Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	father_n	ghost_n	holy_a	5,369	5	5.6194	4	true

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A15857	H. Zanchius his confession of Christian religion Which novve at length being 70. yeares of age, he caused to bee published in the name of himselfe & his family. Englished in sense agreeable, and in words as answerable to his ovvne latine copie, as in so graue a mans worke is requisite: for the profite of all the vnlearneder sort, of English christians, that desire to know his iudgement in matters of faith.; De religione Christiana, fides. English	Zanchi, Girolamo, 1516-1590.	1599 (1599)	STC 26120; ESTC S120607	223,465	477

repentance and the faith of Christ but seing they were as Luke reporteth onely baptized into Iohns baptisme which notwithstanding they knew not what it was and were altogether ignorant of the baptisme of Christ that is of the spirit he baptized them shewing vnto theÌ„ what Iohns baptisme was and how he baptized into Christ not into his owne sprinkling or dipping of the water as though that could be any profite vnto them He therefore baptized them with this baptisme of Iohn that is as Iohn vsed to do into the name of the Lord Iesus and by by after laying on his hands he baptized theÌ„ with the baptisme also of Christ that is with the spirit For immediatly the holy ghost came on them as it is there read This there And vpon the epistle to the Ephes chap. 4. the same Bucer writeth thus Hereby it is also manifest that the twelue men at Ephesus which knew not whether there were an holie ghost or no whome Paule baptized were not baptized with the baptisme of Iohn that is with that which he administred but as they witnessed themselues they were baptized into Iohns baptisme For Iohn preached vnto all whome hee baptized that Christ should baptize them with the holy ghost and exhorted them that they would beleeue in him and that of him they might receiue the holy ghost And therefore these EphesiaÌ„s could not haue beene ignorant of the holy ghost if they had bin washed with that baptisme which might truely be called Iohns which also the Apostles words to those men doth sufficiently declare Iohn verily baptized with the baptisme of repeÌ„tance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ For by these wordes he would teach vs that they neuer receiued Iohns baptisme who as yet knew not Iohns preaching of Christ and the promise Thus farre Bucer Seing then the fathers expound this place in Act. 19. as wee haue nowe declared who I pray am I that I should dare or that I ought to gaine-say so many and so learned men in such an exposition of this scripture which neither doth any whitt wrest the text nor contrarieth any other scriptures nor is against the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities For if any man shall obiect out of the text that same truely and but it prooueth nothing against the fathers exposition seing it is no vnusuall thing with the Apostle where hee saieth first truely not alwaies to ioyne the aduersatiue particle but Rom. 3. ver 2. Coll. 2. ver 23. and in other places And vnto this truely another but which Luke for breuitie sake left out might bee vnderstood verie fittly as hereafter we will shew so that it is no necessitie with this truely to ioyne that but which followeth in the 5. verse in which verse the fathers will haue not Paules speach but Lukes to be continued Therefore the fathers exposition is not repugnant to the text nor yet with any other scripture For if any man say Paule writeth to the Corinthians that he is gladd he baptized none but the house of Stephana it may be answered it is true namely at Corinth but these twelue were baptized at Ephesus and besides he speaketh of such as were baptized with his owne hand but these twelue he might baptise by some other to dispute no longer about the circumstance of the time And it is most certaine it is not repugnant to the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities because the fathers do not speake of a baptisme rightly administred as though Paule had repeated that again This expositioÌ„ therefore of the fathers in my iudgement cannot easily be refelled And this therfore is the chiefest cause why I haue euer thus thought and yet thinke of this action of Paule although indeed I cannot consent vnto them all in the cause why Paule baptized them but onely to Ambrose and Hierome That Iohns Baptisme Christs Baptisme did differ the fathers teach both by this that Iohn saide how he baptized onely with vvater but Christ should baptize with the holy ghost with fire and also by this that the baptisme of Iohn is called the baptisme of repentance but Christes baptisme is said to bee giuen for the remission of sinnes And because that he prepared the waye to this as Tertull. speaketh that baptisme of repentance was as it were a sueing for the remission of sinnes and sanctificatioÌ„ in Christ which was to follow after Read Tertul. of bap pag. 707. So Cyprian also in his sermon of the baptisme of Christ and of the manifestation of the Trinitie pag. 430. So August To. 7. against Petil cap. 7. But all of vs doe not knowe what the father 's meÌ„t by this differeÌ„ce of the baptisme For they ment not that the one diffred from the other in the matter or in the signe or in the doctrine and forme of baptisine but onely in efficacie that namely although remission of sinnes was giuen to them which were washed with Iohns baptisme yet the same was not of Iohns baptisme that is of water but by the baptisme of Christ which is the baptisme of the spirite whereunto that belongeth I baptize with water but he with the holy ghost And with this baptisme of the spirit were they only baptized which beleeued in Christ whome Iohn saide was then come though all knewe him not Therefore Iohn in his baptisme did inculcate and often repeate this faith as Paule witnesseth in that place of the 19 of the Actes They therefore are deceiued who for this diuersitie did thinke the baptisme of water was to be repeated August against Petil. as we touched a little before sheweth how some held opinion that the 12 did lye vnto the Apostle when being asked vnto what they were baptized they answered vnto Iohns baptisme So by this that first those Ephesians saide vnto him that they had not yet heard whether there were that is whether that holy ghost did exist or not namely the giuer of those giftes whereof the speach was the Apostle might be said to conuince theÌ„ of a lye by this argument Whosoeuer haue bin baptized they haue professed faith in Christ as the sonne of God and consequently in the father and in the spirite of them both For Iohn did require this faith according to the same he baptized men and in baptizing he alwayes vrged that Iesus Christ was he which should baptize in the spirit But you by your owne coÌ„fession do not know this spirite c. and so beleeue not rightly in Iesus Christ Therefore c. But surely to saye that these twelue did lye vnto the church and to the Apostle it seemes to me to be to hard and vile a thing in meÌ„ which professed Christ And for this cause we did euer better allow of the opinioÌ„ of Ambrose Hierome that the 12 did say truely wheÌ„ they said they were baptized vnto Iohns baptisme but yet not by

Iohn himselfe but by some one of Iohns disciples who expounded not vnto theÌ„ the true doctrine concerning God and therefore baptized them not rightlie But all the fathers doe hold beyond all controuersie that they which are not rightly baptized into Iesus Christ as the naturall Sonne of God mediatour and so also into his father and the spirite of them both the same must bee rightlie baptized And therefore those twelue were not as being not baptized rebaptized but as being not rightlie baptized Paule did baptize them with true baptisme first teaching them the true doctrine of the trinitie which also Iohn had preached vnto them And thus much of the authoritie of the fathers from whome either in their assertions or in their expositions of Scriptures especiallie where they all for the most part doe agree I dare not decline for my coÌ„science sake vnlesse I be coÌ„strained by most apparant reasons Thus I freelie coÌ„fesse to the whole church of Christ The reason also besids the authoritie of the fathers brought as we saw before euen by the fathers out of the verie text confirmeth me in the same opinion This reason is partly gathered out of those words which these Ephesians being asked by Paule whether they had receiued the holie ghost that is the gifts of the holie ghost aunswered saying that they had not so much as heard whether there bee that is whether that holie ghost bee existent whome Paule would haue to bee the author of those gifts so farre from theÌ„ it was that they should haue receiued him and his gifts and partlie it is gathered out of the wordes which Paule vsed concerning the doctrine and baptisme of Iohn saying Iohn verily baptized with the baptisme of repentance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ Iesus as if he had said you haue not rightlie beleeued in Christ such as he is the sonne of God God seing yee know not his spirite The conclusion followed that therefore they although they were baptised by I knowe not whome into Iohns baptisme yet were not rightlie baptized seing they were not instructed in the doctrin of the person of Christ in whome they ought to beleeue namelie that he was not onelie man and the Messias but also the sonne of God God from whome also from the father proceedeth the holie ghost and consequentlie not in the doctrine of god the father the sonne and the holie ghost in the name of all which baptisme is to be giuen And therefore that they ought to learne the true doctrine concerning the father sonne and holie ghost and resting therein to receiue lawfull baptisme that afterwardes by laying on of hands they might receiue the gifts of this holy spirite which Luke teacheth to bee afterwardes done saying but vvhen they heard it namely those twelue Ephesians what wheÌ„ they heard euen when they perceiued Paules doctrine concerning true faith in Christ the sonne of God and so in his father and the holie ghost which faith Iohn had also preached and wherein they resting were baptized c. This is the interpretation of the fathers namelie that those twelue were not rightlie instructed in the doctrin of god the father the sonne holie ghost and so neither rightlie baptized and it may be confirmed both by the kindred and cuntrie of those twelue and also by the cause for which Paule letting alone al the rest peculiarly asked them whether they haue receiued the holie ghost since they beleeued By kinde they were Iewes as appeareth by Iohns baptisme vnto which they saide they were baptized and they were baptized by a Iewe. But the Iewes for the most part neuer rightlie held the doctrine of the three persons subsisting in one essence And therefore these 12 Iewes also though they graunted Iesus to bee the true Messias yet they seemed to acknowledge but onely two persons the person of God the father and the person of the Messias euen as the most thought a bare maÌ„ but yet such a one as in whome God the father dwelt but that they were altogether ignoraÌ„t that the holie ghost was an existing thing the giuer of those graces they are conuinced by their owne words But surely there was some cause why Paule comming into Ephesus where were manie of Christs disciples asked this question of the 12 Iewes onely Surelie it is to bee thought by their aunswer that the Apostle either by their owne talke or by telling of some other of the brethren perceiued that these twelue did not thinke aright concerning the holie ghost Finallie this was the Apostles argument whereby he would prooue by their owne auÌ„swere that they were not baptized with the true baptisme of Iohn Whosoeuer hath bin baptized with the true baptisme of Iohn he hath also heard his doctrine concerning god the father the sonne the holy ghost and hath professed the same and consequently hath knowne also the holy ghost This proposition is not expressed but the proofe of it the Apostle bringeth in the 4. verse saying Iohn baptized c. that is Iohn preached not onely repentance but also faith in Christ namely that he is not onely man the Messias but also the sonne of God God from whome as also from the father proceedeth the holie ghost and that hee shall baptize in the holie ghost and therefore all which desire to bee saued must also beleeue in him as the true Sauiour But you haue not heard this doctrine nor professed it therfore haue not truely beleeued in Christ such as he is For yee your selues say yee haue not so much as heard whether there bee an holie ghost namelie when yee were baptized Therefore c. So consequentlie it remaineth that professing this doctrine and faith yee nowe receiue lawfull baptisme and afterward by the laying on of handes those giftes of the holie ghost This is the declaratioÌ„ of the argument according to the exposition of the fathers but Luke as the Prophets and EuaÌ„gelists vse to doe coÌ„prehended the whole summe in few words And I praye what absurditie can followe hereoÌ„ or what iniurie is done to the Apostles narration is the heresie of the Donatiftes Anabaptists maintained nothing lesse For they rebaptize such as are rightlie baptized the Apostle baptizeth them which had not beene rightly baptized as hauing not heard nor professed the true doctrine concerning God he tooke care they should be rightlie baptized And such when they come into the catholicke church we speake of them that bee of yeares of discretion all the fathers teach they must be baptized with true baptisme instructing them first in the doctrine concerning God Christ their Sauiour Touching the text it selfe it is no whitt wrested That their aunswer But wee haue not so much as heard whether there be an holie ghost caÌ„ not bee vnderstood of the giftes of the holie ghost it appeareth by Paules demaund following being asked with an admiration Vnto what were yee then

