the first may be removed by Justification when the other to wit the punishment is to be satisfied for at least in part by satisfaction to Justice where the sins have been committed by the free-will of the person to wit if he were adult or at age for they acknowledge this not to be necessary for infants and originall sin See Suarez lib. 7. pag. 128. Et pâ—ena aliqua as he saith non remittitur gratis sed per condignam satisfactionem And therefore gratis remittitur culpa licet postea sit de justitiâ satisfaciendum pro poenâ To lay down then their way these things are supposed without controversie 1. That man naturally is obnoxious to Gods curse and cannot save himself from it 2. That before he can be admitted to happinesse he must be justified 3. That God is the efficient cause of this and the principall worker is also without controversie 4. That both infusion of Grace and remission of sin do accompany Justification is denied by none 5. That the ultimate or finall end is the glory of God and the salvation of the person justified is the subordinate is agreed unto by all 6. That Christs righteousnesse is the only meritorious cause is in word professed 7. They acknowledge the necessity of Faith to concur in it as we do of good Works to follow after hitherto there seemeth to be no great absurdity we had need therefore to consider it the more narrowly in respect of three other causes added by them to wit the formall materiall and instrumentall causes with the effects and consequents following thereon And we put the question thus Wherewith may a sinner hazard to appear before Gods justice so as to expect Gods acceptation of him This will draw the question nearer when a sinner is to choose what defence to take him to or whereupon to ground his plea before the Throne of God 1. They answer roundly that man is justified per solam gratiam inhaerentem tanquam per forman integram sine imputatione externae justitiae Christi that is by inherent Grace alone as the intire form of righteousnesse without any imputation of Christs Righteousnesse and that this inherent righteousnesse doth confer this of it self as Suarez layeth it down lib. 7. cap. 7. pag. 83. in two corollaries expresly although they differ amongst themselves Some making it habituall Grace only as Bellarmin some both habituall and actuall as Suarez yet all agree that it is inherent Grace which constituteth us just before Gods Throne therefore do they call it gratia gratum faciens 2. This inherent Grace they acknowledge to be infused by God without any condign merit and to imply these two 1. Some-what positive to wit the bringing-in a new quality or Grace in the soul which is as it were a new form to it 2. Some-what privative that is a purging or cleansing of the soul from the blot of sin which necessarily followeth upon the former as two contrary forms are inconsistent together Thus they say this Grace expelleth or excludeth sin from the soul as light doth darknesse or heat coldnesse in water when it is calâ—fied This to them in effect is the remission of the fault which they account necessary to Justification and so Gods justifying of a sinner is His infusing that first Grace into the soul whereby necessarily sin is really and actually removed and not in opinion only as they object to our not imputing thereof Aquin. 1.2 quaest 113. doth include four things in Justification to wit an act of free-will tending to God and another in reference to sin beside the former two 3. They acknowledge Christs Righteousnesse to be the only meritorious cause of this first justification because that cannot be merited either by Faith Works or any thing that preceedeth pag. 127. that is He procured the infusion of this Grace 4. The materiall cause of this Righteousnesse or Justification they hold to be the soul of man which by the acts of its free-will in Faith Fear Contrition Love Prayer and other dispositions must necessarily concur for disposing to the receiving of this Grace and that as a cause without which it is not attained for faith the forecited Author lib. 12. pag. 504. cap. 24. Faith Contrition and such dispositions are laid down in Gods appointment to be the condition of His infusing this Grace and so man obtaineth this Justification when of his free-will and otherwayes he is congruously disposed to receive the same and saith he pag. 524. God infuseth Grace with respect to mans contrition idea infundit quia contritus other wayes not Although these dispositions be not de condigno meritorious of it yet they are matter whereby or out of which it is brought forth as a pre-existing materiall cause and in this mans soul is not the subject capable only which we say but the materiall cause 5. For the way how or instrumentall cause by which this is applied because this is so lesse necessary than other causes for it cannot profit if it be not applied they maintain that to be done by the Sacraments of the Church although some name the Word and Ministers also these according to their grounds confer this Grace ex â—pare operatoâ— or by the applying of them to persons so disposed especially Baptism and Pennance that is the Priests absolution after confession which to them is a sacrament this they say ex Dei ordinatione attrito confert gratiam pag. 68 and if there be noâ— occasion of the Sacrament they may have it in their vow and for be accepted without it pag. 225. Baptism they say conferreth it injusto poenitentia contrito 〈◊〉 justâ—â— Therefore are these two Sacraments simply necessary to them the first for originall sin the second for actuall 6. When one is thus justified by this first Justification although the blot of sin be removed and the person be just and holy there remaineth yet satisfaction to be made for the removing of the punishment at least in part and that as some affirm satisfaction condign as Vasquez 3. part disp 1. cap. 11. for which end they prescribe their Pilgrimages Pennances Fastings Vowes Almes Dotations and even Purgatory it self and Soul masses come in here for removing of the punishment and making the satisfaction to God for their guilt And because where there are many sins it will draw to thousands of years in Purgatory for they prescribe sometimes 5.7.10 or 20. years for one sin and they may be multiplied in one day and so draw to a great length therefore it is to them as Bellarmin calleth it a great difficulty what cometh of such whose satisfaction is not compleat as at the day of Judgement seing it may draw 20000. years He answereth it either by the Popes indulging of it or by the greater intensnesse of suffering whereby to 300. or 400. years that may be contracted De indulg lib. 1. cap. 9. col 1174. 7. Because heaven cannot be obtained according to their principles
imputation of Christs Righteousnesse Justification by Faith c. are things so essentiall unto the up-making of a sinners breach with God and that yet all of them are so great strangers even in the very name to the Popish way of justification and materially inconsistent with the same it cannot be of God More particularly we will find it overturn 1. the nature of Justification and at best it doth put in Sanctification in the room thereof and there is never any distinct ground laâ—d by which a sinner may come to receive a sentence of absolution before God but this to wit Justification is lost by the former Doctrine and they acknowledge no such thing distinct from Regeneration or Sanctification as if no such act as Justification were needfull or mentioned in Scripture as distinct from these and in effect it leaveth a sinner to a way of Salvation that wanteth Justification in it and therefore cannot profit him For by denying that which is the formall cause of Justification they deny it self seing that giveth it a being 2. It derogateth from the nature of Grace and that in severall respects 1. As to graces efficacie that it hangeth at mans free-will 2. As to its Soveraignity that it boundeth it to mans disposing of himself 3. As to its freedom in that it appointeth mans own satisfaction for the removing of punishment and his own merit for the obtaining of reward and as to its spirituall sublime way of working making it carnally to be conferred ex opere operato 3. It enervateth the merit of Christ For at the best it attributeth to that only the restoring of a Covenant of Works which may be entered keeped and broken according to mens working and as it were the procuring to men a new stock of habituall Grace with which they are to trade and procure their own happinesse by their after merit In reference to which if they fail Christs merit and their habituall Grace will not profit them Therefore the weight of obtaining life is laid there But the removing of the punishment and the obtaining of the reward they ascribe to humane satisfaction and good Works and that by reason of their own intrinsick worth without the imputation of Christs merit except in respect of the generall influence formerly alleaged yea they fear not to call Saints their Redeemers in so far as by their works of Supererogation they suppose them to have satisfied in some thing for them as Bellar. asserteth lib. 1. de indulg cap. 4. col 1161. and at most they are sanctified by Christs merit but after that they do for themselves 4. It wrongeth the Lord Himself 1. In His Grace as hath been said 2. In His Justice as if He were to be satisfied by creatures satisfaction and that in such things as many men would not be pleased with yea they scare not to affirm that such holinesse could not but have satisfied Him and merited although Christ had never suffered which sheweth also how little they respect Christs merit as the forcited Suarez pag. 484. and 486. afterteth 3. It wrongeth His soveragnity in that it tyeth Him in proper Justice to be mans debter and that not by vertue of His promise only but from the consideration of the intrinsick value and merit of mens good works that He were not just if He did not reward them 5. It wrongeth Gods Covenant for either it alloweth no Covenant at all or quite altereth the nature and tearms thereof and turneth it to Works as hath been said For it doth still make the stipulation on mans part the same which doth constitute the form of the Covenant of Works however one be enabled to perform that stipulation which certainly was by Grace even to Adam 6. It enervateth Faith excluding altogether that Faith that receiveth Christ and taketh hold on Him and closeth with the Covenant of Grace and leaveth no more to a Believer but a naked assent to the Truth of God which is in the devils and utterly secludeth Faith from any particularity of application in the making of our peace with God in any respect 7. It overturneth the Truth concerning mans naturall estate in giving him a free-will in reference to spirituall good and that before the infusion of Grace and in making this acting of free-will a necessary disposition to Justification and a necessary condition of merit 8. It corrupteth the holy Law of God 1. In its end as if now it were to be the condition of Gods Covenant upon which life is to be attained 2. In its meaning as if it did not condem naturall concupiscence and many other things are exempted by them from it that they may make the fulfilling thereof possible 9. It denyeth the true nature of sin and maketh many things that are contrary to the Law of God to be no sin as by its excluding of the remainings of originall sin and many others by that fond distinction of venial and mortal sins from being accounted sins that make men lyable to eternal wrath 10. It overturneth the nature of the Sacraments 1. In making these to be Sacraments which are not as Pennance Extream unction c. 2. In attributing other ends and another manner of attaining to these ends than agreeth with the Word or can quiet a conscience in reference thereto as the conferring of Grace ex opere operato 11. It doth not leave Discipline undestroyed for it abuseth the power of the keyes in this absolution to make up a Sacrament and confer grace and give Indulgences and such-like which no sober man will think a sufficient way for founding of his peace or to be a defence against a challenge in the day of Judgment 12. It doth altogether overturn that consolation that God alloweth His people For 1. there is great anxiety in the supposed way of attaining it 2. No certaintie of having of it and so it can yeeld comfort to none 3. According to their principles it may be lost and one that is justified to day may be in a stare of damnation tomorrow 4. It maketh their recovery difficult and almost desperat for as Bellar. in the forecited place asserteth it may have with it 20000. years continuance in purgatory Of this uncomfortablnesse and of all this matter more may be seen on Chap. 9. Lect. 1. 13. It excludeth knowledge and cryeth up ignorance So that Bellar. lib. de Iustific doth not fear to say that Faith ought rather to be defined by ignorance than knowledge per ignorantiam potius quam per notitiam 14. It overturneth and corrupteth the nature of holinesse and good works and all spirituall worship putting in I cannot tell what will-worship externall rites c. in the place of all practice mumbling and muttering unknown words for prayer afflicting of the body for mortification and many such like things have they These are but a part of the horrible absurdities of this way and yet we suppose are sufficient to demonstrate the truth of what we assert to
