and most perfect essence in three existences or as the church vseth to speake persons Mat. 28.19 1. Ioh. 5.7 namelie subsisting of the eternall Father the eternall Sonne and the eternall holie spirite truely distinct among themselues yet without all diuision being both beginning and cause of all thinges II. That so euerieperson by it selfe is true god that yet there be not three gods For so wee doe beleeue and haue learned out of the holie scriptures that the father by himselfe is true and perfect god the Sonne by himselfe is god and the holie spirite by himselfe is god and yet that they are not manie but one onelie god Almightie Rom. 11.30 of vvhome all things by vvhome all things and for vvhome all things are III. One person to be distinct from another in personall proprieties but in essentiall they differ from euerie creature And because the holie scriptures doe so speake of god that they attribute vnto him manie proprieties both essentiall and personall and they teach that in the essentiall he differeth from all things created but in the personall one person to be distinguished frō another we therefore doe so beleeue that as to begett the Sonne is such a proprietie of the Father as can agree neither with the Sonne nor the holie spirite and againe to be begotten can agree to none but the Sonne and so of the rest so likewise to be most pure eternal immeasurable present euerie where simplie knowing all thinges simplie almightie simplie good and such like are in such sorte the verie proprieties of god that they can by no meanes bee communicated to anie creature so as it should bee good for example sake in that immeasurable goodnesse or omnipotent in the same omnipotencie that god is IIII. The essentiall proprieties in god doe not in verie deede differ from the essence For we acknowledge that in god for his singlenesse the essentiall proprieties doe not in deede differ from the essence and therfore they without this cannot be communicated to anie creature and therefore no creature can be or can be said to be for example sake omnipotent simplie iust wise or such like Euen as our Lord Iesus speaking of one proprietie Matt. 19.17 teacheth of them all saying none is good simplie but god V. That nothing is or can be made simplie such as god is vnlesse the same might simplie be god Wherefore they which will affirme that anie created substance euer could or can bee made partaker of those diuine proprieties whereby it should be such as god is as simplie omnipotent and such like they must needs then confesse that the same is or that it can be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same substance with god for asmuch as neither the sonne himselfe is simplie omnipotent but as he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consubstantiall with the father nor yet the holie spirite VI. A confirmation of the former opinion Whereuppon we also vnderstand how it is that sith the sonne is no lesse omnipotent thē the father and so likewise the holie ghost yet we doe not saie that they are three almighties Atha creed but wee confesse with Athanasius and the whole church that they are one onlie almightie because indeed of them all there is but one and the selfe same substance Therefore seeing no creature hath one the selfe same essence with God but a farre other and diuerse and if the same by cōmunication of the diuine omnipotencie could also be made omnipotent then it must follow that there might be more almighties then one which wee beleeue can not without blasphemie be affirmed VII Errors Wherefore we condemne and detest all heresies which haue risen against this first article of our faith or haue sprong from hell bin condemned by the holie fathers in their lawfull councells as those of Cerin thus Ebion Valentinus Marcion Manichaeus Arius Eunomius Sabellius Praxea Fotinus and such like as Seruetus and Tritheitae also the blasphemies of Iewes and Turkes and lastlie all heresies which haue bin inuented by the diuell either against the vnitie of the diuine essence or against the true Trinitie of persons Yea and those therefore which denie either the Sonne to be true and euerlasting god or the holie ghost to be so or which do cōfound these persons and saie they bee one and the selfe same existence which for diuers respects is called by diuerse names of Father Sonne and holie Ghost We also condemne all those errors which doe seperate the essentiall proprieties of god from the diuine essence which it seemeth vnto vs that these men verie vnaduisedlie doe which teach that those essentiall proprieties in verie deed may be communicated or rather at already cōmunicated to creatures without cōmunication of the essence CHAP. III. Of the foreknowledge and praedestination of god I. God did foreknovv and foresee all thinges from the beginning WE beleeue that God before he made the worlde euen then from before all things by his immeasurable wisedome foreknew all things yea and what good he ment himselfe to doe and what ill he meant to suffer to be done so farr forth as nothing was euer hidden or could be hidden from him but all things aswel what hath bin done is done or shall be done as what cā be done though it neuer be done Heb. 4.13 Act. 15.18 wee doubt not but hath and doth lye open and manifest all waies in his sight II. God hath determined all things in his eternall counsell and hath before hand ordayned them to the best ends And we beleeue that God hath not onely foreseene all things and that they are present in his sight Act. 4.28 but also in that his most wise and eternall counsell he hath certenly established whatsoeuer did or doeth appertaine to the creation and gouernement of the world or to the selecting of his church from the vncleane filth of other people or to our redemption and eternall saluation and that he ordained through his infinite goodnesse that those euills which in his wisedome he would suffer to be done should bee to good endes so that not one haire can fall from our head Mat. 10.29.30 without the will of the Father or without cause III. All men to be praedestinate some to life and some to death Wherefore we also doubt not that God when he created all men to speake nothing of Angells in Adam righteous he foresawe that in him all should sinne and elected some in Christ Eph. 1.4.5 that they should be holiē and vndefiled in his sight in charitie and therefore predestinated them of his meere grace and according to the purpose of his will Rom. 9.22 to eternall life other some he would not vouchsafe that grace and therefore prepared them as vessells of wrath for destructiō because of his iustiudgement that in the one sort his infinite mercie in the other his iustice might bee knowne to the whole world to his great glorie IIII. The
Iohn himselfe but by some one of Iohns disciples who expounded not vnto thē the true doctrine concerning God and therefore baptized them not rightlie But all the fathers doe hold beyond all controuersie that they which are not rightly baptized into Iesus Christ as the naturall Sonne of God mediatour and so also into his father and the spirite of them both the same must bee rightlie baptized And therefore those twelue were not as being not baptized rebaptized but as being not rightlie baptized Paule did baptize them with true baptisme first teaching them the true doctrine of the trinitie which also Iohn had preached vnto them And thus much of the authoritie of the fathers from whome either in their assertions or in their expositions of Scriptures especiallie where they all for the most part doe agree I dare not decline for my cōscience sake vnlesse I be cōstrained by most apparant reasons Thus I freelie cōfesse to the whole church of Christ The reason also besids the authoritie of the fathers brought as we saw before euen by the fathers out of the verie text confirmeth me in the same opinion This reason is partly gathered out of those words which these Ephesians being asked by Paule whether they had receiued the holie ghost that is the gifts of the holie ghost aunswered saying that they had not so much as heard whether there bee that is whether that holie ghost bee existent whome Paule would haue to bee the author of those gifts so farre from thē it was that they should haue receiued him and his gifts and partlie it is gathered out of the wordes which Paule vsed concerning the doctrine and baptisme