh whatsoever is a medium of discovering any thing must be somewhat proportionable to that it discovereth Now Flesh and God are at a distance nor is there any proportion between them but beloved St. Paul speaking of this calls it a great mysterie and therefore if we cannot see how it should be let that content us Besides it cannot be denyed but that the assumption of our flesh was in respect of the Deity not a manifestation but an obscuration and therefore it is said of him by St. Paul he emptyed himself he humbled himself when he took on him our nature but yet still in respect of us it was a manifestation To clear this briefly and yet fully you must know That objects of excelling brightness are best manifested through allaying mediums thus the Sun being in it self so transcendently lightsome cannot be looked on by us as it shineth in its own lustre but best conveyeth its light to us through the clouds and hence it is that whilest the clouds obscure they make the sun beams to us more obvious the same is the case in this present matter Gods face in it self is so bright that we cannot see it and live which made the Israelâ—tes desire that God would no more speak to them by himself but by Moses whereas in the face of Iesus Christ through the cloud as it were of our humanity God is become familiar with men and we partake of the light of the knowledge of the glory of God as St. Paul speaketh 1. To apply this here is matter of 1. Exultation and that upon several grounds 1. Because it is spoken of as a thing already accomplished it is not the life may be or shall be but was manifested this manifestation was that which the Saints of the Old Testament waited for and rejoyced in the very expectance for so it is said by Christ concerning Abraham He saw my day and rejoyced much more cause have we to rejoyce in the reall performance 2. When we look upon the impulsive cause of this manifestation which was no other than free love and mercy Revelatio deitatis revelatio charitatis in the appearing of our Saviour Christ there was an appearing of the Grace of God in the manifestation of this eternal life was a manifestation of immense love to the sonnes of men and therefore saith Athanasius our Saviour gave a great experiment of his singular affection in that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being in himself invisible he was pleased to manifest himself as the eternal word to us 3. And yet lastly considering this manifestation in the effect whereby it appeareth that as he was manifested to us so likewise for us even our Redemption The Pagans when any great works are done beyond the common course of nature ascribe it to the apparition of some deity the Son of God appeareth to do a great work such as not all the creatures in heaven or earth could possibly have effected this life was manifested yea and he was manifested that we might have life through him Why art thou strange poor trembling soul and standest afar off from him who draweth so nigh to thee the blessed God was willing to manifest the riches of his love and that all terror might be prevented he appeareth as a man God is come down and that not in a flaming fire roaring thunder warlike armour but cloathed with the garment of flesh thus whilest he vaileth his greatness he unvaileth his goodness and therfore say not Who shall go up to heaven to bring down this life to us or down into the deep to fetch it thence it is nigh us even manifesting it self in yea conveying it self to us by our flesh 2. Excitation to endeavour that as this life was manifested to and for so it may be in us Those words in the Canticles Set me as a seal upon thy heart and a signet upon thy arm are by the Antients understood as the words of Christ to his Spouse thereby stirring her up to pious affections and religious actions in quibus figura Dei Christus luceat by which Christ may shine forth and it may appear that this life liveth in her That expression of St. Paul holding forth the word of life is by some referred to Christ whom we must hold forth to the world by pious exemplary conversations that so as he was pleased to manifest himself in our nature we may manifest him in our lives I end this first generall which is the Messiahs character who is the object of the Gospel He is the â—ord let us give â—are to him He is the life let us seek it from him He is the eternal life with the Father let us adore him He was in due time manifested let us acknowledge him And to this word of life who being from eternity with the Father was thus pleased to manifest himself let us give in heart in word in life faith and affection praise and thanksgiving obedience and subjection to all eternity Amen THE FIRST EPISTLE OF St. IOHN CHAP. I. Ver. 1. That which was from the beginning which we have heard which we have seen with our eyes which we have looked upon and our hands have handled of the word of life SUch is the transcendent worth of Christ the word that no words can declare it of the word of life that no tongue can set it forth to the life of the life manifested that no expressions can manifest it and yet even in these very characters much of the excellency of Christ is delineated before us so that what the Psalmist said of Ierusalem Glorious things are spoken of thee oh thou City of God I may say of Christ as he is here
boasting of the wickednesse they act it is a confession which is attended with dedolent impâ—nitency but the penitent confession is of a contrary nature ever accompanied with a shamefull griefe and loathing 4. Beleeving and fiduciall that must be like the confession not of the malefactor to the Iudge but of a sick man to the Physitian wee read of Cain and Iudas confessing but it was rather a desperate acâ—usation then a penitent confession Daniel as he acknowledged to them belonged confusion so that to God belongeth mercy thus must our most sorrowfull acknowledgment be joyned with some comfortable hope of and trust in divine mercy 3. The consequent of this confâ—ssion must be dereliction were it onely to confesse our fault when we have done it it were an easie matter but if Solomon may be St. Iohns expositor it is not onely to confesse but forsake sin and therefore interpreters truly assert that confession is here put synecdochiâ—ally for the whole worke of repentance it being not enough for us to confesse the sin wee have committed but wee must not commit again wilfully the sins wee confess indeed it is very sad to consider how generally defective mens confessions are as to this particular Many as Fulgentius â—xcellently being pricked in conscience confess that they have done ill and yet put no end to their ill deeds they humbly accuse thmselves in Gods sight of the sinnes which oppresse them and yet with a perverse heart rebelliously heape up those sins whereof they accuse themselves The very pardon which they beg wâ—th mournfull sighs they impede with their wicked actions they aske help of the Physitian and still minister matter to the disease thus â—n vaâ—n endeavouring to appease him wâ—th penitent wordâ— whom they goe on to provoke by an impenâ—tent course â—ookâ— how Saul dealt with Davâ—d one whiâ—e confessing hiâ— injustice towards him and soone after persecuâ—â—ng him in the wildernesse so doe men with God you know the story of Pharaoh