Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n formal_a grace_n justification_n 1,818 5 9.4473 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A57667 Pansebeia, or, A view of all religions in the world with the severall church-governments from the creation, to these times : also, a discovery of all known heresies in all ages and places, and choice observations and reflections throughout the whole / by Alexander Ross. Ross, Alexander, 1591-1654.; Haestens, Henrick van.; Davies, John, 1625-1693. 1655 (1655) Wing R1972_pt1; Wing R1944_pt2; ESTC R216906 502,923 690

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

when a sinner of a wicked man is made good which is by remission of sins and infusion of inherent righteousnesse The second justification is when a just man becomes more just and this is in doing of good works by the merit of which he can make himself more just They say Christ is the meritorious cause of our justification but the formal cause is either intrinsecal and that is the habit of infused grace or extrinsecal to wit the righteousnesse of Christ or actual which are our good workes so that here is a threefold formal cause they teach that justification consisteth not in the bare remission of sins but also in the inward renovation of the mind That we are not onely justified but also saved by good works as efficient causes 5. Concerning good works they teach that the good works of just men are absolutely just and in a manner perfect that a just man may fulfil the Law that a man is justified by works not in the first but second justification yet not without the assistance of grace 〈…〉 unregenerate man by the works of repentance may merit the grace of justification ex congruo as doing works agreeing to the law of God that they who are justified by the first justification do merit life eternal by their works ex condigno Q. 4. What are their Tenets concerning pennance fasting prayer and almes A. They teach that faith is no part of pennance That repentance may be totally lost That the parts thereof are not mortification and vivification but confession contrition and satisfaction That pennance is a Sacrament that contrition is to be ascribed partly to grace partly to free-will That it is necessary to justification and the cause of remission of sins and that by it all sins are pardonable That a●ricular confession to the Priest is necessary to reconcile us to God That a sinner before baptism is received into grace without his own satisfaction onely by the satisfaction of Christ but after baptisme he must make satisfaction himself That after the fault is forgiven there remaines often times the guilt of temporary punishment either here or in purgatory which must make satisfaction that the punishments of purgatory may be redeemed by fasting prayers almes c. 2. Concerning fasting They hold it a sin and deserving death to eat of meats prohibited by the Church That fasting consisteth onely in abstinence from meat not from drink That the times of fasting chiefly Lent are of Apostolical institution That fasti●g is satisfactory and meritorious That the tradition of the Church in such indifferent things obligeth the conscience 3. Concerning prayer They say that it is meritorious that the Canonical hours of prayer should be observed that they are to be said or sung in Latine by the Clergy and Monks That the titles given to the Virgin Mary are true and holy That to prayer in the Quite ought to be joyned singing Organs Trumpets and other musical instruments 4. Concerning almes They hold that the giving thereof is meritorious That there is not onely a corporal but also spiritual almes consisting in comforting counselling teaching c. That almes may be raised of ill gotten goods and filthy lucre as of Whore-houses c. Q. 5. What opinions do they hold concerning the Sacraments A. They teach that the efficacy of the Sacraments depends upon the intention of the giver That the Sacraments are not seals to confirm the promises of grace That grace is contained in and conferred by the Sacraments ex opere operato and that the receivers thereof by their justifying vertue are saved That three Sacraments namely Baptisme Confirmation and Order do imprint an indelible character form or figure in the very substance of the soul the caracter of Baptisme is Passive making a man capable of all other Sacraments that of Order is Active that of Confirmation is partly Active partly Passive That there are seven Sacraments of the New Testament That all the Ceremonies used by them in the Sacraments are necessary 2. Concerning Baptisme They say that Lay-men and Women in case of necessity may Baptise That the Baptisme of Iohn was not the same with that of Christ nor had the same efficacy and that after Iohns Baptisme it was necessary to receive Christs Baptisme That to Water in Baptisme should be added Oyle Spittle Salt c. The signe of the Crosse Exorcisme Exsufflation a White Garment c. That Baptized Infants have if not Actual yet Habitual Faith infused into them That Infants cannot be saved without Baptisme that Baptisme began to be absolutly necessary on the day of Pentecost That it totally abolisheth original sin 3. Concerning the Eucharist They say that onely unleavened bread is to be used That Christ by way of Concomitance is wh●lly in the Bread that is his Body Blood Soul Divinity c. That the whole Essence of the Sacrament is in the Bread alone That there is no necessity to communicate under both kinds That the Wine ought necessarily to be mixed with Water That the Priest may participate alone That the Eucharist is profitable for the dead That the Bread should be dipt into the Wine that it should be elevated carried in Procession adored c. That there is no trope in these words This is my body c. That Christs Body is not onely really but substantially in the Sacrament That it may be at one time in many places That the Bread is transubstantiated into Christs body That the form of consecration consisteth in these words This is my body That the Mas●e is a Propitiatory Sacrifice for the quick and the dead 4. Concerning Confirmation Pennance Extream Vnction Orders and Matrimony They teach that these are Sacraments properly so called that there is vertue in Extream Vnction either to cure the body or to do away the remainders of sin for this cause they anoint 6. parts of the body to wit the Eyes Ears Mouth Hands Reins and Feet That Ordination is a Sacrament as well in Deacons Sub-Deacons Acoluthi Exorcists Readers and Door-Keepers as in Priests Q. 6. What Ceremonies do they use in the five controverted Sacraments A. In confirmation the Bishop anointeth the childs forehead with chrisme making the signe of the Crosse thereon and saying I signe thee with the signe of the Crosse and confirme thee with the chrisme of salvation in the Name of the Father c. Then he strikes him on the cheeke to shew he must not refuse to suffer for Christ. In Pennance the Bishop goeth to the Church door where the Penitents lie prostrate on the ground saying Children come to me and I will teach you the feare of the Lord. Then he kneeleth and prayeth for them and having used some words of admonition he brings them into the Church this is done on the day of the Lords Supper that they might be partakers thereof all the Church doors are then opened to shew that all people have accesse to Christ.
