workes whereas these are two divers propositions to bee without workes and to iustifie without workes The third Argument is taken from the removal of the Causes whereas Faith alone Iustifieth which causes are of Bellarmine referred to three heades cap. 16. The first is the authority of the word whervnto the Adversary answereth That it is no where taught in the scripture That wee are iustified by faith onely Answ Though the Particle alone be not expressed in the Scripture yet the signification of that word is expressed by Synonimall formes of speaking which are these 1. Without Workes 2. Of Grace freely by Grace 3. The exclusiue Particles which are two particulars Galat 2.16 but by Faith Luc. 8.30 By beleeving onely by which formes of speaking as all works aswell Ceremoniall as Moral are excluded so faith alone is included as the only Instrument of Iustification The second head is the will of God who will haue vs iustified with the alone condition of faith The Adversary answereth that it contradicteth the Scripture which layeth downe also the condition of Repentance Answere 1. Repentance is the condition of faith and of the person justified but not properly of Iustification 2. It is one thing to treate of the condition of Iustification but another thing of the cause and Instrument therof for a condition noteth a consequent or effect but a cause the Antecedent or Efficient 3. Neyther is our Iustification with the condition of Faith as Faith is a habite in vs but as it apprehendeth Christ out of vs. The third is the nature of faith which alone hath that property that it apprehendeth Iustification The Adversary answereth that Faith doth not properly apprehend Answ There is a double apprehensioÌ„ the one of knowledge in the vnderstanding the other of trust in the Will both these Faith includeth which in respect of the vnderstanding and the will apprehendeth Christ but the nature of the Sacramentes is otherwise which were instituted not that they might iustifie but that they might confirme the party iustified in the feeling of his Iustification The fourth Argument is from the maner of Iustifying for we affirme that faith Iustifieth not by the maner of cause worthinesse or merite but by relation onely which Bellarmine denyeth and proveth by three arguments that faith iustifieth by the manner of merite and cause cap. 13. The first is taken from testimonies which teach that faith is the cause of iustification Rom. 3. Rom. 5. Ephes 1. Answer First for Faith is one thing and by Faith is another thing The one is of the cause the other of the Instrument Secondly neyther is the maner of works the same with that of faith in opposition because workes haue the nature of righteousnesse inherent in vs but faith the nature of righteousnesse imputed vnto vs. Thirdly nor doe the places which are alleadged note the cause of Iustification but eyther the Instrument thereof or the quality and state of a man iustified The second is taken from those testimonies which testifie that faith is the beginning of righteousnesse and hereby the formall cause of Iustification Rom. 4. First there is a two-fold imputation as in that very place the Apostle noteth the one of debt the other of grace and the Apostle treaâ—eth of this and not of that Secondly â—â—th Faith is the instrumeÌ„t it is no strange â—hing if as it is vsually the manner of â—nstruments the name and the office of the thing whereof it is but the Instrument bee attributed vnto it 1. Cor. 3. First A foundation is vsually considered two wayes properly or by a Metalepsis properly Christ is so but by a Metalepsis Faith which hath respect to Christ For distinctions sake the one may bee called i Primum ad primuÌ„ the first the other to the first Secondly a foundation is eyther vnderstoode to bee as a part of a building or a ground of a building Christ and Faith are sayd to be the foundation of the Church not properly as they are a part thereof but as they are the Ground and Base of the same Act. 15. First the hearts are justified by faith not as the cause but as the Instrument not by effecting but by affecting or applying Secondly the place it selfe doth manifestly distinguish Faith which is onely the inner instrumeÌ„tal cause from the cause properly Efficient to witte the Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost The third is taken from those Testimonies which teach that Remission of sinnes is obtayned by Faith Luke 7. Ans First men are sayde to bee saved both properly of God our onely Saviour and figuratiuely by the meanes which it hath pleased God to vse eyther inward as faith or outward as the voyce of the Gospell and the signes thereof Secondly the efficacy of faith wholy dependeth vpon the object which it apprehendeth and it is sayde to saue for that it is the effectuall and necessary Instrument of Salvation like as the Gospell is called the power to every one that beleeveth vnto salvation Rom. 4. Ans First The Particle wherefore noteth not the cause of the Consequent but of the Consequence Secondly it is there shewed not what the habite of faith deserveth sith faith and merites are opposites but what is the vse and effect of true naturall faith Rom. 10. Answ First the Apostle doth neyther make preaching the cause of faith nor faith the cause of invocation and salvation but teacheth that as that is the Instrument of the one so this is of the other SecoÌ„dly the degrees of Salvation are reckoned vppe by the Apostle which are badly confounded with the causes thereof Thirdly those things which Faith obtayneth by Invocation it obtayneth as an Instrument and not as a Cause because all the power of Faith consisteth in Relation Heb. 11. Ans First men please God by faith not for faith Secondly whatsoever examples are cited they note not the merite of Faith but the vse and effect thereof The Fift Argument is fee from two principles the first whereof is the Formal Cause of Iustification which the Adversary affirmeth to bee righteousnesse inherent in vs The second is the merite and necessity of good workes Of the former wee shall treate in the explication of the Formall Cause of the latter in the place concerning good workes DISTINCTIONS IN DEfence of the Materiall Cause I. THere is one Iustice Create and another Increate the one is of God of Christ as hee is God the other of the Creature and of Christ as hee is a creature II. THe Create righteousnesse is eyther of the Person or of the cause by that some person is judged just by this a righteousnesse of the Cause of some controversie is vnderstoode the righteousnesse of the Person to speake properly is in Christ III. OF the person there is one inherent another Imputatiue that was in Christ this is in vs by the worke of the Spirite for Christ IIII. INherent righteousnesse is eyther originall or habituall or else
actuall both of these were in Christ yet properly he imputeth this onely V. ACtuall righteousnesse is eyther perfect or imperfect this is in vs that in Christ VI. PErfect actual righteousnesse of Christ consisteth in a double obedience whereof the one is called the obedience of the Law the other obedience vnto death VII THe obedience of the law which is truely and properly the effect of the person being the mediator neyther ought nor can bee called eyther a part making the person or a quality pertayning to the making of that person VIII THe places of Scripture which treat of Christes death are not to bee taken exclusiuely or oppositely but figuratiuely or Synecdochically for the last accomplishment of the whole obedience DISTINCTIONS in defence of the Formall Cause The Arguments which Bellarmine bringeth against the truth of this cause are of two sorts for first hee endeavoureth to proue by certaine reasons that our inherent righteousnesse is the formall cause of our righteousnesse Secondly he impugneth the imputation of Christs righteousnesse The first he endeauoureth to perform by 8. Testimonies Cap. 3. Lib. 2. De Iustificatione The first is in Rom. 5. Of which wee haue treated in the explication of those places which were alleadged against the true nature of the name or word The second is in Rom. 3. Answ First the Grace of God is taken in Scripture aequivocally First for the free and eternall favour of God wherby hee made vs acceptable to him selfe in his beloved Sonne and this is the Grace that maketh acceptable Secondly for the giftes by Grace whether outward or inward whether generall or particula and that in the place cited it is taken in that signification and not in this three thinges doe proue First because the Apostle excludeth the righteousnesse of the law which is of works to the end hee might establish the righteousnesse of faith the causes whereof hee reckoneth vp Secondly because what hee called freely hee expounded by grace that not onely the workes that goe before but also those that follow after faith might bee excluded Thirdly because the Apostle opposeth the very same Grace cap. 4.2.4 against Abrahams works howsoever proceeding from the renuing of the Spirite Secondly neyther in deed doth the conjoyning of those two words Freely and by Grace sith the one expoundeth the other according to the Scripturall Phrase of speaking nor doth the force of the Preposition by which is not found in the originall Text and very often in the Scripture noteth the efficient nor doth the Efficacy of Gods grace the effect whereof ought necessarily to be distinguished from the Cause nor lastly doth it because loue in Scripture is called any Grace whereas both the loue of God towards vs is a grace making acceptable and ours towardes God is a grace freely given any way infringe that interpretation The third 1. Cor. 6. To this wee haue aboue answered The fourth Titus 3. Answ First the Effect is badly confounded with the cause to witte Iustification with Regeneration and Renovation for the matter of that is the righteousnesse of Christ but of this our Inherent righteousnesse Secondly neyther doth the Apostle call Renovation Iustification sith hee expresly distinguisheth the one from the other Thirdly the Apostle sheweth not the cause but the vse of Renovation or good workes when he sayeth that being justified by the grace of God wee might bee heyres according to the hope of everlasting life The fift Heb. 11 Ans First there is a two-folde righteousnesse Imputed and Inherent by both they are called Iust or righteous but after a divers manner by that by way of Relation and perfectly before God by this Inchoatiuely Subjectiuely and vnperfectly Secondly the perfection which is ascribed vnto the faithfull in the Scripture hath a three-fold respect the first of Gods councell from everlasting Secondly of the foundation in Christ lastly eyther of comparison and opposition vnto other mēs vnrighteousnes or of the end or tearme of perfection vnto which it tendeth besides these respects there is no perfection of the faithfull in this world Thirdly the nearest cause in deede of a righteous worke is inherent righteousnesse but the chiefe and principall cause is the Spirit of Christ imputing his righteousnes to vs and by the power of that imputed righteousnesse working this inherent righteousnesse in vs. The Sixt Rom. 8. 1. Cor. 15. Ans first our Conformity with the Image of Christ whereof mention is made in the Scripture is threefold the one vnto the image of glory being opposite to that which is vnto the image of Christs afflictions And of this the Apostle treateth in the cited places The second vnto the image of Christs obedience which in deede in this world we performe vnperfectly but Christ applyeth the same to vs as perfectly performed for vs. The third is of the death buriall and resurrection of Christ Secondly of Christs righteousnesse there is a double vse the one principall of satisfaction and merite the other exemplary and of document as touching satisfaction Christs righteousnesse is imputed to vs as touching example it is the rule of our inherent righteousnesse Thirdly the opposition which is made betweene the image of the first Adam and the second according to the sense of the Apostle in both places hath respect vnto the mortality and immortality the earthly and heavenly qualities of the body not properly vnto sinne and Christs imputed righteousnesse The seaventh Rom. 6. Ans The word Iustification is taken two wayes properly and improperly Properly when wee are sayde to bee justified by the cause Improperly when wee are sayde to bee justified by the effects Secondly the Apostle treateth of our Sanctification and the two parts therof the mortifying of the old man and the quickning of the new of both which partes hee giues vs an example in the death and resurrection of Christ Thirdl◠to bee justified signifieth to bee freede according to the proper phrase of the Hebrewes who comprehend the Consequent with the Antecedent The eight Rom 8. Answere First the degrees of our Salvation Adoption and Iustification are badly confounded together Secondly of Adoption there are two considerations the one according to the truth and foundation thereof in the eternall counsell of our Election the other according to the fruition and accomplishment thereof in the other life In that signification Adoption goeth before Iustification but in thi Adoption is the bound and end of Iustification Thirdly it is one thing to call Iustification Putatiue and another Imputatiue that as being false is falsely also faigned vnto vs this is no lesse true then if we our selues had it subiectiuely because of the truths sake both of Gods promise and our coniunction with Christ That the FORMAL CAVSE of our Iustification is not the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse Bellarmine proveth by ten Arguments Cap. 7. Lib. 2. de Iustificatione To the FIRST IT is false for whereas there are two sorts of testimonies some expressed and some by