who one day saith I have sinned and promiseth to let Israel goe and the next day hardâ—neth his heart and refuseth to let them goe and this practice is too too frequent our repentance is a kind of cheâ—ker worke black whâ—te whâ—te and black we sin and then we confess we confess then again we sin But oâ— beloved what will it availe you to vomit up your sins by confession if you do it onely with the drunkard to make way for pouring in more drinke committing new sins nay with the dog you returne to your vomit and lick it up again It is excellent councell that is given by St. Ambrose oh take we heed that the devâ—ll have not cause to triumph over our remedy as well as our dâ—sease and that our repentance be not such as needs a repentance Indeed as Fulgentius appositely Then is Confession of sin Availeable when it is accompanied wâ—th a separation from sin and the practice of thâ— contrary duty and therefore what our Apostle saith of Loving let mee say of confessing confesse not in tongue or in word onely but indeed and in truth by endeavouring to forsake those sins which wee confesse not onely saying I have done iniquity but cordially aâ—ding I wâ—ll doe so no more I end this with that note of St. Austin upon those words of the Prophet Wash you make you clean He onely washeth and is clean who sorrowfully acknowledgeth past and doth not again willingly admitt future sins and so much shall serve in dispatch of the third question 4. Come we now in a few words to the last which is who they are that must thus confessâ— that is intimated in the word we To confesse 〈◊〉 is that which belongs not onely to wicked and ungodly men but to St. Iohn and such as he was good nay the best Christians and that in a respect of their 1. Past enormities True penâ—tents love still to rub upon their old sâ—res David in his psalm deprecateth the sins of his youth our old sins call for new confessions and this holy men doe upon severall considerations 1. To keep down the swellâ—ng of spirituall pride which is apt to arise in the best saints King Agathocles by drinking in â—arthen vessels to minde himselfe of his orâ—gâ—nall which was from a potter kept himsâ—lfe humble so doe good Christians by remembring and acknowledging their hainous sins before conversion 2. To gain further assurance of the pardon of these sins Faith in the best is apt to faint and feares to arise in their minds but the renewing of confession and contrition supports faith and expels fear 3. To strengthen themselves the more against relapses into those sins The best men want not temptations to the worst sins especially those which before conversion they were accustomed to lived in but every new confession is as it were a new obligation upon a man not to doe it any more 4. To enflame their souls with greater measure of love to God and Christ. The sence of sin is a great indearment of mercy and the confession of sin renewâ—th the sence of it indeed wee must not commâ—t sâ—n abundantly that grace may abound the more but we may and ought to confesse sâ—n abuâ—dantly that grace may abound be the more precâ—ous to us for these reasons it is that good Christians are frequent in confessâ—ng their old sâ—ns but besides they have new matter of coâ—â—ession in respect of 2. Their present infirmâ—tâ—es not onely all that are wicked but all that are sinners are bound to confesse their sins and as you formerly heard the best whilest they continue here are sinners whilest the ship is leaking the water must be pumped out as the room continually gathereth soyle so it must be daily swept and the stomack which is still breeding â—ll humours must have vomits administred The line of confession must be drawn out as long as the line of sinning and that is as long as the line of living To shut up therefore we may by this see what kind of Saints those are who are altogether for high raptures of gratulation and admiration but think themselves past confession and humiliation and therefore you shall observe their prayers to have little or no mixture of acknowledgment of sin To all such I shall say as the Emperor did to the Arch-Puritan Acesius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Erect thy ladder and climb alone upon it to heaven for our parts my brethren let confession of sins be as the first so the last round in that ladder to heaven by which we expect and endeavour to ascend that Celestial Habitation THE FIRST EPISTLE OF S. IOHN CHAP. I. Ver. 9. If we confesse our sins he is faithfull and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness THat Covenant which Almighty God hath made with fallen man in Christ Jesus is not unfitly called by Divines a Covenant of Grace free grace being the impulsive cause from
then which we have further to take notice of and would by no means be omitted is that the promise of the Gospel is conditional it is a position with a supposition nor are the benefits in it granted absolutely but respectively It is a question moved by some how the promise can be free and yet cnoditional not considering the difference between a meritorious cause for which a thing ought to be and a necessary condition without which it cannot be effected were there a proportion of equality between the thing promised and required the promise could not be free but the Evangelical condition is such only as maketh us meet for not worthy of the thing promised and therefore hath onely a proportion of congruity Mercy then is the spring from whence the promise floweth but duty is the channel in which it runneth down to us The primarie design of the Law was precept commanding us to do though there was annexed to it a promise which upon doing what was commanded we should receive The principal scope of the Gospel is promise revealing what God is pleased to do for us yet so as that there are precepts annexed to it which require somewhat to be done by us that we may obtain the promise What then God hath joyned together let not us put asunder the most of us with Malchus have but one eare to hear the promise but not the precept of the Gospel we like well to gather the rose and suck the hony of a promise but the condition we hate as the pricles and sting we would gladly have the priviledge assured and yet we abhorre the duty required but be not deceived if you will have the one you must do the other God will not fulfill his part unlesse we perform ours and therefore it is in vain to expect an accomplishment of his promise but on his own terms in fine the Gospel is a promise let us not be so unthankful unto God and Christ as to reject it it is a conditional promise let us not be so injurious to our selves as to misapply it 2. The Apostles heard this message of him if you ask of whom the answer is to be fetched from the end of the third verse the Father and his Son Jesus Christ it would not be passed by that the Apostle speaking of two persons nay implicitely of all three useth the singular number saying not which we heard of them but him from which though Socinus would only gather an unity of will affection yet the Orthodox conclude an unity of essence and nature The multitude of beleevers were of one heart in the primitive times and one soul yet it would have been very improper to have spoken of them as one man but inasmuch as the Father and the Son