of Iohn saying Iohn verily baptized with the baptisme of repentance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ Iesus as if he had said you haue not rightlie beleeued in Christ such as he is the sonne of God God seing yee know not his spirite The conclusion followed that therefore they although they were baptised by I knowe not whome into Iohns baptisme yet were not rightlie baptized seing they were not instructed in the doctrin of the person of Christ in whome they ought to beleeue namelie that he was not onelie man and the Messias but also the sonne of God God from whome also from the father proceedeth the holie ghost and consequentlie not in the doctrine of god the father the sonne and the holie ghost in the name of all which baptisme is to be giuen And therefore that they ought to learne the true doctrine concerning the father sonne and holie ghost and resting therein to receiue lawfull baptisme that afterwardes by laying on of hands they might receiue the gifts of this holy spirite which Luke teacheth to bee afterwardes done saying but vvhen they heard it namely those twelue Ephesians what whē they heard euen when they perceiued Paules doctrine concerning true faith in Christ the sonne of God and so in his father and the holie ghost which faith Iohn had also preached and wherein they resting were baptized c. This is the interpretation of the fathers namelie that those twelue were not rightlie instructed in the doctrin of god the father the sonne holie ghost and so neither rightlie baptized and it may be confirmed both by the kindred and cuntrie of those twelue and also by the cause for which Paule letting alone al the rest peculiarly asked them whether they haue receiued the holie ghost since they beleeued By kinde they were Iewes as appeareth by Iohns baptisme vnto which they saide they were baptized and they were baptized by a Iewe. But the Iewes for the most part neuer rightlie held the doctrine of the three persons subsisting in one essence And therefore these 12 Iewes also though they graunted Iesus to bee the true Messias yet they seemed to acknowledge but onely two persons the person of God the father and the person of the Messias euen as the most thought a bare mā but yet such a one as in whome God the father dwelt but that they were altogether ignorāt that the holie ghost was an existing thing the giuer of those graces they are conuinced by their owne words But surely there was some cause why Paule comming into Ephesus where were manie of Christs disciples asked this question of the 12 Iewes onely Surelie it is to bee thought by their aunswer that the Apostle either by their owne talke or by telling of some other of the brethren perceiued that these twelue did not thinke aright concerning the holie ghost Finallie this was the Apostles argument whereby he would prooue by their owne aūswere that they were not baptized with the true baptisme of Iohn Whosoeuer hath bin baptized with the true baptisme of Iohn he hath also heard his doctrine concerning god the father the sonne the holy ghost and hath professed the same and consequently hath knowne also the holy ghost This proposition is not expressed but the proofe of it the Apostle bringeth in the 4. verse saying Iohn baptized c. that is Iohn preached not onely repentance but also faith in Christ namely that he is not onely man the Messias but also the sonne of God God from whome as also from the father proceedeth the holie ghost and that hee shall baptize in the holie ghost and therefore all which desire to bee saued must also beleeue in him as the true Sauiour But you haue not heard this doctrine nor professed it therfore haue not truely beleeued in Christ such as he is For yee your selues say yee haue not so much as heard whether there bee an holie ghost namelie when yee were baptized Therefore c. So consequentlie it remaineth that professing this doctrine and faith yee nowe receiue lawfull baptisme and afterward by the laying on of handes those giftes of the holie ghost This is the declaratiō of the argument according to the exposition of the fathers but Luke as the Prophets and Euāgelists vse to doe cōprehended the whole summe in few words And I praye what absurditie can followe hereō or what iniurie is done to the Apostles narration is the heresie of the Donatiftes Anabaptists maintained nothing lesse For they rebaptize such as are rightlie baptized the Apostle baptizeth them which had not beene rightly baptized as hauing not heard nor professed the true doctrine concerning God he tooke care they should be rightlie baptized And such when they come into the catholicke church we speake of them that bee of yeares of discretion all the fathers teach they must be baptized with true baptisme instructing them first in the doctrine concerning God Christ their Sauiour Touching the text it selfe it is no whitt wrested That their aunswer But wee haue not so much as heard whether there be an holie ghost cā not bee vnderstood of the giftes of the holie ghost it appeareth by Paules demaund following being asked with an admiration Vnto what were yee then
the gift of constancie in the faith the end is our glorious resurrectiō euen eternal life I say for this other principal foundation of christian religion what cā be said more plainly more largely thē that which hath bin in the councells of Africa determined out of the scriptures by Meliuitanus Arausicanus others against the Pelagians which were written by Augustine to say nothing of others in manie bookes against the same Pelagians Concerning the holy Catholike Church what is there needfull to bee knowne which hath not beene most plentifully and plainely set downe by Augustine aswell in other places as especially in his bookes against the Donatists euen out of he foundations of the holy scriptures But it is a matter of great moment to knowe what and where the true church of Christ is being out of the church there is no saluation and therefore it is an article of faith not of the least accompt About the points of the sacraments also if a man will cōtent himselfe with the simple truth what is more euident then the doctrine which the auncient fathers Iustine Ireneus Tertullian Cyprian and chieflie Augustine haue deliuered out of the scriptures and left vnto vs in their writings One saith Like as Iesus Christ being by the word of God made flesh had flesh and blood so also we haue learned that the foode hallowed by him by the word of prayer and thanks giuing is the flesh and blood of the same incarnate Iesus Christ euen according to those words of Christ This is my bodie But Christ that is the vvorde was made flesh without anie chaunging of it selfe into flesh but onely by a hypostaticall or personall vnion therefore neither is the bread made the body of Christ by any transubstantiation of it selfe into the body but onely by an vnion and that not a physicall or bodily or hypostaticall but onely a sacramētall vnion Also he saith by that foode namely of the blessed bread our blood and our body is nourished by a certaine chaunging of it selfe namely into Christ therefore that chaunge which is made in the supper is not of the bread into Christs body nor of Christ into vs but of vs into Christ by reason of our ingrafting as also wee reade in Augustine that Christ should say speaking of the receiuing of the Eucharist I shal not be chaunged into thee but thou shalt be chaunged into me The same man saith vnto this the foode of the Eucharist none is to bee admitted but they that beleeue that our doctrine is true being washed with the water of regeneration vnto remission of their sinnes so liuing as Christ hath taught them Therfore no infidells and heretikes nor they which haue not receiued the baptisme of Christ not they which liue in such apparent sinne and wickednes that they giue no notice to the church of their amendment are to bee admitted to the supper Another of them saieth the eucharist consisteth of two matters an earthly and an heauenly The bread though it be sanctified yet he calleth it an earthly matter why so because it comes from the earth it existeth on earth and is eaten with an earthly mouth the body of Christ he calleth a heauenly matter not because the substāce of it is out of heauen but partly because it is taken into vnitie of the person of the word and partly because it is in heauen endued with heauenly