reason is because in the Church of GOD there are euer some to whome they are effectually perfourmed howesoeuer the most neglect and refuse them yet there is a remnant which receiue them still and are saued by them Tim. What profit is to be made of this poynt Silas That the great number of vnbeleeuers and wicked men should neuer weaken our account and credit of the promises of the Gospell which being vniuersally reiected yet still take place in the elect to whome they are peculiarly made Tim. Tell vs what is meant by the election of grace Silas The guift of predestination or the grace whereby men are elected or predestinated or by an Hebraisme a gracious and free election The meaning is that such as are kept free from the pollution of Idolatry and other sins they may not thanke themselues as if they were worthy of it for their workes sake but are beholding to the good pleasure of God who hath separated them from others according to his gracious purpose Note that election is not here put and taken actiuely whereby wee chuse grace but passiuely whereby men were chosen of God for hee speaketh of such as were foreknown of God verse second of Gods election of men and not of mens election of God Tim. What is the doctrine from hence Silas That election vnto eternall life proceedeth from the free fauour and grace of God This is the same with that which is written Rom. 9 11 15 Eph. 1 4 5. Ro 15 19. Tim. What profit is to be made of this poynt Silas First it confuteth the Pelagians who affirme that men chuse Gods mercies not that his free mercies chuseth them whereas this text plainly speaketh not of mans electing God but of Gods electing men out of his grace not out of their owne merites Also it ouerthrowes the conceite of Origen and Chrysostome which vpon this place imagine some men which beleeue in Christ to be saued by grace and others which besides faith haue good workes to be saued by the election of grace deuiding things which are conioyned to wit election and grace faith and works as if there could be a iustifying faith without works Secondly it abateth the pride of all flesh to teach that election commeth not from themselues but is wholly of grace Lastly it 〈◊〉 vs vp to great loue and thankefulnesse towards God to praise him for his free loue Tim. What other doctrines will flow from these words Silas That if election be of grace then our iustification sanctification and glorification all be from grace too as it is written 2. Tim. 1 9. Rom. 3 24 28. The reason hereof is 〈◊〉 est causa causae est causa causati quicquid est causa antecedentis est causa consequentis Tim. But be grace and works at such vartance as that these blessings and things cannot proceed from both Silas Yes verily they are as contrary as can be when the cause of election and saluation is to be searched out there is no coniunction of grace and workes no more then of light and darkenesse as the text speaketh If it be of faith then not of works The reason hereof is because merite of works being once put and granted grace is destroyed as it is heere written then were grace no grace Tim. What is the cause of this consequence that therefore grace is destroyed if works be admitted as a partner in the cause of election and saluation Sil. The reason is because grace giueth eternall life and whatsoeuer belongs to it as a thing not due but merite of workes craues them all as a debt therefore if election calling iustification c. should not bee wholly from grace but in part also from workes then grace should not remaine free and therefore shoulde not bee grace see Rom. 4 4 〈◊〉 Gal. 3 18. Tim. What profite of this point Silas It refuteth such as in the mystery of election iustification c. doe mingle grace and merite of workes together ascribing some-what to grace some-what to workes foreseene in matter of election past or present in matter of iustification whereas these thinges by God himselfe are pronounced asystata which haue no agreement at all together Secondly we are taught that it is impossible that the Church of God should faile upon earth because it doth springe out of the election and grace of God which cannot at any time vtterly faile Thirdly it conuicteth them of error which heere vnderstand by grace infused grace the habite of iustice powred into mans heart by the Spirite whereas the Apostle speaketh heere of grace as it is in God subiectiue as in a subiect and doth oppose it as a thing contrary to the works of righteousnesse which be in men as to a contrary and tels vs what he meanes by grace to wit the election of God Lastly this must prouoke all beleeuers to ioyfull thankefulnesse seeing God when he could not saue them by works which they had not did by his franke grace chuse and saue them which deserues at our hands al possible praise both in word and deed in life and death Such as bee often mindefull of such a free mercy to glorifie God for it it is a good signe that they be vnder this grace and are euen the chosen children of God DIAL V. Verses 6 7. And if it be of grace it is no more of workes or else were grace no more grace but if it be of works it is no more grace or else were works no more works What then Israel hath not obtained that he sought but the election hath obtained it and the rest haue beene hardened Tim. VVHat doth this text containe Silas These two thinges hauing set downe grace to be the efficient cause of election and of effectuall calling now he excludeth workes or denieth them to be any cause thereof Secondly he concludeth the first part of this Chapter touching the casting away of the Iewes in the seauenth verse That all which were freely elect amongst them were certainely saued none perished but the reprobates and that through their owne default because they were hardened in their sinnes and namely in their disobediēce of the Gospel of Christ which they obstinately and rebelliously refused beeing graciouslie and first tendred to them Tim. What signifies Grace Silas Grace signifies Gods free fauour or his euerlasting gracious loue and mercy and workes doe signifie merite of workes or meritorious workes for these bee contrary to grace and not woorkes simply considered as duties Tim. By what argument doeth Paul shut out workes from being any cause of election or vocation or how proueth hee that these come not from merit of workes Silas The argument is taken from the opposition or repugnancy of flat contraries such as in no wise can stand and consist together being immediate contraries The argument may thus bee framed If election and calling bee of meritorious works then it is not of grace but they both come of grace therefore not of
sake he maketh noble or base Eightly Paul saw no other cause of election but the will of God and it is dangerous to assigne that to bee a cause of election which Paul purposely entreating of this matter saw not this is to make our selues wise and him blockish nay our selues wiser then the Holy-Ghost Ninthly if the cause of election were workes or faith or vnbeleefe cause reprobation what need he say Oh the depth or obiect Is their iniquity with God and therefore it necessarily followeth that election is most free and absolute without any dependance vpon them Yet God did not chuse vs to the end without respect to the meanes for his decree concerneth both meanes and the end This is sufficient to stoppe the clamours of the Lutherans Tim. Doe ye thinke so of reprobation that it is free also without dependance on infidelity or ill workes fore-seene Silas In that some are not chosen to life it is without all respect of their vnbeleefe as a mouing cause but in that they are not onely refused but also appointed vnto destruction this is not without reference to infidelity sinne which as it is the proper cause of damnation so it moued God to ordaine to destruction but not to refuse and cast out from saluation for this was done to Esau ere he had done euill Secondly it is written God hardneth whom he will his will then is the high and first cause why men are not saued Thirdly God as a Potter may make vessels to ignominy for his wils sake Fourthly as we were corrupt in Adam God could see nothing in any man saue vnbeleefe and sinne And therefore if these had moued him not to chuse all had beene reprobated then Paul also should haue said that the purpose might remaine according to merite Lastly there is no vnrighteousnesse to cast off and refuse for sinne all will confesse this to bee iust Tim. What is the end or finall cause of election Sil. The vtmost end is the praise of his free grace Eph. 1. 5. hence elect are called vessels of mercy Rom 9 23. The nerest cause is mans saluation to attain eternal life and the final cause of reprobation is the praise of his iustice and the destruction of sinners Tim. What be the effects of election Silas Two First grace in this life as redemption by Christ vocation faith iustification adoption sanctification repentance good works perseuerance in grace Secondly vnspeakable and endlesse glory in heauen Tim. Are men and women elected to both these Sil. They be so for first Iacob and Isaac were chosen to the grace of the promise verse 8. but this comprehends al. Secondly it were absurd to separate the means from the end or end from the meanes Thirdly Scripture speaketh thus Acts 13 48. So many as were ordained to life beleeued Fourthly hec speaketh of election which is a preparation of the Vessell of mercie to glorie and which is ioyned with loue which is a willing of eternal life to men and all things which bring thither Tim. What vse of this point Silas It confuteth the Papists which say it is to grace and not to glory this they attribute to mans merits Secondly it reprooues such as thinke themselues elect to life they wanting notwithstanding the meanes of effectuall calling and good life Thirdly it comforts such as haue the means that they are sure they be elected to the end for meanes and end be linked together Ti. May they perish whō God hath chosen purposed to saue Sil. No they cannot for the purpose remaines firme Secondly God is vnchangeable and his loue is so too Thirdly then God should not be Almightie if he were not able to saue such as hee was once willing to saue Fourthly there would be no sound comfort to the godly except this foundation of God remaineth sure God knoweth who are his 2 Tim. 2 19. Tim. May such as be elect know themselues to be such Silas They may know it by their calling therefore is election heere ioyned with calling and before Rom. 8 28 30 because the counsel of election being hid before in the counsell of God is manifested in our calling Tim. What should this teach vs Silas First that such as haue but an outwarde calling by the Gospell ought to hope well of their owne election that it cōmeth of his purpose to saue them by saith Secondly because many are called which be not chosen it should stirre vp all sorts of Christians to examine their owne hearts whether they haue obeyed their Calling hauing their hearts changed from vnbeleefe and loue of sinne to faith and loue and practise of righteousnesse Thirdly let such as yet feele not this calling not dispair for who knoweth what may be tomorrow God calleth and turneth at all houres Mat. 20 1 2. Example in Paul and the theefe c. Tim. What are we to thinke of the election of others Silas First let euery man be most careful of his owne to assure it to himselfe by graces of the Spirit 2 Pet. 5 6 7. Secondly in charitie we are to hope well of all which heare the word and outwardly obey it 1 Thess. 1 6. Leaue to God the iudgement of certainty and the searching of hearts DIAL VII Verse 12 13. It was sayde vnto her the elder shall serue the yonger as it is written I haue loued Iacob hated Esau. Tim. VVHat is the end and scope of these words Silas To declare that the difference betweene one man and another touching grace and eternall life depends onely vppon Gods purpose and election and not vpon our worthinesse or vnworthinesse This is declared by two Oracles of God or testimonies of Scripture The first is taken out of Genes 25 23. The latter is taken out of Mal. 1 2. Tim. What is the meaning of the former place of Genesis Sil. That Iacob the younger brother should be Lord and Esau the elder should serue him Tim. This difference might come by chance or by their own deserts Silas Not so for first it was spoken ere they had done good or euill Secondly by another place of Malachy it is shewed that Iacobs dominion came from Gods loue and Esaus bondage from his hatred therefore it is Gods onely purpose which discerned between them and consequently betweene all other men Tim. But doe these words taken out of Genesis fitly belong to proue Gods eternall election to be the soueraigne cause of eternall saluation in heauen Silas Yea they are so or else Paul being ledde by the Spirit of God would not haue alleadged thē so for it were blasphemy against Christ to say that Paul did alleadge the Scriptures false or vnfitly being an Apostle of Christ who in his doctrine was priuiledged from erring as all other Apostles were Tim. Tell vs then how the lordship of Iacob and seruitude of Esau may proue that for which it is cited men may bee poore and lye in prison and be
goodnesse and purpose Tim. But how may it bee proued that in this testimony the Prophet comprehendeth things belonging to saluation Silas First because all Gods blessings had their foundation in Christ and in the couenant of grace through him For if God gaue the Israelites Canaan as a more fruitefull land it was because he was mercifull to them now certainly God is mercifull to his people no otherwise then for Christs sake in whom hee is well pleased Mat. 3 17. Therefore vpon the promise of Christ depends all externall blessings giuen to the faithfull before the comming of Christ. Secondly the possession of the land of Canaan was not simply promised and giuen to Iacob and his posterity but as a type figure and signe of the heauenly inheritance Heb 11 13 14 15. Therefore doth Paul proue the election of Iacob to eternal life by the enioying of that land and the reprobation of Esau by thrusting him and his posterity out of it Then these temporall thinges were effects and signes of Gods loue and hatred Tim. But that was spoken of the posterity of Iacob and Esau how well doth it agree vnto their persons Silas It agreeth vnto both though principally vnto Iacob and Esau as the two Authors yet so as that some of Esaus posterity might be saued and of Iacobs prosterity some might be damned without any impeachment vnto this truth namely that God chuseth vnto saluatiō most freely whomsoeuer he electeth Tim. Now interpret the wordes and tell vs what it is to loue Sil. To loue is to will vnto one the greatest good euen eternall saluation and all things which bring thither Tim. What things doe ye consider in Gods loue Sil. First purpose Secondly manifestation As in our loue to others first wee wish them good whom we loue and then wee doe them good as in the example of Parents friends husbands c. So it is in God hee purposeth all good to his Children chusing them from euerlasting to be saued by Christ and afterwards when they come into the world he makes knowne his loue by their effectuall calling sanctifying and renuing their hearts ingendering in them a study of good workes strengthening them to an vpright obedience and perseuerance in grace and finally glorifying them in heauen Rom. 8 38 39 30. Iohn 3 17. Rom. 5 5. Tim. But if wee were alwayes loued of God how were wee then his enemies Silas Wee were enemies because of sinne which God extreamely hateth but loued because of his election and mercy Though hee out of his purpose decreed the cheefest good to his children yet while they sticke and remaine in their naturall corruption being out of Christ they were children of wrath enemies vngodly c. Ephe. 2 1 2 3. Tim. What is our instruction from hince Silas That our saluation and all that appertaineth to it springeth altogether from Gods eternall loue The reasons heereof bee first because God being most free would not fetch the cause of our saluation from any other thing then from himselfe Secondly because there can no higher or former cause of mans good bee giuen then Gods good pleasure Thirdly to beat downe the pride of mans heart that hee might not glory in his owne merites but render the whole praise of his saluation and whatso euer belongs thereto to the free loue of God in Christ. Tim. But though God were not moued to chuse vs for any workes in our selues yet was hee stirred thereunto for his sonnes sake Silas Not so neither but contrarily the loue of God did moue him both to purpose and to giue Christ for our Sauiour and therfore could not be the impulsiue cause to Gods loue to the which it is subordinate and not superior Indeed sinners hauing offended God are 〈◊〉 to fauour for Christs sake so they beleeue and repents but that is because God out of his loue had decreed such a meanes of our recouery Tim. What vse of this Silas It teacheth a difference betweene Gods loue and our loue his wayes and our wayes for we are not bounde to loue or to chuse any person but in respect of his worth euen in our enemies we are to esteem Gods creation and adoption in them as grounds of our loue but with God there is no such matter who findes no cause of louing vs out of himselfe vnlesse we speak of his actuall loue which he bare vs in time and hath reference to his owne image restored in vs Psal. 11 7. Secondly hence wee haue a spurre giuen vs to quicken vs to thankfulnesse when we consider that both for our selues and whatsoeuer good thing we haue we are beholden to Gods eternall mercy for it Thirdly wee must endeauour in euery blessing that wee haue to see the loue of God in it since his loue is the fountaine of all good eyther temporall or spirituall that comes vnto vs. Lastly wee are warned as God loued vs freely so to loue him freely not for his benefit onely or feare of punishment but meerely for himselfe In louing God studying to loue God his infinite most sweet loue grace mercy bounty and all other thinges in him and for him Tim. In what meaning is hatred applyed to God in Scripture Silas In a three-fold sence First to hate it signifieth not to loue and chuse Secondly rustly to decree punishment and inflict it Psal. 5 3. Thirdly to be displeased with things done against his law God is not saide to hate Esau in this last sence for hee was hated of God before hee had done any euill but in the two former meanings God hated him for he did not elect him and hee appointed to destroy him in regard of those sins which he should commit after he was borne Tim. What is the instructions from hence Silas That Gods hatred is the soueraigne and chiefe cause of the damnation of the wicked their owne sinnes eyther actuall or originall or both beeing the meritorious cause Secondly by the example of Esau we learne that all men are not chosen but that there are some reprobated as well as elected Lastly that Gods promises though they be preached vnto all the members of the visible Church yet they do take no place in those which are not elected DIAL VIII Verse 14 15. What then is there iniquity with God God forbid for hee saith to Moses I will haue mercie on whom I will shew mercy and will haue compassion on him on whom I will haue compassion Tim. VVHat is the purpose and drift of this Text Silas To cleare God from al iniustice in the matter of his eternall predestination Tim. What be the parts of this Text Silas First an obiection verse 14. Secondly an aunswere verse 15. Tim. What is the obiection and whence doth it arise Silas The obiection is that there is iniquitie with God or that God is vniust It doth arise from the pride of mans corrupt reason rebelling against the counsell of God Tim. What is
his purpose for where the equity and cause is common there from a singular example may be gathered a generall doctrine as here seeing no good comes vnto any man but by Gods mercy therefore election is no lesse to be ascribed the run to then Gods reuealing himselfe to Moses so familiarly Tim. What is here meant by mercy and compassion Silas Mercy in the Hebrew comes from a word which signifies pitty or free fauour and compassion from a word which signifies to loue with such tender affection as mothers doe their children Tim. What may the often repeating of these wordes mercy and compassion teach vs Silas First that Gods mercy is most free and not due vnto vs as if he should say In that I shew mercy I find no cause but in my mercy and not in any mans goodnesse or merite Secondly that it is arbitrary proceeding meerely from his owne good will and not depending vppon any mans goodnesse vppon whome bee will c. Thirdly that Gods mercy is vnchangeable and most constant asin Pilats speech Iohn 19-22 What I haue written I haue written that is I will not change my writing So this speech I pitty whome I pitty is thus much I will not breake off the course of my mercy towardes my childe I am Iehouah I change not Fourthly that Gods mercy is vnmeasurable and infinite reaching it selfe not to some one but to many and manifold good things as if he should say to whome I shew mercy in decree I will she 〈◊〉 mercy in act on whom I will haue compassion in electing them I will haue compassion in iustifying sanctifying glorifying thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doe collect Hence is God in Scripture to armed the Father of 〈◊〉 God of compassion rich in mercy See Psal. 103 11. And is said to giue grace vpon grace lohn 1. 16. also see Rom. 8. 30. Tim. What is the vse that wee are to make of the properties of Gods mercie Silas First it giues comfort to consciences afflicted with their sinnes in as much as wee knowe that God will not deale with vs after our 〈◊〉 but after his infinite mercies Secondly it serues to humble Gods children in who 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 no cause 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 him to she we them the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but must setch and draw it 〈◊〉 from himselfe euen from his owne good will and pleasure It is not a more vile pride in a begger to attribute the almes giuen him to his owne deserts then to ascribe the mercies of God vnto our owne 〈◊〉 either in whole or in part Thirdly it must moue the godly vnto true thankfulnesse which consists in two thinges namely the confession and imitation of his mercies to bee mercifull vnto others as we haue found him mercifull vnto vs according to Christs precept Math. 5. good reason we should bee mercifull to our brethren seeing he expressed much mercy to his enemies not in a few things but in many not for a while but with continuance Lastly it confutes such as make foreseene faith and good workes or either of them the mouing cause of Gods 〈◊〉 them as the Patagians wherof one expounded these wordes thus on whome I will that is sayeth he whome I shall know to be iust and obedient to my precepts Tim. What doctrines 〈◊〉 from this sentence 〈◊〉 together Silas These first that election seeing it comes from mercy doeth therefore 〈◊〉 misery for mercy hath relation vnto misery therefore God did not chuse men as they are in 〈◊〉 but as in the 〈◊〉 and fall Also that so 〈◊〉 seene 〈◊〉 could 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God to chuse or refuse because then all had beene refused seeing all were lost in Adam Secondly wee learne that election is not vniuersall seeing mercie is not vniuersall but pertaineth onely to such as God would shew mercie to Thirdly that the mercie of God is most free and absolute depending vppon nothing without himselfe but wholly and absolutely vpon his owne will so as if question be why was mercie taken on Isaac and not on Ismael The aunswere is because hee would But why would hee Heereof no reason is to be giuen Tim. What vse are we to make heereof Silas First it admonisheth vs to ascribe the whole glory of our election and saluation to the free fauour mercy of God Secondly to teach vs to exercise our mercy freely towards others not vpon any sinister respect as for gaine and credit to our selues but onely for pitty sake that so we may imitate our heauenly Father as well in the manner of shewing mercy as in the matter it selfe Howsoeuer in the execution of Gods decree there shall bee place for Iustice because it shall bee rendred to euerie man according to his worke yet in the decree it selfe mercie beares 〈◊〉 whole sway choosing them on whom hee would haue mercie and leauing those to be hardened on whom hee woulde not haue mercie DIAL IX Verse 16. Now then it is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy Tim. VVHat doth the Apostle 〈◊〉 this text Silas It is a conclusion of his answere concerning election to wit that God electing some whom he would hee is not therein vniust seeing he did it out of his free mercie as he proued by a testimony of Scripture in the former verse So farre off is God from being vniust as in choosing some hee shewes 〈◊〉 most good Hence then the Apostle infers that seeing election comes wholly of mercie and there is no cause of Gods mercie but in himselfe Therefore it depends not at all vpon the will and workes of man Nowe then it is not in him c. Tim. What be the parts of this Text Silas Two First it remoueth that which is the falsely supposed cause of mans election to wit our willing and running Secondly it putteth downe the verie true and sole cause to wit the mercy of God Tim. What is meant by It Silas Either election and Gods purpose is to be supplied out of verse 11. or his loue out of verse 13. which comes all to one as also to supply saluation is the same in effect Tim. What is meant by Hm Silas We may particularly vnderstand it of Iacob mētioned before but the best is generally to expound it of many euen Iacob and all others which be chosen For the Apostle nowe deliuereth a generall doctrine touching the cause of election Therefore they are deceiued which interpret this Him of God referring to God all three following willing running and shewing mercy Tim. What meaneth he by Will Silas The thoughts purposes and endeauours of the minde euen whatsoeuer it is that men doe striue and attaine vnto by all the inward faculties of their mind and soule Tim. What must be vnderstood by Running Silas All mans outward actions his words and deedes whatsoeuer Not of Esaus running to hunting or Iacobs running to dresse the Kid for this is absurde but of all good workes done by
plagues Fiftly that by a secret but iust iudgement he inclined his will to rebell against his Iustice yet without infusing or putting into him any motion of sinne for God tempts no man to euill Iames 1. Sixtly that for his former wickednesse and malice hee was deliuered vp to Satan and his owne lusts to be more obdurated which God did as a most iust Iudge executing wrath for former sinnes Tim. What doth all this concerne the counsell of reprobation Sil. Verie much because all these are so many consequents which follow vpon the decree of reprobation therefore strongly proue it For if God had chosen him hee could not haue continued in his naturall blindnesse and corruption but must haue had his heart mollified changed as Iacob and Paul had Tim. What is the end of Gods decree of reprobation in Pharaoh and others Silas The manifestation of his power in their iust destruction to the praise and honor of his name that fierce and mighty Kings could not stand but fell before him rebelling against him Tim. What vse of this Silas It serues to mooue vs to honour God in all his iudgements and workes whatsoeuer withall wee may learne from this example that Gods invitation of sinners to repentance by benefites or corrections is not of efficacie sauing in the elect alone For there lacked not bounty in blessing and lenity in forbearing and differring punishment yet they being not elect it no whit auailed them to amendment DIAL XI Verse 18. Therefore he hath mercy on whom hee will and whom he will he hardeneth Tim. WHat is the sum of this Text Silas A conclusion of the Apostles answere vnto the obiection of Gods vnrighteousnesse He had proued by testimony of Scripture that though of lost mankind God choose whom he will yet he is not vniust vpon this reason that in his election reprobation he vseth his absolute right ouer his Creature which is to shew or not to shew mercy as hee will this hee had proued by two-folde Scripture and the former reason he now includes in this Text. Tim. What be the parts of this Text Silas Two the first concerns the elect the latter concernes the Reprobate Tim. What is meant by hee Silas God himselfe of whom in verse 16. God sheweth mercy and verse 17. That my power may be shewed c. Tim. What is meant by Mercy Silas Both his decreed mercy and his actiue mercie euen the whole worke of God touching his election calling iustifying sanctifying them their perseuerance in grace and glorifying And all this is according to his free and absolute will Tim. What is the doctrine of this first part Silas That the cause of Gods mercy touching the sauing of the elect restes wholly in himselfe euen in his owne good will and pleasure This appeareth by plaine testimony of Scripture and first concerning election we haue Ephes. 1 4 5. where it is thus written He predestinated vs according to the good pleasure of his will And secondly touching calling Math. 11 25 26. Euen so O Father because so it pleased thee 2 Tim. 1 9. who hath called vs according to his purpose and grace Thirdly of Iustification Rom. 3 21. We are freely iustified by his grace Fourthly of Sanctification Iames 1 18. Of his own will begat he vs. And lastly of glorification Rom. 6 23. Eternall life is the gifte of God Finally the whole worke of mans saluation depends wholly vpon the good will of God as appeareth by Ephes. 1 11. Hee worketh all things after the counsell of his will Tim. What vse of this Doctrine Silas First it instructeth vs that the mercie of God is arbitrarie so as hee may shew it or not shewe it as hee pleaseth Also it teacheth that the right that God hath ouer men is absolute and independant so as if hee will shewe mercy to elect and call some which were as corrupt as those which he giueth ouer to be hardned in sinne as it may and doeth greatly commend his goodnesse so it doeth in no wise prooue him to be vniust because in mercy which is vndue there can bee no iniustice Lastly it teacheth that our mercy which wee exercise towards men must not respect their owne deseruings and merites but be free after the example of the Samaritane Luke 11. The reason hereof is because we are commaunded to bee mercisull as God is mercifull Luke 6. 36. also the man Christ shewed mercy freely for hee prayed for his enemies Luke 23. 34. So did Steuen Acts 7. also Paul Rom. 9. 1. 2. Yet this letteth not but that we ought to deale kindly to such as haue beene kinde to vs and to pitty them that haue had mercy on vs so as it be for the Lords sake and not for our owne sake Tim. Come nowe vnto the second part of this text and tell vs what is meant by haraning Silas Heere the consequent is put for the antecedent hardening the consequent of reprobation vppon which it depends and also for the meanes by which that decree is effected That this is the meaning is apparant by the opposition of hardnesse to mercy which plainly shewes that the one word is taken as largely as the other that as mercy contaynes election with all the degrees and meanes by which the elect are brought to glory so hardnes contains reprobation and all the meanes by which the reprobate are brought to destruction Tim. In what sence is it sayed here of God that he hardned Pharaoh Silas Not by infusing of hardnesse nor yet by bare permission not yet by his long suffering and patience But two wayes partly by forsaking his creature withdrawing his grace as it is saide Indurat quos non emollit and as the sunne freezeth the water not by adding coldnes to it but by keeping backe his heate so is God a deficient cause of hardnes but not an efficient Secondly by his iust iudgement punishing former sinnes with hardnesse which is a iust thing with God to punish sin with sinne Sathan hardeneth as a malicious authour man hardneth himselfe as a voluntary instrument God hardneth as a most righteous iudge and auenger Tim. What is the doctrine from henee Silas That a hardened hearte is a signe of a reprobate which must not bee vnderstoode neither of naturall hardnesse which is common to elect and reprobate nor yet of actuall hardnesse being felt which may be and is in the regenerate as in the Apostles and in the godly Iewes but of habituall hardnesse being totall and finall which befalleth none but castawayes when it is without feeling and perpetuall to the end of ones life Tim. What is the note to know this hardnes which is peculiar to reprobates Silas There be three speciall tokens of it first obstinate disobedience to the worde and warnings of GOD when the will of God being knowne is resisted by disobedience and not in one but in many things and that constantly from time to time
of these things Sil. By a prolepsis or rhetoricall in sinuation protesting his good will towards them and preuenting of suspition and hatred towards him in the Iewes Tim. Was there any inst cause or necessity why the Apostle should vse any such entrance by preoccupation Silas Yea very iust For in the former precedent Chapter he had prooued that the promises of grace belonged not generally to the Iewes beeing the most part of them reprobates and had saide that they stumbled at the stumbling stone verse 33. In this Chapter he takes from them all praise of righteousnesse by the workes of the law which were two things they much boasted of the promises and the lawe also hee directly speakes of their reiection from God Now least the Iewes should ascribe these discourses vnto Pauls hatred of their Nation and so become vnwilling to entertaine his doctrine therefore it seemed very behoouefull hee should testifie his good will towards them and to pacifie their mindes that they be not exasperated with such sharpe and harsh things as the Apostle wrote of Tim. What lesson are wee to learne from this arte and proceeding of the Apostle Silas That the Ministers of Christ are so to speake truth as they be carefull to doe it out of louing affections and the hearers ought to haue a good perswasion of their teachers good will towards them The reasons heereof be First if all Christians must reprooue out of loue much more the Ministers of the Gospell because it behooueth them to excell in all graces for example sake Secondly the Spirite of the Gospell is a Spirite of loue and compassion and the Ministers ought to be led with this Spirite Thirdly reproofes will hardly or not at all profite them when the teachers loue is suspected and his person hated Lastly it is a very good preparation for the hearers to be forestalled and possessed with a good opinion of the Teachers good will towards them as Physitions by sweetning bitter potions make the patient the willinger to take it And Rhetoritians being to speake of vnpleasant things wila first mollifie their mindes and win their good will by some artificiall insinuation so ought Preachers to do much more as occasion and cause requires by how much it imports him and his flocke the more that his hearers thinke well of him And if the Scorpion will first lay fast holde on them with his claw whom he purposeth to strike with his tayle then ought much more they to imbrace them by loue whome they must cure by reproofe Tim. What profit is to be made of this lesson Silas It teacheth that Ministers haue neede of great wisedome to discerne their 〈◊〉 and that also which they teach that they may know what it is that is likely to giue offence also when to vse friendly admonitions and sharpe reprehensions Secondly it teacheth that Ministers ought to be endowed with a spirit of singular loue and to expresse good will euen to such as are contrary minded so long as there is any hope for to winne them Thirdly that they ought to haue an vpright heart that in shewing loue and preuenting offence they may not conceale any truth or smoothe any vice out of flattery and desire to please man Fourthly heere is a reprchension to such as will bee Ministers and yet altogether lacke these graces as if a lame man would attempt to runne and a blinde man to take vpon him to be a guide Lastly heere is an admonition to all hearers to striue in themselues against all suspition that their teachers exhorte and reprooue out of hatred of them as they would euer desire to take any profite by their labours For wee are verye apte to mistrust and Sathan by his suggestions will drop into vs ill affections and therfore looke to it and put away iealousie Tim. Come wee now to the Text and tell vs what bee the parts of his prolepsis Silas These foure First hee protests his good will towards them Secondly he proues it by an argument from the effect to wit his earnest prayer for their conuersion and saluation verse 1. Thirdly he mentioneth the engendering cause of his loue towards them to wit their zeale of God Fourthly he rehearseth three faults in their zeale First ignorance Secondly spirituall pride Thirdly obstinate contempt of the grace of Christ verse 3. Tim. In what sence doth be call them brethren Silas Because they were his kinsmen by naturall generation see Rom. 9 3. Thus hee calleth them that hee might both expresse and excite good will and prouoke readinesse to heare and beleeue him Tim. What is meant by hearts desire Sil. Exceeding great pronenesse and readinesse of loue or more then common euen singular good will such as is ioyned with delight and exceeding great pleasure in those which are loued For the word heere vsed is the word whereby the eternall loue of God towards the elect is notified as Mat. 3 17. Ephe. 1 5. Luke 2 14. Tim. What doctrine is to be gathered from hence Silas That in all the prayers which wee make to God for our selues or others the desire of the heart must goe before The reasons heereof bee these First the commandemenr of God Prou. 23 26. My sonne giue mee thy heart Secondly the nature of God who being a Spirite will bee worshipped spiritually with the desire of the heart Iohn 4 24. Thirdly this is the very cheefe thing in prayer Psal. 25 1. Marke 11 24. Fourthly without this prayer cannot be feruent and vnfained and therefore cannot be heard For the promise is made vnto feruent prayers Iames 5 15. Marke 11 24. Lastly such prayers as come from hearty desires are onely pleasing and acceptable to God and they onely testifie that we haue the Spirit of God Rom. 8 26 27. Tim. By what meanes are these desires stirred vp in the hearts of Gods Children Sil. By the due and godly meditation First of the excellency of the thinges we pray for Secondly of the necessity in that we cannot be happy if wee be without them Thirdly of our greeuous sinnes which deserue things quite contrary to the things we doe pray for Tim. What vse of this point Silas It teacheth that the thing cheefest in prayer is that the heart be set on work in sending vp good desires towards heauen as sparkles out of a furnace Secondly it sheweth the true cause why that many prayers of the godly speed not euen for that their desires are cold and faint and slender Thirdly it warneth that the prayers of the wicked are but bablings vaine abhominable because they call on God with their lippes the desire of their heart being farre from him Mat. 15 8. Lastly the distinction of mental and vocall prayer is iustified by this place and indeede no distinction in diuinity is currant but that which hath ground in the Scripture directly or by good deduction Tim. In that the Apostle prayeth for them