though two persons â—ave one and the same essence it was very proper to use the singular number that which we have heard of him That which we are here to take notice of is 1. Partly that these Apostles heard before they declared It is very observable that in the Hebrew tongue the same verb in Kal signifieth to learn and in Piel to teach and the same noun signifieth both an hearing and a report and indeed the Greeks use 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Latines auditio in the same sense whereby is intimated to us that we must be hearers ere we be speakers learners ere we be Teachers Scholars before we be Tutors And I could heartily wish that this consideration might be a check to the inconsiderate rashnesse of those giddy heads in this age who never sate at Gamaliels feet and yet step into Moses his chaire and though they have scarce learned any thing themselves at either School or Academy adventure to teach the people in these sacred Oratories 2. Chiefly That what they declared to the world was no other then what they heard from Christ this is that which as S. John asserteth here so S. Paul elsewhere concerning himselfe That which I have received of the Lord I have delivered unto you and in another place not I but the Lord Thus it was with the Apostles and thus it was with the Prophets who uttered nothing but what was by God revealed to them and therefore you find them very often bringing in Sic dicit Dominus Thus saith the Lord. 1. It is an Item to Ministers that our faithfulnesse appear in delivering as wholly so only the Counsell of God the mind of Christ revealed in his Word to the people whilest Jesuites declare what they hear from the Pope as accounting him infallible whilest Enthusiasts declare what they hear from the devill mistaking his delusions for the spirits inspirations let the Ministers of Christ declare nothing but what they hear though not immediately yet mediately from Christ oh far be it from us to pretend to be his messengers and yet to vent our own inventions and preach our own fancies what Ambassadour dare deliver any thing to a forraign Prince but what the King his Master giveth him in charge Oh let us who are the Ambassadours of Christ declare nothing but that message with which he sends us 2. It is a document to the people that the Apostolical writings and our preaching according to them be received by you with Faith and reverence because they are no other then the dictates of Christ indeed whose authority should prevaile if not Christs and with whom if not the Church it is the character of Christs sheep that they know his voyce and follow it we need not fear that he who is the way will cause us to wander who is the truth will cause us to erre who is the faithful witness will go about to deceive us so long as we speak the truth in and from Christ and lye not do you beleeve and doubt not 3. The Wee to whom Christ was pleased to impart this message and by whom he declared it to the world would be considered and that especially in respect of their mean and low condition if you look upon S. John and the rest of these holy Apostles with a carnal eye there was nothing in them which might render them worthy of so high a prerogative they were poor rude illiterate despised Fishermen and who were they that Christ should imploy them to be his Ambassadours Kings do not use to send beggars and pesants of their errands but Christ was pleased to make use of these contemptible persons for his Embasie In this respect it is the Apostle saith we have this treasure in earthen vessels not golden or silver but earthen vessels are chose by Christ for the receiving and communicating of this heavenly treasure of the Gospel Indeed whether you look on things or persons still they are mean and despicable which Christ imployeth in his service As the Prophet from God appointed the water of Iordan to be the means of curing Naamans leprosy so hath our Lord Christ instituted water
as lyable to the penalty so is the forgiven sinner from the punishment it selfe which is the remote term and the obligation to it which is the proxime term of pardon in this respect it is that Anselm saith to forgive sinne is not to punish it and St. Austin to the same purpose it is Gods not marking inquity so as to inflict the penalty due to it and the Schooles to remit the sinne is not to impute it so as to punish it For the fuller opening this truth know 1 On the one hand there is a great deale of difference between these two to withhold the execution off and to withdraw the obligation to the punishment it is one thing for a creditor to give day of payment and another thing to cancell the bond indeed the phrase used by Moses of Gods forgiving his people from Egypt untill now seemeth chiefely to intend his sparing to punish them but that is forgivenesse in a larger and improper sence according to the genuine notion there is a vast difference between forgiving and forbearing mercy As learned Davenant upon those words forbearing forgiving one another hath observed that there is far more in the latter than in the former since a man may forbear revenge meerly for want of ability or opportunity so is it true though not upon the same ground in respect of God his forgiving is farre more then his forbearing and therefore this latter hee vouchsafeth even to those who goe on in sinne but the former onely to them who confesse theâ—r sin since whereas by the one it is onely hee doth not as yet by the other it is that he will not at all punish 2 On the other hand there is a great deal of difference betwixt afflâ—cting for sin and punishâ—ng for sin properly so called for though the meritorious cause of both be the same to wit sin yet the impulsive cause from within is different that from an anger mixed with love this from meer anger and purely judiciall wrath besides the finall cause is far differenâ— that is for emendation of the person this is for satisfaction of the law and so whereas that is medicinall this is exitiall That God doth afflict his own people for sin yea for sinne after it is forgiven is a case so cleare that it cannot upon any just reason be denied The Antinomians doe but discover their owne blindnesse whilest they deny that God seeth sinne so as to correct it in justified persons that instance of David is pregnant whom the prophet tels as it were with one breath that God had forgiven his sinne and yet for that sinne the childe must dye that of the Psalmist concerning the Isralites is very plaine Thou wast a God that forgavest their sinne though thou tookest vengeance of their iniquities finally that of the Corinthians is no lesse apposite who though they were forgiven and therefore should not be condemned with the world yet were judged and chastized of the Lord for their sinne of unworthy receiving the holy sacrament But still though God doe afflict yet hee doth not punish for sinne those whom hee forgiveth unlesse as all afflictions may in some sort bee called punishments and the reason is plain because punishing for sinne is in a war of revenge and Satisfaction which are direâ—tly opposite to forgivenesse and wee may as well say that â— judge can at the same time pardon a malefactor and exâ—â—ute him as that God can punish when hee forgiveth indeed because those eternall miseries have most properly in them rationem paenae the nature of satâ—sfactory punâ—shment therefore forgiveness chiefly consists in taking off the obligation to that according to St. Pauls Phrâ—se There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesus but yet it is no less true that the oblâ—gation to temporall as well as eternall punishâ—enâ— is taken off so that though the same ouâ—ward miseries seize upon pardoned as well as unpardâ—ned sinners yet nâ—t in the same way as hath been already iâ—timated and therefore though God doe inflict many miseries of life yea death it self upon forgiven sinners to make them feel the smart of sinnâ— watchfull how they run into sinne and to declare his justice against sinne yet not in the least to satisfy his justice upon them for sinne that being already most fully as I shall hereafter shew performed by Christ. 