the gift of constancie in the faith the end is our glorious resurrectioÌ„ euen eternal life I say for this other principal foundation of christian religion what caÌ„ be said more plainly more largely theÌ„ that which hath bin in the councells of Africa determined out of the scriptures by Meliuitanus Arausicanus others against the Pelagians which were written by Augustine to say nothing of others in manie bookes against the same Pelagians Concerning the holy Catholike Church what is there needfull to bee knowne which hath not beene most plentifully and plainely set downe by Augustine aswell in other places as especially in his bookes against the Donatists euen out of he foundations of the holy scriptures But it is a matter of great moment to knowe what and where the true church of Christ is being out of the church there is no saluation and therefore it is an article of faith not of the least accompt About the points of the sacraments also if a man will coÌ„tent himselfe with the simple truth what is more euident then the doctrine which the auncient fathers Iustine Ireneus Tertullian Cyprian and chieflie Augustine haue deliuered out of the scriptures and left vnto vs in their writings One saith Like as Iesus Christ being by the word of God made flesh had flesh and blood so also we haue learned that the foode hallowed by him by the word of prayer and thanks giuing is the flesh and blood of the same incarnate Iesus Christ euen according to those words of Christ This is my bodie But Christ that is the vvorde was made flesh without anie chaunging of it selfe into flesh but onely by a hypostaticall or personall vnion therefore neither is the bread made the body of Christ by any transubstantiation of it selfe into the body but onely by an vnion and that not a physicall or bodily or hypostaticall but onely a sacrameÌ„tall vnion Also he saith by that foode namely of the blessed bread our blood and our body is nourished by a certaine chaunging of it selfe namely into Christ therefore that chaunge which is made in the supper is not of the bread into Christs body nor of Christ into vs but of vs into Christ by reason of our ingrafting as also wee reade in Augustine that Christ should say speaking of the receiuing of the Eucharist I shal not be chaunged into thee but thou shalt be chaunged into me The same man saith vnto this the foode of the Eucharist none is to bee admitted but they that beleeue that our doctrine is true being washed with the water of regeneration vnto remission of their sinnes so liuing as Christ hath taught them Therfore no infidells and heretikes nor they which haue not receiued the baptisme of Christ not they which liue in such apparent sinne and wickednes that they giue no notice to the church of their amendment are to bee admitted to the supper Another of them saieth the eucharist consisteth of two matters an earthly and an heauenly The bread though it be sanctified yet he calleth it an earthly matter why so because it comes from the earth it existeth on earth and is eaten with an earthly mouth the body of Christ he calleth a heauenly matter not because the substaÌ„ce of it is out of heauen but partly because it is taken into vnitie of the person of the word and partly because it is in heauen endued with heauenly qualities For although in the hypostasie which is the very word it bee euerie where yet in the owne proper essence it is only in heauen and not on earth Whereupon it also followeth that it is not eaten either by earthly men or by the teeth of an earthly body but onely of those men who being borne from aboue do carrie the image of heauenly men eate it in a heauenly manner namely in soule spirite And yet notwithstanding the very bodies also of the faithful while they eate onely an earthly matter they also participate of a heauenlie matter to their glorious resurrection are nourished by it as the same author in that place very learnedly expoundeth I think that by this which I haue spoken out of the creede concerning foure principal partes of christian doctrine your Hon. can well gather such is your piety learning wisedome what is to be concluded concerning the whole body The summe is this that those bee the true churches of Christ and therefore called of vs the truely defensed citties of Christs kingdom which professing generally the sacred scriptures and specially the catechisme in all places receiued doe so reuerence the auncient church and auncient fathers hauing therefore friendshipp and communion with them being now in heauen that neither in their opinions nor yet in their expositions of the holy scriptures they will easily decline from them but onely then whenas they bee forced to dissent both by manifest wordes of the holy scriptures and also by testimonies and consequences beyond all doubt necessary drawne from the principles of faith This surely was counted for a notorious fault in Nestorius and it is written to bee the cause of his vile heresie that contemning the fathers and trusting vpon his owne witt he expounded the holy scriptures after his owne braine What speake I of Nestorius yea that the same contempt of the fathers and some confidence of their owne witts and their owne learning did cause diuers more besides otherwaies verie notable men to fall into sundrie heresies I could easilie shewe out of the Ecclesiasticall histories and councells if the breuitie of an epistle would suffer me For whence I pray was it that after that most holy councell at Nice so many heretikes forth with arose of whome some oppugned the true and euerlasting deity of Christ others his true and perfect humanitie others the true vniting of both the natures in one and the same person others the true distinctioÌ„ of their natures their proprieties hence surely that conteÌ„ning the determinations of the fathers in the Nicene councell and their expositions vpon the holy scriptures and trusting confidently to their owne witts and puffed vp with humane knowledge and eloquence they dared euery one to expound yea indeed to depraue wrest the holy scriptures and foundations of the faith according to their owne fansies Hereunto pertaineth that which Vigilius left written in his first booke of the causes of heresies against Eutyches but they blow forth saieth he these smoakes of vaine accusations chieflie because they are euen sicke of the infirmity of ignorance or disease of contention and whilst they are gogged on with a fond conceite of minde they despise the rules of faith deliuered of old by the fathers onely for this cause to bring in their owne conceited opinions of innouations into the church Thus saith Vigilius This that I say is confirmed by the dispositions imitations and wordes of the sound fathers on the other side who expounding the scriptures and the foundations of christian faith

and most perfect essence in three existences or as the church vseth to speake persons Mat. 28.19 1. Ioh. 5.7 namelie subsisting of the eternall Father the eternall Sonne and the eternall holie spirite truely distinct among themselues yet without all diuision being both beginning and cause of all thinges II. That so euerieperson by it selfe is true god that yet there be not three gods For so wee doe beleeue and haue learned out of the holie scriptures that the father by himselfe is true and perfect god the Sonne by himselfe is god and the holie spirite by himselfe is god and yet that they are not manie but one onelie god Almightie Rom. 11.30 of vvhome all things by vvhome all things and for vvhome all things are III. One person to be distinct from another in personall proprieties but in essentiall they differ from euerie creature And because the holie scriptures doe so speake of god that they attribute vnto him manie proprieties both essentiall and personall and they teach that in the essentiall he differeth from all things created but in the personall one person to be distinguished froÌ„ another we therefore doe so beleeue that as to begett the Sonne is such a proprietie of the Father as can agree neither with the Sonne nor the holie spirite and againe to be begotten can agree to none but the Sonne and so of the rest so likewise to be most pure eternal immeasurable present euerie where simplie knowing all thinges simplie almightie simplie good and such like are in such sorte the verie proprieties of god that they can by no meanes bee communicated to anie creature so as it should bee good for example sake in that immeasurable goodnesse or omnipotent in the same omnipotencie that god is IIII. The essentiall proprieties in god doe not in verie deede differ from the essence For we acknowledge that in god for his singlenesse the essentiall proprieties doe not in deede differ from the essence and therfore they without this cannot be communicated to anie creature and therefore no creature can be or can be said to be for example sake omnipotent simplie iust wise or such like Euen as our Lord Iesus speaking of one proprietie Matt. 19.17 teacheth of them all saying none is good simplie but god V. That nothing is or can be made simplie such as god is vnlesse the same might simplie be god Wherefore they which will affirme that anie created substance euer could or can bee made partaker of those diuine proprieties whereby it should be such as god is as simplie omnipotent and such like they must needs then confesse that the same is or that it can be ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ of the same substance with god for asmuch as neither the sonne himselfe is simplie omnipotent but as he is ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ consubstantiall with the father nor yet the holie spirite VI. A confirmation of the former opinion Whereuppon we also vnderstand how it is that sith the sonne is no lesse omnipotent theÌ„ the father and so likewise the holie ghost yet we doe not saie that they are three almighties Atha creed but wee confesse with Athanasius and the whole church that they are one onlie almightie because indeed of them all there is but one and the selfe same substance Therefore seeing no creature hath one the selfe same essence with God but a farre other and diuerse and if the same by coÌ„munication of the diuine omnipotencie could also be made omnipotent then it must follow that there might be more almighties then one which wee beleeue can not without blasphemie be affirmed VII Errors Wherefore we condemne and detest all heresies which haue risen against this first article of our faith or haue sprong from hell bin condemned by the holie fathers in their lawfull councells as those of Cerin thus Ebion Valentinus Marcion Manichaeus Arius Eunomius Sabellius Praxea Fotinus and such like as Seruetus and Tritheitae also the blasphemies of Iewes and Turkes and lastlie all heresies which haue bin inuented by the diuell either against the vnitie of the diuine essence or against the true Trinitie of persons Yea and those therefore which denie either the Sonne to be true and euerlasting god or the holie ghost to be so or which do coÌ„found these persons and saie they bee one and the selfe same existence which for diuers respects is called by diuerse names of Father Sonne and holie Ghost We also condemne all those errors which doe seperate the essentiall proprieties of god from the diuine essence which it seemeth vnto vs that these men verie vnaduisedlie doe which teach that those essentiall proprieties in verie deed may be communicated or rather at already coÌ„municated to creatures without coÌ„munication of the essence CHAP. III. Of the foreknowledge and praedestination of god I. God did foreknovv and foresee all thinges from the beginning WE beleeue that God before he made the worlde euen then from before all things by his immeasurable wisedome foreknew all things yea and what good he ment himselfe to doe and what ill he meant to suffer to be done so farr forth as nothing was euer hidden or could be hidden from him but all things aswel what hath bin done is done or shall be done as what caÌ„ be done though it neuer be done Heb. 4.13 Act. 15.18 wee doubt not but hath and doth lye open and manifest all waies in his sight II. God hath determined all things in his eternall counsell and hath before hand ordayned them to the best ends And we beleeue that God hath not onely foreseene all things and that they are present in his sight Act. 4.28 but also in that his most wise and eternall counsell he hath certenly established whatsoeuer did or doeth appertaine to the creation and gouernement of the world or to the selecting of his church from the vncleane filth of other people or to our redemption and eternall saluation and that he ordained through his infinite goodnesse that those euills which in his wisedome he would suffer to be done should bee to good endes so that not one haire can fall from our head Mat. 10.29.30 without the will of the Father or without cause III. All men to be praedestinate some to life and some to death Wherefore we also doubt not that God when he created all men to speake nothing of Angells in Adam righteous he foresawe that in him all should sinne and elected some in Christ Eph. 1.4.5 that they should be holieÌ„ and vndefiled in his sight in charitie and therefore predestinated them of his meere grace and according to the purpose of his will Rom. 9.22 to eternall life other some he would not vouchsafe that grace and therefore prepared them as vessells of wrath for destructioÌ„ because of his iustiudgement that in the one sort his infinite mercie in the other his iustice might bee knowne to the whole world to his great glorie IIII. The