qualities For although in the hypostasie which is the very word it bee euerie where yet in the owne proper essence it is only in heauen and not on earth Whereupon it also followeth that it is not eaten either by earthly men or by the teeth of an earthly body but onely of those men who being borne from aboue do carrie the image of heauenly men eate it in a heauenly manner namely in soule spirite And yet notwithstanding the very bodies also of the faithful while they eate onely an earthly matter they also participate of a heauenlie matter to their glorious resurrection are nourished by it as the same author in that place very learnedly expoundeth I think that by this which I haue spoken out of the creede concerning foure principal partes of christian doctrine your Hon. can well gather such is your piety learning wisedome what is to be concluded concerning the whole body The summe is this that those bee the true churches of Christ and therefore called of vs the truely defensed citties of Christs kingdom which professing generally the sacred scriptures and specially the catechisme in all places receiued doe so reuerence the auncient church and auncient fathers hauing therefore friendshipp and communion with them being now in heauen that neither in their opinions nor yet in their expositions of the holy scriptures they will easily decline from them but onely then whenas they bee forced to dissent both by manifest wordes of the holy scriptures and also by testimonies and consequences beyond all doubt necessary drawne from the principles of faith This surely was counted for a notorious fault in Nestorius and it is written to bee the cause of his vile heresie that contemning the fathers and trusting vpon his owne witt he expounded the holy scriptures after his owne braine What speake I of Nestorius yea that the same contempt of the fathers and some confidence of their owne witts and their owne learning did cause diuers more besides otherwaies verie notable men to fall into sundrie heresies I could easilie shewe out of the Ecclesiasticall histories and councells if the breuitie of an epistle would suffer me For whence I pray was it that after that most holy councell at Nice so many heretikes forth with arose of whome some oppugned the true and euerlasting deity of Christ others his true and perfect humanitie others the true vniting of both the natures in one and the same person others the true distinctiō of their natures their proprieties hence surely that contēning the determinations of the fathers in the Nicene councell and their expositions vpon the holy scriptures and trusting confidently to their owne witts and puffed vp with humane knowledge and eloquence they dared euery one to expound yea indeed to depraue wrest the holy scriptures and foundations of the faith according to their owne fansies Hereunto pertaineth that which Vigilius left written in his first booke of the causes of heresies against Eutyches but they blow forth saieth he these smoakes of vaine accusations chieflie because they are euen sicke of the infirmity of ignorance or disease of contention and whilst they are gogged on with a fond conceite of minde they despise the rules of faith deliuered of old by the fathers onely for this cause to bring in their owne conceited opinions of innouations into the church Thus saith Vigilius This that I say is confirmed by the dispositions imitations and wordes of the sound fathers on the other side who expounding the scriptures and the foundations of christian faith
a garment For this manner of speach although it doe not perfectlie declare the personall vnion Hypostatica yet it sheweth a manifest difference beetweene the person of the sonne of god taking and our nature taken For this same cause we embrace those kindes of speaches of the Fathers as mans nature was borne of the sonne of god to subsist in the person of the sonne of God and such like separating the person of the sonne of god taking from the nature taken and teaching that the person of the sonne of God by the comming of mans nature was made neither other nor more perfect VII A confirmation of the former opinion with an exposition of the place of Athanasius Surelie we confesse with Athanasius that as the reasonable soule and flesh is one man so God and man is one Christ that is Christ is onelie one person although there bee in him two natures yet not that the person of Christ if we will speake properlie is constituted or made of both these natures as of the parts as to the perfect cōstitution of man no lesse the bodie as an essential part then the soule must ioyne together seeing the person of Christ was alreadie 1. Cor. 10.9 1. Pet. 3.19 and that whole and most perfect before it was shewed in the fleshe but the person of man as of Adam was none at all vntill the foule was coupled with the bodie and sith that nether the soule doth assume vnto it selfe a body or the body a soule as the sonne of God assumed vnto himselfe the seed of Abraham into vnitie of the same person And further sith the bodie and the soule are two existences as it is manifest in the creatiō of Adam but mans nature did neuer subsist by it selfe but onelie in the person of the sonne of God so that verie vniustlie doe some abuse this godlie saying of the holie man for proofe of their owne dreames For he which did shew himselfe and he is the person of the Sonne of god must needs differ frō the flesh wherein he did shewe himselfe and that not onelie before but also after his resurrection and sitting at the right hand of his father which as saith Augustine added a glorie to the flesh but took not away the nature VIII How Christ is one onely person and that eternall and vnchangeable but there are in the same two natures and how it is said to consist of them We therefore acknowledge and confesse against Nestorius that in Christ is onelie one person and that eternall most simple most perfect and the same shall remaine for euer namelie the person of the euerlasting sonne of God Further that vnto this eternall person there came in time not another person but another nature namelie mans nature and the same not as a parte of that person of whome it was taken but a thing farre different from it and yet takē vnto it into vnitie of the same And therefore we thirdly confesse that in one the selfe same person of Christ there is now two natures the diuine and the humaine in which we doubt not that the same doth subsist doth liue and doth worke for which cause also we feare not to speake thus Christ consisteth now of his diuine nature his humaine being taken into the vnitie of person that he is after a sort compounded of them both IX Hovve the tvvo natures are vnited into one person without alteracion or confusion the properties and actions of either of them remaining whole and distinct But we beleeue and confesse that these two natures are truelie and inseparablie ioyned and vnited into one person of Christ that yet we doubt not but each of them remaineth whole and perfect and the one truely distinct from the other yea and that they do hold the essentiall properties and operations of each of them distinct without all manner of confusion so that as the diuine nature holding the properties remaineth vncreated infinite immeasurable simplie omnipotent and simply wise euen so the humaine nature holding hirs remaineth created comprehensible determined with certen limitts And as the diuine nature hath will and power whereby Christ willeth worketh as god such things as are of God so hath the humaine nature will and power whereby Christ as mā willeth worketh those thinges which are of man so farre forth as Christ in that he is God hee willeth not nor worketh by humaine will or power so neither as he is man willeth he or worketh he by diuine wil or power as it hath bin learnedly determined by the fathers both against Eutyches and against Macarius We therefore did alwaies like wel of that saying of Leo the first Epi. 10. c. 4 writing vnto Flauianus about the same thing where he saith He which is true God the same is also true man and in this vnitie there is no vntrueth whereas there meet together the basenesse of manhood and the excellencie of the godhead For as God is not chaunged by the partaking so man that is mans nature in Christ is not consumed by the dignitie for each forme vvorketh with communion of the other their