Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	father_n	holy_a	son_n	6,458	5	6.0598	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A49644	A letter to a friend, touching Dr. Jeremy Taylor's Disswasive from Popery. Discovering above an hundred and fifty false, or wretched quotations, in it.	A. L.	1665 (1665)	Wing L4A; ESTC R213944	35,526	47

who agree among themselves that few shall buy to the end to bring down the price or some other reasonable cause then he may lessen his measure or mix a little water and sell it for pure wine and compleat measure taking the just price c. 147. He saith Emanuel Sa affirms That if a man lie with his intended Wife before marriage it is no sin or a light one nay it is good to do so if the benediction or publication of marriage be much deferr'd which is a gross falsification for Sa spake not of lying with her afore Marriage but onely afore the Benediction To come together afore the Benediction is no sinne or a light one yea it is expedient if it that is the Benediction be much delayed 149. He saith Vasquez saith That not onely an Image of God but any creature may without danger be worshipped with God as his Image which he saith not but that any other creature out of the nature of the thing and danger seeluded may be worshipped c. 150. He saith Vasquez saith That it is no sin to worship a ray of light in which the Devil is invested if a man supposeth him to be Christ and quotes for it his Chap. 5. sect 33. whereas that Chapter hath no Sections nor doth Vasquez say any such thing in that Chapter but onely this That in a ray of light which appears a man may out of a right intention and affection toward God worship that ray and although the Devil should be there yet no affection of servitude or exterior note of submission would be exhibited to him Sect. 9. 151. He saith Quirinus de Salazar affirms That the Virgin Mary by offering up Christ to God the Father was worthy to have after a certain manner that the whole Salvation and Redemption of mankinde should be ascribed to her c. whereas Quirinus affirms there the direct contrary Illud imprimis exploratum est apud Catholicos c. In the first place that is most certain among Catholiques that the Virgin was not the principle or cause of our Salvation for Christ alone finished the whole business by his Passion intirely satisfying our debt but onely that by her impetration she in some manner promoted and helped it That therefore which he Rhetorically addes afterward in confutation of one that compared her scornfully to a purse full of Gold which when the Gold is out of it is little worth it self That because she had that in common with Christ that she may be truly and properly said to have given and offered the price of our Redemption as he had afore cited out of S. Jerome and other Fathers therefore also with him she carries all those Titles and Names which are used to be given to Christ c. meant no more then as he explicated himself both afore and after out of the Fathers that she contributed to our Salvation by her prayers for it and offering up her Son willingly to that end Afore thus That is to be premised that the holy Fathers do attribute so much to the B. Virgin that they will have her to be some cause of our Salvation not by satisfying or satis-giving for sin son that belongs to Christ alone but by impetrating it for us So Irenaeus She was made the cause of Salvation to all mankinde So S. Chrysostom c. And presently after these words thus Therefore because the Virgin by her Prayers contributed somewhat to our Salvation truly in my opinion that seems to be sufficient that she may be called a Cause Auctress or Mediatress of our Salvation as others who also prayed c. 152. He saith It is a famous saying of S. Gregory that the Bodies of many persons are worshipped on Earth whose Souls are tormented in Hell But he quotes no place for it nor hath S. Gregory any such words in any place 153. He quotes Augustinus Triumphus as affirming that all who are Canonized by the Pope cannot be said to be in Heaven who there saith no such thing 154. He quotes Prateolus how the body of one Herman after he had been for twenty years honoured for a Saint was taken up and burnt as if he had been honoured for a Saint by authority of the Church whereas Prateolus meant no such thing but onely that he had been so honoured by the simple vulgar or perhaps the Hereticks his followers Chap. 3. Sect. 2. 155. He qoutes Sa as expresly teaching That the rebellion of a Clergy-man against his Prince is not treason because he is not his Princes Subject when Sa hath not a word to any such purpose And he saith These words though left out of the Edition of Paris yet still remain in the Editions of Antwerp and Colen which is false too for my Edition is of Antwerp and in that they are not Sect. 3. 156. He saith Bellarmin dares not deny the Oration published under the name of Sixtus V. to be none of his when in the very place quoted for it he doth expresly deny it I answer that there is no Oration of Sixtus V. extant but among the enemies of the Church who set out Anti-Sixtus But although no credit ought to be given to an enemy nor although he were no enemy credit could be given to him c. FINIS In Preface a Pol. Virg. b Id. c Eginard d Hinemarus e Blondus f Amonius g Driedo Cont. Hermog Gen. 1. 