Notaries which went between God speaking and the Church which hee speaketh vnto for the perpetuall verity of the thing x Eph. 2.20 Secondly commeth the consent of the Cannon of the Law with the truth Thirdly the assent of the Church which hath allowed the Scripture delivered of God receyved kept and delivered the same by the vse and exercise of Gods Ministery and of Ecclesiasticall Discipline which dependeth thereon Which authority of the Church is secondary not to establish but to testifie thâ— authority of the Scripture for both are to bee acknowledged yet in theyr degree and order for that of the Scripture is Primary sound and essentiall but that of the Church is subordinate accidentall and altogether ministeriall The Materiall Cause of the holy Scripture arâ— divine matters revealed to our salvation according to our capacity and registred in the Canon Wee call the Canon the doctrine that is contayned in the Bookes of both Testaments the forme whereof internall is the vnchaungeable trueth of God but the externall is the holy Scripture the most absolute Symbole of the same for God hath vsed and sanctified the Instrument of the Scripture as it were the Index or declarer of that Essentiall Canon and the truth of the worde for the approving of the truth as it were in a certaine state or habite of an externall forme that by divine ordinance it might bee the Canon of our faith and life as a right even measure both whole and perfect The nature and office of this Canon come now to be declared The Nature for whereas even vnto this day there hath beene a threefold Canon in the Church the one divine the other Ecclesiasticall and the thirde false how the Canon properlie called divine may be distinguished from the Ecclesiasticall and both from the false it is very needefull for vs to discerne first by the partes thereof secondly by the manner of delivering thirdly by theyr proper conditions Wee devide the pattes of this Canon into the bookes of the olde and new Testament according to those two severall times of the olde and new Church The olde Canon is that which being receyved from God the auncient Church of the Iewes kept and next after delivered from hand to hand to theyr posterity by Gods appointment the bookes whereof are reckoned to be 22. by the Iewes but more distinctly by vs 39. and are divided into three rankes the first contayneth the fiue Bookes of Moses the second contayneth the bookes of the Prophets both hystoricall and propheticall whereof some were published before the Captivity to wit the booke of Ioshua Iudges Ruth two of Samuel two of Kinges being hystoricall Esay a good part of Ieremie and the nine lesser Prophets being Propheticall Others were in the time of Captivity and after as Esdras Nehemias Ester which are hystoricall some part of Ieremie Ezekiel Daniel and the three last of the smaller Prophets which are Propheticall the thirde contayneth holy writings before the Captivity Iob the greatest part of the Psalmes the Proverbes Ecclesiastes the songs of Salomon in and after the Captivity the two bookes of Chronicles The New Canon is that which the christian church had more largely since the time of Christ and the Apostles the substance of which Canon is the word by Christ vttered and the thinges which hee did the most faithfull hystory whereof is contayned in the fower Evangelists the examples in the Acts the y Exegesis exposition in one twenty Epistles the Prophesie in the booke of Revelation The manner of the delivery of both the Canons varyed according to the times of the church and persons the internall forme that is the vnchangeable word of God remayning stil the same for as for the time being the law or the bookes of Moses were the Canon in the church so also after Moses that which was added thereunto was the z Exegetica fuller exposition of that Instrument or canon The conditions of this Canon properly called divine are two the one that it contayne in it selfe the truth or haue the expresse forme of the word of truth the second that it bee delivered ruled and sanctified by divine authority to the end it might bee a Canon for vs in the church the latter of which conditions can never bee pluckt away from the former Now God hath sanctified these forsayde bookes to the ende they might be a Canon in the church partly after a generall partly after a particular manner after a Generall manner because God hath approved and confirmed the Bookes of both Canons not onely by the testimony of his spirit but also by the consent of the Canon and testification of the church after a particular manner because God hath specially sanctified the Bookes of the olde Canon to wit Moses his fiue Bookes with his speech miracles signes and events the bookes of the Prophets and holy writings before the captiuity with the extraordinary signes of a cloud and smoake in the Temple g 1. Kin. 8.10 Leu. 16.2 as also of Gods answere by the Ephod Vrim and Thumim h Exod. 28 30. after the captivity with singular testimonies of eventes the bookes also of the new Canon God hath sanctified singularly both by his sonne made manifest in the flesh as also by his wordes and deedes c Heb. 1.2 and by the Ministery of his Apostles which was most effectuall in signes powers miracles d Mat 3.5 pag. 13. And these are the partes manner and conditions of the divine Canon The other Canon is Ecclesiasticall which neyther contayneth the truth perfectly in it selfe nor was sanctified by God in the Church that it might bee a Canon of doctrine and faith and therefore is called of the Greeke fathers a second or inferiour Canon To this Canon belong the Bookes Apocryphall eyther wholy so as the thirde and fourth of Esdras Tobit Iudith the two bookes of the Machabees the booke of Wisedome Ecclesiasticus or being e Appendices additions to the canonicall as Baruch the prayer of Manasses and those which are added to Daniel and Esther these although they be taken into the Canon Ecclesiasticall yet by evident meanes that is by faith order and vse they were of the Fathers lesse esteemed then the bookes of that divine Canon whereby though abusiuely they were called Canonicall to witte by custome yet properly they were distinguished in the church from the canonicall by the name of Apocrypha The False Canon is that which after the Authority of the Apocrypha bookes grew greater was constituted by humaine opinion The office of the Canon is twofold the one is to teach the truth the other by this rule of truth to decide al controversies concerning Religion for it is the prâ—per Iudiciary voyce and sentence of the holy Ghost that soveraigne inward Iudge from which wee may not appeale The Formall Cause of the holy Scripture is twofold inward and outward the one is wherby the Scripture is proportionable
cause of salvation Efficient Act. 23.48 Ans There is 〈◊〉 Consequence from the state marke and conditioÌ„ of the persons which weâ— elected to the causes of Election eythâ— impulsiue or meritorious Rom. 8.29 Answere The Presâ—ence or fore-knowledge of God is nâ— the Consequent or the Effect of thing but the Antecedent neyther doothâ— signifie in the place cited a foreseeing of the beginning but the speciall loâ— of God but the fore-knowledge of approbation is one and that of naked science and knowledge is another Heb. 11.6 It is one thing to treâ— of the first cause of Election and another thing of the meanes and subordinate causes for faith is the proper and onely Instrument of our Iustification and reconciliation with God of which mention is made in this place Rom. 11.20 It is one thing to treate of the perseverance of the Saints but another thing of the election neyther ought those which are the meanes to bee mingled with the Causes and beginnings Places for good Workes Rom. 8.29 The Conformity of â—â—e Image of the Sonne of God is the â—onsequent of Predestination but not â—e Efficient meritorious cause thereâ—f and those words which are to bee â—â—pounded according to the sense of the â—postle by the vnderstanding of the â—erbe Substantiue Were ought not to â—e taken in a contrary meaning 1. Tim. 2.20 to treat of the seales of â—aith which of the Apostle are reckoned â—o be two the one Inward the note or â—nowledg of divine approbation the other outward the avoiding of iniquity of which the Apostle speaketh in this â—lace as also to treate of the cause and beginning of our salvation and election are things diverse Apoc. 3.11.4 It is one thing to treate of the crowne of Ministrie and another thing of the crowne of eternall life and the worthinesse which in scripture is attributed to the elect is not 〈◊〉 naturall excellencie but of meerenes oâ— fitnesse by God given freely also theâ— is one by inherence in the faithfull and another by imputation of which mention is in this place Distinctions for the matter I. THe matter of Election is called so Equivocally eyther Ex qua out 〈◊〉 which and it is the counsel of God 〈◊〉 Circaquam about which and it is maâ— or in which and it is Christ as the Mediator II. MAn is considered eyther Commonly without any consideratiâ—â— of the qualities or Singularly as he iâ— a Sinner after that manner in the fâ— Act of Election and Reprobation bâ— after this in the second III. THe number of the Elect and Reprobates the person numbering and numbered is certaine though both be not certainely knowne vnto vs. For the FORME I. THe Forme of Predestination consisteth in two thinges in the Action and manner thereof the Action is Adoption the maner is in Christ in whom as in a bond lying betweene the vnion of vs with him was made II. PVrpose Prescience Predestination are distinguished in God not by time but by order Purpose signifieth the whole counsell of God Prescience the first degree thereof Predestination not only them but also those which depend on them III. DEcree together with the execution therof as they ought neyther to be confounded or mingled together nor plucked asunder so it is needefull they should bee ioyned together and distinguished all which distinction is from that which is the latter from the maner of the thinges effected OF CREATION The Part Confirming CHAP. III. THat sorte of Divine Actions immanent wee haue already declared in the doctrine concerning Predestination now by order wee passe to Gods actions externall Of these according to the double obiect there ought distinctly to be had a double respect and notice for those divine actions which passe over vnto the Creatures doe eyther belong to this common nature the common beginning of things naturall or to speciall grace the speciall beginning of thinges supernaturall vnto the communion whereof Man is to bee advanced Those which concerne Nature men distinctly consider to be eyther that first beginning or springing vp as it is a In fieri in the doing or making or the conservation of the same as b In sacto it was already done or made that wee are wont to expresse by the name of Creation but this by the name of Providence The Worke of Creation is known of vs two wayes the one common according to the common consideration of all thinges which were created even as the generall and every speciall of them haue their proper conditions in nature which were effected since that first vniversall beginning in the very time of Creation the other particular according as there is a singular respect and expresse marke of the same the first maner properly belongeth to Divinity the second to the science of thinges Naturall Creation therefore Theologically is the first bringing foorth of Nature and of thinges in nature done or made by God in the beginning of time and finished in the space of six dayes vnto his owne glory and the salvation of the Elect. The Cause Efficient of Creation is God for the thinges created were not by one vnderstanding conceyved and by another procreated as the Valentinians thought not by another Nature which Cerinthus calleth one while the Wombe another while the Generall Worke not by the Angels as the Symonians deemed not by their peculiar spirites called Daemones as the Philosophers Lastly not by Fortune as Epicures but by God they were produced and disposed c Psal 33.9 Esa 40.28 which beside the Scripture eyther the distinct workings of the three persons or the nature or maner of the Creation or lastly the manner of beginning doth convince The persons working in the Creation are as the Causes first the Primordiall Cause is the Father d Act. 17.24 the working cause is the Sonne e Col. 1.16 Ioh. 1.3 and the perfecting or finishing cause is the holy Ghost f Gen. 1.2 Psal 33.6 The manner of Creation is two-folde the one by the bringing forth of things the other by the most wise setting of them in order g Iob. 9.8 Esa 40.22 both of them is from God eyther immediately or mediately The consideration of beginning is that it should loue singularity and there can bee no vniversall first thing vnlesse it bee one neyther one vnlesse it be God The matter of Creation ought to bee distinguished two wayes according as there is one creation primary immediate another secondary and mediate There was no primary matter of creation neyther with God coeternal nor of God existent or as a materiall cause put or spread vnder the work of this creatioÌ„ for God gaue not immediately the beginning of nature by nature but by himselfe for that he is of infinit power he necessarily excludeth all matter wherfore out of nothing as it were the bound God brought forth h Psal 33 9. Rom. 4.17 Heb. 11.3 nature by his owne power Of the second and mediate Creation the