ovvne propertie namelie the vvord vvorketh that which is proper to the vvord and the flesh performeth that vvhich is proper to the flesh Thus farre Leo that learned man which hee afterwards fetteth out by examples whereby it is plainelie shewed that as the natures are truelie vnited in Christ yet remaine distinct and not confounded so also were and are the actions for thinges which were proper to the word the flesh did not performe but the word that which was proper to the flesh the word performed not but the flesh To raise againe Lazarus from death was proper to the word but to crie Lazarus come forth was proper to the flesh yet both those actions were vnited to the raising vp of Lazarus because they were both one and in one Christ tend both to one purpose and yet they were distinct Likewise to forgiue sinnes was a proper actiō to the diuine nature but to say thy sinnes bee forgiuen thee was proper to the humaine nature To restore his sight that was born blinde was an action of his diuine nature but to put clay vppon his eies and to say goe and wash was of the humaine nature Therefore this personall vnion as it did not confound the natures so neither did it the actions but kept them distinct neither yet did it confound the properties of the natures For there be in one the same person of Christ these three things Natures the proprieties and faculties of the natures and the actions of them and these proprieties of natures in Christ are after the verie same manner that the natures and actions are Therefore as it is cleere that one nature passeth not into another nor one action is confounded with another so is it apparent that their proprieties are after the same sorte X. That it cannot bee prooued by the vnion
malice and therefore he had no part in the kingdome of Christ Many also as saith Augustine doe eate the bread of the Lord but not the bread the Lord. For as they that heare the gospel are not all made partakers of the forgiuenes of sinne declared therein vnlesse they repent them of their former ill-life and doe beleeue in Christ so neither do they obtaine those things which are represented and offred by the sacraments because they receiue the same sacramentes vnlesse they haue also true repentance and faith XIV By the vnworthinesse of the receiuers the vertue of the Sacraments is not taken away nor weakened Neither yet do we thereby weaken or take away the vertue of the sacraments and the force and power giuen vnto them of God which we acknowledge to depend not vpon the vnworthines of the ministers or receiuers but on the faith and vertue of Christ the institutor of the sacraments For euen as the gospell doth keepe vnto it selfe alwaies both the signification though it bee not vnderstood of all and the power of giuing all things which it offreth though all bee not made partakers thereof euen so the sacraments those visible wordes doe the like namely that as the gospell of it selfe is the power of God to saluation but indeed to none but the beleeuers So also the sacramentes are alwaies the working instruments of the holy ghost to saluatiō howsoeuer none receiue this powerfull working but the true beleeuers For which cause the Apostles feared not to call them all which were baptized 1. Cor. 6.11 holy renued righteousse although they knew that among them were many hypocrits For by such speaches they declared the great power giuen by God vnto the sacraments what we should beleeue they would work vnlesse perhaps our hypocrisie did hinder them In which sence if a man saye that who so doe eate the bread of the Lord they also are made partakers of the Lords body that is it cannot stand with the vertue of the sacrament and with the vertue of the author and distributor thereof but who so be partakers of the sacramēt must needs also be partakers of the thing signified and offered by it such a manner of speach we cannot disallow so that such expositions might be added by which the people might be instructed and those false opinions conceiued before of the worke wrought might be drawne out of their mindes XV. Betvveene the signes and the matters is a sacramentall vnion and what it is And although we saye that the matter of the sacraments is not tied to the sacraments or included in them namely either physically or locally or corporally or also by any knott or bande as though God had simply promised the very matters themselues to euery one that should receiue the sacraments howsoeuer they lacked faith so that he were bound to communicate them vnto vnrepentant and vnbeleeuers yet we take not away all coniunction and copulation of the thing signified with the signes For we acknowledge confesse a sacramentall that is such an vnion as is agreeable to a sacrament with the thinges of the Sacrament And this sacramentall vnion consisteth in a certaine mistical and holy relation namely in as much as the signes do signifie the things and offer them to be receiued the things are signified by the signes and are giuen to be receiued no otherwise thē the vnion is betweene the word signifying exhibiting and betweene the things by the word signified and exhibited But the coniunction aswell that of the sacraments as this of the word with the things themselues hangeth or dependeth vpon the wil and counsell of God the institutor who when he instituted the preaching of the gospell and administration of the sacraments did institute them to this ende and purpose as is declared both that we hearing the word and seeing and receiuing the signes should by by lift vpp the eyes of our minde to the things signified by them beeing offred vnto vs should receiue them with the hands of faith and might indeed be vnited vnto Christ whom they preach vnto vs and shewe as it were with the finger by their signification Therefore as the coniunctiō of vs with Christ is al full of mistery as the Apostle teacheth in the 5. to the Ephe. So also we thinke this vnion both of the word sacramēts with the things wherof they be signes and sacraments to be misticall and spirituall XVI A definition of the sacraments We iudge therefore sacraments in fewe wordes to comprehend manie things to bee externall signes and such as are obiect to our senses ioyned to the word of the gospell according to Christes institution for our ignorance and infirmitie and the more earnestlie to stirre vp and confirme our faith by which all men are seriously called to the true and reall communion with Christ and so with his flesh and blood and consequently to the parking of all the good things which ar in Christ and which are signified offred by the word and by the signes and as for the elect faithfull they are indeed drawne by the holy spirit inwardly working in their mindes that they being incorporated to Christ may accomplish and make vpp the bodie of the whole church preordained of the Father to his owne praise and glorie and their eternall blessednesse XVII The sacraments of the old Testament what in general they had in them common vvith ours Touching the sacraments of the old Testament there is no cause we should speak much seing they are quite abrogated only this that the Fathers had the same God the same promises the same mediatour the same spirite of regeneration the same faith and hope and the same sacraments in respect of the substance which is Christ howsoeuer in cerimonies they were diuerse from ours especiallie sith theirs were deliuered to them for the same ende and purpose for which ours were deliuered to vs namely that they might bee confirmed in the faith of Christ and bee ioyned in communion with him Whereunto belong those sayings The lambe slaine from the beginning of the worlde Apoc. 13.8 1. Cor. 10.4 Heb. 13.8 Also All did drinke of the same rock and the rocke was Christ And Christ yesterday to day and for euer XVIII There be onely two sacraments of Christs church And wee acknowledge two sacramentes which are properly to be called by that name and which haue euer bin common to the vniuersal church of Christ Baptisme the Lords supper of which the one properly belongeth to the beginning of the communion with Iesus Christ the other to the increase whereupon also the one is called the water of regeneration the other the holy banquett and supper XIX Errors Wherefore we cannot allow of those who will haue sacramentes to be there where no word is heard but only the element seene nor those which distinguish not the matter of the sacrament from the sacrament but will haue it come into the mouth aswell
