in that day that thou eatest therof thou shalt surely dye Gen. 2.17 that is either in thy selfe or in thy surety therefore Christ performed both active and passive obedience If the Law requireth not only passive but active obedience and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the Law then he in whom they beleeve and that as the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience but the Law requireth active and passive obedience as is evident in the foregoing Arguments and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the righteousnesse of the Law Rom. 8.4.10.4 therefore he in whom they beleeve and that as he is the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience This further appeareth in that Christ was to answer the Law instead of the Elect and that the Law pronounceth every one accursed that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 If Christ had no done what the Command required of us as wel as suffered for our disobedience unto the command Obedientia Christi est una copulativa Alsted Theol Sect 3 loc 22 how wil it appear either that Christ is a perfect Saviour or that any man can be saved the whole obedience of Christ both active and passive make up one intire and perfect obedience why should any particle of the one or the other be excluded As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Rom. 5.19 It were too strait an interpretation to restraine the words to his passive obedience only And for their sake I will sanctifie my selfe Joh. 17.19 Obj. Justification is often in the Scripture ascribed unto the death of Christ Mat. 20.28 and 26.28 Act. 20.28 Rom. 3.24 25. and elsewhere therefore not the active and passive but the passive obedience of Christ only seems to be the matter of our Justification Ans 'T is true that Justification is often ascribed in the Scripture unto the death of Christ but to his death as the Meritorious cause not as the material cause of our Justification neither yet is it ascribed to his death as the Meritorious cause wholly but partly a part being put for the whole viz. the passive for both active and passive obedience a trope often used in the Scripture and as in the places alleged the part or at least that which is as a part is put for the whole in respect of the cause so also is there a part put for the whole in respect of the effect of that cause viz. Justification which is but a part of the good of Redemption is put for the whole good thereof Take for example Mat. 26.28 For this is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins by remission of sins which is but a part of the good of Redemption we are to understand the whole good of Redemption with the application of it Que. If the obedience of Christ be an ingredient into the Meritorious cause and be also the whole Material cause how then doth the obedience of Christ as it is an ingredient into the Meritorious cause differ from the obedience of Christ as it is the Materiall cause of our Justification Ans In the Meritorious cause it is considered together with the Person Office actual execution of that Office and Merit In the Material cause it is considered as distinct from all these They are distinguished as the cause and effect Obedience considered in the Material cause is in part the effect of obedience considered in the Meritorious cause they are distinguished as the whole and the part Christs obedience is but a part only of the Meritorious but the whole of the Material cause in the Meritorious cause it is both a Legal and Evangelical act Christs obeying the Law is Legal but his obeying it for us is Evangelical in the Material cause 't is only an Evangelical act it is given to us freely Willet Synops cent 4. error 56. qu. 1. in that it is considered formally in this vertually though Christ obeyed the Law formally yet 't is not the formal working of obedience or doing of the command but the good vertue and efficacy thereof that is imputed to the Beleever there it is considered as wrought by him for us here as applied to us there it is as a garment made here as a garment put on there it may be compared to the payment of the Mony by the Surety for the Debtor here to the Mony both payed and accompted unto the use of the Debtor The formal cause of Justification is by imputation The formal Cause Imputation is the actual and effectual application of the righteousnesse of Christ unto the Beleever To impute reckon or account in this place intend the same thing the same word in Greek being translated indifferently by any of these three To impute Perkins in Gal. câ—p 3. ver 6. is to reckon that unto another which in way of righteousnesse whether of Justice or Grace or both belongs unto him Imputation is either Legal imputing unto us that which we have done so the word is used Rom. 4.4 or Evangelical imputing unto us that which another hath done thus to impute is for God in his act of justifying a sinner to account the righteousnesse of Christ which is not ours formally not by debt to be ours by Grace as verily and really as if it were wrought by us and in this sense the word is used ten times Rom. 4. v. 3.5 6.8 9 10 11.22 23 24. The justification of a Beleever is either by righteousnesse inherent or imputed but not by righteousnesse inherent therefore by righteousnesse imputed The righteousnesse whereby man is justified before God is perfect but the inherent righteousnesse of a Beleever is not perfect It were destructive to the merit and righteousnesse of Christ to say we were justified by a righteousnesse inherent in us We are made righteous by the obedience of Christ as we are made unrighteous by the disobedience of Adam But this is by imputation therefore All justification of the ungodly that is such as are under the guilt and power of their-sins is by imputed righteousness but the Justification of a Beleever Justificat impios in sensu diviso non in sensu composito Trelcat sen Justificat impios antecedenter non consequenter Paraeus in Rom. 4.5 is the Justification of the ungodly Rom 4.5 therefore God justifieth the ungodly viz. objectively not subjectively that is such who were ungodly until they were justified but doe not remain ungodly being justified That Justification which is by the righteousnesse of another is by way of imputation but the justification of a Beleever is by the righteousnesse of another that is such the matter whereof is the righteousnesse of Christ as we saw largely in the Material cause of our Justification Paul calleth Sanctification his righteousnesse Phil. 3.9 for
thus 1 In what sense the term Justification is here used 2 What Justification by Faith is 3 The causes of Justification viz. Efficient Meritorious Material Formal Final Instrumental 4 Plow Faith justifieth 5 Divers objections satisfied 6 Many mysteries that shine forth in the doctrine of Justification 7 The peace of conscience following thereupon In what sense the term Justification is used in this question Justification is the making of a person just or righteous and it is done either by infusion or declaratively by ajudicial sentence To justifie by infusion Justitia imputata est quoad essentiam idem ille status coram Deo quem perdidimus in Ademo B. ex T. 4. lib. 6. cap. 1. Pemble Treanise of Justification Pag. 2. is to make a person inherently righteous by infusing into him an indwelling principle of holinesse So Adam was made just Eccl. 7.29 To justifie declaratively is when a person accused or both accused and convicted as an offender is justly acquitted by the judicial declaration of his Legal innocency and freedome from guilt and punishment To justifie in this place is not by way of infusion viz. to sanctifie that is of a person unclean unholy and unjust to make him formally and inherently pure holy just by working in him the inherent qualities of purity sanctity and righteousnesse but judicially to absolve a guilty sinner at the Tribunal of Gods Justice from guilt and punishment and to declare him righteous Justification in this place doth not signifie a change of our nature but a change of our state i. e. of our spiritual condition in order to the curse and promise so as the person which was under the Law before is now not under the Law but under grace Rom. 6.14 It is a Court-phrase taken not Physically but Judicially for a Judicial not a Physical act it signifieth a relative Justification of accounting a man just not an habitual Justification of making a man just thus Barrabas a Thief is acquitted judicially whence followed a Legal not a Physical change of Barrabas Justification is sometimes applyed to God when a man justifieth Psal 51.4 Rom. 3.4 Luke 7.29 Matth. 