with the woman her self 537 538 E WHat is meant by the Saints reigning upon earth 292 By Earth is understood the visible militant Church and not alwayes the unconverted world 345 346 Who are to be understood by the Earth and them that dwell therein 558 What is the proper and immediate effect of Christs purchase to the Redeemed 307 What we are to understand by the twenty four Elders spoken of Chap. 4. 273 What the Elders question and Iohn's reply and the Elders answer do import Chap. 7.13 14. where that innumerable multitude are described 398 399 Civil and morall men may be great enemies to the Church and Religion 354 Why these Epistles are directed to the Church-guides or Angels see Angel Wherein all the Epistles agree and direction how to make use of them 66 67 If any truely Godly may be led away into Errour 166 That Satan aimeth mainly to seduce Christs servants unto Errour and why 167 That it is a great aggravation of Errour when Christs servants are seduced thereby and why ibid. 168 That repentance for Errour is very rare and why ibid. Some Errours inconsistent together and opposit one to another wherewith the Church may be at once assaulted 383 384 F FAith necessary to Justification vid. Justification Different opinions about the way of Faiths concurring thereto 236 Some considerations and distinctions laid down for clearing the way how Faith concurreth 237 Faith only the condition of Justification 238 A double peculiarity of Faith beyond any other grace in the point of Justification one of being the condition of the Covenant which floweth from the Lords extrinsick appointment another of being an instrumental cause which floweth from its intrinsick aptitude 240 That Faith doth peculiarly concur in the point of Justification and that Works do not concur therewith cleared and proven 240 241 The main act of saving Faith 306 Whether Faith and other saving graces be the fruit of Christs purchase 308 They who are sound in the Faith will be exceeding tenacious of their testimony 363 Marks of that fear which we should shun 45 How Christ's feet are like unto fine brasse vide Brasse How Christ's eyes are said to be as a flame of fire 38 There is a fire coming from the Altar which hath terrible effects 416 Of the change made by fire at the great day 756 What we are to understand by those fountains and rivers mentioned chap. 8. ver 10. 427 428 The fountain of life what 762 G A Gift for the Ministery what it is and what it includeth 199 200 What we are to understand by the sea of glasse and what by standing thereupon 274 275 602 603 Glory is the compleat outgate of Believers trials 393 That there is but one God and three distinct persons in the Godhead where of the expressions used in this mysterie 5 6 7 8 Whether God intended the salvation of all men conditionally in giving Christ to die 300 How can the glorified behold God since He is invisible and whether they all alike enjoy Him 773 774 How great a God He is whom we worship 397 There is nothing which can be a ground of praise but it is in God ibid. Gods people in their difficulties would strengthen themselves in the faith of future glory 400 What enemies we are to understand by Gog and Magog 737 Why is the Church compared to Gold since there is so much corruption in it 51 52 The Gospel at its first coming amongst a people ordinarily prevaileth most and why 342 343 A flourishing state of the Gospel is not long free of errors and offences following it 354 355 Church government opposed by Satan and the reason thereof 82 83 84 That there is a Government in the Church distinct and independent from Civil-government proven and objections answered 85 to 89 That it is not arbitrary for the Church to confederate for governing the Church but that which de jure ought to be done 90 Absurdities wherewith a Church government distinct from the Civil is loaded answered 93 94 Wherein the power of this government consisteth and who is the proper subject thereof handled both negatively and positively 97 98 99 How little reason men have to be jealous of this government 100 101 102 103 Concerning the nature and difference of common and saving grace 120 How a man should try the sincerity of his grace 123 Baxter's opinion about the difference betwixt common and saving grace related which doth not really differ so far from the common opinion as at first it would seem to do 125 126 Two distinctions laid down to clear the difference between common and saving grace and wherein the difference lyeth 127 That the habit of saving grace in the renewed doth dâ—ffer from any thing which can be in the unrenewed 129 130 That there is a difference also between the acts of a gracious man and acts of any other proven by instances and arguments 131 to 139 The trial of grace by its kind is safest and that which discovereth hypocrisie best this is Christs way the contrary is attended with inconveniences 133 134 Grace is a necessary qualification for a Minister and in what respects which is much to be regarded both in peoples calling him and in Presbyteries admitting him neither is it impossible to take trial herein and what length may be attained and aimed at in this trial which doth not infer but overturn the rigid way of trying Church-members 202 to 209 The grace of our Lord Jesus is that which a gracious man wisheth to himself and others as that which is comprehensive of all happinesse 781 782 H IT is not indifferent for persons to hear whom they will and the evils that attend it 64 When new errors may be esteemed old heresie 155 Heresie and error wait ordinarily upon the Churches outwardly prosperous condition 383 Heresie and error one of the greatest plagues whereby God in His holy justice punisheth those who receive not the truth in love ibid. Heresie and error a terrible judgement and what the nature of it is 422 The heresies of the Arians Macedonians Nestorians c. when and how suppressed 536 537 Who they are whom Hereticks seek mainly to seduce 166 What an excellent condition it is to be in Heaven 394 Some beginning of Heaven here and wherein it consisteth 402 How we are to understand the passing away of the Heaven and the Earth and what this new Heaven is 753 754 Whether the Heavens and Earth which now are be substantially changed ibid. Some things premitted to the glorious description of Heaven 757 Heavens happinesse set forth and described 759 760 A more particular amplification of Heavens happinesse 761 to 772 Where Hell is and whether any materiall fire be there 739 No coming to Heaven without holinesse 763 764 How we are to understand the number of ten horns 648 The type of the white horse explained 340 341 The type of the red horse 344 345 To what time these persecutions relate
possible upon mans side as a satisfaction to that Justice there is an external righteousnesse provided to wit the satisfaction of the Mediator which being imputed to the sinner is in law to be accepted as satisfactory for him by vertue of the Covenant of Grace and by vertue thereof he is to be absolved and discharged as if he himself had satisfied this is the meritorious cause of our Justification 3. This satisfaction of the Mediator is not imputed to all nor to any but upon the terms agreed upon to wit that it be received and rested upon Therefore the Gospel is Preached and this righteousnesse is not only revealed therein but offered thereby to all who shall by Faith receive the same in which respect the Gospel â—s it is contained in the Word and the Preaching thereof is â—oâ—â— only called the external instrumental cause of our Justification 4. When by the Power of Gods Spirit the sinner is brought to receive this offer and to rest upon this righteousnesse as the only ground of his peace and his whole defence against the Law before the Justice of God then according to the offer he becometh interested in this righteousnesse and Christ becometh his righteousnesse who is by this receiving of Him put on by the Believer and by this he may plead absolution from the challenges of the Law before Gods Justice as a debtor may plead absolution from his debt upon his instructing the Cautioner to have payed it And in this respect Faith is called the condition of the Covenant because it is upon this condition that Justification is offered to us therein and upon this condition God becometh our God and Christ our Righteousnesse and it is also called the instrumental cause of our Justification because it acteth by receiving Christ as He is â—olden forth in the Word and if that be justly called the external instrumental cause which doth offer him for our righteousnesse Then may Faith well be called the internal instrumental cause because it doth receive Him for that same end and because by this receiving He becometh our righteousnesse upon which our Justification is grounded Hence 5. upon this receiving of Christ and presenting of His righteousnesse for our defence before Gods Justice that righteousnesse and satisfaction is imputed to us and accounted for ours and upon this our sins are pardoned and we absolved before God and this is that wherein formally our Justification consisteth and this is the end why this counsel is proposed that by receiving of this offered righteosnesse this may be attained This way of restoring of sinners by Grace is often set forth by way of mutual bargain as in Covenanting Treating by Ambassadours Marrying Bâ—ying and such like All which do import a mutuall dosing of a bargain upon mutual terms and thus it is expressed to shew not wherein formally our Justification doth consist but to shew the way and terms by which we may come at it and upon which we close with God and in this respect Faith is called the condition of the Covenant of Grace because it supplieth that place and hath in it that which ordinarily a condition hath that is proposed in making of a mutual bargain sometimes also it is set forth under legall expressions as to lybell an accusation against to charge and arraign a sinner before Justice and then to absolve him from that charge in opposition to condemnation and thus sin is called debt and to punish for it is to exact or require satisfaction and Christ in that respect is called the Cautioner or Surety and His suffering satisfying the pardoning of the sinner is called justifying or absolving in opposition to condemning and the deriving of this from Christ is called imputation or to repute the sinner righteous upon Christs satisfying for him or it is the reckoning of Christs satisfaction on the account of the sinner All which expressions are borrowed from the way of legall and judicial procedour before men The first way sheweth how we become friends with God to wit by Covenanting with Him in Christ Jesus The second sheweth a prime benefit which doth slow from that friendship to wit our Justification These two are not to be conceived different things or successive in time much lesse to be separated but as they be different wayes of holding forth the same thing whereof the one doth especially relate to the means the other to the end and that so as Grace and Justice may be seen to go alongst in this great businesse and that a sinner may be helped to conceive of the same the more distinctly when he hath it moulded in the terms and forms used among men and that under diverse considerations that so he may the more satisfyingly comprehend this mystery of free Justification Concerning which in the general we say 1. That the immediat meritorious cause of our Justification is Christs Righteousness we take for granted for it is the gold here that maketh rich without which the dyvour could not pay his debt it is the raiment which covereth our nakednenesse and therefore the righteousnesse of the Saints must be a put on communicated external and imputed righteousnesse so that supposing a man to be pursued before the barr of Gods Justice there is no defence can be proposed but Christs satisfaction which only will be a relevant exception in that Court which in Paul's example is clear Philip. 3.9 as if it were asked Paul what will thou flie to in that day Only to be found in Him saith he not having my own righteousnesse which is by the works of the Law but that which is by Faith in Christ. Thus Christ is our Righteousnesse and we are righteous in Him as He was made sin for us for that opposition 2 Corinth 5.21 doth evince this but our sins were imputed to Him and so were the immediat ground upon which He was found liable to Justice in that same manner therefore His Righteousnesse must be the immediate cause of our being absolved seing His Righteousnesse must be transferred to us as our sins were to Him as is said 2. That this Righteousnesse of the Mediator is immediatly imputed to us hath also been accounted a truth amongst the Orthodox hitherto that is that as a cautioners paying of the debt being instructed in a Court is sufficient for absolving of the debtor from the creditors pursuit because in the Law the cautioners paying in the debtors name is reckoned as if the debtor had paid it and so it is imputed to him and accepted for him so it is here And this way of imputing Christs Righteousnesse immediatly doth serve exceedingly 1. to humble the sinner when that whereby he is justified is not in himself this being certain that we are more proud of what is supposed to be in us than of what is imputed to us even as a dyvour hath lesse to boast of when the cautioners paiment is immediatly imputed to him for his absolution than if by his