first the pure doctrine of the gospell is preached heard and allowed of and that so allowed of that there is no place nor hearing for the contrary Ioh. 10.4.5 For these both are properties of the flocke or sheepe of Christ namely to heare the voyce of their shepheard and to reiect the straungers voyce in those also where the Sacraments instituted of Christ as much as in them lieth are lawfully 1. Cor. 11.20 that is according to Christs owne institution administred and receiued and so where other Sacraments deuised by men are not allowed of in those lastlie where the discipline of Christ taketh place that is where a care is taken through loue that both priuately and publickely Mat. 18.19 Tit. 1.8 by admonitions corrections and when need requireth by excommunications the commandements of Christ may bee obserued and so that men may liue soberly iustly and godlie to the glorie of God edification of their neighbours For wheresoeuer vngodlinesse and all loosenesse of life is in publike practise and open offences are not reprooued according to the discipline of Christ there we beleeue that it is possble that manie good and godlie men may be but we beleeue this is not a godlie christian congregation the Lord himself saying Ioh. 13.35 in this men shall know that yee are my disciples if yee loue one another but what loue can there be where no care is taken that according to Christs doctrine brethren which offend may be corrected may repent may be gained vnto the Lord and saued VI. By vvhat manner of succession of Byshops it may be shewed that some church is Apostolicall So we acknowledge that from a perpetuall succession of byshops in some church I say not any manner of succession but such a one as hath had ioyned also vnto it a continuance of the Apostles doctrine it maye rightly bee shewed that that church is Apostolicall such a one as was once the church of Rome the succession of the byshops thereof euen to the time of Ireneus Tertullian Cyprian and some other So that they were wont not without reason to appeale vnto it and cite before it and such other of the fathers the heritickes of their times But indeed as we do acknowledge and confesse with Tertullian and other of the fathers that those churches are to be acknowledged to be truely Apostolicall in which the Apostles doctrine with the discipline of Christ and lawfull administration of the Sacraments is kept pure though the same haue not beene planted by the Apostles nor haue had a perpetuall succession of byshops euen from the Apostles time So againe the churches which were planted and watered by the Apostles although they can shewe a succession of Byshops continuall and without interruption yet if with the succession of byshops they can not also shewe a continuance of the doctrine of Christ and his Apostles we wil graunt that they haue bin christian and Apostolical churches but now we cannot acknowledge them for such For as the hood as the Prouerb saith makes not the monke but his godly and holy life so neither do byshops but the doctrine of Christ and christian religion make the church of Christ VII Not by any manner of consent but by consent in Christs doctrine some churches may be shewed to be true and christian churches For thus wee knowe that it can neuer bee prooued that wheresoeuer there is a full agreement among themselues there are the true churches of God sith both in the Iewish sinagogues and in the turkish congregations and long since in the conuenticles of the Arrians and Donatists there hath euer bene an especiall agreement but wee hold it may bee prooued onely by that consent which is in the pure doctrine of Christ and in true pietie For where the Apostle saieth 1. Cor. 1.10 I beseech you brethren by the name of our Lord Iesus Christ that yee all speake one thing and that there bee no dissentions among yee but be yee knitt together in one minde and in one iudgement hee meaneth in that Lord Iesus Christ by whose name he intreated them VIII The churches bee not taken away by euery dissention that ariseth in them But by the waye we are not so vniust to denie those to bee christian churches wherein there is not alwaies a full consent and agreement of all things For as euerie agreement doth not make a church so euerie dissention doth not dissolue the same so long as the foūdation which is Christ true God and true mā the true and perfect Sauiour be kept sound firme and so long as there is a full agreement in the summe of the Apostles doctrine which is deliuered in their creede IX A confirmation of the former opinion For as the reprobate hypocrites by their being in the churches do not hinder but that they still remaine true churches so neither the dissentions which are raised in the churches by the vngodlie or which through frailtie or ignorance doe spring among the Saints themselues can extinguish the same which verie thing the Apostle teacheth whenas speaking of the ministers of the true churches he saith that vpon the same foundation some do build gold siluer and pretious stones other wood stubble haye and to the Philippians hauing declared the summe of christian doctrine and exhorted all men that who so had profited therein should persist in it afterwards he addeth and if any be otherwise minded God shall reueale the same vnto them if we abide in the same vvhereunto vvee are come For else if we should denie there to bee anie true church where contentions about religion are stirred vp then was there no church at Corinth in Paules time where there were not onely diuisions verie rife one saying I am of Paule another of Cephas another of Apollo but also maruailous controuersies rose concerning religion Nor yet in Gallatia because immediatly after those churches were passing well planted by Paule there sprang vp in them seducers and heresies lastly neither yet could there be said to be any churches in the East or in the West because they were neuer voide of contentions not only betweene the catholicks and the heretikes such as arose from the catholicks but also euen among the godly fathers themselues as the histories doe plentifully make mention in so much that for these dissentions and sects the christians were wōt to bee skoffed at in the theaters and stages among the infidells as also at this day wee are all derided for the same cause among the Turkes and Iewes But as in the primitiue church by those contentions of the christians it was no consequence that therefore they were not the people of God so neither at this time by ours can any man prooue it iustlie against vs but that indeede the contrarie may rather be concluded because it is the propertie of good wheat that is of the gospell wherby Gods people are gathered into his church that where it is sowen
Christ and he shall raigne in the house of Iacob for euer and the Apostle that he is as the sonne ouer his owne house and this house we are that is the church and in another place that he is the head of the church Eph. 5.23 the same is the Sauiour of his bodie II. Christ ordereth his church partly by himselfe and partly by assistance of fellowe labourers But the gouernment wherewith Christ guideth his church we know to be two fold one wherein he of himselfe and by his holy spirit without any help or seruice of man Phil. 2.13 Eph. 1.23 raigneth inwardly in the hearts of beleeuers and worketh in them to will and to performe and is euen all in all and mooueth vnto that which is good defending vs from euill against Sathan the worlde and all our enemies The other wherein he so guideth the church as hee also vouchsafeth to vse the help and ministerie of others aswell Angells as men especially to the preseruation of the church As of Angells the Apostle speaketh Heb. 1.14 They are ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes which shal bee heires of saluation 1. Cor. 3.5.9 and of men he saieth Wee are Gods ministers by whome yee haue beleeued For like as in a man the head of it selfe by vertue of the minde which liueth worketh chieflie therein doeth so rule the whole bodie that it also vseth the helpe of euerie member to the profite of the whole bodie so Christ the head of the church doth in like sort beare himselfe in the gouernment thereof not for his owne cause or that hee needeth our ministerie but doth