the Salvation of the Elect. Of CREATION the Part Confuting Distinctions for the Cause Efficient I. CReation is sayed to bee eyther properly concerning the work of the first bringing forth of thinges or Metaphorically of those things or works which are of no lesse vertue and power both wayes it is attributed to God alone II. THose things are created which are made of no substantiall and materiall beginning but those things are generated which are made of a fore-being matter the Creation of God is by himselfe but the generation of nature next after God III. NO things being apt to generation or corruption which are brought forth of God by second causes coÌ„ming between are properly sayed to be created because to be created is immediately to be brought forth of God IIII. CReation is two-folde Actiue and Passiue the one sayeth that there is a divine Essence and that the Creature cannot exist vnlesse hee put the case that there is a divine Essence the other sayeth that the Creature was really brought forth by God and noteth withall a creating Essence V. TO Create and to make differ because that more strictly taken signifieth of nothing to make somewhat but this more generally importeth not that onely but also to bring forth somwhat out of a matter lying and being before VI. THe thinges themselues and the nature substance of them ought to be distinguished from the evill that comes vnto them and from the Accidents of the thinges and substances For the MATTER I. THere is one respect or maner of the Primary Creation another of the secondary wherefore that generall u Classicum Alarme of the Philosophers of nothing nothing is made may be fitted or applied to the estate of bodily things but cannot bee opposed to the Creation II. NOthing is sayed to bee eyther privatiuely or Negatiuely Negatiuely of the Primary Creation Privatiuely of the second For the FORME I. THe signification of beginning is threefold for it pertayneth eyther to the time or to the thinges and causes or lastly to the order but it is taken in the first signification when wee treate of the beginning of Creation II. THose thinges which of Moses are written down of the forme and order of things created are not to bee taken Allegorically but Physically or Naturalâ—y OF PROVIDENCE The Part Confirming CHAP. IIII. ANd this is the beginning both Primary Secondary of things created acording to their nature now followeth the powerfull coÌ„servation of the same and the most wise ordering of them vnto their end which by the vse of the Scripture and the Doctors of the Church we call Providence Now whereas a double part of this Providence is wont to bee discerned and distinguished the one of decree according to the eternall fore-knowledge and fore-appointment of all thinges in God the other of Execution according to the externall Administration of the same in time and wheras also the consideration of the former properly pertayneth to Predestination which is a kind of Gods operations Immanent wee in respect of this latter doe here consider and treate of Providence properly so called This Providence then is an outward and temporall action of God whereby he keepeth all and several things which are and disposeth â—ll several things which are done to that end which hee hath determined according to the liberty of his will and that to the end hee might in all and severall things be glorified The Efficient Cause of this Providence or governement is the same which is of Creation sith the one and the self fame beginning is of both from by which all things proceed are conserved to witte God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost a Psal 32.13.15 139.78 Ioh. 12.34 The Father or the loue and goodnes of the Father is the first beginning cause The Sonne in that he is the wisedom and word is the working causes The holy Ghost in that hee is the vertue and power of the Father and the Sonne is the finishing cause The nature of God teacheth this whose presence power operation the scripture coÌ„mendeth in both works b Psal 9 4.8 Mat. 10.29 Ier. 10.23 Prou. 6.19 Esa 45.7 coÌ„mon Nature testifyeth it which as the commoÌ„ Instrument of God being stirred by that vniversall beginning stirreth and being moved moveth it selfe and al things according to it selfe Our nature together witnesseth and feeleth it because as in himselfe we haue our being so in himselfe also we liue and are moved c Act. 17.28 And the operatioÌ„s of this efficient cause are according to degrees distinguished now they are distinguished by a threefolde order maner The first is of Conservation the second of Governing The third of Ordayning to the end of which more at large in the formall cause of providence The Matter about which Providence is imployed according to the twofold consideration of the things which are subiect vnto it may be distinguished two wayes one way in respect of those things which are another way in respect of those things which are don for after both wayes respects all and severall things are ruled by Gods provideÌ„ce The things which are ought three wayes to be distinguished first according to their nature secondly according to their Accidents thirdly according to their vse Of the nature of things whether it be that superior or inferior wherof wee treated in the place of creation there is a double knowledge the one common and according to their natural form or kind the other singular acording to the d Individua things theÌ„selues as they are indivisible The Accidents whatsoever they are are either of common nature in its beginning perfection or of singular nature in the defect and condition thereof f Agnata besides the course of nature Of things according to their vse there is a twofold distinction for eyther they are the ends or the means vnto the end but the ends are some furthest off and some intermediate vnto the same the meanes are severally known two waies first after the manner of doing for some are ordinary some extraordinary and both ordained to their proper ends Secondly by the quality and essentiall condition of them for some are necessary and some contingent Of those which are necessary there are two kinds for some are by themselues absolutely necessary by a necessity of the Consequent as they call it and some by the cause from a g Ex Hypothesi Supposition by necessity of the Consequence Those which are absolutely necessary when we treate of things created we distinguish by two degrees The first is in the first and common beginning of nature first by themselues and by all things necessary as when wee say that twice two is foure which vnchangeably and by an infallible necessity are true The other degree of necessity is from nature out of it owne inward beginning whether materiall as when we say that every thing compounded of contraries must necessarily perish
is that in every Action three thinges are to bee discerned and distinguished the Nature the Subiect the Accidentall quality of them both The Nature is from the Creator which gaue it and moveth the beginnings of naturall properties and actions The Subiect is the moving of the Action which is according to nature in respect whereof every sinne is said to bee in God subjectiuely The Quality is the Accident of Nature and of the Subiect being good indeed according to grace but evill according to the corruption that groweth in nature and in the Subiect which infecteth man and those things which are of man with a bodily and effectual taynt or strayne whence the will which is the inward beginning of actions infuseth the force of that corruption into the actions immediately These things layed downe it is to bee marked that Providence also in evill actions worketh by all the wayes and degrees t Esa 45.7 Lam. 3.37 Am. 3.6 In the way degree of Conservation for it hath put into man both the beginning of Nature which by it selfe by a naturall necessity is limitted as also the beginning of actions which is the will that by it owne power limitteth her motions and freely inclineth them vnto whatsoeuer actions vndetermined againe it sustayneth the will as it moveth the things of nature by a common beginning and the actions naturall and voluntary by a particular beginning By way and degree of Governing for first God bringeth to passe effectually the worke that is evill as farre foorth as it hath a respect of good chiefly it hath that both because it is in good subiectiuely because it is vnto good reduciuely Secondly God remitteth the sinne and prescribeth a bound vnto it according to the liberty of his will u Pro. 16.9 Thirdly hee permitteth evill things not that he alloweth them but that it is no evill to permit evils for sith hee which permitteth hath power to forbid without any obligation as also he to whome it is permitted hath power to doe without any compulsion the Will in both parties is voluntary in the former without fault in the latter without excuse In the way and degree of ordayning for God ordayneth the events of sinnes vnto good x Rom. 8.28 eyther morall that is of punishment and chastisement or Supernaturall that is of his glory in Iustice and mercy y Rom. 5.20 11.33 wherby it is cleare that for a thing to haue being to doe and to bee ordayned it is good but for the same to bee evill to doe evill and to bee carried vnto evill it is euil that God effecth but this God suffereth to bee effected by the creature this is the formall cause of providence The end of Providence which may easily bee gathered from the thinges afore-going is the glory of God conioyned with the salvation of the Elect. z Mat. 6.26 OF PROVIDENCE The Part Confutatiue Distinctions for the Cause Efficient I. FAte or Destiny is eyther true or fayned that without violence this violent The true Fate eyther is Divine or Naturall the Divine is nothing else then the governing and providence of thinges the Naturall is none other then the course and order of naturall thinges The fained Fate eyther is of the Chaldeans or the Stoickes the one superstitiously bindeth and tyeth the actions and eventes of thinges vnto the power and position of the starres the other is flowing from everlasting being such a ranke and knitting together of causes that on it should depend both God himselfe and Gods Providence the Consequent of both is a necessity of constraint II. VNto Providence pertayne two thinges the manner of order the execution thereof the first is Eternall the second Temporall III. GOD governeth the Inferior things by the thinges superior not for the defect of his power but for the aboundance of his goodnesse according to the liberty of his will IIII. THe Nature of the following cause is not onely like to the superior Cause in that it hath somewhat thence but also vnlike it in that it proceedeth from without or outwardly For the Materiall Cause I. ALL thinges subiect to the causing of the first agent are also subiect to the ordinance of the same vnto their end wherefore all things in that they haue being are subiect to Providence II. IT is one thing to treate of the cause vniversall and another thing of the Causes particular Of the Particular Causes there are chances but the Vniversall Cause nothing can escape III. COrruptions and defects in naturall thinges are indeed against the particular nature yet they are from the Intention of the vniversall nature in that they fall out for the good of the whole vniversall IIII. THe manner of the Doer is one and of the Instrument is another that which is of the Instrument and the Creature is disorder but that which is of the doer and the Creator even in things most out of order is order V. SOme things are done by Providence efficiently and causally some other thinges according to Providence permissiuely and determinatiuely For the Formall Cause I. THe Soule alwayes worketh freely which although it depend on the causes yet it selfe is the neerest cause of her own actions for naturall effects haue more likenesse with the neerest causes then with the furthest off II. THere is one necessity from the former or a Constituens that which appointeth another from the latter b Consequens or that which â—nsueth one inward another outward one of constraint another of â—mmutability one absolute another by supposition the distinction of all which in this point of Providence is very necessary III IT is one thing to speake of deedes is they are in act and another thing as they are subiect to the Cause contingent for after the first maner they are necessarily after the second contingently IIII. SInne is two wayes considered eyther properly principally as it is sinne or as farre forth as it hath the respect of good and that two wayes first because it is in naturall motion action Inclination that is in good subiectiuely Secondly because it is vnto good God from evill drawing forth good V. THat thing which being once decreede another infallibly followeth without any other Intermediate Cause is the Cause of the Consequent but God will haue sin to come to passe not immediately but by the wil of man as the meane intermediate VI. OF things being God is the effectuall beginning but sinne to speake properly hath not the manner of an Act or being but of defect for there is a double being of the thing and of the manner vnder the being of the maner not only notions and relations are contayned but also Privations and sinne is a being of the manner not having a being Positiuely but Privatiuely VII IN every sinne there are two things the Materiall or the Subiect and the Formall that is to say the naughtinesse The Subiect is a thing