industrie he had procured something to pay for himself although the stock had been freely bestowed on him by the cautioner 2. It serveth to commend Christ and to bound all boasting and glorying in Him who is our Wisdom Righteousnesse Sanctification Redemption 1 Cor. 1.30 for this very end That â—e who glorieth might glory in the Lord. 3. This riddeth marches between the righteousnesse of the two Covenants that the one is inherent and consisteth in Works that is as the Apostle speaketh Tit. 3.5 the righteousnesse or somewhat which we our selves have done the other is without us and cometh by imputation and so is not only distinguished from our own righteousnesse but opposed to it Philip. 3.9 And although this truth be misrepresented by many yet we judge it to be impregnable and that in the great Day the decision will be found favorable thereto when only happy shall they be that shall be thus found in Christ. Thus therefore we are to conceive the terms of the Gospel as if a debaushed dyvour were ready to be apprehended having nothing to pay suppose one should offer to undertake for him and pay the debt so as he might be liberated upon condition that he should acknowledge his benefactor and plead ever his defence against the pursuit upon the cautioners payment and the discharge procured by Him in this respect the cautioners payment is the meritorious cause whereby such a man is absolved to wit because that payment is reckoned for him or imputed to him yet his pleading that defence or producing of that discharge immediatly may be said instrumentally to procure it because it is not the cautioners payment simplie that is sustained as a relevant defence in judgment till that be instructed and except the defence be founded thereon for so the Law provideth so it is not Christs satisfying simplie but His satisfaction pleaded by Faith and â—â—ed unto that justifieth for so the Law of Faith hath enacted yet the producing of such a discharge meriteth nothing but giveth a legall ground of right to the cause that doth merit and so to what is merited And the Lord hath appointed this to be the condition of Justification to wit the pleading of Christs satisfaction before the barr immediatly for 1. that stoppeth all mouths and none can produce that satisfaction but they must necessarily acknowledge emptinesse in themselves Justice and Grace in God and love and fulnesse in the Mediator 2. The pleading of this sheweth a compleat perfect equal evangelick righteousnesse in all whereas if it were any thing in us that were accounted so then it would not be equal if perfect which cannot be said of that which is our righteousnesse or that one man hath better ground to be justified upon and a better righteousnesse than another 3. That Faith is necessary for Justification so that none can expect to be justified but Believers hath been also hitherto almost amongst all uncontroverted till that of late Antinomians have opposed it But the Scripture is very expresse 1. in limiting all the promises of pardon to a Believer 2. in cursing all that believe not and declaring them to be under the curse 3. in placing Faith correlatively taken in the room that Works had in the first Covenant which must be in reference to Justification it self and not the sense thereof only 4. in asserting that we believe that we may be justified Gal. 2.16 c. So that there needeth not much speaking to this beside that many things spoken of Repentance may be applied here And if it be found that Faith is either the condition of the Covenant of Grace or the instrumental cause of Justification This will necessarily follow that there is no Justification without it I know there are some Divines that use different expressions here yet seing they also oppose Antinomians we will not now stick on that There is more difficulty in conceiving of the manner how faith concurreth that there is some eminency in it is acknowledged both by Papists who account it a radicall grace having influence on all other graces and so having special influence on that which they call Justification and also by some others who making works with it to be conditions of the new Covenant do yet acknowledge a special aptitude in it for applying of Christs righteousnesse and that therefore it is the principal condition and other things lesse principal In this â—ndeed these of the last opinion seem to differ from us 1. That they place Faith Repentance and Works in one and the same kind of causality in reference to Justification 2. That this causality is but to account them all causes sine quibus non 3. That all instrumentality is denied to Faith 4. That Faith is not alone the condition from any respect to its immediate acting on its object Christ but as other graces are 5. That Christ is not our immediate Evangelick righteousnesse but Faith properly taken and that as comprehending all other duties and graces under it and so it is both properly taken and improperly 6. That therefore we may be said to be justified by works as by Faith Faith being taken largely for all Although where the thing is clear and Christ is rested on in Justification and His satisfaction acknowledged as is in this case there needeth be no great debate for words and terms of condition imputation instrument c. yet these being still used among Divines we conceive there is no just reason to cast them the use of them having now of a long time made them to passe in this matter without mistake or strict binding of them to the acceptions wherein they are â—sed in other matters much lesse is there reason to cry down the matter expressed by them And it cannot but be sad that such new controversies should be moved We are perswaâ—ed that the reflecting on many worthy men the obscuring of the troden path by new Questions and Objections the confounding of Readers by proposing as it were of a different strain of the Covenant from what formerly hath been preached the giving of an open door to men to propose new draughts in all things and that not in expressions only but also as is alleaged in fundamentall materiall things c. shall be more prejudiciall to edification nor the bringing forth of this shall be usefull for if by this all the former Doctrine of Justification be enervated where are we till now if it stand so as the followers thereof may attain Heaven what is the use of this so full a new mould with so much professed danger in and dissatisfaction with the former will it not be welcome to Papists to have Protestants speaking in their terms and homologating them in condemning the former language of the most eminent Reformers and though unlearned or unread Divines be the Epithers of the opposers of this Doctrine yet possibly experience may shew that such may most readily be the embracers of it I say again when the Church
Adam was in Covenant with God at first yet could he not claim life by vertue thereof till he had continued in the obedience of the Commands and actually performed the same as Servants must do before they can plead for their hire Again the Covenant of Grace is compared to free adoption or a mans entitleing of a stranger to his inheritance upon condition of his receiving that and to Marriage betwixt Man and Wife which is frequent in Scripture not because the Covenant of Grace requireth not holinesse and works but because it doth not require them actually to prâ—â—ede a persons title to all the priviledges covenanted and doth freely entitle him to the same upon his entry therein as a Wife is entitled to what is the Husbands upon her Marriage with him although afterward she be to perform the duties of that relation rather as duties called-for by it than as conditions of it Hence we may call the Covenant of works a servile-covenant and the Covenant of Grace a filial or conjugall Covenant and therefore although holy duties be required in both yet there is difference and the one is of works and the other of Grace Neither is it the difference that works in the one were meritoâ—ious and in the other not for there is proper merit in neither nor is the difference to be placed in this that the one requireth works perfectly holy as the condition thereof and the other Evangelick works not perfectly holy because so there were not the same law for ordering of holy duties to us which they had noâ— that same absolute patern of holinesse for our copy to wit Gods holinesse calling us to be holy as He is holy nor were defects in reference to our perfect holinesse sinfull under the Covenant of Grace if perfection were not required therein all which are false besides that so it were sâ—ill of works But the difference lieth in this that our working is not to be the ground of our right to the inheritance nor actually to precede our right as in the Covenant of Works it was necessary but believing and consenting only This difference betwixt the Covenant of Works and of Grace may be conceived thus Suppose a debtor being sued for his own debt should either plead no debt or that he had paid it or would pay it this is the Covenant of Works Again that of Grace is as a debtor acknowledging debt but being unable to pay pleadeth only the cautioners payment and expecteth to be absolved upon that account and not as if by a cautioners interveening he had all the debt forgiven him to so much or had a new bargain given him for a peny yearly or a pepper-corn in the place of a thousand talents and in a word somuch down or that for gold ure of gold should be accepted For so 1. some would have their peny more weighty than others and thereby be more justified than others or at least have a better ground to be justified upon 2. It would be still the same kind of condition and so the same Covenant in kind mâ—jus minâ—s 〈◊〉 variant speciem for paying of one bushell for an hundred chalders still saith it is victual-rent although it be of Grace that it is so little and indeed so the first Covenant might be called of Grace because the good promised were so far beyond the rent required and so it were but as a man that did at first require a talent for that which were worth much more and should afterward alter and require only a shekel 3. It cannot be so for the sinners charge is not that he wants his peny or pepper-corn but that he hath broken the Law his righteousnesse therefore must be such as doth meet that charge as Rom. 8.34 and so it must be such a righteousnesse as must stand before Justice and be equipollent at least to his own fulfilling the Law or his having satisfied the penalty thereof 4. When the Apostle opposeth the righteousnesse of the Law and Gospel he opposeth not as it were a thousand talents to a peny or one sort of works to an other but the righteousnesse of Christ or to be found in Him to all kind of works whatsoever Phil. 3.9 2 Cor. 5.21 Gal. 3. c. and to have the righteousnesse of Faith and the righteousnesse of Christ and the righteousnesse by Faith are ever one and the same and are still opposed to Works From this also it doth appear that Covenanting doth in order of nature precede Justification because by Covenanting and being in Covenant we come to have a right thereto as to a promise of the Covenant as the accepting of an offered pardon doth go before ouâ— having actuall riâ—ht to the following priviledges or a womans consent before her actuall claim to the Husbands goods though the one is not supposed to be without the other even as the breach of Covenant doth precede our being liable to condemnation by the Law Hence also we may someway gather that there may be some formall different consideration of the condition of Justification from the condition of the Covenant for Justification being a legall judiciall act it must presuppose such a condition as may be a ground in Justice to absolve a sinner and therefore in this Christs satisfaction as presented and pleaded must be the only ground for it is with respect to that only by which a sinner can be justified and this is to be found in Christ Phil. 3.9 Covenanting again being a mutuall deed wherein the Lord condescendeth to make a free offer and to admit in Covenant upon condition of receiving the condition here must be that which entiâ—eth to that thing offered and entereth the person within the bond of the Covenant which must be Faith Hence these two acts of Faith whereby it is defined may be thus conceived 1. It receiveth Christ and so it entereth into and closeth with the Covenant and getteth instantly a title to what is contained therein 2. It resâ—eth on him which must be judicially understood as oâ—â— resteth on a relevant defence and therefore pleadeth it as it is said Rom. 2. that the Iews rested on the Law which was to expect Justification by it and so to rest on the righteousnesse thereof in which sense we now rest by Faith on Christs Righteousnesse this supposeth one to be in Him and in the Covenant and it looketh as such to Justification and in respect of its manner of acting immediately on Christ our Righteousnesse it may well be called the instrumentall cause of our Justification Thus suppose a sinner to be lying under Gods curse and suppose the Mediator to have satisfied and a Proclamation to be made that whatsoever sinner liable to the curse for sin will accept of Christs Righteousnesse and rest thereon he shall be justified 1. A sinner is induced to receive that offer which is done by consenting and submiting to that way of obtaining righteousnesse this is the closing with the Covenant