11.19 Luke 7.35 sometimes to man between man and man Deut. 25.1 Isa 5.23 Prov. 17.15 2 Sam. 15.4 In which last places and the like Pemble after others observeth that to justifie is in judicial proceeding to absolve a party from fault and blame whether it be rightly or wrongfully Ezek. 16.52 Luke 16.15 Sometimes unto man between God and man Exod. 23.7 Isa 50.8 Rom. 8.33 34. 1 Cor. 4.4 Act. 13.38 39. which places can intend no other but a judicial or declarative not a physical or infused Justification whereby a person of unjust is made just Infused righteousnesse which is sanctification is distinguished from Justification Though they are inseparable yet they are distinguished as light and heat in the Sun 1 Cor. 1.30 6.11 The subject of our Justification is Christ the subject of Sanctification is the Beleever Justification is onely imputative Sanctification is inherent Justification makes a relative change Sanctification an inherent Physical change Justification is an individuall act all at once Sanctification is gradual by degrees Justification is perfect in this life Sanctification is imperfect It is plain that the Apostle by Justification intends remission of sins therefore not inherent righteousnesse We are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus Rom. 3.23 24. which redemption is remission of sins Eph. 1.7 Col. 1.14 See Rom. 8.33 Act. 13.38 Justification is opposed to Condemnation Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opouitur 3 ad Rom. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Grec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opouitur 3 ad Rom. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lat. Jujtificare opouitur 3 ad Rom. Condemnare Rom. 5.18 As condemnation therefore consists not in infusing a principle of guilt into a person but in a Legal pronouncing of a person to be guilty so Justification is not by infusing a principle of righteousnesse into a person but onely the pronouncing of a person to be righteous To justifie is not to make a person habitually righteous Praeterea nullo nec Hebraico nec Greco nec Latino nec Vernaculo idiomate justificare est habitualiter justum efficere Par. in Rom. c. 3. neither in the Hebrew Greeke Latine nor any other Tongue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used in the Old Testament many times yet it is but once used in any other sense which also is observed of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the New The Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to justifie never signifieth to make inherently but alwayes to make declaratively just excepting Dan. 12.3 where it signifieth not those that pronounce righteous but those who instruct others unto righteousnesse The Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by which the Hebrew is rendred hath the same signification in the New Testamenent and difficult it is to produce it in any other sense except Rev. 22.11 This observation saith Pareus is firmly to be urged against false teachers Haec observatio fermiter tenenâ—a urgenda est emtra Sophistas quia evincit justificationem Apostolo nequaquam significare justificationem seu habitualis justitiae infusionem quod illi contendunt sed gratuitam absolutionem à peccatis justitiae impulationem propter Christi meritum Pareus in Rom. 3.28 Praeter unum locum ex Danielis 12. alterum ex Apocrypho Syracida ecclesiast 18. tertium ex Apocalypsi his exceptis audacter dico non dari posse alium Cham. Tom. 3. lib. 21. c. 5. n. 11. because it doth evince Justification in the Apostles sense in no wise to signifie the making of one righteous or the infusion of habitual righteousnesse which they contend for but a free absolution from sins and imputation of righteousnesse for the merit of Christ These places being excepted viz. Dan. 12.3 Rev. 22.11 Chamier boldly affirms that there cannot be found another place in Scripture where Justification is used in any other sense What Justification by Faith is What Justification by faith is Justification is a gracious act of God upon a beleever whereby for the righteousnesse sake of Christ imputed by God and applied by faith he doth freely discharge him from sin and the curse and accept him as righteous with the righteousnesse of Christ and acknowledge him to have a right unto eternal life The Efficient cause of Justification is the gracious good pleasure of God Efficient cause the Father Son and Holy Ghost In the Scriptures it is called Grace In the Schools grace that makes us acceptable He is God Lord Law-giver and Judge whose will is the rule of righteousnesse Sin as sin In scripturis appellatur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Scholis gratia graâ—â—n faciens is properly committed against God Psal 51.4 and God only can remit sin Mark 2.7 It is called the Righteousnesse of God Rom. 3.22 The righteousnesse
which is of God Phil. 3.9 Because God is the Author of it it is opposite to our righteousness namely that whereof we are the workers or the subjects Phil. 3.9 and to the righteousness of the Law Rom. 10.5 namely that which is prescribed in the Law and according unto which the Law justifieth 'T is God onely that was the Inventor of this Robe and Garment of Justification The meritorious cause is the whole legal obedience of Christ consisting of his habitual conformity The meritorious cause together with his active and passive obedience from the instant of his Incarnation unto his passion inclusively performed by him as God-man our Mediator and Surety in way of Covenant The application of Redemption whereof Justification is a part is due unto the Elect for Christs sake according to order of Justice by vertue of the promise made unto Christ Isa 53.10 Four things are to be attended in the meritorious cause First The Person Secondly The Office Thirdly The Service Fourthly The Merit whereupon debt ariseth according to order of Justice The obedience of Christ was meritorious not from the dignity of the Person onely as such but from the constitution of God who by his free promise made himself a Debtor of the application of salvation unto them for whom Christ satisfied Hereof see Chap. 10. Though the word Merit be not in the Scripture yet the sense of it is frequent Act. 20.28 which he hath purchased with his own blood which is the earnest of our inheritance untill the redemption of the purchased possession Eph. 1.14 For God hath not appointed us unto wrath Ad sensum meriti accedit vox 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 verbum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Par. in Ro. 5. but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ 1 Thess 5.9 i.e. Vnto the salvation purchased by our Lord Jesus Christ The word translated Purchased in the two former places is used in the third and is in effect with the Merit To this purpose the death of Christ is called a Ransome Matth. 20.28 Marc. 10.45 a Counterprice turned a Ransome 1 Tim. 2.6 A Redemption that is a restoring of a Captive by way of buying his freedom at a full price Luke 1.68 2.38 Heb. 9.12 Gal. 1.14 Heb 9.15 1 Cor. 1.30 A propitiation for sin or expiation for sin Rom. 3.25 Heb. 9.5 1 Joh. 2.2 Christs obedience merited Justification much more than Adams disobedience demerited condemnation Rom. 5.18 Had Adam stood he had merited life for himselfe much more Christ by vertue of the Promise whereby God hath freely indebted himselfe to give life according to the order of Justice Mediatorly satisfaction unto the Law for the Elect whereunto he was no debtor must be acknowledged to have merited Christ hath procured a right of remission of sins Christus nactus est jus remittendorum peccatorum sed non ojusmodi jus quo possint remitti sed quo remitti debent omnia illis pro quibus per mortem ejus satisfactum est alioquin injustus esset Deus qui non ageret cum Christo filio suo secundum exigentiam meritorum ejus Twiss de permiss l. 2. cr pag. 79. Vide etiam p. 84. 