it for our necessitie yea for our manifest commoditie and honour III. A difference betweene the ministerie of Angells and of men By the way wee acknowledge a difference betweene the ministerie of Angells and of men sith the Angells are not sent either to teach in the church or to administer Sacraments but to performe other dueties those for the most part inuisible neither come they ordinarily alwaies and to all but at such time and to such persons as God sendeth them but the ministerie of men is apparent and perpetuall and pertaineth to euerie one IV. Jt was most aduisedly done that Angells should not teach in the church but men And wee know it was most wisely and aduisedly done of God that Christ should teach in his church not by Angells but by men both because we can not more willingly suffer our selues to be informed familiarly of our equalles then to be taught of spirits of a farre diffring nature with an vnaquainted maiesty and also because we might more easily be deceiued of Satan falsly faining himselfe to bee sent of God and transforming himselfe to an Angel of light And those surely in our iudgement are two not the least causes why the sonne of God when he was to fulfill the office of a teacher in the church would bee made a man and our brother and familier and like vnto vs in all thinges sinne onely excepted whereto that same tendeth Heb. 4.15 Heb. 2.12 Heb. 1.1 I vvill declare thy name to my brethren in the midst of the congregation will I praise thee and that same In these last daies he hath spoken vnto vs by his sonne namely being nowe made man and liuing familiarlie in the church V. There be two kinds of men especially whose ministery Christ vseth to the gouernment and preseruation of the church And although there be not one member in this whole great body of the church but Christ vseth the same to some profite of the other mēbers 1. Cor. 12.7 and so of the whole bodie as Paule teacheth yet wee acknowledge two principall kindes of men whose help and seruice he is wont to vse for the gouernment and preseruation of the church namely first teachers and others to administer the word sacraments other ecclesiasticall dueties then godly princes and magistrats whose ministeries or offices we confound not but acknowledge them to be distinct and verie diuerse among which differences this also is not the least that the ministerie of teachers is alwaies verie necessarie to the church but of politicke magistrates not so sith the former the church cannot bee without but the other it often hath wanted and may want them VI. About what matters especially the ecclesiasticall ministerie is imployed But as the summe of christian pietie consisteth in three things in faith in Christ in continual repentance that is in the mortification of our flesh and of our sinnes and quickening of the spirite and lastlie in charitie towards our neighbour so also wee acknowledge three principall parts of the ecclesiasticall ministerie First to teach and to preach the worde of the gospell and also to administer the sacraments and offer vpp the publike sacrifice of praise to God through Iesus Christ Secondly to declared by the Apostles and lastly to do all such things which though they be not expressed in the scriptures yet doe belong to order and to decencie and do make for edification and not for destruction according to the generall rule giuen by the Apostle 1. Cor. 14.40 that all things ought to be done in the church in order decently and to edification Neither thinke wee that any authoritie is giuen vnto ministers beyonde the boundes of the word of God or to any other ende then for edification therefore we denie that one Bishop or all Bishops together haue authoritie to appoint any thing against the scriptures to adde or detract any thing or chaunge any thing in them to dispense with the commaundements of God to make new articles of faith to institute new sacraments to bring new rites into the church to prescribe any lawes which may binde consciences or may be thought equall to gods law to forbid any things which God hath graunted and left free or lastly to commaund any thing without the word of God as necessary to saluatiō sith not the whole church can haue or truely be said to haue this authoritie XXI The Bishops which are also princes their politicall authoritie is not denied By the way we disallow not but that bishops which are also princes besids their ecclesiasticall authoritie they haue also their politicall rites and secular powers euen as other princes haue the law of commaunding in secular causes the law of the sword some of them the law of choosing and confirming kinges and emperors and of directing and ordering other politicall matters and to constraine people that are their subiects to do them obedience and therefore we confesse that their politicall commandements which may be kept without breach of Gods law are to be obeyed by their subiects not onely for feare but also for conscience sake Rom. 13.5 For we know that all power is of God Rom. 13.1.2 and vvhosoeuer resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God and that kings are to be honoured 1. Pet. 2.17 and that we
repentance and the faith of Christ but seing they were as Luke reporteth onely baptized into Iohns baptisme which notwithstanding they knew not what it was and were altogether ignorant of the baptisme of Christ that is of the spirit he baptized them shewing vnto thē what Iohns baptisme was and how he baptized into Christ not into his owne sprinkling or dipping of the water as though that could be any profite vnto them He therefore baptized them with this baptisme of Iohn that is as Iohn vsed to do into the name of the Lord Iesus and by by after laying on his hands he baptized thē with the baptisme also of Christ that is with the spirit For immediatly the holy ghost came on them as it is there read This there And vpon the epistle to the Ephes chap. 4. the same Bucer writeth thus Hereby it is also manifest that the twelue men at Ephesus which knew not whether there were an holie ghost or no whome Paule baptized were not baptized with the baptisme of Iohn that is with that which he administred but as they witnessed themselues they were baptized into Iohns baptisme For Iohn preached vnto all whome hee baptized that Christ should baptize them with the holy ghost and exhorted them that they would beleeue in him and that of him they might receiue the holy ghost And therefore these Ephesiās could not haue beene ignorant of the holy ghost if they had bin washed with that baptisme which might truely be called Iohns which also the Apostles words to those men doth sufficiently declare Iohn verily baptized with the baptisme of repētance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ For by these wordes he would teach vs that they neuer receiued Iohns baptisme who as yet knew not Iohns preaching of Christ and the promise Thus farre Bucer Seing then the fathers expound this place in Act. 19. as wee haue nowe declared who I pray am I that I should dare or that I ought to gaine-say so many and so learned men in such an exposition of this scripture which neither doth any whitt wrest the text nor contrarieth any other scriptures nor is against the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities For if any man shall obiect out of the text that same truely and but it prooueth nothing against the fathers exposition seing it is no vnusuall thing with the Apostle where hee saieth first truely not alwaies to ioyne the aduersatiue particle but Rom. 3. ver 2. Coll. 2. ver 23. and in other places And vnto this truely another but which Luke for breuitie sake left out might bee vnderstood verie fittly as hereafter we will shew so that it is no necessitie with this truely to ioyne that but which followeth in the 5. verse in which verse the fathers will haue not Paules speach but Lukes to be continued Therefore the fathers exposition is not repugnant to the text nor yet with any other scripture For if any man say Paule writeth to the Corinthians that he is gladd he baptized none but the house of Stephana it may be answered it is true namely at Corinth but these twelue were baptized at Ephesus and besides he speaketh of such as were baptized with his owne hand but these twelue he might baptise by some other to dispute no longer about the circumstance of the time And it is most