malice and therefore he had no part in the kingdome of Christ Many also as saith Augustine doe eate the bread of the Lord but not the bread the Lord. For as they that heare the gospel are not all made partakers of the forgiuenes of sinne declared therein vnlesse they repent them of their former ill-life and doe beleeue in Christ so neither do they obtaine those things which are represented and offred by the sacraments because they receiue the same sacramentes vnlesse they haue also true repentance and faith XIV By the vnworthinesse of the receiuers the vertue of the Sacraments is not taken away nor weakened Neither yet do we thereby weaken or take away the vertue of the sacraments and the force and power giuen vnto them of God which we acknowledge to depend not vpon the vnworthines of the ministers or receiuers but on the faith and vertue of Christ the institutor of the sacraments For euen as the gospell doth keepe vnto it selfe alwaies both the signification though it bee not vnderstood of all and the power of giuing all things which it offreth though all bee not made partakers thereof euen so the sacraments those visible wordes doe the like namely that as the gospell of it selfe is the power of God to saluation but indeed to none but the beleeuers So also the sacramentes are alwaies the working instruments of the holy ghost to saluatioÌ„ howsoeuer none receiue this powerfull working but the true beleeuers For which cause the Apostles feared not to call them all which were baptized 1. Cor. 6.11 holy renued righteousse although they knew that among them were many hypocrits For by such speaches they declared the great power giuen by God vnto the sacraments what we should beleeue they would work vnlesse perhaps our hypocrisie did hinder them In which sence if a man saye that who so doe eate the bread of the Lord they also are made partakers of the Lords body that is it cannot stand with the vertue of the sacrament and with the vertue of the author and distributor thereof but who so be partakers of the sacrameÌ„t must needs also be partakers of the thing signified and offered by it such a manner of speach we cannot disallow so that such expositions might be added by which the people might be instructed and those false opinions conceiued before of the worke wrought might be drawne out of their mindes XV. Betvveene the signes and the matters is a sacramentall vnion and what it is And although we saye that the matter of the sacraments is not tied to the sacraments or included in them namely either physically or locally or corporally or also by any knott or bande as though God had simply promised the very matters themselues to euery one that should receiue the sacraments howsoeuer they lacked faith so that he were bound to communicate them vnto vnrepentant and vnbeleeuers yet we take not away all coniunction and copulation of the thing signified with the signes For we acknowledge confesse a sacramentall that is such an vnion as is agreeable to a sacrament with the thinges of the Sacrament And this sacramentall vnion consisteth in a certaine mistical and holy relation namely in as much as the signes do signifie the things and offer them to be receiued the things are signified by the signes and are giuen to be receiued no otherwise theÌ„ the vnion is betweene the word signifying exhibiting and betweene the things by the word signified and exhibited But the coniunction aswell that of the sacraments as this of the word with the things themselues hangeth or dependeth vpon the wil and counsell of God the institutor who when he instituted the preaching of the gospell and administration of the sacraments did institute them to this ende and purpose as is declared both that we hearing the word and seeing and receiuing the signes should by by lift vpp the eyes of our minde to the things signified by them beeing offred vnto vs should receiue them with the hands of faith and might indeed be vnited vnto Christ whom they preach vnto vs and shewe as it were with the finger by their signification Therefore as the coniunctioÌ„ of vs with Christ is al full of mistery as the Apostle teacheth in the 5. to the Ephe. So also we thinke this vnion both of the word sacrameÌ„ts with the things wherof they be signes and sacraments to be misticall and spirituall XVI A definition of the sacraments We iudge therefore sacraments in fewe wordes to comprehend manie things to bee externall signes and such as are obiect to our senses ioyned to the word of the gospell according to Christes institution for our ignorance and infirmitie and the more earnestlie to stirre vp and confirme our faith by which all men are seriously called to the true and reall communion with Christ and so with his flesh and blood and consequently to the parking of all the good things which ar in Christ and which are signified offred by the word and by the signes and as for the elect faithfull they are indeed drawne by the holy spirit inwardly working in their mindes that they being incorporated to Christ may accomplish and make vpp the bodie of the whole church preordained of the Father to his owne praise and glorie and their eternall blessednesse XVII The sacraments of the old Testament what in general they had in them common vvith ours Touching the sacraments of the old Testament there is no cause we should speak much seing they are quite abrogated only this that the Fathers had the same God the same promises the same mediatour the same spirite of regeneration the same faith and hope and the same sacraments in respect of the substance which is Christ howsoeuer in cerimonies they were diuerse from ours especiallie sith theirs were deliuered to them for the same ende and purpose for which ours were deliuered to vs namely that they might bee confirmed in the faith of Christ and bee ioyned in communion with him Whereunto belong those sayings The lambe slaine from the beginning of the worlde Apoc. 13.8 1. Cor. 10.4 Heb. 13.8 Also All did drinke of the same rock and the rocke was Christ And Christ yesterday to day and for euer XVIII There be onely two sacraments of Christs church And wee acknowledge two sacramentes which are properly to be called by that name and which haue euer bin common to the vniuersal church of Christ Baptisme the Lords supper of which the one properly belongeth to the beginning of the communion with Iesus Christ the other to the increase whereupon also the one is called the water of regeneration the other the holy banquett and supper XIX Errors Wherefore we cannot allow of those who will haue sacramentes to be there where no word is heard but only the element seene nor those which distinguish not the matter of the sacrament from the sacrament but will haue it come into the mouth aswell

commaundeth to be performed faithfully and prudently by the other faculties of the minde and instruments of the body Vpon the 19. chap. Of iustification Aphorisme 6. Whereas I so expounded that place concerning the faith of Abraham out of the 15 of Genesis and the 4. to the Rom. as I saide that that same thing was imputed vnto him for righteousnes which hee beleeued concerning Christ the promised seede I did it rather respecting the matter it selfe then the bare word of faith For I was not ignoraÌ„t that both Moses and Paule spake of the faith of Abraham that this faith was imputed to him for righteousnes seing the Apostle manifestly gathering a general doctrine from the example of Abraham adioyneth these wordes But to him that vvorketh not but beleeueth in him that instifieth the vngodlie his faith is counted for righteousnes that is hee is therefore accompted iust with God because he beleeueth in him which iustifieth the vngodlie by which place it most plainelie appeareth that from the true iustification of vs are excluded our owne works and that it is whollie ascribed to onely faith aswell touching the ende as touching the beginning But when the question is asked what cause there is why iustification should be attributed to faith and not to the works thereof it is woÌ„t to be aunswered and that both well and truely because faith not the works thereof doth apprehend remission of sinnes and Christ our righteousnes For by it we are not iustified in respect that it is a worke but in respect that Christ is appreheÌ„ded by it by the righteousnes of whom alone being imputed vnto vs we are properlie reputed iust before God and this is that which some say how faith iustifieth not in respect of it selfe but in respect of the obiect which it taketh hold on Thus is it manifest that it is true which I saide how that was properlie imputed vnto Abraham for righteousnes for that hee beleeued God concerning Christ namelie that in him all nations should be blessed and therefore Abraham himselfe also Likewise in the last aphorisme Neither deo wee allow of those which set our iustificatioÌ„ in the only remission of sinnes denying the imputation of the iustice and obedience of Christ which we thinke to be repugnant to the Scriptures Esay 7. Achild is giuen vnto vs c Whatsoeuer therefore he did or hath it is wholly ours Rom. 5. As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one many shal bee made righteous The disobedience of Adam was the breaking of Gods commaundement therefore the obedience of Christ coÌ„sisteth not onely in his death but also in his whole former keeping of the law Likewise the disobedience of Adam was whollie imputed to vs why not then also Christs whole obedience Also wee are two manner of wayes made sinners by Adams disobedience namelie by imputation of his transgression and by the reall deriuation of sinne that is of concupiscence into vs. Why then should we not thinke the same of Christ The vertue of his obedience to the commaundements of God the father is truely communicated vnto vs so that wee also begine to obey Gods law What lets then why wee may not say that his whole obedience is imputed vnto vs 1. Cor. 1. He is made vnto vs of God wisedome and righteousnes and sanctification and redeÌ„ption Phil. 2. He became obedient vnto death for which humbling of himselfe and obedience euen vnto death God hath highlie exalted him and in him vs c. He hath deserued by his obedience eternall glorie for himselfe vs as al the schoolemen and fathers do teach Therefore his obedience also to the law is imputed vnto vs for righteousnes Gal. 4. He was made subiect to the law that hee might redeeme those vvhich were vnder the lavve Therefore he kept the law for vs and for our saluation The testimonies of the fathers and also of the learned men of this age for breuitie sake we ouerpasse To conclude we beleeue concerning Christ that as for vs men and for our saluation hee came downe from heauen and was incarnate so also for the same cause he kept the law and did all the other things Vppon the 25. chapter Aphor. 10. and 11.12 When I write this coÌ„fession of saith I write euerie thing vppon a good conscience and as I beleeued so I spake freelie as the holie scriptures doe teach that wee ought to doe My faith is grounded simplie and principallie on the word of God and next somewhat vpon the common coÌ„sent of the whole auncient catholicke church if it doe not gainsaye the holie Scriptures For I beleeue that the thinges which were decreed and receiued of the fathers by common consent of them all gathered together in the name of the Lord without anie contradiction of holie Scriptures that they also though they bee not of equall authoritie with the Scriptures come from the holie ghost Hereupon it is that the thinges which are of this sorte I neither will nor dare disprooue with a good conscience And what is more certaine out of the histories the councells and writings of all the fathers then that those orders of ministers of which wee spake were ordained and receiued in the church by common consent of all the whole christian common wealth And who om I that I should disprooue that which the whole church hath approoued Neither haue all the learned men of this age dared to disprooue the same as knowing both that the church might lawfullie doe so and that all those thinges were ordained and done vppon a godlie purpose and to excellent good endes for edification of Gods children For confirmation sake hereof I haue thought good here to insert that which Martin Bucer of godlie memorie a man both for life and learning most famous hath left written concerning those matters vpon the Epistle to the Ephesians The ministerie of the worde being performed by reading and rehearsing the diuine Scriptures by interpretation and exposition of the same and with exhortations takeÌ„ there out and also by rehearsall and catechisme which is done by mutuall questions and aunswers of the yong beginner and the catechizer and also by holie conferences and deciding of the hard questions about religion according to this manifold dispensation of wholesome doctrine there are also manie dueties in this function For whatsoeuer beloÌ„geth to the perfectest manner of teaching is with an especiall care to bee vsed in the ministerie of the doctrine of saluation because indeed it ought to be deliuered as a knowledge both of all other most diuine and of all most difficult namelie that he which is man should liue according to God Now they which do teach diligently the artes as they are contained in certen knowne books as if they meane to teach mathematicall principles out of Euclide first of all they will reade and rehearse the same booke by and by they will expound the seuerall words such as euerie one knowes