of nature from God the naughtines came vnto the Subiect by the corruption of man The Places of Scripture which are wont to bee wrested against the truth of this Doctrine of Providence are for the most part these Against the Materiall Cause 1 Of the Corinth 9.9 Ans Providence is eyther generall or speciall A conclusion from the deniall of the one vnto the deniall of the other is of no force 2 Sam. 1.6 1. King 21.34 Ans Providence and chance are not repugnant the one to the other if the respect of divers causes bee distinguished Esay 31. 1. Act. 5.38 Ans according to the divers considerations of the beginninges wee iudge both of the Causes whether neerest or remote and of the qualities of Actions whether good or bad but whatsoever quality is vitious it is from the particular beginning and not from that which is Vniversall or Common Against the Formall Cause Ezec. 18.33 Ose 13.9 Answ a double consideration of the punishmēt of sinne is wont and ought to bee distinctly noted one is of Iustice in God and hath a respect of morall good another of merite and fault in man hath a respect of evill and in this latter signification these places are to bee vnderstood Prou. 16.4 Answer The working of God in respect of the wicked presupposeth three thinges first the limitation of sinne secondly the withdrawing of Grace thirdly the ordayning of punishment Ierem. 10.7 Answ The Prophet speaketh from the feeling of his own infirmity not of an vntruth in doctrine nor of any wickednesse in life but of his vocation vnto which hee was drawne against his will Exod. 4.21 Esa 69.19 Ezek. 14.9 Rom. 1.28 2. Thes 2.11 Answere A Working is one thing and a working permission is another thing That is in good thinges onely this both in good evil for by permitting God worketh foure wayes first as touching the materiall of sinne secondly as touching the withholding of grace which God oweth to no man because it is grace Thirdly as touching the endes vnto which God disposeth sinnes Fourthly as touching the iust punishment of the sinner whereof this is the highest degree by sinne to punish sinne OF THE WORKES OF Grace or of Redemption CHAP. V. THe Worke of God Externall and Temporall which he bringeth to passe in thinges is twofold of Nature and of Grace The Worke of Nature whereof hithervnto we haue spoken is whereby God hath eyther created thinges not as yet being or conserveth governeth and ordereth them being created by his Providence The Worke of Grace is that which God effecteth in the Elect who shall be heyres of Salvation according to the good pleasure of his will And this Worke commonly is called Redemption for the explication of which worke three thinges concurre the beginning the manner and the Effect or the Application thereof The beginning is Christ as hee is God and man from whome there is no power nor healthfull Action which is needefull for Redemption but doth proceed The manner according to which Christ executed this worke is that holy disposing and dispensation of his offices Now the Effect or Application is discerned first by the degrees hereof in this life that is by Calling and by Iustification Secondly by outwarde meanes that is by Gods Covenant and by his Sacraments Thirdly by the Subiect that is the Church which Christ hath redeemed with his blood Wherefore wee must treate first of Christs person secondly of the offices of his person Lastly of the other places pertayning to the application OF THE PERSON OF CHRIST The Part Confirmatiue CHAP. VI. THe neerest singular and determinate beginning of our Redemption is Christ as hee is God and man because by him Man was to be redeemed in whome our redemption was from everlasting Predestinated by him againe to be restored by whom at first he was created in him he ought to bee made partaker of the loue of God who was the Sonne of loue or the beloved Sonne and at last in him to obtayne the right of Sonnes or adoption who by Nature was the Sonne and heyre of God from everlasting Christ therfore being God and man is as the scripture most briefly defineth the Worde made flesh or God made manifest in the flesh that is a person in whose singularity two Natures the properties thereof remayning whole are vnited for the Redemption of mankind For the explication of this Definition we must consider of three things in order First of the Natures and the necessity verity and actions thereof Secondly of the Subject of the Natures or of the person and of both the Vnity and the operation thereof Thirdly of the Hypostaticall vnion of the Natures and of the manner foundation power and efficacy thereof As concerning the Natures whereas Nature is an outward beginning making the thing it selfe and distinguishing it from other things we acknowledge two such natures in Christ according to the Scripture Divine and Humane both in themselues and in their properties distinct a Rom. 9 1 1. Ioh. 5.20 Phil. 2.6 the one from everlasting immutable immortall impassible the other in time conceyved and borne mutable mortall passible Both are Indivisibly necessary for the redemption of mankind or the dispensation of the office of a Mediator the divine Nature that hee might satisfie God that the satisfaction might bee proportionable to our debt that an Infinite good might helpe an Infinite evill by overcomming death and by vndergoing both the heavines of sinne and the infinitenesse of Gods judgement Adde further that whereas the arbitrement betweene God and man is aboue the humanity because no man can bee a chiefe and supreme messenger of divine thinges but God by his God-head because no working aboue nature such as is a sufficient Intercession with God is of or from nature because no beginning but of the Godhead it selfe can bee the beginning of that satisfaction which may stand before God it must needes bee that according to the divine nature in his person hee tooke on him all the partes of Mediation or Mediatorship But the humane that being man hee might according to the Law satisfie Gods justice that hee might sufficiently suffer for the accomplishment of the worke of satisfaction both by obeying made vnder the law and by dying made a curse according to the Law that in all thinges being like vnto his brethren sinne excepted hee might bee a faithfull and vniversall high Priest in those thinges which are to bee performed before God to purge the sinnes of the people b He. 2.17 Now the divine Nature of Christ that wee may in few wordes speake touching the verity of those Natures is that whereby hee obtayneth the same Essence with the Father and the holy Ghost albeit both according to his person whereby hee is distinguished to bee the Sonne of God and according to the dispensation of his office whereby hee is discerned to bee a Mediator hee is distinguished from the essence of God of which nature
the generall of outward calling Gods good pleasure as the foregoing cause therof Christs Ransome as the meritorious cause therof Out of both ioyntly ariseth that singular and benevolent affection of Gods will whereby hee embraceth vs adopted in his beloved Sonne with his Infinite loue by applying vnto vs his saving grace i Eph. 2.17 19. Ioh. 15.19 Act. 6.14 Eph. 1.5 Of this Inward calling or application there are two inward meanes the Spirite and Faith The Spirite which calleth by the efficacy of the cause k 1. Ioh. 2 17. Ezec. 11 1â— Faith answereth the calling by the office of the instrumeÌ„t l Rom. 8.30 â— Pro. 1.22 Now as the giving of the Spirite so also the bestowing of faith is the singular gift of God m Passe To be possible to haue both is of Nature but to haue both is of Grace The Matter of this Inward calling are those whome God fore-knew and predestinated vnto life for whome hee hath predestinated them hath he called n Rom. 8.30 Neyther can this Inward and effectual calling bee of any others then of them whose also is the Spirite of Christ and saving faith according to the purpose of Gods Predestination in Christ all others are excluded for albeit it be somtimes given vnto the wicked not onely with their sences to perceiue those things which are of the outward Ministery but by them after a sort inwardly to be affected in the heart that is in the vnderstanding and will yet this inward saving calling whereof we here treate doth affect them onely to salvation who liue and are moved by the Spirite of Christ and are ingraffed by faith into Christ to life eternall o Ioh 17 â—0 Eph. 2.20.21.22 The forme of this calling is that inward Information of the faithfull by the spirite and faith for the communicating of Gods grace and glory Of this Information there are two partes the one is that effectuall action of Gods Spirite in vs and according to that the whole renuing of man which in the Scripture is commonly called Regeneration p 1 Ioh. 3.9 Rom. 8.1 The other is the action of Faith whereby both the mind is inlightened that it may know and the Will sanctified that it may apprehend God in Christ q Col. 1. â— Rom. 14.14 The End Remote is the glory of God gratiously calling Neerest the salvation of Man effectually called And this is the maner of the outward and inward absolute calling whereof the one is of good pleasure and election the other of the signe the one of Efficacy the other of Signification tending to Efficacy the one proper to the Elect the other common to all But because the one cannot nor ought to be separated from the other in the Elect in the ordinary way vnto Salvation out of both ariseth a calling which wee tearme Coniunct both ordinary effectuall in the matter of our salvation Now is it an effectuall and gracious action of the holy spirite sealing vp in the Elect by the instrument of true faith the preaching of the word the vse of the Sacraments the communion oâ— Christ and his Church for their salvation and Gods eternall glory The Efficient cause of this calling is God for the calling is of gift not of merite of grace not of nature God calling whome hee will and againe whome hee will eyther not calling at all or not effectually calling but both freely without respect of person or without blame The matter are men elect in whom alone onely this calling is effectuall perticularly and savingly though generally the not elected and Hypocrites may both receyue the vse of the outward calling and seeme openly to declare the sence and feeling of the Inward whence it is that the Effect of the calling of these is called in the scripture a r Heb. 6.5 taste onely but of those a commixture of the Word with faith Å¿ Heb. 4.2 The Forme is that divine manner of divine Information Inward and Outward whereof this is fully performed with the preaching of the Word the vse of the Sacraments and other both private and publicke exercises of faith and charity but that with the saving communion of the Spirite and Faith The End is both the glory of God being mercifull as also the advancing and translating of man from his misery to spirituall grace and glory OF THE CALLING OF MAN vnto Salvation The Confuting Part. Distinctions in defence of the Efficient Cause I. THe Vniversall Calling which is coÌ„monly called Naturall is one and the Politicall or Ecclesiasticall which is called Personall is another Lastly the saving is another of which we treate in this place yet of all these the Principall and onely Efficient is God II. THere is one calling Immediate another Mediate Extraordinary Ordinary That God effecteth by himselfe This by the Ministery of men III. OF the Efficient cause of all callings there is commonly had a two-fold notice the one according to the beginning the other according to the Instrument that is properly of the cause this of the r Concausa fellow cause In Defence of the Matter against the Vniversality of Effectuall Grace I. THe grace and good will of God is eyther noted generally whereby God doth benefite all men or particularly whereby hee doth good to the Elect in Christ but this vniversall and generall grace ought to bee discerned from the singular and particular as also the vniversall and common benefits towards all as they are men from the Particular towardes men as they are Christians II. THe Affirmation is Inconsequent from the Generall to all Particular things for all ought not to bee taken vniversally of every man but generally of all sorts of men III. THe Argumentation holdeth not from the communion of Nature to the communion of Grace IIII. THe quantity of Actiue vertue ought to bee knowne by the Effect of the quantity V. THere is one Efficacy of calling outward another inward the outward is when the sences and corporal things are touched moved by the outwarde Ministery the inward when the vnderstanding and will are touched and moved Both these Efficacies againe are two-fold the one saving proper to the Elect the other not saving but leading the way according to the generall order and generally belongeth vnto all that are called The Places 1. Tim 4 10. Ans The benefites of Christ in the saving of men are distinct by two degrees the one is common to all the other is peculiar to the Church and saving to the faithful Adde further that the word of saving importeth sometimes the benefites of God in this life and sometimes that eternall benefite of salvation aequivocally Ezek. 28.26 God two wayes is called the God of men eyther vniversally and commonly according to nature or particularly according to Grace whereby hee chose them from everlasting in Christ In Defence of the Formall CAVSE I. THere is one Calling by grace naturall and another by Grace supernaturall
II. THe Calling which is common to all by naturall Grace is wrought by God according to the a Esse naturae being of Nature as the Schoole-men speake generally but that which happeneth to those that are called Supernaturally is concluded in two partes for it proceedeth generally from the caller belongeth particularly to the called III. THe Formall of the calling ought to bee distinguished from the Materiall thereof because the Subject of that is particular but the Subject of this belongeth to all men alike OF MANS IVSTIFIcation before GOD. The Part Confirming CHAP. IX THe Second degree of Application which is here made on the behalf of God is Iustification It is needefull that the verity of this Iustification bee declared two wayes by Anotation of Words wherof there is vse in the explication of this doctrine as also by definition of the thing it selfe according to all the causes The Words whose doubtfull signification is to bee taken away lest they should in the doctrine it selfe breed any difficulty are chiefly two Iustice and Iustification Iustice which indeede is of the Person is two wayes vsually considered one way in the manner of quality or Inherence and it is the obedience of the Law which wee performe to it the other in manner of Relation or Imputation and it is a gracious giving of another mans obedience for vs performed that is called the righteousnesse of the law or Works this of the Gospell or Faith that is in the person subjectiuely this of the Person by Grace of Imputation It is needefull that both bee distinguished because there is a diverse vse of both of this in the Private and inward court of the conscience before God of that in the publicke and outward Court of christian profession before men Iustification generally considered is the very application of righteousnes but specially if wee treate of righteousnesse inherent it is the effecting of a certaine habituall holines in man which signification is most vnusuall and vnproper if wee treate of the righteousnesse of Imputation it is a gracious Imputation of another mans righteousnes by faith and so an absolving of a man before God And this signification as most proper and vsuall both the common custome of tonges a Idiotismus the proper phrase of the holy Scriptures doe confirme The common custome of tongues for as with the Grecians to justifie hath two significations besides or without the doctrine of Iustification the one to judge and pronounce one just by publicke judgement the other after the cause is judged judiciously to punish one so that there is the same vse of the word with the Hebrewes two things doe most evidently proue first the direct and most frequent vse of that word in court