Sam. 1 23. though he were a most wicked man The Reasons heereof be first because euery good thing so farre as is good comes of God Iames 1 17. therefore must bee loued and liked Secondly this is a good meanes to cherrish concord and friendship among men and the contrary stirres vp strife and hatred Thirdly it is iustice to giue euery man his due praise vnto whome praise belonges and shame vnto whome shame appertaines Tim. What profit is to be made of this point Silas It reprooues such sowre vncharitable men as for some fault in others condemne whatsoeuer good they finde in them either not being able to distinguish the worke of God and of sinne or by malice and enuy shutting their owne eyes that they may not giue vertue the due praise Secondly it warneth all men in their iudgements and speeches of others to keepe a moderation so speaking of their vices if cause require as to reproue them for their amendment as yet wisely and with loue mention be made of their graces least they be driuen away from godlinesse by too much austeritie after the example of Paul heere and 1 Cor. 11 2. Tim. What other Doctrine of this verse Silas Hence we learne that there is a two-fold zeale one good and another euill the former true being guided by knowledge the latter dissembled beeing ignorant and erroneous Tim. What bee the properties of this true and good zeale Silas First it greatly loueth nothing but that which ought to bee loued Secondly it greeueth for wrong truely and indeede done to the thing it loueth Thirdly it neither exceedeth the bounds of calling and charitie Fourthly it euer affecteth and seeketh the honour of God and not selfe-praise and vaine-glory and opinion or applause of man Examples of this true zeale we haue in Christ when he whipt the buyers and sellers out of the Temple Iohn 2 15. and of Phineas when hee thrust thorough both the Adulterers euen as they were in their vncleannesse Numb 25 8 11. and of Paul and Barnabas when they rent their cloathes Actes 14 19. and Moyses when hee broake the Tables Exod. 32. and Paul for the Corinthians 1 Cor. 1 11. and for the Galathians Gal. 4 19. Tim. Is not d ssembled Zeale contrary to the former in all these properties Silas It is and euer faileth in all or in some of these For besides the Iewes named in this Text wee haue the examples of diuers other in Scripture as Demetrius his zeale for Diana whom hee ought not to haue loued Actes 19. Iehu was zealous but fayled in the manner 2 Kinges 10 6. Paul a Pharisie was zealous but hee loued that which hee should not haue loued that is his owne righteousnesse as the Iewes did heere and hee thoght Gods glory to be wronged by that by which indeede it was not wronged but honoured rather as the Doctrine of grace and righteousnesse by Faith Actes 22 15. Thus the Pharisies and manie of the Iewes offended in their zeale Also the Apostles wishing Fire vpon a Towne in Samaria fayled in the ende of theyr zeale which was onelie to ease their impatient minde and not out of a pure affection to Gods glorie nor out of charity to their neighbor Lastly Vzza exceeded his Vocation when hee put his hand to the Ark 2 Sam. 6 6 7. How do the Papists dote and are euen mad with loue and zeale of their Strumpet and her trumpery Tim. What vse of this distinction Sil. It admonisheth all to labour for zeale but as they desire not to sinne and offend God in their zeale to rule it acording to knowledge There are three sorts of people that do offend about zeale and are therefore to bee reprooued First such as be starke cold hauing no zeale at all for Gods worship doctrine and glory What becomes of these things they are no whit moued so they may enioy their worldly pleasures and profits such an one was Gallio Acts 18 17. The second sort be lukewarm and indifferent ones neither hot nor cold as the Laodiceans Reuel 3 15. and the Israelites halting between two 1 Kings 18 21. The third sort are they whose zeale is blinde voide of knowledge and godly wisedom being rash and intemperate in their actions couering their owne carnall affections with the cloake and pretence of glorifying God yea too too many bee hot in publicke reformation and yet be vnreformed priuately in their owne persons being no Disciplinarians at home but rather do much hurt to the name and Gospel of Christ and giue great scandall to the Church of God whilest they leap without the bounds of their vocation and all Christian duty and discretion whereof this age and Church of ours affoords vs many lamentable examples especially in Separists Therefore as it behooueth all Christians to be zealous zeale being commanded of God Reuel 3 19. it being commended as a good thing Galat. 4 18. and as a fruite of repentance 2 Cor. 7 11. and as a part of Christes Image Iohn 2 17. yet let all men striue by earnest prayer to get godly knowledge ioyned to their zeale to go before it as a guide to conduct it and as an eye to direct it both in the things to be loued and in the manner and scope of their loue Tim. What is the last instruction out of this verse Silas That a good intention is not sufficient to make ones action to bee good These Iewes in persecuting Christ his Apostles and their Doctrine meant wel for they thought that God his worship and Law and Moses his seruant to be wronged by the preaching of the Gospel therefore in killing the Preachers they should do God good seruice yet they are blamed here by Paul for rash proceeding against knowledge The reason heereof is because a mans intention is neuer good but when it is built vpon a good warrant to wit the word of God and referred to a right end namely the praise of God Tim. Can you giue vs any examples of any who haue swerued from this rule Sil. Yea in Vzza in putting his hand to the Arke 2. Sam. 6 7. of Peters disswading Christ to go to Ierusalem Math. 16 22. of the Apostles calling for fire from heauen to fall vpon the Samaritanes because they would not receiue Christ Luke 9. 54. of many Papists striuing for haeresies and superstitions against the Gospel wherein they all thinke they did well but indeede and truth were deceiued deeply offending God when they thought to do him best seruice Tim. What vse heereof Silas First it reprooues such as thinke they may do euill that good may come of it Secondly it warnes vs not to be offended at the preposterous zeale of many which studie to beare out bad courses with good intentions countenance their hurt to the truth and defence of their errors with faire shewes of burning zeale to do seruice to God and his Church heere of Christ fore-warned vs Iohn 16. Lastly it exhortes
were not for a time knowne and apparant to the world Though Elias see much beeing a Prophet yet he is blinde where God doth clearely see for Gods knowledge is infinite If any shall ask how this may be seeing either in those times they lacked the publicke Ministery or had it corrupt the answere is that they had so much of the doctrine of God priuatly as was sufficient to instruct them and saue them through Gods blessing who can saue by weake and few meanes as wel as by strong and many God needs no meanes it is man for whose weakenesse sake meanes be prouided Tim. What profit is to be made of this Doctrine Silas It stops the Papists mouths who ask where was our Church some eighty or a hundred yeares ago Vnto whom we say it was hid amongst themselues as a little wheat is hid in a great heape of chaffe and a little Gold amongst a great deale of drosse and howsoeuer men did not or could not marke them yet vnto God they were all times seene and in due time stoode vp to reproue the great Whore and to maintaine the Gospell Tim. What other instruction haue we to marke Silas That not mens merits nor their owne free will but Gods onely grace is the cause why some are sound when most are corrupt Therefore it is not said they are reserued or they haue reserued themselues but I haue reserued to exclude all power of will and of merit to attribute all wholly vnto the grace and free election of God as verse 6. This confutes the Papists which say wee bring one part God another parting stakes between Nature grace for what haue we that we haue not receyued It is God worketh in vs both to will and to do and both according to his good pleasure Phil. 2 13. Tim. What learne we hence that to himselfe bee reserueth them Silas That Gods Children must liue to his gloric and be addicted to please and honour him who alone saueth them Secondly that they haue much and sound comfort that cleaue to God alone in that hee will euer defende them as he hath reserued them As Maistes defend their Seruants Kings their Subiects and Fathers their Children which be deare vnto them so will God keepe his owne whom he to himselfe hath reserued Tim. What other Doctrine may bee collected from these wordes Silas That howsoeuer in the inuisible Church of the faithfull there be multitudes perfectly and plainely seene vnto that God who knoweth who bee his and where his bee yet the visible Church of such as are outwardly called is oftentimes obscured and decayed in such sort as the publike exercise of religion faileth the people of God by persecution beeing driuen into corners as Conies by vermine are chased into their holes and Doues by the Kite into the cleft of the rocke The Christian Church which is alwaies glorious within or inwardly as a Queene which sitteth in her chamber cloathed with gold yet shee is not euer glorious and illustrious without to the eye of the world but is sometime like a desolate solitary and forsaken widow For the Church once consisted in two persons Adam and Eue and afterwardes in the family of Abraham and of Lot also euen in Iuda the visible Church was somtime driuen into straite and narrow places as in the dayes of Idolatrous Ahaz 2 Kings 16 17 also in the raigne of Ammon and Manasses 2 Kings 25 4 5 22. when for the most part they fell to Idolatry and forlooke the true God and broke his couenant Againe how was the Church visible at the time of Christs passion when the Virgin Mary only and a few others did appeare and prosesse him openly the rest being fled away for feare of the Iewes Also afterward in the raigne of the beast when Sathan was let loose howsoeuer there might many be no doubt were many which feared God and serued him in secret yet there was a time when to the appearance of men there seemed to be but one Luther in Germanie one Husse in Bohemia one Caluine in Sauoy one Zuinglyus in Heluetia and one Waldos in France one Wickleff in England and one Patrick in Scotland as heere in our Text we finde that among all the ten tribes Elias did dreame or iudge himselfe to bee left alone Thus as the sea sometimes flowes and sometimes ebs and the Moone is some time in the full sometime in the wanc so the visible Church is by the dispensation of God some times greater and more copious and againe other while it is more lesser and more slender euen according as the doctrine of the word is more or lesse cleare and pure for the doctrine and the Church depend one vppon the other and do shine together or be darkned together Tim. But the Papists write that the complaint of Elias touching the fewnesse of true worshippers is not well applyed by vs Protestants vnto the decay of Religion vnder the Pope at the first reformation by Luther and to this purpose sundry exceptions are alledged by Master Stapleton and the Rhemists in their readings vpon this place The which exception I will here repeate expecting your answere vnto them seuerally as I shall propound them First they say the Nation of the Isralites was then no part of the Church of God Secondly that these seauen thousand were at Ierusalem in the kingdome of Iuda wherein were many more then seauen thousand that openly worshipped God Thirdly that the Christian Church resteth vppon better promises then the Iewish Church did Fourthly that not onely seauen thousand but not so many as seauen nay not scarce one could be found of Luthers beleefe at the least not to consent with him in all poyntes of the faith These are their maine obiections shew vs I pray you what answere may bee giuen vnto them Silas The Papists haue beene long obserued to bee as a very murderous and bloudy so a lying and very bold generation If they speake or write any thing in defence of their errours which seemeth but probable they care not how little soundnesse and substance of truth there is in it as will appeare in the sisting and scanning of these their exceptions particularly And therefore this I say to the first that howsoeuer the Nation of the Iewes weere exceeding corrupt and Apostaticall hauing broken their first faith plight vnto God in stead of whome they worshipped Baall the God of the Sidonians as sacred story reportes yet God had not giuen to them a bill of deuorce it remayned still a Sinagogue and part of the visible Church Had it bin otherwise God would not haue giuen vnto them his word sent them his Prophets as Elias Elzeus and others to instruct them in his statutes except there had beene in Israel some of that people which he had knowne before and loued from euerlasting and certaine it is that where soeuer there is a Preacher and some to receiue the
4. What art thou that condemnest another Mans seruant he standeth or falleth to his owne Maister DIAL IIII. Verse 5 6. Euen so then at this present time there is a remnant according to the election of Grace if by grace then it is no more by workes c. Tim. VVHat doth this Text containe Silas An application of the former example vnto the time wherein Paul himselfe liued Secondly a conclusion drawne out of the application to wit that if election be free and come of grace then not of workes for merit is contrarie vnto Grace which is not at all free if it bee not all and absolutelie free Tim. What is the sum of the application Sil. This that as Elias was not alone in that corrupt estate of Israel but euen then when all seemed to bee gone from God yet there were in secret left seuen thousand true Worshippers so now when Paul alone amongest all the Iewes seemed to prosesse Christ 〈◊〉 raigning in Iewry and Paganisme in all the Worlde besides yet no doubt but God had of his fauour kept certaine beleeuers which were not knowne to the world Tim. Shew vs somewhat particularly and more plainely wherein the times of Elias the Prophet and of Paul the Apostle were like for it seemed that this should be no good Reason that it should bee so in Pauls because it was so in Elias daces For there is no such necessity as that which is once done by singular and especiall example the same ought to be done in euery time and age Silas This example of Elias is very fitly applied to the times of Paul whether we respect the thing it self or the circumstances or the causes Touching the thing it selfe as Elias thought himselfe alone in Israel and yet was not for there were many more so Paul might take himself of al the Iewes to be the only professor of Christ whereas besides him there was a remnant For circumstances they do agree Elias the prophet was raised vp extraordinarily so was Paul myraculously called to be an Apostle Againe as Elias alone was zealous for the worship of God so Paul alone of all the Iewes was an earnest defender of the Doctrine of God and as very manie resisted Elias so not a few persecuted Paul and as in Elias time Idolatry had ouerspread the kingdome of Samaria so in Pauls time Hellenisme and Pharasaisme preuailed in the world For the cause it is the same to wit Gods free election of Grace which seeing it neuer faileth nor falleth therefore it euer calleth and keepeth a certain number vnto God in his Church visible and faueth a remnant in Pauls time as it reserued a cōpany in Elias time election was the cause of reseruation of some then and of a remnant now Of these likenesses and resemblances there issueth an argument and similitude in the very phrase and manner of speech for in Elias story God sayed I haue 〈◊〉 and in Paules text it is sayed There is a remnant to make all thinges alike both in worde and matter And as the Apostle sayeth according to the election of grace so there it is written I haue reserued to my selfe which is all one in effect that they were not reserued of themselues but because God chose them in his euerlasting loue Tim. What lesson is it that wee learne by this comparing of the estate of the Church according to seuerall times Silas That it makes much for our comfort to lay together the olde and present state of the Church namely in time of afflictions The reason is because God is wont for the most part to vse like proceedings in the gouerning of his Church therfore in the afflicted state of the Church it will be very profitable to looke backe to former times of persecutions that as Paul by considering Elias his time armed himselfe against the fewnesse of professors so Gods children by such conference of times may stay their minds in patience For no crosses nowe happen but the like or worse haue falne in former ages of the Church It is vsual with the Papistes to boast of multitudes howe many and how mighty bee their friendes and followers the Gentry the Nobles Ladies and Lords Dukes Arch-dukes Princes Kings Emperours Learned men Cardinalles Popes are on their side and walke in their way whereas for most part a company of silly Tradesmen and silly persons take part with vs. To whom though we might truly say that our number is greater by a good many then they would haue it and that if the trueth of religion went by number then the Turkes and other Pagans should bee the true Church rather then Papists which come short in multitude of the Pagans Iewes and Turkes Yet let vs cast our eye backe vppon Elias and Paules times concluding that as then the multitude of Idolaters and vnbeleeuers did no preiudice to the trueth and worship of God which may be preserued and professed by a few as well as by many so nowe the faith of the Gospell if but one onely professed it in the world whereas God is to be thanked many Nations and Kings doe receiue it were not the lesse wholesome and sound though the whole world besides did goe after the great whore as sometime it did But come nowe nearer to the wordes of our Text which haue two parts First that a remnant of beleeuers were amongst the Iewes when Paul preached Secondly the true cause heereof is the election Tim. Tell vs what is meant by a remnant Sil. It signifies the smalnesse of the number of the faithfull that they were farre fewer then such as abode in vnbeliese and perished therein yet the number was not so smal but it made many thousands There is the like phrase in Rom. 9. 27 29. It is a metaphor borrowed from a cloth or heap of wheat whereof a remainder onely is left so but a few in comparison of the rest durst opēly professe the faith of Christ. Tim. What may we learne from this word for our Instruction Silas First that that part of men which perisheth is farre greater then that part which is saued as the whole heape of corne is more then that part which remaineth for seede and the peece or web of cloath is greater then the remnant and thus it is written That many are called fewe chosen Math 20 16. and that few doe enter into that narrow way which leades to life Mat. 7 14. Tim. What vse hereof Silas First to striue to be of this little stocke of this poore remnant whereof not to bee were better neuer to haue beene Secondly it mooueth to great thankfulnes such as are called to bee of this remnant when such numbers were passed ouer which were no worse then they by corruption and as good as they euery way by creation Tim. What is the second instruction Silas That the promises of God touching eternall life are neuer voyde nor euer doe fall away The
They are to be driuen away with an angry looke as the East winde driueth away the rayne they therefore doe sinne much which receiue tales with a delight to heare other mens sinnes for if there were no receiuers of tales there would be no bringers of tales the one hath the Deuill in his care the other hath the Deuill on his tongue Lastly such shall enter into heauen as receiue not false reports against their neighbour Psal. 15 3. Tim. But what thinke ye are all complaints to be accounted whisperings and back-bitings Sil. No if these conditions be obserued First that the party complayned off be first duely admonished Secondly if the complaint bee put to such as haue power to redresse the fault Thirdly if the complayner secke nothing but the amendment of the party Lastly if hee grieue that hec hath cause to complayne and pray for his conuersion doing all in loue these two last vices are forbidden in the ninth commandement Tim. What is the next vice Sil. Haters of God such as be hated of God and be haters of him such be al back-byters and whisperers persons which deserue the hatred of God Tim. Are there any which be haters of God Sil. There be such as this place and other moe do mention God doth not deserue any hatred of them but rather hath in him all causes of loue both goodnesse and beauty but it commeth to passe that men hate God through that naturall corruption which they deriued from Adam for whilst man bare Gods Image he loued him and was loued of him but when he put on Sathans Image was vnlike to God then began he to hate God and was hated of God Tim. Are there not degrees of hating of God Sil. True there be so First some doe it and know it not Secondly there are some that hate him and know it Thirdly there are some which are secret haters of God Fourthly there are some which are open haters of God Tim. By what markes may it be knowne that men hate God Sil. By these especially First by seldome praying or coldnesse in prayer Secondly by neglecting to praise him or doing it without delight Thirdly by hating or hurting his Children Fourthly by beeing loath to thinke or speake or heare of God as Atheists Fiftly by ordinary disobedience to his word Sixtly by not procuring the good or by seeking the hinderance of his Gospell being enemies to Religion Lastly by murmuring and repining vnder his correcting hand DIAL XIX Verse 30. Doers of wrong proud boasters inuenters of euill things disobedient to Parents Tim. WHo be meant by doers of wrong Silas Such as be contumelious or despitefull reproachers of others in an insolent manner insulting petulantly ouer others Tim. How many wayes may wrong be offered and done Sil. Sundry and many wayes First wrong may bee done in thought word and deed also to soules bodies goods or name also by doing euill that we should not doe and leauing vndo e some good that we should do also by fraud and violence Moreouer wrong may bee done in our particular callings when the duties thereof be not well done as also in priuate affaires and in place of iudgement this is vilest Tim. What reasons may keepe vs from doing of wrong Silas First that we may bee like God who doth no wrong to any and shew our selues his Children Secondly that we may be vnlike Sathan whose plotting and practise is continually how to doe some wrong Thirdly we would haue no wrong done to our selues Fourthly it is directly against Gods word Fiftly it dopriueth men of Heauen 1. Cor 6 9. vnrighteous persons shall not inherite Heauen Sixtly it bringeth iudgment euen in this life as in Iesabels example whereas the contrary that is to deale iustly procureth many blessings as in the example of Iob. Lastly it hurteth our name and woundeth our Conscience and it is a cause that wrong is done to our selues for with what measure wee meate to others that shall be meate to vs againe Mat. 7 2. Tim. What is pride Sil. An high conceite of our owne excellency cyther arrogating to vs what we haue not and are not or beeing too high minded for that we haue Tim. What is the matter of Pride Sil. The guifts of body and mind supposed or in truth possessed Tim. What be the remedies of this vice Sil. First to consider the danger which is great and certaine as it is written God resisteth the proud 1. Pet. 5 5. And pride goeth before a fall Prouer. 16 18. Secondly to remember Christs example as Phil. 2 5. Let the same minde be in you which was in Christ. Thirdly to thinke what promises be made to the vertue of humility 1. Pet 5 5. God giueth grace to the humble Fourthly to thinke whereof we are made and whither we must goe for dust we are and to dust we must returne Gen. 3 19. Lastly how vnfit we are to any good and that al the good wee haue or doe it is giuen vs 1 Cor. 4 7. Finally pride in the minde is the same that a swelling is in the body Tim. What call ye boasting Sil. To glory or insult in any thing whereas many proud men boast of that that they haue the boaster is one who brags of that which he hath not Tim. How many kinds be there of boasting Sil. One necessary vrged by importunity of euill men such as Paul vsed 2 Cor. 11 16. Secondly Christian boasting which is a holy confidence in Christs merits Thirdly a vaine and foolish boasting which is a boasting of things we think we haue done or which others haue done by our means or of wickednes this is the worst boasting Tim. What reasons against this foolish boasting Sil. First it breaketh a rule of the word euen that rule which biddeth vs to be modest and lowly Secondly it is a signe of a vaine and ambitious heart Thirdly it maketh vs resemble the Diuell Math. 4 9. Tim. What do ye call inuenters of euill things Sil. Such as are not content with the euils that bee already in vse and practise doe study to finde out new euils as the proud man he inuenteth new fashions the couetous man hee inuenteth more wayes of gaine the opressor inuenteth new cruelties and torments the Epicure inuents new deuices new pleasures and delicates Such were Tiberius Sardanapalus Phalaris who rewarded such as found new delights and new torments Tim. What Reasons against this vice Silas The euils which men do inuent do commonly hurt the inuenters Psalme 7 15. They shal fall into the pit which they digged for others Tim. Wherein doth disobedience to Parents shew it selfe Silas First in their impatient bearing of corrections Secondly in an vnwillingnesse to obey things commanded well and iustly Tim. In what things chiefely are Children to shew obedience to parents Silas In two things First in choise of their Calling or Trade of life Secondly in their marriage and choise of their yoake fellow This may appeare by
from mee or any other to teach or to thinke God vniust in punishing Tim. What was learned by this Sil. That we must haue euery thing in abhomination which is vttered cōtrary to Gods glory which ought to be so precious deare as we should not endure in our selues the least thought or in others the least word against it Tim. What is the third part of the answere Sil. An argument to proue his deniall taken from the proper office of GOD which is to bee iudge of all the world This argument is thus framed from hence If God be vniust in punishing then he cannot be the iudge of the world but it is his office to iudge the world therefore he is not vniust but they rather wicked which dare so charge him Tim. Wherein doth God declare himselfe to be iudge Sil. In two things first in the gouernment of the world which hee ruleth with great equity Secondly in the execution of the last day when as supreme iudge he shall render to euery man according to his works Tim. What was gathered from hence for our instruction Sil. First whatsoeuer punishment is inflicted vpon sinners either here in this world or in the world to come it is most iust because the iudge who is iustice it selfe doth it Tim. Whereunto serueth this Sil. First this serues to stoppe the mouth of all wicked men for howsoeuer they may be discontent and murmure yet God can doe no iniurie to any Secondly to teach Gods children contentment and patience in all aduersities which befall them sithence they proceede from a righteous iudge Thirdly it admonisheth all men in all places at all times to liue godlily and honestly because they are euer in the eie of their iudge now hee must bee impudent and desperate which will offend before the iudge Lastly it instructeth all iudges and rulers and whosoeuer haue any kind of power and authority ouer others to follow this great iudge of the world in doing iustly whatsoeuer they do to their inferiours by way of correction or reward For following him as their patterne they are sure to haue and finde him for their patron and shield in the euill day when most need is of his fauour and help DIAL V. Verses 7 8. For if the truth of God haue more abounded through my lie vnto his glory why am I yet condemned as a sinner and as wee are blamed and as some affirme that we say why doe wee not e-uill that good may come of it whose damnation is iust Tim. WWhat is the drift of this text Sil. To confute and answere a wicked and lewd slander obiected against his doctrine which was that the trueth of God through mens lye and vnbeleefe doeth more abound to his glory this was his doctrine which wee haue learned before howe to vnderstand it Tim. What is the slander and how doeth the Apostle answere it Sil. The slander was that Paul should affirme that men may doe euill that good may come of it which flander the Apostle answereth First denying the slander and secondly he threatneth the iudgement of God to the slanderer Tim. What is it that the Apostle calleth the trueth of God Sil. His fidelity and constancy in his promises when hee makes good indeede that which hee hath spoken with his mouth Tim. What doth this offer vnto vs Sil. A ground of our hope and an example for our imitation for God who is most true cannot deceiue vs so as wee may haue hope in him also wee must striue to be like him in truth Tim. What is here meant by a lye Sil. Not a word spoken vntruely or with purpose to deceiue but some act or deede wherein a man doth deceiue or violate his faith and much plight to God for wee are to know that a lie may be committed sundry wayes First in doctrine as they that taught iustification by workes of the law Gala. 3. Secondly in ciuill iudgement as they which pronounced false witnes against Naboth and Christ. Thirdly in gesture and countenance as in Ioab Cayne and Iudas Fourthly in words and common speeches either ieastingly officiously or hurtfully Fiftly in action of life as when a man hath made promise to God to beleeue and practise his word and yet otherwise liueth in vnbeleefe and disobedience this is here and elsewhere called a lie as 1 Iohu 2. 5. 6. Tim. What was our instruction from hence Sil. That we should labour to liue as wee profesle least we be accounted liars to God to his Church to our selues and in our owne consciences Tim. Shew vs now how our lye doeth turne to Gods glory Sil. As sinne profiteth Gods children so it turneth to his owne glory to wit by accident as before is said for it is not in the nature of sinne which being a filthy thing is both against Gods glory and his childrens good but it is of GODS mercy that it turneth to his praise and their commodity whiles they become more wary after some sinne and Gods goodnesse more famous and renowned Tim. What other thing were we taught out of this verse Sil. Two thinges first in that the Apostle propoundeth the slander in the person of an vncertaine man it teacheth vs that wee must conceale the name of offenders when there is no cause to vtter them because the credite of other men must bee deare to vs. Secondly that self-selfe-loue makes sinners seeke all shifts to shunne the condemnation of their sinnes nay the very imputation of sin they would not be so much as sinners Tim. What learne wee from the beginning of the eight verse and as wee are blamed c. and from therest of the verses Sil. First that the doctrine of the Apostle could not scape the blame and slaunder of euill tongues Secondly slaunders cast out against the Doctrine of the Ministers doeth hurt both the name of the Minister and the faith of the flocke Thirdly that no euill faulte and crime may bee done to procure any good for a good pretext or a good intent nay a good euent of an euill action cannot make that action good that is euer euill which was euill from the beginning Tim. Whome doth this reproue Sil. Three sorts of men first the Papists who couer their owne blinde deuotion with the cloak of good intents Secondly blinde Protestants which doe euill things vpon pretence of good euents that bee like to follow and ensue Thirdly 〈◊〉 worldlinges who blame Gods children because they will not doe some little euill to compasse some great good which is directly against the rule of our Apostle that the least euill of fault or crime is not to bee done to gaine neuer so much good Tim. What learne we from the last part of this text Whose damnation is iust Silas Two things First they which slander the Doctrine of the Ministers shall not escape the righteous punishment of God Secondly such as wilfully do speak euill against the truth must not be answered with many words but
depriued of the glory of God and are freely iustified by his grace thorough the redemption which is in Christ Iesus Tim. WHat be the parts of this Text wherein this former Doctrine is more fully opened and illustrated Silas Two First a generall necessity of iustification Secondly two causes thereof the efficient and the matter Tim. What is the meaning of this 23. verse Sil. That all through 〈◊〉 are depriued of the righteousnesse wherein God is most glorified Or thus as some expound it all the elect by reason of their sinfull nature and life are voide and destitute of eternall life which consisteth in the participation of Gods glorie and therefore are depriued of righteousnesse to which belongeth the promise of glory Tim. How proue ye that al men haus sinned Sil. First by the authority of Scripture 1 Iohn 1 6 8. and Iames 4 2. Secondly by common experience because it hath beene seene in all ages that the best men haue sinned as Noah Lot Abraham Dauid Thirdly by the testimony of conscience which doth witnesse vnto euery man that he is a sinner and doth bring dread and feare of iudgement for sinne Lastly the iudgements of God which are so common in the world do tell vs that no man is without sinne which sticketh close to mans nature euer in the godly till the dissolution of nature Tim. How many wayes do men sinne Sil. Not a few but many not one but sundry waies as originally actually by omission and commission against God and man in thought word and deede of ignorance of negligence of presumption secretly openly in matter and in manner in substance in circumstance against Law and against Gospell Tim. What vse make you of this point Sil. It reproueth the Papists which ascribe freedome from sinne to the virgin Mary and also other Heretickes which hold an absolute freedome from sinne in the regenerate euen in this life Secondly it teacheth vs to thinke of other mens sinne with compassion considering our owne Thirdly it serueth to humble all men and to driue them out of themselues to Christ to feeke righteousnesse in him and to bee full of awe and watch seeing there bee so many wayes to misse the marke and but one to hit it Tim. What is meant by the glory of God Silas Some thinke it is the perfect righteousnesse of Christ the imputing whereof to the beleeuers is much to the glory and praise of his free grace and good will But I think it is hereput for eternall life which standeth in the fellowshippe of Gods glory and that this is the meaning may appeare by the worde destitute or depriued which signifieth one that fainteth in a race falleth short of the goale nowe eternall life is the goale of our race the price of the high calling of God Philip. 3. Tim. What vse of this poynt Sil. That through sin wee are most miserable as hauing thereby lost the chiefest thing which is Gods glory in the fruition whereof is all our happinesse which should make vs loue Christ by whome it is restored Tim. What learne we hereby that wee are freely iustfied by his grace Sil. That which mooued the Father to giue his Son to vs was his free fauour Secondly it proueth that faith iustifieth onely for were we iustified by workes but in part we could not be iustified by grace Rom. 11 6. If of works not of Grace Tim. What is the matter of our Iustification Sil. The redemption which is in Christ Iesus by which is meant a deliuery from sinne and misery by the merit and power of Christes bloud shed of which redemption wee haue the beginning now and looke for perfection in heauen Tim. What learne we from hence Sil. First the exceeding loue of Christ giuing himselfe a ransome for sinnes Secondly the exceeding daunger of sinne hauing inthralled vs to Sathan and hell Thirdly the exceeding great duty of thankfulnes we owe to Christ our Redeemer Note that wee are saide to bee iustified freely though Christ laide downe a price and wee bring faith which is an act of our will because God freely gaue Christ and freely workes faith in vs which iustifieth in respect of the obiect Christ and not as it is an act or worke of ours DIAL XIIII Verse 25. Whome God hath set foorth to bee a propitiation through faith in his bloud to declare his righteousnes by the forgiuenes of sinnes that are passed Tim. VVHat doth this text set forth vnto vs Sil. All the causes of iustification yet more fully Tim. Shew vs these causes what they be Sil. The efficient cause is God the matter is Christ our atonement the instrument is faith the end is the glory of God in the declaration of his righteousnes Tim What learne ye by this that God is said to set forth Sil That wee must seeke the first and soueraigne cause of saluation not in Christ but in God vpon whose eternall loue it doth depend Tim. What learne we hereof that Christ is saide to bee set forth of God Sil. That the doctrine of the Gospell is no newe thing inuented by men but commeth from heauen beeing a diuine truth Tim. But how many wayes is Christ said to be set forth Sil. Two wayes first by the reuelation and preaching of the gospell wherein things to be beleeued concerning Christ and our saluation are propounded to vs and set before vs. Secondly therein the Spirit of Christ inspireth vs with faith and perswadeth our minds to assent to the things shewed and propounded being good and mostioyfull things Tim. But may not this of Gods setting forth his sonne be referred to predestination Sil. It may so because thereupon dependeth the merit of Christs death Now if yee take it so that God in his predestination decreed to set forth his son then the meaning is thus much that touching our reconcilement to God by the redemption of Christ we must account that this commeth to vs by the onely determination and free purpose of God The reason of which purpose seemeth to be this that God meant to restore the world to his first estate by him by whome it was made at the first Tim. Christ the matter of our Iustification why is he called Our Reconcilement Tim. Because Christ is the true propitiatory as the word heere vsed doth signifie our Propitiatour or Reconciliator for he doth allude to the propitiatory or Mercie-seate of the Law which was a figure of Christ in these three things First out of the Mercy-seate were the Oracles giuen so by Christ we are shewed the Oracles of the will of God as touching our saluation Secondly God was saide to dwell at the propitiatory so in Christ the whole fulnesse of the Godhead dwelleth corporally Col. 2 9. Thirdly there God was made fauourable to the people so is God by Christ alwayes pacified and reconciled to vs Col. 1 18. Tim. Why is Christ our onely reconcilement Sil. Because he is a man free from sinne Secondly