85. yea such a right whereby they not only may be remitted but whereby they ought to be remitted unto all those for whom he satisfied by his death otherwise God should be unjust who should not doe with his Son Christ according to the exigence of his Merits Christs merit is absolute in respect of its efficacy though the obedience could not have merited absolutely i. e. of it selfe without Gods acceptation The Material cause of our Justification The Material cause is the whole course of the active and passive obedience of Christ together with his habitual conformity unto the Law The righteousnesse of Christ is either essential Willet on Rom. 5. cont 25. wherewith he is righteous as he is God this is increated or Personal wherewith he is righteous as man though he had never been Mediator Willet Synops cent 4. err 57. for Christ being both God and Man must needs be a righteous Man this though created abideth with him and is not imputed unto any Or fide-jussory that is Mediatorly namely the righteousnesse of him as a Surety Et ejus obedientia nobis in justitiam imputatur Calv. 1 Cor. 1.30 Perk. on Gal. 2. v. 16 17. This is that which was in and performed by Christ as Mediator for the Elect and so remaines in him as its formal subject that it s made the Beleevers by imputation as really as if it had been wrought and performed by them Not the passive obedience of Christ alone but both the active and passive obedience of Christ is the Matter of our Justification The passive obedience of Christ were not obedience if it were not in some kinde active his Soul set it self an offering for sin Isa 53.10 He layed down his life according to the commandement received from his Father Joh. 10.18 He gave himselfe Tit. 2.14 Christ in suffering obeyed and in obeying suffered there cannot otherwise any sufficient reason be given of so long viz. for the space of neer thirty four years and so much active obedience it must be yeelded either to have been for himself or for us not for himself there was no use of it If for us what better reason can be given than this the active obedience after his suffering is of use for the demonstration and application of the good of Redemption and therein of Justification Rom. 5.25 if holinesse was requisite in Christ before his suffering that he might purchase our redemption Heb. 7.26 1 Pet. 19. and the actions of Christ after his suffering were of use for the application of Redemption Rom. 8.34 Heb. 7.25 1 Cor. 15.14 and therein of Justification in particular Rom. 5.25 How wel doth it agree that his active obedience both before and in his suffering should be looked at as done in obedience to the Law in our stead and consequently as matter of our Justification This two-fold righteousnesse answereth to our two-fold misery viz. of the guilt of sinue and the defect of righteousnesse Rom. 3.22 23. If the Justification of a sinner consisteth not only in the non-imputation of sinne but also in the imputation of righteousnesse then not only the passive but also the active obedience of Christ is required to our justification But the Justification of a sinner consisteth not only in the not-imputation of sinne but also in the imputation of righteousnesse it is not enough for us not to be unjust but we must also be just therefore not only the passive but the active obedience of Christ is requisite to our Justification That obedience which the Law requireth unto life Christ fully performed but the Law required active obedience unto life Levit. 18.5 Gal. 3.10 which if a man doe he shal live in them and in case of sinne hath required passive obedience for
rule There is no repugnancy between these two propositions 1. It is the duty of man to beleeve 2. It is not the purpose of God to give him grace to cause him to beleeve Obj. 8. The Event out of which according to the Decree of God cometh good yea that great good of the manifestation of the glory of God ought not to be counted sin nor is the doer thereof to suffer vengeance But sin is that event out of which cometh this great good Therefore why should sin be accounted sin or the doer thereof suffer vengeance See Rom. 3.5 7. Ans This Objection is framed in the person of man I speak as a man vers 5. not as from God and being both blasphemous and absurd the Apostle censures it in the same place with an holy abomination God forbid vers 6. Sin in it self tendeth only unto evil it is by accident that it becometh a means of any good 'T is the occasion Lambertus Danaeus censuit periculosam istam Gregorii magni sententiam ubi loquens de culpa Adami sic ait O foelix culpa quae talem tantū habere meruit Redemptorem Twisse de Praed l. 1. part 1. Nisi esset hoc bonum ut essent mala nullo modo sinerentur ab Omnipotente bono August Twiss referente Cr. 3. l. 2. Vid. Cr. 3. l. 2. not the cause of the manifestation of the glory of God That sin which in its own nature tends only unto evil is turned into an occasional commendation of the Righteousness and other Attributes of God doth not at all excuse sin but commends the wisdom and goodness of him that brings good out of evil yea a far greater good out of sin then sin it self is an evil So of the Objections The Decree is to be propounded in the same order in which God hath revealed it in his Word God knoweth best how to reveal his own mind And we speak well when we speak after him In particular these Rules are to be observed Rule 1. What order is to be observed in propounding the Doctrine of the Decree Not Gods Decree but the Command is the Rule of Faith and Obedience Rule 2. Consider of the Decree as proceeding according to the order of the End and the means conducing to that End hereby finding the End of God in them that perish not to be the death of a sinner but the manifestation of the glory of his Justice in punishing man for sin and the blameable cause of death to be sin appears the unwarrantableness as well as the offensiveness of such expressions as God made man to damn him c. together with the groundlessness and sinfulness of blasphemous charging God with cruelty in his Decree of Reprobation O Israel thou hast destroyed thy self but in me is thy help found Hosea 13.9 Here God removeth from himself the being the cause of the destruction of Israel He also denyeth solemnly Ezek. 18.23 32. yea with an Oath Ezek. 33.11 That he taketh any pleasure in the death of a sinner Say unto them As I live saith the Lord God I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked but that the wicked turn from his way and live Turn ye turn ye from your evil ways why will ye dye O house of Israel Death as we saw before is considered as the destruction of the sinner or as an execution and declaration of Justice God delights in it as it is a declaration and execution of Justice but not as it is the destruction of the sinner In the execution of Justice upon a Malefactor we must distinguish between punishment and destruction Punishment is from the Judg destruction is from the evil doer Punishment proceeds from the Author of the Rule of Justice as the efficient Cause but destruction from sin as the meritorious Cause Though punishment as it destroyeth the creature be an evil to Nature yet as it is a declaration of Justice it is a moral good 'T is true Condemnation followeth infallibly upon Reprobation yet so as Reprobation is the antecedent not the cause of sin sin both an antecedent and cause of condemnation None are condemned because reprobated but because they sin Notwithstanding man be reprobated yet if he had not sinned he should not have dyed Rule 3. We must not separate between the end and the means That Diabolical Sarcasme and bitter scoffe invented to the abuse and derision of the Doctrine of the Decree is not only an untruth but implyeth a contradiction viz. If I be elected howsoever I live I shall be saved and if I be not elected live I never so well I shall be damned Satan in this Sophism divides the end and the means asunder which God hath joyned together The Decree consists not of the end without the means nor of the means without the end but of both together Both end and means are contained in one Decree Yea so far is the Decree from admitting such an inference as that the contrary infallibly