or pubilcke judgements causes and actions b 2. Kin. 15.4 Deut. 25.1 Esa 43.9 secondly the manifest c Pro. 17 15. Esa 50.8 Rom. 8.33 â—4 opposition of condemnation and justification as being contraries d Antithesis And in this signification the word to Iustifie commonly importeth three thinges To absolue a person accused e Esa 5.23 Exod. 23. Luc. 7.29 to iudge one for righteous to giue a testimony to one already Iustified as also rewardes which are due to the iust and innocent If you respect the proper phrase of the Scripture by iudiciall proceeding it proposeth the whole doctrine of Iustification this the Phrases of speaking which the Scripture vseth as also that whole manner and course of our Salvation which it describeth doe proue The Phrases which in this point the Scripture vseth do proue some by way of deniall that hee which is iustified is not condemned not iudged and that sinnes are not imputed vnto him f some by way of affirmation doe proue that hee is made iust is freede from the accusation and condemnation of the law that righteousnesse is imputed vnto him c. g Rom. 5.18 8.33 The whole course and manner of our Salvation is fully performed as it were by two degrees by the knowledge of our misery and the trust of Gods mercy Of our misery there are three partes the Offence the Guilt and the Punishment Of Gods mercy there are three opposite parts the foregiuenesse of the fault the absolving from the guilt and the freeing from the punishment That whole course or proceeding froÌ„ our misery to Gods mercy is caled IustificatioÌ„ by a signification taken from common pleadings h Forensi or from the Lawyers Iustification therefore is properly a free iudiciall action of God whereby hee iudgeth the elect in themselues subiect to the accusation and malediction of the Law to bee iust by faith through Christ by imputation of his righteousnesse vnto the prayse of the glory of his Grace and their owne salvation i Rom. 3.24.25 That this definition might be rightly vnderstoode it is needefull that the Causes which are orderly noted in the same bee two wayes considered according as Iustification is taken eyther Actiuely in respect of God who iustifyeth or Passiuely in respect of man who is iustified The Efficient cause of Iustification taken actiuely is God the Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost k 2. Cor. 5.19 2. Cor. 6.21 for it is in him to absolue or acquite the guilty person by whose Iustice hee is made guilty in him to pronounce one iust whose will is a rule of Iustice Lastly in him to giue iudgement of life or death who by nature right and office is supreme iudge l Esa 59 1 Psal 5â— 4 Esa 43.21 Mar 27. Of this Efficient there is a double Impulsiue cause Outward and Inward the Inward is the onely mercy of the father m Rom. 3.23 both in regard of his good plesure which predestinated vs n Ephe. 1.5 into the adoption of sonnes o Rom. 3.23 as also in regard of the p Oeconomiae disposing and dispensation which both ordained the Sonne for this end and applyed the benefite obtayneâ— by the Sonne vnto vs q Coloss 1.12 And this is the grace which in Scripture if called the Grace of r Free gifts in Schooles the Grace that maketh one acceptable and among the common sort the Grace that freely giveth and is alwayes opposed vnto workes which are called the gifts by grace or of grace freely giveÌ„ because God tooke not the first cause of Iustification from vs or our workes but in himselfe and from himselfe for the vnsearchable riches of the glory of his grace Wherefore there can bee from vs no disposition and preparation which of the Popelings is surmised to be necessary for the bringing in of the forme of Iustification Å¿ Eph. 2.8.9 Tit. 3.5 Eph. 2.4 for albeit there bee two speciall degrees of preparation if not in time at leastwise in nature going before Iustification to witte the feeling of our misery and a confused knowledge of Gods mercy yet none of these maketh for the manner of the Efficient Cause not
onely concerning the condigne but not so much as concerning the congruent The outward impulsiue cause is Christ God-man both in respect of his merit as also of his efficacy and operation Of his merite because both by obeying and suffering in his life and death he purchased for vs the benefite of Iustification t Esa 83.3 1. Tim. 2.6 1. Ioh 1.7 Rom. 8.30 31. Of this Efficacy because he effectually applyeth this purchased benefit both by offering the same by the preaching of the word conferring it by the inward and effectuall operation of his spirite u Rom. 1.16 2. Cor. 5.19 On mans behalfe that which is is called reductiuely the Efficient cause of the Passiue Iustification is wholy Instrumentall and it is saith by which not for which we are sayde to bee iustified both in respect of her Correlatiue as also in respect of her cōtrary the law and good works Of her Correlatiue because the whole forme of saith as it is justifying consisteth in relation neyther is it sayde to justifie vs as it is a quality but as it is occupied relatiuely in the applying of her Correlatiue u Gal. 3.8 Heb. 2.4 Rom. 1.17 Of her contrary because the good workes which are required in the person of him that is justified are excluded from the merit of Iustification as in the place concerning Earth and Workes shall be spoken more at large x Rom. 5.15 11.6 Ephes 2.8.9 The matter of Iustification which on Gods behalfe is considered actiuely is two fold according as there are two parts of Iustificatjon the Remission of sinnes and the obedjence of Christ For because we y Asiequuti sumus procured vnto our selues both the bond of death and the deprjuation of righteousnesse and life both were needful for our Iustificatjon that both our sinne might bee abolished by Remission that wee might be freed from death which is the wages of sinne and that righteousnesse might bee communicated vnto vs to the end we might attaine vnto life z Dan. 9.24 Gal. 3.13 By the name of Remission of sinnes we vnderstand that gratious act of God whereby hee perfectly forgiueth and remitteth the fault and the punishment for the merit and satisfaction of Christ a 2. Cor. 5.19 Rom. 8.1 4.7 The foundatiō hereof is the righteousnesse of Christ not his Essentiall and Diuine b Esa 42.8 nor yet his habituall which was his originall righteousnesse opposite vnto our originall righteousnesse or spot of nature but his actuall righteousnesse which is the effect of both namely a most perfect obedience performed to the Father both by satisfaction for sin and by fulfilling of the Law For the obedience of Christ is two fold opposite to the double bond of man after his fall actiue for the fault passiue for the punishment or both for both The Actiue obedience is a perfect performance of Gods law which Christ fully and perfectly executed even to the vtmost title c 1. Cor. 1.30 Rom 5.19 2. Cor. 5.21 of the law the necessitie hereof in the worke of our Redemption and Iustification three things doe prooue the Iustice of God the office of a Mediatour and our Salvation The iustice of God for if you eyther respect his nature wherby he is infinitly iust he ought not to saue man but by the same manner of iustice d Prou 17 Exod. 20.5 eyther proper to vs or freely imputed or if we respect his will revealed in the law which is an vnmoueable 〈◊〉 of Iustice he hath prescribed none other way vnto life than obedience The office of Christ the Mediatour for wheras he as our surety was bound by a voluntary dispensation to vndergoe and performe those things which we our selues were necessarily bound to vndergoe and performe it was needfull that he should not onely suffer death for vs but also performe the law because we were bound vnto both e Rom. 8.3 Gal. 4 45. Our Saluation for whereas two things are necessary for the same a freeing from death and a giuing of life it was needfull we should obtaine the one by the purging of sinne and the other by the gift of righteousnesse f Rom. 10 4 Rom. 5 19 20. Hence it is that Christ is said to be the end and presection of the law vnto Saluation to every one that beleeveth and the actuall obedience of Christ whereby we are made just is in the Scripture opposed to the actual disobedience of Adam whereby wee are made sinners g Heb. 10.14 Rom. 4.25 1. Pet. 1.19 1. Ioh. 1.7 Gal. 3.13 Adde further that in the very passiue obedience the actiue neverthelesse doth of right challenge vnto it selfe the chiefty for the suffering doth not simply justifie but as it is the suffering of Christ voluntarily presenting himselfe to God the Father by his Eternall Spirit whervpon the same Christ by offering himselfe as a sacrifice suffered as a Sacrificer performed it The Passiue obedience of Christ is the sacrificing or suffering of Christ very necessary in respect of God of Christ the Mediator and of vs. Of God because his justice must haue beene satisfied by punishment Of Christ because he being our surety ought to haue payde our debt Of vs because it was needefull that we should be freed from death by death h Num. 8.33 The Subiect of this righteousnesse is Christ alone in whom subiectiuely that habituall Iustice is inherent and from whom that both actiue passiue obedience proceeded which wee called actuall righteousnesse The matter of Iustification which is considered Passiuely are men elect i Rom. 5.8 10. Tit. 3.3 Eph. 2.12.13 Of this matter there is commonly had a double notion the one according to Nature the other according to Grace supernaturall according to nature they are sinners and therefore subiect to the accusation and malediction of the law k Rom. 8.30 Eph. 5.30 Ioh. 17 20. according to grace supernatural they are beleevers or ingraffed by faith into Christ The forme of Iustificatiō taken actiuely is a feee imputation of Christs actuall righteousnesse whereby the merits and obedience of Christ are applied vnto vs by vertue of that most strait communion whereby hee is in vs and we in him The forme therfore consisteth in Relation in which the vnity that ariseth thereout hath between both boundes the manner of a forme and consisteth rather in the issuing forth and the habite then in the inherence Hence it is also that Relation is sayde m Non esse eius sed esse ad aliad not to bee his but to be in respect of another Now it is receyved by right of the giving and acceptance of the merites of Christes obedience for this imputed righteousnesse is grace and not nature the communicating of a benefite not a Real or habitual possession of the righteousnesse or substance of Christ Lastly an Imputation not a passible quality inherent in vs. In this Imputation we consider two things the truth
thereof in it selfe and the manner of the truth thereof in vs. Of the truth in it selfe there are two bounds Righteousnesse and the Imputation thereof between these there is a relation because Christ hath perfect righteousnes for no other end then that hee might impute it nor imputeth any other thing then righteousnesse nor is our righteousnesse any otherwise then by Imputation The manner of the truth thereof in vs is in the Scripture two wayes limitted whereof the former teacheth vs that wee are iust not in our selues not in our owne righteousnesse but by the righteousnesse of Christ which being out of vs is made ours by right of giving Hence wee are sayde to be made the righteousnesse of God in him n Cot. 5.21 the second teacheth vs that we haue righteousnesse as Christ hath our sinne now he hath it not subiectiuely or inherent but by imputation Hence is that o Autithesis oppositioÌ„ made by the Apostle in the place already cited to wit of Christ whome God made sinne for vs and of vs who were made the righteousnesse of God in him And according to this forme of Iustification there is one and alike Iustification in all men though in diverse according to the measure of him that apprehendeth it be after a divers maner modified The former â—efore of Iustification is not an haâ—â—â—al saÌ„ctity inherent in vs for albeit Iustification Sanctification agree in the Efficient causes as well Gods grace as Christs merit in the Instrumentall cause to wit faith by receyving that of the one and by effecting that of the other Lastly in the scope and end for they tend to one end saue that the one is as the cause the other as the way yet they much differ both as touching the substance and as touching the Adiuncts As touching the substance that is as touching all the causes for the matter of IustificatioÌ„ is the obedience of Christ of Sanctification our owne obedience the one perfect the other vnperfect the forme thereof that is the Imputation of Christs obedience but of this the drawing backe of our minds from vnpure to pure qualities Of Iustification there is no neerest and inward efficient cause but of this Sanctification the wil of man is being the beginning of human actions the end of that is the peace of conscience but of this an open testifying of the reconciling of our selues with God As touching the Adiuncts because they differ first in the maner of effecting for that is effected by right of donation this by maner of alteration secondly by the Effects that absolveth vs in the iudgement of God This doth not Thirdly and lastly in continuance for That shall haue an end with this life This shall endure for ever The Forme of Iustification taken passiuely is the application of Faith Hence it is that wee are sayde to bee saved p Per fideÌ„ fide ex fide by faith through faith of faith of which wee haue spoken in the cause Instrumentall q Mar. 5.39 Rom. 3.7 Gal. 1.16 Eph. 2.8.9 Tit 3.5 The End of Iustification taken actiuely is the glory of God in the wonderfull tempering of his Iustice and mercy r Eph. 1.5.6.7 Rom. 3. â—6 Of his iustice that he would haue his Sonne to satisfie it of his mercy that he would impute his sonnes satisfaction vnto vs. Å¿ Rom. 5.1 Tit. 3.7 The End of Iustification taken passiuely is peace of Conscience and eternall salvation OF MANS IVSTIFICATIon before GOD. The Confuting Part. Distinctions in defence of the Definition of the Name or Word I. IN the searching out of the interpretation of a Word the derivation and composition of the Word is not simply to bee looked vnto but the vse and the propriety of the same II. THe vse of the Word Iustification is vsually two-fold for eyther Iustification