of those singular thinges without fruite for the whole Scripture is profitable howsoeuer wee may not become followers of them therein yet there is of euery Scripture a profitable vse perpetuall to all times Tim. What other things may bee noted from this ground of the Apostles application Sil. Sundry things first the sauing vse of the Scriptures is proper to the faithfull for whose good alone they were written a speciallmercy Scondly that diuine trueth must bee prooued by diuine Scripture and not by humaine writers which are of no authority in matters of saluation Thirdly examples serue very well to declare doctrines and commaundements because to thinges hard and doubtfull they bring great light and cleerenesse for that in them the minde and sences both are ioyned together Fourthly we learne that it is a great comfort to the faithfull to bee made equall to Abraham in iustification To Iusticiaries mercenarie hypocrites infidels and prophane vnbeleeuing worldlings it hath no comfort Tim. What is the fourth thing contayned in this text Sil. To lay forth the two principall thinges whereunto faith leaneth to witte the death and resurrection of our Lord. For Christ dead and raysed againe is the thing which a true faith chiefly looketh vnto because there it is that faith findeth matter of support stay to itselfe Therfore the Apostle doth ioyne his death and resurrection togither because neither his death without his life nor his life without his death could any whit auaile vs to Saluation Hence are they in Scripture so often ioyned togither Pagans can beleeue that Christ being a man died but that he is risen they do not Tim. Who deliuered Iesus to death Sil. Iudas for his gayne the Iewes for enuy Christ deliuered himselfe for his Fathers will to obey it God the Father deliuered his Sonne for the redemption of sinners out of his loue as it is written So God loued the world Iohn 3. 18. This last deliuering is meant here Iudas Christ God did one and the same thing but not for one and the same end therefore Iudas a sinner and God iust Tim. What was learned hence Sil. That the whole efficacie of Christs death doth depend vppon Gods free will and decree that is that his death had beene of no force to satisfie Gods wrath had he not dyed according to the determination of his father and this is that which is written Iohn 6. 27. Him hath God the Father sealed Tim. To what death was Christ deliuered Sil. To the most shamefull and cruell death of the Crosse his bare death is not onely here meant but all the miseries of his life yet his death onely is named because it was the perfection of all and that wherein his obedience most appeared the top of his obedience Epilogue of his passion Tim. What necessity was there of his death seeing hee was free from sin in himselfe Sil. Although himselfe had no sinne yet our sinnes were all imputed to him as to our surety and pledge who was to answere for vs. But further this was the end for which hee dyed that ouercomming death in his resurrection he might fully satisfie for our sinnes For death by GODS iust decree was pronounced the wages of sinne Genesis 2. we had surely suffered it eternally if our Mediatour had not both borne and conquered it Tim. What sins doth he speake of Sil. Not our light and common infirmities but our most grieuous and haynous sinnes by the which wee deserue euen to fall from the grace of God if he should deale with vs in rigour not his but our sinnes were the cause of his death which suffied for all hath acquitted vs from them all one and other Tim. What learne we from hence Sil. Very many things first that we are bound to loue Christ who so loued vs. Secondly we must loue our enemes as Christ Iesus dyed for his enemies Thirdly sinne is a most loathsome thing being the cause of Christes accursed d at h Fourthly that there is iust cause of beeing humbled by this consideration that wee were the meanes of Iesus death wee killed the Lord of life Fiftly there is matter of great comfort to heare that our greatest sinnes are done away by his dying for vs for his bloud was of infinite value being the bloud of God Acts 20. Sixtly that all men must be fearefull to offend God who shewed himselfe so mercifull and so iust in the death of his sonne iust to his Son standing in our roome but mercifull to beleeuing sinners whome he absolueth by his Sonnes death let this mercy leade men to reuerence God continually Tim. Did Iesus remayne in death Sil. No surely for then he should be thought to dy for his owne sinnes also to be but a meere man and therefore he rose againe euen to declare that hee was God and absolued from our sinnes and wee in him for in that death could not hold 〈◊〉 in his denne and house that made it manifest that our sinnes which hee tooke vppon him were all discharged that we might be iust through him This is the meaning of that which is here written Hee rose againe for our iustification Christ is sayd to be raised of God who deliuered him and of himselfe for God doth all things by his Son Tim. Is there any other fruit of his resurrection Silas Yea for thereby Christs members are raised vp to newnesse of life Rom. 6 4. Also it is a pledge of our resurrection to life eternall at the last day 1 Corm 15. Lastly in his resurrection he began his exaltation vnto glory and hath giuen sufficient testimony and declaration of our absolution from sinnes out of which sithens he was deliuered as his raising againe did proue for he had stayed in death if but one sinne had beene vnsatisfied for heereby we haue assurance of our iustification in him CHAP. V. DIALOGVE I. Verse 1. Therefore being iustified by faith wee are at peace with God through Iesus Christ our Lord. Timotheus WHat is the connexion or dependance betweene this Chapter and the former Also tell me the argument of this Chapter and of what parts it consisteth Silas Paul hauing taught in the last verse of the former Chapter that mans iustification before God was founded vpon the death and resurrection of our Lord Iesus being by faith apprehended now he continueth the same argument and sheweth what a riuer of benefits do flow out of this Fountaine of free Iustification both to present comfort and life eternall in the heauens Vpon the rehearsall and demonstration of which benefits as the two principall parts this Chapter standeth For first he reckoneth vp the seuerall and singular fruites of the passion and resurrection of our Lord beginning with iustification the foundation of reconciliation peace whence the rest do yssue to ver 5. after followeth the demonstratiue confirmatiō of the same to verse 19. Vnto which is anexed an answer touching a question wherefore the
Law entred namely to encrease sinne and make the grace of God to superabound in the two last verses For this first verse there be these foure thinges done in it First the Author and worker of so many great benefits is mentioned The Lord Iesus Christ. Secondly the hand which receyueth him to wit Faith Thirdly Iustification as the imediate fruite of Faith in Christ. Fourthly Peace as the neerest effect of a iustifying Faith Touching the words by Iustified is meant as afore in Chapter 3. to bee absolued from sinne and accepted as righteous before God thorow or by faith that is not for faith as a meritorious cause or by infusiō of the habite of faith formed by loue but by faith as a spirituall hand instrument receiuing Christ dead and raised again By peace not mutuall concord between Iew and Gentile differing about the Law but reconcilement with God and therefore the verbe Haue is to bee read in the indicatiue not in the imperatiue moode as the olde Latine translation reads it which reading and sence some of the Fathers fauour contrary to the authoritie of the Greeke Copy Tim. What is the drift of this Chapter Silas To teach and set foorth iustification by the effects and by the contraries The effects of iustification mentioned in this Chapter be sundry First peace with God Secondly accesse vnto his grace Thirdly standing in that grace Fourthly hope of glory these bee internall they which follow be externall Fiftly reioycing vnder that hope Sixtly ioy in tribulation Seauenthly patience and experience out of a sence of Gods loue in Christ. The contrary is Adams disobedience and death ensuing thereby Tim. What vse is to be made of these fruites of Iustification Sil. A two-fold vse First there is a reason from them to proue that Iustification is by faith the reason is this That Iustification which breedeth and bringeth foorth peace and the rest of these effects that is true Iustification But Iustification by faith bringeth foorth peace and the rest of these effectes therefore it is the true Iustification The second vse is this by these effects in our selues we try out the truth and certainty of our Iustification before God Where these effects be found in any true measure there the cause which is iustification must go before Tim. What 〈◊〉 the first of these effects Silas Peace with God by which some thinke is meant mutuall concord and amity amongst men then they do read it exhortatiuely Let vs haue peace but this cannot heere be vnderstood for then he woulde haue saide peace with men neither would he haue said in the first person we haue But by peace with God is vnderstood Reconciliation not humaine but diuine atonement whereby our sinnes which breede enmity and separate God from vs beeing forgiuen vs wee haue him now pacified towardes vs and of a more then terrible Iudge he is become a most kinde and amiable Father Tim. Then our sinnes had made a diuision betweene vs God Silas They had so but the guilt of them being done away and pardoned through faith in Christs death now God is one with vs and we with him euen so manie as haue Faith to beleeue in Christ who was dead and risen for them Tim. Where doe ye finde peace put or vsed for truce or attonement with God Silas In many places of Scripture as where Christ is called our peace and the Prince of peace our Peace-maker Esay 9 6. Ephes. 2 21. Col. 1 18. Tim. Is this a great benefit to haue God reconciled vnto vs Silas Yea surely for all our happinesse standeth in it and without it there is nothing but misery For in his fauour is life and death in his displeasure From which benefit dooth follow a tranquillity and peace within our selues which is called peace of Conscience vpon which doth follow another outward peace euen agreement among Brethren Tim. What do ye call peace of Conscience Silas When the wounds and terrors of the Conscience caused in vs by the feare of Gods iudgements for sinne being healed by the death of Christ instead of accusing and terrifying it doth excuse and acquit vs before God whereof followes vnspeakable quietnesse rest in the soule Tim. What difference put ye between a true peace of a good Conscience and a false peace of a dead and benummed conscience Sil. They agree in this that both are quiet but in other thinges they differ much as first the dead conscience is quiet because it hath no feeling of sinne at all of the terror of Gods wrath for the same but a good conscience is quiet because it feeleth sinne to be forgiuen God pacified Secondly a dead conscience feareth not sinne but a good conscience is awfull of sinne Lastly a dead conscience though it be quiet yet it comforteth not but a pacified conscience hath vnspeakable comfort within it selfe For it is a continuall Feast chearing the heart admidst dangers Tim. How is this peace of Conscience gotten and preserued Sil. It is gotten two waies First by grieuing for our sinnes past done against Gods Law Secondly by beleeuing the promises of the Gospell touching forgiuenesse of sinnes Also it is two wayes preserued first by auoyding all but especially knowne sinnes Secondly by doing euerie dutie vprightly though not perfectly Thirdly by often confessing our sinnes and earnest asking of pardon and forgiuenesse for them Tim. May not this peace with God be lost Silas The sence of it may bee lost but the thing it selfe cannot be lost the sence of it may bee lost eyther by some grosse actuall sinne or by some strong fitte of temptation or when men waxe proud and secure This may be declared by the comparison of the Sunne vnder clouds of fire couered vnder ashes of trees dead in the Winter of a man in a trance Also it may bee declared by the examples of the godly as Iob Ieremy Dauid Ezekiah Christ. Tim. How is this peace recouered after the sweetnesse of it is lost Silas By priuate prayer and comforts of the Godly Iames 5. Secondly by remembring the olde mercies of God Thirdly by attending the publicke Ministery Fourthly by renewing our repentance more seriously Tim. By what meanes is our peace wrought with God Silas By meanes of our Lord Iesus Christ without whom nothing is to bee found in God but wrath and horror As contrarily thorough his mediation and merit all grace and fauour is procured for vs. They which say that Iesus is the preseruer of vs in this estate of peace say true but say not all for this peace was effected by Christ as a ioynt cause and fellow-worker with his Father for whatsoeuer the Father doth that dooth the Sonne DIAL II. Verse 2. By whom also wee haue had an enterance by faith vnto this grace wherein we stand and reioyce in hope of the glorie of God Tim. VVHat is the Sum and drift of this Text Silas To lay downe three fruites of a iustifyfying Faith First
of worldly things which we may call humaine or ciuill hope it is of things vncertaine which may fall out or not fall out because they haue vncertaine causes and this hope hath no assurance but is ioyned with continuall doubting but Christian hope it hath alwayes assurance and certainty ioyned with it because it is of spirituall blessings and protections also of heauenly glory which commeth of a most firm cause namely the vnchangeable good will and loue of God as also his most free and firme promise in Christ. Tim. Whereunto doth this serue Sil. To reproue both the Papist and ignorant prophane Protestants which seuer assurance from Christian hope wherein they doe iniury to God himselfe and shewe that they are not such who haue his loue shed abroade in their harts DIAL VI. Verse 6. For Christ when we were yet of no strength at his time died for the vngodly Tim. VVHat is the drift and end of this text Sil. To confirme that which hee had said of the loue of God towards vs by an effect and fruite of his loue which is the death of his Sonne Christ Iesus Here beginneth the demonstration which is the second part of this Chapter as before Tim. How is this set foorth Sil. It is set foorth by a double circumstāce of time first in that the Sonne of God was giuen to death for vs at that time when we were yet weake vngodly sinners and enemies Secondly in that he dyed for vs at the time appoynted of his Father called his time Tim. What be the parts of this sixt verse Sil. Foure first what ones God loued weake and vngodly ones Secondly by what guift hee expressed his loue his Sonne Christ. Thirdly at what time the guift was bestowed at his time Fourthly to what thing he was giuen to death Tim. Now come to the interpretation of the words and first tell vs what is meant by weake in this place Sil. The word here vsed is applyed sometime to the body then it signifieth either weaknesse which commeth by some disease or sicknesse after which men bee feeble or else it noteth the want of al might as in that text of 1 Cor. 15 43. The body is sowne in weakenesse or it is affirmed of the minde and then it is either put for small strength as Rom. 15 1. or for no strength as here in this text that this is here meant may appeare by this that they which are called weak the same are called vngodly sinners enemies such are voyd of all spirituall and sauing power to beleeue or repent Tim. What doe these termes teach vs Sil. That they for whome Christ was giuen to death were such as had no force of their own to help themselues but needed all manner of helpe vnto saluation Secondly that such as Christ died for doe not onely neede all helpe but being vngodly refuse helps being offered and beeing sinners encrease their euils more and more and which is most of all they grow in hatred of the remedy being open enemies to God heere is a singular gradation to amplify Gods loue to lost mankind Tim. What is the vse to be made of this truth Sil. It sheweth the wretched estate which men liue in without faith in Christ. Secondly it condemneth the madnesse of such as affime that the elect beeing in this estate were yet Iustified and the sonnes and heires of God this their madnesse may appeare in this that the selfe same persons at one time shal be actually and indeed both enemies and friends to God sinners and righteous vngodly and sonnes to need all helpe and yet to haue all helpe this is to confound heauen and hell grace and corruption Sathan and God death and life togither Thirdly it confuteth the Pelagian and Papist who ascribe some strength to nature to prepare at least to dispose it selfe to grace This the Pelagian sets forth by a similitude of waxe fitte for any impression of white paper or a naked table ready to take any forme so is our nature say they apt to learne if it be but taught vs also the Papists they expresse it by the similitude of a man sore wounded or much enfeebled or laden or borne downe with bolts and fetters which with a little helpe of another mans hand will raise vppe himselfe and make shift to stand vppon his feete So say they nature is but wounded enfeebled or ouerburthened and with litle helpe of grace can reare it selfe to heauenwards These their corrupt opinions appeare to be false by Ephes. 2. 1. where it is written that wee are dead in trespasses and sins and therefore as touching God and godlinesse wee are by nature dead corps and in this our text we are said to bee of no strength Fourthly it prouoketh Gods children to great humility and thankfulnes towards God to consider what they were before their conuersion for the more miserable our former estate the more amyable present grace also it must moue them to compassionate others which yet be in this woeful estate seeing themselues once were such And lastly it must stirre vp a feruent loue to God who in this most pittifull case loued vs and gaue such a guist and remedy to vs and for vs. Tim. What was that gift whereby God doth expresse his loue vnto vs being so sinfull and wretched Sil. No lesse then Christ his owne and onely begotten Sonne which is the greatest and best guift that the most great and good God could bestow vppon mankinde the reason is because it is more worth then all the world for it is himselfe in the person of his Sonne therfore the greatest Also through this gift all other gifts are made good and profitable to vs which else would bee so many curses Therefore the best cause that moued him to bestow such a gift vpon vs was the good pleasure of his will which here and elsewhere is called his loue Iohn 3 16. 1 Ioh. 4. Tim. What did we learne by this that God would witnes his loue by such a fruit of it and gift Sil. That our loue must be like the loue of God that is an effectuall and fruitfull loue not in purpose onely and goodwill but in effect as wee are able to expresse it Secondly that as God declareth his great loue and that to his enemies so after his example wee should out of loue do good to our enemies whereby we are knowne to be Gods Children Luke 6. For euen Infidels and the most wicked persons they will loue such as loue them Math. 5. Tim. What doth this meane which is added According to the time or at his time Silas It meaneth thus much euen that fit and conuenient time appointed of his Father called fulnesse of time Gal. 4 4. and his houre John 5 25. for God hath his times appointed for all his workes Eccl. 3 1. Tim. What followes of this Silas That Christ could come neither sooner nor later then hee did Secondly it commendeth the more Gods loue
Christ. This reioycing is a speciall good thing and it is as it were the very life of a mans life Tim. How many kinds of reioycings be there Silas There is a naturall reioycing common vnto all men when the hart is cheared either by an in-bred liuelinesse or by outwarde occasions as in the presence of things pleasant or agreeable to our nature This reioycing is not meant heere Also there is a spirituall and Christian kinde of reioycing which ariseth from the spirit of God stirring vp the heart to reioyce in spirituall and heauenly things when they are present with vs or certainly hoped for As first when the Church flourisheth Psal. 137 3. Secondly when a sinner returneth to the Lord Luke 15 10. Thirdly in the meanes of saluation Ps. 122 1. Fourthly in doing righteousnes iudgement and equity Fiftly in the exercising our selues in the praises of God Psal. 95 1. Sixtly in the reconciliation that we haue with God through Christ when it is beleeued or felt of this our Text speaketh Tim. What is it to reioyce concerning God Silas To haue ioy of heart in this respect that hee is become our Father and loueth vs as his Children and Sonnes Tim. What difference is there in these speeches concerning God as heere and to reioyce in God as 1 Cor. 1 31. and to reioyce with God as Rom. 4 2 Sil. To reioyce in God it is to attribute all thinges which be good vnto God and to render him all thanks for them this we may doe Secondly to reioyce with God it is to to bring something with vs of our owne wherein to glorie and reioyce besides Gods fauour and this we may not doe Thirdly to reioyce concerning God it is to be merry in our hearts for this that we do vnderstand how God doth loue vs as a father his children The like vnto this we haue in Ier. 9 24. Let him that reioyceth reioyce herein that he knoweth me to be mercifull and righteous whereas others reioyce in riches or pleasure or honour or wisedome the Christian ought to reioyce in Christ. Tim. Is there great and iust cause to reioyce for such a gift bestowed on vs as Gods Fatherly fauour through Christ Silas Yea very great for heerein consistes all mans happinesse both now and for euer to haue God reconciled that he may bee a Father to take vs for his sonnes sake and loue Such onely do reioyce therefore such as waigh these things and do inwardly feele them so as they are are affected with them do from hence gather exceeding strong hope of enioying euerlasting life For God is such a Father so constant in his loue as though he will correct them yet neuer will he disinherit them Tim. By whom is it that God is become a fauourable Father vnto vs Silas By Christ his beloued sonne who by his death on the Crosse hath made attonement for our sinnes being there in our stead by the will of his Father and by meanes of our receiuing it thorough faith in the promise of the Gospell we haue made it ours Tim. What thinges doe yee consider seuerally in this attonement spoken of in this place Silas First God to whom wee are reconciled he louing vs and giuing his sonne for vs. Secondly his Son comming to worke our attonement by his obedience passion and Sacrifice Thirdly our Faith embracing this attonement and receiuing it Fourthly a great reioycing of hart in the Faith and certainty of this reconcilement with God Tim. What do ye collect from this whole Doctrine Silas That our Christian and spirituall reioycing it is as our measure of beleeuing is none if our Faith bee none little if our faith be little great if our Faith bee great Therefore as any do long for much true Christian comfort let them endeuor a daily increase of Faith by the humble sincere and constant vse of al those holy meanes priuate and publicke whereby God vseth to enlarge the beleefe of his children DIAL X. Verse 12. Whereas by one man sinne entred into the world aud death by sinne and so death went ouer all men in whom all haue sinned Tim. WHat is the purpose of the Apostle in this Text Silas Hauing spoken hitherto of the first part of Iustification touching remission of sins by faith in the sufferings and death of Christ and laide out the same in the causes effects now he proceedeth to handle the other part of Iustification touching the imputation of Christs perfect obedience vnto vs which beleeue Tim. Is there any necessity of this part of Iustification Sil. Yea very great for we were two wayes endangered to God 1. by not fulfilling and keeping the law as we are bound we lost all right and title to Heauen Secondly by our sinnes done against the Law wee become worthy for euer of eternall punishment in Hell and therefore wee haue neede of a double remedy from Christ one to haue a satisfaction for the deserued punishment and this wee haue by the death and bloudshed of Christ imputed to vs. The other to restore vs to the right of our lost inheritance and this wee haue by the perfect obedience of his life put vpon our faith Tim. How may it appeare that Paul doth thus distinguish the parts of our Iustification Silas Two wayes First by the word reioycing or glorying vsed in the former verse wherein hee makes his passage to this Treatise Tim. What doe ye gather from hence Silas Thus much beleeuing Christians cannot fully reioyce and glory concerning God vntil together with the discharge from the paine due to their sinnes by free forgiuenesse through Christs passion they know and beleeue themselues to be decked and blessed with that absolute obedience and righteousnesse which the Law requireth and vnto which by the promise of the Law eternall life is due which seeing they haue not nor can haue in themselues therefore they haue it of Christ. Tim. What is the second way how ye gather this distinction of two parts of Iustification Silas By the comparison of Adams vnrighteousnesse and his disobedience with Christ his obedience both communicated to all elect persons though in diuers sorts and fashions the which he doth begin in verse 12. and continueth it to verse 20. Tim. Wherein be Adam and Christ compared together Sil. Both in things wherein they are like one to the other and in things wherein they are contrary one to the other They are alike in this generally that each of them conueyeth that which is his vnto such as are theirs and be of them particularly Adam sendeth ouer to all that come of him guilt of sinne and death by his disobedience imputed Christ conueyeth ouer righteousnesse and life to his members by free imputation of faith Also they differ in this that the offence of Adam by which death came vpon all men was but one but the obedience of Christ imputed to beleeuers doth not only couer and doe away that one but all other offences of
Fourthly the destruction of Sodom 19 24. Fiftly the drowning of the Egyptians Exod. 14 27 28. al which hapned for sinne Tim. What other examples can ye giue to proue this that sin was imputed Silas The death of infants as well as of men of yeares which plainly proueth all men to haue bin sinners and guilty before the Law of Moyses Tim. What learne ye by this that sinne and death doe vnseparably follow one the other Silas That death came in not by creation but by corruption Secondly that if men accompt death terrible they should not thinke sleightly of sin the breeder of it Tim. What meaneth this which is saide heere That death raigned from Adam to Moyses Silas Heereby hee signifieth the force and power of death to bee exceeding great bearing all men downe before it as a mighty King dooth subdue such as rise against him Tim. How long doth the raign of death continue and last Silas Not from Adam till Moyses onely but till the end of the world Tim. Ouer whom doth death exercise his power and kingdome Sil. Ouer all both olde and young none exempted Infants nor men Tim. Yet the Apostle saith of some that they shall not dye but be changed Cor. 15 52. Sil. True yet that change shall bee instead of death to them Secondly this is the condition of all men that through sinne they are subiect to death God may priuiledge whom he will as Enoch and Elias Tim. Whence got death this power Sil. Through mans sinne according to Gods decree Tim. What learne ye heereby Sil. That there is a necessity for al men once to come vnto death Tim. But the faithful haue their sinnes forgiuen them how is it then that they dye Sil. Yet sinne is still in them whence commeth death to them not as a part of the curse for sinne but as an entrance into heauenly blisse whither they cannot come but by death so as they are freed from the hurt which death brings but not from the necessity of dying Tim. What should this teach Sil. That all men are so to make account of death as they doe prepare continually for it and arme themselues continually against the fear of it by keeping faith and a good conscience Tim. You saide that death raigned ouer Infants tell vs by what words are infants described Sil. That they sinned not after that maner that Adam sinned Tim. What meaneth this Sil. That they are free from voluntary and actual sins as in respect of their owne persons Tim. What sin then haue Infants to procure death Sil. Their byrth-sinne or originall corruption which they draw from their Parents by propagation Tim. What is to be gathered hence for our instruction That parents haue cause to mourne for sinne in their young children as well as for their owne Secondly that in the death of their children they consider not so much the losse as the cause which is sinne which would keepe them from impatiencie serue to humble them Thirdly that there is diuers kindes of sinne to wit voluntary inuoluntary originall actuall Moreouer that all sinne is equall thus farre as to deserue death though in other respects vnequall Tim. What will follow of this Silas That God is no respecter of persons young or olde all are one with him Tim. Yet sinnes are not euery way equall Sil. No For there is difference in the degree both of the offence and of the punishment some more heynous then others some to be more grieuously punished then others Tim. What should this worke Silas It should be a bridle to wicked ones to refraine from sinne as much as they can thereby at least to lessen their paine Also a Curbe euen to the godly whose sins howsoeuer pardoned so as they shall not dye eternally for them yet sorer temporall punishments are inflicted as their sinnes be greater As is to be seene in Dauids example who had many smartfull blowes for his very shamefull falles DIALOGVE XII Verse 14 15. Which was the figure of him that was to come But yet the gift is not so as is the offence For if by the offence of one many be dead much more the grace of God and the gift by grace which is by one man Iesus Christ hath abounded vnto many Tim. VVWhat doth this Text containe Silas Two things First the similitude or like nes between Adam and Christ which was the tipe or figure Secondly the dissimilitude or vnlikenes betwixt them but yet the gift is not so Tim. What is meant by him that was to come Silas First Adams posterity as some iudge and then the meaning is all they should be sinners as he was Secondly Iesus Christ who in respect of Adam sinning was to come this is the truth Tim. In what meaning is Adam said to be a tipe or figure of Christ Silas Some take it thus that as Christ is an example to such as willingly obey God so Adam was an example to so many as sinne and disobey willingly this sauours of Pelagianisme as if sinne came by imitation and not by propagation Tim. How then do ye take Adam to be a figure of Christ Silas In respect of that force and efficacy which was in Adam to propagate and conuey euen into all his progeny destruction by sinne Heerein hee was a figure or a Tipe of the second Adam the man Christ Iesus in respect of the like force in him to deriue into his members eternall life by his righteousnesse imputed to their faith Tim. Report vnto vs more plainly and in few words this analogie and proportion which is betweene Adam and Christ Iesus Silas As Adam by his sinne was the cause of death to all men though they did not eate of the forbidden tree so Iesus Christ was made righteousnesse to beleeuers though them-selues had wrought no righteousnesse Heerein was Adam a figure of Christ. Tim. But it may appeare that this is rather a difference and vnlikenesse then a likenesse Sil. True it is so if you take it particularly but not if it be taken generally that is that as Adam meriteth death for his so Christ meriteth life for his that is to take it generally but particularly there is great oddes for grace righteousnesse and life came by Christ Sinne death and damnation by Adam Also Adam by generation of the flesh poureth euill things into men Christ by faith poureth good things into his members Tim. What vse can ye make of this Silas It serueth to confute both Iew and Papist the one for thinking that one Christ cannot bee the redeemer of the whole world whereas it is of them confessed that the whole world was corrupt by one Adam the other for denying that we are iust before God by the obedience of another to wit of Christ yet all men bee made vniust by the disobedience of another to wit of Adam and why not that as well as this De similibus simile iudicium parium par est ratio Tim. What do ye