certaine it is not repugnant to the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities because the fathers do not speake of a baptisme rightly administred as though Paule had repeated that again This expositiō therefore of the fathers in my iudgement cannot easily be refelled And this therfore is the chiefest cause why I haue euer thus thought and yet thinke of this action of Paule although indeed I cannot consent vnto them all in the cause why Paule baptized them but onely to Ambrose and Hierome That Iohns Baptisme Christs Baptisme did differ the fathers teach both by this that Iohn saide how he baptized onely with vvater but Christ should baptize with the holy ghost with fire and also by this that the baptisme of Iohn is called the baptisme of repentance but Christes baptisme is said to bee giuen for the remission of sinnes And because that he prepared the waye to this as Tertull. speaketh that baptisme of repentance was as it were a sueing for the remission of sinnes and sanctificatiō in Christ which was to follow after Read Tertul. of bap pag. 707. So Cyprian also in his sermon of the baptisme of Christ and of the manifestation of the Trinitie pag. 430. So August To. 7. against Petil cap. 7. But all of vs doe not knowe what the father 's mēt by this differēce of the baptisme For they ment not that the one diffred from the other in the matter or in the signe or in the doctrine and forme of baptisine but onely in efficacie that namely although remission of sinnes was giuen to them which were washed with Iohns baptisme yet the same was not of Iohns baptisme that is of water but by the baptisme of Christ which is the baptisme of the spirite whereunto that belongeth I baptize with water but he with the holy ghost And with this baptisme of the spirit were they only baptized which beleeued in Christ whome Iohn saide was then come though all knewe him not Therefore Iohn in his baptisme did inculcate and often repeate this faith as Paule witnesseth in that place of the 19 of the Actes They therefore are deceiued who for this diuersitie did thinke the baptisme of water was to be repeated August against Petil. as we touched a little before sheweth how some held opinion that the 12 did lye vnto the Apostle when being asked vnto what they were baptized they answered vnto Iohns baptisme So by this that first those Ephesians saide vnto him that they had not yet heard whether there were that is whether that holy ghost did exist or not namely the giuer of those giftes whereof the speach was the Apostle might be said to conuince thē of a lye by this argument Whosoeuer haue bin baptized they haue professed faith in Christ as the sonne of God and consequently in the father and in the spirite of them both For Iohn did require this faith according to the same he baptized men and in baptizing he alwayes vrged that Iesus Christ was he which should baptize in the spirit But you by your owne cōfession do not know this spirite c. and so beleeue not rightly in Iesus Christ Therefore c. But surely to saye that these twelue did lye vnto the church and to the Apostle it seemes to me to be to hard and vile a thing in mē which professed Christ And for this cause we did euer better allow of the opiniō of Ambrose Hierome that the 12 did say truely whē they said they were baptized vnto Iohns baptisme but yet not by
commaundeth to be performed faithfully and prudently by the other faculties of the minde and instruments of the body Vpon the 19. chap. Of iustification Aphorisme 6. Whereas I so expounded that place concerning the faith of Abraham out of the 15 of Genesis and the 4. to the Rom. as I saide that that same thing was imputed vnto him for righteousnes which hee beleeued concerning Christ the promised seede I did it rather respecting the matter it selfe then the bare word of faith For I was not ignorāt that both Moses and Paule spake of the faith of Abraham that this faith was imputed to him for righteousnes seing the Apostle manifestly gathering a general doctrine from the example of Abraham adioyneth these wordes But to him that vvorketh not but beleeueth in him that instifieth the vngodlie his faith is counted for righteousnes that is hee is therefore accompted iust with God because he beleeueth in him which iustifieth the vngodlie by which place it most plainelie appeareth that from the true iustification of vs are excluded our owne works and that it is whollie ascribed to onely faith aswell touching the ende as touching the beginning But when the question is asked what cause there is why iustification should be attributed to faith and not to the works thereof it is wōt to be aunswered and that both well and truely because faith not the works thereof doth apprehend remission of sinnes and Christ our righteousnes For by it we are not iustified in respect that it is a worke but in respect that Christ is apprehēded by it by the righteousnes of whom alone being imputed vnto vs we are properlie reputed iust before God and this is that which some say how faith iustifieth not in respect of it selfe but in respect of the obiect which it taketh hold on Thus is it manifest that it is true which I saide how that was properlie imputed vnto Abraham for righteousnes for that hee beleeued God concerning Christ namelie that in him all nations should be blessed and therefore Abraham himselfe also Likewise in the last aphorisme Neither deo wee allow of those which set our iustificatiō in the only remission of sinnes denying the imputation of the iustice and obedience of Christ which we thinke to be repugnant to the Scriptures Esay 7. Achild is giuen vnto vs c Whatsoeuer therefore he did or hath it is wholly ours Rom. 5. As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one many shal bee made righteous The disobedience of Adam was the breaking of Gods commaundement therefore the obedience of Christ cōsisteth not onely in his death but also in his whole former keeping of the law Likewise the disobedience of Adam was whollie imputed to vs why not then also Christs whole obedience Also wee are two manner of wayes made sinners by Adams disobedience namelie by imputation of his transgression and by the reall deriuation of sinne that is of concupiscence into vs. Why then should we not thinke the same of Christ The vertue of his obedience to the commaundements of God the father is truely communicated vnto vs so that wee also begine to obey Gods law What lets then why wee may not say that his whole obedience is imputed vnto vs 1. Cor. 1. He is made vnto vs of God wisedome and righteousnes and sanctification and redēption Phil. 2. He became obedient vnto death for which humbling of himselfe and obedience euen vnto death God hath highlie exalted him and in him vs c. He hath deserued by his obedience eternall glorie for himselfe vs as al the schoolemen and fathers do teach Therefore his obedience also to the law is imputed vnto vs for righteousnes Gal. 4. He was made subiect to the law that hee might redeeme those vvhich were vnder the lavve Therefore he kept the law for vs and for our saluation The testimonies of the fathers and also of the learned men of this age for breuitie sake we ouerpasse To conclude we beleeue concerning Christ that as for vs men and for our saluation hee came downe from heauen and was incarnate so also for the same cause he kept the law and did all the other things Vppon the 25. chapter Aphor. 