followeth thereupon and in point of Election is not only necessarily concluded but irresistably caused Faith repentance new-obedience and perseverance being the effects of Election Acts 27.24 God had decreed by the ship-mens staying in the ship to run the ship a ground near the shore so as that all there might escape safe to land He concludes unsafely from thence that saith Do now as they will Stay the ship-men in the ship or not there shall no man perish For except the ship-men abide in the ship ye cannot be saved ver 27. Just so do they reasonlesly and to their own destruction conclude who notwithstanding God hath from the beginning chosen us to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth 2 Thes 1.13 Yet infer if they were elected live as they will whether they believe or not be sanctified or not they shall be saved There was one saith Augustine of our society who when his brethren expostulated with him Quidam in nostro Monasterio qui corripientibus fratribus c. August de bono persever l. 2. c. 75 why he did some things which ought not to be done and why he did not some things that ought to be done answered What kind of one soever I now am I shall be such an one as God hath foreknown me to be Who truly saith that Ancient said the truth and by this truth profited not in good but so much profitted in evil that forsaking the Society of the Monastery he became a Dog returned to his vomit again and as yet what he will be is uncertain Rule 4. We must be carefull to distinguish between the Doctrine of the Decree and the Personal Application thereof in point of Election and Reprobation The Doctrine of the Decree is commanded to be taught and learned and is many ways useful both before and after faith respectively But the Personal Application thereof before faith in point of Election or during this life in point of
and that no thought of thine can be hindered So some read that Job 42.2 As God is free to will what he pleaseth and immutable without any change of his Will so he is Omnipotent to effect what he hath willed 4. No effect nor event falleth out besides the intent Consect 4. and deliberate constant purpose of the first Cause Obj. Time and Chance happeneth to them all Ans The Hebrew word translated Chance doth not signifie chance in that sence wherein we ordinarily take it viz. For an event that falleth out besides the intent of the first cause but an evil occurrent Like as the same word is used 2 King 5.4 and in that place so translated So that the meaning is I returned c. but time and evil occurrents that is disappointment in respect of their expectation and order of the second causes happeneth unto all As for the word Fortune in the sence of the Gentiles it is a Blasphemy which the Devil hath spit upon Divine Providence whence it repented Agustine that he had so often used that word 5. Consect 5. From the Doctrine of the Decree it clearly followeth not to mention here how the like truth shineth forth also in other Attributes of God that God knoweth all things and seeth all things always He knoweth all things because he knoweth his own Will in which are all things eminently We know things Analytically by ascending from the effect to the cause but God knoweth things Genetically and in their cause The increated Idea of things is God himself representing the Being thereof in his own mind Hence God seeth things in his own Will before he seeth them in themselves He hath the Idea of things in himself and receiveth it not from the things themselves With us the creature is the Sampler and our knowledge of it is the image thereof But in God the Divine Knowledge is the Sampler and the creature is the image thereof As God knoweth all things so he both seeth and mindeth all things always because he always actually knoweth his own mind being a perfect and constant Act. All things are always present with him as fresh in his mind throughout their whole duration whether of time or Eternity as in the first or any other instant of their Being What Peter speaks of day and a thousand years in inference unto God One day is with the Lord as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day 2 Pet. 3.8 may be also said of a moment and the whole duration either of time or of the Eviternity of the creature One moment with the Lord is as all duration of time and all duration as one moment 6. Consect 6. It is God's Prerogative to dispose of all things as he will God is that only absolute Potter having power to dispose of one vessel unto wrath and of another unto mercy to make vessels of honour and dishonour Rom. 9.21 22 23. He giveth Kingdoms to whomsoever he will Dan. 2.21 and 4.17 He divideth gifts to every man severally as he will 1 Cor. 12.11 He hath mercy on whom he will Rom. 9.19 All is his and it is lawful for him to do with his own what he pleaseth Mat. 20.15 Gods pleasure is the supreme and satisfactory Reason of his Administrations Gods Will is mans Rule but Gods Rule is his own Will We have a Lord and are under Rule theresore owe an account Luke 16.2 Give an account of thy Stewardship God is an absolute Lord having no Rule but his own Will therefore giveth not account of any of his matters Job 33.13 This Truth containing in it no less then the knowledg of God and of our selves evidently leading us to the acknowledgment of Gods allness and mans nothingness is often inculcated in the Scripture Know the Lord Jer. 31.34 It is the Lord let him do what seemeth him good 1 Sam. 3.18 God may do what he will why He is the Lord. Thou shalt do this thou shalt not do that as in the Decalogue why I am the Lord thy God I have legislative Power Exod. 20.2 This Attribute of his Lordship in which a great part of his Name consists God will have known in respect of spiritual things Exod. 33.19 Rom. 9.15 16 18. Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy and whom he will he hardeneth In respect of temporal things Job though he knew this truth in an high degree and sanctified God accordingly Job 1.21 22. The Lord gave and the Lord hath taken away blessed be the Name of the Lord yet God takes much pains to teach him and he suffered much pain to learn it better and which is much to be observed God taketh not his hand off from him until he had profited accordingly and confessed his folly in complaining of Gods dealing with him and desiring to dispute with God as unsatisfied concerning his proceedings with him against whom he was moved without a cause Compare Job 2.3 and 13.2 and 40.3 4 5. and 42.1 6. God abased Nebnchadnezzar that child of pride by teaching him this lesson though with seven years sharp discipline And they shall drive thee from men and thy dwelling shall be with b asts of the field they shall make thee to eat grass as Oxen and seven times shall pass over thee until thou know that the most High ruleth in the Kingdoms of men and giveth it to whomsoever he will Dan. 4.32 17 25 35. We do not know our selves till we acknowledg Gods absolute Right over us nor do we acknowledg the glory of Grace till we see his Will as the first Cause thereof nor do we acknowledg the glory of his Will until we acknowledg and acquiesce in his Will as the Rule of Righteousness the first supreme and satisfactory Reason of all things and all events Christ rests here Even so Father for so it seemeth good in thy sight Mat. 11.26 The Saints rest here For of him and through him and to him are all things to whom be glory for ever Amen Rom. 11.36 7. Consect 7. The administration of all things and all events is ordered in perfect Wisdom Who worketh all things after the counsel of his own Will Ephes 1.11 Counsel is attributed unto God to shew that whatsoever he doth is done in perfect Judgment All even the least of the motions of the creature are ordered not by a counsel of men or a counsel of Angels but by the Counsel of God The rings of the wheels which signifie the changes of this life though they were high and dreadful yet were full of eyes Ezek. 1.18 The Counsel of God runneth throughout his Providence The Counsel of God is to be seen in the folly of man The disorder of the second Causes falleth under the order of the first The Decree disposeth both of the Means and the End the Execution thereof consisting in Creation and Providence is the only and best way to the best End It is an Attribute of the first Being