election of the Saintes by free gift For as the calling vnto Christ and iustification in Christ is wholie of free gift Eph. 2.9 Tit. 3.5 and not of our owne vvorkes so likewise we vnderstand that the whole praedestination of Saintes is freelie giuen Eph. 1.4 Rom. 9.11 1. Cor. 1.31 because it is wrought in Christ and for Christ is put in execution that no man might glorie in himselfe but he vvhich glorieth should glorie in the Lord. V. We are pradestinate not onely to the ende but also to the meanes Whereuppon wee also beleeue sith God hath chosen vs in Christ that wee might bee faithfull holie vnblameable in his sight that wee are praedestinated not onely to the ende that is to eternall life and glorie but also to the meanes by which wee attaine vnto the ende and chieflie vnto faith whereby wee are ingrafted into Christ and to regeneration and true repentance 2. Cor. 5.17 Gal. 6.15 Mat. 5.16 whereby being made new creatures in Christ we might liue holilie to his glory and edification of our neighbour VI. They bee not elect neither can they bee saued vvhich are neuer grafted into Christ by his spirite and true faith They therefore are shamefully deceiued to their owne destruction which perswade themselues they are elect Tit. 1.16 Eph. 2.10 and therefore shall be saued although they bee not grafted into Christ by faith nor repent them of their sinns nor regard the will of God or to doe anie good workes For they separate that which god will haue ioyned together VII Euerie one ought stedfastlie to beleeue he is â—lect in Christ yet we may be more assured by the feeling of our faith in Christ Hence it is manifest although no man in generall ought to exempt himselfe out of the number of the elect sith the Scripture doeth not so but rather stedfastlie to trust that when he is called to Christ he is called according to the eternall decree and election of God 2. Cor. 13.5 yet if any man will be more assured of his certaine election he must runne to his faith and the witnes of his conscience whether he perceiue that he truely beleeueth in Christ and whether he carrie a sincere loue towards god and his neighbour Yea if he finde himselfe herein not altogether soundlie and throughlie setled yet let him not desparre but desire of god that he will helpe his vnbeleefe hoping that he may in time be better assured Mat. 9.24 VIII The causes why the doctrine of predestination is deliuered in the Scriptures For neither is the doctrine of the eternall free and vnchangeable predestination deliuered in the holie scriptures that we should neglect Christ or despaire of saluation or with securitie let loose the raines to our concupiscence or growe insolent but contrariewise for these especiall causes Act. 4.12 2. Tim. 2.19 First that wee may knowe that without Christ none can be saued sith the foundation of our whole saluation was fastened and laide in him before the world was made Then that in time of our temptations wee which beleeue in Christ should strengthen our selues by the certainetie of our saluation Rom. 8. and so neither dispaire nor distrust knowing the same to be certaine and sure in the eternall decree of god Thirdlie that thereby wee might be stirred vp to the studie of faith in Christ of holinesse and of good works Eph. 1.4 2.10 sith we are chosen that we should be faithfull and holie and blamelesse in his sight and walke in good works Lastlie that wee growe not proude if we trust in Christ and liue godlie in Christ and that he which glorieth may glorie in the Lord 1. Cor. 1.13 sith god through his grace did from the beginning decree in Christ that we should be such CHAP. IV. Of the omnipotencie and will of God I. So is god omnipotent that he is able to doe more then he will doe VVE beleeue that God is so omnipotent that he not onely hath done doeth whatsoeuer he would will but also he is able to will and to doe infinite works which he wil not following also herein the doctrine of Iohn who said Mat. 3.9 God is able of these stones to raise vp children vnro Abraham which yet he would not doe and also the opinion of the Apostle who writt Ro. 9.15.18 that God will haue mercie on whom he vvill whenas he could haue mercie on all and he will harden not all Turt con Prax. as hee could but those vvhome he vvill so that it is verie impious to conclude anie thing to haue beene done to bee done or shall bee done of the onely omnipotencie of God wherein his will is not also reuealed II. Jt infringeth not the omnipotencie of god that certaine things can not be done by him Where the Apostle writeth that god can not denie himselfe we holde that there is no iniurie done against the omnipotencie of God if a maÌ„ say there are manie thinges which cannot bee done by god namely such thinges as are repugnant to the nature of god and do implie a contradiction III. A confirmation of the former assertion For he being the chiefest good he can neither be made euill nor can doe ill and beeing trueth it felfe he cannot lie being iustice it selfe he cannot doe vniustlie beeing life it selfe how should he die Finallie being onely one god and that vncreated and eternall subsisting only in three persons we beleeue and confesse that he can not so take anie creature to himselfe to make the same ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ consubstantiall to himselfe and wholie such as he himselfe is or constitute a fourth person and wee are perswaded that nothing is drawne or taken away from the omnipotencie of god by this confession yea surely whatsoeuer is alreadie done it cannot be that the same should not haue bin done so that it is certaine that what so implieth a contradiction the same cannot bee done by God who is the especiall trueth it self For by this reason euen the omnipotencie of God whereby they were done should be apparentlie denied IV. The will of god to be searched for onely in the holie scriptures Furthermore sith the counsells of god are infinite and secret which he reuealeth not to the Angells themselues wee hold Mar. 13.32 that when there is anie question concerning the will of God the same is not to bee sought for in anie other place then in the holie scriptures wheras whatsoeuer thinges were necessarie to our saluation Ioh. 15.15 17.29 god hath plentifullie and perspicuouslie laide open vnto vs and whatsoeuer he would haue vs to doe he hath of his singular goodnesse reuealed vnto vs by his spirite CHAP. V. Of the creation of the worlde of Angells and of mans first estate I. All things were made by god Gen. 1. 2. and that exceeding good WE beleeue that God the Father Col. 1.16 by the

diuine prouidence yet we beleeue that the Church of god is gouerned by an especiall care and meanes and all the elect people Rom. 8.13 Phil. 2.13 2. Cor. 6.16 yea and all the willes and actions of the elect sith he calleth peculiarlie iustifieth and sanctifieth but not all sith hee vvorketh in them to vvill and performe Act. 4.16 and saith that he dwelleth in them and not in all sith lastlie he leadeth them vnto eternall life but suffereth others in his iust iudgements to walke in their owne pathes and fall into eternall destruction 1. Pet. 5.7 so that worthilie we be commaunded peculiarlie to cast all our care vppon god because he peculiarlie careth for vs. III. That god ordinarilie gouerneth the vvorld by second causes This also we learne by the holie scriptures though God performeth manie purposes of his diuine prouidence by himselfe without any external helper yea and sometimes quite against ordinarie meanes yet he executeth manie more thinges ordinarilye by second causes Hos 2.21.22 as well in the gouernmeÌ„t of the whole world as of the church sith he himselfe saieth he vvill heare the heauens the heauens vvill heare the earth the earth vvill heare the corne the corne vvill heare Israell IV. The meanes vnto the ende are not to bee contemned sith god ordereth as vvell the one as the other by his prouidence Whereuppon we also knowe that although we are assured that god hath a care ouer vs yet the meanes which hee hath ordained for the saluation both of our soules and bodies are not to be contemned nor god to be tempted but herein we must followe the Apostle vvho although he vvere assured of the safetie of all them which were in the shipp yet as the mariners went about to escape awaie he saide to the soldiors and to the captaine vnlesse these abide in the shippe you cannot be saued For God who setteth an ende vnto each thing he also hath ordained both the beginning meanes by which that ende is attained vnto V. All thinges come to passe in respect of god necessarilie in respect of vs manie thinges happen casuallie But sith god by his prouidence doeth preserue second causes which he vseth in gouerning the worlde euerie one in her proper nature yea and is the moouer of them and of them some are ordained of their owne nature to certaine and sure effects other some are indefinite Wee knowe and confesse that although in respect of God Mat. 10.29.30 Ex. 21.13 without whose foreknowledge and wil nothing can happen in the world all things are done necessarilie yet in respect of vs and of the second causes manie things happen come to passe chauÌ„ceablie For what can bee more chaunceable and casuall to a carpenter and trauailer then if the axe fall out of his hand kill the other yet the Lord saieth that it is he which killed the trauailer And our Lord Iesus died willinglie yet he said Christ must suffer Luc. 24.46 Herode Pilate of their free-will condemned Iesus yet the Apostles saie Act. 4.28 they did nothing but what the hand and counsaile of God had decreed to be done VI. That god is not the author of sinnes vvhich are committed in the world And hereupon we also know and confesse Act. 17.28 that although manie offences are committed in the world by men god in the meane time guiding all thinges 1. Ioh. 2.16 yet the same cannot bee imputed to god nor to his prouidence for he indeede mooueth all thinges and ministreth strength by his prouidence vnto euerie one to worke but yet he instilleth not that corruption to anie whereby they worke amisse As therefore the earth yeelding her sappe aswell to il trees as to good yet is not to be blamed because an ill tree makes ill fruite so much lesse may god rightlie be said to bee either the cause or the author of our sinnes although by the hand of his prouidence he beareth vpholdeth ordereth and guideth euen the wicked Jn him saieth the Apostle we liue vve are mooued Heb. 1.3 Act. 17.28 and haue our beeing namelie wee are mooued of him such as wee are except he by his grace doe make vs otherwise VII The secret counsailes of God in gouerning the world are to be reuerenced not inquired after Meane while the secrete and vvonderfull counsells of god whereby wee see innumerable things to be done and whereof we cannot giue or know any reason the same we behold adore with that reuereÌ„ce which we ought contenting our selues with this assured knowledge Mat. 10.29.30 Rom. 9.14 namely that nothing comes to passe in the worlde without the will of God and that will of god to be so just that it is the most certain rule of all iustice therefore that which the Apostle saith must euer bee holden Rom. 11.33 O the deepenes of the riches both of the wisedome knowledge of god how vnsearcheable are his iudgements and his vvayes past finding out Rom. 9.14 Rom. 11.36 Also that Is there anie iniquitie vvith God And yet Of him and through him and for him are all thinges To him be glorie for ouer Amen VIII Errors Wee condemne therefore all scorners and all those philosophers which either do wholie take awaye the prouidence of god out of the worlde or denie that humaine matters and smale things are regarded of god Those likewise which abusing the prouidence of God doe contemne the meanes ordained of God for the saluation of vs both soule and bodie as also those which woulde haue all thinges to come to passe so meerely necessarily that they take awaye all casualtie and depriue men of all libertie lastlie those which will haue God so to worke all thinges in all men that they also doe blasphemouslie prooue him to bee ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ a iointe-worker an author of sinne CHAP. VII Of mans fall and of originall sinne and the fruites thereof I. Adam sinned of his owne accord by disobedience WE beleeue Gen. 1. 2 Eccl. 7.30 Sirac 15.18 that the first man when he was created after the image of God iust and righteous and meerlie free so as he might if he woulde not haue sinned nor haue died any kinde of death The diuell then alluring him and god not letting him but leauing him in the haÌ„ds of his owne counsells he transgressed by disobedience Rom. 5.19 Libera voluntate of his owne accord and of his meere free choise so that he nether can nor ought to ascribe the blame of his transgression to his owne nature giuen to him of god nor to god himself nor to any other thing created but to his own selfe alone because it was his owne vvill II. What and what manner of sinne Adams was For vve knovv that Adams sinne was a voluntarie transgression of gods commandemeÌ„t that he should not eate of the forbidden fruit as Moses describeth it and so as the Apostle speaketh it