10. and 11.12 When I write this cōfession of saith I write euerie thing vppon a good conscience and as I beleeued so I spake freelie as the holie scriptures doe teach that wee ought to doe My faith is grounded simplie and principallie on the word of God and next somewhat vpon the common cōsent of the whole auncient catholicke church if it doe not gainsaye the holie Scriptures For I beleeue that the thinges which were decreed and receiued of the fathers by common consent of them all gathered together in the name of the Lord without anie contradiction of holie Scriptures that they also though they bee not of equall authoritie with the Scriptures come from the holie ghost Hereupon it is that the thinges which are of this sorte I neither will nor dare disprooue with a good conscience And what is more certaine out of the histories the councells and writings of all the fathers then that those orders of ministers of which wee spake were ordained and receiued in the church by common consent of all the whole christian common wealth And who om I that I should disprooue that which the whole church hath approoued Neither haue all the learned men of this age dared to disprooue the same as knowing both that the church might lawfullie doe so and that all those thinges were ordained and done vppon a godlie purpose and to excellent good endes for edification of Gods children For confirmation sake hereof I haue thought good here to insert that which Martin Bucer of godlie memorie a man both for life and learning most famous hath left written concerning those matters vpon the Epistle to the Ephesians The ministerie of the worde being performed by reading and rehearsing the diuine Scriptures by interpretation and exposition of the same and with exhortations takē there out and also by rehearsall and catechisme which is done by mutuall questions and aunswers of the yong beginner and the catechizer and also by holie conferences and deciding of the hard questions about religion according to this manifold dispensation of wholesome doctrine there are also manie dueties in this function For whatsoeuer belōgeth to the perfectest manner of teaching is with an especiall care to bee vsed in the ministerie of the doctrine of saluation because indeed it ought to be deliuered as a knowledge both of all other most diuine and of all most difficult namelie that he which is man should liue according to God Now they which do teach diligently the artes as they are contained in certen knowne books as if they meane to teach mathematicall principles out of Euclide first of all they will reade and rehearse the same booke by and by they will expound the seuerall words such as euerie one knowes
like as no other but the verie same Christ rose from the dead so he rose in no other but in the verie same bodie in which he suffred died and was buried 14 For he could not be truely said to be raised and to rise from the dead except that which truely died the verie same quickened againe should rise againe 15 Now the bodie wherein Christ suffred died and was buried was a true humane bodie visible palpable circumscribed Therefore Christ after his resurrection had and retained no body but that which was circumscribed in a certaine place and wheresoeuer it was and is might and may be seene and handled 16 Add also that the Apostle carefully discoursing of the qualities with which our bodies being raised vp to eternall life shal be indued he saith not that they shal not be subiect either to the eye or to the touch or not bee circumscribed in a definite place but he rehearseth onely incorruption glorie and power as is the agilitie thereof and that they shall rise spirituall not that the corporall substance shal be chaunged into an incorporeall but that they shal be as the greeks call it immortall and shal be full of the holie spirite dwelling and working in them The Apostle therefore taught that these are qualities neuer to bee seperated from the bodies namely that they shal be circumscribed visible palpable Wherefore neither did Christs body after his resurrection put of these qualities 17 Neither is that exception any thing that Christ after he was risen came in to his disciples the dores beeing shut For it was not therefore either made vnvisible or vncircumscribed or vnpalpable seeing Christ being come in and seene of his disciples presently saide Feele or handle and see Luc. 24. for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue And therefore as the Fathers teach there was no chaunge made of Christs bodie no more then there was when he or Peter walked vpon the waters but by the omnipotency of his diety hauing power ouer all things the doores gaue place to the true and firme bodie of the sonne of God 18 Wherefore not without cause did the Fathers condemne not onely Marcion the Maniches and others which taught that Christ tooke not a true and firme humane bodie but a phantasticall one and did all things according to imagination and phantasie but also the Originists Iohn of Hierusalem and Euticius of Constantinople Hier. tom 12. ad PaÌ„mach Greg. in Iob. lib. 24 c. 29. Bishops and others which said that Christs bodie after his resurrectioÌ„ was made so spirituall that it was more thinne then ayre and therefore invisible and vnpalpable 19 Seeing then that in the supper no other bodie of Christ is giuen vs to be eaten but that which was broken for vs that is truely suffered and died it followeth that Christs 〈◊〉 body which we eate in the Supper is truely circumscribed visible and palpable and consequently seeing nothing is seene touched or perceiued in the Supper besides bread the same body cannot in it owne substance really be contained vnder the formes of bread and wine or lie hidden in the very bread and wine 20 Nowe we acknowledge the resurrection of Christ is both the cause and an example of our as well spirituall as corporall resurrection The cause of the spirituall because the Apostle saith to the Rom. 4. he rose againe for our iustification and an example because he saith Rom. 6. we are burâ—ed togither with him by baptisme into his death that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father so we also should vwalke in newenesse of life 21 But that he is the cause of our corporall resurrection we doubt not 1. Cor. 5. for that the Apostle saith If Christ be risen againe we shall also rise againe and for that he also saith Christ is the first fruits of them that rise and an example for that the same Apostle also writeth he shall chaunge our vile bodies Phil 3.21 that they shall be like his glorious bodie 22 Wherupon It also followeth either Christs bodie not to be invisible vnpalpable vncircumscribed and so not spirituall bodies but incorporall spirits 23 For where Christ saith Feele and see for a spirite hath not flesh and bones as yee see me haue hee did not onely conclude that himselfe was no spirite but he especially taught this that there is no flesh nor bones but may bee seene and felt 24 The Scripture teacheth and the church coÌ„fesseth that our Lord Iesus Christ being raised from the dead did shew vnto his disciples for fortie daies space by many arguments that he was truely risen and then euen in the beholding of the Apostles that he was lifted vpp from the earth ascended into heauen Therfore like as no other Christ rose againe then he which died so no other ascended into heauen nor in no other body then he in which that truely rose againe froÌ„ the dead the sonne of God truely humane visible palpable and circumscribed 25 Wherefore as the conuersation of the same Lord Iesus Christ wherein he conuersed amoÌ„g his Apostles after his refurrection for fortie daies space was not fantasticall but reall and true so also his ascension was not onely visible but also truely as the fathers say locall when the Apostles sawe him ascend from the earth vp into heruen 26 But such an ascension and mouing cannot agree to his divine nature therefore he ascended according to his humane nature 27 Yet by the way we denie not this but that Christ as God like as he is said to haue descended from heauen in respect that he abased himselfe taking vpon him the vile forme of a seruant and suffred in it so also it may rightly be said that he is exalted and ascended vp into heauen namely in respect that in the very same forme of a seruant when it was glorified euen the forme of God was after a sort glorified by his ascention and after it that is was made glorious in the wholle world 28 But it is apparent that as this consequence is not good Christ himselfe beeing God and man ascended into heauen in a locall and visible moouing Therefore he in the same sort ascended according to his dietie so neither is this good Christ God and man is with us to the ende of the world truely and in his owne essence therefore he is present on earth as wel in the substance of his body and soule as in the essence of his dietie 29 If also the Apostles sawe with their eies Christan his owne body by chaunge of place ascending from earth into heauen then the heauen into which he did ascend caÌ„not be an vbiquitary heauen but it must needes be farre distant from the earth 30 Moreover nature and all right requireth that for every thing some certeÌ„ place must be assigned as we see god hath done in all the things which he created Seing then no created thing