and with respect to the appointment did receive health yet so as that health was attained by looking thereto in which respect their eye or look might be called instrumental in their health although it was not looking simply but to that Object with respect to the Lords appointment even so it is here it s Christs vertue whereby we are justified yet so as by Faith it is apprehended and according to Gods appointment looked unto and thus as Matth. 7. the eye is called the light of the body because it is the organ by and through which light is brought or letten-in to it so Faith may be called our righteousnesse as it is the mean by which Christs Righteousnesse without us is apprehended brought in as it were and admitted of to be ours 3. Justification is still held forth in judicial expressions as is said Now as an accused party their producing of a Law for them or a discharge may be said to be instrumentall in their own absolution although it be only the vertue of the discharge given-in that doth procure the same so may Faith be said instrumentally to justifie us as it presenteth for us Christs satisfaction before the justice of God And so it is here as in humane Courts for although some Advocates it may be plead better and some worse yet suppose that they all produce the same discharges and the same Laws in favours of their Clients they might all be called instrumental in their absolution and the ground of their absolvitours would be equal whereas if their act of pleading without respect to what is pleaded were considered it would not be so even so here though some mens faith be more strong and others more weak yet all apprehending the same satisfaction of Christ there is equal sharing in Justification which could not be if Faith did not concur instrumentally in the use-making of Christs Righteousnesse even as of the only immediate Evangelick-righteousnesse as it respecteth our Justification because if Faith be considered in it self and not as with the object apprehended by it it is not equal even in those that are justified 4. See it in miraculous Faith as it concurreth for attaining of a particular benefit so doth saving Faith for attaining of Justification for that there is an equal influence of both upon their respective effects cannot be denied Now that miraculous Faith might be said someway to concur instrumentally for health is clear for it is said that some had Faith to be healed to receive vertue from Christ c. which others had not and accordingly the effects are attributed both to their Faith and to Christs Power therefore it may be so here to wit Justification may flow from Faith as the instrumental cause and from Christs Righteousnesse as the meritorious 5. In the ordinary similitude of Marriage or solemn Covenanting it may be seen for actuall consenting or the hand that writeth the name may be said to be instrumental in the closing of the bargain or in attaining the priviledges that follow thereon and the hand hath an other influence than the foot or eye although these also be necessary yet it is not consenting or subscribing simply but such and such in reference to such Objects and Covenants even as it is not the tongue its speaking truths and the reaching forth of discharges simply that are instrumental in mens courts for attaining absolution but it is the speaking of such pertinent truths or producing of such sutable discharges that cometh under that name and this is all we intend when we say that Faith concurreth instrumentally even to hold out the immediate cause of our Justification to be Christ apprehended by Faith so that Faith and Christ are both necessary but differently and so also that the efficacie of all the concurrence of Faith may be from Christ the Object from which it is not to be separated when it is said to justifie The other thing peculiarly attributed to Faith is that it is the condition of the Covenant of Grace properly which can be said of no other grace or work This is to be understood as is above expressed to wit that Faith is that which on our side is called-for for constituting of us Covenanters and giving us right to the great comprehensive promise thereof that God may be our God and upon the performing of which that which God hath promised in it may be expected as is before said That Faith is thus the condition peculiarly and not Works nor any other grace beside what is said afterward upon Repentance may thus appear 1. Because Faith only hath that peculiar aptitude of receiving Gods offer and returning of our engagement and so for making the bargain mutually to be closed and Faith cannot be conceived to be exercised but the bargain must be conceived to be closed and that person to be in Covenant therefore the exercising thereof must be peculiarly the condition 2. If Faith be that which peculiarly riddeth marches between the Covenant of Grace and the Covenant of Works and curse and a Believer so ipso be freed from the curse because he is a Believer and doth rest on Christ Then Faith must be peculiarly the condition of the Covenant of Grace But the former cannot be denied and is clear Ioh. 3 18 36. 3. If Works concur in the same causality with Faith Then it must either be Works before one be in Covenant or Works thereafter But it can be neither not before one be in Covenant because such Works cannot be accepted nor secondly after because then they could not be the condition upon which we are admitted for so we would be accepted before the condition be performed If it be said that the same reasoning will seclude Faith because if Faith be the condition Then it must either be Faith before we be in Covenant or after c. Answ. It followeth not because its Faith neither before nor after our entrie but that which enters us that is the condition and it cannot be conceived before nor after being an instantaneous act as solemn consenting in Marriage is not before nor after as it constituteth Marriage but instantly Here still observe that when we speak of a condition we speak of that condition whereby one is admitted within the Covenant and not of any thing that may be implied to be performed by one admitted already to Covenant because that must be the condition of the Covenant properly that intitleth one to the priviledges covenanted But what entereth one into this Covenant doth intitle him to the priviledges covenanted Therefore it must properly be the condition and Faith being that is therefore alone so to be esteemed Which we may further urge thus either being admitted to the Covenant one is freed from the curse and instated in all the priviledges of the Covenant or not It cannot be said not because that were to make one a Covenanter and not a Covenanter and one cannot be conceived to be in Covenant with God
our righteousnesse properly there needed no imputation of Christs after our believing except it be said as some Papists say that it is imputed to make up our defects and to make our holinesse acceptable and so it were our Faith and Works that should be justified by the imputation of Christs Righteousnesse and not our persons which is contrary to Scripture 2. This is upon the mater the same with what we said as is hinted for suppose a debtor to be pursued he pleadeth absolution because his Cautioner hath payed and he produceth the discharge given to him wherein that is acknowledged his pleading so and producing of that discharge may be someway called the ground that giveth him right in Law to have that payment of the Cautioners imputed to him yet his absolution floweth from the complex businesse not of his pleading simply but of the cautioners paying his pleading of that payment and the Laws accepting of that defence and imputing of it to him and so from all these together his absolution floweth just so it is here our Justification floweth from Christs satisfaction being accepted and rested on by us and imputed to us by God And therefore thirdly though Faith properly be the condition upon which Christs Righteousnesse is imputed to us I had rather call it the mean by which it is apprehended yet it followeth not that therefore Faith properly taken is our righteousnesse and as such is imputed to us and accounted so seing still this presupposeth the imputation of Christs Righteousnesse in order of nature to interveen betwixt our believing and our Justification and therefore that His Righteousnesse imputed must be properly our righteousnesse seing we upon account and considered as such to wit as having Christs Righteousnesse imputed to us are justified and upon that Righteousnesse imputed Justification is immediatly grounded Yet Fourthly All this doth say nothing for Faith largly taken as comprehending all Gospel-duties for though Faith strictly taken be necessary for having right to Christs Righteousnesse or having it imputed to us yet are not actuall works so by any means but through the imputation of Christs Righteousnesse we are first accepted and then bring forth these good works which sheweth that they do not go before that imputation of Christs Righteousnesse or our Justification but that rather they follow thereupon For if we cannot do good works till we be Sanctified and if none be Sanctified but such as are Justified and these two cannot be separated no not for an instant of time for it cannot be said that a man is Sanctified but not yet Justified aut contra Then it will follow that a man is Justified before he hath actuall works it is of such we debate and not of habituall seminall holinesse for he may be and is Sanctified before he can have them much more ere he persevere in them And so consequently actuall good works cannot concur to Justification as Faith doth or be the condition thereof But the former is true and clear Therefore so is the latter also which is the thing that was in Question Lastly we say if Faith properly and largely taken according to their meaning or yet strictly be imputed to us for Righteousnesse Then either Christs Righteousnesse is not imputed but our Faith only or Christs Righteousnesse and our Faith properly taken also But neither can be said not the first to wit that the Righteousness of Christ is not imputed to us but Faith only That I suppose is not intended neither can the latter be said viz. that Faith is imputed to us for Righteousness and Christ also for then Christ is either imputed for our totall righteousness and so Faith cometh not in or as a partiall righteousness and that is absurd Again either His Righteousness is imputed to us before we believe and so before our Faith can be imputed which is false for that would make Christs Righteousness to be ours before we were in Covenant internally Or it is imputed to us after we believe and so after our own Faith is imputed to us and accepted for Righteousness But that cannot be for then we would be righteous before the imputation of Christs Righteousness which is absurd or lastly both must be imputed together which also cannot be for if both be imputed together properly Then both in the same sense or kind of causality or in diverse senses the first cannot be said for that would make both meritorious which is disclaimed if the last be said then it must be so as the one is imputed to us for our legall-righteousness to wit Christs satisfaction and the other as our Evangelick to wit Faith But 1. That is the thing already spoken to and doth divide Christ and our Gospel-righteousness Or 2. It turneth to this that Christ is the thing that satisfieth Justice but Faith is the ground or mean by which we come to have title to that satisfaction which is the thing that is granted and we suppose is the thing that by some is intended and is in sum that to which others give the name of the instrumentall cause And if so there needeth not be contending for words for both are acknowledged to wit that by Christs Righteousnesse only as the meritorious cause we are justified and that there is no right to plead Justification by that except by Faith or upon condition of believing by which actuall right to Christ and by Him Justification is obtained Further it cannot be said that they are imputed joyntly for then 1. Either that imputation must be an instantaneous act at the first believing or exercise of Faith and so Justification must be an instantaneous act also which they will not grant because the Faith that is imputed according to them is Faith and the exercise of holinesse persevered in for which cause Justification to them is a continued act 2. It must be instantaneous but not imputed till Faith and Holinesse be persevered into and by this neither Christs Righteousnesse nor Faith is imputed to the person not can he be accounted in friendship with God or to be in Christ or righteous till his life be closed for he cannot be accounted so till he be justified and he is not justified till these be imputed to him for Righteousnesse Or 3. that imputation must be a continued act from the first closing with Christ till the end But how can that be For 1. It is hard to conceive the act of the imputation of our faith to be continued but more hard to conceive the imputation of Christs Righteousnesse to be a continuing act for Christs Righteousnesse at the first is perfect and it is to be imputed to the Believer if therefore one may be called a Believer it is to be imputed to him instantly 2. Imputation being a judiciall word and act it supponeth an instant sentencing of such a righteousnesse to belong to such a person as it were and to be accepted for him for if he hath not perfect right there is