2 You see the significancy of the first word and thereby the nature of the thing passe wee on to the second which though the same as to the thing with the former yet wants not its peculiar emphasis That distinction of Divines concerning remissio culpe paenae the remission of the fault and the punishment may not unfittly bee made use of for a distinct reference of those two expressions the former of forgiving more properly refers to the remission of the punishment though yet it includeth the fault as a creditor cancelleth the bond doth thereby remit the debt it selfe this latter of cleansing chiefely refers to the remission of the fault which defileth though it include the punishment because it is of that defilement which is contracted through the guilt of sinne And now as in the former so in this expression wee have two things considerable what unrightâ—ousnesse doth and what pardon doth 1 What unrighteousnesse dothâ— it maketh the sinner filthy and polluted in Gods sight sinnes as they are debita debts so they are said to bee remitted and blotted out and as they are sordes filthy so they are said else where to bee covered and here to bee cleansed Oh then how odious is an unpardoned sinner in Gods sight It is very observable how Almighty God describing the sinfull state of rebellious Israel borroweth a metaphor from a châ—ld that is not swadled but lieth polluted in its bloud the Psalmist speaking of wicked men saith They are corrupt â—nd become abominable where the former word iâ— borrowâ—d from a dead carkass and truely â— child in its bloud is not more loathsome to our eyes a carkasse on the dunghill is not more nâ—isome to our smell then a sinfull wretch is in Gods eyes and to his nostrils 2 What forgivenesse doth it cleanseth the sinner An expression that must not be strained too much as 〈◊〉 according to the doctrine of the Church of Rome the pardoning of sinne were an utter extinction and aboâ—â—tâ—on of it as cleansing doth wholy take away filthâ— truâ— it is where sinne is forgiven the filth of sinne is in some measure and shall at last bee wholly removed but that is onely the effect of glorification not of justification or sanctification and indeed as if our Apostle would prevent any such inference from this Phrase wee finde him subioyning if wee say wee have not sinned as before whâ—n hee speaketh of Christs cleansing he addeth if wee say wee have no sinne so that sinne is therefore said to bee cleansed not that the
1. Some interpreters make faithful and just to be synonima's therefore he is faithful and just because it is just he should be faithful in this respect the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth truth is by the Septuagint translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that signifieth righteousnesse nor is it without reason because it is a righteous thing to be true before a man maketh a promise he is free to make it or not but when he hath made it he is not free to keep it or not by promise a man becometh a debtor and for one to pay his debt is no more then just Indeed this is not exactly true in regard of God because we never so fully perform the condition but it is justly lyable to exception yet after a sort it is that which he accounts himself engaged to in point of justice to perform all his promises and therefore though it is meer mercy which maketh it is justice which fulfilleth the promise This interpretation Socinus layeth hold on hereby to evade the doctrine of satisfaction which this word according to its proper sense doth clearly â—avour But the designe of the Holy Ghost being in these words to strengthen our weak faith in beleeving the pardon of sin I conceive we shall do best to expound the words in that way which may most â—onduce to this end and that is as affording not only a single but a double prop to our faith from a double attribute in God and therefore I waâ—e this interpretation 2. Others there are who distinguishing these two understand by justice mercy so Grotius here saith I interpret just to be good gentle and Illyricus observeth that righteousnesse is sometimes taken for benignity and clemency in this respect iâ— is that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth mercy is sometimes by the Sepâ—uagint rendred 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that signifieth righteousnes agreeable hereunto the Greâ—k word for almes is by the Syriach rendred righteousness the merciful mans bounty is by the Psalmist and St. Paul called righteousnesse yea upon this account mercy and righteousnesse gracious and righteous are joyned together and David promiseth if God would deliver him from blood guiltinesse he would sing aloud of his righteousnesse And now according to this interpretation we see another impulsive cause of forgivenesse namely the grace mercy clemency of God Among others there are two Greek words by which pardon is set forth that excellently confirm this truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the former by St. Paul which comming from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to forgive freely and intimateth free grace to be the spring of pardon the latter by the Authour to the Hebrews in that quotation of the Prophet I will be merciful to their sins and their transgressions which is by shewing mercy to the sinner in the forgivenesse of his sins so that we may hence learn to what we are to ascribe the pardon of our sins meerly the good will and grace and mercy of God Indeed we shall still find all those benefits especially spiritual which we receive attributed to mercy the regeneration of our nature according to his mercy he hath begottâ—n us the salvation of our soules according to his mercy he saved us and the remission of our sins through the tender mercy of our God oh let us admire the bowels of love the riches of grace the treasures of mercy which are manifested in pardoning and cleansing our sins 3. But though this interpretation may be received yet since it is a good rule in expounding Scripture to keep to the proper meaning of the words if there be not very good reason to the contrary and there being no reason why we should here recede from I have chosen rather to adhere to the litterall sence of the word Iust. For though it be true that 1. The commission of sin deserveth punishment and therefore justice which giveth every one their due calls for the punishing not the remitting of sin and 