was a disobedieÌ„ce Gen. 2.17 3.6 Rom. 5.19 which was shewed not so much in the outvvard deede as in the purposed consent of his minde vvherin he vvould not be obedient vnto god III. What and how manifold a death followed Adams sinne So vve confesse that man being then destitute of the fauour of god by his ovvne faulte did loose that life vvherein he liued holily vnto God his minde being darkened his vvill depraued and all integritie of nature vtterlie lost Ioh. 8.34 Eph. 2.1 Rom. 5.12 name lie in those things vvhich pertaine to god and to a life acceptable to God and so vvas made the seruant of sinne the slaue of sathan and quite dead vnto god Moreouer he incurred both the death of the bodie vvhich is novv come vnto all men with al the calamities of the bodie and also the eternall that is the most miserable grieuous and most vnhappie life of the vvhole man more intollerable vvithout comparison then anie death vvith the deuill in euerlasting torments vvhence he could not be deliuered but by Christ 1. Cor. 15.22 IIII. That in Adam all men sinned But for as much as al mankinde which was by naturall generation to issue from Adam was then in his loines whereby the commandement vvith the curse annexed pertained not onelie to the person of Adam but to all mankinde likewise The Rom. 5.19 efore with the Apostle do vve beleeue and confesse that in Adam sinning all men sinned so that that disobedience was not onelie proper to Adam himselfe but also made common to all mankinde sith his guiltines enwrapped all men who were then and are yet dailie carnallie to be begotten of his seede Euen as the Apostle to the Romaines plainly teacheth yea and most strongly prooueth by an Antithesis or contraposition of the disobedience of Adam and the obedieÌ„ce of Christ For if the obedience of Christ be no lesse ours by imputation then his owne by his proper action because wee are regenerate of his incorruptible seede and of his spirite it followeth that the disobedience likewise of Adam must be imputed vnto vs and we touched with his guiltines because we are borne of the seed of his flesh being father of al men V. The corruption of mans whole nature followed vpon Adams disobedience in all men But like as the corruption of our vvhole nature Rom. 7.7 Aug. tom 7 con Iul. Pela li. 5. c. 3 immediatlie by gods iust iudgement tooke holde on the person of Adam for that actuall disobedience called of the Apostle Concupiscence which is both a punishment of the former sinne a sinne and a cause of other sinnes euen so being taught by the holy scriptures we beleeue and with the whole church confesse that all men which by naturall propagation are conceiued of his seed ar borne infected with the contagion of his corrupt nature For all men sinned in Adam and by the guiltinesse of his disobedience wee are all kept bound VI. What we properlie call originall sinne Wherefore we doe so saie that this haereditarie fault and contagion of nature is sinne in all men and so we vse to cal it originall sinne that we do not separate it from the guiltines and imputation of the first disobedience Euen as likewise on the other side we doubt not but the righteousnes of christians doth consist not so much in the regeneration of nature which is made by the spirit of Christ which is vsuallie called by the name of inhereÌ„t righteousnesse as in the imputation of the perfect obedience and righteousnes of Christ whose members we are VII That contagion of nature is verie sinne And although that contagion was inflicted not onelie vppon Adam alone but also on his whole posteritie for a punishment of that first transgression of Gods commaundement yet wee hold this as certainelie out of the holy scriptures as whatsoeuer is most certaine Rom. 7.7 that the same is not onely the punishment of sin and the cause of all other follovving sinnes but also a verie sinne it selfe euen so great as were sufficient to condemne vs. VIII That concupiscence of it owne proper nature is a sinne in the verie regenerate Yea so farre doe we learne that concupiscence of it owne nature is a sinne fighting against the lavve of God and making all men subiect to condemnation vnlesse they bee deliuered by Christ yea that in the regenerate themselues though the guiltines being taken away by faith in Christ it be not imputed vnto them anie more yet we doubt not 1. Ioh. 3.4 Rom. 7.7 but it is a sinne yea and that worthy of eternall death sith it is ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ a transgression of the lawe and is by gods lawe condemned as the Apostle teacheth IX From concupiscence ingrafted in vs the riuers of sinne doe continually flowe Futrhermore we beleeue that this our naturall deformitie is such a fountaine of al sin and that euer so abounding that from it doe continuallie spring most corrupt waters of e-euill affections of vngodlie thoughts vvicked desires which vnlesse they be by the spirit of Christ restrained they breake out at length into manifest sinnes offences some worse theÌ„ others so that there is not any man so holie which beareth not about him this puddle of vices yea and feeleth not the filthie vapors breathing from it and is not often sprinckled and bespotted with that noisome contagion Euerie man is tempted of his ovvne concupiscence saieth Iames vvhen he is drawne avvaye by his ovvne concupiscence Iam. 1.14.15 and is entised then vvhen lust hath conceiued it bringeth forth sinne and sinne wheÌ„ it is finished bringeth forth death X. That God is not the author of sinne Now all these things beeing thus wee are confirmed in that beleefe wherein wee hold that god is not the author of sinne sith he neither created Adam euill or prone vnto euil but iust and righteous neither did hee intice or mooue him to il but he of his own accord and by his free-will sinned 1. Io. 2.16 neither yet vvas this naturall peruersnesse from god but of it selfe it followed that disobedience of Adam being depriued of his righteousnes god most iustly so permitting and punishing mans traÌ„sgression by that worthie punishment XI Errors We condemne therefore with Ireneus and the whole church all those which make god the author of sinne likewise all Pelagians as wel new as old which denie that all men sinned in Adam and are holden in the guilte of the first offence or doe labour to prooue that this ingrafted concupiscence is onelie a disease and a punishment of sinne but not indeede a sinne it selfe or at least in the regenerate will not haue it to bee worthie the name of a sinne Wee condemne also those which haue taught that originall sinne is a substance because this opinion either makes god the author of sinne or else denies that god is the maker of euerie substance and confirmes the doctrine

bee not iustified by our workes yet others are oftimes edified thereby and saued Now this also we add that as of the fruits of trees though the trees themselues liue not by the same yet others namely earthly creatures and men are fedde and their life maintained by the same so although wee by our owne good works bee not iustified yet others thereby are not a little edified Mar. 5.16 and stirred vp both to glorifie God and also by our example to seeke after the true righteousnesse and life in Christ and are so saued Rom. 11.13 The Apostle also saying that he magnified his office among the gentilles namely by his diligence and holines of life that he might prouoke them of his flesh to follow him might saue some of them 1. Cor. 7.16 And in another place Sometime by the beleeuing wife liuing godly and holily and doing her duetie the vnbeleeuing husbaÌ„d is saued And to Timothie 1. Tim. 4.16 if he look to himselfe that is doe the duetie of a byshop he shall saue himselfe and others VI. Though we deny a man to be iustified by works yet we do not therefore condemne works Wherefore though wee denie that good workes are to bee done to this ende that by them we might bee iustified because that this ouerthroweth the free iustice of god whole benefite of Christ yet wee doe not therefore disallowe the care of a holie life and good works nay we commend them and vrge meÌ„ thereunto as much as we can possiblie VII There be many and those most weightie causes why men must labour to doe good works For there be many and very weighty causes declared in the holy scriptures why wee must diligently labour to do good works although wee bee not iustified by the same whereof some are referred immediatly to the glory of God some to the saluation of our neighbour and profite of the church and some also pertaine to our owne thankfulnes towards God yea and to our owne saluation God commandeth this thing and to his commaundement we must simply obey Mat. 5.16 By these workes God is glorified and the glorie of God must bee set forward Tit. 2.12 God did therefore elect create redeeme and plant vs in Christ that we should liue soberly iustly and godly in this worlde and God is not to bee defrauded of his purpose Act. 10.35 Col. 1.10 They please God for he hateth iniquity and loueth righteousnesse and wee must doe those thinges which please god though thereby there should arise no profite either to our neighbour or to our selues But both to our neighbour and to the church especially commeth great profite by our good works not onely in regard of the bodie and external coÌ„modities but also of eternall saluation whilst by our example to let passe other thinges the elect are prouoked to the like godlinesse 2. Cor. 1.4 Heb. 10.24 2. Pet. 1.10 And to vs they are profitable first because that by good works as by the effectes of our election and vocation wee make them both that is both our election and calling assured both to our selues and others Secondly because faith not onely manifesteth and vttereth it selfe by the fruites thereof 2. Tim. 1.6 but is also by them exercised kindled strengthened and increased eueÌ„ as al moral vertues do get increase streÌ„ghtning by the exercising of them Thirdly because Eph. 4.30 as by our sinnes we grieue the holie spirit dwelling in vs so by good works we make glad and fill our hearts and consciences with spirituall ioye and contrariewise we resist the temptations of the deuill Fourthly because Deut. 28 as in auoyding sinnes there be also many punishments auoyded so by doing good works Eph. 2.10 we obtaine many blessinges of God aswell in this life as especially in the other Lastly because they are the waye by which God ordinarily leadeth his elect vnto eternall life and vnlesse the braunch bring forth fruite it shall be cut of and cast into the fire Ioh. 15.6 VIII There is promised and giuen a revvard to our good workes yet of free grace and for Christ Whereby wee vnderstand that although by our works we cannot to speake properly deserue for our selues the possession of the heauenly inheritance for eternall life is the gifte of God yet we may obtaine the same Luc. 17.10 Rom. 6.25 Ier. 31.34 Mar. 5.7 as it were a reward but yet of the free mercie of god and for the merits of Christ IX Errors We coÌ„demne therefore those which teach that for the worthinesse of their works there is due vnto them either remission of sinnes or ternall life or any other good gift For though wee should perfectly fulfill the commandements of God yet we should be but vnprofitable seruants Luc. 17.10 But no maÌ„ yea after his ingrafting into Christ keepeth the commandemeÌ„ts of God as they should be kept Meanewhile we disproue not the Fathers in that they vsed the worde merite namely so farreforth as thereby they ment nothing else then a good worke done by faith vnto which of fauour and for the onely merites of Christ was giuen a reward Againe wee cannot allowe of those which doe so discourse of good workes as if they were things indifferent and therefore hold that the same are not onely needelesse Heb. 11.6 Iud. 2 20 but also doe nothing auaile to saluation For how should any man bee saued without faith and how can he haue a liuing faith without a care to doe good workes and who can also hold faith vnlesse hee also keepe a good conscience and how can he keep a good conscience vnlesse he also keepe a care to auoide sinne and to doe good workes and to frame his whole life to the will of God but wee simply condemne all Libertines who make it all one to keep or not to keep gods commandements to do well or to doe ill We condemne also those which teach that our good workes doe profite the very soules of the dead which lye in a certaine burning flame which they call purgatorie 2. Cor. 3.10 sith the scripture saieth euerie one shal be iudged according to his owne works which he did in his owne bodie Apoc. 14.13 and not the works of other men but their owne workes doe followe them which are dead CHAP. XXII Of inuocation and an oath BEcause among the other good workes commaunded by God prayer is not the least so that very often in the scriptures it is taken for the whole seruice of god whereunto is ioyned also an oath as being a part of Gods seruice therefore we haue thought fitt brieflie to declare our faith concerning these two things and the rather sith among the professours of Christ there is some controuersie about both these points I. Onely God and so Iesus Christ to be praied vnto We beleeue that speaking of prayer which pertaineth vnto religion the true God that is the Father Sonne and

