Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	father_n	holy_a	son_n	6,458	5	6.0598	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A64013	Two letters concerning the Holy Trinity reconciling together in some measure the semi-Arian and the Trinitarian systems, concerning Christ's divinity, and inquiring, whether the term persons, speaking of God, shou'd be impos'd in acts of church-communion : to be offered to the consideration of the learned, in order to their giving their opinion and reasons concerning the things herein mentioned.		1680 (1680)	Wing T3456; ESTC R38384	16,482	18

could not then be great But there is no Antiquity and Authority like that of the Scripture And it seems that this kind of Arian or Semi-Arian System which I have described in these two Letters is the most agreeable to it If I err in my Sentiment I said I hope I am but of those Weak in the Faith who may be received and whom God will receive for I am heartily desirous to know his Will and the Truth to follow it and have fervently prayed him to shew it me so far at least as it is necessary to to be known And this Unitarian System little differs from the Trinitarian It seems indeed strange to address distinct Prayers to the Divine Power The Scripture doth it not It seems in a manner as harsh as to represent it as a distinct Deity and it seems to do it in making of it a Divine Person And tho' the Man Christ Jesus may be invocated by Wishes when absent we find he is invocated in Scripture as Mediator between God and Man and as united to the Godhead yet as a distinct supremely Divine Person is I think no where expresly taught in Scripture nor necessarily deducible from any Argument It seems Christ now is sufficiently invocated here by us when both we are denominated by him and he is so call'd and relied upon in our Prayers that our Petitions are put up to God in his Name and that we therein offer up his Sacrifice to God and plead his Merits and Intercession This is actually to call upon his Name in Prayer as is observed in the Brief History of the Vnitarians on Acts 9 14 and 21. As St. Jerom rejected and protested against the term Persons and St. Austin owned it to be improper and Mr. Calvin opined it sufficed to say Properties Dr. Sherlock Page 7th of his Book which is intituled The present State of the Socinian Controversy observes that the Truth doth not depend upon the use of this and other the like Scholastick terms for he owns the true Faith was before them Why should they then be imposed By the second and third Persons may those partial Considerations of the Divine Mind be understood the Divine Wisdom and Power or Inspiration There would then be no Difference in the Doctrine for all do acknowledge these things to be in God But for the Term it cannot be warrantable to impose the calling Wisdom and Power Persons for the reasons aforesaid And on the other hand when God is worshipped can we then be wanting in our Worship of what is supremely adorable That cannot be imagined In summ The term Persons is not in Scripture in speaking of the Divine Nature The Texts alledged for it or for the sense and import of that term are very rationally susceptible of another signification Nevertheless the Divine Mind Wisdom and Power are owned to be in God and to be God or eternal infinite all-perfect 'T is granted all that is in God is reducible to these three Divine Intellect or Mind Wisdom and Power the Divine Will being implied in the Divine Power or the Power in the Will and the Divine Wisdom comprehending the Divine Goodness and Justice But then the Divine Mind is most properly the Divine Essence and the Divine Wisdom and Power are incontestably Divine Properties 'T is from Plato's School that Christians learned to make Persons of them And it seems manifestly that the Doctrine of three Persons in one God is encumbred with unavoidable Contradictions What must I do I cannot think otherwise of that term nor of the Nicene and Athanasian Creeds which use it or imply it I most humbly beseech You for God's sake to compassionate me if I seem to mistake in my thoughts concerning the scholastick terms May these things be so considered and illustrated that the Truth may be made to appear most conspicuous to all that are sincere I humbly beg your Prayers and am c. P. S. If by the Word and the Spirit should seem to be understood some things in the Divine Nature somewhat analogous to Persons yet first of all it seems at least they must be not only inferiour to the Father but as it were some Portion as Grotius notes on John 1 2 or but some Beams of his Person in some measure as are to a Man his right Hand and left Hand insomuch that the Father communicates of his Perfections to them but so far as he pleases For the Scripture as we have seen John 17 3. 1 Cor. 8 6 c represents the Father not only as the Superiour but as the whole Godhead all that Christ and the Holy Spirit do is ascribed to the Father as the Chief and Primary Cause working in and by them Christ says that the Father who dwells in him doth the Works that the Son can do nothing of himself that the Son knew not when was to be the Day of Judgement that the Spirit not only is sent but is taught and commissionated what to do and say and if the Practice of Scripture and the Texts to that purpose be exactly weighed it seems that Christians are not directed to address their Prayers to the Son or the Spirit but to the Father or God in general terms For when in a Vision Christ is both seen and heard speak since his Exaltation that is a particular case there being no doubt but that not only he is then to be personally honoured but may then certainly be applied to tho' not as a distinct and second Divine Person yet as the Mediator between God and Men and as the Viceroy of the Universe assisted by the Godhead dwelling in him as was said It should then be observed Reason and Scripture plainly shew us that the Divine Mind is endued with infinite Wisdom and Power as being the natural and necessary Perfections and Properties of the Divine Mind it self But that the Divine Wisdom and Power are real and distinct Persons that particular Prayers should be address'd distinctly to the Divine Mind distinctly to the Divine Wisdom and distinctly to the Divine Power and that the Deity consists of several real Things or real Portions whereof the one has excellencies above the other seems unaccountable to the most sedate Reason and appears not expresly specified in the Word of God Now it seems that from this consideration all along enforced or made way for in these Two Letters these two Inferences do necessarily follow First We should then ordinarily and in common Assemblies content our selves to direct our Prayers to the Father or God in general terms as the greatest number of the reformed Churches do these incontestably would be the safest Measures in so intricate a Matter it being certain that when God is worshipped all is adored that is supremely adorable and we should content our selves with the Apostles Creed the Expressions whereof are as general as those of Scripture whereas Human Terms more decisive may be erroneous and may cause just scruples in so abstruse a subject