is taken properly or in a signification translated from the speciall to the generall by an abuse of speech it importeth all those thinges which follow Iustification III. THere are two orders of Testimonies concerning Iustification the one Legall the other Evangelicall the testimonies of the Legall Iustice do teach what manner of iustice standeth before the Tribunall of God the testimonies of the iustice of faith or those which are Evangelicall doe some pertaine to the causes of Iustification some to the outward signes and testimonies of the person iustified Lastly some to the comprobation of the worke done by faith The Places by which Bellarmine prooveth that to iustifie signifieth to make iust cap. 3. lib. 2. de Iustitia Rom. 5.16.18.19 Ans First there is a manifest opposition of condemnation and justification Now whereas thinges opposite are vnder the same kinde Genere it must needes be that iustification as well as condemnation is a judiciall Act. Secondly as condemnation is never taken out of that signification which belongs to places of judgment and pleading so justification which is made before God is never taken from the effect of infused grace Thirdly the judgement of God is according to truth as well when hee pronounceth vs just for the imputed righteousnesse of Christ as when hee maketh vs just by the power and vertue of his Spirite both truely though diversly the one perfectly the other vnperfectly Dan. 12.3 Ans Iustification in the signification belonging to courts of pleading is two-fold the one immediate the other mediate of this speaketh the Prophet whereby God by his Ministers absolveth sinners as by the same hee bindeth and holdeth sinners and it is a Figure familiar in the Scripture to attribute that to the Instrument which is proper to the cause Esa 53.11 Answ First the Hebrew word in the third conjugation signifieth to pronounce one just as in the first it signifieth to be just positiuely Secondly the Text hath not in his Knowledge but in the knowledge of himselfe whereby is declared not the manner of Iustification but the Instrument or faith expressed by a circumlocution a Per Periphrasm Thirdly it is one thing to treate of Christs righteousnes which in him is inherent subjectiuely and another thing of that which by Grace is imputed vnto vs. Fourthly Christs satisfaction is the meritorious cause of Iustification which is become onely ours by benefite of Imputation Apoc. 22.11 Ans Iustification in the iudicial signification noteth out two things according as there is a two-fold Court the one of Conscience before God the other of holinesse before men for it importeth to bee absolved eyther before God by the righteousnesse of faith or before men by the righteousnesse of workes In the first signification the sense is thus Hee that is iust let him be iustified still to witte by applying vnto himselfe the continuall remission of his sinnes and the imputation of Christs righteousnesse In the second the sense is thus Hee that is iust let him bee iustified still that is he that desireth to bee iust let him bee informed more and more vnto Iustice and
holinesse eyther of both wayes the iudiciall or law signification remayneth 1. Cor. 6.11 Answ First there is a fallacy of conioyning for these three are not ioyned together as if they were b Synonyma of one signification but as subordinate and opposite to the three-folde accusation going before for to those corruptions whereof hee treated he opposeth washing to defiling or vnrighteousnesse fornication covetousnesse hee opposeth Sanctification but to Guilt which hee expresseth in these wordes They shall not inherite the kingdome of God hee opposeth Iustification Secondly hee treateth of Iustification which is made in the name of Christ and not of that which is by a certaine infusion or inherent righteousnesse In defence of the Efficient Cause of Passiue Iustification or the Instrumentall Cause of the Actiue against Bellarmine from the 13. Chap. lib. 1. De Iustificatione to the 19. THat Faith alone doth not iustifie Bellarmine proveth by fiue Arguments First is That the Fathers and Scriptures doe attribute the power of Iustifying not onely to Faith but also to other vertues Chap. 13. Distinctions according to the rancke of his Arguments I. FAITH in the Scriptures and with the Fathers is wont two wayes to be considered one way properly according to the Nature of Faith simply the other may figuratiuely that is by a h Metaleptice transumption correlatiuely whereby faith apprehendeth her obiect after the first manner Faith is sayde not to be alone after the latter it is sayde alone to iustifie II. Iustification which is the actiō of faith is considered two wayes eyther generally for that whole missery of our reconciliation with God or particularly for the principall and speciall part thereof which consisteth in the application and imputation of Christes righteousnesse The ground of the one is Generall the Instrument of the other is particular III FAith is considered one way in the person of him that is iustified another way in iustification it selfe another way in the effect of Iustification In the person of him that is iustified it is the roote and beginning of all vertues In the act of Iustification it is the instrument in the effect it is the dore of life the gate and way into life IIII. THe feare of the Lord in the Scriptures and with the Fathers is taken aequivocally for it signifieth eyther the fore-goer or antecedent of Faith or faith it selfe or the consequent of Faith the Antecedent of Faith because feare is the first degree of faith vnto Iustification First not in time but in order of nature Faith it selfe because the feare of God in Scriptures very often signifieth the whole worship of God knowledge and trust that is Faith it selfe The consequent of Faith because the feare of God or that desire to avoyde sinnes and to performe righteousnesse followeth faith as the fruite the good tree Now whatsoever things are attributed to the feare of God by the Fathers or in the Scripture they are attributed eyther in the second signification by a Synecdoche or in the third by a Metonymy V. THe Word Hope is sometimes taken for trust it selfe according as the same Verbe signifyeth sometime to trust sometime to hope In which signification it is taken of the Fathers and in the Scripture in the places cited by Bellarmine sometimes it is taken oppositely so that faith is of things past and present hope onely of things to come VI. TRue loue which in this world can never be perfect is neyther in time not nature before Iustification seeing that it beeing as it were the effect by issuing forth followeth faith as the neerest cause neyther doe the places of Scripture which are alleadged point out the cause of the remission of sinnes or of Iustification but the Adiunct and the necessary consequent thereof VII THere is a two-fold repentance propounded in the Scriptures a true and an hypocriticall Faith defineth and limitteth the true but the want of faith the hypocriticall and therefore those things which are attributed in the scriptures and by the Fathers to the true repentance they are attributed not in respect of it selfe simply but in respect of faith d Secundū quid after a sort Adde further that by a frequent and vsuall Metonymy in the Scripture that is attributed to the Effect which is proper to the cause VIII THe Purpose and desire truely to receaue the Sacrament as also a purpose and desire of a new life and obedience are excluded from Iustification but not from the person justified for the cause of Iustification is one thing the quality of the person justified is an other thing neyther are the effectes to be confounded with the causes or the causes with their effects The second Argument If Faith cannot be seperated from loue other vertues then it alone cannot Iustifie Cap. 14.15 DISTINCTIONS I. IT is one thing to treate of Faith as it is considered absolutely as a quality but another thing as it is considered relatiuely as an Organ and Instrument being absolutely considered it cannot be separated from good works but considered relatiuely it justifieth without workes because it alone is the Instrument of Iustification and not workes so it is never alone yet it alone worketh in the worke of Iustification II. ANd yet it followeth not that faith justifieth with vices as it justifieth without workes because Faith onely is cōsidered exclusiuely without works as it iustifieth Quae iustificans est and not what it is iustifying III. WHerefore that third point also is in cōsequent that faith if it be alone shall also alone iustifie vs because as Iustification is never separated from faith so neyther is faith from workes As also that is an Inconsequent if the eye alone seeth therefore it shall see although it bee alone IIII. BVt that which the Adversary proveth that true faith may in very deed bee separated from loue and other vertues leaneth vpon no ground and first as touching the places in Iohn 15. there is speech of faith historicall in 1. Cor. 13. Of faith of miracles In Iames 2. Of faith temporall or hypocriticall Secondly as touching the argument taken from the state of the Church hee playeth with the doubtfull signification in the word Faithfull who in the places now cited are so called for the outward profession of faith and the communion of the Churches and not according to the inward truth and formall manner of faith and the Church Thirdly as touching the argument taken from the proper manner of faith and loue it leaneth both vpon a false consequent and a false supposition for this is a false consequent in that albeit there bee two vertues yet they may mutually be separated the one from the other This also is a false supposition in that loue springeth not necessarily from faith for God hath given Faith as the mother begetter of loue Fourthly as touching the absurdity there is none for Iustification shall not therefore depend vpon workes because it is not without
of the very Institution Neyther must we referre the words of the Promise in the Supper to Christs Sacrifice but to the Sacrament which hee instituted neyther also in Baptisme is the efficacy of the Sacrament simply expressed but the promise given concerning the efficacy V. THe m Concionale word pertaining to the congregation the word of Institution are not opposite but both in Baptisme and the Supper there is the same worde for that which is n Or of Preaching for the congregation in Baptisme the same is of the Institution and that which is of the Institution in the Supper the same is for the congregation VI. IN every Sacrament two things must needes bee distinguished the Substantiall and the Accidentall thereof the one whereof is properly required for the being the other for the well being of the same Now the Preaching of the same is no part of the Essence of the Sacrament but pertayneth to the manner of Administration VII THe Consecration of Sacraments consisteth in two thinges in the Institution or ordinance blessing sealing of the word and in the promise of God himselfe then in the holy vse thereof which is done by prayers and thanksgiving VIII THe chaunge of the Sacramentall word is twofold Substantiall and Accidentall the one properly pertayneth to the sense the other to the wordes and order of the wordes and yet a conclusion from the change of wordes to the change of the Element is of no force because this cannot bee changed without corruption but those may easily be changed the sense neverthelesse remayning Distinctions in Defence of the Cause Materiall I. SIgnes are eyther of things past or thinges present or things to come and they all eyther pointing out or sealing vp or presenting of all which the Sacramentall signes are mixt II. THe signe signifieth eyther the Element or the Action or both wherefore in a Sacramentall thing all that is called the signe which is perceyved by the fences whether it bee seene or heard for the Element is perceyved by the sight but the action by the sight and hearing III. THe thing signified in the sacrament is both a substance and action the substance is eyther properly whole Christ or Synecdochically the body of Christ delivered vnto death and his bloud shed the Action is Gods alone and is eyther Iustification or Regeneration IIII. THe thing and the signes are both offered eyther joyntly and truely in respect of God who promiseth or distinctly in respect of the faithfull to whome without the sacramentall coÌ„munion the thing signified is truely and spiritually given or of the vnfaithfull to whome even in the Sacramentall Communion the Signes indeede are offered but the thing signified is not given Distinctions in Defence of the Forme and Effect of a Sacrament Bellarmine proveth by ten reasons that the Sacraments of the New Law are the causes of Iustification by the worke done Cap. 8. Lib. 2. de Sacram. Ex opere operato I. THe Sacramentall Signes are sayde to bee practicke not for that they worke by the deede done but because they are effectuall Instruments whereby the truth of Gods Grace in Christ is sealed vppe vnto vs and because Infantes are baptized the Sacramentes doe not therefore immediately effect Sanctity for in respect of the Infants Baptisme is properly a Sacrament of entrance as in respect of them that are growne to full age it is a Sacrament of Sanctification not by effecting but by binding II. GOds institution or authority hath â—ot put a power of effecting in the Sacraments which is proper to the Principall Agent but of signifying sealing and presenting neyther hath humane instirution any place in divine matters sith the nature of those things which concerne faith and religion lerneth vpon the alone word of God III. THe Institution and vse of a Sacrament consisteth in two things first in the Relation of the Signe vnto the thing signified Secondly in the lawfull administration and receyving the verity and vertue of the Relation doth wholy depend vpon the Institutor of the lawfull administration God is the Author according to his will but man is the Minster of the same according to the rule of Gods will and his owne calling IIII. THe Sacraments depend vpon God and Christs Passion after a divers respect vpon God as the cause vpon Christs death and