therefore let none with Caine say my sinne is greater c. but rather with Paul 1 Tim. 1 15. Tim. But will not this Doctrine giue some liberty to sinne Sil. Nay it is a restraint rather and bridle from sinne for Gods children are made the more carefull not to offend him by how much the more they feele his mercies to be great towards them Therefore if any abuse this Doctrine to licenciousnesse it is a maruailous bad signe and a fearefull token that they are growne desperate Tim. What are we to learne by the beginning of the 21 verse As sinne hath raigned to death Silas First that sinne rules as a king in al vnbeleeuers Secondly while sinne beareth rule whatsoeuer men do tendeth to destruction Thirdly all Gods elect are first vnder the raigne of sinne and death First Prisoners wounded dead ere they be healed deliuered and restored to life Tim. When are we to iudge of sinne that it raignes as a King Silas When the lusts and motions of our sinnefull nature are willingly obeyed and followed Tim. What are we to learne by this where it is saide That grace might raigne Sil. That as there is a kingdome of sinne so also there is a Kingdome of Grace vnder which two Kingdomes the elect must passe For they are translated from the raigne of sinne to the raigne of Grace as the people of Israell were drawne out of AEgypt into Canaan and seeing euerie one must belong to one of these kingdomes therefore our care must bee to examine vnto which we are subiect Tim. What do ye cal the raigne and kingdome of Grace Silas When our conscience beeing assured that our sinnes are accompted Christs and his righteousnesse accompted ours we begin to leaue and withstand our sins and to liue vnto God thinking on those thinges which please him with care and study to do them Tim. What is meant heere by righteousnesse Sil. Christes obedience imputed to vs to iustifie vs before God Tim. What is meant heere by life Silas That blessed estate wherein we are set by means of this righteousnesse whereunto it is annexed as a fruite Tim. Why is eternall added vnto life Silas To shewe that the blessednesse of iust men shall continue for euer in Heauen as long as God endureth Tim. Why doth he mention Iesus Christ Silas To teach vs that it is by him alone that we obtaine Grace righteousnesse and life Tim. Wherefore is there no mention of Faith Silas In the matter of Iustification Christ is neuer mentioned without respect to Faith which apprehendeth him CHAP. VI. Of Sanctification DIAL I. Verse 1 2. What shal we say then Shall we continue in sin that Grace may abound God forbid How shal wee that are dcad to sinne liue yet therein Timotheus WHat doth the Apostle entreate of in this sixt Chapter Silas Of Sanctification whereby they which are Iustified and haue their sinnes forgiuen them thorough Faith in Iesus Christ are enabled to walke in a new life and to doe good workes so as they cannot licentiously liue in sin though through infirmity they do sinne Tim. What may we learne from this order of the Apostle in teaching Sanctification after Iustification Sil. Two things First that the Doctrine of free Iustification by faith dooth not destroy good works but produce them rather 2. the doctrine of good works or Sanctification must follow the Doctrine of Iustification as an effect the cause and fruit the roote Tim. What be the differences betweene Iustification and Sanctification Sil. Iustification is an action of God imputing to vs the perfect righteousnesse of Christ when wee beleeue in him Sanctification is a worke of the Spirit framing in the hearts of the elect a new quality of holinesse Secondly Iustification remoues from vs the guilt curse of sinne Sanctification remoues and takes away the rule and power of sinne Thirdly Iustification is as the cause and roote Sanctification is as the fruite effect thogh both done to vs at one time Fourthly Iustification is perfect heere Sanctification is vnperfect and encreaseth daily till at length by degrees it bee perfected in Heauen Tim. What be the parts of this Chapter Silas Two the first entreateth of the Doctrine of Sanctification prouing that such as bee sanctified cannot serue sinne vnto the 12. verse The second hath the dutie of sanctified persons who are exhorted to flye the seruice of sinne and to liue holily seruing righteousnesse vnto the end of the Chapter Tim. How doth the Apostle enter vppon the Doctrine of Sanctification Sil. By a Prolepsis wherein he preuenteth a certaine Obiection against his former Doctrine Tim. Where is this Obiection contained Sil. In the first verse in these words Shal we remaine in sin that Grace may abound Tim. What is it to remaine in sinne Sil. To fulfill the lusts of sin with a purpose to continue in the obedience of sinfull lustes which is a thing that cannot stand with grace howsoeuer grace and sin may stand together Tim. Tel vs now the obiection made against Pauls Doctrine what it was or what is the effect of it Silas This that he had taught men to liue and abide in sin that grace might abound Tim. How did they raise this Obiection and from whence did they gather it Silas From Pauls words when he saide Where sinne abounds there grace more abounds Tim. How did they collect reason from hence Silas Thus it is a good thing that Grace should abound therefore to liue securely and purposely to sin it is a good thing for by that meanes grace shall abound the more Tim. But if the encrease of sinne do cause grace to encrease why should it not be good to encrease and multiply sin seeing it is a very good thing that grace should abound Sylas This obiection is very faulty and absurd for first it maketh sin and encreasing of sin to be the cause of grace whereas it is but the occasion onely as a discase makes a Phisition famous by occasion onely for his skill in his Art is cause of his fame so our sinnes beeing many and great are occasions of illustrating and magnifying the grace of God and not causes to purchase grace for vs they are indeede properly causes ofire and vengeance But howsoeuer sins are not nor can bee causes of grace yet there needed an aboundant and infinite grace to take away sinnes beeing mightily encreased this then is the first fallacy in their reason that which is no cause put for a cause The next fault it is in the ambiguity of the word for they take this word where as if it were as much as wheresoeuer sin abounded which is not so many beeing ouerwhelmed with sinnes as Cayne Esau Iudas 〈◊〉 c. which had not a drop of grace affoorded them The meaning of the Apostle is this where sin abounds that is of whome sin is aboundantly knowne and felt with desire of the remedy which is Christ towardes them grace is more aboundantly shewed and
euen in regenerate persons is more carnall then spirituall their blindnesse and ignorance being far more then their sight knowledge Lastly it reprooues such Ministers which teach darkly and couertly affecting obscuritie in matter and in maner of teaching and such people as loue to bee so taught loathing simplicity Tim. Now come to the similitude it selfe and tel vs whence it is fetched Sil. From worldly matters wherein it is vsuall for seruants to serue their seuerall Maisters with like diligence and promptnesse which the Apostle doth thus fit to his purpose It is meete that Christians should bee as willing forward and cheerefull in seruing God nowe they are regenerate as they were in seruing sinne before they were regenerate seeing bodily seruants equally please their Lords Tim. What be the partes of this similitude or comparison Silas Two First a proposition contained in these words As ye haue giuen c. In which words is contayned the conditions of that seruice which the elect yeeld vnto sin while they are naturall men Tim. What conditions do ye obserue in their seruice to sinne Silas These foure First they wholly serued sin Your Members that is to say your selues Secondly they serued sinne with all readinesse and with their whole strength Ye haue giuen that is yee haue willingly presented your selues before sinne as a Seruant before his Lord to do his will Thirdly they did and fulfilled not one but all manner of sinne which is meant heere by vncleannesse and iniquity Fourthly they proceeded went forward from one degree of sinne to another To commit iniquitie whereby is meant the outward work of sin and that they rested not in the inward lust and consent of sin Tim. What doth vncleannesse and iniquity signifie Silas Vnder vncleannesse bee contained sins that tend to our commodity and pleasure and vnder iniquity such sinnes by which we are iniurious and hurtfull vnto our Neighbour Tim. What is the secondpart of this similitude Silas It is an application of the former proposition contained in these wordes So now giue your Members c. Tim. What thinges do ye obserue out of the second part of this reason Sil. These foure things First the elect beeing conuerted are bounde to serue God with the whole man Your Members that is your selues Secondly they must do it with great readinesse and alacrity Now giue Thirdly they must serue God in euery duty Righteousnesse which hath our dutie to man and Holines which hath our dutie to God Lastly they must goe forwards and profit daily in godlinesse and in the seruice of God as they did before in the seruice of sin and wickednesse For there is no standing at a stay Men goe backeward which go not forward in goodnesse and the Nature of sanctifying grace is to grow and encrease to perfection as Scripture and all experience teach vs wherein men may take a true triall of themselues whether they bee led by the spirit of sanctification DIAL XII Verse 20 21. For when ye were the Seruants of sin ye were free from righteousnesse 21. What fruite had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed For the ende of those things is death Tim. VVHat doth this Text containe Sil. Two things First he declareth the cause why they did so diligently follow the lusts of sinne before their conuersion verse 20. because they were free from righteousnesse The second part is argumentatiue giuing reason why sinne ought not longer to be serued but resisted rather Tim. What is meant by righteousnesse Silas Not the righteousnes of Christ imputed to beleeuers yet they were free from that also but the righteousnesse of workes which is a quality infused into the soule to conforme or frame it after the will of God in their desires and actions and it is Gods Image after which man was made in his creation and restored in his regeneration Tim. What is it to be free from this inherent righteousnes Silas To be vtterly without it and void of it and a stranger from it As before verse 17. to bee free from sin signifieth a cleane riddance and deliuerance from all sin touching guiltinesse and rule of sinne so heere to bee free from righteousnesse is to want it and to bee without it wholly but yet not so as if vnregenerate persons had no kinde of righteousnesse for they haue a ciuill righteousnesse which consists in outward workes beefore men thus wee reade of Paul that as touching the righteousnes of the Law he was vnblameable euen then when hee was a Pharisie Phil. 3. of which our Sauiour saith in the fift Chapter of Mathew That except our righteousnes exceed that which Pharisies haue wee cannot enter into the kingdome of Heauen The righteousnesse then which vnregenerate men are voide of it is Christian righteousnesse which is not in externall duties and obseruation before the world but in purenesse and cleannesse of heart before God Tim. What is the instructions from hence Silas First it teacheth a true cause why naturall men doe so greedily striue for the fulfilling of the desires of sinne the cause is for that they are vtterly without righteousnesse or grace which should hinder or stoppe their study and course in sinning As an vntamed Colt runncs headlong hauing no rider or bridle to stay him or as Children grow rude and wanton being without Tutors or guides so they which are free from righteousnesse which should bridle their nature must needs sinne Iustily and horribly Secondly it sheweth the miscrable condition of naturall and vnregenerate persons in that they are stript of all grace and so are wholly bound to sinne and kept vnder the heauy yoke of corrupt lustes The darkest night hath as much light as they haue grace the veriest vassall and Gally-slaue hath as muth freedom as the seruants of sinne haue which should breede in all naturall men a desire to be out of this estate and a thankfulnesse in such as are already pulled out Thirdly it serues to confute two sortes of men First such as stand for liberty and freedome of will without grace because wee being before our regeneration altogether bondmen to sinne there cannot be therefore in vs any freedome of will unto goodnesse Secondly such as hold workes preparatiue in naturall men disposing them vnto grace whereas they being free from righteousnesse cannot doe any workes but sinnefull and sinnes seeing they merite death cannot dispose them vnto grace and life Tim. What is the other thing contayned in this text Sylas It is an argument to disswade and draw the godly from the seruice of sinne taken from the fruite of sin in this life which is shame and from the end of it after this life which is eternall death The argument may be thus framed All Christians stand bound to auoyd that which is filthy bringing them shame and that which is harmefull breeding their death but sin if it be serued and obeyed it will
is it that the Law cannot iustifie and make vs righteous seeing it doth teach a perfect righteousnesse Silas It is true indeede that the Lawe instructeth vs fully both what is to be done and what is to be auoyded but there are 3. other things required to the iustifying of vs which it is impossible for the Law to do for vs. As first to offer vs forgiuenesse of those thinges wee do against the Law which accuseth but absolueth not Secondly to worke faith in vs to lay hold vppon forgiuenesse being offred which the law cannot engender Thirdly to put strength and power into vs that we may be able to keepe all the commandements of the Law to the end of our life All which things are impossible to the Law because it only instructeth what to do but ministreth no strength to do that it bids It promiseth life to the doers threatneth death to the transgressors but offreth no power to sinners much lesse giues faith to apprehend it for this is the office of the Gospell 2 Cor. 3 9 7 8. The cause why these things are impossible to the Lawe is because it is weake that is vneffectual and feeble for these purposes which commeth not from the Law but from our flesh and corrupt nature Tim. What doth the Flesh signifie heere Silas That naughtinesse and sinfull corruption that through Adams fall passed thorough all mankinde and doth remaine still euen in men regenerate but it is corrected and reformed in part in them and that daily til it be abolished Tim. What is the effect and fruite of this remaining corruption and sinne Silas It doth make the members of Christ and newe borne Children of God vnable perfectly and fullie to keepe the Law As first because through force of this remaining corruption they do diuers things contrarie to the Lawe Secondly they leaue vndone manie good things commanded by the Law Thirdly in the good things which they do there is much imperfection and vncleannesse therefore it is impossible to bee kept of the most righteous that is In our creation it was possible and in state of glorification shall bee but in estate of our vnperfect Sanctification it cannot be Tim. Is it not a wrong to God to say that he hath giuen vs a Law impossible to be kept Silas No none at all First because in our Creation we receiued strength to keepe it which we lost through our owne default Shall a Landlord be blamed because the Tenant is vnable to pay his rent Secondly because in the estate of glorification wee shall haue power to keep it perfect for then our knowledge and loue of God and our neighbour shall be perfect Thirdly because in the estate of regeneration the godly may be saide after a sort and in some sence perfectly to keep it For the regenerating Spirit hath begunne in them obedience to the Law giuing them strength to desire and endeauour it Also their wants and failinges in their obedience are pardoned and he is saide to haue no sinne when that is not imputed which is done And lastly the perfect obedience of Christ is allowed vnto the faithfull Omnia mandata Dei inquit August fact a deputātur quando quicquid non sit ignoscitur Ti. In what sence is it thē that the law is imposs ble to be kept Silas The wicked which are strangers from Christ are absolutely vnable to do any part of it but breake it thoroughout Rom. 5 8. Secondly the regenerate and godly they are not able by grace inherent in their own persons perfectly to do it but faile in many things and sundry wayes 1 Iohn 1 7 8. Iames 3 2. Tim. Declare vnto vs the profit that we are to make of this Doctrine touching the impossibility of keeping the Law being iustified by it Sil. First it conuinceth and confuteth both the Pelagians and the Papist the one because they teach that men by the strength of nature are able to keep the commandements the other that by strength of grace the godly are not only able to keep the Law but to do more then the Law requireth Secondly it serues to humble vs much that we cannot keepe the Law and that thorough our sinfull weaknesse also to stirre vs vppe vnto Prayer for grace to yeelde better obedience vnto it seeking that strength from God which wee haue not in our selues to be able in some measure to yeelde obedience to the Law Thirdly it instructeth all the faithfull to know that iustification before God is not to be had by good workes because they are imperfect not answerable to the rigour of the Law and are all stayned by the corruption of the flesh mingled with them Fourthly this doth teach vs that seeing we cannot haue iustification from the Law therefore all men must bee content to deny themselues and go out of themselues and seeke perfect righteousnesse in another to wit euen from the Sonne of God sent into the world that he may be made man for vs and the end of the Law for righteousnesse to all which beleeue Tim. What are we to learne from these words that GOD sent his owne Sonne Silas These three seuerall Lessons First the distinction of the persons in the Trinity for if the Sonne be sent from the Father of necessity he is a person distinct from the Father which confuteth Sabelius who held a distinction not of persons but of names Secondly that Christ is the sonne of God otherwise then we are euen his own sonne that is consubstantiall and coequall with the Father contrary to the Arrians who denied the eternall Godhead of the Sonne whome they make an inferiour second created God that is indeede not a God at all Thirdly hence we learne that when the high and soueraigne cause of our saluation is sought for wee may not stay in Christ himselfe but arise vp vnto the goodnesse of God the Father sending his Son which confuteth such as will haue foreseene faith and workes to be the mouing cause of appointing vs vnto saluation when as Christ himselfe is not the impulsiue moouing cause of appoynting vs vnto saluation but Gods owne loue moued him to giue and send Christ vnto vs Iohn 3. 16. Tim. What is the vse of this third and last lesson Silas It doth admonish all the faithfull that since God freely out of his loue sent his Son for them therefore it is their duty to send their harts vnto him wholly to bee his as men send mutually gifts one to another Rom. 12. 1. Tim. What is meant here by the similitude of sinfull flesh Silas The meaning is that Christ being sent of his Father became a very man hauing the true nature of a man being like to all other men except sin also by flesh is here meant humane nature consisting of body and soule being considered without corruption of sin Tim Why doth he say in the similitude of flesh Silas To teach vs that Christes manhoode not onely seemed and appeared but indeed
was such as is the manhood and nature of euery other man Secondly to shewe vs that howsoeuer a naturall eye could see nothing but the forme of a man yet that he had another euen a diuine nature not to be perceiued but by the eye of faith Tim. Why is sin added here and put to flesh Sil. First because humane nature as we beare it is corrupted with sin but Christ tooke it pure without sin Secondly our nature as Christ tooke it though it were free from the contagion of sin yet it was not free from the effects and fruites of sin for he was subiect to hunger thirst cold nakednesse wearinesse and death it selfe which because they are the necessarie consequents of sin therefore are they here called by the name of sin Tim. What is the instruction that ariseth from these words being thus opened Silas That Christ was truely incarnate and made man for our sakes as God taking mercy on lost mankind is the efficient cause of our freedome so his Son sent is the materiall cause of our freedome Tim. Wherefore was the Son of God rather to take humane nature then the nature of Angels Silas Because the purpose of God was to redeeme and saue not the Angels but mankinde which as it doeth expresse the greatnes of Gods loue to man so it must greatly excite and stirre vp mans loue to God for it is very considerable that men and Angels are both sinners yet the remedy was allowed to vs. Tim. But wherefore was the Son of God to take mans nature pure without sin Sil. Because otherwise he could neither haue been made a sacrifice for vs nor righteousnesse to vs for had hee had our nature with the least sin hee could not onely haue bin no Sauiour to vs but himselfe should haue stood in neede of a Sauior and in stead of giuing righteousnesse to others must haue receiued righteousnes from another Tim. But how was it possible to seuer sin and our nature one from the other Sil. Well enough he that seuered them in the first Adam by creation could tell how to seuer them in the second Adam by incarnation as hee will at length seuer them in all beleeuers at their glorification sin being but an accident which may bee separated without hurt to the subiect Tim. What is the vse of this Sil. First to moue vs to blesse God who hath giuen vs a Sauior holy and separated from sin and sinners Secondly to hunger and thirst after the sanctity and purenesse of Christs humane nature seeing wee haue so great need of it to couer our most vnholy and defiled nature the infection whereof alone is enough to condemne vs without this remedy Tim. What was it that Christ did for vs being made man Sil. He did for sin condemne sin in the flesh Tim. What is meant here by condemne Silas Not to punish or exact punishment for sin but to abolish and take away sin at once out of mans nature as the word is vsed 1 Pet. 4. 6. condemnation being put for that which followes it as condemned persons vse to be taken out of the world that they may be no more so is sin from vs by the imputation of Christs perfectly sanctified manhood for though sin remaine in the godly yet it is as if it were not being not imputed as Augustine sayed Quicquid ille non imputare decreuit sic est quasi non fuerat Tim. What is to be vnderstood by this word when he sayth for sinne Silas Some interprete for sin of sin because sin did vniustly set vpon Christ to get him to dye and to bee crucified see Iohn 16 9. Secondly for sin by some doeth signifie for remission of sinnes Rom. 5 6 8. Thirdly some interprete for sin to be a sacrifice for sin 2 Cor. 5 21. but I take it this word for sinne must bee ioyned to the word sent and then it noteth the finall cause or ende for the which Christ became man namely to take away chase and driue sin out of our nature which hee tooke vpon him for this text speaketh of his incarnation and not of his sacrifice and death Tim. What is our instruction then from these last words Sylas This that all true Christians stand in extreame neede not onely of his passion and death in being made a curse or of his perfect obedience in doing the wil of God in his life but of his very incarnation and of his most holy and pure manhood because otherwise it is not possible that euer any beleeuing Christian should be saued but that they should all perish and Christ with whatsoeuer he is or hath as by testimony of Scripture giuen to vs ordained for vs and our Saluation Tim. Why doe ye say sa howe can they perish for whome Christ dyed and for whome he hath kept the law Silas Because none can haue eternall life in Heauen vnlesse they haue the absolute perfect righteousnesse which the law exacteth one principall part whereof is the perfect intregity of our nature our will and reason being conformed and fashioned agreeably to the perfect iustice of God reuealed in his law so as there bee not the least inclination or pronnesse to any euill but a through disposition to euery good thing This full perfection the law is not able as we haue heard to effect worke in vs because it is weake through our corruption wherby we are made vnable to answere it And therefore if we should not finde this perfect righteousnesse and integrity which the law requireth of them that are to liue for euer in the humane nature of Christ and haue it allowed and giuen to such as doc beleeue in him it were vnpossible that any should bee saued because nothing that is vncleane and vnholy shall enter into the new Ierusalem Reuel 21 27. and our nature euen after regeneration and faith it is still defiled by the remainder of sinne Howbeit Christ is not deuided he that hath one part of his Mediatorship hath the whole like a Ladder where no one stale can be lacking Tim. What profit is there to be made of this Silas First it teacheth Christians to be no lesse thankefull for Christs incarnation then for his passion Secondly it serucs to humble euen the godliest that are to thinke vpon their dwelling and remaining sinne for the abolishing whereof God must defcend and bee made man Thirdly it helpes to comfort the weake ones whē they are tempted to doubt of their saluation thrugh the in-bred corruption which they carry about them and prouokes them to sinne against God Let them by a true faith consider of Christ his most perfect naturall innocency that it is no lesse reckoned to them for healing their defiled nature then his obedience and sufferings for remission of actuall sinnes and acquiting them from eternall destruction DIAL IIII. Verse 4. That the righteousnesse of the law might be fulfilled Silas First it ouerthrowes all Popish additions of mens
merits which are to be abhorred howsoeuer couered coloured with the name of Christ. 2. It admonisheth al men to seek after the true distinct knowledge of Christ and to desire to knowe nothing but him vnto their Saluation hungring after his righteousnesse wherein standeth their full and perfect happines Tim. What is the other instruction out of this first part of the verse Silas That the whole righteousnesse of Christ and whatsoeuer is in him is theirs which are his members by faith Tim. By what meanes may we know them which are thus his members Silas By this marke that they walke not after the flesh but after the spirit Tim. But wherefore doth the Apostle repeate this hauing mentioned it before Sil. Because faith by the which we are in Christ being an inward and hidden thing seated in the heart may easily be counterfeited by hypocrites who if they doe say professe and glory as they are apt enough to doe that they are in Christ there is none can controlle them because none can see what is within their heart And howsoeuer such as are in Christ and haue faith cannot deceiue themselues yet many doe by thinking that they are in Christ and haue faith when they haue not presuming of what they neuer receiued This moued the Apostle heere againe to mention such a witnesse of our being in Christ which is outward and more subiect to sence and therefore lesse apt to deceiue namely newnesse of life or sanctification which is such a thing as without it we can neuer assure our selues that our sinnes are forgiuen by Christ and that wee are free from condemnation For though it bee not the proper cause of our comfort yet it is a cause without the which we can haue no sound comfort because it is ioyned vnseparably with iustification for God doth euer sanctifie by his Spirite whom he doth iustifie by faith also newnesse of life is a sure testimony of a liuely faith which makes vs certaine of our reconciliation with God Moreouer newnesse of life is a fruite of the Spirite and it is a chiese part of our thankfulnesse to God who is then most honoured when his will is sincerely obeyed Tim. What vse is to be made of this doctrine Silas First it reproues the hypocrites who say they haue sanctification and yet still walke after their owne corrupt lusts Secondly it admonisheth all to labour for sanctification without which there is no certainty of iustification to be had Lastly it much confirmeth such Christians as labour to leade their liues purely after the motions of Gods Spirit stiuing against the lusts of the flesh grieuing hartily with a godly sorrow for their dayly failings of infirmities rising by true repentance laying hold vpon forgiuenesse promised of Christ in the Gospell and euer after walking more awfully and warily and endeuoring to profit to better and greater obedience of the worde let not such despaire DIAL V. Verse 5. For they that are after the flesh sauour the things of the flesh and they that are after the Spirit sauour the things of the Spirit Tim. VVHat doth this text containe Sil. The Apostle hauing turned himselfe againe to the doctrine of sanctification affirmeth of all beleeuing iustified persons that they study to liue and leade an holy life this hee declareth by a comparison of contraries after this manner They which are after the flesh walke after the flesh and liue wickedly but they which are after the Spirit walke after the Spirit and liue godly Tim. Now expound the words and tell vs who they are that are said to be after the flesh Sylas Vnregenerate and wicked men who are nothing spirit euen as carnall men guided by the flesh are wholly giuen and addicted to such workes as bee euill The reason hereof is that which our Sauiour saith Math. 12 33. make the tree good and the fruite will be good also it is the nature of the spirit and grace of God to moue and prouoke vnto such works as be like it selfe that is to say holy and good works as the spirit is holy and good Tim. But many godly persons which are after the spirit haue both thought vpon and done the things of the flesh as Dauid Peter c. Howe then is it saide that they which are after the spirit sauour the things of the spirit Sil. It is so yet godly persons are not mooued to those euill works by the spirit but by remaining flesh and dwelling sin for the godly are sanctified in part and not perfectly and wholly therefore it is that they are still subiect to sin which as they doe not commit by full consent of will so they rise againe from it by repentance Secondly a spirituall and godly person must not be iudged by one or some few acts and deeds of his life but by the tenour of it and as it is for the most part now for the most part godly men do sauour and mind the things of the spirit their desire is to liue honestly and to keepe an vnspotted conscience toward God and all men Tim. Shew vs nowe the profit that is to bee gathered out of this doctrine Silas First it teacheth that all beleeuing iustified persons much exercise themselues in such works as are commanded of God for iustification by faith wheresoeuer it is it hath alwayes annexed with it sanctification or study of an holy life which can no more bee separated from it then a liuing man can bee separated from the Soule Secondly heere is a speciall comfort for such as endeuour to doe good things pleasing to God with loue and delight in them because such haue the spirit of Christ and therefore are certainly iustified free from sin and death and shall neuer be condemned but eternally saued in heauen Lastly it affoards a reproofe to such as say they haue the spirit of Christ and yet sauour not the things of the spirit being either openly vicious and wicked or else careles of a godly conuersatiō neither fearing the offence of God nor yet once in earnest minding his glory DIAL VI. Verse 6. For the wisedome of the flesh is death but the wisdome of the Spirit is life and peace Tim. WHat doth this text containe Silas Vnto the doctrine of sanctification set forth in the 5. v. here is now ioyned an exhortation stirring vp beleeuing persons vnto holinesse of life Secondly a dehortation to disswade from following the lusts of the flesh and liuing wickedly Tim. By what argument and reason doth he call men from walking after the lusts of the flesh Sylas By a reason taken from the effects thus To liue after the flesh following and obeying the lustes thereof will bring forth death and therefore we must not sauour and affect the things of the flesh but eschue them rather Tim. By what reason are beleeuers perswaded to sauour the things of the spirit or to liue holily Silas By a reason taken from the effects after this sort To sauour the
manifold is it Silas Two-fold It is the inheritance eyther of glory or of dominion and power The inheritance of glory is this that after his death he being risen and ascended into Heauen he liueth there most blessedly and gloriously his body and soule being wholy freed from all infirmities and temptations and filled with all ioy and glorious brightnes euen like the Sunne in the Firmament also his inheritance of dominion and power consists in this that in his humane nature he is exalted and listed vp aboue all principalities and powers and euery name that is named in earth hauing all creatures and the Church it selfe subiect to him as vnto their head Ephe. 2 21 22. Phil. 2 9. Notwithstanding although that the elect be partakers of this double inheritance of Christ yet they are not partakers in equall degree For Christ raigneth in Heauen as Gods onely and first begotten but the faithfull are but adopted children Phil. 3 21. Reuel 3 21. Reuel 2 26. Rom. 8 29. By al this then appeareth that the children of God are very honourable personnages because their dignity is not carnall and earthly such as may wither and perish but spirituall and heauenly such as endureth for euer Tim. What vse and profit may be made of this Silas First it should admonish the faithful not to behaue themselues basely by making themselues seruants to their filthy lusts but endeauouring to follow the direction of the Spirite in all things 1. Iohn 3 2. 2. Pet. 3 11. Secondly not to take any leaue vnto our selues to thinke of or deale basely with such excellent personnages as Gods children be Tim. But tell me I pray you doe these honourable and worthy personnages giue any Scutchion or Coate-Armour Silas That they doe the feild and ground whereof is Azure and Gules for they are celestiall creatures borne from aboue Iohn 1 13. And they are a people purchased by the bloud of Christ Acts. 20 28. The partes of this armour be many and seuerall First in their Armour they giue the Eagle in respect of their aspyring aloft as it is written Where the carkasse is there will the Eagle resort Luke 17 37. Secondly they giue an Helmet or Anchor to wit their Hope which stayes their soules against all the Waues of temptation Heb. 6 19. Thirdly they giue a Lyon because of their Christian fortitude despising all threatnings and dangers Prou. 28 1. The Righteous are bolde as a Lyon The fourth is the band of Charity which knits together the faithfull as many stickes tied fast togither with one band Col. 3 14. Fiftly they giue a Sheepe to witnesse their meekenesse and obedience Iohn 10 27. My Sheepe heare my voice follow me Sixtly they giue a Doue to witnesse and represent their simplicity and innocency Math. 10 16. Be innocent as Doues And lastly they giue the Serpent to signifie their godly prouidence and wisedome to forecast and preuent dangers Math. 10 16. Bee wise as Serpents Vnto all which may be added the girdle of verity the sword of the Spirit and the breast-plate of righteousnesse Ephe. 6 14 17. Tim. What is the morall or meaning of this their Coate-Armour Sil. It serueth to put all Gods children in minde that if they will walke worthy of that their honourable and worthy calling they must expresse and shew forth a true faith a firme hope vnfained loue Christian courage meeke obedience innocent simplicity Serpentine wisedome and generally an heauenly purity in all partes of their conuersation as they may honour the house and stocke to which they belong and of which they come DIAL XVII Verse 17. last part If so be that wee suffer with him that we may also be glorified with him Tim. VVHat doth this text containe Silas At this Text the second parte of the Chapter beginneth concerning consolation vnto such as are vnder the Crosse and suffer for Christ. Hitherto hath continued the first part of the chap ter wherein blessed Paul hath ministred comforte to the faithfull against the remainder of their sinfull corruption and earnestly exhorted them to the diligent mortification of all their sinfull lustes and corruptions not to beare with these though they feare no condemnation from them Now the Apostle vseth a transition passing forwards to that part of the Chapter which strengthneth the Saints against the bitternesse of the Crosse and exhorteth them to be constant in the bearing of it without fainting or being weary in their minds Tim. How doe these words depend vpon the matter contained in the verse going before Silas Hee had saide a little before that the sonnes of God are sure for euer to liue in heauenly glory now he proueth it by a fresh and new reason taken from the vse of afflictions that the beleeuing Romanes and other the sons of God shall be inheritors because they haue taken vp their Crosse. This reason may bee framed two waies and both very good First by inferring the cōsequence or that which comes after by an antecedent which necessarily goeth before as thus They which shall be glorified in Heauen must suffer afflictions heere for Christ But yee Romanes which are the sonnes of God doe suffer afflictions for Christ ye are therefore sure to be glorified with him The strength of this reason dependeth vpon the authority of the worde of God affirming that such as dye with Christ shall raigne with him and that such as suffer with him shall bee glorified with him 2. Tim. 2 12. Which is the selfe same thing which is here saide in our text if with that great learned man Peter Martyr wee reade as wee may for these words if so be seeing that or because The second way how this reason may be framed is by a reasoning frō the lesse vnto the greater after this fashion If ye bee partakers with Christ in his Crosse and in his sufferings yee shall much more be partakers with him in his kingdome and glory Thus Chrysostom gathereth the argument Tim. Tell vs now the sum of this sentence Sil. It is thus much that so many as are vouchsafed this mercy valiantly to endure tribulation for the Gospell thereby they may bee well assured that they shall inherit eternall glory God meanes to crowne all such as take vp the Crosse. Tim. What Instructions are we to learne from hence Sil. Two First it doth admonish vs what the condition state of the Children of God is in this life is namely this that that way which Christ passed from this life into his glory by the same way must they passe this life vnto glory euen by tribulations and afflictions whereof there is very plentifull proofe in many places of the Scripture as Math. 10 37. Luke 14 26. Acts 14. 22. 2 Tim. 3 12. Heb. 12 5 6. The causes why Gods will is to haue it so are sundry and many but these are the chiefe First for the triall of their Faith in God and also of their loue towards God 1 Pet. 1 7.