1. John 1. 1. De verâ fide in Mo●al reg 72 c. 1. 80 c. 22. De verâ fide 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Dominicâ doctrinâ ali3nam Ep. Pasch. 2. De incarn Christi L. 2. cap. de orig error L. 7. con Ce● Pag. 1. Cod. l. 1. 4. 4. ●●x 1. Pag 10. Pag. 10. Pag. ●●d Pag. 13. Pag. 14. Part. 2. act 6. c. 7. Pag. 15. De pot Eccl. Consil. 22. Sess. 21. c 4. Pag. 16. In art 18. Luth. Pag. 22. Hom. 1. in ep● ad Philem. Pag. 22. Serm. 1. de Adu Pag. ●â● Serm. de mare● Pag. 27. Artic. 18 cont Luth. De Inv rer l. 8. c. 1. Pag. cad a Haer. 75. b Cat. myst 5. Pag. 28. De Ritib Eccl. l 2. c. 35. Pag. 29. in marg I. 6. annot 345. Pag. 30. Enchir. c. 69. l. 21. de Civ Dei c 26. C. 68. C. 69. De Civ Dei l. 21. c. 26. Pag. 30. L. 8. Chron. 2. 26. It is to be enquired if after the judgement is finished there remains c. For some do ●●●●●m that there is in hell a place of Purgatory meaning after the day of judgement in which they who are to be saved c. Pag. 31. Dist. 3. Exem 3. Pag. 33. Act. Conc. Flor. Pag. 34. Ad Demetrian sect 16. quando isthinc excessum suerie Orat. 15. in Plag grand Orat. 42. in Pasch. Pag. 35. Ep. 59. Pag. 36. In 4. Scnt. d 11. q. 3. Ibid q. 6. Cap 1 cont Capt. Babyl Pag. 37. To. 3 ● sp 46. sect 3. Loc. Com. l. 3. ● 3. fund 2. Sum. l. 8. c. 20. Pag. 38. L. 4. Sent. dist 11. lit A. Dist. 9. Dist. 10. Pag. 38. In 4. Sent dist 11. q. 1. Sect. Propter tertium Pag. 39. Pag. 41. Dial cum Tryph. Pag. 41. Demon Evan. l. 1. c. ult Homil 27. Pag. 42. In Ps. q. 8. Pag. 43. Pag. 47. partibus passim servat arcendi Pag. 49. De Corp. Sang. Dom. c. 19. jure Pag. 51. In 1 Cor. 14. a Hom. 1. in ● Joan. b De Doct. Chr. c. 5. Pag. 52. a l. Quae ex vaeriis scrip locis b in 1 Cor. Hom 35 c in 1 Cor. 14. d Sup. Psal. 18. Com. 2. e in 1 Cor. 14. f in 1 Cor. 14. Pag. 54. Con. Lat. 3. c ● Pag. 58. 〈◊〉 imperi●iam satutare Pag. 59 Ep. ad Job Hier●s Pag. ead De mor. Eccl. l. 1. c. 34. De Fid. Symb. c. 7. Con. Adim c. 13. imperitorum Pag. 59. Pag. 61. a Strom l. 6. b Adv. marc l. 2. c. 22. c l. 4. co Celf. Pag. 62. a De Cor. Mil. b De Praep. Evang●l l. 1. c. 5. c Orat. Co. Gent d In c. 40. Es. e in Deut. q. 1. f L 4 de Fid. Onth. c. 17. g L. 18 c. 53. Theodoret. in Deut q. 1. L. 18. c. 53. Pag. 64. Acts 20. 28. De unit Eccl. Pag. 65. In 1 Cor. 3. In Roman 1. Vice Domini Pag. 66. Extrav Com. l. 1. tit 9. de Major Obed. Pag. 67. Pag. 67. Apud Baron to 6. Anno 499 n. 36. dum convenit Pag. 67. Eccl. Hier. de Sacerd. perfect cap. 5. Pag. 68. D. 97. C. Duo sunt Pag. 68. Pag. 69. De Bapt. cont Donat. l. 3. c. 3. Pag 70. In Act. Apost Hom. 3. Pag. 70. Loc. Com. l. ● c. 8. Conc. Cath. l. 2. c. 34. Sent. 4. d. 24. q. 2. a. 5. De Eccles. Dogm l. 4 c. 3. Pag. 72. De Cons. d. 2. C. Peracta Ib. C In Cae●a C. Si quis D 1. C. Omnes De Cons d. 2. C. Et si non Pro luxuria sua Pag 76. Euchir c. 1. n. 31. Pag. 76. Prax sori Poenit l 5. c. 2. Sent. 4. n. 23. Pag. 80. 81. Pag 86. V. Satisf n. 10. L. 3. Instr. Sac. c. 11. n 6. Pag. 99. Qu. 37. de Iud. Prop. 3. Pag 102. Pag. 113. L 5. c. 6 n. 15. fustium percussionem paratam Pag. 114. L. 5 c. 13. n. 10. Pag. 114. L. 5. c 11. n. 5. Pag. ead L. 8. c. 39. n. 4. Pag. ead Aphor. tit Deb. Conjug 6. Pag. ead De Ador. l 3. Disp. 1. c. 2. Pag. ead De Ador. l. 3. Disp 1. c. 5. sect 33. Pag. 124. Com. in Prov. 8 17. Pag. 133. Pag. 133. Q 14. ad 4. Pag. ead Verb. Hermanus Pag. 162. Aphor. verb. Clericus Pag. 170. Resp. ad Apol. pro Juram fidel

Ancients and Moderns 3. From what he saith Art 2. in resp ad 2. To adde a truth which is contained in holy Scripture to explicate or declare hath alwayes been lawful for the Church 13. To the same purpose he quotes Petrus de Ancorano who spake not of making new Articles of Faith as making opposeth declaring which was the sense for which he quoted him for this was his charge The Church of Rome pretends to a power not onely of declaring but of making new c. but onely of making them such quoad nos by declaring them to be of Faith as appears by his own explication The Pope may make new Articles of Faith that is that a thing ought now to be believed when afore it ought not so c. 14. To the same purpose he quotes Panormitan when he saith no such thing neither but rather the contrary viz. that the Pope cannot make but onely declare as would have appeared had the Dr. set down his words at length which he fraudulently curtail'd for these are his words The Pope can induce a new Article of Faith declaring this Divine right of which he had afore spoken and of this is inferred that this Constitution or Canon cum Christus looks back upon things past 15. To prove our corrupting the writings of the ancient Fathers he saith That when not long since we printed Origen we left out that whole 6. Chap. of S. John and Origens Commentary upon it and so maim'd the Author for the same cause that is because Origen argued there against