beings themselves as appeared but now from the instance of fire and may further be seen in the example of the Sun which whilest experience witnesseth to warm and heat us upon Earth with the presence of its virtue yet Sense and Reason shews to be far absent in respect of its body being in the Heavens Yet such is the nature of the first Cause as that wheresoever it worketh it worketh immediately both with the immediation of his virtue without which there could be no effect and with the immediation of his presence because he is in every place Although the first Cause worketh immediately in respect of the immediation of its being and virtue yet in respect of those things which it acts by means of second causes whether by the mediation of the beings themselves Ames Med. lib. 1. cap. 9. or of their virtues into which things the second agents do send their influence by virtue of their proper forms I say in respect of such things it worketh mediately whence the first Cause is said to be a mediate cause in respect of the order of the second causes Vna estactio I ei creaturae respectu operis sed non respectu modi agendi 4. Determining For though as the beings so the operations of the second causes are from the first Cause efficiently yet they are from their next causes formally God causeth the burning of the fire yet we do not say God burneth but the fire burneth God worketh repentance in the Soul yet it is not a truth to say God repenteth but man repenteth God is the next efficient Cause but not the next formal Cause 4. The first Cause so concurreth as it determineth the second cause in its operation This is readily granted in natural agents in free-rational agents it is proved thus If the futurition of the operation of the second cause is determined by the Decree of God then the operation it self is determined by the Efficiency of God 1. Because the Efficiency is adequate to the Decree 2. Because there can be but one absolute Determiner 3. If the operation of the second cause were not absolutely determined by the Decree God might suffer disappointment in respect of the Decree Either the Will is determined by God in its operation or else it would follow either that there were not an essential subordination of the second cause unto the first that is of man to God which were repugnant to the nature of the second cause it being imperfect and dependent or that the first Cause were subordinate to the second which were repugnant to the nature of the first Cause being perfect and universal If as often as the Will doth not will it therefore doth not will because God hath not determined that it should will then as often as it willeth any thing it therefore willeth because God hath determined that it should will But as often as the Will doth not will it therefore doth not will because God hath not determined that it should will Therefore the Minor appeareth in two particulars 1. As often as the Will doth not will God hath not determined it to will 2. The Non-determination or Suspension of the Determination of God is the Antecedanious Cause in respect of God this cause cannot be positive A positive cause cannot be terminated in a Non-ens such as mans Non-volition i. e. Not-willing is it must therefore be suspensive The meer Suspension or withholding of the Influence of God without any positive action sufficeth to the annihilation of the creature that is Twiss lib. 2. crim 3. therefore the Suspension of the Determination of God sufficeth to the preventing of that operation of the creature which yet is not Obj. 1. If All-efficiency be from the first cause Against the All-Efficiency of God then the second cause hath no efficiency it doth nothing neither good nor evil man neither sinneth nor obeyeth no difference between good and evil the high way to confusion Thus the Libertines Ans Causes are either co-ordinate namely such as in respect of their Efficiency depend not upon their co-working cause or subordinate namely such as in respect of their efficiency depend upon their co-working cause In co-ordinate causes the Argument holds but second causes in respect of the first being subordinate and therefore as in their being so also in their working depending upon the first cause the Argument is of no force To deny the Efficiency of the second cause Tho. Part. 1. q. 105. art 5. Calvin contra libert c. 13 14 15 16 Suarez Metaph Tem. 1. disp 17. S. 1. is to deny that which experience proclaimeth namely That the Sun shineth or the fire burneth The denyal of the proper and formal efficiency or working of the second cause is repugnant to the whole Order of Nature Things that have not life it depriveth of their first qualities which are nothing else but active principles as power to heat in the fire power to cool in the water It disinables us from collecting effects from second causes or second causes from effects because it denyeth all such causes and effects It makes void all those dispositions in several creatures that tend to action Vain is the disposition in fire to ascend or in the earth to descend if there be no motion of ascent nor descent by them It takes away all perfection from those creatures as also from all other which consists in action Lastly If action be only the first cause in the presence of such a creature and not by the second cause we can no better conclude that the fire is hot from its burning nor that the water is cold from its coolness then we can conclude that the fire is cold or that the water is hot from such operations of heat and cold The reason is the first cause can as well make hot in the presence of water or make cold in the presence of fire as the contrary It takes away all difference between things that have life and things that have no life that which takes away action takes away life Take away action from the second cause and you take away the vegetative soul and its operations from living creatures You take away the sensitive soul and its operations from the sensitive creature The reasonable soul and its operations from the reasonable creature There is no difference to be found between reasonable creatures and sensible creatures between reasonable sensible and those creatures which are vegetative only having life Between reasonable sensible and vegetative and those that are lifeless in respect of their formal and most noble difference which is a principle of action with the operations thereupon ensuing There remains indeed a difference between them in respect of their outward shape but not in regard of the respect fore-mentioned It takes away the distinction between good and evil actions for that which denyeth actions simply denyeth all kind of actions whether good or evil therefore man in all
his ways dothneither good nor evil He doth no good therefore there is no Heaven because of a double incapacity First In respect of Nature he that neither understandeth willeth remembreth or is affected all those are action is uncapable of blessedness blessedness consisting in the vision and fruition of the chief good Secondly In respect of the way to Heaven namely obedience which man not being a subject of action is uncapable of without action there cannot be obedience and as he doth no good so neither doth he any evil therefore sinneth not therefore there ought to be no conscience of sin nor punishment for sin The Sum is from hence it followeth That man may do what he lists he neither sinneth nor obeyeth There is neither Heaven nor Hell without the actions of man there could be no obedience of man if there could not be the obedience of man there could not be the obedience of Christ who is God-man if there could be no obedience of Christ Christ could be no Saviour nay if there were no actions of man the very reasonable soul by just consequence supposing action it would infer that there were no man and consequently no Christ Christ being both God and man See then and be astonished at that heap of transgression and confusion in this opinion that denyeth the Efficiency of the second cause It is against all experience against the whole order of the creature it takes away the vegetative sensible and rational souls with all other operations it takes away all difference between