after the committing whereof men become more humble and warie Which yet is not the proper meaning of this place because it doeth particularly treate of afflictions and of the crosse and of the good that comes thereof which is eternall life or the saluation of our soules which being the chiefe good whither all good things tend is heere called of the Apostle by an excellency that good Tim. What is meant heere by working together Silas It signifies thus much that afflictions themfelues in their owne nature doth not bring foorth that good heere spoken of Tim. But how then comes it to passe that they are so profitable Silas By the force and vertue of another supreme cause working togither with afflictions to wit the maruailous goodnesse and wisedome of God disposing the afflictions of his people to their good As Ioseph said to his Brethren Gen. 50 20. When ye thought euill against me God disposed it to good euen to saue much people aliue so when as Satan by afflictions meanes to driue vs to despaire God disposeth them to an happie end euen to encrease hope Rom. 5 34. For if a Physitian who is but a man can so temper Hemlocke or other poysonous things to make it become medicinable much more can God so temper and dispose of afflictions that they shall be wholesome to his children Tim. What is the Instruction to be gathered from hence Silas That afflictions through Gods great mercy do helpe forwards the saluation of his children the reason heereof is because they are Instruments whereby the holy Ghost mortifieth their sinnes weaneth them from the loue of the worlde stirres them vp to better obedience quickens their prayers exerciseth their patience lastly humbles the pride of their heart Iob 33 16 17 Rom. 5 4. 1 Cor. 11 32. Psal. 119. Tim. What vse is to be made of this point Silas It serueth much to strengthen our mindes vnto godly and constant patience Secondly to reproue such as faint in their troubles Also to see how to make our profit of euery thing Tim. Proceede now to the latter part of this verse 〈◊〉 me how those persons be described vnto whom afflictions shall do good Silas They are described by these three markes First they be such as loue God Secondly such as are called 3. they are such as are elected or called of his purpose Tim. How do these three markes depend one vpon another Silas Thus loue is the effect of Gods calling and calling is the fruite of Gods purpose None can loue God except first he be called our calling proceedeth from the eternall purpose of God Thus our Apostle setteth downe things first more manifest and afterward thinges more secret First the effects and then the causes For as Gods purpose is the cause of calling so is calling in order before Faith and Faith before Loue in order of causes Tim. Tell vs now first what it is to loue God Silas It is to set the delight of our heart vpon him and to take pleasure to thinke and speake of him of his properties word and workes with liking and ioy studying by all meanes in all thingsto set foorth his glorie They which hate and abhorre God do the quite contrarie to all this Tim. Whence springeth this loue of God in vs Silas From the sence and feeling of Gods loue toward vs 1 Iohn 4 19. For it cannot bee that any man shoulde certainly perceiue the loue of God towardes himselfe in Christ for eternall life but that that loue will constrain him to loue againe 2 Cor. 5 14. Also the goodnesse and mercie of God in Christ is such a beautifull and amiable thing as being certainely knowne it will bee both earneftly loued and desired Tim. Why is it written they that loue God and not they that are loued of God Silas Because it is better knowne to vs namely in afflictions what loue we haue to him then what hee hath to vs for this is out of vs the other is within vs God striketh those he loueth Tim. By what speciall note may one know himselfe to be one of their number which loue God Silas By an vnfained purpose and endeuour to obey his word Iohn 14 15. If ye loue me keepe my commaundements Also verse 21 23. Tim. What is the reason that the Apostle speaking of patience suffering afflictions doth rather mention the loue of God then of our neighbor Silas Because our loue to God is that that maketh the burthen of afflictions more easie and light to bee borne euen as a man is ready to beare any calamitie for his sake whom he loueth at his heart thus did Ionathan for Dauid And as the seruice of Iacob 14. yeares seemed nothing to him for the loue which he bare to Rahel so they that truely loue God will for his sake suffer such aduersities as he sendeth either for correction or triall and this is the reason also why hee rather mentioneth loue then faith For howsoeuer patience springeth from Faith yet the next and immediate cause of it is loue Secondly it is to put a difference betweene counterfet sincere faith which cannot bee seuered from loue Gal. 5 6. whereas they that professe faith and say they beleeue when they do not haue their hearts void of al loue either to God or to their neighbour or themselues as appeareth in the example of Cain Esan and Iudas Tim. What instructions are we now to gather from this first marke Sil. Two First that the sound loue of God is needfull to all those which shall beare afflictions patiently Iames 〈◊〉 12. First because it maketh the godly valiaunt keeping them from fainting vnder the greatest crosses which is to be seene in the example of the Apostles Paul and Peter and other Martyrs who because they loued God were therefore ready to endure much for him Secondly it kindleth their zeal and maketh them earnestly bent to glorifie God by their constancy Tim. What profit are we to make of this point Silas First it stirreth vs vp to seeke for the loue of God and for the encrease of it in our hearts seeing we cannot be patient without it Secondly it warns vs by our patient-bearing to shewe our loue to God as God by his chastisements shewes his loue vnto vs Heb 12 5 6. Tim. What other instructions ariseth from hence Silas This none but Gods children can be patient in afflictions because none can loue God saue his owne children therfore they haue but the shadow of patience and be blockish and sencelesse rather then patient Tim. What vse is of this Silas It affoords comfort to such as haue patience in afflictions because this is a testimony vnto them of their adoption Secondly it teacheth vs that wicked men how quiet soeuer they are in afflictions yet they haue not true patience but an apearance of it they are rather blockish then endued with true Christian patience Ti. What is the
So the decree of his loue from euerlasting is tearmed fore-knowledge Tim. What is the instruction that we gather from hence Silas That God doth not begin then to loue his elect when they bee in this worlde and are regenerated but hee hath loued them in his decree and purpose from euerlasting For vnto God those things towardes men were long since purposed and appointed saith Chrysostome Tim. But if this be true that we are from euerlasting loued of God how can we at any time be enemies to him Silas Though we be loued as creatures and more loued as Gods elect yet in respect of inherent and remaining corruption we are enemies of God beeing neuer actually beloued till we be regenerate by the Spirite of God and haue his image imprinted in vs. Tim. What vse is to be made of this point Silas First that God hath certainly loued vs in this it appeareth that our election is most firme so as the chosen must needs come to glory because whome God loueth once hee loueth to the end Secondly seeing God loued vs in his purpose when we were sinners wee ought therefore to loue him againe and also one another euen our very enemies Thirdly if God loued vs euen when wee were enemies hee will nowe much more loue and saue vs seeing wee are reconciled by his Sonne through faith in his bloud Tim. What is the second instruction Silas That the eternall good will and pleasure of God is the spring and fountaine of all spirituall graces now and heauenly glory hereafter The reason is for that the Apostle setting downe the causes of our saluation nameth the foreknowledge of God as the head and chiefe of the rest for wee are therefore predestinated called iustified and sanctified glorified because God knew vs for his own before the foundation of the world Tim. What vse is to be made of this poynt Silas It teacheth that faith loue and good workes cannot bee the cause of our election because Gods foreknowledge and election is the cause of them Secondly it confuteth such as woulde haue our beleeuing and working well to come in part frō our naturall free will wheras in trueth they are all the fruites and gifts of Gods eternall election and loue by which they are giuen to vs and wrought in vs insomuch that we haue neither good counsell thought nor good deede but that which God hath decreed to put into vs from euerlasting Ephe. 1. 4. wee are chosen in Christ not because wee were but to bee holy Tim. What is it to predestinate Silas To predestinate is to decree any thing before hand and bring it vnto a certaine end through certain and appointed meanes If this predestination saith Augustine can be deceiued then may God be ouercome of mans sin which cannot be Tim. What learne we from hence Silas That predestination is ioyned vnto foreknowledge as subordinate to it Gods foreknowledge is no bare and idle thing but is euer coupled with his decree and ordinance whatsoeuer God knoweth or seeth before hee ordaineth to some speciall end and vnto that end hee shall at last bring it this is it which is here called predestination Tim. If this be so that all things are foreordained of God howe is hee not the authour of sinnes for they bee in the number of things Silas Sinnes are foreordained of God not as they are sinnes but as they are the meanes to effect his counsell thus Adams fall and Iudas treason were foreordained of God as meanes whereby God did effect and serue his own counsell in sauing the elect to the praise of his mercy and condemning the wicked to the praise of his iustice Secondly predestinating in scripture may be taken generally and largely for Gods generall and whole decree touching all things and persons or strictly for the decree of election whereby he hath foreordained some to saluation as the end and confourming to Christ as the meanes to leade to that end and so it is here vsed Tim. Wherein stands this conformity with Christ Silas In two thinges first in being like vnto him in respect of the end that as Christ is nowe glorified in heauen so all that are predestinate shal be glorified with him Secondly in being like vnto him in respect of the meanes standeth thus that as Christ entred into his glory through holinesse and suffering afflictions and death so they that liue godly and are ready to suffer with Christ for Christ are sure to be saued with Christ. Tim. What is our instruction from hence Silas This euery one that looketh to inherite eternall life in heauen with Christ must endeuor to bee like him in this life they must be holy and righteous as he was and be ready to suffer afflictions as hee did The reason here of is Gods eternall decree and ordinance whereby hee hath appointed it to bee so that they shall bee partners with Christ in his heauenly glory whosoeuer shall bee followers of him here in his patience and holinesse which are the way we are to walke in vnto our country which is aboue Tim. What is the vse to be made of this Silas First here is an exhortation to moue vs to liue holily according to the will of God and to suffer afflictions with patience according to the example of Christ as wee desire to haue communion with Christ in his blessednesse Secondly heere is comfort for such as suffer any manner of shame or iniury for Christ and his word for this likenesse with Christ in his infirmities is a witnes that we shall be like vnto him in glory Thirdly here is sharp reproofe for such as liue prophanely and shunne the crosse saying it mattereth not how we liue or what we doe for wee must be saued if we be predestinate and if not then we cannot be saued though we do liue well Tim. How is Christ the first begotten amongst his brethren Silas This phrase hath reference to the custome of the Iewes whose first-borne did excell his brethren both in power and portion in dignity and possession so doeth Christ far excell all his brethren who are all like to Christ but not equall with him neither in nature office glory nor dominion for by nature hee is God truely and God-man in vnity of person for office the onely redeemer and mediatour of his Church therefore onely king and high-priest for glory and dominion he sitteth vpon his Fathers throne hauing a name aboue all names Phil. 2. 9. DIAL XXVII Verse 30. Whome he hath predestinate them he hath called whome he hath called them hee hath iustified and whome he iustifieth them he glorifieth Tim. VVHat doth this text contayne Silas The seuerall actions and effects whereby God doth witnes his eternall loue to his elect ones and by which as meanes hee bringeth them to their purposed and promised blessednes Here is the golden chain wherby men chosen are drawne vp and ascend to heauen here be the steps and degrees
whereby Gods eternall loue descends to his chosen and whereby they climbe to their decreed felicity to which none can come but through these meanes by which means the elect are sure to attaine it yea though they be afflicted here which causeth them to bear afflictions more patiently and valiantly in that they perceiue their saluation to be of God by so many excellent works of his grace so certainely and vndeceiueably procured and effected Tim. What are the degrees whereby the elect arise and climbe to blessednesse in heauen Silas Foure 1. predestination 2. vocation 3. iustification and glorification the first of these is done afore all times the three last of them be performed in time Tim. What doe ye call predestination Silas It is an action of God peculiar to all the elect which are purposed vnto saluation the rest of mankinde being passed by and left to their corruption and iust perdition This action of God is not done in time but from euerlasting God fore-ordaining his elect both to the end which is eternall life and vnto the meanes leading thither to wit vocation faith iustification sanctification the Crosse also death eyther naturall or violent The very worde predestinate is taken foure times in Scripture in this sence as Rom. 8 29 30. Ephe. 1 5 11. But yet the matter and doctrine it selfe is handled in very many places as Rom. 9 and 11. Ephe. 1. Mat. 11 25. Iohn 6. and 17 6. Acts 13 48. 1. Thes. 5. 1. Pet. 1 2. Iude 4. Reuel 17 8. and else-where often Tim. Some thinke this doctrine should not bee taught and therefore raile at the teachers of it what thinke ye do they well Sil. No verily for it ought to be taught to Gods people and Gods Ministers should sinne if they passed by it My reasons for this be these First because Christ and his Apostles taught it and their example is warrant enough for Gods ministers For as the Apostles were followers of Christ in doctrine and life so ought other Ministers Secondly it is a part of Gods reuealed will and therfore belongs vnto vs Deut. 29 29. Thirdly it is a speciall ground-worke of comfort and patience vnder the Crosse to knowe our predestination to bee so vnchangeable strong and firme as our Apostle doth heere aduertise vs â—â—at afflictions though many and great cannot hinder â—â—â—t further our saluation Fourthly it is the Mother of all godlinesse to which a man or woman doth then and neuer before seriously and chearfully apply themselues when they vnderstand by Faith Gods eternall loue towards them in their free predestinating to life 1 Iohn 4 10. We loue him because he loued vs first Lastly it begetteth true and ioyfull thankfulnesse which we will not offer vnto God except wee know that all good comes of his eternall purpose without any respect to our worthinesse Tim. But the conceite of Predestination and that the Predestinate persons must be saued dooth take away from men all care of Faith Ministery Prayer and Good workes vse of Sacraments c. Silas This is a verie slanderous vntrueth because the Doctrine of Predestination doth necessarily put commend vnto vs all these meanes so farre off it is from destroying them or extinguishing the care vse of them because it is taught that whome God predestinateth them he calleth iustifieth and glorifieth Thus vnlikely it is that Predestination should exclude Christ the Gospell Faith Calling Iustification Holinesse of life as it doth include and inferre all these necessarily The reason heereof is because it is wholesomly taught beleeued according to Scripture that God predestinating vnto the end hath also fore-ordained to the meanes which bring vs vnto such an end and that immutably and most freely And therefore it is a grosse error to say this Doctrine breedeth either desperation or licentiousnes Tim. What is heere meant by Calling Sil. It is that meane or worke of God wherein his eternall loue in predestinating vs to eternall life doth first appeare and shew it selfe vnto vs for till the time of our Calling the decree of predestination is secret and hidden in Gods counsell but by our Calling it is made knowne to the elect themselues For if God doe call all those in time whom he ordained to life before all times then such as be called may thereby know they are predestinated as the cause is knowne by the effect the roote by the fruit the fountain by the riuer so Gods eternal loue by calling Tim. Yet it is written Math. 20. 16. that many are called but few chosen whereby it should seeme that calling is no sure marke of election and predestination vnto glory Silas It is true there is an outward calling by the Gospell onely which wants the inward grace of the Spirite to make it effectuall this is common to many reprobates and is no sure token of election because it brings no further then to the bare knowledge and profession of Christ and to some generall and sleight reformation such as an hypocrite may haue but not to Christ himselfe by faith in the gospel But the calling which is both a fruite and a certain note of predestination is such a calling which together with the outward preaching of the word hath the inward working of the holy Spirite to be get faith in the Gospell whereby a man is carried to Christ himselfe to be planted in him and ioyned to him as a true member and to be gouerned by his spirit working in vs obedience to our caller of this calling our text speakes Tim. What instructions are to bee learned from this which hath beene sayd of calling Sil. First how needfull a thing it is for vs to haue the gospell and the preaching thereof seeing persons of yeares are not ordinarily called vnto the faith of Christ without it Rom. 10. 14. Secondly that no Christian must rest in an outward generall calling and knowledge though it be a great mercy but striue and labour after that especiall and effectuall calling which is euer coupled with faith and obedience to the Gospell Thirdly such as haue this calling haue exceeding cause to reioyce and be glad and to bee thankfull to God because they haue receiued an vndoubted pledge of Gods loue and their owne saluation in such sort as they may glory in God yea euen in tribulations Tim. But what shall we thinke of Infants that cannot heare the Gospell cannot they haue an effectuall calling Silas Yea all predestinate Infants and such wee are to take all the infants of Christian Parents to be for that they belong to the Couenant and we know nothing to the contrary they haue an inward calling by the Spirit though not after the same manner as persons of discretion and yeares For the Apostle heere speakes of the meanes how all the elect are brought to blessednesse therefore seeing infants are predestinate as no doubt many be they must of necessity bee iustified and haue a Calling For whom hee predestinateth them he
by our loue to God and our brethren and by our hope of glory If we finde these things in vs then God is with vs because these are proper to his elect ones This serues to discouer hypocrites and to call the saithfull to a tryall and examination of themselues whether they haue these things or no as they may praise God for the graces they shall finde in themselucs and pray more feruently for supply of all their spirituall wants DIAL XXIX Verse 32. Who spared not his owne Son but gaue him for vs all to death how shal he not with him giue vs al things also Tim. VVHat doth this Text containe Silas First a sound proofe that God is with the faithfull as a louing sather to protect them and to take care for them Secondly an 〈◊〉 to a particular assault touching want penurie and extreame pouerty and neede of all thinges The former temptation was de 〈◊〉 mali this is de absentia boni for lacke of thinges needefull 〈◊〉 hauing our Sauiour Christ they can lacke nothing Tim. How doth he proue that God is with beleeuers Silas By an vndoubted signe or fruite of his loue because he freely gaue them his owne Sonne to bee their redeemer and Sauior both by merit and efficacy this is such an argument of his loue as there cannot be a stronger Other Fathers giue all to spare and redeeme their children but God hauing but one childe gaue him to spare vs which are vngodly and his enemies Of this loue Rom. 5. 8. Iohn 4. 9. Tim. How is this gift set forth in this text Silas First by the giuer God Secondly by the meanes and end free and precious gift Thirdly by the substance of the gift his owne Sonne Fourthly by the persons to whome to wit all elect beleeuers Lastly by the consequents or appurtenances of this guift With Christ all thinges are giuen Tim. What learne wee from hence that God is the authour of this great gift Silas That not onely our saluation but euen the sending of Christ the worker of it depends vppon the good will of God 1 Iohn 3. 16. Rom. 5. 8. Tim. What vse is to be made of this instruction Silas It confuteth the opinion of merite by workes for if Christ bee not the soueraigne and first cause of our saluation but Gods loue is aboue it then much lesse are our workes the cause of eternall life Secondly it commends the exceeding loue of God that hee being so great would respect vs so little which should moue vs to loue and reuerence him againe and to expresse it by our sincere and entire obedience to his word and by suffering for him Tim. What are we to learne from hence that he sayth God spared not his Sonne Silas That this guift for the kinde and quality is rare and precious because things which are rare and excellent vse to be spared and are seldome or neuer to be spent but when it is to purchase something which is more deare excellent An Emperor of Rome chused rather to spare his money then to redeeme his Souldiers beeing taken prisoners but to redeeme vs God woulde not spare no not his owne Son because no mony nor treasurie would serue the turne but only the bloud of his Sonne 1 Pet. 1 18 19. Tim. What profit of this Silas It should warne vs that wee spare neyther our selues goods or any thing how deare soeuer to please and glorifie God Shall not God spare his Sonne but kil him for vs and shall we spare to mortify our sinful lusts to please and honour him Tim. What learne wee from hence that the gifte is called His owne Sonne Silas It teacheth against the Arrians that Christ is God coessentiall to his Father Iohn 5 18. Secondly it distinguisheth Christ the naturall Sonne from adopted ones which are not his proper or owne sons but by acceptation and grace Thirdly it highly extolles the loue of God which hereby appeares to be very great by the greatnesse of the thing giuen If Abraham shewed how he esteemed of God in that he offered to haue giuen his Son Isaac how dooth God declare his loue to vs by giuing his owne Son for vs Moreouer this serues to comfort Gods people in all their wants necessities whatsoeuer for seeing God gaue vs his Sonne it is not possible that he should keepe any thing frō vs which is good for vs. The reasons hereof bee very strong First because Christ is the greatest good thing he is more worth then a thousand worldes and he that giues the greatest good wil not sticke at the lesser Thus Christ reasons Math. 6 25. If he giue you life he will much more feede you and cloath you Secondly Christ is the Fountaine of all other good thinges it is for him and through him that wee haue any thing else that is good and al good things come from him as riuers from the spring and beames from the Sun therefore hauing him we can want nothing and possessing him wee possesse all things The due meditation heereof affoordes strong comfort in time of any want or penury it is not so forcible a remedy against the temptation of want to heare God say that he will not forsake the righteous he will not faile nor forsake them or they that feare him shall lacke nothing that good is as to heare and belieue that he hath giuen his Sonne for vs in whom the sicke the needy and disgraced may finde health riches and honour and all things else Tim. What else are wee to learne from the latter part of this sentence Silas That Christ and the things of Christ cannot be diuided but that he which hath the one must haue the other his person and benefits be inseparable See Iohn 6 40. These benefits they are either spiritual as righteousnesse sanctification and redemption 1 Cor. 1 30. or earthly good things so farre as they are behoouefull for his members either they be supernal things as God or equall as Angels or inferiour as the worlde all is giuen with Christ. Tim. What vse is to be made of this point Silas It reproues two sorts of men First Papists who shut out the wicked from eternall life and yet affirme that they eate Christ in the Sacrament Secondly such as would haue vs partake in the benefits of Christ without partaking with himselfe as if a branch could haue the iuice and life of the Vine and not be in the Vine Besides it greatly comforts such as be married to Christ by faith for hauing him they are sure to haue al his things euen as a woman maried to her husband communicates in all his honour and wealth Tim. What are wee to learne from hence that Christ is saide to be giuen for vs Sil. It teacheth that wee haue not deserued Christ because he is a gift yea a free and frank gift proceeding of meere fauour and loue as the worde heere signifies Also it stirreth vs
the cruelty of Sathan in as much as these either dare not appeare before God to accuse and charge vs or if they doe it it is but lost labour since GOD the iudge hath discharged vs. Secondly as it shewes the happines of iustified persons so it bewrayes the great misery of such as doe not beleeue because they bee subiect to the accusation of sin and Sathan themselues and of the world and to the condemnation of God and his law Tim. So doe the beleeuers because they haue sinne still in them and Gods iustice must needs condemne sinne how doth the Apostle answere this assault Sil. Thus that Christ being dead he hath in his death made satisfaction and where satisfaction is made to diuine iustice there is no cause to feare condemnation which doth neuer proceede but against persons who cannot satisfie neither by others nor themselues Tim. Tea but what can a dead man profit vs Silas Nothing at all had death swallowed him vp and subdued him but Christ once dead is risen againe and now sitteth at the right hand of God Tim. Hath God a right band or doth Christ sit in heauen Sil. No not so for in heauen be no seates and God is a Spirit and therefore is no bodily substance hauing fleshly members but the meaning of this phrase is that Christ liueth in heauen blessedly and raigneth in exceeding glory and power not onely as he is God but also as he is man being exalted in his kingdome and Priest-hood and declared king and head of his Church before God and the Angels hauing all things subiect to him Of which singular dignity and honour giuen to him by his Father reade Mat. 28 18. Ephe. 1 20 21 22. Phil. 2 9. Col. 2 15. 10. 13. 3. Tim. What is meant by this that he makes request for vs in Heauen Silas That as he once merited our saluation in earth by dying so he now continually preserues it for vs in heauen by his intercession for vs which is not now in humiliation by kneeling vpon his knees as in the dayes of his flesh nor as the Spirite doth by stirring vp requests for vs but hee now maketh request by the vertue and merite of his death appeasing his Fathers wrath and turning his fauour towards vs so often as wee sinne of infirmity and seeke for pardon in his name Tim. Tell vs distinctly in what things doth this intercession of Christ consist Sil. In foure things First in his appearing for vs before God Heb. 9 24. Secondly in his satisfaction once performed to Gods iustice for vs Heb. 10 12. 14. Thirdly in that his will is that this satisfaction should euer stead all his members before God Heb. 10 10. Lastly the consent of God his Father resting in this satisfaction and will of his Sonne Iohn 11 42. Tim. What is the benefit that beleeuers haue by this intercession of Christ to whom alone this honour is peculiar Silas Exceeding great for it quits them from all feare of condemnation by Gods Iustice in respect of theyr sinnes because where Christ becomes Patrone for to defend against the sentence of damnation it is in vaine for sinne Law or Sathan to attempt any thing against beleeuers Euen as an innocent person is safe so long as he hath his learned aduocate to answere things obiected and to pleade his innocency and as one accused vnto a Prince is well as long as he hath a friend in the Court to speake for him so is it with all beleeuers who haue the Iudge himselfe both iudge and aduocate 1 Iohn 2 2. Tim. What other thing is to be learned from hence Silas Two thinges First that the sinnes of the elect shall neuer come into examination or inquiry being all for giuen and couered Secondly that Christ Iesus is a sufficient remedy against all things that may trouble or feare the conscience and that these four maner of waies First by his death freeing vs from sinne and damnation Secondly by his rising againe getting righteousnesse victory ouer all his enemies Thirdly by being at the right hand of God he sheddeth downe the holy Ghost vpon vs with his sauing graces Fourthly by his intercession he effectually applies vnto vs all his merites and continually preserues vs in the state of grace and saluation Therefore all that seeke for any soul comfort from any thing in heauen or in earth in themselues or others they are most miserably seduced for Christ is alone sufficient both to merit and preserue our saluation vnto vs. Away then with abhomination cast away those blasphemous prayers and professions of Papistes touching the blessed Virgin Marie calling her Queen of Heauen our hope our onely hope our health our saluation our comfort refreshing and our ioy our deliuerer from danger our refuge and calling vpon her in life to defend in the houre of death to protect to entreate God the Father not as intercessor but with authority to command the Son Christ as a Mother with such like horrible impieties vnto her and to the Crosse and to Thomas Becket and to Saint Francis as their owne rotten Bookes do witnesse DIAL XXXI Verse 35 36 37. Who shall separate vs from the loue of Christ Shall tribulation or anguish or persecution or famine or nakednesse or perill or sword as it is written For thy sake are we killed all the day long we are counted as Sheepe for the slaughter neuerthel esse in all these thinges wee are more then Conquerors through him that loued vs. Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas To confirme and comfort faithfull hearts against a new and most daungerous assault made against their faith by sundry greeuous crosses and enemies by which Satan endeauoureth to shake out of the minds of the godly the perswasion os Gods loue toward them men through weaknesse being apt to thinke that they are not loued of God when they are sore and long afflicted as if troubles and calamities were so many testimonies of his anger and wrath as Dauid complaines Psal. 13 1. And against this temptation they are heere strengthned Tim. What be the parts of this Text Silas Two First a question verse 35 36. Secondly an answer verse 37. The question containes two things First a rehearsal of the particular calamities which fight against the beleeuers and seem to wrest out the sence of Gods loue from them verse 35. Secondly a confirmation of the last calamity to wit the sword by testimonie of Scripture verse 36. The answere containes a notable consolation from the contrary euent to wit the most wholesome yssue of calamities and crosses wherein the beleeuers are not onely not ouercome but do ouercom yea do more then conquer This euent is set forth by the cause which is the vnchangeable loue and assistance of God through him that loued vs. Tim. What is meant heere by the loue of Christ Silas It is taken heere not actiuely for that loue wherewith wee loue him as if our
constancie were called in question as Augustine and Ambrose thinke but passiuely for that loue wherewith the faithfull are beloued of Christ as if the sence of that could be shaken out of their hearts That this is the meaning may appear by the end of the 37. and 39. verses which expound it of Gods loue to vs. Also it appeares by that which goes before our Text for Paul had spoken of Christs loue to vs witnessed by his dying for vs rising againe sitting at the right hand of God and making request for vs all which proueth his great loue toward the elect Tim. How may it bee further knowne that the sence of Christs loue is heere to be vnderstood Silas By Pauls scope which is to comfort beleeuers who would haue no comfort of Christs loue except they felt it as Rom. 5 5. Againe it is the sence and perswasion of Christs loue that Satan by crosses seekes to wrest from vs. Tim. What learne we from hence Silas A good Lesson which is this the godlie must make reckoning to haue the perswasion of Gods loue assaulted and sore shaken The reason is because it is a notable aduantage to Satan and hurt to Gods children to doubt of Gods loue to them For then Satan may bring in impatiency despaire dulhesse in Gods seruice disobedience loosenesse of manners and all iniquity which we are kept from by the sence of Gods loue quickning our loue and causing to hope in him wel constantly Tim. What is the vse of this point Sil. It warneth the beleeuers to arme themselues against this assault labouring by all meanes to setle their hearts more and more in the assuraunce of Gods loue holding fast that truth that Gods loue is most constant and nothing in the world can be of such force as to hinder it much lesse to plucke it away so as sin and security be taken heed of This was Pauls perswasion for his part verse 28. and pray vnto God that yee also may bee thus perswaded and striue mightily for it Tim. Now shew vs particularly what things they bee which be contrary to our perswasion of Gods loue Sil. They be either crosses and calamities whereof he rehearseth seauen or enemies whereof he mentioneth nine in number Tim. Shew vs the meaning of these calamities in particular Sil. First by tribulation is meant euery thing which presseth or wringeth to wit any vexation Secondly by anguish is meant streightnesse of place properly but by a Metaphor preplexity of minde when one knowes not what to doe an example heereof we haue in Ichosaphat 2. 〈◊〉 20 12. Thirdly by persecution is meant some extreame violence offered by Tyrants and wicked men to our goods name person or life Fourthly by famine is meant hunger through wante of victuals to sustaine our life Fiftly nakednesse signifies want of apparell and cloathing to couer and defend our bodyes from cold Sixtly by perill is meant dangerous distresses which put a man in perill and ieorpardy such as Paul reckoneth 2. Cor. 11 25 26. and Heb. 11 36 37. Lastly by sword is meant slaughter cruell tormenting death or punishment by barbarous sauage bloud-shed as happened to Abell the Prophets and Christ and holy Martyrs Tim. What obserue you in this particular rehearsing of calamities Silas First what heauy and hard things the godly are subiect vnto for their profession sake others haue felt these things and we must prepare for them Secondly the Apostle by reckoning vp the most bitter things would teach vs that seeing these things cannot put out the sence of Gods loue neither any else in the world can doe it For what can goe beyonde these for smarte or shame Tim. But how is it proued by the Apostle that the faithfull are subiect vnto the sworde and bloudy slaughters for the Gospels sake Silas By a text out of the psalme 44 verse 22. For thy sake we are killed all the day long we are counted as Sheepe for the slaughter All the day may signifie all times of this life or without intermission or all the time of the world Tim. What things doe yee note from this testimony of the Psalme Silas First that Christians are subiect euen to death and slaughter as well as other calamities Secondly that in this respect wee are like vnto Sheepe not which are fedde for wooll or store but such as are appointed for the kitching Thirdly they are put in mind to be meeke and patient in suffering of death euen as sheepe are vnder the Butchers hand Fourthly that death doth continually hang ouer their heads euen all day long either for that they are ready euery day to dye if neede require or because their continuall dangers are so many deaths as it were Lastly that the cause of the death of Gods Martyrs is not any crime of their owne but their sincere faith and profession of Christ for thy sake as Math. 10. for my names sake and Mat. 5. Tim. But what is the comfort of the faithfull against all these terrible things Silas Euen this that in all these things they are more then Conquerors The meaning heereof is that true beleeuers in their miseries they doe not onely not fainte and are ouercome but themselues get a glorious victory ouer their crosses and persecutions both by their patient wearying and vanquishing the persecutors themselues brought to heauen Tim. But how may this be that the slaine and conquered should yet be Conquerers Silas Indeed this is a paradoxe and strange to carnall reason yet it is most true in this spiritual warfare howsoeuer it be otherwise in the bodily warrefare For the Saints when they suffer and are killed they are not onely patient but reioyce and glory which is the parte of victours Rom. 5 3. Secondly because by their constancy they doe euen daunt the minds of their persecutors who rather seeme to bee ouercome then the Martyrs which suffer Example heereof in the Pharisies Acts 4. and in Iulian the Apostata whose cruelty was conquered by the patience of the Martyrs Lastly of some of the Romaine persecutors in the ten first persecutions whose barbarous sauagenesse was euen tired with the stedfastnesse of the Saints in suffering Thirdly the Diuels practise is by crosses to wrest from Gods children their confidence in Gods loue which is rather increased by this meanes Rom. 5 5 6. Tim. But whence haue they strength to be so stedfast to hold out and to conquer Silas Not from themselues who are farre vnequall for so great a battaile but from the helpe and aide of God confirming and establishing them The cause that mooueth God to affoord this strength is his great loue which he beares them in Christ Through him that hath loued vs. Tim. What is our lesson from hence Silas That the victory which beleeuers doe get ouer all their troubles depends not vpon their owne power or merites at all but meerely solely and wholy in the loue that God beares them in Christ see 1.