2. The confession of sin cannot as hath been before asserted deserve pardon because it is no proportionable compensation of the offence Upon which grounds it appeareth that this justice which forgiveth cannot be in respect of us yet it still is a truth in regard of Christ God is just to forgive so that a Gualtâ—r well he cannot but forgive unlesse he will be unjust to his own Son and inasmuch as our Apostle in the foregoing verse save one expressely attributes this cleansing to Christs blood this interpretation of justice is doubtlesse most genuine and congruous To clear briefly and perspicuously this sweet truth of pardoning justice be pleased to know that 1. The mâ—ledictory sentence of death denounced by the law against sinners was inflicted by God upon Christ this is that which the Prophet Esay positively asserts where he saith the chastisement that is the punishment called a chastisement because inflicted by a father and onely for a time of our peace was upon him and again he was oppressed and he was afflicted which according to the genuine sence of the original is better rendred it was exacted to wit the punishment of our sin and he was afflicted or he answered to wit to the demand of the penalty It may be here enquired how it can stand with Godâ— justice â—o inflâ—ct punishment upon the guiltles and if this doubt be not cleared we shall stumble at the threshold and the foundation of this pardoning justice will be layed in injustice and truly when we find God saying the soul which sinneth shall die and asserting those who condemne the righteous as an abomination to him it is hard to imagin how he can himself justly punish the innocent for the nocent To remove this scruple consider 1. That God did inflict death on Christ is undeniable and who may question the justice of his actions when as things are therefore just because he wills them to be done whose will is the supream rule of justice 2. There cannot be a more necessitating reason of Gods afflâ—cting Christ by death then this so that if it be not just for God to inflict it upon him on this ground it is much lesse upon any other That Christ should die for the confirmation of his doctrine was needless it was done sufficiently by miracles To make way by death to his glory was not necessary he might have been translated as were Enoch and Eliah To dye only as an example of patience and fortitude to his followers is a far less cogent cause then to dye as an example of Gods justice and severity against sin nor need he have died for that end since the death of any of his Apostles might have been exemplary in that kind Finally had he died only for the declaration of Gods immense love to us and not for the demonstration of his severe justice against sin whilest he had been so
that there be in some things a similitude though not in all things an aequality nor is it any wonder if there be more energy in the body then in the shadow since the shadow is but a resemblance of the body 2 Besides this allusion which no doubt is most congruous to S. Pauls phrase there is another more suitable to this of S. John and that is in reference to the Sacrifices of expiation attonement Almighty God in the Law appointed both the burnt-offering for sin in generall and trespasse-offerings for particular sins by which being offered up he became appeased towards the sinner Now all those Sacrifices did look at Christ and the attonement which was made by them was not as considered in themselves but as they did typify Christs death and the propitiation to be wrought by it That those sacrifices did all of them typify Christ seemeth to me an undoubted truth and that among others for this reason because by Christs death they were abolished and became mortua dead yea soon after mortifera not onely dead but deadly upon this account that to continue those Sacrifices was to deny Christ. That whatsoever efficacy those Sacrifices had towards attonement was onely in reference to Christ must needs follow upon the former since as when the antitype is accomplished the type ceaseth so the vigour of the type whilest inbeing is from its relation to the antitype in this respect it is that under the legall administrations the people offering Sacrifices were minded of Christ and beleeving in him and God was propitiated by those Sacrifices as they did prefigure and so as it were mind him of Christ to be offerred up a reall and effectuall propitiation To close up this it would not be passed by how emphaticall our Apostles expression is in that he doth not onely say of Christ he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a propitiatour but the propitiation it selfe that is victima 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the propitiatory Sacrifice Indeed he is both the Priest and the Sacrifice rhe propitiator and the propitiation according to which is that of Origen God hath set him forth a propitiation through faith in his blood that by the Sacrifice of his body he might render God propitious to men In one word to speak after the Schooles inasmuch as Christ by his death did removere peccatum take away the guilt of sin which causeth the enmity and offerre sacrificium Deo acceptissimum offer up a sacrifice most grateful to God he might be truly said to be the propitiation There is only one objection which carrieth in it a shew of reason and therefore calls for a solution It is drawn from those Scriptures in which Gods love to mankind is set down as the cause of sending Christ into the world whereas if Christs coming into the world to dye did propitiate God for our sins this love of his towards man should be the effect not the cause and those Scriptures should have run thus not God so loved the world that he sent but God sent his Son into the world that he might love it and not in this was the love of God manifested but by this was the love of God procured to wit the sending his only begotten Son To untye this knot you may please to know that these two assertions are not irreconcileable Gods love to us moved him to send Christ to dye Christs dying moveth him to love us Indeed the love of God to man is in one respect the cause and in another the effect of Christs death and that thus it appeared to St. John is plain in that he puts these two together in one verse he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins To clear the truth hereof briefly observe these distinctions 1. Man fallen is to be considered say the Schooles two wayes either quantum ad naturam or quantum ad culpam as made by God or marr'd by sin he loved us as the work of his hands and that love was the cause of sending Christ he hated us as transgressours of his Law and Christ by making satisfaction removeth that hatred and obtaineth his favour 2. There is a twofold love of God towards man The one of commiseration and benevolence whereby he was reconcileable yea himself appointed the way of reconciliation and this love was the cause of Christs death The other of friendship or complacency whereby he becomes actually reconciled and so conferreth all good upon us and this love is the effect of Christs death It is observable concerning the friends of Job that God said to them My wrath is kindled against you therefore take seven bullocks and seven rams and go to my servant Job and offer up