creatures in those respects it alloweth man and devils to do what they will it denyeth that there is either obedience or sin Heaven or hell Sic itaque administrat omni â— quae creavit ut etiam ipsa proprios exercere agere actus sinat Aug. de Civit. Dei cap. 30. Vna est actio Dei creaturaerespeclu operis non aâ—tem modi agendi Alsted Tom. 3. Metaph Pars 1. cap. 16. or that Christ is a Saviour yea upon point it denyeth that there is either man or Angel yea or Christ himself Confusion be upon that Tenet that brings all unto such confusion What more frequent in the Scripture then to ascribe Efficiency unto second causes For we are Labourers together with God 1 Cor. 3.9 So doth God administer all things which he hath created as that he also suffers them to exercise and act their proper Motions Obj. 2. Some operations of the second cause cannot be ascribed unto God as faith repentance we neither do nor may say God believeth or repenteth but man belieheth man repenteth Therefore God doth not work all things Ans Actions are done either efficiently or formally The Work of repentance is wrought by God efficiently 2 Tim. 2.25 by man formally 'T is God that worketh repentance not man 't is man that repents not God the very formal efficiency of the second cause in man is the effect of the first cause The formal efficiency of the second cause being the effect of and in all respects essentially depending upon the first cause is so far from denying of or detracting from the All-efficiency of the first cause as that it much commends and sets it forth The reason why works wrought by God efficiently are yet ascribed unto man are first because man God not for want of power but out of abundance of goodness being so far pleased to make use of him co-worketh with God therein Secondly Because man is the next formal efficient cause viz. in respect of the order of the ascent and descent of the causes Thirdly Because many operations of the second cause note imperfection as faith repentance c. Obj. 3. If the second cause be determined unto its operations by the concurse of the first cause then the second cause is not free Ans 1. The Will cannot be compelled to say That which is done willingly is done constrainedly is to affirm a contradiction namely that which is willing is unwilling God can determine the Will Sic itaque administrat omnia quae creavit ut etiam ipsa proprios exercere agere Motus sinat quamvis enim nihil esse possit sine ipso non tamen sunt ulla quod ipse Aug. de Civit. Dei lib. 7. cap. 30. Pertingit autem a fine uno ad alterum fortitèr disponit omnia utilitèr vel suavitèr Sap. 8.1 and not prejudice the Nature of the Will because he is an infinite Cause God determineth the Will sutably and agreeably to its own Nature i. e. freely He so determineth the Will as the Will determineth it self God so determineth the Will as a first free Agent as that the Will determineth it self as a second free Agent The Efficiency of God offereth no violence nor changeth the nature of things but governeth them according to their own natures it reacheth from one end to another mightily and sweetly ordereth all things The external transient efficacious Motion of God upon the Will determineth the will with a real determination the Will so moved moveth it self with a real and formal determination The Will in the sence of Composition that is Voluntas codem instanti quo agit habuit potentiaÌ„ actum suum suspendendi in sensu diviso Twiss de permiss lib. 2. crim 3. considered as subordinate to the Decree and Efficiency of God cannot but act in the instant of the determining Motion The Will considered in the sence of division that is as in it self without its subordination to the Decree and Efficiency of God may act or not act in the instant of the determining Motion The Will placed under this determining Motion of God inclineth it self freely to the Act and to that only whereunto it would have inclined it self if upon a supposition of impossibility there were no Decree nor physical or hyperphysical Determination thereof by God Deus ita utitur voluntate ut ipsa voluntas sese electivè vitalitèr expractico rationis judicio agat Rhetorf de gratia excercit 3. cap. 3. Against the All-governing Providence of God If the Decree of God hindered not the liberty of the second cause as we saw before then the Efficiency of God hindereth not the Liberty of the second cause Gods Efficiency being nothing else but the Execution of the Decree If the Decree of God be so far from being a hinderance unto liberty as that liberty cannot be without it nay is the effect thereof as its first cause then the Efficiency of God being but the Execution of the Decree will also be found to be so far from being a prejudice unto liberty as that liberty cannot be without it nay is the effect thereof as its next cause Obj. The Disorder of the second cause is often such as seemeth not to consist with the All-governing Providence of God Divine Government would not order things so disorderly Ans Order is two-fold either the Order of the Decree or the Order of the Command the whole
it doth not determine but is determined by the second cause thus Bellarmine So as not fore-going only accompanying of the second cause thus Vasquez So as it co-operates with the second cause not after the manner of a principle but after the manner of an action thus Suarez It determineth the second cause say they negatively Hurtado Phys disp 10. Sect. 4. N. 53. not by way of influence which mystical sence of the Jesusuits Hurtado himself also a Jesuite opens by a familiar comparison thus As saith he in case you can write with two pens and I holding one of them hinder you writing with it permitting you to write with the other this permission compelleth not you to write you are free to both but if you write it must be with that pen which I leave not with that which I hold in my hand 7. The Doctrine of the Arminians Profunda subtilitas Twiss de praed digr 10. Sect. 6. who with the Jesuites yeild a concurrence of the Spirit to be necessary unto each act of obedience yet so as they make it subsequent not antecedent following not fore-going lackquying not leading of the operations of the Will Whence according to them the beginning of every good work or act of new-obedience is from the creature As this Doctrine ministreth an Antidote against many pernicious errours so is it also a principle whence we may deduce many precious truths Amongst many take these God's Decree is the Rule of his Efficiency Who worketh all things according to the Counsel of his own will Ephes 2.11 God's Efficiency is answerable unto his Decree The universal Efficiency of the first cause and the subordinate Efficiency of the second cause consist together Workout your own salvation with fear and trembling For it is God which worketh in you to will and to do of his good pleasure Philip. 2.12 13. The second cause acts and doth its actions as properly really and formally as if upon a supposition which yet is impossible there were no first cause The first cause acts and doth all things as properly and really as if there were no second cause Notwithstanding the creature in regard of its formal free-efficiency is somewhat distinguished from a meer instrument yet even those effects wherein God useth the second cause as a subordinate free-agent depend upon and are determined by the first cause as much as where the second cause is a meer passive instrument because the free-efficiency of the second cause is the effect of the first cause And as much as those effects for the producing of which a man makes use of a meer instrument depend upon and are determined by the man who used that instrument Because an instrument being a creature cannot depend upon its fellow-creature so much as every creature depends upon its Creatour And hence it is that second free-agents are sometimes compared unto meer instruments Notwithstanding sin is wholly of man and subordinate efficiency in sinful actions belongs formally unto the second cause yet the infallible futurition and execution of all effects the infallible futurition and ordering the execution of all events is as fully ascribed unto God as if man had no hand therein So then it was not you that sent me hither but God Gen. 45.8 As it is