and an illusion of the diuel Their reasons be First because none can be certaine of his perseuerance in grace contrary to Rom. 8 29 30. Secondly because they finde the word heere Englished Perswaded to be elsewhere in Scripture applyed vnto coniecturall knowledge as 1 Thess. 1 4. Rom. 15 14. 2 Tim. 1 5. Heb. 6 9. The cause whereof is because in these places the Apostle speaketh not of his own but of the faith election of others wherof we can haue but a charitable perswasion The second vse of this doctrine is to prouoke all that finde not this certaine perswasion of Gods loue to labor for it and those which haue it to be exceeding thankfull to God for it Lastly this reproues those that build their perswasion of Gods loue and their title to eternall life on grounds which be probable onely as because they are baptized and haue knowledge and make protestation and come to Sermons and Sacraments and do some good things and refraine from some euil things and haue bin manie waies blessed and holpen of God for al these things are common both to good and bad which liue in the bosom of the Church See Eccl. 9. 2. 1 Cor. 10 1 2 3 4. Hypocrites may haue and many haue them all in a farre greater plenty and proportion then very many of Gods children haue them CHAP. IX DIAL I. Verses 1 2 3. I say the trueth in Christ I lye not my conscience bearing mee witnesse in the Holy Ghost that I haue c. Timotheus WHat doth the Apostle handle in this Chapter Silas In this Chapter and the two following Paul entreateth of that great mystery of diuine election and reprobation and of the reiection of the Iewes and the vocation of the Gentiles depending thereon Tim. How doeth hee fall into this dispute and argument of Gods eternall predestination Tim. Of this diuers men iudge diuersly they all so agree in the matter of his treatise as yet they vary about the coherence and knitting of these three following Chap ters to the former Some thinke that he climeth vp to the mystery of election that he may lay foorth the fountain of faith and iustification and so proue them to be free and independant vpon vs. Others say this depends on Chapter 3. verse 29. where the Apostle hauing prooued righte ousnesse by faith now he setteth on the other thing to proue that it comes without respect of persons both to Iew and Gentile which beleeue and that according to election Others fetch the coherence from verse 30 or 38. 39. of the eight Chapter thus If God will glorifie whome hee foreknewe and the faithfull cannot bee separated from Gods loue how comes it that the Iewes whome God foreknew once and which are Gods onely people are now cast out and repelled from grace and glory Vnto which he answereth that all which be Iewes by carnall generation be not the people of God vnto whome the promises doe belong but the elect alone whether Iewes or Gentiles But I take it rather this to be the reason of the connexion that against the former doctrine of iustification by faith the vnbeleefe of the Iewes might bee obiected thus If Pauls doctrine bee true which hitherto hee hath taught of the right way of being iustified and saued thorough faith in Christ why doe not the Iewes approue and embrace it either the Iewes are none of Gods people or the doctrine and promises of grace belong to them if not to them then how is God faithfull in keeping promise seeing hee sayed hee would be their God Vnto which the Apostle answereth that the Iewes obtained not righteousnesse and saluation by Christ because many of them were vnbeleeuers The reason of this is because they were reprobates for such as were elect did beleeue and were iustified and saued which is sufficient to proue God true of his promise which was neuer made but to Abrahams spirituall seede not to such as came of him according to the flesh Tim. What be the parts of this Chapter Silas Three first a graue protestation of Pauls sorrow in behalfe of the Iewes which beleeued not in Christ vnto verse 6. Secondly a defence of Gods promise against humane reason to verse 24. Thirdly a declaration of the mystery touching the calling of the Gentiles and refusing of the Iewes by the oracles of the Prophets which did foretell the one and the other to the ende of the Chapter Tim. Why did Paul beginne with protestation of his sorrow Silas To auoide the offence of the Iewes who were likely to take indignation at this doctrine therefore hee vseth an insinuation to gaine their good will for which purpose he also prayseth them ver 4. 5. Which commends the wisedome of the Apostle in preuenting the contempt of his doctrine Tim. What doth he performe in these three first verses Silas Hee layeth downe or propoundeth the trueth Secondly the greatnesse Thirdly the cause of his sorrow The trueth and greatnesse of his sorrow he proues by a sacred oath calling Christ his conscience and the Holy Ghost to witnes that it was so that he did truely and great ly bewaile their case Tim. What instructions are we to learne out of this first verse Silas That a Christian must alwaies speake trueth but especially in an oath the reason is because an vntrueth vttered in an oath is not onely a lye but it is a periurie which is a greater sinne Secondly because by such vntrueths Gods name is dishonoured when hee is called to witnesse a false matter who is the auenger of all falsehoode Tim. What vse hereof Silas It admonisheth all men to take heede what they affirme or denie vpon their oath that it be no vaine matter or vncertaine and doubtfull or vntrue or false but such as they know to be most certaine and true Tim. What further instruction from hence Silas Hence wee learne what an oath is by whome we may sweare and in what forme of words Tim. What is an Oath Silas A confirmation of some hidden trueth necessary to be knowne and yet not knowne to others by appealing to the witnesse and iudgement of GOD who is the searcher of hearts and punisher of periurie 1 Kings 8. 32. Heb. 6. Tim. By whome may we sweare Silas By Christ Iesus and by the Holy Ghost as well as by God the Father which doth plainly proue the deity of Christ and the Spirit as also that it is a sinne to sweare by any Creature because they are not the searchers of hearts nor punishers of secret periuries also because swearing lawfully is a part of Gods worship Deut. 6. 13. Tim. Why then doth Paul put his conscience in the Oath it being a creature Sil. His meaning is that what his conscience knew to be true Christ the Spirit also knew it more perfectly Tim. In what forme is an Oath to be taken Silas Thus I speake the trueth and lye not Christ bearingmy conscience witnesse Tim. What
many Israelites which were Abrahams children after the flesh do loose saluation Tim. What is the summe of this text Silas That the promise of grace and saluation was restrayned vnto Iacob by election onely before he was born not by his birth nor by his workes for then Esau should haue obtained the blessing promised who came of the same Parents and yet was reiected and hated of GOD therefore all which carnally come of Abraham be not the children of the promise Tim. How doth Paul knit this example to the former Silas By a gradation as a thing greater and stronger to proue his purpose that the promise of grace and saluation doth not indifferently and equally pertaine vnto all the posterity of Abraham but to such of them onely as were elect For the Iewes might obiect that Ismael was reiected because hee was borne of a bondwoman to wit Agar whereas no such thing could be alleadged in this example of Iacob and Esau who both came of Isaac Abrahams lawfull Son and of Rebecka at one time and by one birth yea and Esau was the elder of the twaine so as this example fits the Apostle much better to she we that the prerogatiue of carnal birth is not the cause of receiuing the promise Tim. Yea but the Iewes might alleadge that Esau being a prophane man and behauing himselfe ill was therefore reiected whereas Iacob was loued and had the effect of the promise because he was a good man and did well Sil. The Apostle meeteth with this obiection in saying that Gods purpose was declared touching them both ere euer they were borne and therefore their present good or euill works for they had done none when God had vttered his counsell of them could not moue God to loue the one and hate the other Tim. Yet it may be said that God decreed of them both for the fore-seene workes of them both Silas Paul denieth this saying it was not of workes and affirmeth the quite contrary that the purpose of sauing Iacob and of refusing Esau came of his free election whereby of his loue he chused the one not the other Thus whereas the Iewes stood much vpon the priuiledge of their birth and their works Paul reiecteth them both as no causes of Gods promises which are applied and take place by the decree of Gods election The mystery whereof vpon this occasion he beginneth to open both particularly by example and generally by testimony of Scripture verse 15 16. and in the rest of the Chapter Tim. What instructions are to be gathered from this Text thus vnfolded Silas That faith nor good workes neither present or foreseene are any cause why God electeth any vnto saluation And contrariwise infidelity and badde workes whether present or foreseene doe not moue God to refuse any man and cast him off from hauing any parte in Christ and the promises by him The reason is faith and good works doe proceede from election therefore cannot bee the cause thereof for one thing cannot bee the cause and effect in respect of another Now that faith and workes be effects see Acts 13 48. Titus 1 1. Ephe. 1 4. No man hath any good but what God purposed from euerlasting to put into him Secondly Gods election depends vpon his will onely verse 15. therefore not vpon foreseene faith and workes Thirdly infidelity foreseene and bad workes were not the cause that men were refused because all sinning in Adam God could see in whole mankind no other thing but vnbeleefe and concupiscence which hereditarily flowed from Adam vpon all his race and so all had beene reiected for sinne foreseene if any were cast out Tim. But if wicked men be destroyed for vnbeleefe and bad works then God decreed to destroy them in respect of these Sil. It is true so he did but hee refused and did not chuse them onely because hee would not chuse them without all respect to their ill qualities and works It is otherwise with the elect whom God did appoint in his eternall decree vnto saluation not in respect of their workes but in and for Christ yet so as hee purposed in time to call to iustifie and to sanctifie them ordaining to these things not for these things Tim. What vse of this point Silas It reproues such as tye Gods predestination to mens merites whereas it is independant and without all relation to the worthinesse and vnworthinesse of men Secondly it moueth the beleeuers to thanke God for their free election and to ascribe all to grace because free election is not onely in it selfe a great mercy but it is the spring of all other mercies both earthly and heauenly whatsoeuer For sinners beleeue and receiue the holy Ghost and are borne anew and blessed with repentance and good workes because they are Gods chosen and elect ones DIAL VI. Verse 11. For ere the children were borne and when they had neyther done good nor euill that the purpose of God might remaine according to election not by workes but by him that calleth Tim. VVHat is the drift of these words Silas To proue that God cannot be charged with failing of his word so long as he keepes it with the elect Tim. What is the meaning and substance of these words Silas That the saluation of beleeuers depends not at all on our selues but is all wholy to be ascribed to the election of God Whereas all men are alike by creation and nature and yet some beleeue doe good workes and are saued others beleeue not but liue wickedly and doe perish the cause of this difference is not in nobility of birth and bloud or dignity of workes as the example of Esau Iacob sheweth but in the election of God chusing some to life according to his will and refusing others because hee would not chuse them Summarily that which putteth the difference betweene one man and another all men beeing alike is Gods eternall election before all worlds Whence it is that some are not called to Christ and some be and of those which bee called some beleeue being elect some do not beleeue being not elect Election being the fountaine of all our weale therfore it would be taught distinctly and well vnderstood for it is a fundamentall doctrine reuealed in the Scripture Tim. From whence is this word Election taken Silas From the manners and affaires of men who will haue that to be firme and to continue which they haue by election chosen and vpon good aduice 〈◊〉 Whereas they are wont to alter such things which they rashly appointed but hold fast what by good election they haue purposed so are we to thinke of God of whom the Scripture speaks after the manner of men for our infirmity sake noting to vs in this word the stablenesse of his decree Tim. How manifold is Election Silas Two-fold one humane whereby men chuse whō and what they like aboue others And another diuine whereby God chuseth what
and whom he loueth Tim. How manifold is Gods election Silas Twofold also one is to an office as Iudas was elected to an Apostleship The second is to grace and glory as Peter and Paul were elected I haue not chosen you all one is a Diuell yet Iudas was chosen one of the twelue Tim. But is there any such thing as election or be there any such persons as be elect Sil. Yea there be because holy Scripture mentioneth both in this and sundry other places as Tit 1 1. Ephe. 1 4. Rom. 11 5. 2. Iohn 1. 1. Thes. 1 4. 2. Thes. 3 13. else-where mention is made of elect Angels and men Tim. Seeing there is an election tell vs what it is Silas It is an eternall decree of God purposing out of lost mankinde some persons to bee saued by faith in Christ to the praise of God and not chusing others but refusing them and appointing them to wrath Herewith agreeth Augustine saying Predestination is a purpose in God to haue mercy on some for Christ and reprobation is the purpose not to haue mercy Tim. How doe ye proue that election is eternall Silas Because it is written God loued Iacob ere hee was borne Rom. 9 11. Also Paul saith so expresly Ephe. 1 4. before the foundation of the world was laid The word predestination and fore-knowledge prooueth it for they note a precedent eternall counsel Tim. Then they erre which thinke election to bee all one with calling Silas They doe so for calling is a fruite of election and is done in time after wee are borne but election is before all time and is the cause of our calling as Chapter 8 30. Tim. Also if some onely be chosen then they are deceiued which will haue all to be chosen of God Sil. True First then should all beleeue and be saued because God changeth not Secondly because where all be chosen there is no election which is a chusing of some out of many Thirdly we haue examples of Reprobates as Caine Esau Iudas c. Tim. Is there then a decree of reprobation as well as of election Silas There is so for election is not the chusing and taking of all as appeareth by Gideon Iudges 7 7. and Deut. 7 6. but a taking of some with a forsaking of others Secondly Scripture speaketh of appointment to wrath 1. Thes. 5 9. and of an ordination to disobedience 1. Pet. 2 7. and to damnation Iude 4. Thirdly experience teacheth this because many vnbeleeuers and wicked men haue beene and be in the world which sheweth that many be reprobates refused from whence it commeth that they cannot haue faith and godlinesse Iohn 10 26. They beleeue not because they be not my Sheep yet the proper cause of all misery is sinne which stickes in mans nature euen his Originall infection Rom. 5. Paul speakes heere of the whole purpose of God as it containeth both election and reprobation as the two examples proue and verse 15. Whom he will be hardeneth This makes against Huberus who is for vniuersality of elect and Stapleton who restraineth this place to the elect Also it appeareth that some be reprobated because elect and reprobates bee opposed as contrarie in Esay 41 9. Lastly God hath made Vessels some to mercie and honour and some to wrath and dishonour Rom. 9. And finally our experience telleth and teacheth this whilest daily wee see some called and altered others abyde in their sinne Tim. The decree of Election and reprobation whether hath it respect to the lumpe of man pure or corrupt that is were men chosen and refused as they stood vpright in Adam or as they are corrupt in him In which estate of these twaine did GOD consider them when he elected some Silas As they are corrupt by Adams fall so Gods decree of election and reprobation respects them that is to declare it more distinctly God purposed to glorifye himselfe by mankinde Prou. 16 4. God made all things for himselfe Rom. 11. God did purpose to create all righteous in Adam and to suffer him to fall for causes knowne to himselfe and of men being thus falne hee purposed to saue some by Christ these be chosen and not others these be Reprobates For such as we are when God iustifieth vs such he decreed to iustifie and choose but at our iustification we are vngodly and enemies Rom. 4 4 5 8 9. therefore such he chose and decreed to iustifie Secondly Christ the remedy must needs in order of causes be purposed to be giuen to such as were falne for man in his pure estate needed not Christ therefore they were not then chosen in Christ. Augustin saith that God of the same lost man originally as a Potter made one vessell to honour and another to dishonour Tim. What is the foundation and ground of election Silas Christ Iesus into whome hee purposed to ingrast vs as members into an head whome hee purposed to saue see Ephe. 1. 4. The reason hereof is because wee are chosen with respect of Christes merites as the materiall cause or meane whereby all elect ones were to be saued Tim. What cause moued God to elect some and not others Silas The cause is in himselfe his own purpose and wil calling vs to himselfe of his meere purpose and good pleasure Ephe. 1. 5. Iohn 3. 18. Not workes past for men are chosen from euerlasting nor workes present for Iacob was loued and chosen ere hee was borne not woorkes foreseene for men were all corrupt in Adam and not by workes which in none are good by nature but euill in all contrary to Palagians not foreseen faith for it is giuen according to election whereof it is a fruite and then wee had chosen God and not hee vs yea nor Christ is not the impulsiue or moouing cause for the loue of God moued him to giue his Sonne And finally not our worthinesse or vnworthinesse for by naturall corruption wee are all alike vnworthy for Iacob and Esau were equall in this Tim. Giue vs some reasons to proue that nothing in man could moue God to chuse him Silas First then election should not remaine firme by him which calleth but depend vppon some good thing in our selues be it faith or workes that the purpose of GOD might remaine firme by merites which is directly against the text here Secondly then we should haue some good thing in vs which God giueth not Thirdly then grace should not be the high and soueraigne cause of all good if there were something in vs before it as a moouing cause Fourthly election is deriued from grace and not from ought in vs Rom. 11. 6. Fiftly all good things come after the grace of election as effects and fruites of it Ephe. 1 4. Sixtly election is referred to the will and mercy of God in this Chapter verse 16 Seauenthly God hath as much right ouer men as a Potter ouer his pots which for his will
euen the best out of themselues and enforceth thē to goe to Christ for righteousnesse and life eternall by beleeuing that he hath fulfilled the law for vs by his obedience and death and this is indeed the right meditation of the doctrine of the lawe when it schooleth and swindgeth a sinner vnto Christ to fetch from him alone righteousnesse and saluation Now heereby shall wee know that the preaching of the righteousnesse of the law hath driuen vs to Christ First if we trust not to the workes of the law to seeke life by the merite thereof in whole or in part Secondly if wee striue to order our workes according to the leuell of the law making it the rule of our Christian life still suing to Christ for pardon of faults Lastly learne hence that if the righteousnesse of the law hauing promise of life do consist in doing thinges commanded in all perfection therefore Christ cannot be the end of the law for tighteousnes vnlesse beside the passion of his death there be allowed vnto beleeuers his actiue obedience and integrity of life that in him wee may claime life as well as escape death DIAL VI. Verses 6 7 8. But the righteousnesse which is of faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thy heart who shall ascend into heauen that is to bring Christ from aboue or who shall descend into the deepe that is to bring Christ from the dead but what saith it c. Tim. VVHat is the scope of this Text Silas As before he described the righteousnes of the law out of Moses so now by an antithesis out of Moses he setteth foorth the righteousnes of faith by the effects obiects and properties plainely shewing that it driueth away doubting and feare frō the conscience leaneth vpon the word of promise beeing possible easie and certaine and in all these it is quite opposite vnto the legall iustice Tim. Declare now plainely the summe of this Text. Silas It is thus much that the righteousnesse of faith neyther leaueth the conscience doubtfull of saluation nor striketh in it any feare of condemnation but staying it selfe vpon the manifest and sure worde of the Gospell concerning Christ dead for our sinnes and risen againe for our righteousnesse it engendereth firme quietnesse in the hearts of beleeuers and draweth free confession from their mouth of Christs death resurrection and ascension Tim. What be the parts of this Text Sil. Two the first negatiue shewing what faith speaketh not or forbiddeth with the cause and reason why verse 6 7. The other affirmatiue teaching what it is that faith faith and what manner of thing it is Tim. What doth faith forbid and why Silas All doubting about eternall life in heauen vpon this ground because Christ is ascended thither for vs. Secondly it forbiddeth all trembling and feare of beeing tormented in hell vpon this reason because Christ being dead hath by his death ouercome eternall death not for himselfe but for his members Tim. Come wee to the words and tell vs what is meant by the righteousnesse of faith Silas That which before in verse three is called the righteousnesse of God standing wholly in beleeuing or the righteousnesse of Christ being laid hold vpon by faith or a person iustified by faith in Christ it is no matter which of these we follow Tim. But how may this righteousnesse bee saide for to speake Sil. By a figure called Prosopopoia as Rom. 8 19 20. Paul putteth a person of a reasonable creature vpon the iustice of faith and bringeth it in speaking and declaring it selfe what manner of thing it is and what it works in beleeuing hearts Tim. What may we learne from these first words Silas That a liuely faith is necessarily required as an instrument to receiue true righteousnesse before God Secondly whosoeuer is indued with this faith hath that righ teousnes which God alloweth of in iustice not that faith as it is a quality a worke or guift is this iustice but because God imputeth to faith the iustice of his Son Christ which alone is able to appease him and to abide the rigor of his law which faith as a worke cannot doe Tim. What may wee learne by this that Paul confirmes the doctrine of free righteousnesse by faith out of Moses his writings Silas That Paul the Apostle and Moses writings had good agreement in the doctrine of the Gospell Secondly that the righteousnesse of faith hath witnesse from the law and the Prophets Thirdly that Moses knew and preached the Gospell as well as the Law hence it is that Moses lawe doeth oftentimes signifie the whole doctrine of God as Psal. 19. 7. Tim. Why then is Moses accounted a Preacher of the lawe and set against the Apostles and Christ the preachers of the Gospell Iohn 1. 17. Silas Moses had this denomination of that which hee did for the most part and that was to publish and expound the lawe to the people howbeit the promises of grace are contayned in his writings also he prophesied of Christ Iohn 5. 46. For Moses wrote of mee euen as Christ and his Apostle did preach the law and vrged repentance Marke 1. 15. Yet because their chiefest endeuor was to set forth the promises of grace they are therefore called the Ministers of grace and dispencers of the Gospell Tim. What vse of this poynt Silas It serueth to draw the Iewes the sooner to embrace the righteousnes of faith since it was taught by Moses a Prophet whome they much honoured and respected and yet refusing to beleeue in Christ euen for that they thought therby to be drawn away from this Moses wheras Paul tels them that there is no such matter if they would beleeue Moses but contrariwise they must receiue Christ whome hee preached as Iohn Baptist so Moses prepared Disciples for Christ the one more the other lesse clearely Tim. But how may it appeare to vs that Moses in this testimony did speake of Christ and the Gospell Silas First out of Moses wordes Deut. 30. 6. 11. the promises of conuersion to God and circumcision of the heart are parts of the Gospell and this was the commaundement and not the legall precepts which that day hee spake Secondly out of Paul who in this place tearmeth the word which Moses spake to be the word of faith verse 8. Thirdly if Paul had vsed this text of Moses by allusion agreement or proportion onely as if such wordes as were spoken by Moses touching the law might fitly be applied by Paul to the Gospell then had they not serued the purpose of the Apostle which was to confirme by testimony of Moses that which hee had spoken before touching Christ being the end of the law for righteousnesse to him that beleeues They are then deceiued which think that Paul alludeth to Moses citing him by way of consequence and not directly or that he doth speake of the bare knowledge or performance of
bring you tydings of great ioy c. Tim. What signifies to obey the Gospell Silas To beleeue the doctrine of saluation by Christ and thus the word is vsed in Acts 6 7. and Romanes 1 5. whereupon it is tearmed the Lawe of Faith Rom. 3. 27. because it requireth obedience Tim. For what Reasons is Faith called Obedience and to Obey put for Beleeue Silas Because to beleeue is the chiefest obedience it is commanded vs to beleeue in Christ 1 Iohn 3 23. and our reason and iudgement is naturally repugnant to the Doctrine of the word for they are darknesse Ephes. 5 8. Therefore to assent to the word and willingly to beleeue the truth without reasoning and gainsaying it is a verie great obedience Secondly this obedience of Faith bringeth forth obedience in practise for faith purifieth the heart Acts 15 9. and workes by loue Gal. 5 6. No Christian shall obey God by louing him and our neighbour by slaying sinne and dooing righteousnesse vnlesse he first beleeue that the word is from God and submit to it by Faith Tim. What will follow heereof Sil. First that all vnbeleeuers are obstinate and rebellious sinners against God though they think otherwise and be held for honest men Secondly that such as lacke Faith cannot perfourme any obedience vnto God it is sinne if it be not of faith Tim. What Doctrine ariseth from hence That all which heard the Apostles did not beleeue them Tim. That the Faith of the Gospell is not common to all which heard the Gospell as it is written All men haue not Faith 2 Thess. 3 2. Also experience proueth the truth heereof for the Prophets complaine that few beleeue their preaching Esay 53 1. Also Christ when hee preached the doctrine of the Gospell most clearly and mightily confirmed it by myracles yet but one heere and there did receiue it scarse one man of a thousand such also was the successe of the Apostles preaching as this place proueth and such it is continually Tim. But Paule had sayde that hearing bringeth foorth Faith Silas It is true that hearing of the word is necessarie to faith but not on the contrary doth faith necessarilie follow of hearing If any man do beleeue it is thorough hearing as an outward meanes but not euery one that heareth proueth a beleeuer Iustification presupposeth vocation but vocation is not alwaies accompanied with Iustification Tim. What is the reason why all which heare do not proue beleeuers Sil. Because all are not elect and it is a certain thing that onely such as are ordained to life do beleeue Actes 13 48. Thence it is called the Faith of the elect Titus 1 1. and they are said to be called which are predestinate Rom. 8 31. Secondly because outward hearing is not enough to engender faith there must be also an opening of the eyes and heart by the Spirit Acts 26 18. and 16 14. But this Spirit the world cannot receiue Iohn 14 17. Such onely receiue it to whom it is giuen Math. 13 11. And Esay 53 1. hauing saide few beleeued their report addeth this as a reason because The arme of the Lord was not reuealed that is Gods powerfull spirit did not touch their hearts effectually Thirdly in some their pride and ouer-weening by conceyuing too highly of their owne wit and vnderstanding leaning vnto their owne naturall wisedome is a very great hinderance to faith Math. 11 25. 1 Cor. 1 26. Fourthly many stumble at the pouertie of Christ and his followers Mat. 11 6. To which may be added the wicked examples of preachers and professors of the Faith as a great obstacle Tim. What vse is to be made heereof Silas That we now do not the lesse esteeme the Gospell though we see it generally vnfruitfull because this hath beene the portion of other times and ages herewith Christians must arme themselues that they bee not offended to see the multitude of vnbeleeuers and there is no place so ful of vnrighteous men as where the word is most preached which is a great occasion of stumbling to cause men to thinke ill of the Doctrine as if it were the proper cause of wickednesse or at the leastwise vnable to conuert sinnes whereas the faulte is not in the word nor alwayes in the teachers but in the indisposition naughtines of the hearers the seede being good but the ground barren and euill Secondly it confutes such as thinke the Faith of the Gospell to proceede in part at the least from the naturall strength of mans free will whereas this beeing equall and of the like force in all men then should all men haue Faith and equally obey the Gospell If free will were the cause of beleeuing that is if men did therefore beleeue and receiue Grace offered because they are willing to receiue it might refuse if they would if Faith might come after this fashion who is it but he would be content to be a beleeuer But the Scripture teacheth vs that Faith is the gift of God Tim. From whence doth the Apostle fetch this testimonie of Esay to prooue the fewnesse of beleeuers what is the drift of that Oracle Silas He doth fetch it from Esay 53 1. the drift both of the Prophet there and the Apostle heere is all one euen to complaine of the Iewes infidelity namely that the ioyfull message of the Gospell had so harde successe and vnhappy end among them as that the greatest number should still abide in their vnbeleefe wherewith seeing men were not mooued therefore Paul turneth his complaint to God and mourneth for it before him Tim. What are wee to vnderstand by this Question Who hath Sil. This question signifies sometimes None at al as Rom. 10 6. and it is sometimes put for Few as Psal. 15 1. and heere likewise Tim. What signifies Report Silas The word in the Hebrew signifies hearing or the Doctrine which was heard not which the Apostles themselues heard of God but which the Iewes heard from the Apostles therefore it is saide Our report in which word the thing which is the obiect of hearing is put for hearing it selfe Tim. What Doctrines from hence Silas That the Prophets by the Spirit of prophesy did foresee what effects would follow the Gospell preached to the Iewes God foreseeth all thinges of himselfe primarily men do it secondarily by the helpe of his Spirit Secondly we learne that it is a cause of great greefe to the Ministers of God to see none or little fruite to come of their teaching Heb. 13 17. wherein they must shewe patience considering it was the portion of Christ his Prophets and Apostles Thirdly wee learne that when the Gospell was first deliuered to the Iewes the smallest number did receiue it euen an handfull in respect of the rest which resisted it like to the gleannings in haruest or Grapes after the vintage The cause heereof was not the prophesie of Esay because he foretold it but the cōtrary rather beeing true