for your selves a burnt-offering and my servant Job shall pray for you for him will I accept wherein it appeareth God so far tendred them as to acquaint them with his wrath and the meanes of pacifying it but his wrath was not removed till those meanes were used An enemy may so far love as to propose and offer conditions of peace to his adversary but till those conditions be accomplished and performed there is no amity between them so is it in this case though God loved us so as to propose nay indeed to perfect the meanes of reconciliation yet still he is not actually reconciled to us but only in and by those means the chief whereof is Christs passion The summe of all then amounts to this God considered without respect to Christ was though iratus yet placabilis actually angry yet so as that there was a possibility of appeasing it he was not so far provoked with men as with the Angels for whom he would not appoint nor accept a ransom but still it is only in and through Christ that he becometh placatus actually appeased toward sinners 2. He only is the propitiation for our sins only Moses must go up to God in the mount none but the High Priest must enter with the blood into the holy of holies Christ alone must mediate with God for man Indeed there was not could not be found in heaven or earth any one fit or able to undertake this work This will the better appear if we consider that whosoever would become a propitiation for our sins must both be free himself from all sin and be both capable and able to undergoe the punishment of our sins 1. He must be free from sin and therefore we could not propitiate God for our selves can it be imagined a Rebâ—ll should pacify the King towards himself or fellow-rebels whatever we could do whilest in our sins were but evaginato gladio pacem peterâ— seeking for peace with a drawne sword in our hand against our Soveraign indeed the good works of them that are in Christ do placere but not pacare please not appease and that only as dyed in Christs blood but as we are in a
within moving God to make that Covenant But though it be of grace yet it is still a Covenant and therefore as in all Covenants there is a mutual obligation on both parties between whom the Covenant is made so is it in this wherein is signified as what God will do for us so what he will have done by us Hence it is that we find not only in the Law but Gospel commands as well as comforts precepts as promises yea these promises still proposed conditionally for so we may observe among other places in this Chapter and particularly in this verse wherein remission is annexed to confession If we confess our sins he is faithful c. Having already dispatched the duty in an absolute consideration as it is the matter of a precept we are now to handle the relative as it is the condition of a promise the prosecution of which shall be done two wayes 1. Negatively it is not a cause but only a condition of the promise and therefore it is not said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because but if we confess our sins indeed if confession be a cause of remission it must be either meritorious or instrumental but it is not it cannot be either of these 1. Confession is not cannot be a meritorious cause of forgiveness it is satisfaction not confession which merits remission and therefore with men forgiveness upon meer acknowledgment is an act not of equity but of charity in this regard the merit of remission is Christs not ours his blood whereby he hath made satisfaction not our tears which are only the concomitant of confession True it is there is a congruity in confession inasmuch as it maketh us fit for but there is no condignity to render us deserving of this mercy of forgiveness It may perhaps be here inquired why since the commission of sin is meritorious of punishment the confession is not of pardon for if the sin be therefore of so great a desert because against God why shall not the acknowledgement be of as great merit because to God The answer to which is iustly returned partly that whereas our Commissions are purely sinful our confessions are not purely penitent since even when we confess our sins we sin in confessing partly that whereas the demerit of the fault is chiefly respectu objecti in regard of the person to whom the injury is done the amends for the fault is respectu subjecti principally considerable in respect of the person by whom it is made and hence it is that though the sin committed by us bee of infinite demerit because against an infinite justice yet nothing done by us can bee of infinite merit because wee are finite persons 2. Confession is not the instrumentall cause of forgivenesse to clear this the more be pleased to know that there is a great deale of difference between that which is meerely conditionall and that which is so a condition as it is withall an instrument that may be a necessary condition which is onely required to the qualification of the subject on whom the thing is conferred but that which is not onely a condition but an instrument hath some kinde of influence into the Production of the thing which is conferred and this being well observed will serve excellently to clear that Orthodox doctrine of justification by faith alone we are justified a chiefe ingredient whereof is forgivenesse of sinnes onely by faith not by repentance not by charity nor by any other grace or work because it is onely faith which concurreth as an instrument to this work in as much as it is the hysope sprinkling the soul with the bloud the hand applying to the soule the righteousnesse of Christ for which wee are forgiven and justified and hence it is that the preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is onely used concerning faith hee is the propitiation for our sinnes through faith and we are justified by faith whereas it is never said wee are justified by confessing or forgiving or repenting though yet still these are conditions of justification and forgivenesse in as much as they are necessary qualifications required in the person whom God doth justify and to whom sinne is forgiven 2. Affirmatively it is a condition and that both exclusive and inclusive 1. It is an exclusive condition this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this si as nisi if otherwise not there is no forgivenesse to bee had without confession though it be not that for which no nor yet by which yet it is that without which no remission can be obtained I thinke it is needlesse to dispuâ—e what God could doe by his absolute power it is enough hee cannot doe â—t by his actuall because he will not truly though theâ—e is no need of any yet there is abundant reason of this divine pleasure since it is that which his justice his purity and his wisedome seem to call for Justice requireth satisfaction much more confessiion If God shall pardon them which doe not confesse but conceal and goe on in sinne it would open a gap to all prophanesse and impiety which cannot consist with his purity finally it cannot stand with Gods wisedome to bestow mercy but on them that are in some measure sitted for it and wee are not cannot be sitted for remâ—ssion till we have practised confession None are fitioâ— mercy but they who see theâ—r need of it hunger after it and know how to value it