first the pure doctrine of the gospell is preached heard and allowed of and that so allowed of that there is no place nor hearing for the contrary Ioh. 10.4.5 For these both are properties of the flocke or sheepe of Christ namely to heare the voyce of their shepheard and to reiect the straungers voyce in those also where the Sacraments instituted of Christ as much as in them lieth are lawfully 1. Cor. 11.20 that is according to Christs owne institution administred and receiued and so where other Sacraments deuised by men are not allowed of in those lastlie where the discipline of Christ taketh place that is where a care is taken through loue that both priuately and publickely Mat. 18.19 Tit. 1.8 by admonitions corrections and when need requireth by excommunications the commandements of Christ may bee obserued and so that men may liue soberly iustly and godlie to the glorie of God edification of their neighbours For wheresoeuer vngodlinesse and all loosenesse of life is in publike practise and open offences are not reprooued according to the discipline of Christ there we beleeue that it is possble that manie good and godlie men may be but we beleeue this is not a godlie christian congregation the Lord himself saying Ioh. 13.35 in this men shall know that yee are my disciples if yee loue one another but what loue can there be where no care is taken that according to Christs doctrine brethren which offend may be corrected may repent may be gained vnto the Lord and saued VI. By vvhat manner of succession of Byshops it may be shewed that some church is Apostolicall So we acknowledge that from a perpetuall succession of byshops in some church I say not any manner of succession but such a one as hath had ioyned also vnto it a continuance of the Apostles doctrine it maye rightly bee shewed that that church is Apostolicall such a one as was once the church of Rome the succession of the byshops thereof euen to the time of Ireneus Tertullian Cyprian and some other So that they were wont not without reason to appeale vnto it and cite before it and such other of the fathers the heritickes of their times But indeed as we do acknowledge and confesse with Tertullian and other of the fathers that those churches are to be acknowledged to be truely Apostolicall in which the Apostles doctrine with the discipline of Christ and lawfull administration of the Sacraments is kept pure though the same haue not beene planted by the Apostles nor haue had a perpetuall succession of byshops euen from the Apostles time So againe the churches which were planted and watered by the Apostles although they can shewe a succession of Byshops continuall and without interruption yet if with the succession of byshops they can not also shewe a continuance of the doctrine of Christ and his Apostles we wil graunt that they haue bin christian and Apostolical churches but now we cannot acknowledge them for such For as the hood as the Prouerb saith makes not the monke but his godly and holy life so neither do byshops but the doctrine of Christ and christian religion make the church of Christ VII Not by any manner of consent but by consent in Christs doctrine some churches may be shewed to be true and christian churches For thus wee knowe that it can neuer bee prooued that wheresoeuer there is a full agreement among themselues there are the true churches of God sith both in the Iewish sinagogues and in the turkish congregations and long since in the conuenticles of the Arrians and Donatists there hath euer bene an especiall agreement but wee hold it may bee prooued onely by that consent which is in the pure doctrine of Christ and in true pietie For where the Apostle saieth 1. Cor. 1.10 I beseech you brethren by the name of our Lord Iesus Christ that yee all speake one thing and that there bee no dissentions among yee but be yee knitt together in one minde and in one iudgement hee meaneth in that Lord Iesus Christ by whose name he intreated them VIII The churches bee not taken away by euery dissention that ariseth in them But by the waye we are not so vniust to denie those to bee christian churches wherein there is not alwaies a full consent and agreement of all things For as euerie agreement doth not make a church so euerie dissention doth not dissolue the same so long as the fouÌ„dation which is Christ true God and true maÌ„ the true and perfect Sauiour be kept sound firme and so long as there is a full agreement in the summe of the Apostles doctrine which is deliuered in their creede IX A confirmation of the former opinion For as the reprobate hypocrites by their being in the churches do not hinder but that they still remaine true churches so neither the dissentions which are raised in the churches by the vngodlie or which through frailtie or ignorance doe spring among the Saints themselues can extinguish the same which verie thing the Apostle teacheth whenas speaking of the ministers of the true churches he saith that vpon the same foundation some do build gold siluer and pretious stones other wood stubble haye and to the Philippians hauing declared the summe of christian doctrine and exhorted all men that who so had profited therein should persist in it afterwards he addeth and if any be otherwise minded God shall reueale the same vnto them if we abide in the same vvhereunto vvee are come For else if we should denie there to bee anie true church where contentions about religion are stirred vp then was there no church at Corinth in Paules time where there were not onely diuisions verie rife one saying I am of Paule another of Cephas another of Apollo but also maruailous controuersies rose concerning religion Nor yet in Gallatia because immediatly after those churches were passing well planted by Paule there sprang vp in them seducers and heresies lastly neither yet could there be said to be any churches in the East or in the West because they were neuer voide of contentions not only betweene the catholicks and the heretikes such as arose from the catholicks but also euen among the godly fathers themselues as the histories doe plentifully make mention in so much that for these dissentions and sects the christians were woÌ„t to bee skoffed at in the theaters and stages among the infidells as also at this day wee are all derided for the same cause among the Turkes and Iewes But as in the primitiue church by those contentions of the christians it was no consequence that therefore they were not the people of God so neither at this time by ours can any man prooue it iustlie against vs but that indeede the contrarie may rather be concluded because it is the propertie of good wheat that is of the gospell wherby Gods people are gathered into his church that where it is sowen

rites and ceremonies wherein the vnitie was be polluted with diuers superstitions yea and especially if also the Sacraments instituted of Christ be corrupted and wholly disordered so that a good conscience can not bee partaker of them but what if the heauenlie trueth also be banished from them and in the place thereof preached and defended the doctrines of deuills what also if thou canst not there bee suffered to bee silent but shalt bee constrained either to denie Gods trueth and to subscribe to diuelish vntrueths or else to spill thy life and blood XVII He which is departed from the church of Rome hath not thereby broken the vnitie of the Church nor is seuered from the bodie of Christ In as much therefore as wee are accused of apostasie or a backsliding from the catholick and apostolick church of Christ and are saide to haue broken the vnitie thereof because we would no longer communicate with the congregations of the Romish church in vngodly superstitions idolatrous seruices but choose rather to follow the auÌ„cient doctrine seruice and discipline renued through gods benefite by the true seruants of Christ wee protest before God and his angels the whole church euen to the worlds ende that they doe an exceeding iniurie not onely to vs but also to the holie ghost and to all the auncient church Sith in this matter we haue done no otherwise nor doe then wee are commaunded to doe by the holie ghost taught by the fathers yea and counselled by the Papists themselues XVIII A confirmation of the former opinion For the Lord hath especially forbidden 1. Cor. 5.11 2. Cor. 6.14 Tit. 3.10 Rom. 16.17 Ca. 24 q. 1 c. 24 26 q. 3. c. 9 that we should haue any fellowship with idolaters and obstinate apostataes and heritickes in their idolatries and heresies Nor otherwise do the fathers teach as they are alleadged for witnesses euen in the canons then that not onely if there be a man but also if there bee a church which renounceth the faith C. 24. q. 1. c. 29. holdeth not the fouÌ„dation of the Apostles preaching and in which Christ doctrine abideth not it is to be forsaken Neither for any other cause was the old church of Rome so celebrated of the fathers that which then flourished was holie and called the mother of the churches but because it constantly retained the doctrin receiued of the Apostles all the rest for the most part slipping away But now what the doctrine of it is and what seruice and how farre it is fallen from the auncient doctrine in manie things it is too too well knowne We therfore moreouer protest that we haue made no other separation from the church of Rome that now is but as we are constrained by the word of God as we must needs obey God so commaunding vs and therefore least wee should still abide in an apostasie from the apostolicke and catholicke church wee haue iudged it our partes and dueties to returne at length to the same againe and to depart from the idolatries of this filthie polluted Romish companie XIX We are not simplie departed from the church of Rome but ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ in some respect For we haue not simplie and in all thinges forsakeÌ„ the ehurch of Rome but only in those things wherein it hath fallen from the apostolicke church and euen from it selfe and from the old and sound church nether are we gone with any other meaning but that if it would returne amended and reformed to the auncient state wee would also returne vnto it and haue communion with it and in their owne congregations Which that it maye one day come to passe wee beseech the Lord Iesus with our whole heart For what were more to be wished of euery good man theÌ„ that where we were by our baptisme borne a new there we might liue euen to our liues end so it were in the Lord. I Hier. Zanchius with my whole familie pronounce this to be witnessed to the whole church euen to the worlds end XX. The whole catholicke church is not suffered to erre but euerie particular church may Wee beleeue and acknowledge that this catholicke church as wee haue before described it is so gouerned by the holie ghost that he neuer suffereth the same wholly all of it to err because it euer preserueth in some godlie men the light of the trueth and retaineth the same pure and sounde by their ministerie to the ende of the world and deliuereth it to posteritie To which purpose wee doubt not but that tendeth which Paule saide 1. Tim. 3.15 The church is the pillar and ground of trueth because without the church is no trueth but in the church it is alwaies reserued sith there is euer more some congregation great or smale wherein the word of trueth doth sound But of euerie particular church wherein there bee euer good and badd mingled together wee know the reason is farre otherwise For first in these congregations either the pure word of God is preached or else with it vntruethes are also taught For where no ministerie of the word is ther we acknowledge to be no church If therefore together with the trueth there may also false assertions be taught howe can that congregation be said that it cannot erre when it doth manifestly erre And if the pure word of God be onely taught then the reprobate hypocrites which beleeue it not doe alwaies erre when they reiect the light of the trueth and walke in darkenesse and of them is almost in euerie place the greatest number As for the godly Mat. 24.24 though they are neuer suffered so to erre that they coÌ„tinue in their error and perish Christ himselfe saying Gal. 2.11 c. 1. Cor. 1.11 c. Gal. 1.6 c. The elect can not be seduced no not by the miracles and wonders of Antichrist namely not to the end to their destruction yet that they may erre aswell euerie one seuerally as many gathered together and that not onely in manners but also in the doctrine of faith wee are manifestlie taught by the histories both sacred and ecclesiasticall and by that which hath happened to godlie and holie byshops and their churches in the East and in the West XXI A confirmation of the former opinion Peter doubtlesse did erre at Antioch manie in the church of Corinth and more in that of Galatia being seduced by the false Apostles did most grossly erre though they were soone after called back againe by the Apostle from their errors Dauid also taught that the verie sheepe of Christ may erre Psal 119.176 when he said I haue gone astray like a sheepe that is lost and why were the ministery of the word in the church needfull for all the godlie if they could not erre Sith therefore euerie godlie man in each particular church and the same a true and pure church haue often and doe often erre that hypocrites are neuer indued