haue I stretched forth my hand vnto a disobedient and gaine-saying people Tim. VVHence are these two testimonies fetched Silas Out of the Prophet Esay Chapter 65. verse 1 2. wherein the first verse which is heere by Paul set latter is the former in Esay and the former heere is latter there the last wordes of the first verse of Esay being quite left out and some words in the second changed but the meaning kept entire Tim. What is the summe of these two texts Sil. The one is a consolatory Prophesie foretelling the vocation of the prophane Gentiles how they should be accepted of God vnto mercy the other is a menacing prophesy threatning reiection casting off to the rebellious and stubborn Iewes or the refusing of the Iewes for their obstinacy Tim. What meaneth Paul when hee sayeth that Esay is bold Silas The meaning is that though hee well knew that the Iewes would hate and persecute him for his foretelling so plainely the abiection of themselues and the adopting of the Gentiles to be Gods people in their stead yet hee did not couertly and fearefully but openly and confidently speak of it without feare of their cruelty or respect of danger This grace is commended in Paul Acts 28 31. in Peter and Iohn Acts 4 13. for where there is no perill proposed there is no cause of boldnes but boldnes and liberty of speach argueth that it could not bee sayed without hazard Tim. What instructions may we learne from hence Silas First the condition of the Ministers of Christ that they shall fall into dangers if they bee faithfull and ready to speake the truth freely as the Galathians became enemies to Paul Achab to Elias Herod to Iohn Baptist the Pharisies to Christ and all because they spake the trueth this lewd vnthankfull world can affoord no better wages to the seruants of God Secondly that Ministers of the word may not for feare of dāgerconceal the truth because that God who commandeth them to declare his will without feare can will recompence them with good things if they doe their duty and with euill thinges if they fainte because of men see Ieremy 1 17 18. Tim. What learne ye hereby that God was found of them that sought him not Silas The woefull estate of the Gentiles euen of vs all by nature as we are corrupt in Adam The reason hereof is because we are naturally ignorant of God and careles of him of his fauor and worship we neyther of ourselues seek him or so much as aske after him Such are all men by nature without the Spirite of Christ as is to bee seene in the example of Paul Acts 9. and Zacheus Luke 19. and the Thiefe on the crosse and by testimonies of Scripture Psal. 14 1 2 3. Rom. 5 7 8. Gal. 4. 8. Ephe. 4 18. Titus 3 3. Wee doe more thinke of God before our conuersion then the lost groat on her which lost it or the lost sheepe minds his sheepheard from whome he strayed Tim. What vse of this poynt Sil. It serueth to humble vs in our owne eyes when we shall meditate vppon our old estate and to cause vs to extoll the loue and mercies of Christ freely of his own goodnesse calling vs to him and seeking vs vp when we not so much as once minded him no more then a dead man mindeth the things of this world Tim. It is elsewhere written that such as seeke God shall finde as Esay 55 6. I am found of them that seek me and Mat. 7 7. Seeke and ye shall finde how then is it sayd here that he is found of them who sought him not Sil. This is vnderstoode of the time going before their first conuersion and calling of the elect which seeke not God till hee first seeke and finde them but the other places and texts speake of such as beeing once conuerted and moued by the Spirite of Christ doe henceforth seeke him and by seeking find him When God inwardly stirreth the elect then they seeke him Iohn 6 44. and by seeking find but before they be first found of God they no more seeke him then a dead man seekes life or a sleeping man foode Tim. What doth the 21. verse contayne Silas It doeth describe Gods exceeding great mercie towards the Iewes their wicked ingratitude in despising it being louingly and constantly offered but more particularly it doeth set forth two excellent vertues in God and two notorious vices in the Isralites Tim. What be the two vertues in God Sil. First Gods kindnes signified in stretching forth the hand which is a speeech borrowed from mothers who allure their wanton children to them by casting abroad their handes therein shewing howe ready they are to embrace them when they come in like manner God by benefites threatnings exhortations promises yea by al meanes faire or foule inuiteth and calleth to faith and repentance the obstinate Iewes that he might reclaime them The second vertue in God is his patience perseuerance noted hereby that hee stretched out his handes all the day with great continuance euen all the time of the lawe of Moses euer since they first came out of Egypt God tooke speciall care of that people and neuer ceased one way or other to prouoke them to come to him as appeareth in 2 Chron 36 15. 16. Tim. What is the profit to be made hereof Sil. First it teacheth that wicked sinners perish through their owne demerite and the cause of their destruction can at no hand be imputed to God O Israel thy destruction is of thy selfe Hos. 13 9. Secondly it admonisheth all Christians but Ministers especially how to proceede in their rebukes and exhortations namely with al manner of kindnes loue and continuance leauing nothing vndone which may turn to the amendment of others doing it constantly without wearinesse euen so long as there is any hope 2 Tim. 2 25 26. also 2 Tim. 4 2. and while Ministers doe thus men are to consider that now God doeth spread abroad his hands to receiue them the contempt of which kindnesse will draw on remediles and most grieuous plagues vpon whole Churches as the seauen Churches of Asia Reue. 2 and 3. Chapters and on whole countries as Iuda and Israel and innumerable other kingdomes which for contempt of this kindnesse tendred in the ministery of the worde lye vnder Paganisme or Papisme by whose example let vs bee admonished to beware and learn to come when God calles to answere when he speakes to repent when hee inuiteth vs thereunto Thirdly we are here admonished that if we lose our paines patience yet not to be discontent seeing God himselfe had no better speed and it is well if the seruant be as his Lord. Tim. But what be the two vices in the Iewes Sil. First rebellion or disobedience in the heart in refusing to beleeue the promises and to do the commandemēts of God Secondly their contumacy in gaynsaying the
saluation and cannot bee sure of it by an ordinary and infallible certainty Secondly to exhort all Christians to endeuour the making sure of their owne election to themselues according to the counsell 2 〈◊〉 1. 10. and it is made sure by the fruites of sanctification 2 〈◊〉 1 5 6 7. Tim. What is the second argument to proue the Iewes to be not reiected from saluation by Christ Silas It is taken from the efficient cause to wit Gods eternall and vnchangeable loue the reason standeth thus whome God from euerlasting loues as his owne and electeth them these he neuer casteth off this proposition is in the beginning of the second verse but there are some of the Iewes whome God did loue and chuse from euerlasting this proposition is not expressed but infolded in these words his people therefore all the Iewes are not reiected this must be vnderstood as a consequent necessarily arising of the promises Tim. What is meant by casting away in the 2. verse Silas To repell or driue from God and Christ Iesus and from eternall life in heauen God hath done this to euery Iew. Tim. What signifies foreknowledge Silas Predestinating so Ambrose expoundes it or whome hee loued and embraced beeing elected from the beginning so Beza expounds it and maister Caluine puts foreknowledge for Gods good pleasure There is in God a twofolde prescience or fore-knowledge the one is a bare speculatiue foresight whereby hee vnderstandeth all things which be and are done in the worlde This belongeth not somuch to his will as to his knowledge and is no cause of things for things are therefore done not because they are foreseene but for that they be decreed Secondly foreknowledge is a knowledge in God with loue and approbation 2 Tim. 2. 19. Rom. 8. 29. this kinde of prescience in God is the cause of things and it is all one with election or predestination which is a knowing of some persons from euerlasting and 〈◊〉 them in his loue as his owne whom he will saue by Christ. Tim. What doctrine ariseth from these words Silas These two First wee are to learne that the first and highest cause of mans election and saluation is the eternall loue will or good pleasure of God as may appeare out of Mat. 11 26. Rom. 11 8. Ephe. 1 5. Rom 27 28. Rom. 9 15 18. For what can God haue out of himselfe to goe and be before himselfe and who hath giuen God first Rom 11 35. Tim. What vse of this poynt Silas First it confutes the error of such as will haue the bare prescience of God to be the cause of election and saluation this was Chrysostomes error who held that as God foresaw men would beleeue liue wel so he choose them also Ambrose was of this minde so expounding Romanes 9 15. and Augustine attributed election to foreseene faith which errour he retracted after Pelagius and his followers did erre in this matter grosly Tim. How is this errour confuted Silas First because the bare foresight of God is not the cause of the existence of any thing for hee knewe before those things which shall not bee as those which shall bee Secondly Iacob was loued and chosen of God ere euer he had done any good thing from Gods purpose nor from his bare prescience Rom. 9 11. Thirdly seeing all men were to be alike corrupt through sinne there was no good thing hee could foresee in any therefore all men shoulde haue beene reprobate if his bare foresight had beene the ground and cause Lastly the Scripture expresly denyeth that mans worthinesse is any cause of mans election Deut. 7 7. See the place Tim. What other thing learne we frem the former doctrine Silas That wee doe owe all thanks and prayse to Gods free loue for electing calling and sauing vs. Thirdly here is matter of comfort by assuring vs that now we are God will not refuse nor destroy vs since hee loued so long before we were And lastly heere is an exhortation to loue all the Children of God since they are euerlastingly beloued of God this is cause sufficient to make vs take heed how we hate any vpon whom God eternally hath set his loue and to repent of our vnkindnesses towards them Tim. What other doctrine ariseth from the 〈◊〉 of this second verse Silas That such as God foresaw and elected before all worlds cannot possibly perish The wordes of our Text do fully auouch this truth God casts not of his people whom he knew before againe it is written Mat. 24. 24. that it is not possible the elect should perish and Rom. 8 30. The predestinate shall be glorified and lastly Christ hath prayed for al the elect that they may haue his glory in heauen Iohn 17 24. Reason also confirmeth this truth for the loue of God is immutable therefore they cannot perish whom he loues for then should God alter and be changeable if the elect could fal from Gods loue and be Reprobates but because God changes not he that is once loued of God is euer loued and therfore cannot bee condemned in hell Hence is the election and fore-knowledge of God compared vnto a seale and foundation which bsares things of great stablenes 1. Ti. 1 17. Mountaines of Brasse are not so strong as Gods louing purpose and decree is I am not as men that I should repent nor as sonnes of men that I should 〈◊〉 againe I am 〈◊〉 I change not Tim. What profite of this doctrine Silas It confuteth the error of such as say the elect may lose Gods loue by their owne fault this is to make God vnable variable and the Scriptures false Secondly it teacheth the estate of the elect to bee most stable and permanent not in respect of their owne strength but of Gods loue and counsell Thirdly it comforteth the poore afflicted consciences of Gods children against the feare of damnation such as once haue perceiued their owne 〈◊〉 may be assured of it for 〈◊〉 Fourthly it is a preseruatiue against despaire and a motiue to continuall thankefulnes that God hath set them in such an vn moueable condition If we blesse God for his temporall perishing benefits what praise doe wee owe for the lasting fruites of his eternall loue and mercy DIAL II. Verses 2 3. Know ye not what the Scripture saith of Elias how he makes request vnto God against Israel saying Lord they haue killed thy Prophets and digged downe 〈◊〉 Altars and I am left alone and they seeke my life Tim. VVHat doth this text containe Silas A third reason of his deniall taken from the like example of Elias dayes or from the like estate of the olde Church in the time of the Prophet Elias The summe hereof is thus much That as it was in the time of Elias so it is in the times of Paul the Apostle then very many Iewes were preserued in Israel frō Idolatty though Elias knew not of them so now though Paul were ignorant of it
at any time shewed any mercy eyther on our soules or bodies name or goods for he can neuer bee truely thankfull to God who is vnthankfull to the meanes by whome God doth him good DIAL XVI Verses 19 20. Thou wilt say then the branches are broken off that thou mighst be grafted in well because of vnbeleefe they were broken off and thou standest by faith Tim. VVHat doth this text containe Silas Two things First an obiection on the behalfe of the Gentiles why they ought to boast verse 19. Secondly the answere of the Apostle thereunto verse 20. Tim. What doe the Gentiles obiect and alleadge for themselues Silas That they might boast and reioyce against the Iew because they were more worthy then they for for their sakes that they might bee called to be Gods people the Iewes were broken off and destroyed as if they should say The Iewes are broken off and cast out for my sake they giue place vnto me but the lesse worthy doe giue place to the more worthy therefore I excell them and may glory against them for he is of more worthines for whose sake a thing is done then is that which is done for his sake Tim What doth this obiection teach vs Silas This lesson that humaine reason is exceeding proane to pride and arrogancy which appeareth hereby that not onely no argument can be so sound and strong as to cal it back frōpride vnto modesty but it will rather take occasion to strengthen it selfe in arogancy by that which is brought in to humble and take it downe This hapned here vnto Paul the Apostle vsing this firm reason to proue the Gentiles ought not to be proud for that they had bin once as a wilde oliue strangers from Christ but were now planted into the true oliue and become Gods people in stead of the Iewes This reason doeth but the more lift vp the Gentiles in pride who attribute it to their owne worthinesse that the Iewes were reiected and they receiued This shewes the wicked pride of man to wit how hard it is to reclaime it and bring it vnto humility for as other sinners haue their defence the couetous pretend thrift care of wife and children the drunkard good fellowshippe the wanton youthfulnesse the reuenger iniuries of others prouoking so the proud person pleads his owne excellent parts and worthinesse And hence it commeth to passe that fewe proude wittes are reformed and cured because they are drunken with opinion of their owne woorth and goodnesse which must bee denied and renounced ere they bee pleasing to God who loues the humble Tim. What other thinges do ye obserue in the words of the obiection Silas The great difference which is betweene worldly grafting and that which is spirituall whereof Paul nowe speaketh they are both like in this that there is in both an vniting and coniunction betweene the stocke and that which is grafted into it they become one and haue a communion the roote and branches Christ and his Church be most neerely conioyned so as the Church hath the appellation and name of Christ put vppon it for his vnion sake see 1. Cor. 12. 12. howbeit these two kindes of grafting doe disagree in these two things First in the manner of grafting a good science and graft is taken and set in a wilde and barren stocke as a pipping or pearemaine on a crab-tree but in the spirituall it is clean contrary for there branches of the wilde oliue as the Gentiles were are taken and grafted into the true tree the body of the Church and society of the godly this is good but the grafts are vnfruitfull barren and wilde oliue trees that is wicked and vncleane men and indeede it cannot bee otherwise for whosoeuer is found without Christ and his Church his body he can be no other but vngodly accursed Secondly in naturall grafting the branch communicates sap to the tree that by the fat and fruitfull sap of the good graft the barrennesse and wildnes of the tree might bee amended but in the spirituall planting the branch and graft giue not but receiue iuyce from the tree So elect sinners by the grace of Christ to whome they are grafted be changed to bee like to himselfe holy and righteous as he is and this to be the end of their incorporation into Christ namely to bee conuerted and beare his Image is proued by Ephe. 4. 23. 24. Col. 3. 10. Tim. But were all the Gentiles that weere grafted into the tree of Christ and his Church transfourmed into his Image Silas No verily some were grafted into the Church of Christ by profession of the mouth onely some also were planted into it by faith of the hearre which distinction is proued plainely by Rom. 2. 28. by Math. 7. 21. 2. Tim. 3. 5. The former bee not altered from their wilde and barren nature by Christ and therefore may bee broken off and perish but the latter not so because they passe into Christ and by his Spirit are renewed to his owne glorious likenes 2. Cor. 3. 18. Tim. What be the parts of Paul his answere Silas Two first a concession granting the thing obiected so farre as it was true Well sayeth he it is true the branches that is the Iewes bee broken off in great number and this was done not because God delighted simply in their fall but he vseth their reiection as a meanes to further the grafting in and calling of the Gentiles this Ideny not saith Paul The second part of his answere is a negation wherein hee doth deny that the worthinesse of the Gentiles was the true cause why the Iewes were reiected and the Gentiles planted in but infidelity because of vnbeleef as if he should say not for thee nor thy sake but for their vnbeleefe are they cut off euen because they proudly refused the faith of the promses and of the Gospell seeking to be iustified by their owne merites of workes and not by the faith of Christ as before Rom. 9 31 32. and 10 3. And the cause why the Gentiles were ingrafted into the body of the Church was not any dignity of their owne but their faith whereby they rested vpon Christ alone for righteousnesse and saluation as it is said of them Rom. 9 30. and heere Thou standest by saith Thus in few and plaine words are laide downe the right causes of the destruction of the Iewes and of the vocation of the Gentiles whereof the one to wit vnbeliefe is naturall and might befall both Iew and Gentile beeing both borne in sinne and vnbeleefe The other to wit faith is a free guift of God depending vpon mercy alone and from the hand of mercy giuen to the Gentiles who therefore had no cause to bee high minded but to feare and be humble Tim. What is the doctrine which ye gather from the former part of this answere they are broken off through vnbeleefe Silas First that God is iust and most righteous in condemning and casting away the
an Apostle was aboundantly enough Silas It is true Paul his owne assertion might haue sufficiently authorised this doctrine but for two or three especiall reasons hee doeth nowe as aften heretofore appeale vnto Scriptures repeating his wonted words as it is written His reasons bee these First to manifest and make good that which in his defence before King Agrippa hee had spoken that hee did witnesse no other thinges then those which the Prophets did say should come Acts 26 22. Secondly to preuent and put by the offence of the Iewes that they might not be scandalized and grieued with the doctrine of the Gospell wherein they should apparantly behold a great and full agreement between it and the Gospell Thirdly to commend the vse of the Scriptures that it alone is a perfect rule of faith and manners all-sufficient alone to demonstrate and proue all doctrines touching saluation so as we neede not for this purpose authority humane or traditions of the Church and vnwritten word Tim. What are we then to learne from this constant customs of Paul still prouoking to the authority of the old Testament for proofe of poynts and articles of religion Silas First the great proportion and harmony or consent which is betweene the Propheticall and Apostolicall writings Nothing in the new Testament is taught to be beleeued vnto saluation which is not fore-told and foreshewed in the olde nothing promised in the old which hath not the acomplishment in the new so as the bookes of Euangelists and Apostles bee as it were commentaries of the Prophets as the Prophets be interpreters of Moses The new Testament is the illustration of the old as the old is the shadowing of the new both bee but one word and one Scripture as there is but one faith one Church whatsoeuer fanaticall and fantasticall men as Marcionites Manichees and others do dreame Secondly we learne that neither preachers publikely for doctrine matter of faith do teach ought which they cannot auouch and make good by authority of Scripture nor the people embrace as truth of God vnto their saluation ought which cannot bee shewed them to be contained in the written worde eyther for words expresly or for matter and meaning If any thing in the matter of Faith and saluation be saide or alledged without authority of Scripture it may be reiected with the same facility as it was alledged saith an ancient Father Whatsoeuer is necessary is manifest sayth Augustine Againe If I reade it not in the Canonicall Scripture I will not beleeue it Tim. From what Chapters of Esay are these two authorities drawne and fetched and how are they fitted vnto Paule his purpose Silas Heere be two Oracles of Esay the Prophet contracted into one as was done before in verse 8. The former Text or sentence taken out of the Prophet Esay ch 59. v. 20 there is a little alteration in the words for in Esay it is The deliuerer shall come to Syon in Paul following the translation of the Septuagint it is Shall come out of Syon This difference may thus be reconciled eyther 〈◊〉 is by the Notaries and Coppiers fault crept into the Text for heneca as the Septuagint rendred it For Syons sake or if we read out of Sion then it hath relation vnto the progresse of the Gospell as if Paul doing the office of an Interpreter should say that out of Sion that is the Church of God signified by Sion where the Tribes assembled to worship should come the Gospell which should conuert the Iewes to Christ whereas Esay respecting the very time and instant of the first comming of the Messias said Vnto Sion There is another alteration in the wordes though no change in the sence for whereas Esay saith vnto them which turne from iniquity which implyeth repentance Paul rising higher nameth the very cause of their repentance namely remission of sinnes by faith in Christ. For none can turne away from sinne by repentance exGod turne sinne from them by free remission Or else with Maister Iunius wee may say that for his comming whereof Esay makes mention Paul setteth downe a beneficiall consequent of his comming which is remission of sinnes The second authority is fetched the one part of it This shall be my couenaut out of Esay 59 21. and the other part out of Esay Chap. 27. verse 9. This is al the fruite the taking away of sinne Some thinke it an allusion to the words of the couenant Ier. 31 34. The Apostle applieth this place to his purpose after this sort Seeing God meaneth by free couenant to bee reconciled to the Iewes forgiuing them their sinnes and hath foretolde it by his Prophet therefore there is no doubt of it but it should be in which regard the Gentiles haue no cause proudly to despise and insult ouer the Iewes but in feare and humility to preserue themselues in the estate of grace If we will heare the application of these Scriptures more at large thus it is What God hath promised by couenant the same must bee fulfilled because God is faithfull and cannot lye or deny himselfe 1 Tim. 1 2. Shall he promise and not doe But by promise hee couenanted to giue a deliuerance not temporall from Babylonish captiuity but spirituall vnto remission of sinnes and eternall life which couenant he hath made not with Gentiles onely but with Iewes not with one or with a fewe but with the whole people signified by Iacob opposed against In part verse 25. This Couenant of sending Christ who is the deliuerer here spoken of to conuert the whole Nation of the Iewes and to saue them by forgiuenesse of sinne is not yet accomplished Therefore in time to come euen before the Conclusion of the world it must be fulfilled for one title or iot of Gods word may not fall to the ground This is like the prophesies of Math. 1 21. Mich. 4 7. Luke 1 33. which are not yet done therefore must be For the Iewes being the chiefe part of the people are but in smal number yet called to the kingdome of Christ. Tim. What is now the generall Doctrine of these two Verses What is taught out of them Sil. That there shall be a generall calling of the Iewes to the faith of the Gospell before the second comming of Christ as the Prophets haue fore-tolde it It is not meant that euery one shall be saued so as there shal not be any one beleeuer in the whole nation but as the fulnesse of the Gentiles are saide to come into the Church because the most and greatest number shall imbrace Christ so all Israel must be saued and whole Iacob shall haue sinne forgiuen them because this shall be done to the cheefest part whereof the whole vseth to take denomination For further proofe heereof see the 21. Chapter of the Reuelation which is a prophesie of this last and great vocation of the Iewes as hath beene proued before Vnto which wee may ioyne Ezekiels
These latter are vnderstood heere and these are tearmed vnsearchable because they ought not to bee searched nor enquired into and vntraceable and past finding out because by no search they are to be found as the way of a ship in the Sea and the way of an Arrowe in the ayre so the wayes of God cannot be knowne as touching the cause and manner of them vntil they bee reuealed That Ioseph was so exalted in Egypt and Dauid so aduanced in Israel and Ismael not chosen when Isaac was and Christ sent to redeeme the world by death these are Gods iudgements which we may search because they are knowne by the worde But why Ioseph Dauid exalted rather then any of their other Brethren Why Iacob taken and Esau refused both being euery way equall Why Redemption by Christ was rather wrought by Iudas his treason then by any other meanes Finally why the Iewes a long time hauing beene Gods people should be broken off and that in the time of grace and the Gentiles at that time planted in when they were grosse Idolaters and why the calling of the Iewes is deferred so many hundered yeares these and such like are the wayes of God that cannot be known nor ought to be searched but are to be thought vpon with great admiration and silence after Paules example Tim. What instructions haue wee from these last words of the 33. verse Silas First it is the duty of Gods children auoyding al curiosity to adore and wonder at the secrets of God as did Mary Luke 2. and the Euangelist Iohn Reue. 5 4. And the reason hereof is both because strange thinges deserue to bee admired and ignorance is euer a iust cause of wondering for no man wonders at what he knows but at what hee knowes not therefore God neuer wondereth at any thing and wise men wonder lesse then fooles because they know more and yet both fooles and wisemen must wonder at somethings which they cannot know Tim. To what profit serues this doctrine Silas It serues to rebuke blockishnes in such as are not moued to wonder at the admirable waies of God Secondly the curiosity of others who in steade of wondering and being amazed breake out into murmuring and blaspheaming of the thinges which they vnderstand not as many Papistes Palagians and Lutherans vse to doe about the matter of predestination and other high poynts condemning what by thē is notconceiued Thirdly the prophanenes of some who deride and iest at things which they cannot perceiue the worlde is too full of such Atheistes and mockers all such must be sent to schoole to sober godly minded Paul to reuerence and adore things which bee aboue them Tim. What other instructions from hence Sil. The cause and reasons of Gods eternall counsel cannot be sought out nor foūd which instruction admits 2. ex ceptions First of the blessed Trinity of which ech person knowes the hidden things of God 1. Cor. 3. Secondly of such things as are manifest by the workes and worde of God 1. Cor. 2 16. Mat. 11. So much of Gods wayes as Christ hath taught wee may nay wee ought to learne but we may not be learners where God is no teacher nor haue eares to heare wher God hath not a mouth to speak Learned ignorance is much better and safer then proude and curious knowledge for hee that searcheth the glory shall be consounded of the maicsty and secret things belong vnto God Deut. 29 29. Tim. What profite are we to make our selues of this point Silas First it condemnes such curious persons which like Adam Gen. 3. and Peter Iohn 21. neglect to search what they may well finde and know and desire to pry into that which they cannot know these lose their labor and themselues Secondly it exhorts vs all vnto Christian sobriety to content our selues with things reuealed and letting passe that part of Gods minde which hee hath reserued to himselfe because he needeth none to be the men of his counsell as Esay well speaketh For as hee knowes all the counsels of all his creatures and is sufficient to himselfe to be his own Councellor hauing none to aduise him when he purposed to create how to gouerne the world so it bootes not for any man to looke after those counsels of his which hee will haue kept secret there is no more dangerous madnesse then not regarding that which wee ought and may know to molest our selues in hunting out what cannot be knowne DIAL XXXV Verses 35 26. Who hath giuen him first and it shall be recompenced to him againe For of him and through him and for him are all things to him be glory for euer Amen Tim. HOw doth this text agree with the former Silas Hauing saide wee cannot pierce into Gods secrets hee giueth a reason because they depend not vpon vs but we rather depend vpon God as the first beginner of all things he conferres all vpon others none confers ought to him withall he now quitteth God frō accusations of iniury to any creature by a reason taken from his Iustice because he is a debter to none but all are beholden to him for all that they be or haue Also he hath both made all at first and still gouerneth all thinges vnto his owne glorie therefore hee cannot bee vniust in his wayes Tim. Doth Paul allude to any place of Scripture in saying Who hath giuen c. Silas Yea to a place in Iob Chap. 41. verse 2. such an interrogation hath the force of a negation or denial as if it were saide None hath ought giuen vnto him to binde himto make recompence to them Tim. What is signified by First and by recompence Silas First signifies before and recompence signifies due reward by debt Tim. What is the Doctrine from these words Silas That God hath absolute right and power in ouer all men so as hee oweth nothing to any or takes ought of any he may do to them or not doe what hee will giue or not giue what and to whom how much as he pleaseth being independant vpon any creature free from all obligation which might oblige or tye him vnto any of his creatures No Potter ouer his clay or Lord ouer his vassals can haue more absolute right and iurisdiction then God hath oueral things created Adam in Paradice or the good Angels which be in heauen did not nor could demerit God or make him in least degree bounde to them they giuing or adding nothing vnto him but taking all their goodnesse wisedome integrity and whatsoeuer excellency from him and that freely out of his owne good will and pleasure as being himselfe of himselfe a most full perfection and an absolute most free Agent himselfe before all thinges cause of all things vpholder and sustainer of all things end of all things As the Sea hath nothing from the Riuers but they from it nor the Sun takes any light from the moon but it borroweth all from the