Passion as the object for the Passion of Christ cannot properly be called the cause of the Sacrament but the object and the thing signified wherevnto it is carried V. WE are made assured of the remission of sins by the Sacraments through an assurance not absolute but relatiue not from the former but from the latter not by the Principall but by the Instrumentall not properly by effecting but by scaling VI. THe Sacraments the word haue reference vnto faith not after a contrary but after a subalternall manner because as faith is begotten by the word so it is nourished by the Sacraments both are Instruments yet distinct by manner of working VII SAcraments profite not except they bee well applyed now there are two meanes of Application the one outward the other inward the outward are the Signes and the Word the vse of the Signes is perceyved by the touching but the vse of the Word by hearing the vnderstanding of both is required because the Signes and the word not beeing vnderstood doe not profite the inward is faith which bringeth the vse of the Signes and the word to the Soule VIII THe subordinate Instruments of the stirring vp of faith is the word of preaching or the Scripture and the visible word of the Sacrament neyther doth the one disanull the other but rather settle and establish each other Adde further that the vse of the picture and outward Signes of Baptisme is one and of the Signe is another whereas that hath neyther the worde nor promise this both IX THe profite of the Sacraments is both Generall and Particular in a diverse respect Generall in respect of the entrance and the whole outward action Particular in respect of the Application the one Generally is performed by the Signes and the word the other particularly by faith X. THe Difference of the Sacraments of the olde and new Testament consisteth not in the thing signified but in the manner of signifying and other outward Adjuncts and circumstances whereof wee haue aboue spoken The same Point doth Bellarmine proue by eight Testimonies of Scripture Cap. 4. The First Place is of Mathew the 3. Answ There is no difference made between the Efficacy of Iohns Baptism and Christs but betweene the Persons whereof the one by the outward Ministery onely giveth the water as the Signe of the Remission of sinnes the other by the Inward Efficacy giveth the Spirite as the earnest of the thinges signified And hee vseth the future Tense speaking of Christs Baptisme because he hath respect to the very Ministery of Christs Preaching which he was about to take in hand neyther doth the Place
cited as that of the Councell of Carthage and of Milevitum out of Augustine For those Councels doe treate against the Pelagians who at that time denied the baptisme of children and some are suspected as that of the Tridentine Councell and the Testimonies of the Popes III. INfants ought two wayes to bee considered eyther according to common nature or the singular manner of the covenant and grace that way they are conceived in sin but this way they haue obtayned remission of sinnes by the promise In Defence of the Effects of baptisme against the same Cap. 4 and the rest that follow I. SInne dwelling in vs is by baptisme taken away by three meanes and degrees First because it is not imputed Secondlie because by little and little the body thereof is destroyed Thirdly because in death it shall vtterly bee taken away by the power of the same bloud of Christ wherewith wee are washed in Baptisme II. IT is one thing to speake of the cause of Iustification and another thing of the Instrument thereof lastly an other thing of the sealing the cause is the merite of Christ the Instrument is Faith and the sealing is Baptisme III. THe new and vncertaine devise of the Schoolemen concerning the Character or Marke which cannot bee defaced is with the same facility denyed as it is affirmed chiefly whereas neyther Scripture teacheth nor necessary reason sheweth nor authoritie of Fathers proveth any such Character Adde further that the chiefe reason why Baptisme is not iterated is not the impression of the character but Gods onely Institution OF THE LORDES Supper The Part Confirming CHAP. XIII THe other Sacrament of the christian church immediately instituted of Christ for the perpetuall vse thereof is The Lords Supper whereof though there be divers appellations both in Scriptures and with the Fathers for in the Scriptures it is called The body and bloud of the Lord The New Testament The Communion The breaking of bread The Lords Table The bread and the cup The Communicating of the body bloud of Christ a Mat. 26.28 Luc. 22.20 Act. 20.7 1. Cor. 11.25 1. Cor. 10.21 1. Cor. 10.16 which by the Fathers First it is called a gathering together The Eucharist or Thankesgiving Publâ—â—g Administration Secondly the Latâ—â—â— Offering because of collections and sacrifice for the remeÌ„brance of Christs Sacrifie yet most properly by this appellation Of the Lords Supper the thing it selfe hath most fitly beene expressed and indeed it is called The Supper with respect had both of the thing and of the time because it is a holy banquet of the soule and not of the belly instituted of the Lord and that in the Evening but the Lordes in respect both of the Author who is the Lord and of the End which is the remembrance of the Lord. Now it is defined to be A Sacrament of the New Testament instituted of Christ consisting of the Signe and the thing signified proportionable by an Analogicall Relation and action of themselues betweene themselues whereby the full growne members of Christ and his church are trayned vp and taught in the lawfull vse of the visible signes concerning the true and spirituall communication of the body and bloud of Christ vnto life eternall The Efficient Cause of the Lordes Supper ought to be considered eyther as instituting or as vsing and administring the same that is the principall cause but this is the serving or administring cause The Principall or Instituting cause is the Lord from whome it hath beene customably called the Lordes Supper to wit Christ God and man our onely Redeemer instituting the mystery of his body and bloud by the oblarion whereof hee redeemed vs b Rom. 15 18. 1 Cor. 11.23 Of this mysticall and divine Institution there are two parts Christs Deeds and his Words by the one wherof hee limitted and left an example of Administration by the other a doctrine of Institution Of Christs Deeds wherby the manner of the lawfull publicke office or administratioÌ„ is declared there are three partes according as concerning both signes which Christ receyved he orderly vsed holy and ceremoniall actions c Mat. 26.26 Mat. 14.22 Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11 24. The first is Blessing and Thankesgiving for the Scripture vseth those two words the one Mathew Marke vseth the other Luke and Paul both signifying the one selfe same thing to witte how Christ by prayers to God by thanksgiving and all that holy action prepared appointed and sanctified the Bread and Wine to a holy vse that they might bee a Sacrament of his Body and Bloud not by their owne nature but by divine Institution and this is that true Consecration or Sanctification of the Sacrament whereof mention is made among the Fathers The Second is The breaking of the Bread and the powring of the wine into the Cuppe which Christ vsed not onely for the cause of dividing and distributing thereof but for the representing of his death for it is an Essentiall and Sacramentall Ceremony of the Lordes Supper pertayning to the end forme thereof d Mat. 26.26 Mar. 14.22 Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11.24 The third is the offering and distributing of the Bread broken and the Wine powred in For Christ gaue not the same to his Disciples that they should distribute but that they should receyue that which was distributed e Mat. 26.26.27 Mar. 14.22 Luc. 22.56 because they were in that Supper not the dispensers of Gods Mysteries but the Guestes But Christ as being the Feast-maker with one labour instituted and with his owne hands dispensed the Sacrament of his Grace and withall sanctified the Ministeriall dispensation thereof And all these Actions are Sacramentall and ought diligently to be considered as farre forth as they are vsed for the signifying and sealing of Spirituall things by divine Institution To these Actions that wee may come to the second part of the Institution Christ added Words whereof some include a Commaundement some a Promise and lastly some an Explication These in Schooles haue vsually been tearmed Preceptiue the other Definitiue and Sacramentall Lastly these Expositiue The Words Preceptiue are those by which hee hath injoyned both vpon the dispensers a necessity of their administration and vpon the communicants a necessity of taking and hath prescribed vnto both a forme of both Administration by his deed whereof we haue aboue spoken and by his commaundement of Imitation ioyned therevnto e Mat. 2 6 26. 1. Cor. 11.24 Of Communicating by a double Precept by the one To take by the other To eate and to drinke The Taking is a Sacramentall Rite prescribed to him that commeth to the Lords Table whereby wee receyue with our hand the Bread and Cuppe of Thanksgiving for it cannot bee gathered eyther from the Story of the Institution of the Lordes Supper oâ— froÌ„ the fashion of Christs sitting down and his Apostles that Christ in the first Supper did put those signes into the mouth of every of the Apostles by which
doe in the lawfull vse of the Lords Supper but by neyther of both ways is that Popish consecration proved III. OVr Consecration Christs differ not in Substance but in degree for that which is Christs is nothing else but an appointing or dedicating of the bread and wine to the holy and divine vses made by the word of Institution according to his Free will but that which is ours doth all and wholy depend vpon the verity power and ordinance of God not vpon the secret recitall and muttering of wordes IIII. THe will of Christ consecrating is not to bee separated from the Sacramentall manner and Rite of consecration because as the one is the cause Efficient of the consecration so the other also is the materiall and formall cause thereof If you respect the Efficient Christ consecrated it with his will alone if the materiall and formall he consecrated it with the solemne word of Institution and with those Rites of dispensing which hee himselfe vsed commaunded vs to vse V. TO doe this in the Institution of the Supper is not to consecrate the outward signes or symboles but to doe all that which Christ commaunded his Disciples to doe Neyther did Christ vtter these wordes This is my Body to the end hee might consecrate the signes for he vttered them after the blessing breaking of bread but that he might declare vnto his Disciples the manner or nature of the Sacrament VI. THere is no change made in a Sacrament by vertue of the wordes but of the divine Institution and ordinance And that which is made is not made in Substance in quantity or in naturall qualities but in relation onely that is in vse and office Neyther doth eyther the custome of the church proue any other thing which vsed a shewing holding forth of the Eucharist not for adoration but eyther that they might prepare the people to the communion or that thereby out of the offering of private men a certaine part being set aside for the peculiar vse of the Sacrament might be shewed or the costom of the Greeke Fathers who never vsed this Rite of Elevating since the beginning vnto this day VII IT is manifest that those words which were not spoken over the bread or to the bread but to the Disciples communicating were spoken to instruct the people and not to change the breade neyther doe the most auncient Lyturgies gaine-say this which joyne together the wordes of consecration with the whole action of the Lordes Supper or doe the Fathers who when they affirmed that the Eucharist is made by a mystical Prayer by calling on the name of God by solemne blessing by thanksgiving or some certain consecration had no respect to those fiue wordes alone and that they with them would not haue consecrated the bread of the Sacrament by any Substantiall change their owne most evident expositions doe plainely shew In Defence of the Matter constituting the Lordes Supper and first against Concomitancy Bellar. Lib. 4. Cap. 21. I. AN Argument drawne from the hypostatical vnion of God man and that which is naturall of the Flesh and the Soule to concomitancy is of no force because it is one thing to treate of flesh and bloud which are things substantiall and entire partes of humane nature but another thing as they are given vnto vs for meate and drinke according to the voluntary and Testamentall disposition of Christ neither is therefore the Hypostaticall vnion of God and man broken which was not broken in death howsoever the soule and bloud were separated from the body II. THe spirituall eating whereof onely the order of the Text in the Chapter cited sheweth that mention is made ought to bee distinguished from the Sacramentall eating whereof here the question is neyther ought that which is spoken Synecdochically of eating in some places be taken exclusiuely seeing also in other places there is very often mention made of drinking III. FRom false ambiguous and impertinent Principles a false ambiguous and impertinent consequence is drawn Now the first Principle is false for we doe not acknowledge any reall or visible presence of Christs body bloud in the Supper In respect of the signes it is wholy Sacramentall in respect of the thing signified meerely spirituall IIII. THe second Principle is ambiguous because the body and bloud of Christ are two wayes considered one way as they are the partes of Christes humane nature all which being vnable to bee sundered liveth glorious the other as they are represented vnto vs Sacramentally in this action of the Supper to witte as both the body was offered vnto death for vs on the crosse and his bloud out of the body powred forth for the wordes added to the Institution doe plainely testifie that the body and bloud of Christ as things separated in the sacrifice of the Crosse are offered and exhibited vnto vs in the Supper V. THe third Principle is impertinent and different from the question now in hand because wee treate not here eyther of the vniversall presence of Christs Divinity which pertayneth nothing to the speciall kindes for if the adversary vnderstand the presence of nature Christ shall bee aswell any where else as in the Supper because he filleth all things if the presence of grace he affirmeth nothing that is proper to the bread but what pertaineth to all the faithfull or of the Hypostaticall vnion of the two natures in respect wherof notwithstanding we wil never affirm that the Divinity of Christ is with his humanity by a Concomitancy because that were a Nestorian heresie VI. THe Fathers which are cited eyther spake Synecdochically by the body vnderstanding the whole humane nature of Christ as Cyprian Hillarie Ambrose or of the whole person wherof in the Supper we are made partakers as Basil Hierome Chrysostome Origen the Nicene Synode or Sacramentally they vttered that of the signe which is proper to the thing signified as Augustine Cyril both he of Ierusalem and that other of Alexandria VII The body of Christ vnder the shew of bread is Sacramentally offered vnto vs in the Supper as it was crucified and broken and his bloud as it was shed for Christ instituted the Supper for a remembrance of his death and yet is not his carkasse eaten because Christ by his death purchased merite of life for himselfe and his VIII It is one thing to speake of the body bloud of Christ as touching themselues and another thing according to the manner of a Sacrament as touching themselues the bloud of Christ cannot bee plucked from the body that was done once on the Crosse but as touching the nature of a Sacrament they ought distinctly to be considered partly because in the Supper they represent that vnto vs which was once done and partly also because the perfection of our refreshing in Christ is exhibited in the eating of Christes flesh and in the drinking of his bloud IX MIracles are not to be drawne into vse and rule because every