a truth that God is not the Authour of any evil so it is a truth that God is the Authour of all good God is the Eternal and only Independent the creature is a time-dependent He is the only all we are of our selves nothing The second cause is in respect of its being Nam si tu lumen facici averteris a me Mox abeo in nihilum qui nihil antefui Non secus ac vultu substracto aufertur imago In speculo corpus cum later umbra perit and continuance in its being so also in respect of its operation essentially dependeth upon the first cause This is true in spiritual actions John 15.5 For without me you can do nothing In all actions both Natural Civil Moral and Holy For in him we live and move and have our being Acts 17.28 All disorder in the second cause falleth under the order of the first cause yea the most ungoverned actions of the reasonable creature are governed by the Creatour and that not only according to his Decree but also according to his Law prescribed to them where the Gospel hath not been heard According to both Law and Gospel where the Gospel hath been promulgated It is the duty of man to sanctifie God by acknowledging of and acquiescing in his Decree and his All-glorious essicient execution thereof By Creation and Providence applying our selves to the care of our duty and leaving unto him the care of the event to be effected according to the All-predetermining Counsel of God This is the substance of Hesters answer to Mordecai Go gather together all the Jews that are present in Shushan and fast ye for me and neither eat nor drink three days night nor day I also and my Maydens will fast likewise and so will I go in unto the King which is not according unto the Law and if I perish I perish Hest 4.15 16. See Gen. 43 14. 2 Sam. 10.12 Acts 21.14 Prov. 29.26 There is grace enough in the Promise In hac fiducia recumbere unicum est reelè agendì compendium Calv. Epist ante Pralect in Daniel to enable believers to run the race of Providence Let us run with patience the race that is set before us looking unto Jesus the Authour and Finisher of our faith Heb. 12.2 There is also comfort enough in the Promise to support believers so running concerning all events of Providence And we know that all things work together for good unto them that love God to them that are the called according to his purpose Rom. 8.28 So much hath God revealed as that he who believeth and walketh according to the rule needs not be afraid of his secret Will Both the Decree and the Execution thereof though yet unknown as touching infinite particulars are for them not against them Unmortified discontent at the Providence of God is an Argument of an ungodly man the character and disposition of a sinner Eccles 2.26 Contentment therewith is the special gift of God unto his Saints The character and life of the life of a godly man As concerning all the infallible changes that pass upon us in their appointed time according to Gods Eternal Decree I know there is no good in them but for a man to rejoyce and do good in his life and also that every one should eat and drink and enjoy the good of his labour this is the gift of God Eccles 3.11 12. To speak properly no man is content with his estate but a godly man no godly man but is content with his estate CHAP. VI. There are certain Preparatory works coming between the carnal rest of the soul in the state of sin and effectual vocation Or Christ in
the sinner either in himself or in his Surety 3. That it is his glory by revealing and impartially executing such a measure of wrath in case of transgression upon the work of his own hands to manifest the Majesty of him who is offended the goodness of the Command that is transgressed the evil of sin and the vileness of the sinner Justice in God is his constant Will to render unto every one that which is theirs The Justice of God Rhetorf de Gratia Exeroit 2. cap. 3. is considered either in respect of himself or in respect of the reasonable creature in order to to himself whereby he is a necessary debtor to himself It is called essential justice in order to the reasonable creature whereby he hath freely made himself a debtor unto them it is called Relative Justice In the Essential Justice of God Vid. Twiss de reprob lib. 1. digress 1. Justitia condescentiâ—e is contained that which is called the Justice of Condecency or Comeliness which necessitates not God to constitute any rule of Relative Justice betvveen himself and the creature only in case he be pleased to constitute any it necessitares him so to do it as becometh such an Agent and as serveth best unto his end and which being done continueth inviolable and infallible The Essential Justice Constancy and Truth of God permitteth not any defect or alteration concerning the Execution of his Decree after he had once decreed it notwithstanding before the Decree he was free to have decreed or not to have decreed that Decree Relative or Moral Justice is an external Work of God whereby he proceeds with man according to the Law of righteousness freely constituted betvveen him and them rendring to every one what is due unto them thereby either by way of recompence in case of obedience or by way of punishment in case of disobedience For our better understanding of this Moral Justice of God in respect of man Consider 1. That nothing can be due from God to man as of himself 2. That which is due from God to man is from the free and meer good pleasure of God Non enti nihil debetur nam valet argumentuÌ„ est id cui aliquid dâ—betur Ergo est Twiss ubi supra 3. That this good pleasure or Will of God is the Rule of Righteousness 4. That God proceeding to Execution according to this Rule of Righteousness constituted by his good pleasure can do no wrong Nothing can be due from God to man as of himself the creature of it self being a meer nothing and God being all he cannot become a debtor to the creature either of good or evil otherwise then he is pleased to make himselfe a debtor Should God be looked at as a necessary Debtor unto the creature it must either be to the creature not yet in being or to the creature in actual being but he cannot be a Debtor to the creature yet not in being for to it nothing can be due but Creation and that should be due unto nothing Thence it would follow that God were bound to create every creature that were possible to be created and that also from Eternity Neither can he be a Debtor to the creature in actual being to which if he can owe any thing it must either be the continuation of it in its being or annihilation In Deo neque est justitia commutativa nedum distributiva propriè Rhetorf ubi supra If God doth not ovve unto the creature its creation he cannot owe unto it its continuation Continuation being nothing else but the continuance of Creation he that is not bound to give a creature its being for one instant which is done in creation is much less bound to give unto a creature its being for many instants which is included in continuation Besides Were God bound to continue the creature in actual being for one year by the same reason he vvere bound to continue them for ever Neither can he ovve unto the creature in actual being annihilation for then neither could the godly enjoy Eternal life nor the vvicked be punished vvith Eternal death to ovve annihilation is to ovve nothing The vvorth of the creature in order unto God is not intrinsecal For who hath first given to him a d it shall be recompensed unto him again Rom. 11.35 2. Whatsoever is due from God to man is from the meer Will and good pleasure of God Moral Justice flovveth from the good pleasure of God the Manifestation of the Glory of God in a way of justice is the end the permission of sin is the means that this should be the means and that should be the end is vvholly of the Will of God The Creation of man is an effect of Gods good pleasure That Prohibition of Adam to eat of the forbidden fruit upon the transgression of vvhich followed the death of mankind vvas an Interdict of Gods free-vvill The Moral Lavv it self is an effect of Gods good pleasure What reasonable man but will yeild that the being of the Moral Lavv hath no necessary connexion vvth the Being of God That this Moral Lavv should be a constant rule of manners and that all mans actions should