the right disposing of the publike almes there were appointed Officers Acts 6 5. whose guift was simplicity without fraud vaine-glory couetousnesse or frowardnesse to giue out the almes The second Ministers were they which were ioyned as assisstants and helpers to the Pastors for good gouernement of the flocke to preuent scandals and offences 1. Cor. 12. 28. 1. Tim. 5 17. These Mc Caluine calleth Seniors Osiander censors of manners Tertullian presidents which obserued and attended manners and outward behauior only there guift is diligence which containeth both a resolute purpose and great endeauour with delight to do the businesse and charge committed to them The third and last Ministers bee mercy-shewers not such as be spoken of Mat. 25 35 36. for these workes be common to all Christians but such mercifull workes as be mentioned 1. Tim. 5 10. Their guist is cheerefulnesse which containeth in it three things first alacrity of heart secondly gentlenesse in words thirdly pleasantnes in countenance they which were to be implyed in this seruice of mercy shewing vnto sicke aged impotent strangers exiles orphanes as their worke was such as might breede lothsoinnesse to attend sicke and feeble so they were to bee olde widdowes and aged men whoe naturally are sowre and testy therefore needed this precept of cheerefulnesse DIAL VI. Verses 9 10. Let loue be without dissimulation abhorre that which is euill cleaue to that which is good Be affectioned c. Tim. WHat is beere performed by Paul Silas After particular duties in respect of a gift and a function in the Church now hee turnes vnto generall dutyes and commendeth vnto Christians certaine generall graces pertaining vnto common conuersation whereunto he exhorteth them namely to continue in the practise of them for being beleeuers they already had begun to exercise these vertues as namely loue courtesie diligence feruency hope patience prayer liberality hospitality humility mutuall affection and simplicity forbearing of reuenge and such like godly grace as ornaments of our Christian profession and fruites of charity Of this loue heere be in our text sundry good precepts First that it be true without dissembling Secondly discreete abhorring euill Thirdly firme in adhering and sticking to goodnesse Fourthly vniuersall to all the brethren without partialnesse Fiftly fernent and earnest without coldnesse Sixtly humble without ambition Tim. Wherefore doth be begin with loue why is this first named of all other vertues mentioned in this Chapter Sil. Because it is the chiefe guift aboue other and sountaine of all the rest which doe spring out of loue as head-spring and mother of them all Before in former Chapters whiles Paul discussed the doctrine of grace and entreated of free Iustification by Christ he neuer mentioned loue for that it had nothing to do in matter of forgiuenesse of sinne either to merit it or to receiue it It doth onely declare as a signe who be iustified and pardoned by faith But now he giueth exhortation to manners and good life hee nameth loue as the chiefe and principall grace which swayeth most in the matters of a Christian life and conuersation being ringleader vnto and breeder of the rest for therefore doe men behaue themselues iustly meekely peaceably chastly and curteously because they do loue Tim. By what Reasons may it bee proued that charitie is a chiefe gift of the spirit Silas Not onely because Paul nameth it in the first place as heere and Galath 5 22. and for that it is the roote of all the rest as Faith is the roote of loue but thirdly because it is the summe of the Law Rom. 13 10 And fourthly it makes al graces profitable which are of no vse without charity 1 Cor. 13 1 2. and fiftly it is the band of perfection which knits all Christians and holds all duties together as stickes are made fast by a bande And sixtly it is the maine badge and cognisance of true Christianity and a certaine note to discerne a true Christian from a counterfet Iohn 15 35. 1 Iohn 3 14. Lastly it is perpetuall and remaineth after other giftes when Faith and hope ceaseth it continues 1 Cor. 13 13. Tim. What Vse is to bee made of this Doctrine touching the excellency of loue Silas First to enflame our hearts more and more with the loue of this louely grace more earnestly to seeke after it also more heartily to praise God for it I exhort therefore as Paul Col. 3 14. that aboue all things wee put on loue Tim. Of what quality is that loue we are exhorted vnto Silas Such loue as is without dissimulation that is it must bee true sincere from the heart without fraude guile deceite false shewes or wrinkles Tim. How may a Christian iudge of himselfe that he hath this vndissembled and vpright loue Silas There be three rules by which it may be discerned to be voide of hypocrisie First when one doth heartily loue God and that which is pleasing to him A good rule for then wee cannot choose but in our loue to our neighbour to be sincere because sincerity and truth is a thing highly pleasing to God The second rule when we are ready to do towardes our neighbour as wee our selues would bee dealt withall by others This rule is commended in Math. 7 12. for no man will dissemble or deale falsely with himselfe The third rule is not to loue in word and tongue onely but in truth and indeede 1. Iohn 3 18. not as they are spoken of in Iames 2 15 16. but as God loued mankinde to whom he promised his Sonne by word and afterwarde sent him at the sulnesse of time Gal. 4 4. or as Christ who shewed his loue not onely by kinde speeches but by giuing his life 1 Iohn 3 16. so our loue must bee expressed in actions and then it is sound and vndissembled Lip loue is lying loue Tim. To what profit may we turne this doctrine Silas It serues for iust and due reproofe of all such as make shew of loue and mean it not such as giue sugred for words to hide the gaule of the heart and the bitternesse of the hand speaking faire when they meane foule as Caine did speake to Abell Ioab to Abner and Amaza and Iudas to Christ. These had honie in their lippes and swords in their hearts Secondly such as shew loue out of seruile base feare and dread as Malefactors and Offenders do to seuere Magistrates bad seruants to their vncourteous Maisters and the poore to the mighty whō they could wish in their graues yet by speeches and gestures pretend much reuerence and loue Thirdly such as loue others for profit which they hope to suck out of them so long they make much of them giue kind words as Felix did Acts 4. At a word all such are heere condemned as do not loue their neighbors out of a pure heart the seate of loue vnfaigned Faith the cause of loue a good conscience the companion
first gathered together in their house to celebrate their assemblies for they might not haue in most places the free vse of Christian religion through the malice of the Iews somewhere elsewhere of Gentiles see Acts 13 14. Epenetus is intituled the first fruits of Achaia both because hee was in order of time the first which professed Christ in that country as first fruites came before the rest and for that in degree of piety and vertue excelled others as first fruites are both reaped before and be the chiefe and choice of the crop A worthy thing it is to giue the onset and begin to leade others the way which feare and worldlinesse makes men backward to doe yea keepeth numbers from following others that haue broken the Ice and made an entrance into the zealous profession and practise of Christianity The other titles of beloued approued of labouring in the Lorde and beeing in the Lord giuen to diuers heere doe note howe deare they were to Paul for their profession of faith or fruites of their faith teach that others ought to be so farre foorth beloued and esteemed of as they pertaine to Christ our common Lord shew the same by their faithfull endeuors to further the Gospell Also note v. 7. to be in Christ signifies to be a christian or faithfull person and to bee approued in Christ is to bee vnblameable or without reproofe nay well allowed offor his faithfulnesse and constancy in the cause of Christ. Whereas he salutes some of his kinsmen learne that to our kindred when they be godly we are tied by a double band one of nature the other of Religion therefore such as forsake and forget their Christian religions kindred do giue cause to fear least neither piety nor humanity be had in regard by them Such as were in bonds with Paul for the Gospell sake are therefore called his fellow-prisoners They suffered bondes and imprisonment with him and so shewed their hearty loue both to Christ and to his Apostle Paul whom they forsooke not as diuers others did 2. Timothy 4. All forsooke mee but did cleaue to his doctrine by faith and became his fellowes in afflictions Let Christians learn thus to loue the word and the Ministers of it such imprisonment is more sweet then liberty Also whereas some are commended for labouring in the Lord and others for labouring much in him that is in the divulging of his truth and edifying his Church or doing other seruices of charity heereby wee do learne that there is a difference among Labourers some according to their meanes opportunities gifts great zeale labour more and some lesse but each are to haue their due praise euen he who laboreth litle as well as he who laboureth much none are to be defrauded Whereas v. 13. Rufus mother is called Paules Mother vnderstand a Mother by affection not naturall Obserue that Aristobulus and Narcissus are not saluted as beeing belike not yet conuerted and Narcissus is thought to haue bin full of riches and naughtinesse ouerthrowing many a woorthy man by calumnies yet both hadde Christians in their families The kisse which Paul mentioneth v 16. sheweth the custome to be ancient for the Saints at their meeting do declare mutuall good will by a kisse which was giuen sometime in token of subiection as Gen. 42. and Psal. 2 12. Sometimes a signe of Charity this was cheefly done before the receiuing of the Eucharist to testifie peace and brotherly amity Whence arose the superstitious kissing the Paxe in popery which depraues abuseth al good things By adding holy he distinguishes 1. chast kisses from wanton 2. adulatory and 3. proditory and 4. dissimulatory kisses such as Ioab Iudas and Ammon gaue which is no small thing For as giuing the hande one to another at our meeting after long absence signifieth the deliuery of our heart to him toward whom we vse such gesture so kissing of all other gestures hath I know not how the most euident expresse representation of that which is within For whereas life consisteth in respiration and our breathing is by our mouth kissing is a signe that a man is ready to communicate and as it were to infuse his own proper soule to another A custome not so ancient for vse 1 Pet. 5 14. in Eastern Churches especially but now is as grosly abused in the Westerne and by such as affoord this loue-token euen to dogs Finally whereas Paul familiarly nameth and saluteth many of his acquaintance at Rome and farre more then other Churches being better knowne vnto him yet not once mentioneth Peter who should be the chiefe Pastor there as Papists say The Apostle either did forget and neglect him which is vnlike or Peter was vnworthy as an Apostata of his salutation which is vntrue or Peter was not then at Rome which is not vnprobable yea whether he were there at all or no is vncertaine For we do not finde in all the history of the Acts or other partes of the new Testament that euer Peter came at Rome no not one syllable to that purpose therefore it can bee no Article of faith or thing necessary to bee beleeued vnto saluation for all such things are either expresly written or by necessary deduction to bee collected out of Scriptures which are as Origen saith the sole norme and rule of Faith the vnmooueable Canon of verity as 〈◊〉 the most exact gnomon ballance square of all truths as Chrysostom Againe what shal we say if the Scriptures doe teach the quite contrary For Paul was conuerted a year or thereabouts after the ascension of our Lord. The third yeare after Pauls miraculous conuersion in his way to Damascus Peter went to Ierusalem where hee continued with Paul the space of fifteene dayes Gal. 1 18. all this while Peter was not at Rome Eight yeeres after Pauls conuersion Peter was abiding at Ierusalem beeing imprisoned was sought for to be killed by Herod about the 3. yeare of Claudius as yet then he was not at Rome Acts 12 2 3 4. c. Sixe yeares after that euen full fourteene yeares after that hee first had met Paul at Ierusalem which was the 51. yeare from Christs birth hee was at Ierusalem where hee gaue Paul and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship Gal. 2 9. At which time a councell was held at Ierusalem Acts 15. and then it was agreed vpon by mutuall consent Galat. 2 9. that Paul should preach vnto the Gentiles and Peter to the Iewes who by an edict were cast out banished from Rome so as all this while hee came not there When the Councel was dissolued whither did Peter goe to Rome his Sea and seate as the Papists faine nay to Antioch where hee was to his face a bold acte to be done if Peter had beene Pope hee was I say reproued of Paul for his dissimulation Galath 2 11. Moreouer when Paul was first led prisoner to Rome hee found not Peter there for then would not
not vs. This is by accident and not of the Essence Na ture of the Gospell Doctrine Psal. 34. 1 2 3 1. Cor. 8 5. See Actes 14 11 12 13. 1. Cor 10 20 21. Act. 7 22. Fxod 32. Ezek 8. 10. God blindeth men saith August when he doth not ealighten them and hardens whē he doth not sosten 2 Chro. 15. 2. Psal. 69. 22. Rom 11. 7. Acts 17. Iames 1 4. Esay 3 10 11 2 Thes. 1 6 7. Vnrighteousnesse set out by the parts 1 Cor. 6 12 13 14 c. Luke 16. Reason 1. Part. Scope Interpretation Instructions Psal. 77. 1 3. The end of Gods bounty Right vse of Gods kindnesse Abuse of Gods bounty and kindnes Of hardnesse of heart Causes of it The kinds of it Rom. 14 9 10 11. Note this Rom. 3 20. Rom. 4 15. Iohn 13 17. Iames 1 22. Iohn 14 23. Rom. 2 4 5. Coloss. 3. 10. Psa. 119. 105 Math. 7. 22. Gen. 4. also 18. Math. 16. 7. Priuiledge The chayre of Moses and an heap of titles By euil liuing by giuing occasion they blasphemed God Some do receiue the Sacrament and the thing som the Sacramēt and not the thing some the thing and not the Sacrament Sins not 〈◊〉 but per accidens are causes of Gods glory Prou. 22. 1. Eccles. 3. 7. Sin is not eligible Math. 7. None righteous ex natura Some men be counted righteous ex gratia Obad. 12 13 14 15. Psal. 5. 9. Also saith Origen Vsus sce lerum verecundiam 〈◊〉 Psa. 113. 3. Note further that a venomous tongue is thus resembled 1. because this Serpent infecteth by biting 2. It is a poyson vncurable 3. they are in t actable stopping their care at the charmers voyce Psal. 10. 7. Their mouth is said to be ful because their mouth is as a large vessel out of which flowes cruel word Esay 59. 7. 8. Psal. 36. 1. Quideum non timent sine retinaculo currūs ad maium 〈◊〉 anus Besides the meeting with this Obiection it may wel be that area sem is giuen why the Law could not iustify the Iews because it condemned them Not the writing or Scripture but the thing written to wit that al men are sinners stoppeth al mouthes Non opera que precip untur sed quae prestātur Workes done before Faith cannot iustify because they please not God nor workes done after faith because they be vnperfect In his sight this distinguisheth between righteousnes of good men and that whiche is before God 3. Reasōs why none can be iustified by works before God I the most perfect purity of gods nature before whome heauens be not clean Iob 15. 15. 2. God lookes vnto the heart which is perfect in none 3. the law is spiritual requiring exact obedience such as none can attain vn to yet before men we may be iustified as Abraham was Rom. 4. 1. Iames. 2. That law in this text hath a double acception 1. for the doctrine of the moral Law this doth not reueale faith in Christ ney ther yet natu ral law 2 for the bookes of Mese where in be many promises of Christ. Iohn 5 46. Acts 10. 43. Rom. 1. 2. Faith iustifies not effectiuely as working a iustice in vs or materially as being our Iustice. A word borrowed from such as come shortin a race and cannot attaine to the mark or prize Iohn 3. I Cor. 1. 30. This word set forth sheweth the euerlasting purpose of God to giue his sonne for our Redemption so is the same word vsed Rom. 8 28. Iohn 1. Hebr. 13 8. Apoc. 13 8. 1 Cor. 1. 29. Iohn 6. 27. Also without Faith it is impossible to keep the law or anie part there of In this sence the word imputing is vsed Nom. 8. 27. 1 Cor. 1. 30. Abraham had the promise of righteousnes Anno 85. of his age but hee was circumcisea an 99. Righteousnes of faith is often had before the Sacraments be had which follow as seales and do not go before as causes Sacramenta sig na sunt sigilla non merita 〈◊〉 et vitae Sacraments be signes first of grace secondly of duty Obsigna ' analogia signi pactionali stipulatione Sacramenta 〈◊〉 tantum significāt iustitiam sed dant et obsignant 〈◊〉 in glossa A digression into the praise of Abraham and his faith Non 〈◊〉 more sed dei exemplo vt Chrysost. Faith is but a condition or Organ of righteousnes not a meriting cause God manifested in the death and resurrection of Christ is the euen or equal obiect of true faith which is so carried to God as it acknowledgeth Christ the re deemer and confidently resteth on him dead and raysed Iudas shal haue the reward of his malice when Christ shal reape the prayse of his Loue. Scriptures lead our mids to God as soueraign cause Esay 53. Iohn 13. 17. Rom. 8. 32. 33 2 Cor. 5. v. last Esa 53. 5. 6. 7. That we may haue the fruit of Christ his death we must bring Abrahams faith loue repentance as proofes of a true faith If Christ had abid in the Graue sinne had not been ransomed nor Gods wrath appea led not death conquered nor life merited Quisacit boons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 per 〈◊〉 in bono 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 et 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dei timor in cordibus piorumvt dco 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Idem 〈◊〉 charitas Christi 〈◊〉 sacit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rabiles Ambro. Sine muta 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dena dci Hoc est 〈◊〉 fider 〈◊〉 nunquam 〈◊〉 deturbatur 〈◊〉 F. 〈◊〉 est perpetua 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quoni am vera Luthe rus fides cocuti potest non 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What Hope is As God could not sweare by a greater then himselfe so he could not giue a greater then himselfe in the person of Christ. He suffered the first death and the pangs of the second death A Metonimie of the cause put for the effect Prouerbes 1. This is Piscators iudgemēt Mille mundis red mendis sufficit Christus 〈◊〉 The iust shall liue by faith Rom. 1 I liue by faith Gala. 2. Christs-obedience actiuein doing passiue in suffering How many wayes the seruice of sin is knowne How Hypocrites be discerned frō true Christians How and by what signs our freedom from sinne is manifested 1. Food 2. Recreatiō 3. Exercise 4. Sleepe 5. Phisicke 6. Remouing impediments Est peccatum luèt non imputalur Sanctis Augustin Reatus tollitur in Baptismo non corruptio macula Idem Original concupisence is sin formally and not the matter or mother of sin Euery sin original and actual raigneth in the vnregenerate not so in the godly Therefore Mortal Obsta principijs sero medicina paratur cum mala per longas conualuere moras As weapons may be vsed by a good Subiect or a Rebell so the body is an indifferent thing Theophylact. Not I sayth Paul but the grace of God in me 1 Cor. 15 2. Ephe. 〈◊〉 1. Help the pore with those hands with which ye oppressed
Christians will not bee reformed by that voice of Christ Mat. 20 6. Why stand yee heere idle all the day nor by that of Salomon He that loueth sleepe shall surely goe in rags and come to pouery yet let them be affraide of being shut out of the kingdome and cast into extreame darkenesse which must bee the portion of all such as loue their ease and snort in their sinnes For such as liue like droanes deuouring the hony gathered by the industrious Bees what will be their ends Tim. What is the other lesson from this word honestly Silas That our workes must be honest and such as become the day of knowledge Common ciuility teacheth men to goe decently and to doe honest things in the day when al men see and obserue how they goe and what they doe Likewise let Christians thinke that now the day-light of the Gospell is come they must doe onely such workes as may become the Gospell and are worthy of the light Men are drunke in the night saith Paul 1. Thess. 5 7. and when ye knew not God ye serued dumbe Idols Gal. 4 8. And he tels the Ephesians that when they were in ignorance they committed sinne with greedinesse Ephes. 4 19. but now that they know Christ they must no more haue fellowship with the workes of the night the vnfruitefull workes of darkenesse For the light which hath appeared teacheth vs to deny vngodlines worldly lusts and to liue godly towards God iustly towards our neighbour and soberly in our selues If a man would doe such workes in the day as many will doe in the night what a shame were that so it were a dishonesty now that Christ the day starre is risen still to lye steale deceiue c. and do the other works of darkenesse As Paul exhorts Ephes. 4 28. and 1. Peter 4 2 3 4. so I exhort you not to doe the euill now which in your ignorance ye were wont to doe but to thinke it sufficient that so long ye haue followed the lusts of ignorāce henceforth applying your selues to please God by doing godly workes Now seeing there must be a ceasing from euill workes that wee may doe the workes beseeming the day what may wee thinke of such as since the day appeared continue still in their former vices their vncleannesse vsury couetousnesse oppression cruelty railing slandering swearing to whom may we compare these They are like vnto certaine infamous and vnthrifty gamesters who contrary to the order God hath set in nature turne night into day and day into night sporting and playing al night time when they should sleepe and sleeping in the day whē they should worke So it sareth with numbers of vs who still delight in and exercise our selues in workes of corruption nowe in the cleare and bright day of grace these things which without red cheekes one cannot doe no not in secret which a Christian should be ashamed to speake of yet are commonly practised without blussing in this broad day light of knowledge a most lamentable case will cost full deare to walke still in darkenesse now in the day of the Gospell Tim. What be those duties which doe most defile our honest conuersation and which euery man must auoid that hath care to liue honestly Silas These sixe especially First gluttony or rioting which properly signifies night reuellings all vntimely and vnmeasurable eating and more generally it imports all excessiue feasts by day or night when men eate till they glut themselues to the dulling of their spirits the silling of their bodies with diseases the wasting of their substance the stirring vp of Concupiscence And note that Paul forbids not eating whereof there is great necessity or feasting whereof there is lawfull vse so the occasion be iust and care be had of fit time of our estate degree and ability also that moderation be vsed but immoderate vnhonest feasting is heere prohibited such as the Heathens vsed and the Prophets condemne Amos 6 3 4 5. Esay 5 12 and 22 12. The second vice is drunkennesse this is excesse in drinking taxed by Esay 5 11. Prou. 23 29 30 c. it causeth much woe to bodye and minde For wine women takes away a mans hart or wisedom Hos. 4 11. by Peter 1 Pet 4 3. Eph. 5 11 12. in wine is excesse otherwise a little wine for infirmity sake is allowed 1 Tim. 5 23. It is reckoned vp among the sins which barre men out of Gods kingdome Gal. 5 17 18. and 1 Cor. 9 10. This vice being so sweete and agreeable to our corrupt nature is hardly repented of Lawes of God men wil not bridle it Such as suffer it when it is in their power to hinder or do not what lieth in them to hinder it they are no lesse guilty before GOD then they that committed it The third vice is Chambering the sourth is wantonnesse that is all vncleannesse about the acte of generation or bed meeting by fornication adultery c. Non prohibet cum mulieribus miscere sed scortari saith Chrysostome these be continuall companions and fruits of the two former For vagrant and vnchast desires about sexe do proceede from excesse in meats and drinks This may appeare by the example of Lot Noab Dauid all which vpon much drinking and full stomackes did sinne by incontinency Sine Cerere Baccho friget Venus Looking vpon wine and lust after women are ioyned together by Salomon Pro. 23 33. Rioting and harlotry met in the prodigall son and who sees not most Bastardes where there is most liberall drinking and feeding The fift vice is strife which is a falling out and contending about matters of Faith or affaires of life The sixte vice is enuy which is a repining or griefe at the prosperity of others See the Dial. on Rom. 1. verse 29. Tim. What are we generally to obserue touching these sixe Vices Silas These sixe things First they be such vices as a man which hath no further care but of his honest reputation he wil not do them many Heathens haue shunned them and haue bin free from them touching outwarde acte Secondly obserue that he nameth some few vices in stead of all see more of this bad broode in Gal. 5 19. 1 Cor. 6 9 10. Thirdly these were named because they were nationall or more naturall or sinnes most vsed therefore most to be striuen against Fourthly a great fountaine or sinke rather of sinne is stopt and dammed vp when either christians do repent of excesse in eating and drinking or when gouernors doe represse these vices whereas by sufferance and practise of them a floud gate of iniquity is set wide open Fiftly obserue that godly persons after their newe birth be subiect to these dishonest sinnes else Paul would not haue dehorted the beleeuing Romanes from them Therefore Gods people must watch and pray and his Ministers must warne the people continually of them Lastly to be free from these vices is required that Christians
auoide all occasions means causes prouocations vnto them Sinne cannot be eschewed whiles enticements vnto sinne be cherrished Who will no euill doe must do nothing that belongs thereto Tim. What is done in verse 14 Silas The maine exhortation is repeated onelie the forme of words is varied Also now he expoundes the armour of light as hee had by particulars declared the workes of darknesse by a new Metaphor of a Garment to which Christ is likened put on because as a Garment hides our corporall nakednesse so by Christ our sinnes are couered from the sight of Gods Iustice. Also a Garment compasseth in our body aboue and belowe from top to toe so all the corruptions of beleeuing sinners bee couered vnder this Mantle of Christes righteousnesse Lastly a Garment serues not for couering onely but for comelinesse ornament too so the Spirit of Christ dooth decke and adorne Christians soules euen as his death doth hide our spirituall pollutions Christ is our wedding Garment and our long white robe Reuel 3 18. Aarons Garment is a type heereof the glorious apparrell of the High-Priest vnder the Law was a figure of this spirituall raymenr and taught Gods people that as neuer the High Priest might appear before God without his Ephod and fine linnen garment so sinners cannot with liking and allowance come vnto God otherwise then by Christ by whome alone there is accesse made to God Rom. 5 2. Iacob put on Esaus clothes when he got the blessing and for the obtaining of heauenlie blessednesse it is verie necessarie that we put on Christ. Tim. But seeing Christ is put on by Baptisme Gal. 3 27 how are the Romanes being alreadie baptized exhorted to put on Christ Silas Christ is put on two wayes First Sacramento tenus Secondly reipsa either in the Sacrament onely or in truth also Thus the Maister of Sentences distinguisheth out of Augustine who writeth thus Indu mus Christum aut ad Secraments perceptionem aut ad vite sanctificationem The former is common to good and bad the latter is peculiar to the Saints many of Gods Children do liue euen in the estate of sin and death without Christ till they come to yeares of discretion as Zacheus Paule the theefe these till their conuersion receiue no more but the Sacrament without Christ who is the thing signified and reprobates do neuer put on Christ otherwise then Sacramentally and by profession of him before the Church Paul writing heere to persons both baptized and conuerted and growne into yeares and grafted into Christ exhorteth them vnto the latter putting on of Christ to wit in deede and trueth and that more and more vnto further sanctification of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Fob this phrase put on in the present time noteth a continuall acte which endureth and must be done al our life long Christ is truly put on after two sorts First when the elect thorough a liuely faith do as certainely possesse Christ as they do their owne Garments whereof they are still the more assured the more they stirre vp their Faith and do encrease in good knowledge of the Gospell Vnto this putting on belongs two actions one of Christ that hee put on all our sinnes and wretchednesse 〈◊〉 Cor. 5 21. the other of the beleeuing heart to lay holde more firmelie on Christ his righteousnesse and life to make them our owne as our cloathes be The second way of putting on Christ truly is when the fruits and graces of the Spirit are plentifully giuen or more largely powred into the Christian soule to deck beautifie her as a rich Garment there being two vses of apparrell first to couer and secondly to adorne this latter is heere respected principally at least For howsoeuer Paul would haue Christians to bee cloathed with the Sacrifice of Christs death as Adam couered his naked body with skinnes of dead Beastes yet because hee doth not heere entreate of incorporation into Christ apprehending him to Iustification and this phrase of putting on Christ beeing opposed vnto the workes of darkenesse mentioned verse 13. Therefore this woulde be vnderstood chiefely of growing and encreasing daily in the graces of the new man such as be rehearsed Col. 3 10. Galath 5 22. 2 Peter 1 5 6. but especially in sobriety chastity charity peace and meekenesse which are contrary vnto these vices mentioned in the former verse So then the meaning is that as the bodie with Iewels and outward Ornaments so our Christian soules should bee beautified plentifully with such temperance tinency sober and chaste liuing purity of thought and bodye with that loue and comfort as commeth vnto vs from Christ and were in all abundance in the manhood of Christ whom the Scripture setteth before vs as a patterne and sampler to follow in these and other graces Iohn 10 27. 2 Pet. 2 21. 1 Iohn 2 6. Tim. What instructions may wee gather from hence Silas That all Christians that doe endeauour themselues more to resemble Christ in these good workes then they haue done before beeing more studious of a temperate peaceable humble and chaste behauiour they do fulfill this precept of putting on Christ. Againe whereas these graces are called Christ wee are taught that we must haue Christ himselfe before wee can haue any gift of grace Whereas Origen saith He that hath all graces hath Christ it were better to say with Chrysostom He that hath Christ can lack no Vertues for the treasure of all graces are in Christ and himselfe is giuen ere his benesits and graces can be gotten Also where Christ is there is the Spirite of Christ which is a Spirit of knowledge of the feare of God of chastity and righteousnesse c. Moreouer heere wee are to be admonished that as our apparrell is seene and makes vs knowne to them with whom we liue so Christ must appeare in all our words and workes Wee are to liue as Christ liued that we may be knowne whose wee are Furthermore as they which put on their apparel put on one part as well as another with delight so Christians must chearefully imitate Christ in all his vertues so farre as concerneth them and this they ought to do not for a day or two or a few months or a year but continually all the time of their pilgrimage striuing how to abound in the workes of the Spirit For as wee cannot haue worldly riches all at once so neyther may wee looke to enioy all good giftes in a moment or in a short time for wee are full of imperfections and haue manie temptations and hinderances to wrestle with therefore our whole life must bee nothing but a profiting and encreasing in spirituall and Christian graces a putting on of Christ. Lastly this exhortation being vniuersall directed to all members of the Church therefore Magistrates Ministers people olde young learned vnlearned men women must make it their study to followe and imitate Christ being daily more like him in all parts of honesty and holinesse For certaine