mutare voluntatem potest tamen velle mutationem There is more difficulty in answering the second Question to wit in what respects Repentance is necessary for obtaining the pardon of sin and how it doth contribute to the obtaining thereof As Antinomians give too little to it on the one hand so on the other Papists Socinians and Arminians give too much To guard therefore against those extremities we say against Papists 1. That Repentance is not necessary as having any efficiency in it for the expelling of sin by the in-bringing of a contrary gracious quality as light doth expell darknesse For remission of sins being to them the infusing of habituall Grace and Repentance being a part of that inherent Holinesse In this respect they account Repentance necessary as a part of our formall Righteousnesse by which sin is expelled and the person constituted formally and inherently just This indeed is an absurd overturning of the nature of true remission of sins which consisteth in Gods not imputing the same to us or in His blotting them out and altereth the whole strain of the Gospel 2. We say that Repentance doth not contur for the obtaining of the pardon of sin as any materiall cause disposing the soul for the receiving of a gracious quality for the expelling of sin or as being a pre-requisit matter to Gods working thereof in the soul. This we reject as absurd upon the grounds foresaid for though we acknowledge the soul of man yea the whole man to be the object whom God doth pardon yet pardon being a judiciall act of His Grace it can admit of no material cause 3. Neither doth Repentance concur for the obtaining of pardon by way of merit as if there were any congruity or condignity therein for obtaining thereof This marreth the freedom of forgivenesse and encroacheth upon Christ Jesus His Offices who is the alone immediate and meritorious cause of our being accepted and obtaining pardon 4. Repentance doth not concur by way of satisfaction as if the grief that doth accompany it upon our sensitive part within were some satisfaction or recompence for the offence committed against God and so had influence as it were to procure the easier terms from Him in which respect they do place whippings fastings and such like as satisfactions without concurring for the remission of sin at least in its temporall punishment as this doth within This also we abhorre as derogatory to the alone satisfaction of our Lord Jesus who by His once offering up of Himself hath perfected for ever them that believe Heb. 10.14 5. Neither do we establish a Sacrament of pennance thereby instrumentally to communicate remission of sins that is habitual grace as they understand it by the power of the keyes in the Priests absolution and that ex opere operato this we disclaim as being without any warrand in the Word and certainly cannot be imagined to be the thing called-for in the forecited Scriptures These wayes are indeed pleaded-for by the Papists who thereby do overturn the whole nature of Repentance remission of sins and the Covenant of Grace and do enervate the consolation of poor penitents as may be further spoken-to from Chap. 9. but are disclaimed by us in Doctrine and ought to be adverted to in practice least the Doctrine of the necessity of Repentance be abused beyond that which is warrantable We have for that cause disclaimed these assertions explicitely as also that thereby many and almost all the Antinomian arguments and calumnies may be answered and removed who have nothing ryfer in their mouths and writtings than this that the pressing of the absolute necessity of Repentance is a point of Popery a marring of the freedom of Grace a crying up of inherent holinesse and such like ◠which are most injust as is said The Socinians and Arminians do also acknowledge the necessity of Repentance and although they give it no proper causal influence upon the remission of sins yet do they miscarry in reference thereto in these respects which we also disclaim 1. Albeit Repentance be necessary yet it is not necessary as any pre-requisite qualification to be performed by us in the strength of our own free will This were indeed to make nature a sharer in our conversion and to give it occasion of boasting contrary to the scope of the Gospel which doth exclude that I is indeed we who repent formally and our will and soul is the subject wherein it is wrought and to say Christ is formally the penitent we abhor yet it is by the strength of Grace working in us to will and to do Phil. 2.13 that we do repent and that our wills are enabled to elicite acts of true Repentance so that if we will consider these acts of Repentance as they are acts simply and are in Categori◠actionis they are our acts and performed by our wills as the next formall cause producing them But if we consider them as such that is as gracious and acts of saving Repentance in Categoriá qualitatis they are not from us but do proceed from the grace of God alone sweetly and powerfully determining the will in the bringing forth of them 2. We say Repentance hath no moving efficacy in it so as to be an externall impulsive cause or ratio movens why God should forgive sins as Repentance and resenting of wrongs committed have influence to move provoked men to forgive and pity those that have offended them This seemeth plausible-like to men who cast the way of grace in a mould of humane and naturall reason and inadvertingly in practice may be fallen into by many who though they disclaim a meritoriousnesse in their Repentance yet are ready to conclude some prevailing perswasive efficacy to be in it which appeareth by this that when they are satisfied with their own Repentance they more confidently expect pardon and when their sensiblnesse in Repentance drieth up they are ready to question it as if there were some weight in their Repentance of it self to prevail with God and perswade him as it were to pity This I say is not to be admitted because Gods will being absolutely pure simple and soveraign is not capable of any motus from any cause without it self and forgivnesse being an act simplie of Grace and ordered alone in all its manner of proceeding by His soveraignty there can no reason moving Him thereto be imagined although He want not reason in His acting as they say Datur ratio voluntatis divina sed non ejusdem movens This also would propose the most high and holy One as some way having passions to be wrought upon like unto us and would obscure exceedingly the freedome and soveraignity of Grace which hath alwayes its rise in his own bosome Therefore it is assered by Divines in this case that properly it is not our Repentance that maketh our sins either actually to be remitted or yet to be remissible but God Grace alone for if Grace had not ordered the
connexion between Repentance and Remission upon grounds laid down by it self no sinners could have expected pardon not would their sins have been remissible even upon supposition of their Repentance more than if there had not been Repentance if such a supposition may be made 3. We say that Repentance doth not concur for the obtaining of remission of sins as it is a piece of our own new obedience and of the condition of the Covenant of Grace and so now to be imputed to us with Faith and the other Graces for Righteousnesse in stead of the perfect holinesse which was the condition of the Covenant of Works as if now God in the pardoning of penitent sinners their sin should not respect Christs imputed Righteousnesse as the immediate cause making them acceptable to Him but the very acts themselves of Faith Repentance c. and so the first Covenant of Works will be mans performing of all holy duties according to the Commands perfectly which Covenant being now broken and man made unable by sin to perform the condition thereof this opinion supponeth Christs satisfaction to have procured which yet Socinians deny as any procuring cause of a new Covenant upon these terms that sinners who are short of perfect Holinesse and yet do believe and repent of their sins should be accepted and these acts of Believing Repentance c should be accounted to them by vertue of that Covenant as if their obedience had been perfect This way is not sufferable because it shutteth out Christs imputed Righteousnesse from being the next immediate and meritorious cause of our Justification and continueth the Covenant to be in substance a Covenant of Works for its form although it place no condignity of merite in these works yet by this it is still some work of outs that is the ground of our defence before Gods Justice and so cannot be admitted for even Faith it self in this case cometh not in to be considered but as it uniteth with its object to wit Christ Jesus in the promise as hath been said These wayes which are more grosse being disowned so that there is neither ground to charge us with Popery nor Arminianisâ—us for our asserting the necessity of Repentance we come now to show positively in what respect it is necessary 1. We say Repentance is necessary not only by necessity of precept but also of mids necessitate praecepti medii that is not only as a duty laid on by God but as a mean appointed by Him for attaining that end to wit remission of sins in which respect a penitent or repenting sinner may be said to be using the means how pardon is attained and to be in the way of obtaining it which cannot be said of a sinner that repenteth not For although Repentance as absolutely considered in it self doth not make a penitent any nearer unto remission yet it being considered in respect of Gods contrivance and of the order which He hath laid down and the promise which He hath subjoyned to it it may well be called a way and mean for attaining to pardon 2. Beside this there is a kind of congruity and suitablnesse in this order which God hath laid down by subjoyning the promise of pardon to it thus it is more suitable that a penitent sinner should have pardon than an impenitent because he is a more congruous object to speak so for grace to shew it self gracious upon than if there were a continuing in security Neither hath this congruity any causality or merit in it but only doth shew Gods wise contrivance in appointing a mids suitable to His end which is the glorifying of His Grace and the making of Himself to be precious to the sinner 3. Repentance concurreth in the obtaining of pardon by qualifying the sinner in reference to the promise wherein pardon is proposed which is not to be understood as if this qualification were a thing previous to a saving work of Gods Grace or as if it did dispose the subject for receiving of any inherent quality Or lastly as if there were any merit in it to commend the person so qualified unto God for the attaining of pardon these things we have already rejected But it may be said to qualifie a person in these two respects 1. That it putteth one within the reach of the promise which speaketh pardon to none but to such who are so qualified and thus it qualifieth the person meerly with respect to the promise and the qualification contained it â— and so a true penitent sinner may be said to be qualified for remission and may take hold of the promises that make offer of the same which no other not so qualified can do because the promises are peculiarly holden forth to such who are so qualified 2. It qualifieth the sinner in reference to the promise as it doth dispose him to accept the offered salvation freely and to rest upon Christ alone for that end Thus it qualifieth for obtaining of pardon as felt poverty qualifieth a proud begger to receive willingly an offered almes and to be thankfull for it neither is the almes the lesse free that it requireth one sensible of poverty to receive it but it is rather the more free and acknowledged to be so when it is conferred even so it is here There is one thing more questioned even among Orthodox Divines that is if Repentance may be acounted a condition of the Covenant with Faith and if in that respect it be necessary and do concur for the obtaining of Pardon For answer That we may not disgresse long in this we shall lay down some assertions after we have premitted this distinction A condition may be taken more largely for any thing required as an antecedent for obtaining the thing promised in this sense there may be many conditions 2. It may be taken more strictly and properly for that upon which the closing of the Covenant dependeth and that which as such cannot be considered but as implying the closing thereof 3. A condition may be taken as it looketh to some consequent following the close and is virtually implied therein As for instance in Marriage there are several things necessary as the hearing of the proposall the believing historically the truth of the thing heard an esteem of it and a desire to have it with a loathnesse to offend the party proposing it These are supposed to be requisit and necessary in one that is called to Marrie that she should forget her kindred and her fathers house and cleave to the husband and so forth Yet none of these resolutions or qualifications are properly the condition of the Marriage-covenant but the parties consent to accept the offered match upon the terms proposed The actuall and positive solemn declaration whereof in the approven way is that which formally closeth the match and entitleth the party so accepting to the husband which none of these former qualifications did't after which there followeth the performance of Marriage-duties the obligation