like as no other but the verie same Christ rose from the dead so he rose in no other but in the verie same bodie in which he suffred died and was buried 14 For he could not be truely said to be raised and to rise from the dead except that which truely died the verie same quickened againe should rise againe 15 Now the bodie wherein Christ suffred died and was buried was a true humane bodie visible palpable circumscribed Therefore Christ after his resurrection had and retained no body but that which was circumscribed in a certaine place and wheresoeuer it was and is might and may be seene and handled 16 Add also that the Apostle carefully discoursing of the qualities with which our bodies being raised vp to eternall life shal be indued he saith not that they shal not be subiect either to the eye or to the touch or not bee circumscribed in a definite place but he rehearseth onely incorruption glorie and power as is the agilitie thereof and that they shall rise spirituall not that the corporall substance shal be chaunged into an incorporeall but that they shal be as the greeks call it immortall and shal be full of the holie spirite dwelling and working in them The Apostle therefore taught that these are qualities neuer to bee seperated from the bodies namely that they shal be circumscribed visible palpable Wherefore neither did Christs body after his resurrection put of these qualities 17 Neither is that exception any thing that Christ after he was risen came in to his disciples the dores beeing shut For it was not therefore either made vnvisible or vncircumscribed or vnpalpable seeing Christ being come in and seene of his disciples presently saide Feele or handle and see Luc. 24. for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue And therefore as the Fathers teach there was no chaunge made of Christs bodie no more then there was when he or Peter walked vpon the waters but by the omnipotency of his diety hauing power ouer all things the doores gaue place to the true and firme bodie of the sonne of God 18 Wherefore not without cause did the Fathers condemne not onely Marcion the Maniches and others which taught that Christ tooke not a true and firme humane bodie but a phantasticall one and did all things according to imagination and phantasie but also the Originists Iohn of Hierusalem and Euticius of Constantinople Hier. tom 12. ad PaÌ„mach Greg. in Iob. lib. 24 c. 29. Bishops and others which said that Christs bodie after his resurrectioÌ„ was made so spirituall that it was more thinne then ayre and therefore invisible and vnpalpable 19 Seeing then that in the supper no other bodie of Christ is giuen vs to be eaten but that which was broken for vs that is truely suffered and died it followeth that Christs ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ body which we eate in the Supper is truely circumscribed visible and palpable and consequently seeing nothing is seene touched or perceiued in the Supper besides bread the same body cannot in it owne substance really be contained vnder the formes of bread and wine or lie hidden in the very bread and wine 20 Nowe we acknowledge the resurrection of Christ is both the cause and an example of our as well spirituall as corporall resurrection The cause of the spirituall because the Apostle saith to the Rom. 4. he rose againe for our iustification and an example because he saith Rom. 6. we are burâ—ed togither with him by baptisme into his death that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father so we also should vwalke in newenesse of life 21 But that he is the cause of our corporall resurrection we doubt not 1. Cor. 5. for that the Apostle saith If Christ be risen againe we shall also rise againe and for that he also saith Christ is the first fruits of them that rise and an example for that the same Apostle also writeth he shall chaunge our vile bodies Phil 3.21 that they shall be like his glorious bodie 22 Wherupon It also followeth either Christs bodie not to be invisible vnpalpable vncircumscribed and so not spirituall bodies but incorporall spirits 23 For where Christ saith Feele and see for a spirite hath not flesh and bones as yee see me haue hee did not onely conclude that himselfe was no spirite but he especially taught this that there is no flesh nor bones but may bee seene and felt 24 The Scripture teacheth and the church coÌ„fesseth that our Lord Iesus Christ being raised from the dead did shew vnto his disciples for fortie daies space by many arguments that he was truely risen and then euen in the beholding of the Apostles that he was lifted vpp from the earth ascended into heauen Therfore like as no other Christ rose againe then he which died so no other ascended into heauen nor in no other body then he in which that truely rose againe froÌ„ the dead the sonne of God truely humane visible palpable and circumscribed 25 Wherefore as the conuersation of the same Lord Iesus Christ wherein he conuersed amoÌ„g his Apostles after his refurrection for fortie daies space was not fantasticall but reall and true so also his ascension was not onely visible but also truely as the fathers say locall when the Apostles sawe him ascend from the earth vp into heruen 26 But such an ascension and mouing cannot agree to his divine nature therefore he ascended according to his humane nature 27 Yet by the way we denie not this but that Christ as God like as he is said to haue descended from heauen in respect that he abased himselfe taking vpon him the vile forme of a seruant and suffred in it so also it may rightly be said that he is exalted and ascended vp into heauen namely in respect that in the very same forme of a seruant when it was glorified euen the forme of God was after a sort glorified by his ascention and after it that is was made glorious in the wholle world 28 But it is apparent that as this consequence is not good Christ himselfe beeing God and man ascended into heauen in a locall and visible moouing Therefore he in the same sort ascended according to his dietie so neither is this good Christ God and man is with us to the ende of the world truely and in his owne essence therefore he is present on earth as wel in the substance of his body and soule as in the essence of his dietie 29 If also the Apostles sawe with their eies Christan his owne body by chaunge of place ascending from earth into heauen then the heauen into which he did ascend caÌ„not be an vbiquitary heauen but it must needes be farre distant from the earth 30 Moreover nature and all right requireth that for every thing some certeÌ„ place must be assigned as we see god hath done in all the things which he created Seing then no created thing

hypostaticall or personall vnion 19 Out of which place it euidently appeareth first that those things which are of the flesh are no lesse giuen to the word then the things of the word to the flesh then that they which belong to the word are giuen to the flesh after no other manner then they which pertaine to the flesh are giuen to the word lastlie that this manner of giuing is called the manner of mutuall pradication not simplie and in the abstractiue names of the natures but in the concretiue noting the person 20 Moreouer what this manner of praedication is and why it is so called the same Damascene expoundeth in the 4. chapter both by example and by the cause in these wordes This manner of mutuall praedication is vvhen those things vvhich are proper to one nature are spoken of the other nature by reason of the hypostaticall identitie or personall vnion of them both and for that the one nature is in the other for example vvee may say of Christ this our god was seene vpon the earth and conuersed with men and this man is vncreated not subiect to passion not circumscribed in any place And the examples added doe manifestlie shewe howe one nature doeth attribute those things which are proper vnto it selfe to the other and for what cause For God in that by this name is ment the diuine essence was not seene on earth but onely in that the person is ment by it which is both God and man 21 Therefore we mislike not that receiued description of the communicating of proprieties The communication of the proprieties is a praedication wherein the proprietie agreeable to one nature is giuen to the person in a name concrete because these two natures the vvorde and the humane nature taken are one existence or person 22 Thus therefore we iudge that the communication of the properties may not amisse be defined the communication of the proprieties is a praedication or a manner of speach wherein the proprietie that is the concrete name signifying the proprietie of one nature is spoken really of Christs person signified by the name of the other nature and is spoken onely in worde of the other nature in the concrete by reason of the coniunction of the natures the personall vnion thereof 23 But we say it is all one to be praedicated or said of the person signified by the coÌ„crete name of the other nature and to be said of the concrete name of the other nature signifying the person as also the proprietie and the concrete name signifying the proprietie of the one nature are in this matter alone 24 For this question was propounded by the fathers against the heretikes not so much about the things themselues as about the manners of speaking which the holy scripture vseth speaking of Iesus Christ when sometime it saieth The Lord of glorie vvas crucified sometime The sonne of man vvhen he vvas on earth vvas also in heauen and other such like namely how such phrases should be vnderstood 25 For none of any sound iudgemeÌ„t euer doubted but as the natures so also the essentiall proprieties of both the natures remained distinct whole and vnconfounded in the person of Iesus Christ after the vnion so as for example sake neither the deitie was made passible and locall nor the humanitie impassible and vncircumscribed as some heretickes falsifying the scriptures haue blasphemed 26 Now the very foundation of this whole exposition was the true and neere vniting of the two natures within themselues and a meeting of them into one and the same person vnspeakably made without conuersion without confusion without diuision without separation 27 For Damascene declaring this after he had taught how those things which are of the flesh are giuen to the vvorde and likewise how the things of the word are communicated to the flesh namely according to this manner of praedicaâ—ation he adioyneth the cause thereof saying by reason of the meeting together of the partes one with the other and the hypostaticall or personall vnion in the 4. chapter This is the manner saith he of mutuall predication vvhenas one nature doth giue the proprieties of one nature to the other which it doth in respect of the personall identitie the ioyning of the natures one with the other Now this ioyning of the natures one with the other is the very vnion that is an inward absolute and most perfect vniting them together As Damascene both els where especially in his 4. booke and 19. chapter expouÌ„deth it saying But the diuine nature once going through the flesh gaue vnto the flesh also an vnspeakable going to the diuine nature vvhich vvee call the vnion 29 We our selues add that this vnion is also the finall cause of this forme of speaking because therefore this reciprocall praedication is deliuered in the holie scripture that the true vnitie of the natures in one person of Iesus Christ might be shewed which is the cause why these verball praedications can by no meanes be said to be vaine or to no purpose seing they haue great vse shewing how the two natures are vnited into one person without confusion 30 Moreouer this same communication of the proprieties for example in this proposition God was crucified we say to be both verball and reall in diuers respects For in that by this concrete word God is ment a person which is not onely God but also man it is a reall predication For because he was man therefore he truly and indeed died But as the deitie is meant by the formall signification as they speake or as God simply is meant thereby it is a verball praedication and that a true one For god is truely said to haue died by reason of the person togither meant and that which is God indeed died not nor could die although he which is God did truely die 31 These thinges thus declared it is easie to iudge of the diuers enunciations which be tru and which false and in what manner of Praedication each one is to be taken Neither one nature nor the proprieties thereof can by any meanes neither in the abstractiue name nor in the concretiue be predicated or spoken of the other nature signified in the abstractiue For it is as false to say The humaine nature or the humanity is God as to say The humanity is the dietie And as false to say the humanity is immeasurable and infinite as to say the humanity is very immeasurablenesse or infinitenes Therefore in all the scriptures is no such kind of speech to be found 32 Neither can one nature or the proprieties thereof be spoken in the abstract of the other nature signified either in an abstractiue or concretiue name For both these propositions are false God is the humanity and the Deity is the humanity 33 Of either of the natures signified by what name soeuer the thinges that are proper therevnto may truely be spoken and that of them both in the concrete but of