expedient h Rom. 1 7.16.17 Rom. 10.8 Ioh. 3.8 The Matter of Faith ought onely three wayes distinctly to be considered acording as it hath respect vnto the Subject Object or parts The Subiect proper and neerest is the vnderstanding and will of man as both these faculties are regenerate by the supernatural grace and vertue of the Spirite and as the vnderstanding knoweth the supernaturall benefits of faith which are offered in Christ as true and the will applyeth the same to it self with a sure perswasion of the heart as good healthfull i Luc. 24.25 Eph. 4.23 Act. 16.14 Ro. 10.20 The Obiect in respect of the vnderstanding is Gods truth in respect of the will is Gods singular Grace laid open by his promises in Christ Iesus Now both are contained and limitted in the word of God which wholy and soly faith imbraceth as her levell object in the same Christ crucified together with all his benefites as her principall first neerest and proper Object k 1. Cor. 2.2 Heb 10.22 2. Cor. 3.4 Rom. 4.8 8.38 The Parts according to the maner of the Subject or Object are wont diversly to be considered In respect of the divine vnderstanding and will they are both a Knowledge an Assent the Knowledge is wherby we vnderstand the whole word of God as touching the principall heades thereof according to the measure of grace revealed l Esa 53.11 Ioh. 10.38 1 Ioh. 4.16 The assent is whereby wee most firmely resolue with our selues that all thinges which are knowne out of the law and the Gospell are most true and rest our selues perswaded in them m Rom. 7.16 Eph. 3.12 Eph. 1.22 In respect of the will the chiefe and principall part of faith is Trust which is a firm perswasion of the heart whereby every one of them that are truely faithfull do particularly appropriate to themselues the generall promise of Grace Which trust manifesteth it selfe by a double effect to wit by constant Indurance whereby faith opposeth it selfe to all dangers inward and outward and ful Persuasion whereby we surely trust in God concerning our salvation n Rom. 8 15.16 Eph. 1.13 Heb. 10 22. Heb. 11.1 The Forme of faith consisteth in Relation whereby every Elect after a particular manner applyeth to himselfe both the word of Truth and the particular promises of GODS Grace by appropriating vnto himself through a firme perswasion those things which are taught and promised particularly and o In Hypothesi by a Supposition though conceyved in a position and generally p In Thesi Ioh. 17.15 Mat. 9.2 Gal. 2.20 Ioh. 1.12 The Supreame and chiefe End is the glory of God the Author of our Faith and Redeemer q Rom. 11.35 Eph. 1.12 the neerest end is our Salvation which the holy Scripture calleth the end and reward of faith r 1. Pet. 1.9 Ioh. 3.15 16. Ioh. 20.31 By this opening of the Definition through the causes 2. things consequētly follow First that Faith is both one and divers One both in Special kind for faith ſ Species specialissima is a Speciall kind most speciall and in Object because the thing beleeved is one t Eph. 4.5 2. Pet. 1.1 Divers both in number and in degree In Number because every one hath his owne faith distinct from another In Degree because he hath it acording to the measure of Gods grace as it is more or lesse u Heb. 2.4 Mat. 9.22 Rom. 14.1 Secondly that faith is so far firme in all the elect that it can neyther totally nor finally ever at any time be lost to wit because of the certainety and vnchangeablenesse of the Election promise of God of the satisfaction and merite of Christ and of the sealing of the Spirite Wherefore faith after some degree is oftentimes diminished but as touching the forme it cannot perish x Ioh. 3.16 Phil. 1.6 Ioh 6.56 1. Ioh. 2.1 OF FAITH The Part Confuting DISTINCTIONS In Defence of the Obiect of faith against Bellar. cap. 8. Lib. 1. De IVSTIFICATIONE I. THe Testimonies which are alleadged out of the histories of the Gospell doe eyther treate of faith in Christ expresly Mat. 16. Luc. 7. Ioh. 1 Ioh. 6. Ioh. 11. Ioh. 14. Ioh. 20. and so of the speciall mercy of God which God layed open in Christ singularly effectually or of Gods speciall mercie which Christ exhibited by will worke in the example of the Leaper Mat. 1. or they treate onely of an hypocriticall boasting of that speciall mercy of God as in the example of the Pharisie Luc. 18. Or lastly of the outward meanes and extraordinary miracles that further faith which make not a justifying faith but do eyther generally testifie or particularly confirme the same Mar. vlt. II. THose which are alleadged out of the Acts and Epistles are eyther Sermons touching Christ and so Metonymically concerning Gods speciall mercy Act 2.4.10.13.17 18. or do treate of Abrahams faith not in respect of the temporall or earthly but of the spirituall and eternall promises for he saw the day of the Messias by faith and therefore rejoyced Rom. 4. Or lastly they treate of the meane of speciall mercy procured vnto vs and confirmed by the resurrection of Christ Rom 10. 1. Cor. 15. Against Bellarmine cap. 10. I. THe Word of God is two wayes vsually considered eyther as the Word of truth generally or as the Word of promise and grace specially The one Faith respecteth as it is a Knowledge or assent but the other as it is a trusting or beleeving for albeit the promises are generally proposed in the Scriptures yet there is a speciall application of them by faith as the examples of the sicke of the palsie Mat. 9. Of the sinnefull Woman Luc 7. Of the Adulteresse Ioh 8. of Zacheus Luc. 19 and of the Thiefe Lu 23. doe teach II. FAith is the Instrument of Iustification and not the Cause which neither by time nor place can be discerned or separated from the things which it apprehendeth Neyther doth the faith of a speciall mercy follow Iustification because without it there is no Iustification III. IVstifying Faith taketh not away but proposeth the subordinate means of confidence such as are Prayer Sacraments good workes Baptisme and vseth them for the augmenting and confirming of the same IIII. THe confidence or assurance of faith dependeth not vpon the quality of the person beleeving or the quantity of his Faith but vpon the truth of God promising the will of Christ redeeming and the faithfulnes of the spirite sealing Of the Forme of Faith against Bellarmine Lib. 1. De Iustificat Cap. 5. THe Testimonies which are cited out of the 11. to the Hebrewes do not overthrow the forme of Faith but establish the same First the Apostles definition of Faith and the sence and interpretation of the two properties of faith whereof mention is made in that Definition For faith is sayde to be a Ground or substance not
one declared by the effects of both but as concerning the Object are both vniversally all Creatures even the vnreasonable which shall be freed from the servitude of corruption and generally all both Angels and Men and particularly that man of Sinne and Sonne of Perdition Antechrist e Mat. 29.32 1. Thes 4.17 Apoc. 20.12 The Forme is that whole order and proceeding of the most majesticall judgement comprehended in the very preparation both of the Iudge and of the Persons to be judged in the sentēce of the judgement and in the execution of the sentence f Mat. 25.32 1. Thes 4.16.17 The End Supreame is the glory of God himselfe and the accomplishmēt or Christs office Subordinate the iust condemnation of the wicked and the glorious felicity of the faithfull both which the infinitenesse and eternity either of joy or sorrow followeth g 2. Tim. 4 8. Particularly the State of man after this life after the time of that vniversall life resurrection and last judgement is eyther of life or death eternall Life Eternall is the life of glory wherein the Soule ioyned to our body enioyeth God for ever being advanced to the highest toppe and height of her felicity The cause of this life is God to wit the Father the Efficient the Sonne the Meritorious and the holy Ghost the sealing and applying Cause h Ioh. 14 2◠Apo. 21.3 1. Cor. 15.45 Rom. 8.11 The Matter which hath the respect of the Subiect are those good things which neyther eye hath seene nor eare heard nor can the mind of man comprehend i 1. Cor. 15 28. That which is of the Obiect are all the blessed and elect k Apo. 21.3 Mat. 25.24 The Forme is the most perfect knowledge vision and fruition of God himselfe and the exceeding felicity blessednesse of man which accompanieth the same which also consisteth both in the separation and absence of all evill things in the participation and presence of all good things both are both perfect and eternall l Apo. 22.4 Psa 7 15 1. Ioh. 3.2 Psa 16.11 The End is the glory of Gods grace and the glorifying of the elect m Apo. 21.3.5.12.11.17 1. Cor. 15.28 Death Eternall is the vnspeakeable and most miserable condition of the reprobates appointed or decreed of God whereby both their Soule and body are most justly adiudged to eternall punishments The Efficient Cause remote is God the most iust iudge the Instrumentall is Sathan the neerest is Sinne n Mat. 25.41 The Matter which hath the respect of the Subiect are Eternall punishments that which is of the Obiect are the Cursed and the Workers of iniquity o Ioh. 5.29 1. Thes 1 9. The Forme is the perpetuity and the infinitenesse of the punishments in Hell p Apo. 20.15.21.8 Esa 66.24 Mat. 4.42 The End Supreame is the glory of Gods Iustice The Neerest is the iust condemnation and punishment of the wicked OF MANS ESTATE after this Life The Part Confuting Touching the Resurrection I. THe Resurrection in the holy Scripture is two wayes taken Figuratiuely or Properly Figuratiuely eyther by a Metonymy it signifieth immortal life or by a Metaphor eyther a deliverance from danger or the regeneration of the Soules which is a spirituall resurrection and is called the First Properly Resurrection signifieth the quickning of the Bodie which shal be done at the last day which also is called the Second II. THere is one Resurrection Vniversall and Finall which no man shall escape an other Particular or foregoing whereof there are particular examples extant in the Scriptures Of the last Iudgement I. IVdgement in the Scriptures signifieth three things eyther the cause of damnation or an vniversall governement or the very Act eyther of condēnation or Iustification II. THere is a two-fold Iudgement of the Lord Particular or Antecedent When God in this life eyther defendeth his people or represseth the wicked Vniversall being the last which shall be done in the last day of the Resurrection III. THe Sonne is sayde to be the iudge of the world not exclusiuely or oppositely but by an appropriation for that by the Sonne in a visible forme the last iudgement shall be executed IIII. THe Sonne is said to be ignorant of the day of iudgement eyther because he would haue vs to be ignorant thereof or as touching his humane nature which by ordinary and naturall knowledge knoweth nothing of this matter or as touching his state of humility which as touching his voluntary dispensation hee hath taken vpon him Of Life Eternall I. THere are 3. kinds or differences of life there is a life of nature which the Apostle calleth Naturall There is a Life of Grace which the Sons of God alone doe enioy in this world there is a life of Glory which consisteth in the vision of God II. LIfe Eternall is two wayes taken Metonymically both for the way to life and for Christ himselfe Properly for the State of the blessed after this life III. THere is one Vision of God Naturall in the thinges created an other Specular or Symbolicall by resemblances and Signes an other of Faith by the doctrine and doings of Christ an other of Present sight or of glory to come when we shall see God face to face Of Death Eternall DEath is fowre-fold First Corporall which in the Scriptures is also called Temporall and the first death in respect of the wicked Secondly Spirituall and that eyther of the faithfull or vnfaithfull that of the faithfull is three-fold of Sinne which is called Mortification of the Law as it is the power of Sin of the world as the world is dead vnto them The death of the vnfaithfull is that which may be called the death of faith or of the soule Thirdly Eternall which is called the second Fourthly Civill death which of the Lawyers is sayde to be of them which are condemned to death FINIS