themselves principall duties and great helps in all the practice of holinesse 3. He presseth these exhortations to duties with motives which comprehend both the prejudice of neglecting them and the advantage that cometh by the performing of them Again when He proposeth the offer of the Gospel and inviteth to believe as to the Church of Laodicea He doth 1. open their sinful dangerous and hypocritical case and battereth down the ignorant self-confidence which they had in their own formal profession And 2. He proposeth the right remedie to wit Himself and His benefits His imputed Righteousnesse which can only cover their nakednesse c. 3. He cleareth the terms upon which that gold and white raiment is obtained under these expressions of buying opening hearkening c. And 4. He doth most sweetly and yet most vehemently presse it partly by condescending friendly to counsel and intreat partly by making His offer large free and particular to any man that will open c. and partly by urging His call weightily and rousingly with a behold I stand as if after He had made the offer and had knocked He were now taking instruments in the consciences of hearers thereby as with a nail to fasten His invitation upon them and so pressing their closing therewith or otherwise assuring that He will leave this instrument upon record against them 11. We find what ever the case of the people be that He speaketh unto the up-shot and scope of His message is ever to perswade a closing of the treaty between Him and them Therefore when He chargeth with sin He leaveth not there but commendeth unto them Repentance and giveth a promise of welcoming of them upon that condition when He quarrelleth for hypocrisie and deadnesse in profession He proposeth Christ and adviseth to accept of Him when He exhorteth to duty as to Repentance and Zeal yet even then doth He propose Christs Righteousnesse as the only cure and cover of their nakednesse as in the last Epistle is clear whereby we may see 1. what a Ministers scope should be and whereat he should aim in conviction reproof c. and where he should leave his hearers to wit at Christs feet who is the end of the Law for Righteousnesse And it is not unprofitable even explicitly to make that the use and close of all 2. We may see that the Law and Gospel should be both preached and pressed together and that so as the one seem not to encroach upon the other And especially this would ever be clear that the weight of our peace with God doth not ly upon duties when they are pressed but upon the righteousnesse of Christ. As it is a great practice in a Christian to give the Law and Gospel their due place in practice so is it a main qualification of a Gospel-Minister rightly to ridd marches between the Law and the Gospel This maketh so much insisting in the Epistles to the Romans Galatians c. to keep Justification by Faith in Christ clear and distinct from Works and Duties even when they were much pressed and practised And it is no lesse dangerous to Professors to rest on Duties than to omit them and therefore the necessity of being denied to them in the point of Justification and of resting upon Christs alone is to be cleared and pressed by Preachers as a most necessary and fundamental thing 12. For this cause the nature of the Covenant and Justification by Christ are especially to be cleared where a Church is formall that is free both of errours in Doctrine and grosse scandals in practice and resting there wherefore we see that in the Epistle to the Church of Laodicea which is charged with neither of these our Lord doth most especially insist on this for the beating down of errour and banishing of grosse profanity are but as it were the taking-in the outworks of the devils kingdom therefore when these are gained the main batteries are to be directed against self righteousnesse hypocrisie presumption self-confidence c. that the soul may be brought to receive Christ in earnest and zealously and seriously to study holinesse without which a formal profession will be but as a stone of stumbling 13. We see that our Lord Jesus putteth together an intire mould of the whole Doctrine and practice of Godlinesse giving as at one view a sight of our naturall sinfulnesse and hazard and of the way how these may be remedied so that when He proposeth any quarrel He leaveth not off till He propose also the remedy presse dutie and close with some encouraging conditionall promise This is also profitable for a mixt Auditory especially at solemn times and other occasions wherein people are usually most serious and attentive to give together a view of the Doctrine of the Gospel so that when a conviction is pressed and the Hearer is made somewhat hot he may have some present discovery of the way which he ought to take and that he may either be informed or at least be put in mind of as much of the Gospel as may be a ground of his peace if it be improven though he should never afterward hear any more This we see was the Apostles way in their occasionall Sermons in the History of the Acts wherein the sum of the Gospel is usually comprehended and the Lord himself doth so with Nicodemus Ioh. 3. and though there be difference now in some respect where the Gospel is ordinarily and daily Preached so that this is not so necessary to be done alwayes explicitely as if they had never heard the Gospel before and although it becometh a Minister to draw his Doctrine from some particular Text yet considering that the generality of Hearers are very ignorant of the series of the Gospel and others are weak and inadvertent even in things which they someway know and considering withall that a Minister may have occasion by way of Reason Use Mean Motive Question or otherwayes to hint a view of the Gospel almost from any materiall Doctrine and that without any just imputation of impertinencie we conceive that generally and usually its expedient to follow this manner especially on the Lords Dayes which are most fit for Gospel-doctrines people being then for that end set apart and sequestred from their ordinary bussinesses and when the bodie of the most ignorant people are gathered together This way certainly by Gods blessing would look more like a mean of conversion and hath in experience been ordinarily found so than when now one point and then another are distinctly handled and so the one is either forgotten by the most part before they hear the other or at least is not so warm to them although they have the knowledge thereof And these things being the Text of the Bible to say so and the great subject and earand which Ministers have to insist on It ought not to be accounted grievous because of mens nauseating and loathing of them from the frequent mentioning of them seing to the
usuall to the Prophets whose expressions Iohn often followeth to set out the Church and her troubles under that name because she is the most excellent part of all the World Therefore do they account it sad to all the earth which is sad to her contra See Isa. 24.1 4 5 6 c. where yet the Church is understood as appeareth from vers 5. and therefore the former exposition doth agree well with this expression We take it then for granted that this exposition agreeth well with the scope which is to shew the Churches condition immediately after the Gospel came into the world and her sufferings then that it agreeth well also with the description of the horse in his colour rider commission and weapons We are therefore 3. to consider how it doth agree unto the event which in every thing we will find answerable None that know any thing but know how soon persecution especially killing with the sword followed after the Gospel The Scripture mentioneth it of Stephen Act. 7. of Iames Act. 12. The History of the Acts Paul's frequent reckoning of persecutions and particularly by the sword Rom. 8.35 c. 1 Cor. 1.4 2 Cor. 4 and Chap. 12. 2 Tim. 3.10 c. and the former Epistles to the Churches of Asia make it evident This also is in general made out by the ten severall persecutions which are for their cruelty and universality famous if we may speak so in all Church-History beside what particular murthers were committed in severall places at all times so that the event answereth well both to the type and to the exposition of it More particularly we think this part of the prophesie looketh especially unto the first two persecutions to wit the first raised by Nero which began neer or about the year 66. of our Lord. The second followed with some intervall under Domitian whose persecution began Anno. 97. These were the first who by publick Edicts stirred up the Heathens and all the enemies of the Christians against them to kill murther and torture at their pleasure By those persecutions suffered almost all the Apostles as the History of the Church cleaâ—eth and many other famous Champions of Christ and it came to that height that Christians were accounted all the day long as sheep for the slaughter Rom. 8.36 and could have no certain dwelling place in the world though it was not worthy of them We apply it especially to these two first persecutions Because 1. It agreeth best with the order of time formerly laid down to wit that the second seal is next immediatly unto the first 2. Because the nature of these persecutions and the effects of them which were in a bloudy cruel and open manner driven on by these two beasts one of whom Paul calleth the Liâ—u 2 Tim. 4 17. do suit best with the type formerly expounded though proportionally the following persecutions in their nature are described here as they were bloudy in which respect we will find killing with the sword again to be mentioned vers 8. under the fourth seal This being the exposition of this type as it is propheticall we shall now lay down some generall Doctrines which may be drawn from what is said and further confirm it 1. From renewing this exhortation Come and see Observe That every passage revealed by God for the good of His Church should be taken notice of by them 2. That it is the second beast which is now made use of when the Church is suffering Obs. That our Lord Jesus hath Ministers fitted for suffering as well as for action He hath them who are like Lions to spread the Gospel and therefore the first Preachers or Reformers in a Land are eminently furnished ordinarily with boldnesse and zeal daringly to undertake such a difficult task Again He hath them who are patient like calfes when He calleth for suffering Obs. 3. That fitnesse for patient suffering is a gift necessary and profitable for the edification of the Church and a qualification becoming a Minister of the Gospel no lesse than the former boldnesse and hath work and use in the Church as well as the former hath though it be not alway so shining yet is it not to be despised by any Obs. 4. That our Lord Jesus Christ timeth and trysteth Ministers qualifications according to the task which He hath to do with them whether it be for doing or suffering He hath them accordingly qualified 1. He sendeth out as it were Lions because then He is to triumph over difficulties then come as it were calfes after them because their great work is not so much to gain new ground as to maintain what the former have gained and as it were calfes to endure suffering yet both sorts are employed for one end to preach one Gospel for the edification of the Church â— More particularly from that which is holden forth in the type being compared with the former seal we may Observe That a flourishing Gospel in the World or in a Land is not long without a persecuting sword on the back of it Or ordinarily there is a certain connexion betwixt a conquering Gospel and sad trials upon the Professors thereof Luk. 12.49 50 51. I came to send fire on the earth and what will I if it be already kindled c. Scripture and experience do abundantly confirm this We may only ask How it cometh that persecution followeth so at the heels of the Gospel and what sort of connexion this may be Answ. We will find a threefold connexion between these The first is meritorious procured by the Churches walking unworthy of the Gospel for many despise and reject it others walk unworthy of it the most part sit down under a formall and lukewarm profession and so by not welcoming kindly the white horse they do procure this red horse to be sent out upon them for punishing their hypocrisie This is given for a cause of these first persecutions by some of the blessed Martyrs particularly by Cyprian who laying out the causes of the persecution doth name worldlinesse emulations divisions c. as sins amongst Christians justly provoking God so to exercise them accounting that a chastisement as from God which was persecution as from men See Cyprian in his fourth Epist. of his fourth Book wich is the 8. Epist. pag. 15. Edit Pamelii and frequently See Euseb. lib. 8. cap. 1. The second connexion is finall in respect of Gods purpose who by these persecutions intendeth the bringing about of good ends as to make His truth more manifest to discover the rottennesse of some professors to evidence the honesty of others Many will rejoyce for a time under the profession of the Gospel who when persecution cometh like the seed sown in stony ground Mat. 13. by and by will stumble therefore the Lord in His wisdom letteth a sword pierce through many of His most precious Servants that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed which reason is given Luk. 2.34 35. The third