whereas if God should offer pardon to an impenitent he would scarce accept it how ever hee would not prize it It is confession which maketh us taste the bitternesse of sin and so prepareth us for a relish of the sweetnesse of forgiving mercy The exclusivenesse of this condition is that which Solomon expresseth when hee opposeth hiding to confessing and as hee assureth mercy to the one so hee flatly denyeth it to the other he that hideth his sin shall not prosper and to this purpose it is that Almighty God threatneth I will goe and returne to my place till they acknowledge their offence and seeke my faâ—e in which doneâ— is manifestly intimated a nisi untill that is unlesse they acknowledge I will not vouchsafe my gracious presence to them yea this is that which David found verified in his own experience where he saith when I kept silence my bones waxed old day and night thy hand was heavy upon mee I acknowledged my sinne and thou forgavest unlesse the sore be opened and the corrupt matter let out the party cannot be healed when the ague breaketh forth at the lips then there is hope of its cessation If the Apostume break and come not forth at the eares or mouth the patient is but a dead man till that which oppresseth the stomach be cast up there can bee no ease and unlesse there be a penitent laying open of our sinnes
it to wicked men 219. Deceive Man apt to deceive himself 246. the more need to wheare of it 253 254. there are many deceâ—vers 246. Despair Antidotes against it Christs blood two 216 217. his Avocateship 360 361. his propitiation 381. especially the undversality of it 400. despaire and presumpt on two dangeroâ—us rocks 344. E. EPistles their use 12. Exordium's the properties of them 18. Excuse men apt to make for their sins 268. by transferring the fault on others 269. the sins of the godly no excuse for the wicked 276 237. F. FAlls Saints nay fall grossely 347. fear of falling a preservative 348. Father when applied to God how taken 50. how God is our Father and how Christs 357. Fathers love to their children 333 357. Faith the Christians spiritual sense 74. the means of fellowship with God 85. it applieth but doth not appropriate Christ. 38 no salvation but by faith in Christ. 389 390. greatly oppugned by the devil 126. it is neither unmannerly nor uncharitable 386. the only instrument of pardon 281. Faithfulness Gods in performing his promises 310 311. ground of faith 313. mans required in imitation of Gods 312. Fellowship between Saints 83. with God and Christ wherein it consists 91 92 93. we may have it as well as the Apostles 84. how with the Father 94. how with Christ. 95 96 97. earnestly to be desired 109. the difficulty of attaining it 197. impossible to men continuing in their sins 167. Forgiveness of sin the nature of it 292 293. why called cleansing 296 297. Gods prerogative 304.305 306. Gods faithfulnesse obligeth him to it 312 314. It is just with God to forgive sin and how 316 317. mercy the impulsive cause in respect of us 315. it is onely of sin past 299. it s universal extent 300 301. how consistent with afflictions for sin 294 295. how differâ—nt from forbearing 293. earnestly to be longed after 298. mans required in imitation of Gods 308 309. Forsaking sin to be joyned with confession 275 276. The truest part of repentance 335. how far it is required 337. G. GEntiles as well as Jewes capable of the mâ—rit of Christs death 393 394. Gnosticks their impurity 167. their pretences of purity 245. God all good in him 111 112. why compared to light 137 138. how manifesting himself in the incarnation 58. no authour of sin 142 144. Gospel why called the Word of life 30 31. its excellency above the law 33.129 366. accidentally the savour of death 34. chiefly promissory 129. a doctrine of joy 115. its Antiquity 78 79. its doctrines made by wicked men incouragements to sin 340. whereas they are arguments against sin 341. though a refuge when we have sinned 366. Grace the difference between sincere and counterfeit grace 182 183. see holinesse H. HEathen their condition to be pitied 392. Hide our sins from God we cannot 265. Holiness Gods why compared to light 139 140. all holinesse from him 141.187 mans holinesse why resembled by light and by what light 181 182. how it fits for fellowship with God 198. Humility maketh men low-conceited of themselves 249. she remainders of sin in us should make us humble 238. Hypocrites the worst of sinners 148. sharply to be reproved 149. they are best conceited of themselves 148. they say they have no sin 244 245. they pretend to fellowship with God 163 164. the most miserable men 175. the contrariety of their conversation to their profession 172. I. IEsuites their Arrogancy in assuming that title to themselves 95. Ignorance compared to darknesse 151. affected damnable 170. Image of God what it is 92. Imitation of God required 189 190. Incarnation why called a manifestation 55 56. why the second person incarnate 57. Infidelity it maketh God a lyar 360. Infirmities to be altogether without them the priviledge of heaven 228 229.349 they accompany our best duties 234 235 236. they hinder not fellowship with God 218. they ought to be bewayled 350. but yet must not too much discourage us 239. John his humility 9. prudence 10. innocency 11. his first Epistle the scope of it 2 3 124 125. the comprehensiveness of it 4 5 6 7. why cvlled Cathalick 14 15 16. Joy it is that which all men seek after 106. Christianity doth not abolish it 113. the difference between worldly and spiritual joy 108 109 110. Spiritual joy is fixed on God and Christ. 107 111 it supports in all afflictions 110. Judge how Christ both Iudge and Advocate 352. we must nat judge according to outward shewes 165. our owne frailties should make us judge charitably of others 238 239 348. Justice of God appeareâ—h both in forgiving penitents and punishing of the impenitent 322 323. Justification and sanctification inseparable 290. Justiciaries their self-conceit 244.245 the causes of it 251 252. K. KNowledg not avayleable without practice 185 it must be communicated to others 24. of God how to be attained 143. of sin an antecedent to confession 273. L. LIfe Eternall to be sought after 4. how great the joy of it 112 113. in what respects through Christ. 45. Light threefold 180. Love of God to man threefold 377 378. Lie wicked men fasten on God 255. hypocrisie a reall lie 172 two things concurre to a lye 166.169 three sorts of lies 173. M. MEan things made choyce of to be Christs instruments and why 133.134 Mediatorship onely belonging to Christ. 98.99 how different from his Advocateship 352.353 Men ranked into two sorts 196. Metaphors must be familiar 135 136. Ministers must be sent 25. they must be assured of the truth of what they deliver 73. what they declare to others must be received from Christ. 132. they must give every one their due 137 138. their language must be plain 39. their aime is to beat down sin 338. they must use mildnesse in their instructions 333.334 fathers to the people and how 328. their great love to the people 331 332. their care of and joy in the peoples welfare 119 120 123. they must seek the peoples benefit 85 86. to be honoured and reverenced and obeyed 32 330 331 how far confession to be made to them 271. what their power in forgiving 307. Morality how different from Sanctity 182.183 N. NAme it is prudence sometimes to conceale it 10. O. OBedience the properties of it represented by walking 184. Omniscency Gods attribute 138. Originall sin remaining in the best 231 232. P. PApists we dare vie with them in the point of antiquity 82. Pardon of sin see forgivenesse Precepts See commandements Presumption the grounds of it 162. the difference between presumptuous sinners and weake Saints 262. Christs universall propitiation no just cause of it 401. Pride Spirituall what should abase it 103. Profession without practise a lye 170.173 the loose conversation of professors how great a dishonour to God Religion and injurie to themselves 174 175. Promises their worth 130. benefit 43 303. free and yet conditional 130. Punishment of the guiltlesse how consistent with Gods justice 316