it belongeth to the true gouernement of the church that some godlie and wife men be apointed which may visite the sick persons comforte them out of the word of God and confirme them in faith and if it happen that those sick persons be called of God forth of this worlde to encourage and animate theÌ„ to their departure as knowing that the soules of the faithfull so soone as they goe forth of their bodies do presently passe into heauen to Christ conuaied thither by Christs spirite and accompanied with his Angells and that they are blessed which dye in the Lord Let them also pray with them and accoÌ„panie those who are departing this life with their praiers euen vnto the last gaspe and so commend them to Christ And we doubt not but their bodies are with reuerence to bee brought vnto the graues as our churches both in words and in their deedes doe teach openly witnessing that they were temples of the holie ghost nowe indeede destroyed but shall againe in their time be restored and raised againe to life and that eternall Meane while the graues and churchyardes or buriall places must be kept decently and religiously as it is with vs the children parents kinsemen and alliance of the dead are to be comforted all those offices of humanitie which can be performed we endeauour to performe vnto them and teach that they are to bee performed And if so bee any psalme concerning the resurrection of the dead bee any where song in carrying of the course or any sermon made vnto the people after the dead body is laide in the earth wherein also some honest mention may be made of others that are dead who religiously died in the Lord this we doe not disallow so long as it is not done for the saluation of the dead but for the comfort profite of the liuing and edification of the whole church Wee beleeue also the soules of the faithfull loosed from their bodies do presently passe into heauen to Christ and therefore haue no need of our prayers yet the edification of the church is to be promoted and set forward vpon any occasion whatsoeuer 34 The church cannot rightly bee gouerned without lawfull free and christian meetings and Synodes of ministers Of Sinodes This also wee are assuredly perswaded as we learne both by the holie scriptures and by continuall experience that the church can not rightly bee gouerned vnlesse at knowne times there bee meetings of ministers aswell priuate in each seuerall church which were wont to bee called consistories or consultations Synedria as also publike and common in each prouince kingdome which for this cause were vsed to be called prouincial Synodes yea and also so much as may be common to al people in christendome which were called generall councells wherein it may be determined vppon all matters pertaining to the health preseruation and edification of the church euery ones free opinion may be heard each thing concluded by common consent and out of other the most approued councells as we read the Apostles and all the auncient churches did 35 A confirmation of the former opinion wherin of ecclesiasticall discipline Of discipline For the church is gouerned by discipline and without discipline it cannot bee ruled aright Discipline is a meanes and institution wherein wee as schollers of Christ do learne in his schoole how to liue vnto God and to do all things according to the doctrine of the gospell aswell publikely as priuately to the edification of the church and to our owne saluatioÌ„ It coÌ„taineth therefore the whole course of pietie the beginning proceeding ende 36 Discipline two fold Further discipline in the church is two fold one coÌ„mon to all christian people which of many is called vulgar discipline the other proper vnto ministers and to men appointed for church-offices which therefore is vsed to be called cleargie discipline 37 The parts of vulgar or common discipline That common and popular discipline consisteth chiefly in these matters first for the beginning when any is receiued into the church he must learne to know God and Christ and to call vpon him and to vnderstand what is his will This is done by catechizing wherein euerie one is taught the summe of christian religion and being taught hee must professe his faith before the whole congregation promise obedience vnto Christ and to his church according to the doctrine of the gospel Then Rom. 10.10 Mat. 28.20 because not to go forward in the way of god is to goe backward therefore they which are godly that they may truely proceed and goe on in godlinesse must often frequent the holy assemblies at appointed times and places and giue themselues to heare the word of God make prayers with others and practise charitable deedes towards the poore bestowing their gifts and oblations liberally But seing euen in our proceeding wee doe all fall some more greeuously and with greater offence to the church some lesse greeuouslie therefore the third part consisteth in the censure of our liues and actions namely that euerie one bee subiect to the censure Mat. 18.15 1. Tim. 5.20 all the time of his life yeeld vnto brotherly correction And if any haue fallen into a greeuous fault knowne vnto the congregation and being reprehended hath not truely repented for which cause hee may deserue to bee driuen forth of the church for a time and to be bound vntill he make amends and till he make publike signification to the church of his true repentance let such a brother be excluded out of the church and be bound but when he hath repented let him be loosed receiued into fauour and admitted into his former communion This is the first discipline the ende whereof is that euerie one should liue vnto God and at last also dye in the Lord Iesus 38 The parts of the cleargie discipline By the way albeit all kindes of men aswell ministers as lay men as they call them be subiect to this christian discipline yet among the fathers came in a certaine peculiar discipline of the cleargie whose parte it was to bee rulers ouer others not onely in worde but also in example of life and diligent performance of their dueties Of this these were the principall parts The first that they should abstaine from many thinges which otherwise in some sorte might be suffred in lay-men such as are many delights of the flesh glorious pompes sumptuous feasts costly furnitures prophane attendants and such like matters The second that they should cast aside al businesses of this life which might hinder from doing their duetie which consisteth chiefly in lawfull administration of the holie things in preaching the word and exercising the discipline of maÌ„ners such businesses are warre-fare marchandise law causes looking to vittlers tipling houses and such base affaires The third that they should promise a peculiar obedience to their owne bishop metropolitane of their bishop in honest matters

The fourth that they should more diligently then the lay-men applie the reading and studie of the holie scriptures and those artes and tongues whereby the scriptures may the better bee vnderstood and likewise their prayers and holy contemplations The fift that they should also apply themselues with a more diligent care not one ly to the proper duetie commaunded vnto euerie one but also to all those thinges which may seeme to appertaine to edification of the whole church 39 Vppon the necessitie of the discipline is concluded the necessitie of Synodes These are the partes of the discipline without which wee see not how any congregation can be rightly ordered or preserued And how should this discipline haue any place there where the ministers doe neuer meet together to know what is amisse in the church or what is waÌ„ting to make a censure on mens deeds to iudge vpon doctrines if any new be spread to consult vppon all things which pertaine to the profite of the church we iudge therefore that meetings of ministers and ecclesiasticall Synodes are very necessary to a true wholesome administration and conseruation of churches Seing neither any ciuill state common wealth nor kingdome can stand without their senates counsailes parlaments as they call them and meetings Therefore wee would woÌ„derfully well like that the auncient custome of the churches might bee restored that which was allowed by a newe decree of the emperour Iustinian namely that in euery prouince at the least twise in the yeare Sinods might be celebrated and that sometime also a generall councell might bee called of the most learned discreetest and wisest ministers of al prouinces and embassadours of princes which professe the gospell which if euer it might be in this our wofull miserable time wherein so many and such horrible heresies are euery where recalled out of hell it would as we thinke doe much good And wee pray vnto God the father with our whole heart through Iesus Christ our Lord that he wil stirr vp the godlie and valiant Constantines ValeÌ„tinians Theodosiies who by their authoritie may call a councell in which themselues being present and moderating the Synode it might be deliberated friendly and brotherly out of the holy scriptures of godly agreemeÌ„t peace and saluation of all churches to the glorie of God and of the name of Christ and salnation of all the elect 40 Errors Wee therefore disallow all such thinges as are repugnant to this foresaid doctrine confirmed by the scriptures and chieflie these speciall pointes 1 That the church consisteth of men only and the Angells not to pertaine vnto the same 2 That the true church which is the bodie of Christ consisteth not onely of the elect but also of reprobate hypocrites that they are true members of the church 3 That the church doeth so consist of the elect and of true Saintes that in it should bee contained no hypocrites and that in the scriptures they should neuer bee comprehended vnder the churches name 4 That the church which was before Christes comming was not a true church but onely a tipe or figure of it which was to be gathered by Christ the Apostles 5 That the church hath two heades one inuisible and remaining in heaueÌ„ namely Christ and another visible ruling vpon earth the byshop of Rome with whome whosoeuer doeth not agree in all matters pertaining to religion and obeyeth not him in all thinges he can not belong to the church nor be saued 6 To affirme vpon any particular church that it can not erre 7 So to binde the church to certaine places and persons as to say there onely with theÌ„ is the church 8 Not to acknowledge those for Christes churches which although they hold the grounds of faith yet in ceremonies or in some parte of doctrine doe not altogether iumpe with vs. 9 To make a separation from the churches vpon any error or for the ill life of some men 10 To stand in contention that where true doctrine true seruice and right administration of sacrameÌ„ts is banished yet that therefore there remaineth the true Apostolicall church because there may be shewed a continued succession of bishops euen from the Apostles time and contrariewise that those are not true churches which although they keep fast the true doctrin right sacraments and pure discipline yet can not shewe a continuance and succession of bishops neuer broken 11 That the authoritie of any bishop in that he is a bishop is extended beyond those matters whereunto he is called of Christ 12 That the church hath authoritie to alter any thing in the scriptures or to dispense with the commaundements of God or to make new commaundements that may binde consciences 13 That it shoulde not be lawfull for ministers to marrie wiues or at least to marrie the second time 14 That ministers may not lawfully receiue stipends 15 That it is lawfull in churches to vse an vnknowne language though there bee no interpretation 16 That it is also lawfull to inuocate besides God and lesus Christ the holie men that are dead and to direct prayers and sacrifices of thanksgiuing vnto theÌ„ 17 That christians may not in the fasting time of lent and other certaine dayes eate any kindes of meate 18 That the church should do well in praying for dead mens soules that they might bee deliuered out of the fire of purgatorie CHAP. XXVI Of a magistrate SEing wee haue nowe spoken of the first kinde of men whose labour God vseth in the gouernance of the church namely ecclesiasticall ministers and their dueties and other matters beloÌ„ging vnto them it remaineth that wee also brieflie declare what our faith is concerning the other kinde that is the ciuill magistrate For the Lord doeth also vse his ministerie especially if he bee a christian to the defence and preseruation of the church I. Euerie magistrate whether godly or vngodlie is of God and therefore no magistrate simply to be resisted Wee beleeue therefore that euerie magistrate aswell impious as godlie Rom. 13.1 1. Pet. 2.13 Rom. 13 7 is from the Lord God and is the minister of God for reuenge of euill doers and for the praise of well doers and therefore that he is to be feared to be honoured and his commaundements which may be done with a good conscience without breach of Gods law Rom. 13.5 to be obserued and that not onely for feare but also for conscience sake namely because the Lord so coÌ„maundeth Therefore in respect that he is gods minister Rom. 13.2 he is not to be resisted for who so resisteth it resisteth Gods ordinance and God himselfe II. A magistrate that commaundeth any thing against God must not be obeyed But yet if a magistrate commaund vs any thing against the will of him who sent and whose minister he professeth himselfe to bee we doubt not with the Apostles to denie obedience vnto him Act. 5.29 and to say wee ought to obey God more then man whenas

Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Text snippets containing the quad