fully obliterated and dissolved as concerning the Covenant made with the Fathers Rom. 11.26 are now made ready 2. This readinesse is now set out in two expressions 1. figuratively she is cloathed in fine â— linnen clean and white 2. More plainly it is the righteousnesse or justification of the Saints Both may be two wayes understood 1. Of Christs imputed righteousnesse whom we are said to put on Rom. 13. ult and Gal. 3. when by faith we are united to Him and made partakers of His righteousnesse for the hiding of our nakednesse as in His counsell to Laodicea Chap. 3. 2. It may be understood of inherent righteousnesse which also in some respect we are said to put on Col. 3.12 In the first sense it is called clean and white simply for so Christs righteousnesse is without spot In the second sense it is so comparatively or it is cleannesse and whitenesse not absolute but in respect of what they were and in respect of the holinesse of other times This shall now be more 2. The righteousnesse or justification of the Saints is also two wayes understood 1. for a righteousnesse before men evidencing their justification before God so it is said Iam. 2. that Abraham was justified by his works 2. For that which indeed just fieth and is the cause of our justification before God and so Rom. 4. Abraham was not justified by works not only excluding all the works of the ceremoniall Law for it was then not given but even of the morall Law But he was justified by faith in Jesus Christ which was imputed to him for righteousnesse the former is the same with inherent righteousnesse the latter is called imputed Now though we take in both here as they are alway conjoyned and go together and holinesse serveth in a speciall way to make ready and meet for enjoying Christ in Glory when these garments shall be fully white yet we understand here Christs imputed righteousnesse or the righteousnesse of faith especially as that which maketh the Lambs wife ready and that for these reasons 1. This cloathing is that which is the righteousnesse of all Saints and that before God but that of faith was Abrahams before the Law Rom. 4. Davids under the Law Psal. 32. with Rom. 4. and Pauls under the Gospel Philip. 3.9 therefore so here 2. Christs righteousnesse is only spotlesse and clean ours is unclean the best being filthy 3. This readinesse is that upon which the marriage with Christ standeth and serveth to close with Him in that Covenant but that is in the offer he that believeth sâ—â—ll be saved and it is the want of that that casteth and marreth the making of the marriage for holinesse inherent preceedeth not our union with Christ which is our marriage but followeth our consent when the bargain is closed as duties of a person married 4. It agreeth best with the scope in reference to the in-coming of the Iews they are made ready and brought in by the contrary of that for which they were cast off but that Rom. 11. was unbelief stumbling at the stumbling stone in going about to establish their own righteousnesse and not submitting to His Rom. 9. and 10. vers 3. Therefore now that which maketh them ready must be faith and submission to Christs righteousnesse 5. This agreeth best with and is clear from the expressions setting forth the manner how she is made ready and that in two expressions she is cloathed with it that speaketh to the resemblance of putting on something from without in which this readinesse and decoring consisteth and not of what is within as Rev. 3. which pointeth at imputing of righteousnesse 2. That it was granted to her to shew it was not of her self it was given and freely given and gifted to her which saith it is not inherent holinesse for that someway inferreth debt and is opposed to grace Rom. 4.9 and 11. Eph. 2. but it is of grace which is the same with faith that it might be free Rom. 4.16 Eph. 2. and that to all the seed by which it appeareth how we are to reconcile vers 7. with this Thus if we look to the scope as it is propheticall this Verse saith 1. that these Iews on whom blindnesse and hardnesse hath layen long shall in the end in due time be brought in to believe on Jesus Christ and to submit to that righteousnesse which is common to all Saints Gentiles as well as Iews and to take that one way of salvation with the Gentiles which they have so long rejected God shall freely re-ingraft them again in His Church by that same faith which they despised 2. That they at their in-coming into the Church of God at that time shall be more eminently shining in holinesse than formerly when the Gentiles shall provoke the Iews and there shall be a holy emulation amongst them more fully to adorn the profession of the Gospel then shall the number of believers be increased and their qualifications of holinesse at a higher pitch This flourishing estate is promised whatever be of externall peace The confirmation followeth vers 9. where consider 1. who confirmeth 2. What he confirmeth 3. How First The person confirming is not God or Jesus Christ for it had not been a fault vers 10. to have worshipped hmi but is an Angel it is like that Angel who Chap. 17. came to shew Iohn the judgement of the whore and whom it is like God made use of to shew Iohn the things to come Chap. 1.1 That which he confirmeth in an extraordinary way by a speciall commission to write that the thing may be the more observed is set down in these words Blessed are they who are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. The Lamb is our Lord Jesus often called so His marriage here is that vers 7. especially of the Iews in-calling to faith in him It signifieth 1. that betwixt Christ and believers there is a mutuall tye consent and obligation of each to other 2. That it is reall 3. A near tye 4. Kindly and loving 5. Indissolvable 6. For believers advantage to share of what He hath It sheweth in a word a kindly and loving relation between Christ and them beyond what is betwixt Him and others It is called a marriage supper not mainly from that custome as if then suppers had been most rise feasting times at Marriages what ever truth be in it for Mat. 22.3 it is called a dinner that the guests are invited unto but this seemeth to be the cause that Matth. 22. looketh to the Iews first calling at the preaching of the Gospel which they rejected and it is called a dinner they being more timely invited to it with the first This again looketh to their calling which shall be made effectuall when the day draweth near to an end at their restoring therefore it is called the marriage supper as more immediately preceeding the solemnizing fully of the Bridegrooms Marriage when the Queen shall be brought to His
expression yet doth the thing enjoyed in heaven exceed the expression as far as the maker doth Hâ—s work and that which is infinite exceedeth what is finite for expressions cannot be gotten adequat and suitable to the thing The second expression sheweth how this is made out I will be his God and he shall be my son This comprehendeth all yea it is added as an addition to all things â— It is more to be Gods son and to have Him our God than to enjoy all things beside to be His son and so His heirs and joynt-heirs with Christ Rom. 8.17 What is that or rather what is it not Here now is a portion who would covet let them covet this as the best thing one day the truth of this will appear what great blessednesse is here when once His wrath is but a little kindled Psal. 2. ult O set your hearts on this it is the short cut to possess and inherit all things Who in all the world ever reached to enjoy all the earth yet that is little amongst all things but a Believer inheriteth earth heaven God Christ glory peace his soul even all things for God is his and with Him all things 1 Cor. 3.22 23. and will He not give to Him all things Rom. 8.32 yea is He not Himself all things as is said so that in heaven and earth the soul can wish no more Psal. 73.25 See on vers 3. The condition is overcoming which implieth 1. a fight with a world of enemies and corruption 2. A serious fight and constant war as for life 3. A difficult fight Yet 4. a victory and overcoming of all these enemies before there can be an obtaining of all things This saith folks will not slip nor sleep into these excellent promises and though fighting be not the meritorious cause of these yet it is the way to them and an antecedent going before them necessarily though not the causa sine qua non to our justification yet it is so to our glorification This thirsting importeth engaging and covenanting Isa. 55.3 Overcoming a being answerable to our engagements Observe it then and wrestle so as ye may obtain seing so much dependeth on it and happy is he that overcometh He and every one of them enjoyeth all things and yet none of them enjoyeth anothers portion to one anothers prejudice But as men now enjoy the whole Sun and its light and wrongeth not others by it so then all shall enjoy God fully as to their capacities yet so as there is no want to others That infinit ocean of the Godhead being able to fill all the cups that come to it or are casten in â—t and being such that all may also swim in it when they are full and that Sun of righteousnesse being so clear as to shine on all and to make shining all the eyes that shall behold Him The qualifications to say so of these excluded on the other part are set down ver 8. and we conceive for these ends 1. To presse the receiving of the former offer from the ill of missing it which is the main scope 2. To shew that every one overcometh not and so cometh not there 3. To shew who overcometh not to wit these that ly under the practice of sinfull lusts as here By these sorts understand all other sinfull wretches lying in sin as if they were expressed the most abominable sorts whereof are indeed named yet not at all to exclude others By it we may see also that this must be heaven for these that get not these good promises are cast into the lake and second death O what great odds is there between the end of sin and holinesse what ever men now think it will one day yea in that day appear in its native colours These particular steps or sorts of sins to wit eight are mentioned to shew 1. That there is but one way to Glory but many sins whereby men passe to destruction 2. That by the setting down of these more particularly the happinesse of heaven and the qualifications of these who enter it may be the more conspicuous being put together The first sort of sinners that is excluded is the fearfull or coward opposite to the former fighter and overcomer It is not these who are feared to come short Heb. 4.1 nor these that fear to sin and desire to prevent it Heb. 11.7 nor such that fear that their faith be not good or that they be presuming as the woman Mark 5. and 33. But such as 1. dare act nothing for Christ are cowards and not valiant for Him though not directly against Him such as fearing them that can kill the body Matth 10. sway with every corrupt time as the beast Magog c. and cannot fight against them to any hazard but forsake Christ. 2. Such as are feared to fight against lusts and never appear against them in the field the weak heart Ezek. 16. is evil such a fear as the evil servant had Matth. 25.25 which maketh men lazie in holy duties and trading for Christ as if they were afraid of them the sluggard saith there is a lion in the way this is he who shifteth duty 3. Such as dare venture to suffer nothing for Christ as the Worthies did Heb. 11. The second sort is unbelievers not properly or only infidels much lesse these who are of a weak or little faith that is mixed with doubting and want peace but such as never received the free offer of Christs Grace indeed whatever their profession was that never did flee from the Covenant of Works to rest on Christ for salvation These are Ioh. 3.36 condemned already and this unbelief shall condemn as much as any breach of the Law in that day it will condem that ye believe not according to that command 1 Ioh. 3.23 as to be a murderer to be a witch or a warloch Quest. How differeth it from weak faith Answ. Weak faith hath a sure ground but a weak grip of it therefore it is feared for it But unbelief hath a weak ground but thinketh its grip sure Therefore it is not troubled 2. Weak faith hath much fear of unbelief Mark 9.24 and would be rid of it this unbelief is willingly and so wrestleth not against unbelief but against doubting and fear lest its security be marred 3. Weak faith is clear of its own need and Christs fulnesse but its weaknesse is in its peace or its gripping of Him or byding by Him and as to the fruits of faith it findeth these weak to say so but unbelief is clearer of its peace than of its need c. and whether we take unbelief as a failing on the right hand by presumption or on the left by despare both are unbelief and opposit to faith in Christ and are excluded here The third sort are abominable who by sins against nature have made themselves vile now these are reckoned with such were these in Sodom and these Rom. 1.26 c. The fourth sort