Transubstantiation A meer slander as is manifest by the very Protestant Editions for in the Edition of Basil by Froben Anno 1545 there was no Commentary at all upon John And in a later Edition of Basil 1620. his Comment upon John is set out in the same manner as it is in our Catholique Editions and no other viz. without any Comment either upon the 5 6 or 7. Chap. of that Gospel To the same purpose he quotes our Index Expurgatorius in which in S. Chrysostoms Works printed at Basil these words The Church is not built upon the Man but upon the Faith are commanded to be blotted out and these There is no Merit but what is given us by Christ. And the like he saith we have done to S. Ambrose and to S. Austin and to them all insomuch that Ludovicus Saurius the Corrector of the Press of Lyons complained of it to Junius that he was forced to blot out many sayings of S. Ambrose in that Edition of his Works which was printed at Lions 1559. so that we think it not sufficient to feign some convenient sense when they are opposed in Disputation but the words which make against us we wholly leave out of our Editions Nay saith he we correct the very Tables or Indexes made by the Printers or Correctors c. A notorious slander as appears 1. Because the Index Expurgatorius was not appointed till the end of the Council of Trent which was in Anno 1563. and therefore that could put no force upon Saurius for maiming S. Ambrose in Anno 1559. 2. Because the Index Expurgatorius extended not to any Writings or Works of the Fathers but onely to the Indices or marginal Notes or other corruptions made by Protestants as is confessed by his own Author Junius that published the Index for in his Preface to that Book he makes this Objection But here the Fathers are not purged and answers it 1. That yet by the purging of later Authors the truth of Doctrine and History is in many places expurged 2. That what they dare not with the Fathers they practise upon us Protestant Printers and Writers and with their little forks they thrust out our Annotations in the Margin and Sayings in the Indices although consonant to the Fathers minde For example saith Junius In the Index of S. Chrysostom printed at Basil this is commanded to be blotted out The Church is not built upon the Man but his Faith And likewise this There is no merit but what is given us by Christ. 17. To the same purpose he quotes Sixtus Senensis as saying to Pope Pius V. Expurgari emaculari curasti omnium Catholicorum Scriptorum ac praecipuè veterum Patrum Scripta Thou hast taken care for the purging of the Writings of all Catholique Writers and especially of the ancient Fathers most shamefully corrupting the sense of the Quotation by leaving out the words that follow Haereticorum aetatis nostrae fae●ibus contaminata venenis infecta Contaminated with the dregs and infected with the poisons of the Hereticks of our age 18. Against the power of the Church to adde any Articles to the Creed he quotes the Ephesine Canon That it should not be lawful for any man to publish or compose another Faith or Creed then that which was desined by the Nicene Council c. when that Canon did not mean adding Articles to the Faith defined by that Council for how could the supreme power binde its own hands or make that unlawful for another General Council which the Council of Constantinople had already done in adding divers Articles to the Nicene Creed but publishing any Creed repugnant by adding or detracting to the Nicene 19. To prove that the Council of Constance declared not for the Popes Supremacy he quotes John Gerson as saying That the Council of Constance did abate those heights to which slattery had advanced the Pope and that before that Council they spoke such great things of the Pope which afterwards moderate men durst not speak whereas he saith no such words nor had any meaning against the Popes Supremacy for this is all he saith Fallor si non ante celebrationem hujus S. Constantiensis Synodi c. I am deceived if afore the celebrating of this holy Council of Constance this Tradition which slattery suggested viz. that the Pope was supreme Monarch even in Temporals that he was above the Law could take away mens rights from them c. had not so possessed the mindes of the most that he that should have taught the contrary would have been noted or condemned of Heretical pravity Take a sign of this that after the determination and practice of the same Council there are found who fear not to assert openly such things 20. He puts down these for the words of the Council of Trent Although the ancient Fathers did give the Communion to Infants yet they did not believe it necessary c. whereas the words of the Council are not with any such Antithesis but thus onely Nor therefore is antiquity to be condemned if sometime they used that custome in some places For as those most holy Fathers had a probable cause of their so doing according to the condition of that time so truly it is without question to be believed that they did it with no necessity of salvation 1. Chap. 3. Sect. 21. He quotes Bishop Fisher as saying That