317. of the Godly how consistent with forgiveness 294. Purposes without performance unavailable 186. Propitiation See Reconciliation Christ is the propitiation 369 374 377. the severall causes of it 380. R. REeconciliation is of God to man as wel as man to God 370 371. merited onely by Christ. 378. attributed both to his sacrifice and Intercession 368. God being our Father very willing to it 357. Redemption in what sense universall 395 396. Religion Christian continually proposed 75. Reproofe must be plaine 147. gentle 149 150. with respect to the difference of sinners 148. how profitable 16 Resurrection of Christ how proved 97. S. SAcrament of the Lords Supper no corporal presence in it 69. Sacrifices all looked at Christ. 376. Saints may fall grssoely 347 348. Salvation only by Christ. 388 389. Satisfaction made by Christ to Gods justice 318 319. how consistent with remission 320 321. Scriptures their fulness sufficiency 8.116 they consist of three parts 1. The certanty of Apostolical writings 70 71. Gods mercy in giving them to us 13.28 Some parts more useful then others 145. fulnesse of joy afforded by them 141. to be read by the vulgar 116 117.118 Senses the velidâ—ty of a testimony from them 32. Shame when of confessing sin bad 265 Sin To sin how taker in Scripture 345. it is a wandring 287. why called unrighteousnesse 288 289. it maketh a man a debtor 292. it rendreth us filthy in Gods sight 296. the soules sicknesse 325. compared to darknesse 152 153. the great guilt of it 214. the onely makebate 369 370. God cannot be the authour of it 142. all men by nature sinners 226. The holiest not without it here 226 227 228 229. from grose sins they may be free 230. the sins of the godly no excuse for the wicked 233 234. Christ a propitiation for the greatest sins 387. Sonne how destinct from and one with the Father 51 52. to be worshipped as the Father 58. how inferior to the Father 356. T. TEstament the difference between the New and the Old 33.41 our happinesse who live in the times of the New 41 42. Trinity illustrated by the metaphor of light 136. Truth three fold 170. to do the truth what 171. W. WAlking what it imports 154. Watchfull we ought to be because prone to sin â—39 Wicked men delight in sin 155. make it their course 156. grow worse and worse ibid. their miserable estate 158 159. they cannot have communion with God 186. Witnesse how many wayes we beare it to Christ. 23. Word of God a great mercy that it is written 13 28. the rule of truth 259. as it is among us so it must be in uâ— 257 258 a preservative against sin and accordâ—ngâ—â— to be made use of 338 339. Words nothing without workes 18â— World made by Christ. 40. how 〈…〉 the whole world â—9â— â—99 Writing the advantage of it 26. ERRATA PAge 12. line 36. read 〈◊〉 p. 15. l. 17. 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 p. 17. l. â— s. we r. was p. 22. l. â— bl the and. r. receive p. 23. l. 21. r. credit p. 24. l. 32. r. eâ—râ—and p. 39. l. 2â— r. â—â—struse and l. 30. r. Gospel p. 36 l. 35. f. their r. word p. 80 l 21. bl the and â— are it in l. 12. after have p. 86. l. 3. marg f. 〈…〉 de p. 108. l. 7. r. â—oyeâ— p. 109 l. 15. r. these p. 119. l. 35. r. here p. 120. l. 22. bl afterward p. 12â— l. â—7 r. hardly p. 127. l. 10 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1â— r. he before presently p. 129. l. 19. r. here 36. r. a before promissory p. 100. l. 10. marg r. mentâ—mur p. 168. l. 18. bl the p. 201. in the Tit. 〈…〉 l. 25. r. case p. 203 l. 27. r. it is it p. 204. l. 3. after clause r. 〈◊〉 p. 205. l. 34. after us r. as p. 207. l. 6. after to r· give l. 7. r. doubt p. 209. l. 11. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 211. l. 3. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 23. r. could not be l. 33. f. sure r. since p. 212. l. 25. aftâ—r upon r. those words p. 215. l. 32. r. sight p. 223. l. 10. r. according l. 13. bl so l. 35 set the figure 2. p. 224. l. 30. bl at and. p. 226. l. 35. r. scipsiâ— p. 227. l. 16. r. sense p. â—29 â—8 marg 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 246. l. 9. after and r. as p. 257. l. 26. f. a r. the p. 259. l. 22. after the r. truth p. 261. l. â— for his r. Gods p. 271. l. â—5 bl the after notorious p. 275 14. â— that r. 〈◊〉 p. 276. l. 24. after suâ— bl the p. 283. l. â—5 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 284. l. 1â— after sincere bl p. 287. l. 15. f. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 f. sua r. suâ—m f. 〈…〉 p. 288. l. 15. m. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 289. l. 36. transfer the from affâ—ight to thee p. 293 l. 3. f. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 295. l. 34. r. cancelling p. 333. l. 24. bl ad 27.28 f. sincerity r. severity 28. f. hardneâ—s r. hardeneth p. 338. l. 23. r. as clear glasâ—e p. â—42 l 28. after excite bl the p. 345 l. 3. r. repentance p. 346. l. 7. r. it is p. 351. l. 6. f. this r. the. p. 355. marg r. lap p. 358. marg r. Mestrez p. 361. marg d. verum r. indicat p 362. l 9. bl 10. r. perverted p. 363. l. 6. r. plead p. 369. l. 10. f. the put a p. 370. l. 33. put a â—fter contentions bl the after Solomon p. 372. l. 8. r. carrying in it p. 374. l. 26 after native bl the p. 381. l. 25. bl a. p. 387 l. 20. r. and. 21. r. Christ. Books printed and are now to be sold by Nathanaell Web and William Grantham at the black Bear in S. Pauls Church-yard neer the little North-door Books in Quarto MAster Isaac Ambrose Prima media ultima First Middle and Last things in three Treatises of regeneration Sanctification and with Meditations on Life Death Hell and Judgement in 4. Mr. Nathanael Hardy 11. severall Sermons preached upon Solemn occasions collected into one Volume in 4. The first Ep. General of St. John unfolded and applied in 22. Sermons in 4. History survey'd in a brief Epitome or a Nursery for Gentry comprised in an intermixed discourse upon Historicall and Poetical Relations in 4. Mr. Nicolson's full and plain Exposition of the Church Catechisme in 4. Dr. Stoughton's 13. Sermons being an Introduction to the Body of Divinity in 4. Dr. John Preston The Golden Scepter with the Churches Marriage and the Churches Carriage in three Treatises in 4. A position delivered in Cambridge concerning the Irresistiblenesse of Converting Grace in 4. Mr. Thomas Cradock Gospel-Liberty in the Extention Limitation of it in 4 Mr. John Browning Concerning Publique Prayer and the Fasts of the Church six Sermons or Tracts in