fall vvithin the compass of this rule Quod talis sit natura illius rei quae est peccatum recurrendum semper est adfont mâ—â—dtissimum â—ei aeternum bene-placitum Idem ibid. Zanch. de Natura Dei lib. 3. cap. 4. quaest 12. cap. 5. qu. 3. is from the meer Will of God That the actions of men not conformable to this Lavv should be sin that death should be the punishment of sin that this punishment should be suffered in our ovvn persons or in our Surety as should seem good unto the Lavv-giver all these are the constitutions of God proceeding from him not by vvay of yecessity of nature but freely as effects and products of his Eternal good pleasure 3. This Good Pleasure or Will of God is the Rule of Righteousness The Will of God is God himself vvillng his Will is the Rule of our vvills Whose Will else should be the Rule The Will of God is the cause of all things the constituted Rule of Righteousness therefore being an effect it must needs proceed from the Will of God othervvise there should be an effect vvhich vvere not resolved to the first cause That vvhich is the Fountain of all good is the Rule of Righteousness but Gods Will is the Fountain of all good All Laws vvhich have their beginning in time as the Lavv of Nature the Lavv of Nations the Moral Lavv all Civil Lavv vvhether fundamental or positive that are conformable to the Moral Lavv as all ought to be flovv from the Will of God vvhich is the Eternal Lavv That vvhich is just in it self is the Rule of Justice to all other things that are just But the Will of God is just in it self because the Will of God is God himself vvilling God is essentially
though we are made partakers of it by a power which is without us yet it is inherent in us as in its proper subject and in that notion is opposed to the righteousnesse of Christ whereby we are justified whereof he is not only the worker but which also is inherent in him as its proper subject therefore the justification of a Beleever is by way of imputation No sinner remaining a sinner when he is justified can be justified otherwise than by imputed righteousnesse but all Beleevers though justified yet remain sinners while they live in this world 1 Joh. 1.8 therefore all Beleevers are justified by an imputed righteousnesse The final cause is the manifestation of the glory of grace The finall cause in a way of Mercy tempered with Justice in a way of Mercy in that he justifieth the ungodly Rom. 4.5 and that freely Rom. 3.24 tempered with Justice in that he justifieth not without Christs full satisfaction unto the Law Rom. 3.26 The instrumental cause or instrument of our Justification The instrumental cause or instrument for faith here is but a meer instrument is faith the fuller understanding of this Proposition followeth in the next particular Here observe the intent and consent of such Scriptures as speak diversly of the cause of Justification we are sayed to bee justified by grace Rom. 3.24 i. e. as the Efficient cause by his Blood Rom. 5.9 i. e. as the Meritorious cause by his obedience Rom. 5.19 i. e. as the Material cause by imputation of his obedience Rom. 4.6 i.e. as the Formal cause by faith Rom. 5.1 i. e. as the instrument This Proposition We are justified by faith is figurative How Faith justifieth i.e. Metonymical whereby that which belongs to the principal cause is attributed to the instrumental cause Faith justifieth not for its own worth but for the worth of the object which it apprehends Faith doth not justifie as an act of ours but all the vertue thereof proceedeth from its object the vertue that healed the Israelites proceeded from the object viz. the brazen Serpent they looked upon not from the looking upon the Brazen Serpent and the vertue that healed the Woman Luke 8.46.48.50 proceeded out of Christ who was touched not out of the Womans touch we are declared righteous upon our beleeving Faith in the matter of our Justification is the instrument apprehending and applying that which doth justifie the proper act of Faith is to receive the righteousnesse of another we are justified by faith correlatively that is we are justified by that which is the correlate of faith namely the obedience of Christ the meaning is it is the Obedience of Christ not Faith that justifieth that which is apprehended not that which apprehendeth Faith alone justifieth that is faith as it justifieth is alone but justifying faith is not alone that is faith as it justifieth is without workes but the faith that justifieth is a working faith We are justified by faith alone 1 Because as it justifieth it is not a work Rom. 4.5 2 Because we are not justified by our own righteousnesse i. e. that righteousnesse whereof we are the subjects 3 Because we are justified by the righteousnesse of another sometimes called the righteousnesse of God viz. that whereof God is the Author and Ordainer sometimes the righteousnesse of Christ viz. that whereof he who is God-man is both the Worker and the Subject 4 Because we are justified by a righteousnesse that is made ours by imputation not by infusion as Abraham was justified 5 Because we are justified by a righteousnesse that is actually procured before we doe beleeve Our righteousnesse is compared unto a garment Reval 19.8 Rom. 13.14 Gal. 3.27 which we put on by beleeving yet faith never took stitch in it What was accounted to Abraham for righteousnesse Zanch. in Phil. 3. Not the action by which but that which he did beleeve or as others speak faith not in respect of it self apprehending but in respect of the object apprehended Zanchy Gen. 15.6 Quid reputatum ad justitiam non actio quâ sed id quod credidit seu ut alii loquuntur ipsa fides non sui apprehendentis sed objecti apprehensi respectu This Proposition We are justified by faith understood legally with the Papists is not true but Blasphemous but being taken correlatively it is true Vrsin Haec propositio Ursin explicat catech part 2. qu. 63 fide justificamur legaliter intellecta cum Papist is non est vera sed Blasphema correlativè autem accept a hoc est Evangelicè est vera Faith as a quality doth not justifie but as an instrument receiving and applying to us the imputed righteousnesse of Christ Rivet Fides pro qualitate sumpta Rivet Cathol orthod tract 4. q. 10 non justificat nos sed justificat tanquam instrumentum recipiens applicans nob is imputatam Christi justitiam Faith justifies relatively to wit by a Metonymy whereby the effect of the principal is attributed to the instrumental cause Faith justifieth not habitually as a quality but relatively Paraeus Fides justificat relatè Paraeus in Rom. 3. phrasi nimirum Metaleptica quâ effectus causae principalis tribuitur instrumentali Fides justificat non habitualitèr ut qualitas sed Relatè Faith justifies not simply but relatively after the manner of an instrument applying Chamier Fides justificat Cham. Tom. 3. l. 22. c. 11 non simpliciter sed Relatè per modum instrumenti applicantis He saith Calvin shal be said to be justified by faith that being excluded from the righteousnesse of workes doth by faith take hold of the righteousnesse of Christ wherewith when he is cloathed he appeareth in the sight of God not as a sinner but as righteous and saith he after a few lines we say that the same consisteth in the forgivenesse of sins and imputation of the righteousness of Christ Contra justificabitur ille fide Calvin institut lib. 3. cap. 11. s 2. qui operum justitia exclusus Christi justitiam per fidem apprehendit qua vestitus in Dei conspectu non ut peccator sed tanquam justus apparet ita nos justificationem simpliciter interpretamur acceptionem qua nos Déus in gratiam receptos pro just is habet eámque in peccatorum remissione ac justitiae Christi imputatione positam esse dicimus Confer Sect. 21. 23. Faith doth not justifie as a work Welleb comp l. 1. c. 30. but as an instrument apprehending Christ Wollebius Etsi igitur fides sola non sit sed cum operibus conjuncta sola tamen justificat Fides non tanquam opus sed tanquam instrumentum Christum apprehendens Justification consists in faith organically Spanh de gr un erot 21. in the obedience of Christ objectively and meritoriously Spanhemius Justificatio consistit in fide organicè in Christi obedientia objectivè meritoriè We say with the Apostle Beza in confe majore c.