this life our sinnes are still inherent in us though they be not imputed to us that wee are justified by faith without works and that faith is never without charity that the best of our works deserve damnation that here we may be assured of our justification and salvation that the Church Liturgy ought not to be read in Latin but in the vulgar tongue that faith is a more excellent vertue then charity that there is no merit in us that in this life we cannot possibly fulfil the Law that to invocate the Saints to worship Images and Reliques or the Crosse is Idolatry that usury is not altogether unlawful that Lent and other set Fasts are not to be kept that there be onely two Scaraments Baptisme and the Lords supper and that the Sacraments cannot justifie or confer grace that the Baptisme of water is not of absolute necessity nor depends the efficacy of it from the intention of the Minister nor ought it to be administered by private men or women in private houses That Christ is not corporally in the Eucharist that in the want of Bread and wine other materials may be used and that Wine alone without Water is to be used that there is no Transubstantiation nor ought to be any adoration of the Bread that the ●up should be administred to all that Extream Unction was onely temporary in the Church that the Clergy ought to marry He rejected also the Church-Hierarchy and Ceremonies and exorcisms Penance also Confirmation Orders Matrimony and Extream Unction from being Sacraments Q. 15. What other opinions in Religion were held this age A. Servetus a Spaniard who was burned at Genev● taught with the Sabellians that there was but one Person in God and that there was in Christ but one nature with Eutychees he denied the holy Ghost and Baptisme to Infants which he would have to be deferred till the thirtieth year of their age He held also that God was Essential in every creature Brentius a Lutheran taught that Christs body after its ascension is every where whence sprung up the Vbiquitaries Castelli● a School-Master in Geneva held that the Canticles was not Scripture but a Love Ballade between Solomon and one of his Concubines One Postellus taught that men of all Sects and Professions should be saved by Christ. O●iander held that we were justified not by ●aith but by the Essential righteousnesse of God which he said was the formal cause of our justification One 〈◊〉 a Ma●tuan taught that Christ justified us not as he was God but as he was man Amsdorphius wrot a Book to prove that good works were pernicious to salvation One George Mai●r taught that Infants could not be justified for want of good works Iohn Agric●●● affirmed that the Law was altogether needlesse and that Christians were not tied to the observation thereof Hence sprung up the Antinomians One Steunbergetus in Mor●via denyed the Trinity the Divinity of Christ the holy Ghost and Virginity of Mary he rejected also Baptisme and the Lords day affirming we had no command in Scripture to keep that but the Sabbath onely One O●inus taught that ●olygamy or multiplicity of Wives was lawful One Valentinus Gentil●● of Naples denied the Trinity and rejected the Creed of Ath●●●●ius One 〈◊〉 of Cracovia in ●oland denyed also the Trinity and th●●ty of Essence and taught that neither the Second nor Third Person were God that Satan was created evil that mans intellect is eternal that our free will was a passive power moved necessarily by the appetite that God was the Author of sin and that the will of man in sinning was conformable to the will of God that it was not adultery to lie with another mans Wife that we must belive nothing but what is evident to sense or reason that the same body which dieth riseth not again that the soul perished with the body that there should be no care had of burial that separated souls could not suffer corporeal fire and that God being a Spirit should not be invocated by our mouth but by our heart One Swenkfeldius taught that the Scripture was not the Word of God nor that our faith depended on it but it rather on our faith That Christ brought his body with him from Heaven That Christs humanity became God after his ascension that every man was endowed with the same essential vertues of justice wisdom c. which were in God That the power and efficacy of Gods word preached was the very Son of God In Moravia there started up some professors called Nudipedales because they went bare-footed these in imitation of the Apostles forsook houses Lands Businesse and Children and lived together in common avoiding the society of other people Another Sect sprung up which called themselves Free Men teaching that they were freed from obedience to Magistrates from Taxes Tythes and other duties that after baptisme they could not sin That they were not onely like God but already deified And that it was lawful among themselves but no where else to have women in common Q. 16. Were there no other opinions held this Century A. Yes many more so vain and luxuriant are the wits of men in finding out many inventions and shaping to themselves forms and Ideas of Religions every one esteeming his own the best and as much in love with his own imaginations as Narcissus was with his shadow in the Water or Dercalion with his own picture Some reject Scriptures others admit no other writings but Scriptures Some say the Devits shall be saved others that they shall be damned others that there are no Devils at all Some hold that it is lawful to dissemble in Religion others the contrary Some say Antichrist is come some say not others that he is a particular man others that he is not a man but the Devil and others that by Antichrist is meant a succession of men some will have him to be Nero some Caligula some Mahomet some the Pope some Luther some the Turk some of the Tribe of Dan and so each man according to his fancy will make an Antichrist Some onely will observe the Lords day some onely the Sabbath some both and some neither Some will have all things in common some not Some will have Christs body onely in Heaven some everywhere some in the Bread others with the bread others about the bread others under the Bread and others that Christs body is the bread or the bread his body And others again that his body is transformed into his divinity Some wil have the Eucharist administred in both kinds some in one some not at all Some will have Christ descend to Hell in respect of his soul some onely in his power some in his divinity some in his body some not at all some by Hell understand the place of the damned some Limbus Patrum others the wrath of God others the state of the dead others the grave Some wil make Christ two Persons some give him but