which are prophesied of under the red horse 346 What the type of the black horse importeth 349 350 What we are to understand by the type of the pale horse with the difference which is amongst Interpreters in the application of this Prophesie to a particular time 355 356 357 In what respects hypocrisie is worse than the want of profession 212 The characters of hypocrisie 219 How a hypocrite cometh to have such high thoughts of himself 219 220 If a hypocrite can discern his own hypocrisie ibid. How a Minister may discern a hypocrite and how he should deal with him 221 222 I VVHat is meant by the new Ierusalem 195 A threefold Ierusalem in Scripture and why Heaven is held forth under that name 758 The description of the new Ierusalem and what is to be understood by its coming down from Heaven ibid. The conversion of the Iews who are called the Kings of the East foretold 617 618 Whether the Iews are to be restored to their former possessions after their conversion to the faith 619 620 What Iezabel and her doctrine was 162 The differences which are amongst the Popish Doctors about worshipping of Images 456 457 The worshipping of Images according to the grounds of Popery proven to be Idolatry 458 459 The Heathens and Jews had the same pretences in worshipping their Images which are alleaged by Papists 459 460 The worshipping of Images proven to be Idolatry from the second Command 462 Image of the Beast See Beast How to try an Impulse to the work of the Ministery whether it be from the Spirit or not 55 56 57 Imputation of righteousnesse an instantaneous act 248 When a storm is to come upon the world Christ interceedeth for His People 406 What Intercession importeth cleared from Scripture 407 408 How Christ executeth the office of an Intercessor now in Heaven ibid. What things Christ's Intercession doth include 408 409 Whether Christ before His incarnation did execute the office of an Intercessor ibid. The difference betwixt Christs Intercession before and after His incarnation 409 410 How the consolation flowing from Christ's Intercession is to be improven by Believers 410 411 Whom we are to understand by the children of Israel mentioned Chap. 7. vers 4. and what is meant by the particular distribution of them in so many Tribes and so many thousands of every Tribe 386 387 The scope of the distribution of Israel in Tribes and why some Tribes are omitted in this distribution is further cleared 389 Believers under the New Testament are Gods Israel 390 How the rigid execution of Iustice upon the damned may stand with the mercy of God 584 The last Iudgment described the preparation to it the parties judged the manner of procedure and the sentence it self 740 741 742 What young ones have to be judged for 742 Christs Righteousnesse the meritorious cause of our Iustification Faith is necessary thereto and the only condition thereof with which works do not concur 235 236 to 248 Iustification not a continued act 242 243 That a man is truely justified though his sins after Iustification be not pardoned while committed and mourned for 259 A short view of the Popish way of Iustification with the absurdities which follow upon that way 586 to 593 K VVHat is meant by the Key of David given to Christ. 191 What we are to understand by giving the keyes of the bottomlesse pit to the fallen star 437 What is signified by the Kingdoms of the world and how they become the Lords and his Christs 507 That by Kingdoms and Nations is meant the generality and body of such Kingdoms and Nations and by their becoming the Lords is understood a speciall Church-state and relation proven 511 512 513 Why Believers are called Kings and what that name obliegeth them to 22 23 Who the Kings of the east are what it is to prepare their way and how it is done 617 618 What kind of Government we are to understand by Kings 641 What is meant by the seventh Kings continuing a short space 642 A description of the ten Kings who are held forth by the ten horns 648 649 The war of the ten Kings with the Lamb His victory over them with a description of His followers 649 650 Whether the prophesie of the coming of the ten Kings be yet fulfilled the affirmative proven by severall Arguments 650 651 L HOw death and hell are said to be cast into the lake 747 748 Why Christ is called a Lamb 286 Who this Bride the Lambs wife is that is made ready what this readinesse is and how she is made ready 693 694 What it is to be called to the Marriage-supper of the Lamb 694 Learning necessary for a Minister so far as it implyeth acquaintance with the things of God that it is to be attained in the way of studying and that it is lawfull to do so 200 201 202 That these Locusts which came out of the smoak Chap. 9. vers 3. were Church-men is cleared and why they are compared to Locusts with a description of them 438 439 A particular description of these Locusts with the explication of the severall parts of that description 440 441 The Government of these Locusts described and their King ibid. The object plagued by these Locusts 442 Lords-day See Day M OF the rise of Mahomet 453 Magistrates not the subject of Church power with severall considerations set before them in reference thereto 97 to 103 Magistrates should not tolerate corrupt Teachers 164 Manna what is imported thereby and why called hidden 159 What a Martyr is and that it is not every suffering which will denominate a man so 361 362 Whether the Martyrs who shall reign one thousand years be such as suffered under heathen persecution or these who suffered under the beasts tyranny or such as suffered under both 720 How the Angels come in to praise the Mediator 293 294 Every one not proposed by JEHOVAH to the Mediator to be redeemed by Him 300 The method how the benefits purchased by Christs death are applied to the Redeemed 307 308 How Michael and the Dragon fight who their Angels were with a narration of the event of the war and the song of triumph following the victory with the parts thereof 526 527 528 How a Minister may be clear as to the discharge of the Ministery in such and such a place as also in carrying such a message 56 60 A Minister of the Gospel standeth under a threefold relation 104 That the relation of every Minister is to the Church universall before this or that particular Congregation 105 That the last is not perpetuall to a Minister ibid. What it is that maketh a particular relation between a Minister and a particular flock ibid. Severall conclusions laid down to clear the nature of a Ministers ty to a particular Congregation 106 107 That a Minister may exerce ministeriall acts without the bounds of his own Congregation and that authoritatively cleared and proven and the absurdities
were ordinary Presbyters in the Apostles dayes 231 232 233 What an evil Pride is amongst Church-men to whom it is specially incident and how it hurteth the Church 426 427 Why Believers are called Priests 22 What sort of Professors these are described by earth sea and trees chap. 7. 382 383 Prophesie two wayes taken 4 That part of the Revelation which is properly Propheticall beginneth at the sixth Chapter where of the scope and object of the prophesie with the series of the story 326 Some things in the generall observable concerning the three principall Prophesies in this Book to wit of Seals chap. 6. of Trumpets chap. 8 9. of Vials chap. 16. 328 Some reasons proving the principall Prophesies not to be so contemporary with one another as if each of them did hold forth a view of the Gospel-church from the beginning to the end of the world with some cautions about this 328 229 330 The Prophesie of the Seals and Trumpets hold forth the trouble of the Church and that of the Vials the ruine of her enemies ibid. The explicatory Prophesies shown to be contemporary with and comprehended under the three principall Prophesies 331 332 There is now no gift of Prophesie either for bringing forth any truth not formerly revealed nor can one be warranted by any revelation now to do a thing simply condemned in the Word 470 Prophesie taken for an immediate revealing of Gospel-truths and mysteries is now ceased so that there is neither such a gift nor such an office 470 In what sense Prophesie may be said to continue in the Church 471 No gift of Prophesie now can warrant one to set down his light authoritatively although it be truth as Canonick Scripture ibid. The explicatory Prophesie of the Revelation and some things premitted for understanding thereof 627 R WHat is meant by the Rainbow round about Gods Throne 271 That it is not indifferent for men to read what Books they will and some directions in this 64 65 What is imported in Christs redeeming 290. 297 Whether the Doctrine of universall or speciall Redemption be more comfortable 305 The absurdities which follow upon conditionall Redemption 318 319 Arguments pleading for a conditionall Redemption of all answered 320 321 The mould of conditionall Redemption doth not remove the difficulties which are alleaged to follow upon the contrary proven by several Arguments 322 323 324 325 By the way of conditionall Redemption Ministers are not warranted to make the offer of the Gospel more large than the contrary giveth them ground to do 324 Christs personall reign See Christ. What it is to reign with Christ. 732 Remission of sins not from eternity 250 Giving space to repent will neither prove any ability to repent nor any purpose in God that such shall be saved and yet it maketh men more inexcusable 169 170 Repentance three wayes considered 249 That Repentance is simply necessary in order to the pardon of sin 250 How Repentance doth not concur for obtaining pardon of sin cleared 251 252 And how it doth concur 253 That though Repentance taken in a large sense may be called the condition of the Covenant yet it is not so properly 254 255 256 That Repentance is necessary for a justified person's obtaining of pardon of sins committed after Justification 257 What measure of Repentance is necessary ibid. Severall distinctions of Repentance laid down 258 259 If Reprobates do enjoy any benefit of Christs purchase 309 The first Resurrection how taken 733 734 The qualifications and priviledges of those who shall be partakers in the first Resurrection 734 735 The Lord may now reveal Himself to some in giving them the gift of foretelling some events before they come to passe 470 Reasons for undertaking the Exposition of the Revelation the division of the Book the authority of it Iohn the Apostle the pen-man thereof why this Book is called the Revelation and why a prophesie 1 2 3 4 Why the Revelation is directed particularly to the seven Churches of Asia 20 Some considerations for clearing the propheticall part of the Revelation 267 The matter contained in the Revelation divided into two parts 327 The whole Revelation as propheticall contained in that Book sealed with seven Seals ibid. The Righteousnesse of Christ the immediate meritorious cause of our Justification and that it is immediately imputed 235 That our Legal and Evangelical Righteousnesse do not differ Christ being both 245 What is meant by giving of white Robes to the souls under the altar 366 The grounds upon which Rome challenged precedency 425 Rome recovereth and preserveth Dominion and grandour only by the Popes means 561 562 Rome designed by the City upon seven hills with some objections to the contrary answered 640 That Rome hath been under seven sorts of Government whereof Papacy is the last 643 644 That Papacy is the seventh Government of Rome proven 644 645 That Rome under the Pope is the whorish Church ibid. That the Church of Rome is the whorish Church and Antichrists seat and that the Pope is the Antichrist with some objections to the contrary cleared 660 661 662 663 664 The authors in the destruction of Rome is not the Antichrist 670 The defection whereof Rome is found guilty is the same with Antichrists and that this defection whereof Antichrist and Rome are guilty is not a totall falling from Christianity in the profession of it but a corrupting the principall truths of Christianity 670 671 That defection hath already seized on the Church of Rome proven 672 673 If any of Gods people be de facto in Rome before its destruction 680 The necessity and warrant for separating from the Church of Rome 681 May not one abide in Rome now and not be partaker of her plagues 681 It is no schisme to quit fellowship with Rome 682 The lamentation which is amongst Romes friends for her fall 684 Why Kings so much lament Romes overthrow 684 685 The lamentation of the Merchants and Shipmen for Romes ruine and who these Merchants and Ship-men are 685 686 The greatness of Romes ruine held forth by the great joy of the people of God at her fall ibid. The amplification of Romes destruction and the causes thereof 686 687 The sins for which Rome is destroyed are neither the sins of Rome as heathen nor as under that fancied Antichrist to come but the sins of Rome as Popish 687 688 Much of the Romish pomp derived from the heathens in imitation of their high Priests 563 S THe Saints happy condition set out in several circumstances 399 400 What the reign of the Saints doth import 709 That this reign of the Saints is to be spiritually understood though not only 709 710 More particularly wherein this good condition of the Saints doth consist 711 712 Some caveats about the thousand years reign of the Saints ibid. Three considerations more added for understanding this good condition